Latest / Murder Files Unsealed / The Man Behind the Mask: The Murder of Christile Krug

Transcript

The Man Behind the Mask: The Murder of Christile Krug · Murder Files Unsealed

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Imagine you install security cameras around your house to protect
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: yourself from a stalker, only to slowly realize the person
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: hunting you is the one holding the master password.
• 0:09
  Speaker 2: Yeah. Oh, man.
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: You know, you lock the deadbolt, you arm the sensors,
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: and you think you've built this digital fortress. But on
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: December 14th, 2023, Christelle Cruz's digital fortress didn't keep the
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: monster out. It locked her in with him. Right.
• 0:25
  Speaker 2: And that is that is the terrifying reality of modern
• 0:28
  Speaker 2: intimate partner violence. We are so conditioned to look out
• 0:31
  Speaker 2: the window for a threat, you know.
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: Right. Like stranger danger.
• 0:34
  Speaker 2: Exactly. We assume danger is external. But when a perpetrator
• 0:37
  Speaker 2: have administrative access to your network, your location data and, well,
• 0:42
  Speaker 2: your communication devices, the perimeter of your home is entirely compromised.
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: OK, let's unpack this. We are looking at the murder
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: of a 43-year-old biochemical engineer named Christelle Krug in Broomfield, Colorado.
• 0:55
  Speaker 2: Yes.
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: And our source material today is a collection of transcripts
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: from body cam footage, 911 calls, police interrogations, and trial records.
• 1:03
  Speaker 2: It's a massive amount of data.
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: It is. And the mission of this deep dive isn't
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: just to recount the timeline of a true crime case.
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: We need to dissect the mechanics of how her killer
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: created a digital phantom to terrorize her. And what this
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: case exposes about the invisible vulnerabilities in the smart home
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: tech you probably have running in your living room right now.
• 1:25
  Speaker 2: The forensic footprint of this case is incredibly dense. It
• 1:29
  Speaker 2: forces us to examine the intersection of physical stalking and
• 1:32
  Speaker 2: digital gaslighting. We really have to look at how location brokers,
• 1:37
  Speaker 2: burner applications, and synchronized data ecosystems can be weaponized to
• 1:42
  Speaker 2: inflict profound psychological violence before a single physical blow is
• 1:46
  Speaker 2: ever struck.
• 1:47
  Speaker 1: So to understand how this digital phantom operated, we really
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: have to look at the moment the illusion finally cracked.
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: It's the morning of December 14th. Right. A man named
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: Daniel Krug, who goes by Dan, calls the Broomfield police
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: for a welfare check on his wife, Christille.
• 2:02
  Speaker 2: And this call is so important. It really is.
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: If you listen to the audio of this 911 call,
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: his phrasing is highly calculated. He tells dispatch, you know,
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: I don't think this is an emergency, but this feels
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: really weird. He mentions she isn't answering her phone. and
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: casually seeds the idea that they've been receiving threats from
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: an outside party. He even mentioned she had a meeting
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: scheduled with a Detective Martinez that very day.
• 2:25
  Speaker 2: He is attempting to preemptively construct the narrative frame for
• 2:30
  Speaker 2: the police. Right. By stating it's not an emergency, he
• 2:34
  Speaker 2: mimics the tone of a rational, level-headed husband who is
• 2:37
  Speaker 2: merely being cautious.
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: Yeah, he's just a concerned guy.
• 2:40
  Speaker 2: Exactly. But by simultaneously name-dropping a specific detective and mentioning
• 2:45
  Speaker 2: prior threats... He is effectively directing the dispatcher to look
• 2:48
  Speaker 2: at a pre-existing file.
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: Wow.
• 2:51
  Speaker 2: He is trying to steer the responding officers toward a
• 2:53
  Speaker 2: specific suspect before they even arrive at his driveway.
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: Which raises a massive question about his strategy here. Calling
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: in a welfare check on your own house when you
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: are the perpetrator seems, I don't know, counterintuitive.
• 3:05
  Speaker 2: It does.
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: It is like a hacker intentionally triggering a company's firewall alarm.
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: Isn't that inviting the vampire into your own house? By
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: being the one to initiate the response, he probably thinks
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: he gets to control the IT department's investigation from the inside.
• 3:21
  Speaker 2: That is a perfect analogy. In behavioral analysis, this is
• 3:24
  Speaker 2: a form of inserting oneself into the investigation. Oh, okay.
• 3:28
  Speaker 2: If he waits for her coworkers to report her missing,
• 3:31
  Speaker 2: he loses the initiative. He becomes a passive subject of
• 3:34
  Speaker 2: police inquiry.
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: I see. So he has to be the one to
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: make the call.
• 3:38
  Speaker 2: Exactly. By initiating the call, he takes on the role
• 3:41
  Speaker 2: of the proactive, concerned partner. He believes he is intelligent
• 3:45
  Speaker 2: enough to manage the flow of information to the police
• 3:48
  Speaker 2: and keep their eyes pointed outward toward the perimeter he established.
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: Well, the police are familiar with the Krug family because
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: of those very threats he mentioned on the call. An
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: officer is dispatched, meets up with a neighbor who had
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: also been asked by Dan to check the house, and
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: they go inside.
• 4:01
  Speaker 2: And that's when everything shifts.
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: Yeah, the audio from the body cam shifts almost instantly
• 4:07
  Speaker 1: from routine protocol to total chaos. They find Christille completely
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: unresponsive in a pool of blood on the garage floor.
• 4:15
  Speaker 2: Tactically, the officers immediately treat the home as an active,
• 4:19
  Speaker 2: uncleared scene.
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: Because they don't know who's in there.
• 4:21
  Speaker 2: Right. Because Dan has repeatedly primed them with the narrative
• 4:25
  Speaker 2: of an external stalker threatening kidnapping. The first responders have
• 4:29
  Speaker 2: to assume an armed intruder might still be inside a
• 4:33
  Speaker 2: closet or a secondary bedroom. Gosh. So they move through
• 4:36
  Speaker 2: the house with extreme caution.
