Latest / The Late Debate / The Late Debate | 25 March

Transcript

The Late Debate | 25 March · The Late Debate

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Wait wait, welcome the late base.
• 0:07
  Speaker 2: Well, thanks for joining us. It's great to have your company.
• 0:09
  Speaker 2: I'm James Macpherson with Caleb Bond and Dnika di Georgie.
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: I'll tell you what.
• 0:12
  Speaker 2: It was a beautiful day in Sydney today. How do
• 0:15
  Speaker 2: you spend at Caleb just out.
• 0:17
  Speaker 3: And about went for a walk. I believe you went
• 0:19
  Speaker 3: for a walk quite early this morning, Joe.
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: I did.
• 0:22
  Speaker 2: I am not a morning person, but at six thirty am, sitting.
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: On bell Morrale Beach watching the sun come up, I.
• 0:27
  Speaker 4: Was wondering why you're a bit disorientated this evening. You've
• 0:29
  Speaker 4: had no sleep. I was wondering that I've been talking
• 0:32
  Speaker 4: to James all nights, like talking to a brick wall.
• 0:34
  Speaker 5: Listen.
• 0:35
  Speaker 6: That's the problem, you know, in through one ear out the.
• 0:38
  Speaker 5: Other come on years is from his wife. He doesn't
• 0:40
  Speaker 5: need you.
• 0:41
  Speaker 2: All right, let's get into the show. Here's what's coming
• 0:44
  Speaker 2: up tonight. Should the AFL be financially responsible for players
• 0:48
  Speaker 2: who experienced life altering consequences from serious head knocks? Don't
• 0:52
  Speaker 2: players realize it's a contact sport. The gays and lesbians
• 0:56
  Speaker 2: really need their own housing developments. They're getting one in Manchester,
• 1:00
  Speaker 2: and it's likely to be the first of many.
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: And is there any truth to lawn mowing theory.
• 1:06
  Speaker 2: It's the idea that when one person in the street
• 1:09
  Speaker 2: mows their lawn, everyone else typically follows within just a
• 1:12
  Speaker 2: few hours.
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: We'll find out if.
• 1:14
  Speaker 2: That's true in a moment, but first, a new poll
• 1:17
  Speaker 2: has shown that young women are far more likely Danika
• 1:20
  Speaker 2: to be raging lefties than young men, which is awkward
• 1:23
  Speaker 2: because for the longest time we've been told it's young
• 1:26
  Speaker 2: men with their toxic masculinity who've been causing all societies problems.
• 1:31
  Speaker 2: Now we'll look at the far left views entertained by
• 1:34
  Speaker 2: young women in a moment, bring a helmet, But first
• 1:37
  Speaker 2: the truly revealing detail. It turns out young men under
• 1:40
  Speaker 2: the age of thirty are far more tolerant of difference
• 1:43
  Speaker 2: than young women. When it came to dating and relationships.
• 1:47
  Speaker 2: Fifty eight percent of young women said they'd prefer to
• 1:49
  Speaker 2: date someone with similar political or social views. Translation, when
• 1:54
  Speaker 2: it comes to young women, love maybe blind, but it
• 1:56
  Speaker 2: still checks your voting record.
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: But only thirty one.
• 1:58
  Speaker 2: Percent of men said views would put them off. Asked
• 2:02
  Speaker 2: if they'd lose interest in someone they liked if they
• 2:04
  Speaker 2: found out that person had significantly different views. Fifty three
• 2:08
  Speaker 2: percent of Juliette said Romeo would be shown the door,
• 2:11
  Speaker 2: but only thirty percent of young men said they ditch
• 2:14
  Speaker 2: a girl based on her different political views. Or what
• 2:17
  Speaker 2: about this one, Caleb, Thirty four percent of young women
• 2:20
  Speaker 2: said they'd lose interest in someone if they found out
• 2:23
  Speaker 2: that person followed social media figures with different views to
• 2:27
  Speaker 2: their own. Only eight percent of young men said that
• 2:29
  Speaker 2: would matter to them in a partner.
• 2:31
  Speaker 5: So what we're finding out here is that men buying larger,
• 2:34
  Speaker 5: more tolerant than women.
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: That seems to be the case.
• 2:38
  Speaker 3: You know, because we've heard about all there is a
• 2:39
  Speaker 3: man drought. Women can't find partners.
• 2:42
  Speaker 5: Where have all the men gone?
• 2:45
  Speaker 3: Clearly they're still there. It's just that women have gone
• 2:48
  Speaker 3: way off to the left. Men have veered a little
• 2:51
  Speaker 3: bit to the right. And we'll go through some of
• 2:54
  Speaker 3: the other details shortly, but it bears out that men,
• 2:59
  Speaker 3: more so than women, believe in traditional gender roles, and
• 3:03
  Speaker 3: younger men you agree with things like there should be
• 3:06
  Speaker 3: more freedom in the market and that government intervention is
• 3:09
  Speaker 3: a bad thing, whereas women are more likely to think
• 3:11
  Speaker 3: it's a good thing. On and on it goes these
• 3:13
  Speaker 3: divides that are clearly there, But those numbers very clearly
• 3:17
  Speaker 3: show that men are willing to be far more forgiving.
• 3:21
  Speaker 3: Young men will be far more forgiving when it comes
• 3:24
  Speaker 3: to politics in the realm of dating, and women are
• 3:27
  Speaker 3: simply saying, well, if you don't have the same politics
• 3:29
  Speaker 3: as me, go away, it ain't happening. I don't think
• 3:32
  Speaker 3: this is necessarily specific to women. I don't think it's
• 3:36
  Speaker 3: something that is inherent to women. I think it's something
• 3:38
  Speaker 3: that is generally inherent to the left. Yes, and I
• 3:42
  Speaker 3: have as someone who has dated left wing women and
• 3:46
  Speaker 3: have introduced them not successfully good well, it depends what
• 3:50
  Speaker 3: you call success eight a three and a half year relationship,
• 3:52
  Speaker 3: But having introduced them to friends of mine on the right,
• 3:58
  Speaker 3: the refrain is often, gee, I can't believe how lovely
• 4:02
  Speaker 3: and friendly everyone is, whereas I don't get the same
• 4:05
  Speaker 3: treatment from the left. Generally, people on the right are
• 4:09
  Speaker 3: far more willing to listen to others on the other
• 4:11
  Speaker 3: side of politics, and with young women now going radically
• 4:15
  Speaker 3: off to the left, they just won't have a bar
• 4:17
  Speaker 3: of men. It would seem well, good luck is all
• 4:20
  Speaker 3: I can say. You think you can have it all,
• 4:22
  Speaker 3: You're not going to get it all if that's how
• 4:24
  Speaker 3: you run your life. We should all be more tolerant,
• 4:27
  Speaker 3: but seemingly young women in particular are not.
• 4:30
  Speaker 5: Well.
• 4:30
  Speaker 4: See, here's the thing, right, if the shoe was on
• 4:32
  Speaker 4: the other foot. For me personally, I couldn't date a
• 4:35
  Speaker 4: raging lefty.
• 4:36
  Speaker 6: I couldn't date.
• 4:37
  Speaker 4: A bloke, you know, if he's out there with his kefieir,
• 4:41
  Speaker 4: marching up and down with it, you know, from the
• 4:43
  Speaker 4: river to the sea every weekend.
• 4:45
  Speaker 6: Forget it.
• 4:46
  Speaker 4: He's not for Dadakai, Georgia.
• 4:50
  Speaker 6: He would have absolutely nothing in common.
• 4:53
  Speaker 4: And not that I think it is a prerequisite, but
• 4:55
  Speaker 4: I personally enjoy to be able to chat to somebody
• 4:58
  Speaker 4: on the same side of politics as me, because I
• 5:01
  Speaker 4: feel like we have more a lot.
• 5:02
  Speaker 6: More in common.
• 5:03
  Speaker 4: Like there are some men out there who if I
• 5:05
  Speaker 4: said to them, I really like Donald Trump, they said,
• 5:07
  Speaker 4: oh God, she's a nutter. She's an absolute nutcase, which
• 5:12
  Speaker 4: is I'd like to think that's not the case.
• 5:14
  Speaker 3: You mentioned Donald Trump. We look at this number. There's
• 5:18
  Speaker 3: a number of things. This is fresh water polling that
• 5:20
  Speaker 3: was done for the News Care papers. But they asked
• 5:22
  Speaker 3: about parties and politicians and on the topic of Donald Trump,
• 5:28
  Speaker 3: sixty one percent of women said they had a negative
• 5:32
  Speaker 3: view of Donald Trump versus fifteen percent of I think
• 5:35
  Speaker 3: we've got this graphic here.
• 5:37
  Speaker 5: You can see it at the bottom.
• 5:38
  Speaker 3: Right at the bottom there, that's the favorability rating for
• 5:41
  Speaker 3: Donald Trump for young women sixty one minus sixty one
• 5:45
  Speaker 3: versus minus fifteen for Donald Trump. I mean, that's an
• 5:48
  Speaker 3: example of just how radically different the views of young
• 5:51
  Speaker 3: men and women are.
• 5:51
  Speaker 5: Sorry for interrupting, No, No, that's right.
• 5:53
  Speaker 6: Well, I'll just pick up on that point.
• 5:55
  Speaker 4: Because this poll said that men are more likely to
• 5:57
  Speaker 4: vote conservative than what women are. Women are more more
• 6:00
  Speaker 4: likely to vote for labor and for the Greens parties,
• 6:03
  Speaker 4: and you mentioned Donald Trump. We actually saw this in
• 6:05
  Speaker 4: the lead up to the US election, where the majority
• 6:08
  Speaker 4: of men were saying that they would vote for Donald Trump.
