Latest / Honey Badger Radio / The CIA: A History Of Disturbing Operations

Transcript

The CIA: A History Of Disturbing Operations · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Coming to you live from a now slushy, crusty, but
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: still very icy and windy where radioactive waistline wasistline. We
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: are the survivors of the alt right apocalypse and the catastrophe,
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: once more, wading into battle against the froggy, furry zombie
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: hordes with what's the CIA doing? Rand Zirker number two
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: three six. I am your host, Alison, and with me
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: is the dose in charge and the indomitable Hannah Wallen.
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: So let's let's begin. Incidentally, what's the dog the C
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: I D C I A doing should be said in
• 0:38
  Speaker 1: the same cadence as what's the dog doing?
• 0:41
  Speaker 2: Or alter? What's Yeah?
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: What are they up to? Now? What are those wacky CIA?
• 0:52
  Speaker 2: Yeah?
• 0:52
  Speaker 3: Oh no, man, what's the CIA doing? Can be the
• 0:55
  Speaker 3: answer can be scary sometimes, I mean, yeah, can you
• 0:58
  Speaker 3: look up some of the things that they've done historically
• 1:02
  Speaker 3: to us, actually to the American people. It's it's it's
• 1:07
  Speaker 3: pretty creepy.
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: Well, yeah, I've looked up some of that, and it
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: often feels like they're treating you like labrats m h
• 1:16
  Speaker 1: and very unfortunate.
• 1:18
  Speaker 3: But labrats and in their own personal bank. So yeah, yeah,
• 1:23
  Speaker 3: we we quite have see.
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: All of your security for many of your actually all
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: of your security agents.
• 1:32
  Speaker 3: We keep getting new ones. They like spontaneously irrupt. You
• 1:35
  Speaker 3: remember back in the nineties when Bill Clinton just was
• 1:40
  Speaker 3: was getting what we would today called being cospeed and
• 1:44
  Speaker 3: and Hillary Clinton referred to his accusers as bimbo eruptions.
• 1:49
  Speaker 3: This is this is like that, but with security agencies is.
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: Yeah, like that, your your the US is security agency
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: is going to have a higher birth rate than Japan.
• 1:58
  Speaker 3: Yeah, picking the birth rates. Yeah, they reproduce, they reproduce
• 2:06
  Speaker 3: asexually every time. Every time we have a sy op
• 2:11
  Speaker 3: that's intended to scare the ship out of the American people,
• 2:14
  Speaker 3: the American government then takes the result and creates a
• 2:18
  Speaker 3: new security agency out of it. M.
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: Well, there you go. That's one way to get the
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: birth rate up. Oh anyway, so we are going to
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: be looking at some activities by the security agencies of
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: the US which start to feel a little bit more
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: like they're less security agencies and more some kind of jailer.
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: And yeah, so see what they've been up to, just
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: a just a preview, a little bit of a spoiler.
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: It's some crazy shit.
• 2:53
  Speaker 3: We now have insecurity agencies.
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, good going. And if you're wonder what I'm
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: doing over here, I'm attempting to uh to pat placate
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: the squish spawn.
• 3:07
  Speaker 3: So yeah, pacify the cat, passify.
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: The cat without getting too clawed and uh yeah, so
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: let's uh, I guess we'll just start wait wait, I
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: should do the things right before we get into the
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: first tweet. Okay, so let's see if I can do
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: the things and also keep this stream from falling into catastrophe.
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: All right, So we are doing our monthly fundraiser, so
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: this is really critical.
• 3:36
  Speaker 2: We are.
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: Last time I checked, we're about eight hundred and sixty
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: dollars from the goal, which we we can do. We
• 3:42
  Speaker 1: can do it if you guys help us out. So
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: feed the Badger dot com slash support. This is the
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: last day to do it. Hopefully we make that, so
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: once again, feed the Badger dot com slash support. If necessary,
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: I'll do some arm twisting. Don't make me do arm twisting, guys,
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: but I will do it. I'll explain why it's really
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: critical to support our work and continue support our work
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: despite everything that's happy, in fact, because everything of what's
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: been happening. So feed the Badger dot com slash support
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: and if you want to send us a message and
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: a tip, you can do so at feed the Badger,
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: doll calm slash, just the tip. So it's feed the
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: Badger dot calm slash, just the tip, send us a tip,
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: send us a message, very best way for you to
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: send us funds aside from supporting us, and also have
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: the option of having something read out on air. So
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: let's uh this this uh, it's really hard to introduce this.
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: This is just.
• 4:33
  Speaker 2: It's weird.
• 4:34
  Speaker 1: It's it's weird. It's truly, it truly is weird. It's like,
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: what are they smoking at the CIA?
• 4:41
  Speaker 3: Seriously, Well, I mean we're talking about the same agency
• 4:45
  Speaker 3: that conceived of a plan to experiment on American citizens
• 4:51
  Speaker 3: by surreptitiously dosing them with acid and then you know,
• 4:56
  Speaker 3: watching the resulting panic and and all that that and
• 5:01
  Speaker 3: they did it, like it's historically demonstrated that they did it.
• 5:06
  Speaker 3: So there's no amount of weirdness I would put past them.
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: Well, you think that you've you've reached the depths of weirdness,
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: that's a c is like hold my, hold my bad dragon,
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: purchase see nothing yet just tries to top itself each time. Okay,
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: so let's uh, let's get into this tweet, shall we.
• 5:36
  Speaker 2: Brian, sure, do you want me to read it? Okay, Yeah,
• 5:38
  Speaker 2: go ahead. This tweet was from Christopher f Rufo.
• 5:42
  Speaker 4: Christopher Rufo is a you know, right wing influencer on
• 5:46
  Speaker 4: x and I think he does interviews and stuff. He
• 5:49
  Speaker 4: writes leaked NSA and CIA officials express their desire to
• 5:54
  Speaker 4: have hermaphrodite babies in order to advance trans ideology quote
• 5:59
  Speaker 4: and sex birth would be a great opportunity to raise
• 6:02
  Speaker 4: a kid as non binary and let them choose later.
• 6:05
  Speaker 2: End quote. The people who run the surveillance surveillance.
• 6:09
  Speaker 4: State are insane, and here is an unclassified document. There's
• 6:15
  Speaker 4: some reactions. I assume these are just names. Somebody says
• 6:19
  Speaker 4: how you were raised is how you will be. That's
• 6:22
  Speaker 4: not what I'm saying. I'm saying that you are one
• 6:25
  Speaker 4: hundred percent the result of your experiences. That does not
• 6:29
  Speaker 4: mean the way people raise you will be the way
• 6:31
  Speaker 4: you turn out and interterseex birth would be a great
• 6:34
  Speaker 4: opportunity to raise a kid as non binary and let
• 6:36
  Speaker 4: them choose later or not choose at all. And none
• 6:40
  Speaker 4: of those things mean that their gender wasn't a socially
• 6:42
  Speaker 4: constructed identity. Then somebody says hermaphrodite and intersects are two
• 6:47
  Speaker 4: different things. Yes, da, you are not one hundred percent
• 6:52
  Speaker 4: the result of your experience.
• 6:53
  Speaker 2: So they're they're kind of debating this right now.
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: Debating biology versus versus action.
• 7:00
  Speaker 2: Social social conditioning.
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, okay, this isn't sinister at all, folks, not
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: at all.
• 7:08
  Speaker 3: Uh more, going, I can't even agree on what they're
• 7:13
  Speaker 3: doing or why they're doing it.
• 7:15
  Speaker 4: You are not one to present the result of your experience.
• 7:18
  Speaker 4: And then someone says being trans isn't genetic, and if
• 7:21
  Speaker 4: it was, we super shouldn't want it to be.
• 7:24
  Speaker 2: That sounds like a woman talking by the way the
• 7:26
  Speaker 2: way or a zoomer Yeah, but a zoomer cia agent.
• 7:31
  Speaker 2: I don't know. We super shouldn't want.
• 7:33
  Speaker 4: It to be because holy crap, would that be awful
• 7:37
  Speaker 4: for us? Because one hundred percent, as soon as someone
• 7:40
  Speaker 4: claimed to discover the trans gene, this is the same
• 7:44
  Speaker 4: nonsense people talk about a gay gene. You absolutely know
• 7:48
  Speaker 4: that a people would super use it for eugenics. Why
• 7:51
  Speaker 4: does he ad super before everything and abort trans babies?
• 7:55
  Speaker 4: That's a people would do that. B people would super
• 7:59
  Speaker 4: use it the gatekeeper transness. Oh, your brain slash genetic
• 8:03
  Speaker 4: scan doesn't show that you're trans, so we won't actually
• 8:06
  Speaker 4: acknowledge your identity. And then someone else says, whether it's
• 8:10
  Speaker 4: nine to nine percent or one hundred percent, you have
• 8:12
  Speaker 4: absolutely zero way of knowing who you would be if
• 8:15
  Speaker 4: literally anything about your past was different.
• 8:18
  Speaker 1: It feels like that, Yes.
• 8:20
  Speaker 4: True, hermaphrodism doesn't exist in humans, and it's become kind
• 8:23
  Speaker 4: of an offensive term for her sex people.
• 8:25
  Speaker 1: And you know the guy before the end, I think
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: that's the that's the one, like, you know, sixty year
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: old dude who's been with the organization since it actually
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: was sort of functional, who's like, what the fuck is
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: this shit? Maybeah, what do you guys? What is this
• 8:40
  Speaker 1: even with you guys?
• 8:42
  Speaker 3: Yeah?
• 8:42
  Speaker 4: I mean are They are wrestling with a paradox though,
• 8:45
  Speaker 4: because on the one hand, the queer activists are trying
• 8:51
  Speaker 4: to convince the public that you know, you're born this
• 8:55
  Speaker 4: way as the Lady Gaga song goes, which means it
• 8:58
  Speaker 4: is biologically determined, which is an argument for a gay
• 9:01
  Speaker 4: or trans or queer gene. But they're also saying that
• 9:05
  Speaker 4: you're a product of you know, your experiences, and it's
• 9:08
  Speaker 4: socialized into you. And in both cases they're running into
• 9:12
  Speaker 4: a problem because you see, they want to perpetuate this
• 9:15
  Speaker 4: stuff and promote it everywhere, especially places where it probably
• 9:19
  Speaker 4: has no business being, like you know, preschool. I just
• 9:23
  Speaker 4: heard a story that they're that they're going to have
• 9:25
  Speaker 4: condoms available to you know, kindergarteners. Why I don't know,
• 9:29
  Speaker 4: but this just in some Northeastern like New England state.
• 9:35
  Speaker 4: But the problem is is that if it's socialized, then
• 9:39
  Speaker 4: it can be socialized out of which they don't want
• 9:42
  Speaker 4: because they want people socialized into it. And if it's biological,
• 9:46
  Speaker 4: then it can be like looked at, you know, analytically,
• 9:49
  Speaker 4: with like instruments to determine if it's there, which they
• 9:52
  Speaker 4: also don't want because they want to socialize it. So there,
• 9:55
  Speaker 4: that's why I want to conflict is happening.
• 9:58
  Speaker 3: Yeah, I want to help use people of using abortion
• 10:02
  Speaker 3: to get rid of it, which the people that object
• 10:06
  Speaker 3: to it wouldn't use abortion to get rid of it
• 10:09
  Speaker 3: because they also object to abortion. So that's kind of
• 10:12
  Speaker 3: a moot claim. But these people at CIA are worried
• 10:15
  Speaker 3: about the wrong thing. When you think about this, all right,
• 10:20
  Speaker 3: and this is something that I think our listeners are
• 10:23
  Speaker 3: going to be divided into people old enough to understand
• 10:27
  Speaker 3: this without having to have it explained to them, and
• 10:30
  Speaker 3: the people I'm about to be talking to. Right, So,
• 10:32
  Speaker 3: if you're millennial or a zoomer, you may not understand
• 10:38
  Speaker 3: that transgender status. Being trans, having any kind of gender
• 10:46
  Speaker 3: identity other than identifying as straight and the sex you
• 10:52
  Speaker 3: were born as was incredibly unusual up until you guys
• 10:59
  Speaker 3: were kids and your school started programming all of you
• 11:04
  Speaker 3: to accept this idea that it just could happen to
• 11:07
  Speaker 3: anybody and that it's common and that it's normal and
• 11:11
  Speaker 3: stuff like that. So, before that happened, being trans usually
• 11:22
  Speaker 3: resulted from a type of distress caused by an identity dysphoria,
• 11:29
  Speaker 3: where the individual felt different than they looked. Their body
• 11:34
  Speaker 3: felt wrong, And there are a lot of types of
• 11:38
  Speaker 3: body dysmorphic disorders. Some people who are slim feel like
• 11:43
  Speaker 3: they're fat. Some people who are perfectly attractive feel like
• 11:46
  Speaker 3: they're ugly. There's one for people who think they're dead.
• 11:51
  Speaker 3: There's a lot of disorders where your brain is out
• 11:53
  Speaker 3: of sync with your body, and in most cases, the therapy,
• 11:57
  Speaker 3: the prevailing therapy is tried to trying to the brain
• 12:00
  Speaker 3: back into sync with the body, trying to treat the
• 12:02
  Speaker 3: distress the person is experiencing by alleviating the dysphoria. Because
• 12:10
  Speaker 3: there is politics around sexuality and sexual identity, that didn't
• 12:18
  Speaker 3: happen with gender dysphoria. Instead, they tried to sink the
• 12:23
  Speaker 3: body up with the brain, and they used it with
• 12:27
  Speaker 3: they used surgery, they used hormonal therapy, and they used
• 12:33
  Speaker 3: cross dressing, and in a lot of cases it did
• 12:37
  Speaker 3: not result in satisfaction for the individual. And I mean
• 12:43
  Speaker 3: as a gen xer who has been involved in LGBTQ activism,
• 12:49
  Speaker 3: prior to understanding how much of it is just communism
• 12:53
  Speaker 3: exploiting people of different sexualities and so on, you know,
• 12:59
  Speaker 3: I I noticed that there's there's two distinct groups among
• 13:04
  Speaker 3: people who identify as transgender. There are people who are
• 13:08
  Speaker 3: just trying to survive a psychological disorder that is profoundly
• 13:14
  Speaker 3: disturbing to the individual who experiences it, and then there
• 13:17
  Speaker 3: are people who are doing it for political reasons. And
• 13:20
  Speaker 3: I would say, prior to the about the mid twenty tens,
• 13:26
  Speaker 3: that was probably about you know, ten percent or less,
• 13:32
  Speaker 3: maybe even two percent of the LGBTQ movement. If you
• 13:37
  Speaker 3: went to any kind of an event where there was
• 13:41
  Speaker 3: any kind of activism taking place, or even just socialization,
• 13:46
  Speaker 3: you would see, for you know, maybe if there was
• 13:49
  Speaker 3: one hundred gay men there and you know, eighty or
• 13:51
  Speaker 3: ninety lesbians, there would be many, many more who identify
• 13:56
  Speaker 3: as bisexual and a couple of people who identified as trans.
• 14:02
  Speaker 3: And now, like a social contagion, it's it's dominated the
• 14:08
  Speaker 3: entire movement. That's unnatural. And so when we're talking about
• 14:14
  Speaker 3: these issues, we're not attacking people who have experienced gender
• 14:17
  Speaker 3: dysphoria and navigated with the medical profession as best they
• 14:23
  Speaker 3: possibly could. You know, how do I deal with the
• 14:25
  Speaker 3: situation we are talking about the overwhelming majority who have
• 14:29
  Speaker 3: either been brainwashed or are trying to politicize this idea
• 14:33
  Speaker 3: of being trans. And if you look at it from
• 14:36
  Speaker 3: the perspective of experience as an activist who has you know,
• 14:42
  Speaker 3: gone to events and pushed for you know, don't beat
• 14:47
  Speaker 3: up on people just because they're different and watched that
• 14:52
  Speaker 3: change take place. And then you look at what they're
• 14:57
  Speaker 3: saying here in the CIA communications there, it's very similar
• 15:02
  Speaker 3: to if you just replaced trands with schizophrenia in that
• 15:08
  Speaker 3: because gender dysphoria it's not schizophrenia, but it's as disturbing
• 15:13
  Speaker 3: to the individual to experience it as the symptoms of
• 15:19
  Speaker 3: schizophrenia that interfere with your perception of the world around
• 15:22
  Speaker 3: you and cause your brain to lie to you about
• 15:25
  Speaker 3: the world around you. It's just the difference is your
• 15:29
  Speaker 3: brain's lying to you about your body, and so it's
• 15:32
  Speaker 3: a very distressing condition for people who experience it. They're
• 15:37
  Speaker 3: talking about inflicting from birth that distress on an individual
• 15:43
  Speaker 3: for political reasons, and raising that individual to experience that distress,
• 15:49
  Speaker 3: to have their brain lie to them, to not have
• 15:53
  Speaker 3: a strong sense of self and to not have a
• 15:56
  Speaker 3: strong sense of independence and self determinating because politics, Like
• 16:05
  Speaker 3: when you read it with that understanding, this is it
• 16:08
  Speaker 3: stops being a joke. It is profoundly evil.
• 16:13
  Speaker 4: It is.
• 16:15
  Speaker 3: As bad as child molestation, if not worse. Like Okay,
• 16:21
  Speaker 3: the woodchipper suggestion that we hear all the time for pedophiles,
• 16:24
  Speaker 3: I don't see a difference here, right I'm I'm like,
• 16:29
  Speaker 3: I'm so glad for those right now. I hope that
• 16:33
  Speaker 3: those takes a woodchipper to the funding of this organization
• 16:38
  Speaker 3: and to the structure of this organization. And I'm so
• 16:42
  Speaker 3: glad that none of these people that were in this
• 16:44
  Speaker 3: conversation have their jobs anymore. I hope they face further
• 16:49
  Speaker 3: investigation in case they've done something in their personal lives
• 16:53
  Speaker 3: to children.
• 16:56
  Speaker 1: And I did send Brian an additional links got to
• 17:01
  Speaker 1: take a look at yeah, and we can. We can
• 17:03
  Speaker 1: take a look at that. Once I'm done having my
• 17:05
  Speaker 1: comment on this, I just want to point something out.
