Latest / Real Deal Media / Real Deal 9/11 Debate Night 1: 'Richard Gage Presents'

Transcript

Real Deal 9/11 Debate Night 1: 'Richard Gage Presents' · Real Deal Media

0:33
He was having an affair with this guy.
0:34
He even admitted to the operator that it just was a friend.
1:45
The. Good evening ladies and
2:07
gentlemen, wherever you find yourself.
2:10
This is 911 debate night one night 1 here of a huge week we
2:17
have planned for you here at Real Deal Media with some of the
2:20
legends and the most courageous truth tellers that are speaking
2:26
truth about that dreadful Day in History that we're going to
2:30
learn a lot of things about. Now, because presentations like
2:35
these usually in a debate to go with it or would would take a an
2:40
astronomical amount of time. We have decided to divvy it up
2:45
throughout the week. And that's why Richard Gage here
2:49
is he's here tonight and you're going to hear from him in his
2:53
entire presentation with any very, very abundant amount of
2:58
time. Now you're going to see Jim
2:59
Betzer, his opponent, join us here on the stage this coming
3:03
Thursday. But ultimately, the big debate
3:06
night, you don't want to miss that.
3:08
You want to mark your calendars for is this coming Saturday.
3:13
So you're going to see the presentations and the proof that
3:17
they have and what they think in their thesis.
3:20
And then ultimately Saturday, these two legends will go toe to
3:24
toe. And I'll be the moderator, Slash
3:27
the referee for that. But let's welcome to the stage,
3:30
the legend himself, the one, the only leader and founder of the
3:35
Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth, Richard Gage.
3:39
Richard, thanks for joining us here tonight.
3:42
Thank you, Dean, awesome to be here with you.
3:44
I'm the former CEO of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth.
3:47
And now GAIL and I are on our own and we are having a
3:52
fantastic time reaching the public, millions of people.
3:57
It's a very exciting time in the last three years at
3:59
richardgage911.org. And thank you for correcting the
4:05
matter because, you know, there's so much misinformation
4:08
all over the place. And we're going to set the
4:10
record straight here tonight and you can, you know, mark your
4:13
calendars for Saturday. And Richard, you know, I'm glad
4:16
we're doing this because there's a lot, there's a whole new
4:18
generation that is learning about that day, you know, 2
4:22
decades ago now. How important is it that we
4:26
continue to carry the torch for truth, whether it's in the
4:30
format of debate or discussion or presentation?
4:33
Just how critical are is it right now?
4:35
And then we'll get started. We're going to be living in a
4:39
full on totalitarian police state.
4:42
If we don't expose the false flag operation known as 911.
4:48
We're going to be getting many more of them.
4:50
If we don't alert the public to how manipulated we all are, how
4:55
we're being dragged into wars, particularly in the Middle East,
5:00
and the media drumming up the March to war and our government
5:06
lying to us about these events like 911, we're going to expose
5:10
those lies tonight. Well, isn't that something?
5:13
OK, so let's get started. I'm going to get out of the way.
5:15
And we are broadcasting live now over there on Dean Ryan TV, the
5:19
incredibly Shadow band YouTube channel over there, as well as
5:22
we are on the real Dean Ryan over there on X.
5:24
And Richard Gage is sharing our little broadcast here on his
5:29
big, big stage. And hello to everybody.
5:32
And yeah, hello. Hi, Mom.
5:36
And then we're also on that rumble as well.
5:38
You don't want to miss that. OK, Richard, I'm going to give
5:40
you the floor and I'm going to probably learn a lot of things
5:44
here tonight. Let's get started showing.
5:46
Yeah, me too. We got a lot of new information.
5:49
In fact, you're you're all the we're all the way off of the
5:55
screen. If that's what you want, that's
5:56
fine. Sorry.
6:02
I have Tourette's. I have Tourette's.
6:03
It happens. OK, So yeah, here it.
6:05
Here it is. I thought you might want to do
6:07
it that way, but your choice and variety.
6:11
This takes courage to to to face these facts because they turn
6:16
over for me 19 years ago, turn over my world upside down and it
6:22
can do that to you. So I'm just giving you a fair
6:25
warning. And tonight this is part of a
6:27
debate. So what I've done is taken my
6:29
regular 90 minute presentation and inserted responses to the
6:37
improbability in my mind that there were nuclear weapons
6:41
involved in the destruction of the towers, the improbability
6:46
that no planes hit the towers, meaning I believe planes hit the
6:50
towers. We're going to be addressing all
6:52
of that today and we're going to squeeze it in.
6:54
We're also going to be addressing the directed energy
6:58
weapons theory promoted by Doctor Judy Wood and others.
7:03
And so all of that is going to be the reason we're racing
7:09
through a very tailored presentation tonight.
7:13
But I wanted you to know that we do have this series 9/11 crime
7:18
scene to courtroom that we we have 12 episodes.
7:22
We've already produced four of them.
7:23
They're out there on the website at richardgage911.org, at
7:29
911c2c.org. And I wanted to encourage
7:32
everybody not only to watch that episode, which you'll learn much
7:37
more about NIST and their deceptions.
7:40
NIST is the National Institute of Standards and Technology, who
7:43
was tasked by Congress to explain these collapses to the
7:46
American people. And they lied big time.
7:49
We're exposing those lies. And we're hosting a conference
7:53
in Washington, DC Physically, 300 people will be there.
7:57
The conference will be led and keynoted by Senator Ron Johnson
8:04
of these. Yeah, the chair of this
8:06
Committee on Investigations. He has subpoena power.
8:10
He's used it and he'll use be using it for 911.
8:13
He's going to be telling us how that's going to be happening.
8:17
Very exciting. John Kiriakou, CIA
8:19
whistleblower, other whistleblowers from the Veterans
8:24
of Intelligence, VIPs. You forget what that B stands
8:31
for anyway. Firefighters, family members,
8:35
architects, engineers, we're all gonna be there.
8:39
Former Representative Kurt Weldon and Dennis Kucinich are
8:42
going to be there a very exciting time.
8:44
And yes, it will be live streamed and yes, it will be
8:48
live streamed on Clayton Morris's redacted platform all
8:53
three days of this conference, September 1011 and 12 in the
8:59
evening on September 10 and 11, all day on the Pentagon
9:04
September 12 with the experts speaking there.
9:07
So learn more at Richard Gage 911 org.
9:12
So we're going to dive right into Building 7.
9:15
This is the third worst structural failure in modern
9:17
history and most architects know nothing about it.
9:20
It wasn't hit by a plane. This be the tallest buildings in
9:23
most of our states, yet it's dwarfed next to the tallest
9:27
buildings in the world at the time they were built, the Twin
9:30
Towers. So we're talking about about
9:32
100, part of the World Trade Center complex, about 100 yards
9:35
north of the North Tower. This building is, and it did
9:39
sustain some damage, but that damage was not a significant
9:43
factor in the building's collapse.
9:46
And So what was? Well, let's look at that
9:48
collapse. The most of this smoke is from
9:52
Building 5, which was a raging fire on the other side of the
9:57
World Trade Center Building 7, and after witnesses hear
10:02
explosions, it drops straight down all of a sudden, uniformly,
10:08
symmetrically into its footprint.
10:11
In under 7 seconds. The East Penn House, as you can
10:14
see, comes down first six in the upper left. 6 seconds later,
10:19
again, the whole building drops in the exact manner of a classic
10:24
controlled demolition. No difference.
10:27
So the official cause of this building's collapse, what we.
10:31
Found was that uncontrolled building fires caused an
10:35
extraordinary event. The collapse of World Trade
10:38
Center 7 was primarily due to fire.
10:40
Fires. OK, well let's look at those
10:42
fires. These are those fires.
10:44
They are few, they are small, and they are scattered
10:48
throughout the building and they have never in history brought
10:52
down a steel frame fire protected structure like much
10:57
hotter, larger and longer lasting buildings have never
11:01
even longer lasting fires in these buildings.
11:05
I've never brought down a steel frame fire protected structure,
11:08
not even after 911 where we have these fully engulfed buildings.
11:11
So you can see right off the bat that NIST is standing out there
11:15
naked, trying to gaslight architects, engineers, the
11:20
entire American public. Let's see what it might look
11:24
like if it couldn't have been brought down by fires.
11:27
Oh, yeah, a series of known controlled demolitions on the on
11:32
the left, Building 7 on the right.
11:34
So, yeah, we've got some problems.
11:37
And we're going to look at the typical features of controlled
11:39
demolition, see if Building 7 has any of these, beginning with
11:42
is there a sudden onset? Let's listen to Dan Rather
11:47
describe this for us. And what?
11:49
You're seeing are high shots. Now here.