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: And as the paramedics arrive, the physical reality of the
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: crime scene shatters the initial assumption that Christille might have just,
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: you know, fallen and hit her head.
• 4:46
  Speaker 2: No, it wasn't a fall.
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: It broops brutal. She has sustained two massive blunt force
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: trauma impacts to the skull and a fatal stab wound
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: directly to the heart. It is a highly intimate, immensely violent,
• 4:58
  Speaker 1: localized attack.
• 4:59
  Speaker 2: Alongside the brutality of the attack, the police note a
• 5:03
  Speaker 2: glaring environmental anomaly.
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: The entry point. Yes.
• 5:06
  Speaker 2: There is absolutely zero sign of forced entry. No broken glass.
• 5:10
  Speaker 2: No compromised locks. However, someone has placed physical masking tape
• 5:14
  Speaker 2: over the lens of the home's primary doorbell camera.
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: They blinded the house.
• 5:19
  Speaker 2: Yes.
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: And when police break the news to Dan, his physical
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: reaction on the body cam is highly dramatic. He starts retching, hyperventilating.
• 5:27
  Speaker 1: He keeps repeating, I protected her.
• 5:30
  Speaker 2: He's fully committing to the part.
• 5:32
  Speaker 1: He really is. He is playing the role of the
• 5:34
  Speaker 1: devastated protector. Leaning entirely into the narrative that a six-week
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: nightmare has just culminated in a tragic failure of their security.
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: Because Christille had been enduring a horrific escalating stalking campaign
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: for a month and a half leading up to this morning.
• 5:49
  Speaker 2: To understand the weight of that masking tape on the camera,
• 5:51
  Speaker 2: we have to look at the six weeks prior. On
• 5:54
  Speaker 2: October 31st, Christille went to the police to formally report
• 5:58
  Speaker 2: this stalker. Right. The messages were coming from an individual
• 6:01
  Speaker 2: claiming to be Anthony Holland. Anthony was a man she
• 6:04
  Speaker 2: had briefly dated in high school more than two decades earlier.
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: Right. She told police that for years, this Anthony guy
• 6:10
  Speaker 1: had occasionally sent annoying but mostly harmless messages on Facebook
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: trying to reconnect. She eventually just blocked him.
• 6:18
  Speaker 2: Which is a normal response.
• 6:19
  Speaker 1: Yeah, totally normal. But on October 2nd, the digital boundary
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: was breached. Messages started hitting her actual cell phone. And
• 6:27
  Speaker 1: the tone was entirely different.
• 6:29
  Speaker 2: It escalated quickly.
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: So quickly. They rapidly escalated into violently explicit threats. He
• 6:36
  Speaker 1: was calling Dan a loser, texting things like, I'll get
• 6:39
  Speaker 1: rid of him and we can be together. He even
• 6:41
  Speaker 1: threatened to put something in Dan's tailpipe.
• 6:43
  Speaker 2: The escalation wasn't just in the violence of the language.
• 6:46
  Speaker 2: It was in the breadth of the campaign. The stalker
• 6:49
  Speaker 2: began a systematic attempt at reputational destruction. Oh, right, the websites. Yeah,
• 6:54
  Speaker 2: Christille found that her photos and personal details were being
• 6:56
  Speaker 2: uploaded to various online hookup sites.
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: That is so awful. It is.
• 7:00
  Speaker 2: The goal of this specific tactic is to make the
• 7:03
  Speaker 2: victim feel entirely exposed and vulnerable in the public sphere,
• 7:07
  Speaker 2: stripping them of their autonomy and privacy.
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: But Christille wasn't passive. She didn't just cower and hope
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: it would stop. This is where her background as a
• 7:15
  Speaker 1: biochemical engineer becomes incredibly relevant.
• 7:18
  Speaker 2: She was very analytical.
• 7:19
  Speaker 1: Exactly. She had a highly trained analytical mind, and she
• 7:23
  Speaker 1: essentially treated her own stalking like a complex data set.
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: She didn't just panic. She organized.
• 7:30
  Speaker 2: She fought back with data.
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: She created meticulous logs of every text, every email, noting
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: timestamps and context. She systematically dismantled her own digital footprint,
• 7:40
  Speaker 1: taking down all her social media, and she physically fortified
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: her life. She bought the home surveillance cameras. She applied
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: for a concealed carry permit, and she started open carrying
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: a firearm.
• 7:50
  Speaker 2: Her response is a textbook example of highly adaptive survival behavior.
• 7:55
  Speaker 2: She is isolating variables to try and understand the mechanism
• 7:58
  Speaker 2: of the threat.
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: Wow.
• 7:59
  Speaker 2: But what was driving her to arm herself was the
• 8:02
  Speaker 2: sheer omniscience of the stalker. The entity texting her seemed
• 8:05
  Speaker 2: to have access to real-time, highly granular location data.
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: This is the part that is so deeply unsettling. The
• 8:12
  Speaker 1: stalker would reference her walking into a very specific dentist's
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: office on a crowded street. He sent a photo of
• 8:18
  Speaker 1: Dan getting out of his car miles away in Denver.
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: Christille was agonizing over how this was mechanically possible.
• 8:25
  Speaker 2: She must have felt like she was losing her mind.
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: Yeah, she theorized to the police that this Anthony guy
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: must have physically traveled to Colorado and placed a magnetic
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: GPS tracker under her car or somehow installed spyware on
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: her phone. Because if a guy hasn't been in her
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: life for 20 years, how else does he have her
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: exact geographical coordinates on a random Tuesday?
• 8:45
  Speaker 2: The anxiety of that unseen surveillance is paralyzing. When your
• 8:49
  Speaker 2: daily movements are reflected back to you by a hostile entity,
• 8:52
  Speaker 2: Your brain enters a permanent state of hypervigilance.
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: You can't trust anything.
