Latest / Narcisist Psychology / The Colander That Broke Her: How a Lost Pad Exposed a Conspiracy

Transcript

The Colander That Broke Her: How a Lost Pad Exposed a Conspiracy · Narcisist Psychology

0:03
Speaker 1: At six in the morning on November fourth, twenty fourteen,
0:08
Speaker 1: a fourteen year old named Stephen Walker was three blocks
0:12
Speaker 1: into his newspaper route when he noticed something wedged in
0:16
Speaker 1: the rear fire door of a converted Victorian on Westhaven Drive.
0:20
Speaker 1: It was a yellow legal pad, soaked through its pages,
0:24
Speaker 1: swollen with overnight rain. That pad had been declared destroyed
0:29
Speaker 1: the evening before the fire door opened onto a small
0:34
Speaker 1: parking lot behind the building. Stephen almost walked past him. Instead,
0:39
Speaker 1: he pulled out his phone and took a photograph time
0:42
Speaker 1: stamped GEO tagged unaltered. He had no way of knowing
0:46
Speaker 1: that the pad in his picture would become Exhibit three
0:49
Speaker 1: A in a fraud trial, or that the handwriting on
0:52
Speaker 1: its water blurred pages would dismantle four years of carefully
0:56
Speaker 1: constructed lies. There is something specific about this case that
1:01
Speaker 1: resists easy categorization. No one was physically threatened, no one vanished.
1:07
Speaker 1: What happened to Cheryl Sharp was slower and more precise
1:11
Speaker 1: than that, a systematic dismantling of her trust in her
1:14
Speaker 1: own judgment, engineered by the one person she had built
1:18
Speaker 1: her professional life around. By the time the machinery became visible,
1:23
Speaker 1: Cheryl had spent nearly four years believing that her instincts
1:26
Speaker 1: were wrong. The legal pad should not have existed, and
1:31
Speaker 1: that single fact unraveled everything. Pelham Creek sits in the
1:35
Speaker 1: upper Midwest along the Oakley River, the kind of small
1:38
Speaker 1: city where people stay because they meant to leave and
1:42
Speaker 1: then found a reason not to. Cheryl Sharp was one
1:45
Speaker 1: of those people, though in her case the reason was genuine.
1:49
Speaker 1: She had grown up there, the daughter of Douglas Sharp,
1:51
Speaker 1: a hospital administrator, and Vivian Sharp, an art teacher who
1:55
Speaker 1: kept oil pastels in the kitchen drawer alongside the rubber
1:58
Speaker 1: bands and take out many. Cheryl inherited her mother's spatial
2:02
Speaker 1: instincts and her father's methodical thinking. She studied industrial design
2:07
Speaker 1: and finished her program in three years, which was not common.
2:11
Speaker 1: She returned to Pelham Creek in twenty ten, twenty three
2:15
Speaker 1: years old, carrying a portfolio full of functional objects designed
2:19
Speaker 1: to solve problems people had not yet thought to name.
2:22
Speaker 1: One of those objects had started as a sketch on
2:25
Speaker 1: a paper napkin in her mother's kitchen the year before.
2:28
Speaker 1: It was a calender insert, a secondary mesh layer that
2:32
Speaker 1: sat inside a standard calender bow designed to catch fine
2:36
Speaker 1: grain pasta, and seeds that would otherwise pass through. The
2:41
Speaker 1: sketch was rough made. During a Sunday dinner, Vivian had
2:44
Speaker 1: been straining lentils and cursing the calender. Cheryl watched her
2:48
Speaker 1: mother's frustration and started drawing. By the end of the meal,
2:52
Speaker 1: the basic geometry was on the napkin. She refined it
2:56
Speaker 1: over the following months. By the time she came back
2:59
Speaker 1: to Pelham Creek, it was the centerpiece of her portfolio.
3:03
Speaker 1: Clean lines, two material variants, a manufacturing speck she had
3:07
Speaker 1: drafted herself. She did not know yet what it was worth.
3:11
Speaker 1: She would learn that later in a way she never anticipated.
3:15
Speaker 1: The Oakley River Path runs north from the city center,
3:19
Speaker 1: passed a bait shop at the south entrance, where the
3:21
Speaker 1: owner learned Cheryl's coffee order within her first two weeks back.
3:25
Speaker 1: She ran the path most mornings, three to four miles,
3:28
Speaker 1: turning around at the Garrison Street Footbridge, a green iron
3:32
Speaker 1: pedestrian bridge two miles north of her apartment on Fenwick Street.
