Latest / Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show! / Radio Baloney Live! Fauci Advisor Indicted, Carney's Sovereign Scam, Liberal Media Funding,

Transcript

Radio Baloney Live! Fauci Advisor Indicted, Carney's Sovereign Scam, Liberal Media Funding, · Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show!

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Small fringe minority.
• 0:06
  Speaker 2: All right, what is it? Is it? Tuesday? Yets, Tuesday Night?
• 0:10
  Speaker 2: It must be the Tuesday Night Radio Boloney Live. I'm
• 0:13
  Speaker 2: your host, Richie Bloney. How's everybody doing out there? Get
• 0:16
  Speaker 2: to see Rosie and Trudeau's rivor in the chat already,
• 0:18
  Speaker 2: get to see you guys. All right, let's get to
• 0:25
  Speaker 2: the news, shall we. So what's on the menu tonight?
• 0:27
  Speaker 2: We'll go through the menu quickly, and then we'll go
• 0:30
  Speaker 2: back to the chat and then we'll go through these
• 0:32
  Speaker 2: stories in detail. So what do we got first? So,
• 0:35
  Speaker 2: former senior advisor to Anthony Fauci has been indicted for
• 0:40
  Speaker 2: his role in the COVID nineteen cover up. So yeah,
• 0:44
  Speaker 2: this guy might throw Anthony Fauci under the bus. I mean,
• 0:47
  Speaker 2: you know, think about Fauci is he's got that pardon,
• 0:51
  Speaker 2: got that pardon from Joseph R. Biden. So but will
• 0:55
  Speaker 2: we hear will we hear some truth about Fauci from
• 0:58
  Speaker 2: this guy? I don't know, but we're gonna talk about it.
• 1:02
  Speaker 2: Let's go to what do we got next? We've got
• 1:04
  Speaker 2: a bit more on the Trump shooter. We're gonna go
• 1:07
  Speaker 2: through that, and how insane the media is quite frankly
• 1:12
  Speaker 2: New York. Yet it's not working out well. The communist
• 1:15
  Speaker 2: the comedy plan isn't working out that well. The communist
• 1:18
  Speaker 2: revolution is not working out that well in New York
• 1:21
  Speaker 2: City with their comedy mayor mayor Zorn, Mom Donnie? Do
• 1:26
  Speaker 2: we call them Zorn? Commy Donnie or mom Connie? Commie,
• 1:31
  Speaker 2: Mom commie. I don't know, you guys can work something out. Yeah,
• 1:35
  Speaker 2: budget crisis. Who saw that comment? Who saw that coment?
• 1:40
  Speaker 2: Let's see. So here is Kelly de Ritter, Conservative MP
• 1:43
  Speaker 2: for Kitchener Center, and she's blowing the whistle. She We've
• 1:46
  Speaker 2: been waiting for somebody to tell us exactly what the
• 1:51
  Speaker 2: liberals are doing. What Carney's team is doing. This team
• 1:55
  Speaker 2: to recruit opposition MPs, to bribe them. Let's be honest,
• 1:59
  Speaker 2: what's happening bribe them? Right, So she's just stating this
• 2:04
  Speaker 2: is what they're doing here, although I have to suspect
• 2:06
  Speaker 2: there's more we shall get into that. What do we
• 2:11
  Speaker 2: got here? Yeah, Holly don from black Clock's reporter here
• 2:18
  Speaker 2: has posted this about an eco news site to climate
• 2:22
  Speaker 2: new site National Observer and just how much insane amount
• 2:26
  Speaker 2: of money they get. I thought we'd run that down
• 2:28
  Speaker 2: a little bit, get into some details. Yeah, this new
• 2:33
  Speaker 2: sovereign wealth fundcarentee sovereign wealth fund more like a sovereign
• 2:38
  Speaker 2: debt fund. We're gonna get into this. I mean, you
• 2:42
  Speaker 2: know they talk about like Norway. Well, Norway had a
• 2:45
  Speaker 2: bunch of surpluses, so they had all this money sitting
• 2:47
  Speaker 2: around and they said, well, we've got to invest this
• 2:49
  Speaker 2: in something so we could make more money, because that'll
• 2:51
  Speaker 2: be good for Norway. Right, that's not what's happening here.
• 2:55
  Speaker 2: This is a sovereign debt fund. There's no surpluses obviously, right,
• 3:00
  Speaker 2: So yeah, it's going to be printing money and or
• 3:04
  Speaker 2: borrowing money. And uh, it's going to be borrowing money
• 3:08
  Speaker 2: twenty five billion worth and putting it into what looks
• 3:11
  Speaker 2: like it's probably going to be just a liberal slush fund.
• 3:13
  Speaker 2: Good luck, they're saying you can. You can invest in
• 3:16
  Speaker 2: it too. It's just a private citizen. You can invest
• 3:18
  Speaker 2: in Mark Carty's liberal slush fund. Good luck with that.
• 3:23
  Speaker 2: We've got peer Paulie if here. We've got peer Paul
• 3:26
  Speaker 2: If here, leader of the opposition in Canada, and uh,
• 3:30
  Speaker 2: he's really burning the liberals here in Parliament. And I
• 3:35
  Speaker 2: think it's absolutely worth seeing. And then we have our
• 3:40
  Speaker 2: last book mark, which whoa, what the hell is that
• 3:42
  Speaker 2: front thing? Well that Keith Richards looks terrible now and
• 3:46
  Speaker 2: Michael Jackson still live what? Oh wait a second, these
• 3:49
  Speaker 2: are actresses. Who's that? That's Olivia Wilde and Angelina Jolie Good,
• 3:54
  Speaker 2: good lord, good lord? Uh okay, okay, I guess we'll
• 4:01
  Speaker 2: take a look at that. Jeez, Sad, I got the
• 4:05
  Speaker 2: bongino here. We got a bunch of stuff, a bunch
• 4:07
  Speaker 2: of stuff you guys sent in. Should be good fun,
• 4:10
  Speaker 2: all right, crazy stuff. Look what granny knitted? Nice? That's good.
• 4:16
  Speaker 2: That's a cool granny. Uh yeah, we got lots of fun,
• 4:20
  Speaker 2: lots of good stuff. So before we go back to
• 4:25
  Speaker 2: the chat, I want to say to anybody watching on
• 4:28
  Speaker 2: YouTube right now, please go and subscribe to the new channel,
• 4:31
  Speaker 2: Radio blowny News. This is where all the clip videos go.
• 4:34
  Speaker 2: I take the best clips, the best clips from my
• 4:38
  Speaker 2: live streams, and I clean them up all nice and
• 4:40
  Speaker 2: tidy like, and I put them on Radio bloony News.
• 4:43
  Speaker 2: It's about seven months old. It was going great, moving
• 4:47
  Speaker 2: rapidly towards monetization, and suddenly YouTube decided that nobody's allowed
• 4:51
  Speaker 2: to see my videos anymore. So I guess it's up
• 4:54
  Speaker 2: to you guys, go and help me out. Subscribe there
• 4:57
  Speaker 2: see all the clip videos. There's like almost three hundred
• 4:59
  Speaker 2: videos there already. It's about seven months old this channel.
• 5:02
  Speaker 2: I need your help. Please go do that. Thank you
• 5:04
  Speaker 2: very much. I guess that's it, and let's get back
• 5:08
  Speaker 2: to the weather channel. Where's my backscratcher? I got an
• 5:11
  Speaker 2: that should on?
• 5:14
  Speaker 3: Uh?
• 5:16
  Speaker 2: Oh yeah, yeah. This is why you guys show up.
• 5:22
  Speaker 2: This is why you come for the news, but you
• 5:23
  Speaker 2: stay for the backscratching. There we go, done much better now,
• 5:29
  Speaker 2: and also sip. You also stay for the uh SIPs
• 5:32
  Speaker 2: of rant juice as well. Let's let's try that out.
• 5:38
  Speaker 2: Mm good ranch juice. All right. Everybody knows that we're
• 5:44
  Speaker 2: streaming on Rumble first and foremost, and then YouTube and
• 5:47
  Speaker 2: then X and locals as well. And when you like
• 5:51
  Speaker 2: the stream, you get good karma. But when you're early,
• 5:54
  Speaker 2: you get extra. So let's see what's going on here, Rosie?
• 5:59
  Speaker 2: How you doing? Rose? He's got one one? Now? Is
• 6:02
  Speaker 2: that Roman numerals or eleven? I dropped out of the
• 6:05
  Speaker 2: leering center, so I've got no idea. Uh, I guess
• 6:09
  Speaker 2: we'll go with eleven. I guess I don't know World
• 6:12
  Speaker 2: War eleven. Let's see, what did you say? Well, I
• 6:18
  Speaker 2: don't know. I don't even know anymore. Hey, you get
• 6:20
  Speaker 2: six of your karma, six of your karma. I'm just
• 6:22
  Speaker 2: going with that. And as I said, I don't leer,
• 6:25
  Speaker 2: so good. Truneo survivor got square. So I'll take that
• 6:30
  Speaker 2: as a two. So that's five good karmas. Boom, so
• 6:33
  Speaker 2: many good karmas. Let's see. Uh all right, Trudeau survivor says,
• 6:43
  Speaker 2: the semi semi truck driver who killed sixteen people in
• 6:46
  Speaker 2: Humboldt were supposed to be deported on Monday, but some
• 6:49
  Speaker 2: woke judge in Quebec prevented the deportation order. I think people,
• 6:54
  Speaker 2: I think even a lot of Canadians don't know that
• 6:56
  Speaker 2: judges are giving uh, criminal aliens like people who are here.
