Latest / Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show! / Federal Judge Calls Biden Admin "Orwellian Ministry Of Truth"

Transcript

Federal Judge Calls Biden Admin "Orwellian Ministry Of Truth" · Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show!

• 0:00
  Well, here's the headline. Judge says that the US government appears to have
• 0:04
  acted like an Orwellian ministry of truth during the Kouf pandemic. And I've got
• 0:11
  to say that sounds a lot like what every single saying person has been saying
• 0:16
  forever now. And I don't think ministry of truth is hyperbole here. I
• 0:21
  mean the Biden administration tried to set up a literal ministry of truth or sorry,
• 0:26
  should I say Disinformation Governance Board run by the totalitarian Mary Poppins. You
• 0:32
  remember her. How information honoring is really quite ferocious. It's whine ups to
• 0:37
  take some line and mix them sound proposcious by saying them in Congress for mainstream
• 0:41
  mount itself, just information's origin seems likely lesson terious. Yeah, that's a
• 0:49
  Nina Jankowitz, the most trusted name in batshit crazy, says here that US
• 0:54
  District Judge Terry A. Doughty has blocked various federal government and teas and figures
• 1:00
  from pressuring social media companies to censor protected free speech on their platforms. Plaintiffs
• 1:07
  have alleged that the government wielded its authority to trample First Amendment free speech rights
• 1:12
  and the judge has granted a preliminary injunction. Quote. If the allegations made
• 1:18
  by the plaintiffs are true, the present case arguably involves the most massive attack
• 1:23
  against free speech in United States history. In their attempts to suppress alleged disinformation,
• 1:30
  the federal government and particularly the defendants named here, are alleged to have
• 1:34
  blatantly ignored the First Amendment's right to free speech, the judge wrote. He
• 1:40
  explained that the plaintiffs alleged that the defendants colluded with and or coerced social media
• 1:46
  platforms to suppress disfavored speakers, viewpoints, and content on social media platforms.
• 1:53
  The plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits in establishing that the government has
• 1:59
  used its power to silence the opposition. Opposition to the jabs, opposition to
• 2:05
  masking and lockdowns, opposition to lab leak theory, opposition to the validity of
• 2:10
  the twenty twenty election, opposition to President Biden's policies, statements that the Hunter
• 2:16
  Biden laptop story was true, and opposition to policies of the government officials in
• 2:23
  power all were suppressed. And this isn't anything that we didn't know, is
• 2:28
  it? Because we saw a lot about this and the Twitter files didn't we?
• 2:31
  I mean, how we Twitter files, whether or exactly. I think
• 2:34
  they're going to be about fifty of them. Here's one of them Twitter files.
• 2:37
  How Twitter ragged the COVID debate. Of course, this was all pre
• 2:39
  elon by censoring info that was true but inconvenient to US government policy, by
• 2:46
  discrediting doctors and other experts who disagreed, by suppressing ordinary users, including some
• 2:52
  sharing the CDC's own data. When the Biden administration took over, one of
• 2:57
  their first meeting requests with Twitter executives was on COVID. The focus was on
• 3:01
  anti jab accounts, especially Alex Barrenson. And we also know this was not
• 3:07
  just Twitter, it was Google. It would face all of them anyway,
• 3:09
  the judge continued, It is quite telling that each example or category of suppress
• 3:15
  speech was conservative in nature. Wherever we heard that before. This targeted suppression
• 3:22
  of conservative ideas is a perfect example of viewpoint discrimination of political speech. Viewpoint
• 3:29
  discrimination of political speech. At during the pandemic, a period perhaps best characterized
• 3:36
  by widespread doubt uncertainty, the United States government seems to have assumed a role
• 3:40
  similar to an Orwellian Ministry of Truth. Plaintiffs include the states of Missouri and
• 3:46
  Louisiana, as well as doctor Batticharia and several other individuals. Defendants include President
• 3:53
  Joe Biden, White Host, Press Secretary Karean Jean Pierre, Surgeon General Vec
• 4:00
  Murthy, various other people, and multiple government entities. Boy, I'm sure
• 4:05
  the censorship happy mainstream media is going to have a fit over this. They
• 4:11
  want to be told what to say by the Biden administration. They don't even
• 4:15
  need to be told, they just automatically know, and it makes them so
• 4:18
  angry. Would people say other things, other things that they know that the
• 4:23
  administration won't like? Now? Attorney General Andrew Bailey of Missouri, he tweeted,
• 4:30
  this injunction is a huge win in the fight to defend our most fundamental
• 4:33
  freedoms. But we're not done yet, We're just getting started. Yeah.
• 4:38
  So this is just an injunction and there I'm certain that there is an epic
• 4:43
  amount of lawfare to be waged over this. I mean, does this look
• 4:46
  like a man who wants you to be able to say what you think?
• 4:50
  Yeah? I didn't think so anyway, Please subscribe, like and share sharing
• 4:55
  really helps me out. I thank you for that. I will see you
• 4:58
  next time. Two