Latest / Reformed Thinking / The Structure of Matthew | D. A. Carson

Transcript

The Structure of Matthew | D. A. Carson · Reformed Thinking

0:00
So imagine holding a blueprint for a magnificent building, a
0:04
building that has survived for, well, 2000 years, and you hand
0:08
this blueprint to a room full of brilliant architects, asking
0:12
them to explain the basic structure of the foundation.
0:15
But instead of agreement, chaos breaks out.
0:18
Oh, complete chaos. One architect insists the
0:21
building is organized by the types of stone used.
0:24
Another claims it's all about the direction the windows face.
0:27
And a third are used. The original architect actually
0:29
lost his notes and just copied a building from down the street.
0:32
Yeah, precisely. Today we're looking at the
0:34
Gospel of Matthew, and the hunt for its true architectural
0:38
blueprint is one of the murkiest, most debated mysteries
0:41
in biblical scholarship. Welcome to Reform thinking.
0:44
It is great to be here for this deep dive.
0:46
I am thrilled you are here with us.
0:48
Yeah, if you're listening right now, you'd probably want to
0:50
understand the Bible with more clarity, but you might
0:53
occasionally feel buried under the sheer volume of academic
0:57
opinion. It happens to everyone.
0:58
There is just so much material out there.
1:00
That is why we are here. Our mission today is to extract
1:04
the most significant Nuggets of knowledge from a very specific
1:07
source, and we want to do it in a way that respects your time
1:11
and your intellect. You should be able to walk away
1:13
well informed without the headache of information
1:15
overload. So for this deep dive, our
1:18
mission is to analyze how the Gospel of Matthew is
1:20
structurally organized. We are relying on an excerpt
1:24
from DA Carson's essay, The Structure of Matthew.
1:27
Which is found in the revised 2010 edition of the Expositors
1:30
Bible Commentary. A fantastic resource.
1:33
It really is. We're going to investigate the
1:35
different ways scholars have tried to outline this Gospel,
1:37
figure out where those outlines fail, and discover the brilliant
1:41
design Matthew actually used. But before we look at those
1:44
specific frameworks, I think setting the stage from a
1:46
reformed perspective provides some crucial context.
1:50
Go ahead. When we approach a text like the
1:52
Gospel of Matthew, we align with the Westminster Confessions view
1:56
of Scripture. The Confession teaches that it
1:59
pleased the Lord to reveal Himself and declare His will to
2:01
His Church, and afterward to commit that revelation wholly
2:05
unto writing. Right.
2:06
So it is not just human invention.
2:08
Precisely therefore, recognizing the literary structure of the
2:12
Gospel is not some dry academic puzzle.
2:16
It is a vital part of understanding the precise ways
2:19
God chose to communicate His redemptive historical plan.
2:23
Because the author, Matthew was a highly skilled literary
2:26
Craftsman. He was the Holy Spirit utilized
2:30
Matthew specific intellect, his vocabulary, and his literary
2:33
sensibilities to produce the inspired text.
2:37
Grasping the rhythm, the form, and the architecture of his
2:40
writing honors the text as God has given it to us.
2:43
It trains us to read the book the way the author intended.
2:46
Now, before we jump into the first theory, I want to set a
2:48
ground rule for our discussion today.
2:50
Oh, the no interruptions rule. Yes, we are going to model a
2:52
calm, deliberate conversation. We'll be actively listening and
2:55
waiting for the other person to finish their thought entirely
2:58
before speaking. I think that is a fantastic
3:00
practice. It allows the ideas to really
3:02
breathe. I agree.
3:03
So keeping that in mind, I think the theological framework you
3:06
just laid but is essential. We are dealing with a text that
3:09
demands careful, deliberate handling.
3:12
It does. Carson points out that Matthew
3:14
gave his Gospel structure, form and rhythm.
3:17
He even included large chiasms. If you, the listener, aren't
3:21
familiar with that term, think of a chiasm like a literary
3:25
sandwich, where ideas mirror each other.
3:27
Like ABCBA? Yeah, exactly.
3:30
Wait, I mean, that is a perfect way to describe it.
3:32
You have bread, meat, cheese, meat, bread.
3:35
The most significant point is the cheese in the middle.
