Latest / Global Voice Radio Network's tracks / Radio Ranch with Roger Sayles Archive Replay 101926 - From Fear to Framework: Citizenship, Status, and the Power of Definitions

Transcript

Radio Ranch with Roger Sayles Archive Replay 101926 - From Fear to Framework: Citizenship, Status, and the Power of Definitions · Global Voice Radio Network's tracks

• 0:15
  Unknown: Forward moving and focused on freedom. You're listening to the Global Voice Radio Network.
• 0:25
  This mirror stream is brought to you in part by
• 0:29
  mymitoboost.com
• 0:31
  for support of the mitochondria
• 0:33
  like never before. A body trying to function without adequate mitochondrial
• 0:38
  function is kind of like running an engine without oil. It's not gonna work very well. It's also brought to you by snapfat.com.
• 0:46
  That is snap,phat,.com.
• 0:50
  It's also brought to you by the Prife International Terahertz frequency wand
• 0:55
  through iteraplanet.com.
• 0:58
  Thank you so much for joining us, and welcome to the program.
• 1:57
  Unknown: Well, there you go with mister Alvin Lee ten years after familiar refrain.
• 2:02
  It starts our show. It's very appropriate. A lot of vision mister Lee had in his day.
• 2:07
  Rest in peace there, you absolute
• 2:10
  burning. He was one burning guitar player, that guy right there.
• 2:14
  So, we always open the show with that and of course, as Chris was just alluding to Chris on me with me here, the the other lyrics tell me where is sanity.
• 2:25
  Everywhere are freaks and hairies,
• 2:27
  dikes,
• 2:28
  and fairies.
• 2:30
  Tell me where is sanity.
• 2:32
  I think we got a little here. We tried to get it across to folks and and and some folks just have a real hard time with this for whatever reason and there's several different
• 2:42
  areas
• 2:43
  that people have difficulty with. We try and get on here and talk to you about it, explain it to you,
• 2:51
  resign your fears that
• 2:53
  these guys are
• 2:55
  so tyrannical because once you defang them, they're not.
• 2:59
  Okay?
• 3:00
  And I know that's difficult for people to believe. I deal with it all the time and I have been dealing with it for almost thirty years,
• 3:07
  but my experience is as I was taught by my teacher,
• 3:11
  John Benson, the late John Benson,
• 3:13
  they have a legal legal peg that they're hanging their hat on,
• 3:18
  and by and far the most part,
• 3:21
  they follow it to the tee.
• 3:23
  Okay, and what the problem, I think, of course, is Roger Sails within the Radio Ranch and People's Patriot Network. I think that part of the reason is conditioning. We've been conditioned into thinking that they're lawless and all
• 3:37
  powerful and all this stuff, and they're not.
• 3:40
  And they recognize it if you do it appropriately.
• 3:43
  And I realize, again, it is difficult to believe.
• 3:46
  Oh, they're just waiting till enough people get signed in there. They're gonna come down on all of you. Do you think they're going to intentionally
• 3:54
  expose their own fraud
• 3:57
  to this degree?
• 4:01
  Unknown: Well, they certainly seem to be very
• 4:05
  good at spinning pharisee tales and
• 4:08
  fear mongering.
• 4:10
  This is something they've been doing. That's the intimidation.
• 4:13
  Unknown: That's the intimidation
• 4:14
  factor that keeps you coward in the corner.
• 4:18
  Unknown: Yes.
• 4:19
  Well,
• 4:21
  fear is nothing but fantasy and vision is realities, and we can free ourselves from those fantasies. And
• 4:27
  Unknown: if we know the truth and research it diligently like we try to do at this location. Yeah. And discuss it so we can bring out all these different... You know, it's difficult for one person, Chris, as you know, to do all this research and cover all this really diversified ground here and all these different important areas and know all of it in its intricacy,
• 4:46
  okay? It's just a damn challenge, okay? And I know because I've been through it,
• 4:51
  alright?
• 4:52
  But
• 4:53
  that's what gives us the power of our little get together here in our little platform is that we can get other eyes and other ears looking in all these different places and and and combine our power with our numbers,
• 5:06
  alright?
• 5:08
  And that's where our strength is is in numbers and
• 5:12
  so this
• 5:14
  correspondence I had right before the show and the guy's going, oh man, but it's this tyranny. Look at the NDAA and look at BDS and look at all this stuff. I go, okay, let's look at it. The NDAA and what all they can do is only for citizens of The United States and residents,
• 5:29
  okay? Now, that piece of legislation came out on, I believe, 12/31/2011,
• 5:36
  That
• 5:37
  was right after the book was out, and
• 5:40
  the reason I say that, I told the story the other day. Five months later, I opened up the internet one morning and there's a story right there, and these two ators had passed and sponsored this bill to apply the exact same effects of NDAA
• 5:56
  yanking your citizenship and all the things they can do in there over to US nationals.
• 6:02
  How are you going to grant my, how are you going to yank my god given citizenship?
• 6:09
  See, they can trick you out of it. They can they can trick you out of it which they've done but they can't take it away from you. It's the same reason they've had to hide the state's rights over in American Samoa. They couldn't come in and just say, okay, well, hey, that whole status that's been there for two hundred years almost doesn't exist anymore. Sorry.
• 6:28
  They can't do that. They've got to hide it. That's why they went to all the trouble to stick it over in American Samoa.
• 6:37
  That's why they went... And if you study that and you go back to the legislation,
• 6:41
  which is the Nationality Act of 1940,
• 6:45
  and that's not in the code, it's in the statutes at large
• 6:49
  where the real law is,
• 6:51
  and you go and look in there at that piece of legislation that set up this.
• 6:57
  They had to set up the territory first,
• 7:00
  and they did that with insular cases back at the turn of the century
• 7:04
  and that's what all a lot of the hubbub and the insular cases was about and you've heard the those of you who've been around, I don't have it right in my hand to cite it to you. I wish I did. The John Harlan
• 7:17
  site from Downs v. Bidwell, alright?
• 7:22
  So in that, he recognized it way back then. It's just as clear as the nose on your face when you read that site from him. That was around the turn of the century, last century.
• 7:31
  And then forty years they
• 7:34
  and they go in and set up the MDA, or not the NDAA, I've got that on my mind, they go in and set up the switch.
• 7:41
  But you see they can't just do it in one step, they've always got to set something up to pull the trigger because it's all based on fraud and if you go in and what I'll, you know, Chris, I think you've heard this before. I was having
• 7:55
  debate when the book was first issued with Larry B because
• 8:00
  Larry Bcraft has never believed any of this stuff, alright? And I mean, John talked to him for hours one night on the phone on the tax issue and yeah, I'll tell you what John said about Larry Bcraft. It was a very interesting
• 8:13
  comment.
• 8:14
  He and and of course, remember John Benson, I never heard him raise his voice one time in the entire all the years I knew him. No matter what the situation was. He's just a real calm, collected guy and
• 8:27
  he said,
• 8:28
  Larry's been lawyering
• 8:29
  too long.
• 8:34
  Unknown: Well, and you know, he did have the epiphany
• 8:38
  that there was something wrong with the tax code to be what that is demise there at the IRS individuals representing
• 8:46
  Unknown: Satan. Well, I would say, I would say, you know, Larry Beecraft's always been the attorney for Save a Patriot.
• 8:53
  Okay. Organization's
• 8:55
  been around a long time. Have you ever seen them had any real great victories?
• 9:00
  Unknown: No.
• 9:01
  And there's a higher oath that those bar attorneys take that many people are
• 9:07
  Unknown: either not aware of or reluctant to acknowledge. Well... And there's been... Go ahead. I'm sorry.
• 9:14
  Unknown: Well, that's in Corpus Juris Secundum,
• 9:17
  the second body of the laws, it were, volume number seven, a very special one,
• 9:22
  under
• 9:23
  officers of the court. Yep. And all officers of the court are oathed, one, to the bar,
• 9:30
  two as officers of the court, and three,
• 9:33
  Unknown: not to their mere money paying client. No. No. No. They're they're first obligations to the court. No question about it. So, anyway, we're having this discussion on the book and so, Larry is the one that sent me the Email. He said, Roger, what what definition of the word person are you using?
• 9:51
  And I wrote him back and said, I'm using the one that Gaius used back in Rome. Which one are you using?
• 10:01
  And so, anyway, I mentioned something about all this and in his research and Larry, to his credit, has all
• 10:08
  of the statutes at large and everything in a search engine. So, can go search it. So, he goes and starts searching and he pops out and sends me the the Nationality
• 10:18
  Act of 1940.
• 10:19
  That's the first time I'd seen it, alright? And so, it's a long piece of legislation and just like they always do that we found and proven, they always put the hook at the front.
• 10:31
  Okay. I mean, buddy, they always put the hook right at the front and then write all of this voluminous behind
• 10:39
  it that everybody gets sucked into when the hook's right at the front, they've already passed it, they're already on the line.
• 10:46
  And
• 10:47
  right there at very
• 10:50
  first thing, what do they do in the Nationality Act?
• 10:53
  But they set up definitions.
• 10:56
  Okay? If we're discussed, let us define our terms. So they set up the definitions right at the first of that, and what's the very first one?
• 11:05
  Know, I preach this to you guys day in, day out, learn these substantive
• 11:11
  basic principles of law,
• 11:14
  okay? Now, the very first definition,
• 11:18
  A, that's pretty close to the top, isn't it, Chris? A?
• 11:21
  That's right. Okay. Well, it says a US national is is someone who owes complete allegiance to a small estate.
• 11:31
  Well, there it is right there.
• 11:35
  Okay? Because if you owe total allegiance to a state, then the, you know, the state owes it's that relationship protection for allegiance, allegiance for protection.
• 11:46
  If you owe complete allegiance to a small less state, then they owe you complete protection, don't they?
• 11:53
  Mean, it's right there, the very first one, okay? And then down through the first three or four, if you understand substantive law, you can go in there and see exactly what they're doing until that one where they set up the term outlying territories
• 12:08
  and I defy anybody to read that and interpret it, okay? I read it on the air when I first found this. We had a show one day with Brent,
• 12:18
  and I said, Brent, let me read this to you, and I read that
• 12:22
  definition
• 12:23
  where they set up the term outlying territories,
• 12:26
  and he said, Roger, that is the biggest pile of cobbledygook
• 12:30
  I have ever heard in my entire life,
• 12:33
  and
• 12:34
  you wouldn't be able to come to a conclusion unless you know what they're doing.
• 12:40
  If you know what they're doing, you can sit there and pick that stuff out even though it is unintelligible.
• 12:46
  That definition in the Nationality Act of 1940
• 12:50
  that sets up the term outlying territories
• 12:53
  so they could hide the old states' rights under that term,
• 12:58
  outlying territory. So here's what they did. This is the way they think. This is the way you get to know these bastards.
• 13:05
  They can't do away with it, they gotta hide it. So they go over and find some little island on the total other side of the world that ain't no bigger than an almond.
• 13:16
  If you look at the map of American Samoa, it's no bigger than a darn almond, okay,
• 13:21
  and they take that and they say St. Kitts Island
• 13:25
  and American Samoa, if you're born there, you're a US national. Oh, also by the way, and the outlying territories.
• 13:32
  Well tell me, what other outlying territories are there around St. Kitts Island in American Samoa that have these characteristics?
• 13:41
  Well, there ain't any of them,
• 13:43
  okay, because it's the only territory
• 13:46
  in the entire system
• 13:48
  with these characteristics,
• 13:50
  the only one.
• 13:52
  So what do you always do that I preach to you guys? Whenever you find an exception,
• 13:57
  you go find out why it's an exception,
• 14:01
  because there's some reason it's accepted from that.
• 14:06
  And
• 14:09
  just...
• 14:10
  Why can't they get... They're dying to get these goodies.
• 14:15
  All those people over there in Samoa, they want to ride the gravy train just like everybody else has been doing and they can't do it because if they take that, then it makes it takes away the exclusiveness of the state citizenship.
• 14:31
  It has to change their whole society
• 14:34
  over there. Nobody can own land anymore because if they're getting the fourteenth amendment benefits, then they're considered to be property and property can own property. So, they can't own land with a loyal title anymore and that determines their legislature.
• 14:49
  Who sits in the legislature?
• 14:50
  What laws are made for the island and all that stuff? They can't do it.
• 14:56
  Okay?
• 14:57
  And
• 14:58
  virtually nobody but us and the and our enemies understand why.
• 15:02
  You know, the American Samoans are trying to run all these lawsuits up. They had, they were denied certiorari
• 15:08
  at the Supreme Court and left it in the appellate level there in the DC Circuit, okay?
• 15:14
  Because why can't the Supreme Court hear it? Because if they hear it and rule against
• 15:20
  with them, they gotta overturn the whole system. There's no place to hide those other states' rights anymore.
• 15:28
  So
• 15:31
  it's interesting and for the newer people that are skeptical, hey, just keep studying, you know. I mean, I've never in eight years
• 15:38
  told anybody to file this paperwork
• 15:41
  nor will I, and I'm going tell you why.
• 15:45
  There's a solid reason behind it, Chris,
• 15:48
  is because when you file this paperwork, evidently, you're moving back over under God's dominion and states, rights, status,
• 15:56
  and you have a direct connection because you receive your rights from god and therefore, you owe him the duty. It is not for me to tell anybody to do that.
• 16:06
  Now, what is my baliwick and what is my mandate is to try and get across to as many people as possible that you got a choice.
• 16:15
  You don't have to do this. You can you can take another path. If you choose and it's your because everything's gotta be voluntary and
• 16:25
  and and I don't want to be telling somebody to file this paperwork and then something happened. They get stopped on the side of the road traveling
• 16:33
  with all this about driving and everything and come back and say, well, hold on a minute, officer. Let me call this guy down in Ecuador and let him explain it to you, okay? Because that ain't going to happen, alright?