11:53
We're going to show you a videotape of the collapse
11:54
itself. Describe that.
11:56
Now we go to videotape the collapse of this building.
12:06
It's amazing, amazing. Incredible.
12:09
Pick your word for the third time today.
12:13
It's reminiscent of those pictures we've all seen too much
12:16
on television before, when a building was deliberately
12:18
destroyed. Destroyed by well placed
12:20
dynamite to mark it down. What?
12:22
Was that Dan deliberately destroyed by well placed
12:25
dynamite to knock down? He's using it as intuition.
12:28
We have a frame of reference for this type of collapse.
12:31
Twin towers are very different, but this is a typical controlled
12:35
demolition, one of the tallest in the world other than the Twin
12:40
Towers, the tallest. Is there a straight down
12:42
symmetrical progression? Let's look from West St.
12:46
Pretty straight down, pretty symmetrical.
12:47
How do you do that? You have to take out all of the
12:51
core columns within a fraction of a second of each other,
12:57
followed about a second later by the perimeter columns within a
13:02
fraction of a second of each other.
13:05
And then you have to repeat that floor by floor.
13:09
Now, directed energy weapons cannot do this.
13:13
A nuclear weapon cannot do this either.
13:17
And it would be much more obvious.
13:20
So they don't. The proponents of these theories
13:23
don't provide us that minor detail, not minor at all.
13:29
These fires don't do it either, by the way.
13:31
We all agree on that. They're few, they're small,
13:34
they're scattered. They're not going to provide
13:37
that symmetric, symmetrical progression.
13:40
If, if you don't get the control demolition charges going off
13:45
just right, you get all kinds of problems like that and like
13:48
this. Somebody has to go up back into
13:50
that building and set those charges and fix them.
13:54
Buildings that are damaged on one side, like Building 7 in the
13:58
northeast corner, according to the official narrative, should
14:01
have fallen to the northeast. Or if it was damaged from the
14:06
north tower that hit it in the southwest corner of Building 7,
14:09
it should have fallen that way, but not straight down
14:13
symmetrical and certainly not at free fall feature.
14:16
Now, Richard, just real quick, because this is kind of new for
14:20
some people that may not have heard of a Building 7, a lot of
14:24
people are kind of reawakening to this.
14:26
What exactly was Building 7 because you know the twin towers
14:30
took such precedence of of the focus on this is a financial
14:35
institution building more than half of it was occupied by
14:39
Solomon Smith Barney. Many other floors were divvied
14:43
up to three letter agencies like the CIA, the DIA, the DoD, the
14:50
SEC Securities and Exchange Commission, which lost thousands
14:53
of files related to hundreds of cases that it was actively
14:56
pursuing against Wall Street companies like Enron and
14:59
Worldcom. This was developed by this
15:02
building by Larry Silverstein in 1986, and he then purchased the
15:07
rest of the 76 buildings in the World Trade Center and just six
15:12
weeks prior to 911, which is very interesting.
15:17
Poor guy. Yeah, poor guy.
15:19
His whole. Well, he came away with $5.6
15:22
billion. OK.
15:24
Not poor guy. Not poor guy.
15:25
That's what the asbestos abatement would have cost him a
15:28
loan. Wow.
15:30
Which was required, Jeez. He was required by the New York
15:35
State, the city of New York, to comply with federal laws that
15:40
the the Port Authority was. So it went into private hands.
15:43
And he didn't have to do that because he had his free asbestos
15:47
abatement coming at the expense of the people who are dying of
15:51
cancer. Today.
15:53
Larry Silverstein is still in New York.
15:55
He's a real estate mogul doing very well.
15:59
How fast is this building coming down?
16:01
Well, it's coming down at freefall.
16:04
That's as fast as a bowling ball falling out of the sky.
16:07
The bowling ball has no resistance.
16:08
This building had 40,000 tons of structural steel in it.
16:13
It shouldn't have come down that fast at all.
16:16
NIST finally acknowledges that it came down at freefall for a
16:20
third of its 7 second fall. How do you do that?
16:23
You have to take out all 82 columns in this building.
16:27
You missed one of them. And the building doesn't come
16:30
down in freefall because those columns will give resistance.
16:34
This means that not one of these 82 columns gave any resistance.
16:39
How is a nuclear weapon going to take out all the columns in this
16:42
building floor by floor such that there's no tilting and it
16:48
comes down at free fall? How is directed energy weapons
16:52
going to achieve any kind of accuracy like that?
16:55
They're the most advanced example of the use of energy to
17:03
effect steel is the Hutchinson effect, which is only been
17:08
experimented on by Hutchinson in in small tabletop exercises.
17:16
This is, This is ludicrous to imagine that all these columns
17:21
could be targeted independently to be taken out all at once and
17:27
on each floor subsequently synchronized floor by floor.
17:32
And these fires certainly couldn't do that.
17:35
We all agree on that feature #5 how is this building coming
17:39
down? Well, this was a 47 story moment
17:42
resisting steel frame structure, which falls into his pile just
17:46
six stories tall like a House of Cards.
17:50
What we know from looking at the destruction is that the concrete
17:56
has been pulverized. We're going to talk about how
17:59
that can happen by thermite. We're going to talk about that's
18:04
each individual floor and so we it it falls like a House of
18:10
Cards. Buildings that fall naturally
18:12
like these in earthquakes, they fall over to the path of least
18:16
resistance. The columns being is not
18:18
separate one from another. Go ahead.
18:20
Do you a small question at thermite.
18:22
Is thermite often used like in Vegas when they took down the
18:25
the the Stardust is that it's not common at all, but it has
18:30
been used for demolition on rare occasions.
18:34
And and we'll get to the thermite.
18:37
Yeah, but I wanted to mention that are these fires going to
18:42
bring this building down all of a sudden severing all the
18:48
columns? No.
18:50
So what can? Well, explosions can.
18:52
And guess what? We have witnesses of explosions,
18:57
starting with the deputy director of New York's Office of
19:00
Emergency Management, Richard Rotans.
19:03
Then he had to go into that building to assess it.
19:06
You could hear the building freak above us.
19:10
You could hear things fall. You could hear the fire burning.
19:13
You could see columns just staying from the upper floors,
19:16
keeping holes in the floors up above us, there was an elevator
19:20
car that was blown out of its shaft and it was down the hall.
19:23
What? An elevator car blown out of its
19:25
shaft that was down the hall. Now, a nuclear weapon is not
19:31
going to be blowing one elevator car out of its shaft and have it
19:35
be down the hall on the north side above this core.
19:41
Directed energy weapons are not going to blow an elevator car up
19:46
and out of its shaft being down the hall.
19:51
So what can do that? Well, explosions like are that
19:54
are heard by Mayor Giuliani's attorney, Michael Hess and Barry
19:58
Jennings, who were going into this building.
20:02
They were late. They didn't realize the building
20:03
had been evacuated, but they're being called to the Emergency
20:07
Office of Emergency Management OEM.
20:11
And they get up there and they're told get out of there.
20:14
We've evacuated that building for a reason.
20:17
And here is their experience on the way down.
20:20
When we got to the 8th floor I started walking to one side of
20:24
the building. That side of the building was
20:27
gone. The first explosion I heard when
20:28
I was on the stairwell landing. When we made it down to the 6th
20:32
floor. Then we made it back to the 8th
20:34
floor, I heard some more explosions.
20:37
Also the sound like a boom, like a like an explosion.
20:42
So he's hearing explosions that are blowing him from the 6th
20:45
floor back up into the 8th floor.
20:47
As he describes it, explosions that are localized in the
20:51
building affecting their lives. This is not directed energy
20:55
weapon. This is a witness of two
20:57
witnesses of explosions. And this is not a nuclear weapon
21:01
going off. These are isolated explosions.
21:05
We have foreknowledge of this building's collapse.
21:07
If we allowed it to burn, could we anticipate A collapse?
21:11
Says Chief Hayden to this anonymous engineer who we're
21:17
told had put a transit on the building and they're monitoring
21:21
A bulge. Well, he says it's pretty much
21:23
right on the money, and it's cute.
21:25
Current state, you have about 5 hours.
21:27
Wait a minute, never before in history has a steel frame fire
21:32
protected structure ever come down due to fire and now they're
21:35
telling not only is this one going to come down for the first
21:37
time ever, but it's going to come down in about 5 hours and
21:41
it does. They won't release the name of
21:44
this engineer. It could.
21:46
Prediction could only have been made with foreknowledge.
21:50
So we also have one of the top European controlled demolition
21:57
experts, Danny. Jowenko is the expert on this in
22:01
Europe. What did he say?
22:03
Did this controlled? Demolition Sankovated.
22:07
Sankovated, but it's now a score.
