Latest / UK Column Radio / UK Column News Podcast 12th August 2024

Transcript

UK Column News Podcast 12th August 2024 · UK Column Radio

0:08
Speaker 1: Good afternoon. Today is Monday, the twelfth of August twenty
0:12
twenty four, just after one o'clock. Welcome to UK column News.
0:16
I'm your host, Brian Gerrish, and I'm delighted to have
0:18
with me Diane Rasmusen mcaddie from Scotland and Ben Rubin
0:25
from London. Now I'm just going to say that I
0:29
did mention last week I was going to do an
0:31
update on Ukraine. I'm not going to do that today,
0:34
will be on Wednesday. Obviously some very interesting events and
0:38
folding with the Ukrainian incursion into the Kursk area, but
0:44
other very serious things happening on the battlefield, but I'll
0:47
cover that on Wednesday. We decided that today the focus
0:51
should be on uk We're really in a war in
0:54
this country, and as I've said before, in my opinion,
0:57
that is a war against our own politician. But let's
1:01
hear what Nigel Farange had to say on the subject
1:04
of Key kir Stormer and immigration.
1:08
Speaker 2: So Starmar's going to get tough. We're going to treat
1:10
the trafficking Yangs as if they are terrorists. We're going
1:13
to take the lead in Europe. Goodness may I've heard
1:15
that before, and you know what we're going to do.
1:18
We're going to sign back up to Europole, not Intero Pol,
1:21
no Europeol, the EU's own police force, and we will
1:25
take our share of asylum seekers crossing the Mediterranean coming
1:29
into the European Union. We'll be signing up for the
1:32
EU refugee program. Suddenly we weren't even in as members
1:36
of the European Union. And given that yesterday six eight
1:40
hundred people landed in Lampaduza, Italy alone, I suspect the number,
1:45
even if the boat stopped, the numbers coming would be
1:48
even bigger than Now we're going back into EU programs.
1:52
He won't solve a thing.
1:56
Speaker 1: Well, totally agree with him. It won't solve the thing.
1:59
But what would be nice is if Nigel Frage would
2:02
get into the real detail as what's happening, because the
2:05
illegal immigration is a tiny fraction of the overall migration,
2:09
and that migration is planned policy throughout the European Union. Indeed,
2:15
it's a globalist policy, as we've highlighted several times before.
2:20
But Nigel's certainly right to be warning about Starmer getting
2:24
involved with Europole because this is dragging us deeper into
2:28
the EU and we can be sure that if Europole
2:31
is being engaged in matters to do with immigration, Europole
2:35
will be engaged in matters to do with terrorism. And
2:39
as most people in the UK now understand, Starmer is
2:42
prepared to label anybody who gets out of hand or
2:46
challenges his policies his government as a terrorist. So this
2:50
is very dangerous times. But let's just jump back a
2:53
little bit and see what Keir Starmer was saying while
2:56
he was still in the position of Shadow Leader.
3:01
Speaker 3: Would Labor be prepared to negotiate with the twenty seven
3:05
EU nations on an asylum seeker burden sharing scheme so
3:10
that Britain does its bit within the wider international context.
3:14
Speaker 4: I think it's important to distinguish between the arrangements within
3:17
the for EU members which we're not part of and
3:20
we won't be part of, and sitting outside that a
3:23
returns agreement of some sort. Now everybody knows we need
3:27
a returns agreement. The Prime minist himself has acknowledged that
3:30
we need a returns agreement and that would have to
3:33
be negotiated. We're in opposition, we're not in a position
3:36
to negotiate that, and that's not what I've been talking
3:38
about today. But I accept that that's a discussion that
3:42
needs to take place. The Prime Minister knows that's a
3:45
discussion that needs to take place, but the terms of
3:48
that would have to be negotiated as we went along.
3:50
But it wouldn't be as if we were a member
3:52
of the EU, because we're not a member of the EU.
3:57
Speaker 1: So I'd just like to ask the audience, is this
3:59
man just confused, he doesn't really understand what he said previously,
4:04
or is he actually lying? It's so difficult to tell.
4:07
We're not in, we're not part of But what is
4:10
he absolutely doing. He's burying a burrowing his way back
4:14
into the European Union as falset as possible. So let's
4:18
have a look at him in action here.
4:22
Speaker 5: UK Prime Minister Kiir Starmer has announced ninety nine million
4:26
euros in funding to tackle a legal migration. Starmer said,
4:31
to stop illegal migration, we must also tackle it at source.
4:37
The money will fund projects across Africa and the Middle
4:39
East and includes humanitarian and health support and access to education.
4:45
Starmer was speaking to the leaders of forty five countries
4:48
at the European Political Community Summit in Oxfordshire.
4:54
Speaker 1: So there we are an EU political summit brought into
4:58
Oxfordshire and Kirst armor deep into it. What has happened
5:02
while the EU is still wrapped around us and Kiir
5:06
Starmer is going to make sure that that those chains
5:09
are pulled even tighter around people in UK. Let's look
5:13
at just some of the headlines, as Legacy media did
5:17
actually pick up at least some of the things going
5:19
on here, because whilst headline in the first one is
5:23
the terrorist gang, this is about the chats with europolls
5:27
supposedly on immigration, but is it really And then we
5:33
can see we've got sky News talking about sites on
5:37
a closer relationship with Europe. Kiir Starmer aims to repair
5:42
European bridges that the Tories are burnt. Kiir Starmer plots
5:47
deal to take EU migrants from the Telegraph and the UK.
5:53
Starmer hails European unity on Ukraine tackling migration and of
5:58
course many many people coming out of Ukraine into Europe
6:03
and indeed onto UK. Well, what did the UK column
6:08
have to say about Brexit back in twenty eighteen.
6:13
Speaker 6: That they want a veto over a future trade deals
6:16
signed by the UK. So, in other words, if the
6:19
UK signs a trade deal with a country that the
6:22
EU has a trade deal with. The EU is suggesting
6:25
that they wanted part of Vito some aspects of those
6:28
trade deals that Britain might do with other countries.
6:30
Speaker 1: Yeah, it was Brexit without the exit, and I think
6:32
we're looking at I think that's absolutely it. So I
6:38
think we're allowed to say the UK column absolutely on
6:41
the button. Back then, we saw it for what it was,
6:44
we called it out for what it was. It was
6:47
not Brexit with an exit. There was no exit in
6:51
what was what was done. And Keir Stalmer of course
6:55
knows this, and he's going to continue to lock us
6:58
even d into EU controls. Now, have a look at
7:03
what he's doing to the UK public. This is a
7:07
Telegraph Reporters Articlely here you'll be refused bail even if
7:11
you only watch riots from the sideline. Judge warns, whether
7:15
an active participant or curious observer, anybody involved in disorder
7:20
will be locked up. Now that was told a Belfast course.
7:24
But let's just have a look at this clip at
7:26
an event, a simple event, but very telling this side
7:29
of the water.
7:32
Speaker 7: We've got to stand up against this, we've got to
7:34
come together and stand up against this.
7:36
Speaker 8: Guys, what the papers tomorrow or.
7:37
Speaker 5: Today don't winters, but all on camera.
