Latest / Crosstabs / Rep. Paul Evans - Plan B
Transcript
- 0:01SPEAKER_00: I just didn't want to blow you up.
- 0:03SPEAKER_01: Nah, no, that's it.
- 0:03SPEAKER_01: I was just doing a little sound check there, but yeah.
- 0:05SPEAKER_01: Okay, so you do have an opponent.
- 0:07SPEAKER_01: I haven't really looked.
- 0:07SPEAKER_01: It doesn't seem like it's as aggressive as maybe it was,
- 0:12SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 0:12SPEAKER_01: four years ago when we were running,
- 0:14SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 0:15SPEAKER_01: Dan against you,
- 0:16SPEAKER_01: who now is going to be a state representative,
- 0:17SPEAKER_01: which is kind of an interesting change of events.
- 0:21SPEAKER_01: Yes, it is.
- 0:24SPEAKER_00: That's it.
- 0:25SPEAKER_00: I may or may not have been pulling him.
- 0:32SPEAKER_01: Well, you know, when you can't win, move.
- 0:36SPEAKER_01: Yeah, because
- 0:39SPEAKER_00: again, off record, we have a federally elected official who did the same thing.
- 0:48SPEAKER_01: Oh, yeah.
- 0:48SPEAKER_01: No, no, no.
- 0:49SPEAKER_01: I'm very aware.
- 0:50SPEAKER_01: I think we all are inside the baseball world of politics.
- 0:55SPEAKER_01: It's understandable.
- 0:59SPEAKER_01: There's a little bit of some sandbagging that's happening there,
- 1:04SPEAKER_01: but that's just part of the political game, sandbagging.
- 1:09SPEAKER_01: I think it's been done since the dawn of, I think, politics in America.
- 1:15SPEAKER_01: You know, people moving here, people moving to congressional districts or people moving around.
- 1:20SPEAKER_01: I mean, it's kind of normal,
- 1:21SPEAKER_01: but in Oregon, it's,
- 1:25SPEAKER_01: I think it's frowned on,
- 1:26SPEAKER_01: but at the same time, we just know what happens and you just let it go.
- 1:29SPEAKER_01: I mean, and you just move on, but yeah.
- 1:31SPEAKER_00: Yeah, I think that's right.
- 1:34SPEAKER_00: I think a lot of times the system has actually done a disservice
- 1:38SPEAKER_00: when somebody carpetbags in who doesn't actually understand the system.
- 1:44SPEAKER_00: That's it?
- 1:46SPEAKER_01: I think it does make you susceptible to being primary at a later date because
- 1:51SPEAKER_01: if you don't really have the community connections, the deep kind of butt.
- 1:56SPEAKER_01: So within your party, it's a lot harder usually to win cross party.
- 2:01SPEAKER_01: But within the party, there's usually some opportunity to do that.
- 2:05SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 2:06SPEAKER_01: You know,
- 2:07SPEAKER_01: the one thing that I really wanted to kind of start with is,
- 2:10SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 2:11SPEAKER_01: everybody loves it because it seems like these legislative races,
- 2:13SPEAKER_01: the fact that I don't even know you have an opponent tells me
- 2:15SPEAKER_01: that it's pretty boring on the legislative front.
- 2:19SPEAKER_01: This cycle, it feels pretty boring to me.
- 2:21SPEAKER_01: Everybody seems to be focused on the Kotech, Drazen thing.
- 2:24SPEAKER_01: I mean, there's going to be a couple of key races, but it seems like that's the big race, right?
- 2:32SPEAKER_01: Is that kind of what you guys are hearing too on your side?
- 2:36SPEAKER_00: I think the Democratic,
- 2:39SPEAKER_00: in the House anyway,
- 2:39SPEAKER_00: I think the perspective is that the governor's race is taking all the energy and
- 2:46SPEAKER_00: the oxygen.
- 2:47SPEAKER_00: There are congressional races of interest because of the effects we see,
- 2:51SPEAKER_00: but ultimately, most of the legislative races, I think, are on the back part.
- 2:55SPEAKER_00: It doesn't mean people aren't working hard, it doesn't mean people are trying.
- 2:58SPEAKER_00: But in many people's minds,
- 3:01SPEAKER_00: everybody in Oregon is just waiting to get over with the elected officials.
- 3:04SPEAKER_00: It's wild because I think I was talking to Senator Starr yesterday.
- 3:10SPEAKER_00: We were chatting about ledge days and he's like, you know,
- 3:24SPEAKER_01: Of course,
- 3:24SPEAKER_01: he's optimistic,
- 3:25SPEAKER_01: which is fine,
- 3:26SPEAKER_01: but he's like,
- 3:26SPEAKER_01: it really doesn't matter because if Drazen wins,
- 3:29SPEAKER_01: like throw everything out the window, right?
- 3:31SPEAKER_01: It just changes the entire game.
- 3:34SPEAKER_01: Legislatively, I mean,
- 3:36SPEAKER_01: I feel legislatively we're either 13 or 11 in the Senate for Republicans,
- 3:42SPEAKER_01: depending on what happens.
- 3:45SPEAKER_01: I think,
- 3:46SPEAKER_01: and then I think on the House side,
- 3:48SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 3:49SPEAKER_01: we're probably,
- 3:50SPEAKER_01: you guys are probably somewhere from 37 to 39, depending on what happens.
- 3:56SPEAKER_01: I just don't see a lot of movement.
- 3:59SPEAKER_00: I think you're right.
- 4:01SPEAKER_00: I actually think we're going to be at 37.
- 4:04SPEAKER_00: I don't think,
- 4:05SPEAKER_00: I think there'll be some seats that come and go,
- 4:07SPEAKER_00: but I think the total numbers are going to be right around 37.
- 4:10SPEAKER_00: It is possible we get to 39 as a Radical centrist, I would prefer.
- 4:17SPEAKER_00: Closer to the strong majority, not perhaps the majority.
- 4:24SPEAKER_00: I think the closer we get to 40, the more our Worcester Angels come out, and I'm nervous.
- 4:31SPEAKER_01: Yeah, I think it would be really hard to get to 40,
- 4:35SPEAKER_01: because that means you're beating Kim Wallen.
- 4:40SPEAKER_01: Uh, Shelly, Bosard, Davis, like you start getting into these.
- 4:43SPEAKER_01: I just think at 21, you really can't go much on the Republican side.
- 4:48SPEAKER_01: It's pretty, it's pretty difficult to go much lower than that.
