Latest / How To Protect The Ocean / Oil Companies Knew Coral Reefs Would Dissolve. In 1978.

Transcript

Oil Companies Knew Coral Reefs Would Dissolve. In 1978. · How To Protect The Ocean

• 0:00
  In 1978, an Exxon scientist stood in front of company management
• 0:04
  with a list of research questions.
• 0:05
  One of them was written in capital letters.
• 0:08
  It asked, "Are shallow water carbonates dissolving?" Shallow water carbonates,
• 0:13
  that's the scientific name for the thing a coral reef is made of.
• 0:18
  So let me put the question in plain language.
• 0:20
  In 1978, one of the biggest oil companies on Earth was asking, on the
• 0:25
  record, whether burning its product would dissolve the world's coral reefs.
• 0:29
  They had the question.
• 0:31
  Over the next ten years, they got the answer.
• 0:34
  And then they spent decades paying people to tell you the answer was no.
• 0:39
  This is a story of a paper trail, and by the end of it, you're gonna know something
• 0:44
  most people don't, plus one specific thing that you can do with it this week.
• 0:49
  You're listening to the How to Protect the Ocean podcast, and I'm Andrew
• 0:51
  Lewin, and this is the show that is about one thing, the actions, big
• 0:55
  and small, that keep our ocean alive.
• 0:58
  If that's your kind of thing, hit that follow button so these episodes
• 1:01
  land in your feed every weekday.
• 1:04
  Okay, let's get into it.
• 1:06
  Here's the question driving today's episode.
• 1:09
  If one company knows its product will destroy something and stays
• 1:12
  quiet, and then funds people to muddy the water, who's responsible
• 1:17
  when that thing actually dies?
• 1:19
  That's not a hypothetical question anymore.
• 1:21
  In June 2026, researchers at the University of Oxford's Climate
• 1:25
  Litigation Lab published a study on the journal NPJ Ocean Sustainability.
• 1:30
  They dug through more than fourteen thousand pages of historical fossil
• 1:34
  fuel industry documents, and they found something clean and damning.
• 1:38
  The carbon majors, the biggest oil and gas companies in the world,
• 1:42
  understood by the 1980s that their products could wreck coral reefs
• 1:46
  multiple ways in writing internally.
• 1:50
  So today's episode is in three parts.
• 1:52
  First, what they knew and when.
• 1:55
  Second, what they did about it once the public started catching up.
• 1:59
  And third, what's happening to the reefs right now and where you fit in.
• 2:03
  So here's part one, what they knew.
• 2:06
  Let's start with the reef itself, because the science matters here.
• 2:10
  A coral reef looks like a rock, but it's built by animals.
• 2:14
  Tiny coral polyps pull calcium and carbonate out of the sea
• 2:17
  water and lay down a skeleton made of a mineral called aragonite.
• 2:21
  It's a form of calcium carbonate, the same basic stuff as chalk or seashells.
• 2:26
  They build slowly, upward toward the light, layer on layer.
• 2:30
  For thousands of years, that's the reef that we know and love.
• 2:34
  Now, here's the chemistry that oil companies understood decades ago.
• 2:38
  When you burn fossil fuels, you release carbon dioxide.
• 2:41
  The ocean absorbs a huge amount of CO2.
• 2:44
  And when CO2 dissolves into seawater, it makes the water
• 2:48
  more acidic, and it pulls down the amount of carbonate floating around.
• 2:51
  Carbonate is the exact building block corals need.
• 2:55
  Take it away, and corals can't build their skeletons as densely.
• 2:58
  Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution researchers showed the mechanism
• 3:01
  in detail under more acidic water.
• 3:03
  Corals keep growing upward, and their skeletons get thinner and weaker.
• 3:08
  Easier to snap in a storm, easier for the organisms to bore into.
• 3:12
  Their modeling found that skeletal density in major reef-building corals
• 3:15
  could drop by up to twenty percent this century from acidification alone.
• 3:20
  That's the modern science.
• 3:22
  Now, here's the part that should stop you.
• 3:24
  Exxon knew the shape of this in the late 1970s.