• 6:10
  Speaker 4: And I think that there are some reasons why this
• 6:12
  Speaker 4: is being replicated over in the US. Donald Trump was
• 6:15
  Speaker 4: very much so putting forward an America First policy and
• 6:18
  Speaker 4: wanting to put people into jobs. And you know, Caleb,
• 6:21
  Speaker 4: you spoke about gender roles before. I think that it
• 6:24
  Speaker 4: is very important and I completely agree with this for men.
• 6:27
  Speaker 6: To want to work men actually do want.
• 6:29
  Speaker 4: To work because they want to be able to provide
• 6:31
  Speaker 4: for their families. You know, obviously there are a lot
• 6:33
  Speaker 4: of high flying women out there, but I do think
• 6:35
  Speaker 4: a lot of men want to be able to provide
• 6:39
  Speaker 4: as best they can. So that's one reason why I think.
• 6:42
  Speaker 4: The other thing is is it also said that gen
• 6:44
  Speaker 4: Z women are more radically left wing, and I think
• 6:47
  Speaker 4: that there are a couple of reasons for this. I
• 6:49
  Speaker 4: think that it comes down to a lot of gender issues,
• 6:52
  Speaker 4: which I think that women typically think the left understand
• 6:55
  Speaker 4: abortion rights. If you're on the conservative side of the
• 6:59
  Speaker 4: political realm, you're probably not more likely to support abortion.
• 7:04
  Speaker 4: But it's also this notion of feminism which has absolutely
• 7:07
  Speaker 4: gone out of control.
• 7:08
  Speaker 6: The left love to trot out.
• 7:10
  Speaker 4: The gender the feminism lines, and that's why I think
• 7:13
  Speaker 4: that more women are more likely to be very radical
• 7:15
  Speaker 4: on the left compared to the conservative side of politics.
• 7:18
  Speaker 3: I think a lot of them's also down to the
• 7:21
  Speaker 3: proliferation of university education, because women are far more likely
• 7:27
  Speaker 3: than men now to go after university. They do better
• 7:29
  Speaker 3: at high school, they're more likely to get a university degree,
• 7:33
  Speaker 3: and you end up in university where you get your
• 7:35
  Speaker 3: brain infiltrated with all this left wing garbage, and you
• 7:39
  Speaker 3: come out of the other side of the system exactly
• 7:41
  Speaker 3: as they want you to be. And men have seemingly
• 7:44
  Speaker 3: turned around and are now saying, well, I'd kind of
• 7:47
  Speaker 3: like to go somewhere back to the way things used
• 7:50
  Speaker 3: to be. There's other polling has been done actually to
• 7:52
  Speaker 3: show that young men are far more sensitive than their
• 7:55
  Speaker 3: fathers and their grandfathers before than they want to be,
• 7:57
  Speaker 3: far more involved in family life, etc. But they do
• 7:59
  Speaker 3: have a more traditional view of life than perhaps previous generations.
• 8:04
  Speaker 5: I am curious though, Janiki.
• 8:05
  Speaker 3: I mean you talked about the cafe wearing fellow goes
• 8:08
  Speaker 3: to the demonstration on the weekend. Right, Let's say you're
• 8:11
  Speaker 3: not going to go out with him. But if you
• 8:12
  Speaker 3: went out with a fella and he told you on
• 8:14
  Speaker 3: the first date that he was a member of the
• 8:16
  Speaker 3: labor part, would there be a second date? M assuming
• 8:21
  Speaker 3: everything else went well, Yes, of course, Okay.
• 8:24
  Speaker 6: Yeah, there would be a second date.
• 8:26
  Speaker 5: Yeah, So you are open. You are open.
• 8:28
  Speaker 4: I am open, But it depends on how radical the
• 8:31
  Speaker 4: views are.
• 8:32
  Speaker 6: You know what I mean?
• 8:33
  Speaker 3: The extraordinary thing is because I prefer to date people
• 8:36
  Speaker 3: with similar political or social views to mind, it's like
• 8:39
  Speaker 3: double the number of women who say yes as opposed
• 8:42
  Speaker 3: to men. Like the priorities of men and women are
• 8:45
  Speaker 3: clearly very good at the other.
• 8:46
  Speaker 1: Can I ask you a question here we go.
• 8:47
  Speaker 2: I don't want to man explain these things to you, Danika,
• 8:50
  Speaker 2: so I want you to tell us.
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: Do you think there's.
• 8:53
  Speaker 2: Truth to the fact that because women, I think are
• 8:55
  Speaker 2: typically making a generalization, but typically more empathetic, maybe more compassionate.
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: Generally, I must agree with it. Aren't empathetic, but no, no, no,
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: I would agree.
• 9:05
  Speaker 2: Women tend to be a little more so do you
• 9:07
  Speaker 2: think that reflects some of the views? For instance, in
• 9:10
  Speaker 2: this poll, women were far more likely to say that
• 9:14
  Speaker 2: government handouts were not a problem, whereas men thought there's
• 9:17
  Speaker 2: far too many government handouts.
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: Is that an example of women.
• 9:20
  Speaker 2: Just having more empathy and compassion, which sometimes tend to
• 9:23
  Speaker 2: go more easily to the left, because the left do
• 9:27
  Speaker 2: sell themselves as the parties of compassion and empathy and
• 9:31
  Speaker 2: we want to help everybody absolutely, whether it works out
• 9:34
  Speaker 2: that way in practice or not, totally different subjects, but
• 9:37
  Speaker 2: at the first glance they seem more empathetic.
• 9:39
  Speaker 4: I absolutely agree, and it's got to do with that
• 9:41
  Speaker 4: notion of the tolerant left, for sure.
• 9:43
  Speaker 6: I do think your spot on.
• 9:44
  Speaker 4: I think that women are generally more empathetic and the
• 9:47
  Speaker 4: other thing. The other point I would make on this
• 9:50
  Speaker 4: is that I feel like the results of this survey
• 9:53
  Speaker 4: show that men do actually feel a little bit singled
• 9:56
  Speaker 4: out by women. And I think that the Me Too
• 9:59
  Speaker 4: movement as destroyed, destroyed it for men because I think women,
• 10:04
  Speaker 4: you know, it even happened here in Australia after the
• 10:09
  Speaker 4: whole Britney Higgins saga. I think that it's very easy
• 10:12
  Speaker 4: to point the finger at men and make men out
• 10:15
  Speaker 4: to be the enemy.
• 10:17
  Speaker 6: Men are fantastic. I love men, and.
• 10:19
  Speaker 4: I think that the left have this notion of feminism,
• 10:23
  Speaker 4: whereas I think that men are genuinely feeling quite singled
• 10:26
  Speaker 4: out by women, and that was shown in this result
• 10:29
  Speaker 4: as well.
• 10:29
  Speaker 3: One of the other numbers is before we move on,
• 10:31
  Speaker 3: that was quite stark. They're asking about political agenda. Building
• 10:36
  Speaker 3: more affordable rental housing was a forty two percent favorability
• 10:41
  Speaker 3: for women versus twenty nine for men. But the one
• 10:44
  Speaker 3: underneath it, you can see there of introducing a personal
• 10:47
  Speaker 3: wealth tax twenty four percent favorability versus four percent for men,
• 10:53
  Speaker 3: and banning negative gearing fourteen percent for women versus three
• 10:57
  Speaker 3: percent for men. They are very different numbers. And you
• 11:01
  Speaker 3: mentioned the government handouts as well. We'll show you that one.
• 11:03
  Speaker 3: It's a nineteen percent favorability on too many people depend
• 11:09
  Speaker 3: on government handouts. For women, so marginally favorable, but for
• 11:13
  Speaker 3: men it's forty three percent. More competition leads to better
• 11:17
  Speaker 3: life outcomes eight percent favorability for women and thirty three
• 11:21
  Speaker 3: percent for men.
• 11:22
  Speaker 4: But a man of more competitive well, I know, I know, Well,
• 11:25
  Speaker 4: we just want the handout.
• 11:26
  Speaker 2: Before we move on, quick question, do the liberals have
• 11:29
  Speaker 2: a women problem or is it just that women are
• 11:31
  Speaker 2: typically left so it's not a problem the liberal parties
• 11:35
  Speaker 2: specifically have with women. Correct, The liberal have a problem
• 11:38
  Speaker 2: with lefties as you would expect.
• 11:39
  Speaker 3: They were exactly and they just happen to be women.
• 11:42
  Speaker 3: It's not specifically about a gendered thing, it's exactly that's
• 11:46
  Speaker 3: where things are going these days. Anyway, let's move on
• 11:48
  Speaker 3: to another important discussion. Of course, you at home would
• 11:51
  Speaker 3: have either children or grandchildren most likely who play sport,
• 11:56
  Speaker 3: whether it be for a club on weekend or at school,
• 12:00
  Speaker 3: and the discussion now is a lot around what sort
• 12:03
  Speaker 3: of sport do I want my kid to play? Do
• 12:05
  Speaker 3: I want my kid to be involved in a contact
• 12:06
  Speaker 3: sport where there could be head knocks? And this is
• 12:09
  Speaker 3: a fundamental threat to Ozzie rules, which is the sport
• 12:12
  Speaker 3: of the three of us here tonight, I'd like to
• 12:14
  Speaker 3: watch or NRL in the Eastern States Rugby League. Parents
• 12:19
  Speaker 3: are now opting for their kids, by and large, to
• 12:21
  Speaker 3: play soccer. Soccer is the fastest growing sport in this country,
• 12:25
  Speaker 3: and that the issue of head knocks is a huge one.
• 12:29
  Speaker 3: Now there's a class action that's currently building against the AFL,
• 12:33
  Speaker 3: which is of course the governing body of Ossie rules
• 12:36
  Speaker 3: in this country, around concussions and head knocks, and today
• 12:40
  Speaker 3: eight new players have joined that class action. It takes
• 12:44
  Speaker 3: it now to more than one hundred, or about one
• 12:47
  Speaker 3: hundred players who have joined this class action basically saying
• 12:50
  Speaker 3: that the AFL was negligent in allowing head knocks, concussions
• 12:56
  Speaker 3: whatever to.
