Latest / J&B Live Podcast / 🔥 HIS AZZ IS BEAUTIFUL?!

Transcript

🔥 HIS AZZ IS BEAUTIFUL?! · J&B Live Podcast

• 0:08
  Good evening. Good evening everyone.
• 0:13
  Hope everybody's having a great evening.
• 0:17
  Going to get started shortly. We're
• 0:19
  going to bring Broker J3 up.
• 0:23
  Hey Canelo, how are you this morning? We
• 0:26
  thank you for your like. We appreciate
• 0:28
  that. We're going to get started
• 0:30
  shortly. We're talking about
• 0:32
  um
• 0:34
  uh your beautiful
• 0:36
  your hands, your jawline.
• 0:39
  Oh, we're talking about that this
• 0:41
  evening. Um your buttocks, uh your
• 0:46
  genitalia. Okay, guess who's talking
• 0:49
  about all of that. Yeah, we're going to
• 0:51
  find out in a few minutes. Hey, Rose
• 0:53
  F112.
• 0:55
  Uh I think this is your first live uh
• 0:57
  first time joining us. So thank you for
• 0:59
  that. Uh we're going to get started in a
• 1:02
  few minutes.
• 1:05
  Thank you guys for joining us. We
• 1:06
  appreciate you. So this evening uh we're
• 1:10
  talking about
• 1:12
  well we're having real conversations
• 1:14
  because this is the J&B live podcast. I
• 1:17
  am your girl Dr. B. And so uh broker Jay
• 1:20
  is going to J3 is going to be joining uh
• 1:22
  us shortly. Hey little Sunny. How are
• 1:25
  you this evening? I like the little
• 1:27
  smile. I like it. Okay, we're talking
• 1:31
  about
• 1:32
  um
• 1:35
  the presidential behavior, the
• 1:37
  president's behavior, and um has the um
• 1:42
  American uh standards lowered its
• 1:45
  standards? We got a president
• 1:48
  that's um
• 1:51
  saying that uh [gasps and laughter]
• 1:54
  another man uh Mike Collins in
• 1:56
  particular uh is uh I think that's the
• 2:00
  name he that's who he's called
• 2:01
  beautiful. He's referred to several men
• 2:03
  as beautiful before. Um but we're
• 2:06
  talking about that and and you know this
• 2:09
  is quite different um or to hear your
• 2:13
  president talk like that. Um, but we're
• 2:15
  going to talk about that um this this
• 2:19
  this evening. Uh, we're going to talk
• 2:21
  about that type of behavior. And um, and
• 2:24
  we here here on the Jeremy Live, we also
• 2:28
  um we talk about the things that people
• 2:31
  the questions that people are asking
• 2:33
  around the kitchen table because I know
• 2:35
  some of you are probably saying that why
• 2:37
  in the world is this man saying another
• 2:40
  man is beautiful? You know, that's kind
• 2:43
  of odd to me. I don't know about you
• 2:45
  guys. So, tonight we're talking about
• 2:47
  President Donald Trump public comments
• 2:51
  about other men appearances, you know,
• 2:54
  and their bodies. This is quite weird
• 2:56
  for me. And whether Americans should
• 2:59
  expect more restraint from their
• 3:01
  president, you know, you have to think
• 3:03
  about it. What if another president said
• 3:05
  something like this? We're also uh going
• 3:07
  to take a look at the emphasis uh on
• 3:10
  appearance, his hiring judgment,
• 3:13
  and whether political loyalty has
• 3:16
  created two different standards, you
• 3:18
  know, for presidential behavior. Can one
• 3:20
  president do it, but the other
• 3:21
  presidents can't do it? You know, can
• 3:23
  the Democratic president do it but not
• 3:25
  the republic or vice versa? So, that's
• 3:27
  what we're going to be talking about
• 3:28
  this evening. So, there's a difference
• 3:30
  between entertainment as well because,
• 3:32
  you know, a lot of people say, "Well,
• 3:33
  he's just being Trump." you know, that's
• 3:35
  just him and people are laughing. I
• 3:38
  really personally didn't find anything
• 3:40
  funny about those type of comments, but
• 3:43
  is he is he being entertaining? Is he
• 3:45
  being responsible? So, we're asking uh
• 3:48
  where the line belongs, where do you
• 3:50
  draw the line? And we're going to use
• 3:52
  some documented statements. We're going
• 3:54
  to separate the facts from the opinion
• 3:56
  because this is, you know, the
• 3:58
  disclaimer is there. This is not, we
• 4:00
  didn't make this stuff up. It's been
• 4:02
  reported and we're gonna give you guys
• 4:04
  plenty to think about. So stay tuned.
• 4:07
  Broker J3, you you on the other end?
• 4:10
  >> I'm here B.
• 4:11
  >> Okay, great.
• 4:12
  >> Welcome everybody. Uh I am your host, uh
• 4:16
  Broker J3 and me and Dobby. Thank you
• 4:18
  guys for coming. Whether it's your first
• 4:20
  time, my day one, or you occasionally
• 4:23
  join us, we really appreciate it. So
• 4:25
  thank you so much. You know, Dobby, I
• 4:28
  thought that we was uh discussing who
• 4:31
  could help run the country, not who had
• 4:34
  the best backside in Congress. You know,
• 4:36
  our topic tonight is his ass is
• 4:39
  beautiful.
• 4:40
  >> Now, that's our headline, not a direct
• 4:43
  quotation. Okay. Uh but the actual
• 4:46
  remarks will make you stop and ask, "How
• 4:50
  did a political endorsement turn into a
• 4:53
  body inspection?"
• 4:54
  >> I know, right? It's crazy. And guys,
• 4:57
  before we get started, you know, we want
• 5:00
  to make this and put this out there out
• 5:02
  front that recognizing another man, a
• 5:04
  man recognizing another man as handsome
• 5:07
  does not establish anyone's sexual
• 5:10
  orientation by any means. There's
• 5:12
  nothing wrong with that. That's
• 5:14
  absolutely nothing wrong with it. That
• 5:16
  is not, you know, that is not something
• 5:19
  that we can determine from a speech, you
• 5:21
  know, whether someone, you know, whether
• 5:23
  they're interested in other men. we
• 5:25
  can't make that determination. So, our
• 5:27
  discussion is about public conduct,
• 5:31
  professional boundaries, and
• 5:34
  presidential judgment. That's what we're
• 5:36
  talking about this evening.
• 5:38
  So, that's that's absolutely correct,
• 5:41
  Dobby. Nobody needs an investigation uh
• 5:44
  because they said another man looks
• 5:45
  sharp. But when the president begins
• 5:48
  describing a man's backside and jawline,
• 5:51
  you know, we can ask why that belongs to
• 5:54
  in a campaign speech. But then again,
• 5:57
  dealing with this uh president, um we
• 5:59
  heard it all during campaign speeches.
• 6:02
  >> Yeah, that is crazy. As as a matter of
• 6:06
  fact, he said it during a rally. That
• 6:08
  was so crazy. So, shout out guys to you
• 6:11
  those of you who are our regular
• 6:13
  viewers. uh those who have been with us
• 6:16
  from day one. Uh everyone joining us for
• 6:19
  the first time. I see some new names on
• 6:21
  here. Jeffro, Gabberto, you know, thank
• 6:24
  you guys for joining us for the first
• 6:26
  time and those who are listening to the
• 6:29
  replay. So tell us, let us know where
• 6:32
  you guys are watching from. We want you
• 6:35
  to like, share, put give me those
• 6:37
  hearts. Give us those hearts and we want
• 6:39
  you to share the episode. And then also
• 6:41
  we want you to bring your perspective to
• 6:44
  the conversation. So add some comments
• 6:47
  and let us know what you guys are
• 6:49
  thinking. Yeah. So think about this
• 6:52
  guys. Um you know and and keep this
• 6:55
  question in your mind for a moment. You
• 6:57
  know if Obama,
• 7:00
  Biden or even George W. Bush, you know,
• 7:03
  has said the same thing, would your
• 7:05
  reaction be the same? And that's a real
• 7:08
  question. So, let's get into it. When
• 7:11
  did the presidency become about a beauty
• 7:13
  contest? But then again, hey, we're
• 7:16
  talking about a president that used to
• 7:18
  own the beauty pageant where he used to
• 7:20
  walk in there on young girls and said he
• 7:23
  can do that. Walk in there while they
• 7:24
  naked because he owns the beauty
• 7:26
  pageant.
• 7:27
  >> Yeah. And he can also grab them by the
• 7:29
  what? You know what? [laughter] Okay.
• 7:33
  So, he has not been short on words uh
• 7:36
  when it comes to uh female body parts.
• 7:39
  And now we see that he's uh ventured out
• 7:42
  a little bit. He's ventured out and uh
• 7:45
  now he's discussing men body parts.
