Latest / Reality with The King / Wigging Out! Kim Zolciak vs Ex Wife Divorce Drama

Transcript

Wigging Out! Kim Zolciak vs Ex Wife Divorce Drama · Reality with The King

0:03
Speaker 1: Reality with the King is hosted by me, Carlos King.
0:07
Speaker 1: I'm an executive producer who have produced some of your
0:10
Speaker 1: favorite shows from the Real Housewives in Atlanta, New Jersey
0:13
Speaker 1: and my own creation, The Love and Marriage Franchise and
0:17
Speaker 1: Bell Collective. Every episode we recap reality television from the
0:23
Speaker 1: Real Housewives Franchise to The Bachelor or Selling Sunset, in
0:27
Speaker 1: addition to celebrity guests, whether in the unscripted space or
0:31
Speaker 1: scripted as well. All Right, rain Drops, if you've been
0:43
Speaker 1: sipping with us, then you know Reality Crime Stories is
0:46
Speaker 1: where glam meets grit and the headlines always comes with
0:51
Speaker 1: a sight of hard truth. Every week, Courtney Parker and
0:54
Speaker 1: I put Back to the Velvet Robe on.
0:56
Speaker 2: Fame, Fortune and the fallout they try to hide.
1:01
Speaker 3: That's right, Carlos.
1:02
Speaker 4: Everything from reality TV scandals to the crimes committed behind
1:07
Speaker 4: the cameras, whether it happens on or off the screen,
1:10
Speaker 4: Carlos and I will bring you the tea surrounding hot
1:14
Speaker 4: topic crime stories involving all of your favorite reality TV personalities.
1:20
Speaker 1: And if today's story taught us anything, child, is that
1:23
Speaker 1: in this world the tea is never just hot, it's criminal. Hey,
1:33
Speaker 1: rain Drops, On today's episode of Reality Crime Stories, my
1:38
Speaker 1: co hosts Corny Parker and I are back to talk
1:41
Speaker 1: about my girl, Kim Zosiac and what is happening when
1:46
Speaker 1: it comes to Wins Wallace and divorce wars Cartney, that's.
1:52
Speaker 2: A good title. I love it, love it, love it.
1:54
Speaker 5: I'm glad you like it, Carlos.
1:57
Speaker 2: Not nodult. It's really good. So let's get right into it.
2:00
Speaker 2: From Wiggs and Why to.
2:02
Speaker 1: Warrance and withdraw slips, Kim's Zozziak Bearman's picture perfect life
2:08
Speaker 1: has officially entered war zone. What started off as a
2:12
Speaker 1: fairytale Bravo romance has become one of the most bitter,
2:17
Speaker 1: broke and bewildering divorces in reality TV history. I mean,
2:23
Speaker 1: police calls have been made, so has repossessions, bounced checks,
2:28
Speaker 1: and now whispers of a billionaire boyfriend with his own
2:32
Speaker 1: one hundred million dollars scandal. This is not just messy,
2:38
Speaker 1: this is a bona fide mess Okay. So rain Drops,
2:42
Speaker 1: we're here to talk about what's going on with Kim's Zoziak,
2:45
Speaker 1: our favorite Atlanta housewife, and really get down in terms
2:50
Speaker 1: of what's going on with the new boyfriend in addition
2:52
Speaker 1: to the divorce from her husband Kroix Beerman.
3:01
Speaker 2: It's been a.
3:01
Speaker 3: Minute since we've seen or really heard from from Kim,
3:06
Speaker 3: so I'm super surprised to see how active she's been
3:11
Speaker 3: in headlines here as of late. She's pretty much kept
3:16
Speaker 3: a you know, a low profile as far as the
3:19
Speaker 3: show is concerned. But uh, in her personal life, things
3:25
Speaker 3: have just been spiraling. The one thing I will say
3:30
Speaker 3: about Kim is she bounces back.
3:33
Speaker 2: Uh.
3:33
Speaker 3: And now she's bouncing back with a billionaire.
3:36
Speaker 2: Yes, forget forget bounce checks. Howdy. She just bouncing back.
3:40
Speaker 1: And that's why we have just Tyranny back to talk
3:44
Speaker 1: to us too, as.
3:46
Speaker 2: We you know, ask her all the important questions.
3:49
Speaker 1: That you guys want to know, not not me, You
3:51
Speaker 1: guys want to know this, So welcome just Tiarranny.
3:54
Speaker 2: How are you good?
3:56
Speaker 5: How are you guys today?
3:58
Speaker 3: Really good? And we now listen before we get into
4:04
Speaker 3: the questions, we know you're going to give your infamous disclaimer.