• 12:57
  Speaker 5: Go on in the sport.
• 12:59
  Speaker 3: He's a small example of the rough and tumble of
• 13:02
  Speaker 3: AFL that I'm sure many of us are used to.
• 13:05
  Speaker 1: Didn't need to play on there. He had Robinson right
• 13:07
  Speaker 1: there with him, and he keeps going.
• 13:12
  Speaker 4: Hope they had a heart to climb on the crank pastadium.
• 13:16
  Speaker 2: Robbie's got it, He's got and don't slam tagle face
• 13:20
  Speaker 2: first by night house and Charlie's not happen.
• 13:23
  Speaker 3: Now, many people at home watch that and say, yeah,
• 13:26
  Speaker 3: that's the biff of football. But of course we know
• 13:28
  Speaker 3: the results now of constant head knocks. We know about CTE,
• 13:32
  Speaker 3: we know about what happens when you are concussed too much.
• 13:36
  Speaker 3: But these players are essentially suggesting that the AFL just
• 13:40
  Speaker 3: let them be concussed, that they should have had better
• 13:44
  Speaker 3: rules in place and whatever to stop it from happening.
• 13:48
  Speaker 3: I'm not sure how far you can actually argue that
• 13:51
  Speaker 3: it's the AFL's fault that people have been concussed and
• 13:54
  Speaker 3: they've sustained brain damage as a result, And there was
• 13:59
  Speaker 3: a time where there was basically no awareness of this.
• 14:02
  Speaker 3: Awareness has absolutely grown in the last decade, and I
• 14:06
  Speaker 3: think sporting leagues across the board have taken it seriously
• 14:10
  Speaker 3: and they have instituted concussion rules, They've instituted bands on
• 14:14
  Speaker 3: players playing in subsequent rounds if they've been concust etc.
• 14:18
  Speaker 3: I'm not sure that you can argue that you, as
• 14:21
  Speaker 3: an individual, had no idea, and that if you, as
• 14:23
  Speaker 3: an individual had no idea, that a league or a
• 14:26
  Speaker 3: club or whatever did, and that they are somehow responsible
• 14:29
  Speaker 3: for what has happened after you've been conducted.
• 14:31
  Speaker 2: But when you decide to become a professional darts player,
• 14:35
  Speaker 2: you know you're not going to be tackled. When you
• 14:37
  Speaker 2: decide to become a professional footballer, you know there's a
• 14:40
  Speaker 2: good chance you're going to get whacked in the head
• 14:42
  Speaker 2: at some point. So people play these sports knowing what
• 14:44
  Speaker 2: they're signing up for. Some of these players their careers
• 14:47
  Speaker 2: go back to the early nineteen eighties, where as you say,
• 14:51
  Speaker 2: knowledge about concussions and long term consequences was.
• 14:55
  Speaker 1: Nowhere near what it is today.
• 14:57
  Speaker 2: In fact, back in the day, players would be not unconscious,
• 15:00
  Speaker 2: go off, and then they would beg for the coach
• 15:03
  Speaker 2: to put them back on the field, and everyone would
• 15:06
  Speaker 2: lionize them and applaud them and say how amazing they
• 15:08
  Speaker 2: are and hold them up as role models, role models
• 15:11
  Speaker 2: for continuing to play after being concust Of course, nowadays,
• 15:15
  Speaker 2: there's no way we would let them back on the field,
• 15:17
  Speaker 2: which demonstrates the evolving knowledge of these injuries. I agree
• 15:21
  Speaker 2: with you, we haven't always known the consequences, but as
• 15:25
  Speaker 2: the AFL have understood, they have changed the rules, they've
• 15:30
  Speaker 2: changed medical procedures, if they've changed the game itself, it's
• 15:34
  Speaker 2: starting to resemble netball more than a high contact sport.
• 15:39
  Speaker 2: I've got to be honest, getting rid of the bounce.
• 15:40
  Speaker 2: Have you seen the way they do that they start
• 15:42
  Speaker 2: the game, they throw it up.
• 15:43
  Speaker 1: It's like basketball.
• 15:45
  Speaker 2: I think the AFL are increasingly taking steps, and if
• 15:48
  Speaker 2: this court case succeeds, it'll be millions of dollars. I've
• 15:52
  Speaker 2: read one report today potentially saying a billion dollars.
• 15:55
  Speaker 1: Not only will it cost the league.
• 15:57
  Speaker 2: A fortune, I don't care so much about that, but
• 16:00
  Speaker 2: it could potentially ruin the game because if it's going
• 16:03
  Speaker 2: to cost that much money, they will be loathed to
• 16:05
  Speaker 2: have too much physical contact at all, which is the
• 16:07
  Speaker 2: beauty of our sport.
• 16:09
  Speaker 4: I understand that it is a contact sport, and when
• 16:11
  Speaker 4: you play AFL, when you play elite sport at any level,
• 16:14
  Speaker 4: you know that there is going to be an element
• 16:17
  Speaker 4: of contact. But I actually think that as an employer,
• 16:21
  Speaker 4: you do have a responsibility to look after your employees
• 16:25
  Speaker 4: in this case, it is the AFL. Last year they
• 16:27
  Speaker 4: actually did a brain scan of twenty former players and
• 16:30
  Speaker 4: they found catastrophic injuries, some worse than car crash victims,
• 16:35
  Speaker 4: others worse than war related blast victims.
• 16:38
  Speaker 6: That is horrific.
• 16:39
  Speaker 4: Now, players later on in life are developing traumatic brain
• 16:42
  Speaker 4: injuries like CTE and dementia, and the argument that they're
• 16:46
  Speaker 4: saying is is that the AFL should have done more
• 16:48
  Speaker 4: to have prevented this. Now, the problem is not necessarily
• 16:52
  Speaker 4: the impact of the concussion, but it's what the AFL
• 16:56
  Speaker 4: or even the clubs in general do after that moment
• 16:59
  Speaker 4: of impact. Because a lot of these these players now
• 17:02
  Speaker 4: who are taking part in this class action, they're saying, well,
• 17:06
  Speaker 4: the AFL should have done more to make sure that
• 17:08
  Speaker 4: they did not return to the field, that they had
• 17:10
  Speaker 4: more time off, that they shouldn't have been going back
• 17:12
  Speaker 4: so quickly to have played the game.
• 17:14
  Speaker 6: And that is a problem because for example.
• 17:17
  Speaker 4: Right if you're in an office and there is water
• 17:20
  Speaker 4: on the floor and.
• 17:21
  Speaker 6: You slip over it, then your.
• 17:23
  Speaker 4: Employer automatically becomes negligent because they have not done they
• 17:27
  Speaker 4: have not cleaned up that.
• 17:30
  Speaker 3: But it's right, but to make a fair comparison. You know,
• 17:34
  Speaker 3: if you play AFL at the risk of concussion, right,
• 17:38
  Speaker 3: it's just part of the game. So if you know
• 17:41
  Speaker 3: that there is a certain part of the office where
• 17:43
  Speaker 3: there is water on the floor, and you've been told
• 17:46
  Speaker 3: that there is water on the floor, but I'm.
• 17:47
  Speaker 6: Saying water on the floor.
• 17:50
  Speaker 5: If you haven't, the concussion is bad.
• 17:54
  Speaker 4: It doesn't matter. It's it's the aftercare. It's not I'm
• 17:57
  Speaker 4: not talking about the point of impact. I'm talking about
• 17:59
  Speaker 4: the aftercare. What have these players, What treatment have these
• 18:02
  Speaker 4: players been given? How much have they been given the
• 18:05
  Speaker 4: one hundred percent all clear? What tests have been done?
• 18:08
  Speaker 4: Because some of them said, some of them said in
• 18:10
  Speaker 4: previous lawsuits over the last couple of years that the
• 18:15
  Speaker 4: neglect was the fact that the AFL was not requiring
• 18:18
  Speaker 4: specific scans in the aftercare. That they should have been
• 18:21
  Speaker 4: given specific scans to really diagnose what was going on
• 18:25
  Speaker 4: in their brain, and they did not receive that, and
• 18:27
  Speaker 4: that was their argument.
• 18:28
  Speaker 2: They've now introduced all sorts of concussion protocols to make
• 18:31
  Speaker 2: sure that players don't come back onto the field or
• 18:34
  Speaker 2: indeed back to the game for sometimes weeks after a concussion.
• 18:38
  Speaker 1: But in terms of personal responsibility. I follow North Melbourne.
• 18:41
  Speaker 2: We've got two of our players who wear helmets every
• 18:44
  Speaker 2: time they play. If players are really concerned about this,
• 18:47
  Speaker 2: how come most of them aren't wearing helmet.
• 18:49
  Speaker 4: I'm not suggesting that every player wear a helmet.
• 18:52
  Speaker 6: I think it's necessary to wear.
• 18:54
  Speaker 4: I'm talking about and you go in there, I know,
• 18:56
  Speaker 4: any sort of elite sport. I'm not denying that that
• 18:59
  Speaker 4: you'd go in knowing that that there is a level
• 19:01
  Speaker 4: of contact and that there is a level of risk.
• 19:03
  Speaker 4: But what I'm saying is what is the player management
• 19:06
  Speaker 4: and what is the player care after the moment of impact?
• 19:09
  Speaker 4: And the argument that these players are saying is that
• 19:11
  Speaker 4: they have not received it, And That's what I'm saying.
• 19:13
  Speaker 4: And later it's not until later in life when they're
• 19:17
  Speaker 4: dizzy spells, they're getting up, they're fainting, they're not feeling well,
• 19:19
  Speaker 4: they can't remember things.