• 7:47
  Okay, so let's establish broker J3 what
• 7:50
  has already been reported. Okay, this
• 7:53
  happened on the 17th of October. This
• 7:55
  was at a Kentucky rally. He praised
• 7:58
  candidate Ed Garing by saying, "Look at
• 8:02
  this beautiful guy." Okay, he was
• 8:05
  discussing Senator Hston. He said, "I
• 8:08
  examined
• 8:10
  his ass." That's what he said. Now, now
• 8:12
  I'm like, I would have been like, "What
• 8:14
  on the world is he talking about?" He
• 8:17
  said, "And I looked at his jaw lines
• 8:21
  really." Okay, this is according to the
• 8:23
  Associated Press. This is not me or
• 8:25
  broker J3. best claim disclaimers out
• 8:28
  there. They he described his shoulders,
• 8:33
  his feet, and then was talking about how
• 8:34
  big his hands were. Is that not weird to
• 8:37
  you?
• 8:40
  >> Okay.
• 8:40
  >> Yeah. His hands, his feet, his shoulder,
• 8:43
  his jawline. That sound like a kid's
• 8:45
  nursery rhyme. Head, shoulders, knees,
• 8:47
  or whatever the case may be.
• 8:50
  >> Oh gosh.
• 8:51
  >> You know, you describing all that stuff.
• 8:52
  What's left for the doctor? Now, now,
• 8:55
  now that is a thorough assessment, you
• 8:57
  know, of someone who's supposed to be
• 8:59
  examining why the candidate deserves to
• 9:01
  vote. So, I just don't understand why
• 9:03
  he's describing a man's body parts.
• 9:06
  >> Okay? [clears throat] And so, you know,
• 9:08
  when he made the comment, guys,
• 9:10
  everybody in the stands, they just
• 9:13
  brushed it off jokingly. And you know,
• 9:16
  the the defense behind everything is
• 9:19
  that the president is just joking. Okay?
• 9:21
  political speakers, they use humor, uh,
• 9:25
  exaggeration, and unexpected language to
• 9:28
  hold an audience attention. So, that's
• 9:30
  what they're saying. That's why they're
• 9:31
  saying he made those type of comments.
• 9:33
  But understanding the intention does not
• 9:37
  settle in my opinion whether the remarks
• 9:40
  were appropriate or not. You know, you
• 9:42
  it's a it's a place and a time to say
• 9:45
  stuff like that. That's just my opinion
• 9:47
  now.
• 9:48
  >> Yeah. But, you know, you you you're
• 9:49
  right, D. You know, it if it was a joke,
• 9:53
  explain the delivery. You know, explain
• 9:56
  that. It doesn't automatically excuse
• 9:59
  people's judgment. If I say something
• 10:01
  inappropriate at work and everybody
• 10:03
  laugh, that doesn't mean that the
• 10:05
  supervisor has to approve it.
• 10:07
  >> Yeah. Yeah. That's true. And then just
• 10:09
  think about it. Who was he talking to?
• 10:12
  you know, he has to realize that even
• 10:14
  though the audience were probably
• 10:19
  um Trump supporters or whoever they he
• 10:23
  praised supporters, but what about the
• 10:25
  people independent voters or you know or
• 10:28
  some Democrats or you know anyone else?
• 10:32
  We're all seeing him behave in this
• 10:34
  manner. So you know it matters who is
• 10:38
  speaking. Okay. And the president has he
• 10:40
  has a larger platform and a greater
• 10:44
  responsibility
• 10:45
  um than someone telling a story amount
• 10:47
  among friends. Just think about you
• 10:49
  would say something like that. You know,
• 10:50
  maybe you got a select number of friends
• 10:53
  and you're just entertaining them in
• 10:55
  your home or something. You know, I
• 10:57
  could see maybe making a comment like
• 10:59
  that in that type of environment.
• 11:02
  But this is kind of weird when you do
• 11:04
  that on that type of platform. So people
• 11:08
  reasonably expect some awareness of the
• 11:12
  office, the president's office and the
• 11:15
  setting.
• 11:16
  >> Yeah. So imagine this, guys. Imagine
• 11:19
  your pastor introducing a guest speaker
• 11:22
  by detailing a description of his ass.
• 11:25
  You know, uh the congregation will have
• 11:28
  have questions before that guest even
• 11:31
  reach the pull pit. in their mind they
• 11:33
  gonna be wondering why is the pastor
• 11:35
  talking about his ass [laughter]
• 11:38
  >> and then another scenario because you
• 11:40
  know I used to be in education so this
• 11:42
  would have really flipped me out so
• 11:44
  imagine a principal introducing a need a
• 11:47
  new teacher uh that way you know you
• 11:50
  that would just blow me away we would
• 11:53
  ask whether the introduction respected
• 11:56
  the employee number one because you know
• 11:59
  I wouldn't want to re be remembered from
• 12:01
  my behind my backside and whether it
• 12:04
  modeled appropriate professional
• 12:07
  behavior.
• 12:09
  >> Well, ain't nothing wrong with that, Doc
• 12:10
  B. If your backside is memorable, ain't
• 12:13
  nothing wrong with that. Okay.
• 12:14
  [laughter]
• 12:16
  All right. So, so why does the standard
• 12:19
  suddenly disappear when the person
• 12:21
  holding the microphone is the president?
• 12:23
  And I'm not talking about every
• 12:25
  president. I'm talking about the current
• 12:26
  president right now. Because we already
• 12:28
  know current presidents, I mean pre
• 12:30
  prior presidents could not uh do some of
• 12:33
  the things that this president has done.
• 12:36
  Why are everyday people expecting
• 12:40
  uh uh uh expected to use like more
• 12:43
  discretion than somebody who represents
• 12:45
  the country? So somebody is as simple as
• 12:48
  I am. I'm just a real estate broker. you
• 12:51
  know, why is it what I say um means more
• 12:56
  than if the president said it? You know,
• 12:58
  it it it just doesn't make sense. He
• 13:00
  holds a very high office.
• 13:02
  >> Okay. So, some people some viewers will
• 13:04
  say that they appreciate
• 13:07
  this is in his defense
• 13:10
  um a president who speaks casually, who
• 13:13
  can kind of like I guess speak on some
• 13:15
  people's level. I guess that that's what
• 13:17
  they would probably say and probably
• 13:20
  justifying that type of behavior. But
• 13:22
  that uh preference is understandable,
• 13:25
  but casual speech should still be
• 13:28
  thoughtful. You still should think about
• 13:30
  that person. And then you're, you know,
• 13:32
  I would if I would have been the person
• 13:34
  he was talking about, I would have been
• 13:36
  embarrassed. But that's the present.
• 13:38
  That's how they excuse that behavior. So
• 13:40
  being relatable does not require turning
• 13:44
  another person's body into
• 13:46
  entertainment. I would have been
• 13:48
  embarrassed.
• 13:50
  >> Yeah. And and what does any of this tell
• 13:53
  me about the candidate at all? It tells
• 13:55
  me absolutely nothing. Can he solve a
• 13:58
  problem?
• 13:59
  >> Does he understand what the job is that
• 14:01
  he's trying to get? Will he answer
• 14:03
  difficult questions or do like most
• 14:05
  Republicans have been doing recently and
• 14:08
  avoid answering the questions especially
• 14:10
  to their constituents? You know his
• 14:12
  shoulders cannot explain his voting
• 14:14
  record or his hands.
• 14:16
  >> I know that's right. I know that is
• 14:19
  correct. So appearance is immediately
• 14:22
  visible. You know you can see a person's
• 14:24
  appearance. Uh but competence this is
• 14:27
  what you know people want to I
• 14:30
  personally want to hear. I don't want to
• 14:32
  hear about anybody's backside. I don't
• 14:34
  want to hear about their jawline. I
• 14:35
  don't want to hear about how beautiful
• 14:36
  they are. I want to know what they are
• 14:38
  they qualified, okay? What they're going
• 14:40
  to do for me, especially as a
• 14:41
  constituent. Okay? That's what you want
• 14:43
  to hear. So, competence requires more
• 14:46
  examination. That's why voters uh should
• 14:50
  resist allowing a flattering
• 14:52
  introduction to stand in for evidence.
• 14:55
  In other words, I wouldn't have been
• 14:56
  laughing at all. I would have I would
• 14:59
  have been saying to myself, now what can
• 15:00
  this uh uh candidate do for me? That's
• 15:03
  what I would have been asking for.
• 15:06
  >> Yeah. You know, you can look impressive
• 15:08
  standing beside the flag and still have
• 15:10
  absolutely nothing useful to say. Give
• 15:13
  me somebody who knows the assignment.
• 15:15
  That's what I want.
• 15:17
  >> Okay. Okay. Now, we got somebody said,
• 15:19
  "We making too much of this." I don't
• 15:21
  think we making too much of it. Broker
• 15:23
  J3. Uh the crowd enjoyed it. They
• 15:26
  probably did. They probably did, but
• 15:27
  that's that's because the crowd was
• 15:31
  probably Trump supporters. And guess
• 15:33
  what? They going to laugh at everything
• 15:35
  he say. They're going to support him.