• 17:07
  Speaker 1: I've noticed that gay men have not really increased in proportion.
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: So like people talk about how conservatives have the rhetoric
• 17:20
  Speaker 1: of recruitment right, But what I've noticed is that throughout
• 17:25
  Speaker 1: the whole GLBT rights kind of and I was part
• 17:32
  Speaker 1: of it as well, Like I used to take part
• 17:35
  Speaker 1: in gay rights stuff in the like the nineties, and
• 17:40
  Speaker 1: throughout all of this, the proportion of gay men has
• 17:45
  Speaker 1: not increased. Have you noticed Have you guys noticed that?
• 17:48
  Speaker 2: Yep.
• 17:48
  Speaker 4: I haven't been looking at the numbers for that, so yeah,
• 17:51
  Speaker 4: but it's basically.
• 17:52
  Speaker 1: Stay the same. So when we talk about the like
• 17:55
  Speaker 1: people people will say, what you say, Hannah is just
• 18:00
  Speaker 1: right wing recruitment propaganda. But how is it that the
• 18:04
  Speaker 1: proportion of gay men has stayed the same, right, but
• 18:08
  Speaker 1: trans has exploded. Like, even while there was recognition that
• 18:13
  Speaker 1: gay men should be able to marry, they should have rights,
• 18:16
  Speaker 1: the proportion basically stayed the same. And yet the same
• 18:20
  Speaker 1: discussion has resulted in with with trans individuals has resulted
• 18:25
  Speaker 1: in an explosion. Right, So there's there's something different going on.
• 18:29
  Speaker 1: And it's not just the right wing rhetoric about recruitment,
• 18:34
  Speaker 1: because there's the what like, there's not this is not
• 18:38
  Speaker 1: happening with gay men, but it's happening with trans what's
• 18:41
  Speaker 1: going on? Right? And I think there's a deeper and
• 18:45
  Speaker 1: more sinister kind of thing going on, just like what
• 18:47
  Speaker 1: you're talking about, Panna, and I just joke about it
• 18:49
  Speaker 1: because it's black humor.
• 18:52
  Speaker 2: What would he do? Right?
• 18:53
  Speaker 1: This is insane and.
• 18:55
  Speaker 3: It gets the only way, it's the only way to
• 18:58
  Speaker 3: cope with stuff like this, honestly.
• 19:01
  Speaker 1: Yeah. But what I've what I've researched about essentially UH
• 19:10
  Speaker 1: coping skills like psychological coping skills and gender orientation identity,
• 19:18
  Speaker 1: and what that means is do you identify as masculine
• 19:22
  Speaker 1: or feminine rather than male or female but mascular if
• 19:25
  Speaker 1: you have more masculine or feminine traits. Now on the whole,
• 19:28
  Speaker 1: men of course, have significantly more masculine traits than women,
• 19:32
  Speaker 1: and women have significantly more feminine traits than men. And
• 19:35
  Speaker 1: we're talking about actual psychological traits, not just the the
• 19:40
  Speaker 1: the feminist masculine norms inventory. So things like women tend
• 19:45
  Speaker 1: to be more neurotic, women tend to be more have
• 19:49
  Speaker 1: a more emotional response to things. Women tend to be
• 19:52
  Speaker 1: more performative, so they see their identities in terms of
• 19:55
  Speaker 1: a performance, whereas men tend to see their identities more
• 19:59
  Speaker 1: in in terms of how they function their performance, but
• 20:04
  Speaker 1: in terms of utility. So a woman would see herself
• 20:08
  Speaker 1: as an actor upon the stage, a man would see
• 20:11
  Speaker 1: himself more as the stage hand building the stage, that
• 20:14
  Speaker 1: kind of thing. So those are actual psychological differences between
• 20:18
  Speaker 1: men and women, and men and women can show, you know,
• 20:23
  Speaker 1: more masculine, more feminine. But again, men tend to be
• 20:25
  Speaker 1: more masculine, women tend to be more feminine significantly. So
• 20:29
  Speaker 1: so they looked into this and they judged how well
• 20:33
  Speaker 1: people coped with adverse experiences based on their gender orientation expression. Now,
• 20:40
  Speaker 1: what they found was really interesting. They found that masculine
• 20:45
  Speaker 1: individuals or people who tended to express themselves in more
• 20:49
  Speaker 1: of a masculine way. Coped second best. The third best
• 20:55
  Speaker 1: was feminine individuals. And the difference between the coping is
• 20:59
  Speaker 1: men tend to look what they can do to change
• 21:01
  Speaker 1: in order to affect a better outcome. Women tend to
• 21:04
  Speaker 1: you know, process their emotions, and they tend to be
• 21:08
  Speaker 1: more if I want to say it in a positive way,
• 21:11
  Speaker 1: they tend to be more forgiving and accepting of their emotions.
• 21:16
  Speaker 1: And that could be positive, it isn't always a negative.
• 21:19
  Speaker 1: And so that these different coping strategies were, you know,
• 21:22
  Speaker 1: masculinity was more effective in coping with addressed adverse circumstances.
• 21:27
  Speaker 1: Femininity was second, was third best, but the worst was
• 21:32
  Speaker 1: what they called undifferentiated. And what undifferentiated is is people
• 21:37
  Speaker 1: who have neither feminine nor masculine coping strategies. Neither and
• 21:44
  Speaker 1: I'll get into what was the best, but I think
• 21:47
  Speaker 1: that this is what these agencies on some level are
• 21:50
  Speaker 1: aiming for. They want a population of people who, because
• 21:56
  Speaker 1: they have no feminine coping strategies, can't effectively accept or
• 22:01
  Speaker 1: express how they're being affected by things. And because they
• 22:05
  Speaker 1: don't have masculine coping strategies they can't effectively deal with
• 22:09
  Speaker 1: the circumstances and see things to improve them, so they
• 22:13
  Speaker 1: have no coping strategies. And when they talk about hermaphrodites,
• 22:17
  Speaker 1: when they talk about intersects, when they talked about basically neuter,
• 22:21
  Speaker 1: I think that's what they're talking about. They're talking about
• 22:23
  Speaker 1: stripping the population of any kind of coping strategy when
• 22:27
  Speaker 1: it comes to adverse situations. So what you end up
• 22:31
  Speaker 1: with is a population that can either express any discontent
• 22:35
  Speaker 1: nor do anything about it. They just submit. And that's newter. Now,
• 22:41
  Speaker 1: there was a fourth category which actually was represented the
• 22:45
  Speaker 1: people with the highest level of coping strategies, and those
• 22:48
  Speaker 1: people were individuals who had both masculine and feminine coping
• 22:52
  Speaker 1: strategies and could employ them where necessary. So again this
• 22:58
  Speaker 1: is I'm not saying this as somebody saying that, you know,
• 23:01
  Speaker 1: men men and women men are men must be men,
• 23:03
  Speaker 1: and women must be women. I'm saying that as there
• 23:06
  Speaker 1: is a big difference between recognizing and accepting masculinity infeminity,
• 23:12
  Speaker 1: recognizing and accepting coping strategies, or even men developing coping
• 23:18
  Speaker 1: strategies that women use, or women developing coping strategies that
• 23:21
  Speaker 1: men use, which might seem androgynous, but really is just
• 23:26
  Speaker 1: becoming more adult and learning to be more practical about
• 23:29
  Speaker 1: coping with the circumstances that you're in. And what these
• 23:32
  Speaker 1: individuals are doing, which is neutering people. They're neutering people, right,
• 23:38
  Speaker 1: So it's not even strict gender. What I'm trying to
• 23:42
  Speaker 1: say is it's not even strict gender categories versus androgyny
• 23:48
  Speaker 1: or being able to be pragmatic about coping skills that
• 23:52
  Speaker 1: you use. It is people who want to take away
• 23:56
  Speaker 1: your coping skills by taking away your masculinity and femininity
• 24:00
  Speaker 1: and leaving you as a nothing that simply listens and obeys,
• 24:06
  Speaker 1: and people who want you to develop these skills as
• 24:10
  Speaker 1: a pragmatic and you know, responsible individual. Does that make sense.
• 24:15
  Speaker 1: I'm not saying like, I don't know where, I don't
• 24:18
  Speaker 1: know if I've conveyed anything, but here I have. I've
• 24:20
  Speaker 1: said a lot, so I'll leave it at that.
• 24:24
  Speaker 4: Well, one thing I wanted to say about the number
• 24:28
  Speaker 4: of gay men the proportion. I think one of the
• 24:35
  Speaker 4: things that we have to also understand is that, like
• 24:38
  Speaker 4: the trans agenda is erasing gay men and lesbians potentially
• 24:45
  Speaker 4: because when their children they push them to transition. And
• 24:49
  Speaker 4: most of the time in before we made you know,
• 24:53
  Speaker 4: transitioning like a normal thing, or at least.
• 24:56
  Speaker 2: They there was push. There were pushes to make it normal.
• 25:00
  Speaker 4: Most of the time those kids would go through a
• 25:03
  Speaker 4: phase and maybe they would just remain straight, or they
• 25:06
  Speaker 4: might just find that they were gay or bisexual and
• 25:09
  Speaker 4: then that would be the way they live. They didn't
• 25:11
  Speaker 4: think they were the opposite sex. This is why the
• 25:14
  Speaker 4: T in LGBT doesn't quite fit in because it is
• 25:19
  Speaker 4: it is not an orientation. It is an issue of
• 25:23
  Speaker 4: identity itself, and it gets pushed on you know, young
• 25:26
  Speaker 4: boys and girls. Actually, the number of girls transitioning is like,
• 25:31
  Speaker 4: you know, going up pretty fast now, but it was
• 25:35
  Speaker 4: in the past. I think it was like the overwhelming
• 25:37
  Speaker 4: majority of people who transition were boys to women and
• 25:41
  Speaker 4: the I think that that is what's why you might say, oh,
• 25:45
  Speaker 4: the number of gays hasn't changed, Well, maybe because they're
• 25:48
  Speaker 4: transing them all.
• 25:49
  Speaker 2: And that is killing them.
• 25:51
  Speaker 4: Like there's like I mean, if you think about it,
• 25:53
  Speaker 4: you know, there was a meme I saw It was
• 25:55
  Speaker 4: a pac man eating the dots, but the pac man
• 25:59
  Speaker 4: has the trees RAN's flag instead of being yellow, and
• 26:01
  Speaker 4: the dots.
• 26:02
  Speaker 2: Are all the rainbow colors.
• 26:04
  Speaker 4: I think that that is because if you think about it,
• 26:06
  Speaker 4: being trans is not the same as being like attracted
• 26:11
  Speaker 4: to the same sex. It's literally like you know. And
• 26:14
  Speaker 4: then there's the fact that not all people who transition,
• 26:17
  Speaker 4: not only are they not necessarily experiencing gendericephoria, but they're
• 26:22
  Speaker 4: also not necessarily doing it because of some like issue
• 26:26
  Speaker 4: with their with with it.
• 26:29
  Speaker 2: Might it might not just be because they think they're trans.
• 26:32
  Speaker 4: It might be because they're you know, there's like people
• 26:34
  Speaker 4: with auto gaynophilia. There are people who are like to
• 26:37
  Speaker 4: cross treads. There are people who are drag queens. There
• 26:39
  Speaker 4: are people who just want attention, and they do it
• 26:42
  Speaker 4: for those reasons. So it like inflates the numbers artificially.
• 26:46
  Speaker 4: And the reason why they're allowed to do that is
• 26:48
  Speaker 4: because we can't actually have honest conversations about what it
• 26:52
  Speaker 4: actually means. So you have like, you know, people who
• 26:56
  Speaker 4: genuinely have gendics foria, and then you have weirdos and perverts.
• 27:00
  Speaker 4: They're doing the same thing and they're basically operating onder
• 27:02
  Speaker 4: the same field and they're like, look, I am, this
• 27:05
  Speaker 4: is what I am, And so this is where we
• 27:07
  Speaker 4: run into problems.
• 27:10
  Speaker 3: No, we also have a situation of certain groups being targeted,
• 27:15
  Speaker 3: for instance in Canada and to a lesser degree initially
• 27:20
  Speaker 3: but now pretty much to about the same degree. They
• 27:23
  Speaker 3: were targeting autistic girls with this ideology and transiting them.
• 27:29
  Speaker 3: And there's a lot of detransitioned girls now that are
• 27:33
  Speaker 3: that are Zoomer generation and a few of them that
• 27:36
  Speaker 3: are a millennial generation that are experiencing terrible health problems
• 27:40
  Speaker 3: because of this. That they were convinced that there their
• 27:45
  Speaker 3: social awkwardness and maybe their lack of stereotypical femininity made
• 27:50
  Speaker 3: them boys. And similarly, you have there are boys who
• 27:56
  Speaker 3: are not gay and they're not they don't have gender dysphoria.
• 28:02
  Speaker 3: They know they're boys, but they would be considered effeminate
• 28:05
  Speaker 3: in comparison to other boys that are getting targeted with
• 28:09
  Speaker 3: us as well. And I've seen like this has been
• 28:12
  Speaker 3: a thing for years and years. They were hit before
• 28:15
  Speaker 3: autistic girls. It's just that people started to pay attention
• 28:21
  Speaker 3: when it hit the girls. Right, It's okay to do
• 28:24
  Speaker 3: it to boys as long as you don't touch the girls.
• 28:28
  Speaker 3: That seems to be the way society treats every issue
• 28:31
  Speaker 3: like this, and on top of the medical profession taking
• 28:37
  Speaker 3: a dysfunctional approach when there is gender dysphoria or when
• 28:42
  Speaker 3: there is anything that points to being trans then you
• 28:48
  Speaker 3: had this whole profiteering movement that took place in the
• 28:54
  Speaker 3: medical profession. Oh look, now we can have hundreds or
• 28:59
  Speaker 3: thousands of patients that will need this type of care
• 29:03
  Speaker 3: for the rest of their lives. Because you never stop
• 29:06
  Speaker 3: hormone therapy after you trains, you never stop. You never
• 29:12
  Speaker 3: stop therapies related to preservation of the changes to your
• 29:17
  Speaker 3: body after you go through surgery, especially men who go
• 29:20
  Speaker 3: through bottom surgery. So there are things that you always
• 29:24
  Speaker 3: have to go back and pay for, and your insurance
• 29:27
  Speaker 3: has to pay for if you have insurance and it
• 29:28
  Speaker 3: covers it. And so there is a lifelong, guaranteed profit
• 29:34
  Speaker 3: for people in the medical community who facilitate this targeting
• 29:38
  Speaker 3: of children. And so there's been some pretty insidious things
• 29:42
  Speaker 3: going on here. And in addition to that, like what
• 29:45
  Speaker 3: Allison was talking about, if you want to ask, you know,
• 29:48
  Speaker 3: why why might the CIA want a huge population within
• 29:53
  Speaker 3: the United States that is broken in terms of loss
• 30:00
  Speaker 3: they're coping mechanisms. Will you think about it? That's essentially,
• 30:06
  Speaker 3: that's essentially what grooming is designed to do. So when
• 30:11
  Speaker 3: you're targeted by somebody who is either like child targeted
• 30:17
  Speaker 3: by a pedophile or a scam artist, targeting somebody who
• 30:22
  Speaker 3: is maybe very gullible, or young or old, suffering from dementia,
• 30:26
  Speaker 3: anything like that, they go through a process where first
• 30:31
  Speaker 3: they dismantle your coping mechanisms. They take away things within
• 30:35
  Speaker 3: your security, your identity, your belief in your perception of
• 30:42
  Speaker 3: your surroundings. So they gaslight, they get you taking responsibility
• 30:47
  Speaker 3: for their welfare, or they make promises that they're going
• 30:52
  Speaker 3: to take responsibility for your welfare in ways that you
• 30:55
  Speaker 3: wouldn't accept if your coping mechanisms were not broken down
• 31:00
  Speaker 3: and your sense of self determination hadn't been affected, right,
• 31:05
  Speaker 3: And then they start taking away from you. Then they
• 31:09
  Speaker 3: start the molestation, or then they start getting you to
• 31:12
  Speaker 3: send them money or taking your personal property, or getting
• 31:16
  Speaker 3: you to commit crimes on their behalf, whether you know
• 31:19
  Speaker 3: it's selling drugs or some other types of crimes. And
• 31:24
  Speaker 3: that same pattern is in every instance where a criminally
• 31:30
  Speaker 3: minded individual takes advantage of an individual they perceive as weaker,
• 31:35
  Speaker 3: the target, the dupe. That first step is breaking down
• 31:40
  Speaker 3: those coping mechanisms.
• 31:42
  Speaker 1: So if.
• 31:44
  Speaker 3: The CIA is doing that to the American people, what
• 31:47
  Speaker 3: they are trying to do is create a population that
• 31:49
  Speaker 3: they can control. They're not trying to create a population
• 31:54
  Speaker 3: that they can protect, because there's a big difference between
• 31:57
  Speaker 3: controlling someone for your own sake and protecting them, right,
• 32:02
  Speaker 3: They're creating a population that they can control for whatever
• 32:06
  Speaker 3: purposes the federal bureaucracy wanted control over the American population.
• 32:11
  Speaker 3: They are creating what Hillary Clinton promised foreign leaders when
• 32:15
  Speaker 3: she was running for office, a compliant American population. And
• 32:22
  Speaker 3: since we know from the USAID controversy and all of
• 32:29
  Speaker 3: the various types of funding that we've been looking into,
• 32:34
  Speaker 3: that the federal bureaucracy has basically been using the American
• 32:39
  Speaker 3: people as its own personal bank to go and create
• 32:43
  Speaker 3: a compliant world population that they can then siphon off of.
• 32:49
  Speaker 3: That's probably what this is really all about. It has
• 32:52
  Speaker 3: nothing to do with them actually believing like some of
• 32:56
  Speaker 3: the younger ones might have been brainwashed and believing in
• 33:00
  Speaker 3: brains ideology. But the reality is the goal behind all
• 33:04
  Speaker 3: of this has nothing to do with supporting anybody in
• 33:07
  Speaker 3: the lgbt Q. Quilte bag alphabet soup plus community. It's
• 33:14
  Speaker 3: all about exploitation.
