Latest / DA CREW Podcast / 72125....... LET'S TALK ABOUT IT!!!!! SHANETTE & CORNEL

Transcript

72125....... LET'S TALK ABOUT IT!!!!! SHANETTE & CORNEL · DA CREW Podcast

• 0:22
  Speaker 1: Bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum bum.
• 0:50
  Speaker 2: B Ladies and gentlemen, I have your attention please. The
• 1:19
  Speaker 2: show starts in ten lie eight seven, six, five, three
• 1:36
  Speaker 2: two one.
• 1:41
  Speaker 3: Okay, thank you, thank you, thank you, good ladies in general.
• 1:46
  Speaker 3: This is your co host, mister Cornel Drama. I'm let's
• 1:50
  Speaker 3: talk about it. My host Mesterine Jenouser. He will be
• 1:54
  Speaker 3: uh genous to night. You know what I'm saying for
• 1:57
  Speaker 3: previous reasons, but she might be joining us sometimes on tonight. Okay,
• 2:02
  Speaker 3: and thank you for joining us again. Like I say,
• 2:05
  Speaker 3: for another episode of Let's talk about tonight, we're going
• 2:08
  Speaker 3: to be revisiting this situation of a case that's here
• 2:11
  Speaker 3: in the state of Texas of the the middal ASNY case,
• 2:14
  Speaker 3: where this individual is then charged with intentdonally and knowingly
• 2:19
  Speaker 3: causing the steps of an individual. Okay, and tonight we're
• 2:23
  Speaker 3: gonna share this light on newly new, newly discovered, newly
• 2:26
  Speaker 3: discovered developments in the case that you know, show that
• 2:30
  Speaker 3: there's more going on behind the scenes in this case
• 2:33
  Speaker 3: and what's being actually known to the public, and that
• 2:37
  Speaker 3: you know, this little guy a Camelo Anthony is being
• 2:40
  Speaker 3: caught up from a ram of you know, judicial biasness,
• 2:45
  Speaker 3: you know judicial corruption. So tonight, you know, please join us,
• 2:49
  Speaker 3: because We're going to have a good show tonight and
• 2:51
  Speaker 3: I'm going to go ahead and shed light on what
• 2:53
  Speaker 3: are the more of the situation and hopefully, hopefully we
• 2:56
  Speaker 3: can get to the bottom of this and see if
• 2:58
  Speaker 3: we can get the public more involved to ask him
• 3:00
  Speaker 3: that this case be dismissed. Okay, from the offsets of
• 3:04
  Speaker 3: this case, this individual, mister Camillo Anthony, he went to
• 3:08
  Speaker 3: attract meet, okay, and you know he had a right
• 3:11
  Speaker 3: to be there, Okay, So because he did have a
• 3:13
  Speaker 3: right to see there, you know, he was there, you know,
• 3:16
  Speaker 3: because it was raining and he got out the rain
• 3:19
  Speaker 3: and some other individuals were under the same the chance
• 3:22
  Speaker 3: that you know, mister Li was under. And somehow another
• 3:26
  Speaker 3: an individual who's familiar with him, saw him up under
• 3:29
  Speaker 3: the tent, and somehow there's indications of an exchange of words,
• 3:34
  Speaker 3: but we don't know that for sure. But this individual,
• 3:37
  Speaker 3: when he got some friends appears who are familiar with
• 3:39
  Speaker 3: mister Camillo Anthony, and about seven of damn came and
• 3:43
  Speaker 3: surrounded at Liscon Milo Anthony and was exchanged and mister
• 3:47
  Speaker 3: Camillo Anthony ended up, you know, pulling out what they
• 3:50
  Speaker 3: classifiers a poker or something to that name, and he
• 3:55
  Speaker 3: ended up sharing one of the guys. And this individual
• 3:58
  Speaker 3: has you know, lost of life behind this incident. So
• 4:02
  Speaker 3: now after the fact, uh, the District Attorney's office and
• 4:08
  Speaker 3: the family of the victim is claiming that the Melo
• 4:11
  Speaker 3: Anthony tackling normally called the death of their son. So
• 4:15
  Speaker 3: now they have went out in the public and have
• 4:18
  Speaker 3: requested it got funding pages and donations of this nature
• 4:23
  Speaker 3: to try to raise this to the fact that look
• 4:25
  Speaker 3: of Melo Anthony you know, should be chart with a
• 4:27
  Speaker 3: coronal offensive and Chancelaind Norley called it and been individual
• 4:31
  Speaker 3: and that their son should be classified as a hero,
• 4:33
  Speaker 3: you know of someone who is a victim of an attack.