3:38
Ancient writers use this technique all the time for
3:41
emphasis. But despite all that careful
3:43
micro level craftsmanship, the overall macro level structure of
3:48
the book remains fiercely disputed.
3:50
It really is a battleground of ideas.
3:52
Carson identifies 3 main views dominating the discussion.
3:56
Let's start with the first one. The first major view is the
3:58
geographical framework. Yes, this approach was heavily
4:01
championed by scholars like Alan Hugh McNeil back in 1915.
4:05
And this framework divides the book into five physical
4:08
locations. It does.
4:09
Geography is always a very tempting starting point when you
4:12
were trying to organize historical text.
4:14
The outline basically tracks Jesus across a map.
4:16
It starts with a prologue in the 1st 2 chapters.
4:19
And then there is a preparation phase near the Jordan River in
4:22
chapters 3 and 4. After that, we get a massive
4:25
chunk of text from the middle of chapter 4 all the way to the end
4:27
of chapter 13, where Jesus is in Galilee.
4:31
Which isn't just a dot on a map, it is a bustling hub where he is
4:34
performing miracles and gathering followers, right?
4:38
Then, from chapter 14 to 20, the narrative follows him moving
4:41
around Galilee and eventually heading toward Jerusalem.
4:44
The finally, chapters 21 through 28 place him squarely in
4:47
Jerusalem for the climax of the narrative.
4:50
So when you lay out that geographical framework, the
4:53
appeal is pretty obvious, isn't it?
4:55
Oh, absolutely. As human beings, we naturally
4:57
organize historical events by location.
5:00
Our brains are wired to think in terms of maps and coordinates.
5:03
Like if you were to tell the story of your own life, you
5:05
would likely divide it by the places you lived.
5:07
Yes, your childhood in one stay, your college years in another,
5:10
your career in 1/3. It feels grounded.
5:13
It feels very historical. Since the Gospel of Matthew
5:16
describes real events that happened in real space and time,
5:19
plotting Jesus's ministry on a map seems incredibly logical.
5:22
Especially in 1915, when McNeil was writing, establishing the
5:27
historical and geographical reliability of the text was a
5:30
major focus in biblical scholarship.
5:33
I see the appeal, but let me play devil's advocate here for a
5:37
second. If I'm a 1st century reader,
5:40
geography matters, sure. But organizing the Gospel of
5:43
Matthew purely by geography feels like organizing a vast
5:48
theological library by the color of the book spines instead of
5:52
the subject matter. That is a fascinating way to
5:54
look at. It imagine walking into a
5:56
massive library and sees all the blue books grouped together on
5:59
the N wall and all the red books on the east wall.
6:01
It is an organizational system, sure.
6:03
Yeah, you can point to it and say there is the blue section,
6:06
but you haven't learned a single thing about what the authors are
6:09
trying to communicate. A Blue book might be about
6:11
systematic theology, or it might be a commentary on the Psalms.
6:15
Right, the physical characteristic, the color, or in
6:18
Matthew's case, the location on a map, does not reveal the
6:21
author's actual argument. That analogy captures Carson's
6:25
primary critique perfectly. Carson argues that these
6:29
geographical divisions are neither precise nor helpful.
6:32
Why does he say that? Because the result tells us
6:35
absolutely nothing about Matthew's theological purposes
6:38
through a Reformed lens, we recognize that while God acts in
6:42
real physical history, mapping the Gospel purely by coordinates
6:46
misses the overarching theological argument Matthew
6:49
makes about the Messiah. So the geography is just the
6:52
setting. Yes, it is the setting of the
6:54
narrative, but it is not the message of the narrative saying
6:57
here Jesus is in Galilee and here he is in Jerusalem
7:01
identifies the backdrop, but it completely ignores the dialogue,
7:04
the conflict, the teaching and the resolution happening on the
7:07
stage. So if simply plotting Jesus on a
7:10
map leaves us staring at an empty theological library, where
7:14
do we go next? Well, scholars realize they had
7:16
to stop looking at geography and start looking closer at the
7:18
author's actual vocabulary. They started looking for a
7:21
secret password, essentially. Did Matthew keep using a
7:24
specific phrase? That specific question leads us
7:27
to the second major structural theory, which shifts the focus
7:31
away from maps and onto Christology.
