Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Can SAM Win Men's Vote Back? What about a Queer Latinx of Size? | HBR News 505

Transcript

Can SAM Win Men's Vote Back? What about a Queer Latinx of Size? | HBR News 505 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: This is HBr News number five oh five. Can Sam
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: win Men's vote back? What about a queer latinx of
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: sign where we discuss the news of the week and
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: give it the bad treatment. Hello everybody, and welcome to
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: Honey Badger Radio. Because I'm doing well this week and
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: that you're laughing at all of this absurdity, so that
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: you're not you are not consumed by it. I am
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: your host, Brian. I'm joined by, as always, my lovely
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: co hosts, doctor Randa mcam and Hannah Wallin on today's
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: Yes word word to your mother. And also, by the way,
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: happy Men's Mental Health Awareness Month. I thought you thought
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: I was gonna say pride, but apparently nobody, including a
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: lot of corporations, are talking about that. But they are
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: talking about Men's Mental Health Awareness Month. So let's just
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: take advantage of that, shall we? This month? You know,
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: if you or someone you know is having a bit
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: of a hard time of it, reach out to a
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: friend and just let them know it's gonna be okay.
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: And maybe don't wait for Men's Mental Health Awareness Month
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: to do it. Do it all the time, but just
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: like take extra special care to attend to that. What
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: we're gonna say.
• 1:03
  Speaker 2: Mike and convince them to cut the dick off for
• 1:06
  Speaker 2: Pride Awareness Month, which apparently is now Trends Awareness Month.
• 1:10
  Speaker 2: It's just been stuck in under the rug. Fuck gay people.
• 1:14
  Speaker 2: Everyone should be now, especially the gay people.
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: It's a performance. I heard it, I got it on
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: good authority. But anyway, I should probably get into the stories.
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: So this week we're gonna be talking about the defunding
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: of Planned Parenthood Operation SAM or SAM to get men
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: back on board with the left. Tinder releases new features
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: for women, like new updates and patches for Tinder and more.
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: So stick around. It's going to be a good time.
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: Ambit sure to join us afterwards for the patron only show.
• 1:44
  Speaker 1: So let me just let me see here. I want
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: to bring my yes here we go. We have this
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: article from the BBC that I have archived because fuck
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: the BBC. And they are talking about well, you know, men,
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: they're they're looking for their own solutions to their problems mental, social,
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: end to some degree spiritual, and they are doing the
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: worst thing ever, which is essentially joining Russian churches that
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: promise absurd levels of manliness.
• 2:12
  Speaker 2: It's an intersection, it's an intersection of two of the
• 2:15
  Speaker 2: West things ever ever manliness and Russia.
• 2:18
  Speaker 3: Yes, actually because they're doing this out of female control.
• 2:24
  Speaker 2: Well there you go. There are only two countries who
• 2:26
  Speaker 2: are allowed to hate in the UK, the USA and Russia.
• 2:30
  Speaker 2: Anything else is xenophobia, which is a crime.
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: So this BBC article is going to go into the
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: I guess this trend of young American men joining Russian
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: churches that promise absurd levels of manliness, and we're going
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: to get into that in the Patron Show. I picked
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: this not because I also happen to be Orthodox, but
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: mostly because of the way in which the BBC is
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: framing this entire article, which I've find quite hilarious. And
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: what's also interesting is I knew about this because I
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: know exactly who this priest is, and I've watched a
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: couple of his videos. He's a basically a powerlifter and
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: a priest, So just basically he's a priest that put
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: all of his points into strength and constitution. So we're
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: gonna like talk a little bit about that. And interesting enough,
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: like I was gonna mention even Carl had made a
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: video about this, and he said, oh, monks are pretty
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: freaking cool. So we'll talk about this in the Patron
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: show and let's find out maybe women have cause to
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: be afraid that men may go off and become monks.
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: I guess that's a problem because they're abandoning women. It's
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: like migtao, right. So anyway, if you want to join
• 3:42
  Speaker 1: us for the conversation around this story, then please consider
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: becoming a Badger by going to feed the Badger dot
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: com and setting up a monthly subscription. Five bucks a
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: month will get you into our discord server. We'll be
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: able to watch all the additional content like our patron shows,
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: as well as all of the various kinds of like
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: you know, activities and like movie nights and there's little
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: like writers' rooms and all kinds of stuff like that.
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: And that would be at Feedbadger dot com for slash subscribe.
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: And if you don't want to wake up one morning
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: to find that we have been yeaded from the Internet,
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: then go to where our archive content lives, which is
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: Honeybadger Radio dot com or Badger feed dot com and
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: I hopefully I know you guys will check it out.
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: So anyway, with all that said, let us get into
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: today's stories, all right, so I'm gonna put my thing
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: back on here, all right. So on June first, a
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: violent attack took place in Boulder, Colorado, at the Pearl
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: Street Mall, targeting a group participating in a weekly Run
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: for their Lives event to raise awareness for Israeli hostages
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: held in Gaza since the October seventh, twenty twenty three
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: Hamas led assault. The suspect, Mohammed Sabri Soliman, a forty
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: five year old year old Egyptian national, allegedly through molotov
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: cocktails and use a makeshift flamethrower injuring twelve people, eight
• 4:58
  Speaker 1: of whom were hospitalized with burns. The victims, age fifty
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: two to eighty eight, included a Holocaust survivor and a
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: University of Colorado professor. The FBI has classified the incident
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: as a targeted act of terrorism and a federal hate crime,
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: noting that Soliman shouted Free Palestine and expressed anti Zionist
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: sentiments during the attack. He had planned the assault for
• 5:20
  Speaker 1: a year, researching molotov cocktail in construction online and disguised
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: himself as a gardener to approach the group. Aleiman, who
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: entered the US legally on a tourist visa in August
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: of twenty twenty two, maamed after it expires. Basically, his
• 5:34
  Speaker 1: visa had expired, so he was in the country illegally
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: in February. As of February twenty twenty three, then applied
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: for asylum and was living in Colorado Springs. He faces
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: forty two state felony charges, including sixteen counts of attempt
• 5:48
  Speaker 1: at first degree murder and a federal hate crime charge
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: that could carry a life sentence. Authorities found sixteen unused
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: molotov cocktails. That's a lot, that's a party's work. That's
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: like a whole kegger near the scene, indicating the potential
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: for greater harm. The attack, occurring on the eve of
• 6:04
  Speaker 1: the Jewish holiday Chavat, has heightened fears within the Jewish community,
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: especially following recent anti Semitic incidents in the US. Public
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: figures including President Trump, Colorado Governor Jared Poulis, and Israeli
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu condemned the attack, with many labeling
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: it anti Semitic. The ins of this investigation continues, with
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: authorities confidence Solomon acted alone.
• 6:27
  Speaker 2: Well, now we know what it takes for the FBI
• 6:30
  Speaker 2: to classify an incident as a targeted act of terrorism
• 6:34
  Speaker 2: when some crazed Zimza goes and murders a bunch of
• 6:37
  Speaker 2: children in a Christian school and leaves a detailed manifesto
• 6:42
  Speaker 2: explicitly outlining why they did it. No motive, We just
• 6:47
  Speaker 2: we have no idea what's going on? Sorry, your guess
• 6:50
  Speaker 2: is as good as ours. Wait, no, it isn't. Your
• 6:53
  Speaker 2: guest is transphobic and wrong. You want the manifesto? Yeah, no,
• 7:00
  Speaker 2: just gonna hang onto that for the time being. Actually,
• 7:02
  Speaker 2: we're gonna try and hang on to it forever until
• 7:05
  Speaker 2: Crowder gets hold of it. What manifesto? There was never
• 7:08
  Speaker 2: a manifesto. That was just you having a nightmare. Excuse
• 7:12
  Speaker 2: me while I spark this gaslighter for no apparent reason.
• 7:17
  Speaker 2: It was that inappropriate given the nature of the story. Sorry,
• 7:21
  Speaker 2: but yeah, the when the target is Israel, we won't
• 7:25
  Speaker 2: stand for that, Not on your nelly, sunshine. We're gonna
• 7:29
  Speaker 2: let the whole world know that this white man is
• 7:31
  Speaker 2: a terrorist. And yes, we've all seen the pictures like
• 7:34
  Speaker 2: the one we're looking at now, and by all accounts
• 7:36
  Speaker 2: he does appear to be what we call white. So
• 7:40
  Speaker 2: it wasn't necessarily wrong to report that detail, as many
• 7:43
  Speaker 2: an outlet did. A lot of people took umbradge with
• 7:47
  Speaker 2: it on account of his name being Mohammed Solim. He's
• 7:52
  Speaker 2: not white, He's a Muslim, My, dudes, These attributes are
• 7:57
  Speaker 2: not mutually exclusive. There are people in Egypt, there are
• 8:01
  Speaker 2: white people in Afghanistan. Arabs are a subdivision of Caucasian.
• 8:05
  Speaker 2: After all. There are several East European countries, particularly in
• 8:10
  Speaker 2: the former Yugoslav region, which are still majority Muslim, and
• 8:15
  Speaker 2: there are also North and West European converts to Islam,
• 8:21
  Speaker 2: mostly Ginger for some reason, but not exclusively. Anyone can
• 8:26
  Speaker 2: be a Muslim. You are free to join the faith
• 8:29
  Speaker 2: no matter who you are. You're just not allowed to
• 8:32
  Speaker 2: leave it or you'll get fatwad. By the way, Brian,
• 8:36
  Speaker 2: you're making a background noise.
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: Well, it's my air conditioner distracted.
• 8:40
  Speaker 2: Me, thank you.
• 8:41
  Speaker 3: Yeah.
• 8:41
  Speaker 2: Last week there was an incident in Liverpool, England, where
• 8:45
  Speaker 2: someone drove their car through a crowd of people, of
• 8:48
  Speaker 2: the kind of incident to which we've become accustomed at
• 8:51
  Speaker 2: the hands of Muslims, and in the mainstream media they
• 8:55
  Speaker 2: refuse to identify them as Muslims for as long as
• 8:57
  Speaker 2: they feasibly can. But on the occasion of the Liverpool incident,
• 9:02
  Speaker 2: within half a news cycle that BBC told everyone he's white.
• 9:06
  Speaker 2: He's a white male, please don't riot. He was a
• 9:09
  Speaker 2: white male and I'm like, okay, but what's his religion?
• 9:14
  Speaker 2: He's he's a family man, he had a job and everything. Okay, thanks,
• 9:19
  Speaker 2: but what religion is he don't We don't know. We
• 9:23
  Speaker 2: can't possibly know that. What's his name? His name? What's
• 9:27
  Speaker 2: his name? Does anyone know? Paul Doyle? His name is
• 9:32
  Speaker 2: Paul Doyle? Thanks? Fuck, please don't riot everyone. His name
• 9:36
  Speaker 2: is Paul Doyle. All right. That still doesn't prove anything,
• 9:39
  Speaker 2: but at least his name isn't Mohammad solid?
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: See?
• 9:44
  Speaker 2: That would be a solid indication of which religious prophet
• 9:48
  Speaker 2: he follows, what with it being right there in the
• 9:51
  Speaker 2: form of Muhammad. Some white Muslims are born with that name,
• 9:56
  Speaker 2: and many Islamic converts of all races will change their
• 10:00
  Speaker 2: name to Muhammad. I believe y'all had a reasonably famous
• 10:05
  Speaker 2: boxer who did just that because he didn't want to
• 10:08
  Speaker 2: use his slave name. Apparently nobody informed him of what
• 10:12
  Speaker 2: the Muslims did to their African slaves. Dickhead Anyway, I'm
• 10:17
  Speaker 2: off topic. Getting back to it, I'm sure that James
• 10:21
  Speaker 2: Lindsay's of the world were scrambling to label this Colorado
• 10:24
  Speaker 2: terrorist as woke right right, after all, he appears to
• 10:29
  Speaker 2: have a problem with the Jews. Well, no, I don't
• 10:32
  Speaker 2: think anyone heard him chanting fuck the Jews. They only
• 10:36
  Speaker 2: heard him chanting free Palestine. And that's not something one
• 10:41
  Speaker 2: tends to hear from the right wing, is it. Among
• 10:44
  Speaker 2: the right wing, opinion is divided on Israel. Many a
• 10:47
  Speaker 2: neo con would happily send their children to die in
• 10:52
  Speaker 2: a fire for Israel. On the other hand, many of
• 10:55
  Speaker 2: the based right don't particularly care for Israel. And yes,
• 11:00
  Speaker 2: some of the right doesn't particularly care for the Jews
• 11:03
  Speaker 2: in general either, but they don't give a shit about
• 11:06
  Speaker 2: Palestine either. Free Palestine is a mancha that is chanted
• 11:10
  Speaker 2: almost exclusively by the brainwashed left, very often in the
• 11:15
  Speaker 2: same breath as trans rights. Now without a hint of
• 11:19
  Speaker 2: the irony, it seems to have become a theme for
• 11:22
  Speaker 2: insane men to set themselves on fire or to set
• 11:27
  Speaker 2: other people on fire while chanting free Palestine. So yeah,
• 11:32
  Speaker 2: it's not the woke right who are to blame. It's
• 11:34
  Speaker 2: the woke left otherwise known as the woke. I hope
• 11:39
  Speaker 2: the FBI realizes that they've hereby tripped over themselves and
• 11:43
  Speaker 2: finally declared the woke left otherwise known as the woke,
• 11:47
  Speaker 2: as terrorists. It's about bloody time. What now is there
• 11:52
  Speaker 2: going to be a national conversation about banning fire, not
• 11:56
  Speaker 2: just flamethrowers, but any flammable liquid. We just once answerable,
• 12:00
  Speaker 2: hard to control, that's all we're asking for.
• 12:04
  Speaker 1: If you if you throw molotavs, are you not throwing flame?
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: Does that not constitute a flamethrower.
• 12:13
  Speaker 2: Or anything that can be set fired? Do you have
• 12:15
  Speaker 2: any wood in your house? Well, that's that's that's a
• 12:19
  Speaker 2: deadly pyromaniac weapon. You're under arrest. I joke, but it'll
• 12:24
  Speaker 2: probably happen in Britain before the end of the year.
• 12:28
  Speaker 2: It'll be an arrestable offense to be in possession of
• 12:32
  Speaker 2: anything that can be burned in conjunction with any political
• 12:38
  Speaker 2: opinion other than free Palestine. Transrise. Now, just in case
• 12:44
  Speaker 2: you use that fire to burn a Koran, which by
• 12:49
  Speaker 2: the way, is now officially a crime over here due
• 12:53
  Speaker 2: to a recent precedent sett in case sigh, I say,
• 12:57
  Speaker 2: sigh and shake my head and what the even fuck?
• 13:00
  Speaker 2: All right, I'm getting even further into a tangent, so
• 13:03
  Speaker 2: I'll just stop and silently despair.
• 13:06
  Speaker 1: All right.
• 13:07
  Speaker 3: Well, like I agree with everything Mike said, I'm gonna
• 13:10
  Speaker 3: go on a different tangent. I'm gonna talk about America's
• 13:13
  Speaker 3: dipshit epidemic. Like we've heard all about, you know, multiple
• 13:18
  Speaker 3: viruses over the last twenty years. When when my son
• 13:23
  Speaker 3: was in kindergarten, it was h one N one that
• 13:25
  Speaker 3: everybody was panicking over. I don't know if people even
• 13:28
  Speaker 3: remember that now after the COVID crisis, but right before
• 13:32
  Speaker 3: that was the there was the SARS bird flu epidemic,
• 13:37
  Speaker 3: the first SARS bird flu epidemic because COVID, now what's
• 13:40
  Speaker 3: the second. But we had we had to hear about
• 13:43
  Speaker 3: that happening in China and it was gonna come over here.
