Latest / Yaron Brook Show / DC Shooting & Immigration; Luddites; Zionism; Abolition; Facts, Poverty & Lies | Yaron Brook Show

Transcript

DC Shooting & Immigration; Luddites; Zionism; Abolition; Facts, Poverty & Lies | Yaron Brook Show · Yaron Brook Show

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: A lot of the fund, the missles, I'll lead the
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: last seas and any individual loss. This is the show.
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: Oh right, everybody walk up here on book show on
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: this Friday, November twenty eighth today, have to think so,
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: I mean Black Friday. I expect attendants live today on
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: the show to be down as I'm sure everybody's out
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: at the mall searching for deals or maybe maybe elbowing
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: people left and right at best Buy trying to get
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: that ninety five inch television. There's now one hundred and
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: twenty six inch television oled my dream TV. Yeah, all right,
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: it's on time today. Yes, is that surprising? Jennifer says
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: she's done with Christmas? How can he be done with Christmas?
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: A month before Christmas? We don't even have the tree
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: up yet. I don't know. We're late this year. All right,
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: black fight it is. So let's see what I want
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: to say. There will be a show tomorrow, and there
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: will be a show Sunday. Tomorrow is an ama, ask
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: me anything, so you should receive you should have received
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: the info on that, you should have received the info
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: from that, and okay, so tomorrow's ask me anything. Then
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: Sunday I'm not exactly sure what the topic will be,
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: but on one of these new maybe unmeaning or on capitalism.
• 1:47
  Speaker 1: We'll do some capitalism today and or maybe on the
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: West and religion and civilization and stuff like that, stuff
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: out of my out of the new book. All right,
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: So there will be shows and then next week should
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: be the whole week will have shows. So know wich
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: Draff syndrome for you guys, for the next couple of months.
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: You should be good. We should be we should be
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: you know, full on on on shows over the next
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: over the next few weeks. All so, let's let's jump
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: over to the news. On Wednesday, day before Thanksgiving, as
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: you probably heard, two members of the West Virginia National
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: Guard who were in patrolling I guess in in Washington,
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: d C. They were they were shot. They were shot
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: ambush style. One of them army specialists, Sarah Beckstrom, who
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: twenty years old, has died from the gunshots. The second
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: victim has gone undergone surgery and is in critical condition,
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: and you know, we will see, hopefully, hopefully, hopefully he'sdis
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: The suspect who for you know, for everything from everything
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: we know, acted alone, has been identified as Rahamula La
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: Kanwal who is an Afghan national. We'll get to We'll
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: get to him in a in a minute. And he
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: entered the United States in twenty twenty one under the
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: agreement that Trump signed or the Trump indorsed of uh
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: and Biden. Trump and Biden of joining American troops and
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: providing basically asylum to the Afghans who worked with America
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: in in Afghanistan. Now this guy, it turns out, didn't
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: just work with America. This guy was part of a
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: special unit in Afghanistan working closely with the CIA. So
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: it appears that the suspect was assigned to what was
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: called the Conda House Strike Force or the Zero three Unit,
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: one of a number of so called zero units that
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: were closely with the US and other foreign forces during
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: the one Afghanistan. You know, so he was, you know,
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: the zero unit was an Afghan intelligence unit, a power
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: military force, maybe a force that executed Taliban, work closely
• 4:34
  Speaker 1: with the CIA. Not a lot of not a lot
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: of talk about what this unit did, because some people
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: have labeled these units, these zero units death squads. Right.
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: They were known in Afghanistan for their secrecy and alleged brutality.
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: Members were implicated in numerous extra judicial killings of civilians,
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: particularly during night raids, again all in the auspices of
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: the CIA. So yeah, I mean this uh this uh,
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: I supposedly US officials who were you know, disturbed by
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: the casualties the dis unit inflicted and uh, you know
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: how to tell and and you know, some indication is
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: that this particular person, the killer here, was traumatized by
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: casualties in his unit and troubled by the killing of
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: a close friend overseas, maybe in in in Afghanistan. It's
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: how to tell. I mean, information is still coming out slowly,
• 5:43
  Speaker 1: but again, uh, this is a guy who worked for
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: the CIA.
• 5:46
  Speaker 2: Uh.
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: And he worked for them for about eight years, and clearly,
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: according to officials, at least he suffered from PTSD. The
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: suspect and his family fled the Taliban and relocated. They
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: fled the Taliban, they relocated to Kabul, and then they
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: were transferred to the United States under the Operation Allies
• 6:10
  Speaker 1: Welcome in twenty twenty one. He entered the United States
• 6:15
  Speaker 1: under parole program, not through the lengthier special immigration visa process. Again,
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: I think because of his special status as a CIA operative,
• 6:27
  Speaker 1: he was vetted. He was vetted during the war, and
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: supposedly he was you know, screened, screened when he emigrated
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: into the United States, although there's no it's not clear
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: whether they just relied on the vetting that was done
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: when he was added to the CIA, or whether they
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: screened him separately. Anyway, obviously tragic and hubbable, and we
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: still have no idea what the motive is. It seems
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: likely and again I'm going to speculate as other people speculating,
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: but it seems likely that this is a guy who
• 7:15
  Speaker 1: is mentally disturbed, who has suffered PTSD. I don't know
• 7:22
  Speaker 1: who this friend of his who died recently was, but
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: maybe if somebody feels like the United States abandoned in Afghanistan.
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: I just don't know, but that's the possibility, and wanted
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: to vent his anger at the United States. It's also
• 7:37
  Speaker 1: curious that somebody who was a trained killer and was
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: part of an execution squad would shoot two National Guard
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: troops in Washington, d C. In a way that so
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: easily led to his arrest and capture. It is it
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: seems it seems a little that seems a little strange.
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: If he was top of his game, you'd think that
• 8:01
  Speaker 1: it would be at least being hard to catch him,
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: and he would have found ways to kill without being
• 8:06
  Speaker 1: easily identified. But maybe he wanted to be captured. Maybe
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: that's the whole point. But ultimately I think the bottom
• 8:12
  Speaker 1: line is everything indicates here, at least initially, this is
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: very early that this is a you know, mentally deranged PTSD,
• 8:22
  Speaker 1: A person who's who's clearly suffering, lashed out, didn't care
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: about being captured or at least expected to be captured,
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: because he didn't do much in order to prevent himself
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: from being captured, right, And just a bad guy, you know,
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: who's become a bad guy as a consequence, probably of
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: the hell he went through in Afghanistan and is upset
• 8:47
  Speaker 1: for whatever reason with the United States about something. We
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: will find out a lot more about what actually motivated
• 8:53
  Speaker 1: him in the future. But note note the response of
• 8:58
  Speaker 1: the Trump administration, not in particularly the response to Stephen Miller. Right,
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: there is no such thing as individuals in Stephen Miller's mind.
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: There's no such thing as deranged killers. There's no such
• 9:13
  Speaker 1: thing as unhinged individuals. I need. We saw this a
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: little bit with the Conservatives, with the killing of Charlie Cook.
• 9:21
  Speaker 1: It wasn't that he was a you know, horrible human
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: being who for crazy reasons, you know, decided to go
• 9:28
  Speaker 1: kill Charlie Cooke. This was the Left. This was that
• 9:35
  Speaker 1: tribe killing one of our tribe, their tribe killing somebody
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: from our tribe. They do not have the capacity to
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: view people as individuals. Everything that they do is in
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: terms of tribal allegiance, tribal generalizations. So Charlie Cooke was
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: killed by the Left, and now we're being told that
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: these two you know, National guards men were killed by Afghans,
• 10:17
  Speaker 1: or even more broadly, if you really want it, they
• 10:21
  Speaker 1: were killed by immigrants from third world countries. Immigrants to
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: third world countries killed, murdered. The Wall Steat Journal editorial
• 10:36
  Speaker 1: board wrote, Afghan refugees quote shouldn't be blamed for the
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: violent act of one man. Collect The punishment of all
• 10:42
  Speaker 1: Afghans in the United States won't make America safer, and
• 10:45
  Speaker 1: it might embitter more against the United States against the
• 10:50
  Speaker 1: United States. I agree with the wall Steat general completely.
• 10:52
  Speaker 1: This is Stephen Miller's response. This is the great lie
• 10:56
  Speaker 1: of mass immigration. He responded, You're not just inputting individuals,
• 11:01
  Speaker 1: you're inputting societies. No magic transformation occurs when failed states
• 11:06
  Speaker 1: across cross borders at scale, migrants and their descendants recreate
• 11:11
  Speaker 1: the conditions and terrors of their broken homelands. I mean,
• 11:18
  Speaker 1: this is so ahistorical, it's so untrue, it's so collectivistic
• 11:27
  Speaker 1: and tribalistic. Afghans in the United States have not recreated
• 11:32
  Speaker 1: their society. There's no a Taliban running around the streets
• 11:36
  Speaker 1: and forcing women to cover their faces and shooting up
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: goals schools. You know, if Afghans were shooting up gold
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: schools and if there were a number of Afghans, I mean,
• 11:46
  Speaker 1: this was a phenomena of Afghans going out into the
• 11:48
  Speaker 1: streets and killing Americans or shooting up girls or forcing
• 11:52
  Speaker 1: goals to cover their faces, and oh wow, yeah that
• 11:56
  Speaker 1: makes sense. But there's one guy, clearly emotionally and psychologically unstable,
• 12:10
  Speaker 1: killing probably a couple of gosma. I mean, did the
• 12:18
  Speaker 1: Italians who emigrated to the United States. Did they recreate
• 12:23
  Speaker 1: the poor, you know, immensely Catholic and rather primitive and
• 12:31
  Speaker 1: backward society that they left in Italy when they came
• 12:38
  Speaker 1: to the United States, or some of them did the
• 12:41
  Speaker 1: ones who created them mafia? But did Italians more broadly
• 12:44
  Speaker 1: do that. I mean, how civilized were the Irish migrants
• 12:50
  Speaker 1: who came to the United States in the early early
• 12:52
  Speaker 1: twentieth century, the potato farmers escaping the famine late nineteenth century,
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: how civil were they? I mean not according to Americans
• 13:02
  Speaker 1: of the time, who called them every name in the book.
• 13:07
  Speaker 1: And they weren't free in Ireland. And you know what
• 13:12
  Speaker 1: freedom did they have in Italy, particularly pre it's in
• 13:16
  Speaker 1: the Unification. There was no freedom in Italy, not the
• 13:19
  Speaker 1: kind of freedom we have in the United States. Well,
• 13:25
  Speaker 1: you know, the Eastern Europeans, the other people who escaped
• 13:30
  Speaker 1: the Soviet Union, did they being communism here or did
• 13:33
  Speaker 1: we experience communism in the United States because of them?
• 13:38
  Speaker 1: And of course, you know, the reality is that it
• 13:44
  Speaker 1: wasn't the blacks in America who who bought over a
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: barbaric civilization from Africa. It's the whites who enslaved them
• 13:52
  Speaker 1: in America, and you know, in forced barbarism on them.
• 14:01
  Speaker 1: Cs collective guilt, why not, they're all barbarians. Stephen Miller
• 14:07
  Speaker 1: happens to be, I think, from Jewish origins, so he
• 14:10
  Speaker 1: should not be surprised that his tribalism, his collectivism his
• 14:14
  Speaker 1: tribalism collectivism is leading to people who he considers allies
• 14:19
  Speaker 1: becoming Jew haters, becoming antisemitic, and throwing him in with
• 14:23
  Speaker 1: a bunch of Jews that he probably doesn't agree with,
• 14:26
  Speaker 1: like those leftist Jews and maybe pro Israel Jews. I
• 14:29
  Speaker 1: don't know if he's pro Israel, but he's Jewish. He's
• 14:32
  Speaker 1: part of the tribe. And the Jews who came here
• 14:36
  Speaker 1: in the late nineteenth century early twentieth century, how civilized
• 14:39
  Speaker 1: were they? I mean, the reality is that the Jews
• 14:42
  Speaker 1: who left Europe in the late nineteenth century and early
• 14:45
  Speaker 1: twentieth century were the least educated Jews in Europe educated
• 14:49
  Speaker 1: one state and were slaughtered in the Holocaust. There were
• 14:56
  Speaker 1: peasants and living in little villages and crafts people and uh,
• 15:01
  Speaker 1: and and and and they they came from incredibly poor conditions,
• 15:07
  Speaker 1: and they were escaping murderers, you know, escaping in the
• 15:11
  Speaker 1: programs in Eastern Europe. And uh, they escaped for freedom.
• 15:17
  Speaker 1: And did they do well in this country? Yeah? They
• 15:21
  Speaker 1: kind of did. Did they bring that kind of insular, insular,
• 15:27
  Speaker 1: kind of somewhat backward culture to the United States for
• 15:32
  Speaker 1: a little bit, first generation it's hard to break away
• 15:34
  Speaker 1: from that, but they got assimilated. It's just so. And
• 15:40
  Speaker 1: what is mass migration is the number of Afghans who
• 15:42
  Speaker 1: came to the United States because almost all of them,
• 15:46
  Speaker 1: because they were helping the US in Afganistan. They had
• 15:52
  Speaker 1: risked their lives, risk the lives of their families to
• 15:55
  Speaker 1: help the United States because they believed in the cars,
• 15:57
  Speaker 1: They believed in liber Afghanistan from the barbarity of the Taliban.
• 16:02
  Speaker 1: These are the best of the Afghans, those people coming
• 16:08
  Speaker 1: to the United States. Is that count as mass migration
• 16:11
  Speaker 1: because he writes this is the great lie about of
• 16:14
  Speaker 1: mass migration. What mass migration ac could from Afghanistan? I mean,
• 16:20
  Speaker 1: this man, Stephen Miller, is a just a horrific tribal racist.
• 16:29
  Speaker 1: He is the worst of the Trumpet administration, which is
• 16:32
  Speaker 1: saying a lot because they are God are they bad.
• 16:38
  Speaker 1: He is the worst kind of tribalist, collectivist racist that
• 16:45
  Speaker 1: I know in any kind of leadership position in the
• 16:48
  Speaker 1: United States today and just despicable. This guy should be
• 16:52
  Speaker 1: shunned and if he survives the Trump administration, I hope
• 16:57
  Speaker 1: he never has a job afterwards. I mean, really is
• 17:00
  Speaker 1: beneath contempt and he is really you know, nasty and shaping.
• 17:10
  Speaker 1: I mean, Trump is bad to begin with, but then
• 17:14
  Speaker 1: he's allowing he's allowing Stephen Miller to shape you know,
• 17:21
  Speaker 1: much of his agenda, particularly when he comes to immigration,
• 17:25
  Speaker 1: in ugly, horrific ways. Talk about ugly and horrific. This
• 17:32
  Speaker 1: is Donald Trump's Thanksgiving salutation from yesterday, you know, wishing
• 17:39
  Speaker 1: Americans Happy Thanksgiving. This is a holiday of giving thanks Giving.
• 17:45
  Speaker 1: Thanks Donald Trump, a very happy Thanksgiving salutation to all
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: of the great American citizens and patriots who have been
• 17:54
  Speaker 1: so nice in allowing our country to be divided, disrupted,
• 17:58
  Speaker 1: carved up, murdered, beaten, mugged, and laughed at along with
• 18:02
  Speaker 1: certain other foolish countries throughout the world, for being politically
• 18:06
  Speaker 1: correct and just playing stupid when it comes to immigration.
• 18:12
  Speaker 1: You thought you were going to be you know, congratulated
• 18:16
  Speaker 1: for I don't know, for Thanksgiving and the celebration and
• 18:20
  Speaker 1: thank you know, thankful for the wonders of American No, no, no,
• 18:24
  Speaker 1: this is this is all of you Americans, all of
• 18:27
  Speaker 1: you great Americans who have allowed the country to be
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: to be you know, divided, disrupted, coved up, murdered, beaten, mugged,
• 18:34
  Speaker 1: and laughed at, laughed at by who exactly? I mean,
• 18:37
  Speaker 1: more people are laughing at him. When it comes to immigration.
• 18:42
  Speaker 1: How many of those great Americans are non immigrants? I
• 18:46
  Speaker 1: know it's a cliche, but this country is a country
• 18:48
  Speaker 1: of immigrants. How many of how many of these people
• 18:53
  Speaker 1: are not how many of you Donald Trump? I mean
• 18:56
  Speaker 1: Donald Trump is married two immigrants. His current wife's an immigrants.
• 19:02
  Speaker 1: I think his previous wife is and immigrants. The official
• 19:09
  Speaker 1: United States foreign population stands at fifty three million people
• 19:13
  Speaker 1: according to the Census, most of which are unwelfare from
• 19:18
  Speaker 1: failed nations or from prisons, mental institutions, gangs, or drug cartails.
• 19:23
  Speaker 1: I mean, that's just straight out a lie. None of
• 19:27
  Speaker 1: that is true. Now, it is true that almost fifty
• 19:31
  Speaker 1: percent of Americans receive some benefits from the from the
• 19:33
  Speaker 1: American government. So yeah, you'd expect some of the immigrants.
• 19:40
  Speaker 1: And these are fifty three million immigrants. I assume that's
• 19:44
  Speaker 1: foreign born who live in America. How many of them
• 19:48
  Speaker 1: are actually from failed states or from prisons? How many
• 19:52
  Speaker 1: of them are mental institutions, gangs or drug cartels? A tiny, tiny, tiny,
• 19:56
  Speaker 1: tiny little fraction. But that's the story. We'll get the
• 20:00
  Speaker 1: lies later. But this president just says stuff over and
• 20:04
  Speaker 1: over and over again. He said today that ta's are
• 20:07
  Speaker 1: going to replace the income taxes. I've done the math
• 20:10
  Speaker 1: for you to show that that's impossible. But he's just
• 20:12
  Speaker 1: gonna keep saying that. And when the Supme Court overturns
• 20:16
  Speaker 1: his tariffs, if they overturn his steps, but let's assume
• 20:19
  Speaker 1: they do, he's gonna say, you know, if they'd let
• 20:22
  Speaker 1: me keep the tariffs, I would have ended income taxes.