3:37
Speaker 1: It was a fixed point in her day, a marker
3:40
Speaker 1: she trusted. She met erin Fleming on that bridge in
3:43
Speaker 1: the fall of two thousand ten, Fleming was thirty eight,
3:47
Speaker 1: a self described product consultant who said she had relocated
3:51
Speaker 1: from a city two states east. She presented herself with
3:55
Speaker 1: the fluency of some one who had delivered the same
3:58
Speaker 1: introduction many times, fifteen years of industry experience, eighty thousand
4:03
Speaker 1: dollars in available capital, a network of manufacturing contacts she
4:08
Speaker 1: described as established and worn. She was standing on the
4:12
Speaker 1: Garrison Street bridge with a coffee and what appeared to
4:15
Speaker 1: be a work journal. Cheryl was coming off her run.
4:19
Speaker 1: The conversation lasted longer than either of them seemed to expect.
4:24
Speaker 1: Fleming asked specific questions about Cheryl's portfolio, the kind of
4:28
Speaker 1: questions that signaled genuine familiarity with a field, lead times,
4:33
Speaker 1: material costs, the difference between a prototype and a production
4:38
Speaker 1: ready speck. Cheryl answered. She showed Fleming the Colander's sketch.
4:43
Speaker 1: Fleming studied it and said that the market timing was right,
4:47
Speaker 1: that the mid range kitchenware segment was expanding, and that
4:50
Speaker 1: the design had what she called crossover potential. By December
4:54
Speaker 1: of two thousand ten, they had incorporated Lumen Workshop as
4:58
Speaker 1: an equal partnership in recre Introspect. Several things about that
5:02
Speaker 1: bridge conversation would be reassessed. Fleming later told a journalist
5:06
Speaker 1: after her second appeal failed in twenty nineteen, that she
5:10
Speaker 1: had recognized Cheryl as and this is her phrasing the
5:14
Speaker 1: real engine. During that first exchange. She offered it as
5:18
Speaker 1: a defense prosecutors, and eventually the public record read it
5:23
Speaker 1: as something else entirely. The third floor suite on West
5:27
Speaker 1: Haven Drive came next. In March of twenty eleven, Fleming
5:32
Speaker 1: introduced the Legal Pad system on their first day in
5:35
Speaker 1: the office. Each pad was dated, assigned to a specific project,
5:40
Speaker 1: and stored in a fire proof filing cabinet. Fleming explained
5:44
Speaker 1: it as a protection mechanism, a paper trail that would
5:47
Speaker 1: establish authorship and creative sequence in the event of any
5:51
Speaker 1: licensing dispute. She framed it as professional discipline. Cheryl found
5:56
Speaker 1: it sensible. She had no reason not to. The Legal
6:00
Speaker 1: Pads system was a gift. That was how Cheryl understood it.
6:04
Speaker 1: In the spring of twenty eleven, every project got its
6:07
Speaker 1: own pad. Every pad got a date at the top,
6:10
Speaker 1: a project code in the margin, and a place in
6:13
Speaker 1: the fireproof filing cabinet that Fleming had ordered and positioned
6:17
Speaker 1: herself against the east wall of the third floor suite
6:20
Speaker 1: on Westthaven Drive. Cheryl's handwriting filled those pages wide, right
6:25
Speaker 1: leaning capitals that her mother, Vivian, the art teacher, would
6:28
Speaker 1: have recognized instantly. Fleming rarely wrote on the pads herself.
6:33
Speaker 1: When she did, it was brief, a note in the margin,
6:37
Speaker 1: a correction, a redirect. The first client came in June
6:41
Speaker 1: of twenty eleven, a kitchenware manufacturer, an eighteen thousand dollar fee,
6:46
Speaker 1: and the design at the center of the work was
6:48
Speaker 1: the collander insert Cheryl had sketched in her mother's kitchen
6:52
Speaker 1: two years earlier. The project closed on time. Lumen Workshop
6:56
Speaker 1: was real. What was also real, though Cheryl could not
6:59
Speaker 1: have own it yet, was a second legal entity that
7:02
Speaker 1: Fleming had incorporated in the spring of twenty twelve, e
7:06
Speaker 1: F Design Solutions, a sole entity with Fleming as the
7:10
Speaker 1: only signatory, registered at an address Cheryl had never visited.