• 13:47
  Speaker 3: And there was, of course ebola in several countries if
• 13:50
  Speaker 3: I remember, right in Africa, and people panicked when Obama
• 13:54
  Speaker 3: brought a couple of people over to be treated here,
• 13:57
  Speaker 3: It's gonna spread through the United States. We can't have
• 13:59
  Speaker 3: a here, and of course it didn't because we're actually
• 14:02
  Speaker 3: pretty good with germs. We do pretty well with germs.
• 14:04
  Speaker 3: Of course, we were at war with them, and things
• 14:07
  Speaker 3: have changed. I could explain how they are shooting back,
• 14:10
  Speaker 3: but that's a long explanation. But the dipshit problem has
• 14:14
  Speaker 3: only gotten worse, and I've been watching it get worse
• 14:17
  Speaker 3: for the about forty years that I've been really aware
• 14:22
  Speaker 3: of it, since I started noticing the spread of just
• 14:26
  Speaker 3: being a dipshit. And it seems to have its roots
• 14:30
  Speaker 3: in a couple of different places. You have all of
• 14:33
  Speaker 3: the usual suspects. The establishment media encourages it. The education
• 14:38
  Speaker 3: system is dumbing down our students, the political establishment encourages it.
• 14:44
  Speaker 3: Political correctness is all about normalizing dip shittery. But we
• 14:50
  Speaker 3: got to the point during this last administration when the
• 14:53
  Speaker 3: dipshits were actively importing more dipshits, and this is the result.
• 15:00
  Speaker 3: We have had multiple crimes of this nature, not necessarily
• 15:04
  Speaker 3: of this scope, but of this nature, where people have
• 15:08
  Speaker 3: been attacked by dipshits from another country who were here
• 15:12
  Speaker 3: illegally because of their identity, or because it was convenient,
• 15:16
  Speaker 3: or because the dip shit didn't have anything better to do,
• 15:19
  Speaker 3: And the people who bulk the highest bulk the most
• 15:24
  Speaker 3: just have an absolute tantrum over the idea of maybe
• 15:28
  Speaker 3: filtering who comes in and how long they can stay
• 15:33
  Speaker 3: and under what circumstances, and what they're allowed to do
• 15:36
  Speaker 3: while they're here if they want to stay, and who
• 15:40
  Speaker 3: gets considered for asylum and so on. Are dipshits more
• 15:44
  Speaker 3: dipshits mostly female, And oddly enough, the victims that we
• 15:49
  Speaker 3: hear about the most have been female, even though there
• 15:54
  Speaker 3: have been numerous male deaths at the hands of MS
• 15:57
  Speaker 3: thirteen gang members. And when we hear about the male
• 16:01
  Speaker 3: that's most of the time, it's somebody brings out the
• 16:04
  Speaker 3: crying mother, the crying wife, crying sister, because people have
• 16:09
  Speaker 3: more sympathy for women. But then we have to hear
• 16:13
  Speaker 3: female dipshits going, well, that's not a reason to secure
• 16:17
  Speaker 3: our borders and keep criminals from coming through with the
• 16:20
  Speaker 3: people who are actively trying to escape the environment they've created. Yeah,
• 16:25
  Speaker 3: that is it is a very valid reason to close
• 16:28
  Speaker 3: the borders and say you have to not be a
• 16:31
  Speaker 3: criminal if you want to come here. And this is
• 16:33
  Speaker 3: this is what we get when we listen to the
• 16:36
  Speaker 3: dippiest of dipshits, the dipshit woke Karen, we get results
• 16:42
  Speaker 3: like this, and it's mostly going to be men that
• 16:44
  Speaker 3: are going to have to deal with this. And it's
• 16:46
  Speaker 3: not just just the cops. We know, not all cops
• 16:48
  Speaker 3: are men, by the way. It's it's the families that
• 16:53
  Speaker 3: have to deal with their losses. It's the men on
• 16:57
  Speaker 3: scene that try to protect the women, the men in
• 17:01
  Speaker 3: local neighborhoods that know that these dipshits are being imported
• 17:05
  Speaker 3: into their neighborhoods, that have their wives and their children
• 17:08
  Speaker 3: to think about, right, and then in these crime scenes,
• 17:13
  Speaker 3: it's the cleaners that come in. You know, women when
• 17:16
  Speaker 3: they take cleaning jobs. When we take cleaning jobs, it's
• 17:18
  Speaker 3: usually you know, somebody's house that has a messy living
• 17:21
  Speaker 3: room and a stinky toilet, you know, and stuff like. No,
• 17:25
  Speaker 3: when when men take cleaning jobs, it's usually to scrub
• 17:28
  Speaker 3: the blood off of the walls or the street signs
• 17:30
  Speaker 3: when there's been a murder like this. Because most women
• 17:34
  Speaker 3: don't have the stomach for it, most men don't either.
• 17:37
  Speaker 3: So the men that protect and the men that deal
• 17:40
  Speaker 3: with the consequences, mostly men are going to be investigating this,
• 17:44
  Speaker 3: and mostly men are going to be handling the what
• 17:47
  Speaker 3: do we do now crisis and the dip shits are
• 17:50
  Speaker 3: gonna bitch about it. Don't let dipshits decide what you think,
• 17:54
  Speaker 3: because every time we do, we end up with another
• 17:57
  Speaker 3: situation like this.
• 17:58
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I want to piggyback off of what you guys
• 18:01
  Speaker 1: both said. I wanted to add one other thing to this.
• 18:04
  Speaker 1: So one of the reasons why I pick this story
• 18:06
  Speaker 1: is partly because of the controversy surrounding the conflict in
• 18:11
  Speaker 1: the Middle East between Israel and Gaza, and that there are,
• 18:15
  Speaker 1: you know, very strong opinions on both sides of this conflict,
• 18:19
  Speaker 1: and I don't think that anything is necessarily clear cut,
• 18:23
  Speaker 1: which is why I am very critical of what Israel
• 18:28
  Speaker 1: is doing and how the United States is being, or
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: at least there are are desires or machinations to use
• 18:35
  Speaker 1: the United States as a kind of tool so that
• 18:38
  Speaker 1: the Israeli government can take more land from Palestine. But
• 18:42
  Speaker 1: but the and I see that there are problems there,
• 18:46
  Speaker 1: there are there are injustices, and I want them corrected.
• 18:48
  Speaker 1: And I think, like Mike said, there are people who
• 18:51
  Speaker 1: have criticisms of that that happen to be on the
• 18:56
  Speaker 1: that happen to be the on the on what appears
• 18:58
  Speaker 1: to be the same side of the issue, but for
• 19:00
  Speaker 1: different reasons. And I brought this up before when we
• 19:03
  Speaker 1: I think we talked about the guy who set himself
• 19:06
  Speaker 1: on fire, there was like a soldier that committed suicide.
• 19:09
  Speaker 1: And I got some shit for that because I said
• 19:12
  Speaker 1: that when leftists on college campuses protest Palestine, they're protesting
• 19:18
  Speaker 1: the West through Palestine. Like it's not like they know
• 19:22
  Speaker 1: or care much about what's actually happening on the ground.
• 19:25
  Speaker 1: They see Israel as an extension of the United States,
• 19:28
  Speaker 1: and they hate the United States, and so they're attacking
• 19:31
  Speaker 1: the United States by using this issue. And I said that,
• 19:35
  Speaker 1: and people thought I was crazy. Not you guys, but
• 19:38
  Speaker 1: some people thought I was crazy because they thought I
• 19:40
  Speaker 1: was being dismissive of what was actually happening on the ground.
• 19:43
  Speaker 1: I'm not I know what's happening, but there's a difference
• 19:46
  Speaker 1: between again, what might like just like Mike said, saying
• 19:49
  Speaker 1: from the river to the Sea and just shouting free
• 19:52
  Speaker 1: Palestine while killing Jews, no matter what their their connection
• 19:56
  Speaker 1: is to what's happening, Just like those two that Jewish
• 19:59
  Speaker 1: couple was assassinated, just like what a week ago, two
• 20:03
  Speaker 1: weeks ago or something like that. There's a big difference
• 20:05
  Speaker 1: between that and somebody saying like a Dave Smith, who
• 20:08
  Speaker 1: is like, yeah, what's happening down here is actually like
• 20:11
  Speaker 1: a terrible injustice and something needs to be done, somebody
• 20:15
  Speaker 1: needs to stop them, and usually that's like a call
• 20:18
  Speaker 1: for peace or ceasefire or diplomacy of some kind, you know.
• 20:22
  Speaker 1: And when I heard about this story, what I figured
• 20:25
  Speaker 1: was happening was we are this is a smaller part
• 20:28
  Speaker 1: of a larger pattern of incidents, not all of them
• 20:31
  Speaker 1: related to the same, or they don't look like they're
• 20:34
  Speaker 1: the same. So like, take what this guy did and
• 20:37
  Speaker 1: then look at the guy who killed himself that I mentioned,
• 20:40
  Speaker 1: look at the couple that was assassinated, look at Luigi
• 20:43
  Speaker 1: Mangioni and the guy that he killed, and look at
• 20:46
  Speaker 1: some of the other incidents of terrorism like the trans
• 20:51
  Speaker 1: woman who shot up at Christian Squall, the trans people
• 20:53
  Speaker 1: who' shot up schools. I think there's at least a
• 20:55
  Speaker 1: couple of those incidents that have happened. And what I
• 20:58
  Speaker 1: think is going on is that these are products of
• 21:01
  Speaker 1: a kind of stochastic terrorism through narratives like the people
• 21:05
  Speaker 1: who the multiple attempts on President Trump. So you have
• 21:09
  Speaker 1: rhetoric that's going around online, and there's it's a massive
• 21:13
  Speaker 1: dehumanization campaign of people in the West, of Americans, of
• 21:17
  Speaker 1: white men, of men generally, and once in a while
• 21:21
  Speaker 1: that comes out in a violent, you know, incident where somebody,
• 21:26
  Speaker 1: somebody crazy decides they're gonna be a hero and they're
• 21:29
  Speaker 1: gonna act on this. And what I want, what I
• 21:31
  Speaker 1: was trying to get people to see is that if
• 21:33
  Speaker 1: you support because I know there were people that watched
• 21:36
  Speaker 1: us that supported what Luigi Manngioni did when he killed
• 21:39
  Speaker 1: that guy at United Healthcare or whatever, and they were
• 21:42
  Speaker 1: like saying, oh, he did nothing wrong, Free Luigi, et cetera.
• 21:44
  Speaker 1: And then Bill Burr started doing that. Why did Bill
• 21:46
  Speaker 1: Burr do that? Because there there is like a there
• 21:50
  Speaker 1: is something happening, something very dark, that people are pushing for,
• 21:54
  Speaker 1: although they themselves don't want to actually have any blood
• 21:57
  Speaker 1: on their hands, so they're hoping to use someone who's
• 22:00
  Speaker 1: looking for a great heroic story that they go out
• 22:03
  Speaker 1: and do something for the people that they're being called
• 22:06
  Speaker 1: to something. And most of the time those are men
• 22:09
  Speaker 1: that are you know, aimless, that are radicalized. There's lots
• 22:13
  Speaker 1: of forces that move on them and ask them to
• 22:16
  Speaker 1: do things. So what I am saying is is that
• 22:20
  Speaker 1: this is indicative of the difference, the primary difference between
• 22:24
  Speaker 1: people on the right that are critical of the Middle
• 22:26
  Speaker 1: East and people on the left that are critical of it.
• 22:29
  Speaker 1: And this guy is acting out in the same way
• 22:32
  Speaker 1: that other leftists have acted out because they always fall
• 22:35
  Speaker 1: back to violence. And I know it sounds like I'm
• 22:37
  Speaker 1: being partisan, but by and large, that is how it
• 22:40
  Speaker 1: shakes out because that's what they think has to happen.
• 22:43
  Speaker 1: Why does why do people like Destiny and Vosh and
• 22:46
  Speaker 1: Hassan Piker call for the deaths of the rich, like
• 22:50
  Speaker 1: call for their blood even though those guys they're you know,
• 22:53
  Speaker 1: their te levels are way too low for them to
• 22:55
  Speaker 1: do it themselves, but they'll gladly talk about it online.
• 22:57
  Speaker 1: And if something happens, I e. Guy, the guy who
• 23:01
  Speaker 1: was at the Trump rally that died, they all made
• 23:04
  Speaker 1: jokes about him, and they all said that if any
• 23:06
  Speaker 1: of their people who watched them were shot and killed
• 23:09
  Speaker 1: at that incident, they would not have any sympathy and
• 23:11
  Speaker 1: they would piss on their grave because they are engaging
• 23:14
  Speaker 1: in that stochastic terrorism. They want this stuff to happen
• 23:18
  Speaker 1: and I mean, I can get into like what's wrong
• 23:20
  Speaker 1: with them for that, but the point is this is
• 23:22
  Speaker 1: the difference. This is the difference between someone who says
• 23:25
  Speaker 1: I have criticisms of Zionism for X, Y and Z
• 23:29
  Speaker 1: reasons and people who say I'm going to kill Jews
• 23:31
  Speaker 1: because they remind me of white people too much, or
• 23:35
  Speaker 1: and oh and by the way, one more thing to
• 23:37
  Speaker 1: like to bring this home blue sky. There was an
• 23:40
  Speaker 1: image that was going around. It was like a Venn
• 23:42
  Speaker 1: diagram of the reason. They were basically making the case
• 23:45
  Speaker 1: as to why the Palestine issue is the issue, and
• 23:50
  Speaker 1: they made a case for how all of the other
• 23:52
  Speaker 1: intersectional feminist issues, white supremacy, capitalism, you know, patriarchy, all
• 23:58
  Speaker 1: of that are all together. Of course, it was a
• 24:01
  Speaker 1: giant like rigamarole of you know, spiraling logic, but they
• 24:06
  Speaker 1: use it to make the case that this is our time,
• 24:09
  Speaker 1: this is where the revolution has to happen because we
• 24:13
  Speaker 1: hate the West, not because we care about what's happening
• 24:15
  Speaker 1: in Gaza, not because we think we have anything in
• 24:18
  Speaker 1: common with those people, but because they oppose the thing
• 24:21
  Speaker 1: that we hate. Because the thing that we hate is
• 24:23
  Speaker 1: somehow associated with the West, and that's That is the
• 24:27
  Speaker 1: difference between someone who's being rational and saying I don't
• 24:31
  Speaker 1: like Benjamin at Yahoo for these reasons, and someone who
• 24:35
  Speaker 1: is like, oh, those guys are just like these guys,
• 24:38
  Speaker 1: Like the dynamic is oppressor oppressed. Who is the oppressor
• 24:41
  Speaker 1: in this instance, it's Israel. Why because they're associated with
• 24:44
  Speaker 1: the United States, and the United States is a terrible country.
• 24:46
  Speaker 1: I hate that country. Everyone that they support is my enemy.
• 24:50
  Speaker 1: And that's it. That's the only basis for it. Ultimately,
• 24:54
  Speaker 1: what I'm saying is is that this is just one
• 24:57
  Speaker 1: other incident in a series of incidents at all in
• 25:00
  Speaker 1: the eyes of the left, are connected like this is
• 25:04
  Speaker 1: this is the consequence as much related to, you know,
• 25:07
  Speaker 1: the assassination on those two Israeli ambassadors or whatever they were.
