Latest / Brett Keane and Eve Show / White Hate

Transcript

White Hate · Brett Keane and Eve Show

1:17
Can you be racist to white people?
1:19
Moreover, can non whites be racist?
1:33
In order to answer this question appropriately, I'm going to
1:35
present a. Logical argument to determine.
1:37
Why anti white sentiment is not the answer to racism on this
1:41
video present a strong thesis against this concept while
1:44
trying my very best to maintain analytical balance.
1:47
This is however, not only a structural analysis of the
1:50
concept of racism, but by the end of this video essay I will
1:53
have formed an accurate conceptual model of the two
1:56
repeating definitions of racism, exposing also the social,
1:59
political, strategic placement of anti white sentiment for its
2:02
proponents and the dangerous weight of such ideology onto our
2:06
current society. My goal here today is to
2:09
challenge the increasingly common claim that racism against
2:12
white people is definitionally impossible.
2:15
In other words, I will demonstrate this to be a
2:16
fundamentally flawed position in its linguistic premises and
2:20
criteria. Furthermore, I will demonstrate
2:22
that this is also an ultimately ineffective anti racist praxis.
2:28
My goal isn't to minimize the experiences minorities have with
2:31
racism, but to promote genuine equality where all forms of
2:35
racial discriminations are recognized, are visible, and
2:38
appropriately addressed. That is because a society where
2:41
everyone is treated equally is objectively superior to 1, where
2:45
a single group, any group, in this case white people, is
2:49
singled down, targeted and racism against them is not only
2:53
permitted but even encouraged through shallow and incoherent
2:57
definitional loops. Now, you might ask, but is it
3:07
really a big deal that academic circles and political activists
3:11
tomato tomato these days are trying to constantly justify
3:14
racism against white people? It's really a big deal.
3:17
It is, and this is demonstrated by several clinical studies with
3:21
overwhelming cumulative data with an already established body
3:24
of epistemological evidence which connects and links racism
3:27
as a determinant of health. All of this being based on a
3:30
comprehensive meta analysis of the data in question.
3:32
I'll put links. Thus, this new rebranded form of
3:35
racism, anti white sentiment is to be avoided at all costs and
3:40
be treated just like any other forms of racism.
3:42
Definitional loops do not change clinical test results.
3:47
When we excuse racial hatred through what clearly are just
3:50
semantic games, which is the too long didn't read assessment of
3:53
this current social political phenomenon, we don't advance
3:56
justice, we undermine it. And as we'll demonstrate with
3:59
data later on, an equal society would not only be better for the
4:03
population as a whole, but it would also generate optimal
4:05
youth development outcomes for future generations, both in
4:09
terms of stress management, mental health, and workforce
4:12
success rate. It is unbelievable that I have
4:15
to say this, but the reality is that real civic progress comes
4:19
from applying our principles consistently and not
4:21
selectively. It is realized through
4:23
meritocracy, not racially based exclusive programs such as DI
4:28
and the like. And spending time debating which
4:30
kind of racism will tolerate next is a step backward in
4:34
global societal civic progress. Preliminary synthesis of the
4:41
issue is to be built in the fields of semantics and social
4:44
linguistics. 1 central area of dispute in the current racially
4:48
charged political discourse is whether an act, policy, or event
4:51
constitutes racism. This is extended to word choice,
4:55
viewpoints, and other stances. I contend that the core of these
4:58
debates involves competing definitions of racism.
5:02
In other words, when we engage in these debates about what's
5:04
racist and what's not, we use the same words, but we don't
5:07
mean the same things. And relevant of no to
5:10
definitional ambiguity is a key component of mass perception
5:14
manipulation for propagandistic systems.
5:19
So what is the correct way to define racism?
5:22
Well, several claims and counterclaims will now be
5:25
contextualized. Normally at this point I would
5:27
use online dictionary resources to get the definition proper of
5:30
the words we are discussing for mutual clarity.
5:33
And don't get me wrong, we will. However, I do wish to warn you
5:36
that upon further analysis, these very resources have been
5:40
taken away from us as anti white propagandists continue to spread
5:45
their rhetoric through academic circles and the media.