• 16:45
  You've got to know this stuff. The freedom's not in the affidavit for god's sakes. The freedom's in the knowledge.
• 16:54
  The knowledge is how you assert
• 16:57
  your freedom because you've got the grounds to stand on and can be belligerent about it and if you don't have the knowledge, you ain't got doodly squat, do you, Daryl?
• 17:08
  Unknown: The duty to stop No. You you
• 17:11
  Unknown: Yeah. You you don't have the knowledge. You have somebody else's opinion,
• 17:15
  and then you repeat that.
• 17:19
  Yeah.
• 17:20
  Unknown: Yeah. So I I need to say Paul's not gonna be with us today.
• 17:24
  Hey hey, Daryl. Paul's not gonna be with us this morning, so we got another opportunity to discuss this stuff. And
• 17:31
  he's having some personal problems with of all things a cellphone and
• 17:37
  I'll find out more and we'll find out more but I don't think he's gonna be with us this week. You got a real noisy connection today, Darryl. What's going on with you? Where are you? At the place?
• 17:47
  Unknown: I'm in Alabama,
• 17:50
  and I just... It's hot. I turned my air conditioner off, so... Okay. Is that better? Oh, it is, but I hate to see you sweat just to talk Well, to
• 17:59
  it's not. It's it's no it's no big sweat. Okay.
• 18:03
  Unknown: Okay. Yeah. Alright. Glad to have you along. I can always mute out and turn it on. Okay. There you go. Well, I'm glad to have you along. Yes, sir.
• 18:13
  Unknown: I I was listening to you, and
• 18:16
  something came to mind.
• 18:19
  You know, Paul is
• 18:20
  just so
• 18:23
  superb
• 18:25
  collaboration.
• 18:26
  And,
• 18:28
  you know, and and no not one of us, not... No matter how
• 18:34
  refined
• 18:34
  and knowledgeable
• 18:36
  we are can do all of this
• 18:39
  and contain all of it. And so each one... Each and each and every one of us,
• 18:45
  none of us can do everything, but all of us can do something.
• 18:48
  And
• 18:50
  so that's the premise of a, you know, a crew.
• 18:54
  And
• 18:55
  as a crew,
• 18:56
  each one of us need to take our own specific expertise,
• 18:59
  subject matter area, or
• 19:02
  technical
• 19:03
  skills
• 19:04
  and apply it
• 19:06
  to a common objective.
• 19:09
  So with that in mind,
• 19:11
  I was just listening to you here for the last ten minutes.
• 19:15
  And,
• 19:17
  you know, you have this ability
• 19:19
  to...
• 19:22
  Here here comes the big word, extemporaneously
• 19:24
  just disgorge this information
• 19:27
  and
• 19:29
  connect the dots.
• 19:30
  And
• 19:31
  in the moment that you say it, everybody
• 19:34
  will go, yeah.
• 19:36
  And then if you quiz them half an hour later, they wouldn't be able to reconnect the dots.
• 19:42
  And
• 19:44
  now that's the power of the spoken word is that it's able to
• 19:49
  communicate
• 19:50
  a... An energy, a thought. It's motivating. That's why people give speeches,
• 19:55
  and that's why professors give lectures.
• 19:59
  But to
• 20:01
  reinforce that,
• 20:02
  there needs to be
• 20:05
  a multifaceted
• 20:06
  presentation
• 20:07
  or access to this information.
• 20:10
  So
• 20:11
  people can
• 20:13
  digest it
• 20:15
  and make it their own instead
• 20:18
  of trying to catch sound bites. Well, that's why you wrote your book
• 20:23
  which
• 20:24
  leveraged...
• 20:25
  See, if if that book hadn't been written, I wouldn't be talking Yep. Here right now. Yep.
• 20:31
  And
• 20:33
  so that's a that's a powerful medium,
• 20:36
  and it was the,
• 20:38
  you know, part of the the the printing press and the ability to do that was a was a great
• 20:44
  addition
• 20:45
  and a weapon.
• 20:47
  And
• 20:49
  so
• 20:50
  as I was listening to the last ten minutes, I go, well, listen. If
• 20:55
  if we could take that and
• 20:58
  do that
• 21:01
  that narrative that you just put out
• 21:03
  and put that into
• 21:05
  not a a a lengthy
• 21:08
  article,
• 21:09
  but almost
• 21:10
  like detailed bullet points,
• 21:13
  that would be... Provide
• 21:15
  a a pictorial,
• 21:17
  a mind picture
• 21:19
  that would provide coherency and continuity
• 21:23
  for other people
• 21:25
  to integrate it into
• 21:28
  internalize
• 21:28
  and and make it part of their own.
• 21:32
  And
• 21:33
  so I I I don't know if the... So what I'm saying here is I don't think you need to write another book.
• 21:40
  I I think that
• 21:42
  you would
• 21:44
  see a 100 to one return
• 21:47
  on investment of time and effort
• 21:50
  in the
• 21:56
  internalizing this information and making it your own
• 21:59
  with with just
• 22:02
  the occasional
• 22:04
  one page
• 22:06
  email blog sort of thing. Okay?
• 22:09
  And if
• 22:11
  this was done
• 22:13
  once a week
• 22:14
  on an item or topic like you just discussed or just presented
• 22:20
  on just one, and it was done once a week,
• 22:25
  at the end of
• 22:27
  six months,
• 22:29
  there would be a
• 22:31
  seriously strong, coherent,
• 22:36
  powerful
• 22:38
  talking points
• 22:40
  for people
• 22:41
  to hold on to.
• 22:43
  And and,
• 22:45
  you know, as instructors, we both know that over time,
• 22:48
  you know, the more that you drill, practice, and repeat and rehearse, the better you become at that.
• 22:54
  And and I think that's... That gives people confidence, and when they have confidence, they act.
• 23:01
  And
• 23:01
  Unknown: so I'll just pause right there. Well, I agree with you. You know, the part... I'll tell you the... In an honest admission, I hate to write.
• 23:11
  Alright? I just don't like it
• 23:13
  and that's one of the reasons I don't do very much of it.
• 23:17
  But maybe that's going to be a time when that'll be appropriate, Darrell, and I appreciate, I know that's not the first time you've given me that suggestion,
• 23:25
  and
• 23:27
  maybe
• 23:28
  we would get more circulation stuff. I'll see. You know, we'll see how we go forward. Right now, we're building a base and we've a platform and we're trying to educate a core group of people, and
• 23:41
  it's just the biggest obstacle is having people get over this conditioned feeling they've got that these guys can do anything they want,
• 23:50
  okay?
• 23:50
  Because not in this structure, they can't. If they were Genghis Khan going across the the plains of Mongolia,
• 23:58
  they could do anything they want, but these guys ain't Genghis Khan. Yeah, Chris.
• 24:04
  Unknown: Well,
• 24:05
  I appreciate Daryl's
• 24:07
  contributions and comments and observations.
• 24:10
  And, of course, I know you've been coying with this for a while,
• 24:14
  but the first work,
• 24:16
  Sovereign to Serve,
• 24:18
  is a really wonderful
• 24:20
  testimony
• 24:21
  to mister Benson and
• 24:23
  mister Amborg and others and yourself, of course.
• 24:27
  But maybe just an addendum or a supplement there too
• 24:32
  would be in the There's some other inflation with maybe some charts or other definitions and some of the new case laws
• 24:39
  and citations
• 24:40
  directly from their sites and others
• 24:42
  that are operant on what we're discussing today that are tying this whole
• 24:47
  bag of sticks or
• 24:49
  faci,
• 24:50
  facias,
• 24:52
  together
• 24:53
  for all to learn from and to expand their knowledge. And, you know, we've talked about the fee simple absolute
• 25:01
  titles, the lotium
• 25:03
  being included in something like that. And I think you could probably find a analytical
• 25:08
  mind like Daryl's and engineering related, and
• 25:12
  I might even be able to give some minimal assistance along those lines in a couple of different
• 25:17
  areas of expansion and one line drawings and schematics and things like that that
• 25:23
  kinda show you a a pictograph of where it started and and and fills it down and got to where we are today might be explanatory
• 25:32
  on a different level that
• 25:34
  Unknown: some that are visually challenged or reading challenged to incorporate and understand more clearly. Well, I can tell that thanks to many listeners really over the eight years is I've got enough information to write a whole second book and there's all kinds of stuff that wasn't in the first book because we didn't know it. We either didn't know it or we didn't understand
• 25:54
  because of the voluminous amount of information and
• 25:57
  the tediousness of getting people through it to put things like this
• 26:02
  base of the substantive law in there. You know, the R plus D equals R and
• 26:07
  how to go in and define what a person is and see which person it is, and
• 26:12
  the
• 26:13
  handout that John gave me, I think I sent it to you, Chris, one time, I scanned it in, I've got it in the computer of the different systems of law, okay, and the fact that you hear a lot of patriots talking about rights.
• 26:27
  That's a real that that's one of the first rule words that rolls off their tongue is rights. You very rarely ever hear em use the word duty and you virtually have hardly ever heard anybody use the word remedy.
• 26:41
  And the remedy is the most important one, and if you go to that chart of every body of law in the world, and you look over in the remedy section,
• 26:49
  and see there's only two bodies of law where self help remedies are allowed and used, and one of them is the law merchant, the UCC, and the other is the menoral law.
• 27:01
  Well see, I think that's pretty telling right there that it's the feudal system and the Secretary of State's the lord of the manor, and the manor is The US and anywhere the little serfs go off
• 27:13
  around the rest of the planet. They also, and that's the reason that for many many years,
• 27:19
  The US was the only country in the world that could tax its citizens anywhere in the world.
• 27:27
  Well, how can they do that? It's because you're their property.
• 27:34
  Unknown: Well, and that's another reason Yeah. Why
• 27:37
  Go ahead.
• 27:39
  Unknown: Well, yeah, that's... And just, you know, just to underscore
• 27:42
  that,
• 27:44
  their their jurisdiction
• 27:45
  is not the land area that you
• 27:50
  have in your mind as being The United States. Their jurisdiction
• 27:54
  Unknown: Is person... Is wherever their property is. Is personum jurisdiction.
• 27:58
  It's over the person.
• 28:02
  Unknown: Yeah. Well, it's interesting that they've,
• 28:05
  that when you... In their venues, though, you're not able to demure impresana.
• 28:10
  So
• 28:11
  they keep you in res.
• 28:14
  And
• 28:16
  it's
• 28:16
  so
• 28:17
  it's... Well, now there... But hold That that
• 28:20
  Unknown: cons... Go ahead. They are. You are able to overcome that in the geographical jurisdiction
• 28:27
  if you do this,
• 28:28
  and evidently,
• 28:29
  it's the only way they recognize.
• 28:33
  Why? Because it's the feudal system and in the feudal system with that. Now, listen, let me get this across to you folks. We keep talking about the feudal system and I realize people have very little understanding
• 28:45
  or knowledge of it outside of just some sporadic stuff they've been exposed to in their lives, alright?
• 28:52
  But this feudal system had one thousand
• 28:55
  years of legal precedent.
• 28:59
  That's four times longer than our country's been in existence
• 29:03
  of legal precedent on these principles.
• 29:12
  Unknown: You know, Roger and Daryl,
• 29:15
  it's,
• 29:16
  I think, worth some consideration.
• 29:18
  When we look into the background,
• 29:21
  like you say, they set the hook and then they put the trap later on
• 29:27
  of why they put together Federal Circuit Court of Claims
• 29:31
  and require it to pass through
• 29:34
  to the small d's,
• 29:36
  the district courts of the US for special
• 29:39
  classes of people who are property,
• 29:43
  who have a right, and some that are property
• 29:46
  to give them some means of redress of being made whole
• 29:50
  from
• 29:51
  injuries they've
• 29:53
  suffered
• 29:54
  from abuse of discretion,
• 29:55
  medical,
• 29:57
  factual,
• 29:58
  or domains
• 30:00
  take.
• 30:01
  And so we look at these things while they create these special ports.
• 30:06
  Anytime you see the word special,
• 30:08
  you know you gotta might as well bend over because somebody's fixing to take it up to sue someone. Well, once again especially.
• 30:15
  Unknown: Go ahead. Once again, it's the exclusionary
• 30:18
  approach.
• 30:18
  For some reason, the US Court of Claims is excluded and different from all the other courts in the country.
• 30:25
  That in itself bears research and investigation.
• 30:29
  Now what we think,
• 30:31
  and I took the idea from a guy named Wayne Hague, you can go look Wayne Hague up, he's now deceased and won his case posthumously
• 30:40
  at the Supreme Court. He's got a series of videos that were done when he was alive,
• 30:45
  and in one of those videos,
• 30:47
  he made the statement when I was listening to it. According to our research, we think the US Court of Claims is the only common law court left in America.
• 30:57
  How did they do? What did they do? When they were trying to hide the state's rights, they isolated it over in one island
• 31:04
  on the other side of the world. When they're trying to get away from the common law and make everybody serfs in the feudal federal system,
• 31:12
  they can only leave one common law court for the federal jurisdiction,
• 31:16
  and that's what we feel is the US court of claims.
• 31:23
  Unknown: Well, Ralph Winero is fixing the test.
• 31:26
  I may be fixing the test itself.
• 31:30
  I... The only... The US Federal Court of Claims only considers three different classes
• 31:36
  of cases for
• 31:38
  contemplation and consideration.
• 31:41
  Unknown: Number one is the
• 31:43
  Unknown: Brett, Darryl Vaccine. Darryl, back off of that mic a little bit. You're you're exhaling into it. Go ahead, Chris. We got some sporadic
• 31:50
  fidelity anyway. So, go ahead, Chris. Alright.
• 31:54
  Unknown: They only accept
• 31:56
  vaccine injuries injected for infection more accurately.