• 8:56
  Speaker 2: No. You start looking at every parked car, every stranger
• 8:59
  Speaker 2: on the street, wondering if they are the conduit for
• 9:01
  Speaker 2: that information. The police recognized the severity of this and
• 9:06
  Speaker 2: immediately began drafting digital search warrants for the IP addresses
• 9:09
  Speaker 2: and cell carrier data associated with the burner numbers.
• 9:13
  Speaker 1: But as we know, getting tech companies to comply with
• 9:15
  Speaker 1: subpoenas takes time. Weeks, sometimes months. Right.
• 9:19
  Speaker 2: The bureaucracy of it all.
• 9:20
  Speaker 1: Yeah, so while they are waiting on the digital forensics,
• 9:24
  Speaker 1: the police are actively hunting for Anthony Holland. They treat
• 9:27
  Speaker 1: him as the prime undisputed suspect. They pull his files,
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: they run his name, and within hours of Christille's murder,
• 9:34
  Speaker 1: they locate him. But he isn't hiding in a motel
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: in Broomfield. He is living in Eagle Mountain, Utah.
• 9:40
  Speaker 2: Utah.
• 9:41
  Speaker 1: Yeah, that is an eight-hour drive across state lines.
• 9:44
  Speaker 2: And when Utah authorities make contact with him, the entire
• 9:47
  Speaker 2: architecture of the investigation... He's a massive structural pivot.
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: Why is that?
• 9:53
  Speaker 2: Well, Anthony Holland is completely oblivious to the situation. More importantly,
• 9:58
  Speaker 2: he has an absolute impenetrable... alibi.
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: Oh, wow.
• 10:02
  Speaker 2: He had been on a shopping trip in Salt Lake
• 10:03
  Speaker 2: City over the previous 24 hours. He provides physical, time-stamped
• 10:08
  Speaker 2: receipts for his purchases.
• 10:09
  Speaker 1: So if Anthony is 500 miles away buying groceries in Utah,
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: the digital search warrants suddenly take on a whole new meaning.
• 10:17
  Speaker 2: Completely.
• 10:17
  Speaker 1: Because whoever is sending these texts has to be close
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: enough to know Christille's real-time movements. You can't photograph someone
• 10:23
  Speaker 1: getting out of their car in Denver from a strip
• 10:25
  Speaker 1: mall in Salt Lake City. And Anthony actually tells the
• 10:28
  Speaker 1: police on the phone, I haven't set foot in Colorado
• 10:31
  Speaker 1: since 2016. I haven't seen Christille since we were teenagers
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: in the year 2000.
• 10:35
  Speaker 2: To verify an alibi like that in a modern investigation,
• 10:39
  Speaker 2: police don't just take a suspect's word and a piece
• 10:42
  Speaker 2: of receipt paper.
• 10:42
  Speaker 1: Right. They dig deeper.
• 10:43
  Speaker 2: They do. They cross-reference the transactional data with surveillance footage
• 10:47
  Speaker 2: from the retail stores, and they pull the localized cell
• 10:51
  Speaker 2: tower triangulation for his mobile device.
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: Okay.
• 10:54
  Speaker 2: They look at the unique MSC address of his phone,
• 10:57
  Speaker 2: pinging local Wi-Fi routers in Utah. His digital and physical
• 11:01
  Speaker 2: footprints perfectly align. He was definitively not in Colorado.
• 11:06
  Speaker 1: Which means the terrifying ghost in the machine wasn't Anthony Holland.
• 11:10
  Speaker 1: The police realize they have a massive problem. If Anthony
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: didn't drive eight hours to kill her, they have to ask, well,
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: was Anthony Holland ever actually the one stalking her in
• 11:18
  Speaker 1: the first place?
• 11:19
  Speaker 2: What's fascinating here is from a psychological profiling standpoint, the
• 11:23
  Speaker 2: behavior attributed to Anthony during the six-week stalking campaign made
• 11:27
  Speaker 2: zero clinical sense.
• 11:28
  Speaker 1: Really? How so?
• 11:30
  Speaker 2: Stalkers generally fall into specific typologies. You have the rejected stalker,
• 11:35
  Speaker 2: the intimacy-seeking stalker, the resentful stalker. But a 20-year dormant period,
• 11:40
  Speaker 2: followed by an eruption of hypersexual violent rage, defies all
• 11:45
  Speaker 2: standard behavioral escalation models.
• 11:47
  Speaker 1: That makes sense, yeah. It's too out of the blue. Right.
• 11:50
  Speaker 2: If a high school breakup was amicable, as Christille herself stated,
• 11:54
  Speaker 2: the psychological catalyst for this sudden lethal fixation simply doesn't exist.
• 11:59
  Speaker 1: And Christille's friends had actually spotted this anomaly early on.
• 12:03
  Speaker 1: When she showed them the threatening texts in October... They
• 12:06
  Speaker 1: told her it was bizarre.
• 12:07
  Speaker 2: They knew it didn't fit.
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: Yeah, they said that Anthony they remember from two decades
• 12:10
  Speaker 1: ago might have been a little clingy, maybe emotional, but
• 12:13
  Speaker 1: he was never aggressive. He wasn't capable of this level
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: of vitriol. But Christille was so overwhelmed by the sheer
• 12:19
  Speaker 1: volume of the digital assault that she focused on the
• 12:22
  Speaker 1: name attached to the texts rather than the profile of
• 12:25
  Speaker 1: the person sending them.
• 12:26
  Speaker 2: That is the insidious nature of identity spoofing. The perpetrator
• 12:31
  Speaker 2: isn't just hiding their own identity. They are hijacking someone
• 12:34
  Speaker 2: else's history to create a plausible distraction. It's just so evil.
• 12:38
  Speaker 2: It is. With Anthony cleared by undeniable forensic data, the
• 12:42
  Speaker 2: investigative lens snaps violently back to the epicenter of the
• 12:45
  Speaker 2: crime scene. The threat wasn't coming from across state lines.
• 12:49
  Speaker 2: The threat had the keys to the house.
• 12:51
  Speaker 1: Which brings us back to Dan Krug sitting in the
• 12:54
  Speaker 1: police station. Because of the united defense affront he presented...