5:48
This topic. I know that's what happens when
5:51
institutions, including diversities, agree with the
5:54
propagandists and the message. They in fact function as
5:58
vectors. As we speak, several major
6:01
definitional modifications have been swiftly applied to reflect
6:04
the new definitions that have been pushed.
6:06
This is of course part of the strategy, as we will see on
6:08
Section 3, and we have to be cognizant about it.
6:12
Anyhow. The original definition of the
6:13
word racism, as it's been understood since the beginning
6:16
of time all the way up to 15 minutes ago, is the following.
6:20
In common parlance, we could say that racism is a specialized
6:23
subcategory of prejudice based on race.
6:25
Racism in its fundamental core is a way to attach an evaluative
6:29
quality based on physical, visually observable biological
6:32
differences between people. This usually means phenotypic
6:35
traits. Now for the purposes of this
6:37
video later on, we'll also separate definitionally race
6:41
from ethnicity, racial and ethnic.
6:44
But for now, I want to add this to complete our definition.
6:47
Whenever we look at how people, people and societies are formed,
6:51
then ethnic and racial consciousness represents an
6:54
incipient embryonic process in the formation of individuals and
6:59
group identity. This is a normal characteristic
7:01
of our species, but it's also why attacking race and ethnicity
7:05
is so effective in shaping our perceptions of entire groups
7:09
within any given population cluster.
7:12
In other words, there is nothing wrong in being preferential or
7:15
accustomed or interested in your group first or to will be proud
7:20
of your ethnicity. The problem only manifests
7:22
itself when you use your pride to attack people that are
7:26
different from you. Interestingly enough, in our
7:29
current social political state, everyone except for white people
7:33
not only can be proud of their ethnicity, race, culture, and
7:37
religion, but they are encouraged to do so except for
7:42
white people and Christianity. That is because both ethnic and
7:46
racial components can be used as a basis for discrimination in
7:49
extreme ideologies, whether they be political, religious, or
7:53
secular. Racism can manifest through all
7:55
sorts of ways, from open threats and insults to complex phenomena
7:59
deeply embedded in societal systems and structures.
8:01
However, and this is a key point here, the latter is not required
8:06
for the core definition of what it means to be racist.
8:10
And that is the fundamental flaw of this entire position.
8:15
They say that unless it's systemic, it's not racism.
8:19
That's nonsense. Racism can be systemic, but it
8:23
being systemic is not a necessary definitional component
8:26
of the core concept of racism. To prove this, all we need to do
8:30
is a thought experiment. So let's do just that.
8:32
Take a national socialist from 1940.
8:34
He hates Jews, Roma, black people.
8:37
We all agree this guy's a racist.
8:38
Now moving to modern day Israel or Africa, he suddenly becomes a
8:43
racial minority. His kind is not in power.
8:45
His racial hatred is now definitely not systemic anymore.
8:49
So does he suddenly stop being a racist?
8:52
You see, the real only possible answer when it comes to logics
8:57
is no, he's still a racist. Why?
8:59
Because racism is a state of mind.
9:02
The systemic component is only one possible manifestation of a
9:08
core concept, and you cannot replace the core concept with
9:11
one of its manifestations. Just as a way to manipulate the
9:14
public into excusing hatred towards a group, in this case
9:17
white people. That's all they're doing.
9:22
Prove me wrong. Racism is in the mind and it's
9:26
present regardless of systemic implementation.
9:29
Systemic only means that the system feeds into the ideology
9:33
as culture and then extends into power redistribution patterns.
9:36
Now given institutional and hierarchy related racism is more
9:41
effective than simple racist thoughts because the state is
9:44
involved with it and it makes use of differential power status
9:48
dynamics between people. Yet, this intersectional
9:50
entanglement that's not constituted fabrics of racism as
9:54
a concept of the mind. We all know this.
9:59
Moreover, we can observe that racism is growing in our day and
10:02
age, but not for the reasons you may think.
