Latest / Ryder Lee / The Charlie Kirk Timeline Gets Stranger

Transcript

The Charlie Kirk Timeline Gets Stranger · Ryder Lee

0:00
Speaker 1: Today, I want to welcome back to the show writer Lee.
0:02
Speaker 1: He's a filmmaker, researcher, and host of Raised by Giants podcast. Writer,
0:07
Speaker 1: Welcome back. How you doing doing good?
0:10
Speaker 2: Chris?
0:10
Speaker 3: Thanks for having me on. Really appreciate it.
0:12
Speaker 1: It's great to have you back.
0:14
Speaker 3: Man.
0:14
Speaker 1: Looking forward to this. We're going to get into some
0:17
Speaker 1: of the research you've been doing into the multiple anomalies
0:21
Speaker 1: associated with the Charlie Kirk assassination. You've been pointing out
0:25
Speaker 1: several aspects that we presented that don't add up, including
0:29
Speaker 1: what's going on with this current Tyler Robinson trial. There's
0:32
Speaker 1: a lot to get into at this Before we do,
0:35
Speaker 1: remind the audience a bit about yourself if they're not familiar,
0:38
Speaker 1: and let them know how they can find more.
0:41
Speaker 3: Yes, my name's Rider Lee. I run a podcast and
0:43
Speaker 3: YouTube channel called Raised by Giants. You can find me
0:46
Speaker 3: on any and all podcast platforms. Find me on social
0:49
Speaker 3: media on Facebook x Instagram at Raised by Giants. And
0:54
Speaker 3: I'm looking forward to the conversation because the entire Charlie
0:58
Speaker 3: Kirk scenarios, it's like this giant rabbit hole that you
1:05
Speaker 3: just keep things just keep getting stranger and stranger, and
1:08
Speaker 3: none of it adds up at all period, and it's
1:12
Speaker 3: just this thing that just keeps going, and the official
1:16
Speaker 3: narrative never made any sense, and they keep trying to
1:20
Speaker 3: push the official narrative, and I think people are really
1:24
Speaker 3: waking up to that, and it's kind of like we
1:27
Speaker 3: just reverted back to the very beginning of it with
1:29
Speaker 3: the preliminary trial because basically Tpusay brought in a lot
1:34
Speaker 3: of these media people, like a lot of like MAGA
1:39
Speaker 3: pro TPUSA people, and at the end of the trial,
1:43
Speaker 3: they basically said that they saw all four K footage
1:48
Speaker 3: of Tyler Robinson HD four K footage of Tyler Robinson
1:52
Speaker 3: taking the shot, which I knew that they were going
1:56
Speaker 3: to try and pull something like this, so I made
1:57
Speaker 3: sure that I watched every single preliminary hearing video and
2:02
Speaker 3: there was a lot to take on and a lot
2:03
Speaker 3: of people didn't have a lot of didn't have the
2:06
Speaker 3: time to do that, right because some of them are
2:08
Speaker 3: like eight hours, you know, this is just court room
2:11
Speaker 3: stuff for like eight hours, you know what I mean,
2:13
Speaker 3: back and forth between the prosecution and the defense. And
2:19
Speaker 3: so at the end of the fifth day they said
2:21
Speaker 3: that they had this four K ultra HD footage a
2:23
Speaker 3: lot of these people like Benny Johnson, even some Meghan
2:29
Speaker 3: Kelly brought a bunch of people on that was talking
2:31
Speaker 3: about how they saw this footage, and she's kind of
2:34
Speaker 3: buying into it, Dan BONDI.
2:37
Speaker 1: Where's this footage supposedly coming from all of a sudden.
2:41
Speaker 3: That's the thing that is the whole deal. And if
2:46
Speaker 3: you watch the end of the day one of the
2:49
Speaker 3: pre preliminary trial, you'll see that the state tries to
2:53
Speaker 3: bring into evidence and show to the court this enhanced
2:59
Speaker 3: footage that is being zoomed in and has circles around it,
3:03
Speaker 3: like red circles, because the footage is so freaking blurry
3:06
Speaker 3: of this gentleman running across the rooftop right, it's far away.
3:11
Speaker 3: Footage is super blurry. So they're trying to present and
3:14
Speaker 3: bring into evidence to the court that this enhanced footage. Okay,
3:21
Speaker 3: So the defense comes in and is like, hey, we
3:25
Speaker 3: don't think this evidence should be submitted because it's been enhanced.
3:29
Speaker 3: There's red circles that's been put in it, there's zoomed
3:33
Speaker 3: in footage. So then the judge does, well, yeah, I
3:36
Speaker 3: agree with that, we should not let this enhanced footage
3:39
Speaker 3: be This should not be put into evidence and it
3:41
Speaker 3: should not be seen by the courtroom. But what you
3:43
Speaker 3: can do is show us the raw footage. So at
3:47
Speaker 3: the beginning of day two they released the raw footage
3:52
Speaker 3: of this enhanced footage, and the defense says that there's
3:56
Speaker 3: no footage of anybody taking a shot, so we show
4:01
Speaker 3: that footage. They show some ring camera footage of supposedly
4:05
Speaker 3: Tyler Robinson's vehicle at around midnight a little bit away
4:11
Speaker 3: from UVU campus that was captured by a ring camera,
4:14
Speaker 3: and the agent Hall, which was up there testifying, said
4:18
Speaker 3: that they know that it's Tyler Robinson's vehicle because the vehicle,
4:24
Speaker 3: you could distinguish the tires on the vehicle, so all
4:26
Speaker 3: you got to do is look at the tires and
4:28
Speaker 3: you know that it's Tyler Robinson's vehicle. But the footage
4:31
Speaker 3: they showed previously that was Tyler Robinson's vehicle supposedly pulling
4:36
Speaker 3: into the parking garage early that morning at nine am
4:40
Speaker 3: on September tenth, was not Tyler Robinson's vehicle. It was different.
4:45
Speaker 3: There was a license plate holder on the front of
4:47
Speaker 3: the vehicle. It had a single exhaust, Tyler Robins exhaust
4:52
Speaker 3: of his actual vehicle was different. He didn't have that
4:55
Speaker 3: front license plateed. And that the reason that we know
4:57
Speaker 3: that is because whenever the police and the FBI went
5:01
Speaker 3: to Robinson's house to search it and confiscate his stuff,
5:04
Speaker 3: the police took pictures of his vehicle. It's not the
5:07
Speaker 3: same vehicle that was shown in the surveillance footage on
5:12
Speaker 3: September tenth in court, So back to their original footage.
5:17
Speaker 3: So after they showed the footage and Agent Hall testified
5:21
Speaker 3: and said, uh uh, this is we believe that this
5:26
Speaker 3: is to be Tyler Robinson. They can't prove that it's
5:28
Speaker 3: Tyler Robinson. It could literally be anybody. It could be
5:32
Speaker 3: freaking Tom Hanks, it could be whoever it is. There's
5:36
Speaker 3: no clear the footage. The photograph that they released on
5:40
Speaker 3: the day of assassination or the next day of the assassination,
5:44
Speaker 3: is more clear than the footage that they shown and
5:47
Speaker 3: in court the photograph. Where is that photograph? Why didn't
5:52
Speaker 3: they show that photograph of his face? I'll tell you why,
5:56
Speaker 3: because it's not Tyler Robinson. Okay. So, and people would
6:02
Speaker 3: know that because you can if they showed it in court,
6:05
Speaker 3: a super clear image, you could compare that with the
6:08
Speaker 3: images of Tyler Robinson and see that it's not Tyler Robinson.
