Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Pentagon To Roll Back SA Rules, XX-XY Sides With Men | HBR News 498

Transcript

Pentagon To Roll Back SA Rules, XX-XY Sides With Men | HBR News 498 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:04
  Speaker 1: This is HBAR News number four ninety eight and are
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: gone to roll Back Say rules x x x Y
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: Side with Men, where we discuss the news of the
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: week and give it the Badger treatment. Hello everyone, and
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: welcome to Honey Badger Radio. Because I hope you guys
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: are doing well this week and that you're laughing at
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: all of this absurdity so that you are not consumed
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: by it all. I'm your host, Brian and I am
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: joined by, as always, my lovely co hosts, Hannah Wallin
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: and doctor Ranmerkam. On today's HBr News show, we're gonna
• 0:38
  Speaker 1: be talking about some new developments regarding the protests on
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: Tesla dealerships and such. The Pentagon speaks on due process
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: issues facing military men, which is almost an exclusive story
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: that nobody's talking about. And who is Nutella? And more so,
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: stick around, it's gonna be a good time and be
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: sure to join us afterwards for the Patron only show.
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: So on this Patreon show, I have this article from
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: the Telegraph that showed up in the innerwebs from Zoe Strimple,
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: and this came out in April seventh, I believe, and
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: it is entitled young White men do have problems, but
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: they need to man up. Yes, masculinity is crisis, but
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: the truth is that masculinity has always been in crisis. So,
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: you know, two wrongs equals of who cares?
• 1:36
  Speaker 2: If we look, if we look through this person's back catalog,
• 1:39
  Speaker 2: we'll find another article they did about how we shouldn't
• 1:43
  Speaker 2: tell man tell men to men up. Yes, because that's
• 1:47
  Speaker 2: patriarchy some shit.
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly, So anyway, that should be a fun and
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: totally not you know, blood pressure raising thing to read through.
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: If you want to join us for that, you have
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: to become a Badger yourself by going to feed the
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: Badger dot com four slash subscribe so that you can
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: join us in our discord server and enjoy all of
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: the bonus content. And if you want to find where
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: our content is archived in case we were to be
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: removed by a three letter agency or some such, then
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: please go to badgerfeed dot com or Honey Badger excuse me,
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: Honey Badger Radio dot com to find where all of
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: our content lives. So with that out of the way,
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: let us get into today's story. So, first off, before
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: I get into like the stories I chose, let's look
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: at briefly at the ones I did not choose. So
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: there's two that come to mind. Number one four chan
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: rip and pte soiea rip and piece. Four Chan apparently
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: has been hacked and is down. I've never been there.
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: I don't go there. I don't think it's bad necessarily,
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: but I just like it's not really my cup of tea.
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: But in case people are wondering, ring four chan is down,
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: but that doesn't mean that four chan won't be back.
• 3:04
  Speaker 3: So there there there will be revenge. Yes, interesting, it depends.
• 3:12
  Speaker 3: I mean if this had happened back in the day,
• 3:16
  Speaker 3: that there would have been some very.
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: Well, there was some like shift in leadership for leadership
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: it went woke or whatever, and now it's like government,
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: there's like more like.
• 3:28
  Speaker 3: It's more than that. There, Yeah, there's most of the
• 3:33
  Speaker 3: old flags are going. Yeah there anymore.
• 3:37
  Speaker 2: It's probably edg edge log. It's just like it's just woke.
• 3:42
  Speaker 1: I wish I wish that it happened. That would have
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: been nice.
• 3:45
  Speaker 3: If you ever do you ever hung out on bboard
• 3:48
  Speaker 3: very when you saw that it was always that element
• 3:50
  Speaker 3: was always there, okay, but now it's it's not like
• 3:56
  Speaker 3: it was. There's there's still No, it's it's just not
• 4:00
  Speaker 3: like it was. There's still some people there that are trying,
• 4:02
  Speaker 3: but it's.
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: Not Yeah, it's it's not the same in Reddit kind
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: of the hack swords have been hacked swords.
• 4:08
  Speaker 2: Websites, so it's just impossible to navigate.
• 4:11
  Speaker 3: And the people that have that would get would have gotten.
• 4:15
  Speaker 3: There still might be people there that would get revenge.
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: Mm hmm.
• 4:19
  Speaker 3: But yeah, the people that really would have been scary,
• 4:24
  Speaker 3: I think they're all gone.
• 4:26
  Speaker 2: Yep.
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: So yeah, there was That was one story and the
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: other one that I didn't go with is women in
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: space space space because I think it's just mostly a
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: nothing burger. Like as always we celebrate mediocrey when women.
• 4:41
  Speaker 3: Do it, they should have sent pot bellied pigs, right.
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: So yeah, I didn't want to cover it because I
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: didn't think there was enough meat on that bone. And
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: aside from the fact that, like you know, maybe by
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: going out into space, Katie Perry learned something about what
• 4:58
  Speaker 1: it means to be an astronaut, and maybe the fact
• 5:01
  Speaker 1: that we brought that we just before that had brought
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: back some astronauts that were trapped in orbit or stuck
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: in orbit for a while, they might give them some perspective,
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: but I didn't really want to make that one a
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: big story like that.
• 5:13
  Speaker 2: There's a universe not far from here, a dimension not
• 5:15
  Speaker 2: far from here, where something went hideously wrong on that flight,
• 5:20
  Speaker 2: and the spacecraft got flung out into deep space, and
• 5:24
  Speaker 2: those women became the first ever human beings whose bodies
• 5:28
  Speaker 2: were not consumed back into Mother Earth. And if you soles,
• 5:32
  Speaker 2: then they became the first souls ever to to drift
• 5:35
  Speaker 2: into space and die in unimaginable hell forever. There you go.
• 5:44
  Speaker 3: It's not this universe, because in this universe, when whenever
• 5:47
  Speaker 3: women do something that has been traditionally considered horribly dangerous,
• 5:53
  Speaker 3: you can pretty much figure out that they have added
• 5:56
  Speaker 3: so many fail saves to it that it's really not anymore.
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: Yeah, and it were, they were. They were barely out
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: there very long at all. That's that's that's the thing.
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: It was all just like press stuff. So but yeah, yeah,
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: it was a photo op obviously, you know, men were
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: mostly behind. Like everything that made that possible was men.
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: Women were just passengers, and they actually spent more time
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: taking selfies and looking like than actually like enjoying where
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: they were, which is crazy. But anyway, sorry, but it's true.
• 6:29
  Speaker 1: But anyway, so I didn't cover those. But now let
• 6:32
  Speaker 1: us get into the stories that I did choose to cover.
• 6:36
  Speaker 1: So first we're gonna jump into something kind of funny. Uh,
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: let's talk a little bit about um Ntella. So, a
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: New York woman who joined and actively recruited for the
• 6:48
  Speaker 1: terrorist organization ISIS has been sentenced to nineteen years in prison.
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: See Maya Caesar, whose war name is um Natella, which
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: sounds like the answer to the question what would you
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: like on your toast, of which she appears to have
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: had a lot, had just finished serving a four year
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: term for the same crime. This is sorry.
• 7:12
  Speaker 2: This is a New York woman. She speaks English, she's
• 7:16
  Speaker 2: presumably culturally American. She's familiar with Western brands. This is
• 7:22
  Speaker 2: a pseudonym that she chose from all the possible syllables
• 7:25
  Speaker 2: in any possible language. She chose er Marmite, not just
• 7:32
  Speaker 2: a general food stuff. It's an actual brand, an internationally
• 7:35
  Speaker 2: recognized one. You think you'd think she'd have run into
• 7:38
  Speaker 2: legal problems with Ferrero, the Italian company that manufactures not
• 7:43
  Speaker 2: tell Yes, I did research into this more than I
• 7:46
  Speaker 2: usually do, because this is so funny. Even if that
• 7:50
  Speaker 2: was her real name, it would be legally problematic. If
• 7:53
  Speaker 2: you officially named your child Peanut butter Cups, you probably
• 7:57
  Speaker 2: get a season desist letter from her. She's this woman
• 8:01
  Speaker 2: as a terrorist named herself after Natella. Never mind the
• 8:05
  Speaker 2: US government. She should have been stopped at attracts long
• 8:08
  Speaker 2: ago by Big Confection. They'll be telling me they don't
• 8:12
  Speaker 2: have the power. Big Confection could still could kill several
• 8:16
  Speaker 2: children and get away with it. They probably have already allegedly.
• 8:19
  Speaker 2: All right, sorry, carry on.
• 8:21
  Speaker 3: I think she ate Big Confection.
• 8:22
  Speaker 1: Actually, yeah, right, let me finish the write up. But anyway,
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: while on supervised release, Caesar Natella, let's just call her
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: that because I think it's better. It's more memorable.
• 8:34
  Speaker 4: Uh.
• 8:35
  Speaker 1: Natella almost immediately went back to re establishing times with
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: her ISIS contacts. During that time, the Second US Circuit
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: Court of Appeals overturned the previous judge's decision and sought
• 8:45
  Speaker 1: a harsher sentence for Natella. Upon hearing this, Natella would
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: remove her ankle monitor and attempt to flee to Russia.
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: She was arrested days later while hiding out in New Mexico,
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: Her attorney, Deirdre Van Dornham, sounds like a character out
• 8:59
  Speaker 1: of a Bond movie, was disappointed with the verdict, stating
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: Miss Caesar's sentence demonstrates the utter failure of the federal
• 9:07
  Speaker 1: criminal justice system, lacking the mental health and deradicalization resources.
• 9:11
  Speaker 1: Everyone from the FBI to mental health experts agrees she needs.
• 9:17
  Speaker 1: The court resorted to incapacitating a traumatized young woman who
• 9:21
  Speaker 1: has never hurt anyone but herself end quote. Meanwhile, NYPD
• 9:27
  Speaker 1: Commissioner Jessica Tish has a much more favorable view of
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: the trial's outcome, stating, and by the way, Jessica Tish
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: has been very light on crime in New York, which
• 9:36
  Speaker 1: is why their situation is so bad right now. But
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: she says, quote this sentence is a fitting and meaningful
• 9:42
  Speaker 1: outcome for a woman who assisted ISIS in recruiting, squandered
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: the chance for redemption by exposing herself as cooperating with
• 9:51
  Speaker 1: the US government, and persisted in promoting extremist ideologies to
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: potential new recruits online end quote.
• 9:59
  Speaker 3: The The question then, that her defense brings up was
• 10:04
  Speaker 3: was she a complete and utter failure at it? Because
• 10:09
  Speaker 3: it says she never the defense said she never hurt anyone. Well,
• 10:15
  Speaker 3: for that to be true, she would have had to
• 10:18
  Speaker 3: fail to recruit anyone ever into isis because if she
• 10:24
  Speaker 3: successfully recruited so much as one person, she hurt that person,
• 10:28
  Speaker 3: she persuaded that person to join a terrorist group that
• 10:31
  Speaker 3: was going to exploit them as cannon fodder in an
• 10:35
  Speaker 3: endless and really pointless war on the entire rest of
• 10:41
  Speaker 3: the world. I mean, that's that's pretty harmful shit, right there.