4:08
Speaker 3: You can't talk about active cases.
4:11
Speaker 6: I cannot raindrops get so much sat with me because
4:16
Speaker 6: they want me to go into the details. But I
4:19
Speaker 6: just have to tell you all that I am here
4:22
Speaker 6: really just to inform you about the law. Make sure
4:26
Speaker 6: you have a better understanding, and then you can form
4:29
Speaker 6: your own opinions based on the facts and the information
4:33
Speaker 6: that you know as the rain drops, because we all
4:36
Speaker 6: know that the rain drops know better than most.
4:42
Speaker 2: And look, look you clocked up, and that is true.
4:46
Speaker 2: Solicit Let's get into the.
4:47
Speaker 1: Timeline, the coordinating. I'll have you ask the first question,
4:51
Speaker 1: so rain drops. In twenty twenty two, report surface of
4:56
Speaker 1: unpaid credit cards and malting tax step that allegedly leaped
5:02
Speaker 1: over one point one million dollars oh to the IRS.
5:06
Speaker 1: Kim and Kroy allegedly refinanced their home twice to cover
5:10
Speaker 1: the expenses. May of twenty twenty three, that's when Kroy
5:14
Speaker 1: filed for divorced for the first time. Kim counterst a
5:17
Speaker 1: week later, claiming that they're working it out. Neighbors report
5:21
Speaker 1: frequent police visits for domestic disputes. August of twenty twenty three,
5:28
Speaker 1: Kroy files again, but this time he is citing and
5:32
Speaker 1: reconcilable differences and also demanding full custody. He has alleged
5:39
Speaker 1: that Kim has a gambling addiction and that financial recklessness.
5:45
Speaker 1: He also made sure to file in court earlier in
5:51
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four, the Georgia mansion that we saw on
5:54
Speaker 1: the show interned foreclosure proceedings. Reports claim that look like
6:01
Speaker 1: cameras were there filming it. I can tell you they weren't. Okay,
6:05
Speaker 1: so I can confirm that for you all as of.
6:08
Speaker 2: Today, so check this out. They're still not divorced, right,
6:13
Speaker 2: They're not divorced.
6:14
Speaker 1: And in spring of this year is when Kim was
6:18
Speaker 1: linked to real estate developer Kyle Mowitz, who simultaneously is
6:25
Speaker 1: enrolled in a one hundred million dollar divorce battle in
6:30
Speaker 1: Texas where his estranged wife reportedly is accusing him of
6:37
Speaker 1: funneling marital assets towards another woman. That woman is.
6:42
Speaker 2: Kim Zosiak, who has denied amy and involvement.
6:48
Speaker 1: This is messy, and the gag is I really wish
6:51
Speaker 1: cameras were rolling because this is the type of mess
6:54
Speaker 1: I want to see on Atlanta.
6:55
Speaker 3: Housewives exactly, because you've listed so much of those things.
7:02
Speaker 3: And one of the things that I found very interesting
7:05
Speaker 3: in Kroy's claim was that the excessive spending, and we've
7:11
Speaker 3: all seen from the beginning of Housewives of Atlanta to
7:18
Speaker 3: her own spin off shows, Kim knows how to shop
7:22
Speaker 3: Kim knows how to spend, even from her days with
7:25
Speaker 3: Big Papa. The girl knows her labels and and you
7:32
Speaker 3: know she knows how to shop and spend. My first
7:38
Speaker 3: question for you, based off of all that Carlos has read, Judge,
7:44
Speaker 3: is when a couple files what appears to be some
7:50
Speaker 3: serious yet frivolous legal charges, with so many of them
7:56
Speaker 3: being filings, dismissals, refilings sometimes at this point, how does
8:02
Speaker 3: a court even take something like this seriously?
8:09
Speaker 6: Well, the first thing I will say is that frivolous
8:11
Speaker 6: will be a determination by the court. So everyone is
8:16
Speaker 6: entitled to file suit if they have felt harmed, and
8:21
Speaker 6: so the court will determine the merits of that lawsuit.
8:24
Speaker 6: And like you say, in any divorce, there are several
8:29
Speaker 6: things that if it's a contested.
8:31
Speaker 5: Divorce, things are constantly filed.
8:37
Speaker 6: Unfortunately, in family law it is very common to see
8:42
Speaker 6: because it's such a personal nature. People take everything about
8:47
Speaker 6: a divorce very personal.
8:50
Speaker 5: That you see a lot of foulings.
8:52
Speaker 6: More so than you see in probably any other practice
8:56
Speaker 6: of law.
8:57
Speaker 5: So you have to keep that in mind.