• 33:16
  Speaker 1: Mm hmm, and using these individuals as a self righteous
• 33:21
  Speaker 1: she for that exploitation.
• 33:23
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 33:24
  Speaker 1: And you know, like I think me and you, I
• 33:26
  Speaker 1: mean you, I think got into men's issues, Hannah. You
• 33:30
  Speaker 1: got into men's issues through gay father's rights, or at
• 33:33
  Speaker 1: least you.
• 33:34
  Speaker 3: That's where. That's where I landed when I was looking
• 33:37
  Speaker 3: for help with my husband's custody battle. And I I
• 33:42
  Speaker 3: also was kind of aware of that back in the
• 33:45
  Speaker 3: nineties because of some of the guys that I hung
• 33:47
  Speaker 3: out with having difficulty Like it used to be something
• 33:51
  Speaker 3: that if you just walked into a courtroom as a
• 33:54
  Speaker 3: woman and said, I want custody of my kids because
• 33:58
  Speaker 3: my ex is gay and he might infect them with
• 34:02
  Speaker 3: the gay or he might molest them, he might be
• 34:05
  Speaker 3: a pervert, he might this, or might that. A lot
• 34:08
  Speaker 3: of judges, especially in not necessarily conservative or religious areas,
• 34:15
  Speaker 3: but areas where attitudes had not changed yet toward homosexuality,
• 34:22
  Speaker 3: would would simply accept that. And even when it was
• 34:28
  Speaker 3: even when there was legislation against discrimination that didn't protect
• 34:34
  Speaker 3: gay fathers. It did protect lesbian mothers, but it didn't
• 34:38
  Speaker 3: protect gay fathers. So when my husband was having custody issues,
• 34:44
  Speaker 3: his custody issues weren't related to his sexuality in any way,
• 34:48
  Speaker 3: but it's still a lot of the a lot of
• 34:53
  Speaker 3: the legwork done by gay fathers was what really helped
• 34:58
  Speaker 3: us deal with our situation. And I'm not going to
• 35:02
  Speaker 3: say it helped a lot because we never did get
• 35:05
  Speaker 3: custody of his daughters, but it did help in very
• 35:10
  Speaker 3: important ways because he didn't lose visitation with his daughters,
• 35:14
  Speaker 3: and so there were things we were prepared for, tricks
• 35:16
  Speaker 3: we were prepared for. But what really got me involved
• 35:19
  Speaker 3: with the men's rights movement per se because that father's rights.
• 35:23
  Speaker 3: I was aware of that, and then it just was
• 35:28
  Speaker 3: more of a discusser online and a discusser and common
• 35:33
  Speaker 3: areas you know, in public in person. But then I
• 35:37
  Speaker 3: ran into a case a college friend of mine got
• 35:41
  Speaker 3: together with a guy she went to high school with
• 35:44
  Speaker 3: after she got divorced, and he got divorced and his
• 35:48
  Speaker 3: ex wife put him through seven years of vexatious litigation
• 35:53
  Speaker 3: and malicious prosecution in the Dayton area court systems. And
• 35:59
  Speaker 3: I say systems because we're talking about two different counties,
• 36:02
  Speaker 3: four different police precincts, at least three different prosecuting attorneys
• 36:08
  Speaker 3: for different things, and also the Child Support Enforcement Agency,
• 36:13
  Speaker 3: child Protective Services, like everything that she could get her
• 36:16
  Speaker 3: hands on, and for seven years she just dragged him,
• 36:21
  Speaker 3: keel hauled him really through the underbelly of the court
• 36:25
  Speaker 3: system until her attorney pushed through or his attorney pushed
• 36:29
  Speaker 3: through a vexatious litigation case. And now she has labeled
• 36:34
  Speaker 3: a vexatious litigant, which is really hard to do. She's
• 36:38
  Speaker 3: on a very short list. I think maybe one hundred
• 36:41
  Speaker 3: hundred and fifty people in Ohio the whole state are
• 36:44
  Speaker 3: labeled vexatious litigants and she's on that list. So that
• 36:50
  Speaker 3: case is what really when I realized what was going
• 36:53
  Speaker 3: on there, I started looking into, you know, what is
• 36:56
  Speaker 3: causing these judges to behave this way because I had
• 36:58
  Speaker 3: run into several other cases as in other counties where
• 37:01
  Speaker 3: there were similarities, and I started looking into the Violence
• 37:05
  Speaker 3: Against Women Act and realized that this is this is legislated,
• 37:10
  Speaker 3: This kind of behavior is legislated, and that that pretty
• 37:13
  Speaker 3: much got me in.
• 37:15
  Speaker 1: Yeah, so I started talking. But what I was trying
• 37:19
  Speaker 1: to get at is that you you come from this
• 37:21
  Speaker 1: from like my I personally, as I said, was an
• 37:27
  Speaker 1: I started a lot of my activism with the gay
• 37:31
  Speaker 1: community and uh, you know, the LGBT g l BT community,
• 37:36
  Speaker 1: And so I'm not coming at this from more of
• 37:40
  Speaker 1: a conservative point of view. I'm coming at this as
• 37:43
  Speaker 1: somebody who's been part of these issues and watched this
• 37:46
  Speaker 1: happen to the advocacy I was doing, and it's it's
• 37:52
  Speaker 1: it's it's uh sort of distressing because you can tell
• 37:56
  Speaker 1: what what the end gaming is. It isn't to make
• 37:59
  Speaker 1: people stronger, it's to make people weaker. But I did
• 38:04
  Speaker 1: want to get into uh because it looks like I'm
• 38:07
  Speaker 1: gonna have to do some arm twisting. Guys. I do
• 38:10
  Speaker 1: want to do a shout out to Craig C for
• 38:12
  Speaker 1: putting in twenty five bucks. Thank you, Craig C.
• 38:16
  Speaker 4: I'll give you a little sound yeah, I think he.
• 38:22
  Speaker 1: And I just want to remind everyone that we've gotten
• 38:24
  Speaker 1: this far because of your generosity, because you've taken it
• 38:27
  Speaker 1: upon yourself to keep supporting us. We've all everyone here
• 38:31
  Speaker 1: at Honey Badger Radio has basically put our public reputations
• 38:34
  Speaker 1: on the line to try to promote these issues and
• 38:37
  Speaker 1: make sure that they don't disappear, and I get you know,
• 38:40
  Speaker 1: actually it was it was Mike who pointed Mike, doctor
• 38:42
  Speaker 1: Randamer camp and pointed it out. I and Honey Badger
• 38:46
  Speaker 1: Rado brought gamer Gate into the public sphere. Prior to that,
• 38:49
  Speaker 1: I believe it was almost entirely online online. But we
• 38:53
  Speaker 1: made it, we made it a public thing. We met,
• 38:56
  Speaker 1: we we brought these issues, these issues of transparency and
• 38:59
  Speaker 1: on in the journalism, which has now expanded to transparency
• 39:05
  Speaker 1: and honesty in the government. Who knew that the government
• 39:08
  Speaker 1: was apparently behind the journalism that was that Gamergate the
• 39:14
  Speaker 1: gamers were calling out ten years ago.
• 39:17
  Speaker 3: Who knew that?
• 39:18
  Speaker 1: Who knew that this would be the endgame? Well, I
• 39:20
  Speaker 1: guess you can sort of see that the footprints.
• 39:24
  Speaker 3: Yeah, there were some of us that were signing really
• 39:26
  Speaker 3: paranoid back then that people are going, oh my gosh,
• 39:28
  Speaker 3: you were right.
• 39:29
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 39:29
  Speaker 3: Yeah.
• 39:30
  Speaker 1: And the other thing is that the first group into
• 39:35
  Speaker 1: the breach, the first group into the memory hole, was
• 39:38
  Speaker 1: men's issues. And there's a specific reason why the first
• 39:42
  Speaker 1: group into the memory hole was men's issues, and that
• 39:46
  Speaker 1: is because the entirety of all of this, all of
• 39:49
  Speaker 1: this corruption, all of this attitude rests on the foundation
• 39:55
  Speaker 1: of seeing women as unique victims. And what I mean
• 39:59
  Speaker 1: by that is maybe you guys have watched The Incredibles
• 40:03
  Speaker 1: and there's one one quote that relates this. If everyone
• 40:10
  Speaker 1: is special, no one is the reason why we cannot
• 40:14
  Speaker 1: see the issues that men face. That these things are hidden,
• 40:19
  Speaker 1: and they are the most hidden, They are the most censored.
• 40:22
  Speaker 1: That's why our channel doesn't grow is because once we
• 40:27
  Speaker 1: recognize that men are vulnerable like women and everybody's just
• 40:32
  Speaker 1: basically a column of spam trying to get through the day,
• 40:35
  Speaker 1: there's nobody who's uniquely vulnerable. Women are not uniquely vulnerable.
• 40:38
  Speaker 1: Women are not uniquely victimized. Nobody's vulnerable. Once everybody is
• 40:43
  Speaker 1: recognized as having vulnerabilities, nobody has vulnerabilities. And furthermore, you
• 40:48
  Speaker 1: take away the self righteous narrative that allows certain groups
• 40:53
  Speaker 1: of people to use their vulnerabilities to extort things from
• 40:57
  Speaker 1: other people. Do you see how that works, Like, when
• 41:00
  Speaker 1: everybody's recognized as having vulnerabilities, nobody has any unique vulnerabilities
• 41:05
  Speaker 1: that they can then turn around and say, hey, you
• 41:07
  Speaker 1: owe me right. And that's why men's issues was the
• 41:10
  Speaker 1: first thing in the hole, because they need a group
• 41:13
  Speaker 1: of people a perpetual group of people to blame and
• 41:15
  Speaker 1: frame as being the system that they deserve reparations from.
• 41:20
  Speaker 1: So once men's issues are recognized, and that doesn't mean that,
• 41:25
  Speaker 1: you know, we just sit with with victim and vulnerability. Generally,
• 41:29
  Speaker 1: when people recognize that men have issues, we get to work,
• 41:34
  Speaker 1: We develop discipline, we develop field hospitals, you know, we
• 41:38
  Speaker 1: develop technologies to overcome them. It's a call to action,
• 41:42
  Speaker 1: whereas with women's disability or victimhood, it seems to be
• 41:47
  Speaker 1: a call to internal graft and increasingly corrupt levels offt
• 41:54
  Speaker 1: and grifting. So that's why these issues that we talk
• 41:58
  Speaker 1: about are so critical. Until we recognize them, until they're
• 42:03
  Speaker 1: publicly talked about, we are going to have problems like this.
• 42:07
  Speaker 1: We're going to have groups of people who think they
• 42:11
  Speaker 1: can construct all of this and they do it with
• 42:13
  Speaker 1: absolute self righteousness. All of this, all of this discussion,
• 42:17
  Speaker 1: all of these multiplying so called security agencies, all of
• 42:24
  Speaker 1: these multiplying groups that want to advocate for trans albino
• 42:31
  Speaker 1: muskrats and uganda like, all of this comes from that
• 42:35
  Speaker 1: comes from that idea that there is a group of
• 42:38
  Speaker 1: people that has unique vulnerabilities and as such, has the
• 42:42
  Speaker 1: right to be served by the system. So if you
• 42:47
  Speaker 1: want to make sure that we can continue to challenge
• 42:50
  Speaker 1: what needs to be challenged to keep our grubby fingers
• 42:52
  Speaker 1: on the knot that holds the whole shit sling in place,
• 42:58
  Speaker 1: then go to feed the Badger dot com slam support.
• 43:00
  Speaker 1: And we really need you to do that because if
• 43:03
  Speaker 1: you don't, we won't be able to continue. So feed
• 43:06
  Speaker 1: the Badger dot com slash support. And uh, if you
• 43:09
  Speaker 1: got if you have just five bucks, just be that
• 43:12
  Speaker 1: first five bucks, just you know, give me some peace
• 43:16
  Speaker 1: of mind here, feed the Badger dot com slash support.
• 43:18
  Speaker 1: All right, let's uh, let's keep going.
• 43:20
  Speaker 4: All right, So do you want to look at that
• 43:22
  Speaker 4: other tweet that you sent me that Christopher Ruffo put
• 43:26
  Speaker 4: out exclusive at gross Van Hannah and I have obtained
• 43:30
  Speaker 4: logs from the NSA secret transgender sex chat room in
• 43:35
  Speaker 4: which N S, A, c, I, A, and d IA
• 43:38
  Speaker 4: employees discussed genital castration, artificial vaginas, piss fetishes, sex polycules,
• 43:44
  Speaker 4: and gang bangs all on government time. There's probably a
• 43:50
  Speaker 4: point to it. So what were you gonna say?
• 43:53
  Speaker 2: You were gonna I.
• 43:54
  Speaker 1: Was gonna say, they can talk about all of this crap,
• 43:57
  Speaker 1: but they cannot talk about men's issues. Like, all of
• 44:00
  Speaker 1: this is perfectly acceptable to talk about, but what we
• 44:03
  Speaker 1: talk about censorship.
• 44:05
  Speaker 3: Yeah, but all of this crap is trauma bonding. All
• 44:09
  Speaker 3: of this crap is basically being afflicted artificially with mental
• 44:15
  Speaker 3: health conditions that cause psychological distress and make you overload
• 44:22
  Speaker 3: your coping systems or break down your coping systems, and
• 44:26
  Speaker 3: then you become more controllable and more compliant. And this
• 44:30
  Speaker 3: is interesting because this is within the CIA, so you
• 44:34
  Speaker 3: have upper echelons within the CIA that had to have
• 44:37
  Speaker 3: facilitated this allowed for this to happen, where lower echelons, agents, whatever,
• 44:46
  Speaker 3: people who are employees at the lowest levels of the
• 44:49
  Speaker 3: CIA or mid levels at the CIA have been subjected
• 44:53
  Speaker 3: to this so that they can be controlled. They're actually
• 44:57
  Speaker 3: it's not that they're eating themselves, is that they're building
• 45:01
  Speaker 3: themselves a controllable bunch of people that they can use
• 45:06
  Speaker 3: as weapons against the rest of the population. And they're
• 45:11
  Speaker 3: doing it by facilitating and encouraging this shit.
• 45:17
  Speaker 2: Yep.
• 45:18
  Speaker 1: And again, like I just I just want to look
• 45:21
  Speaker 1: at this. I just boggle at what we can't talk
• 45:23
  Speaker 1: about and what gets censored. But let's keep going. Let's
• 45:26
  Speaker 1: let's read it. Let's read through it all right.
• 45:27
  Speaker 4: So, the NSA maintains a chat system for the intelligence
• 45:31
  Speaker 4: community called intelling. The servers are supposed to be used
• 45:36
  Speaker 4: for government work, but gender activists have hijacked at least
• 45:39
  Speaker 4: two channels, l g B l bt QA.
• 45:43
  Speaker 2: So did we just get the g's in there?
• 45:46
  Speaker 4: You are LBTQA and I see Underscore Pride, Underscore TWG
• 45:53
  Speaker 4: to discuss fetishes, kink, and sex, all legitimized as DEI.
• 45:58
  Speaker 4: And then there's a screenshot, it says a quartering to
• 46:00
  Speaker 4: our sources, the sex chats were legitimized as part of
• 46:03
  Speaker 4: the NSA's commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion. Activists within
• 46:07
  Speaker 4: the agency used LGBTQ plus employee resource groups to turn
• 46:11
  Speaker 4: their kinks and pathologies into official work duties. According to
• 46:16
  Speaker 4: the current NSA employee, these groups spent all day recruiting
• 46:20
  Speaker 4: activists and holding meetings with titles such as Privileged, Ally Awareness, Pride,
• 46:25
  Speaker 4: and Transgender Community Inclusion. They did so with the full
• 46:28
  Speaker 4: support of NSA leadership, which declared that DEI was quote
• 46:32
  Speaker 4: not only mission critical but mission imperative end quote. And
• 46:36
  Speaker 4: I just want to point out that they're they're literally
• 46:40
  Speaker 4: excluding men from this now well or at least men
• 46:44
  Speaker 4: as men.
• 46:44
  Speaker 3: We don't know that because that's his comment, so it
• 46:48
  Speaker 3: could be a typo, but this is something it's a.
• 46:52
  Speaker 2: Weird thing to leave out.
• 46:54
  Speaker 3: Yeah, you know like that. And you know we've seen
• 46:57
  Speaker 3: that before, like with articles like what is a gay
• 47:02
  Speaker 3: men are the straight men of of lgbt Q, and yeah,
• 47:08
  Speaker 3: you know, black men are the the white men of
• 47:14
  Speaker 3: black people. And so there's this everybody's heard of the
• 47:18
  Speaker 3: progressive stack, right, and the idea that being male or
• 47:22
  Speaker 3: being white puts you at the top of the progressive stack,
• 47:25
  Speaker 3: where you are the privileged individual and the people closer
• 47:28
  Speaker 3: to the bottom have more virtue points and you have
• 47:31
  Speaker 3: less virtue points because victimhood is virtue in there in
• 47:35
  Speaker 3: this in this stack. So it makes it believable that
• 47:40
  Speaker 3: that was something that he copied accurately, but we can't
• 47:44
  Speaker 3: confirm that, so we shouldn't say that that's the case
• 47:48
  Speaker 3: in any case. This the rest of this, the ally
• 47:53
  Speaker 3: awareness and privilege bits of this, those go those do
• 47:59
  Speaker 3: go along with that. Uh. And and I've sat in
• 48:02
  Speaker 3: on discussions between people of other sexual identity groups versus
• 48:10
  Speaker 3: gay men who treat them as having male privilege.
• 48:14
  Speaker 4: Uh.
• 48:14
  Speaker 3: And and it's interesting because trans women will not. They'll
• 48:20
  Speaker 3: treat gay men as having male privilege if they're the
• 48:24
  Speaker 3: political type. If they're not the political type, they'll recognize
• 48:28
  Speaker 3: that transphobia is usually missonry directed at Uh, trans women
• 48:36
  Speaker 3: because they are seen as men who are usurping women's place.
