Latest / Wrongful Conviction / #289 Jason Flom with Andrew Royer

Transcript

#289 Jason Flom with Andrew Royer · Wrongful Conviction

0:03
Speaker 1: On Thanksgiving two thousand and five, ninety four year old
0:05
Speaker 1: Helen Sailor returned to her home, a high rise apartment
0:08
Speaker 1: building for the elderly and disabled in Elkhardidiana. When phone
0:12
Speaker 1: calls went unanswered through the following morning, family members found
0:16
Speaker 1: Helen strangled to death, allegedly with the lanyard that had
0:20
Speaker 1: gone missing. A partial print of dubious importance was sent
0:24
Speaker 1: to the Indiana State Police lab. Initially, Elk Cahrd PD
0:28
Speaker 1: had two viable suspects, but the investigation went cold. The
0:32
Speaker 1: case became a priority again when a new homicide unit
0:35
Speaker 1: was formed. Detective Mark Daggy had an unfounded theory involving
0:39
Speaker 1: a string of burglaries and a younger resident the high rise,
0:43
Speaker 1: Lana Canaan. Investigators pressured a vulnerable friend of Lana's to
0:47
Speaker 1: claim that she had confessed to murdering Helen Sailor with
0:50
Speaker 1: another high rise resident, a disabled man named Andy Royer,
0:54
Speaker 1: who was dragged in for a course of interrogation resulting
0:58
Speaker 1: in a false confession. Corroborate these false statements. They pulled
1:02
Speaker 1: the prints from the Indiana State Police ladder and gave
1:05
Speaker 1: them to an untrained analyst just to get him to
1:08
Speaker 1: say the print match Faana. Andy and Lana went to
1:11
Speaker 1: trial together and were not able to cross examine each
1:14
Speaker 1: other to point out the glaring inconsistencies in Andy's recanted
1:18
Speaker 1: statement between the fabricated fingerprint match, false statements, and outright
1:23
Speaker 1: perjury by law enforcement. Both Lana and Andy were sentenced
1:27
Speaker 1: to fifty five years in prison. This is wrongful conviction.
1:45
Speaker 1: Welcome back to wrongful conviction. Today. I have a case
1:47
Speaker 1: out of Elkhart, Indiana, a town that I have a
1:50
Speaker 1: bad feeling. We're going to start to know really well,
1:52
Speaker 1: because if just one case can involve so many of
1:55
Speaker 1: the hallmarks of wrongful convictions in the town of so
1:57
Speaker 1: few people, what else must be out there? And the
2:01
Speaker 1: case today involves a false confession, a coerced eye witness,
2:04
Speaker 1: false expert testimony, prosecutorial misconduct, official misconduct, and a general
2:10
Speaker 1: reckless and almost total disregard for the truth, justice, and
2:13
Speaker 1: public safety. And this case is not only about what
2:17
Speaker 1: happened to an elderly woman, Helen Sailor, but also the
2:21
Speaker 1: two people who were wrongfully convicted, Vlana Kane and the
2:24
Speaker 1: man who is with us today, Andy Royer. Andy, Welcome
2:29
Speaker 1: to wrongful conviction.
2:30
Speaker 2: Thanks for having me.
2:31
Speaker 1: Thank you for joining us. And with him is his
2:34
Speaker 1: attorney from the Notre Dame Exoneration Justice Clinic. I've never
2:37
Speaker 1: seen someone who is more effective at breaking down the
2:41
Speaker 1: blue wall of silence. Elliott Slosar, Welcome to the show.
2:45
Speaker 3: Thanks so much for having us.
2:47
Speaker 1: So tell us a little about where this story takes place.
2:51
Speaker 4: Yeah, Elkhart, you know, small town, Indiana, approximately forty fifty
2:56
Speaker 4: thousand people. I think it still considers itself the RV
3:00
Speaker 4: capital of the world. RVs are less used now than
3:04
Speaker 4: then we're in the nineties, but it's a town that
3:07
Speaker 4: you know, at its height, people were moving from all
3:09
Speaker 4: over the Midwest to go work there and work in
3:12
Speaker 4: the factories and you know, build better lives. You know
3:15
Speaker 4: when the RV stuff sort of slowed down is when
3:19
Speaker 4: Elkhart became more written with crime. That uptick ultimately produced
3:24
Speaker 4: a lot of wrongful convictions.
3:25
Speaker 1: Right, And as we saw all over the country in
3:27
Speaker 1: the eighties and nineties, you had an uptick in crime,
3:29
Speaker 1: and politicians then ran quote unquote tough on crime campaigns,
3:34
Speaker 1: which I have to say is just nonsense. It's really
3:36
Speaker 1: just tough on people. Those things never result in a
3:38
Speaker 1: reduction in crime, but anyway, that led to an era
3:41
Speaker 1: when the authorities were just playing fast and loose with
3:43
Speaker 1: the rules and the civil rights of our fellow Americans,
3:46
Speaker 1: arresting just about anyone in order to close cases, which,
3:50
Speaker 1: of course, as we often recognize here on the show,
3:53
Speaker 1: it leaves the trooper out on the street, ready and
3:56
Speaker 1: willing to commit more crimes in most cases.
3:59
Speaker 4: Yeah, I think systemically Elkhart have had police miss conduct
4:04
Speaker 4: problems dating back to the sixties and seventies. There was
4:08
Speaker 4: a real lack of training in place and a real
4:12
Speaker 4: acceptance and even encouragement of police mist conduct, and that
4:16
Speaker 4: stuff did not end in the nineties.
4:18
Speaker 3: And you know, they've had a lot of wrongful convictions.
4:20
Speaker 4: Five exonerations so far, five exonerations out of a population
4:24
Speaker 4: of fifty thousand, five exonerations. You know, we've got like
4:27
Speaker 4: another dozen wrongfully convicted clients from Melkart who are still trying.
4:31
Speaker 3: To come home.
4:32
Speaker 4: And that's only like the tip of what we're uncovering there.
4:36
Speaker 1: Right, So we're talking about seventeen out of a population
4:39
Speaker 1: of fifty thousand, and those are just the ones we
4:41
Speaker 1: know about. I mean, just to give you a comparison.
4:43
Speaker 1: By the way, there have been three hundred and thirty
4:45
Speaker 1: exonerations in New York City. Now there are plenty more
4:48
Speaker 1: people fighting for justice as we speak, innocent as could be,
4:52
Speaker 1: but still three hundred and thirty in a city of
4:55
Speaker 1: about eight and a half million people. That nets out
4:57
Speaker 1: to about four per one hundred thousand.
4:59
Speaker 4: I think that per capita Elkhart, Indiana, the city will
5:04
Speaker 4: be the wrongful conviction capital in the US.
5:08
Speaker 1: Yeah, you know. I read another case out of Elkhart,
5:11
Speaker 1: a guy named Edgar Garrett in the nineties when interrogations
5:14
Speaker 1: were all video recorded. It's a false confession case which
5:19
Speaker 1: preceded Andy's. But Edgar Garrett was acquitted because the jury
5:22
Speaker 1: saw the interrogation. And I bring it up to illustrate
5:24
Speaker 1: the systemic problem in Elkhart. Can you tell us about
5:27
Speaker 1: that case?
5:28
Speaker 4: What happened in the case with Edgar Garrett? He was
5:31
Speaker 4: a father accused of murdering his child. The child wasn't
5:35
Speaker 4: found yet the police interrogate him for twelve hours. This
5:39
Speaker 4: is like back in like ninety three, ninety four. It's
5:41
Speaker 4: all video recorded, same interrogations rooms. As you know, Andy,
5:45
Speaker 4: a decade later, when that interrogation was going on. It
5:50
Speaker 4: produced a false confession where edgar Garrett falsely confessed to
5:54
Speaker 4: killing his daughter by hitting her.
5:56
Speaker 3: Over the head with like a pipe.
5:58
Speaker 4: They hadn't found the body yet. They then took Garrett
6:01
Speaker 4: to the crime scene, did a reenactment with him. A
6:04
Speaker 4: couple weeks later, they find the body. The daughter is
6:08
Speaker 4: stabbed to death like dozens and dozens of times. She
6:11
Speaker 4: wasn't killed by being hit in the head, and they're like, oh, shoot,
6:15
Speaker 4: so like in hell, caart what they did? They went
6:17
Speaker 4: forward with the death penalty trial. The jury was shown
6:21
Speaker 4: the interrogation video. They found Eggre Garrett not guilty, and
6:26
Speaker 4: the jurors were interviewed and what they'd said was we
6:30
Speaker 4: saw that it was the cops confession that Egregarrett was
6:34
Speaker 4: just repeating it, that they browbeat him into a false confession.
6:39
Speaker 1: And I mean, this is why we obviously and desperately
6:43
Speaker 1: need videotaping of all interactions with police. I'm talking about
6:47
Speaker 1: identification proceedings, witness interviews, interrogations, because when a jury witnesses
6:54
Speaker 1: how these things go down, they can better assess the
6:57
Speaker 1: validity of each of these pieces of evidence.
7:00
Speaker 4: One hundred percent so they do this dayline episode, the
7:02
Speaker 4: Electric prosecutors on there, Michael Consteina, and they're like, boy,
7:05
Speaker 4: you know, mister Constantino, this seems like you've got a problem.
7:09
Speaker 4: Like the guy canfest in a different way than the
7:12
Speaker 4: daughter was killed.
7:13
Speaker 3: That's a real problem. You know.
7:14
Speaker 4: Weren't you concerned about that? He's like, well, you know,
7:17
Speaker 4: wasn't good for the case.
7:19
Speaker 1: Which of course begs the question why did they go
7:22
Speaker 1: forward with the prosecution, let alone go for the death penalty.