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: The terrified husband clutching a steel baton at the grocery
• 13:01
  Speaker 1: store to protect his family. It completely disintegrates the second
• 13:04
  Speaker 1: detective start interviewing Christelle's inner circle.
• 13:07
  Speaker 2: The facade falls apart.
• 13:08
  Speaker 1: Entirely. The reality of their domestic life was incredibly dark.
• 13:13
  Speaker 1: The marriage wasn't just strained. It was functionally over.
• 13:16
  Speaker 2: The contrast between the public facade and the private reality
• 13:19
  Speaker 2: is stark. Christelle's friends informed investigators that she actively loathed Dan.
• 13:25
  Speaker 2: She had mentally and emotionally checked out of the relationship.
• 13:27
  Speaker 1: Weren't she stayed?
• 13:28
  Speaker 2: Yes, but leaving a highly volatile partner involves navigating an
• 13:32
  Speaker 2: incredibly dangerous off-ramp, especially when children are involved.
• 13:36
  Speaker 1: Right. A friend explicitly laid out why she hadn't filed
• 13:39
  Speaker 1: for divorce yet. Dan was explosive. The friend detailed to
• 13:43
  Speaker 1: police how Dan would use what he disguised as corporal punishment,
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: aggressively grabbing and pulling the kids in a way that
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: left Christille terrified.
• 13:52
  Speaker 2: That is so common.
• 13:53
  Speaker 1: She was staying purely as a human shield. She knew
• 13:55
  Speaker 1: that if she divorced him, a family court might grant
• 13:58
  Speaker 1: him shared custody, leaving the kids alone with him for
• 14:01
  Speaker 1: days at a time without her there to intervene.
• 14:04
  Speaker 2: This reframes the entire power dynamic of the household. We
• 14:08
  Speaker 2: are looking at a classic mechanism of coercive control.
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: Okay, what does that mean exactly?
• 14:13
  Speaker 2: Physical violence actually hitting a partner is often just the
• 14:16
  Speaker 2: final manifestation of a much deeper systemic pattern of psychological domination.
• 14:21
  Speaker 2: Dan was losing his grip on her. She was emotionally absent.
• 14:24
  Speaker 2: She was preparing an exit strategy, and he could feel
• 14:27
  Speaker 2: the control slipping.
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: And Christille's family had incredibly sharp instincts about him. Her
• 14:32
  Speaker 1: stepfather described Dan to the police as a slick politician
• 14:35
  Speaker 1: or a used car salesman. He felt Dan was constantly
• 14:39
  Speaker 1: manipulating the social environment to center himself.
• 14:41
  Speaker 2: They saw right through him.
• 14:42
  Speaker 1: They really did. But the most chilling detail comes from
• 14:45
  Speaker 1: Christille's stepmother. Just days before the murder, Christille was exhaustively
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: analyzing how the stalker could possibly know her exact schedule.
• 14:54
  Speaker 1: She was looking at the variables, the data points, and
• 14:57
  Speaker 1: she looked at her stepmom and said, I can't even
• 14:59
  Speaker 1: rule out my husband.
• 15:01
  Speaker 2: For a victim of stalking to independently arrive at the
• 15:05
  Speaker 2: conclusion that the architect of their terror might be sharing
• 15:08
  Speaker 2: their bed requires an immense amount of intellectual bravery.
• 15:12
  Speaker 1: It's heartbreaking.
• 15:13
  Speaker 2: It means dismantling your foundational assumptions about safety. Christille's analytical
• 15:17
  Speaker 2: mind had processed the sheer impossibility of the stalker's logistics,
• 15:21
  Speaker 2: and she identified the only variable that made the math work. in.
• 15:26
  Speaker 1: So with this entirely new perspective on the marriage, Detective
• 15:29
  Speaker 1: Martinez brings Dan into the interrogation room. And watching this
• 15:33
  Speaker 1: footage is a masterclass in observing deception.
• 15:35
  Speaker 2: Oh, absolutely.
• 15:36
  Speaker 1: The detective starts probing about the marital friction, and Dan
• 15:39
  Speaker 1: immediately attempts to invert the victim-aggressor dynamic. He starts complaining
• 15:44
  Speaker 1: that Christille was being secretive. He claims that a few
• 15:46
  Speaker 1: days prior, she left work early for no reason and
• 15:49
  Speaker 1: wouldn't tell him where she was.
• 15:51
  Speaker 2: He is attempting to build a post-mortem narrative that shifts
• 15:55
  Speaker 2: the focus away from his own behavior.
• 15:57
  Speaker 1: Deflection.
• 15:58
  Speaker 2: Exactly. By characterizing her as secretive and elusive, he is
• 16:02
  Speaker 2: subtly suggesting to the detectives that perhaps she was involved
• 16:06
  Speaker 2: in something illicit. He wants them to wonder if a
• 16:08
  Speaker 2: secret lover or a shady business contact was the real killer.
• 16:12
  Speaker 2: It is a highly manipulative deflection tactic.
• 16:15
  Speaker 1: I was watching his physical reactions during this part of
• 16:18
  Speaker 1: the interrogation, and I noticed something bizarre. As the detective
• 16:21
  Speaker 1: starts applying more pressure, asking Dan to explain his feelings
• 16:24
  Speaker 1: of resentment, Dan starts answering questions with his eyes completely
• 16:28
  Speaker 1: squeezed shut.
• 16:29
  Speaker 2: Yes.
• 16:30
  Speaker 1: He's talking for extended periods like this. What is happening
• 16:33
  Speaker 1: neurologically when a suspect does that?
• 16:35
  Speaker 2: It's a fascinating physiological response called blocking behavior. Lying, especially
• 16:40
  Speaker 2: constructing a complex, multilayered fiction on the fly while sitting
• 16:44
  Speaker 2: across from a trained interrogator, requires a massive amount of
• 16:47
  Speaker 2: cognitive bandwidth.
• 16:49
  Speaker 1: So his brain is just overloaded.