10:05
Let me elaborate. According to Google N Grams, the
10:13
word racism first appeared in documented English usage during
10:16
the early 1900s, and it was used to describe interaction between
10:20
early American colonies and Native American or indigenous
10:23
populations. The word entered academic
10:26
vocabulary relatively recently. However, what's important to
10:29
underline is that all early usage of the term in English
10:32
specifically deal with hostility between human groups stemming
10:36
from observable physical distinctions.
10:40
Absolutely no mention of systemic being a necessary
10:43
requirement for the foundational definitional core.
10:47
This is an addition, and it's been done on purpose to
10:50
perpetrate injustice against white people out of hatred.
10:55
So what I claim is that anti white propagandists are doing
10:59
the same thing that the Nazi wear in Germany, just against a
11:03
different group. Do you want to be remembered by
11:05
history books or someone will post this?
11:06
Our children, a couple of 100 years from now we'll study this.
11:09
How do you want to be remembered?
11:10
Were you someone who stood up just like we remember the people
11:12
that stood up against the Nazis? Or are you going to be
11:14
remembered as someone who played along and maybe even got
11:16
brainwashed into thinking it was the right thing to do?
11:20
I made my mind. I know where I want to stand.
11:24
We talked about the initial origins of the concept of
11:27
racism, as we said, fixed to physical characteristics and
11:31
phenotypic features, whether they be actual or attributed.
11:34
In other words, it is quite clear that the way we visually
11:37
differentiate populations from one another is part of the in
11:41
Group out group dynamic that is probably been with us since the
11:44
Paleolithic. The contemporary understanding
11:48
recognizes that racism is in fact multilayered and modern
11:52
conceptual frameworks typically organize these differences into
11:55
several interconnected definitional categories.
11:58
It starts as biological and then it extends.
12:01
And before we jump into the political and sociological
12:03
aspects of this discussion, we need to talk about these
12:06
categories. So racism could be considered a
12:08
massive umbrella term which involves several related spheres
12:11
of human life as observed in this motion graphic.
12:14
All these are sub aspects of racism, but none of these is the
12:18
basic definitional concept. They all spawn as a result of
12:21
the one fundamental definitional core.
12:23
Without this, none of the other would exist.
12:27
Hence, this is is the core, and these are derivatives.
12:31
Unless they are connected to the original core of what racism is,
12:34
they wouldn't exist. As we will explain in details on
12:37
the next section, proponents of the You can't be racist to white
12:40
people. Take the systemic sub category
12:43
and swap it for the definitional core.
12:47
That's it. This way, even if you are
12:50
clearly being racist towards white people while systemic is
12:53
not present, the 2 are contingent and so you're not a
12:56
racist even if you are clearly demonstrating racist thought and
13:00
actions against a single doubt group meaning white people.
13:04
It's a simple slew of hand, but an effective 1 nonetheless.
13:07
And it's dishonest. We are experiencing a change in
13:13
reality of thought due to the reconfiguration of our base
13:16
ideas and language in order to exert control.
13:20
In contemporary academic discourse, particularly within
13:23
the domains of critical race theory and intersectional
13:26
sociology, a paradigmatic shift has emerged regarding the
13:29
fundamental conceptualization of racism.
13:32
This movement propounds A redefined concept of racism as
13:35
an exclusively systemic phenomenon characterized by the
13:38
formula of prejudice plus institutional power.
13:42
This theoretical framework posits that racism, properly
13:44
understood, can only emanate from demographically dominant
13:47
groups who possess the requisite sociological capital to
13:50
operationalize their biases through institutional
13:53
mechanisms. As we explained before, this is
13:56
just one of the possible ramifications of racism, not
14:00
it's core definition. However, this is a calculated
14:04
move. The redefinition arguably
14:06
functions as a rhetorical stratagem that obscures rather
14:10
than illuminate the real core issues of racism.
14:15
Moreover, this raises fundamental questions about the
14:18
instrumentalization of academic discourse for ideological
14:21
purposes, something that we have seen already happen under
14:25
European historical totalitarian regimes of the 20th century.
14:28
We need to prevent and of the 1940s Germany and simply because
14:32
it's white people now that are under fire makes 0 difference.