• 20:25
  Speaker 1: And it's on the Supreme Court. If you complain about
• 20:27
  Speaker 1: your income taxes, it's all because of the Supreme Court.
• 20:30
  Speaker 1: I could have I could have ended income tax I
• 20:32
  Speaker 1: could have had tariffs paid for by foreigners, and America
• 20:37
  Speaker 1: would have been great again. And because of the Supreme
• 20:40
  Speaker 1: courte that's not happening. Because he lies so much that
• 20:45
  Speaker 1: you can you can constantly be like me, constantly say
• 20:48
  Speaker 1: look that's a lie. Look that doesn't work. Look that's wrong.
• 20:50
  Speaker 1: Look and it doesn't. It doesn't resonate. The bold lie
• 20:54
  Speaker 1: is what sticks, it's what holds. And that's a theme.
• 20:58
  Speaker 1: We'll see other bold lies today that are being expressed
• 21:01
  Speaker 1: out there. It's just stunning. Here we go, they and
• 21:06
  Speaker 1: their children are supported through massive payments from patriotic American
• 21:10
  Speaker 1: citizens who, because of their beautiful hearts, many of whom
• 21:14
  Speaker 1: whose parents were immigrants, immigrants. Those patriotic American citizens parents
• 21:21
  Speaker 1: are immigrants. And many of those fifty three million people
• 21:23
  Speaker 1: who were born outside the United States are also American citizens.
• 21:28
  Speaker 1: But I guess not patriotic because they don't have the blood.
• 21:31
  Speaker 1: They don't have many generations, you know, because of the
• 21:36
  Speaker 1: beautiful hearts, do not want to openly complain or cause
• 21:39
  Speaker 1: trouble in any way, shape or form. No. And indeed,
• 21:42
  Speaker 1: patriotic Americans who being here more than one generation, they
• 21:46
  Speaker 1: never commit crimes. Nope, don't do drugs. They don't consume drugs.
• 21:51
  Speaker 1: They don't use drugs, and if they do, it's because
• 21:53
  Speaker 1: of the immigrants. The immigrants are seducing them into it.
• 21:56
  Speaker 1: And they don't join gangs. And you know, they are peaceful, wonderful,
• 22:01
  Speaker 1: amazing people. They put up with what has happened to
• 22:08
  Speaker 1: our country, but it's eating them alive to do so.
• 22:11
  Speaker 1: A migrant earning thirty thousand with a Green card will
• 22:15
  Speaker 1: get the fifty thousand in yearly benefits for his family.
• 22:19
  Speaker 1: How many Green card holders make thirty thousand a year
• 22:25
  Speaker 1: and fifty thousand in yearly benefits for his family. How
• 22:27
  Speaker 1: are you calculating that? What about all the Americans who
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: get fifty thousand in benefits and they've been here many generations,
• 22:33
  Speaker 1: maybe even their ancestors fought in the Civil War, And
• 22:37
  Speaker 1: how come they're still getting fifty thousand benefits when they
• 22:40
  Speaker 1: got all the benefits of living in America and benefiting
• 22:43
  Speaker 1: from everything that America gave their families. Then he says,
• 22:49
  Speaker 1: the real migrant population is much higher. Yeah, there are
• 22:52
  Speaker 1: hundreds of millions of migrants here. You didn't know there's
• 22:55
  Speaker 1: a fuge burden. How many of the migrants or refugees
• 23:00
  Speaker 1: He never tells us this. He implies that it's all
• 23:03
  Speaker 1: of them, the many, more than fifty three million. This
• 23:06
  Speaker 1: refugee problem burden is leading is the leading cause of
• 23:10
  Speaker 1: social dysfunction in America, something that did not exist after
• 23:14
  Speaker 1: World War Two. Failed schools, high crime, urban decay, over quitting,
• 23:18
  Speaker 1: hospital housing shortages, and large deficits. It sounds like the seventies,
• 23:23
  Speaker 1: except for the deficits, which Trump has contributed enormously to
• 23:27
  Speaker 1: making larger and larger. By the way, just you know,
• 23:32
  Speaker 1: the just because some of you might be enthusiastic about
• 23:35
  Speaker 1: the amount of money that's come in from you know,
• 23:40
  Speaker 1: from tariffs, from tariffs, right. This Treasury posted its numbers
• 23:47
  Speaker 1: for October a few days ago, and it turns out
• 23:51
  Speaker 1: that October was the worst month in all of American
• 23:55
  Speaker 1: history in terms of the budget deficit. The budget deficit
• 24:00
  Speaker 1: in the month of October was two hundred and eighty
• 24:04
  Speaker 1: four point four billion. Two hundred and eighty four point
• 24:07
  Speaker 1: four billion, now the second highest budget deficit in American history.
• 24:13
  Speaker 1: Second highest budget deficit in American history was in October
• 24:21
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty. Hm, I wonder who's president then, Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, Trump,
• 24:26
  Speaker 1: that's right, and that's the second highest. That's also two
• 24:29
  Speaker 1: eighty four but point one, so they're almost the same.
• 24:32
  Speaker 1: Goument's spending in October versus last year October, Goumman spending
• 24:37
  Speaker 1: jumped to eighteen percent. And you know, so, yes, maybe
• 24:46
  Speaker 1: revenue is higher, but spending was much higher, much higher.
• 24:54
  Speaker 1: So deficits deficit are your fault, not im not immigrants
• 24:59
  Speaker 1: fault and failed schools, high crime, urban decate, overcrowded hospitals.
• 25:04
  Speaker 1: All of that was the seventies. I don't remember many
• 25:07
  Speaker 1: asylum seekers. In the seventies, immigration was pretty low, and
• 25:12
  Speaker 1: maybe there was some asylum seekers on Soviet Union, but
• 25:14
  Speaker 1: not much more than that. Maybe some Cubans. He goes
• 25:18
  Speaker 1: on as an example, hundreds of thousands of refugees from
• 25:21
  Speaker 1: Somaya are completely taking over the ones great state of Minnesota,
• 25:25
  Speaker 1: completely taking it over. I mean, you can't see a
• 25:28
  Speaker 1: white face in the entire state. Some all the gangs
• 25:31
  Speaker 1: are roving the streets looking for prey, as our wonderful
• 25:34
  Speaker 1: people stay locked in their apartments and housing, hoping against
• 25:38
  Speaker 1: hope that they will be left alone. Connage in the
• 25:41
  Speaker 1: streets of America. Connage caused by immigrants, always caused by immigrants,
• 25:44
  Speaker 1: Never by the good people of America, never by those
• 25:48
  Speaker 1: you know, patriotic white you know, American citizens. They don't
• 25:54
  Speaker 1: cause any connage. This seriously retarded, the seriously retarded government Minnesota.
• 26:00
  Speaker 1: This is Thanksgiving message, sus. The retarded governor of a
• 26:04
  Speaker 1: state in the country, Tim Walls, does nothing, neither through fear,
• 26:08
  Speaker 1: either through fear and competence of both. While the worst
• 26:12
  Speaker 1: congresswoman in our country, Ilan Omar's probably right about that,
• 26:16
  Speaker 1: always wrapped in a swaddling hi job and who probably
• 26:20
  Speaker 1: came into the United States illegally, and that you are
• 26:23
  Speaker 1: not allowed to marry your brother. Spreading a rumor about
• 26:29
  Speaker 1: you know, marrying up anyway, does nothing but hateful coally
• 26:32
  Speaker 1: complain about our country, it's constitution, how badly she's treated
• 26:36
  Speaker 1: and her place of origin is a decade and backward
• 26:38
  Speaker 1: and crime writen nation. True, which is essentially not even
• 26:41
  Speaker 1: a country for lack of government, military, police, etc. True.
• 26:45
  Speaker 1: By the way, this is the kind of response that
• 26:49
  Speaker 1: Trump does that people love. This is why he wins.
• 26:53
  Speaker 1: This is why Maga goes nuts for him. It's because
• 26:57
  Speaker 1: he calls at governor of Minnesota retarded, because he goes
• 27:01
  Speaker 1: after ilon Oma in this in this kind of language,
• 27:04
  Speaker 1: this is what makes him likable. He's fighting. These are
• 27:08
  Speaker 1: fighting words, and they love the fighter in him. Even
• 27:15
  Speaker 1: as we have progressed technologically, he writes, immigration policies eroded
• 27:19
  Speaker 1: those gains and living conditions for many. I will permanently,
• 27:23
  Speaker 1: here it goes, I will permanently pause immigration from all
• 27:26
  Speaker 1: third world countries to allow the US system to fully
• 27:29
  Speaker 1: recover terminate all of the billions of the millions of
• 27:34
  Speaker 1: Biden illegal admissions. So no more immigration from third world countries,
• 27:41
  Speaker 1: including those signed by Sleepy Joe. Biden's out open all
• 27:44
  Speaker 1: because one guy when nuts. I'm not allowing immigrants from
• 27:48
  Speaker 1: third world countries. It's going to be very interesting to
• 27:51
  Speaker 1: see how he defines third world countries. You think Saudi
• 27:54
  Speaker 1: Arabia will be defined as third World country? Do you
• 27:57
  Speaker 1: think Katta will be as fined as the third world country?
• 28:02
  Speaker 1: Do you think Russia will be defined as a third
• 28:05
  Speaker 1: World country? It's not, but you know it won't be.
• 28:09
  Speaker 1: So it's going to be really interesting to see how
• 28:12
  Speaker 1: he defines thill door countries and which countries are not
• 28:15
  Speaker 1: on that list goes on and on about you know,
• 28:23
  Speaker 1: these are people incapable of loving our country and all
• 28:25
  Speaker 1: federal benefits and subsidies to non citizens of our country
• 28:30
  Speaker 1: de neutralize. Oh yeah, okay, So here are the things
• 28:33
  Speaker 1: here the people he's going to stop from immigrating to
• 28:36
  Speaker 1: the country. I'm not immigrant. This is who is going
• 28:39
  Speaker 1: to remove from the country. I'm going to remove anyone
• 28:43
  Speaker 1: who is not a net asset to the United States?
• 28:46
  Speaker 1: Has defined how are you listening to this show? A
• 28:51
  Speaker 1: net asset to the United States? Am I a net
• 28:54
  Speaker 1: asset to the United States? Probably not? According to Trump
• 28:58
  Speaker 1: because that constantly complain about him, I'm obviously doing a
• 29:04
  Speaker 1: massive disservice to the United States. I mean, how dangerous
• 29:11
  Speaker 1: is it to give that president the ability to remove
• 29:15
  Speaker 1: anyone who is not a net asset to the United
• 29:17
  Speaker 1: States or is incapable of loving our country. How do
• 29:20
  Speaker 1: you decide that incapable? No free will buys genes, incapable
• 29:26
  Speaker 1: buys culture. Incapable by is what makes somebody incapable of
• 29:32
  Speaker 1: loving America? And who who is able to figure out
• 29:39
  Speaker 1: who that is? So now we're going to have a
• 29:44
  Speaker 1: loving the country capability school. I think that's a good idea.
• 29:48
  Speaker 1: Let's have it loving the Country capability school. And which
• 29:53
  Speaker 1: country the country under Trump the country under some other president.
• 29:57
  Speaker 1: I mean, if you don't like Trump, that automatically means
• 30:00
  Speaker 1: you can't love the country. I think he's gonna this
• 30:05
  Speaker 1: is a good one. You know, sometimes in a whole
• 30:07
  Speaker 1: string of real evil, he says something right, and all
• 30:11
  Speaker 1: federal benefits and subsidies to non citizens of our country.
• 30:14
  Speaker 1: I think that's fine. How about ending all federal benefits
• 30:17
  Speaker 1: and subsidies to citizens of our country? How about just
• 30:20
  Speaker 1: ending the welfare state? Probably wouldn't happen here, it gets
• 30:26
  Speaker 1: even spooky. Um denaturalize migrants who undermine domestic tranquility, denaturalize
• 30:36
  Speaker 1: So I mean taking away passports, taking away citizenship, taking
• 30:40
  Speaker 1: away green cards based on what undermine domestic tranquility. God,
• 30:48
  Speaker 1: I hope I undermine domestic tranquility. Are you guys tranquil?
• 30:51
  Speaker 1: I hope not. You should be pissed off right now.
• 30:55
  Speaker 1: Later you can be tranquil. Now you gotta be pissed off.
• 30:59
  Speaker 1: I mean, think about power he is taking for himself.
• 31:02
  Speaker 1: You know. Again, I don't think it's legal what he's
• 31:04
  Speaker 1: trying arguing to do, but imagine if he had the
• 31:07
  Speaker 1: power to do this. Really, I like numbers. Really, why
• 31:17
  Speaker 1: do we have two? You know? I like numbers? Really?
• 31:19
  Speaker 1: When's you calling for that in Islam? Islamists in Europe?
• 31:22
  Speaker 1: Did I call for that? Did I call for taking
• 31:24
  Speaker 1: away this thing because they undermine domestic tranquility? Or that
• 31:29
  Speaker 1: I clearly defined who I met and why I was
• 31:32
  Speaker 1: doing it, and clearly defined and I wasn't going to
• 31:36
  Speaker 1: take this citizenship boy? You know, but put them away
• 31:39
  Speaker 1: for supporting the enemy. Put them in jail for supporting
• 31:43
  Speaker 1: the enemy. I mean, you guys are some of you.
• 31:49
  Speaker 1: And that's just damn dishonest, you know. And I say
• 31:54
  Speaker 1: stuff and then my woods get twisted in ways that
• 31:58
  Speaker 1: are just if you can't tell the difference between what
• 32:01
  Speaker 1: I said about Islamists, not even Muslims, Islamists and why
• 32:06
  Speaker 1: I said it, and somebody's saying, undermine domestic tranquility, you
• 32:11
  Speaker 1: can't see the difference between that those two, really, I mean,
• 32:20
  Speaker 1: what does it mean undermining the domestic situation? It's completely subjective.
• 32:24
  Speaker 1: It's completely up to King Trump and put Trump. And
• 32:29
  Speaker 1: then he said and to put any foreign national who
• 32:32
  Speaker 1: is a public charge, security risk, or non compatible with
• 32:37
  Speaker 1: Western civilization. The egoget non compatible with Western civilization? What's that?
• 32:43
  Speaker 1: I've never said that about Islamists. I don't want to
• 32:46
  Speaker 1: deport them because they're not compatible with Western civilization. I
• 32:49
  Speaker 1: want to deport them because they're at war with Western civilization,
• 32:54
  Speaker 1: and not even with Western civilization. They're at war with
• 32:59
  Speaker 1: the UK, Germany, with America, with specific countries. It's a war.
• 33:05
  Speaker 1: In a war, you don't allow your ideological enemy to
• 33:11
  Speaker 1: preach within your country. He's not declaring war, I mean
• 33:16
  Speaker 1: he is. He's declaming wall all immigrants. And again, how
• 33:19
  Speaker 1: do you define Western civilization? I mean, many on the
• 33:23
  Speaker 1: rights today define Western civilization is Christian? White Christian? Does
• 33:31
  Speaker 1: that make us non Christians enemies of Western civilization? How
• 33:36
  Speaker 1: about atheists? God atheists? I mean, I'm sure there are
• 33:41
  Speaker 1: a lot of people on the right, a lot of
• 33:42
  Speaker 1: people on the right who would consider atheists unequivocally enemies
• 33:47
  Speaker 1: or non compatible with Western civilization. I mean, Luckily, I
• 33:56
  Speaker 1: think we have a legal system that is going to
• 33:58
  Speaker 1: hold in spite of this insanity, in spite of this irrationality,
• 34:03
  Speaker 1: in spite of this wickedness, wicked, I like the word wicked, wickedness.
• 34:09
  Speaker 1: He goes on. These goals will be pursued with the
• 34:12
  Speaker 1: aim of achieving a major reduction in illegal and disruptive populations,
• 34:17
  Speaker 1: including those admitted through an unauthorized and illegal autopen approval process.
• 34:23
  Speaker 1: Only reverse migration can fully cure this situation. Yep, send
• 34:29
  Speaker 1: them all back. That will solve all of America's problems.
• 34:33
  Speaker 1: I mean, as I told you since twenty fifteen, this
• 34:37
  Speaker 1: is how he all authoritarians operate. If you're feeling angst,
• 34:42
  Speaker 1: if you're feeling upset, it's completely justified. Indeed, we need
• 34:46
  Speaker 1: angst and upset for you to be willing to vote
• 34:49
  Speaker 1: for an authoritarian like me. But I want to tell
• 34:52
  Speaker 1: you that the angst and upset that you feel has
• 34:55
  Speaker 1: nothing to do with anything you did. You are not guilty.
• 34:59
  Speaker 1: You a great, wonderful, amazing, patriotic, beautiful people. It's all
• 35:09
  Speaker 1: all your problems, all of your anxieties, all of your challenges,
• 35:13
  Speaker 1: the coronage in the streets of America, that is all
• 35:16
  Speaker 1: on the other, on the other. And as I said
• 35:22
  Speaker 1: in twenty fifteen, maybe we're not quite ready to say
• 35:25
  Speaker 1: back then that it's the Jews the other. Maybe we're
• 35:28
  Speaker 1: more ready to say that today, at least in certain
• 35:31
  Speaker 1: circles on the right. So we'll just you know, so
• 35:35
  Speaker 1: we can't say the Jew We'll just call it immigrants.
