Latest / UK Column Radio / Dear Farmers- 999, Part 1 – How Did We Get Here? – With Roger Meacock And Sandi Adams

Transcript

Dear Farmers- 999, Part 1 – How Did We Get Here? – With Roger Meacock And Sandi Adams · UK Column Radio

0:06
Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to another UK column interview and perhaps
0:12
Speaker 1: maybe we will call this interview. Remember their rhyme old
0:15
Speaker 1: MacDonald had a farm. Well, perhaps old McDonald is losing
0:20
Speaker 1: a farm. And for those of you that don't know me,
0:26
Speaker 1: I am a retired State registered nurse and I was
0:29
Speaker 1: also a government advisor at the Department of Health for
0:32
Speaker 1: five years. And I'm hoping as i'm talking to you now,
0:36
Speaker 1: we're ending twenty twenty four and my goodness, what a
0:40
Speaker 1: year it has been. And I'm hoping that you've all
0:43
Speaker 1: had a happy Christmas and that you were able to
0:47
Speaker 1: spend some time with your loved ones and enjoy some
0:52
Speaker 1: lovely food, because that's a lot about what Christmas is about,
0:57
Speaker 1: getting together, sharing love, being thankful for what we have
1:02
Speaker 1: on our plates, being thankful for the food that we're eating.
1:06
Speaker 1: But of course the food is farmed, and whether you
1:10
Speaker 1: eat meat, whether you eat vegetables, it's all farmed. So
1:16
Speaker 1: no matter what your preferences, this, I hope is going
1:21
Speaker 1: to be of interest to farmers, in particular to those
1:25
Speaker 1: farmers that are looking towards the future of British farming.
1:30
Speaker 1: What are farms to be replaced with? Are they going
1:33
Speaker 1: and why are they going? Solar farms, wind farms, where
1:39
Speaker 1: are the flower farms, the market gardens, the market farmers,
1:43
Speaker 1: the dairy farms, the chicken farms. There's far more at
1:48
Speaker 1: play now, and this interview, I hope is going to
1:51
Speaker 1: help farmers who might not know more of what is
1:54
Speaker 1: going on in the background. And today I'm absolutely delighted.
1:57
Speaker 1: It's a double whammy today. And really I'm just here
1:59
Speaker 1: to facilitates today's interview because this is going to be
2:03
Speaker 1: a conversation because of a chance encounter between two of
2:08
Speaker 1: our very well known guests, Roger Mee Kopp, who is
2:12
Speaker 1: a veterinary surgeon natural healing solutions who we've done many
2:16
Speaker 1: of the interviews with, and also the wonderful Sandy Adams, who
2:19
Speaker 1: I know you're all going to be really pleased to see,
2:22
Speaker 1: who has done so much work campaigning and researching and
2:25
Speaker 1: talking about the United Nations' Agenda twenty thirty. But for
2:31
Speaker 1: those of you who are fresh to UK column, so
2:34
Speaker 1: those of you who are farmers who know farmers, I'd
2:38
Speaker 1: like to let Roger and Sandy both introduce themselves to
2:42
Speaker 1: you because you might not have met them before. But
2:46
Speaker 1: thank you both because of a chance encounter in North seven.
2:50
Speaker 1: They had a chat and they came up with a
2:53
Speaker 1: revelation and that is what today's interview is all about.
2:57
Speaker 1: So welcome firstly, Roger Roger me Cock, our veterinary surgeon.
3:01
Speaker 1: Thank you for joining us. Roger, do you mind just
3:03
Speaker 1: giving some very brief introduction into how we got to today?
3:08
Speaker 2: Hi de Wie, thank you, Thank you very much. Yeah,
3:12
Speaker 2: I'm a veterory surgeon. As Debbie has said, I've been
3:17
Speaker 2: specializing in natural healing solutions for the last twenty five
3:21
Speaker 2: plus years and I've been awake as to what the
3:27
Speaker 2: different agenda's going on for some time. And I started
3:30
Speaker 2: off in my vettory career as a farm vet, so
3:33
Speaker 2: hence I interest and love of farming, and I also
3:37
Speaker 2: love my food. Those of you who've seen previous interviews
3:41
Speaker 2: will know that I'm actually on the Carnival diet myself,
3:44
Speaker 2: so potentially losing is upsetting to me, both from a
3:53
Speaker 2: professional point of view and also from a personal point
3:57
Speaker 2: of view. And I had the pleasure to share a
4:01
Speaker 2: stage with Sandy at Cloverly in North Devon. We both
4:06
Speaker 2: were asked to speak at the same event and so yeah,
4:11
Speaker 2: we bumped into each other there and then had a
4:13
Speaker 2: chat afterwards, and this is the culmination of that brain
4:18
Speaker 2: brainstorming that we had at that point.
4:20
Speaker 3: And I'm very.
4:21
Speaker 1: Very pleased that you met together in Clavelli in North
4:25
Speaker 1: Devon because that brought you together and Sandy, welcome yet
4:29
Speaker 1: again to UK column. But for those of you that
4:32
Speaker 1: haven't met Sandy before, Sandy, please introduce yourself.
4:35
Speaker 3: I'm Sandy Adams. I used to work in the corporate
4:38
Speaker 3: world a long time ago, about seventeen eighteen years ago,
4:42
Speaker 3: and I realized that there was something not quite right
4:46
Speaker 3: and I gave it up and I started doing a
4:51
Speaker 3: deep dive really into what is going on in our world.
4:54
Speaker 3: I was working for companies like Microsoft and Google and
5:00
Speaker 3: and BLACKSI Smith Climb and so I decided to really
5:05
Speaker 3: have a look about what's going on in the world
5:07
Speaker 3: and I drew it all right back to the United Nations.
5:10
Speaker 3: Really it seems to be the crux of it, and beyond,
5:14
Speaker 3: I mean, the Rockefeller Brothers Foundation and onwards. So I
5:18
Speaker 3: did this big deep dive and found where the control
5:21
Speaker 3: is coming from and how, and then to my horror,
5:25
Speaker 3: I realized, you know, the whole Earth Summit and the
5:29
Speaker 3: climate change lie and how it's all been used as
5:31
Speaker 3: a vector for control. And that's really what my work
5:35
Speaker 3: is all about about, how really our world has been
5:39
Speaker 3: captured by these massive organizations who deem themselves to be
5:45
Speaker 3: the rightful rulers of our planet. So that's it, really.
5:51
Speaker 1: Thank you, Sandy. And of course you know, just recently
5:53
Speaker 1: we've always seen it in the news, the farmer's protests.
5:57
Speaker 1: It's not long been the budget and there was this
6:01
Speaker 1: huge uproar of course from farmers because of the inheritance tax,
6:05
Speaker 1: because I mean I was shocked at the price of
6:07
Speaker 1: farming equipment for example, you know combine harvester three quarters
6:12
Speaker 1: of a million. I mean, you know, it's extraordinary the prices.
6:15
Speaker 1: So this is a darker agenda, though, isn't it. And
6:19
Speaker 1: I think when you met in Clavelli and I'm going
6:21
Speaker 1: to throw it open now to both of you because
6:24
Speaker 1: I know you've got a presentation and I know that
6:27
Speaker 1: you've got some serious concerns that you want farmers to
6:31
Speaker 1: be aware of. It's not just about one agenda. This
6:34
Speaker 1: is a far bigger issue that affects the veterinary service,
6:39
Speaker 1: that affects the business side of farming. That affects the
6:43
Speaker 1: food chain and it affects the future. So who's going
6:48
Speaker 1: to start off? Shall we start off with Roger? You
6:52
Speaker 1: went to North Devon, you bumped into Sandy. Take us
6:56
Speaker 1: from there and I'm going to let you to take
6:59
Speaker 1: us on into what you've discussed and what you've found
7:01
Speaker 1: in your revelation.