14:37
Racism is racism. The reason why racism plays such
14:41
a pivotal role in modern politics is the way it connects
14:43
to the sociological structure of power.
14:45
Modern society strongly condemns and rejects racism and connects
14:49
strong social stigma to being labeled a racist.
14:53
This turns accusational racism functionally into powerful tools
14:57
to be used to discredit of your opponents both in the political
15:00
and rhetorical arenas. Anti white sentiment is often
15:03
also combined with white people have no culture, white people
15:07
don't exist. How the proponents of white
15:10
people don't exist can also blame white people for literally
15:13
everything is beyond me. The proposed explanation is that
15:22
white people are a societal construct of Lord arbitrary
15:24
group classifier based on the fact that within this very group
15:28
white we put together people of different cultural background
15:30
with different. Cultures.
15:31
White Europeans. And Englishmen, A Frenchman and
15:34
Italian, a Scandinavian, a German and American of European
15:36
descent. What do they have in common?
15:39
Nothing. So white people don't.
15:41
Exist. That's the thesis.
15:43
It is a tentative answer which can and will be responded in
15:47
kind in the following way if. Based on your own.
15:50
Parameters of culture, diversity and national differentiation.
15:53
White people don't exist then neither.
15:55
Do black people exist? In fact, putting all black
15:58
people into one single group or category is more nonsensical
16:02
than doing it with white people and differently from you.
16:04
I can prove this one through science.
16:07
You see, African populations harbor the greatest genetic
16:10
phenotypic diversity according to molecular genetics.
16:12
And whole genome sequence. Data across a broad geographic
16:16
range. That's due to extensive
16:18
populations of structure, the largest number of population
16:20
specific alleles, and less linkage to equilibrium among the
16:23
loci. Together with the heritable
16:25
variation in human genome. This is why he doesn't know,
16:28
because he doesn't actually care.
16:29
Africa is an important region to study human genetic diversity
16:32
due to several factors such as climate variation, diet,
16:35
exposure to infectious. Disease and number of
16:37
demographic factors such as selection.
16:39
Mutation, recombination and gene conversion which result in the
16:42
above mentioned genetic and phenotypic variation within
16:44
population clusters. Moreover, Europe has got 44
16:47
countries according to the UN, whereas Africa has got. 54.
16:50
Add that to the considerable genetic, phenotypic, cultural
16:53
and linguistic diversity within African populations, and then
16:56
tell me again that you've got a problem with white as a subgroup
17:00
population identifier, but not with black.
17:04
This is what I call bias, despite the overwhelming
17:07
evidence of African population genetics, the pattern of genome
17:10
wide nuclear genetic diversity across geographically and
17:13
ethically diverse. Subgroups and enormous.
17:15
Cultural and linguistic divergence shows either a
17:17
complete ignorance on the topic or a deliberate misuse.
17:21
I'll take either, it shows an extreme.
17:24
Bias and the sole objective of singling out a specific group,
17:26
namely white people. For political.
17:28
Reasons in complete disregard of objective reality.
17:32
Now that we understand as if we didn't know what racism is,
17:37
let's discuss the manifestations of racism as a complex
17:41
sociological phenomenon. There are various ways in which
17:44
racism manifests itself in our societies at a global level.
17:48
The phenomena that I'm about to describe are usually
17:51
interconnected, at least at a certain level, although they can
17:54
also occur independently from each other.
17:56
These are, of course, supremacist ideology,
17:59
xenophobia, construction of otherness, segregation,
18:02
nativism, hierarchical stratification, and of course,
18:06
systemic societal structural pressure.
18:08
And they usually express themselves in two primary modes,
18:12
covert or overt. A good example of this is for
18:16
instance the fact that often times when you look at the way
18:19
racism is expressed on left wing political spheres, it tends to
18:24
be overt anti white sentiment, which is a core value of the
18:29
whole oppressed oppressor ideology.
18:31
And due to the fact that this form of racism needs to be overt
18:34
to work and function in this ideology, that's why they try to
18:38
say that technically it's not racism.