• 32:01
  They do that under an administrative arrangement as the overseer or the facilitator,
• 32:07
  the gatekeeper, if you will, for the vaccine
• 32:10
  injury awards damages
• 32:13
  of all the money they seize or take in from the drug safety,
• 32:17
  FDA and others authorized
• 32:20
  to be administered to the American slaves.
• 32:23
  Oh, boy. Also accept breach of
• 32:26
  Unknown: Go ahead. No. You go ahead. They also accept what?
• 32:30
  Unknown: They also accept breach of contract,
• 32:34
  and most everything we deal with anymore is contract. So a breach of contract provide our services or other aspects
• 32:43
  could be something that they could
• 32:45
  accept.
• 32:46
  And the third one is takings clauses,
• 32:50
  in that domain, if you will, from takings without just compensation,
• 32:55
  fifth amendment.
• 32:56
  When you have multiples of those different violations, I think it could enhance or expand
• 33:03
  your accessibility
• 33:04
  to
• 33:05
  federal court... Circuit court of claims to get a rid of cert
• 33:09
  to go to the DC,
• 33:12
  small d, small d, c
• 33:14
  district courts in The US, the true
• 33:17
  constitutional
• 33:18
  common law courts of this land that were founded up, like you said, that were hidden away
• 33:24
  to particularly exclude
• 33:26
  other than the most intrepid,
• 33:28
  adventuresome,
• 33:30
  and diligent investigative
• 33:32
  researchers
• 33:33
  from getting access to true justice
• 33:36
  in America that was set up so that other countries could do business with these corruptocrats
• 33:43
  and these bar agents of America
• 33:46
  who are predatory and terrorists
• 33:48
  and take advantage of everybody on the planet they possibly can. So they had to give them a common law venue so they could have some place where they could have a reasonable expectation
• 33:59
  Unknown: of actually having true justice instead of this private bar or legal crap they poke down the rest of everybody's throat. Well, I don't think they even want you to have any intimation that that may be a common law jurisdictional court up there. Nobody uses it. It's just through time and through comments from people and Glenn sent me something one time on the court system, and it was intricate about this, that, and the other, and said, The only exception is the US Court of Claims. Once again, what I've learned following these guys is anytime you see anything that's an exception,
• 34:33
  you study it and try and find out why it's accepted because there's a reason and it's generally important.
• 34:43
  Unknown: Can't argue with you there when they tell you that there's a carve out, a special exemption.
• 34:48
  In fact, I just had a recent deal with my,
• 34:52
  so called Oklahoma County pact assessor.
• 34:55
  I wanted to sell my property and stuff, and they had a little block down at the bottom of their letter talking about the exemption for disabled
• 35:04
  people and for seniors.
• 35:06
  I have 60 years of age or older, and, of course, I'm near 70 or 68 anyway.
• 35:12
  And so I claim to invoke the exemption,
• 35:15
  the carve out,
• 35:17
  to put them at bay and send them some law from, mister Matthew Bender Law's,
• 35:24
  abuse of imminent domain treaties that's been taken off the Internet that I still have in my computer. Thank goodness.
• 35:30
  And,
• 35:31
  I think I haven't heard anything back from them, but they haven't done anything that I know of. And, of course, these criminals, you never can't put anything past them, so I have to keep a close eye on them.
• 35:42
  Unknown: Well, there... Certainly,
• 35:44
  with anything thereafter, you gotta keep a close eye on it. Let's hope you've deferred them a little bit. Hey, Shane. Welcome Shane in. How you doing today?
• 35:54
  Unknown: Oh, there, Roger. I'm just outside smoking the cigarette. So, just to give me and just here
• 36:00
  Unknown: riding on the tail. Okay, well stick your phone on mute then and just welcome aboard.
• 36:07
  Somebody sent me this kind of interesting on another little twist, although it certainly
• 36:11
  is in our ballet wick here today.
• 36:14
  One of my favorite authors when I used to read all the time, especially in the early days when there wasn't the proliferation of
• 36:22
  dissent that we've got out there now,
• 36:24
  is a black guy,
• 36:26
  okay? And I first became aware of him years ago when he'd substitute host for Rush Limbaugh.
• 36:32
  When I was listening to Old Rush and
• 36:35
  his name is Walter Williams and I got a feel that many people in the audience are familiar with Walter and his work. He's like Chris and I. He's getting up there along in age too but someone sent me an
• 36:47
  article of his,
• 36:49
  a recent one, very current,
• 36:52
  and it's over on lewrockwell.com,
• 36:54
  which is a good
• 36:56
  Austrian economics
• 36:58
  freedom oriented
• 36:59
  website, lew,rockwellasit'sspelled.com,
• 37:04
  and the name of the article here, and I'm gonna read it, I got it, looked at it right before the program and thought it was something we could sink our teeth into today,
• 37:12
  is called Slavery
• 37:14
  is Neither Strange
• 37:15
  Nor Peculiar,
• 37:18
  and Walter says the favorite leftist tool for the attack on our nation's founding
• 37:23
  is that slavery was sanctioned.
• 37:26
  They argue that the founders disregarded
• 37:29
  the promises of our Declaration of Independence
• 37:32
  that all men are created equal, that they're endowed by their creator with certain unalienable
• 37:38
  rights,
• 37:39
  that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. These
• 37:45
  very ignorant people, both in and out of academia,
• 37:49
  want us to believe that slavery is unusual.
• 37:53
  As historian Kenneth Stamps
• 37:56
  suggested in his book,
• 37:58
  Slavery
• 38:01
  in the Antebellum
• 38:02
  South, unquote, that's the name of his book, the title,
• 38:05
  but slavery is by no means peculiar, odd, unusual,
• 38:09
  or unique to The US. The
• 38:13
  University of Nebraska Lincoln political science professor David P. Forsythe
• 38:23
  wrote in his book The Globalist,
• 38:26
  quoting here from that book, The Globalist, The fact remained
• 38:30
  that at the beginning of the nineteenth century
• 38:33
  an estimated three quarters of all people alive
• 38:37
  were trapped in bondage
• 38:39
  against their
• 38:41
  will, either in some form of slavery
• 38:45
  or serfdom.
• 38:47
  Little does he know. Slavery was common among ancient peoples,
• 38:52
  Egyptians, Babylonians,
• 38:54
  Assyrians, Hittites, Greeks, Persians,
• 38:56
  Armenians, and even the Armenians,
• 38:59
  and many others.
• 39:01
  Large numbers of Christians were enslaved
• 39:04
  during the Ottoman years in Europe,
• 39:07
  white slaves were common in Europe from the Dark Ages to the Middle Ages.
• 39:12
  It was only during the seventeenth century
• 39:14
  that the Atlantic slave trade began
• 39:18
  with European assisted
• 39:19
  by Arabs
• 39:21
  and Africans.
• 39:24
  Slavery is one of the most horrible injustices.
• 39:27
  It posts such a moral dilemma
• 39:34
  at our seventeen eighty seven Constitutional
• 39:37
  Convention,
• 39:38
  that it threatened to scuttle the attempt to create a union between the 13 colonies.
• 39:44
  Let's look at some of debate.
• 39:47
  George Washington,
• 39:48
  in a letter to Pennsylvania delegate Robert Morris, wrote quoting George Washington,
• 39:53
  There is not a man living who wishes more sincerely than I do to see a plan adopted for the abolition of it. In
• 40:03
  the Constitutional
• 40:04
  Convention speech, James Madison said, We
• 40:07
  have seen the mere distinction
• 40:10
  of color made in the most enlightened
• 40:14
  period of time,
• 40:16
  a ground of the most oppressive dominion
• 40:19
  ever exercised
• 40:21
  by man over man.
• 40:23
  In
• 40:25
  James Madison's records of the convention,
• 40:27
  he wrote...
• 40:29
  Quoting here again Madison,
• 40:31
  The convention
• 40:32
  thought it was wrong to admit the Constitution,
• 40:35
  the idea
• 40:36
  that there could be property of men. Let me read that again.
• 40:41
  This is James Madison. The Constitution thought it wrong to admit in
• 40:46
  the Constitution
• 40:47
  the idea
• 40:49
  that there could be property
• 40:51
  in
• 40:52
  men.
• 40:54
  John Jay, in a letter to
• 40:57
  R. Lush ington
• 40:58
  quoting John Jay, of course, who's one of the, I think he was first chief justice of the Supreme Court, wasn't he, Chris? John Jay?
• 41:05
  It is much to be wished. That's blessing. It is much to be wished. This quoting John Jay,
• 41:11
  it is much to be wished that slavery
• 41:14
  may be abolished.
• 41:16
  The honor of the states as well as justice and humanity,
• 41:21
  in my opinion,
• 41:22
  loudly call upon them to emancipate these unhappy people, To contend with our own liberty and to deny that blessing to others
• 41:32
  involves an inconsistency
• 41:35
  not to be excused,
• 41:37
  unquote.
• 41:38
  Patrick Henry said,
• 41:41
  believe a time will come
• 41:42
  when an opportunity
• 41:44
  will be offered to abolish this lamentable
• 41:47
  evil,
• 41:48
  unquote.
• 41:50
  George Mason said, The augmentation
• 41:52
  of slaves weakens the states,
• 41:55
  and such a trade is diabolical
• 41:58
  in itself and disgraceful
• 42:01
  to mankind.
• 42:03
  Northern delegates to the convention and others who opposed slavery
• 42:07
  wanted to count only the free people of each state to determine
• 42:12
  representation in the House of Representatives
• 42:15
  and the Electoral College.
• 42:17
  Southern delegates
• 42:18
  wanted to count slaves
• 42:19
  just as any other person. Well, weren't persons, they were things.
• 42:24
  That
• 42:25
  would have given slave slave states greater representation
• 42:28
  in the House and in the Electoral College.
• 42:31
  If slave holding states could not have counted slaves
• 42:35
  at all,
• 42:37
  the Constitution
• 42:38
  would not have been ratified,
• 42:40
  and there would not be a union.
• 42:43
  The compromise
• 42:44
  was for slaves to be counted as three fifths of a person when deciding representation
• 42:50
  in the House of Representatives and the Electoral College.
• 42:53
  My question, Walter says, my question
• 42:56
  for those who condemn the three fifths compromise
• 43:00
  is,
• 43:01
  would blacks have been better off if Northern Convention delegates stuck to their guns,
• 43:07
  not compromising,
• 43:08
  and a union had never been formed?
• 43:12
  To get a union, the Northern delegates begrudgingly
• 43:16
  accepted slavery,
• 43:18
  abolitionist
• 43:19
  Frederick Douglass understood the compromise,
• 43:23
  saying that the
• 43:25
  three fifths clause was,
• 43:27
  in quote,
• 43:29
  a downright
• 43:30
  disability
• 43:31
  laid upon the slave holding states. Now let me quote that again from the guy and the source is Frederick Douglas who was the one that if I remember right, had these debates with a guy named Lincoln
• 43:43
  Unknown: at some point. The Lincoln Douglas space. Yes. As a matter of fact, we had a copy of that tone when I was growing up. Man, and let me quote him again. A downright
• 43:53
  Unknown: disability
• 43:54
  laid upon the slave holding states
• 43:58
  that deprived
• 43:59
  them of two
• 44:01
  fifths of their natural basis of representation.
• 44:07
  Here's my hypothesis
• 44:09
  about people who use slavery to trash the founders:
• 44:14
  they have contempt for our constitutional guarantees of liberty.
• 44:19
  Slavery is merely a convenient moral
• 44:22
  uring tool.
• 44:24
  They use in the attempt to reduce respect
• 44:26
  for the constitution. That's Walter Williams. I thought that was a good article and I wanted to read it because it fits right in with what we do. I don't of course, he doesn't know what we know and if he did, I'd love to see what he'd write, alright?
• 44:40
  But
• 44:41
  I thought that was pretty interesting.
• 44:43
  So, I want to get that out of the way.
• 44:47
  If anybody's got any comment on that, now is Yes,
• 44:51
  Chris.
• 44:52
  Unknown: Well, you had mentioned
• 44:54
  justice Harlan in his Downs v. Midwell case, and I think that's the case where he
• 45:00
  talks about it being a terrible
• 45:02
  day, a dangerous
• 45:04
  situation
• 45:05
  if such a legal
• 45:07
  theory takes
• 45:09
  place in the
• 45:10
  Unknown: minds of the jurist. Well, let's let's... For the audience that doesn't do it, I don't have the site right at hand, but I think it may be for their sake here,
• 45:19
  this was the insular cases. It was about all of these territorial moves they were making in The Pacific.
• 45:25
  There were so many it's like the slaughterhouse cases. There were so many of them that they lumped them all into one heading and they call them the insular cases.
• 45:33
  Harlan
• 45:35
  wrote in Downs v. Bidwell, and let's see if I can paraphrase, he said, What we have coming to the bar is two different types of government.
• 45:45
  So they were arguing right there, and he's saying, There's two different types of government being brought to this bar. Now remember this back in the turn of the last century, okay, I don't remember, it was like around 1910,
• 45:56
  alright, and he's going, One,
• 45:58
  the constitutional
• 45:59
  republic, which we recognize,
• 46:01
  and the other mimics these monarchies
• 46:04
  of Europe.
• 46:05
  And if that system ever takes over, our country is gonna be modeled after and run like the monarchies of Europe, not as over a hundred years ago.
• 46:18
  Unknown: And he was accurate and it is. Dead accurate.
• 46:21
  Unknown: Wow.
• 46:23
  Wow.
• 46:24
  Unknown: Okay?
• 46:25
  And so, people have seen, people that were smart. Here, let's back that up a couple of years from 1910
• 46:33
  back to about 1896.
• 46:35
  You know what was important about 1896,
• 46:38
  don't you there, Chris?
• 46:40
  A little case called US versus Wong Kim Ark.