- 4:51SPEAKER_01: I think from our standpoint, you're right.
- 4:53SPEAKER_01: You get to 39 and all we have is walkout and then,
- 4:57SPEAKER_01: and then who knows what,
- 4:58SPEAKER_01: and then I think they're usually what happens is then as a,
- 5:02SPEAKER_01: being a radical centrist that you are,
- 5:04SPEAKER_01: um, I think you all now, all of a sudden you just start fighting your own party.
- 5:08SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 5:12SPEAKER_01: Yeah, that's pretty, that's pretty great.
- 5:13SPEAKER_01: What's your perspective on, like, it doesn't seem like Kotech really wants to debate Drazen.
- 5:19SPEAKER_01: I think there seems to be a pushback on that with this whole canceling the KGW thing.
- 5:25SPEAKER_01: And like, is there just this idea that she doesn't want to talk issues with her?
- 5:31SPEAKER_01: Or, I mean, I don't think she's afraid.
- 5:32SPEAKER_01: I mean, Tina's a very smart person.
- 5:36SPEAKER_00: Yeah.
- 5:36SPEAKER_00: All right.
- 5:37SPEAKER_00: So, It's a weird situation.
- 5:41SPEAKER_00: For a long time, I believe that Tina Kotech and I were friends in addition to being called.
- 5:48SPEAKER_00: I believe that Tina I believe in,
- 5:52SPEAKER_00: she'd be out there advocating and arguing for a vision for Oregon.
- 5:56SPEAKER_00: She'd be advocating and explaining her vision for how we build
- 6:00SPEAKER_00: a working-class economy and continuing to fight for the values that she's spent
- 6:05SPEAKER_00: on her fighting.
- 6:05SPEAKER_00: I, as a As a rhetorician and as a speech teacher,
- 6:10SPEAKER_00: as a guy who used to speak to debate,
- 6:12SPEAKER_00: I do not understand giving up an opportunity to debate.
- 6:15SPEAKER_00: So I'm probably the least prepared person to give you an answer on why
- 6:20SPEAKER_00: a sitting governor would not debate because I think it's an opportunity to clarify
- 6:25SPEAKER_00: a lot of things that some people out there have perceptions about that
- 6:30SPEAKER_00: in many ways just aren't as simple as some people think.
- 6:36SPEAKER_00: I am on the side of advocating our governor to step up and debate more, not less.
- 6:41SPEAKER_01: Yeah, because she's not even doing, like, really any interviews.
- 6:46SPEAKER_01: Like, there's...
- 6:47SPEAKER_01: There's podcasts on the Democrat side that she could be doing.
- 6:51SPEAKER_01: She'll probably do one on OPB,
- 6:54SPEAKER_01: I bet at some point, talking out loud or thinking out loud, whatever.
- 6:57SPEAKER_01: I haven't even heard her on that.
- 7:00SPEAKER_01: I don't even know.
- 7:00SPEAKER_01: It just feels like she's very...
- 7:02SPEAKER_01: I saw her at the Pendleton Roundup this last weekend.
- 7:05SPEAKER_01: Vicki and I were over there.
- 7:08SPEAKER_01: She wasn't in the Roundup, but we saw her right before the parade started and said hi.
- 7:13SPEAKER_01: She's like, I just don't want to be...
- 7:16SPEAKER_01: Well, how'd she put it, which I thought was fair.
- 7:18SPEAKER_01: She's like,
- 7:19SPEAKER_01: I think it's inauthentic for me to,
- 7:22SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 7:22SPEAKER_01: try to fake,
- 7:24SPEAKER_01: fake that she's,
- 7:25SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 7:26SPEAKER_01: cowboy or all that,
- 7:28SPEAKER_01: which I appreciated,
- 7:29SPEAKER_01: but I was like,
- 7:29SPEAKER_01: well, but you're here, like you should kind of be seen, you
- 7:34SPEAKER_00: know, I don't know.
- 7:37SPEAKER_01: Yeah, like if you're going to go all the way to Pendleton,
- 7:40SPEAKER_01: I feel like instead of, you know, you should at least get out.
- 7:42SPEAKER_01: And it's no big deal to walk through the parade.
- 7:44SPEAKER_01: Like, that's not a big deal.
- 7:45SPEAKER_01: Like, walk and say hi.
- 7:47SPEAKER_01: And, you know, I just think that there's, and that could be her downfall.
- 7:53SPEAKER_01: I mean, if she doesn't win, I mean, I don't, you know, I don't know the ins and outs of it.
- 7:57SPEAKER_01: We're probably going to do a poll on Crosstabs here pretty soon.
- 8:01SPEAKER_01: And we'll release the whole thing.
- 8:04SPEAKER_01: Like we did in the Republican primary where we released the Crosstabs and everything.
- 8:07SPEAKER_01: But I just feel like if she loses, I think it's because she's not...
- 8:13SPEAKER_01: Trying to be who she is.
- 8:14SPEAKER_01: And like you said, defending her record, whatever that may be.
- 8:18SPEAKER_01: I mean, you know,
- 8:20SPEAKER_01: and I think talking about housing, I mean,
- 8:23SPEAKER_01: she's done,
- 8:23SPEAKER_01: if I were to be on the protein aside,
- 8:25SPEAKER_01: I would say the stuff that's been done through the legislature with her team on
- 8:30SPEAKER_01: the governor's office has been dramatic changes to our housing policies.
- 8:35SPEAKER_00: Yeah.
- 8:37SPEAKER_01: We're not seeing the units,
- 8:38SPEAKER_01: but we're setting ourselves up for future success when the market turns around.
- 8:42SPEAKER_01: I'm hearing from the builders, it gets way better.
- 8:47SPEAKER_01: But that would be a pro thing I think she could talk about.
- 8:49SPEAKER_01: She could still always weave in,
- 8:52SPEAKER_01: the Trump cuts, the Medicaid are going to be a problem for Oregon.
- 8:55SPEAKER_01: We've got a lot of people on Medicaid.
- 8:57SPEAKER_01: She can still talk the national stuff,
- 8:58SPEAKER_01: but I just think defending the record is,
- 9:01SPEAKER_01: because we all, I mean, you guys have to do it.
- 9:02SPEAKER_01: I mean, we have to do it.
- 9:03SPEAKER_01: I have to do it for my boss when You vote a certain way.
- 9:06SPEAKER_01: Like, you know, you have to go out there and defend your record.