18:40
Interestingly enough though, the systemic part of it it's
18:42
actually absolutely present considering the fact that
18:45
universities and academic circles and the media with all
18:49
of its power do push it. It is systemic, so even if you
18:54
use systemic as an excuse it just falls apart instead.
18:59
In alt right circles the racism tended to be more covert these
19:03
days with people pretending not to be racist while in reality
19:07
they would be. That's mostly gone now though
19:10
because everyone has been accused of being a racist so
19:12
people are just fed up with it and decided to accept the title.
19:16
There are other categorical frameworks that have been pushed
19:19
into the academic space, but some of these are completely
19:22
relevant. One would be for example the
19:25
idea of subliminal and reverse racism.
19:28
Now subliminal, maybe we can discuss it other than again
19:32
until we in terms of priority if we don't solve the covert overt
19:36
types of racism that we are dealing with until.
19:38
So that's all the looking to the subliminal aspect feels like a
19:41
waste of time. Maybe at one point, but when it
19:43
comes to the notion of reverse racism, that is once again an
19:47
excuse. It is not reverse racism just on
19:49
the basis of oppressed oppressor which is usually the excuse.
19:52
In other words, reverse racism appears designed to delegitimize
19:56
discrimination against numerically politically dominant
19:58
groups. Problem is that the people that
20:01
say this never utilize this framework outside the United
20:06
States or the West as a whole. Because if they did.
20:08
Did and they try to apply this concept and say, well, white
20:11
people who are a minority in another country, South Africa,
20:15
well racism against them now is not reversed and in fact, if
20:17
anything reverse racing will be applied to people who are black
20:20
in that situation. It just doesn't work, it falls
20:22
apart. So they usually only use it
20:24
against white people, once again demonstrating definitional
20:28
inconsistency. Now that we have attacked the
20:38
definition of proper, we need to start studying the possible
20:41
defence lines that will be used in order to attack our counter
20:45
arguments. And the first line you will
20:46
encounter will be denial. What this means is that people
20:50
will often try to debate whether or not this intolerance even
20:52
exists. They'll tell you now why people
20:54
never experience any forms of discrimination.
20:56
Never happens. Violence against white people,
20:58
Not a thing, doesn't exist. Refer them to the introductory
21:02
clip of this video. You're welcome, but I will go
21:07
one step further. All forms of racism are wrong.
21:10
However, anti white racism is the type of racism we need to
21:14
focus on the most. Why you say?
21:16
Because it's the one that it's permitted.
21:19
It's the one that has no repercussions.
21:21
It's the one that activists try to paint as not being a form of
21:26
racism. Hence it is the one we need to
21:29
focus on the most over every other.
21:31
Institutional racism is a form of racism that, generally
21:35
speaking, operates through rules, procedures, and practices
21:39
that prevents any given population group to achieve full
21:42
societal participation. Global data indicates that
21:46
racism persists as a significant driver of exclusion, conflict
21:51
and dis advantage When looked at a global level, the data becomes
21:55
more murky and complicated to analyze because of course race
21:59
is improper. May overlap with anti foreign
22:02
sentiment whereby exclusion or any form of discrimination could
22:05
correlate not only to biological differences but also and in fact
22:09
mostly cultural ones. And to that we need to add the
22:13
socio economic layer, situations in which people may discriminate
22:17
towards others, individuals of any given group, not necessarily
22:20
once again because of genotypic trade difference, but mostly
22:23
because of socio economic stances and differences in
22:26
numbers and statistics. And here is another thing that
22:28
we need to address. Massive elephant in the room.
22:31
This idea that data can be racist is one of the most anti
22:35
scientific statements of our century when given the chance.
22:42
Or the need to look at data when it comes to for instance crime
22:46
statistics and percentages of different groups within any
22:49
population. As we analyze the data per
22:52
capita we need to be clear and transparent to what the data
22:57
says. The idea that data needs to be
22:59
hidden, changed, modified parameters fumble with in order
23:04
to give different results because they do not push a
23:07
certain preconceived message or because people may think, oh
23:12
this could lead to more racism is a lie and lies never form or
23:18
can form the basis of a just society.