7:33
Christology being the study of the person and work of Christ.
7:37
Correct. That shift brings us to the work
7:40
of Jack Dean Kingsbury. He built upon hints from earlier
7:43
scholars like Ernst Lohmeyer and Ned Stonehouse.
7:46
What did Kingsbury propose? He proposed a three section
7:49
structure based on a recurring Greek phrase, a botet.
7:53
And translated into English, that means what?
7:56
It means from that time on, Kingsbury noticed this phrase
7:59
appearing at what he believed were key transitional moments,
8:03
and he used it to divide the gospel into 3 distinct sections.
8:06
Let's break those sections down South.
8:08
You, the listener, can really visualize what Kingsbury was
8:11
proposing. The first section he titles the
8:13
person of Jesus Messiah. And that covers the very
8:15
beginning of the book, chapter one through chapter 4, verse 16.
8:19
It handles the genealogy, the birth, the baptism and the
8:22
temptation. Then the second section is
8:24
called the Proclamation of Jesus Messiah.
8:26
That one runs from chapter 4, verse 17, all the way through
8:29
chapter 16, verse 20. This is the bulk of the public
8:32
ministry, the healings, the calling of the disciples.
8:35
And the third and final section is titled The Suffering, Death
8:38
and Resurrection of Jesus Messiah.
8:40
Which takes us from chapter 16 verse 21 to the end of the book
8:43
in chapter 28. To fortify this three-part
8:46
division, Kingsbury points out that the last two sections each
8:49
contain three summary passages. Right, Those summary passages
8:53
are vital to his argument, aren't?
8:54
They they are in the second section, the proclamation
8:57
section. Kingsbury identifies summaries
8:59
at chapter 4, verse 23, Chapter 9, verse 35 and Chapter 11,
9:03
verse one. These are verses where Matthew
9:05
pauses the action to give a wide angle summary.
9:07
Yes, saying things like Jesus went throughout Galilee,
9:11
teaching in their synagogues, proclaiming the good news of the
9:13
Kingdom. And then he finds matching
9:15
summaries in the third section. He does.
9:17
Kingsbury identifies 3 Passion summaries at 16 point 2117.22
9:24
and 20.1 Thiefane where Jesus explicitly predicts his death
9:28
and resurrection. So it looks very balanced.
9:30
By organizing the book this way, Kingsbury argues, he does
9:33
justice to the absolute centrality of Matthew's
9:36
Christology. And from a Reformed perspective,
9:39
we certainly appreciate Kingsbury's intent.
9:42
Viewing Jesus Christ as the absolute focal point of the text
9:45
aligns perfectly with our understanding of Scripture.
9:48
It does, but here's where we need to apply some serious
9:50
critical thinking. It is a very attractive outline
9:53
at first glance, precisely because it centers on Jesus.
9:57
But Carson does not let this theory slide by without some
10:00
rigorous pushbacks. Not at all.
10:02
Frankly, when you look closely at the text, Kingsbury's neat
10:05
little boxes start to break apart.
10:07
First, Carson questions whether the phrase aparthot is actually
10:11
the load bearing pillar Kingsbury claims it is.
10:13
Right, because Matthew uses that exact same phrase again in
10:16
chapter 26, verse 16. That is when Judas is looking
10:19
for an opportunity to hand Jesus over, but Matthew uses it there
10:23
without any suggestion of a massive structural break in the
10:26
outline. Which is a huge problem for
10:29
Kingsbury's theory. If the phrase is the master key
10:32
to the entire Gospel structure, why does it randomly appear
10:35
later on without unlocking a new section?
10:38
That severely weakens its status as a definitive structure.
10:42
It creates a significant inconsistency.
10:45
Furthermore, Carson addresses those summary passages Kingsbury
10:49
leaned on so heavily. Kingsbury claims there are three
10:52
passion summaries in the third section to match the three
10:55
ministry summaries in the second section.
10:57
But Carson points out that one could easily argue there are
11:00
four passion summaries. By adding chapter 26, verse 2.
11:03
Yes, that is where Jesus says as you know the Passover is 2 days
11:08
away and the Son of Man will be handed over to be crucified.
11:11
If the numerical symmetry of three summaries per section is
11:14
broken, the structural argument loses its tightness.
