Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Justice for P'nut and Fred, Barbie Should Get an Abortion | HBR News 477

Transcript

Justice for P'nut and Fred, Barbie Should Get an Abortion | HBR News 477 · Honey Badger Radio

• 1:05
  Speaker 1: This is HBr News number four seventy seven, Justice for
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: Peanut and fread Barbie should get an Abortion, where we
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: discussed the news of the week and give it the
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: Badger treatment. Hello everyone, and welcome to Honey Badger Radio.
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: Well to the wait oh yeah right, let me start over. Okay,
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: Hello Everyboddy, welcome to any Badger Radio. Because of doing
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: well this week and you're laughing at all of this absurdity,
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: so that you are not consumed by it. I am
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: your host, Brian, and I am joined as always by
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: my lovely co hosts Hannah Wallen and doctor Randmercam. This
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: week's HBr News show, we're gonna be talking about the
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: latest developments regarding the Daniel Penny case. I don't know
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: if you guys remember Daniel Penny. I called him Iron Fist.
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: He was the guy who well, we'll get into it,
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: but it was a New York case and you know,
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: a man was stepping up and trying to defend the innocent,
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: and of course he has got to pay the price
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: for that. Boeing is dismantling their DEI team, Peanut the
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: Squirrel and more so stick around. It's going to be
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: a good time and be sure to join us afterwards
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: for the Patron Only show. Uh so, you know, not
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: for and no reason in particular, we're gonna talk about.
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: There's some little thing going on right now. I guess
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: today is like a big deal for some reason. Oh
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: I know why, because it's the it's Guy Fox Day,
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: and it is the fifth of November, and we're gonna
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: be talking about in the that in the Patron Show
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: and maybe some other things that also happen to be
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: falling on this day.
• 2:41
  Speaker 2: This day of you can celebrate guy folks Night and
• 2:45
  Speaker 2: in the States. So is that still just a Britain.
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: No, that's a that's just a British thing. I only
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: learned about Guy Fox Day because of the movie VFA Vendetta.
• 2:54
  Speaker 2: So it's kind of controversial these days because we're supposed
• 2:57
  Speaker 2: to be celebrating Guy fox failure to blow up the
• 3:01
  Speaker 2: Houses of Parliament. It comes as a surprise to a
• 3:06
  Speaker 2: lot of this because we're like, what I thought we
• 3:09
  Speaker 2: were celebrating him at least trying.
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: Yeah. But yeah, so you know, remember remember the fifth
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: of November. We're gonna be talking about the fifth of
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: November in particular, we're gonna be talking about election stuff.
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: I'm not even gonna pretend that's obvious. But I'm not
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: gonna do it on the main show because everybody's doing that.
• 3:30
  Speaker 1: So I thought, let's try to find some different topics.
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: But if you want to join us for that conversation,
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: please consider becoming a badgery yourself by going to feed
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: the Badger dot com and setting up a monthly subscription.
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: Five bucks a month will get you into our discord server,
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: where you'll be able to essentially, you know, consume all
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: of the additional content and be a part of the community.
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: There's lots of stuff going on there all the time,
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: and they'll probably be people watching various live streams, maybe
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: even appearing on them. I was gonna ask that, Mike before,
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: when before we started you made an appearance on The
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: Lotus Eaters when the English elections came. Are you going
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: to be making an appearance on Tonight's No, Okay.
• 4:13
  Speaker 2: I'm not. I'm not theirs this time.
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: I see, I see they've got a.
• 4:18
  Speaker 2: Load of famous people on.
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: Yeah, they're they're super huge now. But anyway, you know,
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: I'm I I am grateful for you, Mike. I do
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: I appreciate you. I think you're the best, and I'm
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: glad that you're here with us, So who cares. We
• 4:34
  Speaker 1: don't need them anyway, I.
• 4:36
  Speaker 2: Don't need any of any of the dozens of streaming
• 4:40
  Speaker 2: of people who are streaming. Yeah, I'm surprised we've got
• 4:44
  Speaker 2: twenty seven people watching it this point.
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: I am surprised by that. I know that the usually
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: the new show is pretty big, but there's so much
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: else going on. But hey, maybe we can help you
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: understand the where the threads are that other people will
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: not And that's kind of what I want to talk
• 5:01
  Speaker 1: about in the Patron show. What does this have to
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: do with men? Well, I'm glad you asked, but I'm
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: not gonna tell you now, so we'll talk about it then.
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: So if you want to join us again, that's feed
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: the Badger dot com for slash subscribe. And if you
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: just want to check out what the you know, the
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: discord is like, you can go to the free version
• 5:20
  Speaker 1: by going to Badgernation dot online. And if you don't
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: want to wake up one morning to find that we've
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: been yeeded from the mainstream Internet, then look for our
• 5:27
  Speaker 1: archive content on uh It's Honey Badger Radio dot com
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: or badger No, wait, what's the what is the other
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: one called badgerfeed dot com? Badgerfeed dot com? All right,
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: So anyway, with all that said, let us get into
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: today's stories. We're gonna open up with a follow up
• 5:45
  Speaker 1: on Daniel Penny and uh, let me let's talk about
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: that really quick. Here. Let me just where did I
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: put it? Here? We go? Okay, so we have just
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: done jury selection for the trial of Daniel Penny. Daniel
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: Penny is accused of causing Jordan Neely, who was a
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: man on the subway that was apparently threatening people according
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: to witnesses, and Daniel Penny put him in a choke
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: hold and he died on a New York City subway.
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: The process involves questioning jurors about their experience with subway
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: travel and encounters with erratic behavior on public transit. The
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: details of the trial. Penny Chase faces charges of second
• 6:29
  Speaker 1: degree manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide. The trial is expected
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: to last six weeks, with opening statements highlighting the defense's
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: assertion that Penny was defending himself and others, while the
• 6:41
  Speaker 1: prosecution claims he went too far by not releasing Neey
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: even after he was no longer moving. It's also worth
• 6:48
  Speaker 1: pointing out that one of the reasons why Neely did die,
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: you know, from the chokehold, had to do with the
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: fact that the police response time was much higher than
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: it usually was, cause the police have been defunded and
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: so there are fewer of them to actually do their job.
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: So there's like a compounding There are compounding factors that
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: led to this unfortunate outcome. The public reaction has sparked
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: significant discourse, with some viewing Penny's actions as or protective rather.
• 7:19
  Speaker 1: This includes people who are on the train, some of
• 7:22
  Speaker 1: them hopefully will be witnesses in the case, while others
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: will see it as an overstep into vigilantism, raising issues
• 7:29
  Speaker 1: of race, mental health, and societal response to homelessness. For
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: the manslaughter conviction, the prosecution must prove that Penny recklessly
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: caused Neely's death while being aware of the risk of
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: serious harm. The jury will be anonymous due to threats
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: received by all parties involved. So let me just finish
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: reading this out, and then I want to add a
• 7:53
  Speaker 1: little bit extra that makes this kind of a I guess,
• 7:56
  Speaker 1: an interesting case worth talking about. But let me just
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: finish this. So evidence. Video evidence from the incident is
• 8:04
  Speaker 1: central to the case, with the prosecution arguing it shows
• 8:07
  Speaker 1: Penny's unnecessary, prolonged use of the chokehold. This is according
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: to the prosecution, while the defense might challenge the cause
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: of death and Neally's behavior prior to the restraint, which
• 8:18
  Speaker 1: was threatening the people on the train, duror composition. The
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: jury pool will largely consist of individuals with some experience
• 8:25
  Speaker 1: writing the subway, many of whom have witnessed or experience
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: some form of disturbance or harassment on the train which
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: could influence their perspective on the case. So this is
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: going to be It sounds a lot like the trial
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: of Derek Chauvin when George Floyd passed away, you know,
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: while Chauvin was restraining him. And the meaning is is
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: that there is an assumption that Penny is going to
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: be essentially the jury of his peers is going to
• 9:02
  Speaker 1: be making the call. But there's so much like publicity
• 9:07
  Speaker 1: and noise around it that there is a pretty good
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: chance that in the same way, because there's a really
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: good documentary about the George Floyd case that shows you
• 9:15
  Speaker 1: that the jury was either biased against Chauvin based on
• 9:19
  Speaker 1: the coverage which they could not avoid, even though the
• 9:22
  Speaker 1: judge said don't watch any TV like it was like
• 9:24
  Speaker 1: there was no way you could avoid talking about it
• 9:26
  Speaker 1: or getting exposed to some of it, or they felt
• 9:30
  Speaker 1: threatened by not, you know, going with a guilty verdict
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: because of the environment around the courthouse. And there's some
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: cause to believe that this same thing is happening here.
• 9:42
  Speaker 1: Jury selection just happened, And according to ABC for New York,
• 9:51
  Speaker 1: most of the roughly twenty potential panelists who underwent questioning
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: on Friday were at least occasional subway writers, and many
• 9:59
  Speaker 1: said they've seen people have outbursts. Some said the episodes
• 10:02
  Speaker 1: hadn't left them feeling personally threatened or harassed, but several
• 10:05
  Speaker 1: said that they had. So there is a chance that
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: he might have some jury members that do understand the
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: subway and have ridden it themselves, and so they know
• 10:16
  Speaker 1: what the environment is like. But that might that might
• 10:19
  Speaker 1: do him a bit of a favor, because again he
• 10:22
  Speaker 1: was yeah, go ahead.
• 10:23
  Speaker 2: Mike played kind of expertise to have traveled on the subway,
• 10:27
  Speaker 2: like having millions of New York So at some point
• 10:29
  Speaker 2: traveled on the subway.
• 10:31
  Speaker 1: Well, I mean if you live. But if you live
• 10:32
  Speaker 1: in say Manhattan or upstate, or you know, you're not
• 10:35
  Speaker 1: in the city proper, and or you're in like a
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: nice part of the city and you don't travel much,
• 10:40
  Speaker 1: You've just everything is around where you are, or you're
• 10:42
  Speaker 1: relatively shielded from everything, which is possible to live in
• 10:46
  Speaker 1: a bubble and New I know Chicago has bubbles like
• 10:49
  Speaker 1: that as well. People who live on the Gold Coast
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: or you know, near the universities, for example, they're gonna
• 10:55
  Speaker 1: have a different experience than the people who live in
• 10:57
  Speaker 1: the projects or or at the past through them, there's
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: like a Chicago is notorious for its Red Line train,
• 11:04
  Speaker 1: which goes from the north end of the city to
• 11:08
  Speaker 1: the south end of the city and basically a straight line,
• 11:11
  Speaker 1: but once you go south past Chinatown, the entire, like
• 11:15
  Speaker 1: the entire environment changes drastically. So if you don't ride
• 11:19
  Speaker 1: the train outside of downtown and you don't go far south,
• 11:22
  Speaker 1: then you're going to have like, you know, presumptions about
• 11:25
  Speaker 1: what the experience is like versus people who do go
• 11:28
  Speaker 1: on the South Side. And I think that I don't
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: I've never been to New York, but I think that
• 11:32
  Speaker 1: it's possible that there's something similar there. But anyway, so
• 11:36
  Speaker 1: this is the stage of this that we're at. I
• 11:37
  Speaker 1: wanted to mention this story because this guy and this
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: is the last thing I'll say about and I'll let
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: you guys take over. Remember what caused this. He was
• 11:46
  Speaker 1: on a train. I think he's like he was like
• 11:49
  Speaker 1: ex military or something like a veteran, and there was
• 11:52
  Speaker 1: a man on the train who was threatening people and
• 11:55
  Speaker 1: getting in their face and acting erratic, and people were
• 11:58
  Speaker 1: very concerned. We're talking about women and elderly people that
• 12:03
  Speaker 1: were on the train and they felt threatened by this guy.
• 12:06
  Speaker 1: And Penny, you know, stepped in to try to like
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: control the situation or take down the temperature, ended up,
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: you know, putting himself in this physical altercation, which of
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: course it turned out that he was able to handle himself,
• 12:19
  Speaker 1: but there was no way of knowing what would he
• 12:21
  Speaker 1: like he could have been hurt in this instance by
• 12:23
  Speaker 1: this person, but that's not what happened. And then he
• 12:26
  Speaker 1: puts the guy in a choke hold. Some people are
• 12:30
  Speaker 1: calling the police. They don't come for several minutes. The
• 12:33
  Speaker 1: man dies and cousy the cops come and they arrest him,
• 12:36
  Speaker 1: and you know, this is I think that the takeaway
• 12:39
  Speaker 1: from most people when this was happening was that this
• 12:42
  Speaker 1: is what how men are rewarded for, essentially, you know,
• 12:46
  Speaker 1: stepping up and protecting the people who are weaker and
• 12:50
  Speaker 1: more innocent. And it is kind of it does kind
• 12:52
  Speaker 1: of feel that way because Penny is being framed as
• 12:54
  Speaker 1: a racist and that he just one day decided to
• 12:57
  Speaker 1: like kill a black guy on the train because he
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: felt it, I guess, And so, you know, I just
• 13:02
  Speaker 1: want to push back on those narratives. So anyway, anyone
• 13:05
  Speaker 1: else who wants this, and he might go to jail,
• 13:07
  Speaker 1: like they might just convict him. The jury might just say, yeah,
• 13:10
  Speaker 1: you know, there is a lot of this that happened.
• 13:13
  Speaker 1: So but I'll let you guys go if.
• 13:16
  Speaker 3: You want, like you go first.
• 13:17
  Speaker 2: Yeah, correct me if I'm wrong. And I could be
• 13:20
  Speaker 2: wrong because I heard about this on ex formally Twitter.
