Latest / Brett Keane and Eve Show / Atheist Scientists Exposed For Destroying Millions of Lives #atheist #atheism

Transcript

Atheist Scientists Exposed For Destroying Millions of Lives #atheist #atheism · Brett Keane and Eve Show

• 0:05
  Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
• 0:06
  Thanks to all the witnesses for being here.
• 0:08
  Doctor Woolen, it's if I could start with you.
• 0:10
  You served as the chief of staff to Francis Collins for four
• 0:15
  years. Is that right?
• 0:16
  That's correct. Senator from 2017 to 2021, is
• 0:19
  that correct? So right.
• 0:21
  Right through the heart of the pandemic.
• 0:22
  Yes, I see. I noticed that Doctor Collins
• 0:28
  was intensely interested in discrediting the lab leak.
• 0:34
  I guess we'll call it a hypothesis.
• 0:36
  I think it's probably a little bit stronger than that now that
• 0:38
  we know something of what our intelligence agencies have long
• 0:41
  assessed. Last month I had the chance to
• 0:44
  speak with Doctor Robert Gary, who sat right where you are, who
• 0:46
  co-authored that really, frankly shameless propaganda piece, the
• 0:51
  proximal origin paper, which famously, infamously stated that
• 0:54
  the SARS COVID 2 is not a laboratory construct or a
• 0:58
  purposely manipulated virus. It went on to say it could not
• 1:00
  possibly have come from a lab. This, of course, we now know is
• 1:05
  is not what multiple U.S. intelligence agencies assessed.
• 1:09
  What interests me is that your office was very involved in that
• 1:13
  paper. Oh snap, which was supposed to
• 1:17
  be an independent piece of scientific analysis, but Doctor
• 1:20
  Collins actually called Doctor Gary when he was supposedly
• 1:24
  working on the paper on February 1st, 2020.
• 1:28
  Is it normal for scientists who are supposedly doing independent
• 1:32
  research to get together and talk about how the how their
• 1:35
  conclusions going to come out? Thank you for the question,
• 1:39
  Senator Holly. Oh please.
• 1:42
  I I think in general, yes, it is quite common for scientists
• 1:49
  across biomedical research fields while they're in the
• 1:52
  process of doing research to discuss with.
• 1:56
  Pre baked the outcome. Other scientists.
• 1:58
  I do not believe that the that is an accurate description of
• 2:02
  the conversations that took place.
• 2:04
  Well, tell us what? What were the nature of the
• 2:06
  conversations? So while I was not present for
• 2:12
  the those conversations, my understanding based on readouts
• 2:17
  is there was a lot of interest in the origins and current
• 2:23
  understanding of SARS COV two. And I think it's important when
• 2:27
  we're talking about the term lab leak theory to differentiate
• 2:32
  between the idea of a virus escaping from a lab, which is a
• 2:36
  bio, a safety violation, versus a virus that is engineered or
• 2:42
  manipulated in the lab and then escaped.
• 2:44
  Yeah, and. Your boss and Doctor Fauci.
• 2:45
  Tried to discredit. Both of those things, they said
• 2:47
  that the lab was absolutely not involved.
• 2:50
  We know that at the time this paper was supposedly being
• 2:52
  written because we now have the private correspondence from
• 2:55
  Doctor Fauci. Your boss said that it was a
• 2:58
  very destructive conspiracy. Wait, wait.
• 3:01
  Yeah, Yeah. OK, OK, Go conspiracy to think
• 3:08
  that there was a lab involved. So he's on the phone with a
• 3:11
  scientist, quote UN quote, scientist who's supposedly
• 3:15
  writing an independent paper. By the way, Doctor Gary
• 3:17
  testified Underoath that he was coming to his conclusions while
• 3:23
  this paper was being written. He was discovering the answers,
• 3:26
  but we now know that your boss was on the phone with him saying
• 3:29
  this is a very destructive conspiracy before the paper was
• 3:32
  even written. My question is, why was your
• 3:34
  office so intent on pushing to the public the idea that this
• 3:40
  could not possibly have been a lab issue?
• 3:43
  Is it because of the NIH S role in funding gain of function
• 3:46
  research at the lab? Is that the reason why?
• 3:47
  Look, look at this. Somebody come look at this.
• 3:49
  So, Senator Holly, I would say that in the event of any new and
• 3:53
  emerging infectious disease, if you've ever gone through a
• 3:56
  tabletop exercise in bio security, yeah, yeah, yeah.
• 3:59
  Answer my question is it because that NIH was actually funding
• 4:03
  helping to fund eco health, was funding gain of function
• 4:06
  research and. No, I believe that's an
• 4:07
  inaccurate assessment. And in fact, your boss misled
• 4:11
  Congress and testified falsely that NIH and the Eco Health had
• 4:15