• 19:21
  Speaker 6: Suddenly, they don't know what they're doing, where.
• 19:22
  Speaker 4: They put their keys, that they've gone, oh crap, it was.
• 19:25
  Speaker 6: Because of the concussion I had.
• 19:27
  Speaker 4: I should not have been let on the field as
• 19:29
  Speaker 4: early as I was.
• 19:30
  Speaker 2: What I'm saying is, if you want the AFL to
• 19:32
  Speaker 2: exercise a duty of care. Players also have a duty
• 19:35
  Speaker 2: of care to themselves, and if this is such a
• 19:38
  Speaker 2: big issue, I would have expected far more players today
• 19:41
  Speaker 2: to be wearing helmets, where it's only a couple. Most
• 19:45
  Speaker 2: teams don't have anyone wearing helmets, so I think there's
• 19:48
  Speaker 2: personal responsibility it's got to coming into. My prediction is
• 19:51
  Speaker 2: that the AFL will settle this matter out of court.
• 19:53
  Speaker 2: They will pay a large sum of money, but without
• 19:56
  Speaker 2: any liability, and they'll continue to evolve the game to
• 20:00
  Speaker 2: you try and take the brutality out of it.
• 20:02
  Speaker 4: Yeah, well look it's going to be interesting. But certainly
• 20:05
  Speaker 4: there's the lawsuits pretty big. This is not a small lawsuit,
• 20:09
  Speaker 4: and you're right, James, this could cost billions and billions
• 20:11
  Speaker 4: of dollars.
• 20:12
  Speaker 6: Look, let's move on. Now.
• 20:13
  Speaker 4: What is the old saying, do as I say, but
• 20:16
  Speaker 4: not as I do, Because it really seems that this
• 20:18
  Speaker 4: is Labour's motto as they deal with this fuel crisis.
• 20:22
  Speaker 4: I mean, if you remember, it was only a couple
• 20:23
  Speaker 4: of weeks ago Chris Bowen said no, no, please, don't panic,
• 20:27
  Speaker 4: nothing to worry about, and then what he's done a
• 20:30
  Speaker 4: three sixty pirouette. Now Chris Bowen is actually panicking. Chris
• 20:35
  Speaker 4: Bowen has now told us, would you believe to travel
• 20:38
  Speaker 4: less and work from home if you can as to
• 20:41
  Speaker 4: not have an impact on fuel supplies? But this does
• 20:46
  Speaker 4: this sound like the old days to you of COVID.
• 20:48
  Speaker 4: This was him today giving a play by play of
• 20:52
  Speaker 4: how many bowsers are out of fuel.
• 20:55
  Speaker 7: New South Wales. There one hundred and eighty seven with
• 20:57
  Speaker 7: no diesel and thirty two without any stock at all.
• 21:01
  Speaker 1: That's down nineteen on yesterday.
• 21:03
  Speaker 7: That's out of equivalent out of a total of twenty
• 21:05
  Speaker 7: four hundred and seventeen service stations in New South Wales.
• 21:09
  Speaker 7: Queensland figures remained fifty five with no diesel and thirty
• 21:12
  Speaker 7: five with no regular unlitded in Victoria one hundred and
• 21:16
  Speaker 7: thirty four with a lack of one or more grades.
• 21:20
  Speaker 7: That's down twenty eight on the last report. South Australia
• 21:24
  Speaker 7: forty nine out of seven hundred. Western Australia remained six.
• 21:30
  Speaker 4: Move over daily COVID press numbers Now it's fuel numbers.
• 21:33
  Speaker 6: Would you believe?
• 21:34
  Speaker 4: But I want to ask you this at home. Do
• 21:36
  Speaker 4: you think that this is hypocritical or not? So we've
• 21:39
  Speaker 4: got Chris Bowling out there saying you know, basically shackle
• 21:42
  Speaker 4: yourself down, don't leave your home, because we don't want
• 21:45
  Speaker 4: you to use up the fuel supply. But at the
• 21:47
  Speaker 4: same time, Anthony Alberzi is doing a well wind tour
• 21:51
  Speaker 4: of Australia. Now he has touched down in five major
• 21:54
  Speaker 4: cities in the space of ten days, including Friday a
• 21:58
  Speaker 4: week ago when he flew from Sydney to camp to
• 22:00
  Speaker 4: watch the rabbit Os versus Roosters at Alliance Stadium. And
• 22:03
  Speaker 4: you might remember he actually ran onto the pitch there
• 22:05
  Speaker 4: he is. He may even get a fine for that,
• 22:07
  Speaker 4: would you believe. Now his total distance covered was roughly
• 22:10
  Speaker 4: four eight hundred and fifty k's in ten days, requiring
• 22:13
  Speaker 4: about twenty thousand to twenty five thousand leaders of ful
• 22:17
  Speaker 4: A few points on this. Firstly, I do agree the
• 22:19
  Speaker 4: Prime Minister obviously has to travel, he is the Prime Minister.
• 22:23
  Speaker 6: But it's not a very good look when you've got
• 22:24
  Speaker 6: Chris Bowen out there saying please don't travel, when labor
• 22:27
  Speaker 6: are doing the exact opposite.
• 22:29
  Speaker 4: I mean, Chris Bowen last Friday flew himself up to
• 22:32
  Speaker 4: Brisbane to attend a cop summit instead of actually going
• 22:35
  Speaker 4: to a National Cabinet meeting. On the fuel crisis. This
• 22:38
  Speaker 4: guy's meant to be presiding over this fuel crisis and
• 22:41
  Speaker 4: he's gallivanting as part of his part time roles as
• 22:44
  Speaker 4: the cop chairman or whatever the heck he is. And secondly,
• 22:48
  Speaker 4: Bowen wants people to start working from home. Now, this
• 22:51
  Speaker 4: is not COVID. Have businesses not suffered enough. They're already
• 22:54
  Speaker 4: still suffering the side effects of the pandemic.
• 22:57
  Speaker 6: And Bowen's saying no, just stay from home, work from home. Hello,
• 23:01
  Speaker 6: why would anyone want to go into business in this
• 23:03
  Speaker 6: country right now?
• 23:04
  Speaker 1: I take your point.
• 23:05
  Speaker 2: It's the Prime minister's job to travel, and so there
• 23:08
  Speaker 2: you go. But it's also the Prime minister's job to
• 23:10
  Speaker 2: inspire the public to make sacrifices for the common good,
• 23:13
  Speaker 2: and to do that by a personal example. For him
• 23:16
  Speaker 2: to do that much travel in the last ten days,
• 23:19
  Speaker 2: ostensibly to go to sporting events for a lot of
• 23:22
  Speaker 2: it is frankly pretty unwise. When you've got your energy
• 23:25
  Speaker 2: minister saying the sorts of things he's saying, which is
• 23:28
  Speaker 2: highly inconvenient.
• 23:30
  Speaker 1: For most of us.
• 23:31
  Speaker 2: I think the Prime Minister should be setting a better example.
• 23:34
  Speaker 2: That's not to say he can't travel, but dial it
• 23:36
  Speaker 2: back a little bit at the time you're telling everybody
• 23:39
  Speaker 2: else to make sacrifice.
• 23:40
  Speaker 3: I just find it a bit hard to get upset
• 23:43
  Speaker 3: about the Prime Minister traveling.
• 23:44
  Speaker 5: I mean, he's the Prime Minister, for heaven's sake.
• 23:46
  Speaker 3: Can you know you might be able to work from
• 23:49
  Speaker 3: home in your your little.
• 23:50
  Speaker 5: Office job but doing data intry or whatever.
• 23:53
  Speaker 3: But he's the PM. Of course he's going to travel.
• 23:57
  Speaker 3: He's going to get on a plane. He's got a plane.
• 24:00
  Speaker 3: It's part of his deal, and he's got security and
• 24:02
  Speaker 3: all the other bills and whistles that go with it.
• 24:04
  Speaker 5: It's just part of being the Prime Minister.
• 24:07
  Speaker 1: I mean, you know, it's more important than the rest
• 24:09
  Speaker 1: of us.
• 24:09
  Speaker 3: Well, of course he's more important than the rest of us.
• 24:11
  Speaker 3: He was elected to do that job. There's no doubt
• 24:14
  Speaker 3: about that.
• 24:14
  Speaker 4: Yeah, But don't you think it's a bit hypocritical when
• 24:16
  Speaker 4: he's running out on the field.
• 24:17
  Speaker 6: I mean, the bloke's traveled from.
• 24:19
  Speaker 1: To be fair, he didn't use field to get on
• 24:21
  Speaker 1: the field.
• 24:21
  Speaker 6: No, I know that.
• 24:22
  Speaker 4: But the point is he's traveled over there because he's
• 24:24
  Speaker 4: a big supporter as we know of that rabbit os
• 24:26
  Speaker 4: is his shirts and his T shirts. Then and then
• 24:29
  Speaker 4: he's strutted himself onto the field, and now we're being
• 24:32
  Speaker 4: told shackle yourself down, don't leave your house practically, and
• 24:35
  Speaker 4: old mates and old mate's gallivanting around the country.
• 24:38
  Speaker 3: Okay, well, okay, So if it was me, if I
• 24:40
  Speaker 3: was living in Camber and I wanted to go to
• 24:42
  Speaker 3: that game there to watch the thousandth try whatever it
• 24:46
  Speaker 3: was being taken, I would have had to get on
• 24:49
  Speaker 3: a commercial flat.
• 24:50
  Speaker 5: He's the Prime Minister.
• 24:51
  Speaker 3: He's not getting on a commercial flat, right for all
• 24:54
  Speaker 3: the security concerns and whatever. He's got to get on
• 24:56
  Speaker 3: his own plate. So what do you propose we do instead?