7:03
Speaker 2: Yes, I mean, as you say, there's you know, it's
7:05
Speaker 2: it's a bigger agenda. And obviously everybody talks about farming,
7:10
Speaker 2: and we think of the farming side itself, you know,
7:13
Speaker 2: in the fields or with the cows, or or the
7:15
Speaker 2: chickens or the barns. But you know there is a
7:17
Speaker 2: far bigger industry that surrounds or industries I should say
7:22
Speaker 2: in the plural, that surround farming. You know, there are
7:25
Speaker 2: all those that provide equipment for farming. There's those who
7:28
Speaker 2: service the farmers, whether they be vets, whether they be
7:32
Speaker 2: the feed merchants. You know that farming isn't just what
7:37
Speaker 2: goes on on a farm. And you know, if farming
7:41
Speaker 2: is being attacked, then all these other industries are being
7:44
Speaker 2: attacked as well. And I include within that that niche
7:48
Speaker 2: of farm vetery work where I started my veterinary career,
7:52
Speaker 2: so you know, this is something that we all need
7:55
Speaker 2: to be aware of. And you know, this is why
7:58
Speaker 2: Sandy and I had this conversation and said, you know,
8:01
Speaker 2: really we need to get this message out to farmers particularly,
8:05
Speaker 2: and we know how busy they are and how little
8:08
Speaker 2: time they've had perhaps to dive down the rabbit holes
8:11
Speaker 2: that we've had a look down, and so we decided
8:15
Speaker 2: that it would be a good idea to put together
8:17
Speaker 2: a presentation and say that the vast majority of the
8:21
Speaker 2: slides are Sandy's are added a few in, but Sandy
8:25
Speaker 2: has you know, one of the reasons we got together
8:29
Speaker 2: and we sort of gelled, if you like, at the
8:32
Speaker 2: meeting was, you know, Sandy was saying stuff that I
8:36
Speaker 2: knew already, and I think in my talk I was
8:38
Speaker 2: saying stuff that standing you already as well. So you know,
8:41
Speaker 2: it was good to get that reinforcement that we've maybe's
8:45
Speaker 2: gone down these rabbit holes separately, that we've actually come
8:48
Speaker 2: to the same conclusions and we can see what's going on,
8:51
Speaker 2: and actually the conclusions aren't difficult to come to because
8:55
Speaker 2: actually it's written in the documentation. And that's why we've
8:59
Speaker 2: decided to do this presentation. To talk everybody through it
9:03
Speaker 2: and step everybody through it and show what's going on.
9:07
Speaker 2: So let's get going.
9:09
Speaker 3: Exactly what you said, I mean, you really one realize
9:12
Speaker 3: is that a big part of this agenda is to
9:15
Speaker 3: take over the food production and make it a big
9:19
Speaker 3: corporate entity, and to get rid of traditional farming and
9:24
Speaker 3: traditional farmers and particularly you know, smaller farms, you know,
9:29
Speaker 3: medium sized farms, and and to make it make it
9:34
Speaker 3: impossible for farmers to to pass their farms down to
9:39
Speaker 3: to their to their family, to make it a family
9:43
Speaker 3: business that gets passed down through generations, which historically it's
9:46
Speaker 3: always been that way. And what they what they intend
9:49
Speaker 3: to do is to take that facility away from the
9:52
Speaker 3: farmers and literally turn them into corporate, corporate entities. And
9:57
Speaker 3: it will you know, it's going to actually really impact
10:02
Speaker 3: on our food supplies. I think, you know, they're just
10:05
Speaker 3: trying to cover our land with these renewable, renewable energy
10:12
Speaker 3: facilities like solar farms, wind farms. Housing. Housing's a big one.
10:17
Speaker 3: And you look at the land use mapping in local
10:21
Speaker 3: authority land you smapping, you'll find that there's very little
10:25
Speaker 3: provision for food security, and that is the biggest problem
10:28
Speaker 3: at the moment that we're facing is food security. In
10:30
Speaker 3: twenty twenty five and onwards, we are going to really
10:34
Speaker 3: really be challenged, and that's why we're here.
10:37
Speaker 1: That's really helpful. Thank you both so much of that.
10:40
Speaker 1: And I probably just add that you know sustainable goals,
10:45
Speaker 1: and you've just mentioned food security there, Sandy, and I'm
10:49
Speaker 1: seeing that far from sustainable we're becoming. We're being made
10:54
Speaker 1: deliberately very unsustainable.
10:57
Speaker 2: The plot to seize your farm. So the ideas this
11:00
Speaker 2: isn't a new idea. It's a technocratic plan that originated
11:05
Speaker 2: nearly one hundred years ago. So the following presentation is
11:09
Speaker 2: a conspiracy, but it's not been constructed by us. It
11:13
Speaker 2: was initiated decades ago with the ultimate aim to maina
11:15
Speaker 2: control of the growing masses by the few. The slides
11:18
Speaker 2: show the proof taken from government documents and those of
11:22
Speaker 2: undemocratically established global organizations that are set up to achieve
11:26
Speaker 2: their goal for a new world order, who will dictate
11:29
Speaker 2: global governance in a partnership with non governmental organizations, which
11:33
Speaker 2: is Mussolini's definition of fascism. Prominent politicians, financers, and industrialists
11:40
Speaker 2: have been groomed to implement the plan in every country,
11:43
Speaker 2: regardless of which party is being elected within the uniparty system.
11:46
Speaker 2: It gives the bogus impression of democracy when none exists
11:50
Speaker 2: in reality. How it all began, It's.
11:53
Speaker 3: Been a very long term plan, this whole agenda of
11:57
Speaker 3: a carbon based economy, and it started in the nineteen
12:00
Speaker 3: thirties with the just after the depression in America, and
12:06
Speaker 3: it was led by political scientists and engineers a guy
12:10
Speaker 3: called M. K. Hubbart and Howard Scott from Columbia University.
12:14
Speaker 3: They proposed a replacement of capitalism with an energy based
12:18
Speaker 3: economy as opposed to price based economy. It was reintroduced
12:22
Speaker 3: by the Trilateral Commission ze Big New Brasinski in nineteen
12:25
Speaker 3: seventy three as the new economic order known as sustainable
12:29
Speaker 3: development and the Green Economy. Many Illumini of Columbia head
12:34
Speaker 3: up the present agenda, like Klaus schwab Amati, etc. Only
12:38
Speaker 3: he's communitarian guy, George Soros, David Rockefeller. They were an
12:43
Speaker 3: elite group of tech tratz trying to implement what was
12:46
Speaker 3: then global warming to create a new carbon based economy.
12:50
Speaker 3: So they already the seeds of it were actually back
12:55
Speaker 3: in the nineteen thirties. Their whole agenda didn't actually come
13:00
Speaker 3: to anything. It kind of fell at the beginning of
13:03
Speaker 3: the set at the end of the Second World War
13:05
Speaker 3: because people weren't ready quite to give up capitalism. But
13:08
Speaker 3: what's interesting is Joshua Halderman is Elon Musk's great grandfather,
13:13
Speaker 3: and he was heavily involved in this whole technocratic movement,
13:18
Speaker 3: and they called it Technocracy inc. It was a big
13:22
Speaker 3: push to really get onto this carbon based economy. And
13:26
Speaker 3: he was Elon Musk's great grandfather. He was a maverick,
13:29
Speaker 3: an entrepreneur. He flew his family all over the world
13:32
Speaker 3: in his plane, and Elon's father led a very unconventional
13:36
Speaker 3: life in the nineteen thirties. Right the way up to
13:40
Speaker 3: nineteen forty seven, Haldeman headed up Operation Columbia, named after
13:44
Speaker 3: the university. He supported Howard Scott and Alexander King in
13:48
Speaker 3: the technocracy movement. Alexander King, by the way, was also
13:53
Speaker 3: a member of the Club of Rome. He had ready
13:56
Speaker 3: set up his Social Credit Party, so that tells you
14:00
Speaker 3: a lot about him. He organized Operation Columbia, funded by
14:04
Speaker 3: the Freemasons of the United States, with a convoy of
14:08
Speaker 3: cars to drive from California to Vancouver, stopping at every
14:12
Speaker 3: Masonic temple along the way to preach the new economic
14:16
Speaker 3: order of an energy based economy. It failed because, as
14:20
Speaker 3: I said, people weren't ready to give up capitalism. This
14:24
Speaker 3: is just a picture of this very strange gray convoy
14:27
Speaker 3: that went literally from California to Vancouver. And they used
14:32
Speaker 3: to dress in long gray overcoats and do Nazi salutes
14:37
Speaker 3: to each other. It was all a bit strange. The
14:39
Speaker 3: technocracy movement. Anyway, it had to be given up. And
14:44
Speaker 3: I'm just going to quote Fritz Springmyer, who's done a
14:47
Speaker 3: deep dive into Freemasonry. The Kabbalah is a foundational doctrine
14:51
Speaker 3: underlying Freemasonry, and a lot of these are cult organizations.
14:55
Speaker 3: People don't understand that. The cabitalism. They believe that they
14:59
Speaker 3: are going to be two there's going to be two
15:02
Speaker 3: saviors of this world, and one of those saviors is
15:05
Speaker 3: going to be Technocracy, and we wonder who the other
15:08
Speaker 3: one's going to be. Anyway, one of them is going
15:11
Speaker 3: to be Technocracy, the savior of the world. And that's
15:13
Speaker 3: a bit worrying.
15:14
Speaker 1: Really.
15:15
Speaker 3: Now, I just want to make it clear who's behind
15:18
Speaker 3: the United Nations because it is interesting that the Rockefeller
15:22
Speaker 3: brothers were responsible for the building of the UN headquarters
15:25
Speaker 3: in New York. In nineteen forty six, Nelson and David
15:29
Speaker 3: Rockefeller bought the site at East River with an eight
15:32
Speaker 3: point five million dollar donation from their father JD. Rockefeller.
