Latest / World Ablaze with George Fontes / Trump vs Canada: Electricity Threats, Beef Import Waivers and Flock AI Cameras (Chris Michaels)

Transcript

Trump vs Canada: Electricity Threats, Beef Import Waivers and Flock AI Cameras (Chris Michaels) · World Ablaze with George Fontes

• 0:00
  welcome back to another world of blaze everyone i have a very special guest with me today mr
• 0:12
  chris michaels from the chris michaels show but before we bring him on i want to remind everybody
• 0:18
  that we're brought to you by afuera coffee and afuera coffee offers amazing product that is
• 0:23
  ethically sourced from farmers that offer sustainable farming practices. And aside from
• 0:30
  being great coffee, you can basically like 5% of your sales will go towards the upkeep and
• 0:35
  conservation of the great outdoors that we all enjoy. And you can save 15% by scanning my QR code
• 0:40
  above me. And if you can't do that because you're not watching the video, then you can also click
• 0:45
  the link in the show notes or go to my website, worldofblazepodcast.com address up above me in
• 0:51
  the ticker. You can click the link for the sponsors and then the link for A Foy to Coffee
• 0:56
  will be right there and you will save money. All that out of the way, I think it's time to bring
• 1:02
  Chris Michaels on because I've been trying to get him on for a while, but it's all been on my side,
• 1:06
  not his. I've been busy as hell. So we finally had something line up. And here he is, Mr. Chris
• 1:12
  Michaels. How are you, sir? Doing pretty well. How about you? I'm doing good. I had a great time
• 1:17
  on your show last time. Yeah, we've got to get you back on. I know. I've been busy, man. Like I said,
• 1:22
  it's been my fault, and I've been wanting you to be on this show. I wanted to introduce you to my
• 1:26
  audience because I like what you do. I like that also, outside of talking about current events,
• 1:32
  politics, and giving your informed opinions, you also dive into the esoteric topics that,
• 1:38
  you know, the fringe, whatever. And to me, it's really just talking about what might be possible,
• 1:42
  what's out there, what could be, or maybe what really is, and we just don't know. So I think
• 1:46
  that's also very cool that you offer that as well. It kind of gives people a break and allows them to
• 1:50
  chew on something else that they never thought of or were paying attention to, which is cool.
• 1:54
  Oh, yeah. I mean, it's even for me, like three days is enough. And then plus, if I do other
• 1:59
  people's podcasts or streams and they come on mine, I go on theirs. I mean, enough is enough.
• 2:05
  I need some kind of distance from all of this. That's why I do like UFO Thursday, Atlantis
• 2:11
  Thursday. I think the other week I did Giant Thursday, you know, all of that kind of thing
• 2:15
  where we bring in mythology and try to apply it to potentially current events too with UFO Thursdays anyway.
• 2:24
  Fun stuff.
• 2:25
  And we're going to have the opportunity for you to talk about those things a little bit later
• 2:28
  because I want everybody to see how you deliver that and the knowledge you have in that particular area.
• 2:34
  Before that, though, my audience may not be so familiar with you, even though I am.
• 2:38
  I listen to you.
• 2:40
  Maybe give people a little bit of background on you and what your show offers.
• 2:43
  We did a little bit of that, but let everybody know who you are and where you came from.
• 2:46
  And then we'll start diving into what's going on in this crazy world.
• 2:50
  Oh, man.
• 2:50
  Okay.
• 2:51
  So I did terrestrial radio for a long, long time.
• 2:55
  So AM and FM.
• 2:56
  And then during COVID, I was lambasting the mainstream narrative and they absolutely despised
• 3:03
  me for it.
• 3:04
  So I got kicked off of terrestrial radio.
• 3:07
  I was basically doing what I do now, but on an FM station.
• 3:11
  So what does that do?
• 3:12
  It allows me to say all kinds of wonderful things with the art of not actually swearing.
• 3:19
  So that's very, very important for terrestrial radio.
• 3:23
  And then I went into streaming and podcasting and all of that.
• 3:28
  Trust me, it's not as fun as live radio because you don't get that interaction.
• 3:34
  I still do it.
• 3:35
  I do it four days a week.
• 3:36
  I talk about current events.
• 3:37
  I pretty much cut through all of the nonsense out there because I don't care what side you're on.
• 3:46
  I was a big Trump fan until a couple of months ago.
• 3:48
  Still am in some regards, but not so much anymore, especially when it comes to foreign policy.
• 3:53
  But it doesn't matter.
• 3:53
  Democrat, Republican, right to life, libertarian.
• 3:57
  I'm going to lambast you or sing you praises.
• 4:00
  Doesn't matter what.
• 4:01
  And then we also get into the esoteric on Thursdays.
• 4:04
  So it is a smorgasbord of current events.
• 4:08
  And what's more, it's usually improv.
• 4:11
  How about that?
• 4:13
  Perfect.
• 4:14
  Great show.
• 4:14
  I encourage everybody to check it out, to be honest.
• 4:16
  It's good stuff, man.
• 4:17
  And he's always there delivering regardless, even when he's tired.
• 4:21
  Doesn't want to do it.
• 4:22
  He'll even tell you, but he still gets through it.
• 4:25
  That's right.
• 4:25
  And he'll give you a damn good show.
• 4:27
  I will.
• 4:28
  I'm effing tired.
• 4:30
  Oh, God.
• 4:30
  Right.
• 4:31
  One thing you got on me, man, I'm going to tell you, I can't hold the dang tongue.
• 4:34
  right? I got to drop the F-bombs every once in a while, but I try to be a little more reserved
• 4:38
  when I have a guest. So I'm going to hold it back, but I don't know how most people do it.
• 4:42
  I guess it's just how I talk and whatnot in my background. Trust me, it gets really difficult
• 4:46
  sometimes. And I have been more loosey-goosey the past couple of weeks simply because I have
• 4:53
  been tired because now, recently, I'm siring a child, which is one of the reasons why I am so
• 5:00
  exhausted. Gotcha, man. Well, congrats on that. Oh man. All right. So speaking of children,
• 5:10
  I wasn't going to do this, but you and I kind of were talking about the upside down world that
• 5:16
  we're kind of living in. We didn't dive too deep into it, so we don't have to go far into it, but
• 5:22
  I know you talked about it. I've talked about it. Many people I know. What do you think's going on
• 5:27
  with this Lindsay Clancy trial right at the moment.
• 5:31
  Bizarre stuff, right?
• 5:33
  Right.
• 5:33
  So this woman does what?
• 5:35
  She goes after her kids with exercise bans.
• 5:40
  Yeah.
• 5:41
  And then she kills them all.
• 5:44
  But I mean, that's not like, I mean, as extreme as that is,
• 5:48
  that's not the real story.
• 5:50
  The real story behind this is that she's raised close to a million dollars,
• 5:55
  if not over a million dollars on a GoFundMe.
• 5:57
  with all of these TikTok hyper-liberal women saying,
• 6:01
  oh my goodness, I know exactly what you feel like.
• 6:04
  What do you mean you know exactly what she feels like?
• 6:06
  Do you have dirty thoughts or icky thoughts
• 6:08
  about your own children?
• 6:11
  Yeah, I think that's what was bizarre for me was this.
• 6:13
  I mean, look, psycho is psycho.
• 6:17
  And I know I'm not a doctor.
• 6:18
  I'm not trying to diagnose her.
• 6:19
  But look, she killed her children ages 5, 3, and 8 months,
• 6:24
  like you said, with exercise bans.
• 6:25
  That takes some actual effort.
• 6:27
  She sent her husband out of the house to go pick something up.
• 6:31
  And while he was gone, took her children down to the garage and killed them face to face.
• 6:36
  I mean, think about that.
• 6:37
  Trying to choke someone out, right?
• 6:39
  And so she did that to her children.
• 6:41
  And she even said that, I think it was in one of the preliminary hearings, or when she was being interviewed, that she heard a voice or male voice telling her to do things, right?
• 6:50
  Oh, her phone.
• 6:51
  Yeah.
• 6:51
  And she's trying to, I don't know if her or the lawyers, but they're trying to shift the blame.
• 6:56
  First, it was to the husband.
• 6:58
  Then it was now it is or I don't know if it's still going on because I haven't watched what's going on currently.
• 7:03
  Trying to shift it to the health professionals that were allegedly taking care of her.
• 7:08
  Saying, well, it's your fault that I got this way and this happened because you didn't diagnose me earlier and you had me on a plethora of medications for six months or whatever it is.
• 7:16
  And I saw the list.
• 7:17
  Some of them, I was surprised how many she was taking and how many different ones.
• 7:22
  But regardless, she's been dealing with this issue way before.
• 7:26
  She chose to kill her kids.
• 7:29
  I guess I should say allegedly, but I can't because her defense admitted that she killed her kids.
• 7:34
  So I'm not really sure what the play is here or what they're trying to do.
• 7:38
  So it's very strange what's going on here and how she's the victim.
• 7:42
  Sorry, I know I went on this rant a bit.
• 7:47
  But what got me is what you said.
• 7:49
  The amount of women out there supporting her.
• 7:52
  Heart signs up, all of that.
• 7:53
  And then her parents put that GoFundMe together.
• 7:57
  And last I saw it, because I did an episode recently,
• 8:00
  it was already over a million.