• 25:00
  Speaker 3: He should He has to stay in the lot.
• 25:01
  Speaker 2: He could not go to the football one time, exactly,
• 25:04
  Speaker 2: the football, because he's asking all of us to sacrifice exactly,
• 25:07
  Speaker 2: So give up your rabbit os for a weekend.
• 25:09
  Speaker 1: We can't get inspire to take one for the team.
• 25:13
  Speaker 5: Get on a train. You and I could get on
• 25:15
  Speaker 5: a train or a bus with the Prime minister. Can't
• 25:17
  Speaker 5: do that, Well, what option does he have available to you?
• 25:20
  Speaker 4: Just don't want you just don't want to bump into
• 25:22
  Speaker 4: him on a train one day.
• 25:23
  Speaker 3: I'm happy to bump into it in the train less
• 25:25
  Speaker 3: let's be real here, the guys, the Prime Minister, like,
• 25:28
  Speaker 3: I think we've got bigger fish to fry than complaining
• 25:31
  Speaker 3: about the fact he got on.
• 25:31
  Speaker 4: What about bow and about bow and gallivanting up to Brisbane?
• 25:35
  Speaker 3: Well, no, I think it's not the flight that I
• 25:37
  Speaker 3: think is a problem. I think it's more that he's
• 25:39
  Speaker 3: got his eye off the ball.
• 25:40
  Speaker 5: When he's.
• 25:43
  Speaker 1: On the ball.
• 25:44
  Speaker 2: My concern for you, Caleb is that having taken a
• 25:46
  Speaker 2: big stance tonight defending the PM, something will happen tomorrow
• 25:50
  Speaker 2: and you will come to regret it the same way
• 25:52
  Speaker 2: that I have come to regret being the ABC. The
• 25:54
  Speaker 2: other night, I'll be on a play over there and
• 25:57
  Speaker 2: the Jets field over there strike and today I regret
• 26:01
  Speaker 2: defending the ABC.
• 26:02
  Speaker 1: I argued the other night.
• 26:04
  Speaker 2: Look, if they want more than ten percent over the next.
• 26:07
  Speaker 1: Three years, fair enough, have you strike? Everyone else does?
• 26:10
  Speaker 2: We don't get stuck into everyone that takes industrial action. However,
• 26:14
  Speaker 2: the ABC did a couple of things today that I
• 26:16
  Speaker 2: think are indefensible, not least of which using the platform
• 26:20
  Speaker 2: they have at taxpayer expense to argue their case, which
• 26:24
  Speaker 2: I think is a misuse of the Australian Broadcasting corporation.
• 26:28
  Speaker 2: Here's some of what went to air.
• 26:30
  Speaker 8: They're asking ABC management to deliver secure, safe and sustainable
• 26:34
  Speaker 8: jobs so we can deliver the news and content you deserve,
• 26:38
  Speaker 8: but their fallen shot of offering fair.
• 26:40
  Speaker 1: Pay and conditions.
• 26:41
  Speaker 4: We're asking ABC management to deliver secure, safe and sustainable
• 26:46
  Speaker 4: jobs so we can deliver the news and content that
• 26:49
  Speaker 4: you deserve.
• 26:51
  Speaker 1: Now, I don't think.
• 26:51
  Speaker 2: It's on for them to use the ABC channel to
• 26:55
  Speaker 2: argue their wage claim. But here's the second thing they
• 26:58
  Speaker 2: did that made me regret stair up for them the
• 27:00
  Speaker 2: other night.
• 27:01
  Speaker 1: The union came out today and.
• 27:03
  Speaker 2: Asked the public to make donations to the ABC to
• 27:07
  Speaker 2: help staff make it through the strike. So they take
• 27:11
  Speaker 2: our money in the first place. When they're upset they
• 27:13
  Speaker 2: don't get enough of our money, they ask for more
• 27:16
  Speaker 2: of our money so they can afford to protest for
• 27:19
  Speaker 2: even more of our money.
• 27:20
  Speaker 4: There, I believe that, I mean, honestly, the hypocrisy of
• 27:23
  Speaker 4: the ABC. So yeah, they want they want donations. This
• 27:26
  Speaker 4: was put on by the MEAA that was caught a
• 27:29
  Speaker 4: crowd strike fund. I mean, for goodness sake, look what bothered.
• 27:33
  Speaker 4: I mean, this whole thing is absolutely fascical, right if
• 27:36
  Speaker 4: the ABC was actually serious, which they're not, because they're
• 27:40
  Speaker 4: the editorial code never ever gets complied with. But they've
• 27:44
  Speaker 4: walked off the job today, right, They've made such a
• 27:46
  Speaker 4: whoha over it after what I thought was quite generous
• 27:50
  Speaker 4: conditions over three years, and then they've gone to the pub.
• 27:54
  Speaker 4: Now they've all just waltzed off the job and gone
• 27:56
  Speaker 4: down to the pub. Yet they're begging us for money.
• 28:00
  Speaker 4: I don't think it is a very good look personally
• 28:03
  Speaker 4: to have gone to the pub after this for a
• 28:05
  Speaker 4: couple of drinks. I thought that was just silly and
• 28:07
  Speaker 4: it was just wrong to me. That goes to show
• 28:10
  Speaker 4: that they're not actually serious in my view. And the
• 28:13
  Speaker 4: other thing is is that some of them were even
• 28:15
  Speaker 4: spotted holding signs suggested that they couldn't even pay their
• 28:18
  Speaker 4: power bills. So why are they down at the pub
• 28:20
  Speaker 4: having a pint?
• 28:21
  Speaker 1: That's the problem. Those two messages are completely at old right.
• 28:24
  Speaker 5: A couple of things.
• 28:26
  Speaker 3: Yes, I agree that they shouldn't be able to use
• 28:28
  Speaker 3: the ABC's on airspace to are.
• 28:30
  Speaker 1: You about to defend the ABC?
• 28:32
  Speaker 5: Just let me get there.
• 28:33
  Speaker 3: They shouldn't use the ABC's on airspace to talk about
• 28:36
  Speaker 3: their cause you wouldn't be afforded that in a newspaper
• 28:40
  Speaker 3: just to say I don't like the newspaper I work for,
• 28:43
  Speaker 3: right theme a asking for donations to support ABC's staff.
• 28:50
  Speaker 3: I've not seen them do that for any commercial outfit
• 28:53
  Speaker 3: when they have had mass redundancies. And I've been through
• 28:56
  Speaker 3: all of this before in newsrooms i've worked at. Not
• 29:00
  Speaker 3: once have I seen the MEAA stand up and defend
• 29:04
  Speaker 3: or try to support people in that way. But when
• 29:06
  Speaker 3: it's the ABC, Oh, you know, there are different species,
• 29:09
  Speaker 3: all right. As for going to the pub, why can't
• 29:12
  Speaker 3: they go to the pub? For heaven, say, what else
• 29:14
  Speaker 3: do they meant to do all day they're on strike.
• 29:16
  Speaker 3: I may disagree with them being on strike, but they
• 29:19
  Speaker 3: are legally allowed to go on strike. Why can't they
• 29:22
  Speaker 3: go to the pub and have a drink?
• 29:23
  Speaker 6: Caliber real perception of it? It's the perception of it.
• 29:26
  Speaker 4: Some of them are holding up signs saying that they
• 29:28
  Speaker 4: can't pay their power bills. They're meant to be the
• 29:30
  Speaker 4: public broadcast and they're meant to represent this country. Yet
• 29:34
  Speaker 4: they've walked off air today in the middle of a
• 29:36
  Speaker 4: fuel crisis, in the middle of a cost of living crisis,
• 29:38
  Speaker 4: where people are not going to be able to get
• 29:39
  Speaker 4: their most up to date information because we turn on
• 29:42
  Speaker 4: we're watching the BBC for goodness sake, use instead and
• 29:46
  Speaker 4: it's the I agree, come to our come to our channel.
• 29:49
  Speaker 4: You actually get the updated information, but the perception of that,
• 29:53
  Speaker 4: and then to walk out and go to the pub like, oh, well,
• 29:56
  Speaker 4: you know what, we're on the taxpayer dime.
• 29:58
  Speaker 6: I don't care. Looks poor, it looks bad.
• 30:02
  Speaker 5: So they should be locked in their home.
• 30:04
  Speaker 2: No, No, it wasn't that they went to be It was
• 30:07
  Speaker 2: it was that they said we need public donations to
• 30:09
  Speaker 2: help us struggle through the strike because we'll barely be
• 30:12
  Speaker 2: able to afford our rent. And they're down the pub
• 30:14
  Speaker 2: having a drink. You can't sell those two messages saying.
• 30:18
  Speaker 3: That is a human right to be able to buy
• 30:19
  Speaker 3: an affordable part of beer.
• 30:21
  Speaker 1: To beer, it's a human right. It just doesn't look right.
• 30:24
  Speaker 3: Well, you know, there are a hundred things I'll criticize
• 30:27
  Speaker 3: the ABC for, but you know what, going for for
• 30:30
  Speaker 3: a beer on a Wednesday afternoon, I'd be there with you.
• 30:34
  Speaker 6: Can I just say I'm a bit worried about you too.
• 30:36
  Speaker 4: This is this We've had you both defending the AB
• 30:38
  Speaker 4: say this week and some capacity. I am the only
• 30:41
  Speaker 4: person standing on the panel, but you know, the night
• 30:44
  Speaker 4: of the week, you've young, The week is young.
• 30:46
  Speaker 2: Who knows, Mike, I'm the most virtuous because I started
• 30:49
  Speaker 2: with support, but then I changed my mind, proving I'm
• 30:52
  Speaker 2: capable of listening to you.