• 16:51
  Speaker 2: The brain is working in overdrive. When Dan feels cornered,
• 16:54
  Speaker 2: his brain becomes overwhelmed by the cognitive load. By closing
• 16:58
  Speaker 2: his eyes, he is instinctively shutting off the visual processing
• 17:02
  Speaker 2: center of his brain.
• 17:03
  Speaker 1: Oh, wow.
• 17:04
  Speaker 2: He is eliminating the distraction of the detective's facial expressions
• 17:07
  Speaker 2: and body language so he can devote 100% of his
• 17:10
  Speaker 2: neurological resources to maintaining his fabricated reality.
• 17:14
  Speaker 1: It's like a computer shutting down background apps to keep
• 17:16
  Speaker 1: the main program from crashing. But unfortunately for Dan, his
• 17:20
  Speaker 1: main program was about to encounter a fatal error. Because
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: while he is sitting in that room with his eyes closed,
• 17:26
  Speaker 1: spinning tales about his wife's supposed secrets, the digital forensic
• 17:30
  Speaker 1: data that the police requested weeks ago finally lands on
• 17:33
  Speaker 1: the detective's desk.
• 17:34
  Speaker 2: The digital trail he left is astonishingly sloppy for someone
• 17:38
  Speaker 2: who believed he was orchestrating a perfect crime.
• 17:40
  Speaker 1: Okay, break it down for us.
• 17:42
  Speaker 2: Let's look at the mechanics. The threatening messages were sent.
• 17:45
  Speaker 2: using Gmail accounts and burner phone applications like TextNow. These
• 17:50
  Speaker 2: apps allow you to generate a fake phone number to
• 17:52
  Speaker 2: send texts, but the data packets still have to travel
• 17:55
  Speaker 2: through the internet.
• 17:56
  Speaker 1: Right. The app masks your phone number, but it doesn't
• 17:59
  Speaker 1: mask how your physical device connects to the web.
• 18:02
  Speaker 2: Exactly. When you send a message through a burner app
• 18:05
  Speaker 2: over a Wi-Fi network, that local router logs the unique
• 18:09
  Speaker 2: MAC address of the device, And the internet service provider
• 18:13
  Speaker 2: logs the time-stamped IP address. Got it. When the tech
• 18:16
  Speaker 2: companies provided the IP logs for the Anthony accounts, investigators
• 18:20
  Speaker 2: traced them directly back to the computer network architecture at
• 18:23
  Speaker 2: the Colorado Department of Public Health.
• 18:25
  Speaker 1: The exact building where Dan Krug went to work every day.
• 18:28
  Speaker 2: Precisely. And the physical hardware tracking was even more damning.
• 18:32
  Speaker 2: The police pulled the purchase records for the specific burner
• 18:35
  Speaker 2: phone used in the stalking campaign. It was purchased at
• 18:39
  Speaker 2: a local Walgreens.
• 18:40
  Speaker 1: Did he use cash?
• 18:41
  Speaker 2: No, the payment method was a gift card registered in
• 18:44
  Speaker 2: Daniel Krug's name. But the final nail in the digital
• 18:47
  Speaker 2: coffin is co-location tracking.
• 18:49
  Speaker 1: Here's where it gets really interesting. Explain how that works,
• 18:52
  Speaker 1: because this is where the concept of parallel digital footprints
• 18:55
  Speaker 1: comes into play.
• 18:56
  Speaker 2: We all carry smartphones that constantly ting cell towers and
• 18:59
  Speaker 2: communicate with GPS satellites, logging our location data for various
• 19:03
  Speaker 2: apps and ad tech companies. Dan was carrying his primary
• 19:07
  Speaker 2: personal cell phone, and the hidden burner phone simultaneously. Investigators
• 19:12
  Speaker 2: subpoenaed the historical location data for both devices. The GPS
• 19:16
  Speaker 2: coordinates mirrored each other perfectly. Wherever Dan Kruger's primary phone
• 19:21
  Speaker 2: traveled over that six-week period, the burner phone traveled with it,
• 19:26
  Speaker 2: pinging the exact same towers at the exact same milliseconds.
• 19:30
  Speaker 1: So they were together.
• 19:30
  Speaker 2: The stalker wasn't tracking Dan. The stalker was in Dan's pocket.
• 19:34
  Speaker 1: And as they dive into Dante's personal devices, they uncover
• 19:37
  Speaker 1: his search history. And this strips away any illusion that
• 19:41
  Speaker 1: this was a crime of passion or a sudden snap.
• 19:43
  Speaker 1: On December 13th, the day before the murder, Dan is
• 19:46
  Speaker 1: on Google asking the algorithm how to kill his wife.
• 19:49
  Speaker 2: It's so brazen.
• 19:50
  Speaker 1: He searches, when is a head injury a cause for concern?
• 19:53
  Speaker 1: Then he searches, how hard would you have to hit
• 19:55
  Speaker 1: someone in the head to make them unconscious? And finally,
• 19:59
  Speaker 1: how long can you be unconscious without brain damage?
• 20:01
  Speaker 2: He is researching the biomechanics of blunt force trauma. He
• 20:05
  Speaker 2: is mapping out the precise physical methodology for the ambush
• 20:09
  Speaker 2: he plans to execute the following morning. It is cold,
• 20:13
  Speaker 2: calculated premeditation.
• 20:15
  Speaker 1: But the most psychologically jarring data point happens after 8.00 a.m.
• 20:20
  Speaker 1: on the day of the murder. Remember the indoor surveillance
• 20:23
  Speaker 1: cameras Christille bought to protect her family?
• 20:25
  Speaker 2: Yes, the ones that went dark.
• 20:27
  Speaker 1: The app logs reveal that shortly after 8.00 a.m., three
• 20:31
  Speaker 1: of the four cameras were manually deactivated. The logs show
• 20:34
  Speaker 1: they were turned off using Christille's specific device credentials. But
• 20:38
  Speaker 1: based on the forensic timeline, Christille is already deceased on
• 20:41
  Speaker 1: the garage floor at this point.