• 8:01
  I think it was approaching two million.
• 8:03
  I'm not sure if I did it yet.
• 8:04
  But isn't it crazy how they can justify the murder
• 8:07
  and say, hey, we understand.
• 8:09
  And there was women on videos saying,
• 8:11
  you have no idea what it's like to be a mother.
• 8:13
  You know, sometimes I want to kill my child too.
• 8:14
  And just making the, you know, that.
• 8:17
  I'm like, man.
• 8:20
  Why would you say something like that out loud?
• 8:22
  I mean, swearing and saying, oh, God, I got to get out of here for a couple of hours is one thing.
• 8:27
  But to say that I hate this urchin so much.
• 8:32
  Okay, so you said something else, too, that I thought was interesting.
• 8:37
  She supposedly heard this voice over the phone, right?
• 8:40
  And the voice over the phone said, you have to kill your kids and then you have to kill yourself, right?
• 8:46
  When I heard that, I said, okay, this sounds a lot like MKUltra nonsense.
• 8:52
  Now, MKUltra is kaput, but there is some kind of replacement program that is a thousand times more efficient than MKUltra.
• 9:01
  For anybody that doesn't know, MKUltra, basically a brainwash-style program.
• 9:06
  Care of the Nazis that were brought over here after Operation Paperclip.
• 9:10
  And you can even look up things like the Montauk Project, not far from where I am,
• 9:14
  and find out all kinds of wonderful things where they try to commit these children and adults
• 9:20
  into having multiple personalities. So I think the current term is disassociated identity disorder.
• 9:29
  And so basically, you're trying to create super spies that will never snitch because they've got
• 9:32
  multiple personalities that don't remember what the other personality is doing, right?
• 9:36
  So that's the first thing that pops into my mind when I hear that.
• 9:40
  The second thing that I felt that was extremely odd is this guy, Dr. Paul Ziesel.
• 9:45
  Dr. Paul Ziesel, as far as I know, is the one that brought up this phone call.
• 9:52
  He's the one that supposedly said she had this phone call.
• 9:57
  Now, from my research on it, and you can look it up from Morgan on X,
• 10:01
  Morgan posted that Dr. Ziesel didn't even start to see Ms. Clancy as a patient until 11 days after
• 10:13
  Clancy, excuse me, until 11 days after the murders. Okay, so that's bizarre. How would he know this
• 10:20
  bit of information? The other thing is that if you look into his background, he's a psychologist
• 10:26
  for special forces in Afghanistan.
• 10:29
  He's got other experience in Cambodia and Thailand,
• 10:32
  forensic witness experience,
• 10:34
  government enforcement involvement,
• 10:36
  DOD, Department of State, DEA.
• 10:38
  I mean, on and on the list goes.
• 10:41
  I mean, this guy seems perfect,
• 10:44
  perfect for this kind of operation,
• 10:46
  which leads me to believe
• 10:48
  what other contacts does she have?
• 10:50
  I mean, I did a brief research on her bio,
• 10:53
  her husband's bio,
• 10:54
  really didn't find much
• 10:56
  but I miss this guy.
• 10:58
  Yeah.
• 10:58
  There's usually a connection,
• 10:59
  right?
• 10:59
  Like some in the family somewhere,
• 11:01
  like with Charles Manson,
• 11:02
  he was allegedly part of this MK ultra program too.
• 11:05
  Right.
• 11:05
  But he had connections and a lot of people didn't really talk about that.
• 11:10
  There's a few people that did,
• 11:11
  but that's an interesting thing you brought up.
• 11:13
  The only,
• 11:13
  the only thing I have about it though,
• 11:15
  is what capacity did she have as a person to really affect change or,
• 11:21
  or,
• 11:21
  or to do anything that would be considered,
• 11:25
  benefit to a mission, for example.
• 11:29
  And why would
• 11:31
  they trigger her to kill her kids
• 11:33
  and then kill herself?
• 11:35
  That's what I can't get.
• 11:36
  Because as far as I can tell,
• 11:38
  her background is not that elaborate.
• 11:41
  I mean, her job wasn't
• 11:43
  any, you know, and it didn't appear
• 11:45
  as though there was anything sensitive to it.
• 11:47
  Her husband didn't really find
• 11:49
  anything on him.
• 11:50
  But that could be the case, right?
• 11:52
  Because if you are in an intel environment,
• 11:54
  you don't want flashy jobs.
• 11:57
  You want a clerk, a teacher.
• 12:01
  You want that kind of thing.
• 12:03
  So there's definitely more to this story
• 12:05
  than what we're being told.
• 12:06
  I think that's a legitimate angle, though,
• 12:08
  that you're talking about.
• 12:09
  That is a very, very good possibility.
• 12:12
  That is a very good possibility.
• 12:13
  They just scrambled her brain,
• 12:14
  left her out there to live as a civilian,
• 12:17
  and she tried to deal with it.
• 12:18
  Possible, especially after what you said
• 12:20
  about the doctor who was seeing her
• 12:23
  after she murdered the children,
• 12:25
  which is a little suspect in and of itself, right?
• 12:28
  Completely.
• 12:30
  And what I find even more bizarre
• 12:32
  is why is she getting this kind of notoriety, right?
• 12:36
  Agreed.
• 12:37
  It was pushed on TikTok first,
• 12:39
  and then it bled into other social media.
• 12:42
  Well, this happened in 2023, right?
• 12:44
  Something like that.
• 12:45
  This is old.
• 12:46
  Yeah, yeah.
• 12:47
  The actual act of the murder,
• 12:49
  I believe it was 23, 24,
• 12:52
  I believe preliminary hearing,
• 12:53
  If I right I might be off on that but here we are and she now on trial And I didn know the other stuff you just mentioned I just I was just commenting like when I was looking into this I was commenting on the reaction
• 13:05
  of the people supporting someone
• 13:07
  who killed their children
• 13:08
  and trying to say they understand.
• 13:10
  And I couldn't understand that logic.
• 13:12
  That's what really got me more than anything
• 13:13
  outside of this act itself.
• 13:16
  And it's like, why can't, you know,
• 13:17
  and women are still,
• 13:18
  I'm not trying to throw a blanket over all women
• 13:20
  because not all women are supporting this,
• 13:22
  but we're not trying to repeal
• 13:23
  the 19th amendment here.
• 13:25
  No.
• 13:25
  We're just...
• 13:27
  But a lot of women have been saying they understand and we don't understand.
• 13:31
  The world doesn't understand, right?
• 13:33
  But can we not apply that same sympathetic logic to Ed Gein, right?
• 13:38
  Or the son of Sam or Richard Ramirez?
• 13:40
  Because society failed them as well, I would say.
• 13:42
  Why didn't they diagnose their mental issues and struggles before they went and killed people and did what they did?
• 13:47
  Did they get a pass?
• 13:49
  Or is it just this woman?
• 13:50
  I wish I had the story saved.
• 13:52
  But somebody did research on the sentencing of mothers committing murder or killing their kids versus fathers and what their sentences were.
• 14:07
  And more often than not, the mothers had far lighter sentences than the fathers.
• 14:13
  And it turns out that there's a lot of sympathy out there.
• 14:16
  Well, postpartum, well, this, hormones, and all the rest.
• 14:19
  Right.
• 14:20
  I don't care how you slice it.
• 14:22
  You shouldn't be ending people's lives regardless of age.
• 14:28
  It's icky.
• 14:29
  It's not good.
• 14:30
  I agree.
• 14:31
  It's crazy.
• 14:32
  I think there is an argument for, let's say, postpartum, for example.
• 14:36
  Sure.
• 14:36
  But she has a five-year-old, three-year-old, and an eight-month-year-old, right?
• 14:41
  That could hang over, I guess, after the last child I was born.
• 14:44
  but what turns it for me
• 14:47
  is usually what would happen
• 14:49
  is if you're going to act out
• 14:51
  it would be an emotional response
• 14:53
  when you send your husband
• 14:55
  out of the house so he's not around to stop you
• 14:57
  from what you're doing that turns into premeditation
• 15:00
  yes
• 15:00
  it certainly does
• 15:02
  so you know
• 15:05
  hey I don't know
• 15:06
  I don't even want to hear it
• 15:08
  honestly I don't want to hear anybody
• 15:11
  and if you're defending this
• 15:12
  When I saw a lot of these photos and protests come out,
• 15:18
  I think the one I looked at, they all had the same shirts.
• 15:21
  So when I see that, I go, okay.
• 15:23
  Are we talking about the pink ones they're wearing?
• 15:24
  I think so.
• 15:25
  Yeah, that sounds right.
• 15:27
  Okay, so how much is Alex Soros paying for this one way or another,
• 15:30
  directly or indirectly?
• 15:32
  Why are you trying to push this story?
• 15:34
  Are you trying to, with the ultimate goal here,
• 15:37
  push the idea that the state should be the ultimate custodian of the child?
• 15:41
  because I truly think that's the end game with a lot of this.
• 15:45
  Because think about this.
• 15:48
  And it's coming out, the idea of a mature minor,
• 15:52
  starting in California, which is when a 12-year-old,
• 15:56
  your child that happens to be 12 years old,
• 15:58
  can go to a doctor and the doctor claims patient privilege
• 16:04
  or patient privacy and will not tell the parents
• 16:07
  what the doctor's visit was about.