• 13:23
  Speaker 2: But apparently it's been determined along some legalize that Jordan
• 13:28
  Speaker 2: Nearly was still alive by the time he was in
• 13:32
  Speaker 2: police custody and it was only shortly afterwards when he died. Now,
• 13:38
  Speaker 2: I'm not sure what this proves or does not prove,
• 13:41
  Speaker 2: but it's an interesting development. It's possible that nearly died
• 13:47
  Speaker 2: from a delayed reaction of lack of oxygen to the
• 13:52
  Speaker 2: brain or whatever I suppose that would make sense. But
• 13:56
  Speaker 2: it does open up the possibility that there were other
• 14:00
  Speaker 2: factors at play other than the child cold into which
• 14:04
  Speaker 2: Daniel Penny put him. And yet, yes, it does sound
• 14:07
  Speaker 2: rather familiar, doesn't it, as in rather reminiscent of that
• 14:12
  Speaker 2: death in police custody that was thought to be a
• 14:16
  Speaker 2: result of a physical obstruction of the airwaves of oxygen
• 14:21
  Speaker 2: to the brain, but turned out, according to the toxicology report,
• 14:26
  Speaker 2: to be far more likely resultant of well toxicology. And
• 14:32
  Speaker 2: even though we were all furnished with George Floyd's post mortem,
• 14:37
  Speaker 2: most people didn't take heed of it. Indeed, they weren't
• 14:41
  Speaker 2: even privy to it, especially not the race baiting media,
• 14:46
  Speaker 2: and for some reason, not the jury in the trial
• 14:49
  Speaker 2: of Derek Chauvin. You would think it would be in
• 14:51
  Speaker 2: an open and shut case if the jury was shown
• 14:55
  Speaker 2: the details along the lines of no evidence of respiratory
• 15:00
  Speaker 2: obstruction dot dot four times the lethal dose of fentanyl
• 15:06
  Speaker 2: plus methaphetamine. And so this is where I have to
• 15:10
  Speaker 2: show my ignorance, since I haven't made the effort to
• 15:14
  Speaker 2: look it up. But where pray tell is Jordan Neely's
• 15:19
  Speaker 2: postmotem report, especially the toxicology section. Is it possible that
• 15:24
  Speaker 2: his erratic behavior that day could have been a result
• 15:28
  Speaker 2: of a chemical imbalance, perhaps the very same chemical imbalance
• 15:34
  Speaker 2: that could be the primary or at least secondary cause
• 15:38
  Speaker 2: of death, Like chokeholds don't normally kill people, just like
• 15:43
  Speaker 2: kneeling on someone's shoulder doesn't normally kill people. It's actually,
• 15:48
  Speaker 2: it's really rare, but it's more likely to be a
• 15:51
  Speaker 2: contributing factor to a death if the patient in question
• 15:55
  Speaker 2: is already on a potentially deadly cocktail of drugs. And
• 16:00
  Speaker 2: get me wrong, whenever someone's erratic behavior filmed in public
• 16:06
  Speaker 2: is knee jerk attributed to Oh, they must be on
• 16:11
  Speaker 2: something like I'll be the first to respond, Yeah, no,
• 16:15
  Speaker 2: not necessarily. Sober people are perfectly capable of being irrational
• 16:20
  Speaker 2: dickheads on account of being taught to be that way
• 16:25
  Speaker 2: from an early age. I mean, children are irrational dickheads,
• 16:30
  Speaker 2: and some adults have simply never been trained out of
• 16:34
  Speaker 2: that compulsion to be irrational dickheads, largely because they get
• 16:38
  Speaker 2: participation for a fees no matter what and especially if
• 16:41
  Speaker 2: they are pampered as a protected group. Indeed, adherents of
• 16:47
  Speaker 2: a certain religion, a religion that forbids them from becoming intoxicated,
• 16:52
  Speaker 2: can be very prone to stabbing random children in the
• 16:56
  Speaker 2: street or decapitating random soldiers in the street. So in
• 17:00
  Speaker 2: any given case, yes, it might be drugs, but it
• 17:04
  Speaker 2: might also or instead be the result of indoctrination into
• 17:09
  Speaker 2: a broken education system. Such cases are far more common
• 17:15
  Speaker 2: than cases of any given drug intoxication. But we're not
• 17:22
  Speaker 2: just talking about erratic behavior. We're talking about spontaneous death. Miseducation,
• 17:29
  Speaker 2: for all its faults and all its ubiquity, does not
• 17:32
  Speaker 2: cause spontaneous death in those afflicted with it. Drugs do
• 17:39
  Speaker 2: certain drugs anyway, Is there any chance at all? But
• 17:43
  Speaker 2: what we're looking at here is yet another fentinyl death,
• 17:47
  Speaker 2: just like the thousands of fentanyl deaths happening all over
• 17:50
  Speaker 2: the place all the time. I'm just asking questions again.
• 17:54
  Speaker 2: I apologize for my ignorance. I have not seen mister
• 17:57
  Speaker 2: Neelie's toxicology report. It would take to debunk my questions
• 18:02
  Speaker 2: is to show me that report. If anyone can do so,
• 18:05
  Speaker 2: I'll be very grateful, But I'm sure you can understand
• 18:08
  Speaker 2: my apprehension. Since Derek Chauvin is in prison to this day,
• 18:14
  Speaker 2: constantly fearing for his life on account of this small
• 18:17
  Speaker 2: detail not being made apparent, I really don't want Daniel
• 18:22
  Speaker 2: Penny suffering the same fate. Because if police officers can't
• 18:26
  Speaker 2: defend the public from criminals, and neither can well meaning
• 18:31
  Speaker 2: members of the public, then frankly, we're fucked. I mean, frankly,
• 18:35
  Speaker 2: we're already fucked. I guess we'll find out by approximately
• 18:40
  Speaker 2: tomorrow morning just how fucked we're going to be for
• 18:44
  Speaker 2: the next four years at least. Either way, it's gonna
• 18:47
  Speaker 2: be a while before we're completely unfucked, because as it
• 18:51
  Speaker 2: stands right now, we are completely fucked. In the meantime,
• 18:55
  Speaker 2: if you happen to be on a subway when something
• 18:58
  Speaker 2: shady goes down, I say nothing, gentlemen, do nothing. Run
• 19:04
  Speaker 2: away as far as you can, as quickly as you can.
• 19:08
  Speaker 2: It is not worth it. When the system is not
• 19:11
  Speaker 2: worth saving, there's nothing you can do but save yourself
• 19:15
  Speaker 2: from the system. You are still valuable even when the
• 19:19
  Speaker 2: system is not. These bitches will not even thank you
• 19:23
  Speaker 2: for looking after them, So look after yourselves. Brothers, and
• 19:29
  Speaker 2: if it's not too late, vote Trump. They tried to
• 19:32
  Speaker 2: kill him.
• 19:34
  Speaker 3: And then also in regard to these bitches, it's their fault.
• 19:38
  Speaker 3: And I have a long rant. I'll try to condense it,
• 19:43
  Speaker 3: but it'll explain why it's their fault. So we talked
• 19:47
  Speaker 3: on HBr talk recently about how the burgeoning blob that
• 19:56
  Speaker 3: everybody talks about that I think is more like the
• 20:03
  Speaker 3: carnivorous plant from I think that that that bureaucracy can
• 20:16
  Speaker 3: be squarely placed at women's doorstep. Right, So that's the
• 20:21
  Speaker 3: first thing you have to understand. When I talk about
• 20:24
  Speaker 3: the bureaucracy and what the bureaucracy does, I am blaming
• 20:27
  Speaker 3: women because women voted that bureaucracy into place everywhere that
• 20:33
  Speaker 3: it exists, whether it's at the federal level, the state level,
• 20:37
  Speaker 3: the county level, the city level, even the neighborhood level,
• 20:41
  Speaker 3: when there are you know, like homeowner groups and stuff
• 20:47
  Speaker 3: that make rules for your neighborhood, whether you like it
• 20:51
  Speaker 3: or not, all of that is voted into place or
• 20:55
  Speaker 3: pushed into place, socially manipulated into place by women in
• 21:00
  Speaker 3: the name of safety. That never comes from it. Okay,
• 21:05
  Speaker 3: So that's the first thing to keep in mind. Here's
• 21:08
  Speaker 3: the second thing to keep in mind. Feminists fought tooth
• 21:12
  Speaker 3: and nail during the sixties and the seventies to end
• 21:17
  Speaker 3: the practice of involuntarily committing people who appeared to be
• 21:26
  Speaker 3: a danger to themselves or other people. They fought really
• 21:32
  Speaker 3: hard for that on the basis that only husbands do
• 21:35
  Speaker 3: it to only wives. One ended up happening was after
• 21:40
  Speaker 3: the seventies, like right before the Reagan administration, a bunch
• 21:44
  Speaker 3: of institutions that had people in them getting help for
• 21:52
  Speaker 3: serious mental health conditions ended up having to release people
• 21:57
  Speaker 3: who needed help, and the homeless population exploded. And this
• 22:06
  Speaker 3: is why the majority of homeless right now are mentally ill,
• 22:12
  Speaker 3: because it is much harder to get someone help when
• 22:17
  Speaker 3: they very obviously need it. And they didn't create a
• 22:20
  Speaker 3: balance where people's freedoms were protected but their health and
• 22:27
  Speaker 3: safety and the health and safety of the people around
• 22:29
  Speaker 3: them was also protected. They simply released people from mental
• 22:36
  Speaker 3: health institutions that needed to be institutionalized, needed treatment, needed medication,
• 22:45
  Speaker 3: and granted. In the fifties, the sixties the seventies, treatment
• 22:49
  Speaker 3: and medication were still evolving. They were not great. They
• 22:53
  Speaker 3: were the part of the reason that it was so
• 22:58
  Speaker 3: easy for gender dysphoria, instance, to be treated with Frankenstein surgery.
• 23:04
  Speaker 3: Is because the mental health profession was kind of the
• 23:08
  Speaker 3: duct tape and bail wire end of the medical profession.
• 23:12
  Speaker 3: At that point. You had things like zombie drugs and
• 23:17
  Speaker 3: getting iced down as treatment for mental health. And there
• 23:22
  Speaker 3: was a lot of abuse that took place, and there
• 23:24
  Speaker 3: was abuse of the system, but rather than just performing
• 23:28
  Speaker 3: abuse of the system, they tore the whole thing down.
• 23:33
  Speaker 3: They made it damn near impossible for families to get
• 23:36
  Speaker 3: help for people in their family that had severe mental
• 23:41
  Speaker 3: health conditions, severe substance abuse problems, criminal behavior that was
• 23:45
  Speaker 3: cropping up. Even the state has difficulty with that, and
• 23:50
  Speaker 3: it's been to the detriment of people with mental health conditions.
• 23:54
  Speaker 3: So that's the second thing, and that's women's fault again,
• 23:58
  Speaker 3: rather than actually trying to figure out a balance in
• 24:02
  Speaker 3: the system where people who really need help can get help,
• 24:07
  Speaker 3: even if they are so in need of it that
• 24:10
  Speaker 3: they cannot see their need, which happens with drug addiction,
• 24:13
  Speaker 3: and it happens with some severe mental illness, especially if
• 24:16
  Speaker 3: that mental illness involves inability to parse your perceptions of reality,
• 24:25
  Speaker 3: which of course feminists do not like the idea that
• 24:28
  Speaker 3: women might be accused of that, even though it happens
• 24:31
  Speaker 3: with men as well. So those two things, those two
• 24:35
  Speaker 3: factors existed, like this is the environment that this happened in.
• 24:42
  Speaker 3: Those two factors have existed for decades. They've been a
• 24:45
  Speaker 3: problem for decades. They've been growing for decades. And the
• 24:48
  Speaker 3: bureaucracy that deals with these issues in big cities, that
• 24:54
  Speaker 3: deals with these issues at the state level, that deals
• 24:56
  Speaker 3: with these issues at the federal level, has done nothing
• 24:59
  Speaker 3: to improve it. They made all kinds of changes, but
• 25:03
  Speaker 3: they've done nothing to actually improve the situation. Right, So
• 25:09
  Speaker 3: there's that.
• 25:10
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 25:11
  Speaker 3: So, we know from various news stories that mister Neely
• 25:17
  Speaker 3: had multiple run ins with police. He had mental health
• 25:22
  Speaker 3: issues that had come out during these run ins with police.
• 25:25
  Speaker 3: At one point or more, he told police that the
• 25:31
  Speaker 3: reason that he did something that caused to run in
• 25:33
  Speaker 3: with them was that he was schizophrenic and he was
• 25:36
  Speaker 3: off his meds. So this is a man who needed
• 25:41
  Speaker 3: help and he wasn't getting all of the help he
• 25:44
  Speaker 3: needed because sometimes he was ending up in trouble with
• 25:48
  Speaker 3: the police due to behavior that occurred because he was
• 25:53
  Speaker 3: not taking his meds. Right, that's a serious problem. And
• 26:00
  Speaker 3: when that's a woman, people have compassion, people try to help,
• 26:06
  Speaker 3: people try to do what they can to ensure that
• 26:11
  Speaker 3: she is not going to come to any harm, right.
• 26:14
  Speaker 3: But when that's a man, people don't have the same
• 26:18
  Speaker 3: degree of concern for him, whether it's the public or
• 26:22
  Speaker 3: the people who are the cobs and wheels in the system,
• 26:25
  Speaker 3: even their own families. A lot of times people's first
• 26:30
  Speaker 3: response is to protect themselves, and partly it's because when
• 26:34
  Speaker 3: men are violent, people have an easier time recognizing that
• 26:38
  Speaker 3: they're dangerous than they do when women are violent. People
• 26:42
  Speaker 3: don't always recognize that violent women can be dangerous. And
• 26:47
  Speaker 3: I mean I've been guilty of that. I have permanent
• 26:49
  Speaker 3: injuries from an assault that happened in twenty nineteen because
• 26:53
  Speaker 3: I didn't accept how dangerous the woman was that was
• 26:57
  Speaker 3: attacking me. So people, people can recognize the danger inherent
• 27:05
  Speaker 3: in violence when it's a man doing it, right, and
• 27:08
  Speaker 3: that combination affected this situation very dramatically. And of course
• 27:12
  Speaker 3: then there is also women demanding vigilanty violence from men.
• 27:20
  Speaker 3: And I've said this before and I will say it again.
• 27:23
  Speaker 3: You don't owe women that you do not owe anybody
• 27:27
  Speaker 3: that that is not your job. You're not obligated. It
• 27:32
  Speaker 3: is not immoral or unethical for you to have concern
• 27:38
  Speaker 3: for your own personal safety and the potential consequences of
• 27:42
  Speaker 3: any actions that you might take, especially in today's environment,
• 27:46
  Speaker 3: where you can get condemned for stopping someone from trying
• 27:51
  Speaker 3: to harm other people. And that's that's basically what happened here.
