Latest / The Whitfield Report / TWR Tuesday | Catching Up After Christmas

Transcript

TWR Tuesday | Catching Up After Christmas · The Whitfield Report

0:07
Now broadcasting from the next-gen conservative studio in
0:11
Sunny South Florida, bringing you the latest in politics
0:15
current events and pop culture. This is he's the Whitfield
0:19
Report with Sam Whitfield. Hey there folks, welcome to the
0:33
show the Tuesday edition, and welcome back.
0:38
Hope you all had a very merry Christmas.
0:42
I know I did. I actually, you know what, this
0:45
Christmas for a multitude of reasons, was one of the best
0:52
years. I think I've had in a while.
0:59
At least since it's been the best one I've had since before
1:04
the pandemic, that's true. And I think it's true for all of
1:09
us actually. Just, I noticed there were,
1:13
there was a lot more sheerness going around this, you know,
1:17
this Christmas season people seemed a lot more cheery not as
1:23
up here, as apprehensive. You know, is the one of the past
1:30
like I think, you know, more inside.
1:34
For like the last two Christmases you had the, you
1:38
know, the covid Karen's and Ken dolls, you know, as I refer to
1:44
the male covid, Karen's, I refer to them as Ken dolls.
1:48
But yeah, the covid Karen's and the covid Ken dolls, you know,
1:53
freaking out. Everyone you know, saying why
1:58
even going out shopping, how dare you write?
2:02
And then you had the, you had the, you know, the Vemma anti
2:07
Masters who were like I'm not going to go anywhere even if
2:11
there is, you know, someone's wearing a mask.
2:13
I'm not going in there. You know, goddamn it because of
2:17
the You know, because they want us to ask and I will not comply
2:22
and I, you know, it was just crazy the last two years, just
2:27
with that and with all the uncertainty, you know, of the
2:32
holidays and especially after especially after 2020.
2:39
After that. I like some when things were
2:42
really, you know, Things were looking Grim but this year,
2:48
fortunately, everyone seemed to be, you know, really festive
2:51
mood things went smoothly on my end.
2:55
I pretty much got everything I wanted, you know, and then a few
3:00
other things that I love, but I wasn't really expecting.
3:06
So that's good. I know the holidays, you know,
3:12
May have been tough for a lot of people and trust me, I
3:15
understand that I've been there before to the holidays, can only
3:22
be emotionally taxing for some people at various times.
3:29
And other years, the holidays can be wonderful and joyous and
3:34
I'm just very glad that overall the holidays were You know, a
3:41
pretty joyous thing. I ruin glad So today's episode
3:47
folks, I just kind of want to this is my final show of, you
3:54
know 2022. I'm hoping to do at least one
3:59
more live, one this coming Thursday, maybe but this will be
4:07
the last Tuesday edition of the show and I do have some
4:10
housekeeping that I do want to do at the end of the show here.
4:15
But I'll get to that in a bit. In the meantime though, I do
4:19
want to catch up with, you know, a few things both in politics
4:24
and pop culture. One of the things that I want
4:28
to, you know, one of the things I saw popping up all over social
4:35
media, and it was a You know, something popped up about like,
4:40
a week ago, right before Christmas, but I didn't really
4:44
address it was this new information that the, you know,
4:49
that the CIA could have. In fact, been involved in the
4:55
Kennedy assassination. now folks, to me This seems fairly
5:04
obvious. And straightforward.
5:09
The see I was involved with Kennedy assassination.
5:13
Nothing new. Is really new here for me or for
5:19
anyone who has been suspicious of the, you know, the Kennedy
5:23
assassination or the quote-unquote legit story for
5:27
the past you know 60 years now, just like the Twitter files,
5:35
right? This new batch of I guess CID
5:40
classifications pretty much confirms what most of us At
5:46
least in this audience, you know, have known for probably,
5:51
all all of our lives at least if you're around my age and then
5:55
for the older, you know, for the older folks, like my stepdad,
5:59
what they've all known for the entirety of their lives, you
6:02
know? Going back to the assassination
6:04
which was that something something stinks here.
6:09
Something's not kosher. Right.
6:12
But Taco Carlos and I guess, one over these Declassified
6:19
documents about a week or so ago on his show and I didn't have a
6:26
chance to watch the clip admittedly.
6:32
But I want to go through this with you guys and kind of my
6:41
reaction, so this From Tucker collisions show me, see the date
6:47
here, let's see here, if I pull up the day, okay, so this this
6:56
clip was originally uploaded on. Let's see Let's see.
7:10
It just, okay. So it So this club premiered on
7:18
December 15th. So not quite a week and a half
7:25
ago, but again, this printer which kind of confirms at least,
7:32
from what? I've seen everything we knew
7:34
about the Kennedy assassination, a lot of people have been asking
7:38
me to go over this. So what's go ahead and do that.
7:43
So yeah. Roll the tape Tucker Carlson
7:47
tonight. So not long after Jack Ruby.
7:49
Shut Lee Harvey Oswald on camera in the basement of Dallas Police
7:53
Headquarters. A lot of Americans started to
7:55
have some questions about the Kennedy assassination.
7:58
It was, you'd have to admit, a pretty extraordinary sequence of
8:01
events, a lone gunman murders. The president of the United
8:04
States. And then less than 48 hours
8:07
later that lone gunman is himself murdered by another lone
8:11
gunman. What are the odds of that?