• 35:37
  Speaker 1: We'll just cover them all. But clearly, the Jews are
• 35:40
  Speaker 1: anti Western civilization. I think I've got a video on
• 35:44
  Speaker 1: that coming up, definitely. And now it's not the Jews
• 35:48
  Speaker 1: who are into Western civilizis. It's some Jews who enter
• 35:51
  Speaker 1: the Western civilization. According to the CROSSUS, it's the Zionists,
• 35:54
  Speaker 1: the Zionist and Israel in particular Thesionists. The anti Western
• 35:58
  Speaker 1: civilization today is going to be a long show, got
• 36:07
  Speaker 1: a lot to say. All right, well, that that was
• 36:12
  Speaker 1: the that was the wonderful, you know message. That's the
• 36:16
  Speaker 1: wonderful message the President Donald Trump conveyed to the nation
• 36:22
  Speaker 1: yesterday on the wonderful holiday of Thanksgiving. He is my father, nastiest,
• 36:31
  Speaker 1: if nothing else president. We've ever had, the nastiest and
• 36:35
  Speaker 1: the most detached from reality. I think even Biden in
• 36:41
  Speaker 1: his worst episodes of dementia, was not as detached from
• 36:45
  Speaker 1: reality as as Trump is completely oblivious. I mean, or
• 36:52
  Speaker 1: it's just all an act. It's hard to tell. It's
• 36:55
  Speaker 1: hard to tell which one it is. Remove anyone who
• 37:01
  Speaker 1: is not a net asset to the United States, so
• 37:05
  Speaker 1: is incapable of loving our country. Now, that is we
• 37:09
  Speaker 1: should we should that should be like a plaque, we
• 37:12
  Speaker 1: should have that, you know. Yeah, I mean Republicans are
• 37:25
  Speaker 1: all expressing, yeah, this is great. Finally somebody's saying this
• 37:29
  Speaker 1: is amazing. DeSantis and James Woods and you know, James
• 37:35
  Speaker 1: Wood says anything short of this and America is doomed. Yes,
• 37:39
  Speaker 1: what's killing America. Immigrants, That's what's killing America. It's not
• 37:42
  Speaker 1: university professors, it's not ideas, it's immigrants. It's dark skinned
• 37:49
  Speaker 1: immigrants and disuse. They're the ones killing America. I mean,
• 38:00
  Speaker 1: jumping on this. They're lovingness, they're lovingness. I mean, La
• 38:08
  Speaker 1: Luma loves it, loves it. She thinks, you know, she
• 38:14
  Speaker 1: wishes Trump was a little tough on on Muslims, but
• 38:16
  Speaker 1: she loves this. You know, a country depends on it.
• 38:21
  Speaker 1: This doesn't happen. God, country's finished. Just asn't aside. There's
• 38:31
  Speaker 1: literally no evidence that ilan Oma married her brother. She's
• 38:34
  Speaker 1: a despicable, hullable, derange human being, but there's no evidence
• 38:40
  Speaker 1: that she married her brother. But anyway, that's the kind
• 38:50
  Speaker 1: of level we get. And again, it's the kind of
• 38:52
  Speaker 1: thing if you lie often enough, people start repeating it,
• 38:55
  Speaker 1: people start saying it as if it's fact, and it
• 38:57
  Speaker 1: just becomes part of the culture. It's obvious of course
• 38:59
  Speaker 1: that yes, of course that's true. Of course that's true. Yeah,
• 39:12
  Speaker 1: I mean yeah, Andrews says Ben Shapiro. What say you.
• 39:18
  Speaker 1: My guess is that Ben Shavia will ignore this. H
• 39:22
  Speaker 1: We'll say something more moderate, right, moll moderate, Here's here's
• 39:28
  Speaker 1: just an example of your president's my president unfortunately, his attitude.
• 39:36
  Speaker 1: This is who he is, this is what he is
• 39:39
  Speaker 1: this is the guy you voted for, right, and this
• 39:42
  Speaker 1: is it's not just you voted for. This is what
• 39:44
  Speaker 1: Mega loves about him. He has He has an exchange
• 39:48
  Speaker 1: that happened in the in the White House relating to
• 39:51
  Speaker 1: the DC shooting. Trump's you know, somebody says. The reporter says,
• 39:56
  Speaker 1: officials say the suspect of the DC shooting was vetted
• 39:59
  Speaker 1: and it came up clean. Trump goes, he went cuckoo,
• 40:03
  Speaker 1: he went nuts. There was no vetting. Now I think
• 40:09
  Speaker 1: the first part is true. He was cuckoo and he
• 40:10
  Speaker 1: went nuts, which is placing the responsibility on the individual.
• 40:15
  Speaker 1: But then he says there was no vetting, which is
• 40:17
  Speaker 1: just you know, we don't know if it's true or not.
• 40:20
  Speaker 1: I don't know all the facts. We'll see. Then the
• 40:22
  Speaker 1: reporter says, actually, you're Department of Justice IG just reported
• 40:30
  Speaker 1: that there was thorough vetting of Afghans who were brought
• 40:32
  Speaker 1: into the United States. So why do you blame Biden?
• 40:37
  Speaker 1: And this is Trump's response. This is the response of
• 40:40
  Speaker 1: the President of the United States, a position that Ironmand
• 40:44
  Speaker 1: had real veneration for. So for those of you who
• 40:46
  Speaker 1: think that Ironmand would support a Trump, she couldn't even
• 40:50
  Speaker 1: imagine a president of talking like this to a reporter.
• 40:52
  Speaker 1: This is what he says to her, right she's standing
• 40:55
  Speaker 1: right there. He says, are you stupid? Are you a
• 40:59
  Speaker 1: stupid us? You're just asking questions because you're a stupid person.
• 41:14
  Speaker 1: I mean, what do you do about that? What do
• 41:17
  Speaker 1: you do about that? So you know, you know, this
• 41:31
  Speaker 1: is a president who now says that he's going to
• 41:32
  Speaker 1: revoke the citizenship for Americans who weren't born here if
• 41:36
  Speaker 1: he and Stephen Miller, of course, determine that they what
• 41:41
  Speaker 1: are they they don't love America enough or incapable of
• 41:44
  Speaker 1: loving America, or that they you know, they are disruptive,
• 41:53
  Speaker 1: you know, they're just you know, they're they're they're not
• 41:56
  Speaker 1: compatible with Western civilization. Should I worry? I'm not, but
• 42:07
  Speaker 1: because we have robust law in this country, and even
• 42:09
  Speaker 1: Trump couldn't get away with that. But wow, wow, wow,
• 42:14
  Speaker 1: wow wow. Here's a reality check about crime. Roops, I
• 42:24
  Speaker 1: shut that off. Okay, I close my Let's see if
• 42:28
  Speaker 1: I can reopen it one say, yeah, here it is.
• 42:34
  Speaker 1: The re other about claim is that crime is committed
• 42:39
  Speaker 1: by most crimes in the United States committed by a
• 42:42
  Speaker 1: small number of individuals, from any community. It's a tiny
• 42:50
  Speaker 1: number of individuals who commit violent crimes. Usually it's people
• 42:55
  Speaker 1: who repeat offenders. If you just had a three strikes
• 42:59
  Speaker 1: and you're out on violent crimes, three strikes and you
• 43:03
  Speaker 1: outmeans three strikes and you spend the rest of your
• 43:05
  Speaker 1: life in jail, crime would be reduced significantly. And we'll
• 43:09
  Speaker 1: get to some crime statistics later. Crime is reduced significantly.
• 43:13
  Speaker 1: But that's true an Afghan immigrant population, the number of
• 43:16
  Speaker 1: people of criminals is tiny. They sum it's probably point
• 43:21
  Speaker 1: five percent of any given population they're link to most
• 43:28
  Speaker 1: well of a zero point five percent of residents are
• 43:30
  Speaker 1: linked to over fifty percent of the shootings in any
• 43:32
  Speaker 1: particular area. Most homicide suspects. Homicide suspects have eight to
• 43:39
  Speaker 1: twelve prior arrests, violence clusters. So all of this collectivistic
• 43:50
  Speaker 1: nonsense is straight up nonsense. What I want to say
• 43:59
  Speaker 1: about lete. So let me see somewhere here I had
• 44:02
  Speaker 1: a lead a thing I misplaced it though I think
• 44:08
  Speaker 1: it was Yeah. There it is from Roe Rocanna, who
• 44:14
  Speaker 1: was Democratic Democratic House member, right Democratic House member, maybe
• 44:20
  Speaker 1: even senior uh you know rocan leftist. This is a
• 44:30
  Speaker 1: tweet of his today. We need smart regulation. There you go,
• 44:34
  Speaker 1: there's a oxymoron if you have so one. We need
• 44:37
  Speaker 1: smart regulation, not dumb regulation. We wouldn't want umbation. We
• 44:41
  Speaker 1: need smart regulation to protect who are we going to protect?
• 44:45
  Speaker 1: Three and a half million truck drivers and two million
• 44:48
  Speaker 1: long haul drivers. A high should not be used for
• 44:53
  Speaker 1: mass layoffs to drive up short term profits with no
• 44:57
  Speaker 1: productivity gains. There's a biggest sum there. Right, Drivers are
• 45:02
  Speaker 1: needed for safety, oversight, edge cases, and maintenance. What if
• 45:06
  Speaker 1: the turns out that driverless trucks are ninety eight percent
• 45:10
  Speaker 1: safer than trucks with drivers. I wonder what they're going
• 45:13
  Speaker 1: to do. Then I stand with human over machines. Yes,
• 45:19
  Speaker 1: humans over machine over short term profits for corporate oligochs.
• 45:25
  Speaker 1: So yeah, you get Trump on the one side, and
• 45:31
  Speaker 1: you get this on the other side. I mean, I'm
• 45:35
  Speaker 1: with Chris Freeman who tweeted and said, why stop there?
• 45:41
  Speaker 1: Why not ban trucks altogether? Let's just ban trucks, replace
• 45:45
  Speaker 1: them with bikes and do bike delivery for all this stuff.
• 45:49
  Speaker 1: Break down all those palettes into little quantities. There's lots
• 45:52
  Speaker 1: of bikes and that will employ many, many, more than
• 45:56
  Speaker 1: five point five million people, of millions hundreds of millions
• 46:01
  Speaker 1: of people. I mean, I think we should abandon tractors
• 46:07
  Speaker 1: and plows, mechanics, mechanic mechanized plows. We should get rid
• 46:11
  Speaker 1: of all that science and agriculture and bring back the farmer.
• 46:15
  Speaker 1: I mean, I mean, think of all those farmers who
• 46:18
  Speaker 1: lost their jobs. It's just horrible. Let's do it. We
• 46:22
  Speaker 1: should do a moment of silence for the farmers who
• 46:24
  Speaker 1: lost their jobs. Every generation is that it's luddites, you know,
• 46:32
  Speaker 1: there's never it's one thing. There's never a shortage. Job
• 46:37
  Speaker 1: is leadites, le es. You know, crazy is to the
• 46:43
  Speaker 1: left of me, craziest to the right. What are we
• 46:48
  Speaker 1: going to do? What are we going to do? All right,
• 46:54
  Speaker 1: I want to I'll take our short break. Candid just
• 46:56
  Speaker 1: remind you that this show is funded through contributions from
• 46:59
  Speaker 1: you and support from you, in other words, and the
• 47:04
  Speaker 1: best way to support when you're watching live is value
• 47:07
  Speaker 1: doing a super chat. And we have targets. We're short
• 47:11
  Speaker 1: on our one hour target by one hundred and thirty
• 47:16
  Speaker 1: six dollars, and so please consider jumping in with a question,
• 47:21
  Speaker 1: particularly if it's a twenty dollars fifty dollars question. That
• 47:23
  Speaker 1: helps a lot or just to stick out, just to
• 47:26
  Speaker 1: show you support, and that could be two dollars, five dollars,
• 47:28
  Speaker 1: any up to five hundred dollars, just so we can
• 47:31
  Speaker 1: get our targets. Meet our targets for the day, for
• 47:33
  Speaker 1: the week, for the month. We have targets for all
• 47:35
  Speaker 1: of that. As Andrews says, this show is on fire
• 47:38
  Speaker 1: and you should support that fire. And the way you
• 47:41
  Speaker 1: support a fire is by throwing money into the flames.
• 47:46
  Speaker 1: Something has to boon, right, So please trade trade and
• 47:49
  Speaker 1: principle value for value anyway, Let's okay, So Tucker costs
• 47:53
  Speaker 1: in card, I'm showing you another Techo costs and video.
• 47:57
  Speaker 1: I couldn't resist because this one, this one is just
• 48:04
  Speaker 1: so deceptive. It's so targeted at wheeling you in and
• 48:16
  Speaker 1: making you think he's a good guy and hiding what
• 48:19
  Speaker 1: he's really about and contradicting everything he believes in, everything
• 48:27
  Speaker 1: he claims elsewhere, and yet contradicting it in his own
• 48:31
  Speaker 1: statement that it's just it's a masterclass in how to
• 48:38
  Speaker 1: lie and deceive and pretend it it's you gotta say,
• 48:47
  Speaker 1: it's brilliant. It's brilliant, and it's evil. This guy is evil.
• 48:55
  Speaker 1: But you know, with the exception of the Again, why
• 49:00
  Speaker 1: anybody takes some seriously I don't know, but I've been
• 49:02
  Speaker 1: watching this interview he did with Piers Morgan, and Piers
• 49:06
  Speaker 1: Morgan takes him very seriously, and Pierce Morgan spends a
• 49:08
  Speaker 1: lot of time with him, and they talk and Techer
• 49:10
  Speaker 1: calls and spouts absolute nonsense, total bs stuff, and Piers
• 49:20
  Speaker 1: is not smart enough or knowledgeable enough to go back
• 49:25
  Speaker 1: at him at anything. There was a whole exchange I watched,
• 49:28
  Speaker 1: God what, I don't know why I do this to myself,
• 49:30
  Speaker 1: but I did watch it. I watched. I watched these
• 49:32
  Speaker 1: things for you. I didn't post it because I don't know.
• 49:37
  Speaker 1: We could do that one another time. But this was
• 49:39
  Speaker 1: about Techer costs and complaining about the fact that one
• 49:44
  Speaker 1: of the reasons birthrates of declining is because of how
• 49:47
  Speaker 1: many gay people they are like and he said, look biological,
• 49:51
  Speaker 1: he gaged, don't have kids. So the more gay people
• 49:53
  Speaker 1: they are in a society, the fewer kids they're going
• 49:57
  Speaker 1: to be. And this of course freaked out Pismogan and
• 50:01
  Speaker 1: he didn't know what to say, and he's he's he
• 50:03
  Speaker 1: has no clue how to respond to that, and he's
• 50:06
  Speaker 1: saying no, they've always been gay. And Tucker's going, no,
• 50:09
  Speaker 1: they are many, many more gay people today than they
• 50:11
  Speaker 1: were in the past. And Piers is saying, no, you know,
• 50:15
  Speaker 1: people are born gay, so the number of gays is
• 50:17
  Speaker 1: always constant, but just in the past, you know, so
• 50:22
  Speaker 1: you know, Tucker doesn't have any answers, you know, any
• 50:24
  Speaker 1: answer to that, and he saying, no, No, Tucker's saying
• 50:26
  Speaker 1: today thirty percent of people self identified as gay. That
• 50:31
  Speaker 1: wasn't true in the past. And Peas is like, yeah,
• 50:33
  Speaker 1: because in the past they were persecuted, so they hid
• 50:35
  Speaker 1: in the closet. And Tucker's is, you know, but they
• 50:39
  Speaker 1: have kids and now they're not having kids, and it's
• 50:42
  Speaker 1: thirty percent, thirty percent of you know, thirty percent of
• 50:47
  Speaker 1: people are saying that they're gay and they don't have kids,
• 50:52
  Speaker 1: and and Piers and and then you know, Teker Cousin
• 50:55
  Speaker 1: gives Peers Morgan a gift, of course, a gift Pismogan
• 50:59
  Speaker 1: cannot respec on to Tecker says, you know, in Asian societies,
• 51:03
  Speaker 1: he says, this can't be genetic because in Asian society
• 51:06
  Speaker 1: like Japan and South could they don't have gaye or
• 51:08
  Speaker 1: they don't have thirty percent of the people gain. Now,
• 51:14
  Speaker 1: why am I saying Peers is an idiot, ignorant idiot,
• 51:18
  Speaker 1: and that he couldn't even he got handed this on
• 51:23
  Speaker 1: a silver platter. He got handed this thing on a
• 51:25
  Speaker 1: silver platter. I mean he could have. He could have
• 51:27
  Speaker 1: kneeled Tucker calls into the wall, and he let him
• 51:31
  Speaker 1: get away. Two things. One, what is the percentage of
• 51:37
  Speaker 1: gaze in America or the UK Western societies? Well, just
• 51:44
  Speaker 1: chatchip he's here or google it or whatever self identified gaze,
• 51:48
  Speaker 1: I mean gaze in terms of male homosexuals. I think
• 51:51
  Speaker 1: it's one point four percent, one point four percent if
• 51:56
  Speaker 1: you take out LGBTQ plus and everybody who announces the bisexual.
• 52:00
  Speaker 1: You know, and bisexuals can have kids, so bisexuality is
• 52:03
  Speaker 1: not an impediment to you know, I'm multiplying. Indeed, nothing is,
• 52:09
  Speaker 1: because you could do sellrogates, and you could do artificial insemination,
• 52:13
  Speaker 1: you can do all kinds of things, so you know,
• 52:15
  Speaker 1: lesbians can have children. But put all of that aside.
• 52:18
  Speaker 1: Let's pretend none of that exists, all of it, LGBTQ plus,
• 52:22
  Speaker 1: the whole thing. On a good day, where this is
• 52:25
  Speaker 1: really hyped and a lot of people want to say
• 52:28
  Speaker 1: that they're part of that because it's cool. Ten percent,
• 52:31
  Speaker 1: Max and Tucker can get away. We're saying thirty percent
• 52:36
  Speaker 1: and nothing nothing ps. Morgan says nothing. Thirty percent is
• 52:43
  Speaker 1: just that this is this is a theme today. These
• 52:46
  Speaker 1: people lie, they lie, and they lie and they lie.
• 52:51
  Speaker 1: And now millions of people who have watched this video,
• 52:54
  Speaker 1: Attacker calls it now believe that thirty percent of people, okay,
• 53:00
  Speaker 1: which is not true. You know, it put aside the
• 53:03
  Speaker 1: issue of if it was too so what, But it's
• 53:06
  Speaker 1: not just not true. It's just a number that is
• 53:08
  Speaker 1: just completely nuts. Right. And then then he says, right,
• 53:13
  Speaker 1: and this is supposedly keeping birth rates down, and because
• 53:16
  Speaker 1: birth rates are down, civilization's endy. But he says they no,
• 53:20
  Speaker 1: you know, people in Southeast Asia are not gay. What
• 53:24
  Speaker 1: are birthrates in Southeast Asia like South Korea and Japan
• 53:28
  Speaker 1: and China. And let's assume that no gay people over there.