6:11
Speaker 3: Any sane person can look at those photos side by
6:14
Speaker 3: side and realize that it's not Tyler Robinson. Okay. So
6:18
Speaker 3: the state decided they said, well, we would like to
6:22
Speaker 3: show the enhanced zoomed in the footage later on. Would
6:27
Speaker 3: you be opposed to showing the enhanced zoomed in footage
6:32
Speaker 3: with the circles and everything later on in the preliminary trial.
6:36
Speaker 3: And the judge said that he would take that into consideration. Okay.
6:40
Speaker 3: So that at the end of day five, the state
6:45
Speaker 3: asked the judge again if they could show the enhanced
6:50
Speaker 3: footage of the footage that was already shown on day two,
6:55
Speaker 3: just zoomed in with circles and everything. Yeah, okay. Now,
7:00
Speaker 3: mind you, the defense had just questioned an ATF agent
7:05
Speaker 3: on the stand that did DNA analysis of all the
7:10
Speaker 3: things that was found on September tenth, okay, and she
7:14
Speaker 3: disclosed that there were three other people's up to five
7:19
Speaker 3: other people's DNA on the rifle.
7:22
Speaker 2: Okay.
7:23
Speaker 3: So out of the people that we know is Tyler
7:25
Speaker 3: Robinson's dad, Lance Twiggs, and Tyler Robinson's DNA and there's
7:31
Speaker 3: two other unidentified people that DNA is also on the rifle,
7:36
Speaker 3: and out of those people's DNA that is on the rifle,
7:41
Speaker 3: Tyler Robinson's DNA is the most degraded. Huh interesting, which
7:48
Speaker 3: means essentially means that he did not handle the rifle.
7:53
Speaker 1: That he wasn't the last one to handle it, right, at.
7:55
Speaker 3: Least exactly exactly he wasn't. Okay, So Lance Twiggs couldn't
8:00
Speaker 3: even identify Tyler Robinson based upon and the thing about
8:04
Speaker 3: it is is too is the Lance Twigs. It's his
8:08
Speaker 3: his lover, right yeah, yeah, trans lover. People call him
8:12
Speaker 3: a fur furry lover. I don't know if he was
8:14
Speaker 3: really a furry or not, but I don't think that
8:17
Speaker 3: he was a furry. I think that he's just a.
8:19
Speaker 1: It adds to the chatrics of everything, exactly.
8:22
Speaker 3: I think he's just a trans dude or a gay
8:25
Speaker 3: dude that likes dudes. So he couldn't even identify Tyler Robinson.
8:32
Speaker 3: He said that it looks like Tyler Robinson because Tyler
8:35
Speaker 3: Robinson also wears jeans and a hat. Okay, So just
8:38
Speaker 3: like Agent Hall said that it looks like Tyler Robinson's
8:42
Speaker 3: car because we could tell by the wheels of the.
8:45
Speaker 2: Car that is Tyler Robinson's car.
8:48
Speaker 3: Lance Twiggs can tell that it's Tyler Robinson because he's
8:52
Speaker 3: wearing jeans and a hat. Okay. And it turns out
8:56
Speaker 3: that the ring camera footage, the people that the ring
9:00
Speaker 3: camera footage said that it was a bald man driving
9:06
Speaker 3: in the vehicle, and that there were three other people
9:09
Speaker 3: in the vehicle.
9:10
Speaker 4: And do you remember that the nobles told you that
9:13
Speaker 4: the driver of the vehicle was bald.
9:16
Speaker 3: I do remember that being in the rouport.
9:18
Speaker 2: Yes, And you.
9:19
Speaker 4: Didn't mention that today when you were talking about that
9:21
Speaker 4: ring camera, did you I did not. And did they
9:24
Speaker 4: also tell you there were three other people in the car?
9:29
Speaker 3: Yes?
9:29
Speaker 1: I believe they thought that was the case.
9:31
Speaker 3: Okay. So the entire thing has just completely falling apart.
9:35
Speaker 3: So the only thing that they really had was okay.
9:41
Speaker 3: So at the end of the day five again they
9:44
Speaker 3: asked the judge if they could show the enhanced footage.
9:46
Speaker 3: The footage that they have already shown in day two
9:50
Speaker 3: of the preliminary trials is zoomed in. Okay, It's the
9:53
Speaker 3: exact same footage, no different, except that zoomed in and
9:59
Speaker 3: has circles, read circles around it, so you can tell
10:03
Speaker 3: where the person is on the roof, because with the
10:05
Speaker 3: zoom doll footage, it just looks like a freaking blob
10:08
Speaker 3: running across the top of the roof. Is all it
10:10
Speaker 3: is is a black blob. So all they did was
10:12
Speaker 3: zoom in. Anybody has a zoom in future. You're an editor,
10:15
Speaker 3: you've made movies, you have movies, I'm an editor. Anybody
10:18
Speaker 3: can zoom in on that footage. Okay, it doesn't make
10:21
Speaker 3: the footage anymore clear. No, often it makes the footage
10:26
Speaker 3: even worse because you're zooming in on an already created video.
10:33
Speaker 3: So the judge then decides that he will show the footage,
10:40
Speaker 3: but he will not show the footage to the public. Okay,
10:45
Speaker 3: So the footage is shown to the court room only,
10:50
Speaker 3: and that's when we get all the people coming out
10:53
Speaker 3: of the courtroom, all of the influencers and the people
10:56
Speaker 3: that TPUSA had show up to the preliminary hearing to
11:02
Speaker 3: then come out and say that they saw clear HD
11:06
Speaker 3: four K footage of Tyler Robinson firing the shot at
11:11
Speaker 3: Charlie Kirk. And literally all you had to do to
11:14
Speaker 3: disprove this entire narrative was watch the preliminary hearing. Literally
11:21
Speaker 3: watch the end of day one, the beginning of day two,
11:25
Speaker 3: and then skip to the end of day five. Yeah.
11:29
Speaker 1: I just have a feeling, no matter what is presented,
11:32
Speaker 1: what evidence is presented. On the contrary, they have the
11:37
Speaker 1: Tyler Robinson guilty narrative so firmly in place to where
11:43
Speaker 1: they're not going to let it be any other result.
11:46
Speaker 1: They're going to convict Tyler Robinson no matter what.
11:51
Speaker 3: Yeah, they are that is the plan. That is an
11:53
Speaker 3: ultimate goal and the ultimate plant. But I think it's
11:57
Speaker 3: really going to upset a lot of people because the
12:00
Speaker 3: only people that I have seen that believes the official
12:07
Speaker 3: story of what the FBI is presenting that Tyler Robinson
12:10
Speaker 3: got on a roof and with a thirty out six
12:14
Speaker 3: and shot Charlie Kirk from approximately one hundred and forty
12:18
Speaker 3: yards at a sloped angle and hit him in the
12:21
Speaker 3: neck and the bullet didn't go through his neck. There
12:25
Speaker 3: was no exit wound on a thirty out six. Literally,
12:29
Speaker 3: look up any YouTube video of anyone firing a thirty
12:34
Speaker 3: out six and you'll see that the damage is unfathomable. Okay,
12:44
Speaker 3: it will literally go through a four inch brick in
12:47
Speaker 3: through a cow femer. You're telling me that Charlie's neck
12:53
Speaker 3: is stronger than a three inch brick and a cow femer.