• 7:04
  Speaker 2: Judges are giving immigrants lighter sentences so it won't affect
• 7:09
  Speaker 2: their immigration status. So people who've broken the law, we're
• 7:13
  Speaker 2: talking like sexual assault, all kinds of things, right, and
• 7:16
  Speaker 2: they're intentionally giving them lighter sentences so that it won't
• 7:20
  Speaker 2: affect their immigration status. It's totally mad. Yeah, Why is that?
• 7:25
  Speaker 2: Why does Canada need that guy? Well, we don't obviously,
• 7:29
  Speaker 2: is he says, like number three, that's four, good commerce
• 7:31
  Speaker 2: for you for so happy the joy. I wish I
• 7:36
  Speaker 2: could see your face right now. Let's see, is he says?
• 7:41
  Speaker 2: Granny is amazing? How you do it? Is he? Let's see?
• 7:48
  Speaker 2: All right?
• 7:50
  Speaker 4: Is?
• 7:50
  Speaker 2: He says? The port the judges too? What is with
• 7:57
  Speaker 2: these judges? Are they judges all comedies? Are they comedies?
• 8:02
  Speaker 2: I don't know? Are they comedies? No fans, but it
• 8:05
  Speaker 2: sounds like that's some fucking comedy, gobbledygook comies? Are they?
• 8:11
  Speaker 2: Are these judges all comedies? I ask you? Yeah, that's
• 8:14
  Speaker 2: nothing but pure and simple old fashion communism. It really is,
• 8:21
  Speaker 2: it really is. Why do we need it? Like I don't,
• 8:23
  Speaker 2: hondertand why? How does that? How does that enrich society?
• 8:27
  Speaker 2: Of the guy who killed sixteen people young hockey players,
• 8:31
  Speaker 2: by the way, we have to we have to allow
• 8:34
  Speaker 2: them to enrich further, enrich Canada. I don't get it.
• 8:40
  Speaker 2: I don't because I'm not a dirty, filthy, lying comedy.
• 8:43
  Speaker 2: That's why, all right? Should we just get to the stories.
• 8:49
  Speaker 2: Should we just get to our our our stories? Tonight?
• 8:52
  Speaker 2: Let's do it. Let's get to our stories. What do
• 8:56
  Speaker 2: we got? So let's take a look. Nick sort Or
• 8:59
  Speaker 2: posted the and one of Anthony Fauci's advisors has been
• 9:06
  Speaker 2: indicted for his role in the cover up. Well, the
• 9:13
  Speaker 2: the conspiracy to convince people that the COVID nineteen virus
• 9:20
  Speaker 2: didn't come out of the Wuhan lab because that would
• 9:23
  Speaker 2: have connected everything to Anthony Fauci and the gain of function.
• 9:27
  Speaker 2: So they didn't want people to know about that. David
• 9:30
  Speaker 2: Morenz and his co conspirators falsified records to suppress the
• 9:35
  Speaker 2: lab leak theory. Well, let's take a look.
• 9:39
  Speaker 5: I'm're top advisor to doctor Anthony Fauci now facing criminal
• 9:43
  Speaker 5: charges this over an alleged cover up involving research into
• 9:47
  Speaker 5: the origins of COVID. Ridge Edson on this story intriguing,
• 9:51
  Speaker 5: Rich what you find out there in Washington?
• 9:53
  Speaker 6: Now it is Bill. The Justice Department has charged David
• 9:56
  Speaker 6: Moore as a doctor with conspiracy, claiming he concealed federal
• 10:00
  Speaker 6: records to counter evidence that COVID nineteen may have leaked
• 10:03
  Speaker 6: from a lab in China, all to help restore a
• 10:06
  Speaker 6: controversial coronavirus. Grant Moreans, a former aide to Doctor Anthony
• 10:10
  Speaker 6: Fauci testified before the House's COVID Select Subcommittee nearly two
• 10:14
  Speaker 6: years ago about emails he'd sent in February twenty twenty one,
• 10:18
  Speaker 6: claiming that he'd learned to make emails disappear after he
• 10:23
  Speaker 6: received Freedom of Information Act requests.
• 10:27
  Speaker 1: Ever delete or attempt to delete a federal record.
• 10:29
  Speaker 2: No, but let me explain why. When I came there
• 10:33
  Speaker 2: in nineteen ninety eight, we were instructed to delete emails
• 10:37
  Speaker 2: and order to move them into PST files frequently because
• 10:40
  Speaker 2: they jammed the computer.
• 10:42
  Speaker 6: The Justice Department says Morians used his personal Gmail account
• 10:46
  Speaker 6: to exchange non public information. The indictment also claimed.
• 10:50
  Speaker 2: Eehh, that sounds like a loadabull to me. Loadable to me,
• 10:55
  Speaker 2: but let's continue.
• 10:56
  Speaker 6: As an unnamed co conspirator gave Morians wine for his quote.
• 11:00
  Speaker 6: Behind the scenes. Shenanigans then suggested he could push scientific
• 11:04
  Speaker 6: commentary in a prominent medical journal advocating that COVID nineteen
• 11:08
  Speaker 6: had natural origins. That's a competing claim with the lab
• 11:11
  Speaker 6: league theory. The indictment says the co conspirator could also
• 11:14
  Speaker 6: provide meals at top restaurants in Paris, New York, and Washington.
• 11:18
  Speaker 7: D C.
• 11:19
  Speaker 6: In April twenty twenty, the NIH terminated that back coronavirus
• 11:23
  Speaker 6: grant awarded to EcoHealth Alliance, who then contracted the Wuhan
• 11:27
  Speaker 6: Institute of Virology to conduct that research in China. From
• 11:31
  Speaker 6: the start of the pandemic, it's president, Peter Dazik, worked
• 11:34
  Speaker 6: to discredit any theory that COVID nineteen had leaked from
• 11:37
  Speaker 6: that lab.
• 11:38
  Speaker 5: Kol all right, thank you, rich more to com rich
• 11:40
  Speaker 5: Edson on that.
• 11:42
  Speaker 2: Well, if we've learned anything from all of that, I
• 11:44
  Speaker 2: hope that at least, if we've learned anything from that experience,
• 11:48
  Speaker 2: I hope one of the things anyway, is that stop
• 11:52
  Speaker 2: messing with bats. Just stop messing with bats, leave them alone,
• 11:55
  Speaker 2: stay away. Oh you know what the you know, the
• 12:01
  Speaker 2: major lesson should have been from all of that, just
• 12:03
  Speaker 2: stay away from bets. There should be an order, a
• 12:05
  Speaker 2: global order. Nobody goes near any bat ever, on penalty
• 12:10
  Speaker 2: of like execution. Nobody is allowed to have bats pet bats,
• 12:14
  Speaker 2: go near bets. If you see a bat, you have
• 12:16
  Speaker 2: to shoot it immediately. Whatever. Everybody should be equipped with
• 12:20
  Speaker 2: like some sort of bat gun, and scientists definitely stay
• 12:26
  Speaker 2: the hell away from the bats. The government shouldn't be
• 12:29
  Speaker 2: giving money to people, to scientists to mess around with bats.
• 12:34
  Speaker 2: No more bets. And actually, let's throw the pangulins in
• 12:37
  Speaker 2: there as well, just to be safe, all right, or
• 12:42
  Speaker 2: just any animal, how about that. Let's just stop all
• 12:44
  Speaker 2: of it, all right. So CBS news here, ex advisor
• 12:48
  Speaker 2: at Fauci's NIAID indicted for allegedly attempting to hide records
• 12:55
  Speaker 2: during the pandemic. Well, let's see David Morenz. David Morenz,
• 13:01
  Speaker 2: seventy eight, was indicted by a federal grand jury earlier
• 13:05
  Speaker 2: this month and charged with five counts, including conspiracy, destruction
• 13:11
  Speaker 2: of records and federal investigations, and concealment of records. He
• 13:16
  Speaker 2: made his initial appearance before a federal magistrate judge Monday
• 13:19
  Speaker 2: and is set to be reigned next week. So five
• 13:22
  Speaker 2: counts including conspiracy. Well, who is a conspiracy theorist now?
• 13:26
  Speaker 2: Huh huh CNN. Morenz served as a senior advisor to
• 13:32
  Speaker 2: NIAID's Office of the Director from two thousand and six
• 13:37
  Speaker 2: through twenty twenty two. And let's not forget. In fact,
• 13:41
  Speaker 2: there's something I didn't bring up, but it just occurred
• 13:44
  Speaker 2: to me. Now, everybody starts your PhD thesis right now
• 13:47
  Speaker 2: in your epic poetry. Let's see CNN. Hold on, this
• 14:02
  Speaker 2: will be just two seconds. Here we go. So do
• 14:08
  Speaker 2: you remember all of this. Here's CNN health lab leak
• 14:11
  Speaker 2: COVID nineteen. Theory is like something out of a comic book,
• 14:15
  Speaker 2: virologist says March thirty first, twenty twenty one. Remember all
• 14:21
  Speaker 2: of this. There was a big, a big effort to
• 14:24
  Speaker 2: convince everybody that had nothing to do with that bat
• 14:28
  Speaker 2: virus lab in Wuhan that's studying exactly this stuff. Yeah anyway,
• 14:40
  Speaker 2: Oh hold on, yeah, anyway. So this guy served as
• 14:47
  Speaker 2: senior advisor to NIAID's Office of the Director from twenty
• 14:54
  Speaker 2: six through twenty twenty two. Doctor Anthony Fauci led the
• 14:57
  Speaker 2: institute for nearly forty years, so that was Fauci advisor
• 15:00
  Speaker 2: to Fauci. Prosecutors alleged that Morenz had two unnamed, unindicted
• 15:06
  Speaker 2: co conspirators. Prosecutors alleged that Morenz and two unnamed, unindicted
• 15:12
  Speaker 2: co conspirators worked together to defraud the US by shielding
• 15:16
  Speaker 2: federal records related to the pandemic from the public. The
• 15:21
  Speaker 2: first co conspirator, identified as co Conspirator one served as
• 15:25
  Speaker 2: the president and CEO of a New York based nonprofit
• 15:29
  Speaker 2: group that received a grant in twenty fourteen titled Understanding
• 15:33
  Speaker 2: the Risk. I mean, you can't make it up, the
• 15:37
  Speaker 2: risk of BAT coronavirus emergence. So shielding federal records related
• 15:48
  Speaker 2: to the pandemic from the public. So it was really
• 15:53
  Speaker 2: people like, Oh, I don't know, CNN that should have
• 15:58
  Speaker 2: been digging into this stuff. Instead we just got this.