• 48:41
  Speaker 1: And I just.
• 48:42
  Speaker 2: Don't have any trans men. Nobody, nobody raises the stick
• 48:46
  Speaker 2: about that.
• 48:47
  Speaker 3: Yeah, there you don't usually see people making the same
• 48:51
  Speaker 3: allegations of transmen. And like the whole bathroom issue for instance, Yes,
• 48:57
  Speaker 3: there are people who are using the current protection against
• 49:05
  Speaker 3: criticism of anybody who has trans status as a means
• 49:09
  Speaker 3: of doing things that they couldn't get away with if
• 49:12
  Speaker 3: they didn't adopt trans status. But half of women and
• 49:18
  Speaker 3: surveys on restroom use have admitted to going into men's
• 49:24
  Speaker 3: bathrooms just because they felt that the line for the
• 49:26
  Speaker 3: ladies room was too long, so they've invaded. The difference
• 49:31
  Speaker 3: between men's bathrooms and women's bathrooms by the way, you
• 49:34
  Speaker 3: walk into a women's bathroom and in the room, you're
• 49:38
  Speaker 3: going to see usually a couple of sinks and you're
• 49:42
  Speaker 3: going to see at least a changing table and possibly
• 49:46
  Speaker 3: you know those things on the wall that spray your
• 49:49
  Speaker 3: germs all over the room after you wash your hands
• 49:52
  Speaker 3: and so on, and then for actually urinating and defecating,
• 49:59
  Speaker 3: you see stall there's not open toilets unless it's just
• 50:03
  Speaker 3: a single person use restroom and there's only one toilet.
• 50:08
  Speaker 3: But if you go into a men's restroom and it's
• 50:10
  Speaker 3: for a multiple person use room, there's going to be
• 50:14
  Speaker 3: a couple of stalls, and then there will be urinals
• 50:16
  Speaker 3: on the walls. And when men use those urinals, their
• 50:20
  Speaker 3: genitalia is exposed and anybody that walks into that room
• 50:23
  Speaker 3: can see it, so they don't have privacy. So there
• 50:28
  Speaker 3: when you walk in as a woman, when you walk
• 50:31
  Speaker 3: into a men's restroom, like when I've worked places where
• 50:33
  Speaker 3: I to clean their restrooms, you know, I bang on
• 50:36
  Speaker 3: the door like a cop, make sure there's nobody in there,
• 50:39
  Speaker 3: leave my stuff where everybody can see, you know, and
• 50:43
  Speaker 3: isn't going to come in there in desperation when I'm
• 50:46
  Speaker 3: in there cleaning, and then get it done and get
• 50:50
  Speaker 3: out of there as quickly as possible so as not
• 50:52
  Speaker 3: to interrupt, so that men aren't in a position where
• 50:57
  Speaker 3: they have no choice but to be expos to give
• 51:00
  Speaker 3: up their privacy in front of me. But women for
• 51:05
  Speaker 3: just the frivolous reason that they don't want to wait
• 51:09
  Speaker 3: a few extra minutes, will invade that private space, not
• 51:14
  Speaker 3: think about it at all, and actually get offended if
• 51:18
  Speaker 3: men call them perverted or predatory for going in there.
• 51:22
  Speaker 3: And then then they complain that trans women are dangerous
• 51:28
  Speaker 3: to women in the ladies room, And they don't complain
• 51:31
  Speaker 3: about it because they're different. They don't complain it about
• 51:35
  Speaker 3: it because some of them are fake. They complain about
• 51:38
  Speaker 3: it because they're men. To these women, these are men
• 51:41
  Speaker 3: dressed up as ladies. That's what they're saying. They're saying,
• 51:45
  Speaker 3: These are men using a disguise to get in and
• 51:48
  Speaker 3: be predatory. And they target all trans women with it,
• 51:53
  Speaker 3: not just the ones who are actually fake and committing crimes.
• 51:57
  Speaker 3: They target all women, all transit women who for whatever
• 52:03
  Speaker 3: reason choose to use a lady's room instead of men's
• 52:06
  Speaker 3: room and and end up, you know, in there at
• 52:10
  Speaker 3: the same time as a lady, which definitely demonstrates a prejudice.
• 52:16
  Speaker 3: You know, if you have to generalize to an entire
• 52:19
  Speaker 3: population instead of the people that are actually doing the
• 52:21
  Speaker 3: thing you're objecting to. That's a prejudice. So okay, it's completely.
• 52:29
  Speaker 1: It's well, I mean it's it's.
• 52:31
  Speaker 3: Not just hypocritical, but it's completely missandric and it's completely
• 52:37
  Speaker 3: about demonizing men.
• 52:39
  Speaker 1: And it's it's unfounded because women are willing to go
• 52:43
  Speaker 1: into the men's washroom.
• 52:46
  Speaker 3: And has actually thought for the right to go into
• 52:49
  Speaker 3: the men's locker room too.
• 52:51
  Speaker 1: Yeah, So if you're worried about a single trans woman
• 52:55
  Speaker 1: in a bathroom, why would you be okay with walking
• 52:59
  Speaker 1: into a room full of men?
• 53:01
  Speaker 2: You know?
• 53:02
  Speaker 1: It just it doesn't And it's and.
• 53:04
  Speaker 3: If you are willing, if we are going to.
• 53:07
  Speaker 1: Do this, if we're going to one hundred percent refuse
• 53:10
  Speaker 1: to allow trans women in women's bathrooms, then women should
• 53:13
  Speaker 1: be legally barred from men's bathrooms. Yeah, by the same
• 53:17
  Speaker 1: damn logic. All right, So uh yeah, no more sneaking
• 53:22
  Speaker 1: into the men's bathroom when the line's too long. But
• 53:25
  Speaker 1: before we continue, looks like I definitely have to do
• 53:28
  Speaker 1: some arm twisting.
• 53:29
  Speaker 4: Well, I got a super chat Can I read the
• 53:30
  Speaker 4: superchow really quick?
• 53:31
  Speaker 1: And yeah, you can read the superchild and I will prepare.
• 53:34
  Speaker 4: It's just yeah, it's a spurgy one from Great Endoors.
• 53:36
  Speaker 4: So he gives us ten dollars and says, Hannah, good
• 53:39
  Speaker 4: to see you here. The confusing plus fifty eight percent
• 53:42
  Speaker 4: Superchow comment of yesterday was about the percentage by which
• 53:45
  Speaker 4: the average income of an idealized imaginary man would preferably
• 53:49
  Speaker 4: be compared to the actual average income of a single
• 53:52
  Speaker 4: man in the US. Thus, plus fifty eight percent income
• 53:55
  Speaker 4: would result in one hundred percent genuine love and affection
• 53:59
  Speaker 4: provided by the mire and woman's military industrial complex, satisfaction guaranteed,
• 54:04
  Speaker 4: or your own tax money back.
• 54:06
  Speaker 3: Partially partially explaining the joke, well, because I read it
• 54:13
  Speaker 3: during the show.
• 54:15
  Speaker 2: I'm glad that you did. I didn't want to sing
• 54:17
  Speaker 2: that out.
• 54:17
  Speaker 3: So I am all right. I'm not that good at
• 54:21
  Speaker 3: singing either. I mean, y'all have heard me.
• 54:25
  Speaker 1: You do a pretty good job with the with the
• 54:27
  Speaker 1: the parody, though.
• 54:28
  Speaker 3: I have fun.
• 54:29
  Speaker 1: I have fun, all right, So I'm gonna have to
• 54:33
  Speaker 1: do some arm twisting these guys. Nobody has sent anything
• 54:35
  Speaker 1: through except for Great Indoors. Yes, very very emphatic super
• 54:43
  Speaker 1: Chow about explaining his his his sort of opic post
• 54:47
  Speaker 1: which I did get eventually.
• 54:50
  Speaker 3: I had the past.
• 54:52
  Speaker 1: It was after the show. It happened after the show,
• 54:55
  Speaker 1: and no, no, it happened during the show, didn't It happened.
• 54:58
  Speaker 4: We got it after we did our show on broke Men,
• 55:02
  Speaker 4: and then after it was done, it went through and
• 55:04
  Speaker 4: I was like, well, I can't I can't read it now,
• 55:06
  Speaker 4: so yeah.
• 55:08
  Speaker 1: Yeah, but I know, yeah, I had to read it
• 55:11
  Speaker 1: the next day. I actually read it because it pops
• 55:13
  Speaker 1: up on my living room TV whenever I have it
• 55:16
  Speaker 1: on the discord. So I was walking past it and
• 55:19
  Speaker 1: I think on the tenth walk past, I was like, oh,
• 55:23
  Speaker 1: that's what he meant. Oh damn, Oh yeah, that's clever.
• 55:28
  Speaker 1: Oh geez. I wish I had figured that out when
• 55:31
  Speaker 1: I first read it, but it took me a while
• 55:33
  Speaker 1: because you.
• 55:33
  Speaker 2: Know, yeah, it's pretty.
• 55:35
  Speaker 1: It is quite funny.
• 55:36
  Speaker 3: We talk about broke men, and you know, the whole
• 55:40
  Speaker 3: income income controversy regarding men and women and women. If
• 55:46
  Speaker 3: there's ever a place where women have demonstrated that there's
• 55:50
  Speaker 3: no right pathway for you know, satisfying women, and that
• 55:53
  Speaker 3: they're going to complain no matter what, and that you
• 55:56
  Speaker 3: should just ignore their complaints and do what you're gonna
• 55:58
  Speaker 3: do because you can satisfy them. It's in income, all right.
• 56:04
  Speaker 3: If a man makes too much money, he's obviously a
• 56:08
  Speaker 3: bad guy who has been ripping off the people who
• 56:11
  Speaker 3: are are less fortunate than he is. And it's fair
• 56:15
  Speaker 3: to gold dig him because that wasn't really his money anyway.
• 56:18
  Speaker 3: If he doesn't make enough money, he's a deadbeat. If
• 56:22
  Speaker 3: he makes more money than she does, it's unfair, it's sexism,
• 56:25
  Speaker 3: and she's not getting paid what she should be paying.
• 56:27
  Speaker 3: But if he makes less money than she does, then
• 56:31
  Speaker 3: he's not a good provider and she's not interested in
• 56:33
  Speaker 3: why would she could waste her time with a guy
• 56:35
  Speaker 3: that's not keeping up with her and so, and if
• 56:38
  Speaker 3: it's exactly equal, then you know, obviously he's not doing
• 56:43
  Speaker 3: enough because he's not making more and he's not doing
• 56:47
  Speaker 3: more work than she's doing. So there is no right pathway.
• 56:50
  Speaker 3: So guys, don't base your income choices, your labor choices,
• 56:54
  Speaker 3: your professional choices. Don't base that on what you think
• 56:57
  Speaker 3: a woman's gonna want from you, because there isn't anything
• 57:00
  Speaker 3: that you can do that's going to satisfy the complainers
• 57:03
  Speaker 3: out there. Do what you're gonna do, And if you
• 57:08
  Speaker 3: are going to get together with a woman. You'll if
• 57:12
  Speaker 3: you're happy in what you're doing and you're satisfied with
• 57:15
  Speaker 3: your life, you'll be happier with the partner that you
• 57:18
  Speaker 3: find that way than if you try to use whatever
• 57:22
  Speaker 3: kind of professional choices you make as a tool for
• 57:26
  Speaker 3: finding a partner.
• 57:28
  Speaker 1: All right, And with that, i'd just like to uh,
• 57:31
  Speaker 1: speaking of so again, we do need to get that
• 57:37
  Speaker 1: or I would really like to get the fundraiser funded.
• 57:41
  Speaker 1: So if you're if you are able to do so,
• 57:44
  Speaker 1: please go to feed the Badger dot com slash support.
• 57:46
  Speaker 1: I know often it isn't a matter of funds, it's
• 57:49
  Speaker 1: just you don't want to tear yourself away from our
• 57:51
  Speaker 1: scintillating conversation. So please just take a moment to put
• 57:55
  Speaker 1: in feed the Badger dot com slash support in your
• 57:58
  Speaker 1: website and just just ponder. But it would really be
• 58:02
  Speaker 1: a weight off my mind if even five ten bucks
• 58:06
  Speaker 1: from anybody listening to us now would get us much
• 58:08
  Speaker 1: much closer to the goal. And I would be very
• 58:12
  Speaker 1: appreciated because I'm sort of getting the dreads here and
• 58:15
  Speaker 1: I want to be able to continue to do this
• 58:17
  Speaker 1: work because I think it's really critical and I wouldn't
• 58:21
  Speaker 1: want to have to step back the pace or the
• 58:25
  Speaker 1: ability to continue to do these live strings at the
• 58:28
  Speaker 1: rate that we do do in order to try to
• 58:30
  Speaker 1: break through the censorship that surrounds us. But anyway, if
• 58:34
  Speaker 1: you would like to, please please, if you are able to,
• 58:37
  Speaker 1: if you have five ten bucks kicking around, that isn't
• 58:41
  Speaker 1: going towards the McDonald's burger. I don't know, maybe it
• 58:44
  Speaker 1: needs fifty bucks now, but please go to feed the
• 58:46
  Speaker 1: Badger dot com slash support and put some funds in
• 58:49
  Speaker 1: for myself, Brian Hannah and now also doctor Anmerkamp because
• 58:55
  Speaker 1: I'm trying to to you know, to help him out,
• 58:58
  Speaker 1: because he's he's stepping up the raid guys, so pay
• 59:01
  Speaker 1: attention to the main channel as well to see those.
• 59:03
  Speaker 1: So once again, feed the Badger dot com slash support.
• 59:05
  Speaker 1: If every single one of you listening to me, now
• 59:08
  Speaker 1: that includes the people on Twitter who could then we
• 59:12
  Speaker 1: actually have quite a few people watching us on Twitter
• 59:14
  Speaker 1: as well, gave five bucks, we'd be funded. That'd be it,
• 59:19
  Speaker 1: it would be done. So please consider doing so. I
• 59:22
  Speaker 1: feed the Badger dot com slash support. Just be the
• 59:24
  Speaker 1: first one to go and just put five bucks in, please,
• 59:27
  Speaker 1: So we can stop yammering about this, all right, so
• 59:31
  Speaker 1: let's get back to, uh, what the CIA doing and
• 59:34
  Speaker 1: then say, and now this di ia that where the
• 59:38
  Speaker 1: hell is that? Now?
• 59:40
  Speaker 3: Uh? Diversity, equity, and inclusion. Which it's interesting because they
• 59:49
  Speaker 3: don't mean any of those things when they say those things,
• 59:51
  Speaker 3: like diversity doesn't mean what what the word diverse means
• 59:56
  Speaker 3: when when they say it, it means ex exclusion of
• 1:00:01
  Speaker 3: certain groups of people.
• 1:00:03
  Speaker 1: Yeah, you know, advocating for possible Yeah.
• 1:00:08
  Speaker 2: The opposite if they do the opposite of what they claim.
• 1:00:12
  Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, all right, So what are you gonna look
• 1:00:16
  Speaker 4: at next?
• 1:00:17
  Speaker 1: Oh?
• 1:00:17
  Speaker 2: You keep going down the list? No, no, we can
• 1:00:20
  Speaker 2: keep going.
• 1:00:20
  Speaker 4: Okay, So Christopher Rufo like, why would they even very
• 1:00:25
  Speaker 4: how why would you.
• 1:00:25
  Speaker 1: Even have a sex chat for the freaking security agencies.
• 1:00:29
  Speaker 2: Of the US.
• 1:00:29
  Speaker 4: I don't know if there's like a timeline that shows
• 1:00:33
  Speaker 4: when this sort of stuff was stepping up, But what
• 1:00:35
  Speaker 4: I'm guessing is is that a lot of people got
• 1:00:37
  Speaker 4: government jobs from their activism as queer activists, and so
• 1:00:43
  Speaker 4: they just they so they were products themselves of this
• 1:00:48
  Speaker 4: kind of DEI hiring for their identity and of course
• 1:00:51
  Speaker 4: because they don't actually have any skills or merit, and
• 1:00:55
  Speaker 4: their whole personality is being like gay and weird. They're
• 1:00:58
  Speaker 4: basically forming groups with other peo people who are also
• 1:01:00
  Speaker 4: untalented and are gaining weird and they're just sort of
• 1:01:03
  Speaker 4: being weird together in chats. And that's what I suspect
• 1:01:06
  Speaker 4: it is. And so you have a bunch of people
• 1:01:09
  Speaker 4: who have no business getting government funding because they're not
• 1:01:12
  Speaker 4: doing anything for Americans, and they're all just being perverts
• 1:01:16
  Speaker 4: together because they feel like a kinship with other weirdo perverts.
• 1:01:20
  Speaker 2: So that's my guess. And I'm not saying this to
• 1:01:23
  Speaker 2: throw shade. I'm not.
• 1:01:24
  Speaker 4: This is not meant as a pejorative. It's just descriptive
• 1:01:28
  Speaker 4: because we can well, well we'll see, okay. So one
• 1:01:32
  Speaker 4: popular chat topic was male to female transgender surgery, which
• 1:01:36
  Speaker 4: involves surgically removing the penis and turning it into an
• 1:01:39
  Speaker 4: artificial vagina. These male intelligence agents love the feeling of
• 1:01:42
  Speaker 4: penetration and of peeing with their pseudo vaginas. So these
• 1:01:46
  Speaker 4: are okay, so what I'm see. What I'm saying, it's
• 1:01:49
  Speaker 4: like there are people who fetishize transitions.
• 1:01:53
  Speaker 2: They fetishize transitions, Okay.
• 1:01:55
  Speaker 4: And I'm sorry but like human beings were pretty fallen
• 1:01:58
  Speaker 4: and messed up, so we're gonna fetishize all kinds of things. Okay,
• 1:02:02
  Speaker 4: so here I'll read some of the chat here. I mean, honestly,
• 1:02:06
  Speaker 4: the rest is nice too, Wearing panties without worrying about anything,
• 1:02:09
  Speaker 4: showing seeing my reflection in the mirror, wearing leggings, et cetera.