- 9:08SPEAKER_01: And I think you can stand up for that.
- 9:12SPEAKER_00: Yeah.
- 9:13SPEAKER_00: Tina Kotick,
- 9:13SPEAKER_00: I believe in,
- 9:15SPEAKER_00: is a person who is far more earnest than most people would believe of a politician.
- 9:21SPEAKER_00: I believe she got in this for the right reason.
- 9:22SPEAKER_00: I believe she served for the right reason.
- 9:24SPEAKER_00: I believe that if you get to know her personally,
- 9:27SPEAKER_00: it's very different than the public persona that is out there.
- 9:32SPEAKER_00: I'm a believer that the more people Tina actually talks to,
- 9:35SPEAKER_00: The better off she is, which is not the case for some candidates.
- 9:38SPEAKER_00: I would say you point blank.
- 9:39SPEAKER_00: There are certain candidates that we purposely send to doors in the other district
- 9:42SPEAKER_00: so they don't lose them.
- 9:44SPEAKER_00: But in this particular case,
- 9:45SPEAKER_00: I actually think the Tina I know and the Tina I respect and the Tina I used
- 9:50SPEAKER_00: to consider a close friend is there for the right reasons and I want
- 9:54SPEAKER_00: to help her continue that mission.
- 9:56SPEAKER_00: That said,
- 9:58SPEAKER_00: I do believe,
- 9:59SPEAKER_00: and that is not something I have not said publicly,
- 10:01SPEAKER_00: I do believe,
- 10:02SPEAKER_00: yes, sir, she has some aides around her That are very Portland-centric.
- 10:07SPEAKER_00: They're very focused on only two or three things and they have a mistaken belief
- 10:11SPEAKER_00: that you can only do two or three things while being governor.
- 10:14SPEAKER_00: And unless it is on those two or three things, they don't take it.
- 10:19SPEAKER_00: And that's fine for policy advice.
- 10:21SPEAKER_00: That's not fine for governor.
- 10:22SPEAKER_00: And I happen to believe the governor can walk through bubble gum at the same time
- 10:25SPEAKER_00: and I happen to believe he actually does.
- 10:27SPEAKER_00: I just wish some of her staff would get the hell out of the way and let her actually show her.
- 10:32SPEAKER_00: Yeah, well, I put a fork.
- 10:34SPEAKER_01: I put a formal request into her press team and her campaign
- 10:38SPEAKER_00: team to have her on
- 10:39SPEAKER_01: the podcast.
- 10:40SPEAKER_01: So I doubt she'll come.
- 10:43SPEAKER_01: I've talked to her about it personally, and she's like, well, my team won't let me.
- 10:47SPEAKER_01: And I was like, well, maybe Amy should come on.
- 10:53SPEAKER_01: But I'm with you.
- 10:55SPEAKER_01: I think all of them, you know, and a lot of Democrats, you're one of the few.
- 10:57SPEAKER_01: I mean, some of we've had some on the podcast that will come on,
- 11:00SPEAKER_01: but like the leaders don't tend to want to come on.
- 11:02SPEAKER_01: They don't do anything.
- 11:03SPEAKER_01: Rob Wagner won't come on.
- 11:06SPEAKER_01: I haven't asked.
- 11:06SPEAKER_00: I'll come on anytime.
- 11:08SPEAKER_00: I'll come on anytime you ask.
- 11:09SPEAKER_00: Because ultimately,
- 11:10SPEAKER_00: the worst that happens is we have a disagreement and people
- 11:13SPEAKER_00: that are listening go research and they get smarter.
- 11:15SPEAKER_00: So it's a win-win.
- 11:17SPEAKER_01: I think so.
- 11:18SPEAKER_01: I mean, I think that there's, and that's the same, like, I just want to hear...
- 11:22SPEAKER_01: Because I also have some challenges with some of Drazen's policies that she's put
- 11:26SPEAKER_01: on her plan moving forward.
- 11:29SPEAKER_01: I have some bonus.
- 11:31SPEAKER_01: And I also disagree with a lot of stuff that Tina pushes as well,
- 11:34SPEAKER_01: especially the Portland-centric stuff.
- 11:36SPEAKER_01: Just in my world, right?
- 11:37SPEAKER_01: My worldview is more rural.
- 11:40SPEAKER_01: But I would love to just hear, because I'm a wonky guy.
- 11:42SPEAKER_01: You're wonky.
- 11:43SPEAKER_01: Like, we kind of want to hear them.
- 11:45SPEAKER_01: I don't want to hear the spewing debate kind of stuff.
- 11:48SPEAKER_01: What I want to hear is like substance.
- 11:49SPEAKER_01: Like, okay, let's talk housing.
- 11:51SPEAKER_01: Like, Say this and then Drazen, like show us, like, what is your plan?
- 11:55SPEAKER_01: Like, how are you, what would your plan look like differently than Tina's plan?
- 12:01SPEAKER_00: Or homelessness.
- 12:02SPEAKER_01: Yeah, like homelessness.
- 12:03SPEAKER_01: Like, how are you going to solve the problem?
- 12:06SPEAKER_01: Because I only solve homelessness by,
- 12:07SPEAKER_01: I say we solve it with bus tickets, but people don't seem to like that idea.
- 12:12SPEAKER_00: Well, my plan was to,
- 12:15SPEAKER_00: and I had to introduce this back to people,
- 12:17SPEAKER_00: Governor Woodson, effectively find communities of thousands and more.
- 12:23SPEAKER_00: We have a three-hour system where we get people out of the weather.
- 12:28SPEAKER_00: We get them from start to finish assessment of whether they just put for job homeless.
- 12:34SPEAKER_00: That's one issue.
- 12:35SPEAKER_00: But for medication, and then the third category, they just don't want to play well.
- 12:38SPEAKER_00: Well, if they don't want to play well, I'm not opposed to the buses.
- 12:42SPEAKER_00: The folks who need help,
- 12:43SPEAKER_00: let's get them help and let's rethink how we provide care,
- 12:46SPEAKER_00: but not so much on a voluntary basis.
- 12:49SPEAKER_00: Some people need help.
- 12:51SPEAKER_00: And some folks, it's really just the economic situation.
- 12:56SPEAKER_00: And my goal was,
- 12:58SPEAKER_00: after an 18-month intensive period,
- 13:01SPEAKER_00: every community would have a facility that would be used for emergencies
- 13:05SPEAKER_00: if they needed.