• 16:09
  So that could be transitioning, right?
• 16:13
  Yes.
• 16:13
  Little Michael becomes Michelle and vice versa.
• 16:16
  But even though the doctor is not going to tell you about it,
• 16:19
  you still get the bill.
• 16:21
  You still pay for it.
• 16:23
  They're trying to push the same thing with the children
• 16:25
  when it comes to school as well.
• 16:27
  Yeah, totally.
• 16:29
  There was a big deal in New Jersey recently
• 16:31
  where the school districts flat out said,
• 16:35
  we're not going to tell the parents
• 16:36
  if those kids decide to transition
• 16:39
  and Michael wants to become Michelle and that's it.
• 16:42
  Well, in California, that was being pushed.
• 16:45
  Well, that was already, you know, California is what it is.
• 16:48
  A lot of the crazy bullshit starts here.
• 16:49
  Oh, yeah.
• 16:50
  It's like granola.
• 16:51
  One third flakes, one third fruits, and one third nuts.
• 16:54
  That's a perfect description.
• 16:56
  Actually, I wonder where I'm at.
• 16:58
  So the problem is in California, though,
• 17:04
  outside of what you just mentioned, which is a thing,
• 17:06
  they were trying to push now that mental health practitioners in the schools can now talk to your
• 17:13
  child and your child can now talk to them without ever telling the parent and keeping whatever is
• 17:18
  said away from the parent oh yeah totally yes absolutely yeah that's more than suspect honestly
• 17:26
  completely um i spoke uh i used to do a show with a guy greg bolden uh a while ago and we had on i
• 17:34
  I wish I could remember her name, but she has done a ton of interviews on Fox and Newsmax and everything else.
• 17:41
  She's a psychologist.
• 17:43
  And her main focus of study was communism and LGBTQ and all the other letters that come behind it.
• 17:50
  And basically what she found out is that there is a concerted effort within the school districts,
• 17:57
  particularly the ones that are tenured to convert these children,
• 18:02
  either into communists or gay, lesbian, transgender, bisexual, whatever, whatever, right?
• 18:09
  So what they do is that they harp on these teachers that are tenured
• 18:15
  to become the flag bearers of this mantra.
• 18:21
  And since they're tenured, good luck doing something to them.
• 18:24
  Good luck with any kind of repercussion for what they do.
• 18:28
  So this whole thing is extremely true.
• 18:31
  Now, I know somebody else that's a teacher.
• 18:34
  And you may love this.
• 18:36
  You may not.
• 18:38
  So I harp on artificial intelligence a lot because I'm tactile.
• 18:42
  I like books.
• 18:43
  I like touching things.
• 18:44
  And I like to prove what I'm reading is true rather than relying on artificial intelligence.
• 18:48
  this person has to create essentially a digital dossier, right?
• 18:57
  And the digital dossier on the students basically logs what happens with the student,
• 19:02
  if there's an outburst, if there's a great grade,
• 19:04
  if there's some kind of issue with the student or whatever, right?
• 19:06
  And he has to choose from artificial intelligent type responses and all kinds of prompts.
• 19:14
  Now, this school record starts at kindergarten and doesn't stop
• 19:18
  until senior year.
• 19:20
  Now, what's the fun part about all of this?
• 19:22
  Is that not only do you create a record
• 19:24
  for the whole lifespan of the public school attendance,
• 19:29
  but the same company that runs this program
• 19:32
  is also in charge of mortgages for the state.
• 19:38
  So that means...
• 19:39
  So they're just building a profile
• 19:40
  from kindergarten all the way up.
• 19:42
  Bingo.
• 19:42
  It's like an FBI profile, but...
• 19:44
  Exactly.
• 19:45
  Or financial means, whatever it is.
• 19:47
  Yeah.
• 19:47
  exactly so this is where we're at yeah well i mean we could argue that education you know by and
• 19:55
  large public education is really nothing but indoctrination and programming we could make
• 19:58
  that argument oh for sure you know absolutely without a doubt wow without a doubt that's a
• 20:04
  so hey everybody that's how we start the show
• 20:07
  yeah right all right um let's get into some of the stuff i know you love trump right
• 20:16
  No, I didn't.
• 20:16
  You know what?
• 20:17
  I really do.
• 20:18
  I love Trump 1.0.
• 20:19
  I love when Trump is in front of the media.
• 20:21
  I absolutely love it.
• 20:23
  All right.
• 20:23
  Let's go here, man.
• 20:24
  Let's talk about the tariff and trade wars with Canada.
• 20:28
  And I have this little article post.
• 20:30
  I can read it because I'm kind of doing this on the fly.
• 20:34
  I looked at this, but I didn't really dive too deep.
• 20:36
  So this will be you and I just discussing what we think.
• 20:38
  Improv.
• 20:39
  Let's go.
• 20:40
  Yeah, yeah.
• 20:40
  The Ontario Premier Ford threatens to cut off electricity and critical minerals to U.S.
• 20:45
  as trade woes worsen.
• 20:47
  So I guess on Friday,
• 20:48
  Prime Minister Mark Carney
• 20:49
  suspended trade talks
• 20:50
  with the United States
• 20:51
  as long-planned tariffs
• 20:52
  on Canadian goods took effect
• 20:55
  following the collapse of negotiations.
• 20:57
  President Trump responded
• 20:58
  by threatening a 50% tariff
• 21:01
  on Canadian automobiles,
• 21:02
  car parts, and steel
• 21:03
  starting next year,
• 21:05
  claiming Canada has been ripping off
• 21:07
  the United States of America for years.
• 21:08
  And we've heard him say that before.
• 21:10
  Ontario Premier, though,
• 21:11
  Doug Ford called for a strong response
• 21:13
  to new U.S. tariffs
• 21:14
  on 28 billion of exports threatening to cut off electricity and critical minerals to the United
• 21:20
  States if tensions worsen. And Ottawa plans to match U.S. tariffs dollar for dollar after Labor
• 21:27
  Day, targeting steel and electronics, while Ford declared that everything is on the table
• 21:33
  regarding the dispute. Ford claimed former President Ronald Reagan would be throwing up
• 21:38
  over Trump's trade policies, invoking Cold War-era Republican leadership to signal the depth of
• 21:43
  Canada-U.S. tensions.
• 21:47
  So, what do you think about this?
• 21:50
  Because it seems like this is getting nasty with Canada for whatever reason.
• 21:55
  And we've also seen Canada respond by doing deals with what we would consider,
• 22:00
  as far as the U.S. is concerned, nefarious actors and nefarious countries
• 22:03
  that definitely do not have the West's best intentions at heart for sure.
• 22:07
  How do you think this is going to play out based on what you know
• 22:11
  and what you've been monitoring?
• 22:13
  Well, honestly, I do think that this is one of those ways where Trump is trying to bring work back to the United States.
• 22:23
  And one of the ways you do that is through these kinds of growing pains where you levy these tariffs and say, okay, well, then you play ball or you can go home.
• 22:33
  And for what it's worth, Canada has always had extraordinary tariffs on United States products.
• 22:40
  Right?
• 22:41
  Yeah, I'm from.
• 22:41
  For sure.
• 22:42
  And so what is trying to occur here is, I honestly think on a grand scale, like we're talking macro scale, not just Canada and the US, you have to go outside of that.
• 22:55
  You're looking at a global realignment of the power structure.
• 23:00
  You're looking at the burgeoning multipolar world.
• 23:03
  As much as NATO and England and the United States don't want to admit it, it's going to happen.
• 23:10
  It may not happen tomorrow, but it's going to happen.
• 23:14
  And this is just one more of those realignments.
• 23:18
  Now, what you have to also remember, or at least what I remember,
• 23:23
  is that a couple of months ago, didn't the leader of Canada meet with China?
• 23:32
  Yes.
• 23:33
  And then right after that, he gave a speech,
• 23:36
  and he said that he's ready for the new world order.
• 23:39
  He did say that and also mentioned how China was, I think, don't quote, but I think he said something to the effect loosely that China was basically a better partner than the U.S.
• 23:51
  Correct.
• 23:51
  And what country, the United States or China, needs more steel to build their navy?
• 23:58
  Yeah, right now the U.S.
• 24:00
  What country needs more rare earth minerals to complete their robot army, not the United States?
• 24:07
  The United States is scrambling for rare earth minerals, especially since they blew through all the Patriot systems and the PACAMs and all the ATACAMs and all that other nonsense, right?
• 24:18
  So China is basically saying to the United States, no, we're not going to give you anything.
• 24:24
  And then our allies aren't going to give you anything either.
• 24:28
  So go look somewhere else.
• 24:29
  And Canada is just one more of those allies that China has.
• 24:32
  I think that's what's really going on here.
• 24:34
  I think China is pressing Canada to say no to the United States to reign in
• 24:39
  Trump and the United States.
• 24:41
  I think that,
• 24:43
  all right,
• 24:44
  well that tracks,
• 24:45
  that does track because I can see.
• 24:48
  So look,
• 24:48
  well,
• 24:49
  okay.
• 24:49
  So China's not going to take over the United States destroyed kinetically.
• 24:52
  It's just not going to work out.