8:14
One thing if you get struck by lightning rare but possible but
8:18
if every member of your family also get struck by lightning,
8:20
all in different days, you might begin to suspect.
8:23
These are not entirely natural events but oh replied the US
8:27
government. They are this bizarre chain of
8:30
killings was all entirely natural so less than a year
8:33
after the JFK assassination, the Johnson White House released,
8:36
something called the Warren Commission report and the report
8:40
concluded that while their motives remained unclear both
8:43
Lee Oswald and Jack Ruby had acted alone, no one helped them.
8:47
There was no conspiracy of any kind Case Closed.
8:50
Time to move on and many many Americans did move on at the
8:53
time, they had no idea how shoddy and corrupt.
8:56
The Warren Commission was, it would be nearly 50 years before
8:59
the CIA admitted under duress. That in fact, had withheld
9:03
information from investigators about its relationship with Lee
9:06
Harvey Oswald But even then at the time before that was known,
9:11
the government's explanation didn't seem entirely plausible
9:14
and some people started asking obvious questions about it.
9:17
It was at that point, As Americans started to doubt the
9:20
official story that the term conspiracy theory entered our
9:23
lexicon as Professor Lance dehaven Smith points out in his
9:27
book on the subject. The term conspiracy theory did
9:30
not exist as a phrase in everyday.
9:31
American conversation before 1964 in 1964, the year, the
9:36
Warren Commission issued its report.
9:38
Art, the New York Times. Published five stories in which
9:41
conspiracy theory appeared now. Today, of course, the term
9:45
conspiracy theory appears in pretty much every New York Times
9:48
story about American politics. It's wielded.
9:51
Now as then as a weapon against anyone who asked questions the
9:54
government doesn't feel like answering.
9:57
But despite 60 years of name-calling, those questions
9:59
have not disappeared. In fact, they have multiplied
10:02
with time and here's one of them.
10:04
In April of 1964, a psychiatrist called Lewis joycelyn West.
10:08
Seated. Jack Ruby in his isolation cell
10:10
in a Dallas jail. According to West written
10:14
assessment, he found that Jack Ruby was quote technically
10:17
insane and in need of immediate psychiatric hospitalization.
10:22
Those are conclusions that puzzlingly no one who had spoken
10:24
to Jack Ruby previously. Had reached Ruby had seemed
10:27
perfectly sane to the people who knew him Louis Joyland West
10:31
pronounced him crazy. But what what West did not say
10:35
was that he was working for the CIA at the time.
10:38
Louis Jordan West was a contract psychiatrist for the spy agency
10:41
was also an expert on mind control and a prominent player
10:44
in the now, Infamous MKUltra program in which the CIA gave
10:48
powerful psychiatric drugs. So I want to point out here that
10:55
I do kind of find it funny and humorous that the term MKUltra
11:01
is now once again being kind of pushed to the Forefront of the
11:09
Lexicon, you know, culturally I know that Davey Krakow no longer
11:18
on YouTube exclusive. Loosely on Odyssey but still you
11:22
know he's been on the show before he and several others
11:26
have talked, I'm K Ultra for a long time now and you know like
11:36
even just five years ago I remember a few broad with the
11:38
term up at the term MKUltra, you know, even like a lot of quote
11:45
unquote, you know, Patriots or people who were searching with
11:50
the truth. They would How are you quack for
11:53
bringing bringing up the term MKUltra.
11:56
But this, in fact, you know, it's being brought into the
12:02
mainstream again folks. so anyway, continuing on Drugs to
12:15
Americans without their knowledge.
12:18
So of all the psychiatrist in the world.
12:20
What in the world was? This guy doing in Jack?
12:23
Ruby's prison cell, The media did not seem interested in
12:27
finding out. In fact, the New York Times in
12:29
an extensive 1999 obituary of West never mentioned.
12:34
The fact that he had worked for the CIA much less his time in
12:37
Jack Ruby's cell which seems relevant. and that could have
12:43
been and I'm not defending the CIA by any means on this, but
12:48
the explanation for that light is in genuine could, in fact be
12:53
that That was not yet Declassified.
12:59
There were a lot of people who worked for the agency a long
13:05
time ago during the Cold War there information still has not
13:11
been Declassified. For instance, my step
13:15
grandfather who served in World War Two.
13:20
He was a tank commander at both the Battle of the Bulge And deed
13:25
at Normandy, right? So he was a hero obviously, and
13:30
I spoke to him a lot, you know, when I, when I was in my light
13:37
tweens kind becoming a teenager I was interested in history.
13:43
Even then and I remember he talked about he talked about
13:46
World War 2, a lot. Hence why I've always been
13:49
fascinated with this subject but he also mentioned that he did
13:54
some work with the intelligence community and when I asked him
14:02
what that was, he said that he he still can't talk about and
14:08
that was about like in 2007-2008 a year before I died in 2009 and
14:18
by then he was like in his mid-80s but even then A lot of
14:23
those old spy Masters. They took a lot of their secrets
14:28
to the Grave so that the New York Times in their defense,
14:31
might not have been even known that.