• 4:37
  Speaker 3: Well that's not actually really the truth behind what's going
• 4:40
  Speaker 3: on the issue with that little middle Anthony had a
• 4:44
  Speaker 3: right to be there and that these individuals came to
• 4:46
  Speaker 3: attack him and when they did, he defended it this
• 4:50
  Speaker 3: and by the laws you have a right to do that.
• 4:53
  Speaker 3: So now here it is the District Attorney's office gets
• 4:56
  Speaker 3: the case and the case goes immediately to a granduate
• 5:02
  Speaker 3: and a grand jury while a true field indictment charging
• 5:05
  Speaker 3: him with the office of and catching me and normally
• 5:09
  Speaker 3: so now the case has said to go to a
• 5:12
  Speaker 3: jury trial. Now, since this time, you know, there has
• 5:16
  Speaker 3: been new development, you know, issues coming out that mister
• 5:20
  Speaker 3: Camello and his defense team have not crossed emotions of
• 5:25
  Speaker 3: not saying that they didn't to dismiss his case based
• 5:28
  Speaker 3: upon of video showing that he was defending himself. But
• 5:33
  Speaker 3: the victim's family has ties to the district attorney's office
• 5:37
  Speaker 3: and the judicial system over there in that county. Where
• 5:40
  Speaker 3: as pitchers have surfaced off his family, the victim's family
• 5:45
  Speaker 3: taking pictures with the district attorney's office, the district attorney
• 5:49
  Speaker 3: and the judges in this county crie to this incident,
• 5:53
  Speaker 3: indicating some type of a relationship of the family of
• 5:58
  Speaker 3: the victims to the district attorney's office. So now this
• 6:01
  Speaker 3: raid is a question about the antigrity of this process
• 6:06
  Speaker 3: by the District Attorney's office, as mister Camillo Anthony being
• 6:10
  Speaker 3: given a fair shake in this county and if going forward,
• 6:14
  Speaker 3: will he receive a fair trial in this county? Well,
• 6:18
  Speaker 3: based upon this fact that these pictures have been showing
• 6:22
  Speaker 3: judicial connection, the relationships of the district attorney and the
• 6:26
  Speaker 3: family of the victim. The answer to that question is
• 6:29
  Speaker 3: not and now because this has happened. Now, this raid
• 6:33
  Speaker 3: is a question of prosecutable misconduct because the district attorney's
• 6:39
  Speaker 3: office and the judges and that county knows that they
• 6:42
  Speaker 3: have a relationship with the victim's family, and because this
• 6:48
  Speaker 3: case should not be processed in their county, and that
• 6:52
  Speaker 3: they should have reduced themselves to even participating in the
• 6:56
  Speaker 3: process of judicial procedures in this case. So as of
• 7:01
  Speaker 3: right now, uh, the issue with the cases that the
• 7:05
  Speaker 3: case should be dismissa born number one judicial impartiality, because
• 7:12
  Speaker 3: that raises the question because of the relationship of the
• 7:15
  Speaker 3: district attorney's office and the victim's family. As there was
• 7:19
  Speaker 3: enough this case was the Russia a grand jury, So
• 7:23
  Speaker 3: they also raised the question about the makeup of the
• 7:26
  Speaker 3: grand jury or did this case even go to a
• 7:30
  Speaker 3: grand jury?
• 7:31
  Speaker 4: Well, I got I got something to say because I've
• 7:36
  Speaker 4: been listening to a lot of these people on these
• 7:38
  Speaker 4: panels that have been having the different discussions. So the
• 7:44
  Speaker 4: the grand jury was picked in January, so there was
• 7:51
  Speaker 4: no particular grand jury picked aftery for this case.
• 7:55
  Speaker 5: So the jack The grand jury was picked even before
• 7:59
  Speaker 5: this case. So is that normal?
• 8:04
  Speaker 4: Because we was reading we was someone actually read it
• 8:08
  Speaker 4: and I recorded it. I posted it on on on
• 8:11
  Speaker 4: my TikTok. But I recorded this and they showed the
• 8:15
  Speaker 4: document and it shows that the grand jury was picked
• 8:20
  Speaker 4: in January. This case did not happen until April. So
• 8:25
  Speaker 4: it's a grand jury, just a grand jury around the board.
• 8:31
  Speaker 4: Or do they pick grand juries for each case?
• 8:34
  Speaker 3: Okay, minya self, we have twelve months on a year.
