Latest / Reformed Thinking / The Baker’s Delusion and the Severity of the Word (Genesis 40:16-19)

Transcript

The Baker’s Delusion and the Severity of the Word (Genesis 40:16-19) · Reformed Thinking

0:00
When you sit in a waiting room waiting for a verdict, whether
0:03
it is a an agonizing medical test or a legal ruling, there's
0:08
this total suspension of reality.
0:10
Oh yeah, everything just stops. Right, it just freezes.
0:13
Everything hinges on the next word out of the authority
0:16
figures mouth. Will it be life or will it be
0:18
total ruin? You hold your breath.
0:20
Yeah, your pulse pounds in your ears.
0:22
The seconds just stretch into hours.
0:25
It is an experience of total helpless vulnerability.
0:28
It really is. Well, welcome to Reformed
0:30
Thinking, you are listening to a brand new deep dive.
0:33
Glad to be here for this one. Today, our mission is to take a
0:36
magnifying glass to two rigorous theological texts analyzing a
0:41
single chilling narrative from the book of Genesis.
0:44
Specifically, chapter 40, verses 16 through 19.
0:47
Right, we are looking at the story of Joseph, the chief
0:50
cupbearer and the chief Baker, all locked together in an
0:54
Egyptian prison. And we are going to evaluate
0:56
this text and the sources discussing it, paying close
0:59
attention to what it reveals about God's sovereign decrees.
1:03
OK, let's unpack this, because the situation these men find
1:06
themselves in represents the starkest binary we face as human
1:12
beings. It is the absolute dividing line
1:15
between relief and devastation. Yeah.
1:18
What we are going to examine today is a surgical dissection
1:22
of the terrifying reality of divine judgement.
1:24
The sources we are reviewing confront you with the hard
1:27
truths of Scripture. We are analyzing how the Word of
1:30
God can do 2 vastly different things at the identical moment.
1:34
It has the capacity to lift up a head in absolute pardon and,
1:38
well, it has the capacity to lift up a head in brutal
1:40
execution. It's a heavy, heavy reality, it
1:43
is. The narrative revolves around
1:45
the illusion of presumption and the razor thin line between
1:48
grace and wrath. But before we get into the
1:50
actual judgment passed down in this text, we have to look at
1:52
the physical room where this scene unfolds.
1:54
Yeah, I want to anchor you, the listener, in the physical space.
1:57
Put yourself in the setting. We are in the heart of the
2:00
ancient Egyptian Empire during the Middle Kingdom.
2:02
This is a civilization famous for its massive bureaucratic
2:06
structures, it's monumental architecture, and you know, the
2:11
absolute God like authority of its Pharaohs.
2:14
Right, Let us talk about the specific architecture of this
2:17
imprisonment, because that physical setting dictates
2:20
everything that happens next. Yeah, the text explicitly tells
2:23
us this is not a standard local jail for common criminals.
2:27
No, not at all. It is designated as the House of
2:30
the Captain of the Guard. And in the context of ancient
2:33
Egypt, prisons were not they weren't penitentiaries where
2:37
people served long sentences for rehabilitation.
2:40
Right imprisonment was almost exclusively a holding state
2:43
before a final verdict. Just a waiting room.
2:45
Yeah, a really grim waiting room.
2:47
And because this is the House of the captain of the Guard, a man
2:50
named Potiphar, we are looking at a highly secure, elite
2:53
facility. Right, which essentially makes
2:55
it a covert political holding facility.
2:57
Yeah, a black site. Exactly.
2:59
I mean spot on. It is where high-ranking state
3:01
officials are thrown when they anger the monarch.
3:04
And the two men imprisoned here alongside Joseph for chief
3:06
cupbearer and the chief Baker. I think it is crucial to clarify
3:10
their roles because these were not minor kitchen workers or
3:14
simple cooks. Oh no, They were incredibly
3:17
powerful court officials. The cupbearer was responsible
3:20
for guarding the king against assassination by poison.
3:23
He would test the wine. He was a trusted confidant,
3:26
someone who had the King's ear in his most private moments.
3:29
And the Baker oversaw the royal food supply, managing vast
3:33
logistics of grain and royal bakeries.
3:36
So if I am thinking about this in today's terms, this is like
3:39
taking high-ranking cabinet members the inner circle of a
3:42
global superpower, and throwing them into a black site.
