Latest / Ryder Lee / Candace Owens Allegations, Digital Price Tags, Ads in Dreams | Ryan Gable

Transcript

Candace Owens Allegations, Digital Price Tags, Ads in Dreams | Ryan Gable · Ryder Lee

0:00
Speaker 1: I wanted to ask you a question here. There's a, so,
0:03
Speaker 1: you know, they just changed the name of AI to SI.
0:06
Speaker 1: It's like super intelligence or something like that. Well, the
0:11
Speaker 1: state of California, Gavin Newsom signed a, I don't know,
0:17
Speaker 1: like an executive. It's so stupid, man. It's just an
0:20
Speaker 1: executive order that calls it AI. It's like, if you're
0:23
Speaker 1: in California, you have to call it AI. And his
0:26
Speaker 1: whole thing was like, you're, literally posted, you're welcome, America. Yeah,
0:31
Speaker 1: the issue is what we should call this weapon system
0:34
Speaker 1: is whether we call it AI or S. So that's
0:36
Speaker 1: the big thing. And people are like, yeah, the Democrats, yeah,
0:39
Speaker 1: you get Trump, you call it AI, not S. It's
0:41
Speaker 1: just so stupid. But I bring that up because one,
0:47
Speaker 1: why does that matter? It obviously doesn't. And I'm wondering
0:51
Speaker 1: what you think about the Candace Owens story. We know
0:55
Speaker 1: what blackmail, we know what fake stories. We know what
0:59
Speaker 1: propaganda is and what it can do. We also know
1:02
Speaker 1: that as we played earlier, there's a, there's tech to
1:05
Speaker 1: change surveillance footage, text messages, emails, all that kind of stuff.
1:09
Speaker 1: But there's this claim that Candace Owens is like a
1:12
Speaker 1: lesbian or something. I don't, I would love to hear
1:15
Speaker 1: what you think of that, but also I don't understand
1:17
Speaker 1: why that matters. Like Glenn Greenwald, they did the same
1:20
Speaker 1: thing to him. Oh, he's got some weird sexual fetishes
1:23
Speaker 1: and like that discredits what he writes. Like the, what
1:27
Speaker 1: it discredits Candace Owens wasn't friends with Charlie Kirk because
1:30
Speaker 1: she liked to go down on women or something like,
1:32
Speaker 1: is that supposed to discredit people? It's just, I think
1:35
Speaker 1: of that because it sounds just as stupid to me
1:38
Speaker 1: as like, if I'm laying in bed and Jesus starts
1:40
Speaker 1: talking to me, like who believes that? Is that really
1:42
Speaker 1: a thing? Like, Oh, she's a lesbian. I don't, what
1:45
Speaker 1: does that matter? She was still friends with Charlie Kirk.
1:47
Speaker 1: I don't know. What do you think of all that?
1:50
Speaker 1: What's the thing that's going on here? What's the issue?
1:54
Speaker 2: I don't believe that the lesbian allegations are real at all.
1:59
Speaker 2: I believe that they're 100% completely fabricated in order to
2:04
Speaker 2: try and discredit Candace Owens. And people can yell at
2:10
Speaker 2: me all that they want. But I 100% believe that
2:14
Speaker 2: she has done what everybody that was closest to Charlie
2:18
Speaker 2: should have been doing this entire time. And regardless if
2:22
Speaker 2: you like her or if you don't like her, that's
2:25
Speaker 2: kind of irrelevant in this equation. And even if she
2:29
Speaker 2: is gay and even if she is a lesbian, it
2:31
Speaker 2: doesn't matter. It literally does not matter. I think that
2:35
Speaker 2: the only thing that they could possibly do, because in
2:38
Speaker 2: the beginning, Ryan, it was that he hated Charlie Kirk
2:43
Speaker 2: and that's why she was investigating and that's why she
2:45
Speaker 2: wanted to take down the TPUSA, right? And then it became... Oh, well,
2:50
Speaker 2: she's in love with Charlie Kirk and she secretly wanted
2:53
Speaker 2: to be with Charlie Kirk and he didn't want to
2:56
Speaker 2: be with her. And then she became jealous that he
2:59
Speaker 2: wanted to be with Erica. And now it's neither one
3:04
Speaker 2: of those things. Now it's because she's a lesbian. And
3:08
Speaker 2: if you try and verify any of those screenshots from
3:11
Speaker 2: any of those, uh, adult friend finder websites, you can't,
3:15
Speaker 2: there's no verification on it that you can't, you can't
3:18
Speaker 2: find the metadata. They're, they're literally just, uh, they're, they're
3:23
Speaker 2: fake profiles that's been edited to make it look like that.
3:27
Speaker 2: They're real.
3:29
Speaker 1: I am leaning in that direction. This might sound like
3:32
Speaker 1: a silly thing to address, but I actually think it's
3:33
Speaker 1: important because I'll put it this way. One, They accused
3:39
Speaker 1: her of more than just being a lesbian. Part of
3:40
Speaker 1: it was that she was taking money from Larry Ellison.
3:43
Speaker 1: I don't know if you heard that. Now, I can
3:46
Speaker 1: believe that it's possible that her whole, I just discovered
3:51
Speaker 1: that Israel is an issue and I'm going to be
3:54
Speaker 1: an expert on it now. And the algorithm allows me
3:56
Speaker 1: to do that. And then suddenly she's, quote, discredited or
3:59
Speaker 1: at least successive discrediting attempts to discredit people who look
4:04
Speaker 1: into Charlie Kirk or Israel or whatever the case might be.
4:07
Speaker 1: I can believe that maybe she did take money, that
4:09
Speaker 1: she is a disinfo agent. I tend not to believe that,
4:12
Speaker 1: but I can definitely see that. If it's the other
4:15
Speaker 1: way around, I mean, lots of countries use sex and
4:18
Speaker 1: blackmail and stuff like that, but Israel's famous for that.
4:21
Speaker 1: And they're also, as we just played, they're famous and
4:24
Speaker 1: they have technology to be able to change things like
4:28
Speaker 1: your emails, your text messages. So if you can do that,
4:31
Speaker 1: you could I mean, maybe she did have those profiles.
4:34
Speaker 1: They could change them to say whatever they want them
4:36
Speaker 1: to say, even if they are real. Or they can
4:39
Speaker 1: just completely fabricate them, you know, and share screenshots of things.
4:42
Speaker 1: There's like six pixels. You can barely read what it says.
4:45
Speaker 1: You know, that kind of stuff. But if that's... Maybe
4:49
Speaker 1: it's to discredit her among the conspiracy right that are like,
4:52
Speaker 1: we don't like gays. So, like, if she's gay, I
4:54
Speaker 1: guess all the stuff she says is wrong. But it
4:57
Speaker 1: just shows you how.
5:01
Speaker 1: Depraved the propaganda the mudslinging the lying is it also
5:07
Speaker 1: shows you how just how like with the AISI thing
5:13
Speaker 1: how petty how stupid how dumb the general conversation is
5:18
Speaker 1: about anything and it also doesn't make sense to me
5:22
Speaker 1: it'd be like if like all the stuff I said
5:24
Speaker 1: tonight on the show or stuff that you've said someone
5:27
Speaker 1: was to say well you can't that Ryan Gable guys
5:30
Speaker 1: he's crazy But yeah, but he showed all the articles
5:33
Speaker 1: where he got his sources from. He showed the articles. Yeah,
5:36
Speaker 1: but he's crazy. Well, why is he crazy? You can't
5:38
Speaker 1: trust him. Why can't you trust him? Well, he likes
5:40
Speaker 1: East Asian women. What the fuck does that mean? Art
5:44
Speaker 1: Bell's show wasn't a great show because he liked Filipinos.
5:47
Speaker 1: Why is the sexual thing always like a discrediting? You
5:50
Speaker 1: can't trust Greenwald's reporting. He likes to put on BDS gear.
5:54
Speaker 1: And what is that supposed to mean? Maybe I'm missing something.
5:57
Speaker 1: What's that supposed to mean?
5:59
Speaker 2: It's a last-ditch effort. It's the last thing to try
6:02
Speaker 2: and take somebody down with. And I'll tell you exactly
6:05
Speaker 2: what happened. What happened was that the UVU internal report
6:11
Speaker 2: got released. Are you aware of that? Of the independent
6:15
Speaker 2: review of security measures that happened at Utah Valley University
6:21
Speaker 2: on the day of the Charlie Kirk assassination. There was
6:23
Speaker 2: an independent review that was done. that got released and
6:28
Speaker 2: it did not look good for TPUSA at all. Period.
6:34
Speaker 2: It was bad news for them. And in order to
6:38
Speaker 2: try and get people off track of that, to not
6:41
Speaker 2: bring down that kind of heat, they had to come
6:43
Speaker 2: out with something. They had to dig up something, fabrication
6:49
Speaker 2: on Candace Owens. And that's what the entire thing has
6:52
Speaker 2: been about, really, from the beginning. It's not about... Charlie
6:57
Speaker 2: Kirk at all. It's not about finding who really murdered
7:01
Speaker 2: him because it's obviously not Tyler Robinson. It's not about
7:04
Speaker 2: any of that. It's about taking down Candace Owens. And
7:07
Speaker 2: I did a short video today. I was like, if
7:10
Speaker 2: you want to take down Candace Owens, you got to
7:13
Speaker 2: come up with something better than what she's saying. You
7:19
Speaker 2: have to come up with evidence and a theory or
7:22
Speaker 2: some kind of investigation. You have to do something that
7:25
Speaker 2: makes more sense. than the things that she's come up with.
7:29
Speaker 2: That's the only way that you can beat her. That's
7:31
Speaker 2: the only way that the only thing that you can do,
7:32
Speaker 2: you know, slandering and smearing and attacking people just doesn't
7:37
Speaker 2: work anymore. Welcome back, everyone. This will be a simulcast
7:42
Speaker 2: episode for my channel, Ryder Lee, and Ryan Gable's channel,
7:48
Speaker 2: The Secret Teachings. So me and Ryan had a really
7:51
Speaker 2: interesting conversation the other day, and we always have really
7:54
Speaker 2: interesting conversations. I really feel like that every one of
7:57
Speaker 2: our conversations that we have on the phone should be
8:01
Speaker 2: just recorded and then just put out there because, you
8:06
Speaker 2: once you get on a roll with somebody, me and
8:07
Speaker 2: Jay get like this too. I talked to Jay Widener
8:09
Speaker 2: a lot on the phone. We just get rolling and
8:12
Speaker 2: then it just one, you know, 15 minutes turn into
8:16
Speaker 2: like two hours that we're on a phone, just having
8:18
Speaker 2: a crazy conversation. And, uh, we kind of started talking
8:21
Speaker 2: about MK ultra and some of the, you know, programs
8:25
Speaker 2: and like the SSP stuff. Cause our friend Darcy, we're
8:29
Speaker 2: had a, uh, run in with, uh, Corey good where
8:31
Speaker 2: Corey good was, you know, um, Copyright striking his documentary
8:37
Speaker 2: that's up on Tubi. And then we kind of got
8:39
Speaker 2: off on that tangent. And then we started talking about, well,
8:42
Speaker 2: you know, is there any truth to this? You know,
8:45
Speaker 2: what could actually be happening? Could, you know, voices actually
8:49
Speaker 2: be implanted into, you know, someone's head to make them
8:53
Speaker 2: believe that they're actually a part of something that they're not.
8:58
Speaker 2: And I'm pretty sure Randy Kramer claims that that's going on.
9:03
Speaker 2: I'm sure you know more about that than I do, Ryan,
9:05
Speaker 2: but Randy Kramer claims that he has like a chip
9:09
Speaker 2: inside of his head that the galactic council or whatever
9:13
Speaker 2: talks to him through. Isn't that correct? Doesn't he claim that?
9:18
Speaker 1: I believe he claims that. I think a lot of
9:20
Speaker 1: people have claimed that from Randy Kramer to, if I
9:24
Speaker 1: remember this correctly, I believe even Amanda Bynes had claimed that,
9:27
Speaker 1: didn't she? They had put a microchip in her head
9:30
Speaker 1: or something like that.
9:30
Speaker 2: Well, I know Andreeja Puharaj put some kind of chips
9:36
Speaker 2: in people's teeth or like the implants that people would
9:40
Speaker 2: get way back in the day were like connecting to
9:43
Speaker 2: like radio frequencies and radio signals and then they would
9:46
Speaker 2: hear like Actual conversations. Lucille ball literally stopped at a
9:52
Speaker 2: Japanese insurgency. According to, uh, do you know about that story?
9:59
Speaker 1: I've heard rumors.
9:59
Speaker 3: Of that.
10:00
Speaker 1: I don't know if it was true or not or
10:01
Speaker 1: had any truth to it.
10:02
Speaker 2: That's what she says. That's how the story goes. She
10:09
Speaker 2: went to the dentist and got a filling and then
10:13
Speaker 2: she started getting messages in her head about some sort
10:17
Speaker 2: of Japanese insurgency that was going on and she contacted
10:21
Speaker 2: the authorities or whatever. And then the authority stopped it.
10:23
Speaker 2: I don't know. Wild though. But that's kind of like
10:27
Speaker 2: the thing with the Kodak camera to the guy that
10:31
Speaker 2: one of the inventors of the Kodak camera. I actually
10:34
Speaker 2: had that happen to him where they get people were
10:37
Speaker 2: trying to get him out of his share of Kodak
10:40
Speaker 2: and they sent him to this dentist that put this
10:44
Speaker 2: chip in his tooth inside of his filling and it
10:49
Speaker 2: basically messed with his head and he started hearing voices
10:51
Speaker 2: inside of his head and he ended up in an
10:52
Speaker 2: insane asylum and that's where some of the tinfoil hat
10:55
Speaker 2: stuff comes from because he claimed that that's the only
10:57
Speaker 2: way that he could stop the voices was to wrap
11:00
Speaker 2: his head in tinfoil.
11:02
Speaker 1: Of course the son of sam david berkowitz he was
11:05
Speaker 1: hearing voices his neighbor's dog i think his name was
11:08
Speaker 1: harvey telling him to kill people i think that it's
11:11
Speaker 1: important to make the distinction or at least to set
11:13
Speaker 1: the groundwork before we get started and look at the
11:17
Speaker 1: details and some of the stories that we were riffing
11:19
Speaker 1: on in our conversation on the phone the other day,
11:22
Speaker 1: is that there's a difference between genuine government projects, things
11:29
Speaker 1: like the Woodpecker signal, which was a Russian project that
11:33
Speaker 1: was beaming this signal, this frequency into American homes. Things
11:39
Speaker 1: like mind control experiments. I think MKL is... way over
11:44
Speaker 1: referenced and i think that it is um it's become
11:48
Speaker 1: more mythology than fact nowadays within the communities of people
11:52
Speaker 1: that discuss it but there's a difference between that type
11:55
Speaker 1: of a thing and even the aaron alexis this is
11:58
Speaker 1: my elf weapon at the naval yard in washington or
12:01
Speaker 1: the recent more recent event in colorado where a guy
12:05
Speaker 1: was found with a bunch of weapons in the bathroom
12:08
Speaker 1: of the steam park and says that i i'm not
12:10
Speaker 1: a killer i don't i don't want to do this
12:12
Speaker 1: he reportedly killed himself before he did it or before
12:16
Speaker 1: somebody made him do it, perhaps. But there's a difference
12:18
Speaker 1: between all of that. I'm assuming you'd agree with me.
12:21
Speaker 1: There's a difference between all of that and then people
12:24
Speaker 1: that are genuine, legitimate, schizophrenic, paranoid, delusional, watch Star Trek
12:31
Speaker 1: and think that I was on the Enterprise. That wasn't
12:35
Speaker 1: a dream I had after watching 47 episodes of Star Trek.
12:37
Speaker 1: I was actually on the Enterprise. I know Captain Kirk.
12:40
Speaker 1: I am Captain Kirk. There's a difference between... There's two things.
12:44
Speaker 1: Am I right or am I wrong?
12:45
Speaker 2: 100%. You're right. I mean, there's this one guy that
12:49
Speaker 2: thinks that he was master chief and halo.
12:53
Speaker 1: That's, that's great. Yeah. John one, one seven.
12:56
Speaker 3: Yeah.
12:57
Speaker 2: Yeah. Like it's unbelievable. And, and, but that mixed in
13:00
Speaker 2: with like drugs and like, you know, what was really
13:03
Speaker 2: popular in the nineties X-Men was really popular in the
13:05
Speaker 2: nineties X-Men animated cartoon. They even rebooted it recently on
13:09
Speaker 2: Disney plus X-Men 97. It's a reboot for the people
13:13
Speaker 2: that are now in their early 30s that grew up
13:15
Speaker 2: watching the X-Men cartoon in the early 90s and into
13:18
Speaker 2: the mid 90s, into the late 90s. And, you know,
13:21
Speaker 2: you mix that with drugs and what became really popular
13:25
Speaker 2: to put your kids on when they were young and
13:28
Speaker 2: in school and couldn't sit still. I mean, that was
13:30
Speaker 2: Adderall and Ritalin. Right. So you mix you're mixing in
13:34
Speaker 2: all these different amphetamines and then you're having your kid rejuvenate. young,
13:39
Speaker 2: not knowing what's going on and watching, you know, weird
13:42
Speaker 2: and strange cartoons or watching a weird and strange movie,
13:45
Speaker 2: they're going to think that, you know, and then heaven forbid,
13:48
Speaker 2: some kind of traumatic event happened to them, you know,
13:52
Speaker 2: while they're in that state, then they're going to wrap
13:55
Speaker 2: their brain around something fantastic and not the, uh, you know,
13:59
Speaker 2: dreadful thing. I mean, how many people in the United
14:02
Speaker 2: States grew up? I mean, really started happening in the
14:06
Speaker 2: early two thousands with like a one parent household, you know,
14:10
Speaker 2: grew up in a broken family. I would say a
14:12
Speaker 2: large percentage of the population grew up in a, in
14:17
Speaker 2: some sort of broken home with it normally with their mother,
14:21
Speaker 2: you know, And what is that fostering in a young...
14:24
Speaker 2: It's the destruction of the nuclear family and the drugging
14:27
Speaker 2: of an entire generation. You want to get down to
14:30
Speaker 2: the root problem of it, that's what's going on. And
14:33
Speaker 2: that's a whole other rabbit hole in the conversation. And
14:36
Speaker 2: I do want to keep it on this because we
14:38
Speaker 2: could probably go for hours on the destruction of the
14:41
Speaker 2: nuclear family and the drugging of the population. But yes,
14:46
Speaker 2: I do 100% believe that there is a distinction that
14:49
Speaker 2: needs to be made there between... Those two things. There's
14:53
Speaker 2: a fantasy and there's a LARP aspect. And then there's
14:56
Speaker 2: the real side and the real version that is plausible
15:04
Speaker 2: to be happening. But everybody that claims that they're some
15:08
Speaker 2: form of targeted individual, like why? It doesn't make any
15:11
Speaker 2: sense to me as to why the government would be
15:15
Speaker 2: just targeting randomly asked people. It doesn't make any sense.
15:20
Speaker 2: And whenever you ask them, you know, why do you
15:23
Speaker 2: think that the government would be doing that to you specifically?
15:27
Speaker 2: They don't have an answer. They're like, oh, because I'm
15:29
Speaker 2: researching things on the Internet and I'm exposing things.
15:31
Speaker 1: I read a Q post. I read a Q post.