11:17
And there is a massive narrative problem with Kingsbury's outline
11:20
too. It awkwardly splits the crucial
11:22
passage involving Peter's confession in chapter 16.
11:26
Yes, in verses 13 through 16 Jesus asks who do you say I am?
11:31
And Peter replies, You are the Messiah, the Son of the living
11:35
God. Kingsbury puts the brake right
11:37
after this, starting his third section of verse 21.
11:40
But this place is a major structural wall right in the
11:43
middle of a continuous narrative thought.
11:45
Finally, Carson suggests that at these specific transition
11:48
points, Matthew might have simply been following the
11:51
narrative order of the Gospel of Mark.
11:53
Rather than making a grand overarching structural point of
11:56
his own based on the phrase apotote.
11:59
Those are all incredibly valid textual criticisms.
12:02
However, the most devastating critique peak of Kingsbury's
12:05
framework lies in the titles he assigns to these sections.
12:09
The. Artificiality of those headings
12:11
becomes glaring once you read the text with a critical eye.
12:14
This is the part that jumps out to me the most.
12:16
I mean, isn't it highly artificial to restrict the
12:18
person of Jesus to just that first section ending at chapter
12:22
4? It is extremely limiting.
12:23
Jesus's identity, His person, is the absolute focal point of
12:27
chapter 16 where Peter declares him to be the Christ.
12:30
It is the focal point of chapter 22, where Jesus questions the
12:33
Pharisees about whose son the Christ is.
12:35
You cannot confine the revelation of his identity to
12:38
the 1st 4 chapters. And looking at the second
12:40
section, why restrict the proclamation of Jesus to the
12:43
middle of the book? Huge, momentous discourses of
12:46
proclamation happen much later. You have the discourse on church
12:49
discipline in chapter 18 and the massive teachings about the end
12:53
times in chapters 24 and 25. Those occur in the third
12:56
section, yet they are undeniably proclamation.
13:00
The categories bleed into one another too much to act as rigid
13:03
boundaries. Even the final heading, the
13:06
Suffering, death and resurrection, while it
13:08
accurately captures the dominant theme of the end of the Gospel,
13:12
feels like an inadequate designation for much of what
13:15
happens in those final 12 chapters.
13:17
Because you have most of Chapter 18 and all the intense
13:20
theological exchanges with the religious leaders in chapters 21
13:24
through 25. And those do not neatly fit
13:27
under the banner of suffering and death.
13:29
Because Kingsbury's topical buckets were leaking so badly,
13:32
scholars found themselves back at Square 1.
13:35
Which led to a third wave of theories.
13:37
Scholars attempted to fix the issues by blending narrative
13:40
flow with other source critical assumptions.
13:42
They proposed considerably more sophisticated variations.
13:45
Carson mentions Ulrich Luz as a prime example.
13:48
What was Luz's approach? Luz relies heavily on the
13:50
assumption that the narrative flow of Matthew can be analyzed
13:53
by assuming Matthew depends only on the Gospel of Mark and a
13:57
hypothetical source document known to scholars as Q.
14:01
The Q document. Yes, and another scholar when JC
14:05
Warren argued in 2000 6 for a macro structure grounded in
14:10
topographical data. Which he then refined by
14:13
categorizing parts of the text into kernels and satellites.
14:16
These are highly complex academic models, but from a
14:19
reformed confessional standpoint, we run into a major
14:23
roadblock with approaches like the one proposed by Luz.
14:25
Basing A structural outline of a biblical book on source critical
14:29
theories introduces massive, unprovable assumptions into our
14:33
reading. Let's explain what that means
14:34
for a second. The Q document is a hypothetical
14:37
collection of Jesus sayings that scholars guess might have
14:39
existed. Because Matthew and Luke share
14:41
similar material that isn't found in Mark.
14:44
But we have never actually found a physical copy of CUE.
14:46
Relying on the CUE document to structure the Gospel of Matthew
14:50
is like trying to write a critical review of a movie based
14:52
entirely on deleted scenes that the director might have filmed.
14:55
Scenes that no one has ever actually seen, right?
14:58
You are no longer analyzing the film playing on the screen in
15:01
front of you. You are analyzing a ghost.