• 8:38
  Speaker 3: Each grand jury has picked from January and June six
• 8:42
  Speaker 3: months of a grand jury process. Okay, So now that
• 8:46
  Speaker 3: grand jury has a January turn of the grand jury
• 8:50
  Speaker 3: until the end of the last month of me June,
• 8:56
  Speaker 3: then another grand jury in June. So now the district
• 9:00
  Speaker 3: attorney in this case, it happened in May, I mean
• 9:03
  Speaker 3: in April. So April May is the following month. So
• 9:08
  Speaker 3: now if that is the case, then how did it
• 9:10
  Speaker 3: take eighty something days from April for this case to
• 9:15
  Speaker 3: get indicted, because that would be going to the June
• 9:17
  Speaker 3: grand jury. Therefore, the January term of the grand don't
• 9:22
  Speaker 3: have jurisdiction to indict mister Camillo handthe because they do
• 9:26
  Speaker 3: not have a term, So you see what that means. So,
• 9:30
  Speaker 3: how did mister Camelo Anthony get indicted from the January
• 9:33
  Speaker 3: term of the grand jury as opposed to the June term.
• 9:36
  Speaker 3: Because this case did happen in January, but they say
• 9:41
  Speaker 3: it took eighty something days after the incident for him
• 9:45
  Speaker 3: to get indicted. That would mean that this case has
• 9:50
  Speaker 3: lingered into the June term of the grand jury. Therefore
• 9:54
  Speaker 3: that it would not be good because the grand jury
• 9:56
  Speaker 3: don't have jurisdiction to indict him. So that would be
• 9:59
  Speaker 3: a to me if the case even goes to a
• 10:02
  Speaker 3: grand jury. Doesn't that make any sense?
• 10:06
  Speaker 4: Man, I'm not a I'm not a court person. I
• 10:10
  Speaker 4: don't know a lot about the judicial system.
• 10:13
  Speaker 3: Oh okay, okay. Ever, in state of Texas we have
• 10:16
  Speaker 3: we call terms like like like quarters, three, six, nine, twelve.
• 10:22
  Speaker 3: Over here we have two quarters grand jury, which is
• 10:25
  Speaker 3: six months of a turner. Every grand jury system six
• 10:28
  Speaker 3: months January term January to me, from June to December. Okay.
• 10:34
  Speaker 3: So with that, that's the issue of the grand jury.
• 10:37
  Speaker 3: If an indictment case happened within the January term of
• 10:41
  Speaker 3: the grand jury, it would say, yes, the January term
• 10:44
  Speaker 3: about the grand jury. Okay, this case happened within that term.
• 10:48
  Speaker 3: So now here it is. If this case happened in April,
• 10:51
  Speaker 3: which is three much fun January, now is it gonna
• 10:55
  Speaker 3: take them to indict?
• 10:56
  Speaker 4: The course, it took them eighty eighty some days to indict.
• 11:02
  Speaker 4: That's how long it took. I think it was eighty
• 11:04
  Speaker 4: one days.
• 11:05
  Speaker 3: Okay, So if it took eighty one days, okay, the.
• 11:10
  Speaker 4: Incident happened in April, they have already indicted him. The
• 11:14
  Speaker 4: indictment came down a couple of weeks ago.
• 11:20
  Speaker 3: Okay, a couple of so that would mean that this
• 11:25
  Speaker 3: is July. June was last month, okay, So now he's
• 11:28
  Speaker 3: in the June time of the grand jury then, okay,
• 11:31
  Speaker 3: which is this grand jury process from June to December? Okay?
• 11:37
  Speaker 5: Now the question, so what does that mean? What does
• 11:40
  Speaker 5: that mean?
• 11:40
  Speaker 4: Because the indictment has already came down, so that means
• 11:44
  Speaker 4: it came down from the other grand jury, the one
• 11:48
  Speaker 4: that was picked back in January.
• 11:50
  Speaker 5: So what does that mean?
• 11:51
  Speaker 3: Now? Okay, that's a that's that's what I'm going now
• 11:56
  Speaker 3: to you, ma'am. That's not possible because his case was
• 11:59
  Speaker 3: in from the time that he committed the offense the offitted.
• 12:07
  Speaker 4: So what does that mean, because you're they're talking to
• 12:10
  Speaker 4: someone that does not know. So explain that to me
• 12:14
  Speaker 4: so that I can understand. Because this is what's happened
• 12:18
  Speaker 4: in Cornell. You have all these people that know the
• 12:22
  Speaker 4: law and they are going to reading these pinal cols.