• 15:37
  The ones that were there, there were a
• 15:39
  lot of empty seats, but the ones that
• 15:41
  were there were are probably going to
• 15:43
  support him regardless. But just think
• 15:45
  about it, that uh candidate probably
• 15:48
  needs more support than what was in that
• 15:50
  audience.
• 15:52
  >> Yeah. But you know what, B? the crowd
• 15:55
  enjoying something, it does not mean
• 15:57
  that everybody has to surrender their
• 15:59
  standards. Okay. Yeah.
• 16:00
  >> You know, I can understand why people
• 16:02
  laugh and still say a president should
• 16:05
  have, you know, exercise better
• 16:07
  judgment, but it's it's getting to the
• 16:09
  point now that some of the things that
• 16:11
  come out of the president's mouth, you
• 16:13
  know, is is is it it's just it's
• 16:15
  unbelievable if you ask me. It's It's
• 16:18
  hard to even believe even threatening to
• 16:21
  kill people like in Iran, you know, over
• 16:24
  something that you started.
• 16:26
  >> Yeah. Yep. He does that. He does that.
• 16:29
  Okay. So, let's see. I think we have
• 16:31
  another person um who's responded uh
• 16:36
  at least he wasn't insulting the man.
• 16:39
  No, he wasn't insulting the man. But
• 16:41
  it's more than about that, you know.
• 16:44
  you. But for those people who
• 16:48
  uh are okay with that, that that that's
• 16:52
  you. That's fine with me. That I don't
• 16:54
  have no problem with how you feel about
• 16:56
  the jokes and him explaining another
• 16:59
  person's backside, his jawline, how
• 17:02
  beautiful he is. If you don't have a
• 17:05
  problem with it, that's you. Uh I'm not
• 17:08
  going to knock what you feel. You know,
• 17:10
  that's your that's your opinion. But you
• 17:12
  but you know do be a compliment it can
• 17:14
  still cross boundaries. Yeah.
• 17:16
  >> Now can you imagine if we come on here?
• 17:18
  Hey I'm broker J3. Thank you guys for
• 17:21
  joining us. I'm here with my beautiful
• 17:22
  co-host with that big ass Dr. B. Now
• 17:26
  that will cross [laughter] the line. It
• 17:28
  does not make sense. If you introduce me
• 17:31
  professionally, discuss my work before
• 17:34
  you start discussing parts of my body
• 17:36
  that have nothing to do with my job.
• 17:38
  >> Yeah. Now, now that's personally how I
• 17:41
  feel because, you know, at the end of
• 17:43
  the day, I want to re be remembered for
• 17:46
  my character, what I stood for instead
• 17:49
  of my appearance. I I'm I'm I'm going to
• 17:52
  be honest with you. Now, some people are
• 17:54
  different. Everybody's not built the
• 17:56
  same way, but that's just my personal
• 17:58
  opinion. So, this is going to uh give us
• 18:01
  our first uh question. Okay, guys. When
• 18:05
  does a compliment become inappropriate?
• 18:08
  And should the president be expected to
• 18:11
  re recognize that line? What do you
• 18:13
  think about that, broker J3?
• 18:16
  >> I mean I mean I I I think I think it
• 18:19
  becomes appro un inappropriate when you
• 18:22
  start discussing a person's body parts
• 18:24
  instead of discussing uh what this guy
• 18:27
  actually brings to the table um if
• 18:30
  elected into office. because we've seen
• 18:33
  over the last two years
• 18:36
  >> so many people in office, Democrat and
• 18:39
  Republican, that are just straight
• 18:42
  incompetent and should not be in office.
• 18:45
  >> That's one of the reasons why we need to
• 18:47
  push for turning limits because again,
• 18:49
  and I'm going say this until the day I
• 18:51
  die, it makes no sense for nobody to be
• 18:55
  a career politician where your whole
• 18:58
  life you're in the same office. You
• 19:00
  know, I don't care. Even when Joe Biden
• 19:02
  was running, I've been in in the Senate
• 19:04
  for 40 years. Why?
• 19:08
  >> Yeah.
• 19:08
  >> For what?
• 19:09
  >> Yeah.
• 19:13
  >> Same thing with the Supreme Court of
• 19:15
  this podcast because sometime when you
• 19:17
  think about some of the foolishness
• 19:18
  that's going on, it's absolutely
• 19:20
  ridiculous. Let's let's let's talk about
• 19:22
  this
• 19:24
  >> Arnold Palmer, you know, the great golf
• 19:26
  great, you know.
• 19:27
  >> Yeah. uh and the double standard test.
• 19:30
  You know, there is an earlier example um
• 19:33
  involving the golfer Arnold Palmer. You
• 19:36
  know, uh at the n uh uh uh at October
• 19:40
  19th uh uh back in 2024 rally in
• 19:44
  Pennsylvania, Trump said when he took
• 19:47
  the showers with the pros, they came out
• 19:51
  of there. They said, "Oh my god, that's
• 19:56
  unbelievable.
• 19:58
  >> [laughter]
• 19:59
  >> This just this I know when I first heard
• 20:02
  this story, broker J3, it really just
• 20:04
  cracked me up. I'm gonna be honest with
• 20:06
  you because I'm saying to myself, no, he
• 20:08
  didn't make that comment. Okay, it was
• 20:11
  crazy. Okay, so AP reported this as a
• 20:15
  reference to Palmer's genitalia. Yeah,
• 20:18
  he did. The story concerned Palmer and
• 20:21
  described other golfers supposed
• 20:23
  reaction. So, you know, Trump was not in
• 20:27
  the room or he didn't personally see uh
• 20:30
  uh Arnold Farmer's genitalia, but he
• 20:33
  commented on it. So, I'm asking myself,
• 20:35
  what man, broker J3, do you know what
• 20:39
  man comments on another man's genitalia?
• 20:43
  >> Uh, I could say it, but some people may
• 20:45
  not like me once I do, so I'mma keep it
• 20:47
  to myself.
• 20:48
  >> Okay?
• 20:49
  >> You know, correction matters. Okay?
• 20:51
  Corrections, they matter.
• 20:53
  >> [snorts]
• 20:53
  >> We don't want to add anything to the
• 20:55
  story at all. The documented remarks
• 20:58
  give us enough to discuss alone. How do
• 21:01
  you get from honoring somebody's
• 21:03
  sporting achievements discussing what
• 21:06
  another man supposedly saw in the
• 21:08
  showers
• 21:08
  >> in the shower
• 21:11
  publicly? Publicly. Okay. So, just think
• 21:14
  about it, guys. And this is what we were
• 21:16
  talking about earlier. A personal leg,
• 21:18
  you know, a person's legacy deserves
• 21:21
  consideration. I'm sure Arnold Palmer
• 21:23
  felt uncomfortable, you know. Well, then
• 21:25
  again, he may not have, but I think he
• 21:28
  may have felt a little bit
• 21:29
  uncomfortable. I know his wife probably
• 21:31
  did with that information becoming
• 21:34
  public. Okay. So, there are many ways to
• 21:36
  celebrate an athletes talent and
• 21:38
  accomplishment without introducing
• 21:41
  intimate locker room details of a
• 21:44
  person's body.
• 21:47
  >> Look here. If somebody is honoring me
• 21:50
  one day, please discuss to the people I
• 21:54
  helped
• 21:55
  and I worked and what I did. I don't
• 21:58
  want the tribute talking about a detour
• 22:02
  coming through the locker room.
• 22:04
  >> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. And then we
• 22:06
  should distinguish guys be the setting
• 22:09
  in time. Trump was campaigning, you
• 22:12
  know, at that time as the former
• 22:14
  president in 2024. Okay. The recent
• 22:16
  example involved him speaking as uh what
• 22:20
  we're talking we brought it current as a
• 22:22
  sitting president now. So the Arma
• 22:23
  Palmer incident happened a while back
• 22:26
  and then what we're talking about now he
• 22:28
  is beautiful. His ass is is beautiful.
• 22:31
  That is current. Okay. So we wanted to
• 22:33
  establish that.
• 22:37
  >> All right guys um you know either way
• 22:40
  you know my question is about
• 22:42
  discretion. If you know the entire
• 22:45
  country is listening and may hear your
• 22:48
  remarks, shouldn't you ask yourself
• 22:50
  first whether the story belongs in the
• 22:53
  speech at all?
• 22:55
  >> Does see our president, we know he goes
• 22:57
  rogue. He he leaves that teleprompter
• 23:00
  and starts talking like you've never
• 23:02
  seen before.
• 23:05
  >> He goes he goes rogue all the time. And
• 23:08
  so, you know, right now, you know, we we
• 23:10
  put this disclaimer out there earlier.