12:58
Speaker 1: Now I heard the argument that you can adjust the
13:01
Speaker 1: amount of gunpowder to have a less of an impact
13:05
Speaker 1: or less of an effect when it's hit, which I'm
13:08
Speaker 1: sure is true. But how likely is it that Tyler
13:13
Speaker 1: Robinson was creating his own bullets?
13:16
Speaker 3: Yeah? Bro, Like you're telling me a person that his
13:19
Speaker 3: first crime that he ever committed, the first thing they did,
13:24
Speaker 3: the biggest crime probably in history since like JFK in
13:30
Speaker 3: the version of public assassinations, he committed in broad daylight,
13:37
Speaker 3: did it on his first try. Yep, no issues, and
13:42
Speaker 3: just essentially got away with it, and then texted Lance
13:46
Speaker 3: Twiggs kept confessing to Lance Twigs, and he says in
13:52
Speaker 3: the text messages that they presented in court, which the
13:54
Speaker 3: text messages.
13:56
Speaker 2: Have their own set of problems and their.
13:58
Speaker 3: Own set of issue. But he said supposedly to Lance
14:04
Speaker 3: Twigs that he wanted to take this to his grave.
14:08
Speaker 3: So why are you admitting in tax messages to your
14:14
Speaker 3: lover just less than twelve hours after you've done one
14:19
Speaker 3: of the biggest political assassinations in modern time. Why are
14:24
Speaker 3: you then admitting it? It makes absolutely no sense. But
14:28
Speaker 3: here's the deal with the text messages. So there's an
14:33
Speaker 3: investigator online. His name is Diligent Denisen. He's on x
14:41
Speaker 3: a fantastic investigator. You can go to his page a
14:44
Speaker 3: shout at him out several times. He's done a lot
14:46
Speaker 3: of work into this. So he went to a place
14:51
Speaker 3: called Cowboys Smokehouse in Penguage, Utah, which is approximately three
14:56
Speaker 3: hours away from UVU campus, and he interviewed this waiter
15:03
Speaker 3: there that said that he saw Tyler Robinson around nine
15:07
Speaker 3: pm on September tenth. Okay, And he shows the receipt.
15:15
Speaker 3: He posted the receipt online. People are calling the receipt fake,
15:18
Speaker 3: but it's one. He has. The guy that he interviewed
15:23
Speaker 3: at Cowboys Smokehouse in Penguin, Ohio verified the receipt. He
15:28
Speaker 3: blurred out some.
15:29
Speaker 2: Of the He blurred out the card number and.
15:32
Speaker 3: The waiter's name and stuff like that. But it's a
15:34
Speaker 3: very real receipt. People have seen the unreducted version. But
15:41
Speaker 3: and it says the individual that was there paid at
15:45
Speaker 3: nineven okay pm.
15:49
Speaker 2: Okay.
15:50
Speaker 3: The text message goes out to Lance Twigs from Tyler
15:56
Speaker 3: Robinson at eleven PM, and in this exchange with Lance Twiggs,
16:04
Speaker 3: Tyler Robinson says that he's still on UVU campus waiting
16:09
Speaker 3: to retrieve his rifle. So how can he be at
16:15
Speaker 3: UVU campus waiting to retrieve his rifle when he had
16:20
Speaker 3: just paid for his food at nine to forty seven
16:23
Speaker 3: at Cowboys Steakhouse three hours away. You're not going to
16:30
Speaker 3: get there until around one am in the morning back
16:35
Speaker 3: to UVU, So how can you be there anytime between
16:39
Speaker 3: eleven pm and midnight trying to find your rifle.
16:46
Speaker 1: There was also discrepancies about how the rifle was found.
16:49
Speaker 1: Supposedly it was reassembled, and according to the narrative, he
16:54
Speaker 1: disassembled it just to reassemble it somewhere else. Is that right?
16:58
Speaker 3: That's what they're trying to pass off. But the thing
17:00
Speaker 3: is is how did he reassemble it when he left
17:02
Speaker 3: the screwdriver on the roof, Because that was a big
17:05
Speaker 3: part of the evidence that was presented, right, was that
17:11
Speaker 3: they found a screwdriver on the roof of the Lowes building. Okay,
17:15
Speaker 3: that had apparently had Tyler's DNA on me. Okay. So,
17:23
Speaker 3: but the police officer that found it his body camera
17:26
Speaker 3: footage immediately went dead, his body, his buddy that he
17:32
Speaker 3: had on as soon as he got to the roof
17:33
Speaker 3: of the Lowes building. Okay, And they didn't show the
17:39
Speaker 3: screwdriver to the court. They presented it as evidence, but
17:46
Speaker 3: they didn't show it to the media. We didn't even
17:49
Speaker 3: get to see the screwdriver that was reportedly found on
17:52
Speaker 3: the roof of the Lowes building. Well, and another thing,
17:56
Speaker 3: there was a gun holster that was found on campus too,
18:02
Speaker 3: So it's just like and then there was a bullet
18:05
Speaker 3: that was found on another roof, an unshot fire unshot
18:10
Speaker 3: bullet that was that they claimed was a discharge bullet
18:16
Speaker 3: from loading a gun from an officer that was on
18:21
Speaker 3: the roof. Then you have all the craziness with George Zinn,
18:27
Speaker 3: the guy that was then arrested. Uh, that said that
18:31
Speaker 3: he supposedly killed Charlie Kirk, which I cannot find any
18:36
Speaker 3: verifiable evidence saying that he said that he killed Charlie Kirk.
18:40
Speaker 3: There's no video, there's no video, there's no audio of
18:43
Speaker 3: George Dane ever seen.
18:44
Speaker 1: He was the guy that was initially arrested, right, yeah, yeah.
18:49
Speaker 3: The original guy. And uh, but there diligient Dennison also
18:57
Speaker 3: interviewed him from jail on and George zen said that
19:03
Speaker 3: he worked for TPUSA the year prior in Arizona, going
19:09
Speaker 3: door to door knocking trying to get votes for Trump.
19:13
Speaker 3: The whole thing is just completely complete insanity. And then
19:17
Speaker 3: there was another guy that was arrested for going onto
19:25
Speaker 3: the scene that apparently had a was found with some
19:31
Speaker 3: kind of rifle on the scene as well. His name
19:36
Speaker 3: was Kennington Russell. He was arrested that same day. He
19:41
Speaker 3: was wearing like a lab lab coat and lab uniforms,
19:45
Speaker 3: so they had they already had two Patsy's, this Kennington
19:49
Speaker 3: Russell guy, and then George Zinn and then you know,
19:54
Speaker 3: ultimately landed on Tyler Robinson. But they didn't show any
19:59
Speaker 3: footage of Tyler Robinson showing up to the police station
20:03
Speaker 3: to turn himself in. We saw some back footage of
20:07
Speaker 3: him in some kind of interrogation room where she walks
20:12
Speaker 3: in and completely turns around, which he's The shirt that
20:16
Speaker 3: he was shown in is not even the same shirt
20:20
Speaker 3: that he was pictured in at the Dairy Queen at
20:23
Speaker 3: around six pm on the tenth. So the whole thing
20:26
Speaker 3: is just it's a nightmare. And then they tried to
20:29
Speaker 3: run with this entire thing and not thinking that anybody
20:32
Speaker 3: was gonna investigat her looking at any of the stuff.