• 12:27
  Speaker 4: They're reading the laws. And then you got a lot
• 12:29
  Speaker 4: of people that are not in the state of Texas.
• 12:31
  Speaker 4: You got people from Virginia, you got people from all
• 12:34
  Speaker 4: over that's looking at this case. They're sitting on these
• 12:37
  Speaker 4: different panels and they're given their different reddicks. We have
• 12:42
  Speaker 4: a lot of white Tea people that is ready to
• 12:48
  Speaker 4: throw Camelo Anthony under the bus that they have rendered
• 12:53
  Speaker 4: this man guilty and regardless of what they have seen video.
• 12:59
  Speaker 4: There's a video.
• 13:00
  Speaker 5: People have gone to see the video.
• 13:02
  Speaker 4: There's a lady that even went there the other day
• 13:04
  Speaker 4: and she was in their recording and she's we're asking
• 13:07
  Speaker 4: for her to be prosecuted so she can go to
• 13:10
  Speaker 4: jail because she's.
• 13:11
  Speaker 5: Trying to take the derry. And this is what they're doing.
• 13:15
  Speaker 4: They're passing off all these radics and all these different
• 13:19
  Speaker 4: things that is not lining up. What you see, and
• 13:23
  Speaker 4: what the laws. If we go by the law, this
• 13:28
  Speaker 4: baby is innocent. He's still in his ground. But because
• 13:31
  Speaker 4: people have said what they wanted to say, one of
• 13:34
  Speaker 4: the one of the people that was there, the twin to.
• 13:37
  Speaker 5: The deceased person, he was able to leave with with
• 13:43
  Speaker 5: his evidence.
• 13:44
  Speaker 4: O him because he was right there, supposedly blood all
• 13:48
  Speaker 4: over him. This baby was able to leave, go home,
• 13:51
  Speaker 4: change his clothes, come up with whatever story him and
• 13:55
  Speaker 4: his mama gonna decide what he's gonna say, and then
• 13:57
  Speaker 4: he went back and then he was able to make statements.
• 14:00
  Speaker 4: So this is what's happening. This is so many things
• 14:04
  Speaker 4: that went wrong from the beginning to it just it's sad.
• 14:10
  Speaker 4: But then you got so many grown people that have
• 14:14
  Speaker 4: come up with their own logics, and it is they
• 14:18
  Speaker 4: making it about something that it wasn't. They said that
• 14:21
  Speaker 4: this baby planned that he he knew what he was
• 14:25
  Speaker 4: gonna do from the time he left his house.
• 14:28
  Speaker 5: How do you know that they haven't even determined that
• 14:32
  Speaker 5: the poker belonged to him. They're going by what somebody said.
• 14:36
  Speaker 5: And and I can believe from from what people have said.
• 14:41
  Speaker 4: I've listened to plenty of these lives listened to plenty
• 14:46
  Speaker 4: of people that say they went. They watched the video,
• 14:48
  Speaker 4: and I listened to what they're saying. The ones that
• 14:52
  Speaker 4: support Carmelo Anthony all of the same thing. And no,
• 14:56
  Speaker 4: they did not go at the same time. So it's
• 15:01
  Speaker 4: not like they plotting and planning. Some of these people
• 15:04
  Speaker 4: don't even know each other, but yet they say the
• 15:06
  Speaker 4: same thing. They said, there were seven people that walked
• 15:11
  Speaker 4: up briskfully. Some of them even was jogging to catch
• 15:14
  Speaker 4: up with the people that was in front of them.
• 15:16
  Speaker 4: They said, the four people walk up to Camelo Anthony.
• 15:20
  Speaker 4: Camello Anthony sitting down.
• 15:22
  Speaker 5: They bleacher. They said, the four people walked.
• 15:24
  Speaker 4: Up to him, three going and four walked up to him.
• 15:28
  Speaker 4: One got down in his face. Remind you he's sitting down.
• 15:32
  Speaker 4: So one got down in his face.
• 15:34
  Speaker 5: The other one surrounded him. But everybody said, why didn't
• 15:38
  Speaker 5: he leave?
• 15:39
  Speaker 4: He had the opportunity to leave it somebody in your
• 15:41
  Speaker 4: face and somebody surrounding you, how could you leave?
• 15:44
  Speaker 5: And then my thing too was.
• 15:48
  Speaker 4: Honestly, people don't like it, but I believe that the
• 15:55
  Speaker 4: brother was trying to poke Camello and poked his brother
• 15:58
  Speaker 4: by mistake.
• 16:01
  Speaker 5: Hmm. Because if you go and you look at a
• 16:04
  Speaker 5: lot of the stuff that's happening there.