• 25:10
  Speaker 1: I don't know. They were dignitaries or something, did not
• 25:13
  Speaker 1: deserve to die. I don't give a shit. That's not
• 25:14
  Speaker 1: how you get things done. They were just as connected
• 25:17
  Speaker 1: as the Carmelo Anthony, as the Shiloh Hendrix, as Trayvon Martin,
• 25:22
  Speaker 1: as you know, Luigi Mangeoni. It's all the same thing
• 25:24
  Speaker 1: to these people. It's all the same. So this is
• 25:27
  Speaker 1: just another incident in a line of those incidents and
• 25:30
  Speaker 1: the other thing too, And this is the thing that
• 25:31
  Speaker 1: I find I wouldn't say the most annoying, because obviously
• 25:34
  Speaker 1: the murder is probably the worst part of this, and
• 25:36
  Speaker 1: the injury and the damage that was done. But this
• 25:38
  Speaker 1: is actually gonna be good for Zionists because they get
• 25:42
  Speaker 1: to use this and say, look, see, this is why
• 25:44
  Speaker 1: we need your support and funding. This is why we
• 25:46
  Speaker 1: need like the ADL is all over this shit now.
• 25:49
  Speaker 1: Anytime something like this happens, some tragedy like this, these
• 25:53
  Speaker 1: people pounce on that and they use it. And I
• 25:56
  Speaker 1: think this is this is a shame because we could
• 26:00
  Speaker 1: would have done this in a you know, more like rational,
• 26:03
  Speaker 1: philosophical and pragmatic way, and now we're just we're back
• 26:07
  Speaker 1: in the emotional state again. And that's where I think
• 26:10
  Speaker 1: this is asked. I got a superchat from Windows tester
• 26:18
  Speaker 1: for ten dollars. Thank you Windows Tester. Really appreciate it.
• 26:21
  Speaker 1: And they say, hey, can you tell me some life
• 26:23
  Speaker 1: advice you would like to share with the world. Well,
• 26:26
  Speaker 1: I don't know if I'm the right guy to ask
• 26:28
  Speaker 1: that of Windows tester, but thank you for the superchat anyway,
• 26:32
  Speaker 1: really appreciated.
• 26:34
  Speaker 3: Well, I can say never trust anything feminists tell you,
• 26:37
  Speaker 3: because everything that they tell you is based on finances,
• 26:40
  Speaker 3: not on reality. And in this circumstance, I think what
• 26:44
  Speaker 3: I said earlier, don't don't let dipshits decide what you're
• 26:48
  Speaker 3: going to think about something, is probably the best advice
• 26:51
  Speaker 3: we can give about this. Don't let this guy determine
• 26:54
  Speaker 3: your opinions on the subject of Israel and Palestine because
• 27:00
  Speaker 3: he was a dipshit and he did what he did
• 27:01
  Speaker 3: because he was a dipshit and he was influenced by
• 27:04
  Speaker 3: dipshit and most of the people talking about this have
• 27:08
  Speaker 3: some degree of dipshitty. Probably what Brian said is the
• 27:12
  Speaker 3: most important consideration, and you just have to pay attention
• 27:16
  Speaker 3: to whether or not you're being manipulated.
• 27:18
  Speaker 1: Yep, all right, well, thank you for the super chat,
• 27:20
  Speaker 1: and again, if you want to send us a super chow,
• 27:22
  Speaker 1: you can do so anytime during the show. That would
• 27:24
  Speaker 1: be feed Thebadgler dot com forward slash just the tip
• 27:27
  Speaker 1: and you'll be able to send longer messages, uncensored messages,
• 27:30
  Speaker 1: and you can basically make sure that Google doesn't take
• 27:33
  Speaker 1: like half of what you donate so or what you contribute.
• 27:36
  Speaker 1: I don't want to say donate because that's the D
• 27:38
  Speaker 1: word apparently, but let us know what you guys think
• 27:40
  Speaker 1: in the comments afterwards either way. So we're moving on
• 27:43
  Speaker 1: to the next story. So in twenty twenty five, the
• 27:46
  Speaker 1: House of Representatives passed CHR one, the quote one big
• 27:50
  Speaker 1: beautiful bill end quote Act, a Republican led budget reconciliation
• 27:55
  Speaker 1: bill that includes a provision and there's a lot of
• 27:57
  Speaker 1: stuff in it, and a lot of people have problems
• 27:58
  Speaker 1: with it. We're not talking about whatever else is in
• 28:00
  Speaker 1: the bill. I know that that's a mixed bag. But
• 28:03
  Speaker 1: this is the big thing for this story that I
• 28:05
  Speaker 1: thought was worth pointing out. It includes a provision to
• 28:08
  Speaker 1: defund Planned Parenthood by blocking its access to Medicaid funding.
• 28:14
  Speaker 1: Introduced in January eighth, twenty twenty five, as part of HR.
• 28:17
  Speaker 1: Two seven to one and S two oh three defund
• 28:20
  Speaker 1: Planned Parenthood Act of twenty twenty five. The provision prohibits
• 28:24
  Speaker 1: federal funds to Planned Parenthood and its affiliates for one
• 28:27
  Speaker 1: year unless they certify they will not perform or fund abortions,
• 28:31
  Speaker 1: with exceptions for rape incests or life threatening conditions. The
• 28:35
  Speaker 1: Congressional Budget Office estimates this could increase the federal deficit
• 28:39
  Speaker 1: by three hundred million over a decade and risks losing
• 28:43
  Speaker 1: two hundred Planned Parenthood clinics, potentially affecting one point one
• 28:46
  Speaker 1: million patients who rely on services like cancer screenings, STI testing,
• 28:50
  Speaker 1: and contraception. According to Planned Parenthood, they always go to.
• 28:53
  Speaker 1: And I'm not done with them right up yet, but
• 28:55
  Speaker 1: I just want to clarify whenever Planned Parenthood says, oh no,
• 28:58
  Speaker 1: we're losing money, they alway go to. But we do
• 29:01
  Speaker 1: cancer screenings, STI testing, and contraception like they're the only
• 29:05
  Speaker 1: ones that could do it. By the way, the bill
• 29:07
  Speaker 1: passed the House on May twenty second, twenty twenty five,
• 29:09
  Speaker 1: with a two hundred and fifteen to two hundred and
• 29:12
  Speaker 1: fourteen vote. That's freaking razor close supported by Republicans and
• 29:15
  Speaker 1: opposed by all Democrats and two Republicans, so they are
• 29:18
  Speaker 1: even two dumb Republicans that win against it, but its
• 29:20
  Speaker 1: passage in the Senate remains uncertain due to opposition from
• 29:24
  Speaker 1: some Republican senators. Critics, including Democrats and reproductive health advocates,
• 29:29
  Speaker 1: argue that defunding Planned Parenthood would devastate access to essential
• 29:33
  Speaker 1: health care, particularly for low income and undeserved communities. As
• 29:36
  Speaker 1: the organization provides over nine million services annually, with abortions
• 29:40
  Speaker 1: constituting less than five percent of its offerings. The high
• 29:44
  Speaker 1: Amendment already borrows federal funds from covering most abortions, making
• 29:48
  Speaker 1: the cuts primarily affect non abortion services. Supporters, including anti
• 29:52
  Speaker 1: abortion groups like Students for Life and SBA Pro Life America,
• 29:56
  Speaker 1: celebrate this provision as a pro life victory, urging the
• 29:58
  Speaker 1: Senate to pass it. However, opponents highlight that other health
• 30:02
  Speaker 1: providers cannot absorb planted Parenthood's patient load, and the gut
• 30:06
  Speaker 1: Macker gut Mocker Institute notes that contraception access reduces abortion rates,
• 30:12
  Speaker 1: suggesting defunding could paradoxically increase abortions. The bills brought her
• 30:16
  Speaker 1: one point five trillion dollars in spending. Cuts in the
• 30:18
  Speaker 1: eight hundred and eight hundred and eighty billion for Medicaid
• 30:21
  Speaker 1: has also drawn criticism for potentially leaving thirteen point seven
• 30:24
  Speaker 1: million people without health care by twenty thirty four.
• 30:27
  Speaker 3: Yeah, so that's all bullshit. I gotta jump on this
• 30:30
  Speaker 3: one because this is before I was even aware that
• 30:35
  Speaker 3: there was a men's rights community. The thing that turned
• 30:39
  Speaker 3: me against feminism. Before I knew even anything else about feminism,
• 30:45
  Speaker 3: was learning about the abortion issue at the age of
• 30:47
  Speaker 3: thirteen and finding out in graphic terms, very clinical terms.
• 30:52
  Speaker 3: One and abortion was what it constituted, what the different
• 30:56
  Speaker 3: types were, and so on. And so my first activism
• 30:59
  Speaker 3: was on this subject. And let's take a look at
• 31:02
  Speaker 3: what abortion advocates do. Primarily when they are making these arguments,
• 31:08
  Speaker 3: you have the safe argument to make we do all
• 31:11
  Speaker 3: these good things, they're all very important, and abortion is
• 31:15
  Speaker 3: the least of what we do. And then you have
• 31:18
  Speaker 3: the less defensible argument that abortion is an essential service
• 31:23
  Speaker 3: and they can't stop doing it or they they wouldn't
• 31:26
  Speaker 3: have a purpose anymore. Women in mass would be in
• 31:30
  Speaker 3: deep shit. And the fact is, if they're not doing
• 31:33
  Speaker 3: that many abortions, if abortion is only a tiny percentage
• 31:36
  Speaker 3: of what they're doing, then they could leave it to
• 31:39
  Speaker 3: somebody else to do, create a division in their company,
• 31:44
  Speaker 3: branch that off and separate it so that it's not
• 31:47
  Speaker 3: part of the organization anymore, let it float on its own.
• 31:51
  Speaker 3: Because we hear all the time, well, abortions aren't really
• 31:53
  Speaker 3: federally funded anyway, so they won't need to be part
• 31:57
  Speaker 3: of the federally funded organization in order to survive. If
• 32:00
  Speaker 3: they're not federally funded anyway, then losing federal funding won't
• 32:05
  Speaker 3: stop them from engaging in that practice. But that's not
• 32:09
  Speaker 3: the truth. That's the bailey and the mot of well,
• 32:15
  Speaker 3: the majority of what we do is all these beneficial things,
• 32:17
  Speaker 3: and abortion is just a tiny percentage and it's not
• 32:19
  Speaker 3: federally funded anyway, goes away as soon as you propose,
• 32:23
  Speaker 3: all right, well, create a separate organization that only does
• 32:26
  Speaker 3: abortion in none of these other things, and only do
• 32:30
  Speaker 3: that so you don't have this confusion of is federal
• 32:33
  Speaker 3: funding going to abortion in these other organizations they would
• 32:37
  Speaker 3: like to have you believe that the practice is much
• 32:40
  Speaker 3: less widespread than it really is. Women have made being
• 32:45
  Speaker 3: aborted the leading cause of human death in the world.
• 32:49
  Speaker 3: Whether you believe they are fully fledged people or not,
• 32:53
  Speaker 3: it doesn't matter. A fetus is a living human organism.
• 32:57
  Speaker 1: It is.
• 32:58
  Speaker 3: It meets all of the criteria for being a living
• 33:01
  Speaker 3: organism as opposed to a dead organism or an inanimate object.
• 33:06
  Speaker 3: It meets all of the criteria for being human. It
• 33:10
  Speaker 3: is genetically distinct from the mother because it has the
• 33:14
  Speaker 3: father's DNA too, and it's genetically distinct from the father
• 33:17
  Speaker 3: because it has mother's DNA. It is not a parasite
• 33:20
  Speaker 3: because it was created by her own bodily processes as
• 33:24
  Speaker 3: part of something that she did accept in the instance
• 33:28
  Speaker 3: of willingly knowing that this could be the result. So
• 33:32
  Speaker 3: it is a living human organism that the mother created
• 33:34
  Speaker 3: through her own actions using her DNA and the father's
• 33:38
  Speaker 3: DNA and his actions. So to kill it is still
• 33:41
  Speaker 3: killing a living human organism. It outnumbers the cause of
• 33:45
  Speaker 3: death that is labeled the leading cause of death in
• 33:49
  Speaker 3: the United States, that would be heart disease or in
• 33:52
  Speaker 3: the world, actually obesity related illnesses and disorders get lumped
• 33:57
  Speaker 3: together as the leading cause of death, and abortion out
• 34:00
  Speaker 3: numbers that being aborted kills more living human organisms than
• 34:06
  Speaker 3: any other thing that kills people. That's an awful lot
• 34:10
  Speaker 3: for it to be the least thing that Planned Parenthood does.
• 34:14
  Speaker 1: Can I just add so? Like since the Trump get
• 34:16
  Speaker 1: in office, twenty planned Parenthood locations have been forced to
• 34:20
  Speaker 1: close because one of the first things he did was
• 34:23
  Speaker 1: put in like Title ten, which basically would a freeze
• 34:26
  Speaker 1: on funding for nine Planned Parenthood affiliates, affecting twenty one.
• 34:31
  Speaker 1: They have lost. They have had to shut down clinics
• 34:33
  Speaker 1: in across seven states, twenty locations Michigan, Minnesota, Iowa, Illinois,
• 34:38
  Speaker 1: New York, and Utah for starters. So it's already had
• 34:42
  Speaker 1: effects effect and they're very afraid that they're going to
• 34:45
  Speaker 1: essentially lose their whole organization.
• 34:48
  Speaker 3: Well there's more, all right, And this is where this
• 34:50
  Speaker 3: is where I'm going to tie the planned parenthood thing
• 34:52
  Speaker 3: to the worldwide because I know somebody's going to be like, yeah,
• 34:55
  Speaker 3: but planned parenthood doesn't cause abortion all over the world. Yeah,
• 34:58
  Speaker 3: Actually it is a supporting abortion in multiple countries through
• 35:04
  Speaker 3: USAID USAID, right, you know, which I refer to as
• 35:09
  Speaker 3: the USAID system. You can figure out that your country
• 35:13
  Speaker 3: has been subjected to a humanitarian Initiative veil infection, and
• 35:18
  Speaker 3: whether you have full blown us AIDS or not based
• 35:21
  Speaker 3: on whether a lot of money is pouring into organizations
• 35:24
  Speaker 3: within your country that promote things like abortion, gender, the
• 35:29
  Speaker 3: availability of services like provision of food and other social
• 35:33
  Speaker 3: services that promote circumcision or other forms of child genital mutilation.
• 35:38
  Speaker 3: Those are all hallmarks of a full blown us AIDS infection.