8:59
Speaker 6: One that is, anytime you're dealing with family law, and
9:02
Speaker 6: so the judges in those courtrooms are going to keep
9:05
Speaker 6: that in mind.
9:07
Speaker 5: They are used to it.
9:08
Speaker 6: They're going to be able to tell once they review
9:12
Speaker 6: the evidence what should move forward and what shouldn't. And
9:16
Speaker 6: because people are at all time high of emotions, you
9:22
Speaker 6: very rarely are going to get a judge that is
9:24
Speaker 6: going to call something frivolous unless you have evidence of
9:30
Speaker 6: some kind of misrepresentation or mal intent.
9:36
Speaker 5: So that's the first thing I would say.
9:37
Speaker 6: The second thing I would say too, in family law
9:40
Speaker 6: is a lot of times, especially when you have domestic
9:44
Speaker 6: issues involved, you cross from civil law to criminal law,
9:50
Speaker 6: and that becomes an issue. Because you could have family law.
9:53
Speaker 6: Divorce cases are considered civil law. But if you get
9:57
Speaker 6: the police involved and there has been some accusation of
10:03
Speaker 6: an illegal activity, anything ranging from domestic violence to fraud,
10:09
Speaker 6: now you are entering into the realm of criminal laws.
10:13
Speaker 6: And so now you're going to have these things comingling,
10:17
Speaker 6: which would definitely make it a lot more messier and
10:21
Speaker 6: a lot more for the judge to kind of sort through, which.
10:25
Speaker 5: Leads to what we see in a lot of.
10:27
Speaker 3: Cases delays, delayed, delayed delay.
10:31
Speaker 6: So people are always, like I thought, for divorce two
10:34
Speaker 6: years ago, three years ago, you.
10:41
Speaker 3: Thought for divorce.
10:46
Speaker 1: I now if my PTSD from all of the reality
10:53
Speaker 1: shows I've done in all these episodes where these divorces
10:57
Speaker 1: take so much time. So that's why I'm like, you know,
11:00
Speaker 1: just hearing a line about that. A lot of people
11:02
Speaker 1: seem like, Okay, if.
11:04
Speaker 2: I file and leaves within a year, this can happen.
11:08
Speaker 1: But in cases like this, where there's accusations of fraud,
11:12
Speaker 1: there's accusations of a gambling addiction, these sort of situations
11:17
Speaker 1: take longer because, like you said, all divorced proceedings starts
11:21
Speaker 1: off as civil, but this is now entering criminal territory allegedly,
11:26
Speaker 1: allegedly possibly.
11:28
Speaker 2: Yeah.
11:29
Speaker 6: The other issue is anytime you're talking about family law,
11:33
Speaker 6: you have to also remember that if a couple reconciles
11:38
Speaker 6: that voids the divorce proceedings, you.
11:41
Speaker 5: Have to start all over over, so you.
11:45
Speaker 6: Have basically re entered marriage, which will also add time
11:50
Speaker 6: and delay.
11:52
Speaker 3: Got it, And the courts typically that was a good
11:56
Speaker 3: point because one of the key words that you use
11:59
Speaker 3: was there are emotions are high even in family court,
12:04
Speaker 3: especially if there are children involved. There are assets involved
12:11
Speaker 3: in these kinds of cases. When you see filings, refilings, dismissals.
12:16
Speaker 3: Do the courts allow room for reconciliation? Are they really
12:24
Speaker 3: yearing towards and leaning towards hey, because there was once
12:29
Speaker 3: upon a time love there. Hopefully you can reconcile and
12:34
Speaker 3: put your family back together and your marriage back together.
12:38
Speaker 6: Well, you know, before you actually complete a divorce, you
12:41
Speaker 6: have to go through a parents in class if you
12:44
Speaker 6: have kids, but you also have to go through mediation,
12:48
Speaker 6: which is a signal of one. Are you going to
12:52
Speaker 6: be able to reconcile? Do you really need the courts
12:55
Speaker 6: to get involved?
12:57
Speaker 3: Or Two?
12:57
Speaker 5: If you don't reconcile, can you all.
13:00
Speaker 6: Work this out amongst yourself without crowding the doctor of
13:04
Speaker 6: the court. The court never wants to be involved in
13:09
Speaker 6: a personal matter, so of course they want to give
13:13
Speaker 6: you the option to try and work it out between yourselves.
13:17
Speaker 6: But if for some reason you need a referee, then
13:20
Speaker 6: the court is going to step in with the rules
13:23
Speaker 6: and laws of that state to try and balance it
13:27
Speaker 6: in fairness and equity. But you also have to remember again,
13:31
Speaker 6: because it's family law and it's so so emotional, everyone
13:37
Speaker 6: always feels like they were kind of wrong because no
13:41
Speaker 6: one is going to get exactly what they want.