15:37
Speaker 3: The Rockefeller Brothers Foundation also donated two million dollars to
15:41
Speaker 3: the original League of Nations to buy the land in Geneva,
15:45
Speaker 3: which is where the UN building now stands in Geneva.
15:48
Speaker 3: And the who that happened in nineteen twenty seven where
15:52
Speaker 3: the UN now stands. The Rockefeller Brothers founded the UN.
15:56
Speaker 3: I just want to make that clear because not many
15:58
Speaker 3: people realize that, but actually it was all built on
16:00
Speaker 3: the foundation for the Rockefeller Brothers Foundation, So that is,
16:05
Speaker 3: you know, that's quite something. I don't think many people
16:07
Speaker 3: understand that. Now. I'm going to mention this because this
16:11
Speaker 3: is all very important when you realize the corporateocracy that
16:16
Speaker 3: we're now facing and how it's emerged, and why the
16:22
Speaker 3: public private partnerships that are now being created is all
16:25
Speaker 3: part of this. This is a secret in US intelligence
16:28
Speaker 3: report that proves that the Nazis planned a forthright by
16:31
Speaker 3: creating a European Economic border by bankrolling industrialists to take
16:35
Speaker 3: control of nation states in Europe. In nineteen forty four,
16:40
Speaker 3: top SS officers in the Nazi Party distance themselves from Hitler.
16:45
Speaker 3: The war couldn't be won militarily, so they planned to
16:48
Speaker 3: take over the world in a different way. At a
16:51
Speaker 3: meeting in the Maison Rouge Strasbourg, they invited all the
16:54
Speaker 3: top industrialists in Germany at the time. This included Crops, Flick,
17:00
Speaker 3: Dame leer Ben's IBM, Siemens, Volkswagen, and ig Farbin a
17:05
Speaker 3: Lot among more. With the backing of the United States
17:09
Speaker 3: through Operation Paperclip, these top corporations were told to grow
17:13
Speaker 3: many companies and create corporateocracy to take over Europe using
17:19
Speaker 3: the EU as the means. Before the Common Market EU
17:22
Speaker 3: could could be formed, the Nazi industrialists had to be pardoned.
17:27
Speaker 3: The bankers and officials were sort of pardoned in that
17:31
Speaker 3: process and were able to carry on doing business in
17:34
Speaker 3: the US. In nineteen fifty seven, John Maclay, the American
17:38
Speaker 3: High Commissioner for Germany, issued an amnesty for convicted war criminals.
17:43
Speaker 3: This included the above mentioned corporations. This is why we
17:47
Speaker 3: have black Rock and Vanguard. Now, this is like that.
17:50
Speaker 3: It all started really then when the United States bankrolled
17:55
Speaker 3: all the big industrialists from Germany. So we now see
17:58
Speaker 3: that we're living under that corporate and that kind of
18:01
Speaker 3: links in with what's happening now that you know, the
18:05
Speaker 3: big takeover, the corporate takeover of everything literally in our world.
18:09
Speaker 3: The Club of Rome seemed to be behind a lot
18:12
Speaker 3: of this. It was formed as a sort of crisis
18:15
Speaker 3: think tank for the United Nations. It's a global think
18:18
Speaker 3: tank and it was founded on the Malthusian principle that
18:22
Speaker 3: the earth has limited and finite resources. It was founded
18:27
Speaker 3: in nineteen sixty eight at the Rockefeller's private estate in Bellagio, Italy,
18:31
Speaker 3: by Aurelio Peche, an Italian industrialist, for the Rockefeller Foundation
18:36
Speaker 3: and the UN The main purpose for the counts for
18:39
Speaker 3: the Club of Rome is to formulate a crisis through
18:42
Speaker 3: which the world could be united under a one world government.
18:46
Speaker 3: Global problems require global solutions, so they just sort of
18:50
Speaker 3: chuck around ideas about and it's usually on this kind
18:54
Speaker 3: of problem reaction solution model. Various Club of Rome reports
19:00
Speaker 3: pave the way for Gender twenty one, the intended agenda
19:03
Speaker 3: for the twenty first century. This was called the Global
19:06
Speaker 3: Report for the President in the year two thousand. They
19:09
Speaker 3: wanted to figure out a way of reducing the population.
19:14
Speaker 3: And I've got a copy of this somewhere. Yeah, here
19:17
Speaker 3: it is. There we are, and it's quite you know,
19:21
Speaker 3: it's and it was really given to Jimmy Carter, and
19:27
Speaker 3: it was really a way of saying, right, we're going
19:30
Speaker 3: to reduce the population of it said. The US population
19:36
Speaker 3: figure of one hundred million emerged again on the CI
19:39
Speaker 3: a linked website called Deegle That Eagle's a different, different thing,
19:43
Speaker 3: and we'll get onto that later. But the Global two
19:46
Speaker 3: thousand report was really going into depopulation and how it
19:50
Speaker 3: could be reduced using population control like this decreasing population,
19:56
Speaker 3: but also manipulating population by by using other means. And
20:03
Speaker 3: they used the Vietnam War as an example in this
20:05
Speaker 3: book of how they could actually reduce the population. So
20:09
Speaker 3: it's pretty pretty heavy stuff. This is quite interesting. This
20:13
Speaker 3: is the Degal Report that was published about ten years ago.
20:17
Speaker 3: A decade ago, it suddenly appeared on the Degal website.
20:22
Speaker 3: It's a true intelligence operation for the United States government
20:25
Speaker 3: run by the CIA in twenty fourteen to twenty eighteen,
20:29
Speaker 3: it came down in yeah, just before the pandemic. Actually,
20:33
Speaker 3: their website predicted a massive fifty to eight percent global
20:36
Speaker 3: depopulation by twenty twenty five. CIA in the World Bank
20:40
Speaker 3: contributed to these forecasts. These predictions have been taken down
20:43
Speaker 3: in late twenty twenty one with no explanation. The UK
20:47
Speaker 3: population forecast was to go from roughly sixty five million
20:51
Speaker 3: in twenty nineteen to fifteen million in twenty twenty five,
20:55
Speaker 3: later revised down to fifteen million in twenty twenty one.
20:59
Speaker 3: These forecasts were for one hundred and seventy nine countries,
21:02
Speaker 3: with varying degrees of reductions and increases. Now, these degal forecasts,
21:07
Speaker 3: no one knows how they came up with these figures.
21:10
Speaker 3: For the population forecast of twenty twenty five. It would
21:15
Speaker 3: seem that America, Canada, Europe, Australia, New Zealand and the
21:21
Speaker 3: UK were significantly hit by these lowered population forecasts. And
21:32
Speaker 3: you know, we don't know how they came up with
21:36
Speaker 3: these at all, but it's just worrying. It's concerning that
21:40
Speaker 3: these forecasts and the fact that they took them down
21:43
Speaker 3: in around twenty twenty one, and with no explanation at
21:48
Speaker 3: all as to why they were up there for a
21:49
Speaker 3: good four or five years, now more than that, but anyway,
21:54
Speaker 3: that's where they were.
21:56
Speaker 1: Now.
21:56
Speaker 3: One of the other major Club of Rome reports was
21:59
Speaker 3: Limits to Grow. Both now these Club of Own reports
22:02
Speaker 3: came just before the Earth Summit, and they made the
22:05
Speaker 3: bones up of Agenda twenty one, and Limits to Growth
22:09
Speaker 3: was published in the nineteen seventies. It was nineteen seventy one,
22:13
Speaker 3: and it was really again it was about population and
22:16
Speaker 3: how population needs to be controlled. It's a bit like
22:19
Speaker 3: the Global two thousand report. It was using computer models,
22:24
Speaker 3: flawed computer models about how there wouldn't be enough resources
22:28
Speaker 3: to go around and by nineteen eighty they wouldn't be
22:30
Speaker 3: enough food or they wouldn't be enough for anything to
22:32
Speaker 3: go around. So it was basically saying that that we
22:36
Speaker 3: need to do something. We need to use contraception, we
22:40
Speaker 3: need to use ways of decreasing the population. And it
22:44
Speaker 3: was really a bit Malthusium, this whole, this whole thing,
22:48
Speaker 3: but deeply flawed because it was at a time in
22:51
Speaker 3: the nineteen seventies where there was a great debate going
22:53
Speaker 3: on about population and that a guy called Paul Eerlik
22:56
Speaker 3: had written The Population Bomb, a book and that bomb
23:00
Speaker 3: didn't ever go off again. It was based on flawed
23:03
Speaker 3: computer models. It was a very it was a very
23:06
Speaker 3: fashionable thing to be talking about in the nineteen seventies
23:08
Speaker 3: that there were too many of us. And it's interesting
23:12
Speaker 3: now we're not even at replacement level in Europe, So
23:16
Speaker 3: there is certainly in Europe there's no population problem at all.