• 10:45
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 10:46
  Speaker 3: So, now when it comes to the criminal justice system
• 10:52
  Speaker 3: failing to deprogram cult mentalities, I guess we're pretty familiar
• 10:58
  Speaker 3: with that since in the United States is still full
• 11:01
  Speaker 3: of gangs. But you know, and like that part's probably true.
• 11:07
  Speaker 3: She's probably right about that, but it's certainly not unique
• 11:11
  Speaker 3: to women. And why she complaining now.
• 11:17
  Speaker 1: Yeah, while she is getting, from what I can see,
• 11:20
  Speaker 1: a lighter sentence than normal, she sentence nineteen years after
• 11:28
  Speaker 1: court tossed shockingly low punishment, so they okay, they were
• 11:32
  Speaker 1: initially trying to give her a much lighter punishment and
• 11:36
  Speaker 1: it went up to nineteen.
• 11:37
  Speaker 3: Years, which is my thinking on it though, It's just why,
• 11:41
  Speaker 3: why is it suddenly a problem now that the court
• 11:45
  Speaker 3: or that the system failed to rehabilitate the prisoner just
• 11:50
  Speaker 3: because the prisoner is female.
• 11:53
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, for sure. And by the way, as an aside,
• 11:56
  Speaker 1: her name um Nutella translates to mother of Nutella. And
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: by the way, like people naming themselves after brands is
• 12:11
  Speaker 1: not not new. I think there's a lot of examples
• 12:14
  Speaker 1: of rappers that do that. You know, Coachella I think
• 12:18
  Speaker 1: is one. H there's plenty, there's I'm sure the chat
• 12:22
  Speaker 1: can give us throw some names of various musicians that
• 12:26
  Speaker 1: have named themselves after brands. I don't know why they
• 12:29
  Speaker 1: haven't been sued for whatever reason. But yeah, Solla is
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: mother of.
• 12:38
  Speaker 3: She strikes me more as a yeah, like a young
• 12:43
  Speaker 3: Nutella actually, like.
• 12:46
  Speaker 1: I'll take all of it.
• 12:50
  Speaker 2: So yeah, it's it's all sounding rather reminiscent of our
• 12:55
  Speaker 2: very own Shamima begam Uh, I'm proud to say, is
• 13:00
  Speaker 2: no longer our very own. Her current status goes by
• 13:04
  Speaker 2: the enviable sounding description of stateless. Those of us who
• 13:08
  Speaker 2: are generally displeased with the absolute state of the state
• 13:12
  Speaker 2: might find it appealing to be stateless, like an actual
• 13:16
  Speaker 2: sovereign citizen and not actually being detained, But in practice
• 13:21
  Speaker 2: it's not as attractive as it sounds, especially in Shamima
• 13:23
  Speaker 2: Begum's case, because she's currently in a detention camp in
• 13:28
  Speaker 2: Syria and no one is coming to save her. Nobody
• 13:31
  Speaker 2: knows quite what's happening to her in there, but it's
• 13:35
  Speaker 2: probably not good. I feel a little bit bad for her,
• 13:38
  Speaker 2: But at the same time, she serves as a lesson
• 13:41
  Speaker 2: as a cautionary tale. Don't join isis. It's either an
• 13:46
  Speaker 2: incredibly retarded thing to do or an incredibly malicious thing
• 13:50
  Speaker 2: to do, And now that Anlan's razor has been thoroughly
• 13:53
  Speaker 2: debunked and discarded, we have to assume it's out of
• 13:56
  Speaker 2: malice both in the case of Shemima Begam and indeed
• 14:01
  Speaker 2: a grape jam or whatever I actually meant grape there.
• 14:05
  Speaker 2: That wasn't me soft censoring the phrase rape jam, although
• 14:09
  Speaker 2: that's probably exactly what Shamama Beggum is currently in. Yes,
• 14:14
  Speaker 2: I'm a bad person.
• 14:16
  Speaker 1: Eminem is another example.
• 14:18
  Speaker 2: Yeah, Eminem spelled it different, so we got away with it.
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: Oh yeah, I guess so. Yeah, she just brought to
• 14:23
  Speaker 1: tell her that's right. Yeah, didn't even play around. I
• 14:27
  Speaker 1: don't know.
• 14:28
  Speaker 2: For all my faults, I'm still not as bad as
• 14:30
  Speaker 2: fucking lady marmalade over there. Don't give me that mental
• 14:33
  Speaker 2: health bullshit. Lots of people have mental health problems, and
• 14:36
  Speaker 2: it usually results in social awkwardness or substance abuse. It
• 14:42
  Speaker 2: very rarely leads to high treason, mental health or no
• 14:48
  Speaker 2: mental health. You don't get to do that shit and
• 14:50
  Speaker 2: act like you're not dangerous. So it's a shame she
• 14:53
  Speaker 2: was caught in New Mexico. You should have let her
• 14:56
  Speaker 2: escape to Russia, whereupon you could have revoked her US
• 14:59
  Speaker 2: citizenship and she too could have become a stateless non
• 15:02
  Speaker 2: person who can be repeatedly grape in a third world
• 15:08
  Speaker 2: underground torture garden in Russia. Again, I mean graped. The
• 15:12
  Speaker 2: things Russians can do with bunches of grapes will make
• 15:16
  Speaker 2: you wish it was just a penis. Those things could
• 15:19
  Speaker 2: be quite thorny, especially when they've already become encrusted with
• 15:24
  Speaker 2: various dry bodily fluids. Don't join isis, ladies. It's as
• 15:30
  Speaker 2: simple as that. Just don't join isis. It's not like
• 15:32
  Speaker 2: you can slip on a banana peel and fall over
• 15:36
  Speaker 2: and accidentally join isis. It's very much it considered intellectual decision.
• 15:41
  Speaker 2: So you're not that retarded. Just don't join ISIS. Then
• 15:45
  Speaker 2: if you do enjoy your Darwin Award, you've earned it. Ah,
• 15:49
  Speaker 2: I'm going to hell there.
• 15:52
  Speaker 3: I was feeling if you did join ISIS, Russia wouldn't
• 15:56
  Speaker 3: be a good place to flee, to.
• 16:00
  Speaker 1: Not be might not be. Well. Let us know what
• 16:02
  Speaker 1: you guys think about om Natella and this story in
• 16:05
  Speaker 1: the comments. I thought it was funny, so I picked
• 16:09
  Speaker 1: it and I thought the image was so appropriate. But anyway,
• 16:13
  Speaker 1: with that said, let's move on to the next story.
• 16:16
  Speaker 1: So next we have a follow up on the situation
• 16:21
  Speaker 1: with these sort of protests. I guess you could say.
• 16:25
  Speaker 1: So this this group called the Civil Liberties Defense Center,
• 16:32
  Speaker 1: which is an Oregon based legal organization known for supporting
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: far left causes, including Antifa linked activism, activism, and quotes,
• 16:42
  Speaker 1: is actively trading protesters targeting TESLA and its CEO, Elon Musk.
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: The CLDC, founded by Lauren Reagan to defend activists and
• 16:51
  Speaker 1: challenge systemic inequality, as a history of representing environmental and
• 16:56
  Speaker 1: social justice movements, which is like, okay, well, let's go
• 17:00
  Speaker 1: after TESLA vent such as the stop cop City protests
• 17:03
  Speaker 1: in Atlanta, which opposed the police training facility due to
• 17:08
  Speaker 1: concerns over militarization and environmental impact. Recently, the CLDC has
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: aligned with a Tesla Takedown campaign, a nationwide movement fueled
• 17:17
  Speaker 1: by Musk's controversial labor policies and his political ties to
• 17:21
  Speaker 1: President Donald Trump politically or sorry, particularly in following Musk's
• 17:26
  Speaker 1: influential role in the administration after Trump's twenty twenty four
• 17:29
  Speaker 1: election victory. This role has sparked widespread backlash, with protests
• 17:35
  Speaker 1: erupting across the US from Seattle to Miami. As part
• 17:38
  Speaker 1: of the Tesla Takedown initiative, which has included both peaceful
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: demonstrations and violent incidents like arson and vandalism at Tesla facilities,
• 17:49
  Speaker 1: the CLDC has been providing virtual training and know your
• 17:53
  Speaker 1: Rights workshops because they're like a legal support firm or whatever,
• 18:00
  Speaker 1: which is all about like, how did I get away
• 18:02
  Speaker 1: with you know, violence, property damage, theft, destruction, et cetera,
• 18:07
  Speaker 1: often in partnership with Indivisible to guide activists. Indivisible, by
• 18:12
  Speaker 1: the way, was getting usaid money if I remember correctly,
• 18:15
  Speaker 1: to guide activists.
• 18:16
  Speaker 3: On protestization what so organization?
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: Yeah, and this one right, to guide activists on protest
• 18:24
  Speaker 1: tactics while advising caution to avoid arrests in conservative areas.
• 18:29
  Speaker 1: Despite the campaign's nonviolent stance, the article highlights growing tensions
• 18:34
  Speaker 1: urging tesla owners and dealerships to say vigil it as
• 18:36
  Speaker 1: protests intensify. And I have a video here. It's an
• 18:39
  Speaker 1: Instagram in bed here that I'm going to play real quick.
• 18:43
  Speaker 1: This is Lauren Reagan. It's not very long, so we'll
• 18:46
  Speaker 1: just give this a quick Listen.
• 18:47
  Speaker 5: During time periods where the government and corporations are attempting
• 18:52
  Speaker 5: to crack down on descent or crack down on activism,
• 18:56
  Speaker 5: if they believe that that tactic is working for them,
• 19:00
  Speaker 5: and then you're going to see them double down on
• 19:01
  Speaker 5: that tactic, and it's only going to get more pronounced.
• 19:05
  Speaker 5: As a lawyer, I also wanted to tell you that
• 19:09
  Speaker 5: even during periods of heightened state repression, the total number
• 19:14
  Speaker 5: of people who are actually targeted by that repression is
• 19:18
  Speaker 5: quite low. They can't arrest us all, they can't target
• 19:22
  Speaker 5: us all, and their goal is to just pluck a
• 19:25
  Speaker 5: few individuals out and scare the rest of us into
• 19:29
  Speaker 5: submission and apathy. It's time to be strategic and effective
• 19:33
  Speaker 5: but it's not time to be afraid or silenced.
• 19:38
  Speaker 1: There you go.
• 19:39
  Speaker 2: They they never target the deep State, do they? They
• 19:44
  Speaker 2: never target any of the various all powerful.
• 19:46
  Speaker 1: They gets.
• 19:49
  Speaker 2: You think Antifa and other such a narco communist flag
• 19:53
  Speaker 2: waving ignorant geeks will be going after the deep state
• 19:56
  Speaker 2: first and foremost, what with anarco communism being ostensibly a
• 20:00
  Speaker 2: posed to the state. I realized, we realize most of
• 20:03
  Speaker 2: them don't believe the deep State even exists. They think
• 20:10
  Speaker 2: it's a conspiracy theory. They think it's a right wing
• 20:13
  Speaker 2: fantasy and part of the anti Semitic point of no return, weirdly,
• 20:17
  Speaker 2: whatever that has to do with it. But they know
• 20:19
  Speaker 2: the state exists. They know the FBI and the CIA exists,
• 20:24
  Speaker 2: and if you've pressed them, they'll insist that the Trump
• 20:27
  Speaker 2: administration is currently in charge of those agencies. If they
• 20:31
  Speaker 2: were to strike at the most dangerous weapons of the
• 20:33
  Speaker 2: aforementioned Trump administration, their first port of coal would be
• 20:36
  Speaker 2: such agencies. But they're not interested, just like they're not
• 20:39
  Speaker 2: interested in tussling with any of those Patriot Front marches,
• 20:43
  Speaker 2: the ones who are definitely not Feds. It's almost as though,
• 20:48
  Speaker 2: as Brian said, I mean col us crazy, call us
• 20:51
  Speaker 2: nut jumps, wrap our brains in twelve layers of tinfoil.