• 16:01
  Speaker 2: You're a conspiracy theorist. This is like something out of
• 16:04
  Speaker 2: a comic book. That's what people got. Huh, and they
• 16:10
  Speaker 2: wonder why mainstream media is dying. The wu Han Institute
• 16:15
  Speaker 2: of Virology in Wuhan, China, received a sub award from
• 16:20
  Speaker 2: the New York Organization on the coronavirus grant prosecutor said.
• 16:27
  Speaker 2: Emails released in twenty twenty four by the Republican led
• 16:30
  Speaker 2: Select Subcommittee Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic indicate that
• 16:36
  Speaker 2: the New York based organization is the EcoHealth Alliance and
• 16:41
  Speaker 2: co conspirator WAN is its president Peter Dazak. Remember that
• 16:45
  Speaker 2: name all right now, Anthony Fauci. Fauci denies this is
• 16:51
  Speaker 2: from June third, twenty twenty four. Fauci denies suppressing COVID
• 16:56
  Speaker 2: lab leak theory before US House pan all, so we
• 17:02
  Speaker 2: know that they were exchanging emails back and forth. He
• 17:06
  Speaker 2: was advising people like Morenz to deny at lablaque to
• 17:14
  Speaker 2: protect himself because they were funding they were funding that
• 17:18
  Speaker 2: lab and had we know all of that now, right?
• 17:22
  Speaker 2: Did I have something in here? The committee set up
• 17:24
  Speaker 2: to discover the origins of the virus has uncovered emails
• 17:28
  Speaker 2: showing top NIH officials trying to hide public records by
• 17:33
  Speaker 2: evading Freedom of Information Act requests or you know, like
• 17:37
  Speaker 2: as that guy said, making emails disappear. The private emails
• 17:42
  Speaker 2: suggest some officials, including a long time Faucy advisor in AID,
• 17:47
  Speaker 2: deleted correspondence and used private emails to get around public
• 17:52
  Speaker 2: record laws public record laws. Fauci downplayed how closely he
• 17:57
  Speaker 2: worked with the advisor, David Morenz, saying he was unsure
• 18:01
  Speaker 2: if morends even reported to him directly, and that their
• 18:04
  Speaker 2: offices were in different buildings. Wow, Carney, as soon as
• 18:10
  Speaker 2: I think I see the word lie, I think Mark Carney. Sorry, Fauci,
• 18:14
  Speaker 2: there's other liars too, I mean, what a dishonest man,
• 18:19
  Speaker 2: I mean, just shameless denied ever using a private email
• 18:24
  Speaker 2: address to discuss government business. Brandons had told the subcommittee
• 18:28
  Speaker 2: he may have sent emails discussing government business to Fauci's
• 18:32
  Speaker 2: personal email address. Do you wonder if he did? I
• 18:36
  Speaker 2: guess that's where.
• 18:37
  Speaker 8: Uh.
• 18:38
  Speaker 2: Let's see this pardon executive grant of clemency Joseph eight
• 18:43
  Speaker 2: Joseph R. Biden, Junior President of the United States of
• 18:46
  Speaker 2: America for Anthony Fauci, Doctor Anthony S. Fauci. So, I
• 18:50
  Speaker 2: guess this really does come in handy for somebody like Fauci,
• 18:55
  Speaker 2: who's just guilty, right, just guilty, but he's got so
• 19:00
  Speaker 2: he's all right, what do we have here? So here's
• 19:04
  Speaker 2: from a Committee on Oversight hearing. Wrap up, Doctor Fauci
• 19:10
  Speaker 2: held publicly accountable by select subcommittee. Let's see doctor Fauci
• 19:15
  Speaker 2: confirmed that his senior advisor, doctor David Morenz, violated official
• 19:20
  Speaker 2: NIH policies and potentially broke federal law. This was from
• 19:26
  Speaker 2: June fourth, twenty twenty four. Let's see unlawfully deleted federal
• 19:39
  Speaker 2: COVID nineteen records. I mean that's super illegal, right, and
• 19:42
  Speaker 2: shared non public information about National Institutes of Health grant
• 19:46
  Speaker 2: processes with his best friend EcoHealth Alliance Incorporated. EcoHealth president
• 19:52
  Speaker 2: doctor Peter Dazac. His name keeps popping up too, doctor
• 19:58
  Speaker 2: faute At doctor f she maintained his misleading claim that
• 20:02
  Speaker 2: the NIH never funded gain of function research in Wuhan, China.
• 20:07
  Speaker 2: In twenty twenty one, he told Rand Paul that the
• 20:10
  Speaker 2: NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain
• 20:13
  Speaker 2: of function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Sure
• 20:18
  Speaker 2: yesterday's hearing, doctor Fauci doubled down on his previous claim
• 20:22
  Speaker 2: by stating the NIH did not fund gain of function
• 20:25
  Speaker 2: research at the Wuhan Institute of a Virology Notably acting Notably,
• 20:33
  Speaker 2: former acting NIH Director doctor Lawrence Tabek told the Select
• 20:37
  Speaker 2: Committee recently that the NIH did in fact gain a
• 20:43
  Speaker 2: function research in Wuhan. Yeah. Uh, You've never seen anybody
• 20:50
  Speaker 2: as slippery as Fauci was. In that Doctor Fauci agreed
• 20:55
  Speaker 2: with the Select subcommittee that EcoHealth and its president, doctor
• 20:58
  Speaker 2: Peter Dazak should never again receive a single sent from
• 21:02
  Speaker 2: the US taxpayer. Uh So it wasn't all above board then,
• 21:07
  Speaker 2: Lit's see, doctor Fauci corrected his previous testimony that his
• 21:11
  Speaker 2: staff did not possess conflicts of interest. During yesterday's hearing,
• 21:16
  Speaker 2: he changed his tune, testifying that doctor Morens definitely had
• 21:20
  Speaker 2: a conflict of interest. Doctor Fauci publicly acknowledged that the
• 21:24
  Speaker 2: Lableek hypothesis was possible and not a conspiracy theory. This
• 21:29
  Speaker 2: comes nearly four years after prompting the publication of the
• 21:32
  Speaker 2: no alfamous proximal origin paper that attempted to vilify and
• 21:36
  Speaker 2: disprove the Lablik hypothesis because of his connections to it. Obviously,
• 21:44
  Speaker 2: all right, so let's go back here. What do we
• 21:50
  Speaker 2: have hold on? Oh, hold on, give me one second. Uh,
• 21:57
  Speaker 2: I think that's actually it. Let me find where we
• 22:02
  Speaker 2: were hold on? All right, so, uh, David Morenz does
• 22:15
  Speaker 2: not have David Morenz does not have a pardon from Biden.
• 22:22
  Speaker 2: So that's why they're going after him. And I think
• 22:24
  Speaker 2: what will be really interesting is uh finding out what
• 22:28
  Speaker 2: was in all of those emails, you know, all of
• 22:32
  Speaker 2: the communications, you know, how much how much had they
• 22:35
  Speaker 2: already how much did the erase like illegally RaSE. I
• 22:39
  Speaker 2: guess we'll find out. But you know, they're going to
• 22:42
  Speaker 2: be people that are going to be a lot of people.
• 22:45
  Speaker 2: A lot of people were like kicked off social media.
• 22:49
  Speaker 2: You know, people who were relying on that income to live.
• 22:53
  Speaker 2: You know, a lot of people for saying things like, hey,
• 22:56
  Speaker 2: what about this lab down in Wuhan there where they're
• 22:58
  Speaker 2: studying the bat care the viruses. I mean, it seems
• 23:02
  Speaker 2: like kind of a coincidence, right. A lot of people
• 23:05
  Speaker 2: were punished, seriously punished for that, just for saying, hey,
• 23:10
  Speaker 2: this looks totally plausible. So it's taken a long time,
• 23:15
  Speaker 2: but we'll find out what happens with this, all right.
• 23:21
  Speaker 2: Probably nobody will be satisfied with it in the end.
• 23:27
  Speaker 2: All right, So now what's going on? What are you
• 23:31
  Speaker 2: guys talking about? To do, to do, Do, to do,
• 23:40
  Speaker 2: to do, to do, sport to judges too, Granny's amazing.
• 23:45
  Speaker 2: Let's see Denny, how you doing? Get to see? Uh?