• 46:44
  Yes. Okay, and if you'll read the dissent in Wong Kim Ark written
• 46:49
  by Chief Justice Fuller,
• 46:51
  he lays it out exactly what the fourteenth Amendment is when he says, The amendment
• 46:57
  brought the English common law system to our country for the first time
• 47:03
  and made it absolute
• 47:05
  and unbending.
• 47:07
  The relationship
• 47:10
  was the relationship
• 47:11
  of a liege man
• 47:13
  to a liege lord.
• 47:16
  That's futile talk,
• 47:18
  okay? And made it absolute
• 47:21
  and unbending.
• 47:25
  This was coming in our country just as England was getting rid of its inconvenience.
• 47:31
  Now, what threw me for many years and Brent and I had some discussions on this because I didn't know this back then. What threw me for many years is how did the feudal system get into what we current term and consider the common law,
• 47:46
  alright?
• 47:47
  I didn't realize
• 47:49
  I didn't realize at that point that there's two types of common law. Somebody's trying to get us here. Bob's trying to get in with us. Bob, call back, man. I miss you. I'm looking at the other computer.
• 48:00
  And
• 48:01
  the fact that when
• 48:03
  William
• 48:04
  the Conqueror came over in 1066
• 48:07
  and
• 48:09
  conquered England by the by the thrust of one arrow
• 48:14
  audience.
• 48:15
  One
• 48:16
  arrow.
• 48:18
  The Conqueror's
• 48:19
  people were getting beat
• 48:21
  and their guy had one arrow left and he shot it and it went into the English commander's eye and England lost the battle.
• 48:32
  And
• 48:34
  when William the Conqueror came in from France,
• 48:37
  he brought the feudal system, which was very established in Europe in and then infused it into the what would be termed the Anglo Saxon common law to that point.
• 48:51
  Was it? Brent mentioned it the other day on Friday. Go to your Black's Law Dictionary.
• 48:55
  Go to your Black's Law Dictionary and look up a term called the Doomsday Book.
• 48:59
  D o o m s d a y b o o k, the Doomsday Book, and it tells you William the Conqueror in 1066
• 49:07
  conquered England and the very first thing he did was he sent out
• 49:12
  basically surveyors because these are surveying terms minute,
• 49:16
  minute and second, that's how surveyors work, and he went out and sent these guys out to do one of these surveys for the entire country of England so that he could divide it up under the feudal era, and he could give his favorite guys their land,
• 49:31
  and then they've got complete allegiance to him, and then they could rent or lease their land to somebody else, and that gave them a different title, and their allegiance was to the guy that they got the land from, and his allegiance was to the king.
• 49:45
  This is what made up King Arthur and the knights of the roundtable
• 49:49
  because all of these guys that were primary holders of property from the king had to either give him money or give him knights.
• 50:01
  That was the allegiance due for their protection.
• 50:04
  Allegiance for protection,
• 50:06
  protection for allegiance.
• 50:11
  Unknown: And then the two different types of law or common law is the just divine,
• 50:17
  the divine potentate, the king, you know, dictator, whatever the hell he wants to call himself,
• 50:22
  or the common law of the land, the creator's law. Do you serve the creator, or do you serve evil, wicked, perverse man, Frederick Bastier's law? Well, it's my understanding that once this change was made with William the Conqueror, let's differentiate
• 50:36
  Unknown: those two bodies by calling them the Anglo Saxon common law and the English common law.
• 50:42
  Because the Anglo Saxon common law, which predated
• 50:45
  up to when William the Conqueror turned took over, they didn't have any feudal aspects in their law. It was god's law and nature's god.
• 50:55
  Okay? And and I was ignorant of that fact for many many years until just a few years ago and Glenn came on the show. I think the last time Glenn was on the show with us at some point and he came on and was talking about this and he mentioned that fact and I went bam. Well, that's the reason.
• 51:12
  Okay?
• 51:13
  Well, so we all learn collectively going forward but
• 51:18
  that was just brought over to our country. I mean, these guys, just like we talked about yesterday, they don't do too many things original
• 51:25
  from the standpoint of that they hadn't done them before.
• 51:28
  They just repeat over and over and over again what they've done because there's two reasons.
• 51:34
  One is because it's always worked and worked like a snap.
• 51:38
  And second, there's so much at stake for them, and now this is generational
• 51:43
  that's been passed down, there's so much at stake for them that they can't afford to deviate and go off in some whole new tangent
• 51:50
  of doing something because there may be repercussions,
• 51:54
  but if they go back to everything that's always worked in the past, they're pretty well assured it's gonna work like it always has. Wouldn't you agree with that?
• 52:04
  It's a trick. We always use it. That's right. She says so right out of her own mouth.
• 52:10
  Okay.
• 52:14
  So,
• 52:16
  that was something I wanted to cover that was on my mind. Let's see a few things happening here in the world on Zero Hedge. Our...
• 52:24
  Oh, Mueller is designed from the DOJ. He was giving a talk right as we started the show, won't testify
• 52:31
  and made no findings whether Trump committed a crime.
• 52:37
  The circus,
• 52:38
  a new ringer position.
• 52:42
  There's a new player over in the third ring there, audience. Go over and watch him for a while. Says I'll pass.
• 52:51
  Listen, we're right on the cusp of this economy starting to come apart,
• 52:55
  and you can just look at the stories today about what's going on in the bond markets around the world and get a good idea that we're not on real, real solid ground anymore.
• 53:05
  So that's going to be interesting to see unfold,
• 53:08
  and
• 53:09
  I urge everybody again to try and get yourself prepared because it's close now, alright? It's real close. Bob hadn't called me back. Let me see if I can raise him again because he tried to call and I wasn't paying attention.
• 53:23
  At least to this computer.
• 53:26
  I got two computers that I run the show off of and
• 53:30
  because my eyes and I got one big screen and one small screen. Let's see if Bob gets in the air. Oh, I have a question. Oh,
• 53:38
  good, Shane. You know that I love questions.
• 53:41
  Please.
• 53:42
  Unknown: Yeah. So I know you read this
• 53:45
  thing about Mueller
• 53:47
  and his quote.
• 53:49
  Unknown: How much money did it cost him to say that quote? I have no idea. I'm just... All I... Shane, they don't have that information in the headline.
• 53:57
  And all I did was read the headline. I hadn't... I I saw he was gonna speak today. Dalton. I don't spend my time over chasing all that stuff.
• 54:06
  All those rabbit holes they want to send you down but you gotta be aware of the the that the rabbit holes there and
• 54:13
  Unknown: Zero heads, right? Yeah.
• 54:15
  Unknown: Zero Hedge. It's over there on the top story on Zero Hedge.
• 54:20
  Oh, well. Yeah. I mean, there's just a lot of stuff going on. It's extremely interesting time to be alive. What was the... You know the ancient Chinese curse, don't you, Shane?
• 54:31
  Refresh my memory. May you live in interesting times.
• 54:37
  Unknown: Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah.
• 54:39
  Yeah.
• 54:42
  Unknown: So, Hello.
• 54:43
  Hello. Hey, Bob. How you doing? You... I I didn't... I wasn't ignoring you, man. I just didn't see you. I was concentrating on something else and you hung up before I could get to. I see.
• 54:53
  Unknown: Yeah. Well, I wanted to qualify something and I think it even makes a better point than what you had stated.
• 54:59
  It was not Stephen Douglas as the man you're talking about in the debates with Lincoln. Oh. Frederick Douglas is an escaped slave. Okay.
• 55:07
  Frederick Douglas had an even stronger case because he was one at one point. He's an escaped slave turned abolitionist
• 55:15
  activist.
• 55:16
  So
• 55:17
  coming from a black man who was an escaped slave, what you're saying has even more credibility
• 55:23
  or veracity or or or input...
• 55:26
  Import, I should say,
• 55:28
  than if it had come from Stephen Douglas, which would still have been momentous.
• 55:34
  Unknown: But, yeah, I just wanted to qualify who would do there. I'm glad you did. And and and... Because those two last... The same last name got me mixed up. And now that you're... You bring it out, I realize you... You're right. I remember that now.
• 55:47
  Unknown: But I confess that I had the black guy pictured.
• 55:51
  In fact, I'm not sure he was all black. He might have been part white too, as I as I recall from the photo. But I clearly remembered him being a man of color that had the Lincoln Douglas debates.
• 56:04
  Unknown: I think I do too because I know. He was a white guy, but Douglas is not black. He's white. Steven Douglas was the Steven Douglas was the debater
• 56:15
  Unknown: Okay.
• 56:15
  Unknown: I believe.
• 56:19
  They debated Lincoln. But at any rate, I've gotta mute out. I just was trying to make that point because I think it lends even more veracity to the whole the whole what what he said. It does.
• 56:29
  Unknown: And I thank you for making the point and correcting us.
• 56:32
  Last couple of nights, I've been listening to videos. I sent a couple of them to Darryl.
• 56:38
  One of them is by a guy that I really admire, Di Lorenzo,
• 56:42
  who wrote the book about Lincoln and is quite an author and quite a researcher and all that stuff. Did you get a chance to listen to that interview, that presentation he made, Darryl?
• 56:53
  Guess Darryl's with us.
• 56:56
  You can find it. Just put DiLorenzo
• 56:58
  over in YouTube on the search and a bunch of that stuff. Of course, he's working closely with the Abbeville
• 57:05
  and he was covering a lot of ground in that one I listened to last night,
• 57:10
  and one of the things that stuck with me was he was quoting this northern guy,
• 57:15
  and he was saying, Of course, we have to dominate the South.
• 57:20
  If we don't dominate the South, we won't get all the tariffs and we won't be able to afford to extend the railroads
• 57:29
  and take over this country from coast to coast.
• 57:33
  That wasn't exactly on the quote, but it's pretty darn close because I went back and listened to it and I was just so shocked by what the guy had written in there and
• 57:45
  DeLorenzo
• 57:47
  has
• 57:49
  the
• 57:54
  things that happened. It's
• 57:56
  just real interesting to look back with what we know now
• 57:59
  and look over these things. Of course, one of the things that came out of the Di Lorenzo is that the whole civil war was proffered by the northern industrialists
• 58:09
  who are the northern industrialists and who are their bankers.
• 58:14
  And why did they do it? Well, I daresay that we're some of the few people in the world, other than them, that understand that the Civil War was fought to instill the fourteenth Amendment,
• 58:25
  and that's exactly what it was fought for.
• 58:29
  And you can see, by the way, they handled not only the thirteenth,
• 58:33
  but the fourteenth Amendment,
• 58:35
  and how they so slyly
• 58:38
  brought this justly
• 58:40
  over in the feudal era's
• 58:44
  concept and principle
• 58:45
  of citizenship
• 58:46
  by birth,
• 58:48
  and brought it over and infused it into
• 58:51
  just as a...
• 58:52
  Once again, Chris, they do it in steps.
• 58:55
  They can't accomplish these great accomplishments
• 58:58
  at one time,
• 58:59
  so they have to very...
• 59:01
  First of all, they run-in, they get rid of the old thirteenth amendment, and they run the new one in. Well, I would take any... You guys... Here's a good way to toy with people. Bring up the thirteenth amendment, have somebody read it, and ask them what it says.
• 59:15
  What does it say and what's the purpose of that amendment? Well, it's to outlaw servitude.
• 59:21
  Okay? It states it right there. Unless you've been duly
• 59:25
  convicted of a crime, they can't take your liberty, okay?
• 59:29
  And they talk about involuntary
• 59:31
  servitude,
• 59:32
  but voluntary
• 59:33
  servitude is legal by omission because it's never outlawed in that amendment.
• 59:40
  If you look at the bottom, it specifically
• 59:43
  says
• 59:44
  their
• 59:45
  jurisdictions,
• 59:46
  plural.
• 59:48
  So there's the
• 59:50
  transition from the old Constitution,
• 59:52
  because they're the original states,
• 59:55
  their
• 59:56
  jurisdictions,
• 59:57
  with voluntary
• 59:58
  servitude
• 59:59
  now legal by omission.
• 1:00:02
  And in the fourteenth, they go in and tie the residency
• 1:00:06
  back to the states to overcome that, so they cover all their bases.
• 1:00:11
  You're only a state citizen if you reside,
• 1:00:14
  and if you reside in a state, that automatically means you're under the scope and purview of the fourteenth amendment.
• 1:00:21
  Unknown: I think I recall,
• 1:00:23
  unless I'm mistaken, I'm pretty sure I'm accurate, that Obama's so called information czar was built by the name of Cass
• 1:00:30
  Unknown: Sunstein. Oh god. What a creep. What a creep.
• 1:00:34
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 1:00:35
  I'm sure he was a a close friend of Jonathan Gruber and Van Jones and some of the others. Van Jones was one that was removed for being a communist.
• 1:00:44
  But Sunstein wrote a book, I think it was called Nudge,
• 1:00:48
  and that's the methodology they operate by, the synagogue of Satan, the Zion commies.
• 1:00:54
  They nudge incrementalism
• 1:00:56
  is another word for it. That's where you inch it across the goal line, but you continue moving forward. Sometimes you have to go a little in the round or circumnavigation,
• 1:01:06
  but that's how they get all this legislation
• 1:01:08
  of demonica
• 1:01:10
  through and pass the people who don't pay close attention to what they're really doing because it's got a broad scope
• 1:01:16
  Unknown: and a wide field of vision. Well, let me tell you what they really don't pay attention to is the fact that all these laws are only written for citizens of The United States and residents. Oh, they passed the law. Oh, oh, oh, they never asked
• 1:01:29
  to who?
• 1:01:30
  Because the universal feeling is that they have this total control,
• 1:01:34
  and in this system, the way they've constructed it and executed it, they do.
• 1:01:39
  But you can come out of it,
• 1:01:42
  okay?