• 16:05
  Speaker 4: Now, only that we win't on tox top solitary report
• 16:09
  Speaker 4: because why they ain't got the tox holgy report because
• 16:12
  Speaker 4: letty be told, they was at the middle school getting
• 16:15
  Speaker 4: geeked up.
• 16:17
  Speaker 5: They was over there getting geeked doune.
• 16:20
  Speaker 3: Okay, ma'am. So now the period issue again, we have
• 16:27
  Speaker 3: two terms, which is January term and June term. This
• 16:32
  Speaker 3: is the only way in the state of Texas that
• 16:34
  Speaker 3: we can be indicted in prosecurity for acquired So that
• 16:38
  Speaker 3: means that if Jake medicine the January term I already
• 16:41
  Speaker 3: started in my case hopping in April, they have to
• 16:45
  Speaker 3: take us to that grand jury, and that grand jury
• 16:48
  Speaker 3: got to have an indictment on me before the end
• 16:52
  Speaker 3: of June, I mean before the end of me while
• 16:56
  Speaker 3: because the next time grand jury starts in Chilman. So
• 17:00
  Speaker 3: if they don't have me indicted it within that term
• 17:03
  Speaker 3: of the grand jury, then they would have the process
• 17:06
  Speaker 3: and get an extension and have my case sense of
• 17:09
  Speaker 3: the next term of the grand jury, because my indictment
• 17:12
  Speaker 3: cannot say the January return of the grand jury, because
• 17:17
  Speaker 3: my case did happened during that term. But I can't
• 17:20
  Speaker 3: be indicted the term because that indictment term has he
• 17:25
  Speaker 3: left in me. And I'm going to tell another grand jury,
• 17:29
  Speaker 3: which means that this is the whole not total, different
• 17:31
  Speaker 3: people coming in evidence.
• 17:34
  Speaker 4: Well again, I said, I stay again from the paper
• 17:39
  Speaker 4: that the guys show on the TikTok Live on yesterday,
• 17:44
  Speaker 4: it's said the grand jury comprised. It was comprised in January.
• 17:52
  Speaker 1: He read it.
• 17:53
  Speaker 5: I got it on duty. So it ain't nothing that
• 17:57
  Speaker 5: I'm making up. It is.
• 17:58
  Speaker 4: It is something that is actual, at least by their
• 18:03
  Speaker 4: proof in their paper, unless they're making it up.
• 18:07
  Speaker 5: It said that January.
• 18:09
  Speaker 4: So what you're saying, if if, if that is true,
• 18:14
  Speaker 4: then that indictment is no good.
• 18:17
  Speaker 3: Yes, ma'am, that indictment won't be no good because it
• 18:20
  Speaker 3: takes the time. The game of criminal modications cembal. It's
• 18:26
  Speaker 3: not just no. You can't just take it committed from
• 18:28
  Speaker 3: today and here I am indicted at tomorrow. You can't
• 18:31
  Speaker 3: do that because you have other casions before that case
• 18:35
  Speaker 3: that has to be indicted by grand Jewelry.
• 18:37
  Speaker 4: And that's why they said it was taking so long.
• 18:40
  Speaker 4: That's why they said it took those eighty something days
• 18:43
  Speaker 4: for them to get there. I think they said eighty
• 18:45
  Speaker 4: one days to be exact. I think that's why they
• 18:49
  Speaker 4: say it took them eighty one days to even get
• 18:51
  Speaker 4: that indictment because there were others in front of that.
• 18:57
  Speaker 3: Okay, so now we're gonna do that, then we're gonna question.
• 19:02
  Speaker 3: We're gonna question the video because they.
• 19:06
  Speaker 4: Didn't submit the video. It was no video submitted. They
• 19:09
  Speaker 4: they they only went after the police report. And the
• 19:13
  Speaker 4: police report, well not even it's it's not even a
• 19:19
  Speaker 4: police report.
• 19:19
  Speaker 5: It is the arrest record. That's all it is. It's
• 19:23
  Speaker 5: a arrest report, ever, and it's just a couple of statements.
• 19:28
  Speaker 4: From some of them that they don't even have the
• 19:31
  Speaker 4: people because I think they confiscated phones afterwards, and they've
• 19:36
  Speaker 4: done other interviews, but none of that was included. Like
• 19:40
  Speaker 4: I said, the d A and the dad is friends.
• 19:47
  Speaker 4: The judge in the in in in the dad is friends.