22:11
There's an object to build. There's a team for the Alvin
22:14
Express. Interesting.
22:17
A team of experts did this. OK, so he knows what he's
22:20
looking at. He's expert in bringing
22:23
buildings down. Well, there are three dozen
22:25
structural engineers who agree signed on to the petition
22:30
demanding a new investigation. A localized failure in a steel
22:33
frame building like World Trade Center 7 cannot cause a
22:36
catastrophic collapse like a House of Cards without a
22:40
simultaneous and pattern loss of several of its columns at key
22:45
locations within the building. Are directed energy weapons
22:50
capable of targeting those those 82 columns on each of 47 floors?
22:56
How about nuclear weapons? No.
22:58
This caught the attention of Professor Leroy Halsey who did a
23:01
a four year analysis of this building.
23:04
What was his conclusion That in order to take out the bring this
23:10
building on the left in their computer model, the dynamic
23:14
analysis and have it look like the video, the collapse in the
23:20
center, they had to take all the columns out is in their
23:24
essential findings. Fire didn't cause the collapse
23:27
of this building. The temperatures were not high
23:28
enough to cause the weakening of the steel framing.
23:31
Thermal expansion did not result in a loss of support for the
23:34
beams and girders. When he says the temperature was
23:37
not high enough to cause the weakening the steel framing,
23:40
he's talking about the NIST theory.
23:42
He's challenging the NIST theory, which is collapsed by
23:45
fire. Those fires were not hot enough,
23:48
but as we'll see, there's plenty of heat, which is unaccountable
23:51
for from directed energy weapons because that's a cool event.
23:55
According to its proponents, which we'll get to, the collapse
23:59
of World Trade Center was a global failure involving what?
24:03
The near simultaneous failure of every column in the building,
24:06
not a progressive collapse, has claimed by NIST.
24:11
Well, we have to look and see what could have brought this
24:13
building down in the way that it was.
24:17
Well, we have evidence of extreme heat produced by none
24:23
other than FEMA in the Building Performance Assessment Team
24:26
report in May of 2002 in this metallurgical examination of the
24:30
steel at World Trade Center 7 where they document never before
24:36
observed intergranular melting. Melting steel takes 3000°F,
24:44
which is capable of turning a solid steel girder into Swiss
24:48
cheese like you see in this piece of World Trade Center 7
24:52
steel. This is not eroded by the
24:58
Hutchinson effect. This is typical thermite
25:03
erosion, degradation of steel by melting at high temperatures,
25:08
which thermite causes, producing silver dollar size holes in
25:13
here, rapid oxidation and sulfidation, neither of which is
25:18
an effect by the Hutchinson effect, liquid iron, that's
25:24
molten iron, that's 3000°F iron temperatures which are denied by
25:29
the directed energy weapons proponents.
25:32
Sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel.
25:37
So sulfur is a key component here.
25:40
Interesting. We'll come back to that.
25:42
The New York Times says it's probably the deepest mystery
25:45
uncovered in the investigation yet.
25:48
NIST, when they took over this investigation, they threw out
25:53
most of this report and, and, and hid it because it's not
25:58
consistent with their reality. Steel members in the debris pile
26:02
appear to have been partly evaporated in extraordinarily
26:08
high temperatures, says the author of that report.
26:11
One of them, Richard, excuse me. This is Jonathan Barnett, Fire
26:17
Protection engineer. Guess what it takes to evaporate
26:20
steel? Dean, 4000°.
26:23
Where is this heat coming from? It's denied by the directed
26:27
energy weapons proponents. Maybe it's coming from nuclear
26:30
weapons. We'll see.
26:32
But wow, let let me ask real quick too.
26:36
Now this is on the heels too. I I should give some current
26:39
updates. Rudy Giuliani, who had a big
26:43
role in what you know, the the days to months and years
26:47
following 911. But even the day of he was just
26:51
hit in a near fatal car accident, I believe just in the
26:54
past 48 hours. I got to.
26:55
I got to keep rolling. Dean, I'm going to.
26:57
Yeah. I just wanted to say that the
27:00
melted steel and how do we know how long that was melting for
27:05
and how long was it keep three months to the steel was.
27:09
That's what I've been hearing. The fires were burning for that
27:11
long. This is incredible.
27:14
And this is used as evidence in the nuclear weapons theory.
27:17
It's denied altogether by the directed energy weapons theory.
27:21
But thermite has its own source of oxygen.
27:24
It could burn underwater, which is incredible.
27:28
And it's survivability for that long is especially in
27:34
nanothermite with these unburned ships that we're going to be
27:36
looking at. OK, I'll just keep going and
27:39
I'll just, I'll, I'll write down my questions.
27:41
Go ahead. This this structural engineer,
27:43
because I know we have a hard stop in 90 minutes.
27:45
Well, now an hour, so I'm rushing.
27:48
I saw melting of girders in the World Trade Center.
27:53
How do we get melting of girders?
27:56
We, we, we, we have 3000°F temperatures, says this
28:01
structural engineering. He says, Well, it must have
28:03
melted underneath in the pile, which is ludicrous because it,
28:08
well, it, it what? What's happening is these
28:12
incredible temperatures are going on during the collapse of
28:16
this building. As we'll show you, we can tell
28:19
the temperature of molten steel and iron by its color, its
28:25
emissivity. We know this is exceeding 2500°
28:29
with bright yellow, and even hotter than that 'cause it's
28:32
white hot below. Well, how do we get 2500°
28:35
temperatures? There's nothing in the official
28:37
narrative, there's nothing in the directed energy weapons
28:39
theory to account for this. The jet fuel doesn't account for
28:43
this. It burns only 600°F in open air,
28:46
and jet fuel isn't even a factor in building 7.
28:48
But now we're talking about this evidence of extreme heat, which
28:51
applies to the Twin Towers as well.
28:55
And there's several sources of this 600° maximum temperature of
29:00
burning jet fuel in open air. So some say it's twice that.
29:06
OK, So what? They're still missing two to
29:10
three times the temperatures required to melt steel, 3000°.
29:15
Office fires only get at their absolute worst, 18130°.
29:19
Most of them are only 500 to 1000°.
29:22
So none of this evidence, none of the theories put forth by the
29:30
government, certainly by the directed energy weapons folks,
29:34
can account for this. Thermite can account for it.
29:38
What is thermite anyway? An incendiary used by the
29:42
military, thermite is a compound of iron oxide and aluminum
29:47
which, when ignited, sustains an extreme heat reaction, creating
29:51
molten iron. In just two seconds, thermite
29:55
can reach temperatures over 4500°F, quite enough to liquefy
30:01
steel. We know that open air fires
30:05
cannot burn hot enough to melt steel, but metal had melted at
30:10
the base of the towers. Appendix C of the FEMA report
30:15
describes sulfur residues on the World Trade Center Steel.
30:20
The New York Times called this the deepest mystery of all.
30:24
Sulfur slightly lowers the melting point of iron, and iron
30:28
oxide and iron sulfide had formed on the surface of the
30:32
structural steel. Sulfur used with thermite is
30:36
called thermate, producing even faster results.
30:40
Maybe we're getting somewhere here because if thermite were
30:44
used it would explain the presence of sulfur.
30:46
There is no other explanation for it in the DEW or mini nukes
30:52
theories. It would explain the presence of
30:54
4000° temperatures, which is denied by the DEW folks, and it
30:59
would explain the presence of molten iron, which we're going
31:02
to be looking at right now, which is permeated throughout
31:07
all the World Trade Center dust examined by the US Geological
31:11
Survey in their 2005 Particle Atlas of the World Trade Center
31:14
Dust. What do they find?
31:16
Billions of previously molten. That's 3000° iron, not steel,
31:24
not dustified steel. There's no steel dust found in
31:31
the dust by the US Geological Survey or RJ Lee, who's also
31:36
studied the dust, as you'll see. So no, these, this is melted
31:41
iron. How do they get spherical?
31:44
Well, aerosolized liquids form themselves into spheres.
31:48
In the case of molten iron, they cool, they fall with all of the
31:53
dust as And that could be what's toasting the tops of the cars
32:00
around the World Trade Center. Liquid falling molten iron
32:04
droplets as small as a 16th of an inch and smaller the.
32:12
The EPA says we don't know what this stuff is or where it came
32:15
from, but it's a signature component.
32:18
It's used to distinguish common office dust from World Trade
32:24
Center does. In other words, it's not even
32:26
World Trade Center does unless it has all of these previously
32:30
molten iron microspheres in it. They account for up to 6% of
32:36
these samples. The official narrative denies
32:39
these completely. Molten iron up to 4 tons all
32:48
together by extrapolation throughout all the World Trade
32:50
Center dust. RJ Lee Group, an environmental
32:56
consulting firm, says they're formed during the event, not
33:02
before, by the welders putting the building together, not
33:06
afterward by the iron workers taking the building apart, but
33:10
during the event. They're very clear what
33:13
happened. Well, you know what, Dean?