15:05
That is a perfect way to visualize the problem.
15:07
While studying potential historical sources is fine for a
15:11
university seminar, our primary focus must always be on the
15:14
final, canonical form of the text.
15:17
God inspired the Gospel of Matthew precisely as we have it.
15:20
The Holy Spirit superintended the final product.
15:24
Therefore, the structure we are looking for should be evident in
15:27
the text itself. We should not have to depend on
15:29
hypothetical reconstructions of how the author might have
15:32
assembled his research materials on his desk.
15:34
If you are listening to this and thinking OK, organizing by
15:37
geography leads to a dead end where we miss the theology.
15:42
Organizing by Christological headings like Kingsbury creates
15:45
artificial boundaries. And these highly academic
15:47
guesses about hypothetical cue documents require us to analyze
15:51
ghosts. So what did the author actually
15:53
leave in plain sight for us to follow?
15:55
That is the $1,000,000 question. If Matthew is the skilled
15:59
literary Craftsman that Carson says he is, he must have left us
16:03
a key to understand his blueprint.
16:05
That brings us to the third and most texturally supported
16:09
structural view discussed by Carson, the five discourses.
16:12
This scheme makes the entire book center on five main
16:16
teaching discourses given by Jesus.
16:18
What makes his view so incredibly compelling is that it
16:21
relies on explicit repeating markers that Matthew himself
16:25
placed right there in the Greek text.
16:26
We are not forcing an external geographical map onto the book.
16:30
We are not imposing artificial topical headings onto it.
16:32
We are simply following the author's own signposts.
16:35
This is where the detective work pays off.
16:37
Matthew clearly patterned these five sections.
16:39
Inch Discourse begins by placing Jesus in a specific context.
16:43
Then Jesus delivers a substantial block of teaching.
16:46
Finally, and most significantly, each discourse ends with a
16:49
unique formula found nowhere else in the Gospel.
16:52
That formula is a variation of the phrase when Jesus had
16:55
finished saying these things. Matthew uses this exact
16:58
concluding formula 5 distinct times.
17:00
Following that formula, there is a transitional pericope.
17:04
For those unfamiliar with the term, a pericope is just a
17:07
specific self-contained narrative segment or passage.
17:11
This transitional narrative contains links pointing both
17:14
backward to what was just taught and forward to the next action,
17:17
the. Structure is methodical,
17:18
intentional, and it repeats five times with striking clarity.
17:22
The repetition of that specific concluding formula is the
17:27
smoking gun. When Jesus had finished saying
17:29
these things, it is like Matthew is ringing a bell to let us know
17:34
a major class session has just concluded.
17:36
Let's briefly walk through these five discourses so you can see
17:38
how massive they are. The first one is the Sermon on
17:41
the Mount in chapters 5 through 7, ending with that formula in
17:44
7.28. The second is the missionary
17:47
discourse in chapter 10, where Jesus sends out the 12 apostles,
17:50
ending with the formula in 11.1. The third is the Parabolic
17:54
Olivet Discourse in Chapter 13, featuring the parables of The
17:57
Sower and the Mustard Seed, ending in 13.53.
18:00
The 4th is the discourse on the Church in chapter 18, dealing
18:03
with sin and forgiveness, ending in 19.1.
18:06
And the 5th is the Olivet Discourse in chapters 24 and 25,
18:11
dealing with the end times, ending with the formula in 26.1.
18:15
Because there are exactly five of these major discourses marked
18:18
by this formula, scholars naturally started looking for
18:21
historical parallels. Benjamin Bacon, right, in 1918
18:25
argued that these five discourses intentionally
18:28
correspond to the five books of the Pentateuch.
18:30
Which are Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and
18:33
Deuteronomy. Bacon believed Matthew was
18:36
presenting a Moses typology. Let's define typology for a
18:39
second. Typology is when a person or
18:41
event in the Old Testament acts as a preview or a foreshadowing
18:45
of a greater reality in the New Testament.
18:48
Bacons idea was that Jesus is the new Moses.
18:51
Just as Moses went up on Mount Sinai to deliver the law to the
18:54
Israelites, Jesus goes up on the mountain to deliver 5 new books
18:57
of law for the New Covenant people.