• 3:27
  That 1978 document with the capital letter question about dissolving carbonates, that
• 3:32
  was Exxon reviewing research priorities.
• 3:35
  And then around 1982, Exxon scientists went further.
• 3:38
  They'd found a natural gas field near the Natuna Islands in the South China
• 3:42
  Sea, and this field was strange.
• 3:44
  It was more than 70% carbon dioxide.
• 3:47
  If they vented all that CO2 while producing the gas, it would've
• 3:50
  been the single largest point source of carbon dioxide on the planet.
• 3:54
  So Exxon's own scientists modeled what would happen if they injected
• 3:57
  that CO2 into the deep ocean instead.
• 4:00
  Their conclusion, in writing, it would spike the acidity over an area of around
• 4:05
  1,000 square kilometers, and it would dissolve aragonite and calcite structures.
• 4:10
  That's coral.
• 4:11
  They wrote that the chemistry of CO2 and seawater was, quote,
• 4:15
  "well understood" in 1982.
• 4:18
  Then there's Shell.
• 4:18
  In 1986, Shell's internal greenhouse effect working group
• 4:22
  completed a confidential report.
• 4:24
  It walked through what rising CO2 would do to the ocean.
• 4:27
  And it said, "In nearshore areas, shells and corals would be exposed to water
• 4:32
  rich in CO2 and low in pH." And that, quote, " Massive deaths of organisms"
• 4:37
  was, quote, " not unrealistic." The same report listed a potential disappearance
• 4:43
  of complete coral islands as a socioeconomic impact of global warming.
• 4:48
  And it wasn't just acidification.
• 4:50
  In 1988, a conference in Washington co-sponsored by the fossil fuel interests,
• 4:54
  including Texaco and the American Petroleum Institute, NASA scientist James
• 4:59
  Hansen and others laid out that Caribbean corals can't survive when water pushes
• 5:03
  past thirty degrees Celsius, and that warming would drive more intense storms.
• 5:08
  Another presenter warned that warmer water made what he called hot snaps,
• 5:12
  marine heatwaves, more likely and pointed straight at the 1987 Caribbean
• 5:17
  bleaching event as the preview.
• 5:19
  So by the end of the 1980s, pull it all together, the industry had
• 5:24
  internal knowledge of all three of the big killers we watch destroy
• 5:27
  coral reefs today: acidification,
• 5:30
  heating and bleaching and stronger storms.
• 5:32
  Years, in some cases, before the world's climate scientists said
• 5:36
  it out loud in the IPCC report.
• 5:39
  We're gonna have a quick pause here.
• 5:40
  If this is landing for you, if you're sitting there going, "Wait,
• 5:42
  they actually wrote this down?"
• 5:44
  Do me a favor and send this episode to one person who needs to hear it.
• 5:48
  That's how this story grows, and that's how this story spreads.
• 5:51
  Okay, part two.
• 5:52
  What happened once the public started to catch up?
• 5:55
  Here's the turn in the story.
• 5:57
  Knowing something and hiding it is one thing.
• 6:00
  What the researchers documented next is worse.
• 6:02
  The industry didn't just stay quiet.
• 6:04
  It funded the opposite message.
• 6:06
  Jump to two thousand twelve.
• 6:08
  A think tank called the Cato Institute published a two hundred-page report.
• 6:12
  Cato has been funded over the years by ExxonMobil, the American
• 6:16
  Petroleum Institute, and the Koch family foundations among others.
• 6:19
  This report was designed to look almost identical to an official
• 6:23
  US government climate assessment.
• 6:25
  Same title, nearly the same cover graphics, and it was positioned as a
• 6:29
  superior correction to the real thing.
• 6:31
  On coral reefs specifically, the report reassured readers that the science did
• 6:36
  not support, in their words, "alarming statements about losing reefs."
• 6:40
  It suggested bleached corals were simply adapting to warmer water.
• 6:44
  On acidification, it leaned on the study that conveniently stopped before the area
• 6:49
  of heaviest oil fossil fuel pollution.
• 6:51
  And it even floated the idea that warming might help corals grow.