14:32
This guy was agency, So you can see wine on crazy people would
14:44
wonder about what really happened and of course, many
14:47
have wondered in 1976 long forgotten that House
14:52
Representatives, empanelled a special committee to
14:54
reinvestigate the JFK assassination their bipartisan
14:57
in conclusion, Jack Kennedy was almost certainly murdered as the
15:01
result of a conspiracy, but the question is a conspiracy by
15:05
whom, well, the obvious suspect would be the CIA.
15:09
Why else would the agency with hold?
15:10
Critical evidence for investigators.
15:13
Is there a benign explanation for that for maintaining this
15:16
level of secrecy for this many years?
15:20
Not that we're aware of, and it is illegal in 1992 Congress
15:24
passed. The President John F, Kennedy
15:25
assassination records collection act.
15:28
And that act mandated full disclosure of all documents by
15:31
2017. 54 years, after JFK was killed.
15:36
The last Administration promised to comply fully with that law
15:39
but under intense pressure from CIA director, Mike Pompeo
15:43
withheld. In the end thousands of pages of
15:46
CIA documents today. This afternoon, the B
15:50
Administration did exactly the same thing that would be
15:52
thousands of pages of documents after nearly 60 years after the
15:58
death of every single person involved but we still can't see
16:03
them clearly. It's not to protect any person.
16:06
They're All dead. It's to protect an institution
16:09
but why? Well today, we decided to find
16:13
out we spoke to someone who had access to these still hidden.
16:16
See, a documents person who is deeply familiar with what they
16:19
contain. We ask this person directly did
16:23
the CIA have a hand in the murder of John F, Kennedy an
16:26
American president. And here's the reply, we
16:29
received verbatim quote. The answer is yes, I believe
16:33
they were involved. It's a whole different country
16:36
from what we thought it was. It's all fake.
16:40
It's hard to imagine a more jarring response than that.
16:42
Again, this is not a quote conspiracy theorist that we
16:45
spoke to not even close. This is someone with direct
16:49
knowledge of the information that once again is being
16:52
withheld from the American public.
16:54
And the answer we received was unequivocal.
16:56
Yes, the CIA was involved in the assassination of the president.
17:01
Now some people will not be surprised to hear that.
17:03
They suspected it all along, but no matter how you feel about, or
17:07
what you thought about the Kennedy assassination, pause to
17:09
consider what this means, it means that within the US
17:13
government, there are forces, wholly, Beyond Democratic
17:16
control. These forces are more powerful
17:19
than the elected officials that supposedly oversee them.
17:22
These forces can affect election outcomes.
17:25
They can even hide their complicity in the murder of an
17:28
American president. Other words, they can do pretty
17:30
much anything. They Want they constitute a
17:33
government within a government mocking by their very existence,
17:37
the idea of democracy. As cynical as we have become.
17:41
After 30 years of watching government officials, ignore the
17:43
voters who employ them We were shocked to learn this.
17:47
It's not acceptable. Americans have trusted their
17:51
government less with every passing year since the killing
17:54
of John F. Kennedy maybe this is why and
17:58
people have known this for a long time.
18:00
The people who knew would include every director of the
18:03
CIA since November of 1963 and that list would include Obama's
18:08
CIA director. John Brennan, one of the most
18:10
Sinister and dishonest figures in American Life.
18:13
That list would also include, we are sad to say our friend, Mike
18:17
Pompeo who ran the CIA in the last Administration, Mike Pompeo
18:21
new. This we asked Pompey to join us
18:24
tonight. And though, he really turns down
18:25
a televised interview, he refused to come.
18:28
We hope you'll reconsider subscribe.
18:37
All right, ladies and gentlemen now, I have a few things to say
18:42
on this. I for one was really not shocked
18:48
to hear. My name is but to be honest,
18:53
when it comes to the Kennedy assassination and they all turn
18:57
in the alternative history behind all that.
19:00
I I've been into the Kennedy assassination, just as a hobby
19:05
and whatnot, you know, since I was a freshman in high school
19:10
Cool. In fact, you know there are
19:14
earlier very early on in the pot in the history of my podcasting
19:20
career. I'm not even sure if these
19:22
episodes are on BlogTalkRadio anymore if they got rid of them.
19:26
But I had a friend, a good friend Ryan malls who would call
19:33
in and discuss the You know the Kennedy assassination with me,
19:40
we were probably like 15 or 16 but even then his theory was
19:47
that the CIA was involved my so yeah.
19:52
And also my grandmother who was you know she was alive during
20:00
the you know during the Kennedy assassination.
20:04
She's 88 now. But she has told me on multiple
20:09
occasions that she always believed that the Johnson
20:11
administration at the very least had a hand in the Kennedy
20:17
administration. So why am I bringing this up
20:20
today? After the you have to the
20:24
Christmas season because it's not a very cheery thing to talk
20:27
about. Certainly the Canadians
20:30
destination. Well, I'm bringing up because it
20:33
was brought up a few You know, weeks ago, and people asked me
20:38
to talk about it. And I haven't gotten a chance to
20:42
talk about until now and then I also saw a tweet today on
20:49
Twitter from someone, and I wish I bookmarked it because It
20:57
really kind of hit the ball home. for me, as far as you
21:05
know, people are asking that now well, anything happened because
21:13
of this, you right? We'll we'll the CIA finally
21:19
crumble will. They finally go down for the
21:21
assassination Kennedy? And, you know, folks, I believe
21:25
that the answer is no and the reason being is This user on
21:32
Twitter who seem to be very, you know, pretty much like a normie
21:39
said something along the lines of well, Fox News and Tucker
21:43
Carlson, are the only ones who are talking about, you know,
21:47
these yay, Dawkins right? Tucker Carlson is the only one
21:53
covering and so is Alex Jones and all these.