33:15
We can do an experiment. Experiment is the arbiter of
33:19
competing hypotheses. This was not done in the book.
33:24
Where did the towers go? What we see when we burn
33:29
thermite is molten iron microspheres that are that cool
33:34
and fall in the pan as such. And yes, if that were falling on
33:40
cars, could it toast them? You bet.
33:43
What else could toast cars? Melted molybdenum, a metal which
33:47
was found by the US Geological Survey in this this periodical
33:52
table of the elements. It it melts at 47153°.
33:57
They have found and documented heat proving through all of
34:02
these examples of evidence, but it's the highest 1 is this one
34:07
4700°F. This is completely denied, not
34:12
dealt with, ignored by the directed energy weapons people.
34:17
It might be found created by nuclear weapons, but we'll get
34:20
to that. Lead evaporated lead doesn't
34:24
evaporate till 3200°. This is documented.
34:28
And they say the presence of lead oxide on the surface of the
34:30
mineral wool indicates the existence of extremely high
34:34
temperatures during the collapse, which caused metallic
34:38
lead to volatilize, oxidize and finally condense on the surface
34:42
of the mineral wool. All of these temperatures are
34:46
systematically denied by the DEW people, and they suggest somehow
34:53
that the toasting of these tops of these cars is done by an
34:56
exotic weapon. Well, just look at them.
35:02
That's heat that does that. Cooling, falling liquid, molten
35:07
iron droplets. Speaking of heat, the dust cloud
35:12
hits US, then it gets real hot. It felt like it was going to
35:16
light up almost. These are witnesses of hot
35:20
clouds running from the hot clouds.
35:23
A wave, a hot solid black wave of heat threw me down the block.
35:28
None of these quotes are in. Where did the towers go when I
35:32
was running? Some hot stuff went down my back
35:35
because I didn't have time to put my coat on and I had some,
35:38
well I guess between 1st and 2nd degree burns on my back and then
35:43
we're engulfed in the smoke, which was horrendous.
35:46
One thing I remember it was hot. The smoke was hot and that
35:50
scared me. I remember making it into the
35:54
tunnel. It was incredibly amount of
35:56
wind, debris, heat, all denied by DDDEW folks.
36:03
A huge, huge blast of hot wind gusting and smoke and dust and
36:07
all kinds of debris hit me. The Super hot wind blew and just
36:12
got dark as night. You know you couldn't breathe.
36:17
Well, all of that was a summary only of the evidence, which we
36:22
have a whole hour of on extreme heat and witnesses thereof,
36:27
including firefighters who are describing the hot molten iron.
36:34
Well, they call it molten steel flowing down the channel rails
36:38
like lava from a volcano. We have many witnesses of that.
36:45
I don't, I can't put them all in here 'cause we're in such a
36:47
rush. But all of that was evidence of
36:50
ignited thermite and can only be that.
36:53
Is there any evidence of unignited thermite?
36:56
Well, here's Niels Herod from Copenhagen, chemistry professor,
37:00
team of eight international scientists documents 7
37:04
independently connected samples. They find red grayed ships, red
37:08
on one side, Gray on the other. They are curious because they
37:12
are attracted by a magnet, so they have a high iron content.
37:17
Well, interesting primer paint has iron in it, but not it is
37:22
not attracted by a magnet. They get real real curious.
37:25
They zoom in or analyze the red layer with XEDSX ray energy
37:30
dispersive spectroscopy and what do they find?
37:33
They find aluminum and oops and iron, the ingredients of
37:42
thermite. What are the ingredient and
37:44
manganese ingredients of thermate?
37:48
What are the ingredients manganese has added to thermite
37:52
and it helps it become thermate much more effective at cutting
37:56
through steel as a eutectic mixture, which was found and
38:00
documented by FEMA in their Appendix C that we talked about.
38:05
Well, fascinating. What is the ingredients of
38:08
thermite doing in the red layer? They get real curious.
38:11
They zoom in 50,000 times with an electron microscope and they
38:17
find nano sized particles, particles of aluminum and iron
38:22
oxide, the ingredients of thermite that are 1000 times
38:26
smaller than the diameter of a human hair.
38:31
Interesting. They're set in a matrix, a bed
38:34
of oxygen, silica, carbon. This is unmistakable.
38:41
They go, what is the stuff we've we've come across?
38:44
Oh, it's super thermite. Lawrence Livermore lab developed
38:47
this before 2001. It's called super thermite.
38:53
We see when you get these particles so small, the the
38:57
surface volume increases exponentially and you've
39:00
engineered an incendiary which works by means of heat, massive
39:04
heat, 4005 thousand degree heat, which is the only explanation
39:12
for all the extreme heat that we have been looking at in this
39:16
summary. And they've engineered it to
39:19
become more explosive. Explosives work by knocking
39:22
things over, by expanding of gases, and that's what you have
39:26
here, the expansion of organic material in the oxygen, silica
39:31
and carbon, and that knocks things over.
39:35
It's very interesting stuff. In the lab at Lawrence Livermore
39:39
Lab, they in a differential scanning calorimeter, they can
39:43
actually ignite it and measure the resulting heat that comes
39:47
off of it. And guess what?
39:49
It's an exothermic reaction. That's exactly what the samples
39:51
from the Niels Herritt team did. So they know that this is a
39:59
thermitic response is not paint. Paint doesn't have these exotic
40:05
properties. And what do you think happens
40:08
when it ignites? It produces molten iron
40:15
microspheres with the same chemical signature as the molten
40:21
iron microspheres found and produced by USGS and RJ Lee in
40:27
all of their studies. This is not this is all ignored
40:32
in the DEW theory in the book Where Did the Towers Go?
40:37
In fact, the denial of thermite is on page 124.
40:42
The denial of heat in fire is on page 257.
40:46
The denial of these extreme temperatures, which we've been
40:48
looking at irrefutable overwhelming evidence for is
40:52
denied on page 263 to 265 and 370.
40:57
The denial of the witnesses of molten metal on page 270 skewing
41:02
their words, saying they don't know what they're talking about.
41:05
Denial of witnesses of a hot dust clouds occurring on page
41:09
299 and 480 of where did the towers go?
41:14
The denial of the heat source of the previously molten iron
41:17
microspheres which we just looked at is denied on page 332,
41:22
suggesting that this was somehow a cold event.
41:26
The denial of the heat induced steel beam warping that can only
41:36
be produced by 4 and 5000° temperatures in the building 7
41:41
steel been, particularly the twin tower steel coming up
41:44
denied on page 465 S as if we didn't know where those
41:52
previously molten iron microspheres have come from.
41:55
They are found attached to partially ignited red Gray chips
42:02
as you see here and here. So it's not a question where
42:08
they came from. The question is why are they
42:12
located in the dust? This is not made in a cave in
42:16
Afghanistan. This is made only in the most
42:18
sophisticated advanced defense contracting laboratories.
42:21
Wow. Wow.
42:23
I've never heard that before. That that that is something
42:26
we're going to skip this network break and we're going to
42:28
continue on because now we're really getting into things I've
42:32
never heard about with great detail before.
42:34
So continue on. Richard.
42:37
The conclusion of this report in the Bentham Open Chemical
42:41
Physics Journal in 2009 states that the red layer is active,
42:47
unreacted thermitic material incorporating nanotechnology.
42:51
It's a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive
42:54
material. This stands uncontested.
42:56
Nobody submitted their own peer reviewed paper to contest these
43:00
results, and they're not dealt with in Where did the Towers Go?
43:08
So we've looked at the 10 key characteristic features of
43:12
controlled demolition appearing in Building 7.
43:14
Fire doesn't create any one of these.
43:16
Directed energy doesn't create any one of these.
43:19
Many nuclear weapons are not going to create any.
43:23
But the extreme heat, which we'll look at with additional
43:27
circumstantial evidence and corroborative testimony.
43:31
And by the way, the fires and and can't create any of these
43:35
features, let alone all of them. We find this to be proof of
43:39
controlled demolition, a body of proof that's convinced 3600
43:44
architects and engineers to sign on to the petition demanding a
43:48
new investigation based on this evidence, how many engineers
43:54
have signed on to where did the towers go?
43:57
Or the many nuclear weapons? So we got to look at the towers
44:02
then, right? Because if Building 7 was a
44:05
controlled demolition and the twin towers obviously are are
44:09
suspect by default. Look at them upward, outward
44:14
arching streamers, a geometry of fireworks freely flying.