• 24:54
  No.
• 24:54
  You know,
• 24:55
  they have an aging military in terms of actual people like physical age,
• 24:59
  and they don't have enough younger males to replace those or that are leaving
• 25:03
  a retirement.
• 25:03
  So China's kind of a,
• 25:04
  tough spot there militarily, but they do have technology. They have the ability to build.
• 25:08
  There's nothing wrong with what they could possibly do as far as the military is concerned.
• 25:14
  We ain't going to like it, but for them, they can respond. But what you said, I think I side
• 25:20
  with you on because it makes a lot of sense for them to go to Canada, partner with them,
• 25:24
  and then outside of the friction that's being caused right now, cut off the things we need,
• 25:29
  the steel, the minerals, everything else, because we can't get it from too many places. And China
• 25:34
  China already has their fingers into all of the mines right now that are out there,
• 25:40
  especially when you're looking at like the DR over there, the Congo and all that.
• 25:46
  They own those mines.
• 25:47
  They own all those mines and they oversee them.
• 25:49
  So cobalt, everything else like that.
• 25:51
  China has a huge stake in all of that and controls a lot of it already.
• 25:55
  So this could very well be a play to further choke off the United States from those things that we actually need So I can absolutely see that Hey and then if you want to veer off a bit outside of just you know steel and precious minerals I don know if you know about this but I think
• 26:10
  there is a little bit of something going on with China when it comes to like Canada's MAID program.
• 26:15
  And that could be something we could dive in maybe another time. China's what program?
• 26:20
  Canada. Canada's MAID program. MAID program. Yeah. Go into it. I don't know.
• 26:25
  So that is the medical-assisted death program.
• 26:30
  Oh, okay.
• 26:31
  Yeah.
• 26:32
  And Canada, I don't have all the stats on me.
• 26:35
  I just brought this up because it's on top of my head.
• 26:37
  No, no, no.
• 26:37
  Yeah, yeah, yeah.
• 26:38
  But basically, what's been going on and what's been talked about is the medical system in Canada has been pushing a lot of people who either have terminal illnesses or they have mental, they're dealing with mental health issues, etc.
• 26:52
  And one of the first things that they're pushing and offering is the ability for them to say, well, here you go.
• 26:58
  If you want to make it easier on your family and everybody else and you're just not right and don't feel like you have anything left to give this planet, here's this program.
• 27:06
  And they're kind of leading with that before any other treatments.
• 27:10
  And so the reason I bring this up is, what was the book?
• 27:13
  My sister bought me the book.
• 27:14
  But anyway, I'll tell you offline.
• 27:17
  But there's a book that was written by this author
• 27:18
  that really talks about the selling of organs,
• 27:23
  organ harvesting and selling organs in China,
• 27:26
  which is connected with many of the,
• 27:30
  what do you call it?
• 27:31
  The native populations.
• 27:32
  What do they call it?
• 27:32
  The Uyghurs?
• 27:33
  Not the Uyghurs.
• 27:33
  Yeah, the Uyghurs.
• 27:35
  Yeah.
• 27:35
  That was one of them,
• 27:36
  but wasn't there another tribe?
• 27:38
  The Fong something.
• 27:39
  That's it.
• 27:40
  Yeah, yeah.
• 27:41
  I don't remember.
• 27:42
  The Falun Gong.
• 27:43
  Oh, you got it.
• 27:44
  Good.
• 27:44
  Yeah, that was them.
• 27:46
  And so they've been doing this to their own people there.
• 27:49
  Now, combine that with China's needs to keep harvesting and selling organs
• 27:54
  because it's such a big business with Canada's MAID program.
• 27:57
  And now we're looking at this weird relationship between China and Canada.
• 28:02
  I don't know.
• 28:02
  I just think there might be something there.
• 28:04
  Sure.
• 28:04
  I mean, I can buy that too.
• 28:06
  I forgot who said it, but it was a big-time political guy.
• 28:12
  It was like on his deathbed in the 80s or something like that.
• 28:14
  He basically said the real world's currency is drugs, weapons, and people.
• 28:21
  It's not money.
• 28:22
  It's not exchange rates.
• 28:23
  It's not anything like that.
• 28:24
  It's who has the drug trade, who has the arms trade, and who has the human trafficking trade.
• 28:29
  That makes sense.
• 28:30
  I can totally buy that.
• 28:31
  I mean, you could read countless stories about organ harvesting, about human trafficking out of the Ukraine, out of what's happening in the Middle East.
• 28:41
  back in 2013, there was a huge organ trading bust in Brooklyn.
• 28:48
  I think it was a Hasidic community that was involved in New Jersey.
• 28:53
  Oh, it's old. It's old. 13 years old.
• 28:57
  But the crux of this is that, yes, organ trading does happen
• 29:02
  and a lot of these countries are involved in it.
• 29:05
  And I wouldn't be surprised at all if this is part of the program
• 29:10
  that China has with Canada and other countries.
• 29:13
  Yeah.
• 29:13
  The only thing is though,
• 29:14
  is China as a government is heavily involved in it
• 29:16
  and making money on it.
• 29:18
  I'm not sure how many governments
• 29:19
  are actually behind selling organs.
• 29:22
  Now, we kind of got off track a bit,
• 29:25
  but I just brought that up
• 29:26
  because I think there's a lot more,
• 29:28
  like I think there's something more nefarious
• 29:29
  going on between China and Canada
• 29:31
  outside of just trying to cut the US off for minerals.
• 29:34
  I also think this has to do with the Arctic trade routes
• 29:37
  because China is very, very cozy.
• 29:40
  with Russia.
• 29:41
  They just sent their first ship
• 29:42
  through the Arctic trade route
• 29:44
  around Russia,
• 29:46
  up through the Arctic,
• 29:47
  and I believe it was going to Murmansk.
• 29:50
  I don't remember offhand,
• 29:52
  but it went around the Arctic, right?
• 29:53
  It was actually quicker
• 29:54
  to go through the Arctic
• 29:55
  than it was to go around
• 29:56
  the Middle East and all the rest.
• 29:58
  But if you look at Canada,
• 29:59
  what does Canada have?
• 30:01
  It's got a lot of real estate
• 30:02
  in the Arctic, right?
• 30:04
  And the United States
• 30:05
  is always harping about Greenland, so...
• 30:07
  That's what I was just going to say.
• 30:08
  Wasn't that one of the reasons, though?
• 30:10
  Like one of the real reasons Trump was so adamant about Greenland.
• 30:13
  He said it day one.
• 30:14
  Yeah.
• 30:15
  And what are the Dutch doing with it?
• 30:17
  Nothing.
• 30:18
  Absolutely nothing.
• 30:19
  Nothing.
• 30:20
  What are you doing?
• 30:21
  Making waffles up there?
• 30:22
  Nothing.
• 30:22
  It almost makes you wonder.
• 30:24
  Like Trump's crazy.
• 30:25
  I will admit it.
• 30:26
  He's a little off the rocker, but it also makes you wonder if a lot of the things about him is fabricated just to throw everybody off and hate him.
• 30:32
  because it looks like what Trump's trying to do,
• 30:34
  especially with what's going on with Canada
• 30:36
  and the information that you were just talking about
• 30:38
  in terms of the Chinese and Canadian relationship
• 30:40
  in terms of trade,
• 30:42
  that Trump's trying to get a hold of this reset of power.
• 30:46
  It seems like China's trying to reset
• 30:48
  the power structure in the world
• 30:50
  because they want to be the leader.
• 30:52
  They want to be the go-to.
• 30:53
  They've been looking to unseat the U.S. for years.
• 30:58
  So maybe that's what we're looking at.
• 31:00
  But regardless, let's get down to what, because most people, we're talking about this, but most people care about is their electricity going to stay on?
• 31:09
  Do you think Canada is going to actually do that?
• 31:11
  Do you think they're going to really shut off electricity to that section over there of the United States that's relying on power coming from Canada?
• 31:18
  I would like to know the contract that's involved in that.
• 31:21
  And what are the repercussions if Canada decides to violate that contract?
• 31:26
  because you just don't do that kind of thing without any contract involved, right?
• 31:32
  You just don't say, hey, just take this.
• 31:34
  Let's shake hands on it.
• 31:35
  And that's it.
• 31:36
  This isn't a memorandum of understanding.
• 31:38
  There's an actual contract here.
• 31:40
  Now, could I see them doing it?
• 31:42
  Yeah, I could see them doing it.
• 31:45
  I mean, this is what?
• 31:46
  Upstate New York, this would take place in, right?
• 31:48
  Ontario is around there.
• 31:50
  It would be that area.
• 31:51
  I mean, to be quite honest with you,
• 31:53
  I don't really think it would affect all that much.
• 31:55
  I'm pretty sure that the grid that's in place could, in fact, pick up the slack.
• 32:00
  So it would be a ceremonial gesture to say, look at what we've done to those Yankees.
• 32:06
  And then, you know, the New Yorkers will say, all right, well, we still remember the French and Indian War.
• 32:12
  And we'll do it again if we really have to.
• 32:16
  So I hear you.
• 32:18
  You know what's interesting, though, outside of the stuff we talked about, which I guess I'm getting esoteric about things.
• 32:25
  But what's interesting, though, is how everyone said tariffs were stupid and they don't work.