• 27:58
  Speaker 3: What happened with Jordan shouldn't have happened because he should
• 28:01
  Speaker 3: not have been in a position to have that breakdown
• 28:05
  Speaker 3: in that location with no assistance coming. Women had voted
• 28:11
  Speaker 3: to defund police. Women had had headed a movement to
• 28:16
  Speaker 3: defund police. Women had created a situation that caused a
• 28:22
  Speaker 3: homelessness explosion among the mentally ill. Women had created a
• 28:28
  Speaker 3: situation in which men who behavior radically are viewed as
• 28:33
  Speaker 3: more dangerous than maybe they were or are. And women
• 28:40
  Speaker 3: have created a situation in which men feel obligated to
• 28:44
  Speaker 3: protect everyone around them when somebody feels unsafe. And then
• 28:52
  Speaker 3: women condemned Daniel Penny for doing what he was taught
• 28:56
  Speaker 3: was the right thing to do. So there's no win
• 29:01
  Speaker 3: here as far as what action you can take in
• 29:05
  Speaker 3: a situation like this. You could protect everybody on the
• 29:09
  Speaker 3: train and still be condemned for doing the wrong thing
• 29:13
  Speaker 3: because in the process of stopping the violent person from
• 29:17
  Speaker 3: doing harm to other people, you did harm to him.
• 29:22
  Speaker 3: And nobody will recognize that the entire situation could have
• 29:27
  Speaker 3: been prevented by tearing down bureaucracy and addressing human issues
• 29:33
  Speaker 3: as human beings trying to help other human beings. Right,
• 29:39
  Speaker 3: So this isn't just about Daniel Penny. Yes, the way
• 29:42
  Speaker 3: he's being treated is wrong. No, it's not just because
• 29:46
  Speaker 3: of this individual situation. You might as well not step in.
• 29:53
  Speaker 3: You might as well if you're going to get condemned
• 29:55
  Speaker 3: for something, at least you won't go to jail for
• 30:01
  Speaker 3: not stepping in. At least you won't go to the
• 30:05
  Speaker 3: hospital with broken bones or stab wounds or bite wounds
• 30:10
  Speaker 3: or any other type of suffering pain and suffering that
• 30:14
  Speaker 3: you experience because you didn't confront a violent person on
• 30:18
  Speaker 3: other people's behalf. If you're going to be condemned for something,
• 30:23
  Speaker 3: it's better to be condemned for something that didn't cause
• 30:26
  Speaker 3: you personal physical risk and didn't cause you risk of
• 30:29
  Speaker 3: legal issues. And if women get upset about that, they
• 30:33
  Speaker 3: can be reminded that They created this monster. They created
• 30:39
  Speaker 3: the environment in which it's happening. They created the response
• 30:47
  Speaker 3: two men stepping in, and they have no business complaining
• 30:50
  Speaker 3: when men respond to that environment and to that response
• 30:54
  Speaker 3: by choosing not to step in, because it's their fault.
• 31:01
  Speaker 3: And uh, the only other thing that I will point
• 31:03
  Speaker 3: out here is the police didn't just take a long
• 31:05
  Speaker 3: time to get there. They also refused to provide mister
• 31:11
  Speaker 3: Neely with CPR. And they did it because to to
• 31:18
  Speaker 3: to quote a particular news story, Sergeant Johnson testified that
• 31:25
  Speaker 3: none of his team performed mouth to mouth on Neely
• 31:29
  Speaker 3: because he was a drug user. He seemed to be
• 31:32
  Speaker 3: a drug user, he was an apparent drug user, He
• 31:34
  Speaker 3: was very dirty. I didn't want them to get hepatitis,
• 31:38
  Speaker 3: Johnson said. So now, I'm not gonna say that people
• 31:45
  Speaker 3: are obligated to take risks to prevent death either, like
• 31:50
  Speaker 3: the police are not obligated if they are afraid that
• 31:54
  Speaker 3: you're gonna give them a disease. I'm not gonna say
• 31:57
  Speaker 3: they're obligated to risk expose. But if they don't perform CPR,
• 32:06
  Speaker 3: then is it really the fault of Daniel Penny that
• 32:11
  Speaker 3: this man died Because CPR could have brought him back,
• 32:19
  Speaker 3: and it's something that should be usable in court to
• 32:24
  Speaker 3: obtain an acquittal. Now, I, on the other hand, if
• 32:30
  Speaker 3: I was in a situation like that, actually carry a
• 32:34
  Speaker 3: mask with me that assists with CPR. And by the way,
• 32:40
  Speaker 3: there's something else that you should know about CPR. You
• 32:43
  Speaker 3: can do chest compressions without doing rescue breaths and if
• 32:49
  Speaker 3: there is any oxygen in the blood, it will keep
• 32:51
  Speaker 3: it flowing. Now, Gabriel Filan or phil and Lucas says
• 33:01
  Speaker 3: it is technically illegal for civilians not to intervene in
• 33:04
  Speaker 3: some countries. I'd be interested in seeing that law. Are
• 33:07
  Speaker 3: women obligated to intervene and are they obligated to risk
• 33:11
  Speaker 3: their own lives to do so? And if they are,
• 33:14
  Speaker 3: can they then be prosecuted if their intervention leads to
• 33:20
  Speaker 3: injury or death? Because if that is not the case,
• 33:25
  Speaker 3: then somebody needs to start suing for for discrimination if
• 33:31
  Speaker 3: women aren't equally obligated and equally at risk under that circumstance.
• 33:38
  Speaker 3: If that only applies to men, that's that's discrimination.
• 33:42
  Speaker 2: But the human cry thing was was in force in
• 33:48
  Speaker 2: Britain from medieval times right up until fairly recently, if
• 33:54
  Speaker 2: the human crime thing was if if a crime is
• 33:57
  Speaker 2: discovered then someone goes help, help, you will have to.
• 34:00
  Speaker 2: And that means every able body man is right legally
• 34:03
  Speaker 2: obliges to come and help. And if they don't then
• 34:06
  Speaker 2: then it's it's a damned if you do, damned if
• 34:08
  Speaker 2: you don't. Situation right up until the modern days, as
• 34:12
  Speaker 2: Daniel Penny is a testament.
• 34:13
  Speaker 3: To and see, I could see if you saw something
• 34:19
  Speaker 3: happen and you didn't call nine one one, that would
• 34:21
  Speaker 3: be one thing. But if you see something happening and
• 34:26
  Speaker 3: you don't put yourself at personal risk to intervene, that
• 34:31
  Speaker 3: that should be a different story. And know, we have
• 34:35
  Speaker 3: a whole political movement around the world by women that
• 34:42
  Speaker 3: uses exemption from obligation to h to even even to
• 34:50
  Speaker 3: just not intervene in order to protect life. Like they don't.
• 34:57
  Speaker 3: They don't feel obligated to not intervene in or to
• 35:00
  Speaker 3: protect life if failure to intervene puts themselves at risk. So,
• 35:07
  Speaker 3: for instance, if a woman can claim that because seventy
• 35:13
  Speaker 3: one out of three hundred thousand women die at some
• 35:18
  Speaker 3: point between conception and the first year after childbirth, she
• 35:23
  Speaker 3: feels endangered, she feels unsafe being pregnant. They want that
• 35:27
  Speaker 3: to be a basis for allowing her to kill her
• 35:30
  Speaker 3: baby before birth, some of them even after birth. But
• 35:40
  Speaker 3: they want men to have to intervene on behalf of
• 35:43
  Speaker 3: women at their own risk, and not just risk of
• 35:48
  Speaker 3: physical danger, but also risk of being condemned as the
• 35:53
  Speaker 3: bad guy for stopping the violence. So I go back
• 36:02
  Speaker 3: to the video I made in response to the songweight
• 36:06
  Speaker 3: in the Truck, and I can't. I think it was
• 36:07
  Speaker 3: called we have to talk about scare quotes male violence,
• 36:11
  Speaker 3: because I don't believe there's such a thing as male violence.
• 36:13
  Speaker 3: There's violence, men and women both do it. There's a
• 36:18
  Speaker 3: different reaction when men do it than there is when
• 36:21
  Speaker 3: women do it, But it doesn't make that violence male.
• 36:26
  Speaker 3: It's still just violence. Right, But that video I made
• 36:30
  Speaker 3: the point that you're not obligated to be society's bodyguards,
• 36:35
  Speaker 3: not morally. Women have lost that if it ever existed
• 36:40
  Speaker 3: as a real moral obligation, not legal obligation, but moral obligation. Right,
• 36:47
  Speaker 3: that moral obligation has been murdered by the feminist movement. Right,
• 36:57
  Speaker 3: And you don't and you shouldn't, You shouldn't treat yourself
• 37:02
  Speaker 3: and the people around you, as if you owe anyone
• 37:05
  Speaker 3: that debt, because there is no good at this point
• 37:11
  Speaker 3: that comes from paying it. Yeah, that is that is
• 37:17
  Speaker 3: entirely women's fault, entirely.
• 37:21
  Speaker 2: Do you remember this, Folks, Whenever you see a video
• 37:25
  Speaker 2: of either a candid camera or someone's mobile video of
• 37:29
  Speaker 2: some crime taking place where some fucking monkey mugs someone
• 37:38
  Speaker 2: or beat someone up, and there's a white man ten
• 37:41
  Speaker 2: feet away who doesn't do anything or even like flees
• 37:45
  Speaker 2: the scene, your compulsion is to say, this is what's
• 37:48
  Speaker 2: wrong with society. Men don't do anything when this shit happens, Like,
• 37:53
  Speaker 2: don't fucking listen to them. The worst thing that can
• 37:55
  Speaker 2: happen is you might go viral on the internet and
• 37:59
  Speaker 2: forever for a few days, people will say you are
• 38:03
  Speaker 2: to blame for these fucking monkeys mugging and raping and
• 38:07
  Speaker 2: killing everyone. But then that'll go away for a while
• 38:10
  Speaker 2: and then and then they'll be back to normal. That's
• 38:12
  Speaker 2: that's much better than you running in and getting stabbed
• 38:16
  Speaker 2: and no one even thanking you for for your efforts.
• 38:20
  Speaker 2: Like there's there's I was gonna say, there's no shame
• 38:23
  Speaker 2: in running the fuck away, but there is. That's that's
• 38:27
  Speaker 2: the problem with being male. You're shamed if you do,
• 38:30
  Speaker 2: shamed if you don't. But shame is better than getting shanked.
• 38:33
  Speaker 1: So it's true.
• 38:34
  Speaker 2: Just get just get shamed, don't get shanked. There you go.
• 38:38
  Speaker 1: Good advice.
• 38:39
  Speaker 3: Mike also needs to be pointed out real quick. There
• 38:42
  Speaker 3: have been times when men have intervened when they thought
• 38:47
  Speaker 3: a crime was being committed against the woman, and the
• 38:49
  Speaker 3: woman was the criminal. And there have been some of
• 38:52
  Speaker 3: those times when that woman was trying to kidnap a
• 38:55
  Speaker 3: baby away from a father. So bear in mind, if
• 39:01
  Speaker 3: you didn't see the start of the situation and you
• 39:03
  Speaker 3: don't know what happens, you're doubly advised to avoid getting
• 39:09
  Speaker 3: yourself involved in the situation. Call the cops, let them
• 39:12
  Speaker 3: deal with it. They get paid for that. You don't.
• 39:19
  Speaker 1: All right, well, I got a super child from Meredith
• 39:23
  Speaker 1: G for five dollars and she says, honey for the badger,
• 39:26
  Speaker 1: Thank you, Meredith the top G. And that's it so far.
• 39:31
  Speaker 1: But let us on, we guys think about this one
• 39:33
  Speaker 1: of the comments. We're gonna move on to the next story,
• 39:35
  Speaker 1: and I look forward to your thoughts on the Daniel
• 39:38
  Speaker 1: Penny situation as it evolves. I suppose all right, next
• 39:43
  Speaker 1: up Boeing. I think this is interesting and good news
• 39:46
  Speaker 1: if you like flying on planes. Boeing Company has dismantled
• 39:52
  Speaker 1: its Global Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Department, which I mean
• 39:57
  Speaker 1: when you're again planes. This is serious business, integrating its
• 40:01
  Speaker 1: staff into other human resources another human resources team focused
• 40:06
  Speaker 1: on talent and employee experience. What a mind blowing concept.
• 40:11
  Speaker 1: This move is part of a broader overhaul of its
• 40:13
  Speaker 1: workforce under the new leadership of CEO Kelly Ortberg. Here
• 40:18
  Speaker 1: are some of the key points. So, first, there was
• 40:23
  Speaker 1: a leadership change. The decision came as Boeing undergoes a
• 40:26
  Speaker 1: leadership transition, with Kelly Ortberg taking over as CEO, who
• 40:30
  Speaker 1: has been focusing on streamlining operations and reducing executive ranks.
• 40:35
  Speaker 1: This so this is like reducing bloat and wastefulness. This
• 40:38
  Speaker 1: includes a planned ten percent reduction in headcount. DEI department,
• 40:44
  Speaker 1: which was previously led by Vice President Sarah Leang Bowen,
• 40:48
  Speaker 1: has been dissolved. Bowen announced her departure from Boeing on LinkedIn,
• 40:52
  Speaker 1: expressing pride in the work done by her team response
• 40:57
  Speaker 1: to the external pressure. The change follows increasing pressure from
• 41:01
  Speaker 1: activists and public figures like Elon Musk, who have criticized
• 41:04
  Speaker 1: corporate DEI initiatives, especially in relation to quality and safety
• 41:08
  Speaker 1: issues at Boeing. This pressure has influenced several large US
• 41:12
  Speaker 1: companies to either dismantle or downplay their DEI efforts. Boeing
• 41:18
  Speaker 1: had committed to increasing their diversity, particularly in response to
• 41:21
  Speaker 1: societal events like the death of George Floyd in twenty twenty. Yes,
• 41:25
  Speaker 1: that's where the DEI shit comes from. Basically everywhere. Ever
• 41:30
  Speaker 1: since that and the Me Too movement, there have been
• 41:32
  Speaker 1: all of these sort of pushes in various industries and
• 41:37
  Speaker 1: institutions to change the demographics, aiming for a twenty percent
• 41:41
  Speaker 1: increase in black employment by twenty twenty five. Despite this,
• 41:44
  Speaker 1: the company's actions now suggests a shift in strategy, although
• 41:48
  Speaker 1: they maintain a commitment to an inclusive work environment for
• 41:51
  Speaker 1: recruiting and retaining top talent.
• 41:53
  Speaker 2: Twenty twenty five. You say, who, that's the kind of
• 42:00
  Speaker 2: evil project I've heard.
• 42:01
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I've heard that the overhaul at Boeing reflects a
• 42:06
  Speaker 1: broader corporate trend. So, yeah, this is not only happening
• 42:09
  Speaker 1: at Boeing, That's happening in other places. Although, let's say,
• 42:13
  Speaker 1: with a lot of resistance. This move has sparked discussions
• 42:19
  Speaker 1: regarding the future of corporate diversity initiatives, the balance supposedly that,
• 42:24
  Speaker 1: you know, there's an attempt to strike a balance between
• 42:26
  Speaker 1: diversity efforts and core business functions like engineering and safety
• 42:31
  Speaker 1: and how companies will respond to both internal strategic needs
• 42:34
  Speaker 1: and external political pressure. So that space Boeing is reversing course.