15:34
Speaker 1: They don't want me to read that Q post. That
15:36
Speaker 1: kind of a thing. Yes. What you said about single
15:39
Speaker 1: family households. I don't know so much about that, but
15:41
Speaker 1: I know that the percentage is substantially lower for that
15:44
Speaker 1: than it is for drug legal drug use. which is
15:48
Speaker 1: approximately 70, 75% of Americans are on at least, at
15:54
Speaker 1: least one prescription drug. I believe the number, and I'm
15:59
Speaker 1: sure it varies per report, is about 50% of the
16:03
Speaker 1: country is on two or more prescription drugs. This is
16:08
Speaker 1: something that applies to even the Lindsay Clancy case, but
16:11
Speaker 1: this is something that applies to talk, conversation, debate about, quote,
16:17
Speaker 1: mind control, about hearing voices in your head, religious experiences,
16:22
Speaker 1: how many of these things are influenced by some sort
16:26
Speaker 1: of external legal or illegal or unknown substance? And if
16:31
Speaker 1: you compare the psychosis in the United States to other
16:36
Speaker 1: developed countries, like, for example, here in Japan, you have schizophrenics,
16:41
Speaker 1: you have people that are out of their minds, you have,
16:43
Speaker 1: there's even a Jay Anon, which is the QAnon version of,
16:47
Speaker 1: or the Japanese version of QAnon. You have that over here.
16:50
Speaker 1: I stumble on Japanese posts all the time of some
16:52
Speaker 1: female politician and the transvestigators in Japan finding that this
16:58
Speaker 1: female politician's actually a man and the male politician's actually
17:02
Speaker 1: a woman. So there's that kind of thing over here.
17:05
Speaker 1: But you tend to have lower rates of things over
17:09
Speaker 1: here than you do in the US when you factor
17:12
Speaker 1: in the population percentage even. And I think that's because
17:15
Speaker 1: you have a generally healthier population of people from the
17:18
Speaker 1: food that they eat on average to the kind of
17:21
Speaker 1: medical care that they do have or the way that
17:23
Speaker 1: they treat those things. It's not just Japan, but it's
17:26
Speaker 1: an example of how, as far as I can tell,
17:30
Speaker 1: as far as I can see, I believe that it's
17:32
Speaker 1: a great example of how a lot of our issues,
17:35
Speaker 1: whether they're religious issues, secret space program issues, or just
17:40
Speaker 1: genuine general paranoia, schizophrenia, I think a lot of it
17:44
Speaker 1: is driven by by factors like drug use. As a
17:48
Speaker 1: matter of fact, a lot of just basic conditions like
17:53
Speaker 1: vitamin K deficiency, brain bleeding, I mean, that is openly
17:58
Speaker 1: acknowledged to be caused by three main factors. It's caused
18:02
Speaker 1: by circumcision for boys, causes this excess bleeding that's uncontrollable,
18:08
Speaker 1: it's caused by birthing trauma, which is induced through human intervention.
18:12
Speaker 1: And it's caused by, admittedly, the CDC, it's not an opinion.
18:15
Speaker 1: The CDC acknowledges this because it's one of the primary drivers.
18:18
Speaker 1: It's caused by the drugs that the mothers are on,
18:21
Speaker 1: legal prescription drugs. So whether it's something like birth, birth trauma, bleeding,
18:26
Speaker 1: or it's something like hearing voices in your head, absolutely
18:30
Speaker 1: both the legal and the illegal, the illicit drugs are
18:33
Speaker 1: play a major role in this. And Americans are the
18:36
Speaker 1: most drugged. I'm pretty sure statistically worldwide, I think we
18:39
Speaker 1: are the most drugged population in the entire world. So
18:43
Speaker 1: it makes sense that that, which is a very describable,
18:47
Speaker 1: identifiable thing, is certainly behind at least a portion of
18:55
Speaker 1: the idea of mind control, hearing voices, and things like that.
18:59
Speaker 1: I'm pretty sure that's probably what it was when people
19:02
Speaker 1: were talking to burning bushes or hearing voices in their head,
19:06
Speaker 1: telling them to cut up, cut off the tip of
19:08
Speaker 1: their penis or sacrifice their son on an altar. I mean,
19:10
Speaker 1: God told me to do it. I mean, if someone,
19:12
Speaker 1: if I told you, you got to cut your penis
19:13
Speaker 1: off and sacrifice your kid on an altar, I heard
19:16
Speaker 1: voices telling me to do it. You would put that
19:18
Speaker 1: person in a padded room or you would, they'd be
19:20
Speaker 1: on guy TV maybe, but you know, something, something to
19:23
Speaker 1: that effect. We probably wouldn't, uh, wouldn't think that that
19:27
Speaker 1: person was sane. And those are probably people that were
19:30
Speaker 1: definitely influenced by things in the water and, environment or
19:34
Speaker 1: things they took knowing that there would be a reaction like.
19:36
Speaker 2: That you know what's really interesting the whole lindsey clancy
19:42
Speaker 2: case and you know because that actually is a connection
19:45
Speaker 2: here as well that because she claimed that she heard
19:49
Speaker 2: audible voice and stuff and people claimed that it was
19:52
Speaker 2: coming from her alexa and that her husband was playing
19:55
Speaker 2: this to make her insane to then have.
19:58
Speaker 1: Her yeah that makes sense children.
20:01
Speaker 2: But people are acting like this is the first person
20:04
Speaker 2: that's ever killed their kids that have heard voices. William DeFeo,
20:08
Speaker 2: the whole Amityville horror thing, all happened because he killed
20:14
Speaker 2: his entire family. He killed like eight people, I believe
20:17
Speaker 2: it was, or maybe even more. I'll have to look
20:20
Speaker 2: back into it. But he killed his entire family with
20:24
Speaker 2: shotguns while they were sleeping. And he said that the
20:28
Speaker 2: voices told him to do it. you know, people have
20:31
Speaker 2: such an infallible memory. They don't, they can't remember things
20:35
Speaker 2: that happened just a couple of weeks ago, let alone,
20:39
Speaker 2: you know, when in Amityville horror, like early to early nineties,
20:43
Speaker 2: late nine, maybe even late eighties. I'm not sure, but,
20:47
Speaker 2: but look at that case and look at how that
20:49
Speaker 2: kind of turned out. It turned out that, Amityville Horror
20:53
Speaker 2: wasn't really... Like, that wasn't really a haunted house. Like,
20:56
Speaker 2: that was, like, a fake made-up thing in order for
20:59
Speaker 2: William DeFeo to get the crazy charge. So he would
21:03
Speaker 2: just get locked up in a mental health facility and
21:05
Speaker 2: not inside of a prison, you know? So it doesn't...
21:09
Speaker 2: Whenever people pull that, it's like they're trying to get
21:12
Speaker 2: out of actually serving prison time. They're just trying to...
21:15
Speaker 2: And that's another thing, too, is that just because people
21:20
Speaker 2: are acting like if she... It's insanity that she's not going... Like,
21:24
Speaker 2: if she gets the insanity clause, it means that she's
21:27
Speaker 2: not going to serve any time. Like, an insane asylum
21:30
Speaker 2: is sometimes just as bad as a prison. Sometimes it's
21:34
Speaker 2: even worse, depending on which insane asylum that you're going to,
21:38
Speaker 2: which state mental hospital it is that you're going to.
21:42
Speaker 2: You know, it's kind of the exact same thing.
21:44
Speaker 3: So.
21:45
Speaker 2: I don't know if people really understood exactly what was
21:48
Speaker 2: going on with the case and that they thought that
21:50
Speaker 2: she was just going to get off on murdering her children.
21:55
Speaker 2: That's not the way that it works. She 100% murdered
21:57
Speaker 2: her children just because she's being, I think that some
22:02
Speaker 2: people thought that she was just like, she wasn't going
22:06
Speaker 2: to have any consequences. That somehow that she wasn't going
22:10
Speaker 2: to be found guilty for her telling her kids when
22:15
Speaker 2: that is impossible there's no way that she was never
22:17
Speaker 2: not going to be found guilty but she was going
22:20
Speaker 2: to that she could be you know plead insanity she
22:24
Speaker 2: can get the insanity thing go to a mental hospital
22:26
Speaker 2: and serve out her sentence at a mental hospital but
22:29
Speaker 2: i don't think people understood really what was going on
22:33
Speaker 2: there with that entire case you know.
22:36
Speaker 1: The story of of uh of Ronald DeFeo as well
22:39
Speaker 1: with Amityville, as you just referenced, I believe from the
22:42
Speaker 1: very beginning, if I recall the story correctly, it's not
22:46
Speaker 1: just a line in the movie, get out. It's that
22:50
Speaker 1: that's part of the original story. Like he was hearing voices.
22:52
Speaker 1: I mean, you just referenced this, but hearing voices from like,
22:55
Speaker 1: you know, malicious spirits. This is something that has actually
22:59
Speaker 1: been recorded recently within the U S military. I had
23:03
Speaker 1: mentioned this to you and I had sent you some
23:05
Speaker 1: of the articles on it. There was an article, I mean,
23:08
Speaker 1: there's like New York Times, for example, there's a bunch
23:11
Speaker 1: of mainline sources that U.S. troops had come home. Again,
23:17
Speaker 1: this is recent, within the last 10 years.
23:20
Speaker 3: U.S.
23:20
Speaker 1: Troops had come home feeling as if they had been, quote,
23:23
Speaker 1: cursed and seeing ghosts after having battles with the so-called,
23:29
Speaker 1: I don't think it's really the Islamic State, it's more
23:31
Speaker 1: like the Israeli State, but they call it the Islamic State.
23:35
Speaker 1: But they were hearing voices hearing things, seeing things. There's
23:38
Speaker 1: actually a story of a soldier that had come back,
23:41
Speaker 1: and there's actually a couple episodes of the X-Files like this.
23:44
Speaker 1: So maybe the soldiers had watched the X-Files, they were
23:46
Speaker 1: inspired by it, or maybe the X-Files was inspired by
23:49
Speaker 1: real-life horrors like this, where people have done terrible stuff,
23:54
Speaker 1: or they've been in the middle of something terribly traumatic,
23:58
Speaker 1: and then they start hearing voices, they start seeing things,
24:01
Speaker 1: they start hallucinating. There could be a very, and there
24:04
Speaker 1: probably is, a very scientific way to describe or a
24:09
Speaker 1: psychological way to describe it, where you sort of disassociate
24:12
Speaker 1: so much with the body that you almost, you become
24:16
Speaker 1: separate from it, almost like an astral projection. So then
24:20
Speaker 1: you do probably start to interact or see things that
24:22
Speaker 1: aren't necessarily there to the common person. It's probably that, uh,
24:27
Speaker 1: it's probably a psychological equivalent of like taking D taking
24:31
Speaker 1: DMT or something to that effect. So there's that angle
24:34
Speaker 1: to all of this. There's also the possibility, considering that
24:38
Speaker 1: the U.S. military is famous, the U.S. government is famous
24:42
Speaker 1: for experimenting on its own people with various vaccines and
24:47
Speaker 1: various other substances. God knows what. Really, God probably, I mean,
24:51
Speaker 1: I don't think the government probably even knows. It'd be
24:53
Speaker 1: like three people. It's all compartmentalized. So God only knows
24:56
Speaker 1: what they've actually experimented on soldiers with. They've done this
24:59
Speaker 1: with experimental substances. I mean, whether it's like incinerator devices
25:05
Speaker 1: that are experimental they drop on Tokyo the Tokyo firebombing
25:08
Speaker 1: or it's heavy metals that were dumped over ghettos and
25:11
Speaker 1: in st. Louis Or it's vaccines given to soldiers. There's
25:15
Speaker 1: a long long history in America and other countries to
25:19
Speaker 1: of experimenting on soldiers So it wouldn't surprise me if
25:21
Speaker 1: they were given strange cocktails of in God only knows what?
25:27
Speaker 1: that produced these kinds of hallucinogenic effects and They might've
25:32
Speaker 1: even been given hallucinogens who knows, or maybe the quote
25:35
Speaker 1: Islamic state, the Israeli state, uh, maybe they were utilizing
25:39
Speaker 1: substances on the battlefield that made people. I mean, it's
25:41
Speaker 1: kind of like the, the, the, the psychology and Batman
25:44
Speaker 1: of the scarecrow using fear. I mean, can you imagine
25:48
Speaker 1: that's a great weapon. If you could weaponize some kind
25:51
Speaker 1: of substance and aerosolize it onto the battlefield and your
25:55
Speaker 1: enemy would go insane. I, I, I'm sure that there's
25:58
Speaker 1: a very well documented history of that. That's actually another
26:01
Speaker 1: show we should probably do, but it could, it could
26:03
Speaker 1: be that as much as it could be. You and
26:06
Speaker 1: I are pretty big fans for better or worse of the,
26:09
Speaker 1: of the, uh, of the Richard Doty story and the
26:13
Speaker 1: driving insane of Paul Benowitz. Uh, it's very possible that
26:20
Speaker 1: the whole secret space program or the, secret space program,
26:25
Speaker 1: Gaia TV, Corey Good, Dave Wilcox stuff, that a lot
26:29
Speaker 1: of that might actually be legitimate government people that are
26:33
Speaker 1: giving quote information, quote unquote information to these people to
26:38
Speaker 1: disinform them, but also maybe they are putting voices into
26:42
Speaker 1: the heads of people like David. So he thinks he's
26:44
Speaker 1: taught right before he passed away, thinks he was talking
26:47
Speaker 1: to the Archangel Michael. I mean, it's, we've done this with,
26:52
Speaker 1: I think that the U.S. military might have even done
26:54
Speaker 1: this at Guantanamo Bay because there were hunger strikes down there.
26:57
Speaker 1: And I had sent you an article. There was a
26:59
Speaker 1: soldier who suddenly he started hearing these voices in his head.
27:03
Speaker 1: I think there's more than one actually hearing these voices
27:06
Speaker 1: in his head telling him to eat. And maybe that
27:08
Speaker 1: was a subconscious or it could have been the weaponization
27:12
Speaker 1: of something to play on someone's religious beliefs. And here's
27:16
Speaker 1: Allah or Muhammad telling you, you better eat, my son.
27:20
Speaker 1: You better eat. Do what the soldiers want you to do.
27:24
Speaker 1: There's so many variables here and possibilities. As long as
27:29
Speaker 1: we know there's a difference between watching sci-fi and having
27:32
Speaker 1: a dream about it 20 minutes later when you fall
27:34
Speaker 1: asleep on the couch and how those things are not
27:36
Speaker 1: proof that you were actually on the Enterprise. And then
27:40
Speaker 1: there's actual legitimate people have microchips put in their brain
27:45
Speaker 1: or people are traumatized and controlled like a Britney Spears
27:48
Speaker 1: or an Amanda Bynes, as long as we understand the
27:50
Speaker 1: groundwork here, the basis, the language here, the terminology, then
27:55
Speaker 1: we can really start to explore all of this stuff
27:58
Speaker 1: from what happened in Cuba, what happened at the U.S.
28:01
Speaker 1: Embassy in Moscow back in the 50s, sonic weapons, or
28:07
Speaker 1: there were, I think, probably the same thing was used
28:11
Speaker 1: in Cuba. havana syndrome so there's there's definitely a a
28:16
Speaker 1: lot of different things here that should be explored individually
28:22
Speaker 1: rather than just calling it as some people do it's
28:24
Speaker 1: just mind control mind that's just like a really cheap
28:28
Speaker 1: and sort of i would even say uneducated way of
28:31
Speaker 1: looking at these topics and it kind of undermines the
28:34
Speaker 1: the fact that In the case of the military, I
28:37
Speaker 1: was giving you like we've experimented on our own soldiers
28:40
Speaker 1: with God knows what. And then things we do know
28:42
Speaker 1: what we've we've done that with DDT on the on
28:44
Speaker 1: the general public. We sprayed that stuff on children in
28:47
Speaker 1: pools while they and while they were eating lunch in
28:49
Speaker 1: classrooms or in cafeterias. I can't imagine what the kind
28:54
Speaker 1: of stuff we've done behind the scenes without telling people.
28:56
Speaker 1: So I imagine that this might be this might be
28:58
Speaker 1: part of it. I know that's a lot to unpack here.
29:00
Speaker 1: But what do you what do you think?
29:05
Speaker 2: I think it's just like the directed energy weapon stuff
29:09
Speaker 2: that we've talked about several times. And people have gotten
29:13
Speaker 2: really upset with us talking about the directed energy weapons,
29:16
Speaker 2: the do's. And the thing that people need to realize
29:22
Speaker 2: is that neither one of us ever said that directed
29:25
Speaker 2: energy weapons don't exist. We just said that They weren't
29:31
Speaker 2: responsible for the things that people were claiming that they
29:34
Speaker 2: were responsible for. There's a distinction there that needs to
29:39
Speaker 2: be made as well. And because we know that they
29:43
Speaker 2: have the technology. I mean, there's literally the Missile Intelligence
29:49
Speaker 2: Agency's literal thing that they do is create directed energy weapons.
29:56
Speaker 2: So just like with the directed energy weapons, They have
30:01
Speaker 2: the ability to put voices inside of people's heads. Now,
30:07
Speaker 2: are they doing it to everybody?
30:09
Speaker 3: No.
30:09
Speaker 2: Are they doing it for the things that people think
30:11
Speaker 2: that they're actually doing it for? Probably not. But we
30:15
Speaker 2: have Woody Norris. I actually sent you this video, and
30:18
Speaker 2: I think this is a really good jumping off point.
30:20
Speaker 1: You have it pulled up. You have the video.
30:22
Speaker 2: I have it already. Yes, I have it all clipped
30:24
Speaker 2: out and everything.
30:25
Speaker 4: All of audio as we know it. is an attempt
30:28
Speaker 4: to be more and more perfectly linear. Linearity means higher
30:34
Speaker 4: quality sound. Hypersonic sound is exactly the opposite. It's 100%
30:41
Speaker 4: based on non-linearity. An effect happens in the air, it's
30:47
Speaker 4: a corrupting effect of the sound, the ultrasound in this case,
30:50
Speaker 4: that's emitted. But it's so predictable that you can produce
30:54
Speaker 4: very precise audio out of that effect. Now, the question is,
30:59
Speaker 4: where is the sound made? Instead of being made on
31:01
Speaker 4: the face of the cone, it's made at literally billions
31:06
Speaker 4: of little independent points along this narrow column in the air.
31:11
Speaker 4: And so when I aim it towards you, what you
31:13
Speaker 4: hear is made right next to your ears. I said
31:17
Speaker 4: we can shorten the column. We can spread it out
31:19
Speaker 4: to cover the couch. I can put it so that
31:22
Speaker 4: one ear hears one speaker, the other ear hears the other.
31:26
Speaker 4: That's true binaural sound. When you listen to stereo in
31:29
Speaker 4: your home system, your both ears hear both speakers. Turn
31:34
Speaker 4: on the left speaker sometime and notice you're hearing it
31:36
Speaker 4: also in your right ear. So the stage is more restricted,
31:40
Speaker 4: the sound stage that's supposed to spread out in front
31:42
Speaker 4: of you. Because the sound is made in the air
31:45
Speaker 4: along this column, it does not follow the inverse square law,
31:48
Speaker 4: which says it drops off about 2 thirds every time
31:52
Speaker 4: you double the distance. 6 dB every time you go
31:55
Speaker 4: from 1 meter, for instance, to 2 meters. That means
31:59
Speaker 4: you go to a rock concert or a symphony, and
32:01
Speaker 4: the guy in the front row gets the same level
32:03
Speaker 4: as the guy in the back row now, all of
32:05
Speaker 4: a sudden. Isn't that terrific? So we've been, as I say,
32:10
Speaker 4: very successful, very lucky in having companies catch the vision
32:14
Speaker 4: of this from car makers who want to put a
32:17
Speaker 4: stereo system in the front for the kids, a separate
32:20
Speaker 4: system in the back. No, the kids aren't driving today.
32:24
Speaker 4: I was seeing if you were listening. Actually, I haven't
32:26
Speaker 4: had breakfast yet. A stereo system in the front for
32:30
Speaker 4: mom and dad. And maybe there's a little DVD player
32:33
Speaker 4: in the back for the kids, and the parents don't
32:35
Speaker 4: want to be bothered with that, or their rap music
32:37
Speaker 4: or whatever. So again, this idea of being able to
32:40
Speaker 4: put sound anywhere you want to is really starting to
32:42
Speaker 4: catch on. It also works for transmitting and communicating data.