• 32:32
  Well, if they don't work, why is Canada so concerned about the tariffs being imposed on them?
• 32:36
  Exactly.
• 32:37
  Exactly.
• 32:38
  Why is every nation concerned about the tariffs being imposed on them if they don't work?
• 32:44
  Exactly.
• 32:44
  Now, the only thing that Trump did wrong was that he said that these tariffs are all about a national emergency.
• 32:50
  And that's one of the reasons why the Supreme Court said you can't do this and reversed it.
• 32:54
  Now, if he came up with another reason, then he probably would be able to make it stick.
• 33:00
  He could come up with a blanket 15% tariff, 50% tariff on every single country.
• 33:07
  Right.
• 33:07
  And it would probably have had a better argument than, oh, there's a national emergency.
• 33:13
  So we're going to slap 100% tariffs here, 500 there, 20% there, 10% there, and mirror it with this other country.
• 33:20
  It was sloppy.
• 33:22
  But they do work.
• 33:22
  Of course they work.
• 33:24
  That's the whole purpose behind them.
• 33:26
  I think you're right.
• 33:27
  But I also think the other thing that's been concerning to people
• 33:30
  is he seems to be using it as a weapon more than an actual policy.
• 33:34
  Yes.
• 33:35
  It's like, oh, you don't agree with me?
• 33:36
  You don't want to do what I say?
• 33:37
  Well, then here, here's a tariff, right?
• 33:39
  It's just like whoever he's mad at,
• 33:41
  whatever country he's not agreeing with at the time,
• 33:43
  all of a sudden that's where you can apply the tariff.
• 33:45
  Person that he's mad at.
• 33:47
  Because remember, he was throwing tariffs on Brazilians
• 33:49
  that were going against Lula, right?
• 33:52
  The judge or something like that.
• 33:53
  That's true.
• 33:54
  Recently, didn't he throw a bunch of tariffs
• 33:59
  or something like that or restrictions on the ICC,
• 34:04
  the International Criminal Court?
• 34:07
  He did something like that.
• 34:08
  I don't recall that.
• 34:09
  I heard it on a show that I occasionally watch,
• 34:13
  very rarely, Monkey Works on YouTube.
• 34:17
  I mean, a lot of it is dry toast,
• 34:19
  but sometimes he comes up with something good.
• 34:21
  he basically tracks logistics networks of the military.
• 34:25
  And so he'll bring up all these maps of airplanes and cargo and all that other stuff.
• 34:30
  And what his point was, and I do think he's right in this regard.
• 34:35
  He saw that the United States is starting to pull back from the Middle East
• 34:39
  and position troops in Europe and the Mediterranean.
• 34:43
  Okay.
• 34:44
  And then he makes reference to this one flight
• 34:46
  where this one flight is coming across the Atlantic
• 34:51
  and then going throughout Europe.
• 34:52
  But this flight is a cargo plane.
• 34:55
  It's a massive cargo plane, right?
• 34:57
  And it's being escorted by fighters.
• 35:00
  And he says that the only reason
• 35:02
  why you would do something like that
• 35:03
  is because there are particular types
• 35:05
  of nuclear weapons that the United States has
• 35:08
  that does not put those weapons on foreign soil.
• 35:11
  But if you do, you have to escort it to the location.
• 35:14
  And then he says that Trump,
• 35:18
  through all of these restrictions on members of the ICC.
• 35:25
  So his conjecture is that don't be surprised if they're going to use low-yield nukes in
• 35:32
  Iran.
• 35:34
  And by doing so, you need to withdraw your troops from the region, but you still need
• 35:39
  to have a lily pad effect.
• 35:40
  So you can put them in Germany, you can put them in Italy, you can put them in Crete and
• 35:44
  whatever else.
• 35:44
  And so they can go there within a certain period of time,
• 35:48
  but you don't want them on the front lines.
• 35:51
  I can buy that because you had Marjorie Taylor Greene say,
• 35:54
  yes, this is real policy.
• 35:56
  They're talking about how to use nuclear weapons and how to justify it.
• 36:00
  Yeah, there is small yield nukes.
• 36:05
  Not all nuclear weapons mean mass destruction, for example.
• 36:09
  Correct.
• 36:09
  They do have much more concentrated versions that are more surgical.
• 36:14
  That could be used and also reduce fallout.
• 36:17
  Now, as far as using them in Iran, I've heard this floating.
• 36:21
  And the thing though, Mike, Chris, I'm not going to be able to comment on it because I do a lot of deep diving on the Middle East and what's going on there.
• 36:32
  And if I admit this to you, I'm going to admit this.
• 36:35
  I've been ignoring it for a bit just because I got burned out.
• 36:38
  And so I've been looking at domestic stuff more than anything.
• 36:40
  So I'm going to hold my response or my opinion on that.
• 36:42
  We were talking about how Trump throws tariffs at people.
• 36:46
  Yeah, but I want to make sure that I have more understanding of that particular situation.
• 36:51
  Oh, yeah.
• 36:51
  Because there's always a lot of rumors.
• 36:53
  It's just like what just came up with Syria.
• 36:56
  They're saying the Trump administration is removing them from the terrorist watch list.
• 37:00
  That just happened today, which is crazy, right?
• 37:04
  But then you also see how Syria is piping up and talking about how they're going to retaliate.
• 37:10
  So I don't know what's going on there.
• 37:12
  I need to spend more time on that before I can comment further.
• 37:16
  Oh, sure.
• 37:17
  Put my mouth for sure.
• 37:18
  Sure.
• 37:18
  But you know what?
• 37:19
  I have heard that, though, floating around.
• 37:21
  So it's very interesting, that theory.
• 37:23
  And I wonder if it's going to come about because of the frustration that Trump's not getting his way with Iran because what Trump wanted.
• 37:30
  I've said this before.
• 37:31
  I don't know if I told you, but what I think Trump's doing is he doesn't want our troops to die.
• 37:36
  So he's trying to use force.
• 37:38
  He's posturing the might of the U.S. military to get them to bend.
• 37:42
  but they're just not doing it.
• 37:44
  Now he's trying to choke them off economically.
• 37:46
  Last I read, it looked like Iran was in real trouble economically right now.
• 37:51
  And what else is coincidental when we're talking about this is while this was happening,
• 37:56
  Ukraine launched a massive drone strike on Moscow, hitting some of the refineries,
• 38:03
  which led everybody to be sitting in long lines for gas in Russia.
• 38:08
  so if we combine what's going on with what's happening and choking Iran economically and now
• 38:16
  hey guess what the supply of gas from Russia is not really available either
• 38:19
  makes you wonder how much is being tied in together between the Ukraine war in Iran right now
• 38:26
  it's kind of 100% that is the front line right that is the front line it is a Iran Russia
• 38:35
  kind of front line here.
• 38:38
  And what's even more interesting
• 38:40
  about that,
• 38:42
  about what's going on in Russia,
• 38:45
  right?
• 38:46
  Everybody is trying to,
• 38:48
  or at least some of the people
• 38:49
  that I know,
• 38:49
  they're trying to downplay
• 38:51
  what these drones are doing to Russia.
• 38:53
  I mean, I will say that
• 38:54
  the Ukrainians attacking basically Amazon warehouses I sorry It not really going to stop anything It looks nice for propaganda purposes but stop it It useless
• 39:06
  So you're inconveniencing people, so they'll go back to malls.
• 39:09
  Okay.
• 39:10
  Now, what really did some damage politically and also on the world stage
• 39:19
  is that Russia decided to purchase oil from Turkey.
• 39:23
  now why is that a big deal
• 39:26
  because Turkey is a member of NATO
• 39:28
  Russian policy is to
• 39:30
  not purchase energy from any
• 39:33
  NATO country
• 39:34
  that is a big deal
• 39:36
  that's a big deal on both sides
• 39:37
  Russia bending the knee
• 39:40
  to Turkey
• 39:42
  allowing it, a member of NATO
• 39:45
  allowing the purchase
• 39:46
  of its fuel
• 39:48
  very very interesting development
• 39:50
  especially since you have Netanyahu
• 39:52
  rattling the saber, saying that Egypt and Turkey are next and we need to finish off the job
• 39:58
  with Iran. Actually, that was Jonathan Pollard, a pardoned United States spy, possibly the worst
• 40:05
  spy in history of the United States, running for office in Israel, running for the Neset.
• 40:11
  He wants to use all kinds of icky weapons over there to end this so that he can go after Egypt
• 40:17
  in Turkey, or at least contain them in some kind of way.
• 40:21
  I mean, it's crazy.
• 40:22
  Let's go to domestic stuff.
• 40:23
  Screw all that.
• 40:25
  Yeah, I was going to say, I mean, we can go down a rabbit hole.
• 40:28
  Go flock cameras.
• 40:29
  How about flock cameras?
• 40:30
  We could do flock.
• 40:31
  We could talk about beef real quick.
• 40:33
  Oh, beef.
• 40:34
  What the hell's going on with that?
• 40:36
  Holy smokes.
• 40:38
  So Trump announced temporary 90-day waiver on out-of-quota tariffs
• 40:43
  to allow up to 300,000 metric tons,
• 40:46
  tons, sorry, not tongues,
• 40:48
  but probably tongues in there too,
• 40:49
  of imported ground beef into the US.