23:21
You cannot base justice on lies, and such manipulation of data
23:25
can potentially distort empirical assessment, which
23:28
could prevent us from finding real, true solutions.
23:32
You have to understand the causation in order to work up a
23:35
solution. The reality is the following You
23:38
can't be racist to white people. At its very core, is essentially
23:42
a refutation of Reverend Martin Luther King's junior original
23:47
thesis. Consequently, the definitional
23:53
boundaries of racism became strategically significant in
23:56
public discourse. But then they decided to change
23:58
the definition of the term in order to make themselves unable
24:02
to be classified as racist while being able to continue to
24:05
qualify their opponents as racists.
24:08
This is the very basis of the idea of anti white sentiment not
24:13
being categorized as racism. It has nothing to do with
24:17
systemic. That's just the excuse.
24:19
It is a tool for political control.
24:26
I'm not arguing that racism is always identical in its impact
24:30
and scale in all communities. What I'm arguing is that the
24:34
so-called anti racists these days are pushing a new highly
24:39
focused type of racism specifically based on political
24:43
strategic gain and the destruction of opposing voter
24:47
bases. It is time to take a step back
24:49
and attack racism, regain control of the definition of
24:54
racism, reject and in fact pull out every single academic that
24:59
plays along with these deplorable, despicable
25:03
manipulations of our language, and go back to judging
25:07
individuals by their actions, not their race, by their deeds,
25:12
not those of their ancestors. It shows that they're not truly
25:15
anti racist then, are they? The line that demarcates the
25:18
distinction between mass perception and political
25:20
strategies. The following.
25:21
It has nothing whatsoever to do with humanitarian thought or
25:24
social justice. You can't be racist to white
25:26
people, as it's often the case. It's a definitional loop.
25:29
It's an excuse and in fact a justification to try and ensure
25:34
that racism can be directed at, in this case, white people,
25:38
while dodging the term racist, even if we played by their
25:42
rules, their actions, rhetoric, discrimination and violence
25:47
against white people. It's still.
25:49
Abhorrent and deplorable. So even if we accepted
25:52
technically it's not racism doesn't make it good does it?
25:56
But we don't accept their definition, we reject their
25:59
definition. Anti white sentiment is every
26:02
bit as racist as anti black, brown, Asian sentiment exactly
26:09
the same. However, that's not going to be
26:11
enough because when presented with evidence then they will
26:14
tell you it doesn't matter. Why do you care?
26:16
And try to twist it into. Are you trying to say and then
26:20
add something against black people?
26:21
For instance mental manipulation and gas lighting as always.
26:26
Last but not least, once they fail all of these defence
26:29
mechanisms the next one is going to be yes it is happening and
26:32
it's a good thing. Here is why.
26:33
Interestingly enough, one of the ways that will be used to try
26:35
and deflect from this is the idea of right.
26:39
But in comparison it may happen less to white people than it
26:42
happens to other people. To experience racism and
26:44
therefore lower numbers. A minority of occurrence means
26:48
we shouldn't really care about it.
26:50
It's not happening to the majority.
26:51
This comes from the very people that constantly tell US how much
26:54
we should care about minorities. Unless those minorities have of
26:57
course, white people. Once again, racism in disguise,
27:02
and we can see right through it. If the reason why we should not
27:05
care about racial discrimination and hatred received by white
27:08
people is a lower number of incidents, that would
27:11
automatically mean that minority groups of all kinds and their
27:14
struggle do not matter on the simple basis of numerical lower
27:17
incidents. Are you really sure you want to
27:20
use that one? Didn't think so.
27:23
Opposing all forms of racial discrimination is the only way
27:29
forward. Anything else is a step back,
27:33
centuries back in fact. Anti white sentiment is racism
27:39
and those who push it are racists.
27:48
If you appreciate my content so far and wish to help ensure my
27:51
ability to continue to tell it how it is regardless of any
27:54
possible backlash, please support this channel on Patreon.
27:57
Any support helps me and my team of academics keep the channel
28:00
strong and gives us the means to fight back against the political
28:03
rewriting of history. Stand with us form the wall.
28:07
Defend the truth.