44:21
Structural steel sections weighing 4 and 8 tons laterally
44:27
ejected at 80 miles an hour, clocked by physicists, landing
44:33
up to 600 feet in every direction.
44:37
All of that is not dealt with by the where did and where did the
44:42
towers go? None of it is.
44:47
Now maybe the mini nuclear weapons can say, oh really?
44:50
It looks like a nuclear weapon going off.
44:52
We're still coming to that. But why are these structural
44:57
steel sections trailing thick white smoke clouds?
45:03
Steel is not flammable in office fire conditions.
45:10
Well, we've proven that thermite is operative here.
45:13
Let's look at the other byproduct of thermite in
45:16
addition to molten iron. Thick white smoke clouds.
45:23
So now we know why the Twin Towers look like an erupting
45:31
volcanic event. Let's look and see if it has any
45:36
of the features of controlled demolition.
45:38
Beginning with, Is there a sudden onset?
45:41
Well, yeah. The building is at rest, and all
45:43
of a sudden it's in uniform downward motion.
45:46
No jolt, no hesitation upon impact of the cold, hard steel
45:52
below. Same as the South tower, it's at
45:57
rest, and all of a sudden it's in uniform downward.
46:00
Smooth motion. How are we going to make sense
46:04
out of this? We're told that the upper part
46:06
drove the rest of the building down to the ground and then
46:08
destroyed itself. Let's see if that's happening.
46:13
It's not happening. In fact, I'm going to make it
46:15
easier for you. Look at the lower red line, the
46:17
point of plane impacts. The upper part is not driving
46:21
anything down to the ground. It's being destroyed in the
46:25
first couple of seconds here. Fascinating, huh?
46:31
What's destroying it? We're we've been looking at some
46:35
evidence of what that is, but if it were there and driving the
46:39
rest of the building down, we'd see it in the photographs and
46:42
the videos. But it's not there.
46:46
None of them show an upper section driving the rest of the
46:48
building down to the ground. It's gone, as I mentioned, in
46:51
the first couple of seconds. If it were there, it would have
46:58
destroyed these few remaining core columns standing 900 feet
47:04
in the air for six seconds. But no, something else is going
47:11
on. There's a destructive force
47:13
blowing it out and away from these few remaining core
47:18
columns, and they survive for about 6 seconds, and then they
47:22
descend frame by frame. You can see the top of this
47:26
bill, this core column set through the concrete powder
47:31
which has been shaken off of it by presumably another explosion.
47:37
Yes, there's a lot of concrete powder.
47:39
No, there is no steel dust. No, this interior column is not
47:48
turning to dust before your eyes.
47:52
It is dropping straight down through the concrete powder
47:57
that's been shaken off of it. And we're tired of hearing
48:04
magical fantasies that prop up theories that have no evidence
48:11
to support them. I'm referring to DEW.
48:14
There, Look at it. Which one's the volcano?
48:18
Which one's building? I think that's the North Tower.
48:23
Upward, outward arching streamers, a geometry of
48:29
fireworks freely flying solid molten objects trailing thick
48:39
white smoke clouds of aluminum oxide.
48:46
Yeah, I'll make it easier for you.
48:47
The volcanic eruption's on the right, 2009, in the Tongan Sea.
48:52
So this is not what they told us.
48:55
It's not the upper part crushing the lower part and then crushing
48:59
itself, which is put to us by Sedentic Bazan of of
49:03
Northwestern University in Chicago, A false theory which is
49:06
used today as the key theoretical basis for NIST's
49:11
column failure theory. No thanks to John Cole, who's
49:15
giving us a great theory. What we're seeing is explosions,
49:20
and we're going to hear the witnesses of those explosions,
49:24
all of which again are denied by the DEW proponents.
49:29
Explosions blowing the building out and away from the core that
49:35
remains for six seconds 900 feet in the air.
49:41
Feature #2 do we have patterned explosions?
49:43
Well, yeah, we got to look at see what, what's really going on
49:46
here. There's 156 first responders of
49:50
witnesses of explosions in the 12,000 pages of testimony that
49:54
was hidden from us by the New York City until the New York
49:58
Court State of Appeals forced them to release it.
50:02
And it's these are all on the website today.
50:06
Professor Graham McQueen read all 12,000 pages of the
50:09
testimony. He found 156 of them.
50:13
Witnesses of explosions. I could read all of them to you,
50:16
but I don't have time. But you can read them all if you
50:19
care to not cherry pick your evidence.
50:23
And where did the towers go and deny the veracity of these
50:28
witnesses. Just listen to them.
50:30
We felt the ground shake. You could see the towers sway.
50:33
And then it just came down. You can hear this order of
50:36
events again and again. They're seeing something,
50:38
they're feeling something. They're hearing something about
50:41
explosions before the towers collapse.
50:46
All of a sudden the ground just started shaking.
50:48
Felt like a train running under my feet.
50:50
The next thing we know, we look up and the tower is collapsing.
50:53
Shook my bones. Shortly before the 1st tower
50:57
came down. I remember feeling the ground
50:58
shaking. I heard a terrible noise.
51:01
And then debris just started flying everywhere.
51:06
I saw flash, flash, flash at the lower level of the building.
51:08
You know, like when they demolish a building with each
51:12
popping sound initially in orange and then a red flash came
51:15
out of the building. Then it would just go all the
51:17
way around the building on both sides.
51:20
Saw a number of brief light sources being emitted from
51:23
inside the building. Between floors 10 and 15, you
51:26
saw about six of these brief flashes accompanied by a
51:29
crackling sound before the tower collapsed.
51:35
Now, they're not describing a nuclear explosion.
51:40
They're not describing the weakening of the steel by some
51:45
proposed fantastical theory that somehow they scaled up the
51:52
Hutchinson effect hundreds of thousands of times and can
51:57
target these specific floors in order to make this building come
52:03
down fairly symmetrically. I saw low level flashes.
52:09
I saw flash, flash, flash. And then it looked like the
52:13
building came down. An explosion appeared at the
52:16
very top simultaneously from all four sides.
52:18
Materials shot out horizontally, and then there seemed to be a
52:23
momentary delay before you could see the beginning of the
52:31
collapse. None of these explosions are a
52:38
part of the official narrative. None of them are a part of the
52:42
DEW narrative, and we're still coming to the nuclear narrative.
52:48
There was an explosion in the South tower, one floor under
52:51
another. When it hit about the 5th floor,
52:54
I figure it was a bomb because it looked like a synchronized,
52:59
deliberate kind of thing. Synchronized nuclear weapons go
53:02
off all at once, and they're big booms and they're bright
53:11
flashes, many times brighter than the sun.
53:17
And Jim and I are going to talk about this during the debate.
53:21
It seemed like on television when they blow up these
53:23
buildings, it seemed like it was going all the way around, like a
53:26
belt. All these explosions, they're
53:28
describing small series of explosions.
53:38
Building was blowing out on all four sides.
53:40
You actually heard the pops, you know, You heard the pops of the
53:43
building. I thought the terrorist planted
53:45
explosives somewhere in the building.
53:46
That's how loud it was. A crackling explosive, another
53:51
loud boom at the upper floors, and then a series of smaller
53:54
explosions. How many nuclear weapons are
53:57
being outfitted in this building and how how, how small are they?
54:02
Jim and I will talk about that. Another loud earth shattering
54:06
blast with a large fireball that blew out more debris.
54:10
Numerous explosions by those witnesses, the lower level of
54:14
the building. You know, like when they
54:15
demolish a building. That's what I thought I saw.
54:18
You see any flashes? I said, yeah, I thought it was
54:21
just me. He said, no, I saw them too.
54:24
Multiple flashes, not one big flash.
54:28
Everybody, I think at that point still thought these things were
54:30
blown up. So I was fully expecting
54:32
anything else to blow up. You were there when the planes
54:34
hit? No, I was there when the
54:36
building exploded. You mean when it fell down?
54:40
No, when it exploded. He's damn sure what he saw,
54:46
heard and experienced. As are the 36 reporters who
54:51
focused their reports on explosions.
54:55
We have many of them for you to to play.
55:00
Here they are, but as. I was looking up, I saw the
55:05
entire explosion. It looked exactly like the first
55:07
two, but we certainly had the most perfect vantage point for
55:11
that explosion. It was unbelievable.
55:13
There has just. Been a huge explosion.
55:16
We can see a billowing smoke rising and I can't, I'll, I'll
55:22
tell you that I can't see that second tower towers.
55:31
We're not sure exactly what happened, but it was another
55:33
explosion on the far side of one of the buildings from where
55:35
we're standing the the reverberation and another
55:38
explosion on the right hand side.