21:56
You know, crazy right wing conspiracy theorists.
22:00
If this were actually true more than just Fox News would be
22:04
covering it. Right. and unfortunately, folks
22:10
that is a sentiment now that we encountered a lot of it on the
22:17
internet, When anything? Out of the, you know, ordinary
22:26
pops up. And, you know, people question,
22:32
there's always, you know, there's always a contingent of
22:36
the population that will always dismiss.
22:39
You know, people questioning things as a conspiracy theory.
22:44
Or, you know, just crazy talk, right?
22:50
I mean, my YouTube channel has gotten, you know, multiple
22:55
strikes for just mentioning a certain virus of Unknown Origin,
23:03
right? Other channels.
23:06
I mean, same with, you know, or you know, questioning, the
23:11
results was an election. People aren't allowed to do
23:15
that. The point being, you know there
23:20
is a percentage of the population believes that
23:22
questioning. The narrative is bad and if you
23:26
do you're just a kook. And unfortunately ladies and
23:33
gentlemen, the people who are just happy to accept the
23:37
narrative on everything, are the same ones.
23:42
You think that uh oh you know the Kennedy assassination.
23:47
There was no conspiracy there. Now that now the you know, now
23:52
the major concession from the north from like the load here,
23:56
low information voters, people as Rush Limbaugh like to call
24:01
them. Now the low information voters
24:04
are crowd. This is the latest thing I've
24:06
heard well, okay, the Kennedy assassination may have been a
24:12
conspiracy But that happened 60 years ago.
24:17
Now, one is still alive from that time.
24:22
So why does it matter? Well, first off folks, it's that
24:27
attitude, that is so dangerous, you know, to the country and a
24:33
lot of people have that regarding the committee
24:36
assassination. And number two, I'll tell you
24:41
why the Kennedy assassination still matters and why the
24:44
Kennedy conspiracy still matters. because the people who
24:51
are who were involved in the Kennedy assassination or always
24:56
the institutions that these people have worked for, are
25:02
still in power, they're still running things, and in charge of
25:08
our government, the military industrial complex, which
25:14
President Eisenhower warned against way back in the 1950s,
25:21
is bigger than ever. They are incredibly powerful and
25:29
they have tremendous Stranglehold.
25:32
Over both the government and Private Industry and same thing
25:36
with the intelligence agencies. And yeah, the actual people who
25:43
were involved in the Canadian assassination.
25:46
Might be gone, but the institutions, here in America
25:52
are still operating and if you think that they were abusing
25:56
power, then Well, we probably don't even know what they're
26:01
doing. Now, they're probably doing
26:04
things that we can't even comprehend, but we can't talk
26:08
about it because we're just, you know, crazy conspiracy theorist.
26:12
And again this is kind of the same thing with the Twitter
26:16
files. Folks, you know, people keep
26:19
asking Sam a view. Have you covered the lightest?
26:24
Twitter files? Have you covered, you know, have
26:28
you been paying attention to the latest Twitter files?
26:32
And you know I I've went over the first segment of Twitter
26:40
files when the second set of Twitter files here on the show.
26:47
After that. Apex and really to be honest,
26:56
myself included real lost interest in. the Twitter files
27:04
at least reading them on air because essentially the Twitter
27:10
files proves That Big Tex collusion with the government.
27:19
We know, basically everything, we suspected that Twitter was
27:23
doing before long musk took over.
27:26
We now know that it did happen, right?
27:31
I'm not discrediting the fact that it's been revealed, it's
27:34
good that we know that that all has been confirmed, but my
27:39
question now is what is going to be done about that?
27:46
Right. Is Congress going to take any
27:49
action, will any officials be called to Washington from
27:56
Twitter? You know, to answer for this.
28:02
Is this going to be? Are they going to be more, you
28:06
know, serious investigations into what Google is doing?
28:12
Well, that is doing what YouTube is doing because I can tell you
28:16
that Google or rather alphabet, the company that owns Google and
28:22
YouTube, they have a massive Stranglehold on data.
28:28
And whatnot of Twitter has been abusing.
28:30
Their power, chances are alphabet has to same with same
28:34
with Amazon. Okay, right.
28:37
I live an Amazon Prime, you know, member like a lot of other
28:42
people I use Amazon, but they probably have, you know, data
28:48
that they're, you know, that they've been collecting on me
28:51
that they've you know, used for Ellis.
28:56
Purposes. You know, and I, you know, maybe
29:01
even Apple to a certain extent. Apple is very private is very
29:05
privacy based and, you know, usually I I, you know, I'm very
29:10
quick to praise Apple because they are so good for the most
29:15
part, but, you know, even who was an accident with them?
29:19
You just don't know these days. You know, big Tech can be very
29:24
abusive and same with the you know, in same with the
29:30
government and I know the audience that regular that
29:34
really turns into this program, I know you guys know that but
29:38
there there's a certain percentage of the population
29:40
that you know you can You can share all this information with
29:46
them and they just won't care, right?