• 1:02:13
  Speaker 4: But the pee thing is something I never thought of,
• 1:02:16
  Speaker 4: but it's really nice. And someone says, I'm going to
• 1:02:19
  Speaker 4: be wearing leggings all day Friday and Saturday. Then someone
• 1:02:22
  Speaker 4: else says, I think about that last one probably the most.
• 1:02:27
  Speaker 4: Mine's purely aesthetics, well almost purely, and not benign or
• 1:02:31
  Speaker 4: not being able to do some things I want. Mine
• 1:02:34
  Speaker 4: is everything I found that I like being penetrated, never
• 1:02:37
  Speaker 4: liked it before, but all the rest is just as
• 1:02:42
  Speaker 4: important as well. All I can say is that this
• 1:02:45
  Speaker 4: was one bazillion percent worth it, despite having to fly
• 1:02:50
  Speaker 4: to Thailand, pay out a pocket, and the recovery probably
• 1:02:53
  Speaker 4: with our money. By the way, I would not change
• 1:02:56
  Speaker 4: anything if I had.
• 1:02:57
  Speaker 2: To do it over again.
• 1:02:59
  Speaker 4: So sorry, but this isn't just people with genderous for you.
• 1:03:05
  Speaker 4: This is something darker and more twisted. Than that, and
• 1:03:08
  Speaker 4: they're going to use Generis borea as a thing to
• 1:03:10
  Speaker 4: hide behind.
• 1:03:11
  Speaker 1: Okay, So, and I know somebody said that I was
• 1:03:15
  Speaker 1: saying that these coping skills are gendered. Well, yes they are.
• 1:03:19
  Speaker 1: Like they literally are what men and women, and we
• 1:03:23
  Speaker 1: associate masculine and feminine behaviors very strongly with men and women,
• 1:03:26
  Speaker 1: like you think that human beings are some kind of
• 1:03:31
  Speaker 1: balls of pure light that hover above every other mammal
• 1:03:35
  Speaker 1: on the planet. Every mammal species, every dimorphic species, has
• 1:03:40
  Speaker 1: male and female behaviors and male and female prerogatives and goals,
• 1:03:47
  Speaker 1: and we're no different in fact, If anything, human beings
• 1:03:50
  Speaker 1: tend to be more aligned in their goals. Men and
• 1:03:52
  Speaker 1: women tend to be more aligned in their goals than
• 1:03:54
  Speaker 1: any other species on the planet. But we still have
• 1:03:57
  Speaker 1: these differences, We still have coping skills, We still have
• 1:04:02
  Speaker 1: that very based on whether we're male or female. That
• 1:04:04
  Speaker 1: doesn't mean that women can't adopt men's coping skills and
• 1:04:08
  Speaker 1: not be better off for it, or the reverse. But
• 1:04:10
  Speaker 1: what's interesting is that the emphasis here in all of
• 1:04:15
  Speaker 1: this is body and sex. Did they benefit from learning
• 1:04:23
  Speaker 1: female coping skills? Like? Did they? Are they talking about
• 1:04:26
  Speaker 1: any other aspect of being women. No, it's all just
• 1:04:30
  Speaker 1: physical and sex. They're all reducing everything down to the
• 1:04:34
  Speaker 1: body and removing everything else and not even considering anything else.
• 1:04:39
  Speaker 1: And before I let you speak, Karen, I guess I'm
• 1:04:42
  Speaker 1: gonna have to twist your arms again. Come on, that's
• 1:04:44
  Speaker 1: just one one person, go over and put in five dollars, please, like, please,
• 1:04:50
  Speaker 1: do I have to beg I mean, I think I.
• 1:04:53
  Speaker 4: Don't know, we might get like somebody sweeping in at
• 1:04:55
  Speaker 4: the last second.
• 1:04:56
  Speaker 2: Maybe they just like to w yeah, maybe we'll.
• 1:04:57
  Speaker 1: Get somebody sweeping in the last second. But please, guys,
• 1:05:00
  Speaker 1: five bucks, just one of you, please go so I
• 1:05:02
  Speaker 1: can shut up about this.
• 1:05:04
  Speaker 2: Oh how much more do we need?
• 1:05:07
  Speaker 1: We need about uh? We need? Oh okay, well we
• 1:05:12
  Speaker 1: need about now. We just got five hundred from from anonymous.
• 1:05:17
  Speaker 1: So there you go, thank you Anonymous. There yeah, but
• 1:05:28
  Speaker 1: I mean I really appreciate that. I just I want
• 1:05:31
  Speaker 1: to make sure that even the people who are donating
• 1:05:35
  Speaker 1: something smaller realize that it's really critical, because you know,
• 1:05:38
  Speaker 1: I don't want to always be relying on our really
• 1:05:40
  Speaker 1: big supporters. So thank you, huge, thanks to Anonymous, very
• 1:05:45
  Speaker 1: much appreciated. But if you're only like nothing is only
• 1:05:49
  Speaker 1: five ten bucks. What matters is that you're supporting these ideas,
• 1:05:53
  Speaker 1: that you are making sure that these ideas continue to
• 1:05:56
  Speaker 1: exist in the thought sphere, because we can't just handle
• 1:05:59
  Speaker 1: all this no offense. You can't just handle this over
• 1:06:02
  Speaker 1: to the conservatives because I do not think that they
• 1:06:06
  Speaker 1: really understand where this crap is coming from.
• 1:06:08
  Speaker 2: No, they don't.
• 1:06:10
  Speaker 3: In fact, they've latched on to the because of the
• 1:06:14
  Speaker 3: political end of the trends issue. They've latched onto the
• 1:06:19
  Speaker 3: messandric attitudes that the turfs promote. And so you've now
• 1:06:27
  Speaker 3: got the situation where there's gendered laws being passed by
• 1:06:31
  Speaker 3: conservatives and gendered rules being made by conservatives. So for
• 1:06:38
  Speaker 3: forty years, fifty years, really, women have pushed back on
• 1:06:44
  Speaker 3: men's sports by evading them and by insisting that men
• 1:06:50
  Speaker 3: can't have their sports if women don't have an interest
• 1:06:53
  Speaker 3: in equal participation on university campuses and in high school
• 1:06:57
  Speaker 3: sports and so on for decades, Like the initial passage
• 1:07:02
  Speaker 3: of Title nine wasn't it didn't have anything to do
• 1:07:05
  Speaker 3: with sports. It was about there were quotas in universities
• 1:07:09
  Speaker 3: that you can only have this many seats in the
• 1:07:13
  Speaker 3: school of medicine for women can have only this many
• 1:07:16
  Speaker 3: seats in the School of Law for women because a
• 1:07:19
  Speaker 3: lot of women either didn't practice a profession and didn't
• 1:07:23
  Speaker 3: bring any prestige to the school after they graduated, or
• 1:07:26
  Speaker 3: they didn't complete they went there to get their mrs degree,
• 1:07:30
  Speaker 3: you know, or maybe they didn't, but that's what happened anyway,
• 1:07:35
  Speaker 3: And so you had if you wanted as a university
• 1:07:38
  Speaker 3: for your students to go forth and do great things
• 1:07:40
  Speaker 3: and people to want to support your university, and at
• 1:07:44
  Speaker 3: ten year university, because of that, if you wanted future donors,
• 1:07:47
  Speaker 3: you reserved your seats for men up until about the
• 1:07:50
  Speaker 3: sixties and seventies, and then you started seeing more and
• 1:07:54
  Speaker 3: more women striving for that, and universities weren't keeping up
• 1:07:58
  Speaker 3: as quickly as feminists wanted them to. So that law
• 1:08:01
  Speaker 3: got passed, but by the time it actually hit the books,
• 1:08:04
  Speaker 3: it was already outdated. So what ended up happening was
• 1:08:08
  Speaker 3: the administration that was tasked with enforcing that law created
• 1:08:13
  Speaker 3: new reasons for it to exist. Oh, well, there aren't
• 1:08:16
  Speaker 3: enough female athletic programs. There aren't enough specific female athletic
• 1:08:21
  Speaker 3: programs for this sport or that sport. Or more men
• 1:08:24
  Speaker 3: are participating in sports than women, And so what ended
• 1:08:28
  Speaker 3: up happening in the eighties and the nineties is that
• 1:08:32
  Speaker 3: if there were not as many interested female athletes on
• 1:08:37
  Speaker 3: a particular university campus in order to meet the quota
• 1:08:41
  Speaker 3: systems that the Title nine program created after the law
• 1:08:47
  Speaker 3: was written to eliminate quota systems, then the Olympic wrestling
• 1:08:54
  Speaker 3: program or the Olympic gymnastics program for men got targeted
• 1:08:58
  Speaker 3: and they would end up disappearing. Schools weren't going to
• 1:09:00
  Speaker 3: get rid of their profitable basketball and football programs, you know.
• 1:09:05
  Speaker 3: So if they couldn't get powder puff football, if they
• 1:09:07
  Speaker 3: couldn't get enough interest in basketball among women, if they
• 1:09:10
  Speaker 3: couldn't get women to play golf, if they couldn't get
• 1:09:12
  Speaker 3: women to be, you know, have their own wrestling teams,
• 1:09:15
  Speaker 3: then those got scrapped. Right. So that's basically what women
• 1:09:21
  Speaker 3: did with Title nine all that time. And it was
• 1:09:24
  Speaker 3: only in the twenty first century, only in the last
• 1:09:27
  Speaker 3: ten years really that we've started seeing boys participating in
• 1:09:31
  Speaker 3: girls' sports and men participating in women's sports, and all
• 1:09:34
  Speaker 3: of a sudden there's a lot of outrage. Now, granted,
• 1:09:38
  Speaker 3: there are biological differences Granted, some of this is predatory, right,
• 1:09:43
  Speaker 3: that's true. But why was there no outrage when boys
• 1:09:47
  Speaker 3: were being denied scholarships, when men were being denied participation
• 1:09:52
  Speaker 3: in sports for decades, when Olympic hopefuls were being denied
• 1:09:58
  Speaker 3: their ability to train for the Olympics because the university
• 1:10:04
  Speaker 3: didn't have a girls football team, Where was the outrage, right,
• 1:10:08
  Speaker 3: Nobody cared. So it needs to be emphasized that this
• 1:10:14
  Speaker 3: is not a gender issue. This is an issue. This
• 1:10:18
  Speaker 3: is a human issue, and it's an issue of the
• 1:10:21
  Speaker 3: government needs to stop interfering in these ways and let
• 1:10:27
  Speaker 3: the community handle it instead. The only reason boys were
• 1:10:30
  Speaker 3: able to start inserting themselves into girls' sports in the
• 1:10:34
  Speaker 3: first place was the type of government interference that we're
• 1:10:37
  Speaker 3: talking about with regard to the CIA, all that DEAI
• 1:10:40
  Speaker 3: shit and all of that Title nine interference, that anti
• 1:10:45
  Speaker 3: discrimination interference, that's what they're using. Okay, your own shit
• 1:10:50
  Speaker 3: is being used against you, feminists, and now you're mad
• 1:10:54
  Speaker 3: that it's hurting you instead of men instead of joys.
• 1:10:58
  Speaker 3: So I feel sorry for anybody that complains about men
• 1:11:02
  Speaker 3: and boys in female sports, and I agree that conservatives
• 1:11:06
  Speaker 3: are not the answer. Conservatives in a lot of good
• 1:11:10
  Speaker 3: and important ways, and we shouldn't forget that. But don't
• 1:11:14
  Speaker 3: think that conservatism is the answer to men's issues, because
• 1:11:18
  Speaker 3: it's not.
• 1:11:18
  Speaker 1: Well, I would honestly say it's not the answer to
• 1:11:21
  Speaker 1: ultimately solving this issue of the corruption and the graft
• 1:11:25
  Speaker 1: and the grifting and the whole. Idea that women are
• 1:11:34
  Speaker 1: uniquely vulnerable, uniquely victimized relative to men, and not that
• 1:11:38
  Speaker 1: women have their own particular vulnerabilities, but that they are
• 1:11:43
  Speaker 1: vulnerability right relative.
• 1:11:45
  Speaker 3: To men creates Because women have vulnerabilities, that means men don't.
• 1:11:50
  Speaker 1: Yeah, that creates this asymmetrical idea, and it creates the
• 1:11:54
  Speaker 1: idea that there is a class of people that doesn't
• 1:11:58
  Speaker 1: have vulnerabilities, and as result of that, they owe everyone else.
• 1:12:03
  Speaker 1: Without that recognition, there's a class of people without vulnerabilities,
• 1:12:08
  Speaker 1: there can't be this idea that your vulnerabilities make it
• 1:12:13
  Speaker 1: so that society and the other class of people owes
• 1:12:16
  Speaker 1: you stuff. I mean, that's where communists, that's where communism
• 1:12:20
  Speaker 1: springs from. Once we recognize men's vulnerabilities, nobody's vulnerable. That
• 1:12:25
  Speaker 1: means nobody can use their vulnerabilities to extract resources out
• 1:12:29
  Speaker 1: of other people. Where's intersectionality gone? Where's identitarianism gone? Where's
• 1:12:35
  Speaker 1: most socialism? And communism pretty much gone? And it just
• 1:12:39
  Speaker 1: and the problem with the conservative attitude two of this,
• 1:12:42
  Speaker 1: and I don't mean to offend, but the problem with
• 1:12:44
  Speaker 1: the conservative attitude is feminists are addicted to the affectation
• 1:12:49
  Speaker 1: of vulnerability in women, and conservatives are often addicted to
• 1:12:54
  Speaker 1: the idea that men's identity is saving women. So they
• 1:12:58
  Speaker 1: don't want to give that up, don't want to challenge that.
• 1:13:01
  Speaker 1: But the problem is that the shadow side, the other
• 1:13:05
  Speaker 1: side of the conversation about women's or men's vulnerabilities, is
• 1:13:10
  Speaker 1: that women have responsibilities and they have to be held accountable,
• 1:13:15
  Speaker 1: and they are culpable. And if we don't have that conversation,
• 1:13:18
  Speaker 1: we continue to have a society in which half the
• 1:13:22
  Speaker 1: human race is not being held to a standard right
• 1:13:26
  Speaker 1: because men are their identity is to save women. Therefore,
• 1:13:31
  Speaker 1: the worse women get, the more irrational, the more illogical,
• 1:13:37
  Speaker 1: the more non pragmatic, the more advocating weird purse puppy identities,
• 1:13:44
  Speaker 1: the more psychotic, the more violent, The more we uh
• 1:13:49
  Speaker 1: we we focus on this idea that men exist to
• 1:13:52
  Speaker 1: save them, the more we reinforce that identity that men
• 1:13:56
  Speaker 1: have saving women, and so it's like a death spiral
• 1:13:59
  Speaker 1: because here's there's the problem. Women have really important things
• 1:14:03
  Speaker 1: that they need to do to sustain a society and
• 1:14:06
  Speaker 1: a civilization, and when they are not held accountable for that,
• 1:14:10
  Speaker 1: it stops happening. It's not a situation of Atlas Shrugged.
• 1:14:14
  Speaker 1: It's a situation of Athena Shrugged. And what we're seeing
• 1:14:18
  Speaker 1: is women have stepped off the job. And the big
• 1:14:20
  Speaker 1: thing that I've looking throughout history that women do is
• 1:14:24
  Speaker 1: they construct that identity, the patriotism, being a Christian, that's
• 1:14:30
  Speaker 1: what your mom teaches you, you know, being a good person,
• 1:14:34
  Speaker 1: being a good memory, even of a secular society, having
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 1: the kind of morals and social habits that create and
• 1:14:42
  Speaker 1: support civilization, like women are our first experience of belonging.
• 1:14:46
  Speaker 1: This is the essential task they do. And what are
• 1:14:48
  Speaker 1: women teaching that kernel that women are that everybody else's
• 1:14:52
  Speaker 1: identity flows from. What are women teaching in this society,
• 1:14:56
  Speaker 1: and this includes conservative women. They are teaching the in
• 1:15:00
  Speaker 1: a kernel of everyone's identity is victimhood. Right, either you
• 1:15:04
  Speaker 1: are a victim or you're somebody who serves victims. That's
• 1:15:08
  Speaker 1: what women are teaching in our society. Where do you
• 1:15:11
  Speaker 1: think all this graft is coming from. Where do you
• 1:15:13
  Speaker 1: think all of this ability to construct an entire business plan?
• 1:15:18
  Speaker 1: I know it's it's in the government, so it's not
• 1:15:20
  Speaker 1: really business based around. Advocacy for victimhood comes from It
• 1:15:24
  Speaker 1: comes from that because the very foundation of our identities
• 1:15:27
  Speaker 1: is now victimhood, because women, for too long have been
• 1:15:31
  Speaker 1: allowed to pretend that they're victims rather than co creators
• 1:15:34
  Speaker 1: of civilization. And we are going to continue to have
• 1:15:38
  Speaker 1: this shit for as long as we tolerated, like get in,
• 1:15:44
  Speaker 1: we might get dose showing oh, look at all the
• 1:15:47
  Speaker 1: ridiculous corruption, but then stopping short at the feminist NGOs
• 1:15:52
  Speaker 1: and all that's other crap promoting the idea that women
• 1:15:55
  Speaker 1: are victimhood, which women are victims, which incidentally is itself.
• 1:16:00
  Speaker 1: It's first, our first foray into this kind of governments
• 1:16:07
  Speaker 1: sanctioned I don't want to say androgyny, but complete destruction
• 1:16:12
  Speaker 1: of sex roles. The idea that women are victims was
• 1:16:15
  Speaker 1: the first step towards destroying the family, the relationship between men,
• 1:16:20
  Speaker 1: and everything else that falls after that. You believe that
• 1:16:24
  Speaker 1: women are victims, you are part of that system. And
• 1:16:27
  Speaker 1: I don't think conservatives are ready for that conversation, or
• 1:16:30
  Speaker 1: at least not most conservatives, you know, so they could be.
• 1:16:35
  Speaker 1: They can identify the graph when it's obvious, but they
• 1:16:39
  Speaker 1: cannot identify where it's coming from.