3:45
They are just waiting there on the unpredictable whim of a
3:48
dictator. Given the intense paranoia of
3:51
ancient courts, is it safe to assume these two are caught up
3:54
in a suspected assassination plot?
3:56
The historical context strongly points to a discovered
3:59
conspiracy. Because of the poison aspect.
4:01
Yeah, poison was the preferred method of assassination in the
4:05
ancient Near East. That puts both the man who
4:07
handles the liquids and the man who handles the solid food under
4:10
immediate, intense suspicion. Wow.
4:13
So whether it was an attempted coup or an assassination plot
4:16
against the Pharaoh, both men are under the terrifying shadow
4:20
of pending execution or royal pardon.
4:23
They are entirely dependent on the sovereign pleasure of the
4:26
Egyptian king. But does the text actually tell
4:29
us who is guilty? That is the thing, the text is
4:31
completely silent on their actual guilt or innocence.
4:34
Really, it just doesn't say. Nope, Genesis never vindicates
4:38
the cup bearer or condemns the Baker in terms of their actual
4:41
treason. So for all we know, the cup
4:43
bearer was the mastermind of the plot and the Baker was entirely
4:46
innocent. Or both were guilty.
4:49
Or both were innocent victims of court paranoia.
4:52
That adds A terrifying layer to this entire narrative.
4:55
If their moral guilt or innocence regarding the
4:57
assassination plot isn't the deciding factor provided by the
5:00
text, what determines their fate?
5:02
Their fate is determined by the sovereign decree of Pharaoh,
5:05
which the text uses to mirror the sovereign decree of God.
5:09
Right. We recognize this as a vivid
5:11
illustration of unconditional election.
5:13
God's choice to extend grace to 1 and Passover another is not
5:16
based on foreseen merit, moral superiority, or demerit in the
5:20
individual. The text asks us to look past
5:23
the human politics. God's Providence is operating
5:26
Florida State within the intricate, cutthroat political
5:30
machinations of a Pagan court. So we have these two men in a
5:34
political black site. The tension must be agonizing.
5:38
Oh unbearable. How does the text move from this
5:41
passive waiting to the actual judgement?
5:43
Let us trace the sequence of events because the psychology of
5:47
the scene is glipping. Both men have a dream on the
5:50
identical night. The cupbearer goes first, right?
5:53
He tells Joseph his dream about a vine with three branches and
5:56
how he pressed grapes into Pharaoh's cup.
5:59
And Joseph gives him incredible news.
6:00
He says in three days Pharaoh is going to restore him to his
6:03
position. Then we get to verse 16.
6:05
The Baker steps forward, but the text gives us a very specific
6:08
reason why he steps forward. Yeah, he saw that the
6:11
interpretation for his cellmate was favorable.
6:14
He only speaks up because of what happened to the man next to
6:16
him. His logical deduction is based
6:18
entirely on his physical proximity and shared
6:20
circumstances. He thinks to himself, We are in
6:23
the identical prison, we both had a dream on the same night.
6:27
We both work for Pharaoh and we are both facing the identical
6:30
charges. Therefore, the grace shown to
6:32
him must surely be shown to me. He assumes a uniformity of
6:36
outcome based on a uniformity of circumstance.
6:39
If I am sitting next to someone getting a pardon, why shouldn't
6:42
I expect one? He assumes his outcome will be a
6:44
rubber stamp of his cellmates. Good news, he assumes he is
6:48
getting the identical verdict. And that introduces a critical
6:51
theological take away. The sources point out the
6:53
absolute danger of this assumption.
6:55
Proximity to blessing does not equal possession of blessing.
6:58
Sitting in the identical room as someone receiving grace does not
7:02
guarantee you receive it. You can be standing next to
7:05
someone who is entirely right with God, someone who has
7:08
received pardon, and you can still be standing entirely under
7:11
condemnation. The Baker assumes safety through
7:14
association. He demands his own
7:17
interpretation, completely convinced of his safety.
7:20
Here's where it gets really interesting, because he expected
7:23
a rubber stamp of good news. The linguistic pivot in Joseph's
7:27
interpretation is structurally devastating.
7:31
It really is. I want to break down the Hebrew
7:33
linguistics here. The original language does
7:35
something incredible with the grammar.
7:36
Joseph uses a very specific Hebrew idiom when he interprets
7:40
the first dream for the cupbearer.
7:43
The phrase is yisa Pharaoh ethrosheka.