• 35:43
  Speaker 3: But in the meantime, the us AID system has sent
• 35:49
  Speaker 3: Planned Parenthood specifically around the world, and there are organizations
• 35:54
  Speaker 3: affiliated with Planned Parenthood that are actively committing genocide in
• 35:59
  Speaker 3: Africa right now using abortion. A lot of those deaths,
• 36:03
  Speaker 3: a lot of those those deaths of the most vulnerable
• 36:07
  Speaker 3: humans on the planet are directly attributable or indirectly attributable
• 36:12
  Speaker 3: to Planned Parenthood, and that is why the organization was created. Like,
• 36:17
  Speaker 3: if you go back and read the writings of Margaret Sanger,
• 36:21
  Speaker 3: she was very pro keeping there from being too many
• 36:26
  Speaker 3: black people in the world. So I have any sympathy
• 36:29
  Speaker 3: for that organization at all. Like, if they're going to
• 36:32
  Speaker 3: lie and cheat and steal and kill people, they should
• 36:36
  Speaker 3: do it on their own funding, and they should be
• 36:38
  Speaker 3: accountable for it, and you know, they should have to
• 36:41
  Speaker 3: deal with the consequences for those actions instead of being
• 36:47
  Speaker 3: protected and provided for by the US government and the
• 36:53
  Speaker 3: US taxpayer. And every man out there who has mourned
• 36:57
  Speaker 3: the death of his offspring that his baby mama had
• 37:02
  Speaker 3: killed by a medical contract killer has had the insult
• 37:06
  Speaker 3: added injury to date of knowing that his tax dollars
• 37:11
  Speaker 3: went to fund the organizations that committed that murder. So yeah,
• 37:16
  Speaker 3: I'm glad the Planned Parenthood is getting defunded. I think
• 37:21
  Speaker 3: that because there is a real need for the services
• 37:27
  Speaker 3: that they claim to provide other than abortion, other organizations
• 37:31
  Speaker 3: will arise to fill in the void. You don't have
• 37:34
  Speaker 3: to have an organization that does abortions in order to
• 37:37
  Speaker 3: get cancer screening. They don't have to be connected, and
• 37:41
  Speaker 3: you don't have to hold cancer patients hostage in order
• 37:44
  Speaker 3: to get the right to kill your babies. So fuck them,
• 37:47
  Speaker 3: let it, let it go. I hope this goes all
• 37:50
  Speaker 3: the way through. And don't believe a word they say
• 37:53
  Speaker 3: because they're lying.
• 37:54
  Speaker 1: All right, Mike, you're up.
• 37:55
  Speaker 2: I guess to refer you back to a quote from
• 37:59
  Speaker 2: the writer. Quote but the provision prohibits federal funds to
• 38:03
  Speaker 2: Planned Parenthood and its affiliates for one year unless they
• 38:06
  Speaker 2: certify they will not perform or fund abortions, with exceptions
• 38:12
  Speaker 2: for rape, incest, or life threatening conditions. End quote. You
• 38:17
  Speaker 2: know how feminist divorce lawyers will advise their clients to
• 38:22
  Speaker 2: cry domestic abuse because that's how they worm their way
• 38:27
  Speaker 2: into their paycheck in the event that nothing else will
• 38:30
  Speaker 2: work their way into their paycheck. Are you pondering what
• 38:34
  Speaker 2: I'm pondering, Pinky? If Planned Parenthood can't fund their abortions
• 38:39
  Speaker 2: except in cases of rape or incest or whatever. What
• 38:43
  Speaker 2: do you suppose they're going to do when a woman
• 38:45
  Speaker 2: comes to them asking for an abortion. Given the already
• 38:49
  Speaker 2: primed mindset of the average American woman or the average
• 38:54
  Speaker 2: Western woman, there's not much that Planned Parenthood needs to say.
• 38:58
  Speaker 2: They'll just quite italy and solemnly declare, I'm sorry, given
• 39:04
  Speaker 2: that this pregnancy does not affect your life, and that
• 39:07
  Speaker 2: your boyfriend is not related to you, we cannot perform
• 39:10
  Speaker 2: this abortion unless you were raped, And the woman will go, oh, okay,
• 39:14
  Speaker 2: I guess I'll just leave. Wait, wait, listen to me.
• 39:18
  Speaker 2: We understand that you want to abort your boyfriend's baby,
• 39:22
  Speaker 2: but what we're telling you is we can only perform
• 39:26
  Speaker 2: this operation if he raped you. Yes, I heard you,
• 39:30
  Speaker 2: but we actually he didn't. Actually Listen to me, carefully,
• 39:33
  Speaker 2: my dear, We can give you this abortion free of charge,
• 39:38
  Speaker 2: with no further questions asked. If you can assure us
• 39:42
  Speaker 2: without proof or evidence that he raped you. Wink wink.
• 39:47
  Speaker 2: I see, yeah, no, I totally I didn't understand what
• 39:53
  Speaker 2: you were saying the first two times you said it.
• 39:56
  Speaker 2: I just it totally just slipped my mind. What really happened?
• 39:59
  Speaker 2: Oh yeah, he did rip me. It was rape. It
• 40:03
  Speaker 2: was awful and I need an abortion please, good girl?
• 40:07
  Speaker 2: Are you free for an appointment tomorrow morning? Yeah? Sure?
• 40:12
  Speaker 2: Do you need any further details? I mean with regard
• 40:15
  Speaker 2: to the violent crime my boyfriend committed against me. Nah,
• 40:21
  Speaker 2: it's none of our business. I mean, we do have
• 40:23
  Speaker 2: to report it to the police, and as such, your
• 40:25
  Speaker 2: boyfriend will be in jail this very evening. But that's
• 40:30
  Speaker 2: just an administrative technicality. Is that okay? Come to think
• 40:33
  Speaker 2: of it, we don't even care If that's okay. We
• 40:35
  Speaker 2: already have our confession. Stay right there, please, two large
• 40:40
  Speaker 2: men are already on their way to your boyfriend's triangulated location,
• 40:45
  Speaker 2: and another two large men will enter this room shortly
• 40:48
  Speaker 2: to pin you down and insert the four steps. Try
• 40:52
  Speaker 2: not to scream, if you please, It might upset the
• 40:55
  Speaker 2: other marks I mean patience. All right, that's that bit,
• 40:59
  Speaker 2: that's the and of that sketch. And I'm not saying
• 41:02
  Speaker 2: that this defunding of planned parenthood shouldn't happen for this reason.
• 41:07
  Speaker 2: I'm just saying this is the whole into which we've
• 41:10
  Speaker 2: already been dug It would be nice if divorce lawyers
• 41:14
  Speaker 2: weren't such serpentine parasites who prey on women by demonizing men.
• 41:20
  Speaker 2: And it would be nice if so called medical professionals
• 41:24
  Speaker 2: who specialize in killing babies were not also such serpentine
• 41:29
  Speaker 2: parasites who prey on women by demonizing men. But they are.
• 41:34
  Speaker 2: And if society is to truly rid itself of these
• 41:38
  Speaker 2: poisonous reptiles, it's going to be difficult, and it's going
• 41:42
  Speaker 2: to be ugly, and it would be awesome if men
• 41:45
  Speaker 2: could have something resembling due process and innocence before proven guilty,
• 41:52
  Speaker 2: if you ask me, that's the first thing that needs
• 41:54
  Speaker 2: to be restored. But what the hell do I know.
• 41:57
  Speaker 2: I'm just a filthy MRA, and so any one else
• 42:01
  Speaker 2: who deigns to say the things I'm saying.
• 42:05
  Speaker 3: Statistics, we do know that if you combine all three
• 42:09
  Speaker 3: of the big exceptions, right, life of the mother, sayst
• 42:13
  Speaker 3: and rape, that accounts for less than two percent, and
• 42:19
  Speaker 3: often different years, less than one percent of abortions in
• 42:23
  Speaker 3: the United States, where everybody's thinking about when they think
• 42:27
  Speaker 3: of planned parenthood. So if we suddenly have an epidemic
• 42:31
  Speaker 3: of rape abortions, then we will know we have an
• 42:35
  Speaker 3: epidemic of frivolous false allegations made just to be able
• 42:39
  Speaker 3: to kill the baby, and maybe we can use that
• 42:43
  Speaker 3: to get authorities to start taking action on false allegations.
• 42:48
  Speaker 3: The action that should be taken because when you make
• 42:50
  Speaker 3: a false allegation of specifically of rape or intimate partner violence,
• 42:55
  Speaker 3: any kind of sexual violence or animate partner violence, you're
• 42:58
  Speaker 3: you're accusing a man of a heavy enough crime that
• 43:01
  Speaker 3: he is going to get forcibly removed from his home
• 43:06
  Speaker 3: by armed attackers. May include a woman, but usually it's men.
• 43:10
  Speaker 3: And then he's going to be wrongly imprisoned. He's going
• 43:14
  Speaker 3: to be tortured with interrogation, mentally tortured with interrogation. He's
• 43:19
  Speaker 3: going to go through a whole investigative process where he's
• 43:24
  Speaker 3: essentially going through months and months of psychological abuse at
• 43:28
  Speaker 3: the hands of the state. At the same time, the
• 43:31
  Speaker 3: people around him are going to treat him like he
• 43:34
  Speaker 3: might be guilty. Even people he knew and trusted to
• 43:38
  Speaker 3: know him better than that will treat him like he
• 43:40
  Speaker 3: might be guilty. Then he may have to go through
• 43:43
  Speaker 3: a trial. If the prosecutor decides to bring a case
• 43:46
  Speaker 3: which they don't always need sufficient evidence to do. And finally,
• 43:51
  Speaker 3: there is a chance that all exculpatory evidence will be
• 43:54
  Speaker 3: excluded because it has to do with their sex life,
• 43:59
  Speaker 3: and therefore it's not admissible, and so he may be
• 44:03
  Speaker 3: wrongly imprisoned. And there have been men who have been
• 44:06
  Speaker 3: wrongly imprisoned, not just for a few years, but for decades,
• 44:10
  Speaker 3: long enough that if they had been working at a
• 44:14
  Speaker 3: profession during the time that they had been in jail,
• 44:16
  Speaker 3: instead of being in jail, they could have retired.
• 44:19
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 44:20
  Speaker 3: So it is a violent crime to wrongly accuse someone
• 44:25
  Speaker 3: of rape. And there's Gabriel phil and Lucas has pointed
• 44:28
  Speaker 3: out his brother had a friend who killed himself because
• 44:31
  Speaker 3: of a false rape accusation. By the time they find
• 44:34
  Speaker 3: that out that is false, it's too late. If the
• 44:37
  Speaker 3: target killed himself, the victim killed himself. He's dead now,
• 44:41
  Speaker 3: and he's dead just the same as he would have
• 44:44
  Speaker 3: been if she had fired a gun at him, except
• 44:46
  Speaker 3: the gun was the state. False rape allegations really should
• 44:49
  Speaker 3: be prosecuted much more severely than any other form of
• 44:56
  Speaker 3: filing a false complaint with police, any other form of
• 44:59
  Speaker 3: lying to police during an investigation, any other form in
• 45:03
  Speaker 3: other countries, I think it's called wasting police time and
• 45:07
  Speaker 3: any other form of perverting the course of justice, as
• 45:10
  Speaker 3: it's called in the UK, or committing perjury in the US.
• 45:14
  Speaker 3: It should be treated as seriously as the kidnapping, false imprisonment, torture,
• 45:22
  Speaker 3: and attempted murder of the victim, the victim of the
• 45:25
  Speaker 3: false accusation, And yes, the target of a false accusation
• 45:30
  Speaker 3: is a crime victim, those are crimes, but that specific
• 45:35
  Speaker 3: type of accusation should have its own designation as a
• 45:39
  Speaker 3: separate set of crimes. That is much more severe than say,
• 45:43
  Speaker 3: lying about whether your jewelry got stolen from your home
• 45:46
  Speaker 3: so you can get some insurance money. That's fraud and
• 45:48
  Speaker 3: it's wrong and it should be prosecuted. But this victimizes
• 45:52
  Speaker 3: somebody on a much higher level. And when somebody does
• 45:56
  Speaker 3: this to a person, when somebody makes an allegation like
• 45:59
  Speaker 3: this against a person or talks a child into doing it,
• 46:03
  Speaker 3: as happens in custody cases on a regular basis, that
• 46:07
  Speaker 3: individual should go to jail for years. That should be
• 46:10
  Speaker 3: as serious and considered as much of a serious threat
• 46:15
  Speaker 3: to the community as any person who has attempted to
• 46:19
  Speaker 3: kill someone is in their community. People shouldn't want someone
• 46:22
  Speaker 3: in their community that does that. So yeah, I think
• 46:25
  Speaker 3: if if we suddenly have this massive epidemic of women accusing,
• 46:30
  Speaker 3: just lightly accusing men of rape so that they can
• 46:33
  Speaker 3: have an abortion, then especially if those accusations get made
• 46:37
  Speaker 3: to police, that needs to result in prosecution every time
• 46:41
  Speaker 3: it turns out to be false and severe penalties. And
• 46:45
  Speaker 3: if these organizations are just putting rape down, you know,
• 46:48
  Speaker 3: for everybody that wants to come in and have an abortion,
• 46:51
  Speaker 3: and there is no prosecution, and the organizations need to
• 46:54
  Speaker 3: be investigated because that's still fraud, it's still lying, and
• 46:58
  Speaker 3: it's still conventing the goals of that law.
• 47:02
  Speaker 1: Here's another take like that. I'm just gonna throw this
• 47:05
  Speaker 1: out there. I'm just spitballing. One thing we could also
• 47:09
  Speaker 1: try is we could shame women into being responsible for
• 47:14
  Speaker 1: their fertility. I know, wild idea, wild When we could
• 47:18
  Speaker 1: just do all this other stuff. We can introduce all
• 47:20
  Speaker 1: these programs and all of this government money being spent
• 47:23
  Speaker 1: on all these different initiatives, and all of these ways
• 47:27
  Speaker 1: that we can like essentially circumvent women's responsibility. Like this
• 47:31
  Speaker 1: is like everything that we're talking about could be easily avoided,
• 47:35
  Speaker 1: Like there would be no need for planned parenthood to
• 47:37
  Speaker 1: even exist if women could just control their fertility like that,
• 47:42
  Speaker 1: and they have every tool at their disposal, every tool,
• 47:46
  Speaker 1: yea reason, Yeah, lots of not just birth control. I
• 47:49
  Speaker 1: mean they got abstinence, they got like you know, yeah,
• 47:52
  Speaker 1: there's birth control. There's all kinds of options that exist,
• 47:57
  Speaker 1: and I guess we're just that's just asking too much much.
• 48:00
  Speaker 1: It's just asking too much of women to be like, hey,
• 48:02
  Speaker 1: how about how about oh, I don't know, how about
• 48:04
  Speaker 1: you don't fuck like every dude that turns you on
• 48:07
  Speaker 1: a little bit. How about you if you're going to
• 48:10
  Speaker 1: do that, how about you insist that they were protection
• 48:13
  Speaker 1: or you take precautions. No, no, none of that. And
• 48:16
  Speaker 1: it's like we're in this position where we have to
• 48:19
  Speaker 1: like spend all kinds of taxpayer dollars on all kinds
• 48:23
  Speaker 1: of hearings and like you know, bills are being signed
• 48:27
  Speaker 1: and like fucking Congress barely passed this. Like that's how
• 48:31
  Speaker 1: bad it is because we couldn't say, well, wait a minute,
• 48:34
  Speaker 1: wait a minute, these are grown ass women, Like why
• 48:36
  Speaker 1: can't we like, why can't we tell them to get
• 48:39
  Speaker 1: their shit together? Could you imagine anything that even looked
• 48:42
  Speaker 1: anything like this that men were just not taking responsibility
• 48:46
  Speaker 1: for and everybody was flipping the bill for them, or
• 48:49
  Speaker 1: you know, like doing something like that. Like it's it's
• 48:53
  Speaker 1: it's I would say it's shocking, but it really isn't
• 48:56
  Speaker 1: for me because I've been doing this so long. Yeah,
• 48:58
  Speaker 1: it is.
• 48:59
  Speaker 3: If you're aware of the account ability gap.
• 49:01
  Speaker 1: Yeah, how can a woman stop rape? No, that you're
• 49:04
  Speaker 1: a moron, dude, Like, we're not talking about women who
• 49:07
  Speaker 1: get raped. We're talking about women who have sex with
• 49:10
  Speaker 1: men unprotected, get pregnant, carry the baby to term or
• 49:13
  Speaker 1: for a long way, and then decide they want to
• 49:16
  Speaker 1: get an abortion, and that we're having a conversation about
• 49:18
  Speaker 1: that after she's already made all of these decisions, conscious decisions.