7:25
Speaker 4: Yeah, so he went forward with it anyways. And so
7:28
Speaker 4: at the end of the episode, there's this fascinating thing
7:30
Speaker 4: where they're like, and we've spoken to the city of
7:32
Speaker 4: Elkhart and they have now changed their policies and they
7:36
Speaker 4: were no longer video recording interrogations.
7:39
Speaker 1: Okay, So, faced with the reality that this man had
7:42
Speaker 1: not killed his daughter and was coerced at to saying
7:44
Speaker 1: that he had, the remedy was not to reprimand the
7:47
Speaker 1: officer or figured out some safeguards against getting false confessions. No,
7:51
Speaker 1: their solution was to remove the transparency, and that of
7:55
Speaker 1: course set the stage for what happened in Andy's case.
7:58
Speaker 1: But before we get into that aspect of it, go
8:00
Speaker 1: back to before any of this happened, Andy, what was
8:02
Speaker 1: your life like growing up in Elkhart. Can you tell
8:05
Speaker 1: us a little bit about your childhood.
8:08
Speaker 2: I had a stepdad and he was around for us
8:11
Speaker 2: all the time and it turned out good. So.
8:15
Speaker 1: And what were some of your favorite things to do?
8:17
Speaker 2: Swimming and playing baseball? Junior minor leagues?
8:21
Speaker 1: Wow, junior minor leagues. You must have been a pretty
8:23
Speaker 1: decent athlete there, you know.
8:25
Speaker 2: It was It kept me busy during the summer.
8:28
Speaker 1: So you kept busy and never were in trouble with
8:30
Speaker 1: the police. What about school?
8:31
Speaker 2: Yeah, a's and b's and great.
8:34
Speaker 1: So you excelled in sports and in school. But then
8:37
Speaker 1: you later went on to qualify to live in a
8:39
Speaker 1: high rise building specifically for elderly people and people with
8:42
Speaker 1: disabilities because of a tragic accident. Do you feel comfortable
8:46
Speaker 1: telling us about that?
8:47
Speaker 2: No, I don't want to.
8:49
Speaker 1: I totally understand. Is it okay if Elliott tells us
8:51
Speaker 1: about it?
8:52
Speaker 2: Yeah?
8:52
Speaker 4: Andy was working and suffered you know, a really really
8:56
Speaker 4: tragic accident while working, you know, one of those telephone poles.
9:00
Speaker 4: He pushed somebody out of the way it was going
9:02
Speaker 4: to fall in. Another colleague and it caused for Andy
9:05
Speaker 4: to suffer significant traumatic injury to his hand, and so
9:09
Speaker 4: he's lost part of his middle finger.
9:11
Speaker 3: He only has half of it.
9:12
Speaker 4: He saved somebody's life in the process. But the fascinating
9:16
Speaker 4: thing was that the trauma that Andy endured from that
9:20
Speaker 4: experience like rewired his brain, and so Andy now suffers,
9:26
Speaker 4: you know, significant cognitive functioning disabilities that like he didn't
9:30
Speaker 4: have as a teenager.
9:32
Speaker 1: Well, Andy, I know you don't want to talk about it,
9:34
Speaker 1: but what you did was just straight heroic and it's
9:38
Speaker 1: something you should be very proud of.
9:40
Speaker 2: I'm proud of it.
9:41
Speaker 1: Yeah, I would be too. And so you were living
9:43
Speaker 1: in this high rise, struggling to acclimate and adjust to
9:46
Speaker 1: life having gone through this tragic accent, and that's when
9:48
Speaker 1: you offended Lana Canaan, who ends up the second wrongful
9:51
Speaker 1: conviction survivor in this story. Now, from what I understand,
9:55
Speaker 1: the detective in this case had previously had a theory
9:58
Speaker 1: that Lana may have been responsible for or a few
10:00
Speaker 1: burglaries in the high rise. Now he had nothing to
10:02
Speaker 1: actually back that up other than that she had dated
10:05
Speaker 1: a maintenance guy there and could have plausibly theoretically had
10:08
Speaker 1: access to his keys, so pretty much just pure speculation.
10:13
Speaker 1: But she was on the mind of at least one
10:15
Speaker 1: detective before all of this happened. Can you tell us
10:18
Speaker 1: about your relationship to her.
10:20
Speaker 2: Yeah, I used to hang around her. She didn't seem
10:22
Speaker 2: like trouble somebody talk to and just as a friend.
10:27
Speaker 1: Dude, either of you remember what brought her to the
10:30
Speaker 1: high rise.
10:30
Speaker 4: My understanding is that Lana had some sort of mental
10:33
Speaker 4: health struggle that qualified as a disability which allowed for
10:37
Speaker 4: her to live there. I'm not sure the exact type.
10:40
Speaker 4: She was functioning at a much higher rate than Andy was.
10:43
Speaker 1: At the time, and the prosecution then used that as
10:47
Speaker 1: a way to say that Andy was the muscle under
10:49
Speaker 1: Lana's control in an incident that neither of you had
10:52
Speaker 1: anything to do with the murder of another resident at
10:56
Speaker 1: the high rise, a ninety four year old blind woman
10:58
Speaker 1: named Helen Sailor. And this blind woman she lived alone,
11:02
Speaker 1: but she had a home healthcare worker to a sister
11:04
Speaker 1: in her daily task including filling up her medications, and
11:07
Speaker 1: it's believed that she was killed sometime in the evening
11:10
Speaker 1: on November twenty eighth, Thanksgiving, two thousand and two.
11:14
Speaker 4: So they had a family dinner. You know, Helen was
11:17
Speaker 4: dropped off at the high rise. I think sometime in
11:19
Speaker 4: the early evening. Her home healthcare worker called, as she
11:24
Speaker 4: usually would to, you know, say hey, I'm going to
11:26
Speaker 4: be there the next morning to help you out, please,
11:28
Speaker 4: you know, have the door unlocked or whatever. And there
11:31
Speaker 4: were some phone calls that were missed that night. The
11:34
Speaker 4: next morning she also didn't answer, and so ultimately the
11:39
Speaker 4: home health care nurse arrived, the family came, They unlocked
11:42
Speaker 4: the door, and inside they found a deceased Helen Saylor.
11:47
Speaker 1: And one of her relatives was Elkhard PD Lieutenant Paul Converts,
11:50
Speaker 1: who initially led this investigation. Now, Helen had been strangled
11:54
Speaker 1: to death, and they believed that it may have been
11:56
Speaker 1: done with a missing lanyard.
11:57
Speaker 4: Right, so she had like a lanyard around her neck,
12:00
Speaker 4: would have like her key on it. They couldn't find that,
12:02
Speaker 4: and so the thought was that if she was strangled,
12:05
Speaker 4: that it likely would have been that the perpetrator used
12:09
Speaker 4: that lanyard. There were no signs of like forced entry,
12:13
Speaker 4: and so the police sort of suspected that she either
12:16
Speaker 4: opened her door voluntarily or this is somebody who had
12:20
Speaker 4: a key there was some like pretty significant physical evidence
12:23
Speaker 4: that was there.
12:24
Speaker 1: You know.
12:24
Speaker 4: One of the things that they found on her was
12:27
Speaker 4: like a cranberry like substance, like a sticky substance around her.
12:31
Speaker 4: And they also found a pill bottle out on the counter.
12:35
Speaker 4: They ended up recovering a latent print from that pill
12:38
Speaker 4: bottle that became an issue later on in the investigation.
12:42
Speaker 1: Yeah, so there's this partial fingerprint on the pill bottle
12:45
Speaker 1: in an apartment that is frequented by home healthcare workers.
12:48
Speaker 1: But if that print belonged to someone who didn't belong
12:51
Speaker 1: in the apartment, like Lanna Canaan, then that would appear
12:55
Speaker 1: to be damning evidence. Unfortunately, the subjectivity a fingerprint analysis
13:00
Speaker 1: plays heavily in this case, as it does in so
13:02
Speaker 1: many cases. Fingerprints do have appropriate value, but the analysis
13:07
Speaker 1: comes down to a subjective comparison made by a highly
13:10
Speaker 1: fallible human being. This type of analysis is hardly as
13:14
Speaker 1: exact as we've all been led to believe. Now, I
13:17
Speaker 1: encourage our audience to listen to our episode of Junk
13:19
Speaker 1: Science ronfl Coviction Junk Science, where our host Josh Duben
13:22
Speaker 1: does a deep dive on this subject. We're going to
13:24
Speaker 1: have it linked in the bio please check it out.
13:26
Speaker 1: And in this case, the analysis was later proven to
13:29
Speaker 1: be wholly unreliable, but let's put a pin in that
13:33
Speaker 1: for now. So we've got no werner weapon, a partial
13:38
Speaker 1: print which may or may not have had anything to
13:39
Speaker 1: do with the crime, no signs of a break in,
13:42
Speaker 1: which means the perp probably either new missailor or had
13:46
Speaker 1: a key or forced their way in while the door
13:48
Speaker 1: was still a lot. They did DNA testing of her fingernails,
13:52
Speaker 1: detecting only missailors DNA. And then you've got what might
13:57
Speaker 1: be cranberry sauce residue, potentially from somebody thanksgiving leftovers. It
14:01
Speaker 1: was Thanksgiving it for all, but hardly anything to go on.
14:05
Speaker 1: And this investigation happened in almost like phases, the first
14:08
Speaker 1: of which was before ELK CARDPD had a homicide unit.
14:12
Speaker 1: And in this first phase, the detectives from the Criminal
14:14
Speaker 1: Investigation Division did a surprisingly good job at developing leads
14:19
Speaker 1: with this little to go on.
14:21
Speaker 4: These initial leads, there were two really good alternative suspects developed.
14:25
Speaker 4: The first one and you know this isn't a shocker.