• 6:55
  Now, hold that against what the industry's own scientists had written.
• 6:58
  Shell's people said massive deaths of organisms, not unrealistic.
• 7:03
  The public-facing message funded by the same industry was, "Relax,
• 7:07
  the reefs are fine." And here's the detail that makes it land.
• 7:10
  By two thousand and seven, five years before the Cato report, the IPCC had
• 7:14
  already warned in its fourth assessment that all coral reefs would bleach below
• 7:18
  two degrees of warming, and that we would see the extinction of the remaining coral
• 7:22
  reef ecosystems around three degrees.
• 7:25
  The word coral appeared in that report's impact volume
• 7:28
  more than seven hundred times.
• 7:30
  The reassurance wasn't a genuine scientific disagreement.
• 7:34
  It contradicted the settled consensus, and it contradicted what the industry had
• 7:38
  known internally for twenty-five years.
• 7:40
  That's the pattern researchers call knowledge, denial, delay.
• 7:45
  Learn it early, deny it publicly, delay the response as long as possible.
• 7:50
  And every year of delay is an emissions year.
• 7:53
  It's warmer water.
• 7:54
  It's another bleaching event All right, part three.
• 7:57
  What's happening now?
• 7:59
  So where are the reefs today after all of that delay?
• 8:03
  Between January 2023 and mid-2025, the world went through the fourth
• 8:08
  global coral bleaching event, and it was the largest ever recorded.
• 8:11
  According to NOAA, bleaching-level heat stress hit about 84% of
• 8:15
  the world's coral reef area.
• 8:17
  Mass bleaching was documented in at least 83 countries and territories across all
• 8:21
  three ocean basins that contain reefs.
• 8:24
  Just to put that into scale, the first global bleaching event back in 1998
• 8:28
  hit about 21% of the coral reefs.
• 8:30
  This one is 84.
• 8:32
  The heat was so far off the charts that the main forecasting system,
• 8:36
  NOAA's Coral Reef Watch, had to add three new levels of its bleaching
• 8:40
  alert scale because the old top level didn't describe how bad it was getting.
• 8:44
  The new top level signals a risk of more than 80% of the corals on a reef dying,
• 8:50
  not just bleaching, 'cause a reef can come back, but dying because of the bleaching.
• 8:55
  And here's a line from NOAA that I can't stop thinking about.
• 8:58
  When they announced the event had likely ended in 2025, the coordinator said,
• 9:01
  "We are now in an era where reefs bleach on a near annual basis." Near annual.
• 9:07
  Reefs need years to recover between these hits.
• 9:10
  We're not even giving them years anymore.
• 9:12
  Remember, roughly one billion people depend on coral reefs for
• 9:16
  food, income, and for physical wall of a reef that breaks the
• 9:19
  waves before they hit the coast.
• 9:21
  Reefs shelter more than a quarter of all named marine species.
• 9:24
  This isn't a postcard problem.
• 9:26
  It's a food and safety problem for a huge chunk of humanity.
• 9:29
  But I promise that this show doesn't just do doom for the sake of doom.
• 9:33
  So let's talk about where this story is actually moving because
• 9:36
  there's a real opening here.
• 9:38
  The Oxford study wasn't written just to make you angry or
• 9:41
  sad or feel just exhausted.
• 9:44
  It was written to be used because that paper trail, the internal memos, the
• 9:48
  funded disinformation, is exactly the kind of evidence that the courts care about.
• 9:52
  And climate lawsuits that cite coral reefs are already live.
• 9:56
  In January twenty twenty-six, a court in The Hague ruled on a case brought by
• 9:59
  Greenpeace Netherlands and residents of Bonaire, a small Caribbean island
• 10:03
  that's part of the Netherlands.
• 10:04
  Bonaire's reefs were bleaching.
• 10:06
  Its coastline is at risk, and up to a fifth of the island could be
• 10:09
  underwater by the end of the century.
• 10:11
  The court found that the Dutch government was violating human rights by not doing
• 10:15
  its fair share to keep warming below one point five degrees, and it ordered
• 10:19
  the state to adopt a real climate adaptation plan by twenty thirty.