- 13:07SPEAKER_00: National Guard could build them because they're pretty simple to build.
- 13:09SPEAKER_00: They've built bus lines around the state for years on some programs.
- 13:13SPEAKER_00: But that should make it a community effort.
- 13:15SPEAKER_00: So far, it was too simple.
- 13:17SPEAKER_00: And people wouldn't want to follow it.
- 13:20SPEAKER_00: You're right.
- 13:20SPEAKER_00: I want to hear a plan.
- 13:21SPEAKER_00: It may not be a good plan,
- 13:22SPEAKER_00: but I want to hear both candidates say,
- 13:26SPEAKER_00: all right, how are we going to build a middle class?
- 13:29SPEAKER_01: I want to hear those answers.
- 13:31SPEAKER_01: Yeah, I'm with you.
- 13:32SPEAKER_01: And I don't really have an answer really for both.
- 13:34SPEAKER_01: I mean, I could read their websites, but it's not.
- 13:36SPEAKER_01: Having you go back and forth and have that policy discussion is really how you get
- 13:41SPEAKER_01: to finding consensus.
- 13:44SPEAKER_01: And I think that's really important.
- 13:46SPEAKER_01: The difference there.
- 13:47SPEAKER_01: And speaking of that, I mean, let's kind of transition maybe just a little bit into policy.
- 13:53SPEAKER_01: Like, so I watched with bainted breath,
- 13:56SPEAKER_01: the transportation talk,
- 13:57SPEAKER_01: because I think that's really, and you're on transportation.
- 14:00SPEAKER_01: So it's something that's pretty important to your district too,
- 14:03SPEAKER_01: because getting people over the bridge and back in for Salem and over
- 14:10SPEAKER_01: to independence and West Salem, like that's, you know, it's a challenge.
- 14:13SPEAKER_01: Like if you're talking transportation, it's a challenge.
- 14:17SPEAKER_01: And I didn't realize this, but I was, you know, 79,000 miles of roads we have and 8,300 bridges.
- 14:24SPEAKER_01: And watching that from ledge days,
- 14:27SPEAKER_01: the takeaway that I really had,
- 14:29SPEAKER_01: the big takeaway I really had was like,
- 14:31SPEAKER_01: and I drove to Pendleton and back,
- 14:33SPEAKER_01: you know, and we drove these rural roads and I'm sitting there going, you know what?
- 14:36SPEAKER_01: Vicki and I were talking all the way back.
- 14:38SPEAKER_01: I go, you know what?
- 14:38SPEAKER_01: I don't think we've really changed our transportation system.
- 14:43SPEAKER_00: In like 80 years
- 14:45SPEAKER_01: since it was built.
- 14:47SPEAKER_01: I mean, the road, 395, still 395.
- 14:50SPEAKER_01: I mean, they're relatively unchanged.
- 14:52SPEAKER_01: Maybe we've added what,
- 14:55SPEAKER_01: I don't know, what is that, 212 or something coming up on the east side of Portland.
- 14:59SPEAKER_01: But outside of that, I mean, it feels like we have been relatively unchanged, right?
- 15:05SPEAKER_01: So we really haven't built anything new, have we, in 60 years, 70 years?
- 15:11SPEAKER_00: Not really since the cloud administration.
- 15:13SPEAKER_01: Isn't that crazy?
- 15:15SPEAKER_00: It is.
- 15:16SPEAKER_00: And that's why,
- 15:17SPEAKER_00: you know,
- 15:19SPEAKER_00: I have a reputation in the building,
- 15:20SPEAKER_00: as you know, for someone who is not terribly comfortable with the status quo.
- 15:26SPEAKER_00: And I want reasonable, rational, responsible change when agencies are no longer fit for the top.
- 15:33SPEAKER_00: I do not believe ODOT can and should exist the way it does right now
- 15:39SPEAKER_00: because it cannot, by definition, design, cannot meet the new system.
- 15:44SPEAKER_00: I want to split it into at least two, if not three different categories.
- 15:47SPEAKER_00: Because I think you have,
- 15:50SPEAKER_00: I put it this analogy,
- 15:51SPEAKER_00: when you have two catches, three catches in a bag, there's fighting each other.
- 15:55SPEAKER_00: And when you have a mission that is too big,
- 15:58SPEAKER_00: you have internal pressures and external stakeholders effectively pressuring
- 16:03SPEAKER_00: an agency to do nothing.
- 16:05SPEAKER_00: Because nothing is less painful than doing something that anchors one side or the other.
- 16:10SPEAKER_00: And it basically is a situation where inertia, Yeah, I hate that the truth.
- 16:16SPEAKER_00: Because I liked what you said.
- 16:18SPEAKER_00: You said, what is your plan B?
- 16:21SPEAKER_00: And...
- 16:35SPEAKER_01: I thought that was a good response because you were just like,
- 16:39SPEAKER_01: clearly,
- 16:39SPEAKER_01: if you just come back with another gas increase and this and that and another thing,
- 16:45SPEAKER_01: the public isn't going to have it.
- 16:46SPEAKER_01: They're going to show up and,
- 16:48SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 16:48SPEAKER_01: the Republicans clearly have a path and people know
- 16:52SPEAKER_01: that they'll just vote it down again.
- 16:53SPEAKER_01: And then we're just going to waste another two years of not solving the problem.
- 16:58SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 16:59SPEAKER_01: I think ultimately Republicans, we like roads.
- 17:02SPEAKER_01: We like commerce.
- 17:03SPEAKER_01: We like things that happen.
- 17:05SPEAKER_01: We like investing in infrastructure.
- 17:08SPEAKER_01: I think we see that as a critical part of the economy.
- 17:13SPEAKER_01: We see it as something, an essential form of government that should be done as infrastructure.
- 17:19SPEAKER_01: So we like pipes in the roads.
- 17:21SPEAKER_01: We like roads.
- 17:22SPEAKER_01: We like new roads.
- 17:23SPEAKER_01: We like increased capacity.
- 17:25SPEAKER_01: I think all those sort of things are really great,
- 17:27SPEAKER_01: but their response was I thought, and you didn't say anything.
- 17:32SPEAKER_01: I was waiting for you.
- 17:32SPEAKER_01: I thought maybe you were going to pop off on one, but they go, we'll just shut it down.
- 17:37SPEAKER_01: And I was like, we're going to start shutting down bridges?
- 17:40SPEAKER_01: Like, oh, that's going to work well.