• 1:16:41
  Speaker 3: Yeah, and you can sort of see it. And there's
• 1:16:44
  Speaker 3: a thing that's I saw it on the side of
• 1:16:46
  Speaker 3: the screen there when the tweet was closed, when the
• 1:16:50
  Speaker 3: post was closed. But Elon Musk has apparently quoted Goad
• 1:16:57
  Speaker 3: said no, not the it's not on the live stuff.
• 1:17:03
  Speaker 3: It's it's it's any explore stuff. And it was Elon
• 1:17:07
  Speaker 3: Musk's suicidal empathy comment sparks policy debate. So suicidal empathy,
• 1:17:11
  Speaker 3: the concept of suicidal empathy is where you.
• 1:17:15
  Speaker 1: Have so much.
• 1:17:18
  Speaker 3: Drive to be compassionate to people who claim victimhood that
• 1:17:23
  Speaker 3: you give up your well being and your welfare in
• 1:17:27
  Speaker 3: order to cowtow. And it's it's something that happens a
• 1:17:29
  Speaker 3: lot in terms of like in the liberal at the
• 1:17:33
  Speaker 3: liberal end of things and at the communist end of things,
• 1:17:36
  Speaker 3: like those two little pathways off to the left, And
• 1:17:39
  Speaker 3: what you get out of it is people humiliating themselves
• 1:17:43
  Speaker 3: in order to appear to apologize to people who claim
• 1:17:46
  Speaker 3: historical victimhood, or people tolerating patterns of crime new patterns
• 1:17:53
  Speaker 3: of crime in their communities because they've created a culture
• 1:17:57
  Speaker 3: clash between their own culture and a culture that views
• 1:18:01
  Speaker 3: their culture as an enemy culture, in which they've imported
• 1:18:05
  Speaker 3: a bunch of people from the culture that views their
• 1:18:07
  Speaker 3: culture as an enemy culture, and now they don't understand
• 1:18:10
  Speaker 3: why those people are abusing the locals. And you know
• 1:18:14
  Speaker 3: things like that where you engage in self destructive tendencies
• 1:18:18
  Speaker 3: in order to either feel or appear compassionate to your
• 1:18:23
  Speaker 3: fellow human being. And that is a lot of what
• 1:18:27
  Speaker 3: like women sort of drive that, I think, because they
• 1:18:29
  Speaker 3: want that bit about appearing specifically appearing compassionate to your
• 1:18:33
  Speaker 3: fellow human being. Appearances are very important to women, and
• 1:18:37
  Speaker 3: often they're more important than reality. And so you end
• 1:18:42
  Speaker 3: up with this situation where when something like what we've
• 1:18:46
  Speaker 3: been looking at the grains that that grows from, the
• 1:18:50
  Speaker 3: seeds that that grows from when those are planted, and
• 1:18:53
  Speaker 3: people start pointing at it and going, you know, that's
• 1:18:56
  Speaker 3: a weed. We need to get rid of that weed
• 1:18:57
  Speaker 3: that is not a rosebush. Don't put that in with
• 1:19:00
  Speaker 3: the rose bushes. Women come around and surround it and
• 1:19:03
  Speaker 3: they're like, quit picking on the poor, innocent, little unusually
• 1:19:07
  Speaker 3: shaped rose bush. That's not nice. You got to be compassionate,
• 1:19:11
  Speaker 3: You've got to be sympathetic. This is as much a
• 1:19:13
  Speaker 3: rose bush, it identifies as a rose bush as any
• 1:19:16
  Speaker 3: other of the rose bushes in this garden. How dare you?
• 1:19:20
  Speaker 3: And suddenly it's allowed to grow and it's allowed to
• 1:19:25
  Speaker 3: choke out the rose bushes, it's allowed to release poisons
• 1:19:29
  Speaker 3: into the local environment. It's allowed to, you know, create
• 1:19:34
  Speaker 3: a danger with maybe much bigger thorns that shoot out
• 1:19:37
  Speaker 3: at people as they walk by. Like suddenly you've got
• 1:19:40
  Speaker 3: a very aggressive rose bush and it's not growing roses
• 1:19:42
  Speaker 3: on it, you know. And honestly, this.
• 1:19:47
  Speaker 1: Type of.
• 1:19:50
  Speaker 3: Women used to be able to use the functional end
• 1:19:55
  Speaker 3: of tribalism, where okay, yeah, we'll have neighbors that are
• 1:19:59
  Speaker 3: different from us. Okay, yeah, well we'll accept that. We
• 1:20:03
  Speaker 3: can get along with people that are different from us
• 1:20:06
  Speaker 3: as long as you don't pull out your knives. You
• 1:20:10
  Speaker 3: pull out that knife, then you're the other tribe again.
• 1:20:13
  Speaker 3: And fuck you right that women used to be able
• 1:20:17
  Speaker 3: to do that, And now what we have is I'm
• 1:20:21
  Speaker 3: such a good person that I'm going to ignore the knife. Oh,
• 1:20:25
  Speaker 3: how did this knife get into my rib cage? I'm
• 1:20:27
  Speaker 3: so sorry? Would you like it back? That's exactly what
• 1:20:33
  Speaker 3: the United States been has been doing for about the
• 1:20:36
  Speaker 3: last twenty years, and it's exactly why we've ended up
• 1:20:41
  Speaker 3: in this situation. Conservatives can recognize that that's happening. They
• 1:20:47
  Speaker 3: just need to take the step of recognizing that women
• 1:20:51
  Speaker 3: are the driving entity behind it and getting women to understand, no,
• 1:20:58
  Speaker 3: we can't do that anymore. Where we have to go
• 1:21:01
  Speaker 3: back to being our end of of the guardians of society.
• 1:21:07
  Speaker 3: We have to be like, men are the protectors with
• 1:21:10
  Speaker 3: the weapons, women are the protectors with the binoculars. You
• 1:21:14
  Speaker 3: have to pick the binoculars back up, and you have
• 1:21:17
  Speaker 3: to stop shutting up when you see the knives come out.
• 1:21:20
  Speaker 3: And that's not happening. So, yeah, there's no step that
• 1:21:24
  Speaker 3: they need to take. But they are conversation, you know.
• 1:21:28
  Speaker 1: No, they are, and honestly, I'm I am not sure
• 1:21:32
  Speaker 1: they will until things really like the get's worse, or alternatively,
• 1:21:42
  Speaker 1: what they're doing back potentially backfires because taking an even
• 1:21:49
  Speaker 1: layer deeper this thing that's happening now, this focus on
• 1:21:56
  Speaker 1: how women view the world to the exclusion of men.
• 1:21:59
  Speaker 1: So not just uh, not just the old uh, the
• 1:22:02
  Speaker 1: old baboushkas that understood how society functioned and understood how
• 1:22:06
  Speaker 1: you know, you gotta you gotta, you gotta, actually you
• 1:22:10
  Speaker 1: gotta shame the wicked whispers is what they called. And
• 1:22:13
  Speaker 1: you know you have to actually work to keep a
• 1:22:16
  Speaker 1: community healthy. You know, not that kind of femininity, but
• 1:22:21
  Speaker 1: this kind of incredibly effeminatee toxic and what I shouldn't
• 1:22:26
  Speaker 1: use the word toxic, but immature femininity, right, that has
• 1:22:29
  Speaker 1: become the kernel of our society. So women see themselves
• 1:22:34
  Speaker 1: as victims. Then everybody sees themselves either as victims or
• 1:22:38
  Speaker 1: as somebody who should put their head down and just
• 1:22:41
  Speaker 1: submit to destruction in the service of the victims. And
• 1:22:46
  Speaker 1: this is this is this is because again women's role
• 1:22:49
  Speaker 1: appears to be to set the sense of belonging of people,
• 1:22:53
  Speaker 1: because your mom is your first sense of first relationship
• 1:22:57
  Speaker 1: of belonging. Right, So there's something deeper that's going on.
• 1:23:01
  Speaker 1: There's a reason why when civilizations or tribes or communities
• 1:23:06
  Speaker 1: at the end of their life cycle, it ends up
• 1:23:10
  Speaker 1: being that women start to play. Well, what happens is
• 1:23:13
  Speaker 1: women start getting into the things that were usually in
• 1:23:17
  Speaker 1: the past reserved for men. So, for example, in the
• 1:23:20
  Speaker 1: Ottoman Empire at the end, starting towards the end, you
• 1:23:25
  Speaker 1: started to see the sultant of the Harem. So women
• 1:23:27
  Speaker 1: were starting to take over political positions and political power,
• 1:23:31
  Speaker 1: and they've noticed it. Also anthropologists, in tribal communities, the
• 1:23:36
  Speaker 1: community is sort of done for when women start to
• 1:23:40
  Speaker 1: be included in men's mysteries. So this migration of women
• 1:23:44
  Speaker 1: into men's spaces usually indicates that we're in the end.
• 1:23:49
  Speaker 1: But why, I mean, this is something that we've dealt
• 1:23:52
  Speaker 1: with throughout all of human history. Why and how do
• 1:23:55
  Speaker 1: we stop it? Because we can't have these these rises
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 1: and collapses if we ever want to get to the stars.
• 1:24:01
  Speaker 1: I mean, maybe we'll make Mars, but we're not going
• 1:24:03
  Speaker 1: to make any further unless we deal specifically with that.
• 1:24:07
  Speaker 1: Why is it that when women start taking over men's
• 1:24:11
  Speaker 1: role a society collapses. Why does that tell you, Okay,
• 1:24:16
  Speaker 1: let's let's sure go ahead.
• 1:24:18
  Speaker 3: It's the gap in accountability, all right. The society's success
• 1:24:22
  Speaker 3: relies on a level of accountability being imposed on men
• 1:24:27
  Speaker 3: and being adopted by men, So it's internalized as well
• 1:24:31
  Speaker 3: as externalized. Wherein in those positions of responsibility where they're
• 1:24:38
  Speaker 3: building the civilization, where they're running the things that keep
• 1:24:42
  Speaker 3: the civilization safe, or that keep the civilization fed, or
• 1:24:47
  Speaker 3: that keep the civilization sanitary, to keep it secure, and
• 1:24:52
  Speaker 3: that keep it comfortable. That they don't have excuses for
• 1:24:57
  Speaker 3: not doing their jobs right. They don't have excuses for
• 1:25:01
  Speaker 3: not showing up every day. They don't have excuses for
• 1:25:04
  Speaker 3: not working even when it hurts or when it's hard,
• 1:25:07
  Speaker 3: or when it's dangerous or dirty or disgusting or scary
• 1:25:10
  Speaker 3: or gross or even just dismal. Right, even just the
• 1:25:16
  Speaker 3: guy that has to stand out in cold, driving rain
• 1:25:21
  Speaker 3: and completely pay attention the whole time to the same
• 1:25:24
  Speaker 3: small area that he's watching to make sure that that
• 1:25:27
  Speaker 3: thing doesn't get damaged or sabotaged or stop working or whatever.
• 1:25:33
  Speaker 3: If that guy doesn't do his job, you know, then
• 1:25:37
  Speaker 3: that thing doesn't work, and what it does to keep
• 1:25:41
  Speaker 3: that society going doesn't happen. And if that happens all
• 1:25:45
  Speaker 3: over society. If men don't get up and go even
• 1:25:50
  Speaker 3: when their back's hurt, even when their mom just died,
• 1:25:53
  Speaker 3: even when their dog just died, you know, even when
• 1:25:56
  Speaker 3: they're sick or tired or getting divorced, or being falsely
• 1:26:00
  Speaker 3: accused of a crime, or anything else that could happen
• 1:26:03
  Speaker 3: to them, even if they hate that job, even if
• 1:26:06
  Speaker 3: that's not the job they ever wanted to do, even
• 1:26:09
  Speaker 3: if they're not getting their paychecks their ex wife is.
• 1:26:12
  Speaker 3: You know, if they don't do that, society collapses. But
• 1:26:17
  Speaker 3: when you put women in those positions, women are raised
• 1:26:21
  Speaker 3: with excuses. If we're sick, somebody has compassion for us,
• 1:26:25
  Speaker 3: We go to a doctor, we take time off. We
• 1:26:28
  Speaker 3: have this concept called self care. Nobody created that concept
• 1:26:32
  Speaker 3: for men. That concept was created for women, right, and
• 1:26:37
  Speaker 3: we are expected to take time for ourselves. We are
• 1:26:41
  Speaker 3: expected to primp and make ourselves vain, and expect people
• 1:26:47
  Speaker 3: to look at us and approve of our appearances and
• 1:26:50
  Speaker 3: take identity from an entitlement to be approved of. We
• 1:26:55
  Speaker 3: are expected to choose not to do something because we're
• 1:26:59
  Speaker 3: mad at somebody else. We're expected to choose not to
• 1:27:01
  Speaker 3: do something because it's uncomfortable, or we don't feel safe
• 1:27:04
  Speaker 3: doing it, or we don't like it. It's not the
• 1:27:06
  Speaker 3: goal that we had in our lives. Something has made
• 1:27:09
  Speaker 3: it more difficult than usual for us. So when you
• 1:27:12
  Speaker 3: put women in positions where they are responsible for things
• 1:27:17
  Speaker 3: that are essential to maintain the structure of society, to
• 1:27:22
  Speaker 3: maintain the safety of their community, to maintain the provision
• 1:27:28
  Speaker 3: of resources, or to maintain the ability of the community
• 1:27:34
  Speaker 3: to engage with itself in various ways, like traffic flowing
• 1:27:38
  Speaker 3: properly instead of having a lot of car accidents, or
• 1:27:42
  Speaker 3: electricity getting delivered to all of the houses and not
• 1:27:44
  Speaker 3: just the ones you know in the wealthy neighborhoods. They fail, right,
• 1:27:50
  Speaker 3: they fail because they don't have that accountability. They are
• 1:27:54
  Speaker 3: allowed to have excuses to not do their jobs. And
• 1:27:59
  Speaker 3: so every civilization we've had, that accountability gap must have
• 1:28:02
  Speaker 3: been there. We know it's there now, and we know
• 1:28:05
  Speaker 3: that it affects a lot of things in our current situation.
• 1:28:09
  Speaker 3: We know that it's affected our politics. We know that
• 1:28:12
  Speaker 3: it's affected the way that our government has grown. We
• 1:28:15
  Speaker 3: know that it's affected the success of our business endeavors
• 1:28:18
  Speaker 3: in the United States at least, you know, don't We
• 1:28:21
  Speaker 3: don't export a lot of good stuff anymore. We export
• 1:28:24
  Speaker 3: feminism now, like that's that's the consequence of lack of
• 1:28:31
  Speaker 3: accountability and women.
• 1:28:32
  Speaker 1: So because is that first denial of the relationship, and
• 1:28:37
  Speaker 1: the difference is between men and women, and then everything
• 1:28:39
  Speaker 1: else comes down from it.
• 1:28:41
  Speaker 3: So if women want to enter into men's mysteries and
• 1:28:46
  Speaker 3: the places where men gain prestige from taking accountability for
• 1:28:52
  Speaker 3: unpleasant things and worse, then women need to develop male accountability.
• 1:28:59
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 1:29:00
  Speaker 3: And if women don't want to develop male accountability, then
• 1:29:04
  Speaker 3: they need to stay the hell out of those things
• 1:29:06
  Speaker 3: and let the men handle it because they're doing a
• 1:29:08
  Speaker 3: good job.
• 1:29:09
  Speaker 2: Mm hmmm.
• 1:29:10
  Speaker 1: Well, and then there's there's an additional layer to that.
• 1:29:13
  Speaker 1: But I won't get into it unless somebody sends five bucks.
• 1:29:16
  Speaker 1: My bucks, feed the Badger.
• 1:29:18
  Speaker 3: Dot com slash support.
• 1:29:20
  Speaker 1: We got a super job, but I'm going to do
• 1:29:21
  Speaker 1: this first. Somebody, just five dollars. I don't want like
• 1:29:25
  Speaker 1: two hundred dollars, just five. Just send go to feed
• 1:29:28
  Speaker 1: the Badger dot com slash support and put in five
• 1:29:30
  Speaker 1: dollars and I will explain.
• 1:29:32
  Speaker 3: I will export hit something important the deeper thread.
• 1:29:37
  Speaker 2: Yeah you read and read the super service. Yeah, yeah,
• 1:29:41
  Speaker 2: sure so great.
• 1:29:43
  Speaker 4: Indoors gives us ten dollars and says I for one
• 1:29:46
  Speaker 4: welcome our DEI pro trans acceptance governmental non working overlords.
• 1:29:50
  Speaker 4: Let them destroy these agencies from the inside out. G
• 1:29:54
  Speaker 4: will not divide US agencies internal affairs sweats profusely, and
• 1:29:58
  Speaker 4: then what was the earth?
• 1:30:00
  Speaker 3: Which one so irving the fourth pointed out as a
• 1:30:03
  Speaker 3: guy of a younger generation, is becoming more common for
• 1:30:06
  Speaker 3: young fellas to take self care days. They just don't
• 1:30:08
  Speaker 3: call it that. There's a general perception in our culture
• 1:30:11
  Speaker 3: that women doing fun things and enjoying themselves is immoral.
• 1:30:14
  Speaker 3: That's not true. People should always be free to relax.
• 1:30:17
  Speaker 3: Women taking care of themselves is not the problem. Men
• 1:30:20
  Speaker 3: not being allowed to do so is the problem. So
• 1:30:22
  Speaker 3: we have two things on there. First of all, the
• 1:30:25
  Speaker 3: accountability issue, like men taking self care days. When men
• 1:30:30
  Speaker 3: do that, they make arrangements most of the time to
• 1:30:35
  Speaker 3: cover their responsibilities. Women don't necessarily always do that. And
• 1:30:41
  Speaker 3: it's not immoral for women to have self care. It's
• 1:30:45
  Speaker 3: immoral for women to take it at other people's expense
• 1:30:47
  Speaker 3: as an entitlement. And we don't see a lot of
• 1:30:50
  Speaker 3: men doing that. But that might that change of men
• 1:30:55
  Speaker 3: being becoming more likely to do that because women make
• 1:30:57
  Speaker 3: it okay might be another reason why societies collapse. It's
• 1:31:02
  Speaker 3: it's the lack of consideration for other people that women
• 1:31:05
  Speaker 3: engage in that makes women's less lower accountability a thing right.