• 19:52
  Speaker 5: So this is what you got going on. So, like
• 19:56
  Speaker 5: I say, I.
• 19:57
  Speaker 4: Believe that they did a favor for a favor because
• 20:01
  Speaker 4: if you look at when Camelo was supposed to go
• 20:04
  Speaker 4: to court, the day after the day Camilla go to court,
• 20:10
  Speaker 4: it's the day after the election for d A a
• 20:15
  Speaker 4: prosecutor or whatever, whatever election is coming. I think it's
• 20:18
  Speaker 4: a prosecutor that that is coming up for election. Maybe
• 20:22
  Speaker 4: one of them is coming up for election, and the
• 20:28
  Speaker 4: election is going to be held the day before Camilla
• 20:31
  Speaker 4: goes to court.
• 20:32
  Speaker 3: Okay, sure, ma'am. That's very unique right there, because that
• 20:39
  Speaker 3: kind of video showing that committal. Attorney's office do not
• 20:46
  Speaker 3: have that.
• 20:47
  Speaker 4: I'm sure they have all they have access to the
• 20:51
  Speaker 4: same videos because this is public knowledge. That's how ever's
• 20:55
  Speaker 4: getting to go and look at this because it is
• 20:58
  Speaker 4: public records. So that's how they're having to fill out
• 21:01
  Speaker 4: documents and they can go and look at it, but
• 21:06
  Speaker 4: they're only allowing them.
• 21:07
  Speaker 3: Now.
• 21:07
  Speaker 4: Remind you, this was at a stadium, so there's multiple videos,
• 21:12
  Speaker 4: but they're only allowing the public to see that one video.
• 21:17
  Speaker 4: But like I tell, like I've been telling everybody, Cornell,
• 21:21
  Speaker 4: and you know this because you are currently incarcerated. If
• 21:26
  Speaker 4: you if followed any high profile place, and we'll talk
• 21:31
  Speaker 4: about Chris.
• 21:31
  Speaker 5: Brown and Rihanna. Do you remember when he when he abused.
• 21:36
  Speaker 4: That They're how it was all over the news, how
• 21:39
  Speaker 4: it was just everywhere and they would not let it
• 21:43
  Speaker 4: rest if Camelo Anthony was guilty. If these people truly
• 21:48
  Speaker 4: had something on this boy, don't you think they would
• 21:51
  Speaker 4: be ragging him all over the news? They would be
• 21:53
  Speaker 4: no had him because that's what they do with us.
• 21:56
  Speaker 4: We know that there ain't no secret, and then they
• 21:59
  Speaker 4: want to make it about They don't want it to
• 22:01
  Speaker 4: be about a black A B K L and A
• 22:05
  Speaker 4: and a Y T. But we all know what it's about,
• 22:10
  Speaker 4: just like what they're doing right now. I see a
• 22:14
  Speaker 4: case where there was a commissioner, uh elected government official
• 22:20
  Speaker 4: that the white judge wanted to talk to her any
• 22:23
  Speaker 4: kind of way and in discredit.
• 22:25
  Speaker 5: This is what they do. They don't want us to
• 22:28
  Speaker 5: be right.
• 22:29
  Speaker 4: But what's gonna happen is because too many people watching
• 22:32
  Speaker 4: this case, it can't be wiped under the rug and
• 22:35
  Speaker 4: it ain't gonna It ain't gonna come out the way
• 22:37
  Speaker 4: everybody wanting it to come out. Because I feel like
• 22:44
  Speaker 4: the hunter and and those other two boys, they need
• 22:48
  Speaker 4: to be charged as well. If they want somebody to
• 22:50
  Speaker 4: charge for the unalliveed of Austin, it to be those
• 22:56
  Speaker 4: that cost it, because if they are they want to
• 22:59
  Speaker 4: say if Camelo had to kept his hands to hisself.
• 23:03
  Speaker 5: If they had to have been bullied, if.
• 23:05
  Speaker 4: They had to come up in that tick the way
• 23:07
  Speaker 4: they came up in that tent thinking they read something,
• 23:10
  Speaker 4: then he would be here right now, yes, l'am.
• 23:14
  Speaker 3: Yes, ma'am. Okay, so ma'am here. It is so if
• 23:19
  Speaker 3: they're allowing people to go and application to refuse this
• 23:23
  Speaker 3: particular video and this particular video and braising opinions from
• 23:28
  Speaker 3: both sides. Some people are saying that the video showed
• 23:32
  Speaker 3: that he kilty. So I'm saying that shows he's inners
• 23:35
  Speaker 3: for real. If the district attorney's officer got access.