23:20
Speaker 3: And we'll go on to the other club of romes
23:21
Speaker 3: after this next slide, which I think Roger could talk about.
23:26
Speaker 2: Yeah, this is Dr Dennis Meadows, who actually was one
23:29
Speaker 2: of the main authors of the Limits to Growth report
23:32
Speaker 2: that Sandy's just been talking about. And he did an
23:36
Speaker 2: interview that was recorded on video, and this is just
23:39
Speaker 2: a short excerpt from it where he talks about how
23:44
Speaker 2: the population needs to be taken down. At the time
23:49
Speaker 2: he was doing the interview, it was saying that, you know,
23:52
Speaker 2: we've got seven million and we need to get down
23:54
Speaker 2: to one. And he did this original report obviously in
23:58
Speaker 2: nineteen seventy two, but he revised the book in two
24:01
Speaker 2: thousand and four, and you know, he certainly hadn't changed
24:05
Speaker 2: his opinions by that time. So this Alexa is part
24:10
Speaker 2: of a much longer interview which he did.
24:14
Speaker 4: The planet can support something like a billion people, maybe
24:23
Speaker 4: two billion, depending on how much liberty and how much
24:27
Speaker 4: material consumption you want to have. If you want more
24:30
Speaker 4: liberty and more consumption, you have to have fewer people.
24:35
Speaker 4: And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we
24:39
Speaker 4: could even have eight or nine billion, probably if we
24:43
Speaker 4: have a very strong dictatorship, which is smart. Unfortunately, you
24:48
Speaker 4: never have smart dictatorships. They're always stupid. But if you
24:51
Speaker 4: had a smart dictatorship and a low standard of living,
24:54
Speaker 4: you can have it. But we want to have freedom
24:56
Speaker 4: and we want to have a high sentence. So we're
24:58
Speaker 4: going to have a billion people, and we're now at seven.
25:01
Speaker 4: So we have to get back down.
25:02
Speaker 2: Back to you, Sandy.
25:04
Speaker 3: This is about Zabid new Brazinski because he was the
25:07
Speaker 3: one the person who reignited the whole new economic order,
25:12
Speaker 3: the technocracy movement of the nineteen thirties, and he wrote
25:15
Speaker 3: a book called Between Two Ages, America's Role in a
25:18
Speaker 3: Technocratic Era. He studied political science at Columbulia University with
25:23
Speaker 3: MK Hubbard and Howard Scott. He was key in forming
25:26
Speaker 3: the New Economic Order resource based economy CO two carbon
25:31
Speaker 3: taxing resources are more valuable than money, in the technocratic age,
25:36
Speaker 3: they must be controlled and owned. And that's his that
25:42
Speaker 3: was his contribution. He was very very pushing this whole
25:48
Speaker 3: new economic order which actually became Big society with David
25:52
Speaker 3: Cameron and Tony Blair. Now in nineteen eighty seven. Now
25:58
Speaker 3: the sorry the limits to growth and the between two
26:02
Speaker 3: ages within the nineteen seventies, and then we go forward
26:06
Speaker 3: to nineteen eighty seven where Growhal and Bruntland prime Minister
26:12
Speaker 3: of Norway at the time, and she worked very very
26:14
Speaker 3: closely with Maury Strong from the United Nations at that
26:19
Speaker 3: time he was sid or Secretary Generals and they both
26:23
Speaker 3: wrote this book together. But although Growhol and br and
26:26
Speaker 3: takes ordered credit for it, and it was the report
26:29
Speaker 3: on the World Commission on Environmental and Development by Grohall
26:34
Speaker 3: and Bruntland, and it's often known as a Bruntlen Report.
26:36
Speaker 3: Now Prince Charles still uses this and quotes it. It's
26:39
Speaker 3: almost like his bible, and it's all about really leveling
26:43
Speaker 3: up the wealth of all the nations. Wealth needs to
26:46
Speaker 3: be distributed from wealthy countries to poorer nations as wealthy
26:49
Speaker 3: countries are destroying the planet. That was the idea India
26:53
Speaker 3: and China, which is interesting. It was this whole shift
26:58
Speaker 3: from wealth to be given over to poorer countries like
27:02
Speaker 3: India and China. It was a commutarian plan to bring equity,
27:07
Speaker 3: not to be confused with equality to all countries. The
27:11
Speaker 3: West too was too rich and was polluting and had
27:15
Speaker 3: to become poorer and less polluting to meet with the
27:18
Speaker 3: Third World. It came under the scrutiny during the Paris
27:22
Speaker 3: Climate Conference when the disparity of emissions between the West
27:26
Speaker 3: and India and China had become a cause for concern.
27:29
Speaker 3: The Secretary General of the United Nations, Morris Strong, called
27:33
Speaker 3: it a second Marshall Plan, and that's exactly what it was.
27:37
Speaker 3: It was a way of just shifting over the money.
27:39
Speaker 3: So our industry became destroyed really because everything went to China.
27:43
Speaker 3: Now after our common future. The next Club of Rome
27:48
Speaker 3: report to be published was just before the Earth Summit
27:51
Speaker 3: in nineteen ninety one. It was this book where the
27:53
Speaker 3: quote you know about humanity being the enemy of humanity,
27:57
Speaker 3: man being the enemy of humanity because they literally were
28:01
Speaker 3: looking for a scapegoat. They were. This whole Club of
28:04
Speaker 3: Rome report was about trying to find scapegoats because at
28:08
Speaker 3: the end of the day, we needed enemies. That the
28:12
Speaker 3: wall had come down, the Berlin Wall had come down,
28:14
Speaker 3: the World Wars had finished, and there were no enemies.
28:17
Speaker 3: So they had to create one, and they created us
28:19
Speaker 3: as the enemy. So climate change was chosen to vehicle
28:23
Speaker 3: behind which to unite the people through an existential fear
28:26
Speaker 3: to accept restrictions to freedoms and rights with higher taxes
28:30
Speaker 3: that wouldn't otherwise be accepted. So they did identify us
28:35
Speaker 3: in this Club Rome report as the enemy of the
28:38
Speaker 3: planet basically so, and that's why we are being attacked
28:42
Speaker 3: right now. And then, of course we then had the
28:48
Speaker 3: Rio Earth Summit in nineteen ninety two, sometimes called the
28:50
Speaker 3: UNSAID Conference unceed and it was a birth of global governance.
28:56
Speaker 3: This is where really it kicked in. This is where
28:58
Speaker 3: they got together and thought, right is it We're going
29:00
Speaker 3: to really make a plan to have global governance. This
29:05
Speaker 3: is a quote from Maurice Strong at the Earth's Summit,
29:07
Speaker 3: he was the Secretary General. We may get to the
29:11
Speaker 3: point where the only way of saving the world would
29:13
Speaker 3: be for industrialized civilizations to collapse. Isn't it our responsibility
29:18
Speaker 3: to bring this about? That is what he actually said. Now,
29:21
Speaker 3: that's what we're seeing now is the Western civilization collapsing,
29:27
Speaker 3: and it's all controlled and it was all meant to collapse.
29:31
Speaker 3: That's what we're seeing now now. Who was Murray Strong Well,
29:36
Speaker 3: He was the grandfather of Agenda twenty one. He headed
29:40
Speaker 3: up the Earth Summit in Rio. He was an oil
29:44
Speaker 3: billionaire and he worked for the Rockefeller Brothers for seventeen years.
29:48
Speaker 3: He was a member of the Club of Rome, the
29:50
Speaker 3: Trilateral Commission, the Council for Foreign Relations, a member of
29:53
Speaker 3: the Fabian Society. He was a self confessed communist in
29:58
Speaker 3: ideology and capitalist in methodology. So that's a true communitarian.
30:03
Speaker 3: That's how he thinks. It's the new communism and it's communitarianism.
30:09
Speaker 3: He was exiled to China to avoid prison in the
30:12
Speaker 3: US for being involved in the oil for food scandal
30:16
Speaker 3: in nineteen ninety five, where the UN Security Council made
30:20
Speaker 3: a resolution to supply Iraq with food in exchange for oil.
30:23
Speaker 3: There were revelations of corruption of funds involving Maury Strong,
30:27
Speaker 3: Atlan Kushogi and many other oil billionaires. He loved China
30:31
Speaker 3: and the communist system, and he was friends with Chairman Mao.
30:36
Speaker 3: His cousin actually lived with chairman Mao, So he ended
30:39
Speaker 3: his days in China and he loved the whole Chinese
30:42
Speaker 3: communist system, social credit system, everything. So we now realize
30:48
Speaker 3: who was behind the Earth Summit where all this was,
30:50
Speaker 3: this global governance was brought in. So this is it.