• 30:53
  Speaker 3: Well, unlike left wing women, of course, completely discount that
• 30:59
  Speaker 3: point of possibly be entertained. Speaking of point of view
• 31:04
  Speaker 3: that well, I would suggest these ones are not even
• 31:07
  Speaker 3: worthy of entertainment. But somehow, in the weird and wacky
• 31:10
  Speaker 3: place they call England, they are.
• 31:12
  Speaker 5: Entertaining these ideas.
• 31:14
  Speaker 3: In Manchester there's a mob called the Great Places Housing Group.
• 31:18
  Speaker 3: They are not for profit housing association. They build affordable
• 31:22
  Speaker 3: housing for people basically, and they've been off having a
• 31:25
  Speaker 3: little chin wag with the Manchester City Council, the leader
• 31:30
  Speaker 3: of which is a labor lesbian the name of Bev Craig,
• 31:34
  Speaker 3: and they've come up with this grand idea that lgbt
• 31:39
  Speaker 3: QI plus whatever people require their own form of housing. Yes,
• 31:45
  Speaker 3: I know you're probably saying anything, what specifically do they
• 31:50
  Speaker 3: need that everyone else does not?
• 31:52
  Speaker 5: I don't know. Listen to Ms Craig in Manchester rebuilding
• 31:56
  Speaker 5: the UK's first LGBTQ plus affordable heising skin.
• 32:00
  Speaker 1: We're here, I'm saying moly range where there's going to
• 32:02
  Speaker 1: be one.
• 32:03
  Speaker 3: Hundred percent affordable homes, easy social rent and the actual
• 32:07
  Speaker 3: cash in behind me and another forty affordable shado ownership
• 32:11
  Speaker 3: are i'd the corner?
• 32:13
  Speaker 5: I'm sorry.
• 32:15
  Speaker 3: I'm a human being. Gay people I know also happen
• 32:19
  Speaker 3: to be human beings.
• 32:22
  Speaker 5: We live in.
• 32:23
  Speaker 3: Houses or units or flats or apartments or whatever it
• 32:27
  Speaker 3: might be. So what do they need? They need roof
• 32:31
  Speaker 3: over their head, so do I? They need a bedroom
• 32:35
  Speaker 3: and a living room, So do I kitchen?
• 32:37
  Speaker 5: So do I toilet, bath, shower?
• 32:41
  Speaker 3: So what what do l g b t Q people
• 32:45
  Speaker 3: need in a housing that everyone else does not?
• 32:49
  Speaker 2: The argument was as they age, they feel uncomfortable expressing
• 32:55
  Speaker 2: their sexuality around people who may not be LGBTQ community members,
• 33:01
  Speaker 2: so they want a safe environment as they age surrounded
• 33:05
  Speaker 2: by people like them. My question is, how is this
• 33:08
  Speaker 2: not discriminatory? Like what if a straight person wants to
• 33:12
  Speaker 2: get an apartment in this development? Are they excluded on
• 33:15
  Speaker 2: the basis of their sexuality which would go against you?
• 33:18
  Speaker 2: Not gay enough, which would go against everything the LGBTQ
• 33:21
  Speaker 2: community has fought for to be treated like everybody else,
• 33:24
  Speaker 2: or how.
• 33:24
  Speaker 1: Do you prove it?
• 33:25
  Speaker 4: What's the threshold of that? So let me get this straight, right,
• 33:30
  Speaker 4: part of the past, right, let me get this straight.
• 33:34
  Speaker 5: So there's not a need.
• 33:37
  Speaker 4: Housing development, right is being built not to service locals,
• 33:42
  Speaker 4: not to service the millions of Brits who actually need
• 33:46
  Speaker 4: to be put into into housing, but to service members
• 33:49
  Speaker 4: of the lgbt IQ plus community. What exactly is a
• 33:52
  Speaker 4: gay house? What is the difference between a gay house
• 33:54
  Speaker 4: and a straight house?
• 33:56
  Speaker 6: Have I have I missed something? But I do agree.
• 33:59
  Speaker 4: Imagine if the shoe on the other foot and it
• 34:01
  Speaker 4: was a housing development for straight.
• 34:02
  Speaker 3: People, no, no gays, alab you know it's being located.
• 34:07
  Speaker 1: We're somewhere over the rainbow of.
• 34:09
  Speaker 5: A well done, well done.
• 34:11
  Speaker 6: I just I love it. I mean seriously, well they
• 34:13
  Speaker 6: would come marching with this.
• 34:14
  Speaker 2: I just don't understand how that's not discriminated. It's a
• 34:18
  Speaker 2: little to discriminate against people on the basis of their
• 34:20
  Speaker 2: sexuality or gender. And we've got a housing development only
• 34:24
  Speaker 2: for people of a certain sexual perspcive.
• 34:27
  Speaker 3: But haven't they been telling us forever that they want
• 34:29
  Speaker 3: to be just like the rist of us? And we
• 34:30
  Speaker 3: want to be accepted. And now they say no, actually
• 34:33
  Speaker 3: we're different. We want our own houses.
• 34:34
  Speaker 4: Tolerate left as usual. Hey, before we go to a break,
• 34:37
  Speaker 4: have a look at this. In the UK, doctors that
• 34:39
  Speaker 4: work for the National Health Service now want to work
• 34:41
  Speaker 4: from home.
• 34:42
  Speaker 1: Would you believe?
• 34:43
  Speaker 4: In fact, sixty percent of doctors say they want to
• 34:46
  Speaker 4: work from home as part of a new system called
• 34:48
  Speaker 4: an online hospital.
• 34:49
  Speaker 6: It's the en NHS Online, a.
• 34:52
  Speaker 4: Virtual hospital that would treat millions of patients by matching
• 34:55
  Speaker 4: them with specialist doctors for remote consultations to focus on
• 34:59
  Speaker 4: areas like a need in flowered tree bow disease, menopause
• 35:03
  Speaker 4: and demetriosis, prostate enlargement, and glucoma. Now, most of the
• 35:08
  Speaker 4: doctors plan to work for the online hospital four to
• 35:11
  Speaker 4: eight hours per week in conjunction with their current role.
• 35:15
  Speaker 6: Look, I think this is absolutely ridiculous.
• 35:17
  Speaker 4: I'm all for telehealth right, but that's because I'm sitting
• 35:20
  Speaker 4: at home. I don't want a GP to be sitting
• 35:22
  Speaker 4: in their home amongst multiple distractions, amongst kids screaming and
• 35:26
  Speaker 4: yelling around. I mean, what's next at home? Surgeries at home,
• 35:30
  Speaker 4: blood tests for goodness sake?
• 35:31
  Speaker 6: But where are we heading to.
• 35:33
  Speaker 4: I think there are some professions where you've just got
• 35:35
  Speaker 4: to say, you know what, I can't work from home,
• 35:37
  Speaker 4: and that's just the roll of the dice. That's the
• 35:39
  Speaker 4: profession I work in. You don't work in an office job.
• 35:42
  Speaker 6: You're a doctor. For goodness, say go into the surgery.
• 35:44
  Speaker 2: It depends on the purpose of the consultation. If it's
• 35:46
  Speaker 2: for diagnosis, then I think you'd want to be sitting
• 35:49
  Speaker 2: across from your doctor in person. If it's to discuss
• 35:52
  Speaker 2: test results, then you may not need to travel forty
• 35:55
  Speaker 2: minutes through traffic to wait in the waiting room and
• 35:58
  Speaker 2: then go into his office. You could do that, zoom,
• 36:00
  Speaker 2: you could have the conversation. I think there's space for this.
• 36:05
  Speaker 2: I understand white people worried, but I think there's potential
• 36:07
  Speaker 2: for it.
• 36:08
  Speaker 4: I don't know it's the precedent I don't like. I
• 36:10
  Speaker 4: just think you just have to just realize, you know what,
• 36:12
  Speaker 4: some professions just go into the office.
• 36:14
  Speaker 5: That is that is true.
• 36:15
  Speaker 3: But I suppose if the patient's too lazy to go
• 36:17
  Speaker 3: into the office, then why.
• 36:18
  Speaker 5: Would the document vigure the eas do as well?
• 36:20
  Speaker 1: Right, all right, we're going to go to a break.
• 36:21
  Speaker 2: When we come back, we look at what's making headlines tomorrow,
• 36:24
  Speaker 2: including police investigating mosques that commemorated the death of the Ayatolla,
• 36:29
  Speaker 2: that and more in a moment. Okay, welcome back to
• 36:38
  Speaker 2: the program. Let's take a look at what's making headlines tomorrow.
• 36:41
  Speaker 2: As you'd expect, the fuel crisis and the consequences of
• 36:45
  Speaker 2: such making big news tomorrow.
• 36:47
  Speaker 3: Caleb indeed on the front of The Australian it's his
• 36:49
  Speaker 3: epidemic of empty Australia's port operators warned that a diesel
• 36:54
  Speaker 3: scramble could still trade nationwide, paralyzing container terminals and emptying
• 36:59
  Speaker 3: supermarket shelves, while the escalating fuel crisis is threatening fresh
• 37:03
  Speaker 3: vegetable supplies and forcing companies to stand down hundreds of apprentices.
• 37:09
  Speaker 3: As the government revealed replacements for six canceled oil shipments
• 37:13
  Speaker 3: and downplayed industry calls for petrol rationing, DP World Australia,
• 37:17
  Speaker 3: where chandles about forty percent of the nation's movement of
• 37:19
  Speaker 3: shipping containers, issued a stark ultimatum to the government reclassify
• 37:24
  Speaker 3: port operations as a Tier one fuel priority, or watch
• 37:28
  Speaker 3: both imports and exports grind to a halt. This is
• 37:31
  Speaker 3: from the head of DP World's Australian operations, Nicolay, knows
• 37:37
  Speaker 3: it is essential that critical industries are prioritized to ensure
• 37:40
  Speaker 3: Australians can access essential imported and exported goods. You know,
• 37:46
  Speaker 3: every day there is another story about how this is
• 37:50
  Speaker 3: getting worse. We showed that the clip before of the
• 37:53
  Speaker 3: number of places servos that are out of fuel and
• 37:57
  Speaker 3: diesel at the moment. There's no overnight answer to this,
• 38:01
  Speaker 3: and it all comes through in the supply chain, you know,
• 38:04
  Speaker 3: the farmers, the truckees, the shipping companies. Everyone is paying
• 38:10
  Speaker 3: for this, but who ultimately pays for it the consumer.