• 23:11
  We don't know if this is something that
• 23:14
  a typical straight man would say. You
• 23:16
  know, you can't really say. You know,
• 23:19
  there's no universal script for how
• 23:21
  heterosexual men speak. Uh it could be a
• 23:25
  compliment, crude joke, an exaggerated
• 23:28
  story. It does not establish a person's
• 23:31
  sexual orientation. So, we're not saying
• 23:33
  just because he referenced another man's
• 23:35
  genitalia or talking about a man's
• 23:37
  behind, his hands, and whatnot that he
• 23:40
  is gay. We're not saying that. We're
• 23:42
  just saying that that the context, the
• 23:44
  timing, uh, and, you know, in that type
• 23:47
  of environment may be a little off. To
• 23:49
  me, it is personally.
• 23:52
  >> It's is it's very off. It's past that.
• 23:55
  [laughter]
• 23:55
  >> Yeah.
• 24:01
  Okay, guys. So,
• 24:03
  being gay, straight, or bisexual, does
• 24:07
  not determine whether someone can lead.
• 24:10
  Judgment, competencies, honesty, and
• 24:12
  respect are the relevant standards.
• 24:15
  That's what we should be looking for.
• 24:17
  >> So now, let's change the name
• 24:21
  >> for just a brief moment.
• 24:23
  >> Let's change the name. Imagine Barack
• 24:27
  Obama.
• 24:28
  >> Yeah.
• 24:28
  >> Making those remarks about a male
• 24:30
  candidate. Woo.
• 24:32
  >> Would the people defending Trump today
• 24:35
  describe it as harmless fun or will they
• 24:38
  be appalled that a sitting president is
• 24:42
  saying what he's saying?
• 24:44
  >> Yeah, I think they would light him up.
• 24:46
  Okay. I think they personally will. So,
• 24:48
  we cannot know everyone's response to
• 24:51
  this hypothetical question, but let
• 24:53
  leaders can expect their own reaction.
• 24:55
  You know, just how would you feel about
• 24:57
  it? Okay. with the same words suddenly
• 25:00
  seem more disturbing if someone you
• 25:02
  oppose said them. Just think about it.
• 25:04
  What if those same Trump supporters were
• 25:07
  in the stands and Obama made that
• 25:10
  comment? You think they would have the
• 25:12
  same reaction? You think they would be
• 25:14
  laughing? I doubt it. I doubt it too.
• 25:17
  Dobby, in my opinion, some people would
• 25:19
  have talked about it for weeks. you
• 25:21
  know, there would have been questions
• 25:23
  about his dignity, about his values, and
• 25:26
  what kind of example he's setting. So, I
• 25:29
  want those same questions to be asked
• 25:31
  consistently. Don't let it uh be a
• 25:34
  problem if if someone else does it, but
• 25:36
  it's okay if if the President Donald
• 25:39
  Trump does it.
• 25:40
  >> Yeah. And and just think about it,
• 25:41
  broken J3. What if President Biden had
• 25:44
  have said it? You know what the first
• 25:45
  thing they would have what they would
• 25:46
  have gotten to? They would have started
• 25:48
  mentioning his health. Mainly his
• 25:51
  probably his mental health. They would
• 25:53
  have taken a leap there and started
• 25:55
  questioning his mental health. I know
• 25:57
  they would have.
• 25:58
  >> Yeah, they probably would have. They
• 26:00
  probably would have all did the exact
• 26:03
  same things. But, you know,
• 26:05
  >> uh you know, it's it's all good. We
• 26:07
  ain't going to talk about kinks. you
• 26:09
  know, his his pumps be saying. But
• 26:12
  anyway, [laughter]
• 26:13
  and and and and and again, imagine if
• 26:15
  George W. Bush, a Republican now,
• 26:19
  >> would you laugh because it was
• 26:21
  unexpected
• 26:22
  or say he embarrassed the office by
• 26:25
  making those comments. Whatever your
• 26:28
  answer is, explain the standard behind
• 26:31
  it. At least explain why you said it's
• 26:34
  okay or it was an embarrassment.
• 26:37
  >> Okay? So guys, just think about those
• 26:39
  three people. We gave you Obama,
• 26:42
  um, Biden, and we gave you George W.
• 26:45
  Bush. So three different presidents.
• 26:49
  What if they had done the same thing? So
• 26:51
  political consistency. Now, just think
• 26:53
  about it. It's equally serious. It means
• 26:56
  that the identity of the speaker should
• 26:58
  not determine whether you notice those
• 27:01
  mistakes or not. It don't matter who say
• 27:03
  it, it's wrong.
• 27:05
  >> That's right. And and and the part that
• 27:08
  people struggle with the most out is we
• 27:11
  want our opponents to be held
• 27:13
  accountable
• 27:15
  and our favorites understood.
• 27:18
  >> At some point understanding becomes an
• 27:20
  endless excuse because that's what's
• 27:23
  going on. It's it it shouldn't be, oh
• 27:25
  that's just Trump or Trump being Trump
• 27:28
  or you know how he
• 27:31
  is not an excuse. If I hear that one
• 27:34
  more time, broker J3, I'm on screen. I'm
• 27:36
  telling you. Okay, so you know, we got
• 27:39
  another comment. You know, I'm glad
• 27:40
  y'all are giving the comments. Y'all are
• 27:42
  y'all are some of y'all are disagreeing
• 27:43
  with us, and that's okay. That's what we
• 27:45
  do here at JNB Live. You don't have to
• 27:47
  always agree with us. Your voice matters
• 27:50
  whether you agree with us or not. So, we
• 27:51
  got someone that says, "Other presidents
• 27:53
  have said embarrassing things, too."
• 27:56
  Yes, they have. Yes, they have. Yeah,
• 27:57
  that's
• 27:58
  >> you know and and and then we canam
• 28:00
  examine those examples too. Somebody
• 28:03
  else's embarrassing moment does not make
• 28:06
  this one appropriate. Okay.
• 28:08
  Accountability is not a coupon that
• 28:10
  expires when you find another person
• 28:13
  that's behaving badly.
• 28:15
  >> Okay. And then now we got Tammy saying,
• 28:17
  "No, this is Janice saying you just
• 28:20
  don't like Trump." No, it's not about
• 28:22
  whether I like him or not. It's the
• 28:24
  behavior. It it doesn't matter if if any
• 28:27
  president had have made those type of
• 28:29
  comments, I would be saying the exact
• 28:31
  same thing. It wouldn't matter who it
• 28:33
  is. It's totally inappropriate
• 28:35
  regardless of who who said, but I'm
• 28:37
  tired of people giving Trump a pass for
• 28:40
  saying stuff that's inappropriate.
• 28:42
  >> It's inappropriate. I don't care. I
• 28:45
  don't want to hear that Trump being
• 28:46
  Trump.
• 28:47
  >> Yeah. Uh I I feel like this and I feel
• 28:50
  strongly about it. You don't have to
• 28:52
  like my opinion.
• 28:53
  >> Okay. You know, you don't have to like
• 28:54
  it at all. You know, answer the
• 28:56
  question. Would you accept the same
• 28:59
  conduct for somebody you didn't vote
• 29:01
  for? Would you? If the answer is no,
• 29:05
  then your standards need to be, you
• 29:06
  know, you need to take a look at your
• 29:08
  own standards. Point blank.
• 29:10
  >> Yeah, that's true. That's true. That's
• 29:11
  true. So, now we're going to talk about,
• 29:14
  you know, he loves I think he thinks
• 29:16
  he's beautiful. He thinks he's a
• 29:18
  good-look man, y'all. He really thinks
• 29:21
  cuz you know the hair has to be on
• 29:23
  point. You know he thinks he's a
• 29:24
  good-look man. You know he'll have the
• 29:26
  nerve to call somebody else.
• 29:28
  >> 40 years.
• 29:29
  >> Fool you.
• 29:30
  >> What you said broker J3.
• 29:32
  >> I said Trump been balls for over 40
• 29:34
  years. [laughter]
• 29:36
  >> I don't know why he keep having that
• 29:38
  little piece of hair going across. You
• 29:40
  think it's a toup pay?
• 29:42
  >> It ain't no thing. It is. Everybody know
• 29:44
  Trump ball at the top. That ain't that
• 29:46
  ain't no secret.
• 29:48
  >> [laughter]
• 29:48
  [gasps]
• 29:49
  >> Okay, we're going to talk about
• 29:50
  beautiful people. He loves surrounding
• 29:53
  himself with beautiful people because he
• 29:55
  thinks he's a handsome man. We're going
• 29:57
  to talk about some of his hiring
• 29:59
  decisions and self-image. And so, we're
• 30:02
  going to fast forward to what just
• 30:04
  happened in the last week. Honey, this
• 30:05
  little poor press secretary
• 30:08
  Katie, I'm going to say her is Zacharia.