32:48
Speaker 4: It also works five times better underwater. We've got the
32:52
Speaker 4: military had just deployed some of these into Iraq, where
32:54
Speaker 4: you can put fake troop movements a quarter of a
32:58
Speaker 4: mile away on a hillside. Or you can whisper in
33:03
Speaker 4: the ear of a supposed terrorist some biblical verse. I'm serious.
33:12
Speaker 4: And they have these infrared devices that can look at
33:15
Speaker 4: their countenance and see a fraction of a degree Kelvin
33:20
Speaker 4: in temperature shift from 100 yards away when they play
33:23
Speaker 4: this thing. And so another way of hopefully determining who's
33:27
Speaker 4: friendly and who isn't. We make a version of this
33:30
Speaker 4: which puts out 155 decibels. Payne is 120. So it
33:36
Speaker 4: allows you to go nearly a mile away and communicate
33:39
Speaker 4: with people. And there can be a public beach just
33:41
Speaker 4: off to the side, and they don't even know it's
33:42
Speaker 4: turned on. We sell those to the military presently for
33:46
Speaker 4: about $ 70, 000. And they're buying them as fast as we
33:49
Speaker 4: can make them. We put it on a turret with
33:52
Speaker 4: a camera so that when they shoot at you, you're
33:55
Speaker 4: over there and it's there.
33:58
Speaker 2: Bro, what does this sound like? What does it sound
34:01
Speaker 2: like that he's explaining? Now, mind you, this is in 2004. Okay.
34:06
Speaker 1: So it's two decades ago.
34:14
Speaker 2: What does he sound like?
34:16
Speaker 1: Who is this guy again? What's his name and what's
34:18
Speaker 1: his company?
34:20
Speaker 2: Woody Norris is his name.
34:23
Speaker 1: And they're selling this back to the U.S. military.
34:27
Speaker 2: Yes, he's a hypersonic sounds weapon engineer. It's called technical telepathy,
34:34
Speaker 2: is what this TED Talk is about, is what it's called,
34:37
Speaker 2: is technical telepathy. But what this sounds like that he's
34:41
Speaker 2: describing right here is, it sounds like 5G.
34:51
Speaker 1: What he's describing has now been, you've probably heard the phrase,
34:57
Speaker 1: over and over again, people theorize, whatever the government has,
35:02
Speaker 1: we see it 20, 30 years later. Well, that was
35:05
Speaker 1: back in 2004. And that's a TED talk, so it's
35:08
Speaker 1: pretty public. They've been selling them to the government since
35:11
Speaker 1: long before 2004, I would assume. Probably going back to
35:15
Speaker 1: at least the 90s. And that story, 20 years later,
35:20
Speaker 1: if you want to put this on the screen, I
35:22
Speaker 1: have links to all this stuff for those watching the video.
35:24
Speaker 1: I can give the headlines for those who are listening.
35:27
Speaker 1: go to the Associated Press, and this is in 2020.
35:32
Speaker 1: This is almost two decades after that talk. Here's the
35:36
Speaker 1: AP reporting, new device puts music in your head, no
35:39
Speaker 1: headphones required. This is the sound beamer tech, and this
35:44
Speaker 1: is commercial, you can buy it technology. So something for
35:49
Speaker 1: the military, something that's high tech. And then a few
35:52
Speaker 1: decades later, exit onto the marketplace where you can buy
35:56
Speaker 1: one if you would like. And I don't think this
35:57
Speaker 1: tech's very popular. It comes from Noveto systems, which is
36:02
Speaker 1: also an Israeli company for the record, if that matters
36:04
Speaker 1: to you. Uh, and of course that would certainly be
36:08
Speaker 1: why some people are hearing the voices of religious, uh,
36:11
Speaker 1: figures in their heads reportedly, or at least there's a
36:14
Speaker 1: theory that he even referenced that a biblical, you know,
36:16
Speaker 1: something in their head. So this is tech that's available
36:21
Speaker 1: to the public. You could buy it. Uh, I just
36:24
Speaker 1: think that that's interesting. It sort of is in line
36:27
Speaker 1: with that idea that whatever the military, whatever the top
36:31
Speaker 1: scientists are working on today, we'll have that 20, 30
36:33
Speaker 1: years later in the civilian realm. But what he's describing
36:38
Speaker 1: is exactly what all of these stories are that we referenced.
36:42
Speaker 1: I'll show them to you here on the screen. I
36:45
Speaker 1: mentioned the, remember that A & E show, Paranormal State.
36:48
Speaker 1: And this was, this is an old story. This is
36:50
Speaker 1: around the time that he gave that talk.
36:53
Speaker 2: This is crazy. When you sent this to me, this
36:56
Speaker 2: is crazy.
36:58
Speaker 1: Yeah, this isn't the military. And this isn't 20 years
37:01
Speaker 1: later commercial tech. This is Wired Magazine. Billboard blasts passers-by
37:07
Speaker 1: with audio advertisement. Walk by the billboard for the new
37:11
Speaker 1: A & E show Paranormal State on Prince Street in Manhattan.
37:16
Speaker 1: I thought they also did this in Los Angeles, but
37:18
Speaker 1: this story says Manhattan. And you could find yourselves targeted
37:21
Speaker 1: by a narrow beam of sound. That's exactly what he
37:23
Speaker 1: just described. projected from the ad using technology from Holosonics,
37:29
Speaker 1: which specializes in creating audio spotlights that are audible only
37:33
Speaker 1: to the person whose cranium they hit. This was a
37:38
Speaker 1: Hollywood billboard advertisement. This was not for the U.S. military.
37:43
Speaker 1: This was not to start a holy war. This was
37:46
Speaker 1: not for commercial pleasure in your home. This was just
37:50
Speaker 1: to promote some paranormal television show. 2007 they could do
37:55
Speaker 1: this on billboards.
37:57
Speaker 2: Well that's the thing too ryan is that this is
38:00
Speaker 2: being disguised under something paranormal right so when people hear
38:04
Speaker 2: that and then they know that it's for a paranormal
38:07
Speaker 2: reality tv show called paranormal state it's like oh well
38:10
Speaker 2: that's just for the you know spooky because it's it's
38:14
Speaker 2: paranormal and it's something that you don't get to experience
38:17
Speaker 2: all the time you don't get to be targeted by
38:19
Speaker 2: a voice advertisement you know And you take that to
38:23
Speaker 2: a whole other level. Like how, how many people have,
38:28
Speaker 2: if they can do this audibly, how many advertisers and
38:34
Speaker 2: companies and large corporations are, are doing this just subliminally
38:39
Speaker 2: and subconsciously, if they can do it audibly to you,
38:43
Speaker 2: then they can definitely do it to your subconscious. I mean,
38:45
Speaker 2: I feel like that that's the whole point of a
38:47
Speaker 2: commercial nowadays, right? Nobody watches a commercial and, and immediately
38:52
Speaker 2: goes out and buys the product, right? It's hearing it
38:56
Speaker 2: hundreds and hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of times over
38:59
Speaker 2: and over and over again that whenever the opportunity arises
39:04
Speaker 2: for you to need a product that's been advertised and
39:07
Speaker 2: pushed into your subconscious brain, you are more likely to
39:11
Speaker 2: get bounty because you've seen bounty On television, hundreds of times,
39:17
Speaker 2: you're more likely to get Dawn dishwashing liquid because you've
39:22
Speaker 2: seen the birds that has been involved in an oil
39:25
Speaker 2: spill and people are washing birds. Don magically washes anything
39:29
Speaker 2: besides dishes on commercials. They can wash your animals. They
39:33
Speaker 2: can wash whatever it is besides the grease off of
39:36
Speaker 2: your dish, right? But when you go to the store,
39:40
Speaker 2: you're more likely to buy Don because you've seen Don
39:45
Speaker 2: advertised to you thousands of times.
39:50
Speaker 1: This is the MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lincoln Laboratory.
39:56
Speaker 1: Look at this story, confirming all of what we're talking
39:59
Speaker 1: about here. This is one of the top schools, one
40:03
Speaker 1: of the top research facilities in the United States, MIT.
40:07
Speaker 1: Here's their laser. This was in 2019. That can deliver
40:11
Speaker 1: messages directly to your ear from across the room. And
40:16
Speaker 1: it goes through everybody else. It just goes to you.
40:20
Speaker 1: So you hear things that other people aren't hearing. I mean,
40:23
Speaker 1: this stuff is people might think that you or I,
40:27
Speaker 1: at least people think sometimes I'm a like an audio technician.
40:31
Speaker 1: I'm not. I didn't get into radio like Art Bell
40:33
Speaker 1: or others did. I'm not an audio technician, although I
40:35
Speaker 1: did audio in film school. And I know very little
40:38
Speaker 1: about it compared to like an audio professional. But I mean,
40:42
Speaker 1: this stuff is very like nuts and bolts, very mechanical,
40:45
Speaker 1: very technical. technological. It's actually pretty easy to understand when
40:48
Speaker 1: someone explains it to you and how they do it.
40:50
Speaker 1: It's not really science fiction, but to people that don't
40:53
Speaker 1: understand it, it appears to be science fiction. It appears
40:56
Speaker 1: to be something that like you just referred to, it's
41:00
Speaker 1: kind of paranormal. It's not real. It's more of like
41:03
Speaker 1: a movie or it's like people that are schizophrenic, which again,
41:06
Speaker 1: there is that, but maybe some people are schizophrenic because
41:09
Speaker 1: this tech is also being used. I mean, there's the
41:11
Speaker 1: possibility as well, Ryder, that like, look at flock cameras.
41:15
Speaker 1: Block cameras have already just, it's already admitted, it's already
41:18
Speaker 1: acknowledged these camera systems have been used by police. There's
41:22
Speaker 1: several officers. There might've even been one of the, maybe
41:25
Speaker 1: like a chief, even one case if I recall, but
41:28
Speaker 1: there were a lot of officers that have used it
41:30
Speaker 1: to spy on people that they, like family members or friends.
41:34
Speaker 1: The NSA was on the same exact thing. People were
41:36
Speaker 1: just using it to spy on their girlfriends, like using
41:39
Speaker 1: these multi-billion dollar spy apparatus systems to spy on, their girlfriends,
41:44
Speaker 1: like make sure she's not cheating on them. It's very
41:46
Speaker 1: possible that people with this technology could just be using
41:49
Speaker 1: it for the same thing, just like playing around with it. Well, let's,
41:51
Speaker 1: let's target this guy over here and tell him that
41:54
Speaker 1: we're blue avians and, or that we're the Archangel Michael
41:57
Speaker 1: and that we're, we're telling you that, you know, you
41:59
Speaker 1: need to do X, Y, and Z. That's very possible.
42:01
Speaker 1: In fact, it's, it's, it's actually probable considering how things
42:05
Speaker 1: like this are already abused, whether it's in the NSA
42:08
Speaker 1: or whatever it might be.
42:11
Speaker 2: Bro, you just opened up a whole other can of worms.
42:15
Speaker 2: I meant to do an entire video on this because
42:18
Speaker 2: it almost deserves an entire show just on this. But
42:21
Speaker 2: have you seen the new Walmart terms and conditions?
42:28
Speaker 1: No, I don't think so. What are they?
42:31
Speaker 2: The new Walmart terms and conditions are literally insanity. They
42:36
Speaker 2: can literally take all the information off of your phone.
42:41
Speaker 2: Through Bluetooth. It says it right in the new Walmart
42:44
Speaker 2: terms and conditions. And this is a setup for the
42:47
Speaker 2: digital price tag stuff. Okay. So, and this is also
42:52
Speaker 2: a reason why they want all of your medical information
42:56
Speaker 2: to be digitized so that the information can easily be
43:00
Speaker 2: extracted off of your phone. That's what the flock cameras
43:05
Speaker 2: are also doing. It's a Bluetooth digital extraction. From your device.
43:13
Speaker 2: And Walmart is doing this. It says in the Walmart.
43:18
Speaker 2: Freaking terms and new. Walmart terms and conditions. That they
43:21
Speaker 2: can take your biometric data. That they have facial recognition software.
43:28
Speaker 2: Inside of their Walmarts. Like dude. It is complete insanity.
43:35
Speaker 2: But when you brought up the flat camera stuff. That's what.
43:38
Speaker 2: Reminded me of the Walmart stuff.
43:42
Speaker 1: What you're describing just reminded me of this. And for
43:46
Speaker 1: people that just get offended by bringing up Israel, I mean,
43:49
Speaker 1: you know, you're going to need to grow up and
43:50
Speaker 1: get in touch with reality because it's all part of
43:53
Speaker 1: the equation here. Here is a clip. If I can
43:59
Speaker 1: play this, it'll play. Here's a clip of Netanyahu talking
44:03
Speaker 1: very similarly about what you just said. I don't know
44:05
Speaker 1: if you saw this on 60 Minutes. This is recent.
44:07
Speaker 1: Take a listen to this. This is yours, right? Can
44:11
Speaker 1: you hear it?
44:12
Speaker 2: Yes.
44:13
Speaker 1: Okay, so Netanyahu is holding up a cell phone. Listen
44:16
Speaker 1: to this.
44:18
Speaker 3: This is yours, right? You're not immune either because you
44:22
Speaker 3: can penetrate this machine. You can penetrate this little instrument
44:30
Speaker 3: and you can say about Major Garrett anything you want.
44:34
Speaker 3: I can paint you as a monster. If I say
44:37
Speaker 3: it often enough, People will believe it.
44:41
Speaker 1: Do you believe Israel is at risk of losing? What
44:43
Speaker 1: he's describing here is the ability to go into your
44:46
Speaker 1: phone and change messages, change emails, plant information, et cetera,
44:52
Speaker 1: et cetera, et cetera. Do you remember, Ryder, when I
44:55
Speaker 1: told you I said, or maybe I asked you rhetorically,
44:59
Speaker 1: am I going crazy? Or is it sometimes when I
45:02
Speaker 1: text you or other people or when I post something
45:05
Speaker 1: on the Internet? And I double check it to make
45:07
Speaker 1: sure it's spelled correctly. If it's an official like post
45:10
Speaker 1: for my show. And then I go back to it
45:12
Speaker 1: later and suddenly there's a whole bunch of shit in
45:14
Speaker 1: it that's spelled incorrectly. There's words that are removed, et cetera.
45:18
Speaker 1: That's what the Israeli government, at least we know the
45:22
Speaker 1: American government can do the same thing. I'm sure a
45:24
Speaker 1: lot of governments can. That wasn't my imagination. They have
45:27
Speaker 1: the ability to actually do that. And as a matter
45:31
Speaker 1: of fact, speaking of flock cameras, it's the other company Axon.
45:36
Speaker 1: which is like the secondary company, probably more of like
45:39
Speaker 1: the Trojan horse. People hate, hate flock camera systems and like, well,
45:44
Speaker 1: we'll install the alternative, which is Axon. That company, if
45:48
Speaker 1: I remember this correctly, they have, let me see if
45:51
Speaker 1: I can look this up so I can confirm whether
45:54
Speaker 1: or not I have the information correct here.
45:56
Speaker 2: Well, while you're looking that up, I have something to
45:58
Speaker 2: say about the flock.
45:59
Speaker 1: Yeah, go ahead.
46:00
Speaker 3: Go ahead.
46:01
Speaker 2: I think, well, I believe that the flock camera, this
46:05
Speaker 2: cutting down of flock cameras is actually like a controlled thing.
46:11
Speaker 2: Like the people are being paid to go and cut
46:15
Speaker 2: down all these flock cameras. So it makes it look
46:18
Speaker 2: like that there's like a rebellion against it so that
46:21
Speaker 2: nobody really actually does anything about it.
46:25
Speaker 1: I completely agree with you. I don't know if I
46:27
Speaker 1: even mentioned that to you, that I thought the same thing.
46:30
Speaker 1: I'm pretty sure that's exactly what it is. I'm pretty
46:33
Speaker 1: sure the companies, or at least the local law enforcement
46:35
Speaker 1: or the cities or whatever, pretty sure they're behind it.
46:40
Speaker 1: The company I'm thinking about in regard to that is,
46:43
Speaker 1: so I have this in my new book, it says, oh, TOCA.
46:49
Speaker 1: So Flock is tied via Horowitz, who's one of the major,
46:53
Speaker 1: Anderson Horowitz and Peter Thiel were the major backers of Flock.
46:58
Speaker 1: They are tied to Shield AI, which is deployed by
47:02
Speaker 1: the IDF like Palantir. Block is also tied to Horowitz
47:06
Speaker 1: and his investments because he invested in another company called Toka.
47:09
Speaker 1: Toka is another Israeli company that developed a method of
47:13
Speaker 1: hacking surveillance cameras and altering their footage. So you could
47:20
Speaker 1: have a recording of you not doing something or you
47:24
Speaker 1: doing something and it can be changed. so that you're
47:28
Speaker 1: doing what you didn't do or you're not doing what
47:30
Speaker 1: you did do. I mean, that's what Netanyahu's talking about here.
47:34
Speaker 1: That's what they've invested in. That's the technology. They can
47:37
Speaker 1: change things. So this isn't just about mind control. This
47:40
Speaker 1: is also about driving people crazy. I haven't been driven crazy.
47:44
Speaker 1: At least I hope I haven't. Some people might think
47:46
Speaker 1: I'm crazy, but I know for sure that when I
47:49
Speaker 1: post stuff and it gets changed, like I'll give you
47:52
Speaker 1: an example. I think I have screenshots to prove this
47:55
Speaker 1: on my computer here somewhere. maybe I showed this to you.
47:58
Speaker 1: I literally had posted something about, it was, it was,
48:03
Speaker 1: it was something about some Israeli story. And I, it's,
48:07
Speaker 1: I typed, typed in Israeli, et cetera. And it, it
48:11
Speaker 1: literally changed. I'm not exaggerating. It literally changed when I
48:16
Speaker 1: described Israel as blank, blank, blank, it changed it to
48:20
Speaker 1: Islam in real time. It changed Israel or it was
48:24
Speaker 1: something about Israel and and terrorism and all that it changed.
48:28
Speaker 1: So when I posted it, it actually changed it from
48:30
Speaker 1: Israel does blank, blank, blank, blank, blank to Islam's a
48:33
Speaker 1: religion of like terrorism. I'm not, I have to find
48:36
Speaker 1: that and send it to you. It's, it's effing insane.
48:40
Speaker 1: That's what, that's what he's talking about. So they can
48:42
Speaker 1: do this with your phone. They can do this with
48:44
Speaker 1: your computer emails, text messages, as much as they can
48:47
Speaker 1: put thoughts into your head. Literally. I'll try to find
48:51
Speaker 1: that and send it to you. It's, it's crazy.
48:53
Speaker 2: I've always wondered why there was such a big push
48:57
Speaker 2: to make everything digital when physical things were working just fine.
49:03
Speaker 2: Why a big push to digitize medical records? Why a
49:09
Speaker 2: big push to have your entire life? Why the digital ID?
49:14
Speaker 2: The digital ID isn't what people think that it is either.
49:19
Speaker 2: The digital ID is actually just a tracking and tracing
49:24
Speaker 2: of your digital footprint online. It's not an actual digital
49:33
Speaker 2: non-physical identification card. It's to track every website and everything
49:39
Speaker 2: online Any place that you've ever visited ever on the internet,
49:43
Speaker 2: that's what digital ID is. It's a digital footprint. It's
49:46
Speaker 2: not a literal digital identification card. That can be something
49:53
Speaker 2: different that might actually come about sometime in the future.
49:57
Speaker 2: But the whole digital ID thing is a digital footprint
50:01
Speaker 2: of a tracking and tracing of information. every single individual
50:05
Speaker 2: and every web browsing history, where they've been, what they've said,
50:09
Speaker 2: and it's everything online, right? I mean, it's kind of
50:13
Speaker 2: like what Facebook was. Facebook was actually LifeLog. LifeLog got canceled.
50:16
Speaker 2: Facebook comes up the very next day, right? LifeLog, a
50:21
Speaker 2: guard to DARPA organization to, you know, a big tracking
50:26
Speaker 2: and tracing thing. LifeLog is in the name, you know,
50:29
Speaker 2: it's logging all of your information. But that's what's something
50:32
Speaker 2: that kind of bothered me for a really long time.