• 20:42
  Speaker 2: That's horrifying.
• 20:43
  Speaker 1: Furthermore, between 8.00 and 8.20 a.m., text messages are drafted
• 20:48
  Speaker 1: on her phone, but they are programmed to be sent
• 20:50
  Speaker 1: on a time delay later that morning.
• 20:52
  Speaker 2: He is weaponizing her digital footprint to build his alibi
• 20:55
  Speaker 2: in real time. He has just committed a brutally intimate murder,
• 21:00
  Speaker 2: and instead of experiencing the panic or adrenaline crash, typical
• 21:03
  Speaker 2: of a disorganized offender, he remains on the scene. Just
• 21:07
  Speaker 2: hanging around. Covered in evidence and methodically manipulates a dead
• 21:11
  Speaker 2: woman's phone. He is orchestrating a digital puppet show to
• 21:15
  Speaker 2: trick the police timeline.
• 21:16
  Speaker 1: It is a terrifying level of compartmentalization. And as detectives
• 21:21
  Speaker 1: dug into his background, they realized this wasn't his first
• 21:23
  Speaker 1: time writing a script like this. They uncovered an incident
• 21:26
  Speaker 1: from 20 years prior that proves his pathology was fully
• 21:29
  Speaker 1: formed long before he met Christille.
• 21:32
  Speaker 2: This part is wild.
• 21:33
  Speaker 1: Back in college in the early 2000s, a girlfriend named
• 21:36
  Speaker 1: Carrie broke up with Dan. And shortly after, Carrie's life
• 21:40
  Speaker 1: turned into a nightmare.
• 21:41
  Speaker 2: The methodology was remarkably similar, just adapted for the technology
• 21:45
  Speaker 2: of the era. Carrie began receiving bizarre messages on AOL
• 21:49
  Speaker 2: Instant Messenger. Right, A. The messages were coming from two
• 21:52
  Speaker 2: men claiming to be Dan's new roommates, guys named Tom
• 21:55
  Speaker 2: and Nick Clark.
• 21:57
  Speaker 1: At first, these phantom roommates would message Carrie playing on
• 22:00
  Speaker 1: her guilt. They'd say Dan was depressed, he was having
• 22:03
  Speaker 1: a terrible week, and she should really reach out to
• 22:06
  Speaker 1: comfort him.
• 22:06
  Speaker 2: Emotional manipulation.
• 22:08
  Speaker 1: It's a pathetic attempt to use proxy voices to manipulate
• 22:11
  Speaker 1: her empathy. But when Carrie didn't take the bait and
• 22:14
  Speaker 1: actually started dating other people, the phantom roommates turned vicious.
• 22:18
  Speaker 2: The harassment escalated from the digital space into physical intrusion.
• 22:23
  Speaker 2: Carrie started receiving phone calls on her dorm room landline.
• 22:27
  Speaker 2: The voice on the other end was mechanically distorted. artificially
• 22:31
  Speaker 2: deepened to sound menacing.
• 22:32
  Speaker 1: Like out of a movie.
• 22:33
  Speaker 2: Exactly. The persona of Nick Clark even evolved. He claimed
• 22:37
  Speaker 2: to be a cadet at the Air Force Academy, and
• 22:40
  Speaker 2: he began contacting Carrie's social circle, spreading rumors that she
• 22:43
  Speaker 2: was promiscuous, attempting to entirely dismantle her social reputation.
• 22:47
  Speaker 1: Which is the exact same playbook he ran on Christille
• 22:50
  Speaker 1: two decades later by putting her on hookup sites. It
• 22:53
  Speaker 1: is all about reputational destruction.
• 22:55
  Speaker 2: He never changed.
• 22:56
  Speaker 1: So... Kerry was terrified and actually went to the Department
• 22:59
  Speaker 1: of Special Investigations at the Air Force Academy since this
• 23:01
  Speaker 1: guy claimed to be a cadet. The military investigators tracked
• 23:05
  Speaker 1: the IP addresses from those threatening AOL emails. And in 2003,
• 23:10
  Speaker 1: tracking an IP usually meant tracing a dial-up connection or
• 23:13
  Speaker 1: a hardwired university Ethernet line. Right.
• 23:15
  Speaker 2: Much simpler times.
• 23:16
  Speaker 1: And the trace led directly back to a specific computer
• 23:19
  Speaker 1: terminal in the library on Dan's university campus. Tom and
• 23:23
  Speaker 1: Nick Clark never existed. They were Dan's.
• 23:26
  Speaker 2: This historical data point is crucial for understanding Dan Krug.
• 23:30
  Speaker 2: It proves that when he experiences rejection or loss of
• 23:32
  Speaker 2: control over a partner, his default psychological mechanism is not
• 23:36
  Speaker 2: to move on. No. His default is to construct a
• 23:39
  Speaker 2: fabricated external threat. The goal is to terrorize the partner,
• 23:43
  Speaker 2: isolate them from their support network, and create a scenario
• 23:46
  Speaker 2: where he can swoop in as a protective savior.
• 23:48
  Speaker 1: It's a hero complex.
• 23:49
  Speaker 2: Absolutely. His pathology remained completely static for 20 years. only
• 23:53
  Speaker 2: his tool set upgraded from AOL Instant Messenger to VPNs
• 23:58
  Speaker 2: and burner apps.
• 23:59
  Speaker 1: Armed with the IP logs, the co-location data, and this
• 24:03
  Speaker 1: pattern of historical abuse, the detectives return to the interrogation room,
• 24:07
  Speaker 1: and they decide to utilize a very specific psychological pressure test.
• 24:11
  Speaker 2: The Reed technique.
• 24:12
  Speaker 1: Yeah. The detective leans in and says, you know, I
• 24:14
  Speaker 1: can understand how frustrated you must feel. Was she not
• 24:17
  Speaker 1: putting you in the most masculine light when your buttons
• 24:19
  Speaker 1: are pushed far enough? People snap.
• 24:22
  Speaker 2: The detective is employing a variation of the Reed technique.