• 10:22
  Dying coral reefs were part of the evidence the court accepted.
• 10:25
  That ruling was declared enforceable, even if it gets appealed.
• 10:29
  That's the shift.
• 10:30
  For decades, the story was they knew and nothing happened.
• 10:33
  Now, the knowing is becoming evidence, and evidence is the leverage.
• 10:38
  Here's what I want you to walk away with from this story.
• 10:41
  The collapse of coral reefs was not a surprise.
• 10:44
  It was foreseen in writing by the companies whose product caused it,
• 10:47
  and then it was actively obscured.
• 10:50
  That's not a reason to give up.
• 10:51
  It's the opposite.
• 10:52
  It means this isn't a mystery we're helpless in front of.
• 10:55
  It's a situation with a cause, a paper trail, and a growing set of legal tools
• 11:00
  pointed straight at accountability.
• 11:02
  Reefs are tougher than we give them credit for.
• 11:05
  Corals that survive a bleaching event can recover if we give
• 11:07
  them cooler water and time.
• 11:09
  They need the time to recover.
• 11:11
  The single most powerful thing that buys them both is cutting
• 11:14
  the emissions that warm the water.
• 11:15
  Everything else, the restoration projects, the marine protected areas, buys time.
• 11:19
  Emissions give them the future.
• 11:22
  Now let me give you a couple of concrete things, and I'll be
• 11:24
  honest with what each one is worth.
• 11:26
  One, know the story well enough to tell it.
• 11:29
  The most underrated ocean action is being the person in the circle who
• 11:32
  can explain calmly and accurately that this was foreseen and hidden.
• 11:37
  That's not going to save a reef by itself, but shifting how people
• 11:40
  understand the cause is what makes the bigger stuff, the policy, and
• 11:43
  the lawsuits politically possible.
• 11:46
  Share this episode.
• 11:47
  That's a small, real win.
• 11:50
  Now two, support the accountability work.
• 11:52
  Groups like Climate Litigation Lab at Oxford and organizations
• 11:55
  tracking climate cases are turning documents into legal pressure.
• 11:59
  Following them, amplifying their findings, and where you can,
• 12:03
  supporting them feeds the pipeline that makes the Bonaire ruling possible.
• 12:07
  Three, push your own emissions lever at the scale you actually have.
• 12:11
  For most of us, the bigger lever isn't the metal straw.
• 12:14
  It's the votes and the pressure.
• 12:16
  Contact the people who represent you and tell them that ocean warming
• 12:19
  emissions are a voting issue for you.
• 12:21
  If you have a pension or investments, ask where that money is sits.
• 12:26
  These are the most modest actions.
• 12:28
  I'm not gonna tell you one email ends fossil fuel expansion.
• 12:31
  But reefs are dying from thousands of small decisions upstream,
• 12:34
  and they get saved the same way.
• 12:36
  A thousand small decisions pointed the other direction.
• 12:39
  Four, if you can, get in the water respectfully.
• 12:43
  People protect what they love.
• 12:45
  Snorkel a reef, support a local reef organization where you travel, follow
• 12:49
  the marine biologists doing restoration.
• 12:52
  Falling in love with the reef is a legitimate first step for fighting for it.
• 12:56
  Now, that's the episode for today.
• 12:57
  If you got something out of it, follow the show, and share it with one
• 13:00
  person who still thinks all of this has just sort of happened by accident.
• 13:04
  It didn't, and they knew, and now you do too.
• 13:08
  If you wanna support the show and support all the stuff that I do with this podcast,
• 13:11
  with our YouTube channel, the Instagram and TikTok channels, please feel free
• 13:16
  to go to speakupforblue.com/patreon and support the work that I do on Patreon.
• 13:23
  Speakupforblue.com/patreon.
• 13:24
  I wanna thank you so much for joining me on today's episode of the
• 13:27
  How to Protect the Ocean podcast.
• 13:29
  I'm your host, Andrew Lewin.
• 13:30
  Have a great day.
• 13:31
  We'll talk to you next time, and happy conservation.