50:34
Speaker 2: And it kind of started with the password thing. Like
50:36
Speaker 2: whenever iPhone, like, I don't even know, like maybe like 2018,
50:42
Speaker 2: 2009 or something like that. Maybe 2010, somewhere around in
50:47
Speaker 2: there where they started letting you save your password into
50:52
Speaker 2: your device.
50:53
Speaker 3: Yeah.
50:54
Speaker 2: Like I was like, this is not a good idea.
50:56
Speaker 2: This is a bad idea, right? Bad idea to have
50:59
Speaker 2: all your passwords saved into your device for everything that
51:02
Speaker 2: you use. Don't ever do that. You're an idiot. You
51:08
Speaker 2: got all your passwords saved. saved on your device it's
51:11
Speaker 2: a take one click of a button for somebody to
51:14
Speaker 2: have everything because everything is on your phone right write
51:18
Speaker 2: everything down in a notebook keep the notebook right i've
51:21
Speaker 2: been doing that for years but uh that's what kind
51:25
Speaker 2: of got me like in the i'm like this doesn't
51:28
Speaker 2: make any sense they want you to have everything everywhere
51:31
Speaker 2: all at once and that is to be able to
51:34
Speaker 2: extract all of that information anytime that they need it
51:38
Speaker 2: And this comes back to what people have talked about
51:42
Speaker 2: for a really long time off of airplanes, right? They
51:45
Speaker 2: actually have separate cell phone towers set up at airports.
51:50
Speaker 2: This is why airports are kind of like out of
51:53
Speaker 2: the way. They're not really in like areas that are
51:59
Speaker 2: heavily populated. They're kind of outside of town because. the
52:03
Speaker 2: outside of town has their own cell phone tower data
52:07
Speaker 2: networks that have been set up there. So whenever you
52:09
Speaker 2: get on the plane, you're automatically connecting to the towers
52:13
Speaker 2: that are there at that airport. And wherever you land,
52:16
Speaker 2: you're on your cell phone is immediately being connected to
52:20
Speaker 2: those private towers that then I extract all of your
52:23
Speaker 2: information off of your phone.
52:27
Speaker 1: That and the fact that they also seen in pace
52:30
Speaker 1: to have their, their show played on those in the others,
52:34
Speaker 1: airport TVs. What you're saying is, is so critical. It's
52:38
Speaker 1: very important to understand that this goes beyond people's like
52:43
Speaker 1: general on the surface perception of, Oh, I'm being spied on. Oh,
52:47
Speaker 1: they're watching me. And this is, this is more like
52:51
Speaker 1: total information awareness, which is really what Palantir is. It
52:55
Speaker 1: was the total information awareness program. That's what it is.
52:58
Speaker 1: That's what it continues to be. And it's growing. Uh,
53:01
Speaker 1: connected with all these other companies like Axonius and flock
53:04
Speaker 1: cameras and all this, but the idea of putting those
53:08
Speaker 1: thoughts in your head, I couldn't find it. I had
53:11
Speaker 1: referenced it to you. I think it was an Elon Musk,
53:14
Speaker 1: Joe Rogan interview. I could look it up again here
53:17
Speaker 1: to see if I could stumble across it, but it
53:19
Speaker 1: was Elon Musk on Joe Rogan. And he was talking
53:23
Speaker 1: about using those cell towers and utilizing maybe wifi as well.
53:29
Speaker 1: But using cell phone towers to create like a an
53:33
Speaker 1: artificial environment or an artificial world, which is if you
53:38
Speaker 1: if you take the Samsung 6G paper literal, they want
53:42
Speaker 1: to have like a holographic reality and replicas of people
53:45
Speaker 1: and places in in the. it's digital environment, but from
53:49
Speaker 1: the real world, it's like copy and pasting things to
53:52
Speaker 1: a digital environment, like, like a GTA or a, like
53:55
Speaker 1: an open world simulation type game. Uh, but I think
53:59
Speaker 1: he was talking about that on Joe Rogan. So this,
54:01
Speaker 1: this isn't just about like cell phone connectivity or, Oh,
54:04
Speaker 1: there's it's five G it's, it's harmful. Turn off your internet.
54:07
Speaker 1: This is about a lot more than, I mean, my God,
54:10
Speaker 1: Google sends those little cars through your neighborhoods and Google can,
54:13
Speaker 1: and has been caught uploading, uh, information onto people's computers remotely.
54:21
Speaker 1: I mean, the stuff that they can do with technology, God,
54:23
Speaker 1: I mean, even the Xbox, remember the Xbox Connect? They
54:28
Speaker 1: were using that for border security. That's how advanced it was.
54:30
Speaker 1: And people had that stuff in their home for their Xbox.
54:34
Speaker 3: The U.S.
54:35
Speaker 1: Military, I wonder if I can find, let's see if
54:37
Speaker 1: I can find that story.
54:37
Speaker 3: The U.S.
54:38
Speaker 1: Military was like literally using, let's see if I can
54:40
Speaker 1: type in, the U.S. military uses Connect Microsoft Xbox Tech.
54:47
Speaker 1: I think it was for border security. Something like that.
54:52
Speaker 2: Yeah, because it's like an infrared-style stick figure that shows
54:59
Speaker 2: if anybody's in the area.
55:01
Speaker 1: Microsoft Kinect powers the military's virtual training machine. Literally, your
55:07
Speaker 1: Xbox is a weapon system. That's insane.
55:12
Speaker 2: What is that doing that's that's a track and trace
55:15
Speaker 2: program that entire thing like put a camera inside of
55:18
Speaker 2: your home no matter calls put a ai put an
55:22
Speaker 2: alexa inside of your home put a google uh what
55:26
Speaker 2: is it what are those other ones called that um
55:30
Speaker 2: like a google google drive or whatever the the google
55:34
Speaker 2: version of amazon alexa is in your home like put
55:38
Speaker 2: all of these things that can spy on you and
55:41
Speaker 2: we'll give it to the public as something that they
55:43
Speaker 2: need or something that they want or something that's going
55:45
Speaker 2: to make their life better. You know, every single one
55:48
Speaker 2: of your smart TVs has a freaking camera inside of it.
55:53
Speaker 2: That's watching you. That's why I don't get smart TVs.
55:57
Speaker 2: I've never owned a smart TV in my life. I'm
56:00
Speaker 2: not going to, you know, it's like, dude, It's so unbelievable.
56:05
Speaker 2: And it's marketed to the point of where it's like,
56:08
Speaker 2: you know, you need this. If you don't have it, then,
56:12
Speaker 2: you know, you're a loser. And, you know, and maybe
56:15
Speaker 2: that's not even doing that much, not having a smart TV,
56:18
Speaker 2: because we have the perfect tracking and tracing device right
56:21
Speaker 2: here in our pod set is our phone. You know,
56:24
Speaker 2: I mean, it's the greatest one. It's got a camera
56:26
Speaker 2: on it. It's got everything that anybody that you can want.
56:30
Speaker 2: You can't opt out of the, you can't delete the
56:33
Speaker 2: health app off of there. All you can do is
56:34
Speaker 2: like toggle it off. Why do you need a health
56:38
Speaker 2: app on your freaking iPhone? To tell you how many
56:41
Speaker 2: steps you've done? Or is that to literally track and
56:43
Speaker 2: trace every single place that you've ever been and store
56:46
Speaker 2: that on some kind of freaking cloud? So at any
56:48
Speaker 2: point in time that you ever get any, if you
56:52
Speaker 2: were to do anything, then they can immediately pull that
56:55
Speaker 2: up and see the entire history, every single text message
56:58
Speaker 2: that you've ever sent. It's being stored somewhere. Anything that
57:02
Speaker 2: you've ever posted, anything that you've ever posted on social
57:05
Speaker 2: media is all being stored at a data center somewhere.
57:09
Speaker 2: And that's another thing about this, Ryan, is that data
57:11
Speaker 2: centers have been a thing since the inception of technology
57:15
Speaker 2: and the inception of the internet. Data centers have been
57:18
Speaker 2: around since the internet has been around. It's just not
57:21
Speaker 2: been at the scale as AI data centers, but they've
57:24
Speaker 2: been just as big. There's literally data centers everywhere, dude,
57:29
Speaker 2: and they've always been there.
57:31
Speaker 1: I've wondered if the data center thing, who did I
57:35
Speaker 1: mention this to? I think I mentioned it to Matthew
57:37
Speaker 1: James Bailey. And I wonder if some of the data
57:39
Speaker 1: center thing, just like the flock cameras, it comes out
57:41
Speaker 1: of nowhere. I wonder if some of that might be
57:44
Speaker 1: almost like the Obama era, the Obama era green programs
57:52
Speaker 1: where they invested all this money in this big move
57:55
Speaker 1: toward having green environmentalist programs at the heart of every company.
58:00
Speaker 1: And it turns out most of those companies were just
58:02
Speaker 1: like money laundering operations and there really wasn't anything going
58:05
Speaker 1: on there. It was just all to funnel a bunch
58:07
Speaker 1: of billions, billions, hundreds of billions, maybe trillions of dollars
58:11
Speaker 1: in the case of data centers. So it could be that.
58:14
Speaker 1: I think Matthew had also told me that he said
58:18
Speaker 1: some of these facilities are actually being built on or
58:21
Speaker 1: near ancient sacred sites. And I thought, I said, that's
58:26
Speaker 1: interesting if that's even remotely possibly true, because that would
58:30
Speaker 1: mean that the idea that the new god or the
58:34
Speaker 1: new religion would be AI or something to that nature,
58:39
Speaker 1: you're building these new techno temples on top of or
58:42
Speaker 1: near these ancient holy sites. So it really would make
58:45
Speaker 1: it more like a new religion.
58:47
Speaker 2: Have you seen the new Apple iPhone?
58:53
Speaker 1: The Flip?
58:55
Speaker 2: No, it's not the flip one. It's the moon one.
59:00
Speaker 1: Where they say, I don't think I've seen that.
59:02
Speaker 2: What is the next step in evolution? Where do we
59:05
Speaker 2: go from here? And it's like, they show like Apollo 11.
59:08
Speaker 2: It's like them making fun of it. us, dude. It's
59:11
Speaker 2: what it is. They're like, because now I think it's
59:15
Speaker 2: been since the inception of the smartphone has been, you
59:19
Speaker 2: have more power in your phone than the technology that
59:22
Speaker 2: supposedly took us to the moon in 1969. Yeah. So
59:27
Speaker 2: that's like the joke. But people, it's just going over
59:30
Speaker 2: everyone's heads. You know what I mean? They're like, I
59:31
Speaker 2: don't even know what's going on. It's just another Apple commercial.
59:34
Speaker 2: But they show it in the commercial. I wish I
59:37
Speaker 2: could find it. Actually, I don't really want to play
59:40
Speaker 2: it because it might hit me with some kind of copyright.
59:45
Speaker 1: That's okay. I copyrighted the Apple commercial. It's mine now.
59:49
Speaker 1: So you can play it if you want. I just
59:50
Speaker 1: did a Corey Good. I copyrighted something that didn't belong
59:52
Speaker 1: to me.
59:54
Speaker 2: Oh, that's perfect. I didn't know that.
59:56
Speaker 1: Yeah, you can just copyright. I'm thinking about copywriting a
1:00:00
Speaker 1: bunch of Hollywood movies, actually a copyright, all Christopher Nolan stuff.
1:00:04
Speaker 1: They're my movies now. Okay.
1:00:06
Speaker 2: Well, we'll watch the beginning of this at least because
1:00:09
Speaker 2: you can normally do 10 seconds of anything and get
1:00:14
Speaker 2: away with it. Let me make sure that you can
1:00:17
Speaker 2: hear this when I play it. Can you see it?
1:00:19
Speaker 2: Oh no, you can't see it yet.
1:00:21
Speaker 1: I cannot see it yet.
1:00:22
Speaker 2: There we go.
1:00:23
Speaker 1: Now I can see it.
1:00:24
Speaker 2: All right. Tell me if you can hear this. Once you.
1:00:28
Speaker 1: Hear that, been to the moon where do you go
1:00:31
Speaker 1: next you build the fastest chip ever put in an
1:00:34
Speaker 1: iphone you give it the longest battery life in iphone history.
1:00:40
Speaker 2: Oh wow well what about all those other uh battery
1:00:43
Speaker 2: lives and iphones right are you saying that all the
1:00:45
Speaker 2: other battery lives and all the other iphones has come
1:00:47
Speaker 2: out before this one all sucked but uh that's where
1:00:53
Speaker 2: it starts here is like this. It's like the, here's
1:00:56
Speaker 2: the Apollo. Uh, well, this says the Artemis two mission,
1:01:01
Speaker 2: which was, I thought it was the Apollo.
1:01:05
Speaker 1: Well, you're finding that just a very, very fast note.
1:01:08
Speaker 1: And you can show this after the video. That's really
1:01:10
Speaker 1: kind of funny and ironic. And it's probably criminal in
1:01:13
Speaker 1: a sense, because if you, you might recall this in 2020,
1:01:15
Speaker 1: Apple had to pay out like $ 113 million because, uh,
1:01:20
Speaker 1: it was discovered they had put a gate on their batteries.
1:01:23
Speaker 1: So the batteries lasted a lot longer, but they had
1:01:26
Speaker 1: actually throttled the batteries back. And I don't know if
1:01:29
Speaker 1: that lawsuit was part of it, but there was another story.
1:01:31
Speaker 1: It might've been part of this lawsuit where they literally
1:01:34
Speaker 1: had designed it. So every time you upgraded the phone,
1:01:37
Speaker 1: I guess part, I don't know how they do it,
1:01:40
Speaker 1: but part of the programming, it would limit, maybe it
1:01:43
Speaker 1: would close the gate even further. So every time you'd
1:01:45
Speaker 1: update your phone, your battery life would decline. And that
1:01:48
Speaker 1: wasn't like, oh, it's using more power. It's using more space.
1:01:51
Speaker 1: It was because they had engineered it to fry the
1:01:53
Speaker 1: battery every time you updated your phone. They got sued
1:01:55
Speaker 1: for that and lost. So it's just kind of ironic. Oh,
1:01:59
Speaker 1: it's the longest battery life. It's like these people literally
1:02:02
Speaker 1: were defrauding the public with their battery.
1:02:07
Speaker 2: It's just, it's unbelievable. What do you mean? Like you
1:02:11
Speaker 2: want me to, that's all that you've changed with this phone?
1:02:14
Speaker 2: That's your main selling point is a longer battery life?
1:02:18
Speaker 2: You want me to pay $ 1, 500 for this new phone
1:02:20
Speaker 2: and all that you're giving me is a longer battery life?
1:02:25
Speaker 2: What are we even doing? It's kind of like the
1:02:27
Speaker 2: same thing with the Apple Watch. The new commercial for
1:02:29
Speaker 2: the Apple Watch is like the most advanced heartbeat detection
1:02:35
Speaker 2: technology ever made in an Apple Watch. Like, how is
1:02:39
Speaker 2: that even a selling point? Who cares? Who cares if
1:02:45
Speaker 2: it's the greatest heartbeat detection technology an apple watch ever
1:02:49
Speaker 2: like give me a break like i don't care why
1:02:52
Speaker 2: is that even a selling point it doesn't make any
1:02:54
Speaker 2: sense but this is even worse this commercial i thought
1:02:57
Speaker 2: it was apollo 11 but it's not it's the freaking
1:03:01
Speaker 2: artemis 2 mission bro that just happened like when this
1:03:05
Speaker 2: is april 2nd of 2026 dude that's even worse artemis
1:03:10
Speaker 2: 2 didn't even land on the moon bro it went
1:03:12
Speaker 2: around the moon.
1:03:16
Speaker 1: The whole Artemis mission was incredibly ritualized, just like the
1:03:20
Speaker 1: eclipse and the APEP ritual that NASA did. And then,
1:03:24
Speaker 1: of course, Apple itself is tied directly in, I mean,
1:03:27
Speaker 1: in the company founder's own words, like they've tied it
1:03:30
Speaker 1: directly to the Garden of Eden, the poisoned apple that
1:03:32
Speaker 1: you take a bite out of. I mean, the whole
1:03:35
Speaker 1: thing is ritualized. The whole thing is very magical, very esoteric.
1:03:39
Speaker 1: And by the way, the heartbeat thing, that selling point
1:03:42
Speaker 1: that they're going with, I haven't watched advertisements for it,
1:03:45
Speaker 1: but I heard about that. This was just back in April. Military.com
1:03:50
Speaker 1: had published this. You want to throw it up on
1:03:52
Speaker 1: the screen. They call it the ghost murmur, a heartbeat
1:03:56
Speaker 1: tracking tech. So you can, this is CIA stuff, detecting
1:04:01
Speaker 1: people's heartbeats. This is actually, if you type in heartbeat tech,
1:04:06
Speaker 1: I think it was MIT. There's a story, heartbeat tech,
1:04:13
Speaker 1: MIT tracking, maybe tracking your heartbeat, something like that. MIT
1:04:19
Speaker 1: had developed something similar to that. Oh, here it is,
1:04:22
Speaker 1: MIT Technology Review. Pentagon has a laser that can identify
1:04:25
Speaker 1: people from a distance by their heartbeat. So the cell
1:04:29
Speaker 1: phones are just covert technology. weapon systems not just spy
1:04:34
Speaker 1: devices i mean you if you can detect someone's heartbeat
1:04:37
Speaker 1: at a distance if you can beam a signal into
1:04:41
Speaker 1: their head from a distance that nobody else can hear
1:04:44
Speaker 1: then this is the kind of thing that i think
1:04:47
Speaker 1: is at least it's logical to assume that you could
1:04:51
Speaker 1: literally use someone's cell phone to kill them like the
1:04:55
Speaker 1: old idea of the heart attack gun that the cia
1:04:57
Speaker 1: has you could Literally use someone's phone as a weapon
1:05:01
Speaker 1: system to execute them. And I mean, my God, Benjamin
1:05:03
Speaker 1: Netanyahu is essentially telling 60 Minutes that. Plus, you know,
1:05:07
Speaker 1: the Apple phones, the chips are made in Israel. On
1:05:09
Speaker 1: top of that, most I think almost all of them are.
1:05:11
Speaker 1: So their weapon systems to probably I mean, I would
1:05:14
Speaker 1: assume you could be you could use them to actually
1:05:16
Speaker 1: kill people at a distance. There's no hit men involved. No,
1:05:20
Speaker 1: none of that. Just cell phones.
1:05:24
Speaker 2: Yes, I believe that Debra... Someone will put it in
1:05:29
Speaker 2: the comments section, but Debra... I can't remember her last name,
1:05:34
Speaker 2: but she did this big Agenda 2030. She was really
1:05:36
Speaker 2: popular back in the early days of the conspiracy stuff
1:05:43
Speaker 2: and conspiracy community and YouTube. But she would talk about
1:05:48
Speaker 2: how the phones are a gigantic military weapon system. And
1:05:52
Speaker 2: if they can put... freaking explosive devices and a bunch
1:05:55
Speaker 2: of pagers and some blow, blow people up. They can
1:05:59
Speaker 2: definitely put an explosive device inside of a cell phone.
1:06:03
Speaker 2: You just be walking around with that all day. Do
1:06:05
Speaker 2: you remember when everyone's vapes were exploding?
1:06:08
Speaker 1: Yeah, I do remember that.
1:06:10
Speaker 2: No, I had to allow vapes. We need to allow
1:06:15
Speaker 2: pagers and walkie talkies. But the weird thing about that
1:06:18
Speaker 2: is the BB net and Yahoo also gave Trump a
1:06:22
Speaker 2: golden pager.
1:06:24
Speaker 1: Yeah, he did give him a golden pager. Yeah, that
1:06:27
Speaker 1: wasn't a threat. That was a gift.
