Latest / OneLegUpAlex Media / Fairer Fares will help New Yorkers have One Leg up in NYC 2-4-25
Transcript
- 0:02Speaker 1: Here's your host, Alex Garrett. So a couple of weeks ago,
- 0:10Speaker 1: I was on the train and welcome into one leg
- 0:13Speaker 1: up with Alex Garrett for today, February fourth, twenty twenty five.
- 0:17Speaker 1: I was on the train and I was talking up
- 0:19Speaker 1: with one of the ticket collectors and he almost said
- 0:22Speaker 1: he was going to charge me five bucks to go
- 0:24Speaker 1: to Port Washington, and I said, you know, it's funny
- 0:26Speaker 1: you said that, because actually it's six fifty. But my
- 0:30Speaker 1: thought was, and I was talking to the collector about this,
- 0:35Speaker 1: why not make it a five dollars flat fare for
- 0:38Speaker 1: both seniors and disabled people across all the lines. And
- 0:44Speaker 1: the collector agreed, yeah, it wouldn't make it easier for
- 0:46Speaker 1: us too. And then I got to thinking about this
- 0:51Speaker 1: even more because either expecting disabled people, able body people, Martians,
- 0:58Speaker 1: I don't know to pay nine dollars for congestion pricing.
- 1:05Speaker 1: But you know what the MTA and the Governor's office
- 1:08Speaker 1: did not do. They didn't lower the rates of the
- 1:12Speaker 1: l R. I thought the whole point was to make
- 1:15Speaker 1: public transportation so attractive that people don't even want to
- 1:18Speaker 1: drive it. I thought the point was to diswade people
- 1:21Speaker 1: from going into the city at all by car. That's
- 1:25Speaker 1: why they're charging nine dollars congestion pricing. But what they
- 1:29Speaker 1: failed to do is make the able bodied prices, you know,
- 1:34Speaker 1: regular fare prices lower on the l R. I guess
- 1:40Speaker 1: you could say the MT, but really you know, on
- 1:43Speaker 1: the subway too, but really on the l R, it's
- 1:46Speaker 1: still about sixteen bucks to take the train. So not
- 1:50Speaker 1: only are we being socked in our cars, but as commuters.
- 1:57Speaker 1: It just doesn't make sense to me. So yes, I
- 2:02Speaker 1: was thinking of this when I wrote that piece about
- 2:05Speaker 1: fair affairs from both the able body and the disabled
- 2:09Speaker 1: slash senior perspective, because they're going to raise the rates,
- 2:14Speaker 1: and they have raised the rates over and over again,
- 2:20Speaker 1: and now they add congestion pricing to this. On the
- 2:27Speaker 1: adapting side. This is a story to me because you're
- 2:36Speaker 1: even asking disabled commuters. I know there's an exemption there
- 2:39Speaker 1: if you apply and are eligible, but even them asking
- 2:42Speaker 1: them to pay nine dollars to come below sixtieth Street,
- 2:53Speaker 1: there's no incentive right now for anybody to commute fully
- 2:58Speaker 1: if you're just going to keep the fares the same.
- 3:00Speaker 1: MTA well, anyway, I write this piece in my blog
- 3:06Speaker 1: alexganmyc dot com. I'll tag it here in the description
- 3:10Speaker 1: below because I wrote it as feedback to the MTA,
- 3:14Speaker 1: and I wrote this whole long thing about why fairs
- 3:19Speaker 1: should be fair fairs. Then I started doing something very interesting.
- 3:24Speaker 1: I submitted letters to the editor, and wouldn't you know it,
- 3:30Speaker 1: Saturday Daily News a couple of weeks ago, my name
- 3:40Speaker 1: was in the paper after writing this blurb, and they
- 3:48Speaker 1: took this part and put it in the Daily News
- 3:51Speaker 1: with the word merit to discount. See merritt was a
- 3:53Speaker 1: big word that week because it was Trump's first week
- 3:55Speaker 1: in office and he was all about merits. I loved
- 3:57Speaker 1: that merit was accounted to me too. Okay, that was cool.