• 1:31:11
  Speaker 3: You're less accountable if you're more likely to call in
• 1:31:15
  Speaker 3: sick without finding coverage for your shift, You're less accountable.
• 1:31:19
  Speaker 3: If you're more likely to call in sick when you're
• 1:31:22
  Speaker 3: not sick, you're You're less accountable if you're more likely
• 1:31:26
  Speaker 3: to do less of a good job, or stop paying
• 1:31:29
  Speaker 3: attention to the thing you need to be paying attention
• 1:31:31
  Speaker 3: to because you're uncomfortable or unhappy, or any reason other
• 1:31:37
  Speaker 3: than you became unconscious or some other outside source prevented
• 1:31:41
  Speaker 3: you despite your best efforts, and for all of this time,
• 1:31:45
  Speaker 3: for centuries, you know, men have had that obligation of
• 1:31:49
  Speaker 3: if I'm responsible for this, I'm responsible for it, and
• 1:31:52
  Speaker 3: if I don't find some way to meet that responsibility
• 1:31:56
  Speaker 3: besides being there, then I have to be there. And
• 1:32:00
  Speaker 3: you know, women haven't necessarily always had that. They've always
• 1:32:03
  Speaker 3: had excuses for not meeting their responsibilities, but not finding
• 1:32:07
  Speaker 3: help meeting their responsibilities either, And so when women get
• 1:32:13
  Speaker 3: into positions where not meeting their responsibilities affects a large
• 1:32:18
  Speaker 3: group of people, like an air traffic controller or a
• 1:32:23
  Speaker 3: pilot or a cop, a fireman, the mayor of a city,
• 1:32:29
  Speaker 3: the civil service director, and then they don't meet their responsibilities.
• 1:32:33
  Speaker 3: Things that should work normally for large groups of people
• 1:32:38
  Speaker 3: instead inflict harm upon large groups of people when that happens.
• 1:32:42
  Speaker 3: When a man does it, there's accountability, He goes to jail,
• 1:32:45
  Speaker 3: he gets fired, some sort of penalty is inflicted upon him.
• 1:32:49
  Speaker 3: When women do it, they have all kinds of excuses, right,
• 1:32:54
  Speaker 3: So when we get it to a point in society
• 1:32:56
  Speaker 3: where those excuses get transferred to men, that's actually a
• 1:33:01
  Speaker 3: step down. That's worse. Instead of women developing more accountability, now,
• 1:33:06
  Speaker 3: dividing or distributing compassion equally among the sexes is not bad.
• 1:33:12
  Speaker 3: Having compassion for the man who's back is injured, who's
• 1:33:17
  Speaker 3: trying to do that job anyway, or maybe who should
• 1:33:21
  Speaker 3: be allowed to retire any younger man coming to do
• 1:33:24
  Speaker 3: the job, that's not a bad thing. It's a bad
• 1:33:28
  Speaker 3: thing when we treat him like a woman and suggests
• 1:33:32
  Speaker 3: that maybe it's not essential to protect other people from
• 1:33:36
  Speaker 3: being let down, you know, Or when we suggest that
• 1:33:41
  Speaker 3: a woman should get in there and be allowed to
• 1:33:44
  Speaker 3: let people down, after that guy has spent all those
• 1:33:47
  Speaker 3: years with his injured back doing that job and not
• 1:33:50
  Speaker 3: letting people down. So you see what I mean, but
• 1:33:53
  Speaker 3: what you've got there, that grain that you carried in
• 1:33:55
  Speaker 3: there of a lot of guys are now taking self
• 1:33:58
  Speaker 3: care days, but they don't call it that. It's an
• 1:34:01
  Speaker 3: interesting thing because we're already on the downward spiral, and
• 1:34:06
  Speaker 3: it's it's not a bad thing that guys take self
• 1:34:08
  Speaker 3: care days, but it is a bad thing if they
• 1:34:11
  Speaker 3: start doing it in an unaccountable way like women do.
• 1:34:16
  Speaker 3: Does that make sense, yes, exactly, yeah, definitely.
• 1:34:21
  Speaker 1: But if you actually look at the General Social Survey,
• 1:34:24
  Speaker 1: the amount of time that men worked between the fifties
• 1:34:29
  Speaker 1: and the sixties went down three hours a day, but
• 1:34:33
  Speaker 1: they increased the amount of time they did housework by
• 1:34:36
  Speaker 1: like five hours, well, well three hours a week, five
• 1:34:40
  Speaker 1: hours a week, and actually even I think even more,
• 1:34:43
  Speaker 1: and then also substantially increased childcare. So overall men are
• 1:34:48
  Speaker 1: actually doing five to eight hours more time a week
• 1:34:52
  Speaker 1: than they did in the fifties. So we have all
• 1:34:55
  Speaker 1: this feminist stuff saying, well, let's let's let's get men
• 1:34:58
  Speaker 1: to have or let's let's have women be able to
• 1:35:00
  Speaker 1: take self care days, and then you talk about, oh,
• 1:35:04
  Speaker 1: but you know the real problem is that men aren't
• 1:35:06
  Speaker 1: able to do what women were able to do. But
• 1:35:09
  Speaker 1: everybody was better off in terms of their time in
• 1:35:11
  Speaker 1: the fifties. Like that's the that's the big thing, guys.
• 1:35:16
  Speaker 1: Everybody was better off in the fifties when it comes
• 1:35:19
  Speaker 1: to the amount of time they had to spend on household,
• 1:35:23
  Speaker 1: childcare and work.
• 1:35:26
  Speaker 3: Like they were.
• 1:35:31
  Speaker 1: And it's made out like everybody is doing more work now. Yeah, right,
• 1:35:37
  Speaker 1: So explain that if this is supposed to be about
• 1:35:40
  Speaker 1: getting everybody in a better situation, it's made everybody's situation worse.
• 1:35:45
  Speaker 1: And I really think that people need to enlighten themselves
• 1:35:48
  Speaker 1: about the way men and women acted in the fifties
• 1:35:51
  Speaker 1: because it's not what you think it was at all.
• 1:35:55
  Speaker 1: But anyway, the I wanted to do some thank yous
• 1:35:59
  Speaker 1: because we've finally got some some movement. We have movement.
• 1:36:02
  Speaker 2: Yea kay, yay, yay yay movement.
• 1:36:10
  Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, So thank you to zoom Man for
• 1:36:15
  Speaker 1: five fifty dollars. I really hope that's not your legal name.
• 1:36:18
  Speaker 2: All right, Thank you zoom Man, And.
• 1:36:24
  Speaker 1: Thank you for to Wyatt who listened and did exactly
• 1:36:29
  Speaker 1: what I asked, which was five dollars. So thank you Wyatt,
• 1:36:32
  Speaker 1: because putting exactly five dollars I'm going to explain the deeper,
• 1:36:37
  Speaker 1: the deeper significance of all of this. We're going to
• 1:36:40
  Speaker 1: go into the deep dive with me. And then PLM
• 1:36:43
  Speaker 1: gave us ten dollars, so thank you PLM even more base.
• 1:36:50
  Speaker 2: Thank you for that. I don't know this this Okay,
• 1:36:54
  Speaker 2: here we go.
• 1:36:58
  Speaker 1: And now we have now we have let me check,
• 1:37:04
  Speaker 1: just really quick, give me checking music like some form
• 1:37:08
  Speaker 1: of Jeopardy music, will I check?
• 1:37:09
  Speaker 4: Uh?
• 1:37:10
  Speaker 2: I don't have any of that anymore.
• 1:37:12
  Speaker 1: But well, we got two hundred excuse me, two hundred
• 1:37:16
  Speaker 1: and eighty dollars left on the on the the docket,
• 1:37:19
  Speaker 1: so hopefully we make that. And we got about five
• 1:37:22
  Speaker 1: hours remaining, so two hundred and eighty bucks. Hopefully we
• 1:37:25
  Speaker 1: get that. And I shall now take you into one
• 1:37:29
  Speaker 1: of Alison's patented deep dives. No oh, okay, So Kenna
• 1:37:37
  Speaker 1: was right about talking about how when women move into
• 1:37:40
  Speaker 1: men's spaces, the big problem is the lack of accountability.
• 1:37:43
  Speaker 1: It's also I think tribalism and turning the space from
• 1:37:47
  Speaker 1: something that produces resources into distributing resources, which is something
• 1:37:52
  Speaker 1: that you know, female mammals have a greater focus on
• 1:37:55
  Speaker 1: than male mammals. We go down to like anthropology and biology.
• 1:38:00
  Speaker 1: So there's that, But then there's the question of why
• 1:38:03
  Speaker 1: is it that when a society is its end in
• 1:38:07
  Speaker 1: its ends days, women start to move into men's spaces
• 1:38:11
  Speaker 1: in the first place. And the answer to that, I
• 1:38:15
  Speaker 1: think is that we over time we see a deterioration
• 1:38:20
  Speaker 1: in that sense of collective fate, that sense of shared fate.
• 1:38:25
  Speaker 1: So are in conjunction with this movement of women into
• 1:38:30
  Speaker 1: men's spaces and men's mysteries, we also see the destruction
• 1:38:34
  Speaker 1: of the old gods or god or religious structures. And
• 1:38:39
  Speaker 1: those religious structures and those old beliefs generally represent the
• 1:38:44
  Speaker 1: social the social habits, the social attitudes that enable a
• 1:38:50
  Speaker 1: particular culture to get along, cooperate and exploit a particular
• 1:38:56
  Speaker 1: form of resource, because most cultures really form around the
• 1:39:00
  Speaker 1: ability to exploit a resource. And what seems to happen
• 1:39:03
  Speaker 1: is that men will take an identity over how well
• 1:39:05
  Speaker 1: they exploit that resource. So if you have a lot
• 1:39:09
  Speaker 1: of fish, the most impressive man is a fisherman.
• 1:39:14
  Speaker 2: You know.
• 1:39:14
  Speaker 1: If you have a lot of oysters, the most impressive
• 1:39:17
  Speaker 1: man is the one who shocks the most oysters in
• 1:39:19
  Speaker 1: an hour, etc. I'm being a little bit facetious, but
• 1:39:21
  Speaker 1: you get what I mean. So the manhood is centered
• 1:39:24
  Speaker 1: around the exploitation of that resource, and when either the
• 1:39:27
  Speaker 1: resource changes or gets over exploited or something else happens,
• 1:39:32
  Speaker 1: there's almost a abandonment in the belief of the old
• 1:39:36
  Speaker 1: beliefs that generate that identity that exploits the resource, but
• 1:39:41
  Speaker 1: also the cooperation necessary to exploit the resource and the
• 1:39:44
  Speaker 1: cooperation in society. And then you start seeing the question
• 1:39:49
  Speaker 1: who are we? What do we do? The old gods
• 1:39:52
  Speaker 1: don't serve us, you know what, We need something new,
• 1:39:57
  Speaker 1: And it seems like there's almost this ten see towards
• 1:40:00
  Speaker 1: a default of well, let's serve our women and let's
• 1:40:07
  Speaker 1: let's give them the things that they want. Let's put
• 1:40:09
  Speaker 1: them in positions of power. And what it is is
• 1:40:13
  Speaker 1: avoid in our collective identity that's that women are. Actually,
• 1:40:19
  Speaker 1: it's it's like a it's like a patch job. So
• 1:40:22
  Speaker 1: instead of developing a new identity around a new resource
• 1:40:27
  Speaker 1: or a new set of circumstances or new technologies and
• 1:40:29
  Speaker 1: how to exploit them, we just put women in there.
• 1:40:32
  Speaker 1: And we're like, Okay, let's judge everything by women's benefit.
• 1:40:36
  Speaker 1: Let's not let's let's allow them to go into every space.
• 1:40:40
  Speaker 1: Let's let's put them in positions of power. And what's
• 1:40:44
  Speaker 1: interesting to me is if we can actually develop the
• 1:40:50
  Speaker 1: ability too on a very conscious level, look at our identities,
• 1:40:57
  Speaker 1: look at how they're structured, and evolve them as necessary
• 1:41:03
  Speaker 1: to the circumstances of new technology. And I know that
• 1:41:06
  Speaker 1: sounds like some seriously degenerate, fucking black magic, but I
• 1:41:10
  Speaker 1: think that that would actually overcome this perpetual cycle of
• 1:41:15
  Speaker 1: a civilization rising up, exploiting a resource, getting so good
• 1:41:19
  Speaker 1: at exploiting the resource, or alternatively, well actually usually it's
• 1:41:24
  Speaker 1: so good at exploiting the resource that they almost like
• 1:41:27
  Speaker 1: this indulgence, this forgetting this old God's come this that
• 1:41:31
  Speaker 1: creates almost a new circumstance that that old identity is
• 1:41:34
  Speaker 1: not functional in. And then we solve that by centering women,
• 1:41:40
  Speaker 1: because men take an identity from women's benefit. I hate
• 1:41:43
  Speaker 1: to say it, and I mean women and children, but
• 1:41:46
  Speaker 1: for the most part, it's it's it's more difficult to
• 1:41:50
  Speaker 1: what happens is I think women occupy that role because
• 1:41:53
  Speaker 1: they are adults with you know, adult scheming capabilities, right,
• 1:41:57
  Speaker 1: So anyway, let's uh, that's that's what I think is happening.
• 1:41:59
  Speaker 1: We've lost a sense of ourselves, we've lost a sense
• 1:42:04
  Speaker 1: of purpose, we've lost a sense that we are in
• 1:42:07
  Speaker 1: you have a united and shared goal going into the future,
• 1:42:11
  Speaker 1: and we lost It's someone where in the last century.
• 1:42:16
  Speaker 1: And then instead of actually addressing that loss, we just said, well,
• 1:42:21
  Speaker 1: but what if women were the center of the universe.
• 1:42:24
  Speaker 1: Let's do that, and then here we are. Okay, that's
• 1:42:29
  Speaker 1: my deep dive. I've putting it out there for thoughts.
• 1:42:33
  Speaker 3: It's interesting how upset people get when you touch on
• 1:42:35
  Speaker 3: that nerve, because it's because they've taken such an identity
• 1:42:42
  Speaker 3: from that and it's sort of a last ditch identity
• 1:42:45
  Speaker 3: and they don't know what to go back to if
• 1:42:47
  Speaker 3: they let go of that. It's actually terrifying.
• 1:42:50
  Speaker 2: It's like.
• 1:42:52
  Speaker 3: Standing on the edge of a cliff and then having
• 1:42:57
  Speaker 3: you maybe change the lighting so that that becomes invisible,
• 1:43:02
  Speaker 3: and they think that they're over nothing. Very interesting response.
• 1:43:09
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, this is really like if you look at
• 1:43:12
  Speaker 1: the vertical chat, holy crap, these guys are triggered. It's
• 1:43:16
  Speaker 1: interesting because you know when you've really hit something when
• 1:43:21
  Speaker 1: it bothers people to this degree. Anyway, So that's my
• 1:43:24
  Speaker 1: thought for the day. And let me see where we're at.
• 1:43:28
  Speaker 1: I think Actually, no, I I was wrong. We have
• 1:43:32
  Speaker 1: one hundred and eighty left. Did somebody just put something
• 1:43:36
  Speaker 1: through really quick? Was it another five dollars? Okay, I
• 1:43:41
  Speaker 1: just have to wait.
• 1:43:41
  Speaker 4: For thee we.
• 1:43:45
  Speaker 3: We're like the paper boy from.
• 1:43:50
  Speaker 1: The Great Indoors put in one hundred dollars. So thank
• 1:43:52
  Speaker 1: you the Great Indoors. One hundred and eighty bucks left
• 1:43:55
  Speaker 1: on the fundraiser we were starting out with I think
• 1:43:57
  Speaker 1: eight hundred and seventy when we began this an hour
• 1:44:00
  Speaker 1: and a half ago, and now we're at one hundred
• 1:44:03
  Speaker 1: and eighty so we're moving along. Thank you guys for
• 1:44:05
  Speaker 1: getting us unstuck and uh and easing the fear. All right,
• 1:44:14
  Speaker 1: so let's let's do Should we read some more CIA stuff?
• 1:44:19
  Speaker 2: Yeah, let's read more CIA stuff. I guess so. Yeah.
• 1:44:23
  Speaker 4: This is more of that conversation about artificial vaginas.
• 1:44:29
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 1:44:29
  Speaker 4: That's the big thing for me is being able to
• 1:44:32
  Speaker 4: wear leggings or bikinis without having to wear a golf
• 1:44:37
  Speaker 4: under it. I don't know what that means. I don't care.
• 1:44:39
  Speaker 4: Don't tell me, don't tell me. I don't want to know. Also,
• 1:44:43
  Speaker 4: one of the weirdest things that gives me euphoria is
• 1:44:45
  Speaker 4: when ip I don't have to push anything down and
• 1:44:48
  Speaker 4: make sure it aims right. I wear leggings in bikini
• 1:44:50
  Speaker 4: without a gaff under it. It's just that I know
• 1:44:54
  Speaker 4: it will show. But the idea of just having it
• 1:44:57
  Speaker 4: would be amazing. So they're they're they're gushing about their
• 1:45:03
  Speaker 4: jeneritor use for euphoria.
• 1:45:05
  Speaker 3: Well, they're they're gutting about their physical appearance and being
• 1:45:13
  Speaker 3: their low effort p basically like it's a lot less
• 1:45:16
  Speaker 3: effort to pee if you could just sit down and
• 1:45:18
  Speaker 3: let it fall in right. So obviously this is they
• 1:45:24
  Speaker 3: really are transitioning because men aren't allowed to have those
• 1:45:28
  Speaker 3: kinds of Uh.
• 1:45:30
  Speaker 4: Well, remember one of the things that was big during
• 1:45:34
  Speaker 4: the Biden administration were trans women joining the military because
• 1:45:39
  Speaker 4: they were going to surgery.