14:28
Speaker 4: It's like, well, you want to see who the victim
14:30
Speaker 4: has contact with how about the guy who delivers her medicine.
14:34
Speaker 4: And so they looked at this guy, Larry Wood. They
14:36
Speaker 4: went to his apartment. I believe it was the day
14:39
Speaker 4: that the body was found. He was very, very anxious.
14:42
Speaker 4: According to the officers, they found his shoes and on
14:47
Speaker 4: the shoes was blood and they did luminol testing inside
14:51
Speaker 4: the apartment which confirmed it was blood, and then they
14:53
Speaker 4: took the shoes and so they had this guy. They
14:55
Speaker 4: asked Larry at first, they were like, hey, Larry, when's
14:57
Speaker 4: the last time you saw Helen Sailor? And He's like, oh,
15:00
Speaker 4: saw her on Thanksgiving evening, after she got dropped off
15:04
Speaker 4: by her family. You know, I helped her the elevator.
15:06
Speaker 4: And that becomes important because later when Larry's confronted in
15:10
Speaker 4: an interrogation like setting at the Olkcar Police department, he
15:13
Speaker 4: changes his story and said, oh, I think I actually
15:17
Speaker 4: went on the elevator with her, and I may have
15:19
Speaker 4: walked her into the apartment. And so Larry would, by
15:22
Speaker 4: all respects, was like the last person to see Helen
15:26
Speaker 4: Sailor alive. He would later fail a polygraph exam. You know,
15:29
Speaker 4: I know polygraph is an admissible evidence in court, but
15:34
Speaker 4: like this is a guy that like should have like
15:37
Speaker 4: raised every single red flag. So that was like suspect
15:41
Speaker 4: number one. Suspect number two is this guy named Tony
15:44
Speaker 4: Thomas who was like visiting his grandmother at the high
15:47
Speaker 4: rise over that weekend. He had previously been convicted of
15:50
Speaker 4: murder in like Kansas or somewhere, and was acting very
15:55
Speaker 4: very suspicious that day. And the early investigation they spoke
15:59
Speaker 4: to people who saw Tony Thomas on the elevator clicking
16:03
Speaker 4: the buttons for every floor. And this would have been
16:06
Speaker 4: after the time that Helen Saylor got home, and so
16:08
Speaker 4: there was some real question as to whether he may
16:12
Speaker 4: have gotten off on the floor that Helen lived on
16:15
Speaker 4: and tried to take money that way, because he was
16:17
Speaker 4: asking other people for money in the high rise. What's
16:19
Speaker 4: fascinating about Tony Thomas. You would think, hey, convicted murder,
16:23
Speaker 4: you bring him to the police station, you'd interrogate him.
16:25
Speaker 4: There's nothing indicating that they ever did that. And the
16:28
Speaker 4: initial investigators they didn't charge anybody, and eventually they consider
16:35
Speaker 4: the case to be cold. And so I think by
16:38
Speaker 4: like the summer of two thousand and three, so this is,
16:40
Speaker 4: you know, roughly six seven months later, that's when the
16:43
Speaker 4: Elkhar Police Department formed their homicide unit. Lieutenant Converse was
16:47
Speaker 4: in charge of it. This case became the first case
16:49
Speaker 4: that the homicide unit ever investigated. In Lieutenant Converse, we
16:53
Speaker 4: believe you know, was determined to close the case for
16:56
Speaker 4: a relative of his who got killed.
16:59
Speaker 1: But instead of racking those promising leads from phase one
17:02
Speaker 1: of the investigations, the newly formed homicide unit assigned the
17:05
Speaker 1: case to lead Detective Carl Conway and Detective Mark dag
17:09
Speaker 1: who took the case in the wrong direction. So what
17:12
Speaker 1: happens in this next phase of the investigation.
17:15
Speaker 4: Phase two of the investigation was how they framed Andy
17:18
Speaker 4: and Lana. By like August the two thousand and three,
17:22
Speaker 4: this was a cold case and Daggie was like obsessed
17:26
Speaker 4: with Lana Keenan, Like he thought that Lana had committed
17:29
Speaker 4: burglaries in the high rise because she was dating this
17:32
Speaker 4: maintenance worker, so she would have access to a key,
17:35
Speaker 4: he thought. And he can never develop proble cause to
17:38
Speaker 4: charge with any of those burglaries, like he kept coming
17:40
Speaker 4: after and coming after, can never charge on Alna was like,
17:42
Speaker 4: I didn't do any of this stuff, you know, leave
17:44
Speaker 4: me alone. You're like really annoying me. And so Daggy
17:46
Speaker 4: couldn't get her on this. So when him and Conway
17:48
Speaker 4: came up, they're like, Oh, we're gonna go get Lana Kanaan.
17:51
Speaker 4: So on September one, two thousand and three, Lana Cayden
17:55
Speaker 4: Anita Porter are drive in in a car and they
17:58
Speaker 4: get pulled over for like super minor traffic infractions. And
18:01
Speaker 4: at the time, Nina Porter was on prol so she
18:05
Speaker 4: had a lot at risk. But in that interaction, Nina
18:09
Speaker 4: Porter was never like I have information about a murder,
18:12
Speaker 4: nothing like that. The only thing of value was that
18:16
Speaker 4: Lana was taken into costody as a result of that
18:18
Speaker 4: traffic stop. Detective Conway found out and he talked to
18:22
Speaker 4: patrol officer, and patrol officer was like, oh, yeah, Lana
18:25
Speaker 4: was with this woman named Nina Porter. And so Conway
18:27
Speaker 4: took it on his own volition to show up at
18:30
Speaker 4: Nina Porter's house the next day.
18:32
Speaker 1: And from what I understand is that Carl Conway was
18:36
Speaker 1: known for being a case closer, so to speak, who
18:38
Speaker 1: would use intimidation tactics to get what he wanted.
18:42
Speaker 4: Yeah, well, I think now Detective Conway is known for
18:45
Speaker 4: all of his feelings in this particular case. It's what
18:48
Speaker 4: led to the end of his career. But you know,
18:51
Speaker 4: he had a reputation in the department for getting confessions
18:55
Speaker 4: and closing cases. I mean, the guy is massive. He's
18:58
Speaker 4: likely sixty five sixty six, two fifty to three hundred pounds.
19:05
Speaker 1: Sounds like a really scary guy in the interrogation room,
19:08
Speaker 1: Andy who was. He's not somebody you won't show up
19:11
Speaker 1: on your front doorstep either, like he did with Nina Porter.
19:14
Speaker 1: And the details of that interaction didn't come out until
19:17
Speaker 1: Nina testified about fifteen or sixteen years later in post conviction.
19:20
Speaker 1: Can you tell us what she said about that?
19:22
Speaker 4: What Nina Porter says is that Conway shows up at
19:25
Speaker 4: her house, threatening her from the jump to tell her
19:28
Speaker 4: something about implicating Lana Keenan and the murder of Helen Sailor,
19:31
Speaker 4: and Nina's like, I don't know any think I don't
19:33
Speaker 4: know anything. He then threatens to like violate her parle,
19:36
Speaker 4: have her kids removed, then takes her down to the
19:39
Speaker 4: police station and interrogates the heck out of this woman
19:43
Speaker 4: who is super vulnerable. At some point he promises her
19:46
Speaker 4: reward too, because you know reward money have been offering
19:49
Speaker 4: up by the home healthcare company that you know assisted
19:53
Speaker 4: Helen Taylor, and so like just coerces the heck out
19:56
Speaker 4: of this woman for hours to fabricate a fallse statement
20:00
Speaker 4: implicating Laana and Andy and the murder of Helen Sailor.
20:03
Speaker 1: It is so freaking disturbing how normalized that tactic of
20:07
Speaker 1: threatening to take someone's children away is for the police.
20:10
Speaker 1: It's like as common as donuts, but much more sinister.
20:13
Speaker 1: And Nina later in post conviction had so much more
20:17
Speaker 1: to say about the absurd way in which Conway took
20:20
Speaker 1: this false statement.
20:21
Speaker 4: So during a recorded setment, imagine this con is showing
20:24
Speaker 4: her pictures and on the back of it there were
20:26
Speaker 4: phrases that she was supposed to repeat once he turned
20:29
Speaker 4: the recorder on. The story was that Lana keenan over
20:32
Speaker 4: the Fourth of July holiday like stall Nina Porter at
20:36
Speaker 4: a high rise picnic or something, and was just like
20:40
Speaker 4: talking about killing Helen Sailor in like very vague ways.
20:44
Speaker 4: And one of the things she remembered that she was
20:45
Speaker 4: supposed to say was that Lana told her Thanksgiving thanks
20:50
Speaker 4: for giving death, that that's what thanksgiving mentor which is
20:53
Speaker 4: an absurd thing. And then you know, made some other
20:56
Speaker 4: comment implicating her and Andy in the murder by saying
20:59
Speaker 4: that I had like complete control over Andy and so
21:03
Speaker 4: she was basically the brains and Andy was the bron
21:06
Speaker 4: and that was something that the police had feed to
21:09
Speaker 4: her as well.
21:10
Speaker 1: Okay, so now they have the probable cause they needed
21:12
Speaker 1: to drag you and Lana in for question. Lana denied
21:15
Speaker 1: any Vomban and was initially that go. But that's not
21:18
Speaker 1: how it went with you. Andy, tell us about when
21:21
Speaker 1: they picked you up.
21:22
Speaker 2: I was in my apartment and I heard a knock
21:26
Speaker 2: on the door and they said, do you want to
21:28
Speaker 2: come down? And we want to question you know, I
21:31
Speaker 2: thought nothing of it. I wasn't even sure what it
21:34
Speaker 2: was for because I had never heard about the murders.