• 40:53
  The move aims to combat
• 40:54
  historical high grocery prices.
• 40:58
  Now, the other thing that's crazy about this
• 41:00
  is the farmers are complaining about it, right?
• 41:03
  And they're attacking Trump
• 41:04
  for attacking the domestic beef market.
• 41:08
  But the US beef industry,
• 41:09
  they've been facing escalating production expenses
• 41:12
  driven by multi-year drought,
• 41:13
  shrinking cattle herds to 75-year lows.
• 41:16
  And outside of that, the rising cost of doing business and whatnot has also been squeezing
• 41:20
  the beef farmers.
• 41:21
  So they're running out of supply, like literal livestock, to even use for the industry.
• 41:26
  And they're facing the increase of prices as well.
• 41:29
  So Trump says, fine, we're going to go ahead and lift the tariffs temporarily and let all
• 41:34
  this beef from outside the country in to lower costs for families.
• 41:38
  now
• 41:40
  I see what he's doing
• 41:43
  but is that really supporting
• 41:44
  the domestic beef industry
• 41:47
  at all
• 41:48
  is that kind of a slap in the face
• 41:50
  because on one hand we're talking about how he's using
• 41:53
  tariffs and policy
• 41:54
  trade policy to stop
• 41:57
  the great reset of power
• 41:58
  the power structure but then over here it's like
• 42:01
  hey I'm going to help families but at the same time
• 42:03
  I'm going to also strike a heavy blow
• 42:04
  to US industry
• 42:06
  To me, if you're going to do anybody any favors, why don't you do the favors to the farmers of the United States and the cattle herders of the United States?
• 42:18
  Why aren't you bending backwards for them?
• 42:20
  Why aren't you making it easier to sell your product there?
• 42:23
  Because look at what they have to compete with.
• 42:26
  They not only have to compete with now feed costs and fertilizer costs because of the Straits of Hormuz.
• 42:32
  They also have to still compete with artificial meat.
• 42:36
  They have to now compete with mRNA injections into these cattle herds that is now essentially being forced.
• 42:44
  And then just this week, they came up with artificial eggs that are being sold in Walmart and Target.
• 42:50
  So read the ingredients labels.
• 42:52
  That means that they've used cells from eggs to create an egg-like product that doesn't come from a hen's butt.
• 42:59
  And if you combine what you're saying with the ban on Mexican bovine, right?
• 43:10
  Because of the screwworm outbreak.
• 43:13
  I mean, you can't tell me that the screwworm outbreak or epidemic wasn't planned as well, I guess, right?
• 43:19
  It couldn't have just been a coincidence.
• 43:21
  I would beg to say no.
• 43:25
  It probably was not a coincidence.
• 43:27
  Now, what makes me extremely suspicious about this is China had a potential deal with Argentina to take a load of this beef.
• 43:41
  And in March of 2026, Chinese customs said no.
• 43:46
  And they rejected a 22-ton shipment of beef from Array Beef plant in Perez, Milan, in Buenos Aires.
• 43:55
  Why?
• 43:56
  Because they detected residual chloramphenicol.
• 44:02
  What is that?
• 44:02
  It's an antibiotic.
• 44:04
  And what are the side effects in humans?
• 44:06
  Well, it causes, now I'm going to try and say this because I don't like a lot of technical words of the chemical and biological avenue.
• 44:18
  They're challenging.
• 44:19
  Oh, it's terrible.
• 44:21
  There are too many syllables, too many consonants.
• 44:24
  I just can't deal with it.
• 44:26
  But basically, this whole thing causes aplastic anemia.
• 44:31
  And what is that?
• 44:32
  It is a blood disorder where bone marrow stops producing enough new blood cells and platelets.
• 44:40
  So if you've got the Chinese saying, no, we don't want this,
• 44:44
  what happened to all of that beef from March of 2026?
• 44:49
  Is it going to land on our shores?
• 44:51
  Is that the reason why Trump said the Argentinians are really suffering and they need help?
• 44:58
  Wow.
• 44:59
  Good for thought.
• 45:00
  22 tons of it.
• 45:03
  Literally.
• 45:04
  Just floating around.
• 45:05
  Well, hey, man, let's get into what you would usually do on your Thursdays.
• 45:13
  You brought up Flock cameras.
• 45:15
  And I'm going to have you take over.
• 45:17
  and let's go into Flock cameras
• 45:19
  and whatever else that you want to bring up
• 45:21
  before our time ends here.
• 45:22
  All right.
• 45:23
  Take it away.
• 45:24
  What's going on?
• 45:25
  What's on your mind regarding Flock cameras?
• 45:27
  Okay, so Flock cameras.
• 45:28
  If you live in any area,
• 45:30
  you can research dflock.org
• 45:32
  and you can find out where these Flock cameras are.
• 45:36
  And you also have to look up Axon cameras
• 45:38
  because that is the competitor to Flock.
• 45:41
  And unfortunately,
• 45:43
  it seems as though Axon has the leg up
• 45:46
  Because nobody knows about Axon cameras.
• 45:48
  They only know about Flock cameras.
• 45:50
  What do they do?
• 45:51
  They're license plate readers.
• 45:53
  So what happens when you drive by a Flock camera?
• 45:56
  It picks up your license plate.
• 45:58
  It also analyzes your car.
• 46:00
  If you've got bumper stickers, dents, aftermarket products,
• 46:04
  tinted windows, and so on,
• 46:05
  it will log it and it will align it to the license plate.
• 46:09
  Now, what is even worse than that
• 46:13
  is that there's another company that is partnering with Flock.
• 46:16
  And they are doing Bluetooth readings of every car that drives by.
• 46:23
  So if you have Android Auto or the Apple version of Android Auto,
• 46:30
  guess what?
• 46:30
  Your unique Bluetooth is going to be registered with this
• 46:34
  and aligned to the license plate of your car that Flock picked up on it.
• 46:39
  And what does this do?
• 46:41
  It creates a digital dossier on you.
• 46:44
  It tracks you wherever you go.
• 46:47
  Further, Flock is trying to get in with Uber and Lyft to use their cameras too.
• 46:55
  Because if you contract with them as a driver, you have to have a dash cam.
• 46:59
  So not only are they doing this, but they are aligning all of it.
• 47:04
  Now, there is something that Flock has done.
• 47:07
  and I brought it up on a show,
• 47:08
  is that they've created an artificial intelligence tool,
• 47:12
  OS Investigate.
• 47:14
  And what does this do?
• 47:15
  It aligns the license plate,
• 47:18
  the Bluetooth with social security numbers,
• 47:23
  dates of birth, phone numbers, email addresses,
• 47:25
  and what they deem to be relatives and associates,
• 47:29
  along with police case files, 911 dispatch logs,
• 47:33
  and commercial identity records.
• 47:35
  this is a complete digital dossier on you they know who you're seeing it's that tom cruise movie
• 47:44
  what was it um about the premeditated murders minority report yeah minority report right
• 47:50
  and what this is this is exactly what it is and why do you think they're building all these data
• 47:56
  centers it's not so we can make cat pictures with grok really you sure well i don't know i make a
• 48:03
  lot of rude pictures of my ground man that's crazy though so i was gonna i'm gonna show you this
• 48:10
  you already know but i'm just i'm gonna pull it up um so when you were talking about the axon it
• 48:15
  was saying that they want to move that because of data control and sharing uh many local police
• 48:19
  departments are transitioning from flock to axon because axon structures data ownership
• 48:23
  more strictly within the individual agency limiting third party or unauthorized cross
• 48:28
  jurisdiction data leaks, which means it's easier for them to lock it down and other people can't
• 48:36
  access it. Is that what that means? Yeah. So what do you feel safer with? Do you feel safer
• 48:42
  with a third party company violating your fourth amendment or do you feel safer with the sheriffs
• 48:47
  and the police and the local politicians violating your fourth amendment? It's about the same to me.
• 48:52
  Exactly. Because Judge Napolitano, he actually does a blog and it's almost impossible to find.
• 49:01
  It took me a long time to find his stuff because he's on YouTube. He's got quite a bit of a
• 49:05
  following. Now, Judge Napolitano was supposed to be, or he tried to get onto the Supreme Court and
• 49:11
  Trump said no. So he brings on a lot of these people that sound like conservatives, but they're
• 49:16
  actually Democrats. So that's the angle of Judge Napolitano. However, he's a constitutional
• 49:21
  scholar and all that. He basically says that you have a right to privacy, which is where the
• 49:29
  Fourth Amendment comes into play. It's not a privilege that the government gives you.
• 49:39
  The way the Constitution is written, as soon as you're born, your divine right is privacy.
• 49:48
  it's not the government says okay you're a good egg so we're going to give you privacy that's not
• 49:56
  the case and this comes from the aspect that you've got these flock cameras everywhere
• 50:03
  and the argument is oh we need to keep people safe we need to track everybody okay there's a
• 50:09
  difference between observation a cop is out there cop has a warrant there's some kind of thing going
• 50:15
  on where they're going to track you and move you around
• 50:17
  and all this other stuff. Or the cop
• 50:19
  sees you doing something versus
• 50:21
  surveillance, which is blanket
• 50:23
  surveillance. And I don't want to hear
• 50:25
  anybody say, well, you don't
• 50:27
  have the right to privacy in a public
• 50:29
  space.