• 20:54
  Speaker 2: But it's almost as though they're on the same side,
• 20:58
  Speaker 2: and it's the left side. It's almost as though they're
• 21:01
  Speaker 2: all being funded by the same gushing fountain of taxpayers money.
• 21:05
  Speaker 2: Having said that, they're not even going after Ice in
• 21:09
  Speaker 2: terms of boots on the ground. They'll happily advise the
• 21:11
  Speaker 2: general public on how to avoid Ice from all the
• 21:15
  Speaker 2: way from the lowest TikTok video all the way up
• 21:17
  Speaker 2: to the squad themselves, but they don't send their own
• 21:21
  Speaker 2: paid actors into the actual streets to actually fuck with Ice.
• 21:25
  Speaker 2: Even though we could be reasonably sure that ICE is
• 21:28
  Speaker 2: not funded by the left wing money fountain. If it
• 21:31
  Speaker 2: was up to the left, there would be no Ice
• 21:35
  Speaker 2: during Biden's term. There pretty much wasn't. The reason they're
• 21:39
  Speaker 2: not fucking around with Ice is because they would find
• 21:42
  Speaker 2: out same reason they wouldn't fuck around with the deep
• 21:45
  Speaker 2: state even if they wanted to. Those niggers have a
• 21:47
  Speaker 2: license to kill, or at least a license to grab
• 21:50
  Speaker 2: you and throw you into a small room for a
• 21:53
  Speaker 2: very long time. Tesla does not. Tesla is not a
• 21:58
  Speaker 2: federal agency at all. They don't have a license to
• 22:01
  Speaker 2: kill or kidnap anyone. They barely have the legal wherebithal
• 22:04
  Speaker 2: to even retaliate. After all, as the left wing shit
• 22:09
  Speaker 2: Smith's like to remind us, no one elected Elon. He
• 22:13
  Speaker 2: hasn't provided government security, nor are any of his companies.
• 22:17
  Speaker 2: Thank fuck, he can afford his own private security, or
• 22:20
  Speaker 2: he'd be dead seven times by now. Unfortunately, all the
• 22:25
  Speaker 2: private security in the world cannot defend every Tesla in
• 22:28
  Speaker 2: the world from an army of guerrilla terrorists aided and
• 22:33
  Speaker 2: abetted by the deep state. That's why they're going after TESLA,
• 22:36
  Speaker 2: because they can not, because it's a powerful agency with
• 22:41
  Speaker 2: government assured monopoly of control, but because it isn't. It's
• 22:46
  Speaker 2: what the anti for thugs themselves would call punching down.
• 22:51
  Speaker 2: It's government sponsored terrorism against private companies. We have a
• 22:56
  Speaker 2: word for this, ladies and gentlemen, and it is communism.
• 23:01
  Speaker 2: They can tell themselves they're fighting against the richest man
• 23:03
  Speaker 2: in the world, and they'll say it in total oblivious
• 23:06
  Speaker 2: ignorance of the multi trillion dollar superpower propping them up
• 23:10
  Speaker 2: and pushing them forward. Cunts, ladies and gentlemen, Big fat,
• 23:17
  Speaker 2: sweaty cunts who will stop at nothing to turn the
• 23:21
  Speaker 2: whole world into one being fat, sweaty cunt booy by
• 23:24
  Speaker 2: any means necessary. So, for anyone out there who owns
• 23:28
  Speaker 2: a Tesla, I would suggest you fit it with some
• 23:30
  Speaker 2: kind of turret gun that activates automatically by proximity to
• 23:34
  Speaker 2: anyone else who tries to key it. And if that's illegal,
• 23:39
  Speaker 2: well shit, I thought this was America. Oh this is America. Well,
• 23:43
  Speaker 2: at least add a couple of empty turret guns on
• 23:46
  Speaker 2: each side and a couple of robot legs for it
• 23:48
  Speaker 2: to stand on while it faces you down. In chance,
• 23:51
  Speaker 2: please put down your weapon. You have twenty seconds to comply.
• 23:54
  Speaker 2: You have fifteen seconds to comply. I do record everything.
• 23:58
  Speaker 2: I want to see their faces when it happens. Pardon
• 24:03
  Speaker 2: in summary, I've killed commies. Just kill him, kill him
• 24:07
  Speaker 2: dead allegedly, of course, don't kill them in minecraft.
• 24:11
  Speaker 1: Let's chicken jockey.
• 24:16
  Speaker 3: I wonder how many young men this organization is going
• 24:21
  Speaker 3: to get arrested after they've turned eighteen, when it's going
• 24:26
  Speaker 3: to be on their record for the rest of their
• 24:27
  Speaker 3: life for some dumb shit that's going to come back
• 24:31
  Speaker 3: and haunt them twenty years later. When they want to
• 24:35
  Speaker 3: get promoted in some company and it comes up on
• 24:39
  Speaker 3: their criminal record that they engaged in felony vandalism of
• 24:45
  Speaker 3: private property when they were young, and then they have
• 24:47
  Speaker 3: to explain it. But that's not really the worst of it.
• 24:52
  Speaker 3: So I want you to think back to something that
• 24:56
  Speaker 3: at first is going to seem completely unrelated. Everybody remember
• 25:01
  Speaker 3: fucking scum girl from the Toronto protests that and how
• 25:06
  Speaker 3: she showed her terror, her absolute terror of men in
• 25:13
  Speaker 3: general by getting right up in that guy's face and
• 25:18
  Speaker 3: telling them you are fucking scum, right, like, just getting
• 25:24
  Speaker 3: an inch off of him and hissing in his face
• 25:28
  Speaker 3: that he was fucking scum, Not standing twenty feet away
• 25:32
  Speaker 3: behind twenty cops and saying it, but just getting right
• 25:37
  Speaker 3: in there. That type of provocation is targeted and it
• 25:45
  Speaker 3: is purposeful and deliberate, and this organization engages in that
• 25:51
  Speaker 3: kind of stuff, right. The goal is to get people
• 25:56
  Speaker 3: to respond to their vandalism and their their violence, and uh,
• 26:04
  Speaker 3: they're wrongdoing to others with more violence. They're trying to
• 26:09
  Speaker 3: start a civil war. And so just a reminder, son,
• 26:14
  Speaker 3: this is bait, not the story, but the behavior. This
• 26:19
  Speaker 3: is bait, and men all over the United States really
• 26:24
  Speaker 3: should be very careful to avoid taking the bait. If
• 26:29
  Speaker 3: someone shows up and attacks your car, call the cops,
• 26:34
  Speaker 3: don't don't fight back, don't approach them, film them from
• 26:40
  Speaker 3: a distance, let your let your car film them if
• 26:43
  Speaker 3: your car has the the equipment, which I think most
• 26:47
  Speaker 3: if not all teslas do, But don't engage. Do not
• 26:52
  Speaker 3: engage because this needs to be the only result that
• 26:58
  Speaker 3: they need to experience from this is that it sends
• 27:02
  Speaker 3: them to jail. Directly to jail. No no passing, go,
• 27:07
  Speaker 3: no collecting two hundred bucks, just just jail. And when
• 27:11
  Speaker 3: that happens to enough of them, they'll stop doing this.
• 27:15
  Speaker 3: If they try to escalate to something else, that's a
• 27:18
  Speaker 3: that's a different story. If you know they come, try
• 27:23
  Speaker 3: coming into your house, obviously you don't really have much
• 27:26
  Speaker 3: of a choice at that point. But all of this
• 27:31
  Speaker 3: stuff that's going on is about trying to make you
• 27:37
  Speaker 3: make a mistake. So now is the time to be
• 27:42
  Speaker 3: the most stoic you've ever been in your entire life
• 27:44
  Speaker 3: about this kind of shit. Everything you own is just stuff.
• 27:48
  Speaker 3: The most important things you have are your loved ones
• 27:53
  Speaker 3: and your freedom, and you don't want to allow somebody
• 27:58
  Speaker 3: to provoke you into doing something that justifies under the
• 28:03
  Speaker 3: law some entity taking away either of those things from you.
• 28:10
  Speaker 1: Yeah, and I'm glad you brought up the boys thing,
• 28:13
  Speaker 1: because that is what I think is the way that
• 28:18
  Speaker 1: these people, essentially, like you know, run their operation. They
• 28:22
  Speaker 1: use you know, young men looking for some kind of purpose,
• 28:28
  Speaker 1: cause or mission. Yeah, they recruit them. They use women
• 28:32
  Speaker 1: to do it. That's why that woman, Yeah, that's why,
• 28:36
  Speaker 1: the woman who leads this thing is talking about what
• 28:40
  Speaker 1: people should be doing when we know, damn well, she
• 28:42
  Speaker 1: is not going to be out there putting anything at risk.
• 28:45
  Speaker 1: She is asking men to do it, and it is
• 28:47
  Speaker 1: men that will do it. And I brought this up
• 28:49
  Speaker 1: many times. I think I believe it's Portland Antifa. One
• 28:53
  Speaker 1: of the leaders there and I don't know if she
• 28:56
  Speaker 1: still does this was a woman named Yvette Falarca who
• 28:59
  Speaker 1: is a teacher, and she is like the person that
• 29:02
  Speaker 1: ran Antifa, at least in a certain part of Portland.