13:47
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, yeah, I do have a question for you, because.
13:52
Speaker 2: When you are a married couple. This is from what
13:56
Speaker 2: I have been told. I've never been married, but I've
14:00
Speaker 2: been told that when you are a married couple.
14:02
Speaker 1: The reason why they tell people make sure that you
14:06
Speaker 1: know you two people who are joining forces in matrimony,
14:09
Speaker 1: that your finances are straight, because if one partner is
14:14
Speaker 1: in serious depth, then if you guys are married, that's
14:19
Speaker 1: the spouse incurs some of your depth in case you
14:24
Speaker 1: owe money to the IRS.
14:25
Speaker 2: I'm asking that because you.
14:27
Speaker 1: Know, when we talk about Kim and Kroy, there are
14:31
Speaker 1: reports that there's unpaid credit cards and mounting tax depth
14:36
Speaker 1: that is reaching over a million dollars. So, with that
14:39
Speaker 1: being said, if let's say, for example, as Kroy's alleging
14:46
Speaker 1: Kim's alleged gambling addiction is putting them in this situation,
14:52
Speaker 1: is Kroy safe from owing the I r S that
14:58
Speaker 1: money if he can prove that let's say Kim is
15:02
Speaker 1: responsible for the mounting death or because they're married, her
15:06
Speaker 1: death is automatically his.
15:09
Speaker 5: So there's a couple of.
15:10
Speaker 6: Things I think about the IRS that people do not realize. One,
15:16
Speaker 6: even as a married couple, you have to decide if
15:19
Speaker 6: you're going to you check that box right, Are you
15:22
Speaker 6: filing married or single? So you can be married and
15:27
Speaker 6: continue to file single or Hold up? Hold up, you
15:35
Speaker 6: do not it's an election. You do not have to
15:40
Speaker 6: file married simply because you are married. Once you become married,
15:45
Speaker 6: you have the choice to file married, and if you
15:49
Speaker 6: do file married, you have to continue to file married
15:53
Speaker 6: every year unless up until you divorce.
15:57
Speaker 5: But if you.
15:58
Speaker 6: Get married and you continue to file separately as individuals,
16:04
Speaker 6: you have a separate tax account.
16:07
Speaker 1: Okay, So.
16:12
Speaker 6: Without me knowing anyone's personal information, the answer to your
16:17
Speaker 6: question is, if you are married filing married, both parties
16:22
Speaker 6: will be responsible for the tax dick.
16:25
Speaker 5: If you are.
16:26
Speaker 6: Married and filing individually, you are only responsible individually for
16:33
Speaker 6: your tax deck.
16:35
Speaker 2: Did you know that, Courtney?
16:37
Speaker 3: I know that you have choices? Again, know that because
16:42
Speaker 3: I have You know, I have a daughter and we're
16:46
Speaker 3: now at the stage of does she make enough money
16:51
Speaker 3: to file her own taxes? Is it more beneficial for
16:54
Speaker 3: me to keep her on my taxes until twenty six?
16:57
Speaker 3: But when I do that, I have to claim head
17:00
Speaker 3: of household. So I did know that you had choice,
17:03
Speaker 3: some choices. What I didn't realize, and this piggyback's off
17:09
Speaker 3: of Carlos's questions. So when it comes to the acquired
17:14
Speaker 3: debt as a couple, not just tax wise, but just
17:18
Speaker 3: as a debt, if he is claiming financial fraud on
17:22
Speaker 3: Chimp's part, alleging financial fraud on Chimp's part is one
17:29
Speaker 3: spouse solely responsible for the others regardless of their their
17:34
Speaker 3: their taxes. They have shared assets and they do they
17:38
Speaker 3: also share the debt.
17:42
Speaker 6: So again, we have a thing called premarital property, right, Okay,
17:47
Speaker 6: just excluded once you get married.
17:49
Speaker 5: They're exclusions.
17:50
Speaker 2: Explain that. Explain that to us.
17:53
Speaker 6: Okay, So if my grandmother left me a house and
17:57
Speaker 6: then I went and got married, that house is mine.
18:01
Speaker 6: It's pre marital property. It is separated from my marital property.
18:05
Speaker 6: So even though I went and got married, after I
18:08
Speaker 6: own the house, it still does not become a part
18:13
Speaker 6: of my marital estate.
18:16
Speaker 5: But I get married and.
18:18
Speaker 6: My husband and I buy a house that is a
18:21
Speaker 6: part of the marital estate.
18:24
Speaker 5: Everything is lovely.