7:15
Speaker 1: Beginning that spring, Fleming began registering Luhmen's completed designs under
7:19
Speaker 1: EF Design Solutions, not under Lumen, not jointly, but under
7:24
Speaker 1: her name alone. The registrations were filed weeks before the
7:28
Speaker 1: corresponding Lumen client deliveries on paper the designs existed before
7:33
Speaker 1: Luhmenn had delivered them. Luhmann then licensed those designs back
7:38
Speaker 1: from Fleming's entity, paying fees that moved money out of
7:41
Speaker 1: the partnership and into Fleming's sole account. Two hundred sixty
7:46
Speaker 1: thousand dollars moved that way over roughly two and a
7:49
Speaker 1: half years. Luhmann's total billings across that period were approximately
7:54
Speaker 1: four hundred thousand dollars. Cheryl's annual draw never exceeded thirty
7:59
Speaker 1: two thousand. A bookkeeper named Alan Graves worked out of
8:03
Speaker 1: a strip male office on the east side of Pelham Creek.
8:06
Speaker 1: He handled Luhmann's accounts. Eighteen months before the case broke,
8:11
Speaker 1: Graves noticed the EF designed Solutions arrangement and flagged it
8:16
Speaker 1: in writing to Fleming, not to Cheryl. To Fleming, Graves
8:22
Speaker 1: never contacted Cheryl. He never contacted any authority. When Cheryl
8:27
Speaker 1: later asked, on two separate occasions to speak directly with
8:31
Speaker 1: Graves about the accounts, Fleming told her that Graves found
8:35
Speaker 1: Cheryl's questions disorganizing. Cheryl accepted this. She had been accepting
8:41
Speaker 1: versions of this for years. That is the thing that
8:44
Speaker 1: a therapist named Angela Collins would later describe with precision.
8:49
Speaker 1: Collins began working with Cheryl in March of twenty fifteen,
8:54
Speaker 1: roughly a decade into her own practice with coercive control survivors.
8:59
Speaker 1: The term colin used in her clinical summary, a document
9:02
Speaker 1: that would eventually be introduced at trial, was installed doubt
9:07
Speaker 1: the mechanism worked like this. Early in the partnership, Fleming
9:11
Speaker 1: began responding to Cheryl's design instincts not with disagreement, but
9:16
Speaker 1: with hesitation, a pause, a gentle redirect, a note in
9:21
Speaker 1: the margin that said the instinct was off. Over months,
9:25
Speaker 1: though small corrections accumulated, by twenty twelve, Cheryl had stopped
9:30
Speaker 1: logging design decisions without first checking them against Fleming. By
9:34
Speaker 1: two thousand thirteen, Collins concluded Cheryl was no longer consulting
9:39
Speaker 1: her own judgment at all. The inner voice that evaluated
9:43
Speaker 1: her work had been systematically replaced with a question is
9:47
Speaker 1: this right? That could only be answered by Fleming. The
9:50
Speaker 1: Callander design was one of the instincts Fleming had marked
9:53
Speaker 1: as wrong. A legal pad dated March ninth, twenty eleven,
9:58
Speaker 1: contained an entry in d Cheryl's wide handwriting. The subject
10:02
Speaker 1: was the calender insert in the margin in a narrower
10:06
Speaker 1: hand and different ink, Fleming had written, your instinct here
10:11
Speaker 1: is wrong. E Ink analysis conducted as part of the
10:16
Speaker 1: forensic review would later confirm that the annotation had been
10:20
Speaker 1: added months after the original entry on the date written
10:24
Speaker 1: at the top of the pad. That margin note did
10:27
Speaker 1: not exist. The calender design that Cheryl's instinct had produced,
10:32
Speaker 1: the one Fleming had told her was wrong, was later
10:35
Speaker 1: valued by Heartwell Consumer Group at approximately seventy two thousand dollars.
10:41
Speaker 1: Luhmann had received eighteen thousand for it in twenty eleven.