• 1:01:43
  And they can't afford to come after us. That's what our people don't understand, the new ones. They can't get over this insurmountable
• 1:01:52
  vision of these tyrants because they don't understand the game that's being played.
• 1:01:59
  You know, the official,
• 1:02:00
  when you're watching a football or a basketball or some sporting event, the official
• 1:02:05
  can't go up to somebody in the stands and accuse them of pass interference,
• 1:02:10
  can they?
• 1:02:12
  Unknown: Not usually.
• 1:02:14
  Unknown: Because they're not on the field in the game. They're a spectator.
• 1:02:18
  When you file this affidavit,
• 1:02:20
  you become a spectator
• 1:02:22
  instead of a player.
• 1:02:24
  What is difficult to understand about that?
• 1:02:29
  Unknown: The judges on the field don't have anything to say about the people in the stands.
• 1:02:34
  Unknown: Only the players on the field. Only if they start hurling stuff. You know?
• 1:02:40
  I remember, you know, and I've told this story before back one year, the Falcons were playing the Eagles in the Super Bowl, and there's a lot of talk on the sports radio and stuff, and then Philadelphia
• 1:02:52
  fans are pretty notorious,
• 1:02:54
  alright?
• 1:02:55
  And so, they actually have, Chris, a court
• 1:02:59
  in the Philadelphia Eagles Stadium underneath the seats. Do you know that?
• 1:03:05
  I did not. And the reason I know it is because they had the judge that oversits on the court on the radio station interviewing him before the game.
• 1:03:14
  Okay?
• 1:03:15
  And
• 1:03:16
  he was telling about this and and if people get really unruly in the stands, they yank him out of the stands and take him straight down to the court in the stadium.
• 1:03:25
  Okay? And so,
• 1:03:27
  the guy, the judge was telling this story. He he told it on there and he said, there was one egregious guy and I don't remember what the
• 1:03:36
  had led up to him being there but the judge gets him in front of his court there in the stands of the Philadelphia Stadium
• 1:03:44
  and he says, young man,
• 1:03:46
  do you like football?
• 1:03:49
  And the guy goes, oh yes, your honor. I like. He says, if you do this again,
• 1:03:53
  I'm going to send you up as a tight end and you're going to come out as a wide receiver.
• 1:04:05
  Pretty graphic, but I thought it was funny at the time.
• 1:04:09
  The official official is the people playing in the game,
• 1:04:12
  and if you've been born into this system unknowingly,
• 1:04:16
  you've been born into the game whether you knew it or not. Okay?
• 1:04:20
  And when you
• 1:04:21
  come up to the education and confidence level that you're ready to file this paperwork with these specific people,
• 1:04:29
  you take yourself out of the players roster and put yourself in the stands.
• 1:04:36
  Is that a pretty good analogy,
• 1:04:38
  Chris? A metaphor or simile, whatever they call it?
• 1:04:41
  Unknown: Nicely said. I would say so. In fact, there's a series on TV that I've only seen a couple little moments up here and there, but everybody valley hooves to the high hilt.
• 1:04:52
  So you fear there's gotta be something going on there they want you to know about. It's called the Game of Thrones.
• 1:04:58
  Not radically dissimilar to your,
• 1:05:00
  game court trial scenario you're just for playing
• 1:05:04
  out for people, and I think very material and relevant.
• 1:05:07
  But,
• 1:05:08
  you know, you're within or you're without their jurisdiction, and that's what the...
• 1:05:13
  People are not taught the meaning of the word term city genitism or citizenship
• 1:05:18
  as we're told today,
• 1:05:19
  And they're deceived to believe it's something good when it's really a very disabled state of existence because that is the fetal serpent Okay. For the raise high ants, the things identified as fictitious entities,
• 1:05:32
  the citizens
• 1:05:34
  Unknown: of the corporate state, the Whore of Babylon, in my estimation. Okay. When they're coming after you, they pretty well hang their hat on The US code and regulations
• 1:05:43
  attached there under, don't they?
• 1:05:47
  Yeah, our city Muni cycle code. Okay. Well, let's don't talk about non non non. No, hold it. That's that's that's local stuff. I'm talking about federal stuff. That's who we're dealing with. When these feds come after you,
• 1:06:00
  they're...
• 1:06:01
  They always cite some section of the code or some regulation they're under.
• 1:06:06
  Correct?
• 1:06:08
  Unknown: Well, absolutely. In fact, these agencies
• 1:06:11
  have their own private policy codes they operate under that are
• 1:06:16
  far separate from the states, and they're merely federal
• 1:06:19
  executive positions
• 1:06:21
  under the executive powers of the post as his chief executive or commander in chief functions under the War Powers Act
• 1:06:28
  where they created all these so called executive agencies by executive order or FIO. And and before 1933,
• 1:06:35
  Unknown: we didn't have executive administrative
• 1:06:37
  agencies.
• 1:06:38
  We had departments of government.
• 1:06:40
  We had cabinet offices,
• 1:06:42
  okay. Now we've still got those, but now we've got this thing called the Fourth Estate,
• 1:06:48
  the fourth branch of government,
• 1:06:50
  and this administrative
• 1:06:52
  state which was formed after
• 1:06:54
  1933,
• 1:06:55
  March 9,
• 1:06:57
  and why is it there? Why wasn't it there before
• 1:07:00
  and we've got it now?
• 1:07:05
  Why didn't anybody come up with administrative
• 1:07:08
  agencies
• 1:07:09
  even for the blacks?
• 1:07:11
  Because the status was there.
• 1:07:13
  Why didn't anybody come up with administrative agencies before the bankruptcy
• 1:07:18
  to handle these guys?
• 1:07:22
  Unknown: Well, I'm not sure they didn't come up with it. They had the hazard circular circular and other aspects going on. But that's not an that's
• 1:07:29
  Unknown: not an administrative state. That's not an administrative agency where these men write man made laws of interpretation
• 1:07:36
  of laws that are passed? I believe No.
• 1:07:39
  Unknown: They didn't I believe drew admitting to colonel Edwin Landell House, others,
• 1:07:45
  wet dream of the administrative state, the management state, the corporate management,
• 1:07:51
  circumnavigation,
• 1:07:52
  and doing away with the constitutional
• 1:07:54
  with the sovereign state concepts
• 1:07:57
  and putting under monopolistic
• 1:07:59
  municipal jurisdiction
• 1:08:01
  Unknown: of the corporate state. What were you gonna say, Shane?
• 1:08:05
  Unknown: I believe it had had to do with, Franklin D. Roosevelt's,
• 1:08:09
  New Deal. They had a change to the economic, particularly,
• 1:08:14
  particular system
• 1:08:15
  in regards to, making us,
• 1:08:18
  slaves
• 1:08:19
  and
• 1:08:21
  pursuing the,
• 1:08:23
  the, the New Deal,
• 1:08:25
  agenda.
• 1:08:26
  Unknown: Well, what they did is they didn't have everybody in the trap yet.
• 1:08:32
  So they... Because if they would if they would have had if they would have had administrative agencies
• 1:08:39
  before the bankruptcy,
• 1:08:41
  they would have only dealt with half the or less of the people because that's the only jurisdiction they would have had because their jurisdiction is citizens of The United States and residents.
• 1:08:52
  Waited to build the administrative
• 1:08:54
  state until the system of government had been changed with the bankruptcy
• 1:08:59
  so they could set it up,
• 1:09:01
  and then they couldn't set it up very easily because they didn't pass the
• 1:09:06
  Administrative Procedures Act until after World War two in 1946.
• 1:09:11
  They couldn't agree on the rules for this new body of law called the administrative state.
• 1:09:17
  It wasn't
• 1:09:18
  set up because everybody wasn't in the pit yet,
• 1:09:23
  the slave pit.
• 1:09:28
  Unknown: 1954?
• 1:09:29
  Unknown: So,
• 1:09:31
  well, that's when everybody was thrown in there, but they set it up between when the trigger was pulled on the bankruptcy
• 1:09:37
  and before they pulled it and throw everybody in there. They wanted it set up. They
• 1:09:43
  wanted it set up,
• 1:09:45
  and they required it to be set up, and you know how you prove that, Shane?
• 1:09:50
  Two months after Brown versus Board of Education,
• 1:09:54
  they slipped the 1954
• 1:09:56
  Internal Revenue Code in place. Two months.
• 1:10:01
  Here they wait forty years,
• 1:10:03
  fifteen years,
• 1:10:05
  a hundred years,
• 1:10:06
  but boy, when they get it all together, they can't even wait two months till they get that piece of little body of crap in.
• 1:10:15
  Unknown: That's in 1954?
• 1:10:17
  Unknown: Yes.
• 1:10:19
  Two months after Brown.
• 1:10:22
  The point I wanted to get back to a minute ago for all of our skeptical listeners, the new folks out there,
• 1:10:28
  when they come at you, they always come at you with statutes
• 1:10:31
  regulations.
• 1:10:33
  If you go into that code and look around, you're going to find all kinds and regulations too,
• 1:10:39
  all kinds of examples of this twin status.
• 1:10:42
  One, and one of the most important ones, and the... Do you...
• 1:10:46
  Chris, let me see if you agree with this statement.
• 1:10:49
  They take Jurats pretty damn seriously.
• 1:10:55
  In the shower. Sorry about that. That's okay. They take Jurats pretty damn seriously,
• 1:11:01
  don't they?
• 1:11:05
  Hello, crickets?
• 1:11:07
  Yes. Well, let me tell you how seriously they take them.
• 1:11:11
  You could sign your ten forty form and put down there you owe them $5,000,000,000,000
• 1:11:16
  and if you don't sign it, they send it back to you because it wasn't signed under penalty of perjury. Do you think they take their jurats pretty seriously?
• 1:11:31
  I'm gonna ask the question again. Do you think they take their jurats pretty seriously?
• 1:11:37
  I believe so. Yes. Okay. A jurat, for those who don't know, is just simply a penalty of perjury. Okay.
• 1:11:44
  Okay. Here comes Darryl coming back in. I did catch his. Alright. So if you go into the section, Chris will know if I can yank him out of the shower, he'll know which title it's in, I never can remember,
• 1:11:56
  but there's two Jurats in The United States Code.
• 1:11:59
  One of them is from within The United States, and the other's without The United States.
• 1:12:05
  One of them says, I swear under penalty of perjury by the laws of The United States, The other one says, I swear under penalty of perjury by the laws of The United States Of America.
• 1:12:16
  Do you think they don't recognize these statuses?
• 1:12:20
  They put it in their own damn code?
• 1:12:30
  They have to take and hide it over in Title A and hide the states under this term out lying territories,
• 1:12:38
  but they go ahead and fully elucidate it again in title 26 CFR,
• 1:12:44
  all all persons... An income tax is owed... Now this is important, an income tax is owed by all persons who are citizens of The United States and residents,
• 1:12:55
  and to the exception of 871B
• 1:12:57
  and 878B,
• 1:12:59
  77B,
• 1:13:00
  all nonresident alien individuals.
• 1:13:03
  Now that's on the first page of Title 26 CFR,
• 1:13:06
  and that's their jurisdictional statement.
• 1:13:09
  Now I don't know if I've asked you guys this before, Daryl, you're back with us, have you ever flipped the page on the next page of that and over on one of the following sections it asks a really neat question.
• 1:13:22
  It says, What is a citizen?
• 1:13:25
  Have you seen this, Darrell, personally?
• 1:13:29
  Unknown: I personally have not.
• 1:13:31
  Unknown: Well, if you flip if you flip that over on the next page,
• 1:13:35
  there's a question that says, who is a citizen? Is that a fair question? Sure it is. Do you think their answer is?
• 1:13:43
  What do you think their answer is to that question in the Code of Federal Regulations Title 26?
• 1:13:48
  Who is a citizen?
• 1:13:55
  Born in the the land of the state. No. I'll quote it to you exactly. All persons born are naturalized in The United States and subject to its jurisdiction.
• 1:14:05
  They quote the fourteenth amendment.
• 1:14:07
  I
• 1:14:14
  Unknown: have I have the complete internal revenue code 1993
• 1:14:19
  edition here.
• 1:14:21
  I wonder if it's in the front of that. It is. I think it's like 1.1
• 1:14:24
  Unknown: dash one b or something. But if you're looking at the code and that
• 1:14:30
  1.1
• 1:14:30
  dash one a is up at the top right of the page, and if you flip the page, that question is an...
• 1:14:36
  Could dig it up over there in my references, but I'm not gonna take the time to do it. I know it's there. Okay,
• 1:14:42
  this is stuff that we were taught in John and Glenn's seminar to lead up to the point that this is all a fourteenth amendment deal.
• 1:14:49
  Unknown: Fourteenth amendment deal.
• 1:14:58
  Now you got me now you got me looking in the book here. Good.
• 1:15:02
  Unknown: Good. He's gonna make it his. Yeah.
• 1:15:05
  But you know, you know, Darryl, you mentioned earlier when
• 1:15:10
  you came on originally with us that I sit here and this stuff rolls off my tongue like water off a duck's back and it does. Yeah. Because I've immersed myself in it for over twenty eight years.
• 1:15:22
  My patriot birthday is coming up here pretty quick by the way.
• 1:15:27
  Unknown: Which is? July 16.
• 1:15:30
  Unknown: Nice.
• 1:15:33
  Well, happy birthday. Yeah. Well, that's a little premature. Well,
• 1:15:40
  Unknown: I
• 1:15:42
  I
• 1:15:45
  have all these books,
• 1:15:47
  and this particular book I got was from that
• 1:15:50
  big buy that I made from Steve Irino Right.
• 1:15:55
  From his friend that had passed away. And I I purchased
• 1:15:59
  part of his library,
• 1:16:01
  and I I still
• 1:16:03
  haven't been able to go through all those books yet.
• 1:16:07
  So many books, so little time.