• 23:50
  Speaker 2: Happy Tuesday? Now, if anybody gets tired today, it's Tuesday,
• 23:55
  Speaker 2: so we're allowed to get that little energy boost. You
• 23:57
  Speaker 2: know what I'm talking about. You know what I'm talking about,
• 24:00
  Speaker 2: a bit of that they them energy. So if we
• 24:03
  Speaker 2: start getting tired, don't be shy. You throw it right
• 24:05
  Speaker 2: in the chat there. We can get started with that.
• 24:08
  Speaker 2: We'll give you that boost that on lady, lay of
• 24:10
  Speaker 2: them energy can give you all. Right, if I don't
• 24:14
  Speaker 2: only bottle that stuff, I'll tell you, I wouldn't be
• 24:19
  Speaker 2: a millionaire. I'd be a cent in air. Maybe I
• 24:22
  Speaker 2: don't know anyway, uh dollar in air. Let's see, Rosie says,
• 24:29
  Speaker 2: I was attacked on Facebook when I called it the
• 24:31
  Speaker 2: China virus, the China because it's from China. I mean,
• 24:38
  Speaker 2: what a mad time, What a mad time that was?
• 24:42
  Speaker 2: I mean, hold on, do I remember this? Do we
• 24:45
  Speaker 2: all remember this? Uh? Let's see, let's see. Hold on,
• 25:03
  Speaker 2: let's see remember this China Chinese virus? So that China
• 25:10
  Speaker 2: virus is a racist? Take remember that you're a racist
• 25:13
  Speaker 2: If you said China virus China like wes Nile was okay, right,
• 25:20
  Speaker 2: you know, I think Ebola is from like an Ebola,
• 25:22
  Speaker 2: a region called Ebola in uh in Africa. Right, that
• 25:27
  Speaker 2: was all okay, But for some reason it's weird. Weird.
• 25:31
  Speaker 2: It's like trying to like, you know, protect the Chinese
• 25:35
  Speaker 2: Communist Party. Weird, uh is He says, stop making bio weapons.
• 25:43
  Speaker 2: Thought that was already the law. Well, yes see, so
• 25:46
  Speaker 2: they kind of went around the law to do it.
• 25:49
  Speaker 2: That's why they were doing it in China, and that's
• 25:50
  Speaker 2: why they had all those labs in Ukraine as well,
• 25:57
  Speaker 2: which is maybe another reason why I felt you needed
• 26:00
  Speaker 2: that pardon. Let's see, Rosie says, So we're no longer
• 26:08
  Speaker 2: allowed to buy bats to eat at wet markets, wet
• 26:11
  Speaker 2: markets in China? Who does that? No, we're not. I
• 26:16
  Speaker 2: can't buy. I mean, I go to the local wet
• 26:19
  Speaker 2: markets in my town, and you know, you can't even
• 26:23
  Speaker 2: get bats there anymore. It's really a shame, you know.
• 26:27
  Speaker 2: I just it's just pangolins, mostly pangolins, now, you know.
• 26:31
  Speaker 2: Let's see, is he says, think all those monsters should
• 26:38
  Speaker 2: be volunteered for medical experiments. How about mandated something requiring
• 26:43
  Speaker 2: the vocal cords? Oh jeez, I can't read that. I
• 26:47
  Speaker 2: can't read that. Let's see, Rosie says, it is astounding
• 26:52
  Speaker 2: the scope of the fraud and criminality. Yes, it always is,
• 26:56
  Speaker 2: something we hear a lot these days. Let's see, uh
• 27:02
  Speaker 2: and Nevada saying I'm fixing my supper. Be right back. Well,
• 27:04
  Speaker 2: we won't mention anything about bat soup. Let's see, Rosie says,
• 27:14
  Speaker 2: I guess co Conspirator one was not loved by parents.
• 27:16
  Speaker 2: What a name for a baby? Kind of prophetic Yeah,
• 27:20
  Speaker 2: that's a terrible name for a baby. Co Conspirator one,
• 27:24
  Speaker 2: so I guess maybe the next child was co conspirator two,
• 27:27
  Speaker 2: and then so on. I don't know terrible baby name though.
• 27:32
  Speaker 2: Let's see. Uh, Chudas virus says the MSM push pushed
• 27:41
  Speaker 2: the idea that calling it the China virus China because
• 27:44
  Speaker 2: it's from China was racist, and the sheep all went
• 27:47
  Speaker 2: along with it. Just ignore all the viruses named after
• 27:49
  Speaker 2: other places Spanish flu, lime disease, the ebola zeka. Yep.
• 27:55
  Speaker 2: They just didn't want people thinking about the virus at all.
• 27:58
  Speaker 2: Is that what it was. They just didn't want people
• 28:00
  Speaker 2: even thinking about the narrative around it at all, or
• 28:03
  Speaker 2: the virus at all. Just do what you're fucking told.
• 28:13
  Speaker 2: Rosie says. The sheeple were surprising. I never dreamed these
• 28:16
  Speaker 2: people I had known all my life would both skate
• 28:19
  Speaker 2: with post scathing, hate filled words to shame me. It
• 28:24
  Speaker 2: did not work. It just revealed there. Well yeah, look,
• 28:28
  Speaker 2: uh it was shocking. I was shocked. I was shocked,
• 28:31
  Speaker 2: and I'm very sorry to hear that that that happened
• 28:33
  Speaker 2: to you, But I was shocked at the public's reaction.
• 28:39
  Speaker 2: I mean you know, some people always just you know,
• 28:42
  Speaker 2: they just want the boot on their face, like you know,
• 28:45
  Speaker 2: they want to be dominated by the state and oppressed
• 28:49
  Speaker 2: by the state. I was shocked that it was the
• 28:51
  Speaker 2: majority of Canadians were like, nope, we prefer privileges. We
• 28:54
  Speaker 2: don't want rites anymore. Privileges are great because you know,
• 28:59
  Speaker 2: if you do if if you do what you're told,
• 29:01
  Speaker 2: you can go to a movie, or go for dinner,
• 29:03
  Speaker 2: or travel on a plane or a train. And then
• 29:06
  Speaker 2: some people can't, the people who didn't do what they
• 29:08
  Speaker 2: were told can't, and that means we're better than them
• 29:12
  Speaker 2: because we get to do something they can't do. This
• 29:14
  Speaker 2: privileges thing is great. I mean, they'd never taken away
• 29:18
  Speaker 2: from me because I'll always do what I'm told. I
• 29:21
  Speaker 2: was shocked by it, oh, shocked, and just yeah, the
• 29:25
  Speaker 2: hatred and vitriol. I mean even on the front page
• 29:28
  Speaker 2: of the Toronto Star they posted these hate filled diatribes
• 29:31
  Speaker 2: from their readers. I got it was. It was unbelievable.
• 29:34
  Speaker 2: I was shocked. I was shocked. I did not think
• 29:38
  Speaker 2: that I lived in that country. And now after the
• 29:42
  Speaker 2: last election, you know, I will never overestimate the Canadian
• 29:46
  Speaker 2: electorate ever again, or I should say, like at least
• 29:50
  Speaker 2: fifty percent of it, as he says, weak minds easily
• 29:57
  Speaker 2: controlled by fear. Sadly, the majority of people suffer. Yeah,
• 30:02
  Speaker 2: Spambot says, you can do all the them shit you
• 30:05
  Speaker 2: like tonight, I'm going to bed. Yeah, can do all
• 30:08
  Speaker 2: the sh you can do all the they them shit
• 30:11
  Speaker 2: you like tonight, I'm going to bed. Spambot Fadther says, okay, Now,
• 30:20
  Speaker 2: to be fair to spam, he's working like day like
• 30:24
  Speaker 2: I don't know, like seventeen of like forty five continuous days.
• 30:29
  Speaker 2: He has to work like fifteen hour shifts, so you know,
• 30:32
  Speaker 2: like I think it's fair. Let's see. Oh, Spambot says,
• 30:37
  Speaker 2: dropping like number five before I go. So that's but
• 30:41
  Speaker 2: too good. Karmas boom. Let's see. Rosie says, can you
• 30:50
  Speaker 2: spell perjury? Can you spell trees? And she says I can.
• 30:56
  Speaker 2: We'll have to see if that guy can. Let's see.
• 31:04
  Speaker 2: Uh is he says I lost connections with family and
• 31:06
  Speaker 2: friends over that BS. Yeah, it's very common story. Uh yeah,
• 31:14
  Speaker 2: I mean it was shocking how quick how quickly you
• 31:17
  Speaker 2: discovered what was lurking underneath the smiles. Right, let's see
• 31:29
  Speaker 2: Rosie says, just prove fraudulent ballots and election interference, vacate
• 31:33
  Speaker 2: the twenty twenty election, canceling the pardons. That's all you
• 31:36
  Speaker 2: gotta do. Rosie says, I lost people too. All right,
• 31:45
  Speaker 2: let's get on to the next thing, and let's get
• 31:48
  Speaker 2: rid of some of these because we don't need them anymore.
• 31:51
  Speaker 2: We've already been through it. What are we thirty two
• 31:53
  Speaker 2: minutes in? We're doing real good, real good. Okay, what
• 31:58
  Speaker 2: do we got next? Let's say, all right, let's go
• 32:01
  Speaker 2: through some new stuff on this on this Trump shooter.
• 32:05
  Speaker 2: Here's bright bart news Uh, here's a here's Levitt. What
• 32:11
  Speaker 2: the hell is her name? Again? Something Levitt? Catherine Levitt, Kelly,
• 32:15
  Speaker 2: what the hell's her name? God damn it? I forget?