• 30:11
  Zachariah, I'm not sure how to pronounce
• 30:13
  her last name. I don't want to murder
• 30:14
  her last name, but listen here. Ruters
• 30:17
  has reported that she was dismissed as
• 30:20
  the White House secretary on October the
• 30:23
  16th after less than what one week. They
• 30:27
  said she beat uh was it Karamucci beat
• 30:31
  [laughter] his record? Less than one
• 30:33
  week in the row following scrutinies of
• 30:36
  her credentials because she's saying
• 30:38
  that she's an attorney practicing law
• 30:40
  but she hasn't passed the bar. Okay. and
• 30:43
  criticism of her poor performance as
• 30:46
  press secretary. She just was not
• 30:49
  qualified. The reporting also said that
• 30:51
  Trump wanted a spokesperson who could
• 30:54
  better promote his administration's
• 30:57
  accomplishments. That's why he's let her
• 31:00
  go. But we're going to get to the point
• 31:02
  as to why did he hire in the first
• 31:04
  place?
• 31:06
  >> Th this is where the discussion moves
• 31:08
  beyond an inappropriate joke. be when
• 31:12
  you select somebody for an important job
• 31:14
  like that, what are you checking for?
• 31:16
  >> Yeah. Yeah.
• 31:17
  >> Their knowledge.
• 31:19
  >> Yeah.
• 31:19
  >> Their how do you vet her?
• 31:22
  >> Exactly. Their judgment under pressure
• 31:24
  because that's a tough job. Or whether
• 31:27
  you look convincing on television now
• 31:29
  for you to even give her that job
• 31:33
  >> like like Doc B just said, how did you
• 31:34
  vet her? You looked at her. Oh, she's
• 31:36
  beautiful. People love to look at her.
• 31:38
  >> Yeah. Yeah. Because you thought she was
• 31:40
  beautiful.
• 31:41
  >> Mhm.
• 31:41
  >> You didn't even pay attention whether
• 31:42
  she was even smart or not.
• 31:44
  >> Uhhuh. Yeah. Didn't even check to see if
• 31:47
  she had a bar license. You know what I'm
• 31:48
  saying? She don't have to have a uh be a
• 31:51
  lawyer to be press secretary, but if she
• 31:53
  says she is, don't you want to make sure
• 31:55
  she has one?
• 31:57
  Okay, guys. So, we should not claim that
• 32:00
  appearance was the sole reason for her
• 32:02
  hiring. We're not saying that. We just
• 32:04
  go back, people. Y'all can do the math.
• 32:07
  Go back and look at who he's hired. Look
• 32:10
  at his entire cabinet. Most of the
• 32:13
  people, especially the females that he's
• 32:15
  hired, all really look the same. I'm
• 32:17
  gonna be honest with you, the majority
• 32:19
  of them. Okay? So, we're not saying
• 32:21
  that, but reporting
• 32:23
  um we that we've done automatically
• 32:26
  establish that. According to the
• 32:28
  Guardian, they describe her brief tenure
• 32:32
  was exposing weaknesses in Trump's
• 32:34
  television focused approach to hiring.
• 32:37
  That's what it is. Look at Pete headset.
• 32:39
  Where did he come from? I think what had
• 32:42
  a podcast or something on some show Fox
• 32:45
  Media or something like that.
• 32:46
  >> That was the FBI director. Cash Mattel.
• 32:48
  >> Oh, that was Cash Mattel. Okay.
• 32:50
  >> Yeah, he was a podcaster before he
• 32:52
  became the director of the FBI. But I
• 32:55
  think
• 32:55
  >> so that means me and you can work in the
• 32:57
  government.
• 32:58
  >> Huh?
• 32:59
  >> I said me and you can work in the
• 33:01
  government cuz cuz if Cash Patel the
• 33:03
  director of FBI was a podcaster before
• 33:06
  he got the job. Hell, we already
• 33:08
  qualified.
• 33:09
  [laughter]
• 33:11
  We can do their job, can't we?
• 33:14
  Okay, guys. As Ro J3 is on it tonight,
• 33:17
  y'all. Okay, [laughter]
• 33:19
  so this is just an interpretation
• 33:22
  um that was done by the Guardian. um
• 33:24
  that was offered by this publication.
• 33:26
  Not proof of private motives. But just
• 33:29
  think about it, guys. Like I said a few
• 33:31
  minutes ago, you can add one plus two
• 33:33
  equal three. Just look at all of the
• 33:35
  females and males that he's hired. He
• 33:38
  like to surround himself with people
• 33:41
  that he calls looks beautiful, got
• 33:44
  muscles. Some have even said that that's
• 33:46
  why he like Putin so much because you
• 33:49
  know Putin has the little muscles and
• 33:51
  stuff. That's a disclaimer. That's what
• 33:53
  the publications are saying.
• 33:56
  >> But you know that also raises reasonable
• 33:58
  questions. Dobby B.
• 34:00
  >> Does looking the part sometimes receive
• 34:03
  more attention than being prepared for
• 34:05
  the part? You know, you can look like
• 34:08
  you're qualified for a job, but that
• 34:10
  does not mean that you're actually
• 34:12
  qualified for the job.
• 34:14
  >> Yeah, that that is so true, bro. And um
• 34:18
  you know presentation does matter in
• 34:21
  communication roles. I agree you know um
• 34:25
  but still you have to have some
• 34:27
  knowledge as well. A press secretary
• 34:29
  needs to communicate clearly and remain
• 34:32
  composed at all time. This young lady
• 34:34
  came out I think her first press
• 34:37
  conference that she held I think it
• 34:39
  lasted like 14 minutes. I mean she was
• 34:43
  unprepared.
• 34:58
  Okay, B. I'm not sure what happened to
• 35:00
  you.
• 35:10
  >> Do you hear me, brother J3? Yeah, I hear
• 35:12
  you. But um I don't I don't see you on
• 35:17
  I don't see you on the other night.
• 35:21
  >> Um you might want to go out broken J3
• 35:24
  and come back in. That's the same thing
• 35:25
  that happened the other night.
• 35:31
  >> Broker J3, can you exit and come back
• 35:34
  in?
• 35:36
  Sure. Dobby.
• 36:05
  But sometimes
• 36:11
  >> it uh basically want to shut down.
• 36:18
  Uh, I don't see you.B.
• 36:20
  >> Okay.
• 36:20
  >> Oh, there you go.
• 36:21
  >> Okay. Here you go. We're back. Okay. Did
• 36:23
  you have to exit and come back in or it
• 36:24
  automatically came back on it own?
• 36:25
  >> No, I exited and came back.B.
• 36:28
  >> Okay. Does it does that for some reason?
• 36:31
  Okay, guys. So, again, thank you guys
• 36:33
  for joining us. Tiffany, thank you. Uh,
• 36:37
  DTZ
• 36:39
  Honesty, thank you for joining us and
• 36:42
  being a part of the J&B family. We're
• 36:44
  talking about that as ass is beautiful.
• 36:48
  we we pronounce we spell it a ZZ. Okay.
• 36:51
  Okay. And is this uh characteristics or
• 36:54
  is this behavior okay for a president?
• 36:57
  So that's what we're talking about this
• 36:59
  evening. So thank you guys for joining
• 37:01
  us. Just think about the press
• 37:03
  secretary.
• 37:05
  That person has to be able to
• 37:07
  communicate clearly and remain composed
• 37:09
  at all times. Her first meeting with the
• 37:13
  media lasted only 14 minutes and she was
• 37:16
  not prepared. Her abilities must also be
• 37:20
  supported by preparation. She was not
• 37:22
  prepared. That's why I think he let her
• 37:24
  go. She's gone. She only lasted one
• 37:26
  week. Accuracy and a reliable
• 37:29
  understanding of the issues. She didn't
• 37:31
  she she wasn't up to speed her job. She
• 37:34
  got in there and then she just started
• 37:35
  praising Donald Trump, but she knew none
• 37:38
  of the policies. She really didn't know
• 37:40
  anything. I think she was just
• 37:42
  unprepared. And so he kindly asked her,
• 37:45
  told her in so many words that he think
• 37:48
  that she would be better off uh being at
• 37:51
  home, a stay-at-home mom or whatever she
• 37:53
  was doing prior to that job.
• 37:56
  >> Yeah. Cuz you know, eventually
• 37:58
  somebody's going to ask a follow-up
• 37:59
  question. Um and yeah,
• 38:01
  >> you know, she's going to have to be able
• 38:03
  to answer it. you know, her hair stylist
• 38:05
  can't answer it for, you know, no, you
• 38:08
  have to you have to know what you're
• 38:09
  talking about, you know, especially when
• 38:10
  when you're in a role like that. You
• 38:12
  have to know what you're talking about.
• 38:16
  >> Yeah, you have to. And so, we um should
• 38:20
  not demean a woman's appearance or
• 38:23
  assume that an attractive person lacks
• 38:26
  ability. There's a lot of women out
• 38:27
  there who look good or beautiful, but
• 38:31
  they are qualified as well. You know,
• 38:34
  we're not saying just because uh Katie
• 38:36
  Zachariah Zacharia is wasn't prepared,
• 38:40
  you know, doesn't mean all beautiful
• 38:42
  women are and some people may say she's
• 38:43
  beautiful. I don't I mean that's your
• 38:45
  personal opinion, but the key to that is
• 38:48
  you have to have both when you're in a
• 38:50
  press secretary position. You just can't
• 38:53
  have one. Okay? So that would repeat the
• 38:56
  same superficial thinking, you know,
• 38:59
  that we're criticizing right now. So
• 39:00
  we're not going to flip that. You know,
• 39:02
  you got to have both.