1:06:31
Speaker 2: Isn't that weird, dude? Isn't that super weird? Trump wasn't
1:06:34
Speaker 2: even president whenever that whole thing went down. But yeah,
1:06:37
Speaker 2: Bibi Netanyahu comes to the White House and gives Trump
1:06:40
Speaker 2: a golden pager trophy.
1:06:44
Speaker 1: I can give you, by the way, I can give
1:06:46
Speaker 1: you an example. By the way, I think that that
1:06:50
Speaker 1: was a threat or a trophy in the same way
1:06:52
Speaker 1: that Netanyahu has a a glass case for his COVID
1:06:57
Speaker 1: vaccine on his desk, which is, it's like a serial
1:07:01
Speaker 1: killer taking trophies. Here's an example of what I mean.
1:07:05
Speaker 1: This isn't the one about Islam. The funny thing is
1:07:07
Speaker 1: I asked, I just asked Grok to find the original
1:07:11
Speaker 1: post that I had made. That's the only thing I
1:07:13
Speaker 1: use Grok for. And I could see Grok searching for
1:07:17
Speaker 1: it because you can see the list of all the things,
1:07:19
Speaker 1: the tweets that they're going through, that Grok's going through.
1:07:22
Speaker 1: I saw it and I tried to click it. I
1:07:24
Speaker 1: couldn't click it. And then Grok did not give me
1:07:27
Speaker 1: that tweet. So I don't have a link to it.
1:07:29
Speaker 1: And I asked Grok, go back to the other tweet.
1:07:31
Speaker 1: It said, no, that tweet doesn't exist. So I can't
1:07:33
Speaker 1: even find the original tweet because X tells me it
1:07:35
Speaker 1: doesn't exist. But I know it does. I did find
1:07:37
Speaker 1: some similar tweets. Here's one of them. This might have
1:07:42
Speaker 1: been the original tweet that I had followed up with
1:07:46
Speaker 1: a screenshot later. I had typed in, when are we
1:07:49
Speaker 1: going to designate Israel as our greatest enemy? But I
1:07:53
Speaker 1: know I spelled it O-U-R. I know I didn't spell
1:07:56
Speaker 1: it wrong. And I'm very sure it changed it to R-A-R-E.
1:08:02
Speaker 1: But here's the one that I thought was, let's see
1:08:04
Speaker 1: if I can find the other one here. There's another
1:08:07
Speaker 1: one where I had typed in, Israel is threatening America.
1:08:14
Speaker 1: And I for sure 100% hand to God, it changed
1:08:18
Speaker 1: it to treat, not threat. Like it changed it after
1:08:24
Speaker 1: I had posted it. Anyway, the point is Netanyahu says
1:08:29
Speaker 1: they can do this. So it's not my imagination rider.
1:08:33
Speaker 1: And again, this is just technology, but extrapolate this to
1:08:38
Speaker 1: what you hear in your head. And I mean, there's no,
1:08:43
Speaker 1: it's one thing to have AI and have a difficult,
1:08:45
Speaker 1: it's difficult to tell what exactly is right. real and
1:08:49
Speaker 1: what's not real, but it's another thing entirely to have
1:08:53
Speaker 1: just no ability to even really determine whether or not
1:08:55
Speaker 1: your own thoughts are your own thoughts. It's a hijacking
1:08:59
Speaker 1: of the context.
1:09:00
Speaker 3: Even.
1:09:01
Speaker 1: It's really, really evil. Some people might call it satanic,
1:09:06
Speaker 1: but it's really, really evil stuff, I think.
1:09:09
Speaker 2: Well, the best way to do this would be to
1:09:11
Speaker 2: slowly integrate all of these tracking and tracing things into
1:09:16
Speaker 2: our reality so it doesn't set off any kind of alarms, right?
1:09:20
Speaker 2: We'll slowly roll in the facial recognition software. And that's
1:09:26
Speaker 2: the big reason why I think that they did self-checkouts, bro.
1:09:30
Speaker 2: That was the point of self-checkouts was for facial recognition software.
1:09:35
Speaker 2: They got a camera right in it looking at you.
1:09:38
Speaker 2: They say it's for surveillance to make sure you're not
1:09:41
Speaker 2: stealing stuff, but theft has been up with self-checkouts. Literally,
1:09:48
Speaker 2: Walmart has lost billions of dollars since they put in
1:09:52
Speaker 2: the self-checkouts.
1:09:55
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. I think they claim that they're going to
1:09:57
Speaker 1: get rid of, or they have started getting rid of
1:09:59
Speaker 1: them in some places because of that.
1:10:01
Speaker 2: Well, you know why they're getting rid of them is
1:10:02
Speaker 2: because they got all the data and information that they need.
1:10:07
Speaker 2: You wouldn't be doing that Yeah, you wouldn't take that
1:10:11
Speaker 2: kind of loss, Ryan. You wouldn't take billions and billions
1:10:14
Speaker 2: of dollars of loss and revenue of people stealing stuff
1:10:17
Speaker 2: because they're going through a self-checkout for that many years
1:10:20
Speaker 2: if you didn't have another agenda behind it.
1:10:25
Speaker 1: Well, it's the cost of doing business then. I mean,
1:10:29
Speaker 1: that's the same way that you get a 10% discount
1:10:31
Speaker 1: if you give someone your information. And I mean, in
1:10:34
Speaker 1: a sense, sort of, they're paying 10% giving you that
1:10:38
Speaker 1: discount so that you can, they can get your information,
1:10:41
Speaker 1: but then ultimately like they sell it for 10 times
1:10:44
Speaker 1: what the discount was. So that's what all the companies
1:10:48
Speaker 1: have done that for decades. And it's always strange too,
1:10:52
Speaker 1: because if you were to, if you were to say, like,
1:10:54
Speaker 1: I always told companies, I'm not giving you that information.
1:10:57
Speaker 1: Most people are kind of shocked by it. Even when I,
1:11:00
Speaker 1: when I were, I had worked in retail a long
1:11:01
Speaker 1: time ago and I w I would never ask people
1:11:06
Speaker 1: that stuff. but other people that work there when they
1:11:09
Speaker 1: asked and people said, I don't want to give you
1:11:12
Speaker 1: that information. It was really rare, but sometimes people had said,
1:11:14
Speaker 1: I don't want to give you that info. Like the,
1:11:17
Speaker 1: they don't know what to do. Like their immediate reaction
1:11:20
Speaker 1: it's programmed to just, okay, what's your info. And they
1:11:23
Speaker 1: just type in the number. But if someone says, no,
1:11:25
Speaker 1: I remember just the other people around me didn't know
1:11:28
Speaker 1: how to function like, Oh, well, I don't, I need
1:11:31
Speaker 1: a number. I can't go to the next page. Like
1:11:33
Speaker 1: we need your info. They didn't know how to, they
1:11:35
Speaker 1: didn't know how to deal with it, but, Yes, this
1:11:39
Speaker 1: whole thing from the thoughts in your head to the
1:11:42
Speaker 1: programming of your posts, post-post, is part of a much
1:11:50
Speaker 1: larger apparatus, a much larger monster that I do think
1:11:54
Speaker 1: is very heavily, it's not entirely, but I think it's
1:11:59
Speaker 1: very heavily America-centric. And what I mean by that is, Yeah,
1:12:04
Speaker 1: I'm sure that underneath the surface, there's a lot of
1:12:08
Speaker 1: that kind of a thing over here in Japan too.
1:12:11
Speaker 1: The difference is when the Japanese government tells you we're
1:12:14
Speaker 1: doing X, Y, and Z because it's more efficient, it
1:12:18
Speaker 1: is more efficient and it works. When the US government
1:12:21
Speaker 1: says we're doing something to make it more efficient, it
1:12:24
Speaker 1: ain't more efficient. It's usually 10 times less efficient and
1:12:29
Speaker 1: nothing works. Like the Obamacare website, remember that didn't work.
1:12:33
Speaker 1: I think they consider that the worst digital government projects
1:12:38
Speaker 1: in the history of the country. Just they couldn't get
1:12:42
Speaker 1: a website to work. To reinforce that, when I had
1:12:52
Speaker 1: gone to the... I can't ramble on about this, but
1:12:56
Speaker 1: just stick with me for a moment as a listener.
1:12:59
Speaker 1: When I went to the U.S. Embassy for the first time,
1:13:02
Speaker 1: when I was over here before I moved to Japan,
1:13:05
Speaker 1: the U S embassy, you cannot call them. Well, you
1:13:08
Speaker 1: can call, but they, they won't answer. So they don't do,
1:13:10
Speaker 1: they don't do answer answering calls. If you try to
1:13:14
Speaker 1: make an appointment, you cannot make, well, at least you couldn't,
1:13:17
Speaker 1: then you couldn't make an appointment.
1:13:19
Speaker 2: Yeah.
1:13:19
Speaker 1: They have a website, they have a schedule, but you
1:13:21
Speaker 1: can't make an appointment. It doesn't let you make an appointment.
1:13:23
Speaker 1: When you call the helpline, they do answer because they're
1:13:27
Speaker 1: in India.
1:13:27
Speaker 2: Hello, sir. Can I help you? This is U S
1:13:30
Speaker 2: embassy in Tokyo.
1:13:30
Speaker 1: Oh, I said, you're in India, right?
1:13:33
Speaker 3: Yes, sir.
1:13:33
Speaker 1: I'm in India. So the U.S. literally outsources calls to
1:13:37
Speaker 1: the U.S. embassy for U.S. nationals to fucking India. And
1:13:42
Speaker 1: then the guy was nice, though. And he explains to me,
1:13:45
Speaker 1: he says, oh, yes, sir.
1:13:46
Speaker 2: The U.S.
1:13:46
Speaker 1: Website, they've been having issues with it. I said, well,
1:13:48
Speaker 1: I've been over here three months. They've been having issues
1:13:50
Speaker 1: with it for three months.
1:13:51
Speaker 3: Yes, sir.
1:13:51
Speaker 1: They've actually the whole year they've been having issues with it.
1:13:54
Speaker 1: The point is, this guy tells me he said the
1:13:57
Speaker 1: website has been down for or they've been having issues
1:14:00
Speaker 1: with it for almost a year. It's just that you
1:14:04
Speaker 1: can't get an appointment. If you can get a rider,
1:14:06
Speaker 1: I literally, because I was in another city, they had
1:14:11
Speaker 1: gone from Narita outside Chiba to Tokyo. It's like a
1:14:15
Speaker 1: two-hour train ride to go to the embassy, and I
1:14:18
Speaker 1: get there, and then the person that was supposed to
1:14:21
Speaker 1: take payment just went home that day, wasn't there. One person,
1:14:25
Speaker 1: the whole embassy. And I actually went through the... the
1:14:30
Speaker 1: security and they're all like the Japanese security was kind.
1:14:34
Speaker 1: The American security is like, they're like delusional, schizophrenic, paranoid, PTSD,
1:14:39
Speaker 1: whack jobs. Like as an, I'm an American, I'm addressed
1:14:42
Speaker 1: in basically a suit. And I, and my, my wife's
1:14:46
Speaker 1: with me. She's like, you know, a very small little
1:14:48
Speaker 1: Japanese lady. We're walking up to the embassy and the,
1:14:51
Speaker 1: I'm going to fucking American. These soldiers have like their
1:14:54
Speaker 1: hands on their rifles. Like they're going to shoot. Not
1:14:57
Speaker 1: even like I'm approaching the gate. I'm approaching the visitor center.
1:15:00
Speaker 1: And they're like ready to shoot me. And I finally
1:15:03
Speaker 1: get up there and explain the situation. And I was
1:15:06
Speaker 1: arguing with them, which is typical for dealing with American
1:15:08
Speaker 1: government stuff. They finally let me use their phones. I said,
1:15:12
Speaker 1: I can't get an appointment. This is an emergency. I
1:15:14
Speaker 1: need to talk to somebody. They let me call through
1:15:17
Speaker 1: their security line. And I got someone on the phone.
1:15:20
Speaker 1: The woman said, oh, yeah, the website doesn't work. Yeah,
1:15:23
Speaker 1: we haven't been able to answer the phone. We can
1:15:24
Speaker 1: set you up for an appointment, though, here over the phone.
1:15:27
Speaker 1: I had to literally go through security physically at the
1:15:29
Speaker 1: embassy to get someone to actually talk to me to
1:15:32
Speaker 1: get an appointment. It was the most inefficient bullshit literally
1:15:36
Speaker 1: that I've ever gone through. It made the DMV feel
1:15:37
Speaker 1: like a cakewalk or a walk in the park. The
1:15:40
Speaker 1: point is they can't even get websites to work for
1:15:44
Speaker 1: the embassy or for Obamacare. If you want to throw
1:15:47
Speaker 1: this on the screen real quick, I told you about
1:15:49
Speaker 1: this before the show. Now the U.S. government has put
1:15:53
Speaker 1: all websites, 29,000 websites online. into one website, america.gov. Did
1:15:57
Speaker 1: you hear about this?
1:15:59
Speaker 2: No, I didn't. This is incredible. How is this not
1:16:01
Speaker 2: going to crash?
1:16:03
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's exactly. How's that not going to crash? So
1:16:06
Speaker 1: it's your one stop. As I said, when I first
1:16:08
Speaker 1: seen this, I told, so I says one stop shop
1:16:11
Speaker 1: for everything inefficient. I hope it works. It would be
1:16:14
Speaker 1: nice if it works, but, but more to the, the,
1:16:17
Speaker 1: the underlying point of that point, the, the, I'd shared
1:16:21
Speaker 1: this with you before the show. The president had literally
1:16:25
Speaker 1: just signed, I'll show this to you too, they literally
1:16:28
Speaker 1: just signed a super intelligence paper with Google and Facebook
1:16:33
Speaker 1: and all the big companies. So check this out. This
1:16:37
Speaker 1: is Donald Trump posting this. So this is an official paper.
1:16:42
Speaker 1: The president signed it. You can see Sundar Pichai from Google,
1:16:47
Speaker 1: Mark Zuckerberg, Greg Brockman, OpenAI, Elon Musk. This is the
1:16:51
Speaker 1: Joint Committee on Frontier Responsibilities. This deals with artificial intelligence
1:16:56
Speaker 1: and other things as well. I think it might have
1:16:59
Speaker 1: had something to do with superintelligence. But look at this.
1:17:02
Speaker 1: They spelled Donald Trump, Donald J. Trump, there's his signature,
1:17:06
Speaker 1: President of the United States. They spelled United wrong on
1:17:11
Speaker 1: the paper. Now, you had said, and I thought it
1:17:15
Speaker 1: was a brilliant observation, it could be, what did you
1:17:18
Speaker 1: say you thought that they did that for maybe to
1:17:21
Speaker 1: get a conversation going, promote it.
1:17:24
Speaker 2: Yeah. You know, a little misspelling there to get, uh,
1:17:28
Speaker 2: get people upset and start talking about it. It's kind
1:17:31
Speaker 2: of like with the, you know, uh, anything that they
1:17:34
Speaker 2: kind of want to do mainstream nowadays, they kind of
1:17:37
Speaker 2: got to make it over exaggerated or mess something up or, uh,
1:17:41
Speaker 2: you know, promote it to, uh, you know, do something
1:17:44
Speaker 2: really drastic like the Olympics. Now, you know, people are
1:17:48
Speaker 2: kind of decoding the Olympics the way that, you know, the,
1:17:51
Speaker 2: People have been decoding the Super Bowl for a really
1:17:54
Speaker 2: long time. It's kind of like the shock factor. And
1:17:56
Speaker 2: now it's become like a trend online to misspell things.
1:18:02
Speaker 2: Misspelling of things get more views. The mispronunciation of things
1:18:11
Speaker 2: get more views. Uh, because it drives comments and it
1:18:15
Speaker 2: drives people to your, uh, to your page and into,
1:18:19
Speaker 2: you know, that's not how it's supposed to be said.
1:18:21
Speaker 2: That's not, you misspelled this. No, 100%. That's probably what
1:18:26
Speaker 2: it is.
1:18:27
Speaker 3: Yeah.
1:18:27
Speaker 1: And as a matter of fact, I think, I think
1:18:29
Speaker 1: you were the first person I talked to about this
1:18:31
Speaker 1: when you, uh, outside, there was another guy I interviewed recently.
1:18:35
Speaker 1: We talked about it, but I had talked on my
1:18:38
Speaker 1: show about Sean Ryan and how Sean, I spelled his
1:18:41
Speaker 1: name wrong. because I didn't really know how to spell it.
1:18:45
Speaker 1: I didn't know who he was, honestly. I hadn't heard
1:18:46
Speaker 1: the name. I spelled it wrong because I thought that's
1:18:49
Speaker 1: how you spelled it. That was the original post. And
1:18:51
Speaker 1: my post went from like a normal three, four hundred
1:18:54
Speaker 1: views to two hundred thousand for spelling it wrong. I
1:18:59
Speaker 1: even looked up the chronovisor, that stupid fake device people
1:19:02
Speaker 1: say the Vatican has. I typed it incorrectly. I couldn't
1:19:05
Speaker 1: find many of the videos that people claim were from
1:19:07
Speaker 1: the coronavirus or typed it in. I did it live
1:19:09
Speaker 1: on air on a, on a recent show on video,
1:19:13
Speaker 1: typed it in incorrectly and magically everything pops up. So
1:19:17
Speaker 1: there's something to that, that maybe, maybe that's why they, they, uh,
1:19:20
Speaker 1: wrote it unites States. It could also be because unites
1:19:23
Speaker 1: is an ongoing thing. Like you're 19 something under a
1:19:26
Speaker 1: new agreement, maybe like a new United States. You could
1:19:29
Speaker 1: argue that from a legal perspective, maybe, uh, But I
1:19:33
Speaker 1: think it's important to point something else out here. When
1:19:38
Speaker 1: we're talking about hearing voices in your head or people
1:19:43
Speaker 1: that are genuine schizophrenics, the case of Sean Ryan is
1:19:46
Speaker 1: interesting because this is a guy who was in the military,
1:19:49
Speaker 1: CIA contractor. He probably did a lot of really horrible stuff.
1:19:53
Speaker 1: And he has all the classic symptoms of PTSD. But
1:19:57
Speaker 1: he's turned it and transformed it into, maybe knowingly, maybe unknowingly,
1:20:01
Speaker 1: into like, well, it's actually all demons and Jesus is
1:20:04
Speaker 1: the way. Which is fine if you love Jesus, but
1:20:07
Speaker 1: the problem is, even Corey Goodnow is like, yeah, those
1:20:09
Speaker 1: blue chickens I was talking to that gave me legal
1:20:11
Speaker 1: advice as well, those might have been demons. Jesus is
1:20:16
Speaker 1: really the true way. So not only are they utilizing
1:20:20
Speaker 1: the Jesus motif to drive, I think, clicks and views
1:20:23
Speaker 1: or try to tap into that audience, but... A lot
1:20:27
Speaker 1: of these people, I think, have been driven so insane
1:20:31
Speaker 1: by the propaganda or insane by the religious fanaticism that
1:20:37
Speaker 1: anytime anything happens, it's like it's demons. And there's something
1:20:40
Speaker 1: similar there to the voices in your head. Because whether
1:20:43
Speaker 1: you're hearing voices, the voice of God or the voice
1:20:46
Speaker 1: of angels or whatever, it's the paranoia of everywhere you look,
1:20:50
Speaker 1: there's demons. Like everything is demonic. Everything's the demon, demon, demon.
1:20:54
Speaker 1: that kind of paranoid schizophrenia is at the core of
1:20:57
Speaker 1: like the religious revitalism in the United States. It's at
1:21:00
Speaker 1: the core of the secret space program stuff. And it
1:21:04
Speaker 1: might be kind of at the core of all this
1:21:06
Speaker 1: technological stuff, but the technological stuff is, is, is very
1:21:10
Speaker 1: nuts and bolts, very mechanical and documented to be a,
1:21:15
Speaker 1: be a real thing that can be used to put
1:21:17
Speaker 1: those thoughts and ideas into your head. I mean, if
1:21:19
Speaker 1: you know a whole population of people believe for the
1:21:21
Speaker 1: most part in, in, Allah or Muhammad or whatever your
1:21:25
Speaker 1: conception is of that, you can beam that voice into
1:21:28
Speaker 1: their head. And it's the same voice that to an
1:21:30
Speaker 1: American Christian would be Jesus talking to them. But to
1:21:33
Speaker 1: a Muslim, it might be Muhammad or Allah talking to them.