- 17:43SPEAKER_00: Right.
- 17:43SPEAKER_00: And, you know,
- 17:44SPEAKER_00: a mutual friend of ours, Rip Ann Sharp, says, Republicans don't mind paying for tax.
- 17:50SPEAKER_00: And that's why I think sometimes government is important in terms of it does the thing to do.
- 17:59SPEAKER_01: So you've been in the building 12 years now, and you were there in 2017, right?
- 18:08SPEAKER_01: And you came to a consensus.
- 18:10SPEAKER_01: I mean, Cliff Benz,
- 18:11SPEAKER_01: I think,
- 18:12SPEAKER_01: led that for the Senate at the time,
- 18:14SPEAKER_01: I believe, for the Republicans, like the transportation plan.
- 18:18SPEAKER_01: I think he was part of that.
- 18:19SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 18:24SPEAKER_01: But we got a lot of Republican votes.
- 18:26SPEAKER_01: I don't know,
- 18:27SPEAKER_01: it was like $6 billion or something at the time, which was a lot of money back then.
- 18:32SPEAKER_01: I feel like that's not as much money as it was.
- 18:37SPEAKER_01: But, I mean,
- 18:39SPEAKER_01: has the building changed so much that we don't think we can find
- 18:43SPEAKER_01: a consensus like you guys did in 2017?
- 18:46SPEAKER_01: What's kind of your thought there?
- 18:47SPEAKER_00: It doesn't always sound like it, but I try to be an option.
- 18:51SPEAKER_00: I do believe it is still possible.
- 18:53SPEAKER_00: But I can lay out four factors that make it far more difficult.
- 18:58SPEAKER_00: The first is expectations of the Republicans in office and expectations of
- 19:04SPEAKER_00: the Democrats in office.
- 19:05SPEAKER_00: The expectations of the Democrats are to be able to do anything because we have a supermajority.
- 19:09SPEAKER_00: Expectations on the Republicans are to be able to walk out.
- 19:12SPEAKER_00: And if anything that is painful to do, they're not walking out, you're wrong.
- 19:20SPEAKER_00: And I don't think it's fair to anybody involved.
- 19:24SPEAKER_00: That said, so the dynamics of that has changed.
- 19:27SPEAKER_00: The second thing has changed,
- 19:28SPEAKER_00: and this is kind of a pox bow house,
- 19:31SPEAKER_00: we don't elect people with government experience in it.
- 19:35SPEAKER_00: We elect people who are either two believers ideologically,
- 19:39SPEAKER_00: or we elect the people who come out of non-profit and political apps.
- 19:44SPEAKER_01: I mean, you make a good point.
- 19:45SPEAKER_01: I think, like,
- 19:46SPEAKER_01: Republicans need to show up and say,
- 19:47SPEAKER_01: hey, we're not going to walk out, but here's our line.
- 19:51SPEAKER_01: Here's what we're willing to do.
- 19:53SPEAKER_01: We also have to do our part, which is to say we'll be players, but here's the three things.
- 20:00SPEAKER_01: Here's the cap and trade stuff.
- 20:03SPEAKER_01: I know that Bruce and those guys are all trying to figure out how
- 20:07SPEAKER_01: to maybe not remove cap and trade,
- 20:11SPEAKER_01: but just change where the money goes and make sure that if we're going to pull
- 20:15SPEAKER_01: in dollars from this
- 20:18SPEAKER_01: Cap and trade thing.
- 20:19SPEAKER_01: It shouldn't go to these crazy far left groups, nonprofits.
- 20:25SPEAKER_01: It should go to roads and bridges.
- 20:29SPEAKER_01: Those are fair arguments to make, I think, on our end.
- 20:31SPEAKER_01: But we also have to be fair negotiators and say we're willing to go down this path
- 20:38SPEAKER_01: if you guys are willing to go down this path.
- 20:40SPEAKER_01: And then We have to be willing to do big things.
- 20:43SPEAKER_01: I think in 2017, you had people who are willing to do big things.
- 20:47SPEAKER_01: And I think sometimes you've got to have the right players in the room.
- 20:50SPEAKER_01: And I think that's a big part of it.
- 20:51SPEAKER_01: You've got to have people that are willing to stick their necks out there.
- 20:54SPEAKER_01: And even to your point, kind of not be...
- 20:59SPEAKER_01: The most liked in your party because you're going to have to make some decisions
- 21:03SPEAKER_01: that maybe some people don't like.
- 21:05SPEAKER_01: But if the mission is better roads and bridges,
- 21:09SPEAKER_01: if that's truly what the mission is,
- 21:12SPEAKER_01: I feel like Republicans or I know my boss would be at the table.
- 21:15SPEAKER_01: I know that many other Republicans will be at the table.
- 21:19SPEAKER_01: If that's if that's going to be the core mission of ODOT is to do roads and bridges,
- 21:23SPEAKER_01: increase capacity and get commerce going and move people from point A to point B
- 21:28SPEAKER_01: as fast as we can.
- 21:30SPEAKER_01: I just feel,
- 21:31SPEAKER_01: but if you,
- 21:31SPEAKER_01: to your point you were talking about,
- 21:32SPEAKER_01: you have this mission creep going off where they're in spaces
- 21:37SPEAKER_01: where they don't even have any business really doing,
- 21:41SPEAKER_01: like you said, if it's a grant or something, let Business Oregon do that stuff.
- 21:46SPEAKER_01: They're so caught up in the weeds,
- 21:48SPEAKER_01: but I think it's about protecting jobs all the time from SEIU and they come in
- 21:52SPEAKER_01: and they're just bam, bam, bam.
- 21:54SPEAKER_01: From my perspective, I mean, I just think there's a lot of that that happens.
- 21:58SPEAKER_01: And I know they're trying, but I don't think we're losing jobs.
- 22:01SPEAKER_01: We're just going to be redirecting where they go.
- 22:05SPEAKER_01: I don't see us losing jobs in state government that much.
- 22:08SPEAKER_01: I just see if we're smart about stuff, we're just going to be redirecting the effort.
- 22:13SPEAKER_00: Yeah.
- 22:13SPEAKER_00: And I mean,
- 22:15SPEAKER_00: for ODOT purposes,
- 22:18SPEAKER_00: we made a very different Decision in the 90s and early 2000s and basically decided
- 22:25SPEAKER_00: that a lot of the folks that were in ODOT wouldn't be in ODOT anymore.