• 53:34
  Speaker 1: I mean, he just contradicted himself. So we've got low
• 53:39
  Speaker 1: birth rates with no gay people, which means the low
• 53:44
  Speaker 1: birth rates can't be caused by gay people. There's no
• 53:47
  Speaker 1: relationship between the two. There must be something else, some
• 53:50
  Speaker 1: other cause. Of relationship, some other relationship other than so.
• 54:04
  Speaker 1: In South Korea and Japan, the reason low the existence
• 54:08
  Speaker 1: of low both rates are I don't know whatever reason
• 54:11
  Speaker 1: people give. But in the United States and the UK
• 54:13
  Speaker 1: it's gay people. I mean, the guy is just unhinged,
• 54:20
  Speaker 1: but he lies. It's not that he doesn't know the data.
• 54:26
  Speaker 1: He does. He's smart. So he's just basically just trying
• 54:40
  Speaker 1: to what I mean, you can come up with all
• 54:47
  Speaker 1: the reasons you want. Cost of living, push social skills,
• 54:50
  Speaker 1: you know, expectations, cost of living is BS that has
• 54:54
  Speaker 1: nothing to do with it. But okay, I mean Japan
• 55:00
  Speaker 1: and South Korea have way lower birth rates than the US.
• 55:04
  Speaker 1: No gay people according to Tucka. I don't know what
• 55:06
  Speaker 1: the stats about gay people in South Korea. I don't
• 55:08
  Speaker 1: really care. But according to Teca, no gay people, and
• 55:13
  Speaker 1: how do they have a little birthrates. Maybe maybe there's
• 55:14
  Speaker 1: another reason, Maybe something else is going on. Maybe there's
• 55:18
  Speaker 1: some cultural phenomena that is that is disencouraging or causes
• 55:22
  Speaker 1: people not to have kids, or dissuade people who have kids,
• 55:26
  Speaker 1: disincentivizers kids. Maybe it's maybe it's cost of living, which
• 55:30
  Speaker 1: I don't think. Maybe it's poor social maybe it's a
• 55:33
  Speaker 1: culture of pessimism. Maybe it's people like Taka talking all
• 55:37
  Speaker 1: this nonsense. Maybe it's a fear of immigrants, or fear
• 55:39
  Speaker 1: of climate change, or it's fear when you live in
• 55:42
  Speaker 1: fear who wants kids. Maybe maybe maybe it's bad ideas,
• 55:47
  Speaker 1: bad philosophy. Maybe it's women discovering there's a whole world
• 55:50
  Speaker 1: out there beyond having kids and wanting to wanting to
• 55:54
  Speaker 1: experience that world, and maybe not having kids and instead
• 55:58
  Speaker 1: of experiencing that. Maybe I don't know, a lot of
• 56:01
  Speaker 1: things could be happening. But this is Piers Morgan. He's
• 56:09
  Speaker 1: supposed to be like the top end of you in
• 56:11
  Speaker 1: the world. Right, He's like and he can't catch Techerkauson
• 56:15
  Speaker 1: on that. I mean that level of stupidity. Anyway. Here's
• 56:20
  Speaker 1: another Techo Casson one. So sorry, that was a I
• 56:24
  Speaker 1: don't know, I'm just gonna talk today. It seems like
• 56:27
  Speaker 1: no questions from you guys, no stickers, no support, and
• 56:32
  Speaker 1: I've got material here for like five hours. All right,
• 56:35
  Speaker 1: here's the Techa Coscon video, this one. Note how he
• 56:40
  Speaker 1: uses individualism, how he positions himself as an individualist. This
• 56:47
  Speaker 1: is tacos. Remember the ultimate tribalist. Watch how he does
• 56:53
  Speaker 1: it in order to smear Zionism and Jews more broadly
• 57:00
  Speaker 1: in Israel.
• 57:00
  Speaker 2: More broadly, Okay, there are enemies of Western civilization. Who
• 57:05
  Speaker 2: are these people? Are they the Muslims?
• 57:07
  Speaker 1: So Muslims are not enemies of Wsines civilization, the.
• 57:10
  Speaker 3: Jews or they you know whatever people have No, No,
• 57:12
  Speaker 3: they're not the Muslims. They're not the Jews. They're not
• 57:14
  Speaker 3: the Blacks or not whatever group you're blaming. There any
• 57:17
  Speaker 3: individual who doesn't acknowledge the human soul.
• 57:22
  Speaker 1: Period, doesn't acknowledge the human soul. Are there any individuals
• 57:27
  Speaker 1: out there, anybody out there who doesn't acknowledge the human soul?
• 57:32
  Speaker 1: That humans have a soul, individual humans have a soul.
• 57:38
  Speaker 1: Isn't that everybody? Or does he mean soul in a
• 57:41
  Speaker 1: particularly Christian way or something else? What is it? Maybe
• 57:44
  Speaker 1: it's Jesus that don't acknowledge Jesus. So the enemies of
• 57:48
  Speaker 1: Western civilization are people who don't acknowledge the individual human soul.
• 57:51
  Speaker 1: Now he's going to claim he's an individualist. You'll see
• 57:54
  Speaker 1: this in a second. But okay, those are the So
• 57:58
  Speaker 1: let's now find out who the enemies of Western civilization
• 58:01
  Speaker 1: that the rights.
• 58:02
  Speaker 2: Begin and end with the individual, not the group.
• 58:04
  Speaker 1: Wow, the rights begin and end to the individual, not group.
• 58:07
  Speaker 1: He's absolutely right. I'm with Tucker Carlson on this one.
• 58:11
  Speaker 1: Rights begin with the individual, not the group. I imagine
• 58:15
  Speaker 1: if Tucker actually held that and followed that logic through,
• 58:20
  Speaker 1: he'd he'd be a good guy. And he's not because
• 58:24
  Speaker 1: he's a he's a collectivist, irrationalist, anti individual rights guy.
• 58:31
  Speaker 2: Therefore, an attack on Western civilization looks like this.
• 58:34
  Speaker 1: It's tribalism.
• 58:35
  Speaker 2: It's identity politicism.
• 58:36
  Speaker 1: That's right, it is. It's tribalism, it's identity politics. He's
• 58:41
  Speaker 1: absolutely again, it's it's absolutely right. Tribalism is anti Western civilization.
• 58:49
  Speaker 1: Identity politics is anti Western civilization, racist like taker cousin,
• 58:53
  Speaker 1: anti Western civilization. That's absolutely right.
• 58:59
  Speaker 2: It's tribalism. It's identity politics, is DEI, it's whatever. It's
• 59:03
  Speaker 2: zionism's did you see that?
• 59:06
  Speaker 1: How he snuck that in? It's DII. It's all these
• 59:09
  Speaker 1: leftist things that nobody likes, identity politics, and then he
• 59:13
  Speaker 1: throws Zionism in there. It's zionism. We'll talk about what
• 59:19
  Speaker 1: zionism is in a minute, but it's it's Zionism.
• 59:24
  Speaker 3: It's any belief system that begins with the understanding that
• 59:31
  Speaker 3: one group is morally superior to other groups.
• 59:33
  Speaker 1: So one group is morally subpiit to other groups. Yeah,
• 59:36
  Speaker 1: I agree with you, but notice that Zionism right in
• 59:39
  Speaker 1: the middle of there. So Zionism is the one example
• 59:42
  Speaker 1: he has, the one concrete example that he has of
• 59:47
  Speaker 1: a group that views itself as morally superior to all
• 59:50
  Speaker 1: other groups. Do Zionists actually believe is Zionism an ideology
• 59:57
  Speaker 1: and a theory that believes that it's group, the Jews
• 1:00:01
  Speaker 1: are smallly superior than any of the group designers believe that.
• 1:00:08
  Speaker 1: Absolutely not. We'll talk about Zionism in a minute, but
• 1:00:11
  Speaker 1: absolutely not. But that's the one group, the one concrete
• 1:00:15
  Speaker 1: he can find the smear and associate with this tribalism collectivism,
• 1:00:21
  Speaker 1: and he's right about that. Tribalists and collectivists Demanda Western civilization.
• 1:00:26
  Speaker 2: We don't think in terms of groups, as Christians or Westerners.
• 1:00:30
  Speaker 1: As Christians, we don't think in terms of groups. God,
• 1:00:33
  Speaker 1: you might want to tell that to the Catholics slaughtering
• 1:00:37
  Speaker 1: the Protestants, slaughtering the Catholics, slaughtering the Protestant slaughtering the Catholics,
• 1:00:41
  Speaker 1: or the Catholics slaughtering other kinds of Catholics who don't
• 1:00:44
  Speaker 1: quite agree with the dogma of these particular Catholics. So
• 1:00:56
  Speaker 1: Christians deal with people in terms of group all the time,
• 1:01:03
  Speaker 1: all the time. Wow, John is so enthusiastic. He's asking
• 1:01:09
  Speaker 1: the same question twice, a question he's already asked in
• 1:01:12
  Speaker 1: the past. Isn't that amazing? John? Wow? Twice? Ten dollars,
• 1:01:21
  Speaker 1: two fives. I'm excited. Yeah, amazing.
• 1:01:31
  Speaker 2: We think in terms of the individual. It's literally that simple.
• 1:01:36
  Speaker 3: And the reason it's important to say this out loud
• 1:01:39
  Speaker 3: is because there are so many interests vying for the
• 1:01:43
  Speaker 3: mantle of defender of Western civilization. What does you mean
• 1:01:46
  Speaker 3: to defend the West? What does it western?
• 1:01:49
  Speaker 2: Robin? Defender of the Western?
• 1:01:51
  Speaker 1: No? Notice Notice what he says about Nintennian, right, Notice
• 1:01:54
  Speaker 1: what he says about Nintenian again, the only concrete example
• 1:01:58
  Speaker 1: he has. And Neizaniello, And you want to tell me
• 1:02:03
  Speaker 1: he's not a rabbit anti Semite? Absolutely, Notice what he
• 1:02:07
  Speaker 1: says about Neizeno.
• 1:02:08
  Speaker 3: To defend the West, I'm a West you know, I'm
• 1:02:12
  Speaker 3: a defender of the Western of Western civilization.
• 1:02:14
  Speaker 2: No, you're its enemy.
• 1:02:16
  Speaker 1: Israel. Netzenia and Israel are the enemy of Western civilization.
• 1:02:21
  Speaker 1: I mean, if you think tribalism is the enemy of
• 1:02:24
  Speaker 1: Western civilization, Islamic tribalism you know, ones that you know
• 1:02:33
  Speaker 1: cause people to fly airplanes into the World Trade Center
• 1:02:37
  Speaker 1: Islamic uh, you know, tribalism that calls for jihad against
• 1:02:43
  Speaker 1: the West, literal war against the West. That's not tribalism.
• 1:02:49
  Speaker 1: And the people standing up against those jihadis, standing up
• 1:02:52
  Speaker 1: against the violence of Islam. They are what they're the
• 1:03:02
  Speaker 1: enemies of the Western civilization. Israel standing up against the
• 1:03:06
  Speaker 1: explicit enemy of the West, the enemy of the West
• 1:03:09
  Speaker 1: that actually declares itself an enemy of the West, the
• 1:03:12
  Speaker 1: only one. It's Israel that is the enemy of the
• 1:03:16
  Speaker 1: Western civilization.
• 1:03:23
  Speaker 2: Of course, literally it's main enemy. Why because I don't
• 1:03:28
  Speaker 2: like you has something to do with that.
• 1:03:29
  Speaker 1: It's main enemy. Israel and Zionism are the main enemy
• 1:03:33
  Speaker 1: of Western civiliations, not the Russians, not the Chinese, and
• 1:03:37
  Speaker 1: suddenly not Islam. I mean, ultimately, he Tucka is a
• 1:03:42
  Speaker 1: fan of Sharia law, not Islam. It's Jews, Jews, Jews,
• 1:03:47
  Speaker 1: they are the enemy of Western civilization. It really is unbelievable,
• 1:03:54
  Speaker 1: and that he can get away with this and that
• 1:03:57
  Speaker 1: nobody will call him on it, or very few people
• 1:03:59
  Speaker 1: will call him on it.
• 1:04:01
  Speaker 2: The reason that that Nyahu is an enemy of Western
• 1:04:04
  Speaker 2: civilization is because he believes and.
• 1:04:07
  Speaker 3: Has said out loud, that we're fighting these people because
• 1:04:11
  Speaker 3: of how they were born, because of their inherent evil.
• 1:04:14
  Speaker 1: Nobody's ever said that Ninteniao, and I am no fan
• 1:04:17
  Speaker 1: of a Nantenniao's. Nintenao has never said that they are
• 1:04:21
  Speaker 1: born evil, they're inherently evil, that it's in the genes
• 1:04:26
  Speaker 1: to be evil, that Arabs are just evil people, all
• 1:04:29
  Speaker 1: of them, Palestinians, whatever however you want to define it.
• 1:04:32
  Speaker 1: This is just Taka Kausa making stuff up and lying,
• 1:04:37
  Speaker 1: and he can get away with it because they just
• 1:04:39
  Speaker 1: choose and know who he's sighting with. He's siding with
• 1:04:45
  Speaker 1: the collectivists, the Muslims, the Muslims, not just any Muslims,
• 1:04:52
  Speaker 1: the Muslims who are affiliated with the Islamist ideology. He's
• 1:04:55
  Speaker 1: sighting with Hamas, He's siding with al Qaeda, He's sighting
• 1:04:59
  Speaker 1: with He's siding with Kato, who supposedly, according to some
• 1:05:07
  Speaker 1: pay here's bill. I don't know if that's true. I'm
• 1:05:10
  Speaker 1: just asking questions. What do I know? You could have
• 1:05:15
  Speaker 1: used hamas as example of the enemy of Western civilization,
• 1:05:19
  Speaker 1: but no use Israel in Nitaenniel and then put a
• 1:05:23
  Speaker 1: quote into NATO's mouth that he never said, ever said,
• 1:05:28
  Speaker 1: and which is not Zionism.
• 1:05:29
  Speaker 2: Because of how they were born, because of their inherent evil.
• 1:05:32
  Speaker 2: We don't believe in that. Just not every person. He's
• 1:05:35
  Speaker 2: inherently flawed but salvageable.
• 1:05:37
  Speaker 1: I don't believe people are inherently flawed, and I don't
• 1:05:41
  Speaker 1: think Tucker sold eligible.
• 1:05:42
  Speaker 2: God made every person. Why are the Nazis bad? The
• 1:05:46
  Speaker 2: Nazis are bad because for that exact same reason.
• 1:05:50
  Speaker 1: And so no the juxtaposition here. Now we've got another concrete,
• 1:05:54
  Speaker 1: the only other concrete. So you've got Zionism nitaeo I
• 1:05:59
  Speaker 1: e Israel and the Nazis Israel Zionism, and then Nataniel
• 1:06:04
  Speaker 1: like the Nazis.
• 1:06:05
  Speaker 2: So if you want to defend the West, you defend
• 1:06:07
  Speaker 2: a single proposition and everything emanates from that proposition.
• 1:06:11
  Speaker 1: This is true, individual, that's true, that's true.
• 1:06:15
  Speaker 2: Which were given to him by God?
• 1:06:17
  Speaker 1: And what is the only country, What is the only well,
• 1:06:20
  Speaker 1: I won't give it to you by God. But what's
• 1:06:21
  Speaker 1: the only country in the Middle East at least that
• 1:06:25
  Speaker 1: respects any semblance of rights. What's the only country that
• 1:06:29
  Speaker 1: respects any semblance of individualism? Only country, only countries Israel?
• 1:06:43
  Speaker 1: And yet Taka, you know, places himself solidly on the
• 1:06:49
  Speaker 1: side of let's see Kata, Sudan, Iran, Iraq, Gaza, they're
• 1:06:58
  Speaker 1: the ones who represents rights. It's Israel that is the problem.
• 1:07:03
  Speaker 1: Israel that's a problem because hey, it's collectivistic. A note
• 1:07:11
  Speaker 1: how he wraps it all up in a frame of Oh,
• 1:07:14
  Speaker 1: I'm just for individual rights, I'm for individualism. And he
• 1:07:17
  Speaker 1: sneaks these things in and he has been doing this right.
• 1:07:20
  Speaker 1: Tucker has been a journalist commentator on TV what for
• 1:07:26
  Speaker 1: twenty plus years. He knows exactly what he's doing. He
• 1:07:30
  Speaker 1: knows exactly how to play the game. He sneaks these
• 1:07:34
  Speaker 1: things in, and these things land and there resonate. Now,
• 1:07:41
  Speaker 1: I just want to say something about Zionism, because Zionism
• 1:07:44
  Speaker 1: is the exact opposite of what he says. Sionism in
• 1:07:50
  Speaker 1: many respects is in an important way why it can
• 1:07:55
  Speaker 1: be used as a collectivistic ideology. It's not so think
• 1:08:03
  Speaker 1: about the founder of Zionism. God, how am I gonna? Yeah? Anyway,
• 1:08:10
  Speaker 1: the founder of Zionism was an am named Theodore Hertzel.
• 1:08:15
  Speaker 1: Theodore Hurtzel was an individual, a Jew who was completely
• 1:08:20
  Speaker 1: assimilated into European society. He dressed like European intellectual, he
• 1:08:27
  Speaker 1: wrote like a European intellectual. He lived like European intellectual.
• 1:08:31
  Speaker 1: He believed that Judaism should disappear. He was an Austrian,
• 1:08:36
  Speaker 1: lived in Austria. He wasn't a Jew. He believed that
• 1:08:40
  Speaker 1: Jews should become just French and Austrian and German and Russian,
• 1:08:43
  Speaker 1: and the Jews should ultimately disappear and go away. I mean,
• 1:08:47
  Speaker 1: this was his worldview. He told Jews to blend in
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 1: as much as possible, and this is my view. He
• 1:08:56
  Speaker 1: also believed that Europe was the future of the Jewish people.
• 1:09:02
  Speaker 1: He taught Western values, Western society. Western culture was the
• 1:09:06
  Speaker 1: best culture ever, and it was the place for Jews.