29:49
It's like the old saying goes, you can lead a horse to water,
29:52
but you can't make them drink, right?
29:55
You can show the people the information, but unless they
29:58
want to dig in further for themselves, you know, one can do
30:02
things for themselves. Which some people do.
30:08
Okay I'll I'll grant them. That there are some people who
30:12
once you leave them down a path. They will look into more
30:15
information right there, the cures types and that's good that
30:20
they're always willing to, you know, look into things.
30:23
But there are a lot of people who, you know, once you lead
30:26
them to water, you can't they won't drink so.
30:32
Anyway, that's my take on the, you know, on the Kennedy thing.
30:37
Nice to have confirmation that the city I was in fact involved,
30:42
but will anything come from it? I don't really know.
30:48
So okay, the the next thing I want to bring up in pop culture.
30:56
News is henrique have Al's exit from the role of Superman?
31:06
This was pretty big news that happen.
31:12
Just before Christmas. and long story short Henry Cavill, who
31:21
has you know in playing Superman since 2013 He, you know, he's
31:30
adamant, he's had like a very off again on again, off again
31:35
relationship with her, you know, Warner, Brothers and DC
31:39
entertainment as of light. And it was announced last week
31:47
that he was, he was like, go I guess from his contract, as
31:54
Superman, primarily because James gone.
31:58
I guess is rebooting the DC movie Universe from what Jax
32:06
from what Zack Snyder had created and is kind of doing his
32:11
own thing now. And so as a result Henry Cavill
32:19
and Gal Gadot are no longer in the respective roles as Superman
32:27
and Wonder Woman, and we all are we already knew that Ben Affleck
32:31
was out as Batman and obviously, Robert Pattinson isn't that role
32:40
now and You know, the Batman movies are kind of doing their
32:48
own thing right now, right? But as far as Henry Cavill and
32:54
and I Gal Gadot go there out as both Superman and Wonder Woman.
33:01
Now, there are a lot of people who, you know, are saying well,
33:11
Henry Cavill was let go because of I woke politics and Hollywood
33:17
and, you know, he's not woke so therefore the studios they let
33:22
him go because he's against he's against.
33:26
Whoa. Chasm and so is Gal Gadot and
33:30
you know, that's why they were, that's why they won't were like
33:32
go And you know, as much as I love some of my fellow
33:39
YouTubers. In the pop culture.
33:43
Commentary space, let's be honest.
33:48
You the reason why Henry Cavill and Gal Gadot were let go It
33:55
wasn't due to politics really. at least, there seems to be no
34:01
serious indication of that rather, because DC entertainment
34:11
and Warner. Brothers are just shitty
34:15
managers, basically. That's wrong what it comes down
34:21
to shitty management. And you know, I know we look at
34:25
Henry, Cavill, you know, and Gallagher do, especially the
34:30
guys with the Gal Gadot. I know that we like to look at
34:33
both of them with rose-tinted tinted glasses and say, oh, they
34:40
were the best, you know? They were the best as you know,
34:45
Wonder Woman and Superman. And you know, there's nobody
34:49
else like them and how can I You know, how can James Gunn fuck
34:56
them over like this, right? And you have a you have a few,
35:02
there are a few things I want to point out here.
35:06
First off, let me just say that Henry Cavill did a terrific job
35:12
as Superman and so did Gal Gadot that first Wonder Woman movie,
35:19
especially was probably the best.
35:24
You know, it was the it was the highest grossing film in
35:28
probably the the most well-reviewed movie of the DC.
35:34
Extended Universe movies, right? And they did their jobs, well,
35:40
in the respective role, however I remember that man is still one
35:48
of the one of the criticisms for Man of Steel was that, you know,
35:55
Superman and that movie was too dark and too, you know, it was
36:01
too depressing, was too bad man like you know, and Superman was
36:06
meant to be more uplifting and more optimistic and You know, I
36:14
I don't necessarily think it was bad but it was only a tone
36:18
change. You know that received mixed
36:24
reviews right? Batman v Superman I actually
36:28
liked Batman v Superman. I thought they did a really good
36:32
job. It did have some pacing issues
36:37
and some writing issues, but I actually like to display.
36:41
A lot of people saying that was, you know, one of the worst
36:46
superhero movies, ever, Justice League was terrible.
36:53
At least the Joss Whedon cut the Snyder cop.
36:59
Justice League was excellent. But as most people know, the
37:02
only reason why we even got That was because the fans had been,
37:09
you know, basically petitioning that for years.
37:13
And it was a good cut and I'm glad that people finally got to
37:16
see it but even that, you know, it wasn't, it wasn't perfect,
37:24
right? It wasn't, It was a bit
37:28
clunking, you know, some areas, especially with, you know,
37:33
riding and length really. So my point being is that the,
37:39
you know, DC's biggest problem, right?
37:43
I think, is that they've been trying to catch up to Marvel?
37:53
For years and years and years. At this point Marvel when they
37:57
came out with the MCU with the Marvel Cinematic Universe, all
38:02
the way back in 2008, with the first Iron Man movie, they
38:07
struck gold and they built a universe around that.