- 22:29SPEAKER_00: The engineers and the designers and that
- 22:33SPEAKER_01: kind of
- 22:33SPEAKER_00: stuff.
- 22:33SPEAKER_00: Again, different times.
- 22:34SPEAKER_00: I try not to look back and say, boy,
- 22:36SPEAKER_00: they messed up there because they were under different circumstances
- 22:39SPEAKER_00: and expectations.
- 22:40SPEAKER_00: I think we're here right now.
- 22:42SPEAKER_00: And to the point of how do we build a system that can maintain is going to require
- 22:47SPEAKER_00: a lot of folks that are state employees and in some cases,
- 22:50SPEAKER_00: Some other ways of doing business.
- 22:52SPEAKER_00: To your point about the cap and trade thing,
- 22:54SPEAKER_00: I actually think,
- 22:56SPEAKER_00: you know,
- 22:56SPEAKER_00: the governor's executive order and the climate protection program,
- 23:02SPEAKER_00: I would like to see that eventually transition into a cap and invest program
- 23:07SPEAKER_00: that actually made sense, most likely possible.
- 23:10SPEAKER_00: I also believe we need a concurrent effort to plant a billion trees.
- 23:14SPEAKER_00: I want us to become even more of a carbon plant, play towards plants.
- 23:19SPEAKER_00: Get more people in the woods, managing the force.
- 23:22SPEAKER_00: Having a vision of how we can compete in the 21st century.
- 23:27SPEAKER_00: My perspective,
- 23:28SPEAKER_00: businesses that I respect,
- 23:30SPEAKER_00: they know things need to change and for them it's just a matter of cost.
- 23:34SPEAKER_00: But it's also making sure that that cost goes into something that is some kind of investment.
- 23:40SPEAKER_00: Instead of simply just spending it on things that really don't move the mingling.
- 23:45SPEAKER_00: So I think we have to have those kinds of conversations.
- 23:47SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 23:48SPEAKER_00: Unfortunately, I'm just going to lay it out.
- 23:52SPEAKER_00: Some of us old hands aren't necessarily involved in some of those conversations
- 23:55SPEAKER_00: because the advocacy groups don't actually want a solution.
- 24:00SPEAKER_00: They want to have a reason to go raise money and
- 24:03SPEAKER_01: beat their
- 24:03SPEAKER_00: cat.
- 24:04SPEAKER_00: And that's great.
- 24:05SPEAKER_00: God bless them.
- 24:05SPEAKER_00: We need people out there, but we also have to go.
- 24:08SPEAKER_00: And if I do not sign up to be the most liked, I'm not the most handsome.
- 24:12SPEAKER_00: I'll never be the most handsome.
- 24:14SPEAKER_01: Yeah, I, well,
- 24:16SPEAKER_01: I hope we come to a,
- 24:17SPEAKER_01: because I mean, one, I mean,
- 24:19SPEAKER_01: who really wants to talk about transportation for like four straight years in a row?
- 24:23SPEAKER_01: Like, let's just get it done.
- 24:25SPEAKER_01: There's lots of other issues to worry about.
- 24:27SPEAKER_01: You know, I mean,
- 24:27SPEAKER_01: I think that's also part of it is like,
- 24:29SPEAKER_01: we just got to,
- 24:30SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 24:31SPEAKER_01: come up with a plan and even,
- 24:34SPEAKER_01: and then have a straight, I mean, I don't know how, why wouldn't it be too hard?
- 24:37SPEAKER_01: Just like, here's what Democrats want.
- 24:39SPEAKER_01: Here's what Republicans want.
- 24:41SPEAKER_01: Here's what we agree on.
- 24:42SPEAKER_01: Here's the sticking point, sit in a room and figure it out.
- 24:45SPEAKER_01: I don't, I mean, be adults and figure it out.
- 24:48SPEAKER_01: And I've talked to Senator Lieber about this.
- 24:52SPEAKER_01: I've talked to a lot of people who on your side of the aisle, as well as on the Republican side.
- 24:57SPEAKER_01: And I think that's what we just have to do is I think we just got to put
- 25:00SPEAKER_01: the right people in the room to come up with a plan.
- 25:02SPEAKER_01: And I just think if you put the same people from 25 in the same room in 27,
- 25:07SPEAKER_01: I think
- 25:09SPEAKER_00: All I'm saying is right.
- 25:11SPEAKER_00: And he's doing the same thing over and over again.
- 25:13SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 25:14SPEAKER_01: And the same with our people.
- 25:15SPEAKER_01: I mean, I'll say the same thing too.
- 25:17SPEAKER_01: I'll get shit as well.
- 25:18SPEAKER_01: But, you know, I mean, I love Shelly Bosar Davis, but she can be a lightning rod.
- 25:26SPEAKER_01: And you need those people in your caucus.
- 25:30SPEAKER_01: Those people play a role, right?
- 25:32SPEAKER_01: I mean, we all know the game.
- 25:35SPEAKER_01: And she knows transportation.
- 25:36SPEAKER_01: It's not that she doesn't.
- 25:38SPEAKER_01: But there's also clearly personality conflicts that are hard to overcome.
- 25:45SPEAKER_01: And I think,
- 25:46SPEAKER_01: especially when you dive into an issue like this with somebody who cares so deeply,
- 25:51SPEAKER_01: who has a business invested in it, like all the things, right?
- 25:55SPEAKER_01: She's passionate about it.
- 25:57SPEAKER_01: But it also makes you a little bit blind.
- 26:01SPEAKER_01: And you have to understand that.
- 26:04SPEAKER_01: I'm a little blind when it comes to data centers because I You know what?
- 26:08SPEAKER_01: In Primeville here, we like Meta.
- 26:10SPEAKER_01: They've done really well for our community.
- 26:13SPEAKER_01: They've been great.
- 26:15SPEAKER_01: And I'm friends with those guys up there.
- 26:17SPEAKER_01: I was the chair of economic development when we brought Meta here.
- 26:20SPEAKER_01: I signed the documents.
- 26:22SPEAKER_01: I had dinner with Mark Zuckerberg.
- 26:26SPEAKER_01: So I'm clearly a little blind to the fact of all the other things, right?
- 26:31SPEAKER_01: The problems that might be with data centers.
- 26:33SPEAKER_01: But I'm also,
- 26:33SPEAKER_01: I think, I hope I'm smart enough to recognize that as well, that I'm a little blind.