• 1:09:11
  Speaker 1: He was proud of Western civilization. It was part of
• 1:09:14
  Speaker 1: being part of it. He was a journalist and he actually,
• 1:09:21
  Speaker 1: you know, lamblasted the Jews for not acting European enough.
• 1:09:25
  Speaker 1: You wanted them to become more European, more similated. And
• 1:09:34
  Speaker 1: then as part of his work as a journalist, he
• 1:09:37
  Speaker 1: was assigned to Paris for his Austrian paper to cover
• 1:09:45
  Speaker 1: up the Dreyfus affair in France, and he saw thousands
• 1:09:53
  Speaker 1: of so called enlightened French citizens scream against the Jews
• 1:09:59
  Speaker 1: in French in the French speech. You know, there was
• 1:10:02
  Speaker 1: a newspaper that was published in Paris in the late
• 1:10:05
  Speaker 1: nineteenth century during this driver's trial and after, called the
• 1:10:08
  Speaker 1: Anti Semite. It was a newspaper screaming against Jews, and
• 1:10:17
  Speaker 1: you know, bersically persecuted. A Jewish officer was falsely accused
• 1:10:22
  Speaker 1: for a spying for the Germans. And it wasn't like
• 1:10:26
  Speaker 1: down with the criminal, even though he wasn't even a criminal,
• 1:10:29
  Speaker 1: he was set up. It was down with the Jews.
• 1:10:33
  Speaker 1: That is he saw in liberal France, in liberal Paris,
• 1:10:39
  Speaker 1: in Paris of the nineteenth century of you know, Paris
• 1:10:44
  Speaker 1: of Hugo and Chopin and that, you know, Paris, the
• 1:10:47
  Speaker 1: beautiful Paris of the what do you call something, polk
• 1:10:51
  Speaker 1: the beautiful epoch, the beautiful period. Down with the Jews,
• 1:10:58
  Speaker 1: you know. And he thought to himself, if this was
• 1:11:03
  Speaker 1: happening in France, the most modern, open minded place on
• 1:11:08
  Speaker 1: the planet. If hatred for the Jews was that deep,
• 1:11:13
  Speaker 1: that everywhere what was to become. And by the way, Dreyfus,
• 1:11:22
  Speaker 1: who was a Jewish senior officer within the French Army,
• 1:11:25
  Speaker 1: was completely assimilated. He was Jew by birth, only by
• 1:11:31
  Speaker 1: DNA or whatever you want to call it. He didn't
• 1:11:34
  Speaker 1: behave like a Jew in a sense of practicing. He
• 1:11:38
  Speaker 1: wasn't religious, he was an atheist. He was a Frenchman.
• 1:11:42
  Speaker 1: If you'd asked Dreyfus, what are you would have said French.
• 1:11:46
  Speaker 1: He was a French. Patriots realized the Jews could never
• 1:11:57
  Speaker 1: escape the anti semitism of view, no matter how much
• 1:12:00
  Speaker 1: they assimilated, no match how much they became French or Austrian,
• 1:12:06
  Speaker 1: or German or Russian, anti Semitism would not go away,
• 1:12:10
  Speaker 1: because whether you're a Jew or not is not something
• 1:12:13
  Speaker 1: It is not dependent on you, It's dependent on your neighbors.
• 1:12:17
  Speaker 1: They decide if you're a Jew or not. And he
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 1: decided that Europe would turn against the Jews. He predicted
• 1:12:27
  Speaker 1: the Holocaust forty five years before the Holocaust. He understood,
• 1:12:35
  Speaker 1: no no matter how European Jews became, the crowd will
• 1:12:38
  Speaker 1: always remind you that you are a Jew when it
• 1:12:41
  Speaker 1: suits it, and he realized that the only path that
• 1:12:47
  Speaker 1: the Jews had to survive, to continue to exist was
• 1:12:55
  Speaker 1: by creating their own state, defending themselves, not being dependent
• 1:12:59
  Speaker 1: on anybody else to defend them. So here was a
• 1:13:05
  Speaker 1: fully assimilated European realizing the Jewish safety dependent on them
• 1:13:15
  Speaker 1: creating their own state and on them allowing that state
• 1:13:21
  Speaker 1: to be a refuge for Jews as long as anti
• 1:13:26
  Speaker 1: Semitism still existed. I mean, Zionism exists because of the
• 1:13:38
  Speaker 1: if you will, failures of Western civilization to eradicate anti Semitism,
• 1:13:42
  Speaker 1: to eradicate tribalism from within its mist I wouldn't call
• 1:13:47
  Speaker 1: it to a Western civilization for the West to not
• 1:13:51
  Speaker 1: be able to eradicate antisemitism. Zionism exists as a default.
• 1:14:00
  Speaker 1: There's no Holocaust. If there's ninety semitism in late nineteenth
• 1:14:03
  Speaker 1: century Europe and early twenties sent Ee, there's no Israel,
• 1:14:06
  Speaker 1: there's no Zionism. So again, I don't think Tucker is
• 1:14:16
  Speaker 1: ignorant of this. He basically agrees with it, he knows,
• 1:14:24
  Speaker 1: but he completely ignores it, completely ignores it. Now also
• 1:14:31
  Speaker 1: I'll just mentioned that was not in the Piers Morgan interview.
• 1:14:34
  Speaker 1: That's another video that he put out. But in the
• 1:14:36
  Speaker 1: Piers Morgen interview, he goes on to argue that Germany
• 1:14:39
  Speaker 1: was never thirty England, that Britain chose war with Germany,
• 1:14:44
  Speaker 1: that Britain could have stayed out of it, that Germany
• 1:14:48
  Speaker 1: really just wanted to fight communists. Again, Piers Morgan is
• 1:14:52
  Speaker 1: ignorant and can't even rebut that. The fact that when
• 1:14:56
  Speaker 1: Germany invades Poland, it does so under treaty with the
• 1:15:00
  Speaker 1: Soviet Union with the Communists to divide Poland between them.
• 1:15:04
  Speaker 1: I mean, this is basic history. The fact that Germany
• 1:15:07
  Speaker 1: had already broken every treaty that they had signed up
• 1:15:10
  Speaker 1: until that point. The fact that Germany clearly wanted right
• 1:15:15
  Speaker 1: Fans and Belgium and you know, northern Europe, and that
• 1:15:21
  Speaker 1: there was no way Germany was going to not go
• 1:15:25
  Speaker 1: after Britain ultimately.
• 1:15:27
  Speaker 3: You know.
• 1:15:28
  Speaker 1: But that's the cause. All right, God, I am so
• 1:15:35
  Speaker 1: behind guys, and you're not appreciating it, not financially anyway.
• 1:15:42
  Speaker 1: All right, a few feel good stories. Okay, so after
• 1:15:46
  Speaker 1: I did all of that, now let's turn to something positive.
• 1:15:51
  Speaker 1: I came across this tweets and paper and analysis that
• 1:15:55
  Speaker 1: is just blew my mind in terms of what I expected.
• 1:16:03
  Speaker 1: But now we have data, actual data, right, this is
• 1:16:09
  Speaker 1: about who supported abolition in England in the early part
• 1:16:15
  Speaker 1: of the nineteenth century. So these researchers, they literally went
• 1:16:23
  Speaker 1: to find the data about who supported abolition. They did
• 1:16:26
  Speaker 1: it by looking at who signed anti slavery petitions, and
• 1:16:31
  Speaker 1: then they traced every person who signed to who he was,
• 1:16:34
  Speaker 1: where it came from, and all of that kind of stuff.
• 1:16:37
  Speaker 1: They looked at membership and abolition groups. They looked at
• 1:16:42
  Speaker 1: members of Parliament's voting behavior around the issue of abolition,
• 1:16:48
  Speaker 1: and then looked at their economic activity. And what they show,
• 1:16:54
  Speaker 1: pretty overwhelmingly is that the biggest supporters of abolition, but
• 1:17:01
  Speaker 1: by a big margin, the biggest interest group, if you will,
• 1:17:07
  Speaker 1: in favor of abolishing slavery in the UK in the
• 1:17:11
  Speaker 1: early in the in the nineteenth century early nineteenth century
• 1:17:16
  Speaker 1: were the industrialists, you call them the capitalists, I mean
• 1:17:23
  Speaker 1: the gentry were neither here nor there. Right, the merchants
• 1:17:31
  Speaker 1: neither here nor there. Some will force some more against
• 1:17:34
  Speaker 1: the aristocrats clearly wanted to maintain slavery and of course,
• 1:17:39
  Speaker 1: slave owners big time wanted to maintain slavery. Industrialists, those
• 1:17:47
  Speaker 1: evil capitalists, I often say capitalism eradicated slavery. Only capitalism
• 1:17:53
  Speaker 1: eradicated savery. The only system in human history you adicated slavery.
• 1:17:58
  Speaker 1: If you look at the ten most frequent occupations of
• 1:18:02
  Speaker 1: the people who signed a famous eighteen oh six Manchester
• 1:18:06
  Speaker 1: anti slavery petition, number one number one, profession manufacturer number two,
• 1:18:17
  Speaker 1: textile worker number three, but far behind merchant, then dealer,
• 1:18:22
  Speaker 1: than warehouse man, then taylor, then joiner, then shopkeeper, then shoemaker.
• 1:18:28
  Speaker 1: And at the very end, who do you think is
• 1:18:31
  Speaker 1: the very end the ones the fewest of these ten
• 1:18:36
  Speaker 1: who signed the petition appropriately beautifully attorneys attorneys. At the
• 1:18:44
  Speaker 1: very end, they look at signatures of industrialists. They find
• 1:18:50
  Speaker 1: the signatures of industrialists were more likely to be at
• 1:18:53
  Speaker 1: the forefront of the petition of any petition, and usually
• 1:18:57
  Speaker 1: on the first page. So the industrialist, the capitalists, the entrepreneurs,
• 1:19:02
  Speaker 1: the first one is to sign the anti slavery petition.
• 1:19:07
  Speaker 1: Industrialists were the biggest donors to the Anti Slavery Society
• 1:19:11
  Speaker 1: and were over represented in terms of membership. Again, industrial
• 1:19:17
  Speaker 1: Quakers were number one right in terms of membership, but
• 1:19:20
  Speaker 1: in terms of funding, right, it's the industrialist first, Quakers,
• 1:19:25
  Speaker 1: second merchant third. In terms of membership, Quakers first, industrial
• 1:19:30
  Speaker 1: interest second merchants third. So, I mean, this is beautiful stuff.
• 1:19:38
  Speaker 1: If you look at the areas they were most industrialized,
• 1:19:43
  Speaker 1: measured by local consumption and water mill usage, they produced
• 1:19:48
  Speaker 1: the higher share of anti slavery petitions by every measure
• 1:19:52
  Speaker 1: that they kept this they sliced it in so many
• 1:19:54
  Speaker 1: different ways. Industrialists were the number on un pressure group
• 1:20:01
  Speaker 1: interest groups pushing for abolition. That's pretty cool. It's a
• 1:20:08
  Speaker 1: pretty cool data point. It doesn't change anything in life,
• 1:20:11
  Speaker 1: but it's pretty cool given given the just a hostility
• 1:20:14
  Speaker 1: that you know, and the association that people make between
• 1:20:18
  Speaker 1: capitalism and slavery. Slavery is anti capitalists, and it's the
• 1:20:26
  Speaker 1: people who are really practicing capitalism, creating businesses, creating ventures,
• 1:20:32
  Speaker 1: creating industries. They were the ones most anti slavery. They
• 1:20:38
  Speaker 1: were the ones fighting the most and putting their money
• 1:20:42
  Speaker 1: towards the cause of anti slavery. So if you don't
• 1:20:48
  Speaker 1: believe in slavery and abolition movement, you know you should.
• 1:20:52
  Speaker 1: The abolition movement is as a heroic movement. You should
• 1:20:56
  Speaker 1: be you should recognize that it could not have existed
• 1:20:59
  Speaker 1: in England, of at least I don't know what the
• 1:21:01
  Speaker 1: stats are in the US. I guess it's very similar.
• 1:21:05
  Speaker 1: I mean, look, slavey was a phenomena of agriculture of
• 1:21:11
  Speaker 1: of particularly in England, of of the the colonies in
• 1:21:16
  Speaker 1: in In America, slavery was South agriculture. North industry were abolitionists.
• 1:21:24
  Speaker 1: Capitalism is in America and in the UK. It turns
• 1:21:27
  Speaker 1: out the capitalists, the activity of capitalism, the productive of
• 1:21:32
  Speaker 1: the entrepreneurs, the business leaders, they were poor abolition and
• 1:21:39
  Speaker 1: that is a great story and consistent. It's great to
• 1:21:42
  Speaker 1: see somebody come up with with this, these these data points.
• 1:21:49
  Speaker 1: All right, so some some good news about life in America.
• 1:21:56
  Speaker 1: I know, I know you don't want to hear good
• 1:21:58
  Speaker 1: news about life in America because because you know, Trump
• 1:22:01
  Speaker 1: told us that this contage in the streets and things
• 1:22:03
  Speaker 1: are really going bad. But here's a graph. I've got
• 1:22:07
  Speaker 1: a lot of these. I'm only get sure you want
• 1:22:09
  Speaker 1: a graph. I'm going to tell you about the other graphs,
• 1:22:11
  Speaker 1: but you can find them. The data is overwhelmingly positive
• 1:22:17
  Speaker 1: for the material well being of Americans and for crime.
• 1:22:22
  Speaker 1: Here is data on crime. What do I want to do? Yes,
• 1:22:28
  Speaker 1: there we go. There's the data on crime. US deaths
• 1:22:31
  Speaker 1: generally deaths rolling average over twelve months, by type. So
• 1:22:37
  Speaker 1: theft upper left is homicides. Right. Homicides are not quite
• 1:22:43
  Speaker 1: down yet to twenty nineteen data. And this is based
• 1:22:47
  Speaker 1: on CDC data. But you can look at FBI data,
• 1:22:50
  Speaker 1: you can look at local police data. You'll find that
• 1:22:53
  Speaker 1: this all is consistent. Not quite down to twenty nineteen levels,
• 1:22:58
  Speaker 1: but very close. Remember twenty nineteen levels. You know, maybe
• 1:23:03
  Speaker 1: they're up a little bit. I mean, the mid twenty teens,
• 1:23:07
  Speaker 1: lowest homicide rates in probably fifty years and maybe ever
• 1:23:14
  Speaker 1: in American history. If you have a drug overdose that
• 1:23:18
  Speaker 1: peaks in twenty twenty two, going down, going down steadily,
• 1:23:22
  Speaker 1: with a nice slope, and I don't you know, I
• 1:23:26
  Speaker 1: don't even think Trump can get credit for all of that,
• 1:23:29
  Speaker 1: any of these the slope starts in twenty twenty two,
• 1:23:32
  Speaker 1: independent of Trump. He'll take credit for it anyway. Oh,
• 1:23:38
  Speaker 1: drug overdoses is bottom right, bottom right. You can see
• 1:23:44
  Speaker 1: that sharp decrease starting. Actually there, it's twenty twenty three
• 1:23:50
  Speaker 1: traffic deaths top right, shop decrease. I mean not as sharp,
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 1: not as big, still way off from twenty nineteen. I
• 1:24:01
  Speaker 1: don't know what happened in COVID that led people to
• 1:24:05
  Speaker 1: drive like maniacs and to have more traffic deaths. It
• 1:24:10
  Speaker 1: this just emphasizes how much more we need those driverless
• 1:24:13
  Speaker 1: cause as quickly as possible. Suicide rates again actually peaked
• 1:24:19
  Speaker 1: sometimes post COVID. They actually declined during COVID. I remember
• 1:24:24
  Speaker 1: reporting on that during COVID, which was surprising that they
• 1:24:28
  Speaker 1: declined during COVID, but they did, and then they spiked
• 1:24:32
  Speaker 1: from twenty twenty one. You know, if you look at
• 1:24:34
  Speaker 1: this graph, what is it? It looks like it's colllated
• 1:24:39
  Speaker 1: with vaccines. Here's the new theory I have. Maybe you
• 1:24:42
  Speaker 1: can support this theory. I think vaccines created an epidemic
• 1:24:46
  Speaker 1: of suicide. Everybody got vaccinated and then when it killed themselves,
• 1:24:53
  Speaker 1: corlation causation. Right. But yeah, for some reason, right after COVID,
• 1:24:59
  Speaker 1: everybody got freed up from their lockdown and they all
• 1:25:02
  Speaker 1: went and a bunch of people went and killed themselves.
• 1:25:04
  Speaker 1: That's getting better, not at the rate we would like
• 1:25:07
  Speaker 1: it to go, but it's almost back at twenty nineteen levels.
• 1:25:11
  Speaker 1: Every measures of these death things are getting better. My
• 1:25:14
  Speaker 1: guess is that if you had here cancer deaths, heart
• 1:25:17
  Speaker 1: attack deaths, you'd see a downward sloping line. And this
• 1:25:24
  Speaker 1: is poor, you know, you know this is on a
• 1:25:30
  Speaker 1: twelve month over twelve months. It's a rolling average, a
• 1:25:33
  Speaker 1: rolling rolling number, I guess, not average, rolling number, total number.