18:25
Speaker 6: If we bought the house for five hundred thousand dollars
18:28
Speaker 6: and sell it for a million dollars, we make five
18:30
Speaker 6: hundred thousand dollars.
18:31
Speaker 5: And we split it. The problem comes.
18:34
Speaker 6: We paid five hundred thousand dollars is worth one hundred
18:38
Speaker 6: thousand dollars, and we owe four hundred thousand dollars. We
18:42
Speaker 6: equally and jointly owe that money together.
18:46
Speaker 5: What does that mean?
18:46
Speaker 6: That means that our creditors can come after us individually
18:51
Speaker 6: or jointly together. They don't have to come and get
18:55
Speaker 6: half for me or half for my husband, because we
18:58
Speaker 6: are both responsible for that debt. If I owe four
19:02
Speaker 6: hundred thousand dollars and he owes four hundred thousand dollars,
19:05
Speaker 6: but I'm the only person with four hundred thousand dollars,
19:08
Speaker 6: the credit is going to take the.
19:10
Speaker 5: Entire four hundred thousand dollars for me.
19:13
Speaker 6: But during my divorce, I am going to say I
19:17
Speaker 6: paid this entire debt and I should be credited for
19:21
Speaker 6: paying his half in some way. A judge is going
19:26
Speaker 6: to take those things into account and try and balance
19:30
Speaker 6: it out. But as we have taught so much in
19:33
Speaker 6: other episodes, you have to be someone who can collect
19:38
Speaker 6: the money from you. Gotta be collectible. You can't just
19:42
Speaker 6: owe it. I gotta be able to get.
19:44
Speaker 5: It from you.
19:45
Speaker 3: Collectible. That's our takeaway word.
19:48
Speaker 2: Carlos, Okay, I mean the baby.
19:51
Speaker 1: That's why they always say it's cheaper to keep up,
19:54
Speaker 1: and it's cheap or in this case, you know it's
19:57
Speaker 1: cheaper to keep count.
19:58
Speaker 2: Now, as I.
19:59
Speaker 6: Always say, you could never go wrong with the prena,
20:03
Speaker 6: no matter what the value of your state is, because
20:06
Speaker 6: a prenup lays out the rules and it would eliminate
20:11
Speaker 6: delays in court, a lot of legal fees, a lot
20:15
Speaker 6: of high emotions because we have decided all the rules
20:19
Speaker 6: when we love each other the most.
20:24
Speaker 1: I'm always fascinated by these conversations because, look, I do
20:28
Speaker 1: know Kim personally, and I was then when she Mtcroy
20:32
Speaker 1: and it was honestly, love at first sight is on camera.
20:36
Speaker 2: We filmed it.
20:38
Speaker 1: I was coe p of her wedding special and I
20:43
Speaker 1: was able to see again these two people fall in
20:46
Speaker 1: love as a married couple and CROI adopting her two
20:53
Speaker 1: daughters at the time, and now together as a married couple.
20:59
Speaker 1: They had a that are twins, and I believe another
21:04
Speaker 1: boy or two if I'm not mistaken. So it's unfortunate
21:08
Speaker 1: that things have come to this because I did not
21:11
Speaker 1: see this coming, nor did the Bravo fans.
21:14
Speaker 2: Because it's what we always hear.
21:17
Speaker 1: You know, when you do get something like a prenuptural agreement,
21:21
Speaker 1: it's not for the person you're in love with, it's
21:23
Speaker 1: for the person you're divorcing, because that was our two.
21:27
Speaker 1: You know, It's not the person you're marrying, it's the
21:29
Speaker 1: person you're divorcing, which are two different people.
21:32
Speaker 2: And that does beg the question that I just don't.
21:35
Speaker 1: Know because I'm trying to remember if they did get
21:39
Speaker 1: a pre nap because when Kim mcfroyd coroy was in
21:46
Speaker 1: the NFL playing for the Atlanta Falcons, and you know, relatively,
21:51
Speaker 1: he of course had money. She was, you know, the
21:55
Speaker 1: star of the house was in Atlanta, she was also
21:58
Speaker 1: making money. But in terms of a prenup, based on
22:02
Speaker 1: my memory, and I'm going to research this as we're talking,
22:05
Speaker 1: I don't think they have one.
22:09
Speaker 6: No, And again I am for prenups no matter what
22:13
Speaker 6: your economic status is, because I think that it is
22:17
Speaker 6: just the best way. I mean, we do contracts every
22:21
Speaker 6: single day. You go run an apartment and you have
22:24
Speaker 6: a contract and you say, hey, I may have to
22:26
Speaker 6: break the lease.
22:27
Speaker 5: This is what happened.