18:59
It is a very neat, tidy idea, tying the beginning of the New
19:03
Testament back to the beginning of the Old Testament.
19:05
It is tidy, but Carson brings up a strong rejection of Benjamin
19:08
Baker's hypothesis. Why does Carson reject it?
19:11
Carson argues that the claim of a strict Moses typology
19:15
regulating the structure of the gospel is actually very weak.
19:18
When you try to find specific thematic links between Matthew's
19:22
first discourse and Genesis, or his second discourse in Exodus,
19:26
and so on. Wait, let me stop you there.
19:28
The connections are minimal at best.
19:30
They simply do not hold up under scrutiny.
19:32
And from a theological perspective, we must be careful
19:34
here. How so?
19:35
While it is absolutely true that Jesus fulfills the moral law and
19:39
acts as the Supreme Lawgiver, reducing Matthews brilliant
19:44
unique structure to a mere imitation of the Pentateuch
19:47
flattens the glorious reality of New covenant revelation.
19:50
Jesus is far greater than Moses. He is not just giving a second
19:53
edition of the Old law, He is inaugurating the Kingdom of
19:56
Heaven. Therefore, we should appreciate
19:58
the fivefold structure for what it is.
20:01
A brilliant organizing principle designed by Matthew to showcase
20:04
the King's teaching without forcing it into a forced 1 to 1
20:07
carallel with the Books of Moses.
20:09
Let me try an analogy to clarify why Bacon's view goes a step too
20:13
far. OK, let's hear it.
20:14
Imagine you are walking through a city and you see a massive
20:17
modern courthouse. It has four large beautiful
20:21
stone pillars holding up the front portico, right?
20:25
A historian walks by and says look at the four pillars.
20:29
The architect was clearly trying to create a typology of the
20:32
ancient Roman temple of Jupiter, which also featured prominent
20:35
pillars. But then you talk to the actual
20:37
architect. And he says no, I just needed
20:40
four pillars because that is the most structurally sound way to
20:43
hold up a roof of this size. That makes a lot of sense.
20:46
Matthew used five well defined discourses, not because he was
20:49
desperately trying to mimic Moses, but because it was a
20:52
brilliant, structurally sound way to organize the massive
20:55
amount of teaching Jesus delivered.
20:57
It gave his readers a rhythm they could easily follow.
21:00
Form follows function. However, even though the five
21:02
discourse structure is brilliant and heavily supported by the
21:05
text itself, it does face two major objections that we need to
21:09
address head on before we can fully adopt it.
21:12
The first objection deals with Chapter 11.
21:14
If you are reading through Matthew, you get to Chapter 11
21:17
and Jesus is speaking extensively.
21:19
He is talking about John the Baptist.
21:21
He is denouncing the unrepentant cities.
21:24
He is offering rest to the weary.
21:26
The objection asks why should we restrict ourselves to an outline
21:30
of only 5 discourses when Chapter 11 features Jesus giving
21:34
what looks like a major speech? If the outline is based on
21:37
blocks of teaching, shouldn't Chapter 11 count as a discourse
21:40
too? Carson provides a very clear
21:42
resolution to this objection. He points out that the objection
21:45
misses the mark because it misunderstands what the five
21:48
fold sequence is actually doing. The presence of five major
21:51
marked discourses does not assume that Jesus is silent in
21:55
the narrative sections of the book.
21:57
Jesus is portrayed as speaking, sometimes extensively, during
22:00
the narrative action. Chapter 11 is a perfect example
22:03
of a narrative section that contains a lot of speech.
22:06
The crucial difference is that the five main discourses are
22:08
defined by those specific concluding formulas we
22:11
discussed. Matthew clearly planned those
22:13
five blocks as specific self-contained units.
22:16
Chapter 11 lacks that concluding formula.
22:19
It is part of the ongoing narrative flow, whereas the
22:21
discourses are designated teaching sessions.
22:24
I see Matthew is making a clear distinction between Jesus
22:27
talking while he walks down the road, engaging with crowds and
22:31
critics, and Jesus intentionally sitting down to deliver a formal
22:34
curriculum to his disciples. The second objection, however,
22:37
deals with the very beginning and the very end of the gospel.