• 49:24
  Speaker 1: And it's not like weird. There isn't like, you know,
• 49:27
  Speaker 1: education out there, it's not like there aren't resources out there,
• 49:30
  Speaker 1: and it's not like there aren't all kinds of government
• 49:32
  Speaker 1: funded initiatives and groups and like all this stuff, and
• 49:36
  Speaker 1: women are still dropping the ball and at every turn,
• 49:39
  Speaker 1: not not maybe I don't know how many, but it's
• 49:41
  Speaker 1: enough that this is a problem. And all I'm asking
• 49:45
  Speaker 1: is that women be responsible with their fertility. It's it's
• 49:50
  Speaker 1: like and you bring up you bring up rape, like
• 49:52
  Speaker 1: this is like a sub iq take like out of
• 49:56
  Speaker 1: the blue, Well what about we already talked about that,
• 49:59
  Speaker 1: And again that's like a very small percentage of the cases.
• 50:02
  Speaker 1: And even then, you know, there are steps you can take.
• 50:07
  Speaker 1: There are steps that you can take. So no, I mean,
• 50:10
  Speaker 1: no one could live in a world without any suffering.
• 50:12
  Speaker 1: It just doesn't exist.
• 50:13
  Speaker 3: But when, by the way, women spend more every week
• 50:17
  Speaker 3: on their stupid Starbucks purchases than they do monthly on
• 50:22
  Speaker 3: birth control right.
• 50:25
  Speaker 1: Or something else.
• 50:26
  Speaker 3: You know, yeah, they act like it's expensive, unless you know,
• 50:30
  Speaker 3: they're that chick that screwed a hundred guys for a
• 50:33
  Speaker 3: video or whatever. They're not spending that much money. So
• 50:37
  Speaker 3: don't don't let them tell you it's going to put
• 50:38
  Speaker 3: them in the poorhouse.
• 50:39
  Speaker 1: No, of course not. It's like I said, literally, not
• 50:42
  Speaker 1: getting pregnant is free. It's easy. It's easy. And I'm
• 50:46
  Speaker 1: saying abstinence is free. And you know what I'm saying
• 50:49
  Speaker 1: is that, like we would cut it down so much
• 50:52
  Speaker 1: that to even discuss the fringe incidents like rape or
• 50:56
  Speaker 1: incest would just be as ridiculous as it's sounds, because
• 51:00
  Speaker 1: it is ridiculous because it's a fringe thing. So anyway, I'm.
• 51:06
  Speaker 3: Evolution there too. And I have to say this because
• 51:09
  Speaker 3: this is.
• 51:12
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 51:12
  Speaker 3: I had a miscarriage after a rape, and it made
• 51:15
  Speaker 3: things worse knowing that there was another life besides mine
• 51:21
  Speaker 3: that was affected. I don't know if I would have
• 51:23
  Speaker 3: recovered if it had been a different situation and I
• 51:28
  Speaker 3: had been talked into and allowed myself to be conned
• 51:33
  Speaker 3: into doing something like an abortion, that would have probably
• 51:37
  Speaker 3: killed me. It would not have helped my recovery. I
• 51:40
  Speaker 3: probably wouldn't be here. I wouldn't be able to live
• 51:43
  Speaker 3: with that.
• 51:44
  Speaker 1: Do you know who earth a Kit is the actress? Yep?
• 51:47
  Speaker 3: Yep.
• 51:47
  Speaker 1: Do you know that she was a product of rape? Yep?
• 51:50
  Speaker 3: And there are many many people who have come out
• 51:54
  Speaker 3: and talked about that. As you know, they were grateful
• 51:59
  Speaker 3: to their mothers for not aborting them after a rape.
• 52:03
  Speaker 3: But when people talk about rape victims and abortion, most
• 52:08
  Speaker 3: of the time they're just using us as a political football.
• 52:12
  Speaker 3: They don't care how it affects the mother. They don't
• 52:15
  Speaker 3: care what the mother is going through after the rape.
• 52:18
  Speaker 3: They don't care what impact the cognitive dissonance between her
• 52:24
  Speaker 3: moral upbringing and her actions could create later in life.
• 52:27
  Speaker 3: They just consider it a success that they can shove
• 52:30
  Speaker 3: down your throat. Well, you're hurting rape victims if you
• 52:32
  Speaker 3: don't agree with us that we should be able to
• 52:34
  Speaker 3: kill our babies. No, actually, you're hurting rape victims if
• 52:38
  Speaker 3: you use them this way, and if you convince them
• 52:41
  Speaker 3: that this is somehow going to help them recover from
• 52:44
  Speaker 3: the rape. It doesn't. Having an abortion doesn't unrape you.
• 52:48
  Speaker 3: You still have every memory of every second of that incident,
• 52:51
  Speaker 3: and it doesn't go away. The only thing it does
• 52:54
  Speaker 3: is pile on another trauma.
• 52:57
  Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, I got a super chow. For some reason,
• 53:00
  Speaker 1: the super child's not showing up in my video, Ninja.
• 53:02
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna have to like wag my finger at somebody
• 53:05
  Speaker 1: for that. But Meredith gives us five dollars and says
• 53:09
  Speaker 1: HBr News number five oh five. Trivia fact. Chavat is
• 53:13
  Speaker 1: a harvest I'm pronouncing that right. Chavat is a harvest holiday,
• 53:17
  Speaker 1: and it's supposed to be when God revealed the Torah
• 53:19
  Speaker 1: to the Israelites on Mount SINAI. Now for the based right,
• 53:22
  Speaker 1: many of them simply have a problem with net Yahoo
• 53:24
  Speaker 1: because he sold the WMD line to get in to
• 53:28
  Speaker 1: get use into war when he wasn't the Prime Minister
• 53:30
  Speaker 1: of Israel and has supported regime change that has caused
• 53:34
  Speaker 1: so much disruption in the region. Thank you, Meredith. Yes,
• 53:37
  Speaker 1: and I kind of think that October was allowed to
• 53:40
  Speaker 1: happen because when these tragedies happen, it is good for
• 53:44
  Speaker 1: the Zionists and the neocons. So just myself, I'm just
• 53:47
  Speaker 1: saying Israel has like the best like intelligence in the world,
• 53:51
  Speaker 1: and guys in Paris gliders managed to get past their
• 53:55
  Speaker 1: like superior intelligence, which is a little strange if you
• 53:58
  Speaker 1: ask me, but that's theory, a game theory. Then I
• 54:02
  Speaker 1: got a super chat from Albatross for five dollars, who
• 54:05
  Speaker 1: says this feels like the mouse Utopia behavior. Female mice
• 54:08
  Speaker 1: would chase after sex twenty four to seven, but either
• 54:11
  Speaker 1: ignore their pups or just cannibalize that. Yes, I think
• 54:14
  Speaker 1: there's something in Revelations about this as well. But we're
• 54:17
  Speaker 1: gonna move on to the next story. But let us
• 54:19
  Speaker 1: know what you guys think about this one in the comments.
• 54:22
  Speaker 1: So all right, so we're gonna stay on the theme
• 54:24
  Speaker 1: of like what about the men though, and we have
• 54:27
  Speaker 1: this story. So. Following significant losses in the twenty twenty
• 54:31
  Speaker 1: four presidential election, particularly with men, the Democratic Party has
• 54:35
  Speaker 1: launched a twenty million dollar initiative called Speaking with American Men,
• 54:39
  Speaker 1: also called SAM, aimed at regaining support from young and
• 54:43
  Speaker 1: working class male voters who shifted towards the Republican Party,
• 54:47
  Speaker 1: specifically Donald Trump. The SAM project, detailed gonna made twenty
• 54:52
  Speaker 1: twenty five New York Times report, seeks to study the language, syntax,
• 54:56
  Speaker 1: and cultural habits of American men like we're like weird animals.
• 55:01
  Speaker 1: Let's look at what the man does in his natural habitat.
• 55:04
  Speaker 1: It's like a garage, particularly in male dominated online spaces
• 55:08
  Speaker 1: like video games. To craft messaging that resonates, the initiative
• 55:12
  Speaker 1: recommends placing pro Democrat advertisements in video games and moving
• 55:16
  Speaker 1: away from a moralizing tone, which strategists meeting at luxury
• 55:20
  Speaker 1: venues like the Ritz, Carlton and Half Moon Bays a plan.
• 55:24
  Speaker 1: Polling data from Catalysts highlights the Democrats challenge, showing a
• 55:28
  Speaker 1: significant drop in mail support in twenty twenty four, with
• 55:31
  Speaker 1: a ten point gender gap and declines across demographics like young, Black,
• 55:36
  Speaker 1: and Hispanic men. The SAM initiative has sparked widespread criticism
• 55:41
  Speaker 1: both from within and outside the Democratic Party. Critics, including
• 55:45
  Speaker 1: Democratic operatives like Amar Musa and conservative commentators on X,
• 55:49
  Speaker 1: argue that twenty million dollar price tag is excessive and condescending,
• 55:54
  Speaker 1: treating young men as an alien demographic rather than addressing
• 55:57
  Speaker 1: their economic and cultural concerns direct Some, like the New
• 56:01
  Speaker 1: York Times columnist David French, suggest Democrats should focus on
• 56:05
  Speaker 1: genuine engagement rather than strategic studies, while others on ex
• 56:09
  Speaker 1: Machi initiative as a wasteful man whispering safari, we need,
• 56:13
  Speaker 1: we need a little bit of a what's the mike,
• 56:15
  Speaker 1: what's the name of the I'm not done with the
• 56:16
  Speaker 1: write up yet, but what's the name of the guy
• 56:18
  Speaker 1: that used to do all those like nature documentaries? Got
• 56:21
  Speaker 1: the English accent kind of whisper They yes.
• 56:26
  Speaker 2: Yes, and here they have served the men trying to.
• 56:29
  Speaker 1: Be exactly Despite the backlash, SAM operate operatives like Heis
• 56:37
  Speaker 1: Hogue and John Della Volpi, who conducted thirty focus groups
• 56:41
  Speaker 1: with men aged eighteen to twenty nine, it sounds like academics.
• 56:44
  Speaker 1: Please respond. If you guys remember that old meme defend
• 56:47
  Speaker 1: the project as a necessary response to the party's cultural disconnect. However,
• 56:51
  Speaker 1: a recent post on x suggests Democrats may have scrapped
• 56:54
  Speaker 1: the SAM campaign, redirecting efforts to figures like the one
• 56:58
  Speaker 1: I'm about to display for you guys, Olivia Juliana, who
• 57:02
  Speaker 1: is obviously the voice of talking to men. So let
• 57:06
  Speaker 1: me see where where I lost my Olivia Juliana to
• 57:09
  Speaker 1: address men's issues. Juliana, a twenty two year old progressive
• 57:12
  Speaker 1: activist and social media star who have never heard of
• 57:15
  Speaker 1: until this with a significant following, was enlisted to advise
• 57:19
  Speaker 1: the party on strategies to appeal to young men. As
• 57:21
  Speaker 1: noted in sources like Deep Near and The Texas Tribune,
• 57:25
  Speaker 1: her approach emphasizing framing progressive issues like abortion rights, gay marriage,
• 57:30
  Speaker 1: and Black Lives Matter from a male perspective, arguing that
• 57:34
  Speaker 1: many conservative leaning young men already align with these stances.
• 57:37
  Speaker 1: Her efforts included outreach to fraternities at universities like U T.
• 57:41
  Speaker 1: Austin and Texas and It, though these attempts were reportedly unsuccessful.
• 57:45
  Speaker 1: Would all who'd have thought that this woman could not
• 57:49
  Speaker 1: quite get the men to listen to her? Could you imagine? Way? Wait?
• 57:52
  Speaker 3: So their sales pitches. We failed at this all over
• 57:56
  Speaker 3: the country, so you should let us fail at this.
• 58:00
  Speaker 3: It's your party too.
• 58:02
  Speaker 1: Yeah, so send in the middle aged, overweight woman to
• 58:06
  Speaker 1: sex the man anyway? Hurt was I saying? Oh yeah?
• 58:09
  Speaker 1: All four contracted fraternities declined her invitations. The movie spark
• 58:13
  Speaker 1: polarized reactions, with critics on x and conservative media mocking
• 58:16
  Speaker 1: it as tone deaf or desperate, while some progressives defend
• 58:20
  Speaker 1: Juliana's authenticity and ability to engage younger audiences. So, yeah,
• 58:25
  Speaker 1: go ahead.
• 58:26
  Speaker 3: They They're more likely to listen to that old cooking
• 58:28
  Speaker 3: show Two Fat Ladies than they are to this woman.
• 58:31
  Speaker 1: I remember that show.
• 58:32
  Speaker 3: At least they talked about something interesting, good food. You know,
• 58:37
  Speaker 3: this is the problem with political parties and politicians in general.
• 58:41
  Speaker 3: All right, what they're doing here is looking at the
• 58:45
  Speaker 3: issue of getting their ideas entertained and potentially accepted by
• 58:51
  Speaker 3: people from every angle except authenticity, honesty, forthrightness, respect, and
• 58:59
  Speaker 3: consider a shit like. If they could try doing those things,
• 59:03
  Speaker 3: they might connect with people who would be opening too
• 59:06
  Speaker 3: listening to them. But because they lecture, browbeat, preach, sneak, lie, cheat,
• 59:13
  Speaker 3: and steal instead, people aren't listening to them, and they
• 59:16
  Speaker 3: can't figure why are these things not working. We don't
• 59:21
  Speaker 3: understand why people get mad when we lie to them.
• 59:24
  Speaker 3: The shaming language we're using is not endearing us to people.
• 59:28
  Speaker 3: They don't like us. We don't understand calling men everything
• 59:33
  Speaker 3: from murderers to rapists to toxic assholes that just make
• 59:38
  Speaker 3: the whole room bad when they sit in. It doesn't
• 59:40
  Speaker 3: seem to appeal to men. We don't understand. It's like
• 59:44
  Speaker 3: politicians are morons.
• 59:46
  Speaker 1: Well, these are, well, possibly they are. They can't possibly
• 59:54
  Speaker 1: court men because the men want the truth, and they
• 59:57
  Speaker 1: can't tell them the truth because if they did, then
• 1:00:00
  Speaker 1: men would not support them.
• 1:00:02
  Speaker 3: So the thing is, they do think you're stupid. They
• 1:00:05
  Speaker 3: think you'll buy this stuff, and they just don't understand
• 1:00:08
  Speaker 3: why your stupidity is not working for them. They can't
• 1:00:11
  Speaker 3: conceive of the fact that maybe you're not stupid and
• 1:00:14
  Speaker 3: you see through their shit, you know. And on one hand,
• 1:00:16
  Speaker 3: it's very frustrating that they do this, right, it's just
• 1:00:19
  Speaker 3: just pisses you. Makes you want to laugh at them too.
• 1:00:22
  Speaker 3: But I mean, on the other hand, it's probably a
• 1:00:24
  Speaker 3: really good thing because it does keep them from fooling
• 1:00:28
  Speaker 3: quite as many people as they would be able to fool,
• 1:00:30
  Speaker 3: if they were able to fake the sincerity and mutual respect,
• 1:00:35
  Speaker 3: consideration and so on that it takes to get people
• 1:00:39
  Speaker 3: to entertain and possibly accept your ideas.
• 1:00:42
  Speaker 1: Yeah, Mike, did you want to say anything? You didn't
• 1:00:45
  Speaker 1: do some David Attenborough stuff.
• 1:00:47
  Speaker 2: Hell, yes I did. I can't do the whole thing.