20:36
Speaker 3: They thought that they could just lie their way through it,
20:38
Speaker 3: like they've done over and over and over and over again.
20:42
Speaker 3: You know, we got the money. You guys aren't going
20:46
Speaker 3: to figure any of this out because we'll just pay
20:49
Speaker 3: these influencers and these people to take our position. But
20:53
Speaker 3: people are immediately waking up to that they know that
20:56
Speaker 3: this is.
20:57
Speaker 2: Not what happened.
20:59
Speaker 1: As far as the events of the assassination itself, their
21:03
Speaker 1: speculation whether a rifle was even used, and I've seen
21:08
Speaker 1: some of the deep dives you've done about the possibility
21:10
Speaker 1: of the microphone being used as some kind of projectile explosive.
21:16
Speaker 1: Is there anything else you've looked into about that.
21:20
Speaker 3: I have looked into the microphone theory a lot. I've
21:23
Speaker 3: also looked into which is my next theory. I haven't
21:28
Speaker 3: really put it together. Yeah, I haven't done a video
21:32
Speaker 3: on it yet. But the thing about the a lot
21:36
Speaker 3: of the stuff that doesn't make any sense is the
21:40
Speaker 3: crime scene was immediately paved over, was paved over by
21:44
Speaker 3: Sunday and into Monday. It was completely done the microphone
21:50
Speaker 3: looks like it's been exploded, and it is at the
21:53
Speaker 3: bottom of the suv.
21:54
Speaker 2: On the floorboard.
21:56
Speaker 3: The shirt that Charlie was wearing apparently got destroyed somehow
22:04
Speaker 3: and is crumpled up and looks like it's burnt in
22:08
Speaker 3: the back of the suv. Some kind of shirt. We
22:12
Speaker 3: don't know if it's Charlie's shirt, but based off of
22:15
Speaker 3: the photos that Baron Coleman has posted of Charlie Kirk
22:22
Speaker 3: being dragged into the hospital, was he looked like he
22:26
Speaker 3: already had his shirt off.
22:29
Speaker 1: I heard that the first responder had to cut his
22:34
Speaker 1: shirt off and threw it aside, and that's why they
22:36
Speaker 1: couldn't find his shirt.
22:38
Speaker 3: Well, that's not even that wasn't even a first responder.
22:42
Speaker 3: That was Brian Harple, that was part of Charlie's security
22:47
Speaker 3: team that insisted that they take Charlie to the hospital,
22:53
Speaker 3: and they take the long way to the hospital, and
22:56
Speaker 3: they didn't have The door to the v was completely
23:01
Speaker 3: wide open. Charlie's legs were apparently hanging out of the
23:04
Speaker 3: suv as they were driving down the road toward the hospital,
23:07
Speaker 3: and Brian Harple claims that whenever they got to the hospital,
23:12
Speaker 3: he jumped up on top of Charlie and cut Charlie's
23:15
Speaker 3: shirt off with a pair of scissors.
23:18
Speaker 1: I ended up getting on top of him and cutting
23:20
Speaker 1: the shirt that he had on off, that white freedom shirt,
23:24
Speaker 1: and so I cut it off so they could get
23:26
Speaker 1: to him.
23:27
Speaker 3: But that doesn't add up. I personally believe that the
23:32
Speaker 3: cutting of the shirt happened inside of the suv and
23:38
Speaker 3: then the shirt was then burned inside of the suv
23:44
Speaker 3: because you could look at the look at this crumbled
23:47
Speaker 3: up piece of plastic. And Candice Owns was the one
23:50
Speaker 3: that brought this to everyone's attention, was like a it
23:57
Speaker 3: looks kind of like cardboard, but most shirts nowadays are
24:01
Speaker 3: made with at least fifty percent polyester and some form
24:07
Speaker 3: of cotton and some other materials. Right, so whenever you
24:10
Speaker 3: burn a shirt like that, it turns into this weird
24:14
Speaker 3: burnt out type of cardboard. And if you zoomed in
24:17
Speaker 3: that photograph that burned up looking cardboard, you can see
24:23
Speaker 3: the back of the inside of a.
24:25
Speaker 2: T shirt sticker.
24:28
Speaker 3: So it's one T shirt. We just can't confirm if
24:32
Speaker 3: it's and from Charlie's shirt missing, people just come to
24:38
Speaker 3: the conclusion that it's Charlie's shirt because based off of
24:42
Speaker 3: the photos of Baron Coleman posted on Acts of apparently
24:48
Speaker 3: when they were taking Charlie out of the suv and
24:50
Speaker 3: into the hospital, a photo was snapped and you can
24:52
Speaker 3: see some kind of weird, strange markings on the right
24:55
Speaker 3: side of Charlie's chest where there appears to be some
24:59
Speaker 3: kind of red marks or what people are calling burnmarks.
25:03
Speaker 3: And people tried to discount this and say that it's
25:06
Speaker 3: a that's blood, but it looks like a square burn
25:08
Speaker 3: mark right right right on his pack on his chest,
25:13
Speaker 3: on on the right side where the microphone set on
25:16
Speaker 3: the inside of his shirt. And then the suv was
25:20
Speaker 3: completely scrubbed and then they sold the suv. Suv wasn't
25:26
Speaker 3: put into evidence. And the other really strange part about
25:32
Speaker 3: the entire endeavor is that that FBI wasn't concerned about
25:39
Speaker 3: the microphone. They weren't concerned about the vehicle.
25:43
Speaker 2: They weren't concerned about his shirt.
25:45
Speaker 3: They didn't care about any of that. What they what
25:49
Speaker 3: they did care about was his necklace.
25:54
Speaker 2: Hm.
25:57
Speaker 3: Why did they care so much about Charlie's necklace and
26:01
Speaker 3: why did they even know that he had a necklace?
26:06
Speaker 3: How did they know, I can wear a necklace under
26:08
Speaker 3: my shirt and you would never know that I even
26:10
Speaker 3: have a necklace on. Yeah, and that's where he would
26:14
Speaker 3: wear it. How did they know about the necklace to
26:17
Speaker 3: begin with? And then two why were they so concerned
26:19
Speaker 3: about it? Then it turned out one of Charlie's team
26:24
Speaker 3: came in and grabbed the necklace out of the suv
26:27
Speaker 3: and then gave it to Erica.
26:30
Speaker 1: Yeah, Eric is a whole nother story. What I've always
26:33
Speaker 1: been baffled by is in an age of cell phones,
26:37
Speaker 1: especially at an event where you would think everybody would
26:40
Speaker 1: be filming the entire event, there's very few angles that
26:46
Speaker 1: are seen from people's cell phone footage. I'm wondering if
26:50
Speaker 1: most of it was confiscated at the time.
26:53
Speaker 3: Well, that's exactly what they did with the JFK assassination.
26:56
Speaker 3: Tone what you know about the lady across the street
27:00
Speaker 3: there film day and then her footage got completely confiscated
27:04
Speaker 3: by the FBI. No one's ever seen it. Some parts
27:08
Speaker 3: and pieces of it have come out, but not the
27:11
Speaker 3: full thing. And yeah, it's very suspicious. The FBI then
27:17
Speaker 3: went and confiscated all of the footage at the hospital,
27:22
Speaker 3: So we have no footage of Charlie arriving at the hospital.