• 1:16:11
  And that that kinda goes back to my premise of why why it's so important to
• 1:16:16
  to
• 1:16:17
  cooperate.
• 1:16:19
  And
• 1:16:22
  this is...
• 1:16:24
  So I I missed part of your I missed part of your dialogue here today.
• 1:16:28
  I had to do business, but
• 1:16:30
  I'll probably have to go back and and listen and then take bullet point notes
• 1:16:36
  on what you're talking about because this this particular area is incredibly powerful because there's
• 1:16:42
  there's proof
• 1:16:44
  in their own words, in their own documents as to
• 1:16:48
  the veracity
• 1:16:50
  and continuity
• 1:16:51
  of what you're saying. And so
• 1:16:58
  people...
• 1:17:00
  I'm hearing more and more people as they're coming into this. I'm listening to them.
• 1:17:05
  And
• 1:17:08
  some of them are directly saying, then others are
• 1:17:11
  enuating,
• 1:17:12
  well, prove this to me. Yep. Yeah. They're they're they're
• 1:17:17
  they're sort of like they're... They have this sort of like skeptical
• 1:17:22
  stance.
• 1:17:23
  Alright?
• 1:17:24
  And...
• 1:17:25
  Which is okay. This
• 1:17:29
  kind of information in the documentation,
• 1:17:33
  if if they are genuinely open minded, will overcome
• 1:17:37
  that resistance
• 1:17:38
  very quickly. And this is why
• 1:17:41
  being able to give facts instead of just opinions is so important.
• 1:17:46
  Unknown: I And mean, if they didn't recognize the other status, they wouldn't have hidden it so thoroughly in the passport application,
• 1:17:53
  and they wouldn't have stated it so obviously in their statutes and regulations.
• 1:17:58
  They understand they've got to. That's why they went in there in Title 26
• 1:18:03
  and changed the term state national to nonresident alien.
• 1:18:10
  They... Do you... If they didn't have to put it in there, do you think they'd even go to those links to make... To to to to hide it? If they didn't have to put it in there, they just wouldn't be putting in there. No.
• 1:18:24
  Unknown: Well,
• 1:18:26
  at at some point, they're gonna feel like they have enough...
• 1:18:31
  They've dumped everybody else down enough,
• 1:18:33
  and they've experienced no resistance that they'll just do away with that too.
• 1:18:41
  Unknown: Maybe.
• 1:18:43
  Unknown: You see, you know, I go back to John's statement.
• 1:18:47
  They've got a legal peg they're hanging their hat on,
• 1:18:51
  and by and far the most part,
• 1:18:54
  they follow it to a tee.
• 1:18:58
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 1:19:01
  Unknown: Well,
• 1:19:02
  your your freedoms and rights,
• 1:19:05
  so to speak,
• 1:19:06
  are only good as long as you exercise them. Once you stop using them
• 1:19:11
  or exercising them,
• 1:19:14
  Unknown: they'll be deleted. You you wanna you wanna see muscles atrophy?
• 1:19:18
  Go lay in a hospital bed for six damn months and see how well your muscles work.
• 1:19:26
  Unknown: Mhmm.
• 1:19:27
  Well, now... And so do that and then do that with your mind.
• 1:19:31
  Unknown: What happens
• 1:19:33
  Unknown: what happens...
• 1:19:35
  You know, the the reason people like stereotype...
• 1:19:37
  Stereotypical information axioms
• 1:19:40
  is that they don't have to think about it. All they have to do is repeat.
• 1:19:44
  All they have to do is just
• 1:19:47
  be able to repeat
• 1:19:48
  what they've been told,
• 1:19:50
  and then
• 1:19:52
  they don't have to think about it. So they they concentrate on memory
• 1:19:57
  or they'll they'll
• 1:20:00
  take their memory and try to use that as a substitute for knowledge, understanding,
• 1:20:06
  and
• 1:20:07
  they'll just repeat things.
• 1:20:09
  And
• 1:20:11
  you can't defend yourself
• 1:20:13
  because if you can't reason. If you can't reason,
• 1:20:17
  then you can't argue.
• 1:20:19
  Alright? And you can't... You definitely can't be a belligerent claimant.
• 1:20:23
  And
• 1:20:25
  so,
• 1:20:26
  Unknown: of course, that cuts out a lot of... Large part of the population right there, Roger, because there's a lot of people that don't wanna argue. There's a lot of people. Like They to argue. They don't wanna think. They don't wanna read. They don't wanna reason. They wanna go to work, get their little skimpy paycheck that buys less every week, and come home and drink beer and watch King of Thrones.
• 1:20:49
  Unknown: Yeah, or pornography.
• 1:20:52
  Unknown: Or football,
• 1:20:53
  whatever.
• 1:20:54
  Know, I mean, we've all got our releases.
• 1:20:56
  Okay? Yeah.
• 1:20:58
  Yeah. But that's why I say there's just a small percentage of us. Now, hopefully, as things continue to get worse and buddy, they're about to start continuing to get worse real quick, okay? More people are going to start asking questions.
• 1:21:12
  That's what I see and that's what my hopes are, and that's what I'm really hanging the large success of what we're doing on. Okay?
• 1:21:21
  Because I've tried to touch people every other way for over twenty five years, and it just doesn't work
• 1:21:28
  very well.
• 1:21:31
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 1:21:33
  They they enjoy their slavery.
• 1:21:36
  Unknown: Well, they do enjoy their slavery, Shane. I don't know any other way to to say it.
• 1:21:42
  They may bitch, moan, and complain about it but obviously, they must enjoy it because they're not at a point where they're ready to do anything about it as even in thinking or looking.
• 1:21:56
  Unknown: Yep. Well,
• 1:21:58
  Unknown: you know, as as Elvis... This this was this was predicted in the thirties in Aldous Huxley's book, A Break The World. They will come to love their slavery Yep.
• 1:22:08
  And to... And and call it freedom.
• 1:22:10
  Okay?
• 1:22:11
  And, of course, we we have we have many examples
• 1:22:16
  of people loving their their slavery right now, but they call it freedom.
• 1:22:21
  And
• 1:22:22
  the... One of the very best ones that I can describe
• 1:22:25
  as to people loving their slavery
• 1:22:28
  is
• 1:22:29
  pornography.
• 1:22:31
  Okay? And
• 1:22:33
  and pornography
• 1:22:35
  isn't isn't about
• 1:22:37
  a freedom.
• 1:22:38
  Pornography is about slavery because it's a... It's an addiction. Yep. It's slavery.
• 1:22:43
  I'll give you I'll give you a really good example
• 1:22:45
  of how this was used as a weapon,
• 1:22:49
  and it's been used on
• 1:22:52
  probably everybody that's listening here
• 1:22:55
  and everybody you know
• 1:22:57
  and for for generations.
• 1:22:59
  So when
• 1:23:01
  the Israelis
• 1:23:03
  attacked
• 1:23:04
  Gaza
• 1:23:07
  in the first...
• 1:23:08
  When they called the Inafada.
• 1:23:11
  This is... I don't know. Was this, like, thirty years ago, something like that?
• 1:23:16
  The
• 1:23:17
  very first thing they did is they put up snipers on top of all the roofs.
• 1:23:22
  Okay
• 1:23:23
  and they took over the
• 1:23:25
  they they shut down the radio brand radio transmissions
• 1:23:29
  and they shut down the newspapers.
• 1:23:32
  And they shut down...
• 1:23:34
  Took control of the TV broadcasting.
• 1:23:37
  And the only thing that could be broadcast over those TVs, are you ready for this? They were broadcasting
• 1:23:43
  this into people's
• 1:23:46
  Palestinians'
• 1:23:47
  TV... Over their TV sets. Yep. The only thing you could see was pornography.
• 1:23:51
  Yep. They
• 1:23:54
  were... And and and, of course, you know, the the Israelis were really concerned about the Palestinian people's freedom
• 1:24:01
  and liberties and rights, and so they shared with them free porn. There you go.
• 1:24:07
  Okay.
• 1:24:08
  So why why did they do that? It's because these people were isolated inside their homes. They couldn't go outside because they would be shot and killed with snipers.
• 1:24:18
  And the only thing that was on the TV was pornography.
• 1:24:23
  Alright. So this tells you right there that that this is a weapon. Yep. And and most most of most of the culture that people are engaged in, whether it be consumerism
• 1:24:35
  or professional sports or
• 1:24:38
  whatever their predilection is,
• 1:24:42
  is been weaponized.
• 1:24:44
  And and this goes back to what you were saying
• 1:24:47
  is
• 1:24:49
  it it it takes you takes you off the table,
• 1:24:53
  which I'll circle this background, which makes it so important that when we're trying to communicate this to the people whose ox has been gored or is... They encounter the suffering and they lift their head up
• 1:25:05
  to see what just poked them,
• 1:25:07
  you know, we have a coherent message for them
• 1:25:11
  that they can grab ahold of.
• 1:25:14
  I just had this happen to me again today at the
• 1:25:19
  gun store,
• 1:25:20
  And the lady that owns it goes,
• 1:25:23
  you know, you always talk over my head.
• 1:25:26
  And she says, it used to bother me, but she says, now I'm listening.
• 1:25:30
  Unknown: Good.
• 1:25:33
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 1:25:34
  And and
• 1:25:36
  she...
• 1:25:37
  And I've been I've been... But I've been at I've been at her for five years now. Yeah. A long time. And...
• 1:25:43
  Yeah.
• 1:25:44
  And she's finally... And I always did it I always did it from this... What what... Whatever came across was that I was trying to help.
• 1:25:53
  Okay? I wasn't trying to force something on her. I was just trying to explain it. And she goes, I don't understand it, but I'm listening.
• 1:26:01
  Alright?
• 1:26:03
  It's a compliment. I mean Daryl
• 1:26:06
  Unknown: Yeah. Daryl, on this point, let me let me... Do
• 1:26:08
  you... The deeper you get into this,
• 1:26:12
  does the respect
• 1:26:14
  for them grow in the standpoint of what they've been able to pull off here to that extent right there?
• 1:26:22
  Unknown: Oh, yeah. Well, absolutely. I I I
• 1:26:26
  completely and fully appreciate their
• 1:26:28
  their deep,
• 1:26:30
  deep understanding
• 1:26:32
  of
• 1:26:33
  psychology
• 1:26:35
  is what I really
• 1:26:38
  grown to
• 1:26:40
  respect. And now they're they're masterful
• 1:26:42
  congenital liars,
• 1:26:45
  but the way that they can manipulate
• 1:26:48
  people
• 1:26:50
  with a false dialectic
• 1:26:51
  is just
• 1:26:55
  it's it's
• 1:26:58
  Unknown: just staggering. You you marvel. Don't you don't you kinda marvel at it? I mean, I sit back and marvel at it. I'm not kidding you. And I've been fighting this battle for so long to try and turn people's minds.
• 1:27:09
  And I totally understand,
• 1:27:11
  man. And the deeper I get into it, the more I respect them in that
• 1:27:16
  in that one area. I don't respect them as as humans if they are, and I don't respect them as individuals or religionists
• 1:27:23
  or anything else, but I respect their their deafness
• 1:27:27
  and their craftiness,
• 1:27:29
  and the the height of my respect is that I'm always on guard.
• 1:27:34
  Always.
• 1:27:37
  Unknown: Oh, yeah. Absolutely.
• 1:27:38
  Well,
• 1:27:40
  it it...
• 1:27:41
  Listen. You you... If you don't,
• 1:27:44
  if you're not, if you don't respect them, if you don't understand them,
• 1:27:48
  if you're not critical and skeptical,
• 1:27:52
  you do so at your own detriment.
• 1:27:55
  And
• 1:27:56
  you really...
• 1:27:59
  It takes time
• 1:28:00
  to
• 1:28:01
  find people
• 1:28:03
  who you can actually trust because many organizations
• 1:28:07
  and
• 1:28:09
  are intentionally infiltrated,
• 1:28:11
  and then other people in your community
• 1:28:14
  have just naturally succumbed to the psychological operation that's been performed on them. I'll give you an give you an example here of how words
• 1:28:24
  and phrases have been turned in people's minds.
• 1:28:28
  So
• 1:28:31
  as concerns them,
• 1:28:33
  here's an example.
• 1:28:35
  In the old days,
• 1:28:39
  anyone who didn't like...
• 1:28:42
  I'll say, in the old days, people
• 1:28:45
  who didn't like Jews
• 1:28:47
  were called anti Semitic. Okay. Can we... We we can agree on that. Okay.
• 1:28:52
  But now
• 1:28:54
  anyone who the Jews don't like is anti Semitic.
• 1:28:58
  Unknown: Well, that's the that's the famous
• 1:29:01
  who Joseph Sobran stated. Yeah. Okay?
• 1:29:04
  Which always stuck with anti
• 1:29:07
  Semitism
• 1:29:08
  is not someone who hates Jews.
• 1:29:11
  An anti Semite is someone who Jews hate.
• 1:29:14
  And
• 1:29:19
  Unknown: this is why it's so important
• 1:29:21
  to be able...
• 1:29:24
  See,
• 1:29:26
  so, like, in general, this information
• 1:29:28
  disinformation that's discussed here,
• 1:29:31
  the first thing that has to happen is that
• 1:29:35
  people don't even realize the situation
• 1:29:38
  and the system that they're in. Okay? So then you have to explain the system to them,
• 1:29:43
  And then you have to explain the opposite of that system.
• 1:29:48
  And
• 1:29:49
  so it's it's a two part process. Unless you know both sides of the conversation, you don't know anything.
• 1:29:56
  And this is this is one of the fundamental problems of people that run around ranting about constitutionalism
• 1:30:02
  is,
• 1:30:03
  well, they don't even understand it from the from the get go,
• 1:30:07
  so they definitely don't understand the flip side of it.