1:21:35
Speaker 1: You don't have to really change it much, but it's
1:21:38
Speaker 1: just like the voice of what they think or what
1:21:41
Speaker 1: they perceive as God to be. I mean, really, it's
1:21:46
Speaker 1: already hard enough to tell what's real and what's not
1:21:49
Speaker 1: real and what's your own thoughts and what's not your thoughts.
1:21:53
Speaker 1: And it's one thing to go, like if you're on
1:21:55
Speaker 1: social media or if you happen to walk past a
1:21:57
Speaker 1: billboard for a supernatural TV show. But if you look
1:22:01
Speaker 1: at Germany, I pulled this story up from 2013. There's
1:22:04
Speaker 1: a German company that created a way to beam ads
1:22:07
Speaker 1: through the windows of the train. Americans don't know much
1:22:11
Speaker 1: about trains. I didn't know much about trains because we
1:22:13
Speaker 1: don't really use them or take them. But in Europe,
1:22:16
Speaker 1: you do. In Asia, you do. You put your head
1:22:17
Speaker 1: on the window to sleep. And it can literally beam
1:22:21
Speaker 1: advertisements into your brain while you're resting. And that was
1:22:25
Speaker 1: back in 2013. Take a look at that story writer.
1:22:28
Speaker 1: I pulled it up on the screen there. Sky Deutschland
1:22:32
Speaker 1: is the company.
1:22:34
Speaker 2: Wild story. Wild story. I read this when you sent
1:22:37
Speaker 2: it to me. But yeah, talk a little bit more
1:22:40
Speaker 2: about it. Yeah, the bone conduction technology, because this gets
1:22:43
Speaker 2: into the subconscious thing, too, and the dream realm and
1:22:47
Speaker 2: the astral space, because that's where your mind is most
1:22:50
Speaker 2: easily programmed in the dream state, right? That's where they
1:22:55
Speaker 2: want you in is that theta, beta state. type state
1:22:59
Speaker 2: to where that your mind can easily be programmed and
1:23:01
Speaker 2: that's another layer of the commercial right they want to
1:23:06
Speaker 2: program your subconscious and unconscious.
1:23:09
Speaker 1: Mind you can talk a little bit about this actually
1:23:14
Speaker 1: since you read it what i mean what did you
1:23:15
Speaker 1: make of this other than the subconscious stuff it was
1:23:18
Speaker 1: this shocking to you i doubt that it was but
1:23:20
Speaker 1: was this shocking to you that hadn't heard about this before.
1:23:26
Speaker 2: I mean, it's kind of like with anything else, like you,
1:23:29
Speaker 2: nothing is really surprising that it can be done. It's
1:23:32
Speaker 2: just kind of, you know, surprising whenever you read something
1:23:35
Speaker 2: like this and you see how old it was. It's
1:23:37
Speaker 2: kind of like with the Woody Norris stuff, like this
1:23:39
Speaker 2: stuff has been talked about and it's been utilized and
1:23:42
Speaker 2: been done since the early two thousands. And that's the
1:23:45
Speaker 2: thing is like, well, if they were doing it way
1:23:46
Speaker 2: back then, then like, what does it become now? What
1:23:50
Speaker 2: more can they do with this technology now? I mean,
1:23:53
Speaker 2: can it just be done at any point in time? Like,
1:23:56
Speaker 2: can they just flip a switch and then target hit
1:23:58
Speaker 2: somebody with whatever it is that they want them to
1:24:02
Speaker 2: hear easily? And I think that that is the case.
1:24:05
Speaker 2: I think that it can't be done that easily.
1:24:08
Speaker 1: Let's see if we, I've never actually watched this. Let's
1:24:11
Speaker 1: see if we can, it's called the talking window. It's
1:24:14
Speaker 1: from the, it's the sky, Deutschland.
1:24:16
Speaker 2: Yeah.
1:24:22
Speaker 1: Sky presents revolutionary new audio medium.
1:24:25
Speaker 2: Pause this frequently because of the music.
1:24:32
Speaker 1: I can turn it down all the way. Watch the
1:24:34
Speaker 1: video here. Talking windows. Tired commuters often rest their heads
1:24:39
Speaker 1: against windows. Here's people resting their heads on windows. Suddenly
1:24:44
Speaker 1: a voice inside their head is talking to them, it says.
1:24:50
Speaker 1: And then I think here's some, maybe they're describing it.
1:24:52
Speaker 1: Get Skygo for your mobile. Best entertainment and live sport.
1:24:57
Speaker 1: When you want it, where you want it. No one
1:25:01
Speaker 1: else can hear this message. This media innovation is made
1:25:07
Speaker 1: possible by a small technical device. It's called Skygo. It's
1:25:12
Speaker 1: attached to the window. A special transmitter attached to the
1:25:14
Speaker 1: window sending out an audible high-frequency vibrations. There you go.
1:25:20
Speaker 1: And you can hear it in your head and nobody
1:25:22
Speaker 1: else can hear it.
1:25:26
Speaker 2: Again, this feels like what 5G is. You have to
1:25:31
Speaker 2: set up these transmitters every so often because they can't penetrate.
1:25:36
Speaker 2: They're like that millimeter wave that can't go on for
1:25:41
Speaker 2: very far. You have to have them set up. all
1:25:45
Speaker 2: over the place it's not like normal regular cell phone
1:25:50
Speaker 2: tower like you can walk down a block and see
1:25:54
Speaker 2: one disguised as a tree they literally do that they
1:25:58
Speaker 2: disguise the 5g towers as trees and then you can
1:26:02
Speaker 2: walk i don't know uh three or four blocks down
1:26:07
Speaker 2: the road and you'll see another one.
1:26:11
Speaker 1: Yeah, they got me. I couldn't tell that that giant
1:26:14
Speaker 1: cactus that was three times the size of the other Saguaro's.
1:26:17
Speaker 1: And no, I did. It was a cell phone tower.
1:26:19
Speaker 1: It was really conspicuous.
1:26:22
Speaker 2: But that's just the thing that they're saying that it
1:26:24
Speaker 2: is now. Like, do you think that they're going to
1:26:28
Speaker 2: tear all those down and make a bunch of new
1:26:30
Speaker 2: ones for 6G?
1:26:32
Speaker 1: No, it probably probably just I'd assume they just adapted.
1:26:35
Speaker 3: Yeah. Adapted.
1:26:37
Speaker 1: So whether it's beaming a signal into your head on
1:26:39
Speaker 1: a train or I referenced this earlier. This is the 2023,
1:26:43
Speaker 1: actually October, 2023 Colorado theme park shooter where he was,
1:26:51
Speaker 1: he wrote on the wall of the bathroom reportedly. They
1:26:55
Speaker 1: said they couldn't confirm the dead man wrote it. I
1:26:57
Speaker 1: highly doubt anybody else wrote it, but I am not
1:27:00
Speaker 1: a killer. I just wanted to get into the caves,
1:27:04
Speaker 1: which is a very kind of esoteric thing to say.
1:27:06
Speaker 1: I just wanted to get into the caves. I'm not
1:27:08
Speaker 1: a killer. And it's, it's, it is very similar. in
1:27:12
Speaker 1: relation to Aaron Alexis. He didn't just, by the way,
1:27:15
Speaker 1: the Naval Yard shooter back in 2013, he didn't just write,
1:27:19
Speaker 1: this is my elf weapon, extremely low frequency elf weapon
1:27:23
Speaker 1: on his gun. He, and he said, better off this
1:27:27
Speaker 1: way was another thing he wrote. He also had reported,
1:27:30
Speaker 1: I have the police report somewhere. I don't know where
1:27:33
Speaker 1: it's at. Somewhere where he said that he was, I
1:27:36
Speaker 1: think it was Rhode Island. He was in Rhode Island.
1:27:38
Speaker 1: He was being followed by, by a group of three
1:27:41
Speaker 1: people that were beaming a signal into his head, telling him,
1:27:44
Speaker 1: like Dave Berkowitz, telling him to kill. I mean, there's
1:27:50
Speaker 1: like three or four episodes of The X-Files like that, too,
1:27:53
Speaker 1: so people hear that. Oh, that's just The X-Files. Well, yeah,
1:27:55
Speaker 1: but that was inspired from real things that actually happened.
1:27:59
Speaker 1: You know, it might not be true what happened in
1:28:01
Speaker 1: the episode, but it's inspired by something true. I wonder
1:28:04
Speaker 1: if you could actually find that if you look it up.
1:28:05
Speaker 1: Aaron Alexis, Police Report... Three people beaming signal head hotel
1:28:14
Speaker 1: because they were following him from hotel to hotel reportedly.
1:28:19
Speaker 1: Here it is. Naval Yard shooter Aaron Alexis heard voices
1:28:22
Speaker 1: in his head. Experienced paranoia, police report shows. Alexis called
1:28:28
Speaker 1: police Newport, Rhode Island. August 7th, this is 2013. After
1:28:35
Speaker 1: he switched hotels three times because he heard voices in
1:28:37
Speaker 1: the walls and ceilings talking to him, trying to keep...
1:28:40
Speaker 1: him awake and he wanted to file a harassment report
1:28:42
Speaker 1: according to police he told police that he heard voices
1:28:46
Speaker 1: that he that he feared were sending vibrations through his
1:28:49
Speaker 1: body which is like literally what the sky dutchland just
1:28:52
Speaker 1: described this this advertisement device doing sending vibrations through the walls.
1:28:58
Speaker 1: It's literal. And this was 2013. So that was, that
1:29:02
Speaker 1: was the same year, actually 2013, the same year that
1:29:05
Speaker 1: sky Dutchland announced that they have this tech to do
1:29:08
Speaker 1: this on train windows. I'm not saying sky Dutchlands involved
1:29:12
Speaker 1: in this. I'm saying the tech existed. Uh, they were
1:29:15
Speaker 1: out to harm him. Nothing had nothing that he had
1:29:17
Speaker 1: gotten into an argument on a plane to Rhode Island.
1:29:20
Speaker 1: He was convinced the person he argued with had spent,
1:29:22
Speaker 1: had sent three people to follow him. I can't believe
1:29:24
Speaker 1: I remember it all that he tells her that shit.
1:29:26
Speaker 1: three people to follow him. So he was being followed
1:29:28
Speaker 1: and they were beaming vibrations into his head. Oh, well,
1:29:31
Speaker 1: he's got a family history of mental illness.
1:29:34
Speaker 3: Sure.
1:29:35
Speaker 1: David Wilcock had a long history of mental illness too.
1:29:37
Speaker 1: He wrote about it in all of his books, but
1:29:39
Speaker 1: that doesn't mean that what he was talking to was,
1:29:43
Speaker 1: was not real. He could have been talking to something
1:29:46
Speaker 1: that was driving him even more insane. And it probably
1:29:49
Speaker 1: was something to have been government. It could have been
1:29:51
Speaker 1: somebody playing with something. It could have just been a
1:29:53
Speaker 1: wacko sending emails on the internet. in the case of Wilcox.
1:29:57
Speaker 1: But in the case of Aaron Alexis, getting someone just
1:30:00
Speaker 1: like in Colorado, hearing voices, I'm not a killer, I
1:30:03
Speaker 1: didn't want to do it, and then they made me
1:30:05
Speaker 1: do it. There's an episode of The X-Files called Pusher,
1:30:11
Speaker 1: where this guy has the ability to push people into
1:30:15
Speaker 1: having a heart attack or to thinking that they're being
1:30:17
Speaker 1: harmed when they're not. And there's a scene where this
1:30:21
Speaker 1: guy he's told to light himself on fire and he
1:30:23
Speaker 1: can't control himself, but he's aware enough to say, stop
1:30:27
Speaker 1: me while he's trying to light his body on fire.
1:30:29
Speaker 1: Stop me, stop me, stop me. Don't let it stop me.
1:30:31
Speaker 1: Stop me. It's kind of like that where you, like,
1:30:34
Speaker 1: you know, I don't want.
1:30:35
Speaker 3: To do this.
1:30:36
Speaker 1: So you write it on the wall and you have
1:30:38
Speaker 1: enough strength to shoot yourself before you kill a bunch
1:30:41
Speaker 1: of innocent people at a theme park. It sounds like that,
1:30:44
Speaker 1: but this is real. This isn't the X-Files. This is
1:30:46
Speaker 1: real stuff, man. It's, And it can't get any more official.
1:30:49
Speaker 1: It's like ABC News.
1:30:51
Speaker 2: This is mainstream.
1:30:52
Speaker 1: This isn't fringe crap. This isn't like even C2C stuff.
1:30:56
Speaker 1: This is mainline, major, like what you initially hear reported
1:31:01
Speaker 1: kind of stuff. But if you put the pieces together
1:31:03
Speaker 1: with the technology, I don't see what else it could be.
1:31:06
Speaker 1: You can say it's paranoia. And yeah, sure, it is
1:31:09
Speaker 1: one way or another. You cut it. But this is real.
1:31:13
Speaker 1: To what degree, though, is another question.
1:31:18
Speaker 2: Yes, what degree and, you know, were drugs involved? You know, like,
1:31:24
Speaker 2: that's a really big question. I mean, I know that
1:31:27
Speaker 2: there's some meth addicts. I think that freaking the walls
1:31:30
Speaker 2: are talking to them and that their electronics are talking
1:31:33
Speaker 2: to them and the fan is on. There's voices coming
1:31:36
Speaker 2: through the fan. You know what I mean? So, you know,
1:31:40
Speaker 2: and if you're unknowingly drugged with some kind of, you know,
1:31:45
Speaker 2: then you can think that you're completely going out of
1:31:48
Speaker 2: your mind.
1:31:49
Speaker 1: Yes.
1:31:50
Speaker 2: Possibility as well. But that story is very interesting. Yeah,
1:31:56
Speaker 2: I don't really know what to think of that. but
1:32:01
Speaker 2: it sounds exactly like the things that we've been talking
1:32:04
Speaker 2: about in the articles that you've been bringing up and
1:32:07
Speaker 2: what's really been going on. And we know that technology
1:32:10
Speaker 2: is there and the technology exists. I mean, we've been
1:32:12
Speaker 2: talking about it for, you know, the past hour and
1:32:16
Speaker 2: 20 minutes. So it's like, you know, what is really
1:32:18
Speaker 2: going on? And then that brings in the question. Okay. So, um,
1:32:24
Speaker 2: When I was making A Clockwork Shining, I had talked
1:32:30
Speaker 2: to this guy. His dad was the right-hand man of
1:32:37
Speaker 2: Sidney Gottlieb. And the topic of Project Bluebeam came up.
1:32:47
Speaker 2: And I was like talking to him about Project Bluebeam
1:32:49
Speaker 2: because it was around the time that people were kind
1:32:51
Speaker 2: of seeing. You remember that Mary Magdalene thing that was
1:32:56
Speaker 2: going on in other countries where people were, you know,
1:32:59
Speaker 2: supposedly seeing Mary Magdalene and the clouds and everything. And
1:33:04
Speaker 2: he was talking about that.
1:33:05
Speaker 1: And I was like, like the water, the building, that
1:33:09
Speaker 1: kind of stuff.
1:33:10
Speaker 2: Yeah, and I was like, well, what about Project Bluebeam?
1:33:14
Speaker 2: What do you think of that? And he was like, well,
1:33:17
Speaker 2: you know, Project Bluebeam wasn't a holographic technology that they
1:33:25
Speaker 2: could fool people with. That's something different. What Project Bluebeam's
1:33:30
Speaker 2: original goal was was to put the hallucinations directly inside
1:33:37
Speaker 2: of people's heads. So you get a collective hallucination on
1:33:46
Speaker 2: thousands and millions of people all at the exact same time.
1:33:51
Speaker 1: I can actually show, show people what you're talking about here.
1:33:54
Speaker 1: If you read the original blue beam, it's, it's basically
1:33:56
Speaker 1: science fiction, although it was presented by Sergei Monas, the
1:34:01
Speaker 1: Canadian journalist as like a real program. It's basically science fiction,
1:34:04
Speaker 1: even references a ton of science fiction at the very beginning.
1:34:07
Speaker 1: But if you read it, it says, I think he
1:34:09
Speaker 1: spells Muhammad differently. How did he spell that? Muhammad. Maybe Jesus.
1:34:14
Speaker 1: Here it is. Then the projections of Jesus, Muhammad, Buddha, Krishna, etc.
1:34:18
Speaker 1: will merge into one after correct explanation of the mysteries
1:34:20
Speaker 1: and revelations will have been disclosed. So talking about holographic
1:34:25
Speaker 1: images based on nearly identical signals combining to produce an
1:34:27
Speaker 1: image or hologram with deep perspective, which is equally applicable
1:34:32
Speaker 1: to acoustic ELF waves. That's what Aaron Alexis wrote on
1:34:37
Speaker 1: his gun, uh, VLF and LF waves and optical phenomena.
1:34:41
Speaker 1: So yeah, it's not a real program, but it is
1:34:44
Speaker 1: possible that this is so popular now that it's gotten
1:34:48
Speaker 1: the public, uh, the public, uh, frenzy about it, if
1:34:51
Speaker 1: you will, has gotten the government to take notice. And
1:34:54
Speaker 1: maybe they're like, well, I didn't think of that, but
1:34:56
Speaker 1: that's a great idea. Let's do that. It's kind of
1:34:59
Speaker 1: like that movie. Uh, uh, the hunt that came out
1:35:02
Speaker 1: a few years ago was a terrible movie, I thought,
1:35:04
Speaker 1: but where these liberal Democrat people were hunting humans. But
1:35:08
Speaker 1: the whole idea of the movie was that they actually weren't.
1:35:12
Speaker 1: They never planned to actually hunt people. It was all
1:35:14
Speaker 1: just conspiracy theory. But because they were joking about it,
1:35:18
Speaker 1: and people had thought it was all real, the main woman,
1:35:22
Speaker 1: I forget what her name was, she said, well, we
1:35:25
Speaker 1: started hunting people because you kept making fun of us
1:35:27
Speaker 1: and telling people that we were hunting people.
1:35:29
Speaker 4: We weren't.
1:35:30
Speaker 1: But you kept telling us that we were, so we
1:35:32
Speaker 1: were like, well, okay, we'll just do it then. See
1:35:34
Speaker 1: what it's all about. It could be that. Like, this
1:35:37
Speaker 1: is bullshit, but actually, I never even thought. That's great.
1:35:40
Speaker 1: I never thought of that. Get the holographic projectors out.
1:35:42
Speaker 1: Put Muhammad in the sky. Could be that. It probably
1:35:45
Speaker 1: is that.
1:35:47
Speaker 2: Well, we kind of already have a version of that
1:35:48
Speaker 2: with the drones and the amazing drone shows that they
1:35:52
Speaker 2: could do now. There was like a, I think it
1:35:55
Speaker 2: was Japan that was doing a really big Pokemon drone show.
1:36:00
Speaker 2: They had like Rayquaza in the sky and it looked
1:36:03
Speaker 2: like Rayquaza, dude. Like a giant-ass Rayquaza.
1:36:07
Speaker 1: Was that Japan? It might have been China. Let me see.
1:36:08
Speaker 1: It could have been China. Pokemon drone. If that happened
1:36:12
Speaker 1: and I missed, I'm going to be very upset. Oh, no, no, no.
1:36:16
Speaker 1: You're talking about the.
1:36:18
Speaker 2: Yeah, so.
1:36:19
Speaker 1: There was one in Yokohama. There was a drone show.
1:36:22
Speaker 1: That's the one you're thinking of. They put like a
1:36:23
Speaker 1: Pokeball in the sky. And there was a Mew. I
1:36:29
Speaker 1: think there was a Moltres and a Mewtwo. Or a Mew.