- 26:37SPEAKER_01: Maybe I should be the one negotiating a data center deal.
- 26:42SPEAKER_00: I think data centers are a good example.
- 26:47SPEAKER_00: I'm always nervous about moratorium.
- 26:51SPEAKER_00: To me, a moratorium can be surgical.
- 26:56SPEAKER_00: So for a short time to let tempers get down, I can see it.
- 27:00SPEAKER_00: But I don't think the answer for data centers is a long-term border.
- 27:04SPEAKER_00: And here's what I mean.
- 27:06SPEAKER_00: Before Tom McCall, I don't think we need to be suckers.
- 27:10SPEAKER_00: I don't think we need to be throwing ourselves at every business.
- 27:12SPEAKER_00: But we do need jobs.
- 27:15SPEAKER_00: And we do need economics to be able to pay for the services we need.
- 27:18SPEAKER_00: So here's my theory.
- 27:20SPEAKER_00: I'm working with Mark Owens and Pam Mars and a bunch of other folks on.
- 27:23SPEAKER_00: Look, get rid of some of the taxes.
- 27:26SPEAKER_00: Tax incentives, because ultimately now we know data centers want to come.
- 27:29SPEAKER_00: Okay, fine.
- 27:31SPEAKER_00: Come up with a requirement that says,
- 27:34SPEAKER_00: all right,
- 27:34SPEAKER_00: for water and for energy,
- 27:35SPEAKER_00: you have to have a plan to make sure it's safe and sustainable.
- 27:39SPEAKER_00: And then give local communities the ability to negotiate what they want.
- 27:43SPEAKER_00: For some communities, like Pineville, it is absolutely a smart answer.
- 27:47SPEAKER_00: For other communities, maybe they don't want that.
- 27:49SPEAKER_00: That's fine.
- 27:50SPEAKER_00: But just a blanket say to an industry, we don't want you.
- 27:54SPEAKER_00: And again,
- 27:56SPEAKER_00: I'm not naive to how some people,
- 27:58SPEAKER_00: some businesses take advantage just as some individuals take advantage.
- 28:03SPEAKER_00: That said,
- 28:04SPEAKER_00: as a state,
- 28:05SPEAKER_00: I think we need to have a statewide policy of,
- 28:06SPEAKER_00: hey, you have an idea to do something?
- 28:08SPEAKER_00: We're not going to say no out of the box.
- 28:10SPEAKER_00: We're going to say,
- 28:11SPEAKER_00: show me how it actually makes the community better and how we can be good partners.
- 28:14SPEAKER_00: If you can use those requirements, I think that's a good thing.
- 28:18SPEAKER_00: And to me,
- 28:19SPEAKER_00: it's a matter of having a business philosophy that says we can't We can't say no
- 28:26SPEAKER_00: to agriculture.
- 28:27SPEAKER_00: We can't say no to high taxes.
- 28:28SPEAKER_00: We can't say no to forests.
- 28:31SPEAKER_00: We can't say no to fishing.
- 28:33SPEAKER_00: At some point, what kind of economy do you want?
- 28:36SPEAKER_00: And I believe that an economy that's built on rewarding work as opposed
- 28:40SPEAKER_00: to wealth is more sustainable and ecstatic.
- 28:44SPEAKER_00: And I want to be a Democrat that helps bring about some of those conversations.
- 28:48SPEAKER_00: Understanding fully that we can't just give everything away.
- 28:52SPEAKER_00: I don't want that.
- 28:53SPEAKER_00: I want Oregon to be the place people have to fight.
- 28:56SPEAKER_00: But eventually, if they want to be a good partner, they can become a good partner.
- 28:59SPEAKER_01: Yeah, I'm with you.
- 29:01SPEAKER_01: I think a lot of it is, well, labor, big labor, right?
- 29:05SPEAKER_01: And the guys building the dang things.
- 29:07SPEAKER_01: I mean, they want to see more tax centers and they give all their money to Democrats.
- 29:12SPEAKER_01: So, I mean, that's a really an oddball scenario.
- 29:14SPEAKER_01: I'm with you on the moratoriums.
- 29:16SPEAKER_01: I think it's silly to put a moratorium in place.
- 29:17SPEAKER_01: Let's just come up with, like you said, a little bit more transparency.
- 29:22SPEAKER_01: A lot of these guys, they did the non-disclosure agreements early on.
- 29:26SPEAKER_01: And by the way, they do them with solar fields as well.
- 29:29SPEAKER_01: It's not just data centers that are trying to pull the wool over people's eyes.
- 29:33SPEAKER_01: It's just these guys,
- 29:35SPEAKER_01: these site selectors,
- 29:36SPEAKER_01: they love to just kind of keep things quiet
- 29:39SPEAKER_01: because their biggest fear is you go negotiate with Klamath Falls in your meta.
- 29:46SPEAKER_01: And you're negotiating,
- 29:47SPEAKER_01: and then you just get to a point to where,
- 29:48SPEAKER_01: you know what, it's just not going to work.
- 29:50SPEAKER_01: Well, that gets leaked.
- 29:51SPEAKER_01: Everybody in Klamath Falls now hates Meta because,
- 29:54SPEAKER_01: you know, they didn't come to Klamath Falls, and people there get pissed at Meta.
- 29:59SPEAKER_01: And Meta's like, well...
- 30:01SPEAKER_01: Don't get mad at us.
- 30:02SPEAKER_01: It was my site selector.
- 30:03SPEAKER_01: And so that's why they want the NDAs.
- 30:05SPEAKER_01: And I think there's got to be.
- 30:07SPEAKER_01: So when you're having your discussion,
- 30:08SPEAKER_01: I would just ask you to like, I'm fine with full disclosure.
- 30:11SPEAKER_01: I think that's important,
- 30:12SPEAKER_01: but there's got to be a point at which you move to disclosure versus NDA,
- 30:19SPEAKER_01: because if I'm a site selector and I'm just looking at the locations and I think is
- 30:25SPEAKER_01: that, but that's just a normal course of business, right?
- 30:28SPEAKER_01: I mean, if.
- 30:30SPEAKER_00: Yeah.
- 30:30SPEAKER_00: And.
- 30:31SPEAKER_00: I'll give you an example.
- 30:31SPEAKER_00: So when I used to sell goods overseas, there was not a conversation.
- 30:37SPEAKER_00: There was not an initial conversation we ever had, didn't have at least once.