• 1:30:10
  And
• 1:30:12
  so
• 1:30:13
  it's it's just a process
• 1:30:15
  and
• 1:30:16
  I I think the subject matter you're recovering today is
• 1:30:20
  incredibly important
• 1:30:22
  and
• 1:30:24
  and powerful.
• 1:30:28
  So...
• 1:30:29
  Unknown: Well, I'm just sending
• 1:30:31
  the affidavit here. I got an email from one of our guys to see here. Brian's calling in.
• 1:30:36
  Brian,
• 1:30:38
  we'll check with mister Brian. We hadn't heard from him in a while. How you doing, Brian? What you got that bring to the table today?
• 1:30:47
  Unknown: Hey, Roger. How you doing? Good.
• 1:30:51
  Afternoon or good morning wherever you are. And hello, Daryl. I was just gonna call in real quick and add to...
• 1:30:58
  Can you hear me? Yep.
• 1:31:00
  Yeah. Hello? Yep. We got you. Okay. I was gonna add to just
• 1:31:05
  real quick conversation on the word antisemite.
• 1:31:09
  I think that's...
• 1:31:10
  It has a, like, a multilayered
• 1:31:14
  Unknown: Oh, it does.
• 1:31:15
  Unknown: Construct
• 1:31:17
  of the word, just like how the government used the word conspiracy to
• 1:31:23
  black label or almost reverse mind trick
• 1:31:27
  your mind. So think of the word antisemite
• 1:31:30
  and how it's been used. Daryl hit right on the head as well as you do, Roger. But the ones that are calling that and have weaponized that word now
• 1:31:39
  are actually...
• 1:31:41
  And every... Hear this conversation
• 1:31:43
  immediately needs to turn to, well, who's using the word antisemite?
• 1:31:47
  Because the ones that are saying that they're of Semitic blood are not.
• 1:31:52
  They're Edomites,
• 1:31:54
  mixture of Ashkenazi,
• 1:31:56
  Japheth... Japhethites, and the Edomites.
• 1:31:59
  But
• 1:32:00
  they're using a word in almost like a reverse psychology to
• 1:32:05
  confuse
• 1:32:06
  and redirect,
• 1:32:09
  almost weaponizing the word. But, really, the the the ultimate initiative is to hide their identity.
• 1:32:16
  It's to use and to project themselves as if they are the descendants of Shem,
• 1:32:22
  and therefore, the royal bloodline of
• 1:32:25
  Yitshaq and Ya'akob or Jacob as we know him in English. But Ya'akob, Jacob, that was renamed Yasher'al,
• 1:32:32
  not Isis, Ra, and El. Israel is their trifecta, the the trinity.
• 1:32:38
  The three deities, Isis, Ra, and El.
• 1:32:42
  But the word antisemite,
• 1:32:43
  I just wanted to add, then I gotta hop here, but it's it's a it's a weapon to divert,
• 1:32:50
  to create,
• 1:32:51
  to add to the lie of the Holocaust,
• 1:32:56
  and more importantly, to hide their true identity
• 1:32:59
  because they're not even of Semitic blood.
• 1:33:02
  Unknown: Look at their skin color. And to make people with a general accepted phrase that people see as derogatory
• 1:33:09
  to make any opposition shrink shrink into the corner.
• 1:33:13
  Correct.
• 1:33:14
  Heard a very interesting definition of anti Semite, and I don't remember if it was Don Livingston from the Abbeville Institute or Di Lorenzo,
• 1:33:23
  because I listened to tapes on both those guys in the last couple of days, but they said a Semite
• 1:33:29
  is someone who speaks a
• 1:33:31
  Semite language.
• 1:33:35
  Thought that's a very broad definition,
• 1:33:37
  but it
• 1:33:38
  pricked me, you know, enough to where I remembered it and mentioned it today.
• 1:33:43
  And
• 1:33:44
  of course, all things fraud, there are whole things based on fraud. You don't have to go much further than Revelation two:nine and three:nine back there in the basic instructions
• 1:33:53
  before leaving Earth, okay? It tells you right there, if you've got one of those books that's a red letter book, which means the quotations are attributed to Jesus, those quotations two nine and three nine are in red.
• 1:34:06
  Those are attributed straight from Jesus' mouth.
• 1:34:12
  Unknown: You said something there, Roger. The, you know, the the Mashiach Yahusha,
• 1:34:18
  when language is... Remember when when Noah got off the boat with Shemham and Japheth, the three boys that were then told to go repopulate,
• 1:34:27
  there's where the word Shemite Semite comes from, descendants of Shem.
• 1:34:33
  Japheth went north into the Caucasus Mountains,
• 1:34:36
  was a white... A much lighter skinned.
• 1:34:38
  Shem
• 1:34:39
  basically went to the land of Canaan, and Ham went to Kmet,
• 1:34:44
  which is Africa. The real name of Africa is Kmet, the Black Land.
• 1:34:50
  So when you hear the word Shemite or Shem, there is no Shemitic language. There never was any Shemitic language. All those three boys and their mom and dad, Noah,
• 1:35:02
  spoke
• 1:35:03
  Kodesh Hebrew,
• 1:35:05
  meaning set apart,
• 1:35:06
  a beautiful tongue. That's why Noah was the only one led on the boat. That's why he was set apart and worked on a boat for, what, five years or however long it was.
• 1:35:16
  And, when they got on, they all spoke a a beautiful tongue, a Kodesh,
• 1:35:21
  a Kodesh
• 1:35:23
  paleo Hebrew tongue.
• 1:35:25
  And then it was, you know, obviously, at Babylon when all the tongues were changed and confused,
• 1:35:30
  that's where the first deviation in language came from because when they got off that boat, it was only one language.
• 1:35:37
  So just... That's my point. I just wanted to add to the word Shemite because it's Okay. It's like a... It's just a hidden little lie right there where they they hide behind it. God. Blame that if they're There's all kinds of lies. But, you know, the most basic way that I've ever that I've come to understand this
• 1:35:53
  Unknown: audience and Brian
• 1:35:55
  is
• 1:35:56
  when Esau Edom was born first.
• 1:36:00
  The firstborn
• 1:36:02
  got the blessings.
• 1:36:04
  When Esau Edom came out, they tied a red string around his leg so they could identify who was the firstborn.
• 1:36:14
  Esau literally means red, that he came out with a red
• 1:36:18
  complexion and that's why the communists use red as their color, I'm sure,
• 1:36:24
  okay,
• 1:36:25
  and what they've basically done with all this confusing stuff that we cover on here is they've stolen back their birthright.
• 1:36:36
  They gave it away the first time,
• 1:36:39
  he traded it for a bowl of
• 1:36:41
  oats
• 1:36:42
  sakes. Porridge.
• 1:36:45
  And now they've stolen it back. But look what they had to do to steal it.
• 1:36:50
  Unknown: Well, Roger,
• 1:36:52
  let me add that real quick that you just had a good point on the history of the porridge and some of the other stuff that they've been...
• 1:37:00
  That they've watered down with changing all this... The original
• 1:37:03
  scriptures in all these variations.
• 1:37:06
  Right?
• 1:37:08
  When Esau, remember Esau slew who?
• 1:37:12
  Nimrod.
• 1:37:13
  He killed Nimrod. He chopped him up while Nimrod was out hunting, and he laid in wait and sprung a quick one on him and hacked him up.
• 1:37:20
  Esau
• 1:37:21
  was being pursued by Nimrod's guards. They were right on his tail, and they pursued him for almost probably two days from what it sounds like. And he didn't run-in and
• 1:37:32
  give up his birthright because of a of a lousy pot of stew. There's way more to the story. He was a dead man. He knew he was a dead man. He was running for his life, and he was, dead ass tired and wanted some food from his brother.
• 1:37:47
  There's way more to the story than,
• 1:37:50
  I mean, put it this way. Who in their right mind is gonna give up their,
• 1:37:54
  their family heritage,
• 1:37:56
  their their, their lot, their first in line, their wealth, their whatever, the blessing for a pot of porridge? I mean, it sounds it's just one of those... Another story that has been literally whitewashed into creating this
• 1:38:09
  kind of a generalized
• 1:38:10
  homo,
• 1:38:12
  watered down version of the scriptures is all I'm saying. But I'm gonna hop off and listen in. Love you guys. Keep up working. I'll be there. Thanks, Brian. Good to hear from you, man. And I always thank Brian. I think of the
• 1:38:24
  Unknown: people that have come to this message over all these years, and I'm going to point you two guys out specifically,
• 1:38:31
  Daryl and Brian,
• 1:38:33
  have probably attacked this more viciously than anybody else that comes to mind immediately. I'm sure there's others
• 1:38:40
  that need that compliment too, but especially you two guys, and see that's my goal here is to get this message spread and to find some other people that are serious
• 1:38:51
  and as dedicated and as taken by this information as I've been,
• 1:38:56
  and both of you guys have done that, okay, and I attribute
• 1:39:00
  a great deal to Brian for taking the initiative and taking and getting down there at that hospital
• 1:39:06
  and proving everything that we've been using as a thesis for all these years by finding out that you're assigned a birth certificate at birth and your parents do not sign the verification fact sheet,
• 1:39:19
  and that tells you who's your daddy right there.
• 1:39:22
  That proves everything we're saying here, it's all fraud, that's the reason they're not going to come after you, you people that are skeptical.
• 1:39:30
  Well, we're fraudulent and we're going to come and beat your butt because you caught us.
• 1:39:39
  They didn't kill Gandhi, did they? Did they go after Gandhi? He
• 1:39:44
  beat their asses with nonviolence.
• 1:39:48
  He made them leave the country. Yeah.
• 1:39:54
  Unknown: And and and who was that he made leave the country?
• 1:39:58
  Unknown: The East India Trading Company and their surrogates, the British.
• 1:40:03
  There you have it. Because they used the British as the muscle back then. They can't rely on them too much. They're having to rely on us heavily. Do you know there's an article on Zero Hedge? I'll bet you saw it today. I sent it to Paul right after I got up and saw it. The Somalians that live in England
• 1:40:22
  are sending their children back to Somaliland
• 1:40:26
  because it's safer for them to be in Africa than in London.
• 1:40:31
  51 stabbings so far this year in London.
• 1:40:37
  Yeah. So outlaw your guns,
• 1:40:39
  outlaw your guns, you creeps.
• 1:40:41
  Well, they just switched to knives. What are they gonna outlaw next? Cars?
• 1:40:47
  Unknown: Hammers?
• 1:40:50
  Yeah.
• 1:40:52
  Dictionaries?
• 1:40:53
  Unknown: Well, evidently, they're trying to outlaw phones because Paul can't get one.
• 1:41:00
  Unknown: Yeah. Well, he's
• 1:41:02
  he's a he's a he's a person of interest.
• 1:41:06
  So
• 1:41:09
  Unknown: Thank you, Paul. Let's Paul.
• 1:41:11
  Paul, file your common law birth certificate, Paul, and get out of this stuff.
• 1:41:18
  Unknown: I I appreciate what Brian brought to the table as I always do.
• 1:41:23
  I always had to be careful when we call each other and talk because it's... We're we're both gonna be late for supper.
• 1:41:29
  So
• 1:41:32
  taking a different tact on this
• 1:41:35
  this Jewish deception
• 1:41:39
  that
• 1:41:40
  the term Jew...
• 1:41:44
  A lot of people have the... A conflated understanding.
• 1:41:47
  This this word provokes response in people's mind like you were saying, like Brian says.
• 1:41:53
  So I have... I I like to always pose questions. So
• 1:41:57
  are Jews white?
• 1:42:01
  So
• 1:42:03
  so in order to be a Jew, do you have to be white?
• 1:42:07
  No. Of course, that is a... That... No. No.
• 1:42:13
  But when you when you talk to your normal... When you talk to your typical Southern Baptist, they they see an image in their mind when you use that word,
• 1:42:22
  who's a Jew, and they they typically see some
• 1:42:27
  image in their mind of of a white guy with either a yarmulke or Netanyahu
• 1:42:33
  or or somebody
• 1:42:35
  that that looks white.
• 1:42:38
  Alright?
• 1:42:40
  So that's that's one of the first tricks. So I I ask him, so do all Jews have to be white or all Jews white?
• 1:42:48
  And and, of course,
• 1:42:50
  you can go many different directions with that, but
• 1:42:53
  it it opens the argument... It opens the discussion without
• 1:42:58
  calling them names. A family. Right. You don't wanna come at this from... You know? Yeah. You don't wanna come at this from an angry... Yeah. From an angry point of view.
• 1:43:09
  So
• 1:43:11
  the the lesson here is that that the Jew
• 1:43:16
  is a theological
• 1:43:17
  construct.
• 1:43:18
  K? The term Jew is a theological
• 1:43:22
  construct.
• 1:43:24
  It is not a race.
• 1:43:28
  It's not a race of people.
• 1:43:30
  Unknown: And they don't want... And they don't wanna be called a race
• 1:43:35
  because if you go No. And try and call them a religion,
• 1:43:39
  that's a big question in the Jewish... Is it a is it a religion or is it a race?
• 1:43:44
  Okay.
• 1:43:48
  Unknown: Well,
• 1:43:49
  according to different Jewish rabbis,
• 1:43:52
  particularly the secular leaders, is anybody can be a Jew.
• 1:43:58
  And and so that supports that as a theological
• 1:44:02
  construct,
• 1:44:03
  a philosophy,
• 1:44:05
  and it's not a race.
• 1:44:06
  But what do they do?
• 1:44:08
  Okay. They separate themselves
• 1:44:12
  in that... In the term anti Semite is used in that
• 1:44:16
  they
• 1:44:19
  use that as the race card. So if if you're
• 1:44:24
  in disagreement with the behavior
• 1:44:27
  of somebody who identifies himself as a Jew,
• 1:44:31
  which is not a race but a theology,
• 1:44:34
  then they call you an anti Semite, which is associated
• 1:44:37
  with
• 1:44:37
  a race.