• 29:06
  Speaker 1: She at least was running a chapter of it. And
• 29:08
  Speaker 1: the men who work for her, the men who you know,
• 29:12
  Speaker 1: operate under her, many of them don't even really know
• 29:17
  Speaker 1: what it is that they're doing. They just they just
• 29:19
  Speaker 1: believe that they're doing the right thing. They're fighting fascism,
• 29:23
  Speaker 1: and they're they're basically exploiting the male instinct to protect
• 29:28
  Speaker 1: women in order to turn them into weapons. And this
• 29:31
  Speaker 1: is not uncommon. Shout out to b X who has
• 29:34
  Speaker 1: been on the show a couple of times and talked
• 29:36
  Speaker 1: about how, you know, men who are disenfranchised, they're struggling
• 29:43
  Speaker 1: with their you know, their purpose in life. They've been
• 29:46
  Speaker 1: demonized in the media and in the education everywhere. They
• 29:50
  Speaker 1: are separated from their father in some way, they're isolated socially,
• 29:56
  Speaker 1: and they're looking for some place to belong to. They
• 29:59
  Speaker 1: are all exploited by extremist groups, whether it's you know,
• 30:03
  Speaker 1: like neo Nazis or clansmen or Islamist groups or whatever
• 30:09
  Speaker 1: it is. And Antifa is one of those groups, yeah,
• 30:11
  Speaker 1: or Antifa or you know, radical leftist groups, and uh,
• 30:15
  Speaker 1: they're the ones that become Yeah, they're vulnerable, and they're
• 30:18
  Speaker 1: also the ones that usually who's you know, who are
• 30:21
  Speaker 1: the ones that get their lives destroyed by that. So
• 30:24
  Speaker 1: she's willing to like let these kids go to jail
• 30:27
  Speaker 1: to be harmed, maybe even be killed, you know, in
• 30:30
  Speaker 1: a fight, like I don't know by by a person
• 30:35
  Speaker 1: defending themselves like a Kyle Rittenhouse like they're these are
• 30:38
  Speaker 1: the ones that are gonna be destroyed by this. And
• 30:42
  Speaker 1: part of what I think, you know, when we talk
• 30:44
  Speaker 1: about like remaining stoic and not taking the bait, is
• 30:49
  Speaker 1: like helping these these men so they don't end up
• 30:52
  Speaker 1: in a situation where they they think they're doing the
• 30:55
  Speaker 1: right thing for the right reason in some way, when
• 30:59
  Speaker 1: really they're just looking to belong to something and that's
• 31:02
  Speaker 1: how they you know, they get used. So we have
• 31:04
  Speaker 1: to like give them a reason to feel like they
• 31:07
  Speaker 1: belong to something that isn't you know, inherently putting them
• 31:10
  Speaker 1: at risk either their future or their life or their livelihood. So,
• 31:16
  Speaker 1: uh yeah, that's a just a quick mention. You know,
• 31:20
  Speaker 1: these these people, they do want a war. They want
• 31:23
  Speaker 1: a civil war. And I don't think this is like
• 31:25
  Speaker 1: two sides pushing on something. I think there's one side
• 31:29
  Speaker 1: that is essentially funded by the deep state, by you know, uh,
• 31:33
  Speaker 1: these these people who want to see they're either accelerationists
• 31:37
  Speaker 1: or they're radicals of some stripe, or they're afraid they're
• 31:40
  Speaker 1: gonna lose their money. Remember that these people what they're
• 31:43
  Speaker 1: fighting is basically to continue to get paid by the
• 31:48
  Speaker 1: deep state. They're not they're not really you know, they
• 31:50
  Speaker 1: exist to agitate. And if they're not getting paid, like
• 31:54
  Speaker 1: whatever millions or billions of dollars they were getting from USA,
• 31:57
  Speaker 1: I D or whatever other three letter organization is the CIA,
• 32:01
  Speaker 1: then they have no you know, they're gonna lose their
• 32:04
  Speaker 1: they're gonna lose their their pay pig and they have
• 32:08
  Speaker 1: to they have to maintain that. So they're gonna essentially say,
• 32:11
  Speaker 1: or we're losing our democracy, go fight so I can
• 32:13
  Speaker 1: continue to get paid. Go die for me so I
• 32:16
  Speaker 1: can continue to get collect a paycheck, because I want
• 32:19
  Speaker 1: you to do that. You're a man, and you need
• 32:21
  Speaker 1: to prove to me you're a man, because otherwise I'm
• 32:23
  Speaker 1: gonna think you're a piece of garbage like other men.
• 32:25
  Speaker 1: So go die for me, and then I will put
• 32:28
  Speaker 1: something nice on your tombstone maybe, and then I'll continue
• 32:31
  Speaker 1: to get paid. And that's that's kind of like where
• 32:34
  Speaker 1: all of this, all of this stuff that's happening. Like
• 32:38
  Speaker 1: there's a lot of people talking about like the boy
• 32:41
  Speaker 1: crisis and stuff, but they're not really grasping like how
• 32:46
  Speaker 1: absolutely vital it is to address this. They think it's
• 32:50
  Speaker 1: one of multiple you know things happening like effects, and
• 32:54
  Speaker 1: I think that it is one of the core effects.
• 32:57
  Speaker 1: All the other stuff, a lot of it will melt
• 32:59
  Speaker 1: away if we can like solve this problem. And that
• 33:02
  Speaker 1: begins with us seeing men as human and boys as
• 33:04
  Speaker 1: human and not tools to be used. So you know, yeah,
• 33:10
  Speaker 1: so I and also with Mike Yeah fuck commis And uh,
• 33:14
  Speaker 1: that's basically all I gotta say about that. But anybody
• 33:16
  Speaker 1: that wants to, like, you know, weaponize young men by
• 33:21
  Speaker 1: leveraging essentially their desire or need to feel like men,
• 33:26
  Speaker 1: which is essentially to do something you know, useful, to
• 33:29
  Speaker 1: be of service, Yeah, that's exploitative and shitty.
• 33:34
  Speaker 3: So anyway, a lot of these young men that they're
• 33:37
  Speaker 3: exploiting do not did not grow up with their fathers.
• 33:42
  Speaker 1: Absolutely, Yeah, I guarantee you A large majority is probably
• 33:45
  Speaker 1: the case, a large majority.
• 33:48
  Speaker 3: But that's what I would suspect.
• 33:50
  Speaker 1: Yeah, So anyway, let us know what you guys think
• 33:53
  Speaker 1: about this one. In the comments that I get any
• 33:56
  Speaker 1: super chats, I gotta check and make sure I didn't
• 33:58
  Speaker 1: miss any super chats or super childs before we move
• 34:01
  Speaker 1: on to the next story. Let me see here just
• 34:05
  Speaker 1: a moment. I'm just checking the super childs because sometimes
• 34:10
  Speaker 1: Meredith G shows up and she just drops like an
• 34:12
  Speaker 1: absolute spike that there it is the Meredith G superchold.
• 34:15
  Speaker 1: So MEREDITHG gives us five dollars. Thank you, Meredith, and
• 34:18
  Speaker 1: says HBr News four ninety eight, unhappy tax day. Here
• 34:22
  Speaker 1: is some money, honey for the badgers, which will probably
• 34:24
  Speaker 1: go to better use than the taxes that were just
• 34:27
  Speaker 1: taken out of my bank account this morning. Well, I'm
• 34:30
  Speaker 1: sorry that that happened, Meredith. That sucks, and thank you.
• 34:33
  Speaker 1: I got a tax return coming. It's seventy six dollars.
• 34:37
  Speaker 1: I don't know what I'm gonna do with it, but
• 34:39
  Speaker 1: but I am getting something. So there's that, all right.
• 34:42
  Speaker 1: It's because we donated a lot. We did a lot
• 34:44
  Speaker 1: of I think the donations helped. But anyway, let us
• 34:48
  Speaker 1: know what you guys think.
• 34:49
  Speaker 3: About that the Republicans make good on Trump's promise to
• 34:53
  Speaker 3: eliminate the income tax. That would that would go a
• 34:56
  Speaker 3: long way to stimulate the economy.
• 34:58
  Speaker 1: Absolutely, I would like that. Yeah, I mean it seems
• 35:01
  Speaker 1: like a bold move.
• 35:03
  Speaker 3: We'll see when it's stuff like this, Yeah, for sure,
• 35:06
  Speaker 3: obviously there's plenty that's being taken that doesn't need to
• 35:10
  Speaker 3: be taken.
• 35:12
  Speaker 1: Yeah, for sure, all right, and yeah this exploitation Red
• 35:17
  Speaker 1: Devil thirteen, I think in the vertical chat said no
• 35:21
  Speaker 1: young person should be tricked into risking their lives in
• 35:22
  Speaker 1: the most horrific ways in war. Yeah, I mean, it
• 35:25
  Speaker 1: obviously happens in that context as well. And I'm glad
• 35:29
  Speaker 1: that men can see that. Like when you know, we
• 35:33
  Speaker 1: were I think when it was like we would say,
• 35:36
  Speaker 1: like a relative piece time, you know, the military ads
• 35:40
  Speaker 1: were all like lesbian like cartoons and stuff. Do you
• 35:43
  Speaker 1: remember that my two others would took me to protest
• 35:46
  Speaker 1: and then like you know, Russia invades Ukraine and October
• 35:51
  Speaker 1: seventh happens, and all of a sudden, all of the
• 35:53
  Speaker 1: war commercials are like, you know, white dudes with like
• 35:56
  Speaker 1: square jaws jumping out of helicopters and and and I
• 36:00
  Speaker 1: look in the comments of that, and all of them
• 36:02
  Speaker 1: were like, I'm not fighting your fucking wars. Like so
• 36:05
  Speaker 1: like men are young men are very much aware of
• 36:08
  Speaker 1: what's going on in that regard. But I think in
• 36:11
  Speaker 1: the case of like when the government is you know,
• 36:14
  Speaker 1: trying to get you like when they're starting wars and stuff.
• 36:16
  Speaker 1: I think that's more obvious. But this stuff, like the activism,
• 36:19
  Speaker 1: which we were supposed to believe is grassroots, you know,
• 36:22
  Speaker 1: looking out for the women's and all that, that's harder
• 36:25
  Speaker 1: for people to spot. And that's why I think. And
• 36:27
  Speaker 1: it's funded by the government too, so like it should
• 36:29
  Speaker 1: be identified. But thank you for the comment. All right,
• 36:33
  Speaker 1: But anyway, let's move on to the next story. Now
• 36:35
  Speaker 1: we got a little bit of good news, which I'm
• 36:36
  Speaker 1: happy about, all right, So this I'm going to give
• 36:39
  Speaker 1: a quick shout out to Harvis Owens, who has been
• 36:42
  Speaker 1: working very hard to try to change the laws of
• 36:47
  Speaker 1: due process and the way in which let's say, allegations
• 36:51
  Speaker 1: of sexual assault, rape, sexual misconduct, harassment, et cetera are
• 36:56
  Speaker 1: handled in the military. And if you are new to
• 36:59
  Speaker 1: this channel and you're interested, you should check out our
• 37:03
  Speaker 1: backlog of videos. I have done a series of interviews
• 37:06
  Speaker 1: with many men in the military and their mothers or
• 37:10
  Speaker 1: at least one is a mother of a man who
• 37:13
  Speaker 1: have been done really really raw by the military courts.
• 37:17
  Speaker 1: And it was all based in activism, based in feminist
• 37:21
  Speaker 1: studies like the one by Mary Costs, which is the
• 37:25
  Speaker 1: one that is basically the real reason for this, Okay,
• 37:28
  Speaker 1: And he's been working really hard. He's made a lot
• 37:31
  Speaker 1: of appearances. He's been very diligent, and they're starting to
• 37:35
  Speaker 1: show some results, especially since the switch over to the
• 37:40
  Speaker 1: new administration here in the United States. So I'll go
• 37:44
  Speaker 1: ahead and tell you what this is. On April thirteen,
• 37:47
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty five, The Intercept reported that the Pentagon is
• 37:51
  Speaker 1: contemplating the elimination of key regulations designed to supposedly combat
• 37:57
  Speaker 1: sexual assault in the military, specifically to targeting the Sexual
• 38:01
  Speaker 1: Assault Prevention and Response Program. This program, which supposedly tracks
• 38:06
  Speaker 1: sexual violence and supporting supports victims, is under review by
• 38:11
  Speaker 1: multiple Pentagon offices, including the Undersecretary of Defense for Personnel
• 38:16
  Speaker 1: and Readiness and the Office of the Inspector General. The
• 38:20
  Speaker 1: potential cut stem from a memorandum obtained by The Intercept,
• 38:24
  Speaker 1: raising concerns among advocates who argue that such a move
• 38:28
  Speaker 1: could violate federal law and deter survivors from reporting assaults,
• 38:31
  Speaker 1: exacerbating systemic issues like the underreporting highlighted in a twenty
• 38:35
  Speaker 1: twenty one investigation of sexual assaults in Africa. The review
• 38:39
  Speaker 1: occurs amidst a broader climate of regulatory rollbacks in twenty
• 38:42
  Speaker 1: twenty five, influenced by the Trump administration's push to reduce
• 38:46
  Speaker 1: government oversight as seen in other policy areas. Critics, including
• 38:51
  Speaker 1: advocates for sexual assault prevention, fear a chilling effect on survivors,
• 38:56
  Speaker 1: potentially undoing years of progress in addressing military sexual violence.