27:26
Speaker 3: They wouldn't let the doctor go back in and try
27:31
Speaker 3: to prepare Charlie's body for Erica Kirk to come and
27:34
Speaker 3: see him at the hospital. There's a parent nine one
27:41
Speaker 3: police scanner recordings that say that no autopsy was performed,
27:49
Speaker 3: that the Kirk family that Erica did not want an
27:51
Speaker 3: autopsy done. What and then the then the next day
28:00
Speaker 3: he's already ready and prepared and in bomb and in
28:04
Speaker 3: a casket. Those photos of him in the casket with
28:10
Speaker 3: Erica over him, where she's like brushing his hand which
28:13
Speaker 3: looks like freaking porcelain mannequin. Yeah, the porcelain mannequin hands.
28:19
Speaker 3: I've been to a lot of open caskets, Chris and
28:22
Speaker 3: I do not ever recall seeing someone's hands look like
28:26
Speaker 3: mannequin hands. Okay, so, but those were taken because I
28:32
Speaker 3: raised the question of it. Wasn't something really rubbed.
28:38
Speaker 2: Me wrong about the Erica Kirk.
28:41
Speaker 3: Posting the video and the photos of Charlie in the casket,
28:44
Speaker 3: And I couldn't really understand why I felt uneasy about
28:47
Speaker 3: it until around a month ago. I went back because
28:54
Speaker 3: I tried to go back and find a lot of
28:56
Speaker 3: inconsistencies with what they were saying when it first happened
28:59
Speaker 3: and then now to what they're saying. And I found
29:01
Speaker 3: in a lot of them, like the governor of Utah
29:06
Speaker 3: saying that the assassin got up onto the roof, changed clothes,
29:10
Speaker 3: took the shot, changed clothes again on the roof, and
29:12
Speaker 3: then jumped down off of That's legitimately what he said happened,
29:16
Speaker 3: but we don't see that in any of the footage.
29:18
Speaker 3: But regardless, the video and the photos of Charlie Kirk
29:24
Speaker 3: in the casket and Eric Kirk over him didn't sit
29:28
Speaker 3: right with me. But it didn't sit right with me
29:32
Speaker 3: for the same reasons that everybody else was complaining about it. Right.
29:35
Speaker 3: People were like, it's disrespectful, why would you do this?
29:39
Speaker 3: You're trying to you know, like this is a private moment.
29:45
Speaker 3: You know, this shouldn't be captured by media. Why are
29:47
Speaker 3: you miked up? And all of that. And I didn't
29:51
Speaker 3: really care about any of that, right, but it still
29:55
Speaker 3: bugged me. But I couldn't figure out why until I
29:59
Speaker 3: went back and looked at the dates those photos and
30:05
Speaker 3: that video was posted two days after his assassination. Huh,
30:13
Speaker 3: So I made that video. That video went viral, It
30:15
Speaker 3: went crazy on as it had like an astronomical amount
30:20
Speaker 3: of views that it went viral on Instagram, went viral
30:22
Speaker 3: on Facebook, and then Baron Coleman picked it up and
30:26
Speaker 3: started digging into it more, and he found out that
30:29
Speaker 3: those photos were actually taking the very next day, they
30:33
Speaker 3: just weren't posted until two days later. Wow, he was
30:38
Speaker 3: already embombed, cast get ready for burial the very next day.
30:45
Speaker 1: Yeah, that shit doesn't happen. It doesn't happen in any
30:49
Speaker 1: other situation. Why would it happen in an extremely high
30:54
Speaker 1: level assassination case? That makes zero fucking sense, zero sense to.
31:00
Speaker 3: And everyone's like, oh, wow, it's possible, it can be
31:03
Speaker 3: gone if you got enough money. Well, just because it's
31:06
Speaker 3: possible doesn't mean that it should happen. Y, why did
31:11
Speaker 3: it happen like that? If it happened like that, and
31:13
Speaker 3: why are they saying that there was no autopsy? So
31:18
Speaker 3: wird man.
31:19
Speaker 1: Erica Kirk another very odd aspect of this whole situation,
31:25
Speaker 1: not only her reaction and some of the strange things
31:30
Speaker 1: she said, but the accounts of how her and Charlie
31:34
Speaker 1: got together, a bit of their history that she's trying
31:37
Speaker 1: to recount doesn't fit together. People are finding aspects left
31:43
Speaker 1: and right of their lives that seem to be falsified.
31:47
Speaker 1: Huge red flags about Erica. Have you looked into anything
31:51
Speaker 1: about her?
31:54
Speaker 3: Her background is very difficult to find out anything about her.
31:57
Speaker 3: Mom was called Lori Franz. She's a defense and intelligence
32:03
Speaker 3: military intelligence contractor for the government, creates a bunch of
32:09
Speaker 3: technology for the government. And it's very difficult to find
32:14
Speaker 3: history out about Erica. It's almost like it's been hid
32:18
Speaker 3: on purpose. We know that she went to a very
32:23
Speaker 3: specialized school called the Tessa Rat School. Canvas Ownses put
32:27
Speaker 3: that together. She was then part of some kind of
32:30
Speaker 3: basketball team, but she didn't really play on it that
32:33
Speaker 3: much in high school. She was actually benched for the
32:36
Speaker 3: majority of it. Very few photos of her exist from
32:41
Speaker 3: when she was young, very few no photos exist of
32:45
Speaker 3: her pregnant.
32:47
Speaker 2: It's not.
32:50
Speaker 3: Completely unbelievable, but it's strange. It's just very difficult to
32:57
Speaker 3: figure out about her history. It's like it's been hidden
32:59
Speaker 3: on and there may be reasons for that. There's a
33:02
Speaker 3: birth certificate that has different dates on it, which is
33:06
Speaker 3: kind of odd. She claims that she was raised by
33:11
Speaker 3: a single mother, which her stepdad was always in the picture,
33:15
Speaker 3: So it's like, were you really raised by a single
33:19
Speaker 3: mother when you had a stepdad the entire time. So yeah,
33:24
Speaker 3: there's just a lot of really weird and strange stuff
33:26
Speaker 3: with her background. She was in that as that one
33:30
Speaker 3: documentary talking about it that was heavily propped up with
33:33
Speaker 3: a bunch of CIA people talking about the grid down
33:37
Speaker 3: situation where if we're hit with an EMP, what's going
33:41
Speaker 3: to happen. She was also in a bunch of reality shows.
33:45
Speaker 3: It seems like she just wanted money, power, and fame.
33:49
Speaker 1: She was also in a pageant that Trump was in
33:52
Speaker 1: charge of.
33:52
Speaker 3: Right. She also had some ties allegedly to Jeffrey Epstein
33:58
Speaker 3: in New York, And there's just a lot of weird
34:05
Speaker 3: back and then that's exactly what she did. She just
34:07
Speaker 3: tried to profit off of the death of Charlie Kirk,
34:12
Speaker 3: you know, like, sell as many hats as you can, sell,
34:16
Speaker 3: all the shirts, let's do these big giant e Vincent
34:19
Speaker 3: That's the thing that doesn't really make any sense with me.
34:23
Speaker 3: Chris is like, at this point, I don't really know
34:27
Speaker 3: what TPUSA actually does anymore.
34:31
Speaker 1: Seems like just an intelligence front of some kind. Didn't
34:35
Speaker 1: the co author of Mind Wars with Michael Lokino, isn't
34:38
Speaker 1: he on the board of directors of TPUSA. That's a
34:41
Speaker 1: huge red flag right there.