• 42:39
  Speaker 1: I wonder what it took for that. But anyway, this
• 42:42
  Speaker 1: is all well and good.
• 42:43
  Speaker 2: Are we going to get an apology for all the
• 42:46
  Speaker 2: dead vessel blowers? At at least some acknowledgment of the
• 42:50
  Speaker 2: existence of this whistle blow?
• 42:54
  Speaker 3: Is not what it looks like?
• 42:55
  Speaker 2: Can can you at least do us the traditional courtesy
• 42:58
  Speaker 2: of gas lighting us along the lines of yeah, no,
• 43:01
  Speaker 2: it's there. There were it's just a coincidence, Like, can
• 43:05
  Speaker 2: anyone explain to us what was the point in the
• 43:07
  Speaker 2: first place of the DEI policy? Were your planes falling
• 43:12
  Speaker 2: apart because you weren't hiring enough black, lesbian, disabled Islamic
• 43:17
  Speaker 2: other kid? You were your your planes weren't falling apart.
• 43:21
  Speaker 2: Everything was going just fine until you started discriminating against straight, white,
• 43:28
  Speaker 2: able bodied Christian men, And you didn't have to kill
• 43:32
  Speaker 2: any whistle blowers because there weren't any whistles to even blow.
• 43:36
  Speaker 2: How weird, how very very weird. Will there will there
• 43:40
  Speaker 2: be any consequences for this scandal, tragically enough now, because
• 43:48
  Speaker 2: Boeing had already cornered the market. If Boeing were prosecuted
• 43:54
  Speaker 2: into oblivion, there wouldn't be anyone left to manufacture commercial aircraft,
• 43:59
  Speaker 2: maybe US or whatever. So it's frankly miraculous that they
• 44:04
  Speaker 2: were ever held to account. The only reason they were
• 44:08
  Speaker 2: ever able to incorporate these backward ass communists hiring policies
• 44:13
  Speaker 2: is because they had already cornered the aforementioned market. Go woke,
• 44:18
  Speaker 2: go broke is indeed a fallacious concept, as we keep
• 44:24
  Speaker 2: discovering in as many industries as it can infect. It's
• 44:28
  Speaker 2: only true for small businesses.
• 44:32
  Speaker 1: Oh you said fallacious.
• 44:34
  Speaker 3: There's something that you guys don't understand about this news story. Right,
• 44:38
  Speaker 3: this is a non story. Right. They have changed absolutely nothing. Okay,
• 44:47
  Speaker 3: The first paragraph tells us that integrating staff into another
• 44:52
  Speaker 3: human resources team focused on talent and employee experience, the
• 44:57
  Speaker 3: staff from the DEI team is now just on the
• 45:03
  Speaker 3: HR team.
• 45:05
  Speaker 1: All right.
• 45:07
  Speaker 3: Probably the staff from the DEI team came from the
• 45:11
  Speaker 3: HR team. This is something that these companies have been doing.
• 45:16
  Speaker 3: They have been doing this since the eighties, at least
• 45:19
  Speaker 3: possibly the seventies. What is today known as DEI has
• 45:25
  Speaker 3: previously been known as social justice, political correctness, a whole
• 45:31
  Speaker 3: bunch of other names, anti discrimination, affirmative action. It's all
• 45:35
  Speaker 3: the same thing. All of these policies still exist. All
• 45:41
  Speaker 3: of these policies are still in place. They rename rebrand
• 45:47
  Speaker 3: sort of play musical chairs and where people are seated
• 45:52
  Speaker 3: at the political correctness table at the PC culture table,
• 45:58
  Speaker 3: and they continue doing the same shit they were doing before,
• 46:01
  Speaker 3: and they're gonna do it now. I really hate to
• 46:05
  Speaker 3: quash a white pill, but this doesn't deserve celebration until
• 46:12
  Speaker 3: we see people bitching about actual policy change that is
• 46:17
  Speaker 3: actually stopping discrimination against white people, because it hasn't happened
• 46:23
  Speaker 3: in the last thirty or forty years that these people
• 46:31
  Speaker 3: change anything that they're doing when they say they're changing
• 46:34
  Speaker 3: what they're doing. And I hate being the doomsayer here.
• 46:46
  Speaker 3: It's good that it's not popular among the public. It's
• 46:51
  Speaker 3: good that the public doesn't want this, but the public
• 46:55
  Speaker 3: hasn't really wanted this. Public hasn't been united in wanting
• 47:00
  Speaker 3: this ever, and yet it's been there for almost our
• 47:08
  Speaker 3: whole lives as part of Generation X, and if you're
• 47:12
  Speaker 3: a millennial, it has been there for your whole life.
• 47:16
  Speaker 3: You've never worked in an environment that did not have
• 47:19
  Speaker 3: this going on. Every millennial, everysumer in the workplace. This
• 47:25
  Speaker 3: has affected your experience of hiring and promotion. This has
• 47:30
  Speaker 3: affected how you do business with these companies, and it
• 47:34
  Speaker 3: will continue to affect how you do business with these
• 47:37
  Speaker 3: companies as long as they are able to rearrange, rebrand,
• 47:46
  Speaker 3: renew and sidestep accountability for this shit. So until we
• 47:55
  Speaker 3: the public turn around and say, uh huh, we don't
• 47:58
  Speaker 3: believe you, and we're not fooled by this, fix it,
• 48:04
  Speaker 3: stop doing this, Fire the people that you had involved
• 48:09
  Speaker 3: in these teams, and create an explicit policy that completely
• 48:16
  Speaker 3: forbids any use of any demographic details as a reason
• 48:23
  Speaker 3: to hire or promote somebody, and then show us that
• 48:27
  Speaker 3: you are following it and how you are following it.
• 48:31
  Speaker 3: Until we do that, the beatings will continue until morale
• 48:37
  Speaker 3: looks like it has improved, because that's that's the way
• 48:41
  Speaker 3: this has worked for all this time, it's a scam.
• 48:46
  Speaker 3: You have to watch out for this scam.
• 48:51
  Speaker 2: HR departments mostly an artifact of large businesses. Small businesses
• 48:57
  Speaker 2: kind of fault that shit. They kind of the liability
• 49:01
  Speaker 2: of hiring and firing people based on skin color or
• 49:06
  Speaker 2: genitals or an identified reimagining of genitals, because they are
• 49:11
  Speaker 2: at all times one fuck up away from total disaster
• 49:16
  Speaker 2: from which they can't possibly financially recover, and they don't
• 49:20
  Speaker 2: have the money or resources to murder their whistleblowers and
• 49:24
  Speaker 2: get away with it, like McDonald's can kill as many
• 49:27
  Speaker 2: people as they like allegedly, but Mom and Pop's burger
• 49:31
  Speaker 2: shop cannot. What is called DEI is nothing but a
• 49:36
  Speaker 2: weapon of the establishment to use against the unestablished. Yeah,
• 49:41
  Speaker 2: the irony is as thick as clotted tungsten? Is it
• 49:47
  Speaker 2: that the so called progressives who proclaim to want to
• 49:51
  Speaker 2: close the gap between the rich and the poor will
• 49:54
  Speaker 2: enact policies that only favor the rich in detriment to
• 49:59
  Speaker 2: the poor. Any search cases like why are people so stupid? Why?
• 50:05
  Speaker 2: It's because they hate their own kind. It's because rich
• 50:08
  Speaker 2: communist cunts have convinced them that hating their own kind
• 50:12
  Speaker 2: is the right thing to do like I don't. I
• 50:15
  Speaker 2: don't hate rich people, I don't hate large corporations, and
• 50:18
  Speaker 2: I don't hate stupid people. Well, all right, I do
• 50:21
  Speaker 2: kind of hate stupid people. Why wouldn't I. But the
• 50:24
  Speaker 2: problem is how easy it is for rich authoritarians to
• 50:30
  Speaker 2: manipulate stupid authoritarians. And I don't know how we how
• 50:36
  Speaker 2: we sever that that that that connection. I wish I did,
• 50:40
  Speaker 2: because that connection seems to be largely the source of
• 50:43
  Speaker 2: all our problems. Stupid people will never unstupid themselves because
• 50:48
  Speaker 2: megalammoniacal psychopaths are so effortlessly able to recruit them into
• 50:54
  Speaker 2: their army of zombies, banging their heads in the sand,
• 50:59
  Speaker 2: and until until their heads are well and truly buried
• 51:02
  Speaker 2: in that sand. Sorry to say again, but I think
• 51:06
  Speaker 2: democracy is the problem. I think what I've described as
• 51:10
  Speaker 2: the connection between rich psychopaths and stupid psychopaths can indeed
• 51:14
  Speaker 2: be simplified into what we call democracy. The best way
• 51:18
  Speaker 2: to get people to go along with an insane idea
• 51:22
  Speaker 2: is to convince them that it's their idea, that it's
• 51:25
  Speaker 2: their fault, that it's their problem. If you give people
• 51:29
  Speaker 2: the illusion of power, you can give them the illusion
• 51:32
  Speaker 2: that your power is actually their power, and you can
• 51:36
  Speaker 2: and you can punch them in the face over and
• 51:39
  Speaker 2: over again and genuinely convince them that they are indeed
• 51:42
  Speaker 2: punching themselves in the face, and that the only way
• 51:45
  Speaker 2: out of this situation is to punch even harder in
• 51:49
  Speaker 2: whatever direction you feel like you might be punching. I
• 51:53
  Speaker 2: just I just can't you you can, you can see
• 51:57
  Speaker 2: why the problem seems so insurmountable. It's it's it's like
• 52:01
  Speaker 2: being a domesticated animal. It would be nice if we
• 52:05
  Speaker 2: could truly live in the wild and look after ourselves.
• 52:09
  Speaker 2: But we've been trapped in this sensory bubble for so
• 52:12
  Speaker 2: long that it's that it's hard to imagine how we
• 52:16
  Speaker 2: we would ever manage ourselves outside it. I'd like, I
• 52:20
  Speaker 2: like to think it's not too late, but I worry
• 52:23
  Speaker 2: that at best we are at the cusp of the
• 52:27
  Speaker 2: point where it's already too late. If it's not too late, folks,
• 52:34
  Speaker 2: vote Donald Trump. It's not it's not he who will
• 52:37
  Speaker 2: lead us out of the bubble, but it's certainly his
• 52:40
  Speaker 2: opponents who will lead us inexorably into that bubble's event horizon.
• 52:47
  Speaker 2: The the the journey back to nature will not be easy,
• 52:50
  Speaker 2: but it's far better than the alternative. So yeah, return
• 52:54
  Speaker 2: to monkey as sooner as quickly as possible, ook, I say,
• 52:59
  Speaker 2: and the more boy, that's how monkeys talk.
• 53:04
  Speaker 3: I think the journey back people getting an understanding of
• 53:10
  Speaker 3: the malice and threat level of authoritarianism might actually start
• 53:17
  Speaker 3: with a squirrel.
• 53:22
  Speaker 2: Good.
• 53:23
  Speaker 1: That's a good segue. Yeah, uh yeah, So we're gonna
• 53:28
  Speaker 1: move on the next thing. I don't disagree with anything
• 53:31
  Speaker 1: you guys said. I mean when I got like you said,
• 53:33
  Speaker 1: it was in the first paragraph. And this is usually
• 53:35
  Speaker 1: how it goes, you know, like get caught doing something.
• 53:39
  Speaker 1: Uh so you say we're gonna change everything, and then
• 53:42
  Speaker 1: you just sort of move the furniture around and repaint
• 53:45
  Speaker 1: the inside and get new curtains and then reopen for business.
• 53:48
  Speaker 1: So yeah, that's just sort of like the way it
• 53:51
  Speaker 1: normally goes. But I did get a super child from
• 53:53
  Speaker 1: Meredith g who gave us five dollars, says Hannah is correct,
• 53:57
  Speaker 1: Corporate America isn't getting rid of DEI I know the
• 54:00
  Speaker 1: company I worked for had hiring expectations for women and
• 54:03
  Speaker 1: minorities as part of performance evaluations in the nineteen nineties. Yes,
• 54:08
  Speaker 1: DEI is very old. It's just you know what, it's
• 54:10
  Speaker 1: exactly the same as when the Supreme Court made the
• 54:13
  Speaker 1: ruling about affirmative action in colleges, right, And I think
• 54:18
  Speaker 1: that we covered that. I know that I've talked about
• 54:21
  Speaker 1: it and that it doesn't change anything. They're just going
• 54:23
  Speaker 1: to engage in the same practices and an act like
• 54:27
  Speaker 1: they're doing it based on merit and just say it's
• 54:29
  Speaker 1: merit and not because of some you know, initiative or policy,
• 54:33
  Speaker 1: and they're just gonna do it naturally because it's what
• 54:35
  Speaker 1: they want. And I think it's the same thing here.
• 54:37
  Speaker 1: You know, they can just internally virtue signal and maybe
• 54:41
  Speaker 1: not externally virtue signal. So but anyway, let us know
• 54:45
  Speaker 1: you guys thinking about this one in the comments. We're
• 54:47
  Speaker 1: gonna move on to the next one. We're gonna talk
• 54:49
  Speaker 1: about the friend that we didn't know we had. Peanut
• 54:53
  Speaker 1: the Squirrel, so internet famous gray squirrel and mascot of
• 54:57
  Speaker 1: the New York based animal sanctuary and operation known as
• 55:01
  Speaker 1: Peanuts Freedom Farm, was killed last week by New York
• 55:05
  Speaker 1: State's Department of Environmental Conservation. Peanut the Squirrel was taken
• 55:11
  Speaker 1: in by animal rehabber Mark Longo. After he was discovered
• 55:15
  Speaker 1: as an orphan. Peanut was successfully raised by Longo and
• 55:19
  Speaker 1: became the mascot of his Instagram page as well as
• 55:22
  Speaker 1: his pet. Due to being raised in captivity, Peanut was
• 55:26
  Speaker 1: not able to be returned into the wild, but due
• 55:29
  Speaker 1: to numerous anonymous complaints to the Department of Environmental Conservation,
• 55:33
  Speaker 1: a swat style raid was carried out on Longo's property.