10:45
Speaker 1: In October of two thoy fourteen, Christine Boyle, the licensing
10:49
Speaker 1: director at Heartwell Consumer Group in Minneapolis, contacted Luhmann Workshop
10:55
Speaker 1: to request original design documentation. Hartwell was conducting due diligence
10:59
Speaker 1: on a potential licensing deal. The request was routine. What
11:04
Speaker 1: happened next was not. Fleming told Cheryl on October fifteenth
11:08
Speaker 1: that the legal pads were in off site storage and
11:11
Speaker 1: would take time to retrieve. On October twenty second, she
11:16
Speaker 1: said the same thing. On November third, she told Cheryl
11:20
Speaker 1: there had been water intrusion in the storage unit. The pads,
11:25
Speaker 1: she said, were likely destroyed. Four years of original documentation
11:30
Speaker 1: gone overnight. Cheryl did not yet know what to make
11:33
Speaker 1: of this. The filter was still in place. Fleming had
11:37
Speaker 1: always managed the physical records. Fleming had always explained the
11:42
Speaker 1: administrative side of things. Cheryl absorbed the loss the way
11:46
Speaker 1: she had absorbed other setbacks in the partnership, by waiting
11:50
Speaker 1: to understand how Fleming wanted her to feel about it.
11:53
Speaker 1: The next morning, November fourth, at approximately six in the morning,
11:59
Speaker 1: a fourteen year old named Stephen Walker was working his
12:02
Speaker 1: newspaper delivery route along the rear of the West Haven
12:06
Speaker 1: Drive building. He found a soaking yellow legal pad wedged
12:10
Speaker 1: in the gap of the rear fire door. He could
12:12
Speaker 1: see handwriting through the wet pages. He took out his
12:15
Speaker 1: phone and photographed it time stamped, GEO tagged unaltered. He
12:21
Speaker 1: kept the image he kept delivering papers. Eleven days later,
12:25
Speaker 1: on November fifteenth, the ground floor physical therapist mentioned the
12:30
Speaker 1: pad to Cheryl in passing. She had seen the boy
12:34
Speaker 1: find it. She thought Cheryl should know. That was the
12:38
Speaker 1: moment the filter broke. Not a confrontation, not a revelation.
12:43
Speaker 1: A neighbor in passing mentioning a thing she had seen.
12:47
Speaker 1: Cheryl called Christine Boyle that same afternoon and told her
12:51
Speaker 1: to pause due diligence. Then she called Marcus Irvine, a
12:55
Speaker 1: civil attorney, who filed for a forensic accounting review into
12:59
Speaker 1: some The review uncovered the e F Design Solutions registrations,
13:04
Speaker 1: It uncovered the two hundred sixty thousand dollars, It found
13:08
Speaker 1: graves as written flag to Fleming, the one Cheryl had
13:11
Speaker 1: never been shown, and it confirmed that the fire proof
13:15
Speaker 1: filing cabinet on the east wall of the third floor suite,
13:19
Speaker 1: the one Fleming had ordered and positioned herself, was empty.
13:24
Speaker 1: Fleming had told Cheryl the pads were destroyed in a
13:26
Speaker 1: storage unit. One pad had survived by accident, wedged in
13:31
Speaker 1: a fire door photographed by a fourteen year old on
13:34
Speaker 1: a delivery route. That photograph, Exhibit three B, and the
13:38
Speaker 1: pad itself Exhibit three A, became the physical axis of
13:42
Speaker 1: the prosecution's case picture the east wall of that third
13:46
Speaker 1: floor suite in early November of two thousand fourteen. The
13:50
Speaker 1: filing cabinet is empty. Fleming has just told Cheryl the
13:53
Speaker 1: pads are gone. From that image. One version of events
13:57
Speaker 1: assembles itself almost automatically. A partner who panicked when a
14:01
Speaker 1: licensing deal required documentation she could not produce without exposing
14:06
Speaker 1: the e F designed solutions architecture. The time line fits
14:11
Speaker 1: Hardwell's request came in October. The pads disappeared days later.
14:16
Speaker 1: The storage unit story followed. Some one who had spent
14:19
Speaker 1: two and a half years routing money out of a
14:22
Speaker 1: partnership under false registrations would have every reason to destroy
14:26
Speaker 1: the paper trail that showed whose handwriting filled those pages.