7:43
Speaker 7: He's been doing a mega job.
7:45
Speaker 8: Against British people.
7:47
Speaker 7: After documenting the whole event and standing in the same
7:50
spot for about ten more minutes, the police then decided
7:53
to do this. He's been covering all the behind the
7:56
scenes stuff of this, and I'm wrestling for a public
8:02
disorder for filming.
8:06
Speaker 1: Well there you have it, public disorder for filming. And
8:09
it's only going to get worse under Keir Starmer. Free
8:12
speech is being destroyed. Just a little clip here from
8:16
Margaret Thatcher talking on the subject of immigration. I'm going
8:20
to talk over it for people who are just listening
8:23
into the news, but let's play it. So she's saying,
8:26
those who are genuine refugees and that's determined by the
8:30
United Nations, will not be returned. Those are the are
8:34
legal migrants will be returned. And it is customary international
8:39
law for countries to receive their own immigrants back into
8:44
their country. And if he the right honorable gentleman, is
8:47
suggesting that we ever get to a position when you
8:51
cannot return illegal immigrants to their country of origin, then
8:56
he is proposing international care and that, of course is
9:01
what it is, calculated chaos. So Ben a good point
9:05
to bring you in because we are clearly under attacked
9:08
by our own government and the key tactic at the
9:10
moment is anybody who dares to speak out or challenge
9:14
Starmer's government is a far right wing extremist. What's your thoughts.
9:22
Speaker 8: We're all far right now. That was a great opening segment, Brian.
9:27
Thank you. The gentleman being arrested for filming what was
9:31
going on in the street level I think is very
9:32
telling because the government don't want you seeing what's happening
9:35
on the street, and I think it's because they might
9:38
well be coordinating it. And I'm going to talk to
9:40
you about that, and I think draw some dots together,
9:44
draw some information together which supports that analysis. So last
9:49
week there was we were certainly presented with the story
9:53
of an organic and spontaneous anti fascist uprising in response
9:58
to riots across the nor of England, in response to
10:01
the far right thugs and fascists that are our fellow citizens.
10:06
According to the people in power. I was sent this
10:08
message by someone from the Jamaican community which was doing
10:12
the rounds on Wednesday, and we can see here a
10:16
supposed call out from a far right group telling people
10:21
to come together at thirty nine locations from Aldershot to Wigan,
10:25
all around the UK in order to push back against immigration,
10:29
saying they won't stop coming until you tell them. Mask up,
10:32
get out on the street. This was sent to me
10:35
and it'd be doing the rounds across the whole of
10:38
London so far as I can tell, actually a lot
10:39
of people talking about this. It was very well distributed,
10:42
and then in response to that we saw a whole
10:45
bunch of street level activity, most notably for me, this
10:50
event up in Wolfmstowe, which is just around the corner
10:53
from where I live. Here we have Paul Mason, former
10:56
political editor at Channel four News, a former BBC man
10:59
as well, talking about an event in wolf from Stowe
11:02
Central ten thousand people, peaceful, calm, determine the actual working
11:07
class of East London hashtag hope not hate. Now, let's
11:12
just remind ourselves who Paul Mason is for a start,
11:15
going to come back to him a couple of times
11:16
in his presentation. The first thing you need to know
11:18
about him is that he is actually a confirmed six asset.
11:22
So this is someone who works with military intelligence. I
11:26
also like to reference the fact that there are actually
11:28
very few working class people in Walthamstowe these days. The
11:31
average house price is about eight hundred pounds, and in
11:34
this video all I can see is a bunch of fashionistas.
11:37
It looked like the sort of average shoreditch people who
11:40
work in design agencies or that kind of thing. Right,
11:43
So the idea that this is some kind of spontaneous
11:45
working class uprising, I think is just a bit far fetched.
11:49
I did go up to go and take a look.
11:50
I didn't want to, but I thought I best given
11:52
it was happening. This is a photo that I took,
11:55
big crowd and he zoom in a little bit. There's
11:58
certainly worth thousands of people. Thousand, Yeah, maybe. Actually there
12:01
were a lot of people out on the street, but
12:05
it was a very strange atmosphere. My coming away from it.
12:09
I made a little film I shared on my telegram
12:11
and the word that I used was dead. It felt
12:12
like a dead atmosphere. There was no one to be
12:15
in opposition to right. So all these people have come
12:18
out in order to stare down the fascist, but there
12:21
were no fascists at all on the street. There were
12:24
a few people in the crowd speaking in hush tones
12:27
about the fact that maybe someone from the EDL had
12:30
been spotted in this part of London or that part
12:32
of London. But there were no fascists, There were no
12:35
EDL supporters, which is actually, you know, unsurprising given the
12:38
fact that the EDL doesn't exist anymore. It was disbanded
12:42
in twenty fourteen. Right, So this is a bit of
12:45
a bogey man here. It feels like this is a
12:47
story that's been concocted for a specific reason, and actually
12:51
it turns out the whole thing probably was a hoax. Right,
12:54
So this is Nick Lols from Hope Not Hate. I
12:58
mentioned Hope not Hate earlier because Paul Mason used the hashtag,
13:01
so there may be some link here. And we spoke
13:05
about this fella last week because he shared a false
13:07
story about acid being thrown on Muslim women in the
13:10
North of England, which was a deliberate provocation as far
13:13
as I can tell. And yeah, he says it was
13:16
a hope But just look at the front pages of
13:18
today's papers. An anti racist message is being transmitted to
13:22
millions of homes this morning. That's a big propaganda win
13:25
and anti racism. By the way, that is just Marxism
13:28
when you dig into it. So we had water wall
13:32
support for the anti fascists across even the right wing press.
13:36
My goodness, the Daily Mail got in on the act. Right,
13:38
you know, people presenting this like it's some kind of
13:41
huge moral victory for the nation. But actually, what do
13:44
we see on the streets A lot of this kind
13:47
of thing. Actually there are a lot of armed gangs
13:49
of immigrants roaming around in places like Sheffield and Stoke.
13:53
And then what popped up the next day this video
13:57
which came from the wharf and so rotest.
14:02
Speaker 9: They children are women losing those friends or doing some
14:09
relevant They are discussing.
14:12
Speaker 5: And we need to cold their roots and get them alone.
14:16
Speaker 9: Who I don't want to say, thank you all, believe
14:22
down brisbo.
14:28
Speaker 10: Bo, thank you.
14:31
Speaker 11: God bless your.
14:38
Speaker 8: So that was a fellow called Ricky Jones calling for
14:41
political dissidents that he calls Nazis to have their throats cut. Right,
14:46
that is a criminal offense. So he's a labor counselor
14:50
in Dartford, or I should say he was a labor
14:53
counselor in Dartford, because he's been suspended, as we'll find
14:56
out in a minute, back in twenty twenty one, I've
14:59
done a little bit of digging in to this guy.
15:00
He got the sniffles in twenty twenty one and he
15:02
got COVID and he participated in what is basically a
15:06
propaganda exercise. I recommend going to watch this short video.