• 55:37
  Speaker 1: During that time, Peanut the squirrel had Fred and Fred
• 55:40
  Speaker 1: the raccoon. Yeah, there was also a raccoon in the story,
• 55:43
  Speaker 1: where both seized as possible rabies vector species. During the chaos,
• 55:49
  Speaker 1: Peanut allegedly bit one of the officers. Both animals were
• 55:53
  Speaker 1: put down in order to test for rabies. Note that
• 55:56
  Speaker 1: there is no way to test for rabies on a
• 55:58
  Speaker 1: live animal, as the testing required Wire's brain samples to
• 56:02
  Speaker 1: be taken. This gross violation has left Longo shaken with grief.
• 56:06
  Speaker 1: Taking to Instagram, Longo wrote quote to the group of
• 56:09
  Speaker 1: people who called dec There's a special place in hell
• 56:13
  Speaker 1: for you. End quote. The Internet has been set ablaze
• 56:16
  Speaker 1: by this news, with commenters sympathizing with Longo and his loss,
• 56:21
  Speaker 1: and others demanding to know who okayed, this vulgar misuse
• 56:25
  Speaker 1: of government resources. All right, I'll let you guys go ahead.
• 56:30
  Speaker 3: Mike Hey, So I'm gonna point something out. First of all,
• 56:37
  Speaker 3: because I've I've handled squirrels, and I grew up in
• 56:41
  Speaker 3: a little rural community, and the first squirrel that we
• 56:47
  Speaker 3: ever fed and treated as sort of a pseudo pet,
• 56:53
  Speaker 3: he wasn't really, he was still wild and everything. We
• 56:56
  Speaker 3: named him Peanut. So this kind of story kind of
• 57:00
  Speaker 3: at home for a weird reason because it reminds me
• 57:02
  Speaker 3: of my dad. Dad's the one that named him. But
• 57:10
  Speaker 3: squirrels are not the animal that first of all, that
• 57:12
  Speaker 3: you're most likely to get rabies from bats, somebody, somebody,
• 57:17
  Speaker 3: they can get them, Yes, they can. They can. Everything
• 57:21
  Speaker 3: can get rabies. It's it's rabies is very prolific. It's
• 57:24
  Speaker 3: very weird. You know. We have have treatments and vaccines
• 57:27
  Speaker 3: for all kinds of other viruses, but nobody thought rabies
• 57:31
  Speaker 3: was dangerous enough to do that with. But that's, you know,
• 57:34
  Speaker 3: like not the point I'm gonna make. The point I'm
• 57:35
  Speaker 3: gonna make care is there was never a really valid
• 57:39
  Speaker 3: and good reason for anybody to report this, And there
• 57:42
  Speaker 3: was certainly never a good reason for a swat style
• 57:45
  Speaker 3: raid to be carried out. Squirrels aren't like dogs. They're
• 57:52
  Speaker 3: not aggressive. They will run away from you. They don't attack, right,
• 58:00
  Speaker 3: that's the first thing. So if you want to get
• 58:02
  Speaker 3: attacked by a squirrel, you have to grab it, you
• 58:05
  Speaker 3: have to scare it, and you have to cut off
• 58:08
  Speaker 3: its escape. And somebody had to have done that in
• 58:11
  Speaker 3: order to get bitten. So this is a situation where
• 58:17
  Speaker 3: government officials engaging in massive overreach deliberately created a situation
• 58:26
  Speaker 3: in an animal refuge where the squirrel ended up supposedly
• 58:35
  Speaker 3: justifying his own execution. They deliberately set off a wild
• 58:42
  Speaker 3: animal and then killed it. And they did it to
• 58:47
  Speaker 3: punish the guy who was being kind to the animal,
• 58:52
  Speaker 3: to hurt him. They didn't do this because of the animals.
• 58:55
  Speaker 3: They didn't do this because the animals were a threat
• 58:57
  Speaker 3: to anybody. They didn't do this because the animals were
• 58:59
  Speaker 3: being missed, handled, or mistreated. They did it to punish
• 59:03
  Speaker 3: this guy for being nice to the squirrel. They did
• 59:08
  Speaker 3: it to punish this guy for showing the world that
• 59:12
  Speaker 3: he was being nice to the squirrel. That's why they
• 59:15
  Speaker 3: did it. And I like, for me, when I look
• 59:20
  Speaker 3: at this like this is this isn't a story about
• 59:26
  Speaker 3: a squirrel in a raccoon. It's a story about massive
• 59:29
  Speaker 3: government overreach. It's a story about the nurse ratchet type
• 59:39
  Speaker 3: of government official. And it's a story about people being
• 59:46
  Speaker 3: so caught up in bureaucratic bullshit and so devoid of
• 59:54
  Speaker 3: compassion and consideration for the man who's property they stole
• 1:00:02
  Speaker 3: and destroyed that they ordered and carried out the seizure
• 1:00:09
  Speaker 3: and execution of someone's handicapped pet just to hurt the
• 1:00:12
  Speaker 3: guy who owned him for making his care public. And
• 1:00:16
  Speaker 3: it's not a new thing either. Like I've told you
• 1:00:20
  Speaker 3: guys that I've worked in journalism, I've been a photojournalist.
• 1:00:23
  Speaker 3: I've been a writer mostly a photojournalist up until I
• 1:00:27
  Speaker 3: got involved with the men's rights movement.
• 1:00:29
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 1:00:29
  Speaker 3: But my high school newspaper teacher, who I knew from
• 1:00:38
  Speaker 3: the time I was a little kid, because he was
• 1:00:40
  Speaker 3: friends with my dad. I was friends with his daughter,
• 1:00:43
  Speaker 3: so I was over at his house all the time.
• 1:00:45
  Speaker 3: My dad was at his house all the time. I
• 1:00:47
  Speaker 3: would get to hear them talking all the time, told
• 1:00:50
  Speaker 3: this story, okay, of one time when the government was
• 1:00:56
  Speaker 3: called on a farmer. Farmer had had cows, milk cows
• 1:01:03
  Speaker 3: or beef cows, cattle, I'm not sure what, but he had.
• 1:01:07
  Speaker 3: He had he had cattle that he was feeding and
• 1:01:12
  Speaker 3: every day on his farm with big feeding troughs, and
• 1:01:16
  Speaker 3: a deer came along and started eating out of the
• 1:01:18
  Speaker 3: feeding troughs. And he tried everything to chase this deer
• 1:01:21
  Speaker 3: off because the feed was for his property that he
• 1:01:25
  Speaker 3: was going to you know, sell as a product or
• 1:01:28
  Speaker 3: sell milk from them as a product, and he could
• 1:01:33
  Speaker 3: not get rid of it. It wouldn't leave, and it
• 1:01:36
  Speaker 3: wasn't actually doing any harm. It wasn't showing any signs
• 1:01:39
  Speaker 3: of sickness, it wasn't showing any signs of being a danger.
• 1:01:42
  Speaker 3: Like the worst thing with deer is that they might
• 1:01:45
  Speaker 3: have some some sort of parasite or microbe, you know,
• 1:01:50
  Speaker 3: pathogen that could possibly transfer to other animals, and that
• 1:01:56
  Speaker 3: didn't seem to be a problem. So he finally just
• 1:01:59
  Speaker 3: decided to ignore that. Right, somebody calls the government. My
• 1:02:03
  Speaker 3: understanding was the EPA that they called. I doubt the
• 1:02:06
  Speaker 3: epas who showed up, but government officials did show up
• 1:02:10
  Speaker 3: and chased the deer around. They first accused the farmer
• 1:02:14
  Speaker 3: of keeping it captive, and he had to disabuse them
• 1:02:17
  Speaker 3: of the notion that it was actually he considered the
• 1:02:20
  Speaker 3: deer his property or anything like that. You know, He's like,
• 1:02:23
  Speaker 3: have at it. I couldn't catch him. I couldn't stop him.
• 1:02:25
  Speaker 3: You guys, it's up to you if you want to
• 1:02:27
  Speaker 3: take him, take him. And so they did. They they
• 1:02:29
  Speaker 3: chased him all day in somewhat the manner of Inspector
• 1:02:35
  Speaker 3: Clusso chasing the pink panther, because obviously the deer was
• 1:02:40
  Speaker 3: not too keen on being seized by a bunch of
• 1:02:43
  Speaker 3: weird looking human predatory animals in hazmat suits to protect
• 1:02:51
  Speaker 3: them from deer ticks are dangerous, like anybody that lives
• 1:02:56
  Speaker 3: in in any Midwestern state knows that, right, So they
• 1:03:01
  Speaker 3: chased this thing all day, and yeah, Yakity Sacks, Richard Bierre,
• 1:03:06
  Speaker 3: Yakity Sacks would have been the perfect song for this,
• 1:03:09
  Speaker 3: because that's what it looked like. It looked like a
• 1:03:11
  Speaker 3: sketch out of out of Benny Hill, you know, with
• 1:03:15
  Speaker 3: this stupid animal terrified, just absolutely terrified of these government
• 1:03:21
  Speaker 3: officials and running and hiding and everything. And they finally
• 1:03:25
  Speaker 3: caught it, put it in the truck. You know, they Finally,
• 1:03:29
  Speaker 3: they believed themselves to be protecting this animal, remember from
• 1:03:33
  Speaker 3: the farmer right, So they put it in the truck.
• 1:03:36
  Speaker 3: Animal has a heart attack and dies. They did a
• 1:03:40
  Speaker 3: fabulous job. They protected it to death. Government overreach. That's
• 1:03:46
  Speaker 3: the situation we're dealing with and what people are considering
• 1:03:53
  Speaker 3: and concerned about in regard to this squirrel. Yeah, it's
• 1:03:57
  Speaker 3: easy to rally around a cute little animal, right, are adorable.
• 1:04:01
  Speaker 3: They're basically just fucking little tree rats with good pr
• 1:04:05
  Speaker 3: but they're adorable. And you know, I adored them when
• 1:04:09
  Speaker 3: I was a little kid. You couldn't pay me to
• 1:04:10
  Speaker 3: get near when today because I don't want fleas. But
• 1:04:15
  Speaker 3: but yeah, people will rally around that. But it's not
• 1:04:18
  Speaker 3: the deer. It's not the squirrel, it's not the raccoon.
• 1:04:23
  Speaker 3: It's not the cute, fuzzy little animal, all right. It's
• 1:04:30
  Speaker 3: the feed me seymour plant. It's the government bureaucracy. It's
• 1:04:35
  Speaker 3: the fact that when you have a thumbtack that they
• 1:04:41
  Speaker 3: think needs to be moved a little to the left
• 1:04:44
  Speaker 3: or to the right, they don't have a procedure from that.
• 1:04:49
  Speaker 3: They don't have any way to handle that, but to
• 1:04:52
  Speaker 3: bring in a big, big, fat, twenty pounds sledge and
• 1:04:58
  Speaker 3: start pounding away to make it fit. Pein At the
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 3: squirrel is not a symbol of anything. What was done
• 1:05:14
  Speaker 3: to Peanut the squirrel, and in particular, what was done
• 1:05:19
  Speaker 3: to Mark Longo for being for the crime of being
• 1:05:25
  Speaker 3: nice to Peanut the squirrel is a symbol of the
• 1:05:29
  Speaker 3: bureaucratic mind virus, right, and the woke mind virus that
• 1:05:35
  Speaker 3: everybody has been talking about, that is a symptom, a
• 1:05:40
  Speaker 3: manifestation of the bureaucratic mind virus. That's it. We've talked
• 1:05:48
  Speaker 3: about the bureaucratic mind virus before. I think it's been
• 1:05:54
  Speaker 3: five years. It was before COVID. I'm pretty sure that
• 1:05:58
  Speaker 3: we actually did the episode on the bureaucratic mind virus
• 1:06:01
  Speaker 3: and how it affects the way bureaucrats think because they
• 1:06:06
  Speaker 3: literally cannot deviate from what's on their forms and what's
• 1:06:12
  Speaker 3: in their policies. If something doesn't fall into a specific category,
• 1:06:18
  Speaker 3: a specific place, if it's outside the lines, they will
• 1:06:23
  Speaker 3: hammer it, they will shoot it, they will cut it off,
• 1:06:27
  Speaker 3: they will do anything they can to either make it
• 1:06:29
  Speaker 3: fit or make it go away because they don't know
• 1:06:32
  Speaker 3: how to handle it, and they don't care. And if
• 1:06:36
  Speaker 3: you think they'll stop at your pets or your property,
• 1:06:43
  Speaker 3: wait until they decide that your children are outside the
• 1:06:48
  Speaker 3: lines or your parenting is outside the lines, because that's
• 1:06:53
  Speaker 3: happening to people already. There are people whose children have
• 1:06:59
  Speaker 3: been kidnapped, apped by the government because the parents sought
• 1:07:04
  Speaker 3: second opinions after a medical doctor stated that a child
• 1:07:09
  Speaker 3: should or should not have a particular treatment. And I'm
• 1:07:12
  Speaker 3: not even just talking about, you know, blatant obvious stuff
• 1:07:16
  Speaker 3: like the gender treatment, talking about kids who are being
• 1:07:21
  Speaker 3: subjected to other types of surgery, who are being drugged
• 1:07:26
  Speaker 3: against their will and their parents will, who are being
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 3: subjected to or taken off of cancer treatment against their
• 1:07:35
  Speaker 3: parents' will and against their will when they are dying
• 1:07:38
  Speaker 3: or when they are not in need of that treatment. Like,
• 1:07:44
  Speaker 3: it's quite horrifying. What is actually happening in the country today.
• 1:07:53
  Speaker 3: People who have lost custody of their children because the
• 1:07:57
  Speaker 3: other parent disagrees with their parentings in a way that
• 1:08:02
  Speaker 3: doesn't touch on any actual legal issue. There was a
• 1:08:08
  Speaker 3: parent in Florida that was forced, under threat of jail,
• 1:08:13
  Speaker 3: to sign a consent form for her son to be
• 1:08:15
  Speaker 3: circumcised against her will because the judge thought it would
• 1:08:21
  Speaker 3: be healthier for him, not because a doctor ordered it
• 1:08:29
  Speaker 3: and the child was going to have some sort of
• 1:08:32
  Speaker 3: consequence if it didn't happen, but because a judge decided,
• 1:08:38
  Speaker 3: a judge who was not a doctor, decided that he
• 1:08:43
  Speaker 3: liked the information presented in favor more than he liked
• 1:08:48
  Speaker 3: the information presented against. So, yeah, you guys, can there
• 1:08:56
  Speaker 3: are people I've been seeing you know. Oh, I don't
• 1:08:58
  Speaker 3: care about a stupid squirrel. I don't care about a
• 1:09:00
  Speaker 3: stupid squirrel. Forget the squirrel. Look at the government action
• 1:09:05
  Speaker 3: and recognize this is bad. Not because the squirrel died,
• 1:09:11
  Speaker 3: but because your freedom did, because your individuality did, because
• 1:09:16
  Speaker 3: your civil rights did. That's what you should be upset about,
• 1:09:21
  Speaker 3: and that's why you should be scared. Fuck the squirrel,
• 1:09:24
  Speaker 3: not literally, because that would be really dangerous, but who cares.