21:36
Speaker 1: So and when they interrogated you over the course of
21:40
Speaker 1: September third and fourth, how did they come at you?
21:42
Speaker 1: What did they say to you?
21:43
Speaker 2: We know you have ties with Atlanta and what do
21:47
Speaker 2: means to you? And what do you know about the murder?
21:50
Speaker 2: And what I was trying to say is I didn't
21:55
Speaker 2: have nothing to do with it. I told him that too.
21:58
Speaker 2: He just kept twisting and twisting away, repeating himself asking
22:01
Speaker 2: me what'd you choke her with? And how'd you get
22:04
Speaker 2: in the door? And how was Lana involved with this?
22:08
Speaker 1: And it's not like they were oblivious to your cognitive
22:11
Speaker 1: impairment health. It was part of their theory of how
22:14
Speaker 1: Lana could control you. So at some point, after hours
22:19
Speaker 1: of this intense pressure, you finally gave in, thinking that
22:24
Speaker 1: you'd be able to leave if you said what they wanted.
22:27
Speaker 1: Is that accurate?
22:28
Speaker 2: Yes, I just I gave up. They fed me lines, and.
22:34
Speaker 1: As we have seen in so many false confessions, the
22:37
Speaker 1: lines that they fed you ended up being the only
22:41
Speaker 1: things that could be verified, while the information that solely
22:43
Speaker 1: came from you, Andy was riddled with falsehoods, nonsense, and
22:48
Speaker 1: inconsistencies for the simple and obvious reason that you knew
22:51
Speaker 1: nothing about the crime and Elliott, you were able to
22:55
Speaker 1: get Conway to admit to this, right, which is insane?
22:58
Speaker 1: Can you take us through that?
23:00
Speaker 4: But Conway eventually admitted to this. Is like at Andy's
23:03
Speaker 4: evidentiary hearing, was that the only two pieces of information
23:08
Speaker 4: that they were able to corroberate they were actually true
23:11
Speaker 4: was the fact that he lived in the high rise
23:15
Speaker 4: at the time of the murder, and that he knew
23:18
Speaker 4: Lana Kanan. Everything else that was like in his statement
23:22
Speaker 4: was proven to either be false or Detective Conway admitted
23:28
Speaker 4: to feeding Andy.
23:29
Speaker 3: First.
23:30
Speaker 4: You know, a couple of the examples of the stuff
23:32
Speaker 4: that was false is they got Andy to say that
23:35
Speaker 4: he sold Helen Sailors, like some r jewelry or something
23:39
Speaker 4: at like a pawnshop. They went to the pawnshop. The
23:41
Speaker 4: records objectively proved that Andy Royer never sold anything there.
23:47
Speaker 4: Another thing is they got Andy to say that like
23:49
Speaker 4: he cleaned up the apartment with some like towels and
23:52
Speaker 4: threw them down the chute, the trash chute. During the
23:55
Speaker 4: underlying investigation, they actually learned that the trash chute was
24:00
Speaker 4: broken from like the twelfth floor down or something like that.
24:03
Speaker 4: There was also another thing where you know, they're like,
24:05
Speaker 4: you know, what liquid did you pour on her? And
24:07
Speaker 4: Andy said milk. That was wrong because they knew it
24:10
Speaker 4: was like a Cranberry saw substance and wasn't milk. So like,
24:15
Speaker 4: unless Conway actually was telling him stuff that was consistent
24:18
Speaker 4: with the investigation, everything else was objectively wrong.
24:22
Speaker 3: And they knew that.
24:23
Speaker 4: And you know, the biggest piece of evidence that we
24:26
Speaker 4: had that showed the unreliability of the statement was after
24:31
Speaker 4: the statement, According to Detective Conway's report, Andy asked can
24:35
Speaker 4: I go home now?
24:37
Speaker 3: And Conway had to tell.
24:39
Speaker 4: Andy that he just gave a confession to murder and
24:42
Speaker 4: didn't even know right.
24:57
Speaker 1: The Pacers Foundation is a proud supporter of this episode
24:59
Speaker 1: of awful conviction and of the Last Mile organization, which
25:03
Speaker 1: provides business and tech training to help incarcerated individuals successfully
25:07
Speaker 1: and permanently reenter the workforce. The Pacers Foundation is committed
25:11
Speaker 1: to improving the lives of Hoosiers across Indiana, supporting organizations
25:15
Speaker 1: that are dedicated primarily to helping young people and students.
25:18
Speaker 1: For more information on the work of the Pacers Foundation
25:21
Speaker 1: or the Last Mile program, visit Pacersfoundation dot org or
25:25
Speaker 1: the Lastmile dot org.
25:32
Speaker 4: So what they did, though, was because the statement was
25:36
Speaker 4: so botched, as a captain Andy in custody at the
25:39
Speaker 4: police department overnight after charging him with murder so that
25:43
Speaker 4: they can interrogate him the next day, which lake never happens.
25:48
Speaker 4: If you get a confession that's legitimate, why you need
25:50
Speaker 4: to keep this guy the next day? And the interrogate
25:51
Speaker 4: him again. He had already been charged with murder. They
25:54
Speaker 4: kept him overnight, they didn't give him an attorney, he
25:57
Speaker 4: didn't get to go to court, and then they did
25:59
Speaker 4: the whole thing the next day, hoping that they could
26:02
Speaker 4: get a more reliable statement that wasn't so obviously fabricated
26:07
Speaker 4: by coercion.
26:08
Speaker 1: Yeah, imagine if they still had to worry about their
26:11
Speaker 1: misconduct being videotape for a jury to see. And yet
26:14
Speaker 1: somehow this still has room to get even worse.
26:20
Speaker 4: While this two day interrogations going on, with this very aggressive,
26:26
Speaker 4: psychologically coercive interrogator and Andy, who's got the mind of
26:31
Speaker 4: a child, there are people watching the interrogation and we
26:36
Speaker 4: only found this out after Andy was EXONDERI it was
26:38
Speaker 4: one of the people watching. It was the person who
26:40
Speaker 4: ultimately prosecuted him, that she was actually sitting there watching
26:44
Speaker 4: this psychologically coercive interrogation take place and doing nothing about it.
26:49
Speaker 1: What's her name again, Vicky Becker?
26:51
Speaker 4: Vicky Becker, and she's now the elected prosecutor you know
26:55
Speaker 4: Aboutkark County. Our hope is that we can end that
26:58
Speaker 4: she was at the interrogaate. She was the person who
27:03
Speaker 4: put on Detective Conway to testify a trial about the
27:06
Speaker 4: interrogation actually elicited from him. Now, did you feed mister
27:10
Speaker 4: roy or any information? Conway's like, Oh, No, wouldn't do
27:13
Speaker 4: that because I knew he had a mental disability. Wouldn't
27:16
Speaker 4: feed him a single fact. If she was there during
27:18
Speaker 4: the interrogation, which she says she is, she would have
27:21
Speaker 4: known what Conway now admits, which is that he fed
27:24
Speaker 4: Andy all the information that actually aligned with the facts
27:29
Speaker 4: of the case. Whatever those facts were, it came from
27:31
Speaker 4: Conway's mouth. And in Detective Conway's own report, he admitted
27:36
Speaker 4: that before he took Andy's confession that Andy was confused,
27:40
Speaker 4: he was fatigued, and he's later admitted that he believed
27:43
Speaker 4: that Andy was mentally broken before he ever took the statement.
27:47
Speaker 1: And had this been videotaped, like Edgar Garrett's interrogation, had
27:51
Speaker 1: the jury seen this, it would have impeached everything, all
27:56
Speaker 1: the lies that Detective Conway had to say a trial.
27:59
Speaker 1: And if the evidence in this case wasn't fraudulent enough,
28:02
Speaker 1: that brings us to the only physical evidence, the fingerprint.
28:07
Speaker 1: So in Phase one they sent the medicine bottle and
28:09
Speaker 1: other physical evidence off to the Indiana State Police lab
28:12
Speaker 1: and eventually they sent fingerprints of suspects aka standards for comparison.
28:17
Speaker 1: But in Phase two, when Conway and Daggy got involved,
28:21
Speaker 1: something telling happened with the Prince. Conway and Daggy's story
28:25
Speaker 1: was that Andy and Lana first came on their radar
28:28
Speaker 1: through Nina Porter's coerce statement in September two thousand and three.
28:32
Speaker 4: In August of two thousand and three, though before Nina
28:36
Speaker 4: and Lana were pulled over, the Alkhar Police Department removed
28:40
Speaker 4: the physical evidence from the Indiana c Police Laboratory and
28:45
Speaker 4: sent it to a deputy sheriff at the Elkhart County
28:48
Speaker 4: Sheriff's Department named Denis Chapman for him to compare the
28:53
Speaker 4: Leyden print to Andy Warrior's standard. Not only Andy, but
28:56
Speaker 4: but Lana can as well. They were literally targeting Lana
29:00
Speaker 4: and Andy before they manufactured that false evidence during the
29:05
Speaker 4: first week of September. Chapman, come to find out, never
29:10
Speaker 4: trained to do leaking different comparisons at all. And Dennis
29:15
Speaker 4: Chapman writes like a two page report that says that
29:19
Speaker 4: he matches the print from the medicine bottle to the
29:22
Speaker 4: left peaky finger of Lana Canna. Come to find out,
29:25
Speaker 4: it ended up not being a peaky figer at all.
29:28
Speaker 4: It was like the index finger to somebody. He excluded
29:32
Speaker 4: a home healthcare worker. So like he got the finger wrong,
29:35
Speaker 4: the person wrong, and then he somehow excluded the right person,
29:39
Speaker 4: which all of that shows it was just like a
29:41
Speaker 4: total fabrication. Like this guy was not doing a legitimate comparison.