30:54
Speaker 3: This is Agenda twenty one. It was launched then, and
30:58
Speaker 3: it's the agenda for the twenty first entry. That's why
31:00
Speaker 3: it's called Gender twenty one. It's also called sustainable development.
31:05
Speaker 3: That's where the term sustainable development came in. It's written
31:08
Speaker 3: as a forty two chapter document. On the face of it,
31:11
Speaker 3: it talks of sustainability, environmentalism, and conservative conservation, but at
31:16
Speaker 3: its heart, it seeks to divide man from nature and
31:20
Speaker 3: control all resources, taking control of land see minerals, and
31:25
Speaker 3: just about everything on the planet under the deception of
31:28
Speaker 3: saving the world. Prior to this summit, many of the
31:32
Speaker 3: oil billionaires and bankers had invested in the carbon credit banks.
31:37
Speaker 3: Obama had set up the Chicago Climate Exchange, so they'd
31:41
Speaker 3: already invested in this new economy that they'd been trying
31:45
Speaker 3: to get going since the nineteen thirties, and now this
31:49
Speaker 3: was their flagship launch of this agenda, and it worked
31:53
Speaker 3: it worked. Now, this is interesting. This is Prince Charles.
31:57
Speaker 3: Now there's a picture there of here with Faclav Havel
32:02
Speaker 3: from Czechoslovakia and Claus Schwab. Is that chap in the
32:07
Speaker 3: back looking very young? There? Prince Charles was in with
32:11
Speaker 3: all that lot. I mean he was at the Earth Summit,
32:14
Speaker 3: in fact before the Earth Summit. This is quite interesting.
32:17
Speaker 3: I'm going to just say this, just like the Red
32:19
Speaker 3: House report, this is a corporate takeover of the world.
32:24
Speaker 3: In nineteen ninety Prince Charles set up the Prince of
32:27
Speaker 3: Wales Business Leaders Forum as a model for public private partnerships.
32:32
Speaker 3: It was called the Public The Prince of Wales Business
32:34
Speaker 3: Leaders Forum became immensely powerful worldwide, bringing together over fifty
32:40
Speaker 3: powerful corporations, partners and members and funders. In nineteen ninety one,
32:45
Speaker 3: a year before the Rio Summit, Prince Charles hosted a
32:48
Speaker 3: meeting on roy Yot, Britannia, where the summit was going
32:51
Speaker 3: to be held in ninety two. And he hosted this
32:53
Speaker 3: meeting with members of the UN, WEF, IMF, World Bank
32:58
Speaker 3: and key executives SHELL and BP, as well as European
33:02
Speaker 3: leaders to push the idea of sustainable development referencing the
33:07
Speaker 3: UN Bruntler Report as the roadmap for the future world's economy.
33:12
Speaker 3: The following year, in nineteen ninety two, he hosted the
33:14
Speaker 3: same oligarchs in the Rio Harbor to celebrate the successful
33:19
Speaker 3: signing up to Agenda twenty one of one hundred and
33:22
Speaker 3: seventy eight countries. And that's what happened at the Earth Summit.
33:26
Speaker 3: They managed to get one hundred seventy eight leaders of
33:29
Speaker 3: countries to sign up to Agenda twenty one, the agendat
33:33
Speaker 3: twenty first century to save the planet. And of course
33:37
Speaker 3: who wouldn't want to save the planet. All the leaders
33:39
Speaker 3: signed up to this. It was to save the planet
33:42
Speaker 3: and revolutionize the world's economy to that of a carbon
33:45
Speaker 3: based economy controlled by private cooperations. There was a whistleblower
33:50
Speaker 3: blower called George Hunt, and he said as they chinked
33:53
Speaker 3: their champagne glasses on Royalock, Britannia, they applauded themselves, saying, yes,
33:58
Speaker 3: we did it. We got the whole world to sign
34:00
Speaker 3: up to global governance. So unfortunately, that's what happened, and
34:06
Speaker 3: that's why we're in the state we're in now. Public
34:08
Speaker 3: private partnerships via NGOs are undermining politics. That's non governmental
34:13
Speaker 3: law organizations and all Western governments. So they're undermining politics
34:18
Speaker 3: and all Western governments. They are the big businesses destroying
34:21
Speaker 3: representational government in the form of an oligarchy. These extremely
34:25
Speaker 3: powerful multinationals have the ability and are taking over the
34:29
Speaker 3: national governments globally to create global governance driven by greed.
34:34
Speaker 3: Corporate structure will undermine everything if we allow it. It's
34:38
Speaker 3: a new form of corporate communism. Also referred to by
34:42
Speaker 3: claud Schwab of the WEF as stakeholder capitalism. So they're
34:47
Speaker 3: transitioning us from shareholder capitalism, which is a normal price
34:50
Speaker 3: based economy, into stakeholder capitalism, which is corporate led capitalism.
34:57
Speaker 3: So it gets rid of small and medium sized businusinesses,
35:00
Speaker 3: it gets mid of small farms, and what they really
35:03
Speaker 3: want is to corporatize it and have these massive super
35:07
Speaker 3: farms and massive super corporation, you know, sort of businesses,
35:12
Speaker 3: so that you know that the high street will die,
35:15
Speaker 3: you know that the small small businesses will die. And
35:19
Speaker 3: this is what we're facing now. Just to go back,
35:22
Speaker 3: I always talk about this because it is important. The
35:25
Speaker 3: Global Diversity Assessment of nineteen ninety five which I have
35:29
Speaker 3: a copy of here. It's a very very big book
35:32
Speaker 3: and it's got all the it really is. So it
35:36
Speaker 3: was published after the Earth Summit, but obviously it's over
35:40
Speaker 3: one thousand pages, took it costs three point three billion
35:43
Speaker 3: dollars to produce, and it is a control and inventory
35:47
Speaker 3: of everything on our planet. So it's almost like an
35:52
Speaker 3: inventory really of everything, every mineral, every animal, every plant,
35:58
Speaker 3: and how they are going to manage it, how you know,
36:03
Speaker 3: the how the globalists are going to manage our planet.
36:08
Speaker 3: And there's nothing in here except on page nine ninety
36:11
Speaker 3: three about human beings, and on page nine hundred and
36:15
Speaker 3: thirty three they talk about the humans that have destroyed
36:21
Speaker 3: the planet. They'll be put into what they call human
36:25
Speaker 3: settlement zones, and these human settlement zones will have corridors
36:29
Speaker 3: in between, and that is that was all part of
36:33
Speaker 3: something called the Wildliness Project, which I'll go on to
36:36
Speaker 3: in a couple of slides time. So it was really
36:40
Speaker 3: a way of cataloging everything and how it needs to
36:43
Speaker 3: be managed and controlled. Bill Gates depopulation equation based on
36:47
Speaker 3: CO two and this is obviously Bill Gates equation. I
36:52
Speaker 3: don't really understand it. I think obviously it's made up.
36:55
Speaker 3: It's basically go two equals people times services per person,
37:00
Speaker 3: times energy per service times coto per unit. I mean,
37:04
Speaker 3: it's an absolute nonsense. Bill Gates has been buying up
37:07
Speaker 3: huge areas of farmland in the USA and met with
37:10
Speaker 3: Keir Starmer the week before the budget that announced the
37:13
Speaker 3: IHT change, that's the inheritance tax. He has invested heavily
37:19
Speaker 3: in franken foods, yet also in methane reduction in cows.
37:24
Speaker 3: He has a climate alarmist, causing this as leverage to
37:27
Speaker 3: ensure success of his wild ideas and investments e g.
37:32
Speaker 3: Jimming the sun with keem trails. He has invested in
37:35
Speaker 3: the WHO, the World Health Organization, to promote his vaccine investment,
37:40
Speaker 3: and there's been has been implicated in a number of
37:43
Speaker 3: scandals surrounding this, including in Kenya where tetanus and Guardasil
37:48
Speaker 3: vaccines were used to sterilize young girls. I believe some
37:52
Speaker 3: of them died. I mean it was he was actually
37:54
Speaker 3: thrown out of India because his vaccinations killed so many,
38:00
Speaker 3: so many young people. Bill Gates is heavily invested in
38:04
Speaker 3: this whole agenda of control of the planet, control of
38:08
Speaker 3: the land, taking away farmland and it is a huge
38:14
Speaker 3: land grab, corporate land glab of monstrous proportions. Now this
38:19
Speaker 3: came out of the Global Diversity Assessment. I just showed you.
38:25
Speaker 3: This is a map of America and this was put
38:28
Speaker 3: forward as a project called the Wildlands Project of North America.
38:33
Speaker 3: I used to include these over ten years ago, eleven,
38:36
Speaker 3: twelve years ago in my slide presentations and people used
38:40
Speaker 3: to go, oh, that's a bit of a conspiracy thing.