• 1:09:30
  Speaker 3: What the reason was that they did this? That they
• 1:09:35
  Speaker 3: did this should be enough.
• 1:09:40
  Speaker 2: Agreed And to fold this in on itself, given that
• 1:09:47
  Speaker 2: this kind of thing probably happens all the time, non
• 1:09:52
  Speaker 2: koshers being killed I mean or whatever, Given that this
• 1:09:57
  Speaker 2: wouldn't ordinarily be a story unless it was in the
• 1:10:00
  Speaker 2: lead up to an election. Uh, it all it all
• 1:10:04
  Speaker 2: seems a little bit sus to me in the number
• 1:10:07
  Speaker 2: of dimensions, a little bit opportunistic. I mean, call me
• 1:10:11
  Speaker 2: a cynic. Go on, call me a cynic. You're correct,
• 1:10:20
  Speaker 2: I'm a cynic. Call me the kind of recursively black
• 1:10:23
  Speaker 2: pilled duma who thinks everything is a sy of But there,
• 1:10:28
  Speaker 2: this looks like a si. It seems like something of
• 1:10:31
  Speaker 2: a distraction from more important issues, like you know, policies.
• 1:10:36
  Speaker 2: Seems like some hokey bullshit the people are laughing about.
• 1:10:40
  Speaker 2: It feels like it feels like we're the dog from up.
• 1:10:46
  Speaker 2: Everybody be sure to get out there and vote for
• 1:10:48
  Speaker 2: the for the one who squirrel. And yes, I realized
• 1:10:52
  Speaker 2: it's it's I realize it's not just about the squirrel.
• 1:10:56
  Speaker 2: It's a bit. It's about how they'll they'll raid a
• 1:10:58
  Speaker 2: house for a squirrel, and so they're sure as shit
• 1:11:02
  Speaker 2: going to come for you for whatever reason. But they're
• 1:11:04
  Speaker 2: not going to come for the illegal alien humans who
• 1:11:07
  Speaker 2: are invading the country and raping your families and killing you.
• 1:11:11
  Speaker 2: I get it. And even if it was just about
• 1:11:15
  Speaker 2: the squirrel, yes, I understand how meme magic is supposed
• 1:11:21
  Speaker 2: to work. I'm just not all that convinced it actually works.
• 1:11:27
  Speaker 2: Maybe it really is that the little things that go
• 1:11:31
  Speaker 2: a longer way than the big things like policies and whatnot.
• 1:11:35
  Speaker 2: We like to think it was meme magic that got
• 1:11:38
  Speaker 2: Trump elected in twenty sixteen, but I'm not all that
• 1:11:42
  Speaker 2: sure that was the case. I think it was a
• 1:11:45
  Speaker 2: lot to do with how much everyone hates Hillary Clinton
• 1:11:49
  Speaker 2: and how everyone would rather eat their own pancreas raw
• 1:11:52
  Speaker 2: out of their own body than vote for such an
• 1:11:55
  Speaker 2: unaccountable criminal. And seems plausible to me, certainly more plausible
• 1:12:01
  Speaker 2: than magic. And if mametics means anything, it means the
• 1:12:08
  Speaker 2: control of information, the ability to manipulate narratives, to censor
• 1:12:14
  Speaker 2: the truth and replace it with propaganda. And if that's
• 1:12:19
  Speaker 2: some kind of supernatural force, then Google is basically a
• 1:12:25
  Speaker 2: god with with with the power to turn a fifty
• 1:12:29
  Speaker 2: to fifty split of undecided voters into a ninety ten split.
• 1:12:33
  Speaker 2: And the mainstream media is a pantheon of undead greater
• 1:12:39
  Speaker 2: demons and chaos necromancers and immortal lich kings that make
• 1:12:45
  Speaker 2: our that make our quaint Internet sorcery look like well,
• 1:12:51
  Speaker 2: a bunch of nerds who are displaying the D and D.
• 1:12:54
  Speaker 2: The point is. It's not magic. It's assholes making your
• 1:12:59
  Speaker 2: information technology run as jankily as possible. It's not witchcraft,
• 1:13:05
  Speaker 2: it's glitchcraft, just like any sufficiently advanced technology. It looks
• 1:13:11
  Speaker 2: like magic to those who don't understand how it works,
• 1:13:14
  Speaker 2: or who are powerless to stop it. It's just ruthless liars,
• 1:13:20
  Speaker 2: lying so ruthlessly that it's hard for the average person
• 1:13:24
  Speaker 2: to wrap their head around how anyone could lie so ruthlessly.
• 1:13:28
  Speaker 2: And yet despite this unspeakable power, it didn't work. In
• 1:13:34
  Speaker 2: twenty sixteen, they couldn't pull it off. By all accounts,
• 1:13:38
  Speaker 2: it should have been a landslide for Trump, and the
• 1:13:42
  Speaker 2: best they could do was creep up to the halfway
• 1:13:44
  Speaker 2: line and then choke at the last minute. It didn't
• 1:13:48
  Speaker 2: work in twenty twenty either, so they had to use
• 1:13:51
  Speaker 2: a whole different kind of meme magic, namely voter fraud,
• 1:13:57
  Speaker 2: widespread voter fraud, I hope I'm still allowed say that,
• 1:14:00
  Speaker 2: and of course widespread blanket censorship of those exact words,
• 1:14:05
  Speaker 2: among others. But it won't work this time. This time,
• 1:14:10
  Speaker 2: we've broken the information hegemony of YouTube and Twitter. Now
• 1:14:16
  Speaker 2: we have Rumble and x formerly Twitter, and we won't
• 1:14:22
  Speaker 2: get full again, because this time we're able to ascertain
• 1:14:26
  Speaker 2: the truth. The truth is the antidote, the counter spell
• 1:14:31
  Speaker 2: to this tempest of lies. The cute pictures of squirrels
• 1:14:36
  Speaker 2: are just you know, seasoning window dressing. They're the comic
• 1:14:42
  Speaker 2: relief characters that we insert into our legendary epic tales.
• 1:14:49
  Speaker 2: And yes, Peanut did indeed have a legendary epic tale.
• 1:14:53
  Speaker 2: I'll give you that, But HARAMBEI did not. I didn't
• 1:14:58
  Speaker 2: have any kind of tale. It's gorilla. He didn't need one.
• 1:15:01
  Speaker 2: It was us getting our dicks out for him. That
• 1:15:05
  Speaker 2: was the real magic. By the way, have you noticed
• 1:15:10
  Speaker 2: have you noticed how few fucks people give about Fred
• 1:15:14
  Speaker 2: the raccoon? Poor little bugger Oni appears in like five
• 1:15:18
  Speaker 2: percent of the memes. Everyone's going on about justice for
• 1:15:22
  Speaker 2: Peanut and and Fred the raccoon is up there in
• 1:15:26
  Speaker 2: heaven going what what the fuck am I shot liver?
• 1:15:31
  Speaker 2: Well close? You're probably cat food. They didn't even test
• 1:15:35
  Speaker 2: you for brabies. They don't care. The Karen next door
• 1:15:40
  Speaker 2: needed to feed a filthy little manx cat, so they
• 1:15:44
  Speaker 2: went here, have this guy's pet, fuck him, and nobody
• 1:15:47
  Speaker 2: gives a shit because raccoons aren't as cute as squirrels.
• 1:15:53
  Speaker 2: They're not as neotonous or something. So if you think
• 1:15:58
  Speaker 2: Peanut is some kind of omen, like Harambe was some
• 1:16:02
  Speaker 2: kind of omen, well here's your fucking omen. No matter
• 1:16:06
  Speaker 2: who wins the election tonight, some of us will be
• 1:16:11
  Speaker 2: mourned and pedestalized and celebrated, while some of us will
• 1:16:15
  Speaker 2: be lucky if we get the scraps of compassion from
• 1:16:19
  Speaker 2: the infrastructural table to which we brought everything. If you
• 1:16:24
  Speaker 2: care what I'm driving at, it's it's it's like that
• 1:16:27
  Speaker 2: meme of the of the press conference where there's a
• 1:16:31
  Speaker 2: man with one microphone and a woman with like twenty microphones.
• 1:16:36
  Speaker 2: Imagine that meme, but with Peanut and Fred, and then
• 1:16:40
  Speaker 2: imagine it again with the woman and the man. Yeah,
• 1:16:43
  Speaker 2: there you go. That. That's my contribution to the meme war.
• 1:16:48
  Speaker 2: I don't do visual memes. I just I just I
• 1:16:50
  Speaker 2: just speak them into existence because I'm lazy. Someone else
• 1:16:54
  Speaker 2: do the picture. I'm tired. Oh, if it's not too late,
• 1:16:59
  Speaker 2: vote a Trump. He's the raccoon. Kamala Harris is the squirrel.
• 1:17:04
  Speaker 2: Ah did you say it? Did you spot it? Did
• 1:17:07
  Speaker 2: you predict the m Knight SHOWADDI waddy twist extra points.
• 1:17:12
  Speaker 2: I'm glad we're on the same page, or at least
• 1:17:15
  Speaker 2: in the in the same compendium of unwritten encyclopedia. I
• 1:17:19
  Speaker 2: don't know what I'm saying, all right.
• 1:17:22
  Speaker 3: So jail balls, says Steve Lato, who I do watch
• 1:17:28
  Speaker 3: some of his stuff. I'll actually watch a lot of
• 1:17:30
  Speaker 3: his stuff. And I missed this. Apparently he went over
• 1:17:33
  Speaker 3: an article about that raid that says that they were
• 1:17:38
  Speaker 3: when they went on the raid for the squirrel, they
• 1:17:41
  Speaker 3: they weren't actually going after the squirrel. It was actually
• 1:17:44
  Speaker 3: about going after the guy and his wife because they
• 1:17:51
  Speaker 3: have an only fan, and I guess because they have
• 1:17:54
  Speaker 3: an only fan the state only fans, the state assumed
• 1:17:59
  Speaker 3: that they have child porn. Like I'm not sure what
• 1:18:04
  Speaker 3: the connection there is, because there's lots of people on
• 1:18:07
  Speaker 3: OnlyFans who are adults that don't seem to do anything
• 1:18:10
  Speaker 3: but display themselves. And there doesn't seem to have been
• 1:18:15
  Speaker 3: any evidence that came out since then, Like they didn't
• 1:18:17
  Speaker 3: come back out later and say, look, you guys may
• 1:18:20
  Speaker 3: be angry about this squirrel, but look what we found.
• 1:18:24
  Speaker 3: So apparently they didn't find anything, So it may be
• 1:18:31
  Speaker 3: that they weren't trying just to punish this guy for
• 1:18:34
  Speaker 3: being nice to the squirrel. Maybe they were trying to
• 1:18:36
  Speaker 3: punish him for being innocent of a reprehensible crime that
• 1:18:41
  Speaker 3: they wanted to pin on him, which, in my opinion,
• 1:18:46
  Speaker 3: that's even worse. The government shows up at your house
• 1:18:51
  Speaker 3: trying to find evidence to convict you of a serious crime,
• 1:18:56
  Speaker 3: and when that evidence doesn't exist, they kill your pets
• 1:19:03
  Speaker 3: as punishment. Like that's that's pretty scary too, all right?
• 1:19:13
  Speaker 1: Uh yeah, let us I mean, at least we know
• 1:19:17
  Speaker 1: that Peanut and Fred will have company in heaven with Harambe.
• 1:19:26
  Speaker 1: You know. There you go. It started with a gorilla,
• 1:19:32
  Speaker 1: it perhaps ends with a squirrel and a raccoon. I
• 1:19:35
  Speaker 1: don't know how that works, but I'm not in control
• 1:19:37
  Speaker 1: of these things. Okay, but anyway, we're gonna move on
• 1:19:41
  Speaker 1: to the next story. Let us know you guys think
• 1:19:42
  Speaker 1: about this one in the comments. Okay, last one. We're
• 1:19:45
  Speaker 1: talking about Margot Robbie. This is a small story, but
• 1:19:49
  Speaker 1: I thought it was kind of interesting because Margot Robbie,
• 1:19:53
  Speaker 1: if I know her as an actress, she was in
• 1:19:57
  Speaker 1: a number of movies. She was she played Harley Quinn.
• 1:20:00
  Speaker 1: She was in the h Wolf of Wall Street. But
• 1:20:03
  Speaker 1: her really big film is one that she personally worked
• 1:20:06
  Speaker 1: on as well, called Barbie, which I have like ranted
• 1:20:09
  Speaker 1: about a lot because I'm just one of these weird
• 1:20:13
  Speaker 1: people that can see that it's a hyper feminist, intersectional
• 1:20:17
  Speaker 1: garbage fire of a film that made a shit ton
• 1:20:20
  Speaker 1: of money because it says a lot about women, and
• 1:20:23
  Speaker 1: this story also says a lot about modern women. So
• 1:20:28
  Speaker 1: Margot Robbie has just had a baby, so she is
• 1:20:33
  Speaker 1: the face of feminism right now, the modern face of feminism.
• 1:20:37
  Speaker 1: She had a baby and it's a boy, and this
• 1:20:42
  Speaker 1: is a problem for Twitter. So feminists on Twitter are
• 1:20:46
  Speaker 1: so angry about the fact that she had a boy
• 1:20:48
  Speaker 1: that they're publicly wishing for harm to come to her baby. No,
• 1:20:54
  Speaker 1: we're not kidding. Feminists are allegedly wishing harm on Margot
• 1:20:57
  Speaker 1: Robbie's newborn son, expecting her to raise him as a
• 1:21:00
  Speaker 1: girl due to her role in the film Barbie. Now,
• 1:21:04
  Speaker 1: this is the thing about people who are terminally online
• 1:21:07
  Speaker 1: and addicted to culture. They're probably that you see that
• 1:21:10
  Speaker 1: there are people who have made you know, Chucky and
• 1:21:14
  Speaker 1: Penny Wise from horror films into LGBTQ icons and the
• 1:21:19
  Speaker 1: babaduke and stuff like that. I'm not lying. Look it
• 1:21:22
  Speaker 1: up yourself. This is sort of along those lines, except
• 1:21:25
  Speaker 1: that the Margot Robbie having a boy as a child
• 1:21:29
  Speaker 1: is being viewed as a betrayal of feminism. The gender
• 1:21:34
  Speaker 1: revealed trend is causing mental health issues and toxic behavior,
• 1:21:38
  Speaker 1: with women fantasizing about having girls and being devastated by
• 1:21:43
  Speaker 1: having boys. The Barbie movie If You Guys don't Know,
• 1:21:49
  Speaker 1: essentially was a feminist magnum opus that suggested that men
• 1:21:56
  Speaker 1: would should have should have almost as many as women.