• 1:45:42
  Speaker 3: But what I'm saying is men are not allowed to
• 1:45:44
  Speaker 3: be lazy about things like that, and they're not allowed
• 1:45:46
  Speaker 3: to be vain in our society like that. You have
• 1:45:48
  Speaker 3: this when men are vain, and when men want to
• 1:45:53
  Speaker 3: make things easier just for themselves and want for for anything,
• 1:45:57
  Speaker 3: they get lambasted with, you know, allegations of character flaws.
• 1:46:03
  Speaker 3: You're lazy, you're you're narcissistic, you're deadbeat, you're an asshole, whatever.
• 1:46:10
  Speaker 3: When women are vain, we give them careers like that's
• 1:46:14
  Speaker 3: what only fans is, basically like, it is giving careers
• 1:46:19
  Speaker 3: to women whose main characteristic is their vanity. Look at me,
• 1:46:23
  Speaker 3: look at me, and you know. And it's not not
• 1:46:27
  Speaker 3: to say that, you know, if that's your way of
• 1:46:30
  Speaker 3: doing things and you make money at it, that you
• 1:46:32
  Speaker 3: shouldn't be allowed. But you have to understand the difference.
• 1:46:36
  Speaker 3: Men don't get to do that women do. This may
• 1:46:40
  Speaker 3: be one of the reason why, for however many trans
• 1:46:45
  Speaker 3: men there are out there, there's a shitload more trans
• 1:46:48
  Speaker 3: women because men have it harder in terms of comfort
• 1:46:53
  Speaker 3: and choices and like number of choices, scope and so on.
• 1:46:59
  Speaker 3: So when women then move into the fear of getting
• 1:47:02
  Speaker 3: treated like a man, their life becomes harder. When men
• 1:47:06
  Speaker 3: move into this fear of getting treated like a woman,
• 1:47:09
  Speaker 3: they get all kinds of things that seem like luxuries.
• 1:47:13
  Speaker 1: Mm hmm. And I wonder if some of the contempt
• 1:47:16
  Speaker 1: or anger from the conservative contingent over this is this
• 1:47:20
  Speaker 1: idea that men are getting something they don't deserve.
• 1:47:23
  Speaker 3: Yeah, it probably is.
• 1:47:24
  Speaker 1: It probably is. But you know, like I do want
• 1:47:28
  Speaker 1: to address something in the child. I know we have
• 1:47:30
  Speaker 1: a super chow, there's something I wanted to do address
• 1:47:32
  Speaker 1: in the chat. Irving statement plus ads and yeah, let's
• 1:47:38
  Speaker 1: uh like go ahead, Brian, I know that that's probably
• 1:47:41
  Speaker 1: what you want to do, right.
• 1:47:43
  Speaker 4: Oh, I'm just gonna read a super chat that we got.
• 1:47:45
  Speaker 4: Did we get another super child? It was just a
• 1:47:47
  Speaker 4: super chat that I put on screen. J O Bales
• 1:47:50
  Speaker 4: gave us a dollar ninety nine and says movie is better.
• 1:47:52
  Speaker 3: Yes, yeah, it just the moment passed. I didn't say it.
• 1:47:55
  Speaker 3: But yeah, we're like the paper, except with inflation, right,
• 1:47:59
  Speaker 3: not two dollars is five dollars?
• 1:48:02
  Speaker 1: Okay, so we I do have another Thank you. G
• 1:48:06
  Speaker 1: ip Funny Colors gives us twenty five dollars. Thank you,
• 1:48:09
  Speaker 1: g ip Funny Colors. Hopefully not your.
• 1:48:11
  Speaker 2: Legal name be brutally mamma.
• 1:48:16
  Speaker 3: I want somebody's legal name to be that.
• 1:48:18
  Speaker 1: Yeah, me too. So we're at one hundred and fifty five,
• 1:48:22
  Speaker 1: So good job, guys. We're we're chewing it down one
• 1:48:27
  Speaker 1: hundred and fifty five and uh, only a few minutes
• 1:48:29
  Speaker 1: left to the I won't I won't say anything. More.
• 1:48:32
  Speaker 1: But I wanted to address something that was said in
• 1:48:36
  Speaker 1: the vertical chat by ivring IV And yeah, I recognize
• 1:48:39
  Speaker 1: that you weren't with the other dude, and actually what
• 1:48:41
  Speaker 1: you're having, what you're saying is very interesting, you said,
• 1:48:47
  Speaker 1: And I just just moved away from everything and need
• 1:48:50
  Speaker 1: to it all has to load up again because I'm
• 1:48:53
  Speaker 1: I have the attention of a squirrel. I think that
• 1:48:58
  Speaker 1: the idea of people doing similar things being tied to
• 1:49:00
  Speaker 1: societal collapses rather fatalistic. Alice and Bob both being good
• 1:49:04
  Speaker 1: at fishing is not a threat to Jerry and Marry. No,
• 1:49:06
  Speaker 1: it isn't. But the problem is that people we set
• 1:49:12
  Speaker 1: up these situations where in many cases, if people do
• 1:49:16
  Speaker 1: X to survive and another group does why to survive,
• 1:49:20
  Speaker 1: they don't like each other. And it's really difficult. Also,
• 1:49:24
  Speaker 1: it's really difficult for people who have done X to
• 1:49:26
  Speaker 1: survive and they've taken an identity from being really good
• 1:49:29
  Speaker 1: at X to then go and turn into say, Okay,
• 1:49:33
  Speaker 1: well now we need to do why to survive or
• 1:49:35
  Speaker 1: to thrive, and it's really difficult to make that change.
• 1:49:40
  Speaker 1: I'm thinking about something that might be a little bit rarefied,
• 1:49:43
  Speaker 1: but I've been reading a story about the Indian Wars
• 1:49:47
  Speaker 1: or the Native American Wars, what do you want, Well,
• 1:49:49
  Speaker 1: they call it the Indian Wars back then. So and
• 1:49:52
  Speaker 1: how the Planes tribe, in particularly the Comanche, were forced
• 1:49:57
  Speaker 1: onto the reservation or had to give up and and
• 1:50:00
  Speaker 1: and become sedentary. And how one particular I think his
• 1:50:06
  Speaker 1: name is Kwana, was a Comanche chief and he managed
• 1:50:10
  Speaker 1: to make the transition and turn into a man who
• 1:50:15
  Speaker 1: could manage the new the new world, and how to
• 1:50:19
  Speaker 1: sort of make a take the comanchi the original masculine
• 1:50:23
  Speaker 1: Comanche identity and turn it into something that worked as
• 1:50:27
  Speaker 1: a man of the new world basically. But the rest
• 1:50:31
  Speaker 1: of the tribe had a great deal of difficulty taking
• 1:50:34
  Speaker 1: what they were. And I think this continues to the
• 1:50:36
  Speaker 1: current day and and working with the system, with this
• 1:50:41
  Speaker 1: new system, I mean, and I know it's it's not fair,
• 1:50:44
  Speaker 1: but it's also what else was going to happen. I mean,
• 1:50:47
  Speaker 1: the great Planes couldn't remain this kind of void in
• 1:50:51
  Speaker 1: the middle of the States while you know, trends and
• 1:50:54
  Speaker 1: everything though all the rest of the world goes into
• 1:50:56
  Speaker 1: the indust into the future, right, So, but some people
• 1:51:00
  Speaker 1: are able to completely rework their identity around how they
• 1:51:05
  Speaker 1: support themselves, how they become, how they feel like they're
• 1:51:09
  Speaker 1: a good person, you know, and all this, and some
• 1:51:11
  Speaker 1: people aren't. And you know, the question is like, and
• 1:51:16
  Speaker 1: I think that's really part of why civilizations end, is
• 1:51:21
  Speaker 1: that for whatever reason, a resource is no longer exploitable,
• 1:51:25
  Speaker 1: or it's over exploited, or maybe you need to move
• 1:51:29
  Speaker 1: into a different kind of resource. And we just cling
• 1:51:32
  Speaker 1: to this identity of how we see ourselves as big men,
• 1:51:37
  Speaker 1: maybe as the way to put it, like men who
• 1:51:38
  Speaker 1: are capable of making the big you know, getting the
• 1:51:42
  Speaker 1: big the big goods is usually the way it's looked at.
• 1:51:46
  Speaker 1: And that's everywhere. That's an identity that's everywhere. It's from
• 1:51:49
  Speaker 1: the industrialists, it's from the the you know, the big
• 1:51:53
  Speaker 1: big men of Papua New Guinea. You know. It's this
• 1:51:55
  Speaker 1: idea of a man who can create plenty, Santa Claus,
• 1:51:59
  Speaker 1: the green Man, it's the it's the man who creates
• 1:52:01
  Speaker 1: plenty for the people that he loves and he cares about,
• 1:52:04
  Speaker 1: you know, and that we always focus on a particular
• 1:52:08
  Speaker 1: way of doing that, and we become stuck with it,
• 1:52:11
  Speaker 1: and then our society becomes stuck with it and we
• 1:52:15
  Speaker 1: have trouble moving on, and it's not that it's not
• 1:52:21
  Speaker 1: that that has to be our fate. I'm just saying
• 1:52:23
  Speaker 1: it's something that it's a failing that we have and
• 1:52:25
  Speaker 1: we need to overcome it. And I think women are
• 1:52:27
  Speaker 1: a part of that because you know, I think that
• 1:52:32
  Speaker 1: women create purpose for men, and I don't know if
• 1:52:38
  Speaker 1: we're doing a good job of it right now.
• 1:52:40
  Speaker 3: Okay, well, you can't create purpose for a group if
• 1:52:44
  Speaker 3: you're carrying them down, so.
• 1:52:46
  Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly, Well, I mean you can, you.
• 1:52:49
  Speaker 3: Can create purpose, yeah, but you can create sacrifice as
• 1:52:53
  Speaker 3: their purpose. Yeah, but that's not really a good thing.
• 1:52:56
  Speaker 1: That seems to be like the dregs of the Yeah,
• 1:53:00
  Speaker 1: if you see this as an energy source, that's like
• 1:53:02
  Speaker 1: getting into the dregs of it. It's like the getting
• 1:53:05
  Speaker 1: into the kind of a fuel that destroys the engine,
• 1:53:10
  Speaker 1: even if it keeps it running to a little bit further,
• 1:53:14
  Speaker 1: you know. Because shame, and it's not even guilt, it's shame.
• 1:53:17
  Speaker 1: It is this idea that men are obligated to serve,
• 1:53:21
  Speaker 1: but at the same time they have nothing unique to
• 1:53:24
  Speaker 1: offer in that service. And that's shame. That's just yep,
• 1:53:29
  Speaker 1: And it's it's horrible and it shuts people down. And
• 1:53:32
  Speaker 1: that's why we're seeing lots and lots of men shutting
• 1:53:34
  Speaker 1: down in our society, because that's what we're doing to them.
• 1:53:39
  Speaker 3: Okay, yeah, all right, So it's it's just about time
• 1:53:45
  Speaker 3: that I have to go. Yes, sorry, guys, I have
• 1:53:49
  Speaker 3: to go to work today.
• 1:53:50
  Speaker 1: So all right, So if we have any further, thank yous.
• 1:54:00
  Speaker 1: I'm actually I'm actually very happy, guys. Thank you for
• 1:54:04
  Speaker 1: for helping.
• 1:54:05
  Speaker 2: Me let me come there.
• 1:54:06
  Speaker 1: Yeah, getting us there, and so we have oh oh
• 1:54:12
  Speaker 1: we got a few more. We got a few more, No, wait,
• 1:54:14
  Speaker 1: those are okay, So wow, this is a little confusing.
• 1:54:23
  Speaker 1: Uh see where I'm at here. This is a very
• 1:54:29
  Speaker 1: interesting name. Uh my fridge is running stop a.
• 1:54:35
  Speaker 3: Skiing, stop asking?
• 1:54:39
  Speaker 1: Oh my fridge is running, stop asking.
• 1:54:42
  Speaker 3: Ah, it's a comment on an old crank call.
• 1:54:46
  Speaker 1: Okay, dreader running.
• 1:54:48
  Speaker 3: You better go stop it, better go catch it? All right?
• 1:54:51
  Speaker 1: So they that individual gave us twenty five dollars thank you,
• 1:55:00
  Speaker 1: and then gave us an additional ten dollars.
• 1:55:04
  Speaker 2: Oh wow, mister thought whack boy did.
• 1:55:08
  Speaker 1: Yeah. And uh and let's see where we're at. So
• 1:55:12
  Speaker 1: I think that now we are down to just give
• 1:55:18
  Speaker 1: me a second here to do, all right, so uh,
• 1:55:25
  Speaker 1: one one hundred and forty one and thirty five dollars
• 1:55:29
  Speaker 1: one hundred and thirty five dollars left, so yeah, I
• 1:55:32
  Speaker 1: think that. Uh And also I guess we gotta close
• 1:55:35
  Speaker 1: it off because Hannah's gotta go all right, so I'm
• 1:55:39
  Speaker 1: gonna do that really quick. Thank you for everybody who's supported.
• 1:55:43
  Speaker 1: It's really great. We went down from eight hundred and
• 1:55:45
  Speaker 1: seventy to one hundred and thirty in the course of
• 1:55:48
  Speaker 1: about an hour and forty five minutes, so that's really great.
• 1:55:51
  Speaker 1: I very much appreciate it. And uh yeah, So if
• 1:55:56
  Speaker 1: you do want to help out after the show is
• 1:55:58
  Speaker 1: no longer live, you can do so it feed the
• 1:56:00
  Speaker 1: Badger dot com slash support. Looks like we're getting getting there,
• 1:56:03
  Speaker 1: so yeah. And if you want to send us a
• 1:56:06
  Speaker 1: message about anything that we talked about in the show,
• 1:56:08
  Speaker 1: feed the Badger dot com slash just the tip is
• 1:56:10
  Speaker 1: the way to do it, and I send us a
• 1:56:12
  Speaker 1: tip and message and we will talk about it in
• 1:56:14
  Speaker 1: the next available show. I know, we didn't get too
• 1:56:16
  Speaker 1: much into the USAID stuff today. We just ended up
• 1:56:20
  Speaker 1: talking a lot about whatever C I A Is doing.
• 1:56:26
  Speaker 3: Yeah, that's pretty much the par for the course with
• 1:56:29
  Speaker 3: the CIA. The more that you look into it, the
• 1:56:32
  Speaker 3: more you realize that its entire history is just what
• 1:56:35
  Speaker 3: the fuck.
• 1:56:37
  Speaker 1: Mm hmmm, yeah, yeah, just uh the c i A
• 1:56:40
  Speaker 1: is you know, have you ever watched that party in
• 1:56:46
  Speaker 1: the CIA? Yeah, that's just the tip of the iceberg
• 1:56:49
  Speaker 1: for the CIA. That's that's actually just like the least
• 1:56:52
  Speaker 1: defensive things that the CIA gets up to.
• 1:56:56
  Speaker 3: Yeah. So once we get back on track with the
• 1:57:00
  Speaker 3: discussion of war on HBr talk, we're actually going to
• 1:57:03
  Speaker 3: dig into the history of CIA interference in Iran. So
• 1:57:10
  Speaker 3: that should get people to understand a little bit about
• 1:57:13
  Speaker 3: the conflicts that have happened between the United States and
• 1:57:15
  Speaker 3: the Middle East during the last eighty years, because there's
• 1:57:19
  Speaker 3: been quite a bit that has been influenced by US
• 1:57:22
  Speaker 3: government interference in politics and Iran and other countries. We
• 1:57:27
  Speaker 3: also have interference in Afghanistan, interference in Iraq, pretty much
• 1:57:31
  Speaker 3: every place. So it's important to understand in a discussion
• 1:57:38
  Speaker 3: that's an anti war discussion, which I've been sort of
• 1:57:42
  Speaker 3: leading as I've been taking people through the history of
• 1:57:45
  Speaker 3: votes and voting rights. You can't separate those really, so
• 1:57:51
  Speaker 3: you'll have that to look forward to as well more,
• 1:57:53
  Speaker 3: what the fuck are you from the CIA?
• 1:57:56
  Speaker 1: Yep, well you usually can look forward to that. I
• 1:57:59
  Speaker 1: mean the CIA. If they weren't so absolutely destructive, they'd
• 1:58:03
  Speaker 1: be freaking hilarious. Yeah, I mean if you just just
• 1:58:07
  Speaker 1: put them in a box and like give them some
• 1:58:09
  Speaker 1: levers and say, yeah, you're actually doing what you think
• 1:58:11
  Speaker 1: you're doing, or put them in like VR headsets where
• 1:58:13
  Speaker 1: they actually think it's reality and just watch the crazy
• 1:58:16
  Speaker 1: shit that they do. Make a great sitcom, but unfortunately
• 1:58:21
  Speaker 1: they have a little bit too much influence for being
• 1:58:23
  Speaker 1: absolutely the mad scientists of the American government. All right,
• 1:58:29
  Speaker 1: So anyway, once again, feed the Badger dot com to
• 1:58:31
  Speaker 1: support the show and our very unique approach to looking
• 1:58:34
  Speaker 1: at the issues and feed the Badger dot com slash
• 1:58:37
  Speaker 1: just a tip to send a tip and a message
• 1:58:39
  Speaker 1: if you are interested in responding to anything that we've
• 1:58:42
  Speaker 1: said after the show is over, and uh yeah, I'll
• 1:58:45
  Speaker 1: send it back to you.
• 1:58:46
  Speaker 2: Brian all right, yeah, all right, can you guys hear me?
• 1:58:51
  Speaker 2: Oh yeah?
• 1:58:52
  Speaker 4: If you Okay, if you guys like this video, please
• 1:58:55
  Speaker 4: hit like subscribe. If you're not already subscribed, hit the
• 1:58:57
  Speaker 4: bellf notifications, leave us an let us know what you
• 1:59:00
  Speaker 4: guys think about what we discussed on the show today,
• 1:59:02
  Speaker 4: and please please please share this video because sharing is caring.
• 1:59:07
  Speaker 4: Thank you guys so much for coming on today's episode
• 1:59:09
  Speaker 4: of The bran Zirker and we will talk to you
• 1:59:10
  Speaker 4: guys in the next video.
• 1:59:12
  Speaker 2: Have a good weekend.