38:42
Speaker 3: It will never happen. But you know, it's all of
38:45
Speaker 3: the stuff that we've been talking about for so many
38:48
Speaker 3: years is happening. And I began to question myself at
38:51
Speaker 3: one point, but actually it is all. It all is
38:54
Speaker 3: rolling out. Unfortunately, I don't you know, I didn't want
38:56
Speaker 3: it that way. This particular slide is important because it's
39:01
Speaker 3: a simulated reserve and corridor system protect to protect biodiversity.
39:06
Speaker 3: Most of the map you see there is yellow and red. Well,
39:11
Speaker 3: those are the areas that humans aren't allowed to be in,
39:14
Speaker 3: and you've got the red areas are core reserves and
39:16
Speaker 3: corridors little or no human use, and then are the
39:20
Speaker 3: yellow bit of buffer zones highly regulated use, which means
39:24
Speaker 3: it's for military and federal use. And then you've got
39:28
Speaker 3: these little green dots all over the country and they
39:32
Speaker 3: are normal use. This is where the humans are allowed
39:35
Speaker 3: to be in these little green dots which are zones.
39:37
Speaker 3: They call them human settlement zones. And then the pink
39:40
Speaker 3: ones are Indian reservations. So it's almost like they're treating
39:44
Speaker 3: everyone like indigenous, you know, they need to be put
39:46
Speaker 3: in reservations. And then you've got the gray ones, which
39:49
Speaker 3: are a few there, which are military reservations. Now this
39:53
Speaker 3: was produced by David Foreman of Earth First. Now we
39:56
Speaker 3: know what Earth First is all about. It's all part
39:59
Speaker 3: of just stop oil and extinction rebellion, and it was
40:03
Speaker 3: financed by big Oil. The un Wildland Project was very
40:08
Speaker 3: controversial at the time. Seventy five percent of the US
40:10
Speaker 3: to be given over to self willed land and restocked
40:13
Speaker 3: with wild boar, wolves, bears, and wild vegetation. On page
40:17
Speaker 3: nine nine three of the US Global Diversity Assessment, I
40:20
Speaker 3: mentioned this. The Wildlans Project plans to remove fifty percent
40:24
Speaker 3: of the United States population into urban areas or human
40:28
Speaker 3: settlement zones, consisting of high rise dwelling units that had
40:32
Speaker 3: been situated near railway tracks. The railroad will be the
40:35
Speaker 3: main means of transportation. Private automobiles will not be permitted.
40:40
Speaker 3: The Obama stimulus was a major source of funding for
40:43
Speaker 3: this project. EU plans to rewild one million hectares of
40:48
Speaker 3: land two point four to seven million acres and farmers
40:51
Speaker 3: in the UK now paid to rewild their land. So
40:55
Speaker 3: this is where the rewilding has come in. You know that.
40:58
Speaker 3: You know, if farmers aren't putting these renewables on their
41:02
Speaker 3: land or housing, then they're being asked to rewild their land.
41:06
Speaker 3: And where is the food? You know, this is what
41:09
Speaker 3: we have to ask, where is the food? And they
41:11
Speaker 3: don't want they want to starve us. Basically, there's a
41:13
Speaker 3: number of these World Wilderness Conferences that happen all around
41:17
Speaker 3: the world. UN based they call Wilderness Conferences. They had
41:21
Speaker 3: one in Jaipur in twenty twenty. Actually it had to
41:24
Speaker 3: go online in the end because of the pandemic. But
41:26
Speaker 3: they plan to rewild fifty percent of the earth by
41:28
Speaker 3: twenty fifty, co hosted by China, unveiling a global Leadership Committee.
41:35
Speaker 3: So they hold these big, big conferences all over the world.
41:39
Speaker 3: You know that they do it all the time with
41:41
Speaker 3: UN They hold these conferences and they make decisions on
41:44
Speaker 3: our behalf that we have no idea about. So and
41:48
Speaker 3: that's just to prove that we there is World Wilderness's
41:52
Speaker 3: Conferences going on.
41:54
Speaker 1: Wow, I mean, Sandy, there is one heck of a
41:58
Speaker 1: lot of information there and a lot to unpack. And
42:02
Speaker 1: I'm sure people will probably have to go back and
42:04
Speaker 1: watch it again because of the history. But now we've
42:06
Speaker 1: got the background, which is really important. So you farmers
42:09
Speaker 1: out there that are watching, don't panic and think, oh,
42:13
Speaker 1: this is so much. We just want you to know
42:16
Speaker 1: what the background is, okay, so that if you do
42:20
Speaker 1: want to go and research it, and you do want
42:21
Speaker 1: to go and look at these documents, these huge, great,
42:24
Speaker 1: big thick books, and I'm sure you haven't got time
42:26
Speaker 1: knowing what a what a farmer's life is like to
42:30
Speaker 1: do all this incredible research. But I just want to
42:33
Speaker 1: come back on a few things because I think in
42:36
Speaker 1: Part two, where we're going to go is where we
42:39
Speaker 1: are now, so sustainable goals and how we're going to
42:43
Speaker 1: end hunger or are we going to end hunger? Are
42:45
Speaker 1: we going to be in the future looking forward to
42:48
Speaker 1: a famine or is it going to be a feast
42:50
Speaker 1: of bugs? Are our animals going to be injected with
42:54
Speaker 1: things that are dangerous to them and to us? So
42:58
Speaker 1: this is all this all the material that we'll be
43:01
Speaker 1: covering in part two. But I just think for the
43:04
Speaker 1: last few minutes today and thank you so much for
43:07
Speaker 1: that amazing presentation. Let's just have a quick conversation and
43:12
Speaker 1: I'm going to throw it open to Roger in a
43:14
Speaker 1: minute to make some comments. But my comments initially are
43:17
Speaker 1: that I'm fascinated that you, of course mention the Rockefellers,
43:22
Speaker 1: and perhaps farmers don't know the significance of the Rockefellers
43:26
Speaker 1: and the Rothschilds. And believe me, while all this may
43:29
Speaker 1: sound like conspiratorial theories, it isn't. This is science fact,
43:34
Speaker 1: not science fiction. So everything you're hearing today is real.
43:39
Speaker 1: But when we go back to the Rockefellers, for people
43:41
Speaker 1: in the UK, you might be interested to know actually
43:43
Speaker 1: that the NHS wasn't really founded in nineteen forty eight.
43:47
Speaker 1: By nine even it was actually created by David Rockefeller
43:51
Speaker 1: when he was sent across from America to the London
43:54
Speaker 1: School of Economics, and he and William Beveridge cooked up
43:59
Speaker 1: the whole social welfare reform that we now see the NHS.
44:04
Speaker 1: So that's just a reference to the Rockefellers, and I
44:08
Speaker 1: think also your references to the then Prince Charles. Sandy,
44:15
Speaker 1: we've done a lot of work on UK column and
44:18
Speaker 1: for anybody that wants to have a little bit more
44:20
Speaker 1: in depth look at our King Charles. We have a
44:24
Speaker 1: five part series which is growing all the time. There'll
44:26
Speaker 1: be a part six soon of a series called The
44:29
Speaker 1: Green King where we look at the background of what
44:32
Speaker 1: our king has been doing in his long reign fifty
44:37
Speaker 1: years on the Royal Yacht Britannia. He's been up to
44:40
Speaker 1: a lot on the Royal Yacht Britannia, an awful lot.
44:43
Speaker 1: And I just want to say to people that Sandy
44:46
Speaker 1: mentioned their the Earth Summit and this kind of new
44:51
Speaker 1: religion that we're kind of looking at that seems to
44:54
Speaker 1: be the Earth, that's the new religion, Mother Nature, and
44:58
Speaker 1: of course the Earth Charters. Well we now have an
45:01
Speaker 1: Earth Charter, and the Earth Charter is otherwise known as
45:06
Speaker 1: teror Carter, which belongs to King Charles. And King Charles
45:12
Speaker 1: has all the land right, so farmers, especially for me
45:16
Speaker 1: down here in Cornwall, the Duchy, a lot of the
45:19
Speaker 1: farming land is dutchy Land and our king is very
45:23
Speaker 1: much involved, very much involved. And I think it was
45:28
Speaker 1: absolutely fascinating as well when you brought up the Trilateral Commission,
45:32
Speaker 1: because as we're speaking right now, Sekir Starmer, our Prime
45:36
Speaker 1: Minister of course, is a member of the Trilateral Commission.