14:31
Speaker 1: But that version contains a problem. If Fleming intended to
14:34
Speaker 1: destroy all the pads, she almost succeeded. The forensic team
14:39
Speaker 1: found no others. Only one pad survived, and it survived
14:44
Speaker 1: not because anyone protected it, but because it was wedged
14:47
Speaker 1: in a fire door over night and found by a
14:50
Speaker 1: teenager who happened to have a phone. Fleming's execution of
14:54
Speaker 1: the disposal was, by the evidence essentially complete, which means
14:58
Speaker 1: the annotation on that surviving pad your instinct here is
15:03
Speaker 1: wrong e survived by accident II and the ink analysis
15:10
Speaker 1: showing it was added months after the original entry, and
15:13
Speaker 1: the fact that the annotation targeted the colander design the
15:17
Speaker 1: one later valued at four times what Lumen had received
15:20
Speaker 1: for it. Every element of the surviving evidence was one
15:24
Speaker 1: fire door away from disappearing entirely. The question the forensic
15:28
Speaker 1: review could not fully answer was sequencing, specifically, whether Fleming
15:33
Speaker 1: had been running e F designed solutions as an opportunistic
15:37
Speaker 1: parallel structure that grew into a siphon, or whether the
15:40
Speaker 1: architecture had been intentional from the start. Fleming's behavior on
15:44
Speaker 1: the Garrison Street Bridge, the specific questions about lead times,
15:48
Speaker 1: material costs, production specs suggested preparation. Her recognition of Ryl
15:54
Speaker 1: in her own words, as the real engine during that
15:57
Speaker 1: first conversation suggested she had already mapped the partnership's value
16:02
Speaker 1: before Cheryl had agreed to one. What the twenty twenty
16:06
Speaker 1: cold case match confirmed was this the legal pad system,
16:11
Speaker 1: the marginal annotations, the sole entity registration scheme, the financial siphon,
16:18
Speaker 1: the neutralized bookkeeper. The same operational pattern had been used
16:23
Speaker 1: before on a woman named Donna Hale in a city
16:26
Speaker 1: two states east. Around two thousand eight. Hale's company had dissolved,
16:32
Speaker 1: she had moved away. She had never reported it. For
16:35
Speaker 1: twelve years. Donna Hale had believed she had simply failed
16:38
Speaker 1: at entrepreneurship. The system had been repeatable because it had
16:42
Speaker 1: already been repeated Cheryl was not the first. The trial
16:47
Speaker 1: lasted twelve days. Fleming was convicted on all counts wire fraud,
16:52
Speaker 1: theft by swindle, intellectual property fraud in September two thousand fifteen.
16:58
Speaker 1: The sentence was six years. She filed two appeals, The
17:03
Speaker 1: first failed, the second failed. In twenty nineteen, after the
17:07
Speaker 1: second appeal was denied, Fleming gave an interview to a journalist.
17:11
Speaker 1: She described Cheryl Sharp as the real engine of Lumen Workshop,
17:16
Speaker 1: a phrase she offered as an explanation, perhaps as mitigation.
17:20
Speaker 1: The court had already decided what it meant, so had
17:22
Speaker 1: everyone who had read the forensic accounting. The financial damage,
17:27
Speaker 1: as reconstructed by Marcus Servine's review, came to two hundred
17:31
Speaker 1: sixty thousand dollars redirected from Lumen Workshop to e F
17:35
Speaker 1: designed solutions over roughly two and a half years. Total
17:40
Speaker 1: lumen billings across that period ran to approximately four hundred
17:44
Speaker 1: thousand dollars. Cheryl's annual draw had never exceeded thirty two thousand.
17:49
Speaker 1: The IP reassignment was granted in January twenty fifteen, before
17:53
Speaker 1: the trial. Cheryl relaunched under her own name in twenty sixteen.
17:59
Speaker 1: By eighteen She had a staff of four and an
18:03
Speaker 1: independent client list. The bait shop on the south entrance
18:06
Speaker 1: of the Oakley River Path still knew her coffee order.
18:10
Speaker 1: Angela Collins, the therapist who had begun treating Cheryl in
18:13
Speaker 1: March twenty fifteen, wrote a clinical summary that Marcus Irvine
18:18
Speaker 1: introduced at trial. Collins had spent a decade working with
18:22
Speaker 1: survivors of coercive control. Her term for what Fleming had
18:26
Speaker 1: constructed installed doubt, entered the trial record as a clinical
18:31
Speaker 1: description of a mechanism, not a metaphor. The summary documented
18:36
Speaker 1: how a person's of valuative voice can be methodically relocated
18:40
Speaker 1: into another person's approval. By twenty twelve, Cheryl had stopped
18:45
Speaker 1: logging instincts without checking them against Fleming first. By twenty thirteen,
18:51
Speaker 1: she had stopped trusting the instincts before they reached the page.