34:43
Speaker 3: Really big red flag without Charlie Kirk. They I mean,
34:49
Speaker 3: what do they really.
34:50
Speaker 2: Do, right?
34:52
Speaker 3: They just put on halftime performances. Erica does some speaking gigs,
34:57
Speaker 3: a Woman's Summit, she writes a book. She also does
35:00
Speaker 3: some internet videos, you know, dressed like a freaking undercover
35:05
Speaker 3: agent like Joe from You That's out. They're stalking people
35:08
Speaker 3: with the brim hat on her. And the Charlie Kirk
35:12
Speaker 3: Show still goes on somehow, but should probably just be
35:16
Speaker 3: renamed to We Hate Candice Own Show. That's basically what
35:20
Speaker 3: the entire thing is about. I really don't know what
35:24
Speaker 3: tp USA does now and what their donors are actually supporting.
35:31
Speaker 3: I really don't. Right, it feels completely artificially propped up. Yeah,
35:37
Speaker 3: they don't have anybody's taking They don't have anyone taking
35:40
Speaker 3: Charlie's place on the road right at speaking events, doing debates.
35:47
Speaker 3: Right Trump is in office. That was kind of the
35:50
Speaker 3: whole goal. Yeah, turning point was to get Trump back
35:56
Speaker 3: in the office. He's still in office for another until
35:59
Speaker 3: twenty two, in another two years, and of twenty three years.
36:03
Speaker 3: So it's like, well, that might be something completely different because.
36:07
Speaker 2: He might try and run for a third term.
36:09
Speaker 3: Did you see his thing the other day where he
36:12
Speaker 3: was like, I'm gonna run. No, I did it twice,
36:16
Speaker 3: I'm going to do it again. So we might be
36:21
Speaker 3: a tempting to get him for another term. But you know,
36:26
Speaker 3: I just don't understand. I don't know what at this
36:31
Speaker 3: point what tpusa's purpose is now. I just don't know
36:35
Speaker 3: what they do. I don't know what their actual function
36:39
Speaker 3: is other than, you know, being the I just don't know.
36:47
Speaker 3: And it's a really good question because I don't think
36:49
Speaker 3: anybody else really knows either, because Charlie was the central
36:52
Speaker 3: theme point. He was the founder of the entire organization
36:57
Speaker 3: and the thing that he was doing there longer doing.
37:02
Speaker 1: The more you look at that situation, it seems that
37:06
Speaker 1: he himself may have been groomed from an early age
37:10
Speaker 1: to be in that position, but most likely unknowingly by
37:14
Speaker 1: people in his life.
37:17
Speaker 3: Absolutely, Charlie was indeed in the gay program, which is
37:22
Speaker 3: I have it in my new documentary that will be
37:26
Speaker 3: out soon on Amazon prime called psychic agent the gay program,
37:30
Speaker 3: and it turns out that he was inside of the
37:33
Speaker 3: gay program, and he was more than likely groomed for
37:36
Speaker 3: this position of power. Because that's what I believe that
37:38
Speaker 3: the gay programs actually are, are grooming people for roles
37:45
Speaker 3: in society. So if you get people at a really
37:48
Speaker 3: young age, you just put them to the side and
37:51
Speaker 3: you give them a special education, you can then effectively
37:56
Speaker 3: take them in Shepherd and heard them into the position
38:02
Speaker 3: that you want them to be in. So a lot
38:04
Speaker 3: of the people that have made it through officially made
38:07
Speaker 3: it through all of the gate program stuff. You're probably
38:10
Speaker 3: looking at someone that's pretty important music industry people, leader,
38:15
Speaker 3: heads of giant corporations, writers for the New York Times,
38:20
Speaker 3: and they have all these people programmed on exactly what
38:23
Speaker 3: they're supposed to do. So there's really not much of
38:25
Speaker 3: a conspiracy there because the people that made it through
38:29
Speaker 3: don't care about what they went through because they're successful
38:33
Speaker 3: in their job. They don't want to talk about the weird,
38:36
Speaker 3: strange shit that they went through and a grade school
38:40
Speaker 3: in middle school right because it doesn't matter to them
38:42
Speaker 3: because they're making hundreds of thousands of dollars or they're
38:45
Speaker 3: a political leader, or they're a famous.
38:48
Speaker 2: Actor, or they're.
38:50
Speaker 3: This person that's been you know, they're ahead of a corporation,
38:54
Speaker 3: or they they're the CEO or XEO or whatever you
38:58
Speaker 3: want to call it, and they just don't care. Right.
39:01
Speaker 3: But the people that did not make it through normally
39:05
Speaker 3: have a lot more problems, and they are the ones
39:08
Speaker 3: that turn out to be the ones that actually talk
39:12
Speaker 3: about it, right, They're the ones that actually remember what
39:16
Speaker 3: they went through.
39:17
Speaker 1: They have weirder sub sections, darker sub sections of these
39:21
Speaker 1: Gate programs where people are recruited for assassins, some kind
39:27
Speaker 1: of psychic abilities, sexual honey pot blackmail. They get really
39:34
Speaker 1: dark and it becomes torture and extreme horrendous experimentation at
39:42
Speaker 1: certain levels, right, Yeah.
39:44
Speaker 3: And it doesn't even have to be at at like
39:45
Speaker 3: a super high level. It could just be recruitment in
39:50
Speaker 3: to the military. Walter Bosley was in the Gate program
39:57
Speaker 3: in California. Trey Hudson was in the Gay program. They're
40:01
Speaker 3: both in the military. A lot of the people buying
40:06
Speaker 3: themselves working for three let organizations and the military were
40:12
Speaker 3: probably involved in some sort of strange and weird testing
40:17
Speaker 3: whenever they were a kid. Mary Ellen Manson was said
40:24
Speaker 3: in an interview, the CIA wanted to recruit him. So
40:27
Speaker 3: it's all levels of society. Millions upon millions of kids
40:35
Speaker 3: have been through these programs, and the people that remember
40:40
Speaker 3: and start to wake up start to question the entire thing.
40:43
Speaker 3: And that's what it seems like Charlie was kind of
40:46
Speaker 3: going through. At the very end, he was starting to
40:50
Speaker 3: come to the conclusion that his entire life was essentially
40:57
Speaker 3: a giant Truman Ship.
41:00
Speaker 1: Mentioned a bit of JFK crossover. You made a film
41:04
Speaker 1: about the jfk assassination JFKX. Have you noticed any other
41:08
Speaker 1: profound crossover with the kirk assassination.