  never conducted gain of function research in Ruhan, correct?
• 4:17
  No, that's incorrect, really. He did testify that.
• 4:22
  I believe, Sir, that what he testified to was that there was
• 4:26
  no evidence at that time that NIH was funding research that
• 4:31
  met the scope of the P3 Co policy, which I want to
• 4:35
  differentiate from the term gain of function research.
• 4:39
  Oh of. Course, this is the classic,
• 4:40
  this is the classic. Now that we've lied, now that
• 4:43
  you have and your office lied to the American people for years,
• 4:48
  told the American people that a lab leak was a very destructive
• 4:53
  conspiracy. That's your boss's statement
• 4:55
  while you were his chief of staff.
• 4:57
  Of course, we now know that that was the conspiracy to hide this
• 5:00
  from the American people, to censor people who had who, who
• 5:04
  went out and said, you know what, actually, maybe this is a
• 5:06
  lab leak. Your office doctor Fauci and
• 5:08
  others tried to actively censor them.
• 5:10
  There was a propaganda effort that this paper was the center
• 5:13
  of. And now everybody says, oh, oh,
• 5:15
  well, we we just weren't sure at the time, we didn't really knew.
• 5:19
  You knew exactly what you were doing.
• 5:21
  Got that right? You were actively misleading the
• 5:24
  American people the entire time. Get this, after that paper,
• 5:30
  paper, it's really an opinion piece was published.
• 5:34
  Your boss then says to Doctor Fauci that he had really hoped
• 5:39
  that the paper would settle this.
• 5:41
  Is there anything more that we can do to shut down this
• 5:45
  destructive conspiracy? This is in April of 2020.
• 5:48
  And then Dr. Fauci went to the White House podium and said that
• 5:52
  absolutely, there's no way that this could have come from a lab.
• 5:55
  I just, why was your Let me come back to my original question.
• 5:58
  Why was your office so intent on shutting down any talk about
• 6:04
  this being involved with a lab? Why?
• 6:06
  I don't understand it. Why the hysteria?
• 6:09
  So, Senator Hawley, I will say that my understanding of the
• 6:13
  situation is that the no one at NIH, including Doctor Collins,
• 6:23
  Doctor Fauci myself, ever suggested that there wasn't the
• 6:27
  possibility that a virus had escaped from a lab.
• 6:32
  Oh. That's ridiculous.
• 6:33
  I mean that. Let me just stop you right
• 6:35
  there. I just, I cannot have these lies
• 6:36
  just continue to be told over and over again, sorry and wrong.
• 6:40
  That's false. You people repeatedly,
• 6:42
  repeatedly said it could not have come from a lab.
• 6:45
  Your boss said it was a very destructive conspiracy, not that
• 6:50
  it was unlikely, not that it was not the best idea, a conspiracy.
• 6:54
  And based on that, you censored and your administration that you
• 6:58
  worked for actively censored scientists, journalists, and
• 7:02
  what we now know is our own intelligence agencies.
• 7:04
  At the same time, we're concluding and briefing members
• 7:07
  of Congress that it likely was from a lab leak.
• 7:09
  I mean, it's extraordinary. And now you've been caught red
• 7:11
  handed because you you thought that the rest of us wouldn't
• 7:14
  find out. You thought that the public
• 7:16
  would always be kept in the dark.
• 7:17
  And as it turns out, we now know these emails have become public,
• 7:20
  that you were pushing this propaganda effort and yet
• 7:22
  claiming the mantle of science. Don't you see?
• 7:24
  What you have done has set back the respectability and integrity
• 7:28
  of science by generations. In my opinion, that sucked.
• 7:32
  You were acting as propagandists.
• 7:34
  Do you regret your role in any of this?
• 7:35
  Hey y'all come look at this. So, Senator Hawley, I don't
• 7:41
  think you've characterized, do you?
• 7:42
  Regret your role in any of the misleading of the public?
• 7:45
  Do you regret your role in your office saying that a a lab Nexus
• 7:49
  here is a very destructive conspiracy?
• 7:50
  Do you regret your role in helping censor millions of
• 7:53
  Americans who were kicked off social media, who were
• 7:56
  disciplined at work for saying that maybe a lab was involved,
• 7:59
  which we now know the FBI thinks is the fact the case?
• 8:02
  Do you regret it? I do not believe I ever had the
• 8:05
  role that you're describing. Do you regret anything that you
• 8:08
  did during this period? Do you regret not speaking out?
• 8:10
  You regret not advising your boss to tempers comments?
• 8:11
  Do you regret not opposing the censorship?
• 8:13
  Do you regret it? You're in a position of
• 8:14
  tremendous influence. I do not believe censorship took
• 8:16
  place, Sir. You, you liar.