29:45
Speaker 4: He was just doing whatever the conway An EPD wanted
29:49
Speaker 4: him to do.
29:50
Speaker 1: You might as well have my dog look at it.
29:52
Speaker 4: I mean, it would be just the same, right, because
29:54
Speaker 4: like Chapman is a total fraud anyways.
29:56
Speaker 1: Right, And that's even unfair to my dog because Freddy
29:59
Speaker 1: would never do something.
30:00
Speaker 4: Yeah, So like we see him as like Elkhart's hired gun.
30:04
Speaker 4: You know, this untrained, unqualified deputy sheriff that when the
30:10
Speaker 4: elk Car Prosecutor's Office or the el Car Police Department
30:13
Speaker 4: was concerned that the Indy NFC Police Laboratory wouldn't give
30:16
Speaker 4: them the findings that they want, they would remove it
30:20
Speaker 4: and send it to this illegitimate proxy who would then
30:24
Speaker 4: fabricated opinion for them for whoever their suspect was.
30:27
Speaker 1: I shuddered to think. But how many other cases has
30:31
Speaker 1: Chapman been involved in?
30:33
Speaker 4: So we are digging into Chapman now. He had been
30:38
Speaker 4: used by the elkar Police Department to do Leyton print
30:41
Speaker 4: comparisons dating back to the nineteen nineties. So we actually
30:44
Speaker 4: have another wrongful conviction case from Elkhart. That's a murder
30:48
Speaker 4: from like two thousand that Vicky Becker was the prosecutor
30:52
Speaker 4: on and Lo and Behold.
30:54
Speaker 3: The week before trial.
30:55
Speaker 4: In that case, Dennis Chapman was brought in to exclude
30:59
Speaker 4: all the alternati suspects from the print left on what
31:02
Speaker 4: they alleged was a murder weapon.
31:04
Speaker 1: Wow, this is a Fandora's box of evil.
31:09
Speaker 4: And he only stopped giving them opinions in twenty eleven
31:13
Speaker 4: ish when Lana Kingan's post conviction petition unraveled the fact
31:17
Speaker 4: that his opinion was false all along.
31:20
Speaker 1: So almost twenty years worth of cases, this guy Chapman,
31:24
Speaker 1: who has no formal training to do fingerprint analysis, would
31:27
Speaker 1: just come in and testify as an expert. You've got
31:30
Speaker 1: a real problem in Elkhart and Andy was just another
31:33
Speaker 1: one of their countless victims. So they had this in
31:38
Speaker 1: and I'm putting this in quotation marks fingerprint match Nina
31:41
Speaker 1: Porter saying that Lana confessed to her and implicated you Andy,
31:44
Speaker 1: And then they had Andy's false confession. Andy, you had
31:48
Speaker 1: been in jail for two years now, and they came
31:50
Speaker 1: to see you with your defense attorney to see if
31:52
Speaker 1: they could get you to testify and repeat your false confession.
31:56
Speaker 1: But this time he wouldn't do it. How did that
31:59
Speaker 1: all play out?
32:00
Speaker 2: They just kept asking me questions again and making sure
32:04
Speaker 2: everything was okay, And I was like, no, I didn't
32:07
Speaker 2: have nothing to do with the murder.
32:08
Speaker 1: Of course they knew that already. So now it's August
32:11
Speaker 1: two thousand and five and you walk into court. What
32:14
Speaker 1: was that like? Uh?
32:16
Speaker 2: I felt like a stiff board walking down the aisle
32:19
Speaker 2: and going into sit down in the courtroom. And Vicky
32:24
Speaker 2: Becker was, well, we got this and we got that.
32:28
Speaker 2: And they never asked me or my attorney never did
32:32
Speaker 2: anything at the time.
32:34
Speaker 1: Yeah, you had a defense attorney who had just heard
32:36
Speaker 1: you vehemently recant your false confession. Yet he made no
32:39
Speaker 1: effort to suppress that statement. And from what I understand,
32:41
Speaker 1: when he was given a list of false confession experts
32:44
Speaker 1: like doctor Richard Leo doctor offshe that he called exactly
32:49
Speaker 1: zero of the names on that list up to testify.
32:52
Speaker 1: And Elliott. We've seen plenty of cases with multiple Code defendants,
32:56
Speaker 1: but this one really is problematic and it's hard to
32:59
Speaker 1: believe this was allowed to go forward as one trial.
33:02
Speaker 1: Can you explain what I'm talking.
33:03
Speaker 4: About, Because like ol In el Card Indiana, when you
33:07
Speaker 4: have a situation where you have two code defendants, one
33:10
Speaker 4: of them falsely confesses and implicates his other Code defendant,
33:14
Speaker 4: and then Nina Porter attributes a confession to Alanna Keenan
33:19
Speaker 4: that the state then tries to use against Andy. So
33:22
Speaker 4: it's constitutionally problematic because Lana can't force Andy on the
33:26
Speaker 4: stand like he has a right to not testify. Andy
33:30
Speaker 4: can't put Lana on a stand to say that she
33:32
Speaker 4: never made these statements to Nina Porter, and the states
33:36
Speaker 4: like using all of this evidence to convict both of
33:38
Speaker 4: them at the same time, Like the trial should have
33:40
Speaker 4: been severed. You know, the trial was about two days
33:44
Speaker 4: excluding jury selection, and you know the state just like
33:48
Speaker 4: completely ran over the defense. So you had the lead
33:52
Speaker 4: in print fabrication introduce a trial. Conway goes up there,
33:56
Speaker 4: introduces Andy's two recorded statements, which total and length are
34:01
Speaker 4: roughly just over an hour combined. So like, you know,
34:05
Speaker 4: you basically have like eight to nine hours of unrecorded
34:08
Speaker 4: interrogation where and Andy, who had the mind of a child,
34:12
Speaker 4: is psychologically coerced into giving a false confession, fed all
34:16
Speaker 4: the facts. Conway testified the trial in response to questioning
34:20
Speaker 4: by miss Becker, never fed him any information, you know,
34:24
Speaker 4: never coerced him anyway, won't do that, you know, knew
34:26
Speaker 4: that he had a disability. All of that a lie.
34:31
Speaker 4: And then Nina Porter went up there on the stand
34:33
Speaker 4: and testified that Lana gave this confession to her to
34:37
Speaker 4: doing the murder, you know, thanksgiving, thanks for giving death,
34:40
Speaker 4: and that she had complete control over Andy to the
34:42
Speaker 4: extent that if Lana said Andy, go stand in the rain,
34:45
Speaker 4: that he would go do it. And the state and
34:48
Speaker 4: closing arguments were like, the print corroborates the confession, the
34:52
Speaker 4: confession corroborates, need a porter, need a porter corroborates both
34:56
Speaker 4: of it. Look at everything together, You've got your puzzle
35:00
Speaker 4: conduct these people and the jury did what the prosecutors wanted, And.
35:04
Speaker 1: Did they present anything in your defense at all?
35:07
Speaker 2: No, I felt it was all one silence.
35:10
Speaker 4: No witnesses, no defense witnesses, no, and not even like
35:14
Speaker 4: no defense witnesses. But like the police officers went up
35:17
Speaker 4: there and testify to the jury that they never had
35:19
Speaker 4: any alternate suspects, and we know that's a lie, Like
35:23
Speaker 4: Larry would Tony Thomas, people were straight up committing perjury
35:27
Speaker 4: left and right.
35:28
Speaker 1: So, Andy, when you saw this circus unfolding in front
35:31
Speaker 1: of you, did you still hold out any hope that
35:34
Speaker 1: the jury would come back in and get it right.
35:37
Speaker 2: Yes?
35:38
Speaker 1: I was hoping, yes, but as we know, with all
35:42
Speaker 1: the lying and fabricated evidence, it was probably well hard
35:46
Speaker 1: to somewhere near impossible for them to see the truth.
35:50
Speaker 1: So can you tell us about that awful moment when
35:53
Speaker 1: they did get it so wrong?
35:57
Speaker 2: I felt nothingness. I was just numb. It took me
36:03
Speaker 2: back to the jail cell and I just walked in
36:08
Speaker 2: like I not seeing a ghost, but I was a ghost.
36:30
Speaker 2: I got to know people right off the hand, and
36:33
Speaker 2: I found me a job, so I kept busy most
36:36
Speaker 2: of the time, working in a wood factory making skids,
36:41
Speaker 2: and that people would from the outside had come and
36:43
Speaker 2: pick up the skids, and we got paid for it.
36:47
Speaker 2: We got like fifty cents an hour, and if we
36:50
Speaker 2: got so many skids done, we got five or it
36:54
Speaker 2: was either five cents or a penny for each kid
36:56
Speaker 2: that got done.
36:58
Speaker 1: So a lot of people don't know a very important
37:02
Speaker 1: and insidious thing about the thirteenth Amendment, which is that
37:05
Speaker 1: it did end slavery, but they left a loophole in there.
37:09
Speaker 1: And the loophole is that it doesn't apply to people
37:12
Speaker 1: who aren't free. So that meant that if they put
37:17
Speaker 1: people behind bars like they did to you, Andy, they
37:20
Speaker 1: can enslave you. It can pay. In some states they
37:22
Speaker 1: pay four cents an hour and charge attacks on top
37:25
Speaker 1: of that. Other states it's nineteen cents an hour. And
37:27
Speaker 1: tons of products everyday, products that many of us use
37:32
Speaker 1: license plates, instance, are made in these prisons. Big corporations
37:36
Speaker 1: use this slave labor. It's a huge problem, and it
37:40
Speaker 1: creates a perverse and reverse insteadive for people to lock
37:44
Speaker 1: up other people because there's money in it. So here
37:47
Speaker 1: you have a system in Elkhart where it appears they
37:50
Speaker 1: deliberately wrongfully convicted Andy and countless others at a rate
37:54
Speaker 1: that's at least get this eight times higher per capita
37:57
Speaker 1: than a place like New York, which has a long
37:59
Speaker 1: and ordered history of lawful convictions, and the same prosecutor
38:04
Speaker 1: that is still in office today made Andy and so
38:07
Speaker 1: many others essentially into slaves.