41:13
Speaker 3: Well, people want to say that the kirk assassination was
41:18
Speaker 3: was fake and that he faked. I've seen a lot
41:20
Speaker 3: of really wild theories, and I believe that that's being
41:26
Speaker 3: pushed on purpose. I believe that they want to make
41:30
Speaker 3: the Charlie Kirk assassination like two point zero, and they
41:36
Speaker 3: want to take a lot of people down for it,
41:41
Speaker 3: like the famous Alice Jones case where he says that
41:45
Speaker 3: the entire thing was staged and baked and that everyone
41:50
Speaker 3: was crisis actors and the whole family weren't real the
41:53
Speaker 3: kids weren't real and all that, and then he ended
41:56
Speaker 3: up getting sued for millions and millions of dollars and
41:58
Speaker 3: lost as up any info wars. I believe that that's
42:02
Speaker 3: what they want to try and do with the Charlie
42:04
Speaker 3: Kirk assassination. So if they can get enough people believing
42:11
Speaker 3: that the entire thing, because I've seen some I've seen
42:14
Speaker 3: some people go as far to say that it was
42:16
Speaker 3: like a holographic simulation, that Charlie wasn't even really there,
42:20
Speaker 3: that they had holographic simulation technology, and like just a
42:24
Speaker 3: bunch of really wild stuff. And there is an agenda
42:30
Speaker 3: out there to make people believe that everything is staged
42:37
Speaker 3: and everything is fake, in order to make them stop
42:43
Speaker 3: asking questions, right, stop looking into it, because the entire
42:47
Speaker 3: investigation is essentially over in one foul swoop. When you
42:51
Speaker 3: say the entire thing was fake, right, no one's going
42:54
Speaker 3: to look into it anymore, No one asks any more
42:57
Speaker 3: important questions. All you got to do is blanket hire
43:00
Speaker 3: event with it's entirely fake. It wasn't real, it was staged, right,
43:06
Speaker 3: That's how you get away from asking any kind of questions.
43:09
Speaker 3: But and it's interesting because no one would have been
43:14
Speaker 3: saying that if it wasn't for our film JFK X, Right,
43:18
Speaker 3: no one would ever have said that that they believed
43:22
Speaker 3: the Charlie Kirk assassination was fake if it wasn't for
43:25
Speaker 3: a movie right on JFK. But I believe that there's
43:29
Speaker 3: way more evidence for a supposed fake assassination on JFK
43:37
Speaker 3: than anything else because Officer J. D. Tippett was also
43:40
Speaker 3: killed that day and his nickname was JFK. He looked
43:45
Speaker 3: identical to JFK. So if anything, that the entire JFK
43:49
Speaker 3: thing was some sort of weird occult gas lighting ritual
43:54
Speaker 3: to kill someone that looks like JFK is nicknames JFK
44:02
Speaker 3: so that way that they can completely get away with
44:04
Speaker 3: the entire thing, right. And when you look at the
44:07
Speaker 3: autopsy photos of JFK, you see a giant wound to
44:11
Speaker 3: the back of JFK's head, But you don't see a
44:13
Speaker 3: wound to the back of the head in the zubrutera phone, Right. JD.
44:16
Speaker 3: Tippett was shot in the back of the head and
44:19
Speaker 3: in the back, and that's what you see JFK. The
44:21
Speaker 3: wounds on JFK and autopsy photos are shot into the back,
44:25
Speaker 3: into the back of the head, exactly like how JD.
44:29
Speaker 3: Tippitt was killed that exact same day, Right, So there's
44:36
Speaker 3: a lot more evidence when it comes to the JFK
44:40
Speaker 3: thing that makes it more plausible in my eyes than
44:47
Speaker 3: anything else. And even the most experienced JFK researchers will
44:56
Speaker 3: tell you that they believe that JFK's.
44:59
Speaker 1: Body was Unfortunately, just like the JFK assassination, there has
45:06
Speaker 1: been no justice for that event, and unfortunately I don't
45:10
Speaker 1: see any justice for the Charlie Kirk assassination as well.
45:14
Speaker 1: History repeats itself. Even if the circumstances aren't the same,
45:20
Speaker 1: the results will most likely be the same. No justice
45:24
Speaker 1: for any of the people involved with this.
45:27
Speaker 3: Yeah, and it seems like that they're going to keep
45:29
Speaker 3: moving forward into a conviction to go to trial with
45:34
Speaker 3: Tyler Robinson and it'll probably be strung out for a
45:39
Speaker 3: really long time before we ever get any kind of
45:43
Speaker 3: final conviction on it. And that's if he even makes
45:48
Speaker 3: it thought far right, But they have nobody else right,
45:53
Speaker 3: So if they don't convict him, then it looks like
45:57
Speaker 3: the biggest failure on the part of the FBI that
45:59
Speaker 3: has been done and the history of any investigation ever,
46:04
Speaker 3: So they aren't going to let that happen. They're going
46:07
Speaker 3: to have to go through They're gonna have to go
46:10
Speaker 3: headfirst and double down on every single thing that they've
46:13
Speaker 3: ever said, because it's the only option that they have.
46:18
Speaker 3: They have nobody else. There is no other suspect said
46:21
Speaker 3: that they've had on that they could possibly pin for
46:24
Speaker 3: this entire thing, and because they don't want the real
46:29
Speaker 3: person to actually get in trouble for so back to
46:33
Speaker 3: one of your questions that you mentioned about the exploding microphone,
46:42
Speaker 3: it's a possibility that it could have been the microphone,
46:46
Speaker 3: and then there's also a possibility that it could have
46:53
Speaker 3: been the necklace.
46:55
Speaker 1: I haven't heard this one.
46:57
Speaker 3: That's my it's my.
47:00
Speaker 1: Exploded, is what you're saying.
47:02
Speaker 3: Yeah, And the explosion from the necklace destroyed the microphone.
47:10
Speaker 3: The microphone is on the right side of his body,
47:13
Speaker 3: and it's very difficult for even a shape charge to
47:20
Speaker 3: explode here and then somehow hit him on the left side.
47:26
Speaker 3: It would almost have to take a complete U turn.
47:30
Speaker 3: It would have to do some matrix type shit in
47:34
Speaker 3: order to turn back around him and the left side
47:37
Speaker 3: of the neck. But when you watch the footage, Charlie's
47:42
Speaker 3: shirt comes up, his necklace comes up off of the back.
47:48
Speaker 3: So if you saw the back footage, his necklace shoots
47:53
Speaker 3: out the backside of his shirt. Huh, and his shirt
47:59
Speaker 3: flips all the way up. I'm thinking that the necklace
48:05
Speaker 3: turned inside.
48:05
Speaker 2: Of a shirt.
48:06
Speaker 3: It's one of those cross necklaces, right, Yeah, so the
48:10
Speaker 3: necklace shoots up, which brings his shirt up. The necklace turns.
48:15
Speaker 3: It's the only thing that would be able to swing
48:19
Speaker 3: to the left far enough to then explode and hit
48:22
Speaker 3: him into the left side of the neck. Right, So
48:26
Speaker 3: the necklace pops up. It explodes both ways. It bumbles
48:30
Speaker 3: in his shirt, hits him in the side of the neck,
48:32
Speaker 3: and then the other charge comes out the right side,
48:36
Speaker 3: which would be the left side if we were looking
48:38
Speaker 3: at him, hits the microphone and destroys the microphone. No,
48:42
Speaker 3: that's just that's just my theory.
48:44
Speaker 1: It's possible with the level of technology that our military
48:48
Speaker 1: industrial complex has that we'll never know about. I'm sure
48:52
Speaker 1: that they have plenty of devices that could explode in
48:56
Speaker 1: that manner.
48:57
Speaker 3: So you got I mean, that's just my theory. Yeah,
49:01
Speaker 3: really have too much proof on it. But it seems
49:05
Speaker 3: like from the level that the FBI was concerned about
49:09
Speaker 3: the necklace. That's the only thing that makes sense, right.
49:13
Speaker 3: If it was a microphone and you knew about the microphone,
49:16
Speaker 3: then you would be where's Charlie's microphone?
49:21
Speaker 1: It's interesting, man, Anything that we haven't covered about the
49:24
Speaker 1: Kirk assassination before we move on, oh.