- 30:41SPEAKER_01: Yeah,
- 30:42SPEAKER_01: we'll see what the discussions happen in 27 because I think there's going to be
- 30:46SPEAKER_01: a few different proposals out there.
- 30:49SPEAKER_01: Yeah, it should be interesting.
- 30:50SPEAKER_01: Well, let's wind up with 27.
- 30:53SPEAKER_01: What do you, I mean, hopefully we'll talk again before 27 or we'll definitely talk in 27.
- 30:58SPEAKER_01: But do you,
- 31:01SPEAKER_01: what's your,
- 31:02SPEAKER_01: besides,
- 31:02SPEAKER_01: you know, right,
- 31:03SPEAKER_01: data centers, transportation, what I mean, her education is going to be a big thing.
- 31:09SPEAKER_01: Because you see like these universities,
- 31:11SPEAKER_01: like what kind of drives me crazy about Oregon State, right?
- 31:15SPEAKER_01: Probably the two bigger ones.
- 31:18SPEAKER_01: I mean, they have,
- 31:19SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 31:19SPEAKER_01: Oregon as they're paying these football players and basketball players
- 31:22SPEAKER_01: and they're paying them millions and millions of dollars.
- 31:25SPEAKER_01: And all they do is come to the legislature with their handout all the time.
- 31:29SPEAKER_01: And it's just...
- 31:30SPEAKER_01: I think the public is growing really, really tired of that.
- 31:34SPEAKER_01: And I think universities got to kind of take a little look in the mirror.
- 31:38SPEAKER_01: I mean, they got an endowment of, what,
- 31:40SPEAKER_01: $4 billion at U of O.
- 31:42SPEAKER_01: I mean, Phil Knight keeps giving his money away like water right now.
- 31:46SPEAKER_01: I mean, I think his health must not be good because he's given all of his money away
- 31:49SPEAKER_01: to make sure he's got buildings left behind.
- 31:51SPEAKER_01: But yeah.
- 31:53SPEAKER_01: Which is great.
- 31:54SPEAKER_01: I'm glad that he's given that money with OHSU.
- 31:57SPEAKER_01: That's awesome, right?
- 31:58SPEAKER_01: I mean, that's what you're supposed to do with philanthropy.
- 32:01SPEAKER_01: That's what they did back in the day.
- 32:03SPEAKER_01: They built libraries and they built these buildings.
- 32:05SPEAKER_01: And I think that's awesome.
- 32:08SPEAKER_01: But the parents and the education,
- 32:13SPEAKER_01: I looked at the cost of sending,
- 32:14SPEAKER_01: my kids both go to Grand Canyon University in Arizona, out-of-state private school.
- 32:19SPEAKER_01: For both of them, it is cheaper than one of them to go to Oregon State.
- 32:24SPEAKER_00: Yeah, and here's the thing.
- 32:27SPEAKER_00: On the philanthropy aspect,
- 32:31SPEAKER_00: I would really appreciate it if folks who want to give,
- 32:36SPEAKER_00: Would work with us in terms of knowing where to go instead
- 32:39SPEAKER_00: of just giving what they think will get them a legacy.
- 32:43SPEAKER_00: So, for example,
- 32:45SPEAKER_00: the billion dollars that Bill and I just promised for an engineering program at U
- 32:50SPEAKER_00: of O to now compete with Oregon State University.
- 32:55SPEAKER_00: Imagine what we could do with a billion dollars on tuition assistance.
- 32:59SPEAKER_00: We could literally send an entire generation of goods to public schools for free.
- 33:03SPEAKER_01: That's a good point.
- 33:04SPEAKER_01: Yeah, definitely.
- 33:05SPEAKER_01: I mean, a billion, people don't realize like how much money really a billion dollars is.
- 33:10SPEAKER_00: I mean, a billion dollars is a lot of money.
- 33:12SPEAKER_00: It's a thousand million.
- 33:14SPEAKER_00: Keep going.
- 33:14SPEAKER_01: It's a, it's a lot of money.
- 33:16SPEAKER_01: It really is.
- 33:17SPEAKER_01: So I think, and yes, you're right.
- 33:19SPEAKER_01: Giving it to the school, which is great.
- 33:22SPEAKER_01: But to your point,
- 33:24SPEAKER_01: now you're,
- 33:25SPEAKER_01: now they're just competing against each other and,
- 33:27SPEAKER_01: you know, and that doesn't, that didn't really help the solution.
- 33:30SPEAKER_01: It's just, And maybe his goal is to make U of O, you know, preeminent university.
- 33:36SPEAKER_01: Well, if that's the game and that's U of O's goal,
- 33:39SPEAKER_01: then OSU should probably know that because then they need to probably figure out
- 33:44SPEAKER_01: where, how they're going to go get money.
- 33:47SPEAKER_00: So literally rewrite the world in Oregon,
- 33:51SPEAKER_00: like getting a generation of folks,
- 33:52SPEAKER_00: the ability to get out of school, defend the class, be able to buy their homes.
- 33:56SPEAKER_01: Yeah, it really would.
- 33:58SPEAKER_01: Yeah.
- 33:58SPEAKER_01: And transform Oregon.
- 34:00SPEAKER_00: Yeah.
- 34:00SPEAKER_00: And, I mean,
- 34:00SPEAKER_00: what's funny is if you actually look at it,
- 34:02SPEAKER_00: if we can get those guys to agree, give us $500 million apiece for scholarship.
- 34:07SPEAKER_00: I'm going to transform everything.
- 34:15SPEAKER_01: Well, Representative, I'll let you get out of here.
- 34:17SPEAKER_01: I'm sure you got other things to do and talk to me.
- 34:19SPEAKER_01: So, but I do appreciate the time and let's do it again.
- 34:23SPEAKER_01: And next time, maybe we'll even drag Reagan, you know, and said he's up there at Wolf.
- 34:28SPEAKER_01: He's up at Wolf Creek Lodge with his kids or he's on his way.
- 34:31SPEAKER_01: So we'll let him have the weekend, but then we'll, we'll drag him in and we'll do it again.
- 34:36SPEAKER_00: That sounds great.
- 34:36SPEAKER_00: And thanks again.
- 34:38SPEAKER_00: I missed him.
- 34:39SPEAKER_00: I didn't have an opportunity.
- 34:42SPEAKER_01: I'll let him know he was missed.
- 34:44SPEAKER_01: All right.
- 34:44SPEAKER_01: Thank you.
- 34:45SPEAKER_01: Take care.