- 4:02Speaker 1: Since congestion pricing is now socking New Yorkers, I wrote,
- 4:05Speaker 1: I would like to suggest fair affairs for commuters on
- 4:08Speaker 1: the LR. The disabled and senior communities should have a
- 4:11Speaker 1: flat fare. By the way, they put this exactly how
- 4:14Speaker 1: I wrote it, of five dollars, no matter of the
- 4:16Speaker 1: zwe considering that our taxes pay salaries and considering how
- 4:20Speaker 1: many able bodied ferravators got away with it. While it's
- 4:24Speaker 1: basically mandatory the disabled pay their way, it is ludicrous
- 4:30Speaker 1: my own words in the paper. Well, wouldn't you know it?
- 4:33Speaker 1: A couple of days later, people don't know this part really.
- 4:36Speaker 1: The MTA gave me some feedback, and the portion I
- 4:41Speaker 1: liked of that feedback was this ther your suggestion will
- 4:46Speaker 1: be kept on file and take into account when we
- 4:48Speaker 1: reconsider changes to fair policy in the future. I didn't
- 4:54Speaker 1: read the whole thing, but when it came to reduce
- 4:57Speaker 1: fair tickets, the guy who wrote from the MTA Customer
- 5:02Speaker 1: Engagement team wrote this, When reduced fare tickets were introduced,
- 5:09Speaker 1: the purpose was to provide an opportunity for eligible customers
- 5:13Speaker 1: to travel for leisure purposes or medical appointments during times
- 5:17Speaker 1: when trains are less crowded. Let me read that again.
- 5:25Speaker 1: When reduced fare tickets were introduced, the purpose was to
- 5:30Speaker 1: provide an opportunity for eligible customers to travel for leisure
- 5:33Speaker 1: purposes or medical appointments. Nowhere in that explanation does it
- 5:41Speaker 1: say we want to make sure disabled commuters can get
- 5:45Speaker 1: to work in a safe way or in a relatively
- 5:51Speaker 1: affordable way. The reason why they create this wasn't because
- 5:56Speaker 1: they thought disabled people worked. It's because when you get
- 5:59Speaker 1: out bout and them to medical appointments. And I'm not
- 6:05Speaker 1: trying to go to war with the MTA. That's not
- 6:07Speaker 1: what I'm trying to do. I'm just trying to bring
- 6:10Speaker 1: your attention to the thought process that was given to
- 6:15Speaker 1: me that they introduced these not because they want to
- 6:21Speaker 1: disabled people to go to work in an affordable, safe fashion.
- 6:27Speaker 1: It's worse than that. I don't think they believe that
- 6:30Speaker 1: disabled people did work when they put these affair tickets in.
- 6:36Speaker 1: How degrading is that to disabled community. Yes, MTA, the
- 6:42Speaker 1: disabled community does work. And this response. While I appreciate
- 6:49Speaker 1: you're going to put on file this response, and I
- 6:51Speaker 1: appreciate the other discounts that are going on when you
- 6:54Speaker 1: get monthly tickets, but this response and this part of
- 6:57Speaker 1: the response when you write when reduce fair tickets were introduced,
- 7:00Speaker 1: the purpose was to provide an opportunity for eligible customers
- 7:03Speaker 1: to travel for leisure purposes or medical appointments. As someone
- 7:07Speaker 1: who is disabled and works, and though I don't always
- 7:11Speaker 1: feel heavily disabled, because quite frankly I'm not, but I
- 7:16Speaker 1: see other disabled people going to work and know other
- 7:20Speaker 1: disabled people who go to work in the city. As
- 7:26Speaker 1: someone who sees how hard working the disabled community is
- 7:31Speaker 1: We're not just a leisure and travel and medical appointments group.
- 7:35Speaker 1: We are hard workers. We are contributors to society MTA,
- 7:43Speaker 1: and well, I want to think you recognize that through
- 7:46Speaker 1: the reduced Fair program, you could make it fair affairs
- 7:50Speaker 1: for all who work hard and pay your salaries. The
- 8:01Speaker 1: MTA reduced fare tickets on the LR were not introduced
- 8:04Speaker 1: because they thought we were hardworking citizens. How offensive is that?