1:36:32
Speaker 1: Maybe a Mew. actually here, let me, let me see
1:36:36
Speaker 1: if I can pull it up for you. Here's a
1:36:40
Speaker 1: YouTube short video on it. Forgot about that. I thought that,
1:36:46
Speaker 1: I thought you were talking about the fireworks. They had
1:36:48
Speaker 1: a firework show a couple of months ago and they
1:36:50
Speaker 1: had pokey. I don't know how they make them, but
1:36:52
Speaker 1: pokey ball fireworks. They're all handmade by the way.
1:36:55
Speaker 2: And the different photos of those, those were really cool. Yeah.
1:36:59
Speaker 3: Yeah.
1:36:59
Speaker 1: Handmade Pokeball fireworks. Not the fireworks of Pokeball, but when
1:37:03
Speaker 1: it explodes, it explodes and it looks like a Pokeball. Anyway,
1:37:07
Speaker 1: here's the... I think this is the official one from Yokohama,
1:37:11
Speaker 1: which is basically just the Bay of Tokyo area. Cut
1:37:17
Speaker 1: that out before you get sued. Sorry. Charizard, Blastoise.
1:37:21
Speaker 2: I think this is the official one. Yeah. Pikachu. Yeah, yeah.
1:37:29
Speaker 1: Yeah, but due to this point, Japan's so advanced and everything,
1:37:32
Speaker 1: they might just genetically engineer animals to be Pokemon. They
1:37:35
Speaker 1: might even make Pikachu might be real. They're like 50
1:37:38
Speaker 1: years advanced from what other countries are doing. So you
1:37:43
Speaker 1: might actually have real Pokemon soon before you have dinosaurs. Anyway,
1:37:48
Speaker 1: that's yeah, I forgot about that.
1:37:52
Speaker 2: Yeah, so it's like, well, if you combine that with
1:37:57
Speaker 2: a hallucination, because that would be the only way that
1:37:59
Speaker 2: you could really pull that entire thing off. You know,
1:38:03
Speaker 2: like a Project Blue Beam type of scenario with a
1:38:06
Speaker 2: fake alien invasion that is 100% fake, you're not going
1:38:11
Speaker 2: to be able to pull it off. Like, there's too
1:38:13
Speaker 2: many people that are going to be like, no.
1:38:16
Speaker 1: I don't think you should. I'm sorry, go ahead.
1:38:20
Speaker 2: I think that the only way that you can do
1:38:22
Speaker 2: it is if it's real. You have to make it real.
1:38:27
Speaker 2: You have to blow up cities.
1:38:35
Speaker 1: There's two ways to look at this, I think, based
1:38:37
Speaker 1: on your argument. I think, number one, the drone display
1:38:40
Speaker 1: over New Jersey is a great example. If they're not actors,
1:38:44
Speaker 1: you had governors that were like, we have no idea
1:38:46
Speaker 1: what this is. I mean, this is serious. This could be,
1:38:50
Speaker 1: you know, foreign countries. This could be aliens. We don't
1:38:52
Speaker 1: really know. So it could be that those people are
1:38:56
Speaker 1: actors or it could be that my first argument to
1:39:00
Speaker 1: what you said would be to reinforce what you're saying
1:39:02
Speaker 1: is to have basically like a compartmentalized program where you
1:39:08
Speaker 1: don't tell anybody. So even the governors, you know, even
1:39:11
Speaker 1: people in the military generals, like nobody knows. It's like
1:39:14
Speaker 1: just a handful of people like the Manhattan Project And
1:39:17
Speaker 1: then you do it. And then you've got the military
1:39:20
Speaker 1: scrambling for whatever, you know, defending from etheric things in
1:39:24
Speaker 1: the sky if they're holographic and they can't shoot them down.
1:39:27
Speaker 1: So there's that angle. Or you could just simply, I
1:39:31
Speaker 1: think it would be much easier if I was in
1:39:33
Speaker 1: charge and doing it. I feel like it's much easier.
1:39:35
Speaker 1: It's actually cheaper and it's more efficient to just create
1:39:38
Speaker 1: the narrative in the media to frame it like that
1:39:42
Speaker 1: rather than actually have to do something in the sky.
1:39:44
Speaker 1: Because I mean, my God, look at these fake, ufo
1:39:47
Speaker 1: videos that are all over x a significant portion of
1:39:50
Speaker 1: ufology is genuinely convinced that aliens just invaded tehran a
1:39:53
Speaker 1: few days ago so it it doesn't take much to
1:39:57
Speaker 1: convince the public of stuff like that um but i
1:40:01
Speaker 1: mean if you if you wanted to go to that
1:40:03
Speaker 1: extent i don't think they'd blame aliens i think if
1:40:05
Speaker 1: something was going to blow up they would just blame
1:40:09
Speaker 1: iran in this case i think they're more interested in
1:40:11
Speaker 1: framing this as armageddon than they are a uh like
1:40:15
Speaker 1: an alien invasion. Because the real aliens are coming through
1:40:18
Speaker 1: the machines, I believe. That's what the artificial intelligence or
1:40:22
Speaker 1: whatever you want to call it, the quantum computers, maybe
1:40:26
Speaker 1: not literally, but maybe figuratively or literally, if you talk
1:40:29
Speaker 1: about Geordi Rose and others, even Musk, where they're talking
1:40:34
Speaker 1: about the Lovecraftian old ones, these intelligences that are outside
1:40:38
Speaker 1: of our perceptions of space and time, things in the machine,
1:40:42
Speaker 1: the Shoggoth, the Cthulhu, which AI is really good at
1:40:45
Speaker 1: depicting that kind of stuff. I mean, plus, I mean,
1:40:48
Speaker 1: my God, the microchips, the processors look like a lot
1:40:52
Speaker 1: of them, not all of them, but a lot of them,
1:40:53
Speaker 1: or just the general design look like sigils. Most of
1:40:58
Speaker 1: the companies use the same imagery of the eye, you know,
1:41:00
Speaker 1: open AI, NVIDIA is the evil eye, Oracle, the sea
1:41:03
Speaker 1: and the future, Stargate's the gate to the other world.
1:41:05
Speaker 1: Bill Gates is the bill, bell, the devil, Gates, the
1:41:08
Speaker 1: gates of hell. Sam Altman is Samael, the angel of death, Altman,
1:41:12
Speaker 1: the altar of man. And Yuval Harari, his name is
1:41:16
Speaker 1: literally a demonic name. Yuval is a demon. He looks
1:41:19
Speaker 1: like Yuval. And he even talks about, I think it's
1:41:21
Speaker 1: move 37 or something, 38, which is a chess move
1:41:25
Speaker 1: that AI used to win some event. I don't remember
1:41:28
Speaker 1: the story. But Yuval, the demon, literally controls that number
1:41:32
Speaker 1: of legions. This stuff is way, way more... than just
1:41:38
Speaker 1: even technology. It's, it's a new religious system, like with
1:41:41
Speaker 1: those data centers we were talking about on top of
1:41:43
Speaker 1: everything else. And in regard to religion, I know you
1:41:48
Speaker 1: just pulled it off the screen, but if you throw
1:41:50
Speaker 1: it back up real fast, just this one article, this is, uh, uh,
1:41:54
Speaker 1: I had forgot about this. I was talking to Clyde
1:41:56
Speaker 1: Lewis and I'll say this on air for, for, for
1:42:00
Speaker 1: you writer. I think I told you this, he was
1:42:03
Speaker 1: giving you major props for your work on the new
1:42:05
Speaker 1: documentary and, I'm guessing some of your stuff on Charlie
1:42:09
Speaker 1: Kirk and all that as well. So he was giving
1:42:11
Speaker 1: you major props on that, which I, I gave them
1:42:13
Speaker 1: to you too. And I'd like to say it again
1:42:15
Speaker 1: that I, your movies are really great. I still liked
1:42:19
Speaker 1: clockwork shining the most, no offense. That was my favorite movie,
1:42:22
Speaker 1: but the gate programs, great stuff too. We did a
1:42:24
Speaker 1: great interview on, on my show about that. Anyway, Clyde had,
1:42:28
Speaker 1: when I said we're going to do a show in
1:42:29
Speaker 1: this Clyde had mentioned this story to me, I had
1:42:31
Speaker 1: forgotten about it. This guy's name is, I pronounce it correctly.
1:42:37
Speaker 1: Old Slahi, and he was a detainee at Guantanamo Bay.
1:42:41
Speaker 1: Did I tell you about this or I send this
1:42:43
Speaker 1: to you?
1:42:43
Speaker 2: I don't think so. But does it involve the Kubart counterintelligence?
1:42:50
Speaker 1: I don't think so. This is more about voices in
1:42:52
Speaker 1: his head. So this guy's a detainee and he told,
1:42:57
Speaker 1: so this military psychologist talking to him, he said that
1:43:02
Speaker 1: he was hearing voices. And if you read this entire article,
1:43:06
Speaker 1: listen to this. I started to hallucinate and hear voices
1:43:09
Speaker 1: as clear as crystal. I heard my family in a
1:43:12
Speaker 1: casual familial conversation in which I couldn't take part. It's
1:43:16
Speaker 1: easy to clone voices with cell phones and the way
1:43:19
Speaker 1: that technology has people's voices on the internet. I heard
1:43:23
Speaker 1: Quran readings with a heavenly voice. Well, that's just like
1:43:27
Speaker 1: that guy that you played the clip of earlier said,
1:43:30
Speaker 1: putting verses from religious texts into people's heads. I heard
1:43:34
Speaker 1: music from my country Later on, the guards use these hallucinations.
1:43:40
Speaker 1: And we're talking with funny voices through the plumbing, encouraging
1:43:43
Speaker 1: me to hurt the guard and plot an escape. But
1:43:45
Speaker 1: I wasn't misled by them, even though I played along
1:43:48
Speaker 1: when I heard somebody, maybe a genie. But I wasn't
1:43:52
Speaker 1: listening to them. This is that's insane. And I don't
1:43:55
Speaker 1: think this I have no idea who this person is.
1:43:58
Speaker 1: I don't think that they're they're delusional. I think that
1:44:01
Speaker 1: that has all the hallmarks of what we've been talking
1:44:03
Speaker 1: about tonight. I mean, literally the guy that you just. described,
1:44:07
Speaker 1: and played the clip of, he was selling this technology
1:44:10
Speaker 1: to the military. And then here's the military detaining so-called terrorists,
1:44:17
Speaker 1: and they're hearing the exact same thing that that guy
1:44:20
Speaker 1: said that he's selling to the military. This is, by
1:44:23
Speaker 1: the way, in 2013, the story, 2013. And there's people
1:44:27
Speaker 1: like Gitmo that are hearing exactly what that guy said
1:44:31
Speaker 1: the military could use this technology to do, put voices
1:44:34
Speaker 1: in your head about religious things. So anyway, that's just
1:44:37
Speaker 1: one last thing I wanted to bring up that I
1:44:39
Speaker 1: had on the docket here.
1:44:43
Speaker 2: Well, that is really fascinating. And where would be the
1:44:47
Speaker 2: best place to run some sort of operation and do
1:44:50
Speaker 2: that type of testing on? You would want to do
1:44:52
Speaker 2: it on terrorists, right? I mean, that's like the whole thing.
1:44:56
Speaker 2: You want to test on prisoners. You want to test
1:44:59
Speaker 2: on unsuspecting people. You want to drop evidence. some kind
1:45:03
Speaker 2: of genetically engineered modified bug on unsuspecting populations. You want
1:45:11
Speaker 2: to test on the less fortunate. You want to test
1:45:14
Speaker 2: on prisoners, mental asylum patients. That's where you'd want to
1:45:18
Speaker 2: do it. Where better to use this technology to figure
1:45:23
Speaker 2: out how it works and if we can convince somebody
1:45:26
Speaker 2: to escape and to take out a guard or kill
1:45:28
Speaker 2: someone than inside of a controlled environment Facility inside of
1:45:34
Speaker 2: a prison.
1:45:35
Speaker 1: Yeah, but bro, Trump shut Gitmo down. He wanted the key.
1:45:40
Speaker 1: He was going to shut it all down. Yeah, then
1:45:42
Speaker 1: they expanded it. I mean, the prison system in general,
1:45:45
Speaker 1: but the medical system for a century or so, they've
1:45:51
Speaker 1: openly been experimenting on people with drugs, vaccines, new tech.
1:45:56
Speaker 1: I mean, the stuff that they do in prisons is
1:45:58
Speaker 1: well documented, that they just experiment with drugs, like pharmaceutical companies.
1:46:02
Speaker 1: They experiment with drugs on prisoners. It's not a new thing.
1:46:07
Speaker 1: And I mean, Guantanamo is sort of off the map,
1:46:12
Speaker 1: in a sense. Like you just said, it's a perfect
1:46:14
Speaker 1: place to experiment with tech like that. It's a controlled,
1:46:18
Speaker 1: it's a mostly controlled environment, a controlled setting. And I mean,
1:46:22
Speaker 1: maybe it's because the guy was a Muslim, but It
1:46:25
Speaker 1: also could be because they are intentionally putting those sounds like,
1:46:30
Speaker 1: like the Quran into his head. It could just as
1:46:33
Speaker 1: equally be a Christian and they're hearing, you know, this,
1:46:37
Speaker 1: which to me is really stupid. But like, if I'm
1:46:39
Speaker 1: laying in bed and I hear, I hear a voice, Hey, Ryan,
1:46:43
Speaker 1: this is Jesus. What's going on, bro? They're like, that's
1:46:47
Speaker 1: obviously what are you fucking ties on Jesus. But some
1:46:50
Speaker 1: people are really like delusional. And they, I think they'd
1:46:52
Speaker 1: be like, Oh my God, Jesus, what's going on? you know,
1:46:56
Speaker 1: and they'd probably start talking to it. So I don't,
1:47:00
Speaker 1: it's kind of like, I wanted to ask you a
1:47:02
Speaker 1: question here. There's a, so, you know, they just changed
1:47:05
Speaker 1: the name of AI to SI. It's like super intelligence
1:47:10
Speaker 1: or something like that. Well, the state of California, Gavin
1:47:16
Speaker 1: Newsom signed a, I don't know, like an executive. It's
1:47:20
Speaker 1: so stupid, man. It's just an executive order that, calls
1:47:24
Speaker 1: it AI. If you're in California, you have to call
1:47:26
Speaker 1: it AI. His whole thing was like, he literally posted,
1:47:30
Speaker 1: you're welcome, America. The issue is what we should call
1:47:34
Speaker 1: this weapon system is whether we call it AI or S.
1:47:37
Speaker 1: That's the big thing. People are like, the Democrats, yeah,
1:47:40
Speaker 1: you get Trump, you call it AI, not S. It's
1:47:43
Speaker 1: just so stupid. I bring that up because one, why
1:47:49
Speaker 1: does that matter? It obviously doesn't. I'm wondering what you
1:47:53
Speaker 1: think about the candace owens story you know we know
1:47:56
Speaker 1: what blackmail we know what fake stories we know what
1:48:01
Speaker 1: propaganda is and what it can do we also know
1:48:03
Speaker 1: that as we played earlier there's a there's tech to
1:48:07
Speaker 1: change surveillance footage text messages emails all that kind of
1:48:10
Speaker 1: stuff but there's this claim that candace owens is like
1:48:14
Speaker 1: a lesbian or something like i don't i would love
1:48:16
Speaker 1: to hear what you think of that but also i
1:48:18
Speaker 1: don't understand why that matter like glenn greenwald they did
1:48:21
Speaker 1: the same thing to him oh he's got some weird
1:48:23
Speaker 1: sexual fetishes and like that discredits what he writes like
1:48:28
Speaker 1: what it discredits candace owens wasn't friends with charlie kirk
1:48:31
Speaker 1: because she liked to go down on women or something
1:48:33
Speaker 1: like is that supposed to discredit people it's just i
1:48:37
Speaker 1: think of that because it sounds just as stupid to
1:48:39
Speaker 1: me As like, if I'm laying in bed and Jesus
1:48:41
Speaker 1: starts talking to me, like who believes that? Is that
1:48:43
Speaker 1: really a thing? Like, Oh, she's a lesbian. I don't,
1:48:46
Speaker 1: what does that matter? She was still friends with Charlotte Kirk.
1:48:49
Speaker 1: I don't know. What do you think of all that?
1:48:51
Speaker 1: What's the thing that's going on here? What's the issue?
1:48:55
Speaker 2: I don't believe that the lesbian allegations are real at all.
1:49:01
Speaker 2: I believe that they're 100% completely fabricated in order to
1:49:06
Speaker 2: try and discredit Candace Owens. And people can yell at
1:49:12
Speaker 2: me all that they want. But I 100% believe that
1:49:15
Speaker 2: she has done what everybody that was closest to Charlie
1:49:19
Speaker 2: should have been doing this entire time. And regardless if
1:49:24
Speaker 2: you like her or if you don't like her, that's
1:49:27
Speaker 2: kind of irrelevant in this equation. And even if she
1:49:31
Speaker 2: is gay and even if she is a lesbian, it
1:49:33
Speaker 2: doesn't matter. It literally does not matter. I think that
1:49:37
Speaker 2: the only thing that they could possibly do, because in
1:49:39
Speaker 2: the beginning, Ryan, it was that he hated Charlie Kirk
1:49:45
Speaker 2: and that's why she was investigating and that's why she
1:49:47
Speaker 2: wanted to take down the TPUSA, right? And then it became... Oh, well,
1:49:52
Speaker 2: she's in love with Charlie Kirk and she secretly wanted
1:49:55
Speaker 2: to be with Charlie Kirk and he didn't want to
1:49:57
Speaker 2: be with her. And then she became jealous that he
1:50:01
Speaker 2: wanted to be with Erica. And now it's neither one
1:50:05
Speaker 2: of those things. Now it's because she's a lesbian. And
1:50:10
Speaker 2: if you try and verify any of those screenshots from
1:50:12
Speaker 2: any of those, uh, adult friend finder websites, you can't,
1:50:17
Speaker 2: there's no verification on it that you can't, you can't
1:50:19
Speaker 2: find the metadata. They're, they're literally just, uh, they're, they're
1:50:24
Speaker 2: fake profiles that's been edited to make it look like that.
1:50:28
Speaker 2: They're real.
1:50:31
Speaker 1: I am leaning in that direction. This might sound like
1:50:33
Speaker 1: a silly thing to address, but I actually think it's
1:50:35
Speaker 1: important because I'll put it this way. One, They accused
1:50:40
Speaker 1: her of more than just being a lesbian. Part of
1:50:42
Speaker 1: it was that she was taking money from Larry Ellison.
1:50:44
Speaker 1: I don't know if you heard that. Now, I can
1:50:48
Speaker 1: believe that it's possible that her whole, I just discovered
1:50:53
Speaker 1: that Israel is an issue and I'm going to be
1:50:55
Speaker 1: an expert on it now. And the algorithm allows me
1:50:58
Speaker 1: to do that. And then suddenly she's, quote, discredited or
1:51:01
Speaker 1: at least successive discrediting attempts to discredit people who look
1:51:06
Speaker 1: into Charlie Kirk or Israel or whatever the case might be.
1:51:09
Speaker 1: I can believe that maybe she did take money, that
1:51:11
Speaker 1: she is a disinfo agent. I tend not to believe that,
1:51:14
Speaker 1: but I can definitely see that. If it's the other
1:51:16
Speaker 1: way around, I mean, lots of countries use sex and
1:51:20
Speaker 1: blackmail and stuff like that, but Israel's famous for that.
1:51:23
Speaker 1: And they're also, as we just played, they're famous and
1:51:25
Speaker 1: they have technology to be able to change things like
1:51:28
Speaker 1: your emails, your text messages. So if you can do that,
1:51:33
Speaker 1: you could I mean, maybe she did have those profiles.
1:51:35
Speaker 1: They could change them to say whatever they want them
1:51:37
Speaker 1: to say, even if they are real. Or they can
1:51:40
Speaker 1: just completely fabricate them, you know, and share screenshots of things.