18:55
Speaker 1: The annotation on the legal pad, your instinct here is
18:58
Speaker 1: wrong E had targeted the colander insert design. That design
19:03
Speaker 1: was later valued by Heartwell Consumer Group had approximately seventy
19:08
Speaker 1: two thousand dollars. Luhmann had received eighteen thousand for it
19:13
Speaker 1: in two thousand eleven. The annotation had been added months
19:16
Speaker 1: after Cheryl's original entry confirmed by ink analysis. It had
19:21
Speaker 1: been designed to make Cheryl doubt the thing she had
19:23
Speaker 1: already gotten right one fire door that was the margin.
19:28
Speaker 1: Fleming's disposal of the originals was, by the physical evidence,
19:32
Speaker 1: essentially complete. Dozens of legal pads. Gone one survived because
19:38
Speaker 1: it was wedged in a gap by accident, found by
19:41
Speaker 1: a fourteen year old on a newspaper route at six
19:44
Speaker 1: in the morning, photographed before anyone could reach it. In
19:47
Speaker 1: twenty twenty, a cold case unit submitted Flemings DNA profile
19:52
Speaker 1: on file from the Pelham Creek conviction against an open
19:55
Speaker 1: commercial fraud case from two thousand eight. The match came
19:59
Speaker 1: back positive. The prior victim was a woman named Donna Hale,
20:04
Speaker 1: who had been Fleming's business partner in a city two
20:07
Speaker 1: states east. The operational pattern was identical legal pads, marginal annotations,
20:13
Speaker 1: a sole entity registration scheme, a financial siphon, a neutralized bookkeeper.
20:19
Speaker 1: Hale's company had dissolved, she had moved away. She had
20:23
Speaker 1: never filed a report for twelve years. Donna Hale had
20:26
Speaker 1: believed she had simply failed at entrepreneurship. That is what
20:30
Speaker 1: the system was built to produce, not just money, not
20:33
Speaker 1: just intellectual property. The system was built to leave the
20:37
Speaker 1: other person holding the explanation for their own diminishment. Hale
20:41
Speaker 1: believed the failure was hers. Cheryl, before November twenty fifteen,
20:47
Speaker 1: had stopped trusting a mind that had produced work valued
20:50
Speaker 1: at four times what she was told it was worth.
20:53
Speaker 1: The annotation was not a correction, It was an instruction
20:56
Speaker 1: to stop knowing what she knew. What makes this case
21:00
Speaker 1: matter beyond its particulars is the mechanism Collins named installed.
21:05
Speaker 1: Doubt does not announce itself. It arrives as mentorship, as caution,
21:10
Speaker 1: as the voice of experience. It works precisely because the
21:13
Speaker 1: person receiving it is not suspicious. They are grateful they
21:18
Speaker 1: have found someone who seems to see the work clearly.
21:21
Speaker 1: What they cannot yet see is that the clarity is directional,
21:25
Speaker 1: and the direction always points away from the target's own confidence.
21:29
Speaker 1: Cheryl Sharp rebuilt. That is a fact, and it matters.
21:33
Speaker 1: But Donna Hale spent twelve years in the wreckage of
21:36
Speaker 1: a company that had been operational enough to steal from
21:40
Speaker 1: and called it her own failure. The system had been
21:43
Speaker 1: tested before Cheryl, It had worked before Cheryl. The only
21:48
Speaker 1: reason it failed on Cheryl was a fire door that
21:50
Speaker 1: did not close all the way. There is still a
21:53
Speaker 1: question worth holding after everything else has been answered. Not
21:56
Speaker 1: about Fleming's guilt that is settled, not at the money
22:00
Speaker 1: that is documented. The question is about the gap between
22:04
Speaker 1: what the law can name and what it cannot fully reach.
22:07
Speaker 1: Wire fraud, theft by swindle, intellectual property fraud, all accurate,
22:13
Speaker 1: all provable, none of them quite the name for what
22:16
Speaker 1: it feels like to spend years being persuaded systematically that
22:20
Speaker 1: your best thinking is your worst impulse. A law got there,
22:24
Speaker 1: The sentence was six years, the appeals ran out. RYL
22:29
Speaker 1: Sharp has a staff of four, but somewhere in a
22:32
Speaker 1: city two states east, Donna Hale spent twelve years believing
22:37
Speaker 1: a story about herself that some one else had written,
22:41
Speaker 1: and the only update she ever got was a cold
22:43
Speaker 1: case notification from a unit that wasn't looking for her
22:46
Speaker 1: at all. This show is made by Obo Media