• 38:13
  Speaker 4: But even even on the front page of the odds
• 38:15
  Speaker 4: here you could see that it had different.
• 38:17
  Speaker 6: Industries that have been impacted. Have a look at this.
• 38:19
  Speaker 4: Police federal officers ordered to adopt smoother driving techniques to
• 38:23
  Speaker 4: minimize unnecessary idling and refuel within final two hours of
• 38:27
  Speaker 4: each shift. I mean, seriously, it's impacting every industry, the
• 38:30
  Speaker 4: public service, roral doctors, veggie growers.
• 38:34
  Speaker 6: And yet we were told two weeks ago, no, don't panic.
• 38:37
  Speaker 1: We mentioned veggie growers.
• 38:38
  Speaker 2: A survey of one hundred and fifty vegetable growers found
• 38:41
  Speaker 2: forty percent are either reducing their planting schedules or considering
• 38:47
  Speaker 2: reducing their planting schedules.
• 38:49
  Speaker 1: So if you get almost half of.
• 38:51
  Speaker 2: Growers contemplating growing less food because they're not sure they'll
• 38:56
  Speaker 2: be able to get it to market, et cetera, et cetera,
• 38:58
  Speaker 2: pretty quickly, a fuel crime will be a crisis on
• 39:01
  Speaker 2: a whole lot of other levels as well.
• 39:02
  Speaker 3: Indeed, they say two hundred electrical apprentices stood down. Rural
• 39:07
  Speaker 3: doctors are having crisis meetings because they're worried that patients
• 39:10
  Speaker 3: won't come to be treated.
• 39:12
  Speaker 5: It does not get any better this that all's been going.
• 39:14
  Speaker 1: What three weeks, I know, incredible.
• 39:17
  Speaker 3: And you know, if we had our ninety days of
• 39:19
  Speaker 3: oil which were meant to have, we probably wouldn't be
• 39:21
  Speaker 3: having a lot of these discussions on the front of
• 39:23
  Speaker 3: the oars as well. Tomorrow police probing indefensible vigils and
• 39:28
  Speaker 3: exclusive here police are assessing where the dozens of mosques
• 39:31
  Speaker 3: and other Islamic bodies broke the law by commemorating the
• 39:36
  Speaker 3: death of Iranian leader Atola Ali Kahmani, as Jewish community
• 39:40
  Speaker 3: leaders in the federal opposition demand a full audit to
• 39:43
  Speaker 3: ensure public money is not being used to support the
• 39:46
  Speaker 3: terror regime. New South Wales police and the federal government
• 39:49
  Speaker 3: are reviewing multiple taxpayer funded sheer organizations that held vigils
• 39:54
  Speaker 3: or posted tributes to the ar toler who had personally
• 39:57
  Speaker 3: controlled the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to bar Australia as.
• 40:01
  Speaker 5: A state sponsor of terrorism.
• 40:03
  Speaker 3: In one of the most egregious cases, the Australian Peace
• 40:06
  Speaker 3: Association Funny name, Isn't It used a sixty nine and
• 40:11
  Speaker 3: forty two dollars grant from the Home Affairs Department to
• 40:15
  Speaker 3: run a language program while simultaneously promoting a public memorial
• 40:19
  Speaker 3: for the martyrdom of the Iranian dictator. Again, I'm glad
• 40:25
  Speaker 3: the cops are looking into it, because seriously, if you
• 40:30
  Speaker 3: are celebrating not the leader of but someone who was
• 40:34
  Speaker 3: heavily involved in a listed terror organization, you would have
• 40:39
  Speaker 3: to think that is against the law.
• 40:41
  Speaker 2: Well, the Australian Federation of Islamic Councils has argued that
• 40:44
  Speaker 2: we are mourning a fellow Muslim and anyone who's critical
• 40:48
  Speaker 2: of that is politicizing what is a simple funeral for
• 40:53
  Speaker 2: a fellow Muslim.
• 40:54
  Speaker 1: That's a bit disingenuous. I would have thought.
• 40:55
  Speaker 6: And I just make this point.
• 40:56
  Speaker 4: You wonder why Pauline Hanson is so popular right now
• 40:59
  Speaker 4: because she's actually calling out this nonsense. Seriously, Let's look
• 41:02
  Speaker 4: at the Daily Telegraph front page.
• 41:04
  Speaker 6: There, Drill or be drilled.
• 41:06
  Speaker 4: Is the headline. Are a newed push to unlock Australia's
• 41:09
  Speaker 4: vast oil resources could make the country self sufficient in
• 41:12
  Speaker 4: as little as five years, with experts saying environmental lawfare
• 41:16
  Speaker 4: and red tape have crippled our fuel security. The calls
• 41:19
  Speaker 4: to aggressively drill Australia's oil and refine it here too,
• 41:22
  Speaker 4: came as the petrol crisis deepened. More than three hundred
• 41:26
  Speaker 4: stations across New South Wales are running out of some
• 41:28
  Speaker 4: type of fuel.
• 41:30
  Speaker 6: I mean again, I just don't.
• 41:31
  Speaker 4: Know why these sorts of conversations weren't happening earlier. But
• 41:34
  Speaker 4: we're literally sitting on abundance of resources in this country
• 41:37
  Speaker 4: and nobody has thought over the years what to drill.
• 41:40
  Speaker 6: Or be drilled?
• 41:40
  Speaker 2: That's what struck me about that front pages. We run
• 41:42
  Speaker 2: out of petrol and then we think maybe we should drill.
• 41:45
  Speaker 6: Yeah, surprise, and they're shocked by it. WHOA really Okay?
• 41:49
  Speaker 3: But I think there are probably some people over the
• 41:51
  Speaker 3: years who've wondered whether they should drill or be drilled.
• 41:53
  Speaker 3: But we should be as a country on top of
• 41:56
  Speaker 3: this stuff, you know.
• 41:58
  Speaker 5: And this is the ninety.
• 41:59
  Speaker 3: Day, the ninety days of oil that we're meant to have.
• 42:03
  Speaker 3: The fact that at the turn of the century we
• 42:04
  Speaker 3: had eight refineries in this country.
• 42:06
  Speaker 5: Now we have two.
• 42:07
  Speaker 3: They're secured until twenty thirty by the federal government. Who
• 42:11
  Speaker 3: knows what happens after that. I mean, we've just given
• 42:13
  Speaker 3: up all our sovereign capability. The consequences of that are
• 42:17
  Speaker 3: now staring us in the face. But they were steering
• 42:20
  Speaker 3: us in the face twenty years ago. How did we
• 42:21
  Speaker 3: not see this coming?
• 42:22
  Speaker 4: Oh, we get it to do with drill exactly, little
• 42:25
  Speaker 4: baby drill, drill, baby drill.
• 42:26
  Speaker 1: Thank god, we've got all those solar powered semi trailers.
• 42:29
  Speaker 1: That's all like it. Say.
• 42:30
  Speaker 2: The front page of tomorrow's Herald's son an exclusive article
• 42:33
  Speaker 2: number of police patrolling Trouble Plague CBD to surge double duty,
• 42:38
  Speaker 2: reads the headline. The number of police patrolling Melbourne CBD
• 42:41
  Speaker 2: will be doubled for the foreseeable future in an unprecedented operation.
• 42:45
  Speaker 2: The trouble plagued south end of Elizabeth Street is the
• 42:48
  Speaker 2: top target in the new police crackdown labeled Operation Harmony.
• 42:53
  Speaker 2: You know, we run out of fuel, then we think
• 42:55
  Speaker 2: maybe we should drill for oil. We have massive crime
• 42:58
  Speaker 2: problems in Melbourne, and then I think maybe we should
• 43:01
  Speaker 2: put on more police.
• 43:02
  Speaker 4: Well, we didn't just into Alan say that the Melbourne
• 43:04
  Speaker 4: CBD was safe. Wasn't that a stark line?
• 43:07
  Speaker 1: This is about ago about harmony.
• 43:09
  Speaker 6: This is about harmony. This is about harmony. You know.
• 43:11
  Speaker 4: Well, I mean, at least they're going to put more
• 43:13
  Speaker 4: cops on patrol. But I also feel like cops are
• 43:16
  Speaker 4: being made escapego for the fact that just Into Alan
• 43:18
  Speaker 4: has done nothing to crack down on crime.
• 43:20
  Speaker 1: I love the names they give to these things.
• 43:21
  Speaker 2: Weren't they honest and just called Operation the place has
• 43:23
  Speaker 2: gone to hell something like that.
• 43:25
  Speaker 3: That's right, And I mean seriously that they're concerned for
• 43:28
  Speaker 3: the south end of Elizabeth Street. And when I was
• 43:31
  Speaker 3: living there, which is more than three years ago now,
• 43:34
  Speaker 3: that section of Elizabeth Street and Flinders Street, at that
• 43:37
  Speaker 3: intersection there was terrible then, full of drug os and
• 43:41
  Speaker 3: people absolutely whacked out of their brains on booze.
• 43:44
  Speaker 1: But didn't they change in the Abey Street and they
• 43:46
  Speaker 1: made it more sort.