15:08
It's only a couple of minutes, and we'll put a
15:10
link to it in the comments. As I said, he
15:12
was suspended by Dartford Labor. They said that there are
15:15
whether a video circulating. The behavior is completely unacceptable. He's
15:20
been suspended from the Labor party and they're not going
15:22
to be making any further comment. All of the replies
15:25
were locked, so there's no discussion over here. And then
15:28
the next day, actually it was on the same day
15:30
that the video appeared. On the eighth, he was arrested.
15:34
The Metala saying that a man's been arrested and address
15:36
in South London. He was held on suspicion of encouraging
15:40
murder and for an offense under the Public Order Act
15:43
at a peace rally of all things. Isn't that remarkable?
15:46
So anyway, we'll come back to Ricky Jones. We'll let
15:48
you know how that develops. Well, I think it tells
15:50
you quite a bit about the tone of things and
15:52
where that's coming from. Actually, to go back to this image,
15:56
so there were two things that jumped out of me here.
15:58
The first one is that is an Amnesty International, hi
16:03
vis vest And I don't know who that woman is.
16:05
I don't know if she works at Amnesty International, but
16:07
she's certainly been associated with the message that he delivered.
16:10
And Amnesty International will set up to protect political dissidents.
16:14
But Ricky there has just said that he wants to
16:16
kill political dissidents. The optics here are absolutely appalling. Amnesty
16:21
have not thus far made any kind of statement about this.
16:24
I've been onto their Twitter page and they've not posted
16:27
anything since the seventh of August, and I think they
16:29
need to make a statement. So actually this afternoon I'm
16:31
going to be contacting Sasha Deshmerk, who I used to
16:34
work with. By the way, Hi Sasha, who is the
16:36
chief executive of Amnesty UK. So I think that they
16:39
need to come out very firmly on the side of
16:44
on the right side of this. Frankly, who else have
16:48
we got in frame? So this woman laughing about the
16:52
throat cutting. That's Joe Cardwell. She's a radical Marxist. She
16:58
was the chief steward of the event. She was actually
17:01
running the event. She was the senior official there organizing
17:05
things on the ground. As I say, she's a political operative.
17:10
She's been working very closely with the Green Party recently
17:13
and she was a part of the team working with
17:16
this gentleman most In Ali, who's the lead city counselor
17:19
for Gipton and Harehills for the Green Party, and he
17:22
was voted in back in May. And I think this
17:25
image is quite revealing actually, because we have some quite
17:28
high rate immigrant gentleman in the foreground and then you
17:32
have a grinning Marxist in the background looking at all
17:36
of the chaos unfolded. Yeah. I think that's a really
17:39
powerful image. Actually, So who else was talking about this?
17:45
Reuter's got in on the act. They actually had a
17:49
quotation from Joe Cardwell, who they described as a volunteer
17:53
at Stand Up Racism, and she's basically coming out and saying,
17:57
this is a scale of attack that we have never
17:59
seen before. Are they really using this as an opportunity
18:03
to terrorize the population and to turn people against each other?
18:07
And it is absolutely unacceptable and it's all coming from
18:11
at least in part, I think this organization Stand Up
18:14
to Racism. They've been producing these signs and they're clearly
18:18
extraordinarily well back because you don't leave that much timber
18:22
and print by the side of the road every weekend
18:26
and they are all around the country every weekend providing
18:30
protesters with these signs. And that doesn't come for free, right,
18:34
you know, there's a lot of money getting used here.
18:36
Very little information about them on their website. The whole
18:39
thing is run on Gmail accounts. They've got fifty locations
18:42
around the UK, but there's no formal email address. But
18:45
then actually when you do dig into it properly, and
18:48
this came from gentleman called Sean Finch who found out
18:52
that actually the former president of this organization that has
18:55
been organizing these counter protests, Diane Abbotts, had the very
19:03
senior Labor MP Labor MP for Hackney North. And this
19:07
organization is directly linked into something called United Against Fascism,
19:11
the British anti fascist group. You go to the Wikipedia
19:14
page for Stand Up to Racism, there's actually nothing there.
19:16
It takes you directly to this organization heavy union links.
19:20
It's co chaired by a couple of people, including Talha
19:23
Amad of the Muslim Council of Britain. We should probably
19:26
step in, actually because I found this article that he
19:29
wrote in twenty fifteen which says there is nothing liberal
19:32
about calling for execution without regard to due process, which
19:35
is what Ricky Jones has just done at your events. Anyway,
19:38
it's going to keep on escalating. They've got a big
19:40
fundraiser coming up on Saturday with Jeremy Corbyn in Dalston
19:45
in London. They've been active to this past weekend. We've
19:48
got Paul Mason back out outside the reform ATESQ in
19:50
central London with the signs that we've just talked about.
19:54
And actually, let's go back to Paul Mason because I
19:56
think he's absolutely crucial in all of this. So what's
19:58
he talking about. He wants the government to enact the
20:01
Full Online Safety Act with no more consultations. He wants
20:05
heavy censorship. And who's putting his strings? We've already talked
20:08
about six but maybe it's this guy in his switter handle.
20:13
Speaker 1: Well, Ben, thank you very much. Obviously, a lot that
20:18
people need to research to really understand what's causing the
20:21
ankst and trouble in this country. We've got more analysis
20:24
coming up in today's news. But of course another period
20:28
where people were attacked, their mental health was attacked, their
20:32
whole psychology was attacked, was in lockdown. So welcome to
20:37
today's news, Diane. What have you got to tell us
20:40
about the Scottish COVID inquiry?
20:44
Speaker 12: Hello friend Ben, Thanks Brian. Yeah, so we need to
20:47
be doing some coverage I think over the next period
20:50
actually about the both COVID and cairies, both in the
20:54
UK and in Scotland, but I think Scotland in particular
20:57
they have that's some things slip out that the government
21:00
wouldn't have wanted to be slipped out. But let's look
21:03
at this a little bit and what I've planned to
21:05
do over time is some more in depth analysis of
21:07
the hearings and the transcripts and the witness statements that
21:10
are coming out. But we have a long way to
21:12
go in getting through the inquiry. So first let's look
21:15
at according to the Scottish COVID Inquiry website, what is
21:19
a public inquiry. So we're pretty clear here that it
21:22
can investigate what's going on, but it is also expected
21:26
to report on its findings and make recommendations for improvements
21:29
in the future. So what we're saying here is well,
21:32
next time we have a pandemic, I'll put that in
21:35
inverted commas. We don't want this to happen again.
21:38
Speaker 11: No, of course we don't.