• 23:39
  Speaker 5: To that video, everybody got access to it.
• 23:42
  Speaker 3: Okay, but the grand journey got to have access to
• 23:46
  Speaker 3: that video, that video.
• 23:48
  Speaker 4: Well, why wouldn't they have to have Why wouldn't they
• 23:50
  Speaker 4: have access to the video if they wanted access to
• 23:53
  Speaker 4: the video, It was they after.
• 23:56
  Speaker 5: The prosecutor whoever was supposed to present the evidence, right.
• 24:01
  Speaker 3: Okay, that's a good point. Now, the distri attorney supposed
• 24:05
  Speaker 3: to be that whatever evidence he feels is necessary for
• 24:07
  Speaker 3: his case, and if he would hail that particular evidence
• 24:11
  Speaker 3: from the grand jury, then he would hail material evidence
• 24:15
  Speaker 3: from the grand jury. That can shed a different light
• 24:18
  Speaker 3: on this case towards the grand theury of the datment.
• 24:21
  Speaker 3: So when we're gonna claim, we're saying that that's prosecutor
• 24:25
  Speaker 3: of his conduct, that's judicial and partiality. What he's doing
• 24:30
  Speaker 3: is deceiving the grand jury because he's withholding the material
• 24:35
  Speaker 3: evidence from that grand jury, who is governed by the
• 24:38
  Speaker 3: law to indict an individual based upon facts. This case
• 24:42
  Speaker 3: has to be governed by the facts, not because of
• 24:45
  Speaker 3: the district attorney's sending a feeling.
• 24:50
  Speaker 5: They feel like the facts is those falsified documents.
• 24:53
  Speaker 4: Those documents just you know, you know for yourself, you
• 24:57
  Speaker 4: know what happened in your case, So just think about
• 25:00
  Speaker 4: how they falsified documents.
• 25:02
  Speaker 5: So just know what they're doing.
• 25:04
  Speaker 4: These people haven't come up with a report, an arrest report.
• 25:10
  Speaker 4: They have put their narratives in there because they took
• 25:14
  Speaker 4: the report from Austin, not Austin, from Austin's brother, Hunter.
• 25:21
  Speaker 5: And a couple of other people that was there.
• 25:24
  Speaker 4: Of course, those people say what they wanted to say
• 25:27
  Speaker 4: in defense of what was going on, because if the
• 25:31
  Speaker 4: truth be told, they probably could be charged too. So
• 25:34
  Speaker 4: of course they're gonna defend themselves.
• 25:37
  Speaker 3: Yes, ma'am, Yes, ma'am, that's ma'am. So now the public
• 25:41
  Speaker 3: got the power right now, because it's obvious that's the
• 25:46
  Speaker 3: Milo Anthony's attorney. Them are waiting for some reason or
• 25:50
  Speaker 3: miracle or something to this nature. So let's this case
• 25:54
  Speaker 3: go to a grand amory. And why I have no
• 25:57
  Speaker 3: earthly idea this case should not still be standing. Why
• 26:02
  Speaker 3: because ma'am, this case is being governed by political propaganda now,
• 26:09
  Speaker 3: and what's that the Camilo Anthony was turning them know
• 26:13
  Speaker 3: that this case cannot staying and it should not be
• 26:15
  Speaker 3: indicted under these circumstances. So I am questioning why they
• 26:19
  Speaker 3: have not follow emotion to dismiss because if the public
• 26:23
  Speaker 3: sees this video and the public and all this stuff
• 26:25
  Speaker 3: and out they're about the video, then the attorneys have
• 26:28
  Speaker 3: to have the same information. So why is it that
• 26:31
  Speaker 3: they have not taken that video to the DA and
• 26:34
  Speaker 3: act the DA to reconsider this case and to have
• 26:37
  Speaker 3: that indictment dismission.
• 26:38
  Speaker 4: They got their power now, only that they need to
• 26:40
  Speaker 4: have the prosecutor and the judge removed. Judge Roaches need
• 26:47
  Speaker 4: to be removed because he knows the mad Cat family,
• 26:51
  Speaker 4: those kids grew up with them.
• 26:54
  Speaker 3: And you right coslutely right, ma'am. So if the lawyers
• 26:58
  Speaker 3: at Camillo Anthony's case is not, the public gotta do it.