• 1:22:02
  Speaker 1: So there is a they have. The online users, online users,
• 1:22:10
  Speaker 1: I'm sorry, I'm reading from a couple of different sources
• 1:22:12
  Speaker 1: here mainly use the term boy mom to imply Margot
• 1:22:16
  Speaker 1: Robbie was somehow promoting or enabling harmful or misogynistic behavior
• 1:22:20
  Speaker 1: in her son. Okay, there is some comments revealed misogynistic
• 1:22:28
  Speaker 1: undertones implying that Robbie was somehow failing as a mother
• 1:22:31
  Speaker 1: because she has had a boy instead of a girl,
• 1:22:34
  Speaker 1: And of course they're calling that misogyny. Internet and Hollywood
• 1:22:40
  Speaker 1: are being criticized for perpetuating a narrative that men are
• 1:22:42
  Speaker 1: toxic and women are victims, ignoring the existence of good
• 1:22:45
  Speaker 1: men and toxic women. Obviously, the online backlash against Marco
• 1:22:49
  Speaker 1: Robbie's Baby News was largely unfounded and misinformed. The criticism
• 1:22:53
  Speaker 1: was based on misconceptions and undertones that some will see
• 1:22:58
  Speaker 1: as actually massageistic. Hence the title of this story being
• 1:23:03
  Speaker 1: Margot Robbie has a baby boy. Women most affected so anyway,
• 1:23:09
  Speaker 1: so that the story is essentially the person that was
• 1:23:13
  Speaker 1: supposed to be the symbol of women did the awful,
• 1:23:16
  Speaker 1: awful thing of having a baby that is a male,
• 1:23:20
  Speaker 1: Which is interesting also because the film is anti natalist
• 1:23:24
  Speaker 1: at its core. It's all about women like not being
• 1:23:27
  Speaker 1: mothers and that being a burden on them for whatever reason.
• 1:23:31
  Speaker 1: But it didn't actually affect the behavior of the actress herself,
• 1:23:35
  Speaker 1: who chose to have like get married to a man
• 1:23:38
  Speaker 1: and have kids, which is usually the way that feminists operate.
• 1:23:42
  Speaker 1: By the way, so while they're telling you women to
• 1:23:45
  Speaker 1: live one way, they are actually living the way that
• 1:23:48
  Speaker 1: they would normally, you know, in a different way.
• 1:23:50
  Speaker 2: Essentially, go ahead, I wanted to let you finish. Did
• 1:23:57
  Speaker 2: you have more to say?
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 1: No? I think that say it's a small story, but
• 1:24:01
  Speaker 1: I just think it's interesting and funny. That you know,
• 1:24:04
  Speaker 1: she like I said, she had a baby boy, and
• 1:24:06
  Speaker 1: everybody's like upset about it or or feminists online or
• 1:24:09
  Speaker 1: upset about it.
• 1:24:10
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I know, it looks like this isn't much of
• 1:24:13
  Speaker 2: a story because it's just about the reactions of the
• 1:24:15
  Speaker 2: worst corner of Twitter. Karens It sort of seems like
• 1:24:19
  Speaker 2: we're embodying that thing where nine of Twitter is just
• 1:24:23
  Speaker 2: imagining a guy and then getting outraged about that guy.
• 1:24:27
  Speaker 2: And yes, to some extent, that's a factor, but we're
• 1:24:29
  Speaker 2: not making this up. These people might be rare, they
• 1:24:33
  Speaker 2: might not be, but they certainly do exist. And what
• 1:24:37
  Speaker 2: it tells us is that these people have always existed.
• 1:24:41
  Speaker 2: The Internet didn't create these unspeakably missandric demons. Universities did. Arguably,
• 1:24:51
  Speaker 2: they've existed as long before universities validated their demonic missentry.
• 1:24:57
  Speaker 2: The Internet simply shows us that they exist without the
• 1:25:01
  Speaker 2: filter of the mainstream media that likes to paint a
• 1:25:04
  Speaker 2: picture of a purely misogynistic patriarchy in which such massandric
• 1:25:10
  Speaker 2: demons are merely a figment of fragile masculinities imagining it.
• 1:25:16
  Speaker 2: But there's no telling how real this is or how
• 1:25:20
  Speaker 2: ubiquitous this is for every missandric baby killer who's willing
• 1:25:24
  Speaker 2: to admit this in public, there's a greater number of
• 1:25:29
  Speaker 2: them who believe it but would not admit it in public,
• 1:25:34
  Speaker 2: and they are quietly enacting these beliefs in their private actions.
• 1:25:42
  Speaker 2: For all these horror stories we hear about China, right,
• 1:25:46
  Speaker 2: how they apparently drown baby girls because they'd rather have sons,
• 1:25:50
  Speaker 2: never mind how they only do so because their sons
• 1:25:53
  Speaker 2: are legally obliged to look after their parents, while their
• 1:25:57
  Speaker 2: daughters are only obliges to be looked after. We don't
• 1:26:02
  Speaker 2: hear the equivalent horror stories from the West. For as
• 1:26:06
  Speaker 2: long as ultrasound technology has existed, so two has existed,
• 1:26:12
  Speaker 2: this irrational fear and hatred of male humans down to
• 1:26:16
  Speaker 2: and including male fetuses, and so two has existed abortions.
• 1:26:24
  Speaker 2: Every woman has this series of opportunities, first to prefer
• 1:26:29
  Speaker 2: female offspring because they're so terrified of male offspring, and
• 1:26:33
  Speaker 2: then to determine long before birth what sect of baby
• 1:26:38
  Speaker 2: they are just stating, and then to abort the baby
• 1:26:42
  Speaker 2: should they see fit. And how they see fit is
• 1:26:46
  Speaker 2: at their own discretion. They don't even have to tell
• 1:26:50
  Speaker 2: the truth. They can elect to abort the baby for
• 1:26:55
  Speaker 2: any reason disclosed or undisclosed. So yes, that series of
• 1:27:04
  Speaker 2: events can take place. You find out your baby is male,
• 1:27:10
  Speaker 2: and so you kill it because it is male. Don't
• 1:27:14
  Speaker 2: tell me it can't happen, it clearly can, and don't
• 1:27:18
  Speaker 2: tell me it doesn't happen. Many women will proclaim that
• 1:27:23
  Speaker 2: it's exactly what they want to happen. You may say
• 1:27:27
  Speaker 2: they're only joking, and sure, many of them probably are
• 1:27:31
  Speaker 2: just joking. But the point is they can make it happen.
• 1:27:35
  Speaker 2: There's nothing stopping them. It's left only to our imagining
• 1:27:41
  Speaker 2: exactly how often this series of events does indeed happen.
• 1:27:46
  Speaker 2: There's little or no way for us to determine how
• 1:27:48
  Speaker 2: often it does happen, since such medical information is generally
• 1:27:53
  Speaker 2: secret and anonymous. And if we were to take a
• 1:27:56
  Speaker 2: survey of the general population to find out that it's
• 1:28:00
  Speaker 2: still roughly forty nine percent male fifty one female, we
• 1:28:06
  Speaker 2: might notice that the male population is being skewed upwards
• 1:28:10
  Speaker 2: because the vast majority of all these illegal aliens are male,
• 1:28:14
  Speaker 2: and they're being counted on the same census. The great
• 1:28:20
  Speaker 2: replacement ladies and gentlemen is not just conducted along racial lines.
• 1:28:28
  Speaker 2: As long as they're killing, say, ten percent of the
• 1:28:32
  Speaker 2: male babies and replacing the male population with a ten
• 1:28:36
  Speaker 2: percent influx of illegal alien males, or whatever the ratio
• 1:28:41
  Speaker 2: may be. It's very much happening along sexual lines. Indeed,
• 1:28:45
  Speaker 2: the great replacement of males came first. It came along
• 1:28:49
  Speaker 2: before the Great replacement of races or whatever else. It
• 1:28:54
  Speaker 2: was once considered a radical pipe dream to reduce use
• 1:29:00
  Speaker 2: the male population. Now it's very much a regality. But
• 1:29:05
  Speaker 2: of course this is just conjecture. I can't be sure
• 1:29:08
  Speaker 2: of any of this. I'm just asking questions hypatheticals. On
• 1:29:12
  Speaker 2: an unrelated note, if it's not too late, vote Donald
• 1:29:16
  Speaker 2: Trump and see if you can make some headway into
• 1:29:20
  Speaker 2: into preventing this male genocide. Just an idea of throwing
• 1:29:24
  Speaker 2: it out there like like like like a butterfly in
• 1:29:27
  Speaker 2: an anime based meme. Abortion, Is this male genocide?
• 1:29:32
  Speaker 3: Nah? Nah?
• 1:29:33
  Speaker 2: Probably not. Never mind, You're fine, this is fine. This
• 1:29:36
  Speaker 2: is fine. At least I can have abortions.
• 1:29:40
  Speaker 3: So I just uh just wanna just want to take
• 1:29:45
  Speaker 3: everybody way way back in time here for a minute.
• 1:29:50
  Speaker 3: We're gonna go go back before Honey Badger Radio, in fact,
• 1:29:56
  Speaker 3: before the honey Badger Brigade existed. So on December sixteenth,
• 1:30:04
  Speaker 3: twenty eleven, Robert O'Hara of A Voice for Men published
• 1:30:08
  Speaker 3: on the website an article titled radfim Hub the Underbelly
• 1:30:16
  Speaker 3: of a hate movement. And the significance of this article
• 1:30:21
  Speaker 3: in regard to this type of talk is and you'll
• 1:30:26
  Speaker 3: have to look at it in the wayback machine to
• 1:30:29
  Speaker 3: actually see the images that prove this, But it showed
• 1:30:36
  Speaker 3: a lot of women talking like this about men and boys,
• 1:30:39
  Speaker 3: things like, you know, if I have a baby boy,
• 1:30:42
  Speaker 3: I won't nurse him take care of him, and things
• 1:30:47
  Speaker 3: like that. But in among those were feminist activists in
• 1:30:54
  Speaker 3: position of power and authority or in position of authority
• 1:30:59
  Speaker 3: over over boys like school teachers and things like that,
• 1:31:03
  Speaker 3: saying these reprehensible things and talking about ways that they
• 1:31:06
  Speaker 3: undermine the welfare of the people that they were in
• 1:31:09
  Speaker 3: charge of or an authority over. And so when people
• 1:31:14
  Speaker 3: talk about stuff like this as just outrage porn, like
• 1:31:19
  Speaker 3: there is such a thing as just outrage porn. This
• 1:31:23
  Speaker 3: one individual woman gets hired to this company as a
• 1:31:27
  Speaker 3: DEI hire. We know that happens. If you have to
• 1:31:30
  Speaker 3: highlight every instance of that happening, and there isn't some
• 1:31:34
  Speaker 3: other connection that you can highlight. Yes, that is outrage porn.
• 1:31:37
  Speaker 3: This This is a continuation of a discussion that has
• 1:31:41
  Speaker 3: been taking place for a long time because what you're
• 1:31:45
  Speaker 3: seeing on social media with regard to these women behaving
• 1:31:49
  Speaker 3: this way toward this as this actress, this is influenced
• 1:31:56
  Speaker 3: by women in positions of power and authority. And I'm
• 1:32:00
  Speaker 3: not talking about social power, just social power. I'm talking
• 1:32:04
  Speaker 3: about women who are influencers of legislation, who are who
• 1:32:09
  Speaker 3: even vote on what legislation gets pasted, right, I'm talking
• 1:32:14
  Speaker 3: about women who control access to education, talking about women
• 1:32:20
  Speaker 3: who make decisions regarding how law or how policy in
• 1:32:26
  Speaker 3: government agencies is going to be treated. Coordinators for cities,
• 1:32:34
  Speaker 3: coordinators for departments, government departments. And then then you also
• 1:32:40
  Speaker 3: have people who just do jobs that seem like they're innocuous,
• 1:32:43
  Speaker 3: but you know only until they you find out they
• 1:32:47
  Speaker 3: work for the state, like a web developer or a
• 1:32:51
  Speaker 3: creator of media, and then you find out, yeah, they're
• 1:32:56
  Speaker 3: just a creator of media that creates all the grad
• 1:33:00
  Speaker 3: effics for this one department, or they're just a web
• 1:33:03
  Speaker 3: developer that develops the website that determines whether or not
• 1:33:06
  Speaker 3: you're able to apply for grants for this one particular thing. Uh,
• 1:33:11
  Speaker 3: So this isn't just a minor detail. It's actually quite serious.
• 1:33:16
  Speaker 3: It's not it's funny to to to see these women
• 1:33:20
  Speaker 3: getting upset about this and and turning into psycho hoosbists
• 1:33:23
  Speaker 3: over something they have no control over. But at the
• 1:33:25
  Speaker 3: same time, it's it's a bit scary because it's common now. Right,
• 1:33:35
  Speaker 3: the girl bosses are that that run parts of the machine,
• 1:33:43
  Speaker 3: parts of the machine that you rage against, parts of
• 1:33:46
  Speaker 3: the plant that I've been referring to the the love
• 1:33:51
  Speaker 3: crafty and a horror plant monster. Right, they're doing this.
• 1:33:58
  Speaker 3: They want to see baby boys being denied mother's milk
• 1:34:04
  Speaker 3: because they're boys. They want to see little boys being
• 1:34:10
  Speaker 3: denied education because they're boys. They want to see children
• 1:34:16
  Speaker 3: being denied medical care because they're boys. So it's not
• 1:34:25
  Speaker 3: it's not just outrage porn. It's very important and you
• 1:34:29
  Speaker 3: should be paying careful attention to this and noticing how
• 1:34:33
  Speaker 3: many women think it's okay to behave this way toward
• 1:34:38
  Speaker 3: other people in public over their parenting choices in regard
• 1:34:43
  Speaker 3: to boys, because it is a symptom of something that
• 1:34:48
  Speaker 3: is mostly under the surface you mostly don't see that
• 1:34:53
  Speaker 3: is very deep and dark and nasty. And well, I
• 1:35:01
  Speaker 3: did point out the article was written by Robert O'Hara.