7:46
Can you breakdown what those words mean in this context?
7:49
The phrase translates literally to Pharaoh will lift up your
7:52
head. OK, so the Hebrew verb is NASA,
7:55
which means to lift up, to bear or to carry.
7:57
Right, and in the ancient Near Eastern context, lifting up the
8:01
head was a well known idiom. It meant lifting someone out of
8:03
a pit or a prison, reviewing their legal case and restoring
8:07
them to a position of honor and dignity.
8:09
A king lifting up the head of a subject was an act of supreme
8:12
royal favor. So Joseph says to the cupbearer,
8:15
Yisa Pharaoh Ethrosheka, you are getting your job back.
8:19
Then the Baker steps up, tells his dream about the three
8:21
baskets of baked goods on his head, and Joseph begins his
8:25
interpretation. Joseph looks at the Baker and
8:27
says the identical words Yisa, Pharaoh ET rosheka.
8:31
Wow. For a fraction of a second, the
8:33
Baker must have felt an overwhelming surge of euphoric
8:36
relief. He hears the exact same words of
8:38
restoration. But then, under divine
8:41
inspiration, Joseph adds A prepositional phrase, mialeka.
8:46
What does that phrase mean? The prepositional phrase mialeka
8:49
translates to from off you. Oh man, the twist is brutal.
8:54
The idiom of pardon is violently twisted into the grammar of
8:58
literal decapitation. The lifting of the head is no
9:00
longer metaphorical restoration to office, it is the physical
9:04
severing of his head from his body.
9:06
Hold on, So Joseph sets him up with the identical phrasing?
9:09
Yeah, he does. That is incredibly harsh.
9:11
Does the source explain why Joseph didn't just break the bad
9:14
news gently from in the start? Why lead him on for that
9:16
fraction of a second? Joseph is simply repeating the
9:18
structure of what God has decreed.
9:20
The author of Scripture utilizes the nuances of Hebrew syntax to
9:24
demonstrate the terrifying precision of God's decrees.
9:27
This is a divine pun orchestrated by the Holy Spirit.
9:30
The dream itself was a mirror of the cupbearer's dream.
9:34
The cupbearer saw three branches, the Baker saw three
9:37
baskets. So the interpretation mirrors
9:40
the dream. The grammatical structure
9:42
dictates the delivery. It demonstrates that the
9:44
identical word of God functions as a saver of life unto life for
9:48
one, and a saver of death unto death for another.
9:52
The identical outward event, Pharaoh's royal attention,
9:55
carries completely opposite outcomes.
9:58
The Word of God divides with absolute precision.
10:01
And the grammatical twist spells physical death.
10:05
But when we look at the historical context from the
10:07
sources, we realize the true horror extended far beyond the
10:10
loss of biological life it. Was worse than just an
10:13
execution. Much worse.
10:14
I want to talk about the specific details of the dream,
10:17
the birds eating from the basket.
10:19
What is the historical significance of those birds in
10:21
ancient Egypt? To understand the horror, we
10:23
need to look at the specifics of the Baker's dream.
10:26
He dreamed of three cake baskets on his head filled with baked
10:29
goods for Pharaoh. But the crucial detail is that
10:32
birds were eating the food out of the top basket.
10:35
And the Baker is entirely passive in this dream, unlike
10:38
the cupbearer who actively squeezed grapes into a cup.
10:42
In the ancient Egyptian Penal Code, execution methods were
10:45
designed to humiliate the victim and annihilate their existence
10:49
in the afterlife. The text says Joseph tells the
10:51
Baker he will be hung on a tree and the birds will eat his
10:54
flesh. So for an Egyptian, this wasn't
10:56
just a physical execution. Was it?
10:58
Viewed as the literal deletion of their soul?
11:01
Yes. How did that compare to how the
11:02
ancient Hebrews viewed the afterlife?
11:05
Well, in ancient Egypt, mummification, the physical
11:08
preservation of the body, was an absolute requirement for the
11:11
soul to survive. They believed in the Ka, which
11:14
was the life force, and the BA, which was the personality.
11:17
Your soul, right? The car required a physical
11:20
house, the preserved mummy to receive offerings and sustain
11:24
itself. And the BA would fly around but
11:26
had to return to the physical body.
11:27
If the body was destroyed, left unburied or eaten by animals,
11:31
those spiritual elements starved and ceased to exist.
11:34
Leaving a corpse unburied to be desecrated by scavenging birds
11:38
was a well attested Egyptian curse.