22:41
Critics ask, does this five discourse structure push
22:44
chapters one and two, which contain the genealogy and the
22:47
birth narrative, and chapters 26 through 28, which contain the
22:50
passion, death and resurrection to the margins?
22:53
Are they just left outside the central outline as secondary
22:56
material? Carson has a robust resolution
22:59
for this as well. For chapters one and two, there
23:01
is very little difficulty in seeing them as a formal
23:04
prologue. This prologue anticipates the
23:06
opening of the Gospel's main action.
23:08
This is a common feature in canonical gospels.
23:11
They set the stage for who Jesus is, establishing his royal
23:13
lineage and divine nature before His ministry begins.
23:16
But the end of the gospel is a completely different story.
23:19
Chapters 26 through 28 cannot possibly be dismissed as a
23:23
simple epilogue. They are the absolute climax of
23:26
the entire narrative. Everything in the Gospel moves
23:29
inexorably toward the cross and the empty tomb.
23:32
You cannot relegate the resurrection to an afterthought.
23:36
So Carson suggests something brilliant.
23:38
He suggests a King chapter 26, verse 6 through the end of
23:42
chapter 28 as an exceptional 6th narrative section.
23:46
Wait, if there is 1/6 narrative section, doesn't the pattern
23:49
demand 1/6 teaching discourse to go with it?
23:52
Exactly this is where Carson's analysis becomes intensely
23:56
theological and highly rewarding for the reader.
23:58
In the previous five iterations, A narrative section is always
24:01
followed by a teaching section delivered by Jesus.
24:04
But here at the end of the Gospel, Jesus is crucified,
24:08
resurrected, and then he ascends to heaven.
24:10
Carson points out that the corresponding teaching section
24:13
for this six narrative is actually laid upon the shoulders
24:15
of the disciples. It is found in the Great
24:17
Commission in chapter 28, verses 18 through 20.
24:20
Jesus tells them all authority in heaven and on earth has been
24:23
given to me. Therefore go and make disciples
24:26
of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of
24:29
the Son and the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything
24:32
I have commanded you. Yes, Jesus has delivered his
24:35
five discourses now the 6th discourse is the ongoing
24:40
teaching ministry of the Church. This is an open-ended
24:43
anticipatory conclusion. It beautifully aligns with the
24:47
ecclesiology of the Westminster Confession, which states that
24:50
Christ the King has appointed a government in the hands of
24:53
church officers. Christ descends, but he leaves
24:57
his authoritative word and the Commission to teach it to the
25:00
visible Church. The teaching ministry of Jesus
25:03
did not end in the 1st century. It continues through the church
25:06
today. It continues through you, the
25:08
listener, as you engage with and share this word.
25:11
If you are listening right now, pause and think about the weight
25:13
of that. The final block of teaching
25:16
isn't spoken by Jesus in the text, it is the teaching He
25:19
commands us to do. Matthew Structural Blueprint
25:21
intentionally leaves the door wide open, bringing you right
25:24
into the story. You are the one carrying the 6th
25:27
discourse forward into history. That is an incredibly motivating
25:31
way to view the structure of the book.
25:32
It is not just an ancient document, it is an active
25:35
Commission. With the structure defended and
25:38
that beautiful sixth section understood, we need to take a
25:41
step back and evaluate how we should treat any biblical
25:44
outline. We need to move from the
25:46
academic analysis of these structures to the practical
25:50
application of reading the Bible in your everyday life.
25:53
That transition is vital. Carson warns us that no outline
25:56
should be taken too seriously or treated as an absolute
25:59
unbreakable rule. He notes that the Gospels use
26:02
vignettes. They are organized, without a
26:04
doubt, but they remain vignettes, small descriptive
26:07
scenes that together create a larger picture.
26:10
A structural outline provides a helpful guide to the Gospels
26:13
contents, but it is not a comprehensive explanation of
26:16
every single detail. Bringing a pastoral perspective
26:19
to this fact is crucial. We must be careful not to
26:22
worship the outline. We worship the Christ revealed
26:25
in the text. Precisely.
26:26
Matthew organized his Gospel beautifully using these five
26:29
discourses, but the Holy Spirit inspired a text that is dynamic
26:33
and living. The use of vignettes gives us a
26:35
multifaceted view of the Savior. He's the authoritative teacher
26:38
on the mountain, he is the compassionate healer in the
26:41
valley touching the leper, he's the suffering servant on the
26:44
cross, and he is the victorious king emerging from the tomb.