22:28
Speaker 6: Hey if you damage something in my apartment, this is
22:31
Speaker 6: what happens. It's not necessarily a negative thing, but for
22:35
Speaker 6: some reason, prenom, the word prenup has a negative connotation,
22:40
Speaker 6: and I wish we could change that because also, similar
22:44
Speaker 6: to someone you're marrying may have a large amount of
22:48
Speaker 6: debt that once you get married, you may start paying
22:53
Speaker 6: that debt. It becomes shared debt at this time, how
22:56
Speaker 6: are you compensated for that?
22:59
Speaker 3: Right?
23:00
Speaker 6: So it's just a matter of really, let's just get
23:04
Speaker 6: secure and comfortable about talking about our finances and our
23:11
Speaker 6: livelihood of how we would like things to play out, right.
23:17
Speaker 3: I have I want to go back and pivot for
23:20
Speaker 3: just a second. Because Carlo, she brought up the kids.
23:24
Speaker 3: There were claims that Arianna says that her parents took
23:30
Speaker 3: money from Brand Deal's for her to help cover some
23:34
Speaker 3: of the debt. Kim has admitted that she spent some
23:39
Speaker 3: of that money on bills and promises that she will
23:44
Speaker 3: pay back if she hasn't already paid back. I'm giving
23:48
Speaker 3: her a new set of circumstances. I'm sure she has.
23:53
Speaker 3: What do you are there any legal takeaways regarding that
23:57
Speaker 3: or how does everybody feel with respect to that?
24:04
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's interesting because you know, listen. I'm one of
24:08
Speaker 1: ten siblings, and my mother was a true housewife. You know,
24:13
Speaker 1: she gave birth to ten kids. She raised us until
24:16
Speaker 1: she passed away five years ago. But for of course,
24:20
Speaker 1: my whole life, my father was the only person working.
24:24
Speaker 2: And when me and my siblings started to work, my.
24:27
Speaker 1: Father said, okay, it's time for y'all to contribute to
24:32
Speaker 1: some of these bills, and we're like, get out of
24:35
Speaker 1: here us, my buddy. But we obviously helped at as
24:38
Speaker 1: much as we could. So that is an interesting question legally,
24:43
Speaker 1: ken Arianna Beerman if she wanted to. From what I understand,
24:48
Speaker 1: her and Kim are fine and everything is good. But
24:51
Speaker 1: to Courty's point, could Arianna take can a child tech
24:55
Speaker 1: legal action as a parent by saying, I, as a minor,
25:00
Speaker 1: accumulated this money for a job I did. I gave
25:03
Speaker 1: it to my parents because I'm a minor and they
25:07
Speaker 1: spent it.
25:07
Speaker 2: Can it take legal action to get that money back?
25:12
Speaker 6: So the short answer is that anyone can take legal action.
25:16
Speaker 2: That's true. True.
25:20
Speaker 6: Again, that is a part of our great American legal system.
25:26
Speaker 6: Whether someone is going to be successful, it's going to
25:30
Speaker 6: depend on a lot of variables.
25:33
Speaker 5: Again, we don't know.
25:34
Speaker 6: We hear about a lot of child stars and parents
25:38
Speaker 6: who are not just parents, they are also a part
25:41
Speaker 6: of their business, and those parents have to be compensated
25:47
Speaker 6: for their services. And so how that is worked out, Again,
25:53
Speaker 6: you have to have some kind of auditing and accounting
25:56
Speaker 6: of the accounts to see once the reconciliation is done,
26:01
Speaker 6: has the child been given more to the parent than
26:06
Speaker 6: they should have if they are oh something. And sometimes
26:09
Speaker 6: in some of those reconciliations, the parent is actually owed
26:13
Speaker 6: money as well. So again, anybody can sue for anything
26:19
Speaker 6: in this great American system we have.
26:22
Speaker 3: It is very.
26:23
Speaker 6: Unfortunate when you have parents and children suing each other,
26:27
Speaker 6: or parents mishandling funds. But again, unless there is some
26:33
Speaker 6: kind of action taken, I think that it's very hard
26:37
Speaker 6: for anyone to jump to judgment without knowing all of
26:41
Speaker 6: the facts.
26:44
Speaker 1: I do want to shift gears a bit because I
26:46
Speaker 1: want to get into the fact that Kim Zelziak has
26:49
Speaker 1: a new boyfriend.
26:51
Speaker 6: Which.
26:53
Speaker 1: Is already starting a lot of controversy. His name is
26:56
Speaker 1: Kyle Morwitz. His a strange white Jillian Green, has subpoena
27:04
Speaker 1: Kim in this ongoing contentious lawsuit that the wife has
27:11
Speaker 1: against the husband, which is very fascinating. So I want
27:16
Speaker 1: to just recap it again because I'm just like to
27:19
Speaker 1: leave one crazy situation and to embark on another is
27:24
Speaker 1: just insane in the membrane.