• 1:35:05
  Speaker 3: The information was acquired by a Voice for Men secret agent.
• 1:35:13
  Speaker 3: You could say, he's not exactly that, he's a writer.
• 1:35:18
  Speaker 3: He worked with us actually when we first started a
• 1:35:20
  Speaker 3: Honey Badger radio. If you listen to any archives of
• 1:35:24
  Speaker 3: our old blog talk radio shows and you hear us
• 1:35:27
  Speaker 3: talking to James, James was Agent Orange. Agent Orange was
• 1:35:32
  Speaker 3: his code name, and reporting to a Voice for Men
• 1:35:38
  Speaker 3: on his finding of this information, and it's it's basically docxing.
• 1:35:43
  Speaker 3: He went into radfim Hub and pretended to be one
• 1:35:47
  Speaker 3: of them and quite effectively harvested quite a bit of
• 1:35:54
  Speaker 3: their discussion and information that that showed, you know, who
• 1:36:00
  Speaker 3: was having these discussions and what effects they were trying
• 1:36:04
  Speaker 3: to create in the world, which you don't see happening
• 1:36:08
  Speaker 3: a lot anymore. And of course he did it specifically
• 1:36:12
  Speaker 3: because there was this massandric influence among women in positions
• 1:36:18
  Speaker 3: of power and authority that there was affecting people in
• 1:36:22
  Speaker 3: the real world. And he did take a risk, I mean,
• 1:36:25
  Speaker 3: he could have gotten in trouble had he gotten caught
• 1:36:29
  Speaker 3: doing this, So it's something that people should remember, even
• 1:36:34
  Speaker 3: though you know, like he's not involved in that anymore.
• 1:36:37
  Speaker 3: And it's one of the reasons why I like, yes,
• 1:36:41
  Speaker 3: I fully condemn doxing somebody because you don't like some
• 1:36:44
  Speaker 3: stupid thing they said on Twitter. But when somebody is
• 1:36:48
  Speaker 3: in a position of authority and power in their using
• 1:36:53
  Speaker 3: those positions to damage people's lives on the basis of
• 1:36:58
  Speaker 3: an ideology, that's an entirely different situation. You have a
• 1:37:02
  Speaker 3: right to know what your public officials are doing, and
• 1:37:04
  Speaker 3: if they are doing unethical and corrupt things. Uh, and
• 1:37:08
  Speaker 3: and if they are violating Sunshine standards, even if there
• 1:37:13
  Speaker 3: are not Sunshine laws that apply to them, if they
• 1:37:15
  Speaker 3: are violating the ethics of Sunshine Standards, which are basically
• 1:37:20
  Speaker 3: the standard of any government and engagement among any officials,
• 1:37:27
  Speaker 3: any anything that they do that's going to affect the
• 1:37:29
  Speaker 3: public being made public instead of being done in private
• 1:37:34
  Speaker 3: and secret. Right, if they're doing it in violation of
• 1:37:38
  Speaker 3: Sunshine standards, then it is perfectly fair and reasonable for
• 1:37:42
  Speaker 3: somebody to sneak in and expose that. So yeah, that's
• 1:37:48
  Speaker 3: basically my response to this, Like I don't care what
• 1:37:51
  Speaker 3: these women think. And I don't care about their attitudes.
• 1:37:53
  Speaker 3: I care who's having those attitudes, and that that is
• 1:37:59
  Speaker 3: what makes this the most serious thing. And it goes
• 1:38:02
  Speaker 3: right back to the squirrel issue, right that bit coming out.
• 1:38:06
  Speaker 3: And by the way, he clarified, I can't remember who
• 1:38:11
  Speaker 3: it was that said I gotta go back here. Jay
• 1:38:15
  Speaker 3: clarified it was not Steve Lato, which is why I
• 1:38:20
  Speaker 3: couldn't find the video. It was Clownfish TV. In in
• 1:38:25
  Speaker 3: searching that, I found the article, which was a TMZ article,
• 1:38:29
  Speaker 3: and it does it does say that that sources. It
• 1:38:35
  Speaker 3: doesn't say who the sources are, but sources think authorities
• 1:38:38
  Speaker 3: were after porn, not animals. I think the source might
• 1:38:42
  Speaker 3: actually be the family themselves. But when officials show up
• 1:38:50
  Speaker 3: at your house and they ask if you have cameras,
• 1:38:54
  Speaker 3: they ask if they're on camera, unless you know for
• 1:38:59
  Speaker 3: a fact that you're subjec acted to some kind of
• 1:39:01
  Speaker 3: law that says you have to tell them, don't you
• 1:39:05
  Speaker 3: just start right there invoking your right to remain silent
• 1:39:12
  Speaker 3: and let them wonder if they're being filmed. If you
• 1:39:16
  Speaker 3: get official showing it up at your house and trying
• 1:39:20
  Speaker 3: to raid, and you have done nothing wrong, and you
• 1:39:23
  Speaker 3: do have cameras, if it's possible, start publicly streaming it
• 1:39:27
  Speaker 3: the minute they walk up to your door, because this
• 1:39:33
  Speaker 3: kind of stuff should not happen in secret.
• 1:39:41
  Speaker 1: Okay, well, I'm gonna read some super tats and we're
• 1:39:45
  Speaker 1: gonna head into the patient show because we're a little
• 1:39:47
  Speaker 1: over on time. So first I got one from Albatross
• 1:39:52
  Speaker 1: and he says, this is the same insane energy as
• 1:39:56
  Speaker 1: women stalking Adam Driver's family because they on him to
• 1:40:00
  Speaker 1: hook up with Ray Palpatine. Yeah, Daisy Ridley, it is.
• 1:40:04
  Speaker 1: It is that. But I think that the darker thing
• 1:40:07
  Speaker 1: we talked about it is like the normalization of this
• 1:40:10
  Speaker 1: kind of like, you know, like we've basically made abortion
• 1:40:16
  Speaker 1: so normal that it's become eugenics when women call for it,
• 1:40:19
  Speaker 1: and no one seems to think that that's you know,
• 1:40:22
  Speaker 1: that there's anything wrong with that, even though it is
• 1:40:24
  Speaker 1: a vocal minority. But the point we is.
• 1:40:27
  Speaker 3: We've made an abortion so normal in the United States
• 1:40:31
  Speaker 3: that women last year in the United States made being
• 1:40:35
  Speaker 3: aborted the number one cause of death here right, a
• 1:40:40
  Speaker 3: million abortions last year a million.
• 1:40:44
  Speaker 1: Well, they want to get it all in before you know.
• 1:40:47
  Speaker 1: Project twenty twenty five comes. But yeah, like that's what
• 1:40:50
  Speaker 1: I'm saying, Like the issue is the normalization and also
• 1:40:54
  Speaker 1: pointing out again the people who push this message don't
• 1:40:58
  Speaker 1: actually live that, Like Margot Robbie is having children and
• 1:41:03
  Speaker 1: she's not engaging in any of that. But I guarantee
• 1:41:06
  Speaker 1: you she is championing this for other women, but just
• 1:41:09
  Speaker 1: not for herself. So anyway, I gotta read let me
• 1:41:12
  Speaker 1: get through the super chests, thank you, Albatross. Yes, it's
• 1:41:15
  Speaker 1: the same. And Nova Fan gave us a rumble rant
• 1:41:18
  Speaker 1: or it's like one dollar and he says, why do
• 1:41:20
  Speaker 1: I get the feeling? All the women defending Margot Robbie
• 1:41:22
  Speaker 1: against angry feminists spent most of their adult lives supporting
• 1:41:26
  Speaker 1: women's rights. Should we inform them of the history of
• 1:41:29
  Speaker 1: women's rights, Well, women's rights until you do something that
• 1:41:33
  Speaker 1: they don't like, and then then that doesn't count. I
• 1:41:35
  Speaker 1: remember when was it Kirsten Dunst, like years ago, she
• 1:41:42
  Speaker 1: was the actress that was in the Spider Man movies
• 1:41:44
  Speaker 1: with Toby maguire. She basically said, you know something like well,
• 1:41:48
  Speaker 1: I like being a mother and a housewife, and they
• 1:41:50
  Speaker 1: were just writing articles about it because Essentially, it's about
• 1:41:53
  Speaker 1: maintaining a certain you know, narrative for women, and any
• 1:41:57
  Speaker 1: women that stray from that, they get attacked in the
• 1:42:00
  Speaker 1: same way that men having any opinion on this ship
• 1:42:02
  Speaker 1: at all get attacked. So you just become like an
• 1:42:05
  Speaker 1: honorary man. So all right, But anyway, we're gonna move
• 1:42:10
  Speaker 1: on to the Patron show now, and we're gonna be
• 1:42:13
  Speaker 1: talking about what's going on in the background. I have
• 1:42:16
  Speaker 1: no idea. I have not been looking into it at
• 1:42:18
  Speaker 1: all because I wanted to focus on just like you know,
• 1:42:21
  Speaker 1: doing the show and all that, and uh, but we're
• 1:42:24
  Speaker 1: gonna talk about it. We're gonna see where we're at
• 1:42:26
  Speaker 1: in terms of the election here in the United States.
• 1:42:28
  Speaker 1: So if you're not American, you know, I don't know
• 1:42:31
  Speaker 1: what to tell you, but maybe you should hang out anyway,
• 1:42:33
  Speaker 1: because what happens to us will affect you. Yeah, I was.
• 1:42:36
  Speaker 3: Gonna say, we're we're headed down a path in the
• 1:42:39
  Speaker 3: United States right now that makes that that everybody in
• 1:42:44
  Speaker 3: the world should be nervous about because there are potential wars.
• 1:42:48
  Speaker 3: And we talked about this in HBr talk again recently,
• 1:42:53
  Speaker 3: and we just learned from from looking at some of
• 1:42:55
  Speaker 3: the information that came about about the second assassin, who's
• 1:43:00
  Speaker 3: attempted assassin whose failure to assassinate the president with publicized.
• 1:43:06
  Speaker 3: That indicates that under the Obama administration, the United States
• 1:43:11
  Speaker 3: paid Afghan soldiers to commit a genocide against Russia nationals
• 1:43:19
  Speaker 3: in Ukraine for the crime of rejecting a government that
• 1:43:23
  Speaker 3: the United States installed there. So you should care about
• 1:43:28
  Speaker 3: who is president of the United States because that's that
• 1:43:31
  Speaker 3: bureaucracy that women voted into place in action, and that
• 1:43:35
  Speaker 3: bureaucracy continues unabated with Kamala. There's a slight chance, a
• 1:43:41
  Speaker 3: spark of hope that it will be interrupted with Trump,
• 1:43:44
  Speaker 3: and that interruption will continue if we continue to vote
• 1:43:47
  Speaker 3: in people to interrupt it, interrupt it. But so yeah,
• 1:43:52
  Speaker 3: you should. You should want to know what's going on.
• 1:43:54
  Speaker 2: I care. I care about the American election because the
• 1:43:58
  Speaker 2: two parties have significant differences. Like I didn't care about
• 1:44:02
  Speaker 2: the last UK election or any of the recent last
• 1:44:05
  Speaker 2: UK elections because every party in the UK is run
• 1:44:08
  Speaker 2: by corrupt, communist traitors. It doesn't matter how we vote,
• 1:44:12
  Speaker 2: We've already been failed by democracy. Much like before Trump
• 1:44:18
  Speaker 2: turned up in twenty sixteen, like it didn't matter like,
• 1:44:22
  Speaker 2: did it matter if i'l Gore one or if George
• 1:44:25
  Speaker 2: Bush one, or if John Carry one, or if George
• 1:44:27
  Speaker 2: Bush one, or if John McCain one or Barack Obama one,
• 1:44:31
  Speaker 2: or of Mitt Romney one or Barack Obama. It didn't matter.
• 1:44:34
  Speaker 2: They were all the same fucking warhawks of the same uniparty.
• 1:44:38
  Speaker 2: It didn't matter until twenty sixteen, when an outsider finally
• 1:44:43
  Speaker 2: came along, like Donald Trump. And that's why we give
• 1:44:45
  Speaker 2: a shit, because because your your elections actually matter. Plus
• 1:44:50
  Speaker 2: you know, everything that happens in the in the US
• 1:44:53
  Speaker 2: trickles down into the rest of Europe. So this is
• 1:44:56
  Speaker 2: really fucking important.
• 1:44:57
  Speaker 1: Yeah, So I'm gonna read this last super chat that
• 1:45:00
  Speaker 1: I missed, and then we're gonna go into the Patron
• 1:45:01
  Speaker 1: Show where we can like talk about this more so.
• 1:45:03
  Speaker 1: Senior Sticks gave us two dollars and says who's gonna
• 1:45:07
  Speaker 1: pay for squirrel Gate Hannah is Hot twenty twenty four.
• 1:45:11
  Speaker 1: All right, thank you Senior Sticks for that. All Right,
• 1:45:14
  Speaker 1: we're gonna end the show there. Thank you guys for
• 1:45:16
  Speaker 1: coming on. If you like this video, please hit like subscribe.
• 1:45:18
  Speaker 1: If you're not already subscribed, hit the bell for notifications,
• 1:45:21
  Speaker 1: leave us a comment, let us you guys thinking about
• 1:45:22
  Speaker 1: what we talked about on the show today, and please
• 1:45:24
  Speaker 1: please please share this video because sharing is caring. Thank
• 1:45:27
  Speaker 1: you so much for coming on today's episode of HBr News,
• 1:45:31
  Speaker 1: and we will see you next Tuesday, I mean, hopefully
• 1:45:34
  Speaker 1: we're still here after tonight.
• 1:45:36
  Speaker 3: Talk to you.
• 1:45:37
  Speaker 2: Trying to kill him.
• 1:45:38
  Speaker 1: Men's Right activists are machines, dude. Okay, they are literal machines.
• 1:45:45
  Speaker 1: They are talking point machines. They are impossible to fucking
• 1:45:48
  Speaker 1: deal with, especially if you have, like especially if you
• 1:45:50
  Speaker 1: have like a couple of dudes who have good memory.
• 1:45:53
  Speaker 1: On top of that too, holy shit, you're fucked