• 1:00:48
  Speaker 2: We'll just do it in my normal British voice, if
• 1:00:51
  Speaker 2: that's okay. It It pisces me off that people are
• 1:00:55
  Speaker 2: always talking in terms of these of this symbolic dichotomy
• 1:00:59
  Speaker 2: of left versus right, way beyond the point where everyone
• 1:01:04
  Speaker 2: has forgotten how to even define these terms. It's supposed
• 1:01:08
  Speaker 2: to be something to do with social freedom and economic
• 1:01:12
  Speaker 2: freedom slash restriction. It's usually passing the buck onto the
• 1:01:17
  Speaker 2: euphemisms of progressive and conservative. I think that's supposed to
• 1:01:22
  Speaker 2: refer to giving more power to those who are perceived
• 1:01:26
  Speaker 2: not to have any power? Are you progressive? Versus maintaining
• 1:01:31
  Speaker 2: the power of those who are considered to already have it?
• 1:01:36
  Speaker 2: Are e conservative? This made some sense when it came
• 1:01:41
  Speaker 2: to communism. One point, Oh, that was all about balancing
• 1:01:46
  Speaker 2: the power between the poor and the rich. By no means,
• 1:01:50
  Speaker 2: was that ever a good idea by no means was
• 1:01:54
  Speaker 2: that iteration immune from corruption. It was always corrupt from
• 1:01:59
  Speaker 2: day one. That was given the power to the rich
• 1:02:02
  Speaker 2: people who falsely claimed to speak for the poor despite
• 1:02:06
  Speaker 2: doing nothing to actually improve the lives of the poor.
• 1:02:10
  Speaker 2: But at least they had to pretend to speak for
• 1:02:13
  Speaker 2: the poor. We are presently living in communism two point
• 1:02:17
  Speaker 2: zero and three point zero and four point zero and whatever,
• 1:02:21
  Speaker 2: where it's not about class or economic status, it's about
• 1:02:24
  Speaker 2: biological sex and race and sexual persuasion and whatnot. That
• 1:02:30
  Speaker 2: this makes it even easier for the rich and powerful
• 1:02:34
  Speaker 2: to continue subjugating the poor and powerless. In the original communism,
• 1:02:40
  Speaker 2: the bourgeoisie were the rich people. At this point, the
• 1:02:45
  Speaker 2: proposed bourgeoisie are men and white people and straight people
• 1:02:53
  Speaker 2: and cest people. You may notice this accounts for the
• 1:02:57
  Speaker 2: vast majority of the pop population. Under this modern revision
• 1:03:03
  Speaker 2: of communism, the bourgeoisie is the ninety nine percent and
• 1:03:07
  Speaker 2: the proletariat is the one percent. And still none of
• 1:03:11
  Speaker 2: the redistributed wealth actually goes to the gay, transgendered, non
• 1:03:17
  Speaker 2: white females. It still just goes to the corrupt government
• 1:03:21
  Speaker 2: officials who claim to speak on their behalf. This guarantuan
• 1:03:26
  Speaker 2: level of government corruption is not sufficiently described in terms
• 1:03:30
  Speaker 2: of left and right. It's simply the government doing whatever
• 1:03:35
  Speaker 2: the fuck it can do to siphon all of the
• 1:03:39
  Speaker 2: world's resources into its own pockets. So it's not even
• 1:03:43
  Speaker 2: that the Democrat Party is more left wing than the
• 1:03:47
  Speaker 2: Democrat than the than the Republican Party. The Democrat Party
• 1:03:51
  Speaker 2: is just more government than the Republican Party, just like
• 1:03:55
  Speaker 2: it's like how communism is more government than capital After all,
• 1:04:01
  Speaker 2: capitalism is just a slur invented by communists in order
• 1:04:06
  Speaker 2: to demonize the notion of private property and private business
• 1:04:10
  Speaker 2: and private enterprise. I eat anything that is not government.
• 1:04:15
  Speaker 2: So yeah, I'm sick of this symbolic dichotomy of left
• 1:04:20
  Speaker 2: versus right. It's just a euphemism for government control versus
• 1:04:26
  Speaker 2: less government control. So of course the Democratic Party cannot
• 1:04:32
  Speaker 2: conceive of loosening the leash that it has on men's necks,
• 1:04:38
  Speaker 2: the leash that it has spent centuries tightening at every opportunity.
• 1:04:43
  Speaker 2: I mean, it's like telling a shark to loosen its
• 1:04:48
  Speaker 2: grip on the fish on which it prays, Like it's
• 1:04:52
  Speaker 2: not going to do that. Why would it do that.
• 1:04:54
  Speaker 2: If it did that, it would die. The same goes
• 1:04:57
  Speaker 2: for Republicans, The same goes for labor or the Tories
• 1:05:02
  Speaker 2: in the UK terms, or any given party in any
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 2: given country. They are all sharks. Some of them are
• 1:05:09
  Speaker 2: bigger than others and more dangerous to large prey than others,
• 1:05:13
  Speaker 2: but they are all sharks. You cannot convince them to
• 1:05:17
  Speaker 2: show compassion to the fish they consume, the fish they
• 1:05:22
  Speaker 2: have evolved to viciously consume for their entire evolutionary history.
• 1:05:28
  Speaker 2: There are only two options for those of us who
• 1:05:31
  Speaker 2: are fish. Either we kill the sharks, or we evolve
• 1:05:36
  Speaker 2: into lungfish. We flop our way onto the shores of
• 1:05:41
  Speaker 2: the New World, and we evolve into a higher species
• 1:05:45
  Speaker 2: and an ongoing chain of even higher species. We'll still
• 1:05:50
  Speaker 2: have to deal with land predators like bears and tigers
• 1:05:54
  Speaker 2: and whatnot, but we'll be able to do that with
• 1:05:58
  Speaker 2: ease once we develop the brains that have the capacity
• 1:06:02
  Speaker 2: to build tools and weapons. But we won't be able
• 1:06:05
  Speaker 2: to do that as long as we are nothing but
• 1:06:08
  Speaker 2: a bunch of retarded guppies floating around helplessly in an
• 1:06:13
  Speaker 2: ecosystem ruled by sharks. Fun fact you know, the word shark,
• 1:06:19
  Speaker 2: when first coined, it didn't originally mean a kind of fish.
• 1:06:24
  Speaker 2: It meant a kind of human, like the term card
• 1:06:27
  Speaker 2: shark or pool shark, to denote a predator that uses
• 1:06:32
  Speaker 2: certain game theory systems to deceptively hunt down its prey.
• 1:06:37
  Speaker 2: That's what it originally meant. It meant predator, basically. It
• 1:06:41
  Speaker 2: was only later on in its etymological development when the
• 1:06:45
  Speaker 2: word was applied to that genus of elasma branch cartilaginous fish.
• 1:06:51
  Speaker 2: So what I'm saying is not even a metaphor. The
• 1:06:55
  Speaker 2: government is literally a shark. It's a mob of show.
• 1:07:00
  Speaker 2: It's an organized crime syndicate of sharks. And what we
• 1:07:04
  Speaker 2: call left wing governments are simply a larger species of shark.
• 1:07:10
  Speaker 2: They target men for the same reason reason reason large
• 1:07:16
  Speaker 2: sharks target seals because they have a bigger appetite. That's
• 1:07:21
  Speaker 2: all it is. It's in their evolutionary instinct to target
• 1:07:26
  Speaker 2: the largest animals because it makes them larger. It's shark week, folks,
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 2: here on a honey Badger radio to repeat you have
• 1:07:35
  Speaker 2: two options. I can hear your fan. You have two options, folks,
• 1:07:41
  Speaker 2: Get the fuck out of the sea and evolve or
• 1:07:44
  Speaker 2: become the only thing that can kill a shark. I'm
• 1:07:48
  Speaker 2: talking about orcas, folks, killer whales. They never kill humans.
• 1:07:53
  Speaker 2: They've never been found to kill humans. Weirdly enough, but
• 1:07:56
  Speaker 2: if a great white shark focks with a killer whale
• 1:08:00
  Speaker 2: will find itself snapped in half and paraded around in
• 1:08:04
  Speaker 2: the effortless mouth of that majestic black and white dolphin,
• 1:08:08
  Speaker 2: we call it an occa. At this point, I am
• 1:08:11
  Speaker 2: indeed being metaphorical, and it's upting you to figure out
• 1:08:14
  Speaker 2: what I'm talking about. Good luck with that, and when
• 1:08:18
  Speaker 2: I say good luck on you will now be known
• 1:08:21
  Speaker 2: as thank you for looking that up. When I say
• 1:08:24
  Speaker 2: good luck, I mean I have a very particular set
• 1:08:28
  Speaker 2: of skills I will look for you.
• 1:08:31
  Speaker 1: You don't.
• 1:08:31
  Speaker 3: You don't mean we're gonna need a bigger boat.
• 1:08:33
  Speaker 2: I do. I mean all of the above.
• 1:08:35
  Speaker 1: I just wanted to say, does that include a game
• 1:08:38
  Speaker 1: shark anyway?
• 1:08:39
  Speaker 3: Well, I don't know. Did Did it come from? The
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 3: Dutch word meaning villain or scoundrel comes from?
• 1:08:46
  Speaker 1: So I just want to say about this story, the
• 1:08:49
  Speaker 1: problem is the same problem I see. So like sometimes
• 1:08:53
  Speaker 1: people send us videos of like debates right that they
• 1:08:57
  Speaker 1: want us to respond to and it's usually like a
• 1:08:59
  Speaker 1: bread tuber either debating somebody like or or some like.
• 1:09:03
  Speaker 1: For example, the Temple and Adam Connover thing that was
• 1:09:07
  Speaker 1: viral the other day and people were talking about it,
• 1:09:09
  Speaker 1: and a lot of bread tuber types were responding to it.
• 1:09:12
  Speaker 1: And one of the things that I have been saying
• 1:09:14
  Speaker 1: for a while is that, like the bread tuber left,
• 1:09:17
  Speaker 1: the commie left online, they are not interested in actually
• 1:09:21
  Speaker 1: like doing something or talking about something serious that involves
• 1:09:25
  Speaker 1: like potential solutions that will reduce the most harm while
• 1:09:30
  Speaker 1: also being considerate of, you know, like reality as it is,
• 1:09:33
  Speaker 1: like that there are men, and men have desires and
• 1:09:36
  Speaker 1: needs and wants and rights, and that women also have
• 1:09:39
  Speaker 1: those things. They are not serious people, at least in
• 1:09:42
  Speaker 1: that regard, but they are serious about winning and that's
• 1:09:45
  Speaker 1: really their only focus. And typically these people, their idea
• 1:09:50
  Speaker 1: of how they find themselves to be right on an
• 1:09:53
  Speaker 1: issue has nothing to do with whether or not their
• 1:09:56
  Speaker 1: principles makes sense in practice, and every to do with
• 1:10:00
  Speaker 1: whether or not their arguments are like found to be
• 1:10:04
  Speaker 1: difficult or heart you know, difficult to refute. So it's
• 1:10:08
  Speaker 1: all about rhetoric, and a lot of these guys have
• 1:10:10
  Speaker 1: boasted about that. Vosh, for example, who was probably one
• 1:10:13
  Speaker 1: of the most evil people on the Internet, has basically
• 1:10:18
  Speaker 1: his claim to fame. His ability to you know, argue
• 1:10:22
  Speaker 1: comes purely from his skill with rhetoric, not you know,
• 1:10:26
  Speaker 1: like the truth, right. It's all about how can I
• 1:10:29
  Speaker 1: make you make you think that I know what I'm
• 1:10:31
  Speaker 1: talking about. That's basically what it boils down to. How
• 1:10:34
  Speaker 1: can I make you think that I'm right even if
• 1:10:36
  Speaker 1: I'm just spewing bullshit, which is why their videos can
• 1:10:40
  Speaker 1: go on for like an hour while they're like weaving
• 1:10:43
  Speaker 1: a giant, you know, tapestry of bullshit that looks like
• 1:10:47
  Speaker 1: it it sounds like it's sophisticated enough to be passable
• 1:10:50
  Speaker 1: as potentially true. The problem with this is that men
• 1:10:53
  Speaker 1: who have rejected these people are not interested in the
• 1:10:56
  Speaker 1: rhetoric anymore. They're interested in the outcomes, interested in reality,
• 1:11:02
  Speaker 1: and they know that when it comes to the left
• 1:11:05
  Speaker 1: man hatred or at least like seeing man as the
• 1:11:08
  Speaker 1: privileged oppressor class is impossible for them to unpack because
• 1:11:13
  Speaker 1: it's baked into the cake, it's in the mixture. They
• 1:11:17
  Speaker 1: can't undo it. This is why, and I've looked at
• 1:11:20
  Speaker 1: what this Sam thing is all about and you can,
• 1:11:23
  Speaker 1: like we can go back to when I covered Tim Walls.
• 1:11:26
  Speaker 1: I think it was like two weeks ago that you
• 1:11:27
  Speaker 1: know he was basically he said in front of a
• 1:11:29
  Speaker 1: crowd that he was asked to like essentially be the
• 1:11:32
  Speaker 1: man whisperer, which is basically to say, uh, how can
• 1:11:37
  Speaker 1: I give you the impression that I'm on your side
• 1:11:39
  Speaker 1: even though I'm not. That's really what it is. How
• 1:11:42
  Speaker 1: can I make you think that I am on your side,
• 1:11:45
  Speaker 1: that I care about your needs even though I'm not.
• 1:11:48
  Speaker 1: And this was in all of the all of the
• 1:11:50
  Speaker 1: advertising that they were putting out where they were like, oh,
• 1:11:53
  Speaker 1: you're a man, right, and it's like guys drinking beer
• 1:11:56
  Speaker 1: with their bellies out, Like no one understood what mass
• 1:12:00
  Speaker 1: uinity was, so they had no way of appealing to it.
• 1:12:04
  Speaker 1: And the truth is, appealing to it on a surface
• 1:12:06
  Speaker 1: level may work on women, but it doesn't work on men.
• 1:12:10
  Speaker 1: Men want to know, like, how are you going to
• 1:12:12
  Speaker 1: improve the economy? How are you going to make make
• 1:12:14
  Speaker 1: it to where my hard work pays off for me
• 1:12:17
  Speaker 1: and my family? How like how how are you going
• 1:12:20
  Speaker 1: to be able to do any of the things that
• 1:12:22
  Speaker 1: will essentially allow because men don't want handouts. What they
• 1:12:25
  Speaker 1: want is the government to stop being an obstacle to
• 1:12:30
  Speaker 1: what they want to pursue. And the government exists as
• 1:12:33
  Speaker 1: an obstacle to men and they can't they can't not
• 1:12:36
  Speaker 1: be that. So instead they have to pay lip service
• 1:12:39
  Speaker 1: and they have to like woo and you know, an
• 1:12:42
  Speaker 1: attempt to flirt, and none of it works and men
• 1:12:45
  Speaker 1: generally reject it as So it's it's like missingery is
• 1:12:49
  Speaker 1: baked into the cake of leftism. It's baked into it because,
• 1:12:52
  Speaker 1: like Mike said, the old communism of the working class
• 1:12:56
  Speaker 1: versus the bourgeoisie, that doesn't work because in the West,
• 1:13:00
  Speaker 1: we all had the ability to work hard and elevate ourselves, right,
• 1:13:04
  Speaker 1: So they couldn't do that. So they were like, okay,
• 1:13:06
  Speaker 1: what do we do. Let's create class struggle between men
• 1:13:09
  Speaker 1: and women. And so we got feminism. So the whole thing.