• 50:33
  Then what was the whole personal space argument all these years?
• 50:36
  Yeah. No.
• 50:37
  No. What's even worse with all this
• 50:39
  flock stuff, right,
• 50:41
  is this comes
• 50:43
  into play with this dystopian society
• 50:45
  nonsense. They create the digital
• 50:47
  dossier. They create
• 50:49
  the 15-minute cities.
• 50:51
  You have to drive an electronic
• 50:53
  vehicle.
• 50:55
  Everything is going to
• 50:57
  be tagged electronically.
• 51:00
  And if you don't say the right thing,
• 51:02
  and if you buck the mainstream
• 51:03
  narrative, you're a bad egg.
• 51:06
  And you can't use your digital
• 51:07
  currency five miles
• 51:09
  or you can't use it beyond five miles
• 51:11
  of your registered address with the government.
• 51:13
  so thank goodness for those
• 51:16
  flat cameras they can track exactly where we're
• 51:18
  going yeah this was that
• 51:20
  WEF agenda right exactly
• 51:22
  you'll own nothing and you'll be happy
• 51:24
  there's an organization
• 51:26
  c40.org who runs
• 51:28
  that former mayor Michael
• 51:30
  Bloomberg
• 51:30
  Michael Bloomberg what is he like
• 51:34
  5'1 in stature
• 51:35
  yeah he's a not a bank guy
• 51:38
  he yeah
• 51:38
  can't even go on rides
• 51:41
  If I saw him in a room, I'd put my teacup on top of his head.
• 51:45
  That's funny.
• 51:46
  Good.
• 51:47
  C40.org is all about setting up Western cities with a 15-minute city style governance run
• 51:56
  by blockchain and everything else.
• 51:58
  They were trying to do that.
• 51:59
  See, that was one of the things that came up regarding the...
• 52:02
  Palisade fires in California because
• 52:05
  to this day, they've been avoiding
• 52:07
  or the insurance, whatever's going on, they can't rebuild their home.
• 52:10
  There's all this stuff. But somehow, they got the okay
• 52:13
  to build a bunch of apartments there instead
• 52:15
  and turn it into something else. Yes. And one of the agendas that came up,
• 52:19
  literally came up, is the idea of a 15-minute city.
• 52:23
  And they also were talking about that in Dublin, California as well,
• 52:26
  closer to the Bay Area. So it is a thing.
• 52:29
  It is a thing.
• 52:30
  And it was crazy about the, you know, this digital dossier.
• 52:33
  I mean, aside from tying you to your car, they're literally getting your behavioral patterns, your travel patterns and everything else to make sure that they know and they can expect what you're doing at all times.
• 52:46
  And if you deviate, like you said, then they're like, whoa, hold on.
• 52:48
  You're going outside the norm here, buddy.
• 52:50
  You know, you're doing something that we don't approve of.
• 52:53
  Sounds like that's where it's headed.
• 52:54
  And that's what you're trying to do.
• 52:55
  And then combine that with what they're trying to do.
• 53:00
  I think California, I forgot what other state, was trying to push basically a law that takes away our free speech, kind of, almost like what the UK does with whatever you do on social media posts.
• 53:11
  They can kind of go ahead and fine you or even put you in jail and hold you accountable for what you're saying on social media as well.
• 53:17
  Oh, man, I'm screwed.
• 53:19
  Yeah, right?
• 53:19
  Well, no, I'm definitely screwed.
• 53:21
  So it's like the great US, land of the free, free speech, First Amendment, everything else.
• 53:27
  They're slowly chipping at it and trying to take that from us.
• 53:29
  And they're doing it in a way that they're presenting it, like you said, as safety and security.
• 53:34
  From who?
• 53:36
  Exactly.
• 53:37
  From who?
• 53:38
  The only reason why a government would push this kind of policy is because they have nowhere left to go.
• 53:44
  They can't balance a budget.
• 53:46
  effectively with FOSB 56,
• 53:48
  if I remember correctly.
• 53:50
  The whole government budget is black,
• 53:52
  which means you can't audit it,
• 53:53
  which means you can't look
• 53:54
  at where the money is going.
• 53:57
  Right?
• 53:57
  Is it going to dumps?
• 53:59
  Is it going to deep underground
• 54:00
  military bases?
• 54:01
  Is it going off planet?
• 54:03
  And I don't care what anybody says.
• 54:05
  I'm not buying Rand Paul's
• 54:07
  while I went to Fort Knox
• 54:09
  and trust me, the gold is there.
• 54:11
  Picks or it didn't happen.
• 54:12
  Right.
• 54:13
  What the hell ever happened?
• 54:14
  And get that wet ferret
• 54:16
  Off your head.
• 54:19
  But you're right, though.
• 54:21
  Where were the pictures?
• 54:22
  I confirmed it.
• 54:24
  Where?
• 54:25
  This guy's a stooge.
• 54:26
  He was picked to do this kind of PSYOP.
• 54:28
  He didn't even bother to do an AI pick or anything.
• 54:31
  He just said, no, I was there.
• 54:33
  I saw it.
• 54:34
  Trust me.
• 54:34
  It's there.
• 54:35
  I touched it.
• 54:36
  That's crazy.
• 54:37
  That is crazy.
• 54:38
  So, I mean, you're right, though.
• 54:40
  You're right that this whole angle is to track people because they don't have any place to go.
• 54:48
  And this goes in line with people like Catherine Austin Fitz and Dr. Joseph Farrell, where they say they are trying to tokenize everything and remove physical currency from the equation.
• 55:05
  They want digital currency.
• 55:07
  So that means that your Goldman Sachs dollar
• 55:09
  could be worth something different
• 55:11
  than a Bank of America dollar
• 55:13
  versus a federal dollar versus a New York dollar.
• 55:16
  And thanks to blockchain and data centers and 6G,
• 55:20
  we can do all of these exchange rates in real time.
• 55:25
  That's interesting.
• 55:26
  So decentralized currencies
• 55:27
  managed by whoever owns that particular currency.
• 55:30
  So does that mean, in your opinion,
• 55:32
  we would be getting away from a centralized currency as in the U dollar even if that becomes digital No I don think you be getting away from a US dollar It would just be another dollar on the exchange
• 55:44
  Interesting.
• 55:45
  Like a New York dollar won't be worth as much as a California dollar,
• 55:48
  but both dollars will be worth more than an Oklahoma dollar.
• 55:51
  On and on, you can go.
• 55:52
  Or you can have regional dollars.
• 55:54
  I wonder how that would affect the economy though, right?
• 55:56
  Who knows?
• 55:58
  I don't know.
• 55:58
  That'd be interesting.
• 55:59
  But definitely looking at flock cameras implemented without anybody voting on it, by the way.
• 56:06
  Like I woke up one day and they just started showing up.
• 56:08
  Like I don't recall there being a city council meeting or anything about any of this.
• 56:12
  They just show up.
• 56:13
  Combine that with the 15-minute city agenda.
• 56:16
  And then on the horizon, the social credit score that will be implemented.
• 56:22
  I guarantee we're going to start trying to copy China soon.
• 56:26
  Makes you wonder.
• 56:27
  Really does make you wonder.
• 56:28
  it does make you wonder actually it doesn't make me wonder i see the plan so do you
• 56:33
  anybody that has two brain cells to rub together sees the plan now let's take this one step further
• 56:40
  if you're trying to tokenize everything right i mean everything you can look at world economic
• 56:49
  forum stooges you can look at all the bankers they're talking about the value of waterways
• 56:55
  the value of dirt, trees, crops, how many times you flush. They want to put a price on everything.
• 57:05
  One example that they came up with was, well, I can buy groceries with the value of my house
• 57:11
  because I can exchange that value and make it a tax write-off in all this or add on to the taxes.
• 57:18
  So they're talking about really shifting around all this wealth, right?
• 57:21
  Like, there's a, I forgot the lady's name, but it was a talk.
• 57:27
  I don't know if she's with the WEF or what she was, and I forgot her name.
• 57:30
  It was on one of my older episodes.
• 57:32
  But she literally said exactly what she said.
• 57:35
  She was talking about how we have to look at currency different.
• 57:38
  We have to look at the earth, the dirt, everything like that.
• 57:42
  Things that we believe are free are not really free.
• 57:45
  Correct.
• 57:45
  And they want to put a value on that, and they're going to measure worth by basically what we would consider
• 57:51
  They're just natural, everyday assets,
• 57:55
  like the air you breathe, even she was talking about.
• 57:58
  So the dirt, the air, the water, it's like, you're right.
• 58:01
  They're going to shift currency.
• 58:02
  Currency is going to be what you need to actually survive.
• 58:05
  Like literally.
• 58:06
  Right.
• 58:07
  Now, what's interesting about all this, right?
• 58:09
  And this is where we'll get to an esoteric topic.
• 58:12
  And we'll leave it here as a cliffhanger for the next show, right?
• 58:16
  Why would you want to tokenize every single thing on this planet?
• 58:24
  Could it be that the idea of money and value is not necessarily restricted to Earth or this dimension?
• 58:38
  Because that's where we have to go with disclosure and UAPs and everything else.