• 32:21
  Speaker 2: All right anyway, So here's the press secretary with the receipts,
• 32:25
  Speaker 2: Carolyn Levitt. That's what it is.
• 32:27
  Speaker 7: Oh, I gotta.
• 32:33
  Speaker 2: Brave. What I find is is that there's too many names.
• 32:40
  Speaker 2: So that's the problem that I have there. If there
• 32:42
  Speaker 2: was like five names, i'd be fine, right, I'd I
• 32:47
  Speaker 2: will never forget. But there's more than five. There's, in fact,
• 32:51
  Speaker 2: way more than that. There's too many names. We got
• 32:54
  Speaker 2: to do something about that, all right, breit Bart News,
• 32:57
  Speaker 2: here's the press secretary with the receipts all the vile
• 33:00
  Speaker 2: things democrats have said to inspire violence. And yeah, I mean,
• 33:05
  Speaker 2: it's not really a mystery why leftists keep trying to
• 33:11
  Speaker 2: kill Trump. And then also they're literally killing other people
• 33:16
  Speaker 2: like Charlie Kirk. They just you know, the Luigi Mangioni
• 33:21
  Speaker 2: just murdered a man, shot a man in the back,
• 33:23
  Speaker 2: murdered him on the street because he worked for a
• 33:26
  Speaker 2: insurance company. I mean, yeah, I mean, it's it's it's
• 33:35
  Speaker 2: not a giant mystery where this comes from. If you
• 33:38
  Speaker 2: tell people that, hey, that guy is literally Hitler and
• 33:43
  Speaker 2: you're living in a literal fascist state right now, right,
• 33:46
  Speaker 2: And of course the person hearing this has to be
• 33:48
  Speaker 2: totally historically illiterate and not particularly bright, okay for this
• 33:53
  Speaker 2: to work. But there's a lot of people, so they're
• 33:56
  Speaker 2: people are going to hear this, Oh he's actually literally Hitler.
• 34:00
  Speaker 2: I heard that Hitler guy was bad or something really bad. Right,
• 34:05
  Speaker 2: it's going to work. You've got enough people, it's going
• 34:07
  Speaker 2: to work. Let's watch.
• 34:10
  Speaker 9: Unfortunately, it's not just the media, it is the entire
• 34:14
  Speaker 9: Democrat Party has made their pitch to voters across the
• 34:18
  Speaker 9: country that Donald Trump poses an existential threat to democracy,
• 34:22
  Speaker 9: that he is a fascist, and that they compare him
• 34:24
  Speaker 9: to Hitler. I mean, these aren't despicable statements that the
• 34:27
  Speaker 9: American people have been consuming for years, and so many
• 34:30
  Speaker 9: mentally perturbed individuals are led to believe these words are
• 34:34
  Speaker 9: truth and then are inspired to act on it. I
• 34:37
  Speaker 9: have a whole host of examples that we can share
• 34:40
  Speaker 9: with you after it is pages and pages of major
• 34:43
  Speaker 9: Democrat Party elected officials saying such as REPACKEM. Jeffrey is
• 34:48
  Speaker 9: just this April this month said we are in an
• 34:50
  Speaker 9: era of maximum warfare everywhere all the time. Governor Josh
• 34:55
  Speaker 9: Shapiro said heads need to roll within the administration. A
• 34:59
  Speaker 9: Senator Alex Padia said people are quote dying because of
• 35:02
  Speaker 9: fear and terror caused by the Trump administration. Senator Elizabeth
• 35:06
  Speaker 9: Warren president Trump is making the country look like a
• 35:09
  Speaker 9: quote fascist state. Senator Adam Schiff saying President Trump using
• 35:13
  Speaker 9: a dictator playbook. Senator Ed Markey calling President Trump a dictator,
• 35:18
  Speaker 9: saying that this administration's actions are authoritarianism on steroids. Governor J. B.
• 35:23
  Speaker 9: Pritzker Never before in my life have I called for
• 35:25
  Speaker 9: mass protest disruptions. These Republicans cannot know a moment of peace.
• 35:31
  Speaker 9: You have Presley saying We'll see you in the streets.
• 35:34
  Speaker 9: Ret Monica McIvor, a Democrat representative on Capitol Hill. We
• 35:38
  Speaker 9: will not take this shit from Donald Trump. He thinks
• 35:41
  Speaker 9: he's a dictator. We are at war. These are Democrat
• 35:45
  Speaker 9: elected officials calling for war against the President of the
• 35:48
  Speaker 9: United States and his supporters.
• 35:52
  Speaker 2: And like a true dictator, Trump's dealing with all of
• 35:58
  Speaker 2: his opposition brutal in the courts, in the courts with
• 36:04
  Speaker 2: judges and stuff, like it's supposed to be done, right,
• 36:08
  Speaker 2: So yeah, yeah again, Get the rhetoric is insane. In fact,
• 36:14
  Speaker 2: it's like revolutionary rhetoric, right. I guess they're just feeling
• 36:20
  Speaker 2: that coming up from their base there that you know,
• 36:22
  Speaker 2: the universities have been turning out a new revolutionary Red
• 36:26
  Speaker 2: Guard every year for decades, and I guess I guess
• 36:31
  Speaker 2: they're having to echo it. You know, they want the
• 36:33
  Speaker 2: revolutionary communist vote, they want a monopoly on that. I
• 36:36
  Speaker 2: think they've got it. Matter of fact, why do these
• 36:43
  Speaker 2: things keep happening? Why does it keep happening? Here's Matt Walsh.
• 36:46
  Speaker 2: So he's talking about the idea that it was a
• 36:49
  Speaker 2: hoax or that it was staged, which I do not
• 36:52
  Speaker 2: believe it was stage. That doesn't make any sense. But
• 36:55
  Speaker 2: here Matt Walsh explains that I'm officially convinced it was
• 36:58
  Speaker 2: a hoax. The Trumpet meministration A recruited a leftist Kamala
• 37:03
  Speaker 2: Harris voting Trump hater to participate in a staged assassination
• 37:08
  Speaker 2: that would include the shooter getting shot at, shot at,
• 37:12
  Speaker 2: and then locked in federal prison for the rest of
• 37:15
  Speaker 2: his life. Seems like kind of a raw deal, huh.
• 37:19
  Speaker 2: The Kamala Harris voter agreed to this plan that works
• 37:22
  Speaker 2: against his political and personal interests because he's just like
• 37:26
  Speaker 2: a really generous guy. Meanwhile, the Trump administration, despite dastardly planning,
• 37:34
  Speaker 2: but despite dastardly planning multiple assassination hoaxes, decided to keep
• 37:38
  Speaker 2: their Patsy alive and a permanent liability to them rather
• 37:42
  Speaker 2: than just killing him like they could have easily done.
• 37:47
  Speaker 2: They did this because they are also really strangely generous
• 37:50
  Speaker 2: in a very odd and specific way. So, in summary,
• 37:54
  Speaker 2: we have a plot where all parties involved are working
• 37:56
  Speaker 2: against their own interests with no real discernible benefit to
• 38:00
  Speaker 2: any of them. There is no evidence of this plan,
• 38:03
  Speaker 2: and it doesn't even make any intuitive sense, and the
• 38:07
  Speaker 2: motives for everyone are unclear, if not insane. But I
• 38:11
  Speaker 2: still believe it because I'm a very smart person, So
• 38:15
  Speaker 2: I agree with this. I mean, there's one thing for
• 38:18
  Speaker 2: sure that tells you this was not staged, it was
• 38:22
  Speaker 2: not a hoax. Is that the shooter's alive, Like you
• 38:27
  Speaker 2: wouldn't let him live like that if if the administration
• 38:32
  Speaker 2: is so evil in machiavellian, they're not letting him live.
• 38:37
  Speaker 2: So just on that alone, it's pretty ridiculous. Yeah, I'm
• 38:43
  Speaker 2: not buying it. Let's see, here's Jimmy Kimmel defending his
• 38:49
  Speaker 2: joke about Melennia soon to be widow. Uh, let's hear it.
• 38:56
  Speaker 2: Let's hear his justification.
• 38:59
  Speaker 4: So Onday, three days before the event, in order to
• 39:03
  Speaker 4: keep that cherish tradition alive, I did my own version
• 39:07
  Speaker 4: of the correspondence dinner on my show. I put on
• 39:09
  Speaker 4: a tuxedo. We pretended we had an audience of luminaries.
• 39:14
  Speaker 2: We used old.
• 39:14
  Speaker 4: Footage of the trumps of Pete Hegseth Jadie Vance, Kid
• 39:19
  Speaker 4: Rock Vanilla Ice, all the members of his cabinet, and
• 39:22
  Speaker 4: we made it seem.
• 39:23
  Speaker 2: Like they were all together in a room. We had
• 39:25
  Speaker 2: a little roast. Again.
• 39:26
  Speaker 4: This was Thursday, and there was no big reaction to
• 39:29
  Speaker 4: it until this morning, when I agreeted the day facing
• 39:32
  Speaker 4: yet another Twitter vomit storm and a call to fire
• 39:37
  Speaker 4: me from our first Lady, Malania Trump, saying I should
• 39:41
  Speaker 4: be fired because of a joke I made again five
• 39:44
  Speaker 4: nights ago. It was a pretend roast. I said, our
• 39:47
  Speaker 4: first Lady Malania is here. Look at her, so beautiful,
• 39:50
  Speaker 4: missus Trump, you have a glow like an expectant widow,
• 39:53
  Speaker 4: which obviously was a joke about their age difference and
• 40:01
  Speaker 4: the look of joy we see on her face every.