49:29
Speaker 3: Man, not that I can think of off of the
49:34
Speaker 3: top of my head. Some people have brought up the
49:36
Speaker 3: fact that it might have been some sort of that
49:40
Speaker 3: it was a close up shooter, that it was someone
49:46
Speaker 3: with a handgun, yeah, or a palm pistol. I'm not
49:51
Speaker 3: too sure on that, but that was my first thought
49:54
Speaker 3: whenever initially happened, was that the shot, if it was
49:59
Speaker 3: a bullet, it was an up close shot with a
50:03
Speaker 3: twenty two is originally what I thought that it was,
50:07
Speaker 3: because again, at that distance from a rifle, from a
50:11
Speaker 3: thirty out six rifle, it's going to basically take Charlie's
50:17
Speaker 3: head completely off. There's no way that it doesn't, right,
50:21
Speaker 3: And that's kind of what we all reverted back to,
50:23
Speaker 3: and what got everybody up in arms again was, you know,
50:28
Speaker 3: we kind of went back.
50:29
Speaker 2: To the fact after the.
50:31
Speaker 3: Preliminary trial of what we had all been talking about
50:34
Speaker 3: for nine months prior that thirty odd six can't it
50:40
Speaker 3: will leave a exit wound. There's no way that it
50:43
Speaker 3: doesn't leave an exit wound, right, So we reverted back
50:48
Speaker 3: to that again, and we had to go through that
50:50
Speaker 3: entire thing again, you know, showing that and there's been
50:56
Speaker 3: Special Forces snipers that have come out recently inside that
51:02
Speaker 3: there is absolutely no way this was a bullet from
51:06
Speaker 3: a thirty out six And they've killed a lot of
51:10
Speaker 3: people with a thirty six. They know what the damage
51:15
Speaker 3: looks like.
51:16
Speaker 1: And he has bones of steel.
51:20
Speaker 3: Man of steel baby.
51:21
Speaker 1: Yeah, great research writer, man, I love it. Keep it up.
51:26
Speaker 1: We'll have to definitely revisit this as things progress. Before
51:31
Speaker 1: I let you go, it's been a while since we've
51:34
Speaker 1: actually hung out and gotten together. Compared observations about the
51:39
Speaker 1: state of reality, some of the more notable events that
51:45
Speaker 1: are surfacing is the emerging surveillance state, flock cameras, implementation
51:52
Speaker 1: of data centers, the collection of data. How do you
51:58
Speaker 1: feel about the state we're at. Have you noticed anything
52:02
Speaker 1: in your immediate area like flock cameras going up, red
52:06
Speaker 1: light cameras, any other type of surveillance that's emerging.
52:12
Speaker 3: No, I have not. I haven't in this area, but
52:15
Speaker 3: I've heard a lot of people talk about the highway
52:18
Speaker 3: that goes up into Cheyenne, Wyoming. They're from four Collins
52:22
Speaker 3: being heavily put with a bunch of flock cameras on
52:26
Speaker 3: the side of the road there in Colorado. It seems
52:29
Speaker 3: like it's hitting a lot of more royal war areas
52:37
Speaker 3: ahead of heavily populated areas. And you know, we kind
52:45
Speaker 3: of knew this was coming with official recognition software, but
52:50
Speaker 3: it might be even more deeper than that.
52:52
Speaker 2: It might.
52:54
Speaker 3: It might even be a data collection on you, not
53:00
Speaker 3: just taking photographs of your car or you walking past it.
53:05
Speaker 3: It might actually be connecting directly to your phone through
53:11
Speaker 3: some sort of bluetooth signal that's radiating off of the
53:17
Speaker 3: flow cameras that's then collecting all of the information directly
53:22
Speaker 3: off of your phone, So all the conversations that you've had,
53:25
Speaker 3: all the text messages that you have your social media account,
53:29
Speaker 3: if you have passwords saved onto your phone, notes on
53:32
Speaker 3: your phone. It seems like the because I've watched a
53:36
Speaker 3: few videos of people getting up close to them and
53:40
Speaker 3: they had the software that was and said that a
53:44
Speaker 3: lot of these are capturing data from people's phones and
53:50
Speaker 3: from their devices.
53:53
Speaker 1: Yeah. I even heard a theory recently that they are
53:56
Speaker 1: collecting biometrics, especially from those who may have opted into
54:02
Speaker 1: the Waxine the Jevity jabs. They may have some kind
54:07
Speaker 1: of technology that can transmit biometrics to some of these
54:12
Speaker 1: devices that are going out. That then is transferred to
54:16
Speaker 1: a data center where we have simulated versions of ourselves,
54:21
Speaker 1: where they can run predictions and models and learn all
54:26
Speaker 1: about who and what we are as individuals, and add
54:30
Speaker 1: a control system based on that.
54:33
Speaker 3: Yeah, that really wouldn't surprise me. I mean they've been
54:35
Speaker 3: trying to do that for a really long time. That's
54:37
Speaker 3: what the Internet has been all about, is creating these
54:40
Speaker 3: digital avatars of everybody inside of a matrix like system,
54:48
Speaker 3: a virtual reality system. I mean, that's what Nitanic with
54:52
Speaker 3: the Pokemon Go app, that's what they were doing, was
54:54
Speaker 3: trying to map the entire freaking world. Yeah, well they are,
55:00
Speaker 3: That's what they did. They had everybody out with their
55:02
Speaker 3: phones trying to catch Pokemon. All the while they're taking
55:05
Speaker 3: video and sending the video of everywhere that everyone has
55:08
Speaker 3: been to get into the nooks and crannies, into people's homes,
55:12
Speaker 3: into people, all the ways of people, the places that
55:15
Speaker 3: are not very accessible to get cameras inside of, and
55:20
Speaker 3: then they map the entire thing or some kind of
55:24
Speaker 3: VR digital computer simulation program to train AI.
55:31
Speaker 1: Models, train AI models. It's it, man, We're in wild times,
55:36
Speaker 1: Man Rider. This was great. Thank you so much. You
55:39
Speaker 1: mentioned your movie earlier that will be coming out very soon.
55:44
Speaker 1: Are there any other projects for you that are in
55:47
Speaker 1: the works in the future.
55:50
Speaker 3: No big projects right now at the moments of trying
55:53
Speaker 3: to get this movie out. Psychic Agent, the Gay Program
55:56
Speaker 3: that will be on Amazon Prime soon, and hopefully some
56:02
Speaker 3: other streaming platforms as well. I haven't really decided exactly
56:08
Speaker 3: what I'm going to do next on the movie front,
56:12
Speaker 3: but something always comes to me.
56:15
Speaker 1: So the world is your oyster, man, Brady.
56:19
Speaker 3: Can be whatever I want it to be. So thanks
56:22
Speaker 3: for having me on. If people are interested, check me
56:24
Speaker 3: out on YouTube raised by Giants and all podcast platforms
56:29
Speaker 3: are forbidden. Knowledge News Network and on social media at
56:33
Speaker 3: raised by Giants and instagram At raised by a Giants
56:37
Speaker 3: pod and x at raised by a Giants eight. Thank
56:40
Speaker 3: you guys very much. Appreciate it. Talk to you soon
56:43
Speaker 3: until next time.
56:45
Speaker 1: Thank you Ryder. Until next time, everyone, have an excellent evening.
56:48
Speaker 1: We'll talk again tomorrow. See y'all do