• 24:26
  Speaker 2: They have presented the overwhelming evidence, the IP addresses from
• 24:30
  Speaker 2: his office, and they are watching his narrative collapse. The
• 24:34
  Speaker 2: technique then requires the interrogator to offer a face-saving alternative
• 24:38
  Speaker 2: rationale for the crime. They are essentially handing him a
• 24:42
  Speaker 2: socially acceptable excuse for murder on a silver platter. They
• 24:46
  Speaker 2: want him to latch on to the idea of a
• 24:48
  Speaker 2: crime of passion, to mitigate his internal guilt and secure
• 24:52
  Speaker 2: a confession.
• 24:53
  Speaker 1: But watching this, I have to wonder about the efficacy
• 24:55
  Speaker 1: of that tactic here. If Dan is a profound narcissist
• 25:00
  Speaker 1: who genuinely believes he is a master manipulator orchestrating a
• 25:03
  Speaker 1: flawless digital crime, wouldn't taking the detective's crime of passion
• 25:08
  Speaker 1: excuse actually wound his ego?
• 25:10
  Speaker 2: That's a great point.
• 25:11
  Speaker 1: He doesn't want to be seen as a weak man
• 25:13
  Speaker 1: who lost control. He wants to be seen as innocent
• 25:15
  Speaker 1: because he outsmarted them.
• 25:17
  Speaker 2: That is a brilliant observation, and it highlights the friction
• 25:20
  Speaker 2: between standard interrogation techniques and dark triad personality traits.
• 25:24
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 25:25
  Speaker 2: You are exactly right. For a narcissist, admitting they snapped
• 25:28
  Speaker 2: implies a loss of emotional regulation, which shatters their self-image
• 25:32
  Speaker 2: of absolute superiority. Danazigo won't allow him to accept the lifeline.
• 25:37
  Speaker 1: He literally looks at the detective and says, I don't
• 25:39
  Speaker 1: do tech stuff. I read and write fiction at home.
• 25:41
  Speaker 1: I don't do crime drama. He completely rejects the forensic
• 25:45
  Speaker 1: reality of the IP addresses.
• 25:46
  Speaker 2: Denial.
• 25:47
  Speaker 1: Total denial. He believes his verbal denial is stronger than
• 25:51
  Speaker 1: their mathematical data. And surprisingly, because they need just a
• 25:54
  Speaker 1: bit more time to finalize the arrest warrants, he is
• 25:57
  Speaker 1: allowed to walk out of the station that afternoon.
• 25:59
  Speaker 2: Unbelievable.
• 26:00
  Speaker 1: And on his way out, he delivers this parting line
• 26:03
  Speaker 1: to the detective. He says, I have to believe that
• 26:06
  Speaker 1: mommy was strong. I told my daughter she fought.
• 26:08
  Speaker 2: Wow.
• 26:09
  Speaker 1: It makes your skin crawl. He is actively directing his
• 26:12
  Speaker 1: own movie, playing the grieving widower to the very end.
• 26:15
  Speaker 2: But his departure from the station allows the investigative team
• 26:19
  Speaker 2: to finalize the synthesis of all the digital and physical evidence.
• 26:23
  Speaker 2: And what they produce is a minute-by-minute timeline of December
• 26:27
  Speaker 2: 14th that details the exact anatomy of the murder.
• 26:30
  Speaker 1: The timeline is staggering. The morning starts with Christy leaving
• 26:33
  Speaker 1: the house to drop their two kids off at school.
• 26:36
  Speaker 1: While she is gone, Dan initiates the plan he researched
• 26:38
  Speaker 1: the night before.
• 26:40
  Speaker 2: Just prior to 8-0 a.m., he opens the surveillance app
• 26:43
  Speaker 2: on his phone and manually disables the indoor cameras. He
• 26:46
  Speaker 2: then walks outside and physically places the masking tape over
• 26:50
  Speaker 2: the lens of the doorbell camera.
• 26:51
  Speaker 1: So calculating.
• 26:52
  Speaker 2: He has effectively created a blind spot in his own home.
• 26:56
  Speaker 1: He retreats to the garage and waits. When Christille returns
• 26:59
  Speaker 1: from the school run and pulls her car in, the
• 27:01
  Speaker 1: digital fortress has been breached from the inside. He ambushes her.
• 27:05
  Speaker 1: The blunt force trauma matches his exact Google search queries
• 27:09
  Speaker 1: from the previous evening.
• 27:10
  Speaker 2: Yes.
• 27:10
  Speaker 1: After the fatal stab wound, he doesn't flee. He stays
• 27:13
  Speaker 1: in the garage.
• 27:14
  Speaker 2: This is when he executes the digital cover-up. He accesses
• 27:18
  Speaker 2: Christille's phone and programs the delayed text messages to be
• 27:22
  Speaker 2: sent to his own device later in the morning.
• 27:24
  Speaker 1: The puppet show.
• 27:25
  Speaker 2: Yes. This is designed to establish proof of life long
• 27:29
  Speaker 2: after she is actually dead, completely scrambling the police timeline.
• 27:34
  Speaker 1: At 8.24 a.m., a neighbor's security camera captures Danner's vehicle
• 27:38
  Speaker 1: leaving the neighborhood. The police note this is exactly 30
• 27:41
  Speaker 1: minutes later than his usual daily morning departure. And as
• 27:44
  Speaker 1: he drives, he reaches up and manually turns off the
• 27:47
  Speaker 1: dash cam in his vehicle, ensuring the telematics and GPS
• 27:51
  Speaker 1: routing of his morning commute cannot be extracted later.
• 27:54
  Speaker 2: His compartmentalization post-murder is deeply disturbing. He doesn't drive erratically.
• 27:58
  Speaker 2: He stops at a local coffee shop.
• 28:00
  Speaker 1: A coffee shop? Yeah.
• 28:01
  Speaker 2: Eyewitnesses who interacted with him justified that he appeared entirely calm, polite,
• 28:06
  Speaker 2: and composed. His resting heart rate seemingly hasn't elevated, despite
• 28:10
  Speaker 2: what he just did.