21:39
Speaker 12: So what exactly is going on with this inquiry and
21:41
what are they doing? If we look at the terms
21:45
of the Scottish inquiry, you know they've done it separately
21:48
from the UK inquiry, and that's because ministers in Scotland
21:52
had devolved powers that were different in some ways or
21:56
in addition to what happened in the UK. And so,
21:59
for example, the administration of vaccines was some of it
22:03
was devolved in some of it was UK wide. For
22:06
those of you who lived in Scotland, as I did
22:08
during the twenty twenty to twenty two period, we know
22:12
that the restrictions were much stricter up here in Scotland
22:16
than they were down south, which was very, very difficult
22:19
for people, not for the reasons of a deadly virus,
22:23
but for the reasons of the isolation on the other
22:25
consequences that we all experienced through that time period. We
22:30
see in the next slide here that the inquiry is
22:32
now going into its next phase. Even though this covers
22:37
the period from January twenty twenty to the end of
22:40
twenty twenty two for the so called COVID period. We
22:44
have now just moved into our permanent hearing space in
22:48
July of twenty twenty four, so we're just getting started. Obviously,
22:52
we now have a permanent home, so who knows how
22:54
long this is going to last. For investigating what happened
22:56
to a small country. There are ways if you could
23:00
get involved in the inquiry at different levels. We see
23:03
here court participants which have a wider range of responsibility
23:08
in terms of looking at the evidence, looking that anything
23:12
has provided in advance, and writing. There are three themes
23:15
within the inquiry. The first one has just been completed
23:18
the earlier the summer, which is Health and Social Care.
23:21
There are two more to go, so we're only about
23:23
a third of the way through the hearings if we
23:25
want to look at it that way. I am interested
23:28
in contributing to the one in education in young people
23:30
because I saw firsthand the detrimental, terrible effects it had
23:34
on the university students that I was directly responsible for.
23:38
For example, when I had to deal with their suicidal feelings.
23:42
Some of them were wanting to take their own lives
23:44
because they were stranded in residence halls, and I could
23:47
not do anything as a university a program director other
23:51
than send them an email address. I couldn't even send
23:53
them to a counseling office or even give them a
23:55
phone number for campus counseling services at the time. So
23:59
for me, that was really difficult, and so obviously even
24:02
more difficult for the students who are losing their you know,
24:05
their youth on being locked up in residence halls and
24:09
other places. But that all said, there is a man
24:14
called Dave the independent researcher. His ex handle is Biology Phenomence,
24:19
So I would encourage all of you to go and
24:21
check out the extensive video clips and evidence that he's
24:25
been collecting. Unfortunately, it's really hard to summarize video clips
24:29
because there are so much of them in so many transcripts.
24:31
But this is what I'm going to hopefully be working
24:33
on over time. So we have just a couple of
24:37
minutes here summarizing some of the findings from this first
24:40
stage of the inquiry from Help and Social Care. If
24:43
we could play that video.
24:44
Speaker 13: Please we anticipate the inquiry. Will hear that people were
24:51
pressured to agree to do not resuscitate notices that people
24:55
were not resuscitated even though no such notice was in place,
25:00
that residents may have been neglected and left to starve.
25:03
Speaker 8: So yeah, he did know.
25:04
Speaker 14: Is it terrified him?
25:05
Speaker 9: Right?
25:06
Speaker 1: And you know if he was asked one or if
25:08
he's asked a number.
25:09
Speaker 6: Of occasions five times, five times, five times that night
25:13
or five times within twenty four hours.
25:15
Speaker 15: Ay, that's what I says to him. I said, my
25:18
mum's no diner, COVID, my mum's diner, starvation and dehydration.
25:23
Speaker 11: By the next winter, we were back to square one.
25:26
There was lots of people not getting in. There was
25:28
lots of people who were they'd really get into isolating
25:33
people really badly that year. I mean that was terrible.
25:36
There was people being isolated for People were coming in
25:39
the group saying, my mum's been stuck in our room
25:41
for forty five days.
25:43
Speaker 16: I've got a phone call from the care home to
25:45
say that my dad was failing. He was agitated, he'd
25:48
been shouting for help, he'd been wandering into other rooms,
25:51
so he was still mobile. They found him on his
25:54
hands and knees, tried to get to the toilet. I
25:57
was then told they were going to introduce of life
26:00
medication which would be midazzel arm and if needed in morphine.
26:05
Speaker 2: And I was shocked.
26:07
Speaker 14: And that's the time that the sedative that she was
26:10
given is one called middazzle lamb. That's great, and we've
26:17
heard about midazze lamb from other witnesses and I think
26:21
it is associated with end of life care.
26:24
Speaker 12: She was also given to other drugs that were part
26:27
of an end of life protocol.
26:28
Speaker 15: The funeral directors was the ones that says to me,
26:33
They says, they used to have a thing called like
26:35
a cremation Form four or something. If they had that
26:37
issue with the cause of death, which was on the
26:38
death certificate, then they would get in touch with us people.
26:42
They'd tick a box. And I asked them directly. I says,
26:46
if you still had their forms, if they still existed today,
26:49
because they'd done away with them, they stopped doing them.
26:51
I says, I says, would you have ticked that box
26:54
to say that you've got a concern with the cause
26:56
of death of my brother death certificate? And he says
26:58
to me.
26:58
Speaker 10: Yes, I'm personally not convinced my mom hot COVID.
27:08
Speaker 12: So definitely some evidence that a lot of us know,
27:12
obviously anecdotally from what happened to us and from other
27:15
people we know. My father in law was in Madaslam
27:18
death in twenty twenty one. My mother died of well,
27:23
she was on a ventilator in twenty twenty one. I
27:26
wasn't allowed to see her because she died in America,
27:29
and I wasn't vaccinated and I wouldn't test. So we
27:32
know about these detrimental effects and families and people. And
27:36
I'm certainly not discounting anything about what people are saying
27:41
in the testimonies, But I think what we do need
27:43
to look at is what is the actual scope of
27:46
the inquiry. What can an inquiry do to hold people
27:49
to account for what did happen other than just saying, oh,
27:52
let's not do that next time. And how much is
27:54
it costing the Scottish taxpayers If we go to the
27:57
next slide, we can see here the cost us from
28:00
the start of inquiry, so assuming that was sometime in
28:04
before the thirty first of March twenty twenty two, up
28:07
until the thirtieth of June twenty twenty four has been
28:09
a total of twenty six point one million pounds that
28:13
has been spent on the inquiry, and as I said,
28:16
we're only about a third of the way done at
28:18
least when it comes to the hearings and the things
28:21
that are you know, coming out of that, and all
28:24
of the work and the staff and so on. I've
28:26
had a lot of discussion about this on X the
28:29
last few days, and if you would like to get
28:30
involved in this conversation please follow me on X. My
28:33
ID is DIA and E UKC. So that's Diane UKC.
28:38
We see some different ranges of opinions about the inquiries.
28:42
Alex Mitchell, who we've worked with before on the UK column,
28:46
has said, you know, okay, so we have such a
28:48
small amount of the claims where the vaccine entered, both
28:51
in England and in Scotland that are getting awarded vaccine
28:55
damaged payments because the vaccine damage payment scheme is so
28:58
terribly limiting, but yet spending millions on these inquiries. And
29:03
I've said myself, well, if we look at the fact
29:05
that we know that there weren't excess desks in twenty twenty,
29:08
but the excess desk actually started once we got into
29:13
the vaccine rollout in twenty twenty one, and going forward
29:17
that the fact that they're still calling this a pandemic
29:21
inquiry investigation is a problem for me because to me,
29:24
it just expands the narrative that there was a pandemic
29:26
when we know it was actually you know, vaccine damage
29:29
and isolation and bdaslam and other things that actually killed people.