• 39:04
  >> Yeah. Absolutely, DB. You know, be
• 39:07
  beautiful and brilliant.
• 39:08
  >> Yeah,
• 39:08
  >> it's possible.
• 39:10
  >> Be ordinary looking and brilliant.
• 39:12
  That's possible. Just be ready for the
• 39:16
  responsibility. The public should not
• 39:18
  have to pay for somebody's audition.
• 39:20
  Point blank. You shouldn't be up there
• 39:22
  doing your job, auditioning for the job.
• 39:26
  >> Yeah, I agree with you there, Broker J3.
• 39:29
  I agree with you there. So, guys, um
• 39:33
  when that selection failed, which it
• 39:36
  did, the scrutiny, the media just really
• 39:39
  just they ate her alive. I'm going to be
• 39:41
  honest with you. Um but it should extend
• 39:46
  to the person making the appointment
• 39:48
  because who hired Katie Zacharo?
• 39:50
  Zachariah, who hired her? Trump did. He
• 39:53
  hired her without vetting her. So, guess
• 39:57
  what? He knew he made a mistake. And
• 39:59
  guess what? He tried to clean up fast.
• 40:02
  That's why he asked her to resign. I'll
• 40:04
  be honest with you. So, but what was the
• 40:06
  process? How did they vet her? I don't
• 40:08
  think they did. What preparations was
• 40:11
  provided? Were expectations realistic
• 40:14
  for her? Did she knew what she was
• 40:16
  getting into? She probably didn't even
• 40:18
  know, particularly for her to say that
• 40:23
  she practiced law in China. Everybody
• 40:26
  knows that Americans can't practice law
• 40:29
  in China. And then the bar, the exam in
• 40:33
  China is they say only 10% of the
• 40:36
  Chinese people pass the bar in China.
• 40:39
  So, how can she go over there and pass
• 40:42
  the bar? And see, this is what gets me
• 40:44
  broken J3. And I know we need to move
• 40:46
  on.
• 40:47
  How could she not have known that people
• 40:50
  were going to investigate her?
• 40:54
  People have access to everything.
• 40:57
  They even found the person that she
• 41:00
  communicated with before she and her
• 41:02
  husband moved to China that said she
• 41:05
  failed it. She failed the bar exam. So,
• 41:09
  why would you say that knowing that they
• 41:12
  were going to investigate and find out?
• 41:15
  It just that blows me away.
• 41:17
  >> Yeah. But see, that's that's what I want
• 41:19
  to know. Dobby B. Uh you don't get to
• 41:21
  claim all the credit for choosing your
• 41:23
  team and then accept none of the
• 41:24
  responsibility when something goes
• 41:26
  wrong.
• 41:27
  >> You know, uh you know, you you you want
• 41:30
  to talk about your star team, but then
• 41:31
  when something happens and you have to
• 41:33
  get rid of them, you don't want to take
• 41:35
  responsibility like somebody else hired
• 41:37
  him
• 41:37
  >> and you didn't know she was unqualified.
• 41:39
  >> Yeah. That's what he he does that
• 41:40
  quickly now. He all he'll come up he's
• 41:42
  came up with every excuse in the book
• 41:45
  other than the fact that she is not
• 41:47
  confident. People can see that she's not
• 41:49
  confident. You don't even have to say
• 41:51
  it. But he don't want to do that because
• 41:53
  that's going to admit that he was at
• 41:55
  fault. So you could also ask yourself
• 41:57
  whether Trump himself
• 42:00
  sees himself as especially handsome. I
• 42:02
  mentioned this a few minutes ago. I
• 42:03
  think he does. That's documented example
• 42:06
  of him making appearance comparison.
• 42:09
  Okay. According to Ruters, he said in
• 42:11
  2024 that he looked better. He's more
• 42:15
  better looking than Kla Harris. I never
• 42:18
  forget when he made that that statement.
• 42:19
  A lot of people said, "Well, they'd
• 42:20
  rather look at Kla Harris and look at
• 42:22
  him any day of the week." Okay, but that
• 42:25
  tells us what he publicly said, but it
• 42:28
  does not tell us the psychological
• 42:31
  explanation behind it. What man
• 42:35
  says he looks better than a woman?
• 42:38
  That's a good question.
• 42:40
  >> To a woman. [laughter]
• 42:42
  >> Yeah. Yes, that's a good question, Dr.
• 42:44
  B. Uh, Dr. B, you're a little over to
• 42:46
  the side instead of um, you know, my
• 42:49
  response will be this, do B. You know,
• 42:52
  what does that have to do with running
• 42:54
  the country?
• 42:56
  >> You know, if the roof is leaking,
• 42:59
  I'm not choosing a contractor based on
• 43:01
  who thinks he looks better in the
• 43:04
  estimate photo. You understand? I'm
• 43:06
  gonna choose somebody that's capable of
• 43:09
  doing the damn job.
• 43:10
  >> Yeah. But but just think about it. I
• 43:12
  think and when it comes to down to a
• 43:15
  person's appearance, I think that
• 43:17
  actually lives it occupies a lot of
• 43:20
  space in Trump's head. You know, it is
• 43:23
  less responsible to declare that we know
• 43:26
  exactly why. We don't know why he thinks
• 43:28
  that way, but based on some remarks that
• 43:32
  he's made, we all know the Republicans,
• 43:36
  the Maggas, all everybody knows how he
• 43:38
  feels about his appearance, particularly
• 43:41
  that hair is, you know, particularly
• 43:44
  that hair and how he likes to surround
• 43:46
  himself with beautiful women. I I would
• 43:49
  say so-called beautiful women. Maybe he
• 43:51
  thinks it's entertaining the people with
• 43:53
  some of the stuff that he said.
• 43:55
  >> Maybe he believes it reinforces his
• 43:57
  image. But whatever the reason is, I
• 44:01
  want to discuss the discussions brought
• 44:04
  back about the work what's being done.
• 44:10
  >> Yeah. And then you know Republicans or
• 44:13
  MAGAS or everybody really voters in
• 44:16
  general should ask themselves can the
• 44:18
  person explain a decision? Can he
• 44:21
  explain the decision behind hiring her?
• 44:25
  Can he accept correction? Can he accept
• 44:27
  that he should not have hired her
• 44:29
  without vetting her? Can he manage a
• 44:32
  diff difficult situation? These
• 44:35
  questions are more important and useful
• 44:38
  than deciding who looks impressive. So
• 44:40
  in other words, before they hired her,
• 44:42
  they should have vetted her and
• 44:44
  determined whether she would be
• 44:46
  appropriate, whether she could handle
• 44:48
  herself and whether she was qualified
• 44:50
  for that job. Same thing goes with this
• 44:52
  man at this rally who he said was
• 44:55
  beautiful or talking about his backside,
• 44:59
  his hands, his jawline. Don't matter
• 45:02
  what he looked like. Is he qualified and
• 45:04
  what can he do for the constituents?
• 45:09
  >> You know,
• 45:12
  confidence without preparation can be
• 45:15
  very expensive
• 45:17
  and when the job involves public
• 45:20
  responsibility,
• 45:22
  everybody else can end up paying for the
• 45:25
  mistake.
• 45:28
  >> Yeah, that is true. All right, broker
• 45:30
  J3, we're going to look at this and want
• 45:33
  you guys to put yourselves in this
• 45:35
  situation. Would you accept this from
• 45:37
  your own boss? I know I wouldn't. Okay,
• 45:40
  imagine that you are attending a
• 45:43
  community meeting about rising costs and
• 45:46
  delayed repairs. Um, the chair
• 45:49
  introduces a new manager by praising his
• 45:52
  face, how good the manager look,
• 45:54
  good-looking manager, how he has those
• 45:57
  broad shoulders and the backside. The
• 46:01
  residents out there, they're just
• 46:02
  laughing awkwardly. That's cackling,
• 46:04
  [laughter] but they still don't know
• 46:06
  whether the manager can solve their
• 46:08
  problems, but they really laughing. But
• 46:12
  then you got somebody asking, "What
• 46:14
  about his experience?"
• 46:16
  And and the chair says, "Look at him.
• 46:20
  He looks like a manager."
• 46:24
  >> That would not answer one single
• 46:25
  question on my list. I don't care.
• 46:28
  Honestly, I don't give a damn about how
• 46:32
  you look. I need to know whether you can
• 46:34
  do the job or not.
• 46:35
  >> Exactly. Exactly. because everybody that
• 46:37
  everybody that look good I'm not
• 46:40
  qualified for the job. Just think about
• 46:42
  it. You know, you can't judge a person
• 46:44
  based on the way they look. That's
• 46:45
  crazy. Okay. So, guess what guys? A few
• 46:48
  days later, another hire major hire and
• 46:53
  the residents they began questioning the
• 46:55
  selection process. One board member says
• 46:58
  that's just the chair's personality.