• 1:13:12
  Speaker 1: Feminism is at the foundation of everything on the left.
• 1:13:15
  Speaker 1: So that means that if they're they're gonna alienate men inevitably,
• 1:13:19
  Speaker 1: and if they don't, like if they say, okay, we
• 1:13:21
  Speaker 1: were wrong, We're gonna give you guys what you want,
• 1:13:24
  Speaker 1: let's figure it out. Whatever. Guess what they're gonna piss
• 1:13:27
  Speaker 1: off women because they've already radicalized the women into feeling
• 1:13:31
  Speaker 1: entitled to everything that men have because men have historically
• 1:13:34
  Speaker 1: taken it from them through oppression and patriarchy. So they
• 1:13:38
  Speaker 1: can't do that, Like, if they alienate the women, they
• 1:13:41
  Speaker 1: lose everything. So now they're in between a rock and
• 1:13:44
  Speaker 1: a heart place where they have to find out, how
• 1:13:46
  Speaker 1: do we get men to side with us without alienating
• 1:13:50
  Speaker 1: the women that we already have locked in. And by
• 1:13:52
  Speaker 1: the way, they're losing the women too, because the only
• 1:13:55
  Speaker 1: women that they really have a solid hold on are
• 1:13:58
  Speaker 1: the single, childless women. And when women get married to
• 1:14:01
  Speaker 1: other men, they tend to suddenly their priorities are not
• 1:14:04
  Speaker 1: themselves alone, but they can become the priorities of their
• 1:14:08
  Speaker 1: children and families, so they risk losing them as well.
• 1:14:11
  Speaker 1: So the truth is is that they can't do anything
• 1:14:14
  Speaker 1: to fix it, like no amount of focus groups or
• 1:14:17
  Speaker 1: academic research or studies is going to change it unless
• 1:14:21
  Speaker 1: they actually they literally have to abandon the thing that
• 1:14:24
  Speaker 1: they are defined by in order to make any progress
• 1:14:28
  Speaker 1: with men, and they're not going to do that because
• 1:14:30
  Speaker 1: they will lose women. And so at the end of
• 1:14:32
  Speaker 1: the day, they are in a way a victim of
• 1:14:35
  Speaker 1: the very paradigm that they have created, and that's why
• 1:14:38
  Speaker 1: they're struggling. I mean, they literally had to hire a
• 1:14:41
  Speaker 1: queer latina of size to be their representative to talk
• 1:14:45
  Speaker 1: to men, and she's claiming that she gets men. He doesn't.
• 1:14:49
  Speaker 1: Nobody wants her at her frat things. The men find
• 1:14:52
  Speaker 1: it a joke because it is, and it's almost as
• 1:14:55
  Speaker 1: bad as they're like fake, you know, like cardboard cutout
• 1:14:59
  Speaker 1: of a man TI walls. They're empty suit man. I'm
• 1:15:02
  Speaker 1: the coach, I got a camouflage hat. I got to
• 1:15:04
  Speaker 1: go hunting, you know. Elmer Fudd is not men. So
• 1:15:08
  Speaker 1: like they've lost it, and I mean it doesn't mean
• 1:15:10
  Speaker 1: they're not going to keep trying, and they still do
• 1:15:13
  Speaker 1: the shame thing anyways, because I saw like a viral
• 1:15:15
  Speaker 1: video of this woman where you know, she saw that
• 1:15:18
  Speaker 1: people were clowning on her, justifiably so, and she cussed
• 1:15:22
  Speaker 1: everybody out and it was the men, and it was like, okay,
• 1:15:24
  Speaker 1: well there you go. We know, you know, we know
• 1:15:26
  Speaker 1: you hate us. You only sent it was probably a
• 1:15:28
  Speaker 1: job nobody want to do, and you're like, I'll do it.
• 1:15:30
  Speaker 1: I'll get some cloud I'll get that some of that
• 1:15:32
  Speaker 1: twenty million dollars that you're funding. I mean, most of
• 1:15:35
  Speaker 1: this is going to be a money laundering grift anyway.
• 1:15:37
  Speaker 1: And so yeah, they look they got nothing. They they
• 1:15:41
  Speaker 1: they never had anything. I've been saying this for years.
• 1:15:44
  Speaker 1: They have alienated a demographic that finally realized that they
• 1:15:48
  Speaker 1: were a demographic that had voting power and they could
• 1:15:51
  Speaker 1: change things, and they decided to do it. And now
• 1:15:53
  Speaker 1: these people are just stuck.
• 1:15:54
  Speaker 3: So anyway, if you want to, if you want to
• 1:15:57
  Speaker 3: test us, go to USA dot go slash elected dash
• 1:16:02
  Speaker 3: officials and it has that page has where you can
• 1:16:05
  Speaker 3: contact the president, US senators, US representatives, your state or
• 1:16:10
  Speaker 3: territorial government governors or legislators. You can find a mayor
• 1:16:14
  Speaker 3: by by city name or population size. You can find
• 1:16:18
  Speaker 3: a county executive like county commissioners and stuff like that.
• 1:16:21
  Speaker 3: City officials to contact. You could look up your city
• 1:16:24
  Speaker 3: council members. Write to people and tell them what issues
• 1:16:27
  Speaker 3: you care about and see, you know, if any action
• 1:16:31
  Speaker 3: is taken. And in particular, like if you're if you're
• 1:16:36
  Speaker 3: an MRA and you support something like equally shared parenting rights,
• 1:16:40
  Speaker 3: like make that a thing that you write to every
• 1:16:41
  Speaker 3: single one of your representatives about that. You want to
• 1:16:44
  Speaker 3: see equally shared parenting legislation passed in your state to
• 1:16:49
  Speaker 3: make it the default and uncontested cases that you know
• 1:16:52
  Speaker 3: the couple has to actively make other arrangements or have
• 1:16:56
  Speaker 3: a hearing if they can't agree on something in order
• 1:17:00
  Speaker 3: to not have equally shared parenting. And see if you
• 1:17:03
  Speaker 3: get that past now some states you might want to
• 1:17:06
  Speaker 3: check and see what you have, because there are some
• 1:17:08
  Speaker 3: states where Men's aids activists have already gotten that passed.
• 1:17:11
  Speaker 3: But there's other issues that you could write about. In Ohio,
• 1:17:14
  Speaker 3: for instance, we're writing to our legislators because they are
• 1:17:19
  Speaker 3: still not recognizing rape as rape if a female perpetrator
• 1:17:23
  Speaker 3: does it to a male victim. And a few years
• 1:17:25
  Speaker 3: ago there was a case where a mother who raped
• 1:17:28
  Speaker 3: her toddler got off scott free. Her conviction was overturned
• 1:17:32
  Speaker 3: because the court decided the Supreme Court in Ohio decided
• 1:17:36
  Speaker 3: that what the laws said at the time meant that
• 1:17:38
  Speaker 3: she could not be convicted of rape she didn't penetrate
• 1:17:41
  Speaker 3: the child. So yeah, you want to see which government
• 1:17:45
  Speaker 3: government government officials listen to you, write to them, call
• 1:17:48
  Speaker 3: their offices, send them snail mail, not just email, and
• 1:17:52
  Speaker 3: see if that actually changes their minds and affects their actions.
• 1:17:56
  Speaker 3: You might get more response from libertarians on issues, and
• 1:18:00
  Speaker 3: there might be more more response from Republicans on issues
• 1:18:04
  Speaker 3: if you present them as this will discourage divorce. But
• 1:18:08
  Speaker 3: I think for the most part, my experience has been
• 1:18:11
  Speaker 3: ten years ago they were taking action or at least responding,
• 1:18:15
  Speaker 3: but in the last couple of years they're just ignoring people.
• 1:18:18
  Speaker 1: Well, yeah, let us know what you guys think about this.
• 1:18:19
  Speaker 1: One of the comments, I got a rumble rant and
• 1:18:21
  Speaker 1: they're gonna move on to the last story. So Nova
• 1:18:23
  Speaker 1: Fan twenty one gives a dollar and says, Dems, we
• 1:18:26
  Speaker 1: believe men are only motivated to oppress women for no
• 1:18:29
  Speaker 1: good reason, which is why we need men's vote. Feminists,
• 1:18:32
  Speaker 1: the Dems are betraying us. Ree, Yes, Well if they
• 1:18:35
  Speaker 1: if they actually try to address men, they are going
• 1:18:38
  Speaker 1: to piss off feminist and feminists will essentially turn women.
• 1:18:41
  Speaker 1: They'll they'll propagandize women into rebelling. So it's kind of
• 1:18:45
  Speaker 1: a they're kind of fucked all right.
• 1:18:47
  Speaker 3: So like the iteration of women yelling at cats, where
• 1:18:50
  Speaker 3: the cat says men are good and the women are.
• 1:18:53
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, yeah, all right, let's know what you guys
• 1:18:55
  Speaker 1: think about the dolphins in the comedy.
• 1:18:58
  Speaker 2: The Dolphins, right, the shocks?
• 1:19:00
  Speaker 1: All right, last story. So the dating app Tender is
• 1:19:04
  Speaker 1: toying with a controversial new feature. Gold and premium subscribers
• 1:19:09
  Speaker 1: to the app will now have the option to add
• 1:19:11
  Speaker 1: a wait for it, a height setting which I will
• 1:19:14
  Speaker 1: show you guys really quick here a height setting. The
• 1:19:17
  Speaker 1: four potential matches. Bill price Fry, VP of Comms as Tender,
• 1:19:21
  Speaker 1: stated the following quote, We're always listening to what matters
• 1:19:24
  Speaker 1: most to our Tender users, and testing the paid height
• 1:19:27
  Speaker 1: preference is a great example of how we're building with urgency, clarity,
• 1:19:31
  Speaker 1: and focus. This is part of a broader effort to
• 1:19:34
  Speaker 1: help people connect more intentionally on Tender. Our new product
• 1:19:38
  Speaker 1: principles guide every decision, and this one speaks directly to
• 1:19:42
  Speaker 1: a few, prioritizing user outcomes, moving fast and learning quickly.
• 1:19:46
  Speaker 1: Not every test becomes a permanent feature, but every test
• 1:19:49
  Speaker 1: helps us learn how we can deliver smarter, more relevant
• 1:19:53
  Speaker 1: experiences and push the category forward. The company was quick
• 1:19:57
  Speaker 1: to point out that this new setting works as a
• 1:19:59
  Speaker 1: preference rather than a hard filter, merely indicating a preference
• 1:20:02
  Speaker 1: that won't block or exclude other profiles. Still no word
• 1:20:06
  Speaker 1: on when the weight filter setting for men searching for
• 1:20:08
  Speaker 1: women will make its debut, which probably won't happens.
• 1:20:11
  Speaker 2: When are they going to have a weight filter? I'd
• 1:20:14
  Speaker 2: say that would be handy for both genders, but it
• 1:20:17
  Speaker 2: rather depends on how tall you are. Two hundred and
• 1:20:20
  Speaker 2: fifty pounds is an attractive weight for a man who's
• 1:20:25
  Speaker 2: six foot six, but an unattractive weight for a man
• 1:20:29
  Speaker 2: who's five foot six, And more importantly, it's an unattractive
• 1:20:34
  Speaker 2: weight for any woman because it means you're either a
• 1:20:37
  Speaker 2: giant or a land whale. Ninety nine percent of the time,
• 1:20:42
  Speaker 2: it means you're a land whale. So if we're going
• 1:20:45
  Speaker 2: to include a mandatory height stat for both sexes, we
• 1:20:49
  Speaker 2: should also include a mandatory weightstat. Seems fair. Right of course,
• 1:20:54
  Speaker 2: women can't be accused of lying in this way. An
• 1:20:58
  Speaker 2: absolute bloater of a woman could claim there are one
• 1:21:02
  Speaker 2: hundred pounds, and then when they turn up on a
• 1:21:05
  Speaker 2: date looking like a sumer wrestler, they can say, well,
• 1:21:09
  Speaker 2: that was my weight six months ago. I've gained a
• 1:21:14
  Speaker 2: few pounds since then.
• 1:21:15
  Speaker 1: So we're back on orcas is what you're saying.
• 1:21:17
  Speaker 3: But that shouldn't that what we meant when we said
• 1:21:20
  Speaker 3: be the orca.
• 1:21:21
  Speaker 2: That shouldn't matter, you fat fobe. The same way they
• 1:21:25
  Speaker 2: can use a photo of themselves ten years ago when
• 1:21:28
  Speaker 2: they weren't a fucking bloater, whereas a man can't say
• 1:21:33
  Speaker 2: he's six foot tall and then turn up looking like
• 1:21:37
  Speaker 2: a five foot tall hobbit and claiming I used to
• 1:21:41
  Speaker 2: be taller. That is not physically possible according to science,
• 1:21:46
  Speaker 2: unless he's recently had the lower portion of his legs
• 1:21:50
  Speaker 2: chopped off, which you would think he'd be obliged to disclose.
• 1:21:54
  Speaker 2: But yeah, we are once again dealing with one of
• 1:21:57
  Speaker 2: those notorious double standards that favors women's preferences but not men's.
• 1:22:02
  Speaker 1: I mean.
• 1:22:03
  Speaker 2: Sargon did a video about this recently, insisting that it
• 1:22:06
  Speaker 2: shouldn't matter how tall you are as long as you
• 1:22:09
  Speaker 2: have the right personality. My dude, that's very easily said
• 1:22:15
  Speaker 2: by someone who scored himself a wife who is just
• 1:22:18
  Speaker 2: as anti feminist as you. Don't get me wrong, I
• 1:22:21
  Speaker 2: got lucky too. I found myself a woman who doesn't
• 1:22:25
  Speaker 2: hate men either, and who will not hesitate to kick
• 1:22:28
  Speaker 2: the shit out of feminists. But please understand, we are
• 1:22:32
  Speaker 2: the lucky few, the very lucky, very few. But the
• 1:22:37
  Speaker 2: majority of the female population at this point is not
• 1:22:41
  Speaker 2: interested in a man's personality, at least not that first blush.
• 1:22:45
  Speaker 2: They want a man who is tall enough, and strong
• 1:22:48
  Speaker 2: enough and crazy enough to kill all the other men.
• 1:22:53
  Speaker 2: That's why even women who are five foot nothing still
• 1:22:57
  Speaker 2: insist on having a man who is over sex foot.
• 1:23:00
  Speaker 2: Not because they want a man who is taller than them,
• 1:23:04
  Speaker 2: but because they want a man who is taller than
• 1:23:06
  Speaker 2: most of the other men. They want a man who
• 1:23:09
  Speaker 2: can and will slaughter all the other all of the
• 1:23:13
  Speaker 2: other men, and stand over a pile of their slain bodies,
• 1:23:18
  Speaker 2: declaring in his booming, deep voice, behold all the other
• 1:23:23
  Speaker 2: men who are worthless, toxic misogynists who deserve to die
• 1:23:28
  Speaker 2: at my hand. And they did it all for this stunted,
• 1:23:32
  Speaker 2: fucking hobbit woman who's swiped left on me? Is it
• 1:23:35
  Speaker 2: swipe left? I keep forgetting which is which? I've never
• 1:23:39
  Speaker 2: been to Tinder. There's a fucking nightmare, and if you
• 1:23:42
  Speaker 2: go there, you get what you fucking deserved. I will
• 1:23:45
  Speaker 2: tweet what I tweet what I tweeted earlier today avoid
• 1:23:50
  Speaker 2: relationship advice from people who got lucky. They will tell
• 1:23:55
  Speaker 2: you be like me and do what I do, when
• 1:23:59
  Speaker 2: all they did it happened to be in the right
• 1:24:01
  Speaker 2: place at the right time. That includes me. I live
• 1:24:04
  Speaker 2: the oof life and I happen to get lucky. I
• 1:24:08
  Speaker 2: wouldn't recommend it. Ignore me entirely, and I will leave
• 1:24:12
  Speaker 2: you with that with the paradox. Have ignored me entirely,
• 1:24:15
  Speaker 2: Ignore me.