• 39:00
  Speaker 1: As of the latest update on April thirteenth, twenty twenty five,
• 39:03
  Speaker 1: the review process is ongoing, with no final decision announced,
• 39:07
  Speaker 1: leaving the future of the SAPR program uncertain and prompting
• 39:11
  Speaker 1: calls for vigilance from those concerned about its impact on
• 39:14
  Speaker 1: military personnel. And I will add to this that essentially,
• 39:18
  Speaker 1: in case you don't know, this is essentially the same
• 39:22
  Speaker 1: system that was being used or is being used in
• 39:26
  Speaker 1: college campuses. So if you're a college student and you're
• 39:30
  Speaker 1: a man, most of the time this applies to men,
• 39:33
  Speaker 1: and a girl makes an allegation against you of sexual
• 39:38
  Speaker 1: assault or rape or something like that, it does not
• 39:41
  Speaker 1: go Even if it goes criminal, the schools handle it
• 39:45
  Speaker 1: on their own terms, usually internally, partly because they're protecting
• 39:49
  Speaker 1: their reputation from a sort of media scandal that may emerge,
• 39:53
  Speaker 1: but also because they just want to get it over
• 39:56
  Speaker 1: with quicker. And what they usually do is a just
• 40:00
  Speaker 1: presume guilt like instead of the standard of evidence is
• 40:03
  Speaker 1: for something like this is supposed to be beyond a
• 40:05
  Speaker 1: reasonable doubt, but they lower it to a preponderance of evidence,
• 40:09
  Speaker 1: which is extremely easy to get past. The same thing
• 40:12
  Speaker 1: to do in the military, and it is for similar reasons.
• 40:15
  Speaker 1: And so what they're essentially trying to go to is
• 40:20
  Speaker 1: a standard of you know, beyond a reasonable doubt instead
• 40:25
  Speaker 1: of preponderance of evidence. And feminists, because those are the
• 40:29
  Speaker 1: people who oppose this, are claiming that this is going
• 40:33
  Speaker 1: to make it to where women don't step forward because
• 40:35
  Speaker 1: they don't step forward enough, which is not true because
• 40:38
  Speaker 1: there's no way of knowing any of this stuff. And
• 40:42
  Speaker 1: it's actually for people like arvest Oorns and the people
• 40:45
  Speaker 1: that I've spoken to, this is not just about due process,
• 40:49
  Speaker 1: even though that is the primary factor here, because a
• 40:52
  Speaker 1: man that doesn't get due process because of the military courts,
• 40:55
  Speaker 1: they just they'll just throw them in jail and destroy
• 40:58
  Speaker 1: their lives, which they have done. Have many interviews with
• 41:02
  Speaker 1: people who have who have horrifying experiences. But it's also
• 41:07
  Speaker 1: a national security threat because if you're doing that, then
• 41:11
  Speaker 1: guess what, A lot of men are not going to
• 41:13
  Speaker 1: join the military if that's the risk, and men in
• 41:16
  Speaker 1: the military and tell them they shouldn't if that's the risk. Right.
• 41:20
  Speaker 1: So it's getting to the point where our military was
• 41:22
  Speaker 1: made very weak in during the Biden administration, and part
• 41:27
  Speaker 1: of it is because of that, and what they're what
• 41:29
  Speaker 1: the reasoning for doing this to begin with is essentially
• 41:33
  Speaker 1: this Merry Cost study that found this crazy statistic that
• 41:37
  Speaker 1: like one in four or in some some cases one
• 41:40
  Speaker 1: in three women h you know, in the military or
• 41:44
  Speaker 1: on college campuses, depending on which one you're looking at,
• 41:47
  Speaker 1: will be raped, you know, in there before they get out.
• 41:51
  Speaker 1: And of course that is such an overblown statistic based
• 41:54
  Speaker 1: on a false study that essentially like stretches the definition
• 41:58
  Speaker 1: of what constitutes sexual assault and then redefines that as rape.
• 42:04
  Speaker 1: And so what they found is, I think I forget
• 42:08
  Speaker 1: which one, but it was a there was a politician,
• 42:10
  Speaker 1: a female congresswoman that put this through and she said
• 42:15
  Speaker 1: that essentially the number of cases does not come nearly
• 42:21
  Speaker 1: close to what the data that this Merricost study claims
• 42:25
  Speaker 1: should be happening. That means, instead of saying, well, that
• 42:29
  Speaker 1: means that the study is wrong. What they're concluding is no,
• 42:32
  Speaker 1: that means that you're not convicting enough people, because it
• 42:35
  Speaker 1: should be to this level. And so what they're doing
• 42:38
  Speaker 1: is they're convicting more people to try to get closer
• 42:41
  Speaker 1: to that number. So this, this is the this is
• 42:45
  Speaker 1: the reason. And so now that there's new people in
• 42:48
  Speaker 1: there that want to change that, they're re examining this.
• 42:52
  Speaker 1: So we don't know if it's going to happen, but
• 42:54
  Speaker 1: you know, Arvis Owen sent this to me and shout
• 42:56
  Speaker 1: out to him, this looks very, very promising, and I
• 43:00
  Speaker 1: think it's something that we're gonna have to follow up
• 43:02
  Speaker 1: on when we learn more. So now that I've said
• 43:04
  Speaker 1: my piece, I'll give you guys.
• 43:06
  Speaker 3: A floor to understand the wrongness of the cost study.
• 43:10
  Speaker 3: There's a couple of things, you know, like if you're
• 43:13
  Speaker 3: if you're new to listening to us in the last
• 43:15
  Speaker 3: few years, it may not have heard this. If you've
• 43:18
  Speaker 3: been listening to us for years and years, sorry, you're
• 43:21
  Speaker 3: gonna hear stuff that we've we've talked about before here.
• 43:24
  Speaker 3: But this study was created in the I want to say,
• 43:32
  Speaker 3: the late eighties, like eighty seven somewhere around there by
• 43:37
  Speaker 3: Mary Coss when she was a professor at Kent State University.
• 43:41
  Speaker 3: That's the for Dead in Ohio University for History buffs
• 43:48
  Speaker 3: where the student came out to gawk at the protests
• 43:52
  Speaker 3: and got hit by a stray bullet, and then the
• 43:55
  Speaker 3: media made it out like she was this brave protester
• 44:00
  Speaker 3: that got targeted. But in any case, Costs at this
• 44:05
  Speaker 3: university was part of a movement of feminists that was
• 44:09
  Speaker 3: trying to get higher statistics for rape. Their goal wasn't
• 44:16
  Speaker 3: to find out how frequently it was happening. Their goal
• 44:20
  Speaker 3: was to get statistics they could use to convince the
• 44:23
  Speaker 3: state that it was happening more than we thought, and
• 44:29
  Speaker 3: they openly admitted that. At the time. There were articles
• 44:33
  Speaker 3: about it. At the time, there were a bunch of
• 44:35
  Speaker 3: articles in the Toledo Blade, a whole series of articles
• 44:39
  Speaker 3: titled rape the Making of an Epidemic. And one of
• 44:45
  Speaker 3: the things that was covered in that was the fact
• 44:49
  Speaker 3: that cost designed her study in such a way that
• 44:55
  Speaker 3: only one in four of her respondents that she labeled
• 45:00
  Speaker 3: rape victims agreed with her assessment that they had been raped,
• 45:08
  Speaker 3: and something like half of them almost had gone on
• 45:12
  Speaker 3: to have sex again with their alleged rates a lot
• 45:15
  Speaker 3: of them.
• 45:15
  Speaker 1: Yeah, mostly did you have sex with the guy afterwards? Right?
• 45:20
  Speaker 3: Yeah, Well, and it was she had things in there like,
• 45:25
  Speaker 3: if you flirt with your boss until he has sex
• 45:29
  Speaker 3: with you, and then you get a promotion, and your
• 45:33
  Speaker 3: goal was to get that promotion, that even if the
• 45:38
  Speaker 3: woman initiated it, she considered that to be rape. The
• 45:41
  Speaker 3: boss raped the employee, even if the employee seduced the
• 45:46
  Speaker 3: boss to make that happen. If if you had a
• 45:50
  Speaker 3: beer before you had sex, you're a rape victim, right,
• 45:55
  Speaker 3: but only if you're female. And the other half of
• 45:58
  Speaker 3: the issue with was oh and by the way, when
• 46:05
  Speaker 3: when they found out that only one in four of
• 46:08
  Speaker 3: her respondents that she labeled rape agreed that they were
• 46:12
  Speaker 3: rape victims, they she stopped asking that question. Yeah, Like
• 46:18
  Speaker 3: she stopped asking if they agreed with her assessment, yep.
• 46:23
  Speaker 3: And she also stopped asking if they had continued to
• 46:26
  Speaker 3: have sex with their alleged rapists afterwards because of that,
• 46:29
  Speaker 3: they didn't want to know that part, right. But the
• 46:32
  Speaker 3: other thing is that she defined rape to exclude victims
• 46:36
  Speaker 3: of female perpetrators who were male, So any any time
• 46:43
  Speaker 3: someone was forced to penetrate right anytime that someone was
• 46:47
  Speaker 3: forcibly enveloped. So the one way that a woman would
• 46:53
  Speaker 3: commit rape against a guy if she was trying to
• 46:57
  Speaker 3: have an experience rather than strictly trying to torture. So
• 47:02
  Speaker 3: the way that would be the most common way a
• 47:05
  Speaker 3: woman would rape a guy that she excluded from the
• 47:08
  Speaker 3: definition of rape, and she referred to it as other
• 47:11
  Speaker 3: sexual assault. And her literal reasoning behind that that she gave,
• 47:17
  Speaker 3: which was stated in another not a study but a
• 47:21
  Speaker 3: paper she wrote on the use of these types of
• 47:26
  Speaker 3: surveys to determine the prevalence of rape, was that it's
• 47:31
  Speaker 3: just not the same. That's it. Not why it's just
• 47:35
  Speaker 3: not the same, just that it's not the same to
• 47:40
  Speaker 3: override a man's bodily autonomy as it is to override
• 47:45
  Speaker 3: a woman's bodily autonomy. That it's just somehow, for no
• 47:51
  Speaker 3: reason at all, that it's just somehow worse to override
• 47:56
  Speaker 3: the bodily autonomy of a man or a boy than
• 48:00
  Speaker 3: to override the bodily autonomy of a woman or a girl.