38:13
And well, I have said on this podcast, I think a lot of people
38:18
are getting super oh fatigue at least in the movies.
38:22
Me included. There's no denying that the
38:29
Marvel Cinematic Universe at least in its early days.
38:35
It was basically Unstoppable, right?
38:38
They built it, you know, a cohesive universe that kept
38:42
people coming back that at least in its early days, had pretty
38:47
good. You know, movies and pretty good
38:50
stories. And really flushed out a
38:55
universe that people enjoyed and told you no good stores and
39:02
brought the comic books. Brought Marvel, comic books to
39:05
life. And you know now they've kind of
39:09
dragged the MCU out to the point where people are kind of like
39:14
okay you know this is getting Point pretty formulaic.
39:19
Where's this going? Okay.
39:21
Oh, you know another movie. Okay.
39:28
You know, no doubt Marvel Studios got has gone formulaic.
39:34
People are starting to lose interest in it.
39:38
I think a lot of it and again, that's just the whole superhero
39:42
movie, genre fatigue. I think people are getting But
39:47
like or not. Marvel has the, you know, has a
39:50
formula and DC has just been trying to copy that, right?
39:59
And they've done so unsuccessfully.
40:05
And you know, like I said, Henry Cavill, great actor, same with
40:09
Gal Gadot. I mean Ben Affleck You know,
40:15
he's had personal issues but you know he's pretty he's a pretty
40:18
decent actor and a big name and they let him go as their Batman.
40:26
And when that when that happened a few years ago, I knew that
40:29
they were in trouble. DC, when it comes to the movies,
40:35
they're playing catch-up to Marble.
40:40
Right and they can't afford to, you know, keep doing that.
40:48
They have to reinvent the will the wheel somehow.
40:54
So I guess that's what they're going to try and do with James
40:57
Gunn. And to be honest.
41:03
I can't really say that. I'm that optimistic.
41:10
I know that James Gunn is dragging and he did.
41:14
He really did a good job with The Peacemaker series on HBO
41:20
Max. But let's be honest, the suicide
41:24
movies. He did The Suicide Squad movies
41:27
that he did. Our are not that great.
41:31
And so again I really hope that DC is not just trying to copy my
41:37
rope, they actually do something.
41:40
Creative. But we will see in the meantime
41:45
as for what is going to happen to Henry Cavill and Gal Gadot.
41:56
I know that Gal Gadot has like a project coming up for some
42:01
Netflix show. I haven't seen too much about
42:06
it, to be honest, but it'll be interesting to see what her are
42:12
there. You know what she does outside
42:14
of one woman. She, she was okay and the last
42:19
Fast and Furious movie and I don't roll, even the like those
42:21
babies but she was, she did. Okay.
42:26
As far as Henry Cavill goes. There are rumors that he's going
42:31
to be the next James Bond and to be honest, I didn't really see
42:37
at first because I thought well he's already playing Superman
42:43
and he's already playing, you know, geralt in The Witcher.
42:48
But since he's been basically cut from those two projects,
42:57
and, The future of James bought bond is up in the air, honestly.
43:08
I think that Henry couple should be heavily, you know, considered
43:16
for the role of James Bond, he really does.
43:21
I don't want to say, you looks like Sean Connery.
43:26
But he does kind of have Sean Connery's, I guess Swagger.
43:32
And he looks very much like how Ian Fleming originally
43:38
Illustrated him so I think Henry Cavill would be a good choice if
43:44
they bring and Henry Cavill as James Bond.
43:48
I would personally like to see Gal Gadot in a Bond movie
43:54
actually and more, specifically, one of the James Bond novels
44:00
from the 1980s features a, you know, a villain who is a woman
44:08
and she's a femme face, hell for James Bond.
44:12
And she's an, she's an ex Mossad agent who basically you know,
44:20
she turns against the Mossad and turns against Western world and
44:28
you know, she has this actually pretty Sinister, you know,
44:33
conspiracy and She seduces James Bond and really fucks with his
44:41
head, you know, an addition to just fucking him in general, but
44:45
it, but it's, you know, it's a pretty good plot actually, I
44:50
think of the bond villainous Xenia onatopp except instead of,
44:57
you know, being a, just a henchwoman think of that.
45:01
But with, you know, being the Femme Fatale Mastermind Of the
45:08
of the movie. That's kind of where I see, you
45:12
know, Gal, Gadot her playing a bond villain.
45:15
I had a bond going as I think, I think she could do it and I
45:19
think, I think would actually be, you know, surprising twist
45:24
to see a, you know, a bond villain be a woman.
45:30
But of course in, you know, today's present a Hollywood I'm
45:35
not sure forget that or not. But hey, that's just kind my
45:40
wish. I don't know what happened.
45:45
So I don't have anything too much to cover.
45:49
One last thing I do kind of want to cover though, folks is a
45:53
little fun Easter egg that I uncovered kind of in podcasting.
46:02
So people have kind of asked just in general on the in it for
46:06
years. Why does Howard Stern?
46:12
You know, Joe Rogan. Why are those kind of feuding?
46:14
It always seems like whenever Howard Stern Pops in the mix up
46:18
in the news. It's because he's bitching about
46:22
by Joe Rogan. And you know, how?