• 1:44:39
  Okay? Which
• 1:44:40
  it it... Semite is not a race either. It's just people speak Semitic languages.
• 1:44:47
  So
• 1:44:49
  there's two layers right there.
• 1:44:51
  Unknown: Well... Alright.
• 1:44:52
  Unknown: So...
• 1:44:53
  Yeah. Confront
• 1:44:55
  these God's chosen people, Christian Zionists,
• 1:44:59
  and this just came to me one day about a year or so ago,
• 1:45:02
  and you say they're God's chosen people, they're the people of the book.
• 1:45:07
  Okay? The other side does
• 1:45:09
  and so, if you go, what is it? Deuteronomy?
• 1:45:12
  Is it one of those early Patrick's joined us? He'll probably know.
• 1:45:16
  What book of the Bible is it in there where they go through a couple of pages of so and so begat so and so, begat and so, begat so and so. What book? What book is that, Patrick? Numbers.
• 1:45:28
  Okay. So, that's in numbers, alright? Is there in that entire list? Is there one female name?
• 1:45:36
  I don't believe so. Okay. So, the only way that. They saw Elijah Jew today. That's who they are. They come out of Cain. Okay. So, if you're gonna go and apply.
• 1:45:46
  Unknown: Didn't have a a lineage in the Bible. He don't have a he don't have a, you know, he's Lucifer's children. Okay. So, today You talk about nations, Gentiles,
• 1:45:55
  Gentiles means
• 1:45:57
  nations or race of people. Yeah. I mean, it can it can refer to Israel at times which is us.
• 1:46:02
  Or it could refer to
• 1:46:05
  other
• 1:46:06
  people across the world in context where it's used. So when they rewrote the the scripture in in the Nazarene text after Yeshua died, it was was murdered, then
• 1:46:17
  they
• 1:46:18
  they rewrote the Bible and the 66 books. And there's just... There's over 32,000
• 1:46:22
  mistakes in there.
• 1:46:23
  And that's why we're in such confusion about understanding. If you get the 14 books of the aquifer, it'll explain a lot to you. They're holding back 95%
• 1:46:31
  of the Dead Sea Scrolls.
• 1:46:34
  Unknown: So, there there'll be a PHD when you shoot when you when we're resurrected if you make the 18. Well, let me go back to my point I'm trying to make here. We got a long list of who begat who and this lineage in the Bible and everybody in there is a male and yet the only way you're a Jew is if your mother was a Jew. How are they the people of the book?
• 1:46:58
  Unknown: Excellent point.
• 1:46:59
  Unknown: Excellent point. I've I've been working geology Babel. You know, ancestors all weekend. Babel. I'm following my bloodline. Yeah.
• 1:47:06
  Unknown: What are you gonna say, Daryl? I got Babylon
• 1:47:09
  Unknown: Babylon was Babylon
• 1:47:11
  was
• 1:47:12
  goddess worship.
• 1:47:14
  Okay. The the
• 1:47:15
  the female.
• 1:47:17
  Alright? So there... That's consistent with where their their courts, Almudic values come from just through the through the divine feminine.
• 1:47:27
  Alright?
• 1:47:30
  Which is actually
• 1:47:32
  a bull,
• 1:47:34
  which is actually
• 1:47:36
  when you
• 1:47:38
  when you look at the...
• 1:47:39
  Some of the different symbology,
• 1:47:42
  it's androgynous.
• 1:47:43
  It's male and female combined together.
• 1:47:46
  And so this is this is the form of worship that they
• 1:47:50
  apply to.
• 1:47:51
  It's through it's through goddess worship.
• 1:47:55
  And, of course, that that completely
• 1:47:57
  identifies him as not being chosen
• 1:48:00
  by
• 1:48:03
  god almighty.
• 1:48:06
  So the the thing I... The point I wanted to drive home with this conversation about Jews and a theological construct is... Here's here's the punchline. I wanna get to the punchline here.
• 1:48:18
  They are a religion
• 1:48:20
  masquerading
• 1:48:21
  masquerading
• 1:48:22
  as an ethnicity.
• 1:48:23
  Yes.
• 1:48:24
  K?
• 1:48:25
  And when you
• 1:48:27
  when you understand
• 1:48:28
  that,
• 1:48:29
  okay, if it if it takes you all day to think about it, think about that. They are a religion that masquerades
• 1:48:37
  as an ethnicity
• 1:48:39
  while they deprive you of your ethnicity.
• 1:48:44
  And you can't find anywhere
• 1:48:46
  in the Bible or any of the Bibles where it talks about
• 1:48:50
  white or black.
• 1:48:52
  Okay? It does talk about ethnos,
• 1:48:55
  which is ethnicity.
• 1:48:57
  So for all practical terms,
• 1:48:59
  they've converted you from being the ethnicity
• 1:49:03
  that you are,
• 1:49:04
  whether you were Italian,
• 1:49:06
  whether you were German, whether you were English,
• 1:49:10
  whether you were... Whatever you were, whatever your ethnicity was,
• 1:49:14
  and all of a sudden,
• 1:49:16
  it doesn't it doesn't depend wherever you come from,
• 1:49:20
  and you put them in a melting pot in America,
• 1:49:23
  and guess what they are? They've lost all their ethnicity,
• 1:49:26
  You know?
• 1:49:28
  They're white.
• 1:49:31
  And so that's that's why...
• 1:49:33
  And they deprive you of your ethnicity,
• 1:49:36
  but yet they
• 1:49:37
  they retain
• 1:49:39
  theirs
• 1:49:40
  under the disguise of a religion. And do it ferociously.
• 1:49:45
  Unknown: Is this... Ferociously
• 1:49:46
  Unknown: defending. This is a big deal.
• 1:49:49
  This is a big deal.
• 1:49:51
  And
• 1:49:53
  I... I've gone down this line of reasoning and thinking
• 1:49:56
  and and and studying
• 1:49:59
  other people.
• 1:50:00
  And
• 1:50:01
  so you've been turned... All of you have been turned into white people
• 1:50:06
  and... Instead of your your ethnicity. So in all all actuality,
• 1:50:11
  I'm mixed race.
• 1:50:12
  Okay? Mixed ethnicity.
• 1:50:14
  I'm English
• 1:50:16
  and Irish
• 1:50:17
  and Lebanese and
• 1:50:19
  something else. Okay?
• 1:50:21
  But they call me white. Well, I'm I'm I'm not. I'm I'm these other things.
• 1:50:27
  And
• 1:50:28
  and and so they reclassify
• 1:50:30
  you into these other groups, and then they use statutes and regulations and laws
• 1:50:36
  based upon the racism they created
• 1:50:39
  to further divide you. Yep.
• 1:50:41
  And
• 1:50:43
  Unknown: so I picked up something really interesting, Darryl, off of one... Either Di Lorenzo or doctor Livingston. I don't remember which.
• 1:50:51
  And it was about Babylon and when it was invaded by Nebuchadnezzar,
• 1:50:55
  and I've never heard this before,
• 1:50:57
  and it explains a lot to me, okay? When Nebuchadnezzar
• 1:51:01
  came in and conquered the Jews in Judea,
• 1:51:04
  he only took back the high ranking people.
• 1:51:08
  He only took back to Babylon
• 1:51:11
  the administrators
• 1:51:12
  and the elite and the people that governed and pretty much left all the rest of tribes of Judah and Benjamin there and that would explain why when the Edomites and the Canaanites and the Malachites and the all the others invaded Jerusalem
• 1:51:27
  after that, how that interbreeding
• 1:51:30
  took place to get to where we've got to today.
• 1:51:38
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 1:51:40
  Well, that made
• 1:51:42
  perfect sense
• 1:51:44
  Unknown: for him to do that. Sure does and the reason they said that is they said they did that with every other country they conquered,
• 1:51:51
  the Babylonians.
• 1:51:55
  Unknown: An observation
• 1:51:57
  Yes, Chris. In the Las Vegas area
• 1:52:00
  is that
• 1:52:02
  Zionism is a political cult.
• 1:52:06
  It's actually a terrorism cult of criminals.
• 1:52:09
  Whereas Judaism
• 1:52:11
  may be an offshoot, and
• 1:52:13
  it may be a pseudo religion,
• 1:52:16
  and they may believe it's a religion. But
• 1:52:19
  when you start studying what they believe and practice,
• 1:52:22
  it is not like any other religion that the rest of us probably know. Nope. That's because it's nothing but modern day Sabbateanism.
• 1:52:32
  Unknown: That's exactly what it is. Yeah.
• 1:52:36
  Unknown: Sabbatean Frankist,
• 1:52:39
  Zebai Sabbatia
• 1:52:41
  Jacob Frank,
• 1:52:42
  and never forget that the name Jacob
• 1:52:45
  means chiseler.
• 1:52:48
  So
• 1:52:49
  Unknown: Well, you know what astounded me in that... In the Robert Seffer
• 1:52:53
  exposition, those short videos, it's on YouTube,
• 1:52:56
  and he's talking to and interviewing
• 1:52:59
  Jewish rabbi. It may have been Barry Chamish.
• 1:53:02
  Okay? And he said, point blank,
• 1:53:05
  Jacob Frank was the most evil Jew that's ever lived.
• 1:53:09
  I thought that was a hell of a statement, man.
• 1:53:13
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 1:53:14
  I'm trying to trying to remember the name of the rabbi. I I I don't write offhand, but he was he was
• 1:53:22
  back in that eighteen hundreds, and he made the comment that the the purpose for the Talmud was the instruction on how to cheat other people.
• 1:53:32
  Yeah. The the Talmud...
• 1:53:34
  The the the sole purpose for the Talmud
• 1:53:37
  is so that this sect of people
• 1:53:42
  is an instruction manual for how to cheat other people. Yep. And
• 1:53:47
  I I actually have a Talmud here.
• 1:53:50
  It's
• 1:53:51
  Unknown: thick. God, I hope you... There's a lot to it. I hope your house didn't get struck by lightning.
• 1:53:58
  Unknown: Yeah. Well,
• 1:54:00
  I...
• 1:54:01
  Part of part
• 1:54:03
  of this other bloodline that's supposed to be in me is this other this other bloodline, you know, this one we're talking about here. Of course, I don't I don't really associate it with the bloodline,
• 1:54:13
  actually.
• 1:54:14
  I I see it as a as a spirit
• 1:54:17
  of
• 1:54:18
  people who adopt, who who... What's in their heart, it's in their nature. Yeah.
• 1:54:23
  And
• 1:54:25
  so...
• 1:54:27
  But, you know, you have to ask yourself, why why are racists
• 1:54:31
  concerned about equal rights?
• 1:54:34
  That's a good question. And,
• 1:54:38
  you know,
• 1:54:39
  why Liberty. Why would a racist be consoled...
• 1:54:42
  Unknown: Oh, yeah.
• 1:54:43
  Equality Hey. And here's Liberty equality fraternity
• 1:54:47
  is why.
• 1:54:48
  Unknown: Well,
• 1:54:50
  Unknown: here's a reject something. Here's a Hold on. Patrick wants Here's a good reason. Go ahead. Go ahead. I'll get to Patrick. Patrick, what do you what do you gotta add? Go
• 1:54:59
  Unknown: go, Patrick. They're
• 1:55:01
  Unknown: they're chameleons for one. Yep. And, you know, they're crypto Jews. There's all kind of Jews, but in their country, they will not allow anybody into their country.
• 1:55:11
  Yet, they want our countries to take all the floods of all the, sub races. Hey. Not only that. Over in their country, they're trying to they're trying to herd up all the Hebrew, black,
• 1:55:22
  is... You know, the the black Hebrews so called over there. They're trying to get them out of there now. Yeah. But they don't want any of that coming in their country. They want to flood us with it. And and what they're having to do with those Ethiopian
• 1:55:33
  Unknown: Jews that are black is first of all, bribe them and say, we'll give you thousands dollars to leave and those that don't leave after that are gonna be dealt with more directly.
• 1:55:46
  Unknown: Yep. Yep. You're right. Most of their children.
• 1:55:51
  Unknown: Well, I don't. It's written out what's going happen in that time. The Bible tells you it's going to happen. Yep and that's why it also instructs us to come out of her and that's why I try and reach out and touch these people that are amenable to this message that have god's laws, our god's laws written on their heart and say, there's a way to get out of this, man.
• 1:56:09
  It's right there and they recognize it and they ain't going to come beach over the head because they don't want the public ity and they don't even wanna dare bringing you into a court of law and having you with access to that affidavit where you can get it into that courtroom.
• 1:56:27
  Unknown: Hey, small look back,
• 1:56:29
  not coincidental that the Frankus,
• 1:56:33
  their symbol or their mascot
• 1:56:36
  is the wolf in sheep's clothing. Yep. You got it, buddy.
• 1:56:40
  Unknown: There's our whistler.
• 1:56:42
  Listen, I... We'll get... We'll just continue this conversation tomorrow in case anything pops up. Daryl's working on something. He's going to present to us when he's got his end ready and we'll tell you more about that down the line. I don't think it's going to be tomorrow but it'll probably be soon and I want to appreciate everybody that listened in and participated
• 1:57:16
  sees like tomorrow. You guys have a great day, and thanks for spending the time with us.
• 1:57:22
  Good discussion. Well, I'm gonna ruminate on that. Go ruminate on it. I'll see you tomorrow.
• 1:57:27
  Unknown: Thank
• 1:57:28
  Unknown: you. Ciao, amigos.
• 1:57:31
  Ciao, me.
• 1:57:33
  Unknown: Hasta la baby.
• 1:57:35
  Unknown: Hasta la Vega, baby. Hasta la Vega. Ciao. Ciao.
• 1:58:31
  Unknown: Bye, boys. Have fun storming the castle.