38:10
Speaker 2: Yes, I worked in the kitchen too, and they pay
38:13
Speaker 2: fifty cents an hour.
38:15
Speaker 1: So were you able to make any friends while you
38:17
Speaker 1: were in there? Oh?
38:18
Speaker 2: Yeah, lots of friends, played board games. I was in
38:22
Speaker 2: the Ounder doorm. People that didn't get in trouble. If
38:26
Speaker 2: you got one lettle ride up here get kicked out.
38:28
Speaker 2: And I was there for two years and never got
38:30
Speaker 2: a ride up. And you could go outside and walk
38:36
Speaker 2: around to play basketball. And I caught a ride up
38:41
Speaker 2: once before I got in an honor dorm. I fell
38:44
Speaker 2: asleep and went to the chow hall. Then I went
38:49
Speaker 2: back and went to chowhaw again, and they had a
38:52
Speaker 2: scanner and I got a I accidentally got two meals.
38:57
Speaker 1: So this is probably like the worst thing you've ever done. Yes,
39:02
Speaker 1: needless to say, you didn't belong there and desperately needed help,
39:06
Speaker 1: And your first appellate lawyer did bring a compelling ineffective
39:10
Speaker 1: assistance claim based on the fact that your trial lawyer
39:12
Speaker 1: never tried to suppress the false confession of his disabled
39:15
Speaker 1: client and never bothered to call a false confession expert
39:19
Speaker 1: like doctor Leo or doctor Afshi. And the one thing
39:22
Speaker 1: that sticks out in my mind here is that the
39:24
Speaker 1: trial lawyer said in his own defense that this was
39:29
Speaker 1: actual strategy. Okay, he said that in Elkhart, the jury
39:34
Speaker 1: wasn't going to believe.
39:35
Speaker 3: An expert from outside the community.
39:38
Speaker 1: From outside the community, yeah, But what's ironic about this
39:40
Speaker 1: logic here is that because Dennis Chapman's from within the community,
39:44
Speaker 1: they'll believe him, right.
39:46
Speaker 4: I mean, it was an outrageous explanation by the attorney,
39:49
Speaker 4: But the judge overseeing that claim was this guy, Terry Schumaker.
39:54
Speaker 4: He was the prosecutor on Egar Gerrit's case who we
39:57
Speaker 4: found out exclude did Richard off She from testifying as
40:02
Speaker 4: a false confession expert at that midnighteties trial, saying false
40:07
Speaker 4: confession expert testimony should never be before a jury because
40:10
Speaker 4: it invades the province of the jury. So when this
40:12
Speaker 4: guy now who's on the on the bench, he's never like, hey,
40:15
Speaker 4: mister Royer just wants you to know. As a prosecutor,
40:18
Speaker 4: I took the position that these types of people should
40:21
Speaker 4: never be allowed in a court room never disclosed. It
40:24
Speaker 4: denied Andy's post conviction petition. He sat in prison for
40:27
Speaker 4: like another decade. The judge should have recused himself. And
40:31
Speaker 4: that's when I think, you know, we start talking about
40:33
Speaker 4: systemic misconduct. I mean, frankly, when I said the words
40:37
Speaker 4: that there were systemic police and prosecutor and mist conduct
40:40
Speaker 4: that caused wrong quel convictions in Alcarda, Indiana, including Andy Royers,
40:44
Speaker 4: the state filed emotion for an injunction against me. The
40:48
Speaker 4: stakehourt judge found that like when I said systemic misconduct,
40:51
Speaker 4: that that was defamatory. You know what's amusing now is
40:54
Speaker 4: that that judge Formal Cark Kenny prosecutor, she withheld from
40:57
Speaker 4: us that she was also married to a former corrupt
41:00
Speaker 4: Olkar cop in the nineties. Right, Like this is like
41:02
Speaker 4: when you talk about systemic, it's like you're going before
41:05
Speaker 4: judges who are former prosecutors married to Alcar police officers.
41:08
Speaker 4: Like that is the system in Elkhart that is like
41:11
Speaker 4: allowed for people like Andy to get wrongfully convicted in
41:17
Speaker 4: like open view. The whole system is stacked.
41:20
Speaker 3: You don't have a.
41:20
Speaker 1: Chance, and that's how you end up with five going
41:24
Speaker 1: on seventeen exonerations and counting in a town of fifty thousand. So, Andy,
41:28
Speaker 1: how did you end up getting in touch with Elliott?
41:31
Speaker 2: Oh, to one of my lawyers, Michael Sutherland, you put
41:35
Speaker 2: a newspaper article out saying how wrongfully I was done,
41:39
Speaker 2: and Elliott happened to see it and took up the
41:43
Speaker 2: case from there.
41:44
Speaker 1: Yeah.
41:45
Speaker 4: So it's funny, you know, this goes back to the
41:47
Speaker 4: systemic Elkhart misconduct. By the time that I found out
41:50
Speaker 4: about Andy's keys, we had another client who was exonerated
41:53
Speaker 4: by then, by the name of Keith Cooper.
41:56
Speaker 1: Who we'd like to cover in the very near future
41:59
Speaker 1: if you'll both join us.
42:00
Speaker 3: Yeah.
42:01
Speaker 4: And so Keith had been wrongfully convicted. You know, he
42:04
Speaker 4: was framed for a crime he did commit too, and
42:07
Speaker 4: the Indie Star started like a wrongful Conviction series. I
42:09
Speaker 4: want to say, in like twenty fifteen, twenty sixteen, Keith
42:12
Speaker 4: them was still trying to get a part in an
42:14
Speaker 4: actual innocence pardon from the governor, and as part of
42:18
Speaker 4: that series they did a story ultimately on Andy. I
42:21
Speaker 4: want to say, this was like twenty seventeen.
42:23
Speaker 1: So, okay, you saw the article you and Sutherland got
42:26
Speaker 1: in touch what happened next.
42:28
Speaker 4: You know, I was like desperate to get my hands
42:30
Speaker 4: on the material.
42:31
Speaker 3: My wife and I were going on.
42:32
Speaker 4: A vacation to Mexico and I had just gotten like
42:36
Speaker 4: the trial transcripts, and I just remember that whole vacation,
42:39
Speaker 4: like being on the beach under an umbrella, read through
42:42
Speaker 4: the whole trial, was like reading through the police reports
42:45
Speaker 4: and was just like, oh my god, this guy got
42:47
Speaker 4: so framed.
42:48
Speaker 3: You know. So by this.
42:49
Speaker 4: Time, we had a project going at Notre Dame Law
42:53
Speaker 4: School in Andy's case was the first one that we
42:55
Speaker 4: ever worked on, and so we had a number of
42:58
Speaker 4: like great students on the case and incredible investigator named Patty,
43:01
Speaker 4: and we went out and like knocked on a ton
43:04
Speaker 4: of doors.
43:04
Speaker 1: So I'm going to imagine that Nina Porter got a visit.
43:08
Speaker 4: Yeah, Nina Port was actually the first witness that we
43:10
Speaker 4: talked to. You know, by then, you know, to put
43:12
Speaker 4: this in context, By the time we talked to Nina Porter,
43:15
Speaker 4: Lana Keenan, his co defend it was exonerated and sought
43:19
Speaker 4: civil compensation. Andy's like still sitting there, you know, even
43:22
Speaker 4: though the attorney who had this before us, he filed
43:25
Speaker 4: e motion for leave to even file a post conviction
43:28
Speaker 4: petition in the appellate court denied like they weren't letting
43:32
Speaker 4: Andy Royer even get back to court. I mean, it
43:34
Speaker 4: was like fundamentally outrageous. So Lana, she got an incredible
43:39
Speaker 4: post conviction lawyer, Karen Winnicky who dug into the Layte
43:42
Speaker 4: Prince stuff, you know, like Dennis Chapman total fraud. Kara
43:47
Speaker 4: Winnikey is the one who unraveled that fraud. They ended
43:50
Speaker 4: up getting a lane print expert excluded Lana Keenan found
43:54
Speaker 4: all these differences that couldn't be explained away. That science
43:58
Speaker 4: is very subjective. What's fascinating is they filed post conviction petition.
44:02
Speaker 4: State challenges it. At some point, the state sends the
44:07
Speaker 4: print materials off to the DNST Police Lab. Any usctate
44:10
Speaker 4: police cops.
44:11
Speaker 3: Like this excludes her.
44:14
Speaker 4: They still go to an evidentiary hearing. Even though the
44:16
Speaker 4: state lab says not a lot of Caenans, the private
44:19
Speaker 4: person says not a lone of Keenans. Right around the
44:22
Speaker 4: time of the evidentiary hearing, Chapman gets a chance to
44:26
Speaker 4: look at it and sees the print and immediately starts
44:31
Speaker 4: admitting that he got it wrong. That was after he
44:34
Speaker 4: already saw you know what the private expert was saying,
44:37
Speaker 4: so he knew that other people were saying that he
44:39
Speaker 4: was wrong. By then they go to the adventure hearing,
44:42
Speaker 4: the state does an aggressive cross examination of Chapman, like
44:46
Speaker 4: it was self preservation mode. You know, Vicky Becker still
44:49
Speaker 4: prosecutor in the office. You put him on the stand trial.