55:43
On the far side of the building there seemed to be another
55:45
explosion, and also on the right hand side there was also another
55:49
explosion. When I sure that was extra
55:51
reverberation from what happened at the World Trade Center, but
55:54
that was an added explosion. We heard a very loud blasted
55:57
explosion. We looked up and the building
56:01
literally began to collapse before us.
56:04
Again, there has been a second explosion here in Manhattan at
56:10
the at the Trade Center, we are and.
56:12
Believe it or not, there was another major explosion.
56:14
The build, the building itself, literally atop of it, came down,
56:18
sending smoke and debris everywhere.
56:20
Do you know? If it was an explosion or if it
56:21
was a building collapse, to me it sounded like it.
56:25
To me it sounded like an explosion, a huge explosion, a
56:29
huge rumbling cloud. We're taking photographs and
56:32
securing this area just prior to that huge explosion that we all
56:37
heard and felt but it. Literally exploded and came down
56:41
as though it had been hit. He.
56:42
Heard an explosion. Explosion happened with shooting
56:45
pieces of the plane. There are pieces of the plane on
56:48
Church St. There's another explosion as we
56:51
speak. Something either exploded or
56:53
fell at the side of the one building that was attacked.
56:56
Then the. Entire top of the building just
56:58
blew. Up and just seconds.
56:59
Ago there was a huge explosion and it appears right now the
57:02
Second World Trade Tower has just collapsed.
57:05
It was just a small explosion and then rocks and debris and
57:09
everything started pouring down and we're about two blocks away
57:12
when the second explosion hit and all we heard was just a
57:16
small explosion. Then you saw a roar of an, of an
57:19
explosion and all kinds of smoke coming, going out, debris
57:22
falling down. It's unbelievable because you,
57:25
you hear these explosions. In fact, I just heard another
57:28
one. I don't know if it was like an
57:29
after effect or whatnot. Just while you were on the phone
57:32
talking about the school closing, I'm hearing another
57:34
explosion. Just so you know, I'm hearing
57:36
another rumble. And what you can feel when these
57:39
tremors come is that it literally comes up under your
57:41
feet. That's what it feels like.
57:43
I That's the best way I know to describe it, certainly.
57:45
Didn't imagine that there would be second or tertiary
57:47
explosions, so they parked some of their vehicles in those areas
57:50
and many of those vehicles, people in those vehicles.
57:53
Interesting. Some of these voices, well, we
57:55
just heard. Another explosion.
57:56
Go on, I've heard. We'll go on and look at the
57:59
other witnesses of explosions before the towers came down.
58:04
We're talking about Pacific Palisades 20 miles north, which
58:09
FEMA and NIST reports relied on the Columbia University for
58:14
their theory. The official narrative tells us
58:16
that hey, we have we have seismic events occurring at the
58:23
time the planes actually hit the towers and they attributed to
58:28
the planes hitting the towers. We have a a .9 magnitude event
58:34
at the north tower. We have a .7 magnitude event at
58:41
the South tower. When did they really occur?
58:46
We, we, we have identical planes and identical buildings, yet
58:51
very different on on an order of magnitude almost because of the
58:55
logarithmic, logarithmic scale of the seismic data.
59:03
So it doesn't make sense the same plane hitting the same
59:06
building producing quite different results.
59:08
So the seismic signals occurring before the plane impacts in the
59:14
north tower, we have 846 and 26 seconds is when the seismic
59:19
event begins, but the plane doesn't even impact for another
59:22
14 seconds. So how in the world can the
59:27
seismic event be explained by the plane impact?
59:31
It can't. And so NIST says, well, we did
59:34
our own research and we found that the the plane impacts 10
59:40
seconds before, excuse me, that we think the plane impacted 4
59:49
seconds after the seismic event started.
59:52
Well, you're still off by 4 seconds.
59:54
The NTSB radar is accurate to within one second.
59:57
Everybody knows that. So what do they do?
59:59
They go to Columbia University and move their data back 3
1:00:03
seconds and then we don't get that report at all.
1:00:06
What about the South tower? We have the seismic event
1:00:12
occurring at nine O 2 and 54 seconds, but the plane doesn't
1:00:16
even impact here till 17 seconds later.
1:00:20
And this says, oh, no, we don't think we, we don't, we don't
1:00:22
agree with the NTSB radar anymore.
1:00:26
We, we, we looked at the videos we came up and we think that it
1:00:29
happened 12 seconds earlier. Well, you're still off by 5
1:00:33
seconds. Well, again, they moved get
1:00:36
Columbia University to move that data back.
1:00:38
Well, that's darn interesting. What could have produced those
1:00:42
seismic events so far ahead of the plane impact?
1:00:46
Well, we have basement explosions by witnesses denied
1:00:49
again by the in the in the where did the towers go?
1:00:55
Mike Pocoroto says the whole building seemed to shake.
1:00:57
There was a loud explosion. The 2 arrived at the sea level.
1:01:00
They found the machine shop gone.
1:01:02
Nothing there but rubble, but we're talking about a 50 ton
1:01:05
hydraulic press. Gone.
1:01:06
The two made their way to the parking garage, but found that
1:01:08
it too was gone somehow. Steel and concrete fire door
1:01:12
weighed 300 lbs, wrinkled up like a piece of aluminum foil
1:01:16
and lying on the floor. A bomb had gone off in the
1:01:20
building before the planes hit the towers, and that's
1:01:23
documented by the janitor, Supervisor Willie Rodriguez.
1:01:27
The lobby first, then a plane hit the building the.
1:01:31
Bomb hit the lobby first and a couple of seconds in the first
1:01:34
plane. Hit interesting and and of
1:01:37
course William Rodriguez is has many witnesses backing up his
1:01:41
story that they're in the sea level of the basement and down
1:01:45
below they they heard a big explosion push them up and then
1:01:50
about 7 seconds later he hears BA from up above the plane that
1:01:55
that then hit and and there are people that are injured.
1:01:58
The skin was torn off 1 gentleman.
1:02:02
So we have to go to experts who are willing to not lie to us.
1:02:05
Like Andre Rousseau, applied geophysics expert, author of
1:02:09
more than 50 peer reviewed papers, who says the frequency
1:02:12
of the Raleigh waves attributed by LDEO to the plane impacts
1:02:16
were only on the order of 1 Hertz.
1:02:19
Aircraft crash impacts produce much higher frequencies, 10 to
1:02:24
100 Hertz. And these frequencies were even
1:02:27
filtered out by the bandpass filters used by the station.
1:02:32
So Andre says the Rousseau says the range of the instruments
1:02:37
can't even measure those frequencies.
1:02:41
The seismic equipment is designed to detect seismic
1:02:43
events like earthquakes and explosions around 1 Hertz.
1:02:48
Well, that's interesting. So the seismic events are are
1:02:51
not from the planes. He says the actual waves
1:02:53
generated by the crash had to have been deadened even before
1:02:56
hitting or working their way down to the ground.
1:03:00
This is the flagpole standing up.
1:03:03
It's not going to generate transfer all of that energy into
1:03:07
the ground and 20 miles away. So now we have to look at the
1:03:11
seismic events that occurred near the time of the collapse,
1:03:14
which of course NIST attributes to the collapse.
1:03:18
And we have a 2.1 magnitude event at the South tower and a
1:03:23
2.3 magnitude event at the north tower, again, very different
1:03:27
magnitudes. Let's look at them.
1:03:29
The surface waves come at 1028 and 31 seconds that morning.
1:03:35
The tower starts descending about 9 seconds before that.
1:03:39
The first debris hits the ground about that time, but the
1:03:43
heaviest debris doesn't hit the ground till about four seconds
1:03:47
later. So how can the heaviest debris
1:03:50
create a seismic impact? Well, this says, well, we're
1:03:54
going to talk to Columbia University and get them to move
1:03:57
their data back again, 3 seconds, no report, no
1:04:01
accountable accounting to the public, but they completely
1:04:04
ignore the very well defined primary wave and shear waves
1:04:09
that are occurring even before the tower starts descending.
1:04:17
What can cause those waves which are not background seismic
1:04:24
activity 4 seconds before? Oh, we're going to find out
1:04:30
because explosions, which is consistent with the 156 first
1:04:37
responders are detected by cameras that are on the ground
1:04:44
here at the South tower and the north tower.
1:04:52
Excuse me and, and, and you just saw the shake.
1:04:55
So that shake occurs. The tower hasn't come down yet.
1:04:58
No, it shakes about the time the witnesses heard explosions
1:05:02
corroborating their testimony. How about at the north tower
1:05:07
from a tripod mounted camera on top of a roof looking at the
1:05:12
building and there is the shake. And about 10 seconds later this
1:05:19
building comes down just like the north tower comes down
1:05:26
there. So fascinating.