26:49
The structure is a tool given to us to help us read better.
26:53
It helps us track the progression of thought and
26:55
prevents us from pulling verses out of context.
26:58
If you know you are reading a verse from within one of the
27:01
five major teaching blocks, you interpret it as part of that
27:05
specific curriculum. But the outline does not solve
27:08
every exegetical debate, nor is it meant to.
27:11
It is the scaffolding that helps us apprehend the building.
27:14
But we do not live in the scaffolding, we live in the
27:17
building. So practically speaking, how
27:19
should you, the listener, actually use this 5 discourse
27:22
framework when you sit down to read Matthew tomorrow morning?
27:25
You open your Bible, you have your coffee, You start reading
27:27
chapter 5. How does knowing about these
27:30
five discourses and that unique concluding formula change your
27:34
reading experience? It changes your reading
27:36
experience by training you to look for the transitions.
27:39
When you read tomorrow morning, keep an eye out for that phrase
27:42
when Jesus had finished saying these things.
27:44
When you hit that phrase pause, you have just completed a major
27:49
unit of thought. Look back at the chapters you
27:51
just read and ask yourself what was the core theme of this
27:55
specific curriculum? Was it about Kingdom ethics,
27:58
like the Sermon on the Mount? Was it about facing persecution
28:01
like the missionary discourse? Then, as you read the narrative
28:05
that follows, watch how Jesus's actions relate to the teaching
28:09
he just delivered. The framework helps you group
28:12
the teachings logically in your mind, making them easier to
28:14
understand and remember, rather than reading the Gospel as just
28:17
a random collection of sayings and miracles.
28:20
It provides pacing for your study.
28:21
We have covered a massive amount of ground today.
28:24
Let's synthesize the main points we extracted from Carson's
28:27
analysis. We started by looking at early
28:29
attempts to outline Matthew using a geographical framework.
28:33
Tracing Jesus from Galilee to Jerusalem, we found that
28:36
approach failed to reveal Matthew's theological intent.
28:39
It gave us a map but no message. Then we examined Kingsbury's
28:43
Christological attempt, which divided the book into 3 sections
28:46
based on the phrase apotote. While we appreciated the focus
28:50
on Jesus, Carson showed us how the artificial topical headings
28:54
could not contain the material and the symmetry was flawed.
28:57
We also touched on sophisticated source critical attempts that
29:01
relied on hypothetical documents like Q.
29:04
Recognizing that our confessional stance requires us
29:06
to focus on the final inspired text rather than academic
29:10
ghosts. Finally, we found that the five
29:13
discourses marked by the specific concluding formula when
29:16
Jesus had finished saying these things, offers the most
29:19
textually faithful guide to the book structure.
29:22
This is especially true when we view the Passion and
29:24
Resurrection as an exceptional 6th narrative section that hands
29:28
the teaching role over to the Church through the Great
29:30
Commission. As we conclude this analysis, I
29:33
want to leave you with a final thought to Mull over, building
29:36
on that exceptional 6th section. If Matthew intentionally
29:39
designed his Gospel to conclude with an open-ended transfer of
29:43
teaching authority to the disciples, how does that shift
29:46
your personal responsibility when you read the previous five
29:49
discourses? You are just reading a record of
29:52
historical facts. You are reading the curriculum
29:55
you have been commissioned to teach.
29:57
Every time you study the teachings of Jesus and Matthew,
30:00
you are being equipped to fulfill that final structural
30:03
element of the book. That brings us right back to our
30:06
opening thought. Reading the Bible is not always
30:09
as clean and binary as looking at a simple X-ray of a broken
30:13
bone. The structural landscape can be
30:14
murky when you first weighed in. But once you spot the markers
30:18
Matthew left for us those 5 great discourses, the Muddy
30:22
Waters clear up, revealing A masterful design that draws you
30:26
directly into the mission of the King.
30:28
Thank you for joining this deep dive on reformed thinking.
30:30
We encourage you to open your Bibles this week and look for
30:33
Matthew's structural clues yourself.
30:35
Until next time, keep reading and keep thinking.