44:51
Speaker 4: It was a different deputy prosecutor doing the cross but
44:54
Speaker 4: it was like saving his boss, right, Like make this
44:58
Speaker 4: guy look like he's a fraud, that he duped all
45:00
Speaker 4: all of us and that none of us knew about
45:01
Speaker 4: it all along.
45:02
Speaker 1: To save face for the system as a whole, exactly.
45:05
Speaker 4: So then eventually before ruling is made, the state agrees
45:09
Speaker 4: to a new trial for Lana and the case gets dismissed.
45:13
Speaker 1: Now one would think this should have an effect on
45:16
Speaker 1: her co defend and Andy.
45:18
Speaker 4: It's so crazy they use that evidence at Andy's trial
45:22
Speaker 4: and still they were like, you know what, We've got
45:25
Speaker 4: this disabled guy. We're just going to leave him in prison.
45:29
Speaker 4: He hasn't had the rights representation, he hasn't had the
45:31
Speaker 4: funds for private representation. We're going to leave him there.
45:34
Speaker 4: We're going to see if they're able to unravel everything
45:36
Speaker 4: else that happened.
45:37
Speaker 1: All right, So back to Nina Porter.
45:39
Speaker 4: One of our law students, me and our investigator, we
45:41
Speaker 4: knocked on Nina Porter's door. She was like, I've been
45:44
Speaker 4: waiting fifteen years for somebody to ask me how this
45:48
Speaker 4: whole thing came about. And she told us, in painful detail,
45:53
Speaker 4: how she was coerced into lying against Andy and Lana
45:57
Speaker 4: for crimeate in commitment.
45:59
Speaker 1: So Nina Order recanted. The print is toast, which brings
46:02
Speaker 1: us to the false confession. So did you reach out
46:05
Speaker 1: to any of the false confession experts at Andy's trial
46:07
Speaker 1: attorney should have called in the first place.
46:09
Speaker 4: Well, we called doctor Leo. He began digging through the material.
46:14
Speaker 4: But what really changed things? In addition to our investigation,
46:18
Speaker 4: you know, so like patting the students knocked on doors,
46:20
Speaker 4: got a ton of affidavits, people implicating Larry Wood, people
46:23
Speaker 4: implicating Tony Thomas. We also had a former outcar police officer,
46:27
Speaker 4: Larry Towns. He actually called Mark Daggie and was recording
46:31
Speaker 4: the entire conversation and Larry was chatting him up about
46:34
Speaker 4: this case. And Daggy admitted there that the interrogation. He
46:38
Speaker 4: witnessed it. He said he believed that it was actually
46:42
Speaker 4: video recorded, and that the interrogation was super leading and
46:45
Speaker 4: among the worst he had ever seen. He had no
46:47
Speaker 4: idea that a recorder was on. You know, this was
46:50
Speaker 4: like two police officers talking to each other, and so
46:53
Speaker 4: he made these admissions. Towns also called another person who
46:56
Speaker 4: was involved in the investigation watched the interrogations, person Peggy's,
47:00
Speaker 4: and she admitted that she always believed Andy was innocent.
47:03
Speaker 4: She was the one who signed the charging documents, who
47:07
Speaker 4: sought the warrant for Andy's arrest for the murder, and
47:10
Speaker 4: was admitting in this call, I always thought that guy
47:12
Speaker 4: was innocent. So they didn't think that Larry would ever
47:14
Speaker 4: tell They surely didn't think that this other police officer
47:17
Speaker 4: would ever record them, but he did because he was
47:20
Speaker 4: so fundamentally outraged.
47:22
Speaker 1: Okay, so we not only have an expert poking huge
47:25
Speaker 1: holes in the false confession, but also two people who
47:27
Speaker 1: were in the room who didn't think that anyone would
47:29
Speaker 1: be breaking down their sacred blue wall of silence. But then,
47:33
Speaker 1: on top of that, your involvement in Keith Cooper's case
47:36
Speaker 1: had a direct effect on Andy as it turns.
47:38
Speaker 4: Out, in Keith Cooper's wrong quol conviction lawsuit, we were
47:41
Speaker 4: able to do depositions of Conway and Daggy, and that's
47:45
Speaker 4: where things finally unraveled, because those depositions uncovered the truth
47:50
Speaker 4: about what happened the interrogation room. Conway finally admitted defeating
47:54
Speaker 4: Andy information, admitted that he believed that he was psychologically
47:58
Speaker 4: broken down, admitted that he was informed prior to the
48:01
Speaker 4: interrogation that Andy was mentally disabled and had the mind
48:04
Speaker 4: of a child, and then testified under oath that he
48:07
Speaker 4: disregarded all of that, gave no accommodations to his disability.
48:11
Speaker 4: Like this is all like in a deposition. You know,
48:13
Speaker 4: this guy was making all these admissions that were like
48:16
Speaker 4: completely contrary to what he testified to a trial.
48:19
Speaker 1: Elliott I got a hand it to you, man, what
48:22
Speaker 1: you were able to do here. This is not normal.
48:25
Speaker 1: I mean, this is nothing short of and I'm not
48:27
Speaker 1: like a magical thinker, but this shit is just miraculous.
48:31
Speaker 1: The things you've been able to uncover are shocking.
48:35
Speaker 4: And what was also shocking that we found out through
48:37
Speaker 4: the depositions was that Conway was removed from the homicide
48:42
Speaker 4: unit of the Ulkhar Police Department before Andy's two thousand
48:46
Speaker 4: and five trial, from his conduct in another interrogation in
48:51
Speaker 4: a different homicide case was removed. So we got to
48:54
Speaker 4: the bottom of it and ultimately had his supervisor testify
48:59
Speaker 4: for us at the entry hearing that he removed Conway
49:02
Speaker 4: because he believed that he lied in order to interrogate
49:05
Speaker 4: another person without their council present, and that his lie
49:09
Speaker 4: in that case, the supervisor belief could jeopardize the integrity
49:13
Speaker 4: of any further criminal investigations that he worked on and
49:16
Speaker 4: would cause credibility issues a trial, so they removed him
49:19
Speaker 4: from the homicide unit. This all happened before Andy's trial.
49:22
Speaker 4: Conway was like the most important witness at Andy trial
49:26
Speaker 4: because only Conway could either admit or deny what happened
49:30
Speaker 4: the interrogation room before a recorder was turned on. And
49:32
Speaker 4: yet the state withheld the fact that this guy was
49:35
Speaker 4: removed from homicide due to issues with his credibility and integrity.
49:39
Speaker 1: Conway also further admitted defeating Andy all the information and
49:44
Speaker 1: then Vicki Becker watched it all happen and put Conway
49:46
Speaker 1: on the stand to lie anyway, and Chapman had already
49:49
Speaker 1: been exposed as a frauded a lot of post conviction.
49:52
Speaker 4: By the way, Dennis Chapman, we ultimately got his personnel file.
49:56
Speaker 4: What Dennis Chapman admitted. After Keenan got exonerated, Chapman had
50:00
Speaker 4: to sit down with the sheriff and explain how he
50:03
Speaker 4: botched that print so badly. And in that interview he
50:07
Speaker 4: said that he was pressured by el Car police officers
50:11
Speaker 4: to form an opinion. That they told him the theory
50:14
Speaker 4: of the case, that Lana Kanaan was the brains, that
50:17
Speaker 4: Andy Warrior was the brawn. That Andy couldn't do this
50:20
Speaker 4: on his own, so they fed him who they wanted
50:23
Speaker 4: him to id, and then pressured him into making that
50:25
Speaker 4: fabricated ID.
50:26
Speaker 1: You also had those recordings of Daggie and that supervised
50:31
Speaker 1: Daggie repeated what he had said on the recording on
50:33
Speaker 1: the stand as well.
50:34
Speaker 4: I mean, like the state's case imploded. And Nina Porter
50:38
Speaker 4: testified for us too. She told the court how she
50:40
Speaker 4: was coerced into repeating a fabricad statement. And by the way,
50:44
Speaker 4: while Andy was like wrongfully convicted, you know, within like
50:47
Speaker 4: forty eight hours of that, Daggy and another officer went
50:51
Speaker 4: and gave her the two thousand dollars reward that was
50:53
Speaker 4: never disclosed, you know, like nobody ever knew that she
50:56
Speaker 4: was pressured into lying and that like, oh as soon
50:58
Speaker 4: as she got the stand, she was going to be
50:59
Speaker 4: given thousands of dollars.
51:01
Speaker 1: So there they are using the carrot and the stick.
51:04
Speaker 1: So how did it all end up with Andy being
51:06
Speaker 1: here with us today? When was this this long overdue.
51:10
Speaker 4: Hearing September into October twenty nineteen? And the fascinating part
51:14
Speaker 4: about it is that we agree to only litigate like
51:18
Speaker 4: really like a fourth of what it was in our petition. Yeah,
51:21
Speaker 4: we were like Judge, you know, like let's just do
51:23
Speaker 4: five or six issues, like because if we went on
51:25
Speaker 4: those issues, we don't need to get to the other
51:27
Speaker 4: twenty Wow.
51:28
Speaker 1: So you really were ready to embarrass the state further
51:31
Speaker 1: than you even needed to in order to convince the
51:34
Speaker 1: court that a new trial was in order, and the
51:36
Speaker 1: court agreed with you. So Andy, what was it like
51:39
Speaker 1: watching this shit show from your perspective?
51:42
Speaker 2: Like there was a superman on my side, and uh,
51:48
Speaker 2: I just couldn't believe the lawyers before Elliott didn't do anything,
51:51
Speaker 2: you know what I mean? It just they just here,
51:54
Speaker 2: you go give it to the prosecutor.
51:56
Speaker 1: Yeah, so safe to say that Elliott is a good guy. Book.
52:00
Speaker 2: Yes, he's a cool guy. He's got the records straight now,
52:05
Speaker 2: so he's all right around. Great guy.