11:40
To have one's head severed and 1's flesh eaten by birds was the
11:45
ultimate damnation. It meant a complete eradication
11:48
from both the present world and the world to come.
11:51
You cease to exist in their theological framework.
11:53
You suffered the second death. It is like having your entire
11:57
digital, historical and physical footprint scrubbed from reality,
12:01
but on a cosmic, eternal scale. It is totally erasure.
12:05
By contrast, the ancient Hebrews placed immense value on proper
12:09
burial in family tombs, resting with their fathers.
12:12
To be left exposed was a sign of ultimate disgrace.
12:15
And the sources point out that this is not just an Egyptian
12:18
concept playing out, it connects to a broader biblical theme.
12:21
Yes, the sources connect this directly to the covenantal
12:24
curses found later in Deuteronomy chapter 28 verse 26.
12:27
That verse warns that a dead body shall be food for all birds
12:30
of the air, and it shall be no one to frighten them away.
12:32
The Baker, who is a Gentile Pagan, is subjected to the
12:36
universal justice of God that anticipates the very curses of
12:40
the Mosaic Law. This is not random violence from
12:43
Pharaoh. It is unmitigated divine
12:45
justice, executed perfectly through human rulers.
12:48
Knowing the absolute horror of this interpretation, Joseph
12:52
faced an intense decision about how to deliver the message.
12:55
He is standing there looking at a man whose eternal and physical
13:00
doom has just been revealed to him.
13:02
Joseph is a powerless Hebrew slave.
13:04
Yeah, the Baker is a high-ranking official.
13:07
If the Baker were restored, or even if he had friends in the
13:10
court who could advocate for him, he could potentially secure
13:14
Joseph's release. The pragmatic thing to do, the
13:17
safe thing to do, would be to soften the blow, maybe edit the
13:20
message to spare feelings and gain political favor.
13:23
Is this an indictment of leaders who only want to deliver
13:26
positive news? What's fascinating here is how
13:29
the sources present Joseph as the towering example of the
13:32
faithful minister. Joseph refuses to alter God's
13:35
revelation. He does not turn the dream into
13:38
a therapeutic slogan. He does not offer a positive
13:40
spin, he simply opens his mouth and delivers the unvarnished
13:44
truth with old stutter or apology.
13:46
He had already confessed earlier in the chapter, Do not
13:49
interpretations belong to God? Because the authority is
13:51
derivative from God, it is not negotiable.
13:55
The Word of God is not a wax nose to be shaped by human
13:58
desires. It makes me think about modern
14:00
environments where the message is tailored to audience
14:02
approval. Oh absolutely.
14:04
We see a lot of seeker sensitive approaches today where leaders
14:07
focus only on the positive, promising peace and safety.
14:11
They avoid speaking about judgement or wrath because they
14:14
are fearful of offending people or losing influence.
14:17
But Joseph's actions argue that true pastoral care involves
14:21
speaking the truth, even when it involves absolute devastation.
14:25
Leaving a man smiling on his way to execution is not love.
14:28
Warning him of the reality to come is severe mercy.
14:32
A softened lie is not pastoral care.
14:34
True biblical revelation does not rise or fall with human
14:37
reaction. It judges between life and
14:39
death, regardless of how the audience feels about.
14:41
It the world demands a message that makes them feel safe, but
14:45
God's Word demands submission to truth.
14:47
Joseph's fidelity stands as a permanent rebuke to any minister
14:50
who edits the message of God to secure the favor of men.
14:54
Let us pan out to the macro level.
14:56
Joseph delivered this unyielding message in an Egyptian prison.
15:00
But the text wasn't written down right then and there.
15:02
No, Moses wrote this account centuries later for a very
15:06
specific audience. The original recipients of the
15:08
Book of Genesis were the Israelites, and they were
15:11
wandering the Sinai Peninsula. You mentioned earlier in our
15:14
preparation that the sources talk about the Israelites having
15:17
uncircumcised hearts. What does that phrase actually
15:20
mean in this context? Because obviously circumcision
15:24
was a physical sign of the covenant, but here the source is
15:27
using it as a spiritual metaphor.
15:29
If we connect this to the bigger picture, the physical sign of
15:32
circumcision was meant to represent an inward reality, a
15:36
heart set apart for God, cleansed from sin and obedient
15:40
to his voice. An uncircumcised heart refers to
15:43
a person who has the outward physical markers of belonging to
15:47
the covenant community, but possesses a heart that is
15:49
stubbornly rebellious, unbelieving and hostile to God.