46:26
And Joe Rogan doesn't really pay it, you know, doesn't really
46:28
address how stirring at all, you know, he'll be asked at Howard,
46:34
but he won't really bring them up at all.
46:36
And people have often wondered Nerd.
46:39
Why that is? And I found a, you know, quick I
46:44
guess 30-minute documentary on YouTube about this very thing.
46:50
So let me go ahead and Share the screen once again so, okay.
47:04
So this comes from a channel by the name of to the number, too,
47:16
lazy to try and I will link has video If you're watching this on
47:25
YouTube, I'll link it in the, you know, in the title card
47:31
somewhere. And if you're listening on
47:34
Spotify, ER, the podcast players, all wings this in the
47:37
show notes. But long story short, this is
47:41
YouTube, who kind of Chronicles, the history of Howard Stern, and
47:48
Joe Rogan and kind of their Feud.
47:51
I'm not going to play the whole I didn't.
47:53
But I think it's worth playing or what about Matt waste.
48:00
Yo, I'm going to be talking about Joe Rogan, and is
48:02
relationship with Howard Stern, and his time on the Howard Stern
48:05
Show, because I'm sure most people are aware, and that
48:08
Howard is in the biggest fan of Joe, because it seems like the
48:11
only time he's made headlines in the past few years, is when he
48:14
criticizes Joe and his podcast and is political takes, and is
48:17
takes on coronavirus and all that kind of stuff.
48:19
But unless you really know your Joe Rogan or Howard Stern lure,
48:23
you're probably not aware that Joe Rogan.
48:25
And Howard have had a pretty tumultuous relationship for
48:28
almost 20 years now. And that's what we're going to
48:30
be checking out today because I thought it was pretty
48:32
interesting looking back on it and knowing what Joe Rogan has
48:35
become like the top podcast of all time and knowing that Howard
48:39
Stern is probably the top broadcaster of all time and
48:41
these two were each a big fan of each other.
48:44
And Joe was a regular guest on the Stern Show in the early
48:47
2000s when it was a big deal to go on there like going on their
48:50
back, then was probably like going on The Joe Rogan
48:52
Experience today. So it was a pretty big deal for
48:54
Joe to be going on there consistently and it seemed like
48:57
he was a good fit on the show. People enjoy.
48:59
Oi them. It seemed like Howard, enjoy
49:01
them, but that didn't last very long and things soon, took a
49:03
turn. So, before I really get into it
49:05
here, I just want to get this right at user credit.
49:08
This user core mono, he made a whole post about Joe and
49:13
Howard's relationship and his time on the show and everything.
49:15
And he even linked some audio clips.
49:17
I'm going to use so big shout out to this guy because I was
49:20
looking for more information on this because it's really hard to
49:23
find any audio or footage of gel on the Howard Stern Show.
49:27
But this guy found some of the best moments.
49:29
And what I'm going to start with here is Joe's, first appearance
49:32
on the Howard Stern Show, which I believe was in 2000 and that's
49:35
right after Newsradio ended. And it's a year before, Fear
49:39
Factor started and what really got Howard's attention was this
49:43
sketch that Joe and Bryan? Callen did What fuck that.
49:50
Bitch. She said that, fuck her.
49:54
You got a great ass. You really think so.
49:57
Yeah, man. Don't fucking listen to her turn
50:01
around. Let me see your ass man.
50:04
That's a great ass. Yeah, it's round and muscular.
50:10
Let me see. Like take your pants down so I
50:12
can really see it. Okay.
50:16
So what do you think Mikey? That is a great ass I wouldn't
50:21
lie to you Aunt. Olivia, so it tripping over
50:25
yourself here, standing there with your pants down by your
50:27
ankles like a fucking moron. It's take them off.
50:31
Yeah. I guess it looks kind of stupid
50:33
right here. You gonna trip and break your
50:34
fucking head open. I let me see again I'd been I
50:40
couldn't even fit my in your ass.
50:41
That's how muscular it is. Come on, I'm serious.
50:45
Look, I'm actually not totally sure that that was a sketch that
50:48
might have just been a reality right there.
50:50
And of course, Howard joked about that when Joe went on the
50:52
show, like I said, this is a big moment for Joe because the
50:56
Howard Stern Show was insanely popular.
50:58
This is when it is close to its peak and Joe's appearance was a
51:02
good one, it was only like 20 to 25 minutes but they talked about
51:05
a lot and is really Painting and obviously Howard enjoy them on
51:09
there because he brought him back on a bunch of other times.
51:13
And I think he might have. I think, Joe, I'd have been in
51:15
the running for Jackie spot. I'm not totally sure.
51:18
But this is also right before his career really took off, and
51:21
he got the hosting job on Fear Factor, but a lot of people
51:24
don't know your name though. Yet, you're on the verge of
51:25
breaking right. You know what I am?
51:27
I'm that guy. You people see you down the
51:28
street and go. Hey, didn't we go school
51:29
together? I know you from.
51:33
Oh no dude, don't you are you famous enough now, you get into
51:36
the Playboy Mansion. And stuff like this, I would
51:38
never, I think, you know, that's kind of be one of the most
51:40
boring things in the world. We never go, right?