52:09
Speaker 3: Thanks Andy, thank you.
52:10
Speaker 1: So you've just watched Superman come in and kick some
52:13
Speaker 1: serious ass, right right, But this being outid, they're not
52:17
Speaker 1: going to just start doing the right thing now.
52:18
Speaker 4: We got this case kicked out at Khark County. That's
52:20
Speaker 4: why I need to get justice, right. So, like we
52:23
Speaker 4: got that judge to recuse herself. She actually found that it
52:26
Speaker 4: was defamatory when I said that Andy was wrongfully convicted.
52:30
Speaker 4: Like it wasn't just like systemic misconduct. It was like
52:33
Speaker 4: this judge is like the most unfair judge that we
52:36
Speaker 4: could ever be before.
52:37
Speaker 1: And how this judge is oblivious to the system she's
52:40
Speaker 1: been overseeing is ridiculous.
52:41
Speaker 4: But okay, Yeah, so Andy's case outside of Alkhark Counyon,
52:45
Speaker 4: we litigated in Coskiosco County before this super kind, really smart,
52:50
Speaker 4: fair judge. The whole proceeding was like very very fair
52:54
Speaker 4: to both sides, and we felt like we had a
52:56
Speaker 4: real chance given the case that we put on and
52:58
Speaker 4: we submitted proposed find After the hearing, the state did
53:01
Speaker 4: as well, and we waited and when that phone call happened,
53:05
Speaker 4: They're like, hey, Elliott, how far away are you? Because
53:09
Speaker 4: Andy's ready to get picked up. The judge granted a
53:12
Speaker 4: new trial in March thirty first, and I was like
53:16
Speaker 4: in a meeting with other students on a different Elkhart
53:19
Speaker 4: wrongful conviction case, like we were in a zoom meeting
53:22
Speaker 4: because everything was through zoom then, and I was like,
53:25
Speaker 4: oh my god, guys, Oh my god, Andy just got
53:27
Speaker 4: a new trial. He's getting released. I gotta go, And
53:30
Speaker 4: I ran upstairs put on a suit. I was like
53:32
Speaker 4: calling Andy's parents, Janie and Mike, and you know, obviously
53:36
Speaker 4: one of the most incredible phone calls that I'll ever have,
53:38
Speaker 4: and like Andy's coming home, Like we've all got to
53:42
Speaker 4: figure this out. Somebody go by mask, you know, Like
53:44
Speaker 4: my wife was like like seven months pregnant at the time.
53:46
Speaker 3: Like I wasn't leaving the house at all.
53:48
Speaker 1: Right, So this was the beginning of the pandemic. No
53:50
Speaker 1: one knew how bad this was going to be yet,
53:52
Speaker 1: but you forged ahead.
53:54
Speaker 4: No hesitation, drove so fast. I called the students you know,
53:59
Speaker 4: we all sort of like, I agreed to meet at
54:02
Speaker 4: the jail to welcome Andy home.
54:04
Speaker 2: So finally when I got to teskiaskau Joe, I said,
54:07
Speaker 2: you're being released. I was like, wow. I started shaking,
54:13
Speaker 2: color started coming back to my face, and I started
54:16
Speaker 2: feeling like a person again. It was just unbelievable. It
54:20
Speaker 2: was there's no words to put it out there.
54:24
Speaker 1: So wow, yeah, I can only imagine. And this judge
54:27
Speaker 1: didn't have to do what he did, which was to
54:29
Speaker 1: release you on a ricognos response, It seems because he
54:32
Speaker 1: was so convinced of Andy's innocence that he didn't want
54:34
Speaker 1: to see Andy back in prison even for another day
54:36
Speaker 1: waiting for a new trial while the state and COVID
54:39
Speaker 1: dragged this thing out. So Andy was released. The state
54:42
Speaker 1: appealed the ruling for a new trial, and the appellate
54:44
Speaker 1: court affirmed the ruling, stating, and this is a quote,
54:49
Speaker 1: Detective Conway withheld the truth when he attempted to bolster
54:52
Speaker 1: the reliability of Royer's confessions by saying Royer knew details
54:56
Speaker 1: about the murder which were not known to the public. Again,
55:00
Speaker 1: just like Chapman. Now it was Conway's turn to be
55:04
Speaker 1: under the.
55:05
Speaker 4: Bus, and the appellate court ruled Detective Conway that his
55:09
Speaker 4: continued employment at the Elkre Police Department was galling and
55:14
Speaker 4: found that he committed perjury back at Andy I. Llana's
55:17
Speaker 4: two thousand and five trial. And after that happened, we
55:21
Speaker 4: put pressure on the city of Elcar and the Elkhar
55:24
Speaker 4: Chief of Police. You know, we were calling for Conway's
55:26
Speaker 4: termination and the chief, who has a ton of integrity.
55:30
Speaker 4: Finally they have a chief of police there who wants
55:33
Speaker 4: to change things and is trying to change things wrote
55:36
Speaker 4: up a ten page notice of termination of Detective Conway
55:39
Speaker 4: about the egregious misconduct that he committed in this case.
55:42
Speaker 1: Well we'll see if he's actually ever criminally pursued like
55:46
Speaker 1: one of us mere mortals would be, but at least
55:48
Speaker 1: he can't do any more damage. So the new trial
55:51
Speaker 1: ruling was upheld on appeal.
55:53
Speaker 4: Than what happened after the appellate court decision, we filed
55:57
Speaker 4: the motion suppress. That was like the first time that
55:59
Speaker 4: anybody had ever filed the motion in express for Andy
56:02
Speaker 4: saying that is confession, what's false, involuntary and unconstitutional and
56:07
Speaker 4: it should be not admitted at the trial, and the
56:10
Speaker 4: state's response was to not respond and dismiss the case.
56:15
Speaker 1: Right because they knew. They always knew. So Andy's name
56:19
Speaker 1: was finally cleared on July nineteen, twenty twenty one. Conway
56:22
Speaker 1: and Chapman are disgraced. Vicky Becker still needs her come
56:26
Speaker 1: up and and it appears that she's currently running unopposed
56:29
Speaker 1: in November twenty twenty two. Now I'm not sure if
56:32
Speaker 1: it's too late to change that, but we hope for
56:34
Speaker 1: so much worse for her and Andy. Is there anything
56:38
Speaker 1: that you'd like to call on our audience to do
56:40
Speaker 1: or to support, anything that you'd like to see happen.
56:43
Speaker 2: I just hope that they've done wrong so they should
56:48
Speaker 2: pay for it.
56:48
Speaker 1: Yeah, I absolutely agree, and I hope that comes to pass.
56:51
Speaker 1: So now we go to closing arguments, where first of all,
56:53
Speaker 1: I thank you both from the bottom of my heart
56:55
Speaker 1: for being here and sharing your incredible story. I know
57:00
Speaker 1: it must be difficult to drudge up all of these emotions,
57:03
Speaker 1: so thank you for being brave and doing just that.
57:06
Speaker 1: And now I'm going to shut my microphone off, leave
57:08
Speaker 1: my headphones on, kick back in my chair, and just
57:11
Speaker 1: listen to any final thoughts you guys have Elliott please
57:15
Speaker 1: kick it off for us and Andy, you take us home.
57:19
Speaker 4: You know, I think Andy's case shows the need for
57:23
Speaker 4: why interrogation should be video recorded. You know, from beginning
57:26
Speaker 4: to end, Andy was like among the most vulnerable in
57:32
Speaker 4: our community and was manipulated and coerced into confessing to
57:39
Speaker 4: something that wasn't true. And it's heartbreaking, and it was
57:43
Speaker 4: completely preventable the state. You know, the prosecutor was watching
57:48
Speaker 4: the interrogation, other officers were watching the interrogation. They could
57:50
Speaker 4: have stopped it at any point. You know, they didn't
57:53
Speaker 4: have to charge him, they knew it wasn't reliable, and instead,
57:57
Speaker 4: you know, it's pretty clear what happened. They just wanted
58:00
Speaker 4: to close a case, and they sadly did that through
58:04
Speaker 4: framing an innocent really really innocent, not only like in
58:09
Speaker 4: this case, but like Andy's just like an innocent human being.
58:14
Speaker 4: And the students and Notre Dame and our team worked
58:19
Speaker 4: so so hard to show the injustice and to bring
58:22
Speaker 4: Andy home, and in Andy's name, we hope to do
58:26
Speaker 4: that for so many other innocent people from Elkhart.
58:30
Speaker 2: I just want to thank everybody that worked on my
58:33
Speaker 2: case and law students and.
58:38
Speaker 1: The people that.
58:38
Speaker 2: Believed in me, my mom and my stepdad and family,
58:45
Speaker 2: and they brought me through a lot. I didn't know
58:49
Speaker 2: how to get through it, but I did.
58:53
Speaker 1: Thank you. Thank you for listening to Wrongful Conviction. I'd
59:03
Speaker 1: like to thank our production team Connor Hall, Jeff Cliburn,
59:07
Speaker 1: and Kevin Wardis, with research by Lyla Robinson. The music
59:10
Speaker 1: in this production was supplied by three time OSCAR nominated
59:13
Speaker 1: composer Jay Ralph. Be sure to follow us on Instagram
59:17
Speaker 1: at Wrongful Conviction, on Facebook at Wrongful Conviction podcast, and
59:21
Speaker 1: on Twitter at wrong Conviction, as well as at Lava
59:24
Speaker 1: for Good. On all three platforms, you can also follow
59:27
Speaker 1: me on both TikTok and Instagram at It's Jason Flam.
59:31
Speaker 1: Wrongful Conviction is the production of Lava for Good podcast
59:34
Speaker 1: and association with Signal Company Number one