15:53
The original audience, the wilderness generation,
15:55
frequently presumed upon their physical status.
15:57
They thought that just because they had physical lineage to
15:59
Abraham or because they had passed through the Red Sea, they
16:04
were immune to divine judgment. They were like heavily on their
16:07
covenant status. They thought they were safe by
16:09
default. Why does Moses include this
16:11
specific story for them? Moses included this specific
16:15
historical account to strip Israel of any false security.
16:19
By presenting the terrifying account of the Baker, a man who
16:22
presumed he would receive grace simply because of his physical
16:25
proximity to the cup bearer, Moses is issuing a corporate
16:29
warning to the Israelites. He is showing them that being in
16:32
the camp of Israel, sitting next to Moses, or eating manna in the
16:35
wilderness did not make them immune to God's wrath if their
16:39
hearts remained unchanged. It is a warning against
16:42
selective hearing. The Israelites wanted the
16:44
blessings, but Moses is showing them that the identical God who
16:47
promises blessing also announces curses.
16:50
I also noticed that this narrative establishes God's
16:53
absolute authority over earthly kings.
16:55
Right. To the Israelites wandering in
16:57
the desert, Egypt was the superpower.
16:59
Pharaoh was considered a God, the undisputed master of life
17:02
and death. But this narrative reveals that
17:04
Pharaoh is just an unwitting pawn.
17:07
He is executing Yahweh's fixed decrees without even realizing
17:10
it. The Israelites needed to fear
17:12
the Word of God more than they feared the Chariots of men.
17:14
Moses sought to stir up a heavy awe of God's sovereign
17:17
Providence. The Israelites needed to know
17:20
that God orchestrates even the darkest, most seemingly chaotic
17:24
events to accomplish His redemptive purposes.
17:27
The Baker's death was an act of just judgement, but it was also
17:30
a necessary gear in the machinery that would eventually
17:33
lead to Joseph's standing before Pharaoh.
17:35
That chain of events is what saved the covenant family from
17:37
famine. God uses the decrees of a Pagan
17:40
king to fulfill his promises to Abraham.
17:43
This ancient execution in Egypt casts a long, distinct shadow
17:47
across history, the sources argue.
17:49
It points directly to another execution on a hill outside
17:52
Jerusalem. You call this a typological
17:54
shadow. Before we apply it, define
17:56
typological shadow for the listener.
17:58
This raises an important question.
18:00
Typology is a method of biblical interpretation that recognizes
18:04
how historical persons, events, or institutions in the Old
18:07
Testament prefigure and foreshadow the person and work
18:11
of Jesus Christ in the New Testament.
18:13
It's not simple allegory where facts are discarded for hidden
18:17
meanings. No Typology relies on actual
18:20
historical events that God sovereignly orchestrated to cast
18:24
a forward-looking shadow. The shadow gives you the shape
18:27
of the reality that is coming. Joseph stands as a type of
18:30
Christ. He's the innocent sufferer,
18:33
betrayed by his brothers, sold for silver and unjustly
18:36
condemned alongside 2 criminals. He acts as the mediator of
18:40
divine revelation, dispensing the Word of life to 1 and the
18:43
word of condemnation to another. Now paint the scene at Golgotha.
18:46
Centuries later. Christ is hung on a tree between
18:49
two criminals. One criminal hurls insults and
18:51
remains hardened in his presumption.
18:53
He receives unmitigated justice, just like the Baker.
18:56
The other criminal repents, recognizes his guilt, and casts
19:00
himself upon the mercy of the king.
19:01
He receives unmerited grace, just like the cupbearer.
19:05
The cross exactly what similarly like that Egyptian dungeon
19:09
divides humanity into two distinct categories.
19:12
The parallel is breathtaking, but the connection goes even
19:16
further into the theology of the atonement, specifically looking
19:19
at Galatians chapter 3, verse 13.
19:21
In the Old Testament, A hanged man is cursed by God.
19:25
The Baker was hung on the wood, the Ellet's in Hebrew, and he
19:29
bore his own curse for his own sin.