29:34
I would just like to call out again once again
29:36
Dave biology Phenom. He has a substack here that has
29:38
a lot of other in addition to the video clips
29:41
he's put on Twitter, he has extensive information on his
29:44
substack as well. So I don't have time to go
29:46
into all of it, obviously, but I would encourage everyone
29:49
to check that out to see what he's actually uncovered,
29:51
which has been quite substantial. And again I will continue
29:55
to do some formal sort of analysis of some of
29:58
the transcripts on the way and the statements and report
30:01
on those in the coming months.
30:02
Speaker 1: Brian Diane, thank you very much that excellent segment. To me,
30:07
there can be no doubt that the government has been
30:10
attacking elderly people and they've simply been cold. In my opinion,
30:15
and if the government is prepared to do this with
30:17
the elderly, they're prepared to do a lot more with
30:20
the younger living it. It's time for people in this
30:23
country to really understand the venom that now exists amongst politicians,
30:29
many of whom simply will still not tell the truth. Now,
30:35
if you're with us today and you're like what the
30:37
UK Column is doing, then please do support us. Your
30:41
financial contribution of five pounds a month keeps us going
30:45
and we hope with enough supporters we want to be
30:48
expanding to be able to bring you more news and
30:50
across a whole wider spectrum of subjects. So thank you
30:54
to everybody supporting us. If you want us to do more,
30:58
please give us a diitional support or sign up as
31:02
a member. If you're not already won at the moment,
31:05
excuse me, please share material. We put out our material
31:09
in order to spread the word as far and wide
31:11
as possible. Facebook is still not engaging with us, but
31:16
we're still challenging them as to why we've been shadow
31:19
band and making a purchase from the UK Column shop
31:22
is always a big boost for us, and of course
31:24
that shop is available for people who are members and
31:28
non members. Now, perhaps back onto the subject to what's
31:32
happening in our country. Tomorrow at one o'clock I've got
31:37
the third interview with J. Michael Waller, former CIA operative
31:41
and counter intelligence expert. He's going to be looking in
31:45
particular about the Trump assassination attempt, but he will also
31:49
be talking about the Capital riots in twenty twenty one
31:53
and the subversive demise of the US intelligence services, which
31:58
we see a mirror of in the UK. Now, a
32:02
big thank you to one of our viewers who sent
32:05
in this email pointing out that there's been changes in
32:09
the way places are named, or at least in the
32:15
way they're described. So South Wales has now become South
32:19
with a small S. And what the person has said
32:23
is that if you followed this change of language and spelling,
32:27
it leads you back to EU objectives, and he's particularly
32:31
looking at EU policies in Objective one, two and three.
32:36
I think this particular gentleman is absolutely on the button,
32:39
and perhaps the segment to follow in the News excuse
32:43
me will help people see through some of this. Now,
32:47
we'd also like to say that Agenda twenty one, Your
32:50
Life in Their Hands is still selling people are very
32:53
impressed with this publication, so if you haven't bought one
32:56
yet and you'd like one, I suggest you get your
32:59
order in as soon as you can. And on the
33:03
happier side of life. Twenty third twenty sixth of August,
33:06
we've got Freedom Music Festival by Hope, Sussex and lots
33:13
of really good music in a fun four day family event.
33:17
So you may consider going to that to meet some
33:20
new friends or at least have some good discussion. And
33:23
also UK Callum on location event in Bristol for the
33:27
nineteenth of October. Early bird tickets still on sale, so
33:31
if you haven't got a ticket under that scheme, I
33:34
suggest you get on board. But we're looking forward to
33:38
meeting our supporters at that event in Bristol. Now let's
33:43
get back to the subject of the demise of UK.
33:46
Has this been accidental? I don't think, so let's jump
33:50
all the way back to the year two thousand and
33:52
the concept of a new class. This is the quote
33:56
and it came from the Center of a policy studies.
33:59
The Prime Minister has a vision of a new Britain.
34:02
Central to this vision is the creation of a new class,
34:06
a new elite placed in positions of authority who will
34:10
propagate the spirit of the age and spread the principles
34:14
of the Third Way across Britain. So democracy going out
34:18
of the window because basically Tony Blair and his colleagues
34:22
will be bringing in a new elite. And if you
34:25
don't know what the Third Way is, then it suggests
34:27
you have a look at this Guardian article. Credit where
34:30
it's due. It's a very good article about what the
34:34
Third Way is and professor talking about Professor Anthony Giddens,
34:39
the man who helped Labor create it. And if you
34:43
look at the bottom there you'll see Bill Clinton is
34:45
mentioned a bit.
34:47
Speaker 8: Now.
34:47
Speaker 1: Way back in two thousand and six, we were warning
34:50
about a charity that was supported very strongly by the
34:54
Labor Party, particularly from the office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
34:58
This was Common Purpose and what we were talking about
35:01
in twenty two thousand and six was how this pernicious
35:06
charity was controlling cities by putting its people in the
35:10
structure of the city. So if we can imagine this,
35:13
it's almost like a virus infecting the whole level of systems,
35:17
from the council leaders, through chief executive, through social services
35:23
and into the regional government offices, the Government Office of
35:27
the Southwest, the regional development agencies, but also the police,
35:32
local universities, Chamber of Commerce and yes, unfortunately people with
35:38
criminal records or even perversions. So that's the system taking
35:43
control of a city. But this was a subset of
35:46
a much bigger system exerting control through the European Union,
35:52
through UK's democratic government, and through all of our institutions,
35:56
the civil service, the public sector, the quangos, the government
36:00
offices of the regions, the regional assemblies and the regional
36:04
development agencies, plus wider society in the private sector and
36:10
youth and school children. And if we put in red
36:13
the common Purpose system, the thing which went hand in
36:16
glove with it was the use of neuro linguistics and
36:19
nudging so that people at every level of this pyramid
36:24
of power were coming under control of this new system
36:29
for future leaders. Now, if we had a look at
36:33
the Tories, they were pushing big Society, and in his
36:37
March twenty ten Conservative Party Conference speech, Cameron announced that
36:42
the big Society was a guiding philosophy, a society where
36:45
the leading force for progress is social responsibility, not state control.
36:51
It includes a whole set of unifying approaches, breaking state monopolies,
36:56
allowing charities, social enterprises, and companies to provide public services,
37:02
making government more accountable, while weasel words because government control
37:07
has increased while the power of communities has diminished. But
37:12
what was important is that Conservative home blog site revealed
37:18
that this plan is directly based on the successful community
37:21
organizing movement established by Saul Olynsky in the United States,
37:27
and it's trained generations of community organizers, including President Obama himself.
37:34
And if we couple that with these revealing quotes, which
37:37
we've mentioned many times and will continue to mention, this
37:41
was Nicholas Bowle's MP saying that the Prime Minister and
37:44
his deputy Nick Klegg want their people Power revolution to
37:49
unleash chaotic effects across local communities. Chaotic in our vocabulary
37:55
is a good thing. He's talking about the Conservative vocabulary
38:00
and if we bring in a second one to reinforce this.
38:02
This was Cameron's ally and one time advisor, Danny Krueger.