- 8:14Speaker 1: And I want to mention this because I want the
- 8:16Speaker 1: dialogue to continue. I want the MTA to know that
- 8:21Speaker 1: this response is just brutal. If in a mention we
- 8:29Speaker 1: understand tosay what people go to work, I'd understand that,
- 8:34Speaker 1: but there's no mention of work. And then the prior
- 8:38Speaker 1: paragraphs is say the additional rides that would be generated
- 8:44Speaker 1: by the availability of a reduced fare ticket could not
- 8:46Speaker 1: be comfortably accommodated. That's why we don't accept reduce Fair
- 8:50Speaker 1: tickets during the morning rush hour. And this was a
- 8:56Speaker 1: time when the majority of ampeach trade. I know before
- 8:59Speaker 1: COVID everything is really packed. I saw it myself. But
- 9:12Speaker 1: this just shows that society doesn't truly believe we the
- 9:19Speaker 1: disabled community and more in the disabled community work. They
- 9:22Speaker 1: don't believe it, or they refuse to see it or
- 9:25Speaker 1: refuse to accommodate it. But I have this message on
- 9:30Speaker 1: the LR. We don't just take the trains for leisure purposes.
- 9:35Speaker 1: I am a production assistant in a radio station in
- 9:39Speaker 1: New York City. I have friends that commute in that
- 9:44Speaker 1: need accommodations because they're going to work. We're not idlers,
- 9:54Speaker 1: and we're not just leisure folk. We are contributing people
- 9:59Speaker 1: to to society, Metropolitan Transportation Authority. It's not just leisure
- 10:09Speaker 1: or medical appointments, as we have places to get you
- 10:13Speaker 1: because we have to go to work too. Let's not
- 10:18Speaker 1: forget about that. And I don't care how many initiatives,
- 10:22Speaker 1: as great as they might be, and I'm probably gonna
- 10:24Speaker 1: do a monthly ticket from now on the point is
- 10:30Speaker 1: your reasoning behind introducing the fairs wasn't because you thought
- 10:33Speaker 1: we were contributing members of society. It was because you
- 10:38Speaker 1: thought we just need to get out for a while
- 10:40Speaker 1: or just go to medical appointments because all we're good for, right, right,
- 10:44Speaker 1: That's what it says to me. But we are disabled,
- 10:51Speaker 1: Yes we are disabled, but we are tax payers and
- 10:54Speaker 1: we are contributors. To society, and we flip and pay
- 10:58Speaker 1: your salaries empty. Whether you want to admit it or not,
- 11:01Speaker 1: our money that we make one way or another goes
- 11:07Speaker 1: to your salary through taxes. We're not just leisurely people.
- 11:18Speaker 1: We have a purpose, and I hope that you can
- 11:23Speaker 1: rethink the reduced fair tickets when you realize not only
- 11:27Speaker 1: do we have a purpose, we need affordability in this country,
- 11:31Speaker 1: in this city, and to accept anything less would be
- 11:42Speaker 1: to give up. So I am so thankful the Daily
- 11:46Speaker 1: News published my little blurb on congestion pricing socking us.
- 11:52Speaker 1: But I want to do more with this. I want
- 11:55Speaker 1: to elevate the conversation. I want to find a way
- 11:59Speaker 1: to truly make an affordable fair affairs for not only disabled,
- 12:02Speaker 1: but able body people. Because the askts to pay nine
- 12:07Speaker 1: dollars in congestion pricing and then to say, hey, you
- 12:10Speaker 1: gotta pay sixteen dollars if you're you know, able bodied,
- 12:15Speaker 1: and only, by the way, two dollars and fifty cents
- 12:18Speaker 1: less if you're disabled. It's an insult. It's an insult.
- 12:25Speaker 1: So please, thanks for the feedback response, but think about
- 12:32Speaker 1: this a little harder and make it a little fair
- 12:37Speaker 1: for everybody. That's how we can have one leg up
- 12:42Speaker 1: as a city Fair Affairs