51:42
You don't look like some point. It's kind of creepy so that part
51:45
at the end there where they're talking about the Playboy
51:47
mansion, that's definitely some foreshadowing because only a
51:51
couple years later when Howard was doing a show in Vegas, where
51:54
Joe was one of the guests and the night before apparently
51:58
Howard was going out to one of the strip clubs and Joe was also
52:01
there and then on the show the next day, Howard, and pretty
52:04
much all of its crew, we're talking about how they're a
52:06
little Back by how Joe was talking about and talking to, I
52:10
believe the strippers and sorry for this audio quality, but this
52:14
shit is really hard to find and I look out, look out young.
52:18
If you're watching, look out young, Joe Rogan is there to.
52:22
He's even got like hair and whatnot.
52:27
Wow, I think this is the best. We're going to do here.
52:31
I remember seeing this on YouTube, like four or five years
52:34
ago, but now it's not on there anywhere, I don't know.
52:37
If that's because of bent pixels or because of Howard Stern.
52:41
Anyway, I figured I'd just walk in there and not really know
52:44
anyone. Everyone was there from the show
52:47
and a big appearance there? Well, what you already had an
52:49
appearance in Stuttering. John has one there tonight, but
52:52
Joe Rogan easy. You try to act like you're above
52:54
this trip. And then I always see you
53:08
sitting there, what are you talking about?
53:09
You know what, Joe a paradise, Joe uses the word for about 20
53:14
times an hour, these whores and send the other.
53:17
We won the money, that way, that whole routine about the girls,
53:24
who are angry, because he's using a dollar to get them, to
53:28
take off their clothes. Yeah, that is a good routine.
53:30
Using a bumblebee costume for that later, we were at the pool.
53:32
Howard goes look, these are lower shelf hookers here
53:36
tonight. It's crazy.
54:05
That Howard is saying this stuff like right after this, they play
54:09
butterface where they bring out girl.
54:11
Who have like really nice bodies, but their face are just
54:14
like busted and then they just roast them right to their face.
54:17
So if he's calling you out on this shit, it's not a good look
54:21
or maybe. He's just being a hypocrite.
54:22
I don't know. But it sounds like everybody was
54:25
a little freaked out by it. And again, this is like 20 years
54:28
ago, so I really don't want to make a big deal about it.
54:30
I mean, if all this is true, it's possible Jose change.
54:33
Like, I doubt, you still saying shit like this, but I just want
54:37
to show this stuff because this is kind of the start, or the
54:39
beginning of the end of there. Relationship and things.
54:42
Only go downhill from here, because Howard keeps digging
54:45
into Joe's personal life, which is obviously part of the show.
54:49
If you're going on there, you know, he's going to try to
54:51
reveal like the darkish. It possible.
54:53
Like that's what makes it so entertaining, and Joe doesn't
54:55
seem like the person that likes to air out his dirty laundry.
54:58
And he's not looking to be involved in any kind of drama or
55:01
anything, and I'd say, even Howard, might have taken things
55:04
too far. Like he does usually, like most
55:07
of show, is him taking things too far.
55:09
And, as you'll see later on, he never Really, let's the stripper
55:12
thing go. So that was like, the real
55:14
Catalyst, all this other stuff. I'm sure this just added to it.
55:17
Like on one of the shows when Joe was sitting in Howard
55:20
brought in Joe's ex who was a girl that was on Survivor, I
55:23
believe and she might be an actress or something to and she
55:27
revealed that Joe cheated on her there's an old So, yeah, I I got
55:34
as far as that as this part of the thing last night, I don't
55:39
watch the whole thing. But if you're a podcast guy or
55:43
radio guy in, you enjoy this type of like deep, you know,
55:46
podcast / radial or then you might enjoy this too.
55:56
I certainly did. So again I'll I'll link this
56:01
video in the description, you know.
56:07
So everyone can go and watch this a big shout-out to too lazy
56:14
to try and Yeah. So anyway, if you're into radio
56:22
lore and all that this is pretty interesting, I think and yeah,
56:29
alright folks, so that'll do it for the Tuesday show.
56:32
I want to thank everyone for, you know, tuning in to today's
56:37
program and wherever you're listening in the past present
56:41
future. Our hopefully, I'll be back on
56:45
Thursday, I think for One final show of the year and maybe we'll
56:51
get some panelists, who knows? So hoping to do that, And as I
57:01
said quick, you know, housekeeping things here at the
57:05
end not much is changing. As far as the format goes for
57:11
the show but I will be doing the show three times a week now in
57:15
2023. So I'll be doing the Tuesday,
57:20
show the Thursday show, most likely those will be
57:23
pre-recorded Yeah, unless I give notice otherwise and then as
57:32
always we'll do the live show on Saturday evening.
57:36
So we're doing three shows a week and plus you know I'm
57:41
hoping to do some more exclusive content for the sub stack as
57:46
well talking about various topics and whatnot more
57:51
specific. Alright folks so without further
57:55
Ado I want to thank you for listening.
57:57
And and, and or watching have a good day or evening wherever you
58:02
are, and I'll see you on the next episode.
58:05
Folks. Thank you for listening.
58:14
Thanks for listening to the Whitfield report on the NGC
58:18
Network. Please visit Sam's web site at
58:21
www.bsmsphd.com and supports am on patreon and patreon.com
58:30
Whitfield report. Until next time, God bless God.
58:34
Save this great nation and God Freedom Legacy in that order.