• 40:03
  Speaker 2: So there's an applause sign that goes up when he
• 40:05
  Speaker 2: tells a joke, so the audience knows when they're supposed
• 40:07
  Speaker 2: to laugh. So like when there's a joke, they need
• 40:10
  Speaker 2: that applause sign so that they know when he's made
• 40:13
  Speaker 2: a joke. Right. But I wonder if any of them
• 40:16
  Speaker 2: when the sign goes on and they start pretending to
• 40:18
  Speaker 2: laugh and clapping, go, I don't know, I don't know
• 40:21
  Speaker 2: they'd like that's just another guy tried to kill him, like,
• 40:24
  Speaker 2: maybe this is getting out of hand, Maybe it's not
• 40:26
  Speaker 2: that funny time they're together.
• 40:29
  Speaker 4: It was a very light roast joke about the fact
• 40:31
  Speaker 4: that he's almost eighty and she's younger than I am.
• 40:33
  Speaker 2: It was not, by any.
• 40:35
  Speaker 4: Stretch of the definition, a call to assassination. And they
• 40:39
  Speaker 4: know that I've been very vocal for many years speaking
• 40:42
  Speaker 4: out against gun violent geez.
• 40:43
  Speaker 2: I wonder if context means anything. I don't know.
• 40:47
  Speaker 4: I guess not in particular, but I understand that the
• 40:50
  Speaker 4: first lady had a stressful experience over the weekend, and
• 40:52
  Speaker 4: probably every weekend is pretty stressful in that house. And
• 40:56
  Speaker 4: also I agree that Kate well or maybe being a
• 40:59
  Speaker 4: tech the media constantly, maybe that too full and violent
• 41:02
  Speaker 4: rhetoric is something we should reject. I do, and I
• 41:05
  Speaker 4: think a great place to start to dial that back
• 41:08
  Speaker 4: would be to have a conversation with your husband about it, because.
• 41:16
  Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right, that's right, because all the Trump supporters
• 41:19
  Speaker 2: are out trying to assassinate it. Yeah, sure, it's all
• 41:22
  Speaker 2: coming from the left now. An obvious point is is
• 41:26
  Speaker 2: that if Trump were really a dictator, as they all
• 41:29
  Speaker 2: seem to think that he is, Jimmy Kimmel would not
• 41:32
  Speaker 2: have a late night show. He'd be in a camp
• 41:34
  Speaker 2: because that's what dictators do, Right. It wouldn't just be
• 41:37
  Speaker 2: complaining on the internet that he's not funny and his
• 41:41
  Speaker 2: ratings are terrible, so they should fire him that like
• 41:45
  Speaker 2: an actual dictator, going way further than that, right, he
• 41:48
  Speaker 2: wouldn't be allowed to do this at all period, Right,
• 41:51
  Speaker 2: Like he'd go to a camp, he'd go to a prison. Right.
• 41:55
  Speaker 2: So the whole thing is obviously, you know, the whole
• 41:59
  Speaker 2: media narrative that's been drawn by people like Jimmy Kimmel
• 42:02
  Speaker 2: is so insane and that Frank I Gain just historically illiterate.
• 42:07
  Speaker 2: They have literally no idea what they're talking about. Personally,
• 42:15
  Speaker 2: I don't think that obviously he should be able to
• 42:18
  Speaker 2: do that. If somebody is willing to pay him to
• 42:21
  Speaker 2: make his jokes, he should be able to do that. Right.
• 42:25
  Speaker 2: It's just why, I mean, his show loses money. It's
• 42:29
  Speaker 2: not profitable for the network. So what is like, what
• 42:33
  Speaker 2: is the purpose? What do they get out of it?
• 42:34
  Speaker 2: They lose half the country for what for Jimmy Kimmel.
• 42:38
  Speaker 2: So that Jimmy Kimmel won't say that they're you know,
• 42:41
  Speaker 2: fascists too. I mean the word fascist doesn't mean anything
• 42:44
  Speaker 2: anymore anyway, So it shouldn't matter to anybody ever being
• 42:47
  Speaker 2: called that by people like Jimmy Kimmel, Like what like,
• 42:53
  Speaker 2: couldn't they just I mean, it's not like his It's
• 42:59
  Speaker 2: not like everybody has a right to have like a
• 43:02
  Speaker 2: network talk show, right Like, if you're bad at it,
• 43:07
  Speaker 2: like they should be allowed to replace you, right Like,
• 43:11
  Speaker 2: should there be a law that like you could just
• 43:12
  Speaker 2: like a homeless guy could walk off the street and
• 43:15
  Speaker 2: get his own show walk in. A homeless guy can
• 43:17
  Speaker 2: walk in off the street and get his own show
• 43:20
  Speaker 2: and then spend you know, an hour, you know, telling
• 43:22
  Speaker 2: everybody what the demons are telling him. I ain't like
• 43:27
  Speaker 2: if you've got an un like an unprofitable product that
• 43:31
  Speaker 2: people don't like or not enough people like it, right
• 43:34
  Speaker 2: like Jimmy Kible, Like, it's not a tragedy if they
• 43:38
  Speaker 2: just say, yeah, this isn't working out. Yeah you know,
• 43:41
  Speaker 2: we thought it was a good idea at first. It's
• 43:43
  Speaker 2: not working out. I'm afraid not enough people are watching.
• 43:46
  Speaker 2: We can't sell enough advertising. It's too expensive. Uh yeah,
• 43:51
  Speaker 2: So anyway, that's that's my thoughts. On it. Let's see,
• 43:56
  Speaker 2: I don't think we need to see that again. Here's
• 44:03
  Speaker 2: that Carolyn Levitt again here and talking about Jimmy Kimmel,
• 44:07
  Speaker 2: Let's take a look.
• 44:09
  Speaker 9: Much of the manifesto of the would be assassin is
• 44:11
  Speaker 9: indistinguishable from the words that we hear daily from so many.
• 44:16
  Speaker 10: For example, as.
• 44:18
  Speaker 9: The First Lady of the United States pointed out this morning,
• 44:20
  Speaker 9: just two days prior to the shooting, ABC's Late Night
• 44:24
  Speaker 9: host Jimmy Kimmel disgustingly called First Lady Milania Trump an
• 44:27
  Speaker 9: expectant widow who, in their right minds says a wife
• 44:31
  Speaker 9: would be glowing over the potential murder of her beloved husband.
• 44:35
  Speaker 9: And having experienced what I did with the First Lady
• 44:37
  Speaker 9: on Saturday night, I can tell you.
• 44:39
  Speaker 2: Well also too, like they keep trying to kill them,
• 44:42
  Speaker 2: right like that? Doesn't that context mean anything to these people?
• 44:45
  Speaker 2: Apparently not. I mean, we know what they hope for.
• 44:48
  Speaker 2: They would all celebrate, I mean, at least privately celebrate
• 44:51
  Speaker 2: if any of them actually succeeded that she was.
• 44:54
  Speaker 9: Anything but that this kind of rhetoric about the President,
• 44:57
  Speaker 9: the First Lady, and his supporters is completely it's deranged,
• 45:01
  Speaker 9: and it's unbelievable that the American people are consuming it
• 45:05
  Speaker 9: night after night after night. As President Trump said on
• 45:08
  Speaker 9: Saturday night at this podium, we as Americans must recommit
• 45:12
  Speaker 9: ourselves to resolving our differences peacefully, in uniting around the
• 45:16
  Speaker 9: shared values that make our country great. The deranged lies
• 45:20
  Speaker 9: and smears against the President, his family, his supporters have
• 45:24
  Speaker 9: led crazy people to believe crazy things, and they are
• 45:27
  Speaker 9: inspired to commit violence because of those words.
• 45:31
  Speaker 2: It has to stop, yeah, but obviously it won't. I
• 45:36
  Speaker 2: mean we know that now. Like they're not going to stop, period, right,
• 45:41
  Speaker 2: I mean compilation of unhinged leftists having mental breakdowns after
• 45:45
  Speaker 2: another left doing assassin failed to murder the president. Mike,
• 45:52
  Speaker 2: imagine faking your own old attempt for the third time.
• 45:55
  Speaker 2: I mean, how this is just braindead. That's just idea pathogen.
• 46:00
  Speaker 2: What's this guy's saying.
• 46:01
  Speaker 11: I go to bed each night hoping by the time
• 46:05
  Speaker 11: I get up in the morning, he has died.
• 46:08
  Speaker 2: See this isn't normal. That's not normal. That's not healthy, right, Like,
• 46:13
  Speaker 2: this is the idea pathogen. This is the woke mind virus.
• 46:18
  Speaker 2: Once your brain is infected and parasitized by the woke
• 46:21
  Speaker 2: mind virus, you turn into this like whatever you were before,
• 46:26
  Speaker 2: that's of secondary importance. Now now, once you've got the
• 46:30
  Speaker 2: idea pathogen in your brain, yeah, now it's about spreading
• 46:35
  Speaker 2: it to other you know, soft brained people, and that's it.
• 46:38
  Speaker 2: That's the most important thing, like you know, eating, sleeping.
• 46:42
  Speaker 2: Come second. All right, let's go back to the chat
• 46:49
  Speaker 2: for a minute. Let's see Brian Lynch how you do
• 46:53
  Speaker 2: and get to see in the chat? All right, what
• 47:02
  Speaker 2: do we get?