38:07
He was forced to resign as a Tory candidate Sedgefield
38:11
after he was quoted as saying that the Conservatives plan
38:15
to introduce a period of creative destruction in the public services.
38:20
So we've got a big society with the Tories, and
38:25
excuse me, we've got the Third Sector magazine here pointing
38:29
out that they were surprised that an organization called Locality
38:35
had got a big government contract to effectively be manipulating society.
38:42
But it was using the ideas of the Brazilian Paolo
38:45
Frieir and they expected citizens UK that used the Saul
38:50
Olinski method to get the contract. But what we can
38:53
say with certainty is that the government was engaging non
38:58
government organizations in order to use manipulative techniques to take
39:05
control of society in the UK. And if you want
39:09
to know more about Saul Olinsky, well here's a quote.
39:13
True revolutionaries do not flaunt their radicalism. They cut their hair,
39:18
put on suits and infiltrate the system from within. Think
39:23
about Tony Blair, think about Keir Starmer, think about Cameron,
39:27
think even about Eric Pickles. Let's pop him up on
39:31
screen because this is a diagram which UK column produced
39:35
many years ago warning about the Tories' big society. And
39:40
if we bring it into focus, we'd put Saul Olinsky
39:44
at the top with some of the other key players.
39:46
But I have a look at the language being used,
39:49
community empowerment, national citizen service, opening up public services, community
39:55
first fund, social investment, market, social action, and they were
40:01
bringing in a commission for the compact. This is all
40:05
revolutionary language. And alongside it came the use of big
40:09
money through big society capital, and there were the major
40:14
banks involved. Let's just see if we can get this
40:17
one to move on on. It goes bringing in creeping
40:21
state legislation and doctrine to control our lives and a
40:26
lot of projects, the Big Lunch, into Faith Week, a
40:30
Year of Service, the Young Advisors, Youth United, Near Neighbors
40:35
and English Learning and all this was coming together in
40:39
a big society network which was going to bring people
40:43
together in order to implement the States policy. This was
40:48
nothing to do with building communities and so we were
40:51
happy to label it the big lie. And alongside this
40:56
we had the brainwashing which was occurring through Common Purpose
41:00
and the nudge system, and we just run through this
41:03
pretty quickly. But these were some of the key people
41:05
operating at the time, Cameron, Francis maud Gusso, Donald, Jeff Mulgan,
41:11
Julia Middleton, the then chief executive of Common Purpose, Sabombka's
41:16
late came in and then what do we have? We
41:20
had very powerful people working through the Nudge Unit with
41:24
French neuros specialists such as Olivier Oulier from France, who
41:30
was part of Sarcose's personal team, and they were discussing
41:34
how UK society could be manipulated. All of this research
41:39
is unique to the UK column. Nobody has ever done
41:43
this level of analysis in the attack on this country?
41:46
What were they after? Our minds obey as the TV says,
41:51
And of course the big society here largely came under
41:55
the hand of Eric Pickles, the Communities Minister, who called
41:58
himself an unlow revolution but stated that the revolution would
42:03
begin here with his good self. Now, alongside all of
42:08
this you need control of the media and embedded and
42:12
alongside the big society networks of the media networks of
42:16
which the Public Service Board Broadcasting Trust is one example,
42:21
backed by the ITV. It mobilizes individuals in large numbers
42:26
to participate in civil society, democracy and their local communities,
42:32
and using popular mass media PSBT appeals to people's self
42:37
interests and nudges them to take positive social action. I
42:42
wonder if that was happening in the demonstrations that Ben
42:46
was talking about. But before we leave on this, his
42:50
Antonio Gramski, and he believed that, sorry, he was an
42:54
Italian communist theories man. He believed that you could bring
42:59
about revolution in the state by pursuing the steady, incremental
43:05
subversion of free societies. And really this is alongside the
43:10
same doctrine pursued by the Fabian socialists who chose patient
43:16
gradualism rather than violent insurrection, as the most effective means
43:21
to collectivize society. And I just popped this one up
43:26
on screen to end. I can't give you the provenance,
43:29
so I'm just taking at face value. But somebody sent
43:33
me what was a clip which they said was published
43:36
by a judge back in nineteen fifty four, where he
43:40
said a half page of his textbook outlined a few
43:44
steps to overturn a democracy. Divide the nation, create racial strife,
43:50
caused distrust of the police and authority. Swarm the nation's
43:54
borders and gender the military strength to weaken it overburnts,
43:59
over burdens citizens with unfair taxation, encourage civil righting and
44:05
discourage accountability for all crime. Control the balloting, control all media,
44:12
and I'll leave the audience to reflect on that. But
44:15
whoever wrote it, it seems to be pretty pertinent. But Ben,
44:20
there's worse to come because we're now going to use
44:23
AI in helping to nudge communities into the right action.
44:30
Speaker 8: We are indeed, well, that's certainly the direction that we're
44:33
heading in. We're going to go to Demos, which is
44:37
I think probably right now the most influential think tank
44:40
in the UK. Demos was founded by Jeff Mulgan who
44:44
Brian's just mentioned, and they used to share an office
44:47
with Common Purpose, and we obviously talk about all the
44:49
time here on the column. One of the things I
44:51
love about working with UK Column is just the depth
44:54
and the heritage. That research was fantastic, Brian, I'm going
44:56
to have to watch that back a couple of times,
44:58
I think, to get all of the detail out of it.
45:01
But Demos are really setting the agenda now for the
45:04
radical Corporatis left, which is basically what the Starmer government
45:07
has turned out to be. This is pre election this
45:12
image you can see here. You've got Miriam Levin from Demos.
45:15
You've got Georgia Gould who at the time was the
45:18
mayor of Camden. She's now Labour MP for Queen's Park
45:21
and made of veil, and she's very much a right
45:24
hand lady to Kiss Starmer. She's always hanging around with him.
45:28
You also have there Lisa Whitter from a political foundation
45:31
who are trying to execute an audacious takeover of global government,
45:36
and I spoke about them about a month ago on
45:38
the show. And then Crudia Chalis from Democracy Next. I've
45:42
spoken about a few times, and this still comes from
45:46
a event that happened back in March, and I've taken
45:50
a few clips out of it, but if we could
45:52
just get that back on screen quickly, I just want
45:54
to reinforce what you're looking at here on screen, and
45:58
I can't go through all the connections but I haven't
45:59
got time. But you're looking at the combined interests of
46:03
common purpose, George Soros's Open Societies, the Rockefeller Foundation, the
46:08
Builderberg Group, Chathamhouse, the Obama Foundation, and now the UK
46:13
Labor Party and Her Majesty's government. That's what's happening on
46:16
screen right in front of you now. As I said,
46:19
this is from March. The discussion was technology enabled citizens
46:23
assemblie to radically reshape global democracy, and we're just going
46:28
to hear a quick introduction from Crawlea Chalis from Democracy Next.
46:33
Speaker 13: The way that.