• 47:02
  Well, his personality hasn't repaired
• 47:05
  the roof. Being entertainment then being
• 47:08
  entertaining rather, it doesn't complete
• 47:10
  the assignment. Show me the
• 47:12
  qualifications and explain that in a
• 47:15
  real discussion.
• 47:16
  >> Yeah. Cuz sometime when people that look
• 47:19
  good get those jobs, that's all they
• 47:20
  think they supposed to do is look look
• 47:22
  good. They think they not they're not
• 47:23
  supposed to do any work but just do look
• 47:26
  good. So yeah, that's what it is, Dr. B.
• 47:29
  >> Yeah. Yeah. Okay. So, we got some
• 47:31
  comments. We got Bridget, who is from
• 47:33
  Jacksonville, says, "If the organization
• 47:36
  is doing well, why should one joke
• 47:38
  matter?"
• 47:40
  >> Well, I'mma tell you why. Because the
• 47:44
  results matter
• 47:47
  and I will consider that.
• 47:50
  But guess what?
• 47:52
  Success doesn't eliminate the need for
• 47:54
  boundaries.
• 47:56
  You can acknowledge good work while
• 47:57
  still asking somebody to behave
• 48:00
  professionally.
• 48:02
  >> Yeah.
• 48:04
  Yeah, you sure can. You sure can. Okay,
• 48:07
  guys. So, another comment. We got Miss
• 48:09
  Tammy from Tulsa. Tulsa.
• 48:12
  >> What's up, Tammy?
• 48:14
  >> Uh, this proves something is wrong with
• 48:16
  his mind. Yeah, it does.
• 48:18
  >> Yeah, something's been wrong with his
• 48:20
  mind. uh way way back when he was uh uh
• 48:23
  pedophiling uh young girls. Anyway,
• 48:26
  >> it proves he made the remarks uh that we
• 48:30
  discussed.
• 48:31
  >> Now, the diagnosis would require
• 48:33
  different kind of evidence. We can
• 48:35
  criticize his judgment without
• 48:37
  pretending that we actually performed
• 48:39
  the examination. So, it's it's like
• 48:42
  this.
• 48:45
  It doesn't matter what a person
• 48:49
  appearance looks like. Let's get this
• 48:52
  Let's get this clear. If they're not
• 48:54
  qualified for a job, they shouldn't be
• 48:57
  there.
• 48:58
  >> Yeah.
• 48:59
  >> Period.
• 48:59
  >> Sure shouldn't. Okay. Broker J3. So,
• 49:02
  we're going to move on and we're going
• 49:03
  to talk about is Donald Trump's behavior
• 49:07
  getting worse and should he resign? How
• 49:11
  do you feel about that? Well, um, uh, I
• 49:15
  think he should have never been in
• 49:16
  office personally. But hey, [laughter]
• 49:18
  that's just my opinion.
• 49:20
  >> That's just my opinion. Now, let's ask
• 49:22
  the difficult question directly.
• 49:25
  Let's be straight up, guys. Is this
• 49:28
  behavior, let's talk about the behavior,
• 49:31
  is the president's behavior
• 49:34
  getting worse
• 49:36
  or listen carefully. Are the American
• 49:40
  people just getting accustomed to it?
• 49:42
  >> Yeah.
• 49:44
  >> So, my opinion, this does show a
• 49:47
  reoccurrence because this has not been
• 49:49
  the first time that he's behaved in this
• 49:51
  manner. But guys, you know, we're going
• 49:54
  to keep it honest. We're going to keep
• 49:55
  it real. By itself, by themselves, that
• 49:58
  does not establish a
• 50:01
  worsening condition because he's he's
• 50:04
  done it before. He he's continuing to do
• 50:07
  it. Now, what we have to determine is
• 50:10
  why he does it. You know, you know, he's
• 50:12
  he's done it before. It's nothing
• 50:15
  different, but you have to con think why
• 50:17
  does he continue to do that? I think
• 50:18
  it's something internal that causes him
• 50:22
  to make those type of comments. Okay.
• 50:24
  So, a claim that behavior is increasing
• 50:26
  would require a broader comparison all
• 50:29
  the time. But now, I do think I do think
• 50:33
  that he needs a serious mental health
• 50:36
  check. I really do.
• 50:41
  >> But, you know, Dr. B, you know, the
• 50:43
  recurrence is it still matters. You
• 50:46
  know, he always does that. You know,
• 50:49
  it's it's a description, not a defense.
• 50:52
  >> Yeah. If something was inappropriate the
• 50:55
  first time,
• 50:57
  repetition does not turn it into good
• 50:59
  judgment. Period.
• 51:01
  >> Yeah. Yeah. So guys, what we can do is
• 51:03
  we can ask whether the audience
• 51:06
  expectations have changed. Are people
• 51:09
  evaluating each incident?
• 51:12
  You know, they're not because what are
• 51:14
  they saying in Broker J 3? Trump is just
• 51:16
  what?
• 51:17
  >> Being Trump
• 51:19
  >> or have they stopped expecting
• 51:21
  restraints? Just think about it. I
• 51:23
  personally think he's not going to stop
• 51:25
  because nobody's stopping him. Nobody's
• 51:28
  criticizing what he's saying. I think
• 51:30
  it's going to continue. And like I said,
• 51:32
  he may be saying it because he wants to
• 51:34
  get a couple of laughs or two or
• 51:35
  whatnot, but just think about it. He's
• 51:38
  done it when he wasn't trying to get
• 51:40
  votes. So, you know, you have to think
• 51:42
  about this and it's going to continue to
• 51:45
  happen. Now, whether it's going to
• 51:46
  escalate, I'm not certain about of that,
• 51:49
  but we shall see. But you know it's like
• 51:52
  this. If his supporters no longer expect
• 51:54
  the restraints from him then uh where
• 51:57
  does the accountability come from? At
• 51:59
  what point does somebody who likes him
• 52:02
  who voted for him actually say Mr.
• 52:05
  President that is unnecessary? Now
• 52:07
  [snorts] keep in mind his first term he
• 52:11
  had he had people in there that had
• 52:13
  experience
• 52:15
  that that that that knew their job. And
• 52:18
  when he did something, they told him,
• 52:20
  "Hey, you can't say that. You can't do
• 52:22
  that." And he came back many times and
• 52:25
  he he he didn't double down like he does
• 52:27
  now. He actually said corrected himself
• 52:30
  as at, you know, as what was
• 52:32
  appropriate. But this term,
• 52:35
  >> he only hired people in his cabinet that
• 52:38
  basically would say, "Yes, sir. Whatever
• 52:40
  you want, sir. Whatever." So that way
• 52:43
  nobody's correcting him when he's making
• 52:45
  mistakes or doing stuff that he should
• 52:47
  not be doing.
• 52:49
  >> Because if they hadn't got rid of half
• 52:51
  of the generals that actually cared
• 52:53
  about this country or got rid of most of
• 52:55
  the secret service people that knew what
• 52:58
  was going on with national intelligence
• 53:03
  as well uh broker J3 the DOJ employees
• 53:06
  as well. They said they fired about a
• 53:08
  thousand DOJ employees as well. So
• 53:10
  plenty of lawyers lost their jobs that
• 53:12
  they either lost their jobs or they
• 53:14
  left. Yeah. Yeah. And you are correct.
• 53:17
  He put people he put Yes. people in
• 53:20
  place this time as opposed to people
• 53:23
  that challenged him and questioned him
• 53:25
  the last time. He knew exactly what he
• 53:27
  was doing. Exactly what he was doing.
• 53:29
  Because just like think about it now,
• 53:31
  broken J3, what he does is he does
• 53:33
  things that he know are wrong
• 53:37
  or he brings these charges, lawsuits
• 53:39
  against people that he know won't hold
• 53:42
  up in court. But he does that so that
• 53:45
  you he can so that you can challenge
• 53:47
  him.
• 53:48
  >> He don't care if he loses when you
• 53:51
  challenge him. He just wants to do
• 53:53
  whatever he wants to do. So this is this
• 53:55
  is it's going to get worse before it
• 53:57
  gets better. Now, I'm hoping that the
• 54:00
  midterms will make some changes, but we
• 54:02
  won't see until after midterm because
• 54:05
  there that's going this is going to be a
• 54:07
  totally different uh podcast episode and
• 54:10
  we'll get to that probably maybe
• 54:11
  Thursday. We're going to talk about
• 54:13
  what's going on with the midterm
• 54:15
  elections, what's going on from state to
• 54:16
  state, but we don't know. It might be
• 54:19
  worse than this next year round about
• 54:21
  this time. Okay, guys. So let's think
• 54:24
  about this legitimate
• 54:26
  um political question. Mental health is
• 54:29
  totally a a totally separate matter.
• 54:32
  These statements alone do not establish
• 54:35
  a diagnosis that the president has some
• 54:37
  mental health issues
• 54:39
  or his inability to carry out his
• 54:41
  presidential duties. But there are
• 54:43
  people that are questioning his mental
• 54:46
  health at this time.