1:51:44
Speaker 1: There's like six pixels. You can barely read what it says.
1:51:46
Speaker 1: You know, that kind of stuff. But if that's... Maybe
1:51:50
Speaker 1: it's to discredit her among the conspiracy right that are like,
1:51:53
Speaker 1: we don't like gays. So like if she's gay, I
1:51:56
Speaker 1: guess all the stuff she says is wrong. But it
1:51:59
Speaker 1: just shows you how.
1:52:03
Speaker 1: Depraved the propaganda the mudslinging the lying is it also
1:52:09
Speaker 1: shows you how just how like with the AISI thing
1:52:14
Speaker 1: how petty how stupid how dumb the general conversation is
1:52:20
Speaker 1: about anything and it also doesn't make sense to me
1:52:24
Speaker 1: it'd be like if like all the stuff I said
1:52:26
Speaker 1: tonight on the show or stuff that you've said someone
1:52:29
Speaker 1: was to say well you can't that Ryan Gable guys
1:52:31
Speaker 1: he's crazy But yeah, but he showed all the articles
1:52:34
Speaker 1: where he got his sources from. He showed the articles. Yeah,
1:52:38
Speaker 1: but he's crazy. Well, why is he crazy? You can't
1:52:40
Speaker 1: trust him. Why can't you trust him? Well, he likes
1:52:42
Speaker 1: East Asian women. What the fuck does that mean? Art
1:52:45
Speaker 1: Bell's show wasn't a great show because he liked Filipinos.
1:52:48
Speaker 1: Why is the sexual thing always like a discrediting? You
1:52:51
Speaker 1: can't trust Greenwald's reporting. He likes to put on BDS gear.
1:52:55
Speaker 1: And what is that supposed to mean? Maybe I'm missing something.
1:52:59
Speaker 1: What's that supposed to mean?
1:53:00
Speaker 2: It's a last-ditch effort. It's the last thing to try
1:53:04
Speaker 2: and take somebody down with. And I'll tell you exactly
1:53:07
Speaker 2: what happened. What happened was is that the UVU internal
1:53:12
Speaker 2: report got released. Are you aware of that? Of the
1:53:16
Speaker 2: independent review of security measures that happened at Utah Valley
1:53:21
Speaker 2: University on the day of the Charlie Kirk assassination. There
1:53:24
Speaker 2: was an independent review that was done that got released
1:53:29
Speaker 2: and it did not look good for TPUSA at all. Period.
1:53:35
Speaker 2: It was bad news for them. And in order to
1:53:39
Speaker 2: try and get people off track of that, to not
1:53:43
Speaker 2: bring down that kind of heat, they had to come
1:53:45
Speaker 2: out with something. They had to dig up something, fabrication
1:53:50
Speaker 2: on Candace Owens. And that's what the entire thing has
1:53:53
Speaker 2: been about, really, from the beginning. It's not about... Charlie
1:53:59
Speaker 2: Kirk at all. It's not about finding who really murdered
1:54:03
Speaker 2: him because it's obviously not Tyler Robinson. It's not about
1:54:06
Speaker 2: any of that. It's about taking down Candace Owens. And
1:54:09
Speaker 2: I did a short video today. I was like, if
1:54:11
Speaker 2: you want to take down Candace Owens, you got to
1:54:15
Speaker 2: come up with something better than what she's saying. You
1:54:21
Speaker 2: have to come up with evidence and a theory or
1:54:23
Speaker 2: some kind of investigation. You have to do something that
1:54:26
Speaker 2: makes more sense. than the things that she's come up with.
1:54:30
Speaker 2: That's the only way that you can beat her. That's
1:54:32
Speaker 2: the only thing that you can do. Slandering, smearing, and
1:54:37
Speaker 2: attacking people just doesn't work anymore. People can see right
1:54:41
Speaker 2: through that because you can just get on, do a
1:54:45
Speaker 2: live real quick, and explain everything that's going on. And
1:54:50
Speaker 2: if you seem more reasonable, then people are going to
1:54:52
Speaker 2: side with you. If you act like you know what
1:54:55
Speaker 2: you're talking about. And that's the whole thing that they
1:54:57
Speaker 2: tried there for a while. Andrew Wilson tried to come
1:55:01
Speaker 2: out with some footage that disproved one of Candace Owens'
1:55:06
Speaker 2: things that she was saying about Fort Huachuca and showing
1:55:09
Speaker 2: evidence of that, you know, Erica Kirk was actually with
1:55:16
Speaker 2: Charlie Kirk at the time that Candace's whistleblower said that
1:55:20
Speaker 2: he saw her at Fort Huachuca. Okay. And he tried
1:55:25
Speaker 2: to release that footage, but it turns out that the
1:55:28
Speaker 2: footage that you can't prove that Erica was there because
1:55:32
Speaker 2: the person in the background was actually a commercial. It
1:55:36
Speaker 2: was a banking commercial and the wall behind Charlie from
1:55:40
Speaker 2: the time that they said that there's like a drawing wall.
1:55:42
Speaker 2: It's like a chalkboard that his kids would write on
1:55:45
Speaker 2: is the exact same chalkboard that From a video that
1:55:48
Speaker 2: he posted a year prior. She's telling me the kids drawings.
1:55:54
Speaker 2: Are the exact same. On the back of the chalkboard.
1:55:59
Speaker 2: You got two little kids. And they're the exact same
1:56:01
Speaker 2: a year later. You know. So I've just learned. To always.
1:56:07
Speaker 2: Step back and just. Figure out what's going on. Before
1:56:11
Speaker 2: I ever come on and say anything. But that's the
1:56:13
Speaker 2: opposite of the way. That this community operates. I even
1:56:17
Speaker 2: seen Alex Jones come out and be like, Kara, someone
1:56:20
Speaker 2: just needs to admit that she's gay, that she's a lesbian.
1:56:24
Speaker 2: You got to come out right now. Just tell us.
1:56:27
Speaker 2: Just tell us. Because if you're lying about being gay,
1:56:29
Speaker 2: then what else are you lying about? That's what came
1:56:31
Speaker 2: out of Alex Jones' mouth today.
1:56:33
Speaker 1: We got the lesbianphotos.cam shot, please. Lesbianphotos.cam shot.
1:56:38
Speaker 2: Go to Infowars.com and buy all of our merch. Get
1:56:41
Speaker 2: Bluetooth right now. We need the Bluetooth. If you don't
1:56:43
Speaker 2: get the Bluetooth, we're not going to be able to
1:56:45
Speaker 2: defeat the globalists.
1:56:46
Speaker 1: But anyway, does he sell blue chews? Maybe it's like blue, methylene, blue.
1:56:49
Speaker 2: Chew, methylene, blue chew. I'm just doing the thing that everybody,
1:56:54
Speaker 2: the blue chews, all that, the boner pills, you want
1:56:58
Speaker 2: to fight the apocalypse. You want to win the apocalypse.
1:57:00
Speaker 2: You want to defeat the globalists on the, and the
1:57:02
Speaker 2: zombies you got to get, but you got to fight
1:57:03
Speaker 2: them with a rock hard bone.
1:57:04
Speaker 1: You know what that sounds like? It sounds, I was
1:57:08
Speaker 1: playing GTA five again, getting ready for six. And, uh,
1:57:12
Speaker 1: like the amunate, I'm sure you play GTA five, right? The, the, the,
1:57:18
Speaker 1: the ammunition commercials are like that. It's like, be prepared
1:57:21
Speaker 1: for the apocalypse, rocket launchers. And so it's, it's, it's,
1:57:25
Speaker 1: it's just sounds like what you said there. It's funny.
1:57:28
Speaker 2: So that's pretty much what's going on. And, you know,
1:57:32
Speaker 2: there's so many people that are flip-floppers in this community
1:57:35
Speaker 2: that they don't have any kind of, like soon as
1:57:39
Speaker 2: one thing comes out, they're all on board with that.
1:57:41
Speaker 2: And then the next day, as soon as something comes out,
1:57:43
Speaker 2: this proving that thing that they're all, they're immediately all
1:57:46
Speaker 2: on board. It's like, we're all like striving for like
1:57:48
Speaker 2: content to like talk about, like, I don't understand it
1:57:51
Speaker 2: in a lot of different ways. Like, and they, they
1:57:54
Speaker 2: can't stand up for the, they don't have like a,
1:57:57
Speaker 2: a strong freaking bone in their body. They don't have
1:58:00
Speaker 2: one strong boner in their body that will let them
1:58:05
Speaker 2: be for one thing.
1:58:06
Speaker 1: We'll talk about mind control. See, this is all without...
1:58:09
Speaker 1: having to have the nuts and bolts tech. I mean,
1:58:12
Speaker 1: X is, as you could say, it's, it's a sort
1:58:14
Speaker 1: of a psychological weapon system, but you don't need to
1:58:17
Speaker 1: beam thoughts into people's heads. You just have to put
1:58:19
Speaker 1: the thoughts or the, the ideas onto, uh, the timeline
1:58:23
Speaker 1: of an influencer. That's pretty much it. You can do
1:58:26
Speaker 1: whether it's a vaccine or if it's a story about
1:58:28
Speaker 1: Candace Owens or it's a story about AI or SI
1:58:31
Speaker 1: or whatever the case might be. So you don't even
1:58:34
Speaker 1: have to beam signals into people's heads. It's like mind
1:58:37
Speaker 1: control through appeal to authority fallacies.
1:58:43
Speaker 2: Yeah, and that's not me. You know, I like Alex Jones.
1:58:47
Speaker 2: I think he's done a lot of good stuff. He's
1:58:49
Speaker 2: come out with a lot of really great things, but
1:58:51
Speaker 2: it's just like those types of those types of, and
1:58:54
Speaker 2: I see it all the time and it's not just him.
1:58:56
Speaker 2: It's like a lot of people, they, they want to
1:59:00
Speaker 2: play both sides of the game. Like they, they can't,
1:59:07
Speaker 2: it's like they're so confused on what it is that
1:59:10
Speaker 2: they're supposed to believe, but they're also content creators. So
1:59:13
Speaker 2: they got to keep churning out the, same type of
1:59:17
Speaker 2: thing and like I made a comment on X and
1:59:19
Speaker 2: it's done really well I was like hey I like
1:59:23
Speaker 2: Alex Jones but Alex Jones uh you know he'll he'll
1:59:28
Speaker 2: blow with whatever way the world uh whatever way the
1:59:32
Speaker 2: wind is blowing that day you know and that's how
1:59:35
Speaker 2: a lot of people are uh in this community unfortunately.
1:59:40
Speaker 1: There's a great example of, I know we're about out
1:59:42
Speaker 1: of time, but it's a great example of that in the, uh,
1:59:44
Speaker 1: the recent UFOs over Tehran story. And he's Alex had
1:59:49
Speaker 1: Ashton Forbes on recently who really hates me. He hates
1:59:51
Speaker 1: a lot of people that we know, uh, because we
1:59:54
Speaker 1: question his, uh, teleportation videos, but he had Ashton Forbes
1:59:58
Speaker 1: on Ashton Forbes is just a real, I mean, just
2:00:01
Speaker 1: not a nice guy. I don't think he's a very self-centered, uh,
2:00:05
Speaker 1: egotistical narcissistic maniac as far as I'm concerned. But anyway,
2:00:09
Speaker 1: Ashton Forbes was sharing a video, and I could probably
2:00:12
Speaker 1: pull it up and share it with you if you
2:00:13
Speaker 1: want to see it. He was sharing a video of
2:00:14
Speaker 1: what looked like missiles that were disappearing into what he
2:00:19
Speaker 1: said was a portal. And I don't know if it's
2:00:22
Speaker 1: on this page on X here. I'll try to find
2:00:27
Speaker 1: it real fast. So he was sharing these videos, one
2:00:30
Speaker 1: of them from Iran. He was saying these missiles are
2:00:32
Speaker 1: going into a portal and they're disappearing. And that's proof
2:00:37
Speaker 1: that we've got this ability to, to, to move material
2:00:41
Speaker 1: out of this reality. And yeah, but if you, if
2:00:44
Speaker 1: you look, if you just based on what we had
2:00:46
Speaker 1: said about blue beam earlier, or what I had said
2:00:49
Speaker 1: about creating the optics of something without actually having to
2:00:52
Speaker 1: do anything physically, you just have to create the perception,
2:00:57
Speaker 1: the story. Well, if you just tell people that these
2:00:59
Speaker 1: are missiles that are heading into a portal and then
2:01:01
Speaker 1: they're disappearing and we have the tech to do that,
2:01:03
Speaker 1: that is what you initially see. But when you look
2:01:05
Speaker 1: closer at the video, it's clearly not a portal. I
2:01:10
Speaker 1: don't know if it's the moon or what it is,
2:01:11
Speaker 1: but it's a bright object in the sky, but the
2:01:14
Speaker 1: missiles are flying past it and exploding behind it. So
2:01:18
Speaker 1: they're not disappearing into a portal and vanishing. But if
2:01:23
Speaker 1: you tell people that's what it is, that is what
2:01:26
Speaker 1: it appears to be. And Ashton Forbes has been on
2:01:30
Speaker 1: a lot of shows recently promoting that that's what the
2:01:32
Speaker 1: video shows. It shows that we have the technology to
2:01:35
Speaker 1: do that when that's That's not actually what's happened. In fact,
2:01:39
Speaker 1: I found the video here that he had posted. I'll
2:01:42
Speaker 1: show it to you. Here's a great example of what
2:01:45
Speaker 1: I'm talking about and what we were talking about earlier.
2:01:50
Speaker 1: So this is reportedly, I don't know where it's actually from,
2:01:54
Speaker 1: reportedly above Iran. So here's the video. You can see
2:01:58
Speaker 1: this object in the sky. I mean, considering that I
2:02:01
Speaker 1: went to the East City Ranch and they literally thought
2:02:04
Speaker 1: the moon was a flying saucer until it, rows above
2:02:07
Speaker 1: the tree line they're like oh that's the moon i
2:02:10
Speaker 1: wouldn't be surprised if this is the actual moon but
2:02:12
Speaker 1: anyway let's let's look if you look at this video
2:02:14
Speaker 1: you can see see these little objects these little missiles
2:02:19
Speaker 1: going up to this larger object or the moon or
2:02:21
Speaker 1: whatever it is they say it's a portal and then
2:02:24
Speaker 1: they disappear well maybe because i mean i don't know
2:02:28
Speaker 1: anything about rocketry but maybe they have enough fuel to
2:02:31
Speaker 1: get them there and then they can go the last
2:02:34
Speaker 1: few feet or they Detonate. Or maybe if you watch
2:02:38
Speaker 1: the whole thing, watch up here in the top right corner.
2:02:41
Speaker 1: You see the explosions? There's explosions up in the top
2:02:45
Speaker 1: right corner.
2:02:45
Speaker 3: See that?
2:02:46
Speaker 1: So they're going past the so-called portal and detonating. They're
2:02:51
Speaker 1: not going into a portal. You can see there's explosions
2:02:54
Speaker 1: all over the place. You see it?
2:02:57
Speaker 2: Yeah.
2:02:57
Speaker 1: But here's Ashton Forbes. We really need to come clean
2:03:00
Speaker 1: about solving fusion problems. He doesn't sound like Alex Jones.
2:03:03
Speaker 1: He's more like, we really need to come clean about
2:03:05
Speaker 1: solving fusion before other countries start making their own plasma orbs. Well,
2:03:08
Speaker 1: if that's a plasma orb, it's doing a fucking horrible
2:03:11
Speaker 1: job of gobbling up these missiles. What's it teleporting them
2:03:15
Speaker 1: 10 feet behind it for them to detonate? But Alex
2:03:20
Speaker 1: had him on. This is amazing stuff, Ashton. Tell us
2:03:22
Speaker 1: about the portals and the plasma. It's basically like InfoWars
2:03:27
Speaker 1: is like, or Alex Jones' network is basically like Guy
2:03:29
Speaker 1: at TV at this point. And I think he knows that.
2:03:33
Speaker 1: A lot of people know that, but it's clickable. That's
2:03:36
Speaker 1: what does well. Ashton Forbes, when he posts crap like this,
2:03:41
Speaker 1: it goes viral. Two million views. I think it's a
2:03:45
Speaker 1: rational comment. Isn't it more likely, considering you can see
2:03:48
Speaker 1: the flashes light beyond the orb, that these projectiles are
2:03:52
Speaker 1: detonating after flying past the target? Less than 500 views.
2:03:56
Speaker 1: Because people are interested in the nonsense, the garbage.
2:04:01
Speaker 2: You got to pump those numbers up, dude. You got
2:04:03
Speaker 2: to pump those numbers up. You got to say, you're right, Ashton.
2:04:06
Speaker 2: Those are 100%. Can't you see? Can't you see? Can't
2:04:11
Speaker 2: the detractor see?
2:04:12
Speaker 1: And if I spelled his name wrong, if I just
2:04:15
Speaker 1: called him Ash, I don't know. If I spelled Forbes
2:04:19
Speaker 1: with a P, Forbes, I'm sure it would probably do
2:04:22
Speaker 1: a lot better. You have to be an idiot, I guess. Anyway,
2:04:26
Speaker 1: I thought that that was a great example of what
2:04:28
Speaker 1: we were talking about. I know we're out of time,
2:04:30
Speaker 1: but This was fun. I think we covered a lot
2:04:31
Speaker 1: of stuff tonight, Ryder.
2:04:33
Speaker 2: We did. I think we did a really good job.
2:04:35
Speaker 2: Can you let people know where they can find you online,
2:04:39
Speaker 2: plug your website, where they can get your new book,
2:04:42
Speaker 2: where they can watch your show and listen to your show?
2:04:45
Speaker 1: You can listen to the show Monday through Friday or
2:04:47
Speaker 1: really seven days a week. The archive, tstradio.info, has all
2:04:50
Speaker 1: the shows. There are ads in it. However, if you
2:04:52
Speaker 1: don't like the ads, which who does, you can subscribe
2:04:55
Speaker 1: to the ad-free archive. There's other stuff that comes with it.
2:04:59
Speaker 1: at tstradio.info. The archive is there along with my books.
2:05:05
Speaker 1: If you'd like to get a copy of one of those, tstradio.info.
2:05:09
Speaker 1: Thank you, Ryder. And for my audience, where can people
2:05:11
Speaker 1: find you?
2:05:13
Speaker 2: You can find me on the interwebs and on the
2:05:19
Speaker 2: socials at writerly. You can find me on YouTube at writerly.
2:05:23
Speaker 2: And if you're interested in watching my documentaries, you can
2:05:26
Speaker 2: find them on Amazon Prime. And if you would like
2:05:28
Speaker 2: a physical copy, email me and I can get you
2:05:31
Speaker 2: a physical copy of the movie, Psychic Agent, The Gate Program.
2:05:35
Speaker 2: But I have some news, some very special news, Ryan.
2:05:40
Speaker 2: And that is if you are in the UK, you
2:05:45
Speaker 2: can now watch psychic agent, the gate program in the UK,
2:05:51
Speaker 2: which is really great. Uh, so for the people that
2:05:55
Speaker 2: have been messaging me and emailing me and wondering, um,
2:05:59
Speaker 2: if they can sometime at some point get it in
2:06:02
Speaker 2: the UK, you can now get it in the UK
2:06:04
Speaker 2: and you can just click the link in the description.
2:06:06
Speaker 2: If you're on my audience. And Ryan, I'll get you
2:06:09
Speaker 2: that link for you to throw in the description if
2:06:15
Speaker 2: you don't mind on your end. But thanks so much, everyone.
2:06:18
Speaker 2: Really appreciate it. Please hit the like button, share, subscribe,
2:06:22
Speaker 2: and follow us both on our social medias. Let's get
2:06:26
Speaker 2: Ryan's ex-account up there, baby. I'm doing pretty good on that.
2:06:30
Speaker 2: I'm rolling up there. Let's get his views up. Views up.
2:06:34
Speaker 2: And we'll see you guys next time. Bye-bye.
2:06:38
Speaker 3: Bye-bye.