1:05:29
What about the South tower? We have the event occurring at
1:05:34
9:59 and O 4 seconds. The tower starts collapsing 5
1:05:39
seconds before that, but the first debris doesn't even hit
1:05:43
the ground for another 7 seconds.
1:05:46
And the So what, what, what does NIST do with that?
1:05:49
They said, well, we looked at the, our, our videos and we
1:05:53
think that the, the, the, the, the, the debris, we think that
1:06:03
the seismic event occurred 3 seconds later.
1:06:06
Again, no report. Well, what could have produced
1:06:09
the event again with above normal, above background seismic
1:06:17
activity 4 seconds before, 3 seconds before the start of the
1:06:23
actual collapse of the building. Well, this, this would
1:06:29
corroborate also the first responders.
1:06:34
Does anything corroborate the the seismic data?
1:06:39
Yeah, we have in the South tower a tripod mounted camera that's
1:06:46
shaking 3 seconds before and it's very subtle.
1:06:50
That's it right there. I didn't move the camera And
1:06:54
three seconds later this is publicly available for
1:06:56
everybody. The building comes down.
1:06:59
So corroborating the first responders, the official
1:07:04
narrative tells us, oh, this is due to the debris hitting the
1:07:06
ground, but we just saw that's impossible.
1:07:08
But in also also it's not hitting the ground.
1:07:11
These four and a ton structural steel sections are peppering the
1:07:14
ground one at a time. It's ludicrous to compare the
1:07:20
seismic activity from these towers, which are not crashing
1:07:26
onto the ground, but blowing out with individual freely flying
1:07:31
structural steel sections peppering not even the ground,
1:07:35
but the diaphragm, the Plaza deck, the concrete deck.
1:07:40
So and they and they hit over a period of 15 seconds, they're
1:07:46
not even going to even produce a seismic event.
1:07:50
And they're equally distributed over the entire super block of
1:07:55
the World Trade Center. No, this is not the King Dome,
1:08:01
which is very different as as we'll see.
1:08:08
And one of these is 1.6 times greater in energy than the
1:08:13
other. We're talking about a 2.1 versus
1:08:16
a 2.3 on the logarithmic scale, 1.6.
1:08:20
And that makes no sense given the identical buildings and
1:08:25
nearly identical collapses. They could, they could have such
1:08:29
great energy differences unless there were different quantities
1:08:34
of explosives in the building for some reason.
1:08:38
And that's what Andre Rousseau comes up with in 2012.
1:08:44
So we then go to feature #3 is there a straight down
1:08:48
symmetrical progression? By the way, the Seattle Kingdom
1:08:54
is a 25 ton concrete roof which does fall to the ground and
1:09:02
produce I think it was over A2 magnitude.
1:09:07
So that indeed is going to register on the Richter scale at
1:09:12
that quality at that magnitude. So we have a straight down
1:09:20
symmetrical collapse. Well, the South tower begins to
1:09:24
actually tip over. It's tipping over at 22°.
1:09:28
So we have asymmetrical loading on the structure below.
1:09:30
Asymmetrical damage from the building, from the broken
1:09:34
columns, from the plane, asymmetrical damage from the
1:09:37
fires. How in the world then do we get
1:09:45
complete symmetrical damage all the way around each face of the
1:09:51
building just like the firefighters described?
1:09:55
It makes no sense given the all the asymmetry up above.
1:10:03
What are we looking at? Are we looking at directed
1:10:06
energy weapons taking out each floor of columns A 1/10 of a
1:10:11
second and then the next floor directed energy weapons removing
1:10:17
the the weakness without explosions which were heard by
1:10:22
all of these first responders? Or are we looking at a nuclear
1:10:29
weapon which somehow ignited down below, maybe in the
1:10:35
basement if you go with the Kala Dmitry Kalasov theory or
1:10:40
suitcase nukes up above? No, this is floor by floor,
1:10:46
individual pre precisely synchronized explosions.
1:10:53
Let's zoom in on the leading corner of these explosions.
1:10:58
In this looped video, what do we see?
1:11:01
Individual explosions which must have been preplaced floor by
1:11:09
floor. You can see them.
1:11:12
You can see the squibs or isolated explosive ejection
1:11:15
occurring down below. This is not a nuclear weapon
1:11:19
going off. This is hundreds if not
1:11:23
thousands of individual explosions that are, as we'll,
1:11:30
as we've seen, thermite based and most likely high energy
1:11:36
explosions and explosives as you'll as you'll see, and many
1:11:43
of them are mistimed isolated explosive ejections called
1:11:46
squibs in the controlled demolition industry.
1:11:49
Here we see them occurring as far down as 20 stories below, 40
1:11:54
stories below the zone of destruction.
1:11:58
They occur even as far down as 60 stories down below.
1:12:03
There's no accounting for these phenomena whatsoever in the
1:12:08
directed energy weapons hypothesis, which is why they
1:12:11
never talk about it. These are not nuclear weapons
1:12:16
going off way down below here either.
1:12:21
They can only be preplaced and probably mistimed explosions.
1:12:27
Here on the left side of the South tower, as it begins to
1:12:29
lean right, you see a dozen of these isolated explosive
1:12:33
ejections ejecting out of the towers themselves.
1:12:41
And then we have the lateral ejection of those structural
1:12:44
steel sections weighing 4 and 8 tons impaling themselves in
1:12:50
buildings up to 600 feet away. This is incredible explosive
1:12:57
force hurling these freely flying structural steel
1:13:02
sections. That far directed energy weapon
1:13:10
has no capability to do that. At least it hasn't been
1:13:15
produced. It hasn't even been hypothesized
1:13:18
by Doctor Judy Wood. These structural steel sections
1:13:22
have 4 bolt holes at the ends of them.
1:13:26
All the plane had to do was to push in those heavy structural
1:13:33
steel sections. The columns are three stories
1:13:35
tall, welded together by the spandrel panels, and shear off
1:13:42
all 12 bolts that we're looking at here.
1:13:47
Most of these columns were not sliced, and yes, they're ejected
1:13:51
laterally. They are freely flying.
1:13:54
This is not a banana peeling as has been described in the Where
1:14:00
Did the Towers Go book. Look at this one.
1:14:03
It's about to hit Building 7. Let's go back to forward 2.
1:14:08
That's freely flying. What's the energy source that
1:14:13
ejected that section that far and horizontally?
1:14:20
How does gravity work down? How would we expect this
1:14:25
structure to come apart if it were?
1:14:28
Indeed, all the columns were targeted synchronistically timed
1:14:33
by directed energy weapons down it would weaken the steel and it
1:14:38
would just go down. But what we see is out and it is
1:14:44
not a banana peeling, it's about to hit building 7.
1:14:46
And what is a trailing thick white smoke clouds.
1:14:50
Why? Because the aluminum oxide ash,
1:14:54
the other by product of thermite in addition to molten iron is on
1:14:57
the ends of the structural steel sections, all of them.
1:15:02
There's enough energy here by the way to hurl a 200 LB
1:15:05
cannonball 3 miles. This is explosive force with a
1:15:10
1200 foot diameter, actually 1400 foot diameter, blowing
1:15:15
these pieces well beyond the boundaries of Ground Zero.
1:15:17
And by the way, if 100,000 tons or most all of that steel is
1:15:24
distributed outside the footprint, as we can see in this
1:15:30
aerial photography of the site, the steel, the perimeter columns
1:15:38
and core columns are ejected outside of the perimeter.
1:15:42
The north tower there, the South tower here, it didn't disappear.
1:15:47
It didn't turn to dust. There's no steel dust found by
1:15:52
anyone or documented in the Where did the Towers Go book in
1:15:58
the dust. If the steel turned to dust, it
1:16:03
would be in the dust. No, what they do find is
1:16:08
previously molten iron microspheres, about four tons of
1:16:12
them. So what's driving this?
1:16:17
We just have about a few minutes.
1:16:18
I mean, I have to tell. Just inform me.
1:16:20
We got about a good 5 minutes left and this is so compelling.
1:16:25
We may have just, we may have to go even just a little longer if
1:16:29
we can, but this is so compelling.
1:16:31
But go ahead and finish your, your.
1:16:33
Thank you for that. Heads up, Dean, appreciate that.
1:16:36
If 100,000 tons of steel framing is distributed outside the
1:16:38
footprint, you have to ask yourself what's crushing the
1:16:41
building? There's a missing component
1:16:44
here. There's nothing left to crush
1:16:46
the building. That's important.
1:16:48
Maybe it's the concrete 'cause we're missing 110 floors of
1:16:52
concrete. They're not found at the bottom.