27:28
Speaker 2: But let me just catch your guys up on it.
27:30
Speaker 2: So again.
27:31
Speaker 1: Kim was subpoenaed in a one hundred million dollar divorced
27:36
Speaker 1: by her new boyfriend's wife, who is demanding answers over guests.
27:42
Speaker 1: On September thirtieth, court documents were filed that showed this,
27:47
Speaker 1: in addition to the fact that Jillian Green, which by
27:53
Speaker 1: the way, Kim was served at a parking lot out
27:55
Speaker 1: of high school in Georgia.
27:57
Speaker 3: Wow.
27:58
Speaker 2: Okay, that's that's how.
28:00
Speaker 1: Much Jillian ain't planning with the girls. Okay, but let's
28:05
Speaker 1: appear Kim turned over all communities with her boyfriend, any
28:11
Speaker 1: communications between Kim and another third party regarding payment for
28:19
Speaker 1: services or communications concerning her a strange husband. Jillian also
28:29
Speaker 1: asks for any documents regarding gifts from him or any
28:34
Speaker 1: business he owns that he has given her. Last, but
28:42
Speaker 1: not least, she also requested any and all documents regarding
28:46
Speaker 1: or pertaining to Kim's financial relationship with Kyle, including but
28:53
Speaker 1: not limited to gifts given or received from Kyle, expenses
28:58
Speaker 1: paid on her behalf by Kyle, and again any business
29:04
Speaker 1: in which he's connected, money's loan to her and money's
29:08
Speaker 1: paid to her by Kyle or any businesses which he
29:12
Speaker 1: is connected when it.
29:14
Speaker 2: Comes to cam.
29:16
Speaker 1: Now, look, a lot of people can say, Judge Tearing
29:18
Speaker 1: in Courtney, this is a woman scored, Okay, But my
29:23
Speaker 1: question to you is this, Yes, you can take legal
29:26
Speaker 1: action against anybody, know that. But to file a subpoena
29:36
Speaker 1: against a woman that's dating your husband and you're trying
29:41
Speaker 1: to figure out if the money that he accumulated was
29:44
Speaker 1: used to pay you know, gifts for her or do
29:48
Speaker 1: any businesses?
29:51
Speaker 2: Does that happen often? And if so, does.
29:54
Speaker 1: That mean that in case this goes as far in court,
29:58
Speaker 1: that Kim would have to return these gifts back that
30:01
Speaker 1: she was given about his band.
30:05
Speaker 6: So again, I cannot come back on any open cases,
30:12
Speaker 6: got it, But I will point you all. I don't
30:17
Speaker 6: know if you remember the high profile case where the
30:22
Speaker 6: Lakers owner gave a woman a lot of gifts.
30:28
Speaker 3: No, it's the Clippers, I.
30:32
Speaker 6: L yeah, and she had to return these things because
30:42
Speaker 6: in that arrangement. The wife and husband were business partners.
30:48
Speaker 6: It's not just that we are married, we are business partners.
30:53
Speaker 6: And the husband did not have the authority to use
30:58
Speaker 6: the wife's money and business proceeds in that manner. God,
31:07
Speaker 6: Now again, do you have to look at all of
31:10
Speaker 6: the facts? And again you said, is this just simply
31:17
Speaker 6: a woman's scorn? When you start looking at high dollar divorces,
31:25
Speaker 6: there are a lot more like details that you're going
31:30
Speaker 6: to have to look at at the assets because it
31:34
Speaker 6: may not simply be about an emotional retribution. Again, if
31:41
Speaker 6: you have used marital and or business funds that belong
31:47
Speaker 6: to me as the wife, I have a right to
31:51
Speaker 6: know that, and I have a right to know where
31:55
Speaker 6: my money is invested and what I received for my
32:01
Speaker 6: money got.
32:02
Speaker 3: It for those who don't know, if you will allow
32:07
Speaker 3: me who Kyle Morwitz is. According to the International Business Times,
32:15
Speaker 3: he is a businessman and investor who holds a real
32:19
Speaker 3: estate and finance degree from Florida State University. He graduated
32:23
Speaker 3: in two thousand and three. He co founded Imperium Blue
32:27
Speaker 3: Management Group and is a managing partner of Imperium Companies.
32:33
Speaker 3: His family offices reportedly oversee four point five billion dollars
32:39
Speaker 3: in assets. His portfolio reportedly includes investments in real estate,
32:46
Speaker 3: e commerce resistant assets, high barrier businesses alongside his brother.