45:40
Speaker 1: So you can see how everything's dovetailing in and this
45:42
Speaker 1: is going to make for a very interesting conversation in
45:46
Speaker 1: part two. So I do hope you'll join us for
45:48
Speaker 1: part two. But Roger, give give us a message from
45:53
Speaker 1: a vet to farmers about all of this that's going on,
45:56
Speaker 1: you know, containing people into zoe and corridors and land
46:03
Speaker 1: that you can't go on. I mean, what is the
46:06
Speaker 1: future for the farmer that you that you go and
46:10
Speaker 1: serve the farmers animals that you go and look after, Yes.
46:14
Speaker 2: To b Yeah, very concerning, I mean sort of. One
46:17
Speaker 2: of the reasons why we decided to put this presentation
46:20
Speaker 2: together really was to was to give the history of
46:24
Speaker 2: of it all. And you know, if we start talking
46:28
Speaker 2: straight away about what the current situation is and what's intended,
46:34
Speaker 2: it would sound so ridiculous and outlandish that no one
46:38
Speaker 2: would take us seriously. And you know, that's been a
46:40
Speaker 2: problem with which I know we've all had individually, when
46:44
Speaker 2: we've been trying to speak to people and you've only
46:46
Speaker 2: got a few minutes, and you try and give them
46:47
Speaker 2: a few facts, and they tend not to want to
46:50
Speaker 2: believe you because it sounds so dystopian. And yet we've
46:55
Speaker 2: seen it all actually in some of the movies and
46:58
Speaker 2: things from Hollywood. Do you know how many of those
47:00
Speaker 2: have been based on a dystopian reality that actually, when
47:05
Speaker 2: we look back at it, is actually starting to come true.
47:08
Speaker 2: And I watched the BBC version of nineteen eighty four.
47:13
Speaker 2: It was on Telly not so long ago, and I
47:16
Speaker 2: did it as my O level English lip book, and
47:20
Speaker 2: it was just hit me as to how much how
47:25
Speaker 2: when I did it, you know, as a teenager for
47:28
Speaker 2: O levels, how bizarre it sounded, how unrealistic it sounded,
47:33
Speaker 2: and then actually watching the film of it now actually
47:37
Speaker 2: realizing how much have they missed out. You know, We've
47:39
Speaker 2: got so much more already that's already going on, and
47:45
Speaker 2: you know, farmers and people perhaps coming across some of
47:48
Speaker 2: this material for the first time. You know, we're not
47:50
Speaker 2: expecting you to learn it and understand it and quote
47:53
Speaker 2: it back at all by any means. But what we're
47:56
Speaker 2: trying to do is just give you some proof that
48:00
Speaker 2: what we're going to go on and say in Part two,
48:03
Speaker 2: what we're saying now in this discussion isn't based on
48:06
Speaker 2: our fanciful ideas that we've plucked out of some dystopian
48:10
Speaker 2: nightmare that we've dreamt up some night. You know, this
48:14
Speaker 2: has come from all these documents which are step by
48:16
Speaker 2: step taken through what the plan is. And it just
48:20
Speaker 2: happens that we've got to that stage in the industry
48:26
Speaker 2: and development of tech that the facility for using technology
48:32
Speaker 2: for surveillance control has now come to a point of reality.
48:38
Speaker 2: And although it may not have been fully implemented here,
48:41
Speaker 2: that certainly has been in other countries. We only have
48:44
Speaker 2: to look at the Chinese social scoring system. We know
48:49
Speaker 2: that India put in a system during COVID from monitoring
48:54
Speaker 2: their citizens, and that was put in by Infosis, which
48:57
Speaker 2: is a company owned by Richie Sunak's father in law's company.
49:03
Speaker 2: So you know, Hm, these these coincidences inverted quotes aren't
49:09
Speaker 2: happening by chance. You know, there is that there is
49:12
Speaker 2: a definite plan in place. There are step by step
49:16
Speaker 2: issues here and all these things are connected, and so,
49:22
Speaker 2: you know, we do need to wake up. Because I
49:25
Speaker 2: went to the to the to the demonstration, the first
49:29
Speaker 2: demonstration that for the farmers about the inheritance tax, and
49:33
Speaker 2: I listened to some of the speakers there, and that
49:36
Speaker 2: was one of the things that really hit me when
49:38
Speaker 2: I was there, that a lot of the farmers were
49:40
Speaker 2: obviously very concerned about their future and what was being
49:44
Speaker 2: planned and said in the budget, et cetera. But I
49:48
Speaker 2: didn't really get a feeling that there was an understanding
49:52
Speaker 2: or a grasping that there was a much bigger picture.
49:55
Speaker 2: And the idea that the that the inheritance tax has
49:59
Speaker 2: been a miscalculate based on figures that have been mistakenly
50:04
Speaker 2: picked up from the wrong department of government is what
50:08
Speaker 2: they want us to think. You know, this is very
50:11
Speaker 2: much a planned approach. They are absolutely every intention to
50:17
Speaker 2: do what they're trying to do, and that's why we
50:20
Speaker 2: need to be aware of the bigger picture and to
50:23
Speaker 2: realize that it is all part of a much bigger plan.
50:27
Speaker 2: And although we're approaching this very much from the farming perspective,
50:31
Speaker 2: you know, other small businesses which have been you know,
50:34
Speaker 2: included within the last budget as well. You know, any
50:38
Speaker 2: small medium enterprise businesses is now being attacked by these
50:42
Speaker 2: similar sorts of measures. You know, So this is really
50:45
Speaker 2: what we're trying to get across is you know, you
50:48
Speaker 2: don't have to learn all the details I say, but
50:50
Speaker 2: just understand that this isn't being fabricated by us. This
50:53
Speaker 2: is documents which Sandy's obviously got copies off from all
50:58
Speaker 2: her research there and some of these books can't be
51:00
Speaker 2: got hold of anymore because they're trying to hide and
51:03
Speaker 2: stop people from getting hold of the proof. But they
51:06
Speaker 2: had to distribute it to those they wanted to, so
51:08
Speaker 2: they had to print it originally. So you know, this
51:11
Speaker 2: is this is you know, the message we're trying to
51:13
Speaker 2: get across is this is a definitive plan which is
51:17
Speaker 2: going ahead step by step, and you know, we need
51:20
Speaker 2: to know what it is so that we can resist
51:22
Speaker 2: it and understand where it's headed and realize that it
51:27
Speaker 2: is much part of a bigger agenda. So that's that's
51:30
Speaker 2: my perspective on what we've we've got to so far.
51:34
Speaker 1: Thank you so much Roger for that. And this is
51:37
Speaker 1: why Part two is going to be incredibly important. And
51:40
Speaker 1: you know, as we've said before. Today, we've brought you
51:44
Speaker 1: two experts with a huge amount of knowledge who have
51:48
Speaker 1: done thousands of hours work research. All of all that
51:53
Speaker 1: you've heard today is evidenced. It's all real. And I
51:57
Speaker 1: just want to before I go to both of you
51:59
Speaker 1: for your last word, as we always do, I just
52:03
Speaker 1: want to answer a question for Sandy, because you put
52:05
Speaker 1: out a question earlier when you were talking about technocracy
52:09
Speaker 1: Ink and my ears were pricking up and you were
52:12
Speaker 1: talking about there were two saviors of the world, and
52:15
Speaker 1: technocracy Ink was apparently one of them. Well, I can
52:19
Speaker 1: reveal we have revealed it before on UK column, but
52:23
Speaker 1: the other savior of the world is King Charles. And
52:27
Speaker 1: there is a statue of King Charles as the savior
52:32
Speaker 1: of the world. This is real. I'm not making this up.
52:35
Speaker 1: King Charles, he was then Prince Charles knew about this statue,
52:41
Speaker 1: it was commissioned, he was presented with it. It is now
52:44
Speaker 1: in place in the Brazilian rainforest, and some of you
52:49
Speaker 1: may be quite interested to see the picture. So in
52:51
Speaker 1: the little article that goes beneath this interview, there will
52:55
Speaker 1: be a picture of the Savior of the world. I
52:58
Speaker 1: think there's a lot more to be said about the
53:00
Speaker 1: King's involvement, the Commonwealth's involvement, United Nations, the World Economic Forum,
53:07
Speaker 1: and maybe we'll talk about that moving forward, but in
53:10
Speaker 1: part two it's going to be what's happening now and
53:13
Speaker 1: what's going to be affecting your farm and your future.
53:16
Speaker 1: So please come back for part two, but for now,
53:20
Speaker 1: I'm going to throw first to Roger and then we're
53:23
Speaker 1: going to go straight to Sandy for your last word,
53:26
Speaker 1: and are grateful thanks for doing all the research, for
53:30
Speaker 1: putting out the message and also for making the presentation
53:34
Speaker 1: to show people. And if you like what the UK
53:36
Speaker 1: column are doing and you can share the material, please
53:40
Speaker 1: do because the message really does need to get out.
53:43
Speaker 1: So thank you again both of you, and it's over
53:46
Speaker 1: to you first Roger for your last word. Thank you.