1:16:54
You don't see them for an 8 inch thick concrete poured on metal
1:16:58
decking poured on metal decking supported by lightweight steel
1:17:01
trusses. We're looking for pancakes here.
1:17:04
We don't see them. So while I do agree with the
1:17:10
directed energy weapons factoid that there's no pile there,
1:17:21
there's not enough steel here at the bottom.
1:17:22
We saw where the steel went. It went out, didn't disappear in
1:17:27
a real pancake and collapse. We're looking for a pancakes.
1:17:29
This is a 33 story building destroyed by an earthquake.
1:17:33
Its pile is 3-4 times the size the the height of the World
1:17:40
Trade Center pile. Where are the pancakes?
1:17:43
We're looking for pancakes. This 33 story building compared
1:17:47
to 110 story building is 3040 fifty feet tall.
1:17:52
Look at the people on the lower right.
1:17:55
We're missing pancakes. We're missing concrete.
1:17:58
Where'd the? Oh, there's the concrete.
1:18:02
It's pulverized in mid air. What can pulverize 90,000 tons
1:18:09
of concrete is the question. Jim's going to suggest that
1:18:12
nuclear weapons can, and I don't doubt that, but I'm going to
1:18:17
suggest that there are several sources.
1:18:21
The American Society of Testing Materials report C856, which
1:18:25
says that even at temperatures of only 1500°F, concrete turns
1:18:31
to white powder and decomposed hydration products.
1:18:36
That's gravel, sand, cement, paste.
1:18:39
This is documented by others as well.
1:18:41
Concrete specimens subjected to temperatures of 2200°F were
1:18:46
completely decomposed. By what?
1:18:49
Heat? Not explosive detonation speeds,
1:18:54
which Mark Hightower and Jim have criticized for over a dozen
1:19:01
years the capability of nanothermite to do, and for good
1:19:06
reason. But now we know that it's the
1:19:08
heat, not the detonation speed, that's pulverizing the concrete.
1:19:15
That's important. This is not the building turning
1:19:19
to dust. This is concrete powder that's
1:19:22
been pulverized, and now we know why.
1:19:26
It's steel that's been distributed laterally.
1:19:29
By the way, if 90,000 tons of concrete and each building is
1:19:33
pulverized and spread over 3 square miles, what's crushing
1:19:38
the building? It wasn't the steel.
1:19:41
That was a third of the weight of this building.
1:19:43
It's not the concrete. That's another third of the
1:19:47
weight of the building. 2/3 the weight of each building is not
1:19:50
available to crush it. So what?
1:19:54
How did they get these materials in here?
1:19:58
I'm just going to speculate based on the research by Kevin
1:20:01
Ryan and digwithin.net. That they weren't doing fire
1:20:05
proofing upgrades in the months or years before 911.
1:20:07
They were applying liquid applied nanothermite on the
1:20:10
bottom of those concrete slabs, which would then at 4 and 5000°,
1:20:16
evaporate the metal decking, evaporate the steel trusses, and
1:20:21
return the concrete to its original hydration products.
1:20:27
Dry. How else did they have access?
1:20:30
Well, if they had access to the to the elevators, they'd have
1:20:33
access to the core columns and beams in the building.
1:20:35
There's a lot of gypsum board surrounding these hoist ways, so
1:20:40
they'd have to make quite a mess.
1:20:42
And yes, there was a mess in the weeks before 9/11.
1:20:45
It was probably the week leading up to 911.
1:20:48
Every morning I'd come in around 7:00 AM and the dust was
1:20:51
incredible. It was selfie.
1:20:53
It was like the cleaners weren't cleaning right where the windows
1:20:57
were. There was a sill which enclosed
1:21:00
radiators. I was sick to death of the dust
1:21:03
which were appearing on the window sills.
1:21:06
It was dirty, Gray and very, very noticeable.
1:21:10
Very noticeable indeed. Well, Ace Elevator had the
1:21:13
contract. They had 85 employees, but they
1:21:16
were called out to a meeting that day, so they weren't
1:21:20
available to help the firefighters.
1:21:22
They had a a union meeting so they were pulled out to discuss
1:21:26
some business that's convenient. 180,000 tons of steel.
1:21:32
Where did it go? Easily the largest and most
1:21:34
perplexing structural failures in history. 400 truckloads a day
1:21:37
carted off to China before investigators could get their
1:21:40
hands on it. Do a proper forensic
1:21:42
investigation. This is the illegal destruction
1:21:45
of evidence in a crime scene causing many to cry out crucial
1:21:48
evidence could answer many questions.
1:21:50
Is on the slow boat to China, showing an astounding ignorance
1:21:54
of government officials to the value of a thorough scientific
1:21:57
investigation. So we have all the key features
1:22:00
of controlled demolition and twin towers, and some very
1:22:03
uncharacteristic features as well, with additional
1:22:06
circumstantial evidence and corroborative testimony.
1:22:08
None of these features, by the way, can be accounted for by
1:22:11
directed energy weapons, not one of them or NIST's official
1:22:16
theory of fire. And most of them can't buy
1:22:20
nuclear weapons either. So when we have opportunity, Jim
1:22:26
and I are going to talk about no planes and we're going to the
1:22:31
following. Sequence is we're going.
1:22:32
To talk about 53 separate recordings, yeah, that that is
1:22:39
that. That's exciting.
1:22:40
And we unfortunately have to, we have to pull the curtain just a
1:22:45
little bit. But you can catch the main
1:22:47
debate coming this Saturday. But also don't want to miss
1:22:51
Jim's rebuttal to Richard as you can see here this coming
1:22:57
Thursday, Jim Fetzer presents his case for nuclear and what
1:23:01
Richard is wrong and he is right and we can't wait for that.
1:23:05
Richard any kind of final maybe thoughts you want to share with
1:23:09
this worldwide effective audience here at Real Deal
1:23:12
Meeting because everybody is just been so engaged but really
1:23:17
glued to their seat because a lot of this either people maybe
1:23:20
forgot about or really have never heard before.
1:23:23
Final thoughts. Richard Yeah, I I just want to
1:23:27
encourage everyone to do your research thoroughly.
1:23:31
Don't believe something because it sounds futuristic or
1:23:36
something you haven't thought of before.
1:23:38
Critically analyze all the evidence, not just that which is
1:23:43
provided to you in fancy books that are an inch and a half
1:23:47
thick that are full of fantasy. We've got to think critically.
1:23:54
And I'm looking forward to thinking critically with Jim and
1:23:58
going through the evidence on when we have the opportunity on
1:24:02
Saturday at 9:00 PM Eastern on your station, Dean.
1:24:08
And I'm looking forward to seeing Jim's presentation
1:24:13
Thursday. I'm, I'm tickled pink to to have
1:24:21
this discussion, but I'm curious how we can find time to present.
1:24:28
I think what we'll focus on today is what we did and, and
1:24:32
when Jim and I get together, I'll walk through just the
1:24:36
evidence of, of, of, of plain impacts, plain parts picked up,
1:24:43
seeing picked up by Captain Richard Patterson, dozens and
1:24:51
dozens and dozens of plane parts and, and, and talk about why,
1:24:57
what the evidence is for planes definitely hitting the towers,
1:25:01
even though it seems like they couldn't.
1:25:04
I'll try to represent the DEW, you know, and just to let people
1:25:09
know what they're saying, you know, just and when we get to
1:25:11
that segment, but Richard Gage, everybody, how about a round of
1:25:14
applause if you're out there because he's a busy man.
1:25:18
He's one of the hardest working men out there.
1:25:20
Just still pushing the truth about this dreadful day in
1:25:24
American history. So, Richard, thank you for being
1:25:27
here. And I look forward to seeing you
1:25:30
this coming Saturday for this Saturday main event.
1:25:33
It's going to be awesome. And thank you so very much,
1:25:36
Dean. Appreciate you sponsoring this
1:25:38
debate. You bet.
1:25:41
I wish I could do more. OK, Well, there you have it,
1:25:43
everybody. Richard Gage, I want to thank
1:25:46
everybody who's new for finding us, if you can see us or through
1:25:50
all of the censorship and to thank all of our regulars for
1:25:54
being here tonight because this is a most monumental moment for
1:26:00
real deal media, but for this new generation to learn the
1:26:03
truth about what happened that day.
1:26:05
And I tell you, this really makes me upset because it brings
1:26:09
me back because knowing what we all know now and who's behind it
1:26:14
gets me angry. So on that note, until next
1:26:16
time, Fort Richard Gage and everyone else here at Realtor
1:26:19
Medium Team Renzi, thank you for sharing a bit of your night and
1:26:22
always remember to stay tuned and stay awake.
1:26:25
See you tomorrow, everybody. Good night.
1:27:11
The.