46:34
Speaker 10: I've been kind of approaching this work for a while
46:36
has been thinking about how can we really be building
46:38
new democratic institutions for another democratic paradigm, and how does
46:43
our whole mindset shift actually about what that entails, what
46:47
that means for power and relationships when it's an institution
46:50
and not just a tool. But I think there's prison
46:53
and part of these approaches. So I prepared a few
46:56
slides as well, just a little bit about what is
46:59
Democrae Next and what is the work that we're doing
47:01
on these topics our role as an international research and
47:05
learning hub, because I completely share that spirit of really
47:08
needing to learn from what's working what's not working, and
47:12
having that approach to iteration and going off of that,
47:15
and then sharing from two key bits of work that
47:18
we're doing around pushing systemic change with cities and also
47:22
really pushing innovation for things to keep evolving with an
47:25
approach to employing technology within assemblies.
47:32
Speaker 8: So Curlia Cellis is building new democratic institutions. That is
47:38
the brief that she has received. I believe she's received
47:41
that from Jeff Mulgan via the Rockefeller Foundation. I haven't
47:44
got time to explain to you exactly why I'm going
47:46
to come down to that on a show over the
47:47
next few weeks, but that's what she's working on. New
47:50
democratic institutions, and we know that Labor Party policies to
47:53
get rid of the House of Lords and replace it
47:55
with an Assembly, and that's exactly what these people are
47:58
working on. Talk about two more clips. I highly recommend
48:02
going to watch the whole of this hour long presentation.
48:05
It's absolutely critical to see this to understand what's happening
48:09
right now. But we're going to talk very briefly about
48:12
the approach to cities because this is about progressing the
48:16
c Faty Cities and World Economic Forum agenda around urbanization.
48:21
To the next clip, how could we.
48:23
Speaker 10: Change the way in which decisions related to housing and
48:27
infrastructure and mobility get taken every time they have to
48:29
be taken. And so we did this work because we
48:32
see these sorts of issues are the same all over
48:35
the world. Before we launched this, we did interviews with
48:38
people in different countries those different rules. Actually we spoke
48:41
to some of your colleagues in Camden even I remember
48:44
at that stage, and there's just a shared sense of
48:46
these problems being shared in cities around the world, and
48:50
we really believe that we don't just need different policy
48:52
solutions to these issues that we're facing all over the place.
48:56
Speaker 12: We really need a different way.
48:57
Speaker 10: In which we're taking these decisions on an ongoing basis,
49:01
and these new governance models can help break through deadlocks
49:04
and give legitimacy. So THEO sometimes hard choices that need
49:08
to be made that require trade.
49:09
Speaker 8: Offs, so we can't sell our policies to people. Therefore,
49:16
we're creating a piece of technology which would allow us
49:19
to force these policies through on the basis that they
49:23
just have to get on with it and trade offs
49:24
need to be made. There's nothing democratic about that at all.
49:29
This is all, as we've kind of touched on, very
49:31
much technology enabled right, and they're building AI into the
49:37
entire process of selection, sortition, deliberation, decision making, absolutely everything.
49:46
This is happening in collaboration with MIT Center for Constructive Communication.
49:52
We could just bring that up onto screen, that would
49:54
be fantastic, thank you, So you can just see here
49:57
that's the end to end process that they've mapped out
49:59
for how the things work and they're embedding AI into
50:03
the green sections. Right, so all the way through the process,
50:06
they're going to be introducing technologies to nudge and usher
50:09
people through the decision making process and to get them
50:13
going ultimately in the right direction. Right, this is what
50:16
this stuff is for. Now. The final clip, the first
50:18
thing I would encourage you to do is to just
50:21
in the first few seconds, what's Georgia Gould's reaction when
50:25
Claudia Callis talks about keeping a public record of what's
50:28
going on in these assemblies. It's absolutely fascinating. Let's run
50:32
the clip.
50:34
Speaker 10: And then the last thing is about actually having a
50:36
better public archive of what's happening in these assemblies, Like
50:40
we have public archives of what happens in our city
50:43
council decision making moments in our parliaments, and we don't
50:47
really have a proper public archive, but what's happening in
50:50
our assembly processes.
50:52
Speaker 5: And so.
50:54
Speaker 10: This is an example of the kind of archives that
50:56
there my TEA team has done for some of the
50:58
community dialogue works. But you can also again go in
51:01
and have what happened and what took place round it
51:05
in voice. And we want to be working on different
51:07
things like if you have a final set of recommendations.
51:10
Is there a way you could kind of listen to
51:12
and see what was the initial genesis of that idea
51:15
and what were parts of the conversation that led to it,
51:18
how did people get there. So anyways, we're working on
51:20
a whole bunch of different things that can be done
51:22
in this space. But I think it's important for the
51:26
kind of trustworthiness of these processes, and I think for
51:29
the kind of history and the legacy of them. And
51:31
I think connected maybe to what I see as one
51:34
of the bigger picture things that needs to happen of
51:38
moving actually to decision making assemblies. And this is not
51:42
about replacing politicians, but I think that if there is
51:45
going to be an assembly that is commissioned, I think
51:48
we're actually at a place where we should experiment with
51:51
this being a decision making body and exploring what does
51:54
that mean for accountability and legitimacy. And I think having
51:58
a public archive of what happened in the process is
52:01
incredibly important when we're going in that direction.
52:06
Speaker 8: I don't if you saw it, but Georgia Gould became
52:09
very uncomfortable when it was suggested that someone might want
52:12
to keep a public record, But we do need to
52:14
keep a public record, according to Claudia Challis, because we're
52:17
soon going to be seeing decision making assemblies the override
52:21
politicians and as far as she's concerned, and I believe
52:25
everyone's sitting on the panel there, that is the direction
52:28
that we're going in.
52:31
Speaker 1: Yes, been the thought in my head. Was Claudia elected
52:36
to democracy next? That was just a little question. Thank
52:40
you for that now, very very quickly. Here I was
52:43
researching the amount of arms going to fuel the wall
52:48
in the Middle East, arms from UK. I came across
52:51
this July House of Commons library briefing and I got
52:56
into it and I just found one sentence that really
53:00
got me thinking. So initially here it's talking about what
53:04
had happened. The International Court of Justice South Africa has
53:07
accused Israel of international humanitarian law violations, and as I
53:12
went on through, I found this. David Lammy, when Foreign
53:16
Secretary in twenty twenty four called on the government to
53:19
publish the legal advice it had received on the granting
53:22
of export licenses to Israel, the government resists resisted such calls,
53:28
saying legal advice to ministers is confidential, So if you
53:33
want to know what the government is capable of, particularly
53:36
under mister Starmer, but also of course under previous prime ministers.
53:41
Then the public is not going to be allowed to
53:44
know what legal advice they have and have not had.
53:49
But you would have thought if they'd have had positive
53:51
legal advice to allow them in this case to export arms,
53:55
there would be little problem in allowing the public to
53:58
see what that guidance was. But the government wants to
54:01
know every secret amongst every individual in the UK the public,
54:06
and not to know what the government is up to.
54:08
I think we know what sort of government this is.
54:11
It's called a dictatorship.
54:13
Speaker 14: Diane.
54:14
Speaker 1: Let's bring you back, because if we want to talk
54:17
about where society has really got to perhaps going to,
54:22
we need to be on the subject. Well, what do
54:26
we need to have a look at. We need to
54:28
have a look at the games.