32:52
Speaker 3: They have a Morwitz Family endowment at FSU. And the
33:00
Speaker 3: thing about it is, like you were saying, just tyranny.
33:04
Speaker 3: This is a high profile, high asset divorce one hundred
33:08
Speaker 3: million dollars with lots of companies reported within the the
33:15
Speaker 3: more Wits Imperial Blue Management Imperium Company's portfolio. So to
33:23
Speaker 3: be able to ask for a hundred million dollars means
33:27
Speaker 3: that out of this four point five billion dollar managing assets,
33:35
Speaker 3: he has it, she has it. It's all intertwined within
33:41
Speaker 3: a marriage and an arrangement that doesn't feel like it
33:46
Speaker 3: has a pre.
33:47
Speaker 5: Nump right, or it could have a pre nump.
33:54
Speaker 6: And you know, generally when you see someone with a
33:59
Speaker 6: pre nump and they are asking questions that are inconsistent
34:04
Speaker 6: with not having a prenup, they may be trying to
34:08
Speaker 6: break the prenup for some reason. There may be some
34:11
Speaker 6: claus in the prenum that allows them to avoid the
34:17
Speaker 6: prenup under certain circumstances, which like him the answer some
34:22
Speaker 6: of Carlos questions of why would a woman do this.
34:27
Speaker 3: Right and married right, He's still married, she still married,
34:34
Speaker 3: gets her purchase with family money.
34:38
Speaker 2: So yeah, later it was crazy.
34:43
Speaker 1: Is the way that Jilly and the wife of Kempsley
34:46
Speaker 1: boyfriend found out about? Uh this relationship is? She? She
34:54
Speaker 1: said that Kroy reached out to her. She said she
35:00
Speaker 1: was contacted by Kroi. She said she met up with
35:03
Speaker 1: him at her cousin's home to talk about Kim's involvement
35:07
Speaker 1: with her ex. She said that Kroi told her he
35:10
Speaker 1: was concerned that Kim will financially drain money from Kyle
35:15
Speaker 1: Horny boyfriend.
35:16
Speaker 2: Jillian said Kroi showed.
35:18
Speaker 1: Her receipts of groceries that have been purchased by Kim
35:22
Speaker 1: using Kyle's credit cards.
35:24
Speaker 5: Oh wow.
35:25
Speaker 1: Jillian said that Kroi told her that Kim was narcissistic
35:31
Speaker 1: and had a gathering problem and was not present for
35:33
Speaker 1: their children. Kim has since denied all allegations brought by Kroi.
35:40
Speaker 2: So we're talking about a woman's score one hundred.
35:42
Speaker 1: There's a man scort allegedly because babystic Because like you said,
35:51
Speaker 1: both couples are still married going through this divorce where
35:56
Speaker 1: the finances are at the top of this sort of
36:04
Speaker 1: messy situation, infidelity is that the head up this situation
36:08
Speaker 1: because Jillian is alleging that Kyle cheat itself.
36:13
Speaker 2: This has a lot of.
36:15
Speaker 1: You know, information that is going to come out in
36:18
Speaker 1: the coming weeks.
36:20
Speaker 2: And this is only part one of what will be
36:23
Speaker 2: many parts to the story. So John, you gotta come back,
36:30
Speaker 2: right you do.
36:31
Speaker 3: I have one lasting question. You don't have to answer
36:33
Speaker 3: it out, judge, but could Kroy potentially be called as
36:38
Speaker 3: a witness or subpoena in their divorce in the Morwitz
36:44
Speaker 3: family divorce court?
36:47
Speaker 6: Well, in court, you know, there's a thing called hearsay,
36:51
Speaker 6: and so no one can do third party testimony. So
36:55
Speaker 6: if they were actions or events that actually happened that
37:01
Speaker 6: only a certain party can testify, they most certainly can
37:05
Speaker 6: be subpoenas.
37:09
Speaker 2: And there you have it.
37:11
Speaker 1: That's another episode of reality Crime Stories. Judge, Tyranny, thank
37:14
Speaker 1: you so much for your expertise.
37:17
Speaker 2: Courtney, thank you so much for your research.
37:19
Speaker 1: And Rain Johns, We'll be back because let's be clear,
37:22
Speaker 1: there's more to this story than meets the wig. All right,
37:26
Speaker 1: I will see y'all next one. Reality with the King
37:34
Speaker 1: is executive produced by me Carlos King, produced by Lizzie
37:39
Speaker 1: Nimitz and a partnership.
37:41
Speaker 2: With the Lack Effect Network.
37:44
Speaker 1: You can also find us on my YouTube channel at
37:46
Speaker 1: the Carlos King Underscore