• 27:03
  Speaker 3: The public gotta raise they for us and ask that
• 27:05
  Speaker 3: the Conduct Committee on Judicial Conduct step into this case
• 27:09
  Speaker 3: and have that jeris dismissed and contact the District Attorneys
• 27:13
  Speaker 3: are Association and tell them that they want this district
• 27:17
  Speaker 3: attorney removed off this s case and we want a
• 27:19
  Speaker 3: special prosecutor, a special prosecutor all occasion for this case
• 27:23
  Speaker 3: to be dismissed. That's where we're at. That's exactly what
• 27:27
  Speaker 3: we ask because the facts are not lining up to
• 27:29
  Speaker 3: the law man and the district attorney in this case,
• 27:32
  Speaker 3: he's not gonna do that well because he's the friends
• 27:34
  Speaker 3: of the victim's father. So what we're asking for it
• 27:38
  Speaker 3: for the juris to be removed and recused from this
• 27:40
  Speaker 3: case because of judicial and partiality. And we're asking for
• 27:45
  Speaker 3: the district attorney to be taken off this case because
• 27:48
  Speaker 3: pictures have to have revolved showing that he got relationships
• 27:51
  Speaker 3: with the victim's family. So now he has to take
• 27:54
  Speaker 3: come up agause he cannot see the case. So now
• 27:59
  Speaker 3: I don't know why mister Commidal answers. The family have
• 28:01
  Speaker 3: not done none of that. That don't make no sense.
• 28:04
  Speaker 3: That's too long, because soon that information came out automatically,
• 28:09
  Speaker 3: the district attorney in this case supposed to make a
• 28:11
  Speaker 3: public statement of preshy leaf showing that he has to
• 28:15
  Speaker 3: refuse himself from this case because of a conflict of interest.
• 28:19
  Speaker 3: The district attorney's office got to do that. You got
• 28:23
  Speaker 3: to know to fire the public because the public is
• 28:25
  Speaker 3: the people, and because the public is the people, the
• 28:27
  Speaker 3: public deserves to know the truth, ma'am that he took
• 28:31
  Speaker 3: pictions with this boy's father, with the boy's family, and
• 28:34
  Speaker 3: that here it is they got a relationship. So now
• 28:37
  Speaker 3: not only do that questions his conflict of interest, and
• 28:39
  Speaker 3: also questions the indictment. So now we're asking not only
• 28:44
  Speaker 3: for him to be dismissed, we ask him for the
• 28:46
  Speaker 3: indictment to be dismissed as of right now. If they
• 28:50
  Speaker 3: choose to come back and ring indict because the case
• 28:53
  Speaker 3: don't have a statu of limitation, that's fine, But as
• 28:56
  Speaker 3: of right now, we want that indictment taken off the
• 28:59
  Speaker 3: table because now we'll get a chance of with the
• 29:02
  Speaker 3: video and other video cameras and cling but whatever been
• 29:06
  Speaker 3: confiscated to show the truth to this case to another
• 29:09
  Speaker 3: grand jury, because that grand jury that indicted him, that's
• 29:13
  Speaker 3: us painted at grand jury, ma'am. So if the public
• 29:17
  Speaker 3: is listening to this podcast tonight, I'm asking for you
• 29:21
  Speaker 3: to say and have your voices heard and demand for
• 29:25
  Speaker 3: the disc Journey and that County to be taken off
• 29:28
  Speaker 3: this case due to a conflict ad interests because of
• 29:31
  Speaker 3: the fact that tensions have surface of him having a
• 29:34
  Speaker 3: relationship with and the same way with the jedis that
• 29:39
  Speaker 3: he'd be taking off this case due to judicial and
• 29:41
  Speaker 3: partiality because he is aware of the pictures of the
• 29:45
  Speaker 3: disc Turney and the Victimstensy. Therefore that makes him impartial
• 29:50
  Speaker 3: and he cannot sit on this case. So that's what
• 29:53
  Speaker 3: we're acting. And for the indicaments in this case of business,
• 29:56
  Speaker 3: because the indictment has painted it by judicial partiality. That's
• 30:02
  Speaker 3: the case right here tonight. So I will ask that
• 30:06
  Speaker 3: you reviewing this video tonight could be able to the podcast,
• 30:10
  Speaker 3: like to be able to cap in and have your
• 30:12
  Speaker 3: voices heard. So thank you and I appreciate you for
• 30:15
  Speaker 3: listening in tonight or let's talk about it, and we
• 30:18
  Speaker 3: will be you know, continuing this episode and pretty much
• 30:22
  Speaker 3: from that man joining in, and like I said, I
• 30:25
  Speaker 3: appreciate Okay, all right, all right, okay, thank you very much.
• 30:31
  Speaker 5: Well, y'all have a good night.