54:32
Speaker 12: So again, I just I watched the closing ceremony of
54:35
the Olympics last night. As is our tradition here at
54:39
UK column, we watch and read things so you don't
54:41
have to. And I wanted to cover the closing ceremony
54:45
because the opening ceremony created so much controversy for a
54:49
lot of reasons, and we heard the official stories and
54:52
we all know what we saw and you know what
54:55
we have talked about on here. So what the BBC
54:58
said about the closing ceremony of the Olympics was that
55:01
it was sensational, it was brilliant. I even watched a
55:04
bit of BBC Breakfast this morning again so you don't
55:07
have to, and they talked about how sad they were
55:09
to see it was all ended because Paris was amazing
55:12
and oh, we're so sad and we can't wait until
55:14
twenty twenty six in Italy in twenty twenty eight, which
55:17
is going to be back in the City of Angels
55:19
in the United States. So what I did is I
55:22
took a little bit of video with my phone and
55:27
looking at the TV last night as I was watching this,
55:29
and so the vision is very dark and that was
55:34
really not on purpose. It just kind of came out
55:38
that way, but I think it's dark anyway. So basically,
55:40
what they said about the artistic portion, which was created
55:44
again by Thomas Jolly, who created the opening ceremony that
55:47
everyone has talked about, is that this little creature here
55:51
was called the Golden Voyager, who is an extension of
55:54
Jolly's imagination the IOC stated that a golden voyager lands
55:59
in a world that is desert deserted, sorry, deserted, and mysterious,
56:04
ready to explore. This was chosen to represent the Voyager
56:09
Golden Record, or the Record of Humanity, sent to space
56:11
by France in nineteen seventy seven. According to the Associated Press,
56:16
the character is apparently a tribute to a number of
56:18
references from France's historical heritage, including the Spirit of the Bastille,
56:22
while creatures from science fiction and video games also inspire
56:25
its inception. The idea behind this dystopian piece and is
56:30
the games disappearing before being reborn. So we saw this
56:35
kind of all of these. Eventually it came across with
56:38
the Olympic rings. So there was some that came down
56:41
from the ceiling or the top of the stadium, and
56:44
they came together with this ring where these sort of
56:47
shady characters were sort of convening all in one place.
56:52
Speaker 8: Again.
56:52
Speaker 12: Officially, what was both said in the mainstream media is
56:56
that the character's quest sees it encountered Nike, the Goddess
57:00
of Victory, which is linked to the ancient Olympic Games,
57:03
and it takes on the features of various statues which
57:06
can be seen the louver and the conclusion was the
57:09
piece seeing the Golden Voyage or itself elevated by a
57:11
cast of dancers underneath those five Olympic rings before fireworks
57:16
were set off. So if we take a look at
57:18
the next slide, these are just some still images that
57:20
I took that were a particular interest. Again, they're very dark.
57:23
You can see possibly better images on social media and elsewhere,
57:27
but I wanted to capture these as well as I
57:30
could because I think it also focuses really well on
57:32
how dark they were. Some things that I saw just
57:36
from the very abstract way of seeing that darkness, which
57:40
was actually how it looked on my television last night,
57:43
was I thought I saw the Grim Reaper playing guitar.
57:47
I thought I saw a winged angel, which I did,
57:50
which they go into more detail if you read the
57:53
official story behind the mythology that it was supposedly explaining,
57:57
and some other sort of shady characters and things going
58:00
on pentagrams, triangles, lines. I saw red eyes come out
58:05
at various points and some people, So just to ask
58:09
the question, according to this so called Golden Voyager character,
58:14
if you look at the next slide. The first thing
58:16
that I saw and my husband saw, and Debbie Evans,
58:19
who I was sort of watching this with, we all
58:21
the first thing we said was Baphomet when we saw
58:23
this Golden Voyager character. Someone in the chat box, one
58:27
of our viewers suggested Anubis, the Egyptian god of death,
58:31
which I was not aware of. You know, they both
58:33
look very similar to the Golden Voyager. But I think
58:37
we have to ask the question of you know, what
58:39
is it they're trying to tell us here, and maybe
58:42
we don't. We can't say exactly what's going to happen
58:45
from what we saw last night. But if we go
58:47
back to London in twenty twelve and the Olympics, and
58:49
we sort of saw how they told the story of
58:52
the pandemic pandemic again in inverted Commas that was to come,
58:56
what are they telling us now in twenty twenty four
58:58
is going to happen in the next few years. And
59:00
what is really interesting is that the handover which is
59:03
going into the twenty twenty eight Summer Olympics, which will
59:06
be in Los Angeles, we had Tom Cruise falling out
59:10
of a plane about Tom Cruise really looking quite old.
59:14
I have to say I liked him when I was younger,
59:16
I can't say that at all anymore. And then they
59:19
transferred over to Los Angeles on the beach and they
59:21
had Billie Eilish, they had Doctor Dre, they had Snoop
59:25
Dog and all of these performances going on and made
59:27
it look light and bright. I just really hope that
59:31
we are able to reach up to twenty twenty eight
59:34
when this wonderful light Olympics in the City of angels
59:37
is going to happen. But I guess we'll have to
59:38
see what happens for the next four years. But based
59:41
on this dystopian presentation, to me, it didn't give me
59:44
a good feeling for the next few years. I don't
59:46
know about you, Brian, not at all.
59:49
Speaker 1: And I think people in our chat box have summed
59:52
it up. They've described it as horrible, demonic and dark,
59:57
and somebody has said it's witchcraft. So people are clearly
1:00:01
recognizing this. But of course these major events are promoted
1:00:05
and funded by our own governments, and therefore we must
1:00:09
come to the conclusion that this type of ideology is
1:00:13
buried inside our governments. Should we therefore be surprised that
1:00:19
we are seeing an absolute breakdown in society, a lack
1:00:23
of human kindness, and as we've covered in today's episode
1:00:27
yourself in particular, we're seeing an attack on elderly people.
1:00:31
Death is now something to be encouraged. It's an active process,
1:00:36
it's not something that is to be held back at
1:00:41
all costs. So I think we're into very very dark times.
1:00:45
And I'm going to end by saying Ben, thank you
1:00:48
very much for your analysis. This is exactly the in
1:00:51
depth analysis we need to do in order to show
1:00:55
people what is happening in UK. So I hope you'll
1:00:58
be doing more on those lines. Diane, thank you for
1:01:02
your segment there. For the wider audience. We are into
1:01:07
perilous times. We are being attacked. This is very clear.
1:01:11
Can we do something about it? Yes, it requires a
1:01:14
lot of people to stand up and be counted in
1:01:17
a peaceful way. And I'll just end by reflecting on
1:01:21
a wonderful monologue mister Bean gave a few days ago
1:01:27
in which he said, if we want to counter the censorship,
1:01:31
then we need to speak out more, not remain silent,
1:01:35
and I think those were very good words. We'll leave
1:01:38
it there. If you're a UK CORN member, will be
1:01:41
back for UK COLN Extra in a few moments. Thank
1:01:44
you for joining us. Ay bye.