19:31
He faced the justice he earned, but the Gospel declares that
19:34
Christ redeemed his people from the curse of the law by becoming
19:38
a curse for them. The Baker's flesh was eaten by
19:40
birds in a display of ultimate judgment, but Christ's flesh was
19:45
given for the life of the world. Christ allowed his body to be
19:48
broken on the wood, not for his own sins, because he had none,
19:51
but to bear the wrath of God as a substitute.
19:54
Without a substitute, every single person stands in the
19:56
Baker's position. We all face the full blow of
19:59
divine justice. That is the dividing line.
20:01
The Baker had no savior. He bore the curse of his own
20:04
treason. The cross exposes the
20:06
insufficiency of favorable association.
20:09
The Sinner who hears of grace must not rest in the fact that
20:12
others are saved. They must flee personally to
20:14
Christ. The source mentions A
20:16
dispensational viewpoint regarding the timeline in this
20:19
text before we look at their conclusion.
20:21
Define dispensational for me. How does this specific
20:25
theological framework change how we read the text?
20:28
Dispensationalism is a theological system that
20:31
interprets biblical history as a series of distinct eras or
20:35
dispensations in which God relates to human beings under
20:38
different administrative arrangements.
20:40
A key feature of classical dispensationalism is the sharp
20:43
distinction between Israel and the Church, and a literal future
20:48
timeline concerning the end of the age.
20:50
This framework often highlights a forthcoming period of intense
20:53
global tribulation before the physical return of Christ.
20:56
When the source applies the dispensational viewpoint to the
20:59
three days mentioned in the Baker's dream, they are
21:01
interpreting those days as a prophetic marker signifying a
21:05
short, rapidly closing window of time before a catastrophic
21:09
worldwide judgement begins. In the dream, the three baskets
21:12
meant three days time was incredibly short and the outcome
21:15
was entirely fixed. The Baker thought he had three
21:18
days to prepare for a Royal Bank banquet, but he actually had
21:21
three days to prepare for his execution.
21:23
The source takes this timeline and uses it to make a direct,
21:27
urgent plea to the reader. They argue that the world today
21:31
lives in a false peace, mocking the promise of Christ's return,
21:35
assuming tomorrow will be just like today.
21:37
As someone looking at this through a reformed lens, how do
21:41
you evaluate the way the author bridges the historical text to
21:45
this direct call to action? So what does this all mean from
21:48
a Reformed perspective? We might differ slightly on the
21:51
specific eschatological timeline regarding a future tribulation
21:54
period, as Reformed theology often holds to covenantal
21:58
frameworks like amillennialism or postmillennialism.
22:01
However, we absolutely agree with the author, score, premise,
22:04
and pastoral urgency. The necessity of effectual
22:07
calling and personal faith is paramount.
22:10
We can analyze the author's argument objectively.
22:13
They are using the terror of the Baker's impending execution to
22:16
demonstrate the terror of facing divine justice without a
22:19
substitute. The author is demanding
22:21
aggressive self examination from the reader.
22:23
They are warning that proximity is not possession.
22:26
The author asked the reader if they are relying on proxy faith.
22:31
Do you think you are safe because you attend a sound
22:33
church, or because you have a Christian family, or because you
22:37
sit next to someone who is genuinely walking with God?
22:40
That is the Baker's delusion. The author argues that if you
22:43
lack a vital personal union with Christ, you are in grave danger.
22:47
The message they draw from the text is a pleading demand to
22:50
repent and look to the substitute who bore the wrath on
22:53
the tree. We evaluate that evangelistic
22:56
appeal as entirely faithful to the broader message of
22:59
Scripture. The Word of God is exact and
23:02
unavoidable. When it exposes the true human
23:04
condition, the question the text forces upon the reader is
23:07
whether they will submit and seek mercy or just wish for a
23:10
gentler interpretation. The source uses the Baker's
23:13
tragedy to point out that today is the day to seek the Lord.
23:16
I want to leave you with one final unsettling thought drawn
23:19
from the aftermath of this text. It is something to Mull over on
23:23
your own as we conclude this deep dive.
23:25
The cupbearer received pure, unmerited grace.
23:28
He was lifted out of the dungeon and restored to the King's side.
23:31
Yet the text tells us that his immediate response upon his
23:34
salvation was to completely forget Jessup.
23:37
He forgot the very mediator who brought him the word of life.
23:40
How often do you, once delivered from the prison of your own sin,
23:45
immediately forget the Savior who secured your release?
23:48
Keep your eyes fixed on the truth of Scripture and we will
23:50
catch you next time on reformed thinking.