• 54:48
  >> So the question is guys, should he
• 54:49
  resign?
• 54:51
  >> Put it in the chat. Let us know.
• 54:53
  and Dobby B. Imagine this.
• 54:57
  Imagine back in 2020.
• 54:59
  Okay.
• 55:01
  >> Imagine if he had his yes team in his
• 55:03
  administration then.
• 55:05
  >> Yeah.
• 55:05
  >> Do you think he would have transferred
• 55:07
  power after he lost the election?
• 55:12
  >> Oh, if he had Oh, no. Oh, absolutely
• 55:15
  not. Cuz guess what? He's got just like
• 55:19
  now he's trying to challenge uh the
• 55:22
  bailing ballots in in California because
• 55:25
  he knows that if he loses California,
• 55:28
  it's a possibility because remember they
• 55:30
  gained I think five new seats five after
• 55:33
  they red a redistricting. Yeah. He knows
• 55:37
  >> that if he loses California, it's a
• 55:39
  possibility he might lose the midterms
• 55:41
  if you know if the Republicans lose
• 55:43
  California. So he's got things in place.
• 55:46
  Y'all don't think for a minute I don't
• 55:48
  think he's going to let the midterms go
• 55:51
  without causing some type of
• 55:52
  >> I I don't think so easy. But but think
• 55:54
  about think about this Doc B.
• 55:57
  >> How in the world can I tell y'all
• 56:01
  that mail in voting
• 56:04
  uh is fraudulent and me the president
• 56:08
  myself mailed in my own ballot.
• 56:11
  >> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And doesn't make
• 56:14
  sense.
• 56:15
  >> Yeah. And statistically they say there
• 56:17
  might be a handful a handful of ballots
• 56:21
  that might have the wrong information on
• 56:23
  it. And so he's wishy-washy with that.
• 56:25
  He goes back and forth. Uh but I do know
• 56:28
  now I do know based on you know what
• 56:31
  I've heard this week because a lot of
• 56:34
  people are in the midst of voting you
• 56:36
  know uh early uh voting um this week.
• 56:40
  Early voting is at an all-time high. So
• 56:43
  people are getting those ballots in. So
• 56:46
  you know I think
• 56:46
  >> they said they said Georgia they've
• 56:48
  already hit a million early voters
• 56:50
  already in the state of Georgia.
• 56:52
  >> So so so based on that now they said
• 56:54
  Georgia now we're going to talk about
• 56:55
  that too on Thursday. Georgia may flip.
• 56:57
  We don't know. We don't know for sure.
• 57:00
  But I'm sure, and I'm sure Broker J3
• 57:03
  agrees with me, that the uh trying to
• 57:08
  get those absentee ballots thrown out,
• 57:11
  trying to intimidate people at the
• 57:13
  ballot boxes, you know, of going into
• 57:15
  the precinct to vote. Those are things
• 57:18
  that he's going to try to do. Now, I'm
• 57:21
  sure there's going to be some other
• 57:22
  things. Declaring war, you know, because
• 57:26
  he might say that Iran started a war.
• 57:29
  You guys, you don't know what he might
• 57:31
  do. He's desperate at this point. When a
• 57:36
  person becomes desperate, you never know
• 57:38
  what they may do. And see, he's
• 57:39
  desperate. Why is he desperate? Because
• 57:41
  he knows that if he loses the midterm,
• 57:45
  he may become a lame duck and he also
• 57:49
  rich risk impeachment.
• 57:52
  >> Okay, D, let's uh let's give our final
• 57:56
  thoughts on this evening's podcast, you
• 57:58
  know. Okay.
• 57:59
  >> Um and let the people know how how we
• 58:01
  felt about this particular podcast.
• 58:03
  >> Okay guys, so the presidency carries a
• 58:06
  responsibility
• 58:08
  uh to model judgment. People look at the
• 58:10
  president and you know his behavior
• 58:14
  should be model behavior that people
• 58:16
  want to exemplify and follow, you know,
• 58:19
  with dignity, respect. Even when a
• 58:22
  person is holding the office wants to
• 58:24
  entertain a crowd, there's nothing wrong
• 58:26
  with trying to get a laugh or two or
• 58:28
  entertain people. But a compliment does
• 58:32
  not establish someone's sexuality.
• 58:35
  And an offensive remark does not
• 58:38
  establish a medical diagnosis. We are
• 58:40
  aware of that. But public behavior
• 58:43
  absolutely deserves public scrutiny. You
• 58:47
  know, you wouldn't allow another
• 58:49
  president to do that. Okay. When we
• 58:51
  excuse conduct from our favorite
• 58:53
  politician that we would condemn from
• 58:56
  another, we weaken our own standards.
• 58:59
  Americans deserve leaders whose
• 59:02
  preparations matter more than their
• 59:04
  presentation, the way they look, and
• 59:07
  whose decisions matter more than their
• 59:09
  ability to get a laugh. Whether you
• 59:12
  believe Trump should resign or remain in
• 59:14
  office, that's, you know, that's up to
• 59:15
  you. Okay? build that position on
• 59:18
  verified facts, consistent principles,
• 59:22
  and the responsibilities of the job. The
• 59:24
  office belongs to the American people,
• 59:27
  just like that White House belongs to
• 59:29
  the American people, and expecting
• 59:33
  better is a part of holding it
• 59:36
  accountable.
• 59:39
  >> That's deep, Dr. B. That's deep.
• 59:41
  Appreciate that that final thought. You
• 59:44
  know, my final thought is this, Dr. B.
• 59:48
  A handsome face.
• 59:52
  You know, it cannot lower your bills.
• 59:54
  >> No,
• 59:55
  >> a strong jawline cannot explain policy
• 1:00:00
  and a beautiful ass cannot carry the
• 1:00:02
  responsibility of a presidency.
• 1:00:05
  >> We should never become so entertained by
• 1:00:08
  a leader that we forget to evaluate
• 1:00:10
  their leadership.
• 1:00:14
  If you would be outraged hearing these
• 1:00:16
  words from Obama, Biden, or even Bush,
• 1:00:20
  then have the courage to question them
• 1:00:22
  what Trump says it.
• 1:00:24
  >> Yes.
• 1:00:25
  >> Calling calling everything he does a
• 1:00:27
  joke does not make every joke
• 1:00:30
  appropriate. And calling everything his
• 1:00:34
  personality is not an excuse for every
• 1:00:37
  decision that he makes.
• 1:00:40
  When a president's conduct repeatedly
• 1:00:42
  distracts from the work, the public has
• 1:00:45
  the right to demand accountability
• 1:00:47
  and debate whether the president should
• 1:00:49
  step aside.
• 1:00:52
  Stop grading the performance by how
• 1:00:54
  loudly the crowd laughs
• 1:00:57
  and start grading the leadership by how
• 1:01:00
  the responsibility of the job gets done.
• 1:01:05
  >> Yeah, that is true. Very powerful, bro.
• 1:01:07
  J3, very powerful. So guys now we hope
• 1:01:11
  you have enjoyed this uh particular
• 1:01:14
  topic. We want your final thoughts. We
• 1:01:17
  want to know what you think, how you
• 1:01:19
  feel about it. Is this harm harmless
• 1:01:22
  humor, inappropriate presidential
• 1:01:25
  behavior or part of a larger concern
• 1:01:28
  about judgment? What do you think?
• 1:01:32
  >> And and and answer this honestly, guys.
• 1:01:34
  Would would your reaction change if it
• 1:01:36
  was a different president had said it?
• 1:01:38
  If so, put your answers in the comments
• 1:01:40
  and tell us why.
• 1:01:45
  Okay guys, so follow us at live with
• 1:01:48
  J&B. We want you to subscribe. We want
• 1:01:52
  you to like and share this conversation.
• 1:01:55
  Shout out to everyone who joined us live
• 1:01:59
  this evening and everyone listening
• 1:02:02
  afterwards. And guys, we appreciate all
• 1:02:05
  of our uh podcast listeners and our
• 1:02:08
  replay listeners. Um we really
• 1:02:10
  appreciate you guys. So whether you're
• 1:02:12
  on Apple podcast, Spotify, Pandora,
• 1:02:15
  iHeart Radio, or wherever you enjoy your
• 1:02:18
  podcast listening enjoyment, we thank
• 1:02:20
  you guys for joining the J Live podcast.
• 1:02:23
  So make sure you guys keep your opinions
• 1:02:26
  strong and your facts stronger. I'm your
• 1:02:30
  host, your boy, your favorite uncle. You
• 1:02:33
  know that guy, Broker J3.
• 1:02:36
  >> All right, guys. I am your girl. I'm
• 1:02:38
  your favorite auntie, Dr. B. Thank you
• 1:02:40
  again for joining us. We will see you
• 1:02:43
  guys back here again Thursday at 7:30.
• 1:02:48
  And thank you. I'm Dr. B.