• 48:04
  Speaker 3: It just doesn't count, Alli Ellie income free. And we
• 48:09
  Speaker 3: have seen other studies showing that actually women are much
• 48:13
  Speaker 3: more sexually aggressive than men because that attitude's fairly common
• 48:18
  Speaker 3: that they don't feel like it's as harmful. They don't
• 48:21
  Speaker 3: feel like it's a big violation. It's not that big
• 48:24
  Speaker 3: of a deal when a woman or a girl violates
• 48:30
  Speaker 3: the bodily autonomy of a man or boy. And the
• 48:34
  Speaker 3: biggest excuse they make, or at least try to make,
• 48:38
  Speaker 3: is well, you can't get pregnant. No, you can't get pregnant,
• 48:42
  Speaker 3: and you can still get an STI. He can still
• 48:45
  Speaker 3: be traumatized, he can still have his choice taken away
• 48:51
  Speaker 3: and whether or not he's going to remain chaste for
• 48:54
  Speaker 3: his partner, and he can be saddled with eighteen years
• 48:58
  Speaker 3: of child support while his rapist raises a child. And
• 49:05
  Speaker 3: as egregious that as that is when the victim was
• 49:09
  Speaker 3: an adult, it's even worse when the victim was a
• 49:12
  Speaker 3: child himself. Knowing that your molester is raising your child
• 49:20
  Speaker 3: and you, you, before you're even old enough to get
• 49:23
  Speaker 3: a job, can be forced to pay. That seems to
• 49:28
  Speaker 3: me to be a much bigger deal than getting pregnant,
• 49:32
  Speaker 3: especially given the fact that pregnancy can be It's over
• 49:37
  Speaker 3: in nine months if you if you continue it, but
• 49:40
  Speaker 3: it can be terminated, and women still do have that choice,
• 49:45
  Speaker 3: and they did prior to Row versus Wade. Actually there's
• 49:50
  Speaker 3: a there were like two hundred thousand abortions done in
• 49:55
  Speaker 3: the United States prior to the year prior to Row
• 49:58
  Speaker 3: versus Wade. So yeah, it's it's not exactly the way
• 50:04
  Speaker 3: that you think. History is not exactly the way that
• 50:07
  Speaker 3: you think. So the Pentagon considering changing its program to
• 50:13
  Speaker 3: be more friendly toward due process. I think that's a
• 50:16
  Speaker 3: good thing. Is very important because feminists are basing their
• 50:23
  Speaker 3: claim that evidence against perpetration shouldn't be allowed, shouldn't be
• 50:30
  Speaker 3: considered on their own results of not considering evidence against Well,
• 50:38
  Speaker 3: if we just don't consider evidence against perpetration, you can
• 50:44
  Speaker 3: see that it significantly raises the level of cases that
• 50:49
  Speaker 3: get treated as perpetration. Therefore, we should we should always
• 50:53
  Speaker 3: think that we should always consider that evidence to be
• 50:57
  Speaker 3: a problem. No, it actually indicates that that evidence is valid.
• 51:06
  Speaker 3: Evidence against perpetration is valid. And the other end of
• 51:11
  Speaker 3: that argument is that if we pay attention and we
• 51:16
  Speaker 3: look at all of the evidence, women are much safer
• 51:20
  Speaker 3: than feminists want us to think, and a lot of
• 51:24
  Speaker 3: men are getting railroaded, and that has to change.
• 51:30
  Speaker 2: Yeah, Mike, Yeah, so I guess in summary, it's no
• 51:37
  Speaker 2: more random me doing in the armed forces. It doesn't
• 51:41
  Speaker 2: mean you can rape people now. It was never legal
• 51:44
  Speaker 2: to rape people in the military. I mean, I'm assuming
• 51:46
  Speaker 2: so I've never been there, so I can't possibly know.
• 51:52
  Speaker 1: I've never been in I was gonna try to get
• 51:55
  Speaker 1: that in there, but for.
• 51:56
  Speaker 2: All I know, they never carry guns. How would you know,
• 52:00
  Speaker 2: or march information or whatever. I've never been there, so
• 52:03
  Speaker 2: I cannot even speculate what happens there. For all I know,
• 52:06
  Speaker 2: they dressed like clowns and have pillow fights, and they
• 52:09
  Speaker 2: dance the macarena while drinking mehitos. And if an expert
• 52:13
  Speaker 2: tells me that that's exactly what they do in fact,
• 52:16
  Speaker 2: do well, I have to shut the fucker up and
• 52:18
  Speaker 2: believe it.
• 52:19
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 52:19
  Speaker 2: Of course it's irresponsible of us to not have qualified
• 52:22
  Speaker 2: experts on the show to tell us that.
• 52:25
  Speaker 1: But yeah, I don't know what are we even doing.
• 52:27
  Speaker 1: We should just call we should all quit. We're not
• 52:30
  Speaker 1: I don't have a doctorate in English.
• 52:34
  Speaker 2: Yeah, my ignorant, uneducated comedian ass can only assume that
• 52:40
  Speaker 2: this recent change to the rules means that when it
• 52:42
  Speaker 2: comes to the armed forces, armed forces crotchety lesbian deis
• 52:48
  Speaker 2: dei hihres can no longer give the stink eye to
• 52:50
  Speaker 2: a random jar head and have them caught marshaled done
• 52:53
  Speaker 2: nothing but an accusation, am I warm? Well, that's kind
• 52:57
  Speaker 2: of a shame. Actually, such an orchestrated false accusation would
• 53:03
  Speaker 2: be a very good way for an army private to
• 53:05
  Speaker 2: get discharged and as such a void having to go
• 53:10
  Speaker 2: and get blown to pieces in Israel for the sake
• 53:12
  Speaker 2: of some bullshit skirmish that has nothing to do with them.
• 53:16
  Speaker 2: Not that this ever happens in Israel, of course, I've
• 53:18
  Speaker 2: never been there, so for all I know, Israel's full
• 53:23
  Speaker 2: of baby unicorns leaping majestically over rainbows and farting strawberry
• 53:29
  Speaker 2: homeless flavored bagels into the atmosphere. I've never been to Ukraine,
• 53:33
  Speaker 2: so as far as I know, all they do is
• 53:35
  Speaker 2: sit around playing hungry hungry hippos while Russian Gremlin's pissing
• 53:39
  Speaker 2: their eyes for no apparent reason. All right, but it
• 53:44
  Speaker 2: might have been about a different thing.
• 53:47
  Speaker 3: I think the modern state of AI produced media, we
• 53:54
  Speaker 3: can never know if any of the photos and video
• 53:59
  Speaker 3: that we are seeing coming out of any of the
• 54:02
  Speaker 3: alleged war zones around the world are real.
• 54:07
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 54:08
  Speaker 1: Well, remember the Merry Cost study came out of experts
• 54:13
  Speaker 1: that the thing that we have to contend with, the whole,
• 54:17
  Speaker 1: all of the all of all of feminist academia is
• 54:21
  Speaker 1: in fact academia. So when we call it into question
• 54:26
  Speaker 1: and you just say, well, don't talk to the experts,
• 54:29
  Speaker 1: then you know, it's like, but the experts are lying.
• 54:33
  Speaker 1: So I don't trust experts anymore. And for good reason.
• 54:36
  Speaker 1: The experts told us that we should stay in our
• 54:39
  Speaker 1: homes and and and socially distanced from one another like this.
• 54:45
  Speaker 1: The experts did that.
• 54:47
  Speaker 3: So face pities will protect you from viruses, Yeah, even
• 54:52
  Speaker 3: though viruses can go right through them. It's totally the
• 54:56
  Speaker 3: same as wearing you know, like an industrial mask to
• 55:00
  Speaker 3: protect from large dust particles, you know, like sawdust and
• 55:03
  Speaker 3: stuff like that, even though viruses are immensely smaller.
• 55:09
  Speaker 1: Yeah, a little bit, a little.
• 55:12
  Speaker 3: Like the comparison is like comparing a universe to a planet. Still,
• 55:19
  Speaker 3: you know, we we have that total protection. It works
• 55:22
  Speaker 3: every single time.
• 55:23
  Speaker 1: Yeah. So anyway, in in closing, I think this is
• 55:30
  Speaker 1: good news again, shout out to Arvis Owens. I see
• 55:33
  Speaker 1: you if you're watching, and thank you for the information,
• 55:36
  Speaker 1: and when you learn more, feel free to share it
• 55:39
  Speaker 1: with us. I am hopeful that this happened. And someone asks, like,
• 55:43
  Speaker 1: but how long will it last? Well, the thing is
• 55:45
  Speaker 1: is that it's all there's it's always going to be
• 55:48
  Speaker 1: under attack like this.
• 55:50
  Speaker 3: It is going to depend on the voters. Yeah, how
• 55:52
  Speaker 3: long will it last? It depends on whether you go
• 55:56
  Speaker 3: back to trusting the establishment and that that includes the
• 56:00
  Speaker 3: establishment Republicans, or whether you continue to look at populists
• 56:05
  Speaker 3: and outsiders and uh, anybody that that comes along that
• 56:10
  Speaker 3: that says, you know, this is this is uh the swamp,
• 56:17
  Speaker 3: this this establishment, organized organization, this this oligarchy. We have
• 56:24
  Speaker 3: to continue to fight it. This bureaucracy has to go
• 56:27
  Speaker 3: and so on.
• 56:28
  Speaker 1: But there will always be something to take away your rights,
• 56:33
  Speaker 1: like that's always happening, and so we have to remain
• 56:36
  Speaker 1: ever vigilant. So no one ever says, oh, you know,
• 56:39
  Speaker 1: it's fixed, we can go home like because we know
• 56:42
  Speaker 1: in reality that's just not the way it works. So, yeah,
• 56:45
  Speaker 1: this is take the winds, take the w but remain vigilant.