• 47:05
  Speaker 4: Uh?
• 47:08
  Speaker 2: Hold on?
• 47:13
  Speaker 12: Is?
• 47:13
  Speaker 2: He says? Good thing? My satire detector is still working.
• 47:15
  Speaker 2: I almost thought walshwit mad?
• 47:17
  Speaker 12: Yes, Uh, let's see.
• 47:30
  Speaker 2: Is he says, clapping seals talking about Jimmy Kimmel's audience. Yeah,
• 47:37
  Speaker 2: Rosie says Richie. Thank you for always announcing the name
• 47:39
  Speaker 2: of the person on screen. You help me remember who
• 47:42
  Speaker 2: it is. For those who are new to the channel,
• 47:44
  Speaker 2: Rosie has face blindness, so he's not kidding. All right,
• 47:49
  Speaker 2: let's see j j Nevada says. Bosnia. The poorther in
• 47:53
  Speaker 2: Bosnia is great. Great. Romania is good though. Do the
• 47:56
  Speaker 2: jumping jacks there? Love it? All right? All right, we're
• 48:00
  Speaker 2: gonna have to leave the Hot Lady Weather Report and
• 48:03
  Speaker 2: go to our next story. What do we have yes,
• 48:08
  Speaker 2: so the warmth of collectivism. Update from bright Bart News
• 48:12
  Speaker 2: Here Mayor Zooran Mamdani declares a budget crisis. Who could
• 48:17
  Speaker 2: have guessed that the Communist mayor of New York would
• 48:23
  Speaker 2: lead them to a budget crisis? Who could have guessed?
• 48:25
  Speaker 2: Aren't they always great with money, with finances? You know, commies,
• 48:29
  Speaker 2: aren't they?
• 48:30
  Speaker 13: Oh?
• 48:30
  Speaker 2: Yeah, never, they never are, I'd say, which is why
• 48:34
  Speaker 2: so many people starve to death. Anyway, let's watch.
• 48:36
  Speaker 7: New York City faces a budget crisis of a historic magnitude.
• 48:40
  Speaker 7: We inherited a deficit larger than any since the Great Recession.
• 48:45
  Speaker 7: Years of mismanagement and chronic under budgeting, alongside a structural
• 48:48
  Speaker 7: imbalance between what New York City sends the state and
• 48:51
  Speaker 7: what we receive in return, have taken.
• 48:53
  Speaker 2: A long stretch. A lefty is run in New York,
• 48:55
  Speaker 2: hasn't it long stretch in.
• 48:57
  Speaker 7: A toll We cannot close this deficit with savings alone.
• 49:01
  Speaker 7: We need new revenue, and we need a structural reset
• 49:04
  Speaker 7: in our relationship with the state. That is the only
• 49:07
  Speaker 7: way to meet our legal obligation to pass a balanced budget.
• 49:11
  Speaker 2: Oh, you got spending, but he's not going to do that.
• 49:14
  Speaker 7: And to do so without imposing a financial burden onto
• 49:18
  Speaker 7: the backs of working people. I'm glad to partner with
• 49:21
  Speaker 7: Speaker menon as we call upon Albany and deliver a
• 49:24
  Speaker 7: balanced budget. Together. We are extending the executive budget deadline
• 49:28
  Speaker 7: from this coming Friday until May twelfth, because the crisis
• 49:31
  Speaker 7: of the scale cannot be solved without state action.
• 49:33
  Speaker 2: What about like what about like ed not giving benefits
• 49:37
  Speaker 2: to all of the people that are in your city
• 49:39
  Speaker 2: city illegally? How about that one? I don't think he's
• 49:42
  Speaker 2: going to do that either.
• 49:43
  Speaker 7: I want to be clear, we are not simply asking
• 49:46
  Speaker 7: others to act. New York City is doing our partner.
• 49:50
  Speaker 7: We are committed to governing with the fiscal responsibility this
• 49:52
  Speaker 7: moment demands Speaker Men.
• 49:54
  Speaker 2: With the fiscal responsibility that communists always.
• 49:59
  Speaker 7: The and I have already identified meaningful savings and we
• 50:05
  Speaker 7: will continue that work carefully, deliberately, and without cutting the
• 50:09
  Speaker 7: services that New Yorkers rely on. But we cannot do
• 50:12
  Speaker 7: it alone. That is why we are standing together this
• 50:15
  Speaker 7: morning to underscore what is at stake and to call
• 50:17
  Speaker 7: on Albany to deliver additional revenue.
• 50:21
  Speaker 2: Yeah yeah, what was that about running out of other
• 50:24
  Speaker 2: people's money? You know what the problem is, he hasn't
• 50:27
  Speaker 2: seized the means of production fast enough. That's it. Once
• 50:31
  Speaker 2: he does that, yet, I'm sure it'll be smooth sailing
• 50:34
  Speaker 2: for New York City. All right, have anything else here?
• 50:41
  Speaker 2: Let's see. Oh yeah, he's building a thirty million city
• 50:46
  Speaker 2: owned grocery store in Harlem next year. Let's see, New
• 50:51
  Speaker 2: York City is that New York City has time for
• 50:54
  Speaker 2: a grand experiment once again? What does he saying here?
• 50:57
  Speaker 7: New York City is time for a grand ex barman
• 51:00
  Speaker 7: once again?
• 51:01
  Speaker 2: Actually, you can't afford it, so just cut it. That
• 51:03
  Speaker 2: will be the same thing to do, same thing to do. Uh.
• 51:07
  Speaker 2: But uh, you know, the whole commy thing, the whole
• 51:09
  Speaker 2: commy thing. It's a problem. Yeah, let's see. Uh he
• 51:15
  Speaker 2: budgeted seventy million for five grocery stores, but the first
• 51:18
  Speaker 2: one alone will cost thirty million. Yeah, just cut that like,
• 51:22
  Speaker 2: start there, start there. Stop giving benefits to people who
• 51:26
  Speaker 2: are in your city illegally, that sort of thing. Not
• 51:29
  Speaker 2: gonna do it though, That's not the commy way. All right,
• 51:35
  Speaker 2: Let's see what are you guys saying. Let's take a
• 51:38
  Speaker 2: quick peek, uh, Nevada says, in other words, we're going
• 51:42
  Speaker 2: to have to take more of your money. Exactly, exactly.
• 51:48
  Speaker 2: Congrats New York. Enjoy it, enjoy the good times. What
• 51:55
  Speaker 2: do we have here? So So in Canada, Mark Kearney
• 52:03
  Speaker 2: gained a majority government by essentially just bribing opposition MPs
• 52:09
  Speaker 2: both Conservative and NDP to just cross the floe, to
• 52:14
  Speaker 2: to just cross the floor, betray the people who who
• 52:18
  Speaker 2: volunteered for them, who donate to them, donated to them,
• 52:21
  Speaker 2: who volunteered for them, donated to them, and ultimately voted
• 52:26
  Speaker 2: for them, betray all those people and crossed the floor
• 52:29
  Speaker 2: for personal gain. So we know that politics is full
• 52:34
  Speaker 2: of scoundrels, right, But I mean, I'm not one of
• 52:36
  Speaker 2: those people who thinks they're all or even you know
• 52:38
  Speaker 2: most of them are. But we know that they're in there.
• 52:40
  Speaker 2: They're drawn. Scoundrels are drawn to politics and we're seeing it.
• 52:47
  Speaker 2: And but never before has a government gotten a majority
• 52:51
  Speaker 2: through floor crossers in Canadian history. Right, this is dirty
• 52:55
  Speaker 2: as hell. And have five within months of each other.
• 52:58
  Speaker 2: That's never been seen maybe like like nineteen seventeen. But
• 53:03
  Speaker 2: any case, this Conservative MP, Kelly de Ritter, loads the
• 53:08
  Speaker 2: whistle on it. Let's hear what they're doing, And I
• 53:11
  Speaker 2: don't think this encompasses everything that they're doing either. But
• 53:14
  Speaker 2: let's take a listen.
• 53:15
  Speaker 14: As I've ever seen before, a government trying to convince
• 53:18
  Speaker 14: sitting MPs to switch sides just to build themselves a majority.
• 53:23
  Speaker 14: I know because I was approached by them, because it
• 53:26
  Speaker 14: happened directly to me, I can say plainly what that
• 53:30
  Speaker 14: looked like. First, it was pressure. I was told a
• 53:33
  Speaker 14: candidate would be running Kishener Center, was support from both
• 53:36
  Speaker 14: the Liberals and the Greens, and that I wouldn't stand
• 53:39
  Speaker 14: a chance as a conservative. You know what, I'm going
• 53:41
  Speaker 14: to leave that up to the voter. When that didn't work,
• 53:45
  Speaker 14: it turned out turned into compliments. I was told they'd
• 53:48
  Speaker 14: be watching my work on committees, especially on AI and
• 53:51
  Speaker 14: digital policy, and that there could be a spot for
• 53:54
  Speaker 14: me on their team. When that didn't land either, it
• 53:57
  Speaker 14: became about benefits. I was told switching sides would be
• 54:01
  Speaker 14: very good for my riding, giving Kitchener Center's role as
• 54:04
  Speaker 14: Canada's innovation capital. Let me be clear, I am not
• 54:08
  Speaker 14: turning my back on the people who elected me, and
• 54:11
  Speaker 14: I am not going to help any government build power
• 54:14
  Speaker 14: through back room conversations.
• 54:17
  Speaker 2: Yeah, this is turning into Banana republic stuff. It is.