• 1:25:39
  Speaker 1: All right, I'm just gonna read you off some other graphs,
• 1:25:41
  Speaker 1: like home ownership rates. You know how everybody says people
• 1:25:44
  Speaker 1: are buying, you know, home ownership rates suck and young
• 1:25:47
  Speaker 1: people don't have a home. Well, if you look at
• 1:25:50
  Speaker 1: home ownership rates of eighteen to thirty five year olds
• 1:25:54
  Speaker 1: from nineteen seventy six to twenty twenty four, if you
• 1:26:02
  Speaker 1: are married, basically sixty percent of married eighteen to thirty
• 1:26:08
  Speaker 1: five year olds had to own the house in nineteen
• 1:26:12
  Speaker 1: seventy six, and that went up a little bit, and
• 1:26:16
  Speaker 1: it's gone down a little bit, and up a little bit,
• 1:26:18
  Speaker 1: and down a little bit, and down quite a bit
• 1:26:21
  Speaker 1: in the twenty teens, and up a little bit recently,
• 1:26:24
  Speaker 1: and it's like sixty percent sixty percent now. Single single
• 1:26:36
  Speaker 1: people eighteen to thirty five years old, their rates in
• 1:26:41
  Speaker 1: nineteen seventy six were like ten percent, and shockingly today
• 1:26:48
  Speaker 1: like it I don't know. I can't exactly say, but
• 1:26:51
  Speaker 1: i'd say seventeen percent from this graph, seventeen percent. And
• 1:26:57
  Speaker 1: yet if you look at over whoh eight of home
• 1:27:01
  Speaker 1: ownership of eighteen to thirty five year olds, they've gone
• 1:27:04
  Speaker 1: from something like thirty eight percent in nineteen seventy six,
• 1:27:08
  Speaker 1: that's a blend of the married and unmarried to about
• 1:27:13
  Speaker 1: I don't know, twenty eight percent, So they've gone down
• 1:27:16
  Speaker 1: by ten percent. Each points a lot. They've gone down
• 1:27:18
  Speaker 1: a lot. How does that work? Like married people stays constant,
• 1:27:27
  Speaker 1: and single went up, and yet the combined went down.
• 1:27:35
  Speaker 1: This is a trick of statistics, right, trick of statistics
• 1:27:37
  Speaker 1: is not a trick. It's obvious once I tell you
• 1:27:41
  Speaker 1: how does that happen? Well, because the combined in nineteen
• 1:27:47
  Speaker 1: seventy six, I'd say, you know, I don't have the
• 1:27:52
  Speaker 1: exact number, but most people were married. Eighteen to thirty
• 1:27:56
  Speaker 1: five year olds were already married. So the sixty that
• 1:28:00
  Speaker 1: owned a home got a bigger waiting than the ten
• 1:28:03
  Speaker 1: percent who didn't. Fast forward to twenty twenty four, Wall,
• 1:28:10
  Speaker 1: a lot fewer people are married, and now the waiting
• 1:28:15
  Speaker 1: of the sixty percent still have a home is smaller
• 1:28:19
  Speaker 1: as compared to singles. Even though the singles own more homes,
• 1:28:23
  Speaker 1: they're waiting as smaller and therefore the number's gone down.
• 1:28:29
  Speaker 1: In other words, In other words, the whole home ownership
• 1:28:38
  Speaker 1: story is not a story about affordability of homes. It's
• 1:28:42
  Speaker 1: not a story about young people can't afford a home
• 1:28:45
  Speaker 1: and they're not buying homes and nobody owns a home
• 1:28:47
  Speaker 1: if they're eighteen to thirty five. Now it's one hundred
• 1:28:51
  Speaker 1: percent of story about young people not getting married. If
• 1:28:56
  Speaker 1: married couples, sixty percent of them own a home, just
• 1:29:00
  Speaker 1: like they did in nineteen seventy six. But you see
• 1:29:05
  Speaker 1: how people distort the statistics, manipulated change them. So it
• 1:29:12
  Speaker 1: is not the case that young adults are giving up
• 1:29:16
  Speaker 1: on the dream of home ownership. It's the case that
• 1:29:21
  Speaker 1: young people are not getting married, and when they do
• 1:29:25
  Speaker 1: get married, maybe in the late thirties or early forties,
• 1:29:28
  Speaker 1: then they'll own a home. You know, it's probably a
• 1:29:32
  Speaker 1: big chunk, particularly in America, of the birth rate. Issue
• 1:29:37
  Speaker 1: is an issue of people not getting married and people
• 1:29:40
  Speaker 1: getting married much later and therefore having a much shorter
• 1:29:43
  Speaker 1: window to have kids. Here's another positive statistic, you know,
• 1:29:49
  Speaker 1: just for fun, I figured i'd lump them all together, right.
• 1:29:52
  Speaker 1: Another positive statistics the mean wages in Mississippi. Mississippi is
• 1:29:57
  Speaker 1: the poorest state in the United States. Mean is the average.
• 1:30:02
  Speaker 1: The average wage in Mississippi, the poorest state in the
• 1:30:06
  Speaker 1: United States, higher than the average mean wages in the UK, Canada,
• 1:30:14
  Speaker 1: and Germany. So if you take that poorest state in America,
• 1:30:20
  Speaker 1: the average wage and the poorest state in America is
• 1:30:22
  Speaker 1: still higher than the wages in those three major countries, UK, Canada,
• 1:30:28
  Speaker 1: and Germany. Americans, you know, I don't know how to
• 1:30:33
  Speaker 1: tell you this, and I know it's going to break
• 1:30:34
  Speaker 1: your heart, but you're doing pretty well, not as well
• 1:30:37
  Speaker 1: as you could. I'm going to be the first to
• 1:30:39
  Speaker 1: tell you that not as well as you could, you're
• 1:30:40
  Speaker 1: doing pretty well. Do you know that in nineteen eighty
• 1:30:45
  Speaker 1: four you had to work five times five x more hours,
• 1:30:53
  Speaker 1: five times more hours to buy a refrigerator of the
• 1:30:58
  Speaker 1: same size as you do today. So if today you
• 1:31:03
  Speaker 1: know in nineteen eighty so here it is in nineteen
• 1:31:05
  Speaker 1: eighty for the average hourly earnings for production non supervising
• 1:31:09
  Speaker 1: worker in steaded roughly eight thirty two dollars acquiring the
• 1:31:13
  Speaker 1: kin more would that's require poxing one hundred and sixty
• 1:31:16
  Speaker 1: three hours of labor. By contrast, a comparable twenty twenty
• 1:31:20
  Speaker 1: four model from major retailer like Home Depot, matching size
• 1:31:24
  Speaker 1: and features retail so about nine hundred and ninety eight
• 1:31:27
  Speaker 1: dollars in nominal terms in twenty twenty four, and if
• 1:31:32
  Speaker 1: you look at just you know, wages and stuff like that,
• 1:31:36
  Speaker 1: then the labor investment would go down to thirty three hours.
• 1:31:40
  Speaker 1: So today you can buy refrigerator if you'll average something
• 1:31:44
  Speaker 1: in thirty three hours. In nineteen eighty four, it took
• 1:31:47
  Speaker 1: you one hundred and sixty three hours to by exactly
• 1:31:49
  Speaker 1: the same refrigerator. Actually today's refrigerator is a little better,
• 1:31:53
  Speaker 1: but put that aside. We live in a grievance culture.
• 1:32:01
  Speaker 1: We live in a culture of complaining, bitching and complaining.
• 1:32:07
  Speaker 1: If you look at refrigerators today, since one refrigerators, you
• 1:32:11
  Speaker 1: know we talked about one hundred and sixty three hours
• 1:32:13
  Speaker 1: versus thirty three. The one you buy with thirty three
• 1:32:16
  Speaker 1: hours is also like a third of the cost in
• 1:32:19
  Speaker 1: terms of electricity what it'e used, So it's much more
• 1:32:23
  Speaker 1: efficient and it's just as durable, So much for the
• 1:32:28
  Speaker 1: argument that you know, we're time and you know, refrigerators
• 1:32:32
  Speaker 1: and other goods become less durable, they break down more.
• 1:32:35
  Speaker 1: That's just not true, just true. You know, z Racer says,
• 1:32:45
  Speaker 1: we have a massive housing shortage for sure. Yeah, in
• 1:32:49
  Speaker 1: California and in Manhattan, and then a few other in
• 1:32:53
  Speaker 1: Seattle and in a few other places around the country.
• 1:32:56
  Speaker 1: In ninety nine percent of the country in terms of
• 1:32:59
  Speaker 1: job graphy, not inter it's the number of people living there.
• 1:33:02
  Speaker 1: There's no housing shortage. And I was thing, it's pretty cheap.
• 1:33:07
  Speaker 1: People forget that the whole housing crisis is a phenomenon
• 1:33:10
  Speaker 1: of a few cities all blue, by the way, a
• 1:33:14
  Speaker 1: few cities around the country. Some housing shortage in Austin.
• 1:33:18
  Speaker 1: That's why rents the declining and prices are coming down.
• 1:33:22
  Speaker 1: You can buy an amazing house right now in like
• 1:33:25
  Speaker 1: Leander for under a million dollars, a big mcmahonsion type
• 1:33:29
  Speaker 1: house for under a million bucks. All right. Finally, a
• 1:33:36
  Speaker 1: paper came out this week, this last week, and I'm
• 1:33:40
  Speaker 1: not gonna have time to go over all the details
• 1:33:42
  Speaker 1: in this, but I'm just gonna note a paper came
• 1:33:45
  Speaker 1: out by a guy named Michael W. Green who is
• 1:33:50
  Speaker 1: a financier, he works at some money management firm, he
• 1:33:54
  Speaker 1: is a chief economist there or something like that. And
• 1:33:57
  Speaker 1: this has been all the rage among the populists and
• 1:34:01
  Speaker 1: among the economists. And the paper basically made the argument that,
• 1:34:08
  Speaker 1: you know, the poverty line, which in America is defined
• 1:34:12
  Speaker 1: as something like thirty four thousand dollars for particular family,
• 1:34:16
  Speaker 1: I think family with two kids or something like that.
• 1:34:18
  Speaker 1: That's a poverty line. You make that or below, you're poor. Right,
• 1:34:21
  Speaker 1: everybody could agree with that. Anyway, this Michael W. Green
• 1:34:24
  Speaker 1: came out with a paper saying, ah, that poverty line
• 1:34:27
  Speaker 1: is completely wrong. The reality is that in America today,
• 1:34:33
  Speaker 1: if you make one hundred and forty thousand dollars, one
• 1:34:36
  Speaker 1: hundred and forty thousand dollars, you're basically in poverty. And
• 1:34:40
  Speaker 1: the Free Press ran a story written by Michael Green.
• 1:34:44
  Speaker 1: So he wrote a paper and then he wrote a
• 1:34:46
  Speaker 1: version of it for the Free Press where he basically said,
• 1:34:49
  Speaker 1: one hundred thousand dollars you're poor. That's a new poverty line.
• 1:34:52
  Speaker 1: If you make less than one hundred thousand dollars, you're
• 1:34:54
  Speaker 1: poor in America today. This is nuts. I mean, imagine
• 1:35:02
  Speaker 1: how poor Europeans are none of them make over one
• 1:35:05
  Speaker 1: hundred thousand dollars. I mean, that is completely nuts. Now
• 1:35:12
  Speaker 1: I don't have time to go through this, but there's
• 1:35:15
  Speaker 1: a couple of papers by Scott Winship. Scott Winship is
• 1:35:20
  Speaker 1: a fellow and the director of the Center for Opportunity
• 1:35:23
  Speaker 1: and Social Mobility at the American Enterprise Institute. Then there
• 1:35:27
  Speaker 1: was also a paper by Jimmy Hoppenhadull and I can't
• 1:35:34
  Speaker 1: remember what his credentials are, but he's an economist, and
• 1:35:37
  Speaker 1: they basically say, this is basically nuts. You're completely lying
• 1:35:44
  Speaker 1: and cheating with the numbers. You don't know what you're
• 1:35:47
  Speaker 1: talking about. But now this rhetoric of one hundred and
• 1:35:50
  Speaker 1: forty thousand is spreading on Twitter like crazy. Everybody's adopting
• 1:35:54
  Speaker 1: it because it feeds the populist and the left, the socialists. Yeah,
• 1:35:59
  Speaker 1: look at capitalists, it's made one hundred thousand dollars of earnings.
• 1:36:02
  Speaker 1: You're poor. And if he is the populist in the way,
• 1:36:04
  Speaker 1: look at how awful life is. We need those immigrants
• 1:36:07
  Speaker 1: out because because of the immigrants, even on one hundred
• 1:36:10
  Speaker 1: thousand dollars a year, we can't make a living. But
• 1:36:17
  Speaker 1: it's yeah. I mean, this guy drastically underestimates how much
• 1:36:22
  Speaker 1: American income, how much families actually make. He dramatically overestimates
• 1:36:27
  Speaker 1: how much spending is necessary to support a family. He
• 1:36:31
  Speaker 1: uses average spending figures and treats them as if they're
• 1:36:35
  Speaker 1: the minimum amount necessary, and average is always skewed by
• 1:36:39
  Speaker 1: the biggest spender. It's not you know, if he'd use
• 1:36:41
  Speaker 1: the median, it would have been better. Still not right,
• 1:36:43
  Speaker 1: but would have been better. But median is what fifty
• 1:36:46
  Speaker 1: above and fifty percent below. He's using average, which is
• 1:36:49
  Speaker 1: way about fifty percent, because again, if I'm buying a yacht,
• 1:36:53
  Speaker 1: that's driving consumption way higher. He obsesses over the official
• 1:37:01
  Speaker 1: poverty measure and how it's been done since it was
• 1:37:04
  Speaker 1: originally established in the nineteen sixties. Granted it's somewhat arbitrary
• 1:37:09
  Speaker 1: what the official kind of poverty level is, but anyway,
• 1:37:15
  Speaker 1: this is just consistent with this god just grievance culture
• 1:37:20
  Speaker 1: right and left. Everybody wants to blame somebody, immigrants, billionaires,
• 1:37:30
  Speaker 1: people who don't look like me, foreigners, white people, systemic racism, something.
• 1:37:36
  Speaker 1: It's somebody else is to blame. And my life sucks
• 1:37:41
  Speaker 1: and I have no perspective. And one of the interesting
• 1:37:45
  Speaker 1: phenomenas about this all this BS stuff on poverty, on life,
• 1:37:50
  Speaker 1: on income. I've told you about gen Z's, all the
• 1:37:53
  Speaker 1: stats on gen Z is you have to decide at
• 1:37:57
  Speaker 1: some point what do you believe. Do you believe that
• 1:38:00
  Speaker 1: data or he believes what Americans say? And even when
• 1:38:08
  Speaker 1: you talk about what Americans say, do you believe what
• 1:38:11
  Speaker 1: they say about their own life or do you believe
• 1:38:13
  Speaker 1: what they say about their neighbor's life, because survey ask.
• 1:38:17
  Speaker 1: The survey show that Americans are pretty satisfied with their
• 1:38:22
  Speaker 1: own life. They're not that aggrieved. They don't think they're poor,
• 1:38:27
  Speaker 1: they don't think they're struggling. They've got a home, they're okay,
• 1:38:31
  Speaker 1: their income is fine, they manage. But Sylvie Ask, the
• 1:38:36
  Speaker 1: survey also show that those save Americans who are you know,
• 1:38:39
  Speaker 1: okay with their own lives, think they're neighbors. Oh my god.
• 1:38:43
  Speaker 1: There's poverty everywhere, crime is out of control. The world
• 1:38:47
  Speaker 1: is ending for everybody else. In my neighborhood, there's no crime,
• 1:38:50
  Speaker 1: don't get me wrong. And in my neighborhood, everybody's making
• 1:38:53
  Speaker 1: good living. But out there, some way, there are people
• 1:38:56
  Speaker 1: who are awful and everybody's suffering and every but you know,
• 1:39:00
  Speaker 1: wages have not gone up since the nineteen seventies. We
• 1:39:03
  Speaker 1: were told over and over and over and over again.
• 1:39:05
  Speaker 1: The lie that's repeated and repeated and repeated, and then
• 1:39:07
  Speaker 1: it becomes reality. Wages have not gone up since the seventies.
• 1:39:12
  Speaker 1: You know, there's an affordability crisis in America today. No
• 1:39:16
  Speaker 1: stuff is more affordable now than ever. You know, a
• 1:39:19
  Speaker 1: few things are really expensive, and most stuff is more
• 1:39:22
  Speaker 1: affordable than ever, and more variety and more choices, and
• 1:39:27
  Speaker 1: even homes unless you're in California and New York or
• 1:39:32
  Speaker 1: a few other states, the more affordable than they used
• 1:39:35
  Speaker 1: to be because your wages have gone up with inflation.
• 1:39:39
  Speaker 1: Is but people are convinced. And why are they convinced?
• 1:39:45
  Speaker 1: Is it something bad about them? No, it's not. It's because,
• 1:39:50
  Speaker 1: and I've been telling you this for years now, our
• 1:39:53
  Speaker 1: intellectuals and our presidents and our politicians. Our intellectuals and
• 1:39:57
  Speaker 1: our politicians don't stop telling us. They do not stop
• 1:40:01
  Speaker 1: telling us how bad things are, how awful things are
• 1:40:05
  Speaker 1: for us. Wages haven't gone up. There's a crisis. There's
• 1:40:11
  Speaker 1: a fentanel crisis, and an immigration crisis. And a housing
• 1:40:14
  Speaker 1: crisis and a cost of living crisis, and you know,
• 1:40:18
  Speaker 1: and and there's no end to the number of crises
• 1:40:22
  Speaker 1: China crisis, and employment crisis and a manufacturing crisis, and
• 1:40:26
  Speaker 1: there's no end. This is why presidents constantly announce emergencies
• 1:40:32
  Speaker 1: and take on emergency powers, and emergencies are never ascended.
• 1:40:40
  Speaker 1: And they lie and they lie, and they lie and
• 1:40:43
  Speaker 1: they lie, and they make stuff up. You saw there
• 1:40:46
  Speaker 1: with Tucker, you sew with Trump, you sew with Stephen Miller.
• 1:40:50
  Speaker 1: They lie and they lie, and they manufacture stuff and
• 1:40:53
  Speaker 1: they create stuff that doesn't exist, and they just they
• 1:40:56
  Speaker 1: don't stop. And the tragic thing is we just eat
• 1:41:04
  Speaker 1: it up. We eat it up. We just we just
• 1:41:07
  Speaker 1: buy into the whole thing. So there is a crisis,
• 1:41:15
  Speaker 1: you know, the crisis. Yeah, I mean, here's here's what
• 1:41:21
  Speaker 1: Scott Winsip writes about this. You know, just the idea
• 1:41:24
  Speaker 1: that populist rage is rampant because of whitespead economic dissatisfaction
• 1:41:28
  Speaker 1: is almost always an assumption not backed by the evidence.