• 56:50
  Speaker 3: Yeah, you have to understand how this should happened in
• 56:52
  Speaker 3: the first place. So the first thing that feminists tell
• 56:55
  Speaker 3: you about this, this type of legislation, whether it's military
• 57:00
  Speaker 3: or not, is that it didn't exist until the last
• 57:05
  Speaker 3: quarter of the twentieth century. And that's bullshit, right. Rape
• 57:11
  Speaker 3: being outlawed under legal systems influenced by English common law
• 57:16
  Speaker 3: actually goes back to the thirteenth century. Rape was illegal
• 57:21
  Speaker 3: in the twelve hundreds, right, And in the twelve hundreds
• 57:28
  Speaker 3: they actually established an age of consent. The royalty of
• 57:34
  Speaker 3: the time actually established an age of consent. So prior
• 57:38
  Speaker 3: to that, rape was illegal. Prior to that, even rape
• 57:43
  Speaker 3: was illegal, So it's not something that's brand new. And
• 57:50
  Speaker 3: they didn't call it domestic violence. They didn't call it
• 57:53
  Speaker 3: violence against women girls like women and girls. They called
• 57:56
  Speaker 3: it wife beating. Wife beating was illegal going back that
• 57:58
  Speaker 3: far as well. So there's always been national and state
• 58:06
  Speaker 3: or provincial law dealing with this stuff. And in the
• 58:12
  Speaker 3: last quarter of the twentieth century it started to get
• 58:18
  Speaker 3: recognized that this could be done to men as well,
• 58:23
  Speaker 3: and so the United States passed a law called the
• 58:27
  Speaker 3: Family Violence Prevention and Services Act of nineteen eighty four,
• 58:31
  Speaker 3: and that law was gender neutral. It established the first
• 58:35
  Speaker 3: hotline in the United States for twenty four hour hotline
• 58:40
  Speaker 3: for reporting domestic violence intimate partner in sexual violence. It
• 58:46
  Speaker 3: established shelters for victims, and it established in law and
• 58:53
  Speaker 3: policy that just because something that would be illegal to
• 58:57
  Speaker 3: do to a stranger happens in between family members and
• 59:00
  Speaker 3: a home and it doesn't necessarily make it legal. If
• 59:05
  Speaker 3: it's violent, it's illegal. If it's assault, it's illegal. If
• 59:08
  Speaker 3: it's sexual assault, it's still illegal. And feminists got very
• 59:13
  Speaker 3: upset and began lobbying to gender it immediately, and ten
• 59:18
  Speaker 3: years later, Joe Biden's Violence Against Women Act was passed
• 59:25
  Speaker 3: and signed passed by a Democrat and Republican Congress, it
• 59:32
  Speaker 3: was a bipartisan law, It was a bipartisan vote, and
• 59:36
  Speaker 3: then it was signed into law by Bill Clinton, and
• 59:39
  Speaker 3: ever since then that has been the federal law. It
• 59:43
  Speaker 3: gendered everything. It provided funding for feminist academic fraud disguised
• 59:53
  Speaker 3: as research to quote prove that this is a gendered
• 59:59
  Speaker 3: issue by using faulty definitions. In fact, Mary Pea Costs
• 1:00:04
  Speaker 3: has been involved in that the entire time. The CDC's
• 1:00:11
  Speaker 3: National Inmate, Partner, Partner and Sexual Violence survey cites Mary
• 1:00:16
  Speaker 3: pa Costs as one of its resources. She's the resource
• 1:00:20
  Speaker 3: for the survey they use, and she's the resource for
• 1:00:23
  Speaker 3: the definitions they use for different types of sexual violence.
• 1:00:28
  Speaker 2: And in.
• 1:00:30
  Speaker 3: Twenty I want to say, twenty fourteen or twenty sixteen,
• 1:00:35
  Speaker 3: when I started trying to get information on that research,
• 1:00:39
  Speaker 3: I found out the researchers didn't even know why they
• 1:00:42
  Speaker 3: were using those definitions. They didn't even know who they
• 1:00:48
  Speaker 3: came from, so they didn't know what they were doing.
• 1:00:52
  Speaker 3: They were completely just tools of the system, just ignorant
• 1:00:57
  Speaker 3: tools of the system. And so that's basically what you're
• 1:01:02
  Speaker 3: looking at now is approximately forty to fifty years of
• 1:01:10
  Speaker 3: feminist feminist activism, feminist agitation to exclude men and boys
• 1:01:19
  Speaker 3: from the protection of federal law and state law that
• 1:01:25
  Speaker 3: addresses intimate partner in sexual violence. It isn't that that
• 1:01:31
  Speaker 3: type of law didn't exist until the last quarter of
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 3: the twentieth century. It's that during the last quarter of
• 1:01:38
  Speaker 3: the twentieth century we finally started acknowledging that it happened
• 1:01:43
  Speaker 3: to men too, and feminists went ballistic over that.
• 1:01:48
  Speaker 1: Yep, well, let us know what you guys say about
• 1:01:53
  Speaker 1: this one. In the comments. I'm going to move on
• 1:01:56
  Speaker 1: to the last story, which is another kind of pause one.
• 1:02:00
  Speaker 1: So yeah, this is uh, we'll see how it goes.
• 1:02:03
  Speaker 1: This is a good thing, but it is a long
• 1:02:05
  Speaker 1: time coming if it begins to change. And this this
• 1:02:09
  Speaker 1: is only one, you know, facet, So I hope that
• 1:02:13
  Speaker 1: this continues to spread. But I do think there is
• 1:02:16
  Speaker 1: a vibe shift. And this is something I've talked about
• 1:02:19
  Speaker 1: for a while, and here is a story that's sort
• 1:02:20
  Speaker 1: of like related to that. So this isn't like anything massive,
• 1:02:23
  Speaker 1: but I thought it was kind of nice. That definitely
• 1:02:26
  Speaker 1: something that the ladies would probably appreciate more. But so
• 1:02:31
  Speaker 1: Megan Kelly, like, if you guys remember before she I
• 1:02:35
  Speaker 1: know that you guys are gonna say she complained about,
• 1:02:37
  Speaker 1: you know, men not wanting to marry girl bosses. But
• 1:02:40
  Speaker 1: let's just set that aside for a second and just
• 1:02:43
  Speaker 1: hear this out. So, when Megan Kelly adorsed Donald Trump
• 1:02:46
  Speaker 1: for president on the eve of the twenty twenty four election,
• 1:02:49
  Speaker 1: she delivered a speech at the Trump rally in Pittsburgh,
• 1:02:51
  Speaker 1: speaking directly to women and tearing down the left false
• 1:02:54
  Speaker 1: narratives about Trump. She called him a protector of women,
• 1:02:57
  Speaker 1: Kelly and Trump have a contentious history, so our endorsement
• 1:03:01
  Speaker 1: carried a lot of weight. But she also had a
• 1:03:03
  Speaker 1: message for men in her speech, and that was the
• 1:03:06
  Speaker 1: bit that I wanted to sort of mention that was
• 1:03:08
  Speaker 1: more important. For years, the left, the fourth wave feminists,
• 1:03:11
  Speaker 1: and the gender cult have been demonizing men, labeling anyone
• 1:03:14
  Speaker 1: toxic who doesn't bend the need to them completely. Kelly
• 1:03:17
  Speaker 1: noticed noted that real women, strong women appreciate men and
• 1:03:20
  Speaker 1: their masculinity. Now, of course there's a lot of like
• 1:03:24
  Speaker 1: you know, red flags in this. I get that, Like
• 1:03:27
  Speaker 1: I get that when you say fourth wave feminism, I'm like, no,
• 1:03:30
  Speaker 1: it's just all of it. Let's stop with the recent
• 1:03:33
  Speaker 1: the recentism of everything. But that's not again, not the
• 1:03:37
  Speaker 1: important thing. But this morning, this account, Jennifer Say and
• 1:03:43
  Speaker 1: x x x Y Athletics released an outstanding new advertisement
• 1:03:47
  Speaker 1: to further symbolize that shift. Not only are men in
• 1:03:51
  Speaker 1: masculinity not toxic, they are necessary and essential and they
• 1:03:56
  Speaker 1: are important. So we're gonna play this so like, this
• 1:03:59
  Speaker 1: is what I mean by the vibe shift. Again, imperfect,
• 1:04:02
  Speaker 1: I'm not claiming perfect or anything like that, But remember
• 1:04:07
  Speaker 1: when Gillette put out an ad about masculinity, and then
• 1:04:11
  Speaker 1: the only person and there were lots of people putting
• 1:04:13
  Speaker 1: out ads that were like shitting on men in one
• 1:04:16
  Speaker 1: way or another. And then you had the one guy
• 1:04:18
  Speaker 1: who didn't do that, who developed those watches, right and
• 1:04:23
  Speaker 1: I had them on my show. He was selling watches
• 1:04:26
  Speaker 1: and he basically made pro you know, basically pro father,
• 1:04:29
  Speaker 1: pro masculine, pro mail stuff, or at the very least
• 1:04:33
  Speaker 1: not attacking men or demonizing them. So it's a step
• 1:04:37
  Speaker 1: in the right direction, exactly. So like, let's listen to this.
• 1:04:41
  Speaker 1: So like this is sort of along the lines of that,
• 1:04:43
  Speaker 1: but let's take a look at this, this video, and
• 1:04:46
  Speaker 1: the fact that they feel like they can make advertising
• 1:04:49
  Speaker 1: that center's men is actually kind of interesting too.
• 1:04:53
  Speaker 4: So this is not toxic, and neither is this.
• 1:05:01
  Speaker 3: Or this or this my eight year old daughter those inappropriately.
• 1:05:07
  Speaker 4: Ya, This is not toxic.
• 1:05:10
  Speaker 5: This is necessary, and you are not toxic.
• 1:05:16
  Speaker 4: We think you're essential. You're indispensable to a healthy society,
• 1:05:22
  Speaker 4: to creating strong families, chivalrous sums, and fearless daughters. So
• 1:05:30
  Speaker 4: here's to masculinity, here's to x Y.
• 1:05:41
  Speaker 3: All right, So here's what I'll point out about this.
• 1:05:43
  Speaker 3: All right, we already know that the right doesn't get
• 1:05:46
  Speaker 3: it in terms of only valuing men because they're of
• 1:05:51
  Speaker 3: their utility. We already know that that's and we're going
• 1:05:55
  Speaker 3: to stick a pin in that underline it. That's a fact,
• 1:05:58
  Speaker 3: all right, what the men's movement has been dealing with,
• 1:06:05
  Speaker 3: and just the amount of time that you know, I've
• 1:06:08
  Speaker 3: been paying attention to it online and everything, and what
• 1:06:12
  Speaker 3: men have been dealing with as a population for the
• 1:06:17
  Speaker 3: last one hundred years, maybe a little more than one
• 1:06:21
  Speaker 3: hundred years, has been because you know, the coining of
• 1:06:26
  Speaker 3: the phrase toxic masculinity to describe the things about masculinity
• 1:06:32
  Speaker 3: that actually are the reason why men achieve in the world.
• 1:06:38
  Speaker 3: That goes that goes back to mid twentieth century to
• 1:06:44
  Speaker 3: a feminist in Australia who had gender dysph you at
• 1:06:49
  Speaker 3: the time and eventually transitioned from male to female. Right,
• 1:06:55
  Speaker 3: But the attitude definitely goes back to early eighteen hundreds.
• 1:07:03
  Speaker 3: And this is refreshing in that a there is the
• 1:07:10
  Speaker 3: courage to step up and say we do celebrate the
• 1:07:15
  Speaker 3: things that men do that make them great, and there
• 1:07:20
  Speaker 3: is the fact that this didn't get quashed, and those
• 1:07:26
  Speaker 3: two things are encouraging. So baby steps. If we can
• 1:07:31
  Speaker 3: get right wing women to admit that those are not
• 1:07:34
  Speaker 3: the only great things about men, that as important as
• 1:07:37
  Speaker 3: it is to celebrate those things that we don't have
• 1:07:40
  Speaker 3: the right to obligate men to give them to us,
• 1:07:44
  Speaker 3: we'll have some huge success. But I'm happy that they're
• 1:07:49
  Speaker 3: at least acknowledging that the phrase toxic masculinity is shit
• 1:07:55
  Speaker 3: and that the toxic masculinity narrative needs to die.
• 1:08:00
  Speaker 1: Yes, Mike, Mike, Hello, are you guys there? Let me
• 1:08:10
  Speaker 1: just check. Maybe you guys dropped. It's windy out. Yeah,
• 1:08:13
  Speaker 1: I heard you. Yeah, I heard you.
• 1:08:15
  Speaker 3: Mike muted, Mike be muted.