• 58:42
  could the human story and the human condition and all of the policies that we're being forced to
• 58:48
  actually be galactic could there be some other entity whether it's alien which i've got my
• 58:58
  reservations on extra-dimensional um i can sort of buy that more if you read the bible and other
• 59:04
  stories.
• 59:06
  They want to give
• 59:08
  this planet lock stock and barrel to the entities that are coming back And they want a value on this planet The other aspect that you can potentially look at is
• 59:20
  if you finally tokenize every single asset on this planet,
• 59:25
  would it be enough to get rid of the quadrillions worth of derivatives
• 59:31
  still sloshing around in the economic system since 2008?
• 59:35
  so could we finally balance the books if we say okay the planet is now valued at this
• 59:43
  the outstanding derivatives are in the quadrillions we finally did it what's interesting every time you
• 59:49
  see we're going to mine an asteroid the value of the asteroid is always the value of the
• 59:56
  derivatives that are still outstanding in the quadrillions my goodness all you have to do is
• 1:00:02
  mined that asteroid or say
• 1:00:04
  that you've mined that asteroid.
• 1:00:06
  And then you can have Rand Paul go up in his
• 1:00:08
  astronaut suit and say, yep, we mined it
• 1:00:09
  and come back down and say, yep, it's worth
• 1:00:11
  $14 quadrillion. The books are balanced.
• 1:00:14
  It's been verified.
• 1:00:17
  Picks or
• 1:00:18
  it didn't happen, my friend.
• 1:00:20
  Agreed. So, Dan
• 1:00:22
  with that cliffhanger
• 1:00:23
  to speak. So, I know we're at the end of your
• 1:00:26
  time here and you got to get going.
• 1:00:28
  So, before we do that,
• 1:00:29
  you got to tell everybody about where they can find
• 1:00:31
  you and listen to you. Oh, good
• 1:00:33
  luck. Well, I am at
• 1:00:35
  The Chris Michaels Show on Spotify.
• 1:00:38
  I do post on YouTube
• 1:00:39
  The Chris Michaels Show. Instagram,
• 1:00:42
  I believe it's Last
• 1:00:43
  Call Caravan. It's my old show's
• 1:00:45
  name, The Chris Michaels Show. You can find it there too.
• 1:00:48
  And also on Rumble.
• 1:00:50
  X is C. Michaels Show.
• 1:00:52
  The problem is that I am
• 1:00:53
  shadow banned everywhere. So you
• 1:00:55
  really have to do some digging.
• 1:00:58
  Sidebar, I started up on
• 1:00:59
  YouTube a new profile account.
• 1:01:01
  months and months ago. I had about
• 1:01:03
  16 followers and 20 videos
• 1:01:05
  and I got a notification from YouTube
• 1:01:07
  saying that we are demonetizing
• 1:01:10
  you and you're not allowed
• 1:01:11
  to do any live streaming despite the
• 1:01:13
  fact that you have zero strikes.
• 1:01:15
  So we're going to watch you.
• 1:01:18
  Yeah, I'm kind of going through something
• 1:01:19
  similar but no warnings. It's like
• 1:01:21
  suddenly a lot of my videos
• 1:01:24
  and shorts that used to get thousands are
• 1:01:25
  getting like literally less than
• 1:01:27
  100 or zero. I'm like, I didn't
• 1:01:29
  change anything. I don't know what's going on.
• 1:01:31
  I got an official email from YouTube saying that we are restricting you,
• 1:01:35
  even though you don't have any strikes and you didn't do anything wrong.
• 1:01:38
  Yeah.
• 1:01:39
  Well, look, we still got the podcast apps.
• 1:01:43
  Absolutely.
• 1:01:44
  Spotify.
• 1:01:45
  Let's go.
• 1:01:45
  There's Rumble, at least, and X for whatever it is.
• 1:01:48
  I can't figure it out, but at least they're letting you throw your stuff up.
• 1:01:51
  Now, wait a minute.
• 1:01:52
  George, I've been drinking coffee, but I'm not sure I'm drinking the right kind of coffee.
• 1:01:56
  Do you have any recommendations?
• 1:01:58
  You're not drinking a cueto coffee, buddy.
• 1:01:58
  You're not drinking a cueto coffee.
• 1:02:01
  come on you've got to do one last promo i did in the beginning when we do it again
• 1:02:08
  do a live read i gotta pull the whole thing up again um all right no i'm just busting you i'm
• 1:02:16
  drinking this swill but i i'm in the market for a better bean and i think you may be on to something
• 1:02:23
  oh here we go what is this for a weta coffee listen i'm gonna tell you right now chris here's
• 1:02:29
  the thing. Here's the coffees. Sure. It might be a little pricey, but again, they're ethically
• 1:02:34
  sourced from farmers that practice sustainable farming. And here's the thing. I talked about how,
• 1:02:39
  I know this was just a spoof, whatever, but I've talked about how they support the environment and
• 1:02:45
  a lot of people go oh what are you some left whatever No Conservatives like a clean environment too I enjoy the great outdoors So what I liked about these guys is literally like if you go to the charitable giving
• 1:02:56
  literally 5% of everything you purchase
• 1:02:58
  goes towards some kind of company or organization
• 1:03:03
  that literally conserves the outdoors and maintains it.
• 1:03:07
  So I thought it was very cool.
• 1:03:09
  And one of those organizations even be
• 1:03:11
  the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership.
• 1:03:14
  And they even got a blend for that.
• 1:03:16
  And $4 of every bag on that goes towards the TRCP.
• 1:03:21
  So really cool stuff.
• 1:03:23
  And, you know, hey, again, if you want to scan the QR code, cover my face there, but you can still say 15% off.
• 1:03:30
  You don't need to see me to do that.
• 1:03:32
  So there that is.
• 1:03:33
  So, hey, I did it.
• 1:03:35
  There you are.
• 1:03:36
  Beautiful.
• 1:03:37
  Beautiful.
• 1:03:38
  I don't live too far from Teddy Roosevelt's summer residence in Oyster Bay.
• 1:03:43
  Oh, really?
• 1:03:43
  On Long Island.
• 1:03:44
  Yep.
• 1:03:44
  You can go there.
• 1:03:45
  Very cool, man.
• 1:03:46
  fantastic stuff. They have a wonderful
• 1:03:48
  museum over there and you learn all about
• 1:03:50
  Teddy Roosevelt and
• 1:03:52
  how he was just
• 1:03:53
  a striking figure.
• 1:03:56
  I mean,
• 1:03:57
  he's probably one of the few
• 1:04:00
  people that I'm envious of.
• 1:04:02
  I mean, despite the fact of having
• 1:04:04
  enormous wealth and being born into
• 1:04:06
  it.
• 1:04:07
  And Ernst Hemingway. There's something about Ernst Hemingway
• 1:04:10
  and TR that I'm envious
• 1:04:12
  of. Maybe it's the alcohol and still
• 1:04:14
  having the ability to stand after drinking at all.
• 1:04:18
  Well, I think those two figures in America,
• 1:04:21
  as far as American history and what they represented
• 1:04:23
  and who they were in their time,
• 1:04:24
  I think a lot of people probably look up to them.
• 1:04:27
  I don't know about the younger generations,
• 1:04:28
  but I was always a Teddy Roosevelt guy for sure.
• 1:04:32
  And he was one of my favorite presidents
• 1:04:34
  if you look at what he did historically.
• 1:04:36
  Oh, yeah.
• 1:04:37
  They can scoff at some of his foreign policy and whatnot,
• 1:04:41
  but you know what?
• 1:04:42
  carried a big stick, right?
• 1:04:45
  That's what it was.
• 1:04:46
  Speak softly, but carry a big stick.
• 1:04:49
  Now, look, we'll leave it here.
• 1:04:51
  If you do not like
• 1:04:53
  TR, I will bring up this one
• 1:04:55
  little fact. This man
• 1:04:57
  was about to give
• 1:04:59
  a speech. This man
• 1:05:01
  was shot in the chest
• 1:05:03
  and still gave the effing
• 1:05:05
  speech. Yes.
• 1:05:06
  That's enough. That's all you need to know.
• 1:05:10
  Exactly.
• 1:05:11
  Okay, sir.
• 1:05:12
  I think that's your time because I know you got things to do.
• 1:05:14
  I appreciate you coming on the show.
• 1:05:17
  I will definitely hook up to you later and maybe I can get back on yours.
• 1:05:21
  And a lot of time, a lot of me right now, like I said earlier, it's just, I've been busy.
• 1:05:26
  So I wanted you to get on here earlier.
• 1:05:28
  It's just scheduling.
• 1:05:30
  I know.
• 1:05:31
  I know all about it.
• 1:05:32
  I am up to my eyeballs in business.
• 1:05:34
  Oh man, I hear you.
• 1:05:35
  So with that being said, man, we're going to end the show.
• 1:05:38
  See ya.
• 1:05:39
  See ya, everybody.
• 1:05:40
  don't forget to like subscribe share the show check out the chris michael show great stuff
• 1:05:45
  you're really gonna like it i listen to it so if i listen to it you should listen to it
• 1:05:49
  all right with that being said laters
• 1:05:52
  devils hide behind redemption honesty is a one-way gate to hell
• 1:06:10
  Bye.