• 28:12
  Speaker 1: At 8.35 a.m., he arrives at the Colorado Department of
• 28:15
  Speaker 1: Public Health building. But instead of swiping into his office
• 28:18
  Speaker 1: and beginning his workday, he tells a co-worker he isn't
• 28:21
  Speaker 1: coming in. He then navigates to a specific secluded area
• 28:25
  Speaker 1: of a building that he knows is a blind spot
• 28:27
  Speaker 1: for the facility's internal security cameras. He hides there.
• 28:30
  Speaker 2: He, waiting for the digital trap to spring. At 8.56 a.m.,
• 28:36
  Speaker 2: while he is concealed in that blind spot, the text
• 28:38
  Speaker 2: message he pre-programmed on Christille's phone an hour earlier finally
• 28:42
  Speaker 2: transmits and arrives on his device. He now has the
• 28:45
  Speaker 2: fabricated digital artifact he needs. He can show the police
• 28:49
  Speaker 2: a message proving she was alive, texting him, while he
• 28:52
  Speaker 2: was physically miles away at his place of employment.
• 28:55
  Speaker 1: But the hubris that allowed him to construct this elaborate
• 28:58
  Speaker 1: plan is the same hubris that causes him to unravel socially.
• 29:02
  Speaker 1: Before he is even officially arrested for the murder, while
• 29:04
  Speaker 1: staying with his sister-in-law, Christelle's mother overhears a conversation.
• 29:08
  Speaker 2: Oh, this part.
• 29:08
  Speaker 1: Dan is already talking about liquidating their assets. He wants
• 29:11
  Speaker 1: to sell the house immediately. But far more disturbing, he
• 29:14
  Speaker 1: talks about needing to throw out Christelle's intimate apparel, her bras,
• 29:19
  Speaker 1: her underwear, and her torn t-shirts.
• 29:21
  Speaker 2: In forensic psychology, analyzing a perpetrator's post-defense behavior reveals their
• 29:27
  Speaker 2: true motive. Throwing away a victim's most intimate items before
• 29:31
  Speaker 2: a funeral has even been planned has absolutely nothing to
• 29:34
  Speaker 2: do with grief.
• 29:35
  Speaker 1: What is it then?
• 29:36
  Speaker 2: It is an act of total annihilation. Dan's entire goal
• 29:40
  Speaker 2: from the six-week stalking campaign to the murder was about
• 29:43
  Speaker 2: asserting dominance. Right. When the digital gaslighting failed to break
• 29:47
  Speaker 2: her spirit, he destroyed her body. And throwing away her
• 29:50
  Speaker 2: clothes is his attempt to completely erase her physical footprint
• 29:54
  Speaker 2: from the earth.
• 29:55
  Speaker 1: The district attorney, Kate Armstrong, presented this exact narrative to
• 29:58
  Speaker 1: the jury in April of 2025. She systematically dismantled the
• 30:02
  Speaker 1: illusion of the phantom stalker and exposed the domestic terror
• 30:06
  Speaker 1: operating underneath it. The jury didn't buy the fiction Dan
• 30:09
  Speaker 1: was selling.
• 30:10
  Speaker 2: Thank goodness.
• 30:11
  Speaker 1: He was found guilty of first-degree murder, stalking, and criminal impersonation.
• 30:16
  Speaker 1: He was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility
• 30:19
  Speaker 1: of parole.
• 30:20
  Speaker 2: The conviction relied heavily on the very evidence Christille herself gathered.
• 30:25
  Speaker 2: She documented the threats, she isolated the variables, and she
• 30:29
  Speaker 2: installed the hardware that eventually tracked his movements.
• 30:33
  Speaker 1: She really did.
• 30:33
  Speaker 2: She left a meticulously organized trail of breadcrumbs that allowed
• 30:37
  Speaker 2: the detectives to work backward from the crime scene and
• 30:41
  Speaker 2: deconstruct his digital alibi.
• 30:43
  Speaker 1: Which brings us to the most tragic yet important realization
• 30:46
  Speaker 1: of this entire case. Christille Krug was brilliant. She was proactive.
• 30:51
  Speaker 1: She followed every single piece of conventional safety advice we
• 30:55
  Speaker 1: are taught when dealing with a stalker. But her predator
• 30:58
  Speaker 1: had an insurmountable advantage because he was already inside her perimeter.
• 31:02
  Speaker 2: And that is the paradigm shift this case demands we acknowledge.
• 31:05
  Speaker 2: The technology we rely on is inherently neutral. A high
• 31:09
  Speaker 2: definition surveillance camera, a GPS tracker, a smart lock. Well,
• 31:12
  Speaker 2: they possess no moral compass. They do not know the
• 31:14
  Speaker 2: difference between a home invader and an abusive spouse. Their
• 31:18
  Speaker 2: efficacy as security tools relies entirely, 100%, on the morality
• 31:23
  Speaker 2: of the person holding the administrative privileges.
• 31:27
  Speaker 1: So what does a case like this mean for you?
• 31:30
  Speaker 1: You set up your smart home. You download the apps.
• 31:32
  Speaker 1: You share your location data with your family because you
• 31:35
  Speaker 1: want to make sure everyone gets home safe.
• 31:36
  Speaker 2: You'll do it.
• 31:37
  Speaker 1: Yeah. We have traded heavy physical keys, keys that you
• 31:41
  Speaker 1: can weigh in your hand, keys that you can visually
• 31:43
  Speaker 1: track and control for digital keys. And digital keys can
• 31:47
  Speaker 1: be endlessly duplicated, quietly monitored, and weaponized without you ever
• 31:51
  Speaker 1: seeing the intruder. Christille's story introduces the ultimate terror of
• 31:55
  Speaker 1: digital gaslighting. When the architect of your security system is
• 32:00
  Speaker 1: the very person trying to destroy you, how do you
• 32:02
  Speaker 1: ever know if you are locking the danger out or
• 32:04
  Speaker 1: if you've just locked yourself in with it?