• 43:47
  Speaker 3: Of well, they put in all this Austrians astro turf
• 43:51
  Speaker 3: and cut off the traffic that you couldn't drive through
• 43:54
  Speaker 3: it anymore, but didn't make it any better. It just
• 43:56
  Speaker 3: attracted more wackos who said around this and then the
• 43:59
  Speaker 3: state governments they were possibly going to put in an injecting.
• 44:02
  Speaker 5: Room on Flinders Street there near Elizabeth Street. Just crazy.
• 44:05
  Speaker 5: But I mean the council had to get.
• 44:07
  Speaker 3: The Reese police in of course, because the coppers weren't
• 44:10
  Speaker 3: doing anything.
• 44:11
  Speaker 5: They finally woken up.
• 44:12
  Speaker 3: Isn't it amazing? On the front of the NT news tomorrow,
• 44:15
  Speaker 3: speaking of these issues of crime, Darwin CBD hospitality businesses
• 44:19
  Speaker 3: plead for help IMiD surge in anti social unrest. Violence
• 44:23
  Speaker 3: at every turn is the headline. Darwin hospitality operators have
• 44:27
  Speaker 3: demanded urgent action after a surge in violence and anti
• 44:30
  Speaker 3: social behavior in and around their venues. In one alarming incident,
• 44:34
  Speaker 3: staff used a fire hose to break.
• 44:37
  Speaker 5: Up a violent fight at the last supper.
• 44:40
  Speaker 3: Jeez, I'm assuming Jesus wasn't involved in that one, but.
• 44:45
  Speaker 5: I don't know.
• 44:45
  Speaker 3: Did they get the fire hose out and start dousing
• 44:47
  Speaker 3: them or how did this work?
• 44:49
  Speaker 5: I want to know.
• 44:50
  Speaker 1: I have no idea, but I imagine and I would love.
• 44:53
  Speaker 2: To get video footage of that shore. There's CCTV somewhere.
• 44:56
  Speaker 6: There's got to be something.
• 44:57
  Speaker 1: We're going to find it for tomorrow.
• 44:59
  Speaker 6: Let's have a look quickly at the Go Old Coast
• 45:00
  Speaker 6: bulletin now mary a Lago in Bargo.
• 45:02
  Speaker 4: What a headline, A leading expert on public integrity says
• 45:05
  Speaker 4: Gold Coast mayor Tom Tait has no choice but to
• 45:08
  Speaker 4: abstain from deciding the future of the controversial one point
• 45:11
  Speaker 4: five billion dollar Trump Tower development. The Trump organization pay
• 45:14
  Speaker 4: for the mayor's two days stay at Marilago in feb
• 45:17
  Speaker 4: as well as his meals and travel between the estate
• 45:20
  Speaker 4: and airport.
• 45:21
  Speaker 6: Well, well look at this. Now, this isn't good, isn't it?
• 45:24
  Speaker 6: What a great headline? I love that. It's a brilliant.
• 45:27
  Speaker 3: Imagine being the mayor of the Gold Coast and Donald
• 45:29
  Speaker 3: Trump pays for your accomodation, big valeries.
• 45:33
  Speaker 1: It's not bad at all.
• 45:34
  Speaker 2: Right, we're going to go to a break, but stick
• 45:35
  Speaker 2: around because after the break, we've got squirrels vaping.
• 45:39
  Speaker 1: I'm not making it up. It's a thing. Apparently squirrels vaping.
• 45:42
  Speaker 1: That's next.
• 45:47
  Speaker 2: Now, I'd never heard of the unwritten law of lawn mowing,
• 45:50
  Speaker 2: but maybe there's something to it. The law says this,
• 45:52
  Speaker 2: the first person who starts mowing the front lawn in
• 45:55
  Speaker 2: their street starts a cascading effect where within ours everybody's
• 45:59
  Speaker 2: doing it. A Queensland bloke has produced a video that's
• 46:02
  Speaker 2: gone viral proving this rule.
• 46:05
  Speaker 1: Seen this theory getting around that.
• 46:07
  Speaker 4: I don't mind that if you mow your lawn then
• 46:08
  Speaker 4: your neighbor's got one hour to.
• 46:10
  Speaker 1: Respond, sort of like yawning.
• 46:17
  Speaker 2: Apparently one person starts yawning everyone else does.
• 46:19
  Speaker 1: I think there's something to it.
• 46:20
  Speaker 2: You hear your neighbor mowing his lawn, you think, oh,
• 46:23
  Speaker 2: I should probably do mine, and you don't want to
• 46:25
  Speaker 2: be that house in the street that's got the bed.
• 46:27
  Speaker 6: Well, I can't aunswer that because I think lord, mowing
• 46:29
  Speaker 6: is a man's job. So I's being honest. What about
• 46:32
  Speaker 6: that survey would think of me?
• 46:33
  Speaker 1: Now?
• 46:33
  Speaker 3: I know I heard my neighbor doing something the other
• 46:36
  Speaker 3: day and that made me want to do it too,
• 46:37
  Speaker 3: but I won't tell you what it was.
• 46:40
  Speaker 4: What sorry, wait, what got to compute with that? Oh god,
• 46:44
  Speaker 4: I have to rewatch that one back later. Okay, vaping squirrels, No,
• 46:48
  Speaker 4: this is actually a serious problem. E Cigarette scourch, where
• 46:53
  Speaker 4: we've seen it around the world, has become so bad
• 46:55
  Speaker 4: that apparently squirrels are now being hooked on the vapes.
• 46:58
  Speaker 6: Would you believe have.
• 46:59
  Speaker 4: A look at this video that's circulating online.
• 47:02
  Speaker 6: This is in Brixton in South London.
• 47:06
  Speaker 4: I think we've got the video here. No, it's actually
• 47:09
  Speaker 4: we do have some vision. Here we go, Mom, there
• 47:14
  Speaker 4: is a squirrel in your yard smoking your jewel.
• 47:18
  Speaker 6: Mom, I swear it.
• 47:20
  Speaker 4: Actually, I think that might be of the vision of
• 47:22
  Speaker 4: a squirrel in Philadelphia, but it's actually doing the exact
• 47:25
  Speaker 4: same thing.
• 47:26
  Speaker 6: And they're saying it's a very big problem because.
• 47:28
  Speaker 4: They think it's fruit because obviously some of the vape
• 47:31
  Speaker 4: flavors are fruity, and then they're going on to suck.
• 47:34
  Speaker 2: An article in the UK Telegraph interviewed a squirrel expert
• 47:37
  Speaker 2: who said, quote unquote, vapes aren't part of their natural diet.
• 47:41
  Speaker 1: Thank god.
• 47:42
  Speaker 3: Really, I would really never have known that was the case.
• 47:46
  Speaker 4: Is this as bad as the RSPCA rat guy that
• 47:48
  Speaker 4: we had on last week?
• 47:49
  Speaker 2: I did said the same expert said, you don't want
• 47:51
  Speaker 2: animals ingesting nicotine, and I understand because it's a gateway drug.
• 47:54
  Speaker 2: Right next they're snorting cocaine.
• 47:57
  Speaker 6: They're on the pie, they're on the ice pipe.
• 47:59
  Speaker 3: Rules deserve the same pleasure as the rest of us,
• 48:01
  Speaker 3: I have to say. Speaking of pleasure in the United States,
• 48:05
  Speaker 3: our friends over at Fox News sent an intrepid reporter
• 48:08
  Speaker 3: out to see what was going on during spring break,
• 48:11
  Speaker 3: and well, what do they think about the eye toler?
• 48:15
  Speaker 5: You must be happy.
• 48:16
  Speaker 6: I'm very happy, a you Tola's dead?
• 48:18
  Speaker 1: And what whill?
• 48:19
  Speaker 6: What? What is that?
• 48:21
  Speaker 1: Because I tooler, I have never heard that word in
• 48:24
  Speaker 1: my life?
• 48:24
  Speaker 5: Was what's I toler?
• 48:26
  Speaker 6: I haven't heard.
• 48:27
  Speaker 1: I found out about Chuck Norris yesterday.
• 48:29
  Speaker 6: That was more devastating to me.
• 48:30
  Speaker 4: He was a supreme leader of Iran's We killed him.
• 48:35
  Speaker 6: You dead, You killed him.
• 48:39
  Speaker 5: Right.
• 48:40
  Speaker 3: Another one of these women was asked, you know what
• 48:42
  Speaker 3: are you doing this week?
• 48:43
  Speaker 5: And she said, blackout, rackout.
• 48:46
  Speaker 1: Well you're just.
• 48:47
  Speaker 6: Disappointed you didn't just say that. Cut that one out on.
• 48:50
  Speaker 3: A vision broadcast those after the watershed.
• 48:53
  Speaker 5: Maybe you could broadcast set on ten.
• 48:54
  Speaker 6: Maybe it might be appropriate.
• 48:56
  Speaker 2: I got to tell you that vision does not give
• 48:58
  Speaker 2: you any hope at all for the future generation. If
• 49:00
  Speaker 2: that's if that's America's finest.
• 49:02
  Speaker 4: You know what, though, I've got to say good on them.
• 49:03
  Speaker 4: They're having fun on spring break.
• 49:04
  Speaker 6: Let them.
• 49:05
  Speaker 4: I couldn't care less if they don't know who the
• 49:06
  Speaker 4: Io toler is. Go enjoy your life while you're young,
• 49:09
  Speaker 4: That's what I think.
• 49:10
  Speaker 5: Some days, go have fun.
• 49:11
  Speaker 3: Some days I wish I was living my life like
• 49:13
  Speaker 3: that and I didn't have to know who they is.
• 49:14
  Speaker 6: On spring break. You live on spring break every day,
• 49:18
  Speaker 6: to be honest.
• 49:19
  Speaker 2: That's it from us. Tonight stick Around. Coming up is
• 49:21
  Speaker 2: the Read a Penny Show.
• 49:22
  Speaker 1: Good Night,