• 1:24:17
  Speaker 3: I it's funny. These women will complain about how difficult
• 1:24:24
  Speaker 3: things like the women's lives are so hard because of childbirth.
• 1:24:29
  Speaker 3: Childbirth kills seventy one out of three hundred thousand women
• 1:24:35
  Speaker 3: in the country that are pregnant, when it actually doesn't
• 1:24:38
  Speaker 3: it's within the first year after the child is born
• 1:24:43
  Speaker 3: is included in maternal deaths. But then they want to
• 1:24:47
  Speaker 3: date men who, if they marry them and have children
• 1:24:51
  Speaker 3: with them, are going to create harder to deliver babies.
• 1:24:55
  Speaker 3: Babies with tall fathers are more likely to have a
• 1:24:58
  Speaker 3: higher birth weight because eternal height is associated with a
• 1:25:01
  Speaker 3: larger skeletal size, and newborns they're more likely to have
• 1:25:05
  Speaker 3: bigger bones, and they're more likely to be taller, and
• 1:25:09
  Speaker 3: they're more likely to end up, you know, like more
• 1:25:12
  Speaker 3: solidly built. And so as you're trying to give birth
• 1:25:16
  Speaker 3: to this little chunker, just remember that you desperately wanted
• 1:25:20
  Speaker 3: his father to be six inches taller than you. Taller
• 1:25:23
  Speaker 3: fathers tend to have an offspring with a lower likelihood
• 1:25:26
  Speaker 3: of being small for gestational age too, So be ready
• 1:25:30
  Speaker 3: to become the size of a house when you're pregnant,
• 1:25:33
  Speaker 3: and the stretch marks from hell will be all over
• 1:25:36
  Speaker 3: your belly. Very very good reward there, ladies. Brilliant And
• 1:25:40
  Speaker 3: of course they'll bitch about that, and they'll talk about
• 1:25:43
  Speaker 3: it like it's something that just drops out of the
• 1:25:46
  Speaker 3: sky on women's heads, when in reality you have this
• 1:25:50
  Speaker 3: this five foot two dipshit who decided that she wanted
• 1:25:54
  Speaker 3: a guy six feet tall or taller and just doesn't
• 1:25:58
  Speaker 3: understand what that's going to do to her body when
• 1:26:00
  Speaker 3: she has his babies. Right, Sometimes you're not genetically compatible people.
• 1:26:04
  Speaker 3: It's not a good idea, but women, women don't plan ahead.
• 1:26:07
  Speaker 3: And you know what, really the feature they really ought
• 1:26:11
  Speaker 3: to create for premium users who are male, which women
• 1:26:19
  Speaker 3: are willing to bring financial benefits into the marriage, into
• 1:26:25
  Speaker 3: the if they get married, and this is something that
• 1:26:29
  Speaker 3: women used to do because they didn't have to have
• 1:26:33
  Speaker 3: a job. Just like today, a woman can be taken
• 1:26:38
  Speaker 3: seriously as an adult human being, as a as a parent,
• 1:26:42
  Speaker 3: an upstanding member of her community, respected morally, and as
• 1:26:47
  Speaker 3: a mature decision maker. If she doesn't have any kind
• 1:26:52
  Speaker 3: of income revenue stream at all coming into the home
• 1:26:56
  Speaker 3: where she raises her children, she can have none of
• 1:26:59
  Speaker 3: that as long as she either relies on income from
• 1:27:04
  Speaker 3: her husband, or she relies on income from the state
• 1:27:08
  Speaker 3: and doesn't have the father of her children living with her.
• 1:27:11
  Speaker 3: Men never could have that circumstance. A man cannot be
• 1:27:14
  Speaker 3: taken seriously not contributing economically to the welfare of his children.
• 1:27:19
  Speaker 3: In fact, men who failed to do that put in
• 1:27:22
  Speaker 3: jail for it when the state becomes aware that they
• 1:27:27
  Speaker 3: have children and they are not supporting them. Right, and
• 1:27:30
  Speaker 3: that's been historically a child support in English common law
• 1:27:34
  Speaker 3: and all throughout the nations that are influenced by English
• 1:27:37
  Speaker 3: common law. That was created during the Elizabethan Poor Laws.
• 1:27:40
  Speaker 3: The time of the Elizabethan Poor Laws, it was created
• 1:27:44
  Speaker 3: as a response to after King Henry the Eighth. I
• 1:27:48
  Speaker 3: believe it was King Henry the Eighth that attacked the
• 1:27:51
  Speaker 3: monasteries took all their wealth in the dissolution of the
• 1:27:53
  Speaker 3: monasteries basically created the transfer of responsibility for all the
• 1:27:58
  Speaker 3: poor people in the nation from the church to the state.
• 1:28:03
  Speaker 3: And several years about a generation later, the state was
• 1:28:06
  Speaker 3: in crisis, absolute crisis. Well one of our generations later,
• 1:28:10
  Speaker 3: maybe two of their generations. The state was in really
• 1:28:13
  Speaker 3: serious financial trouble from this situation because of all of
• 1:28:17
  Speaker 3: the other things that had occurred at the same time.
• 1:28:20
  Speaker 3: There were some complications, death and disease, war, famine, everything
• 1:28:24
  Speaker 3: kind of hit during that time. So these laws were
• 1:28:27
  Speaker 3: created to basically keep people from mooching off of the state,
• 1:28:31
  Speaker 3: and one of them was if a woman had a
• 1:28:34
  Speaker 3: child out of wedlock, the state could force her to
• 1:28:36
  Speaker 3: name the father and track him down and make him pay,
• 1:28:39
  Speaker 3: make him make him pay for the support of the
• 1:28:41
  Speaker 3: woman and the child. Similarly, though, like if you had
• 1:28:43
  Speaker 3: a relative in say a workhouse which was like a
• 1:28:48
  Speaker 3: welfare house, you could be tracked down if that was
• 1:28:51
  Speaker 3: your brother, your cousin, your parents, your uncle, you know,
• 1:28:56
  Speaker 3: your nieces or nephews, and say hey, take him off
• 1:28:59
  Speaker 3: our hands or pay for their upkeep at this workhouse,
• 1:29:03
  Speaker 3: and it was to keep families responsible for their family
• 1:29:07
  Speaker 3: members instead of having them rely on the state, which
• 1:29:10
  Speaker 3: would be a better way to do things. And the
• 1:29:12
  Speaker 3: only thing that our society kept over the years really
• 1:29:17
  Speaker 3: was that child support. But historically there was another element,
• 1:29:21
  Speaker 3: and it goes back a lot farther, because women were
• 1:29:25
  Speaker 3: not expected to produce a revenue stream that would come
• 1:29:29
  Speaker 3: into the home. At once, our society, our civilization, became
• 1:29:33
  Speaker 3: a revenue stream economy, and not we all have farms,
• 1:29:38
  Speaker 3: and we all have animals, and we all have this
• 1:29:39
  Speaker 3: and that she had to bring monetary dowry with her
• 1:29:43
  Speaker 3: when she got married. That's not just an Indian thing.
• 1:29:46
  Speaker 3: That existed throughout all of Europe and before it was
• 1:29:50
  Speaker 3: common for there to be revenue streams coming in every household.
• 1:29:55
  Speaker 3: Her dowry might be animals, might be farm animals, or
• 1:29:58
  Speaker 3: peace of land. And we stopped practice and we developed
• 1:30:01
  Speaker 3: this idea of you know what a women bring to
• 1:30:04
  Speaker 3: the table. How dare you ask that question? We are
• 1:30:06
  Speaker 3: the table? Well, no, not if you can be taken
• 1:30:09
  Speaker 3: seriously not contributing to the financial welfare of your home
• 1:30:11
  Speaker 3: at all. If you're not going to have a job
• 1:30:13
  Speaker 3: and you're not going to bring in some set of
• 1:30:16
  Speaker 3: investments that pays dividends. You're not going to do anything
• 1:30:19
  Speaker 3: to bring money into the house, and at the same time,
• 1:30:22
  Speaker 3: you're gonna bitch about he doesn't do half the housework
• 1:30:25
  Speaker 3: and I have to spend all my time taking care
• 1:30:28
  Speaker 3: of the children, and I'm oppressed by having to take
• 1:30:32
  Speaker 3: care of my aging parents or his. Then maybe we
• 1:30:36
  Speaker 3: should bring back the dowry system. Maybe women should start,
• 1:30:40
  Speaker 3: you know, And it seems like a horrible thing to
• 1:30:42
  Speaker 3: say about women, And I'm talking about oppressing women and
• 1:30:44
  Speaker 3: making women pay to get married. No, I'm talking about
• 1:30:47
  Speaker 3: putting a nest egg in at the very start of
• 1:30:50
  Speaker 3: your marriage and setting yourself up so that you don't
• 1:30:52
  Speaker 3: have to live your whole life in poverty. Then that
• 1:30:55
  Speaker 3: your children are raised in a better financial environment. Right,
• 1:30:57
  Speaker 3: And that could be an either or situation. You come
• 1:31:00
  Speaker 3: into the marriage with a wage earning job, or you
• 1:31:03
  Speaker 3: come into the marriage with the nest egg. That you
• 1:31:05
  Speaker 3: shouldn't come into the marriage with nothing. And I can
• 1:31:07
  Speaker 3: tell you from personal experience, I did that. I came
• 1:31:10
  Speaker 3: into the marriage with nothing and it really was very
• 1:31:13
  Speaker 3: hard on both me and my husband to recover from that.
• 1:31:17
  Speaker 3: And I think a lot of women in my generation
• 1:31:19
  Speaker 3: did that, and it's not good for the family. Men
• 1:31:23
  Speaker 3: come into the marriage with a responsibility to support their family.
• 1:31:28
  Speaker 3: Women come into the marriage with nothing, and that has
• 1:31:30
  Speaker 3: to change. Dating sites may not be able to solve it,
• 1:31:33
  Speaker 3: but you should be at least able to filter for
• 1:31:35
  Speaker 3: that level of accountability.
• 1:31:36
  Speaker 1: All right, Well, then with that said, that's all the stories.
• 1:31:39
  Speaker 1: I did. Get one more rumble rant from Nova Fan
• 1:31:41
  Speaker 1: twenty one. Put my camera back up here. I'll just
• 1:31:44
  Speaker 1: switch it on and off and for a dollar, he says,
• 1:31:47
  Speaker 1: won't this accelerate Tender's downfalls since the tiny amount of
• 1:31:50
  Speaker 1: men over six feet tall? Well, that's probably why they're
• 1:31:53
  Speaker 1: just testing it. I want to see. But yeah, I mean,
• 1:31:56
  Speaker 1: women on if you're using like a dating app to
• 1:31:58
  Speaker 1: like find men, I think that you're just going to
• 1:32:01
  Speaker 1: treat it like you're essentially like making a custom character
• 1:32:04
  Speaker 1: in a video game and it's just going to turn
• 1:32:06
  Speaker 1: out the way you want. But what the reality is
• 1:32:08
  Speaker 1: is that, yeah, there's very few men that are going
• 1:32:11
  Speaker 1: to meet that criteria, and less than that that are
• 1:32:15
  Speaker 1: actually on Tender and aren't already married or in relationships.
• 1:32:18
  Speaker 1: The other thing, too, is that like very tall men,
• 1:32:21
  Speaker 1: they actually have shortened lifespans. So I don't know if
• 1:32:24
  Speaker 1: that is something women are aware of or whatever, but
• 1:32:27
  Speaker 1: ye know, this just another factor to consider. So but anyway,
• 1:32:30
  Speaker 1: so we're going to end the show there, Thank you
• 1:32:33
  Speaker 1: before you do.
• 1:32:34
  Speaker 3: Okay, just really quick, There's two things that I would
• 1:32:38
  Speaker 3: want to suggest people go look up. I mentioned one
• 1:32:41
  Speaker 3: of them in our chat. If you want to hear
• 1:32:43
  Speaker 3: more about the accountability gap and reproduction there is a
• 1:32:47
  Speaker 3: video on the Justice for Men and Boys YouTube channel
• 1:32:50
  Speaker 3: that's my speech to I think twenty twenty International Men's
• 1:32:53
  Speaker 3: Issues Conference that is titled Reproductive Rights in the Accountability Gap.
• 1:32:58
  Speaker 3: And if you want to understand more about the Dowry issue,
• 1:33:01
  Speaker 3: there's a channel you should look up called This is
• 1:33:03
  Speaker 3: Shaw and he has quite a bit to say about it.
• 1:33:06
  Speaker 3: And when I first heard the idea, it was very skeptical,
• 1:33:10
  Speaker 3: but when I listened to what he had to say,
• 1:33:13
  Speaker 3: he's right. He's absolutely right. Women bringing nothing in sabotages
• 1:33:18
  Speaker 3: their entire lives and their husband's lives, their children's lives.
• 1:33:21
  Speaker 3: It's very important that we consider this change. So or
• 1:33:25
  Speaker 3: look up hashtag goldpill on X. But those are two
• 1:33:29
  Speaker 3: things that you should check out all right.
• 1:33:32
  Speaker 1: So with that said, we are now going to go
• 1:33:35
  Speaker 1: into the patreent only show and look at this article
• 1:33:37
  Speaker 1: from the BBC. Young men are joining in Russian churches
• 1:33:40
  Speaker 1: promising absurd levels of manliness, manliness, manliness, and we're gonna
• 1:33:44
  Speaker 1: see what how okay, what was actually said in this
• 1:33:48
  Speaker 1: interview with Father Moses and what the BBC journalist Lucy
• 1:33:52
  Speaker 1: Ash is saying. So if you want to join us
• 1:33:54
  Speaker 1: for that, you have to be on a Badger yourself
• 1:33:56
  Speaker 1: by going to feed the Badger dot com, forward slash, subscribe,
• 1:34:00
  Speaker 1: Vibe and become a member and then we will hopefully
• 1:34:02
  Speaker 1: see you all in the Pagement Show live chat to
• 1:34:05
  Speaker 1: see what this is all about. But with that said,
• 1:34:08
  Speaker 1: I'm going to wrap the show up there. I want
• 1:34:10
  Speaker 1: to thank everyone for coming on and checking it out.
• 1:34:13
  Speaker 1: I want to thank Hannah and Mike for joining me
• 1:34:15
  Speaker 1: and Mike Jay for helping me with the write ups.
• 1:34:17
  Speaker 1: So with all that said, if you guys liked this video,
• 1:34:19
  Speaker 1: please hit like, subscribe if you're not already subscribed to
• 1:34:21
  Speaker 1: the Belfalification, leave us a comment. Let us know what
• 1:34:23
  Speaker 1: you guys think about what we discussed on the show today.
• 1:34:26
  Speaker 1: If you dislike the video. Feel free to dislike it
• 1:34:28
  Speaker 1: as well. It helps us out either way and we
• 1:34:30
  Speaker 1: appreciate you taking the time to hang out with us.
• 1:34:33
  Speaker 1: And please please please share this video because sharing is caring.
• 1:34:36
  Speaker 1: Thank you guys so much for coming on today's episode
• 1:34:38
  Speaker 1: of HPR News and we will see you next Tuesday.
• 1:34:41
  Speaker 1: Holy shit, you're fucked.