• 1:08:18
  Speaker 1: Yeah he's muted. Uh. Yeah. The only thing I was
• 1:08:21
  Speaker 1: going to yeah, he might be he might have stepped
• 1:08:23
  Speaker 1: away from a woman.
• 1:08:24
  Speaker 3: Uh.
• 1:08:25
  Speaker 1: The The only thing I was going to mention is
• 1:08:27
  Speaker 1: that I think that the thing is men don't need
• 1:08:33
  Speaker 1: this kind of stuff. That's why I say this is
• 1:08:35
  Speaker 1: like more for the ladies, if anything. Like, I think
• 1:08:37
  Speaker 1: that men find the idea of people saying, oh, you know,
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 1: you're you're a man, you are loved, you are seen,
• 1:08:45
  Speaker 1: you are you know whatever. I think men generally find
• 1:08:48
  Speaker 1: that to be cringe, Like they just want. They're not
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 1: looking for society to celebrate them for existing. That's why, like,
• 1:08:55
  Speaker 1: you know, when when women get like all of this,
• 1:08:59
  Speaker 1: I don't know, like these they throw little parades for
• 1:09:01
  Speaker 1: them whenever they do something like like the women who
• 1:09:04
  Speaker 1: went up into space.
• 1:09:05
  Speaker 3: Right, yeah, like when they do something that men have
• 1:09:08
  Speaker 3: been doing since yeah, the last century.
• 1:09:11
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah exactly. But like in general, if it's something
• 1:09:14
  Speaker 1: that like men just do, like, the reward they get
• 1:09:17
  Speaker 1: is not from society throwing them a party. The reward
• 1:09:21
  Speaker 1: they get to them is like just like that the
• 1:09:25
  Speaker 1: knowledge that you know, the people they care about are
• 1:09:28
  Speaker 1: taken care of. Like most men they just do work
• 1:09:31
  Speaker 1: because they're providing for their families. Like that's the choice
• 1:09:33
  Speaker 1: they make, and that is the extent of the celebration, right,
• 1:09:38
  Speaker 1: Like if they do something like amazing, and then we
• 1:09:43
  Speaker 1: recognize that organically, like somebody you know does an incredible
• 1:09:48
  Speaker 1: feat of some kind or an act of courage, like
• 1:09:52
  Speaker 1: there is that. But when you're just like, I don't
• 1:09:54
  Speaker 1: know if this just sounds like a feminine way to
• 1:09:59
  Speaker 1: put a spotlight on masculinity. And that's fine. I'm with
• 1:10:02
  Speaker 1: you on that, baby steps, It's fine. It's nice it's encouraging.
• 1:10:05
  Speaker 1: I'm glad people responding positive to, you know, positively to it.
• 1:10:09
  Speaker 1: I'm glad that bet people are not trying to shut
• 1:10:11
  Speaker 1: it down or belittle it or dismiss it, and they're
• 1:10:14
  Speaker 1: just seeing it for what it is. I'm glad that
• 1:10:16
  Speaker 1: the brand, the brand itself wasn't afraid to do it
• 1:10:19
  Speaker 1: and recognize that it's pretty much common sense stuff. I'm
• 1:10:23
  Speaker 1: glad for all of that stuff. But ultimately, I think
• 1:10:27
  Speaker 1: that women who support men may get more out of
• 1:10:31
  Speaker 1: this than men, if that makes sense from the message itself,
• 1:10:35
  Speaker 1: because it's fastly.
• 1:10:36
  Speaker 3: The women that really need to get something out of
• 1:10:38
  Speaker 3: this are the women who bought into the whole bullshit
• 1:10:42
  Speaker 3: toxic masculinity.
• 1:10:43
  Speaker 1: Yeah, they might, they might.
• 1:10:45
  Speaker 3: Yeah, it's women who support men already know this stuff, right,
• 1:10:49
  Speaker 3: Women are sure, they're already they're already on board with this.
• 1:10:54
  Speaker 3: We're already on board with the fact that that men
• 1:10:58
  Speaker 3: deserve to be valued and that it's time to stop
• 1:11:02
  Speaker 3: ship talking men for everything.
• 1:11:04
  Speaker 1: The bare minimum is for their for their utility, the
• 1:11:07
  Speaker 1: bare minimum, which is like a lot of that what
• 1:11:10
  Speaker 1: this is. But yeah, I'm with you on that this
• 1:11:12
  Speaker 1: is advertising fitness brand. It's like fitness clothes. Not it's
• 1:11:16
  Speaker 1: not political. It's basically like E guard watches.
• 1:11:20
  Speaker 3: Or you know, it is good to see a brand,
• 1:11:24
  Speaker 3: you know, have the courage to step out and say,
• 1:11:27
  Speaker 3: you know what, we're not going to push that narrative
• 1:11:30
  Speaker 3: that's been out there trying to shame men. In fact,
• 1:11:33
  Speaker 3: we're going to say the opposite, called bullshit on it.
• 1:11:35
  Speaker 1: Yeah, and I'm also glad that. I'm also glad the
• 1:11:39
  Speaker 1: ad didn't say anything like, you know, we support strong
• 1:11:42
  Speaker 1: men and women like this kind of like we have
• 1:11:45
  Speaker 1: to put women in there so that women don't feel
• 1:11:47
  Speaker 1: hurt or left out. But yeah, I mean it's you know, yeah, yeah,
• 1:11:54
  Speaker 1: I thought I was good though, So.
• 1:11:56
  Speaker 3: Yeah, Like, strong women don't use the phrase talks masculinity
• 1:12:01
  Speaker 3: to describe men, right, Strong women will describe the phrase
• 1:12:06
  Speaker 3: toxic masculinity in terms of criticizing the concept. Weak women
• 1:12:13
  Speaker 3: use the term in all seriousness and unronically because they
• 1:12:20
  Speaker 3: are weak and they can't compete with men, and they
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 3: don't have any other way to interact with men other
• 1:12:28
  Speaker 3: than to compete with them, and so they come up
• 1:12:32
  Speaker 3: with that bullshit.
• 1:12:34
  Speaker 2: I feel I need to point out some women are
• 1:12:39
  Speaker 2: strong but still complete cunts like, I don't know it
• 1:12:45
  Speaker 2: quite women's strength with being basically decent. A great deal
• 1:12:52
  Speaker 2: of evil people are extremely strong, and women are not
• 1:12:55
  Speaker 2: exempt from this. This is very often considered a masculine
• 1:12:59
  Speaker 2: stereo type that when a man is strong, he is
• 1:13:02
  Speaker 2: able to beat the ship out of people. Well, a
• 1:13:04
  Speaker 2: woman can be strong and be able to manipulate the
• 1:13:08
  Speaker 2: ship out of people. It's it's, you know, being nice
• 1:13:13
  Speaker 2: is not the same as being strong. Being basically decent
• 1:13:16
  Speaker 2: and respectful is not the same as being strong. There are,
• 1:13:20
  Speaker 2: there are, there are many very weak women, both physically
• 1:13:24
  Speaker 2: and psychologically, who are perfectly nice and and and they
• 1:13:30
  Speaker 2: learn to to lean on people who are stronger than them,
• 1:13:34
  Speaker 2: both physically and mentally, and and that's fine. A lot
• 1:13:39
  Speaker 2: of men are weak and they are able to to
• 1:13:42
  Speaker 2: rely on other people's strengths. That's you know, that's that's
• 1:13:47
  Speaker 2: a good way of coming together. You got to know
• 1:13:48
  Speaker 2: your weaknesses and and know your strengths and not confuse
• 1:13:53
  Speaker 2: them with any other you know, personality traits.
• 1:13:56
  Speaker 3: I think, yeah, yeah, I agree, And you know I
• 1:14:01
  Speaker 3: would say that similarly, there is there's not complete overlap
• 1:14:09
  Speaker 3: between strength and aggression, or even between meanness and aggression, right,
• 1:14:17
  Speaker 3: but there's there's a lot of people who are aggressive
• 1:14:22
  Speaker 3: who are completely weak. And I guess the difference if
• 1:14:26
  Speaker 3: you're facing off against somebody between strength and weakness can
• 1:14:32
  Speaker 3: be very starkly revealed when someone does something underhanded like
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 3: calling somebody toxic for for having strength as opposed to
• 1:14:45
  Speaker 3: you know, having real criticisms or as opposed to just
• 1:14:50
  Speaker 3: directly facing off against their strength.
• 1:14:54
  Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, Well, any other thoughts on this? I mean,
• 1:15:01
  Speaker 1: like I said, I think it's nice, you know, just
• 1:15:06
  Speaker 1: kind of wholesome. But otherwise, uh yeah, maybe we'll see
• 1:15:10
  Speaker 1: more of this. Maybe there is like a vibe shift happening.
• 1:15:13
  Speaker 1: I don't know. Let us on, you guys think about
• 1:15:15
  Speaker 1: this one in the comments, and uh, we'll move on.
• 1:15:19
  Speaker 1: So we're gonna actually that's the end of the show.
• 1:15:21
  Speaker 1: So I've gotten through all the stories in a reasonable
• 1:15:24
  Speaker 1: amount of time. So we're now gonna go into the
• 1:15:26
  Speaker 1: Patreot Show and look at this rage bait entitled young
• 1:15:29
  Speaker 1: My white men do have problems, but they need to
• 1:15:31
  Speaker 1: man up. And if you want to join us for
• 1:15:33
  Speaker 1: this bonus content, you have to become a badger yourself
• 1:15:37
  Speaker 1: by going to feed the badger dot com ford Slash
• 1:15:38
  Speaker 1: subscribe so that you can watch the additional content. You'll
• 1:15:42
  Speaker 1: get access to our discord server, and you'll also get
• 1:15:46
  Speaker 1: links to watch the videos. They are unlisted unless you
• 1:15:50
  Speaker 1: are a member, so please consider doing that. Five bucks
• 1:15:54
  Speaker 1: a month gets you into the discord and lets you
• 1:15:56
  Speaker 1: watch the additional content, and you can give it a
• 1:15:58
  Speaker 1: higher levels for more diferent kinds of access. But with
• 1:16:02
  Speaker 1: that said, I want to thank Hannah and Mike for
• 1:16:05
  Speaker 1: joining me on the show today. I want to thank
• 1:16:07
  Speaker 1: you guys of course for watching. And if you guys
• 1:16:10
  Speaker 1: like this video, please hit like subscribe if you're not
• 1:16:13
  Speaker 1: already subscribed, hit the bell for notifications, leave us a comment,
• 1:16:16
  Speaker 1: let us know what you guys think about what we
• 1:16:17
  Speaker 1: discussed on the show today, and please please please share
• 1:16:20
  Speaker 1: this video because sharing is caring. Thank you guys so
• 1:16:23
  Speaker 1: much for coming on today's episode of HPR News and
• 1:16:25
  Speaker 1: we will see you next Tuesday.
• 1:16:27
  Speaker 6: Men's right activists are machines, dude. Okay, they are literal machines.
• 1:16:33
  Speaker 6: They are talking point machines. They are impossible to fucking
• 1:16:36
  Speaker 6: deal with, especially if you have like, especially if you
• 1:16:38
  Speaker 6: have like a couple of dudes who have good memory
• 1:16:41
  Speaker 6: on top of that too, Holy shit, you're fucked