• 54:21
  Speaker 2: There have been floor crossings in the past, but they
• 54:23
  Speaker 2: were rare, I believe the last one previous this was
• 54:26
  Speaker 2: like twenty seventeen something like that. We've never seen it
• 54:30
  Speaker 2: like this, certainly, We've never had a government gain a
• 54:35
  Speaker 2: majority by floor crossers. We've never seen five crossing over
• 54:39
  Speaker 2: in the course of months. This is third world stuff.
• 54:43
  Speaker 2: This is Banana republic stuff. It's obviously corrupt. Canada has
• 54:49
  Speaker 2: changed once. Justin Trudeau was elected in twenty fifteen. He
• 54:55
  Speaker 2: remade the Liberal Party into his own radical programm of
• 55:00
  Speaker 2: image and the country and Canada itself has been transformed
• 55:04
  Speaker 2: into that grotesque image as well, and it is not
• 55:08
  Speaker 2: the same country anymore. And we're seeing it literally in
• 55:14
  Speaker 2: every institution in politics and everything. Get to the point
• 55:17
  Speaker 2: here where the Liberals and they've admitted it like they
• 55:20
  Speaker 2: have a team that is trying to lure rats across
• 55:26
  Speaker 2: the aisle, like amorl people right, bad people, scoundrels into
• 55:32
  Speaker 2: the Liberal Party for power to have the ultimate power,
• 55:36
  Speaker 2: a majority government, which means they can force through anything
• 55:40
  Speaker 2: they want. And that means Mark Carney can force through
• 55:43
  Speaker 2: anything that he wants, right can pass budgets. He's free
• 55:47
  Speaker 2: to max out the National credit card. Now, like this
• 55:50
  Speaker 2: is a level of dirtiness and a dirty business that
• 55:54
  Speaker 2: we actually haven't seen before in Canada. It's a level
• 55:58
  Speaker 2: of corruption, like moral corrupt, like there used to be
• 56:02
  Speaker 2: something called shame in society. It would have been shameful
• 56:05
  Speaker 2: to do for these five. It would have been shameful
• 56:08
  Speaker 2: for them, right obviously, not having you know, gone through
• 56:12
  Speaker 2: a long transfer politically transformational period and changed their mind.
• 56:16
  Speaker 2: People do that, and that's why you saw it happen
• 56:19
  Speaker 2: occasionally in the past, not on mass and not like
• 56:25
  Speaker 2: you know, less than a year after an election. So
• 56:31
  Speaker 2: something is rotten in Canada. Canada has been remade into
• 56:37
  Speaker 2: justin Trudeau's image and now it's in Mark Carney's image.
• 56:41
  Speaker 2: He was really Justin Trudeau's protege anyway. So really it
• 56:46
  Speaker 2: was always Mark Carney's image, I think, going all the
• 56:50
  Speaker 2: way back to twenty fifteen. So here we have it,
• 56:55
  Speaker 2: and this is just in the media in Canada. This
• 56:57
  Speaker 2: is just fine, right, what do we hear? What we
• 57:00
  Speaker 2: hear from the media. Hold on one second, I've got
• 57:03
  Speaker 2: to check something out here very quickly, Ernie one majority,
• 57:14
  Speaker 2: Hold on here we go from the CBC, what is
• 57:21
  Speaker 2: it a Here we go the CBC, what is it
• 57:24
  Speaker 2: a billion and a half dollars a year? Now, Carney
• 57:28
  Speaker 2: Clinch is a majority government with three Liberal by election wins.
• 57:32
  Speaker 2: That's not what happened. They were all Liberal seats before
• 57:35
  Speaker 2: it was the floor crossers. This headline should be Carney
• 57:39
  Speaker 2: Clinch is a majority government with corruption by bribing opposition
• 57:45
  Speaker 2: MPs to join his party. People who you know, the
• 57:50
  Speaker 2: day before were saying they had absolutely nothing in common
• 57:55
  Speaker 2: with the Liberal Party and in fact despised their policies,
• 58:00
  Speaker 2: all of a sudden the next day are just proud Liberals.
• 58:05
  Speaker 2: This is what we get. This is what we get.
• 58:07
  Speaker 2: This is state media, folks, right here, Carney Clinch is
• 58:11
  Speaker 2: a majority government with three Liberal by election wins. That's
• 58:14
  Speaker 2: a lie. That's a lie, and everybody knows it. But
• 58:17
  Speaker 2: they're earning their money, right They're earning their their money
• 58:20
  Speaker 2: for the paymaster, the man who gave them one hundred
• 58:22
  Speaker 2: who promised to give them one hundred and fifty million
• 58:25
  Speaker 2: dollar raise during the election. Of course, that would only
• 58:29
  Speaker 2: happen if you won. I mean, how is that legal again?
• 58:32
  Speaker 2: Banana republic stuff, that's what is. That's what Canada has become,
• 58:37
  Speaker 2: just open an obvious corruption everywhere we look. We're looking
• 58:46
  Speaker 2: like a failed state at this point. You wonder how
• 58:53
  Speaker 2: those people who write those headlines can sleep at night.
• 58:56
  Speaker 2: But I'm sure they're all ideologically captured, so they're just
• 59:01
  Speaker 2: fine with it. Yeah, Josh Dahas. There are offers on
• 59:06
  Speaker 2: the table, ranging from committee appointments to hints of a
• 59:09
  Speaker 2: cabinet post, and even an offer of a judicial appointment.
• 59:14
  Speaker 2: From this is from an article from Brian Lilly. Uh yeah,
• 59:20
  Speaker 2: I mean it's dirty as can be, even if it's not.
• 59:22
  Speaker 2: Even if that's not strictly illegal, which it should be,
• 59:26
  Speaker 2: it sounds like it should be illegal even if it weren't.
• 59:28
  Speaker 2: It's totally morally abhorrent. Again, totally betraying all the people
• 59:32
  Speaker 2: who volunteered, donated, and ultimately voted for these people, totally
• 59:37
  Speaker 2: betraying them. That would have been seen, that would have
• 59:40
  Speaker 2: been seen in the media by the public as a
• 59:43
  Speaker 2: shameful thing, especially when it was coordinated like this to
• 59:47
  Speaker 2: gain a majority government, That would have been seen as
• 59:50
  Speaker 2: deeply dishonorable. Now Canada was rebate into the image of
• 59:55
  Speaker 2: Justice Trudeau, So you know, as long as it's left,
• 59:58
  Speaker 2: as long as it helps radical progressivism, it's fine. All right,
• 1:00:06
  Speaker 2: let's go back to the chat for a second. What
• 1:00:07
  Speaker 2: are guys talking about? We an hour into this already?
• 1:00:11
  Speaker 2: Good lord, good lord, get out sixth tring er. How
• 1:00:14
  Speaker 2: you doing? Get to see you? Uh? As he says,
• 1:00:22
  Speaker 2: I can't wait for my government to proved list of
• 1:00:24
  Speaker 2: food I can pick up at the government store once
• 1:00:27
  Speaker 2: they get it in stock. Well, heavy lewis the NDP.
• 1:00:29
  Speaker 2: He's got the uh. He wants to do what mom
• 1:00:31
  Speaker 2: Donnie's doing. He wants a bunch of government. He wants breadlines.
• 1:00:35
  Speaker 2: That's what he wants. Is he says, Hope I get
• 1:00:41
  Speaker 2: panettas and rice this week. You'd be lucky. Maybe you
• 1:00:46
  Speaker 2: got a loaf of bread made out of ShredIt Chinese newspapers, is,
• 1:00:49
  Speaker 2: he says, useful idiots like good hair and teeth. Yes,
• 1:00:53
  Speaker 2: they do. The thing that I find hilarious still is
• 1:00:55
  Speaker 2: that they keep telling us that hold on, a second,
• 1:00:59
  Speaker 2: hold on a se Let me just pull this up.
• 1:01:03
  Speaker 2: I really should do all this before I start, shouldn't
• 1:01:05
  Speaker 2: I hold on? M uh all right, hold on, give
• 1:01:19
  Speaker 2: me one second? Oh god, damn it. All right, here
• 1:01:27
  Speaker 2: we go hold on, Yeah, I love it. We keep
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 2: hearing that Mark Karney is as handsome he's he's the
• 1:01:39
  Speaker 2: George Clooney of finance. This hobgoblin, really the George Clooney finance.
• 1:01:47
  Speaker 2: They keep trying to push this stuff on it. I
• 1:01:48
  Speaker 2: mean they think that we're actual idiots. And yeah, I
• 1:01:52
  Speaker 2: mean I don't know. I mean we did see the
• 1:01:54
  Speaker 2: last election, right, so we saw what happened there, So
• 1:01:58
  Speaker 2: I don't know. I guess they're may be not entirely wrong.
• 1:02:01
  Speaker 2: That's the Marccardy of international fightance. Oh that's the sorry,
• 1:02:06
  Speaker 2: that's the uh, the Cluity of international finance. Sure, sure
• 1:02:10
  Speaker 2: he is hobgoblin, I say, hobgoblin. All right, Uh let's
• 1:02:19
  Speaker 2: see is he says floor crossings was always slimy, never
• 1:02:22
  Speaker 2: just this obvious. Should be a by election. Look, I
• 1:02:26
  Speaker 2: can understand, like people do change, they just you don't
• 1:02:30
  Speaker 2: just but you don't get five all changing within a
• 1:02:33
  Speaker 2: few months of each other. That's bullshit. I mean, you
• 1:02