53:50
Speaker 2: Thanks Debbie. Obviously, what we've been presenting today, as I say,
53:54
Speaker 2: we've decided it a little bit as a step towards
53:56
Speaker 2: a dystopian future. But I don't want anybody to have
53:59
Speaker 2: now nightmares about it. You know, we're aware of it,
54:02
Speaker 2: and I think it is all going to come crashing down,
54:04
Speaker 2: and I don't think they're going to achieve what they
54:06
Speaker 2: want to achieve, but that will that will happen more
54:10
Speaker 2: more quickly if more of us are aware of it.
54:13
Speaker 2: So you know, I would urge people to share what
54:16
Speaker 2: they what they're learning, and and to do their own
54:20
Speaker 2: research too. You know, well everything that we've managed to
54:23
Speaker 2: research can be found out there, so you know, we're
54:26
Speaker 2: not we're not saying anything that we've only got access to.
54:30
Speaker 2: So you know, my view overall message go you know,
54:34
Speaker 2: sort of leaving really is is one of hope is
54:38
Speaker 2: that you know, I do think we're already seeing it
54:41
Speaker 2: where where people are starting to perhaps look to local
54:44
Speaker 2: farms and to and to source directly and and understand
54:50
Speaker 2: what's going into into the food that they're actually putting
54:53
Speaker 2: on their own table. And so my sort of message
54:57
Speaker 2: really is an encouragement to farmers who have perhaps feeling
55:00
Speaker 2: a little bit in despair over what's happened with inheritance
55:04
Speaker 2: tax and wondering whether to carry on farming. My message
55:07
Speaker 2: to you is carry on. You know we need your
55:10
Speaker 2: food and you know we love your food, and so
55:15
Speaker 2: please carry on and find your own ways of you know,
55:18
Speaker 2: whether you join with local farmers around you, whether you
55:22
Speaker 2: do your own farm shop, or whether you find other
55:24
Speaker 2: ways of supplying direct then that would be my message
55:28
Speaker 2: would be to urge you to do that as well,
55:31
Speaker 2: and for consumers, for all consumers farmers as well. But
55:35
Speaker 2: it's easy for them to find their own food on
55:37
Speaker 2: their own farm. But those people who are local to farms,
55:40
Speaker 2: you know, please do look for local farmers who are
55:44
Speaker 2: trying to make their food more available to you directly.
55:49
Speaker 2: You know, it is better profit for them so that
55:51
Speaker 2: they can survive and carry on farming the way they
55:53
Speaker 2: want to, not the way they're going to be dictated to.
55:56
Speaker 2: And it's better food for you because it's not being traveled,
56:00
Speaker 2: it's fresher, you know where it's come from, and it's
56:03
Speaker 2: all lovely and healthy because you know, UK farmers are
56:05
Speaker 2: the best farmers in the world. So that's my message
56:09
Speaker 2: of hope really. And those who are in industries that
56:14
Speaker 2: are sort of power farming for want of a better phrase,
56:17
Speaker 2: you know, those industries around you know you need to
56:20
Speaker 2: wake up too, and to support your farmers as I
56:22
Speaker 2: know you do in your businesses, but to consider you know,
56:26
Speaker 2: these wider implications because if farming goes then your businesses
56:30
Speaker 2: are under threat too, And I include the vectory profession
56:35
Speaker 2: certainly on the farms side with that too. And you know,
56:38
Speaker 2: if they go for farm animals, then they'll be going
56:41
Speaker 2: for horses. I've already heard some ridiculous stories about finding
56:46
Speaker 2: avian flu in Mongolian horses that could possibly be transmitted
56:50
Speaker 2: to people. I mean, it's all rubbish, and you know,
56:54
Speaker 2: we need to be aware otherwise if they if they're
56:57
Speaker 2: successful in getting rid of farms, that they'll they'll be
57:00
Speaker 2: looking to go for the rest of our animals if
57:02
Speaker 2: we're not careful.
57:03
Speaker 1: Thank you, Roger, thank you so much. I think that's
57:05
Speaker 1: a very poignant message, question everything. And now Sandy Adams,
57:09
Speaker 1: thank you so much again for the wonderful presentation of
57:12
Speaker 1: joining us today, and it's over to you for your
57:14
Speaker 1: last word.
57:15
Speaker 3: Thank you, Sandy, thank you for the opportunity for this
57:18
Speaker 3: because if we can reach as many farmers as we can,
57:22
Speaker 3: because farmers, you know, they work hard, they haven't got
57:25
Speaker 3: time to really go into a deep dive as to
57:27
Speaker 3: what is really happening in our world and what's been
57:29
Speaker 3: happening for many, many decades, and hopefully this presentation, you know,
57:35
Speaker 3: and please, as Roger said, don't believe us, do your
57:39
Speaker 3: own research. I mean, I you know, I haven't been
57:42
Speaker 3: don't get I don't get paid for doing this. It's
57:45
Speaker 3: something that I feel passionate about that I've been doing
57:48
Speaker 3: on my own part time for the last seventeen years
57:51
Speaker 3: and horrified at the way it's been unfolding. So what
57:56
Speaker 3: we really need is numbers, and we need Farmers've on
58:00
Speaker 3: the research for you. Do check it out, but we've
58:03
Speaker 3: done the research for you so that you can have
58:05
Speaker 3: a better understanding that it's not just about inheritance tax,
58:09
Speaker 3: it's about a whole agenda to literally to de incentivize farmers,
58:14
Speaker 3: which they've seen with the SFI. We know that the
58:17
Speaker 3: you know that they've been told that their subsidies are
58:20
Speaker 3: going and that they have to create these businesses on
58:24
Speaker 3: their farms that don't involve food production, particularly meat and dairy.
58:29
Speaker 3: So what we're what we're asking farmers to do is
58:33
Speaker 3: to look at this critically and realize that actually, where
58:36
Speaker 3: is the food going to come from, because there's no
58:39
Speaker 3: provision for it, there's no food security, and that they
58:42
Speaker 3: need to really think about that before they think about
58:45
Speaker 3: putting solar panels on their farm and selling out to
58:48
Speaker 3: the big corporations. And getting the money from them, and
58:52
Speaker 3: to really think about perhaps, you know, just understanding that,
58:57
Speaker 3: you know, there's other ways. The British public it will
59:00
Speaker 3: support them, you know. And there's a massive awakening of
59:03
Speaker 3: people looking at what they're eating, as Roger said, looking
59:07
Speaker 3: at the stuff that's been put into our food, and
59:10
Speaker 3: people want pure food. They don't want they don't want
59:14
Speaker 3: fake meat and and and stuff that's putting milk to
59:18
Speaker 3: to stop car cows from farting or all that horrible stuff.
59:23
Speaker 3: And it's in a way it's doing us a favor.
59:26
Speaker 3: The more the worse it gets, the more people are
59:27
Speaker 3: waking up. But we do need that that mass, mass
59:31
Speaker 3: awakening of the farmers to really understand that there is
59:36
Speaker 3: another way, there's another way of farming. And the thing
59:39
Speaker 3: is that if they, if they, if they, if we
59:41
Speaker 3: don't do this, what will happen is the super farms,
59:45
Speaker 3: which will be talking about in the next the next
59:49
Speaker 3: trunch of of of slides and presentations is what what
59:54
Speaker 3: the what the future of farming entails? And it is
59:57
Speaker 3: so dystopian that nobody in their right mind would want that.
1:00:01
Speaker 3: So we have to find another way, and we have
1:00:04
Speaker 3: to do this together with the public. No one else
1:00:06
Speaker 3: is going to help us. The government aren't, No one's
1:00:08
Speaker 3: going to save us. It's us and the farmers. And
1:00:12
Speaker 3: I believe, as Roger said, that we can do this,
1:00:15
Speaker 3: We can actually have hope that we can have a
1:00:18
Speaker 3: future for our rural communities and for the people in
1:00:23
Speaker 3: cities that serve that are served by the rural communities.
1:00:27
Speaker 3: So I think we need to really sort of honker
1:00:30
Speaker 3: down and understand where this is coming from, where it's going,
1:00:34
Speaker 3: and just say no, don't consent to all this nonsense,
1:00:38
Speaker 3: because if we do, I know they're going to try
1:00:40
Speaker 3: and push this avian flu thing. You know, we will
1:00:45
Speaker 3: end up in the same way that we did with
1:00:47
Speaker 3: foot and mouth and with mad cow disease, with piers
1:00:52
Speaker 3: of perfectly healthy animals, you know, being destroyed. And we
1:00:56
Speaker 3: cannot go down that route anymore because that will be
1:00:58
Speaker 3: the end of the UK farm. So that's all I've
1:01:01
Speaker 3: really got to say, And thank you so much for
1:01:03
Speaker 3: this