• 1:41:32
  Speaker 1: But evidence does exist in this case too, and it
• 1:41:35
  Speaker 1: tells us that people are not actually any more dissatisfied
• 1:41:39
  Speaker 1: with their own economic situation than in the past. Rather
• 1:41:42
  Speaker 1: they think, contrary to what people say about themselves, that
• 1:41:45
  Speaker 1: everyone else is doing poorly. That impression doesn't develop in
• 1:41:50
  Speaker 1: a vacuum. It's fed by inaccurate, sometimes wildly inaccurate claims
• 1:41:58
  Speaker 1: that are taken up by the very online, by the
• 1:42:02
  Speaker 1: very online, and spread like wildfire among the dis effected
• 1:42:07
  Speaker 1: on social media. I won't follow Green in accusation of
• 1:42:12
  Speaker 1: bad faith. Green is the guy who wrote about one
• 1:42:14
  Speaker 1: hundred and forty thousand dollars but as argument about poverty
• 1:42:19
  Speaker 1: is simply bad. Yeah, I mean, we suffer because we
• 1:42:28
  Speaker 1: have bad intellectuals. We suffer because we have bad politicians.
• 1:42:36
  Speaker 1: We suffer because we have bad ideas. We suffer because
• 1:42:40
  Speaker 1: we don't listen to the few among us who are rational.
• 1:42:44
  Speaker 1: We suffer because we're driven by emotion. And note that
• 1:42:50
  Speaker 1: there are consequences of this, and we keep following this,
• 1:42:53
  Speaker 1: we will be in a crisis. They are crises out there.
• 1:42:56
  Speaker 1: You know, the fact that the government is going to
• 1:42:58
  Speaker 1: go bankrupt one day, the fact that you know there
• 1:43:03
  Speaker 1: are real misallocation of capital out there, There's real injustice
• 1:43:07
  Speaker 1: is going on out there. They're not the ones that
• 1:43:08
  Speaker 1: people claim they are, but they are going on. We
• 1:43:13
  Speaker 1: blame the wrong things, we focus on the wrong things,
• 1:43:16
  Speaker 1: and we don't do the right things because we don't know.
• 1:43:19
  Speaker 1: The public has completely bemboozled by a failed intellectual class
• 1:43:25
  Speaker 1: and by a despicable lying political class. And yeah, that's
• 1:43:35
  Speaker 1: what we are. They're my friends. But the reality of it,
• 1:43:41
  Speaker 1: the facts on the ground of it on a day
• 1:43:43
  Speaker 1: to day basis, are that you still, in spite of everything,
• 1:43:49
  Speaker 1: you still I know it's hard for you to believe
• 1:43:51
  Speaker 1: this live from a material economic perspective, in the best
• 1:44:00
  Speaker 1: time in all of human history, and from many other respects,
• 1:44:05
  Speaker 1: It's never been a better time in human history to
• 1:44:09
  Speaker 1: be gay whatever LGBTQ you want to be, oh you
• 1:44:15
  Speaker 1: happen to be, not want to be, happen to be.
• 1:44:17
  Speaker 1: It's never been a better time in probably all of
• 1:44:20
  Speaker 1: human history to be a minority, in spite of the
• 1:44:24
  Speaker 1: nastiness of these people. So it's never been in all
• 1:44:31
  Speaker 1: of human history a better time to be a woman
• 1:44:34
  Speaker 1: than right now. And so there's a violence. It's it's
• 1:44:41
  Speaker 1: probably on a global scale, is the best time to
• 1:44:45
  Speaker 1: be alive in spite of the war in Ukraine and
• 1:44:47
  Speaker 1: what's going on in Gaza and it's don and in
• 1:44:50
  Speaker 1: Somalia and a few other places, it's some of the
• 1:44:54
  Speaker 1: safest times in all of human history right now. So
• 1:45:00
  Speaker 1: there's a lot to fix, but we can't fix it
• 1:45:03
  Speaker 1: until we know what's real and what isn't, What are
• 1:45:05
  Speaker 1: real problems or what or not, what actually makes sense
• 1:45:08
  Speaker 1: to worry about, and what doesn't. All right, friends, that
• 1:45:23
  Speaker 1: is the news for this Friday, November twenty eighth, the
• 1:45:27
  Speaker 1: day after Thanksgiving. Thank you all for being here. We
• 1:45:30
  Speaker 1: are lagging, lagging, you know, painfully lagging our goals. Right,
• 1:45:36
  Speaker 1: so we were about to finish our second hour. Second
• 1:45:39
  Speaker 1: hour went two hours straight today, no break, no nothing, right,
• 1:45:44
  Speaker 1: two hours straight and we haven't made our We've just
• 1:45:48
  Speaker 1: about made our first hour goal, and we need to
• 1:45:51
  Speaker 1: make our second hour goal. So we still lack about
• 1:45:53
  Speaker 1: two hundred and fifty dollars to make our second alur goal.
• 1:45:55
  Speaker 1: So stickers one dollars, stick of five dollars, stick of
• 1:45:58
  Speaker 1: one hundred dollars. Sticker, you know, somebody coming in with
• 1:46:00
  Speaker 1: two hundred and fifty, we'll do it. Two hundreds one,
• 1:46:04
  Speaker 1: you know, five fifties. Anything like that would be greatly appreciated.
• 1:46:08
  Speaker 1: So we can say we made at least the second
• 1:46:10
  Speaker 1: our goal even as we slip into the third hour,
• 1:46:13
  Speaker 1: because there's a there's a few questions, they're just not
• 1:46:16
  Speaker 1: with big dollar amounts on them. So yeah, you know,
• 1:46:20
  Speaker 1: we've got to make our goals. This show could not
• 1:46:24
  Speaker 1: exist without support from you, all right, talk about support.
• 1:46:27
  Speaker 1: The best way to support the show is monthly. Is
• 1:46:31
  Speaker 1: make our commitment to support it monthly. You can do
• 1:46:33
  Speaker 1: that on Patreon Patreon dot com and just go your
• 1:46:36
  Speaker 1: on book show and become a monthly support. If you
• 1:46:39
  Speaker 1: do ten dollars above, you get the podcast version audio
• 1:46:43
  Speaker 1: only with no ads, no ads on your Apple podcast
• 1:46:48
  Speaker 1: or whatever podcasting app you use. So that's the best way.
• 1:46:52
  Speaker 1: I'm still looking for I think I need. I'm still
• 1:46:54
  Speaker 1: searching to make my goal for the end of the
• 1:46:56
  Speaker 1: year seven seven new Ptreon subscribers. Seven you. Now, if
• 1:47:02
  Speaker 1: the seven would like five hundred dollars a month, that
• 1:47:05
  Speaker 1: would make my year. But seven at any amount would
• 1:47:09
  Speaker 1: be fantastic. Seven You. If you're out there and you've
• 1:47:12
  Speaker 1: never supported the show on a monti basos, or you
• 1:47:14
  Speaker 1: used to and you don't anymore, or you subscribed on
• 1:47:17
  Speaker 1: Patreon but you know free subscription, then just flip it
• 1:47:23
  Speaker 1: to a monetize subscription and accounts. I need seven new
• 1:47:28
  Speaker 1: ones or seven re upping or whatever you want to
• 1:47:31
  Speaker 1: call it, and that'd be great. I also want to
• 1:47:35
  Speaker 1: remind you that on December thirty first, New Year's Eve,
• 1:47:40
  Speaker 1: we do the annual year in Review show. We look
• 1:47:46
  Speaker 1: back at the year and we examine it. I might
• 1:47:49
  Speaker 1: have I might try to have some guests on as
• 1:47:52
  Speaker 1: well and do some short interviews as well, and we're
• 1:47:56
  Speaker 1: going to have like a massive goal, a fundraising goal.
• 1:47:59
  Speaker 1: We're gonna going to try to raise like twenty thousand
• 1:48:01
  Speaker 1: dollars on that one show. I'm blocking out at least
• 1:48:05
  Speaker 1: four hours for the show, so this is going to
• 1:48:07
  Speaker 1: go for like four hours on the thirty first of December.
• 1:48:11
  Speaker 1: So please consider dropping in and coming in and making
• 1:48:15
  Speaker 1: a small contribution, a large contribution, like to get us
• 1:48:19
  Speaker 1: to the goal. We have made the goal every year
• 1:48:22
  Speaker 1: in the past, but I keep upping it so it
• 1:48:24
  Speaker 1: keep making it more difficult for me and for you
• 1:48:26
  Speaker 1: and for everybody else. So please consider, please consider coming
• 1:48:31
  Speaker 1: in and if you have the wherewithal to come in
• 1:48:35
  Speaker 1: with significant amounts so we can make our goals, because
• 1:48:39
  Speaker 1: it's going to require some people to do five hundred
• 1:48:41
  Speaker 1: dollars and several hundred dollars and a number of you.
• 1:48:44
  Speaker 1: So that'll be December thirty. First, we'll probably start at
• 1:48:47
  Speaker 1: one pm East Coast time and go for like four hours,
• 1:48:50
  Speaker 1: maybe even five hours, and until we make it. So
• 1:48:54
  Speaker 1: I'll be you know, asking for money. But I will
• 1:49:01
  Speaker 1: have some guests. Uh. Maybe I'm gonna try, uh and
• 1:49:05
  Speaker 1: get some guests, uh see if they'll come on uh
• 1:49:09
  Speaker 1: and uh and just talk about why they like the
• 1:49:11
  Speaker 1: show and why they like being on the show, and
• 1:49:14
  Speaker 1: and just to mix it up a little bit, maybe
• 1:49:15
  Speaker 1: take a few of your questions. So we'll get some
• 1:49:17
  Speaker 1: guests to come on and take some of your questions. Uh.
• 1:49:20
  Speaker 1: And by the way, that we're gonna have guests starting
• 1:49:22
  Speaker 1: next week. So Monday Monday, we're gonna have heavy Vince
• 1:49:26
  Speaker 1: Swang lb on the show. H So Monday evening the
• 1:49:30
  Speaker 1: following Monday, if I'm not mistaken, we're gonna have Gene
• 1:49:33
  Speaker 1: So we're covering the Businessweger family, so Harry, and then
• 1:49:36
  Speaker 1: a week after Jane and then we're gonna have Nicos,
• 1:49:40
  Speaker 1: and we're still trying a bunch of others, you know, uh,
• 1:49:44
  Speaker 1: you know so the rest of December, expect to have guests. January.
• 1:49:49
  Speaker 1: Throughout January, expect to have guests. So we will have
• 1:49:52
  Speaker 1: interviews throughout uh and and into next year. Oh, I've
• 1:49:56
  Speaker 1: got what's his name, Vincent Vincent Galleso Gallesso, the Canadian
• 1:50:02
  Speaker 1: economist who basically, when Trump put tariffs in Canada, basically
• 1:50:06
  Speaker 1: said Canada should have unilaterally zero tariffs. They should reduce
• 1:50:11
  Speaker 1: tariffs in retaliation for Trump's increasing tariffs. And so that's
• 1:50:17
  Speaker 1: gonna be fun. We'll have another free market economists, non
• 1:50:19
  Speaker 1: objectivist female economists on to talk about tariffs and other stuff,
• 1:50:25
  Speaker 1: so that'll be fun as well. That will also be
• 1:50:27
  Speaker 1: in December. And of course we'll have Nicos to talk
• 1:50:31
  Speaker 1: about crazy right and the crazy left. He's an expert. Finally,
• 1:50:37
  Speaker 1: we have some sponsors. Dynamand Institute is holding a confidence
• 1:50:43
  Speaker 1: in Porto, Portugal in April seventeen to nineteen. I will
• 1:50:47
  Speaker 1: be there and you should come. You can get a discount.
• 1:50:52
  Speaker 1: It's twenty six ybs ten that's a discount code. And
• 1:50:56
  Speaker 1: if you're under thirty four years old, you can get
• 1:50:58
  Speaker 1: a scholarship that'll basically pay pay you, pay you for it.
• 1:51:02
  Speaker 1: Somebody says, whatever happened to Joe Sealgian He was on
• 1:51:05
  Speaker 1: like a few months ago. I had him on.
• 1:51:11
  Speaker 2: That was.
• 1:51:13
  Speaker 1: Anyway, that's that manustute. Then you've got Alex Epstein. Alex
• 1:51:17
  Speaker 1: Epstein is the oh to find the stuff for the
• 1:51:21
  Speaker 1: for the institute is ironman dot org slash start here,
• 1:51:24
  Speaker 1: Ironman slash dot here. All the links down below. Alex
• 1:51:28
  Speaker 1: Epstein number one thinker on energy, on on electricity, on
• 1:51:32
  Speaker 1: fossil fuels, on what's going on with energy policy and
• 1:51:35
  Speaker 1: the Trumpet administration. Alex is uh has a substack talking points.
• 1:51:43
  Speaker 1: You will learn so much alex Epstein dot substack dot com.
• 1:51:47
  Speaker 1: Alex Epstein dot substack dot com. And yeah, let's stop
• 1:51:52
  Speaker 1: there and we'll do more in X few days. Can
• 1:51:55
  Speaker 1: do all of them every day, but we'll cover most
• 1:51:58
  Speaker 1: of them. Let's do quickly. Some of the stickers. Stringer
• 1:52:05
  Speaker 1: Bell came in with fifty dollars. Thank you, Stringer Bell.
• 1:52:07
  Speaker 1: That helps a lot. I need four more people to
• 1:52:09
  Speaker 1: do fifty dollars so that we can get to our goal.
• 1:52:12
  Speaker 1: Sir Nerrick, thank you for the sticker. And who else
• 1:52:17
  Speaker 1: did a sticker? Who else we got? Jason Adams, Benjamin Nuniez,
• 1:52:22
  Speaker 1: Margaret and Yahiel and Deeper with Diego and sit went
• 1:52:34
  Speaker 1: to five four and timber Skid and Normative, Randroad and
• 1:52:43
  Speaker 1: Bonnie Bertran and Katherine and Rufa l and freend Harper.
• 1:52:54
  Speaker 1: Thank you for the stickers, really really really appreciate the support. Particular,
• 1:52:59
  Speaker 1: we'll give a shout out the string A Bell who
• 1:53:00
  Speaker 1: did fifty bucks, So thank you Stringer Bell. Really appreciate that.
• 1:53:04
  Speaker 1: All right, let's go with Andrew. Why does xenophobia towards
• 1:53:10
  Speaker 1: immigrants persist? Libertarians routinely expose how every generation of immigrants
• 1:53:16
  Speaker 1: face the same ignorant tropes and then become part of
• 1:53:19
  Speaker 1: the fabric of society. Yet the ignorant tropes prevail. So
• 1:53:22
  Speaker 1: the real question is why the ignorant tropes prevail. It's
• 1:53:25
  Speaker 1: because ignorance prevails and collectivism prevails. And you know, xenophobia
• 1:53:31
  Speaker 1: is just an aspect of collectivism. And when you have
• 1:53:34
  Speaker 1: periods with cultural angst, people upset, people believing that the
• 1:53:42
  Speaker 1: world is not going well, maybe it's coming to an end,
• 1:53:44
  Speaker 1: Western civilization is ending. Then they need to find somebody
• 1:53:49
  Speaker 1: to blame for it and to say ideas, cause it
• 1:53:53
  Speaker 1: is too big, too difficult to abstract. They want to concrete.
• 1:53:58
  Speaker 1: They want somebody to blame, and immigrants are just easy
• 1:54:05
  Speaker 1: to blame. Whatever problems you have, and you know and
• 1:54:09
  Speaker 1: you can you can easily position immigrant groups against one another.
• 1:54:12
  Speaker 1: For example, I mean, the biggest opposition to Chinese immigration
• 1:54:17
  Speaker 1: in the eighteen nineties in California came from Irish immigrants who,
• 1:54:22
  Speaker 1: in a sense, thought that they came first. They were
• 1:54:26
  Speaker 1: not willing to do the kind of work that Chinese
• 1:54:28
  Speaker 1: did on the railroads, and they they they they feared
• 1:54:32
  Speaker 1: that the Chinese were undercutting their wages, so they rose
• 1:54:36
  Speaker 1: up against the Chinese to try and they got the
• 1:54:38
  Speaker 1: They got California legislation and then ultimately the federal government
• 1:54:41
  Speaker 1: to ban Chinese immigration from the United States. So, but
• 1:54:45
  Speaker 1: it's a it's a it's a combination of collectivism and
• 1:54:48
  Speaker 1: ignorance and fear. So when society has become dominated by
• 1:54:56
  Speaker 1: anger and fear, they need to they need a focus.
• 1:55:00
  Speaker 1: They hang on somebody and and they have to and
• 1:55:05
  Speaker 1: that's somebody. An easy target is immigrants, particularly in America,
• 1:55:10
  Speaker 1: where immigration has played such a huge role in the
• 1:55:13
  Speaker 1: history of the country. Lincoln, what is this the disaster
• 1:55:22
  Speaker 1: known as Trump is going to charge two hundred and
• 1:55:25
  Speaker 1: fifty dollars for international visitors instead of eighty dollars for
• 1:55:30
  Speaker 1: national park entry. Oh and add his pick to the pass.
• 1:55:37
  Speaker 1: Discouraging international visitors hurts countless businesses, including ours. Yeah, I mean, oh,
• 1:55:43
  Speaker 1: this is Linda Linda Codell. Okay, I don't know what Yeah, yeah,
• 1:55:47
  Speaker 1: I mean it's it's horrible. It's horrible. So you know,
• 1:55:54
  Speaker 1: when when you don't like foreigners, you don't like foreigners,
• 1:55:58
  Speaker 1: whether they're visitors, whether they come here. I wouldn't I
• 1:56:01
  Speaker 1: wouldn't be surprised if if Americans stop traveling abroad lass,
• 1:56:04
  Speaker 1: because who wants to go to these horrible places? We
• 1:56:07
  Speaker 1: don't want the people coming here, why would we will
• 1:56:09
  Speaker 1: go there? And and you know, you become more insular,
• 1:56:13
  Speaker 1: become more isolated, become more ignorant. And yeah, I mean
• 1:56:18
  Speaker 1: it's the globalist like me who travel around the world
• 1:56:21
  Speaker 1: and and visit new countries and you don't want to
• 1:56:24
  Speaker 1: interact with new people and and and different people from
• 1:56:27
  Speaker 1: different parts of the world. That that that that's that's
• 1:56:30
  Speaker 1: not those real American patriots that Trump talks about. That's
• 1:56:33
  Speaker 1: not them. They don't they don't do that so why
• 1:56:35
  Speaker 1: have them come here. It's very destructive to the US economy,
• 1:56:40
  Speaker 1: particularly concentrate in particular places that that very much rely
• 1:56:45
  Speaker 1: on tourism. And it's destructive to Americans not to be
• 1:56:48
  Speaker 1: able to interact with these fauners and destructive faunas not
• 1:56:51
  Speaker 1: being able to come here to visit never might immigrate.
• 1:56:55
  Speaker 1: Andrew Uh, I know it's a small point Trump calling
• 1:56:59
  Speaker 1: the reporter Pece, But I would like to lecture to
• 1:57:02
  Speaker 1: mature conservative men you support taking talking to a woman
• 1:57:07
  Speaker 1: like that, What if it was your wife? Does character
• 1:57:11
  Speaker 1: matter in life or not? Well, I think that they
• 1:57:15
  Speaker 1: have basically come down on no, it doesn't matter. As
• 1:57:18
  Speaker 1: long as you fight the left, it doesn't character, it
• 1:57:20
  Speaker 1: doesn't matter, you know. And and I mean most of
• 1:57:26
  Speaker 1: the people who met who voted for Trump would never
• 1:57:29
  Speaker 1: talk to people like that like he talks to them.
• 1:57:32
  Speaker 1: But I think a lot of them would like to
• 1:57:37
  Speaker 1: and they live vicariously through Trump. But yeah, I mean,
• 1:57:42
  Speaker 1: character doesn't matter. That's one of the great tragedies. And
• 1:57:45
  Speaker 1: remember when when Bill Clinton was president, it was all
• 1:57:50
  Speaker 1: about character according to the Republicans. Of course, they lost,
• 1:57:54
  Speaker 1: So maybe the lesson they learned is if you emphasize character,
• 1:57:57
  Speaker 1: you lose, so forget about character. What we want is winners,
• 1:58:01
  Speaker 1: God Andrew. The more I strengthen the integration of objectivist morality,
• 1:58:07
  Speaker 1: the more I realized the extent to which the extent
• 1:58:13
  Speaker 1: that the switch a beneficiary from others to self is
• 1:58:17
  Speaker 1: a revolutionary identification in opposition to conventional morality. Yes, it
• 1:58:21
  Speaker 1: changes everything. That switch to say the beneficiaries, your reaction
• 1:58:25
  Speaker 1: should be you, not the other. Everything changes your whole conception,
• 1:58:31
  Speaker 1: your whole psychology, everything about how you interact with the
• 1:58:34
  Speaker 1: world changes. And very few people in all of human
• 1:58:38
  Speaker 1: history accepted that I've adopted that swich is Philosopher's aristotleline
• 1:58:44
  Speaker 1: ran basically, you know, maybe Spinoza hinting at it, but yeah,
• 1:58:50
  Speaker 1: everybody else says, oh yeah, being selfish is that's just
• 1:58:54
  Speaker 1: human ature. What can you do? But you have to
• 1:58:55
  Speaker 1: overcome it with morality. Morality is the way we overcome
• 1:59:00
  Speaker 1: instincts of self interest. Kiro from the Czech Republic. Chad
• 1:59:06
  Speaker 1: Gibd thinks the US NATO whatever rough time defeating Iran,
• 1:59:11
  Speaker 1: even though just for theory, even without just worth theory,
• 1:59:15
  Speaker 1: due to the asymmetric strategy, which uses proxies and Straits
• 1:59:18
  Speaker 1: of Homos, disrupting to inflict high cost, triggering a regional
• 1:59:22
  Speaker 1: war and global economic shock. True, Oh god, no, no, no,
• 1:59:28
  Speaker 1: no over in I mean, even with just Ward would
• 1:59:32
  Speaker 1: be over in a month. I mean Israel completely eviscerated
• 1:59:36
  Speaker 1: them in twelve days. Another twelve days the regime would
• 1:59:39
  Speaker 1: have fallen. And oh right, so they blocked the Straits
• 1:59:44
  Speaker 1: of Homos for a few days. But you land marines
• 1:59:47
  Speaker 1: in the Straits of Homos and you reopen it, that
• 1:59:53
  Speaker 1: will take days. There's no fighting force on the Iranian
• 1:59:56
  Speaker 1: side that we stand anything America has. Think about the
• 2:00:02
  Speaker 1: nineteen ninety one war with euroc it was just it
• 2:00:06
  Speaker 1: was just me and all the experts, and I'm sure
• 2:00:09
  Speaker 1: chat ChiPT was around then. All the experts said at
• 2:00:15
  Speaker 1: the time, Oh, casualties on the American side are gonna
• 2:00:19
  Speaker 1: be horrific. This is gonna be a devastating war. It's
• 2:00:22
  Speaker 1: gonna take weeks months to dislodge the Iraqis. The Americans
• 2:00:26
  Speaker 1: don't realize how strong the Irocky military really is. Would
• 2:00:28
  Speaker 1: it take a few days? So no, absolutely not. Chat
• 2:00:35
  Speaker 1: GPT and all those generals and all those experts. They
• 2:00:39
  Speaker 1: thought Gaza would be a blood bath for these Raeleas.
• 2:00:42
  Speaker 1: They thought Isa could never take Andrebala they thought, oh
• 2:00:45
  Speaker 1: my god, is or can't take on you Wan he
• 2:00:47
  Speaker 1: wants far away. They can't bomb you on, They can't
• 2:00:50
  Speaker 1: do anything to you want. The experts know nothing. Sadly,
• 2:00:56
  Speaker 1: my experience of military experts is they constantly under my
• 2:01:02
  Speaker 1: underestimate the free Western countries and oh way over estimate
• 2:01:08
  Speaker 1: the power of dictatorships and the power of Soviet weapons
• 2:01:12
  Speaker 1: systems and the power of so called asymmetrical warfare. Iran
• 2:01:17
  Speaker 1: has nothing, not a days it would take for the Americans. Andrew,
• 2:01:24
  Speaker 1: is there a nexus between narcissism and conspiracy? Theorizing Candice
• 2:01:29
  Speaker 1: or newest drama is the French government is targeting her
• 2:01:33
  Speaker 1: for assassination. Oh and at least one Israeli is in
• 2:01:37
  Speaker 1: on the plot. Well, he's a member of the assassination team.
• 2:01:40
  Speaker 1: One Israeli a member of the assassination team. I mean,
• 2:01:45
  Speaker 1: she's borderline mentally ill at this point, She's so detached
• 2:01:50
  Speaker 1: from reality you have to say her mind is not
• 2:01:53
  Speaker 1: working right. There's something really wrong. Whether what it is
• 2:01:57
  Speaker 1: exactly what caused the damage is really really hard to tell.
• 2:02:00
  Speaker 1: But something is very, very damaged there, right. I don't know.
• 2:02:07
  Speaker 1: I don't know enough about narcissism to tell you how
• 2:02:12
  Speaker 1: it relates to conspiracy theories. But you know, any any
• 2:02:17
  Speaker 1: ism that detaches you from reality, which narcissism certainly does
• 2:02:21
  Speaker 1: because it places you at the center of something where
• 2:02:23
  Speaker 1: you are not at the center of and and and
• 2:02:27
  Speaker 1: makes everything the standard is not reality truth. But how
• 2:02:31
  Speaker 1: how it you know, how people think of you has
• 2:02:36
  Speaker 1: to encourage conspiracy theories, which are another form of detachment
• 2:02:40
  Speaker 1: from truth from reality. But I'm sure there's a connection.
• 2:02:45
  Speaker 1: We'd have to know more about the nature of narcissism, Michael,
• 2:02:50
  Speaker 1: did you listen to your Casoni's interview about Nick foy
• 2:02:53
  Speaker 1: iNTS the nationalist ideas he pushed are so suicidal he
• 2:02:57
  Speaker 1: has engaged in massive evasion. I haven't listened to the
• 2:03:01
  Speaker 1: whole thing. I want to, as you know, I know Hazzani.
• 2:03:05
  Speaker 1: We've been very friendly in the past, and we've also
• 2:03:08
  Speaker 1: debated both on Alex Friedman Show and at the University
• 2:03:11
  Speaker 1: of Texas. And yeah, I predicted, oops, I predicted way
• 2:03:20
  Speaker 1: back that national conservatism would lead to antisemitism, nationalism, collectivism.
• 2:03:37
  Speaker 1: It kind of obviously leads to antisemitism, so it doesn't
• 2:03:42
  Speaker 1: surprise me at all, and the fact that he can't
• 2:03:45
  Speaker 1: see it, You're right, requires massive evasion. In some senses,
• 2:03:49
  Speaker 1: he's responsible. Like numbers, you say, we shouldn't worry about
• 2:03:55
  Speaker 1: more than fifty years in the future. How does that
• 2:03:58
  Speaker 1: square with it taking one hundred plus years objectivism to
• 2:04:00
  Speaker 1: take hold. Yeah, I mean, I don't know what the
• 2:04:03
  Speaker 1: number is. I'm not worried about it, right. It could
• 2:04:07
  Speaker 1: be a hundred, It could be one hundred and fifty,
• 2:04:08
  Speaker 1: could be two hundred, could be fifty. I'm not doing
• 2:04:10
  Speaker 1: what I do for objectivism to take hold in one
• 2:04:13
  Speaker 1: hundred years. I don't know what's going to cause it
• 2:04:15
  Speaker 1: to take hold. I'm doing what I do because I
• 2:04:20
  Speaker 1: love it, because I enjoy it, because I like the fight.
• 2:04:25
  Speaker 1: You know, I agree with your man that fighting for
• 2:04:29
  Speaker 1: the future. You know, fighting for the futures is like
• 2:04:33
  Speaker 1: living in it. You get a sense of it. It
• 2:04:37
  Speaker 1: basically allows you to integrate those ideas into everything that
• 2:04:40
  Speaker 1: you do, into your life. And I'm doing it, you know,
• 2:04:47
  Speaker 1: I get pleasure and satisfaction over the people. You You
• 2:04:52
  Speaker 1: guys who come to me and say you change my life,
• 2:04:56
  Speaker 1: you help me discover your rand. You help me discover
• 2:04:59
  Speaker 1: this is an alternative the matters out there. You turn
• 2:05:01
  Speaker 1: me away from Trump, or you turn me away from
• 2:05:03
  Speaker 1: the Left. I've had all people from do that. That's
• 2:05:06
  Speaker 1: what keeps you going. I can't hold If I do
• 2:05:10
  Speaker 1: a really good job I do, if I work really, really,
• 2:05:13
  Speaker 1: really hard, then fifty years so now I'll have an impact.
• 2:05:16
  Speaker 1: I give up. There's no way I would do it.
• 2:05:20
  Speaker 1: It's not the purpose you change. If you're not changing
• 2:05:27
  Speaker 1: lives all the time, if you're not changing lives on
• 2:05:30
  Speaker 1: a regular basis, if people are not responding positively to
• 2:05:33
  Speaker 1: what you're doing, then what's the point. Fifty years is
• 2:05:37
  Speaker 1: too abstract, too distant, and too uncertain. And two, I
• 2:05:41
  Speaker 1: don't really care. I'll be dead. It's not even fifty
• 2:05:44
  Speaker 1: years fro now. Fifty years after I'm dead, my kids
• 2:05:49
  Speaker 1: won't even be around. I find it very hard to care.
• 2:05:54
  Speaker 1: I mean, if I was alive, I would care. But
• 2:05:58
  Speaker 1: Michael has it doesn't become an effective business model. Well,
• 2:06:04
  Speaker 1: I mean for some people you know who can you
• 2:06:07
  Speaker 1: can leverage off of that population, sure, but it's not
• 2:06:11
  Speaker 1: an affective business model for anybody other than a few creeps.
• 2:06:16
  Speaker 1: It's not univers versible. You can't take what Nippoyintus does
• 2:06:21
  Speaker 1: and mimicate and make it a business model. And it's
• 2:06:24
  Speaker 1: only one industry in the industry of punder tree to
• 2:06:28
  Speaker 1: the lowest common denominator, Paul, thank you for the sticker.
• 2:06:31
  Speaker 1: Appreciate it. Freend Harper watched yesterday's show after the fact
• 2:06:39
  Speaker 1: and wanted to say I'm grateful that you gave gratitude
• 2:06:43
  Speaker 1: the attention it deserves culturally underrated aspect of the virtue
• 2:06:47
  Speaker 1: of justice. Absolutely, absolutely, thank you, Finn Harper. Oh. John
• 2:06:52
  Speaker 1: John asked the same question twice. John asks, Uh, do
• 2:06:56
  Speaker 1: you dispute the claim that majority of inmates and fans
• 2:06:59
  Speaker 1: and Muslims know right, majority of majority of inmates and
• 2:07:05
  Speaker 1: fans are indeed Muslims. And I'm not gonna I'm not
• 2:07:13
  Speaker 1: gonna take it where you want me to take it to.
• 2:07:15
  Speaker 1: That's up to you. You want to you want to
• 2:07:17
  Speaker 1: draw whatever conclusions you want from that. There could be
• 2:07:20
  Speaker 1: lots of reasons why that is the case. And by
• 2:07:21
  Speaker 1: the way, I don't actually know that that claim is right,
• 2:07:24
  Speaker 1: but it doesn't surprise me, so I'm willing to accept that.
• 2:07:27
  Speaker 1: John has looked it up and uh, and that he's
• 2:07:30
  Speaker 1: not lying to us. But I don't actually know firsthand
• 2:07:33
  Speaker 1: that that claim is right. But it wouldn't be it
• 2:07:35
  Speaker 1: wouldn't be surprising, and it doesn't seem to I don't
• 2:07:39
  Speaker 1: seem to. It doesn't seem to matter to me that
• 2:07:41
  Speaker 1: much that that is. That is true? Well, and happy
• 2:07:49
  Speaker 1: Black Friday, thank you all on you're spending two Swiss
• 2:07:52
  Speaker 1: fanks here instead of instead of going to the mall.
• 2:07:57
  Speaker 1: H that's good. Andrew, is there a logic to the
• 2:08:03
  Speaker 1: soul less Tuka claiming to value the individual soul above all,
• 2:08:09
  Speaker 1: by the way, for those who really want to know
• 2:08:12
  Speaker 1: what it means to value an individual? So Reade ran, Yes,
• 2:08:17
  Speaker 1: I mean logic. It's not about logic, it's about he
• 2:08:21
  Speaker 1: knows that that's what Christianity's about, and he pretends that
• 2:08:27
  Speaker 1: that's what he cares about, and he maybe even convinces
• 2:08:30
  Speaker 1: himself that that's what he believes. But he is soulless.
• 2:08:33
  Speaker 1: He has no soul. The demons of taking it, they
• 2:08:36
  Speaker 1: scratched it out of him, and you know he's a
• 2:08:40
  Speaker 1: lost cause. But Christianity tells him it's all about the soul, right,
• 2:08:45
  Speaker 1: that's what matters, That's what you should care about Jjibis woman.
• 2:08:52
  Speaker 1: Polanski has a relatively new film about the Dreyfus affair
• 2:08:56
  Speaker 1: that is reportedly excellent. It's hard to find because of
• 2:08:59
  Speaker 1: lack of you distribution, But would you be willing to
• 2:09:02
  Speaker 1: see it despite rolland Perlansky? Yeah, I mean I'd be
• 2:09:05
  Speaker 1: willing to see it, So, you know, I obviously Romand
• 2:09:10
  Speaker 1: Polenski's kind of a bit of a creep He slept
• 2:09:12
  Speaker 1: with her, was it a thirteen year old? A fifteen
• 2:09:15
  Speaker 1: year old, I mean, a very young girl, and has
• 2:09:19
  Speaker 1: avoided the United States for fear being arrested since for peterphilia.
• 2:09:25
  Speaker 1: So he's a creepy guy. But he makes he makes
• 2:09:27
  Speaker 1: really good movies, and particularly if I could see it
• 2:09:31
  Speaker 1: not at the theaters, I would see it. So I
• 2:09:33
  Speaker 1: need to look for it because I am very curious
• 2:09:36
  Speaker 1: about it. I'm generally curious about the Dice Drives affair.
• 2:09:40
  Speaker 1: I want to read more about it. I need to
• 2:09:42
  Speaker 1: read more about it. It's an interesting chapter in French history,
• 2:09:47
  Speaker 1: and you know, the centrality of anti Semitism is quite striking.
• 2:09:52
  Speaker 1: All right, Richard, I look forward to your upcoming focal points.
• 2:09:58
  Speaker 1: Here's some support for number one capitalism thank you. I
• 2:10:01
  Speaker 1: appreciate that, all right, and finally equal equal to reality.
• 2:10:08
  Speaker 1: And of course climate change is driven by lack of pirates.
• 2:10:12
  Speaker 1: I'm not sure what that relates to, but maybe some
• 2:10:14
  Speaker 1: of the some of the lying that we talked about,
• 2:10:17
  Speaker 1: climate change is driven by lack of pirates. If the
• 2:10:19
  Speaker 1: one more pirates, they wouldn't be climate change. Maybe maybe
• 2:10:22
  Speaker 1: who knows? Is there correlation fewer pirates more climate change? Yeah? Yeah,
• 2:10:29
  Speaker 1: we've driven away to our pirates in our way of
• 2:10:31
  Speaker 1: climate change. There must be causal. Thank you guys. I
• 2:10:36
  Speaker 1: will see you tomorrow for our AMA. I think it's
• 2:10:40
  Speaker 1: a one pm East Coast time, one pm East Coast
• 2:10:42
  Speaker 1: time tomorrow, Ama, And I'll see you all then. And yeah, today,
• 2:10:51
  Speaker 1: thank you to all the super chatters. Really really appreciate
• 2:10:53
  Speaker 1: their support. And have a great weekend, Have a great weekend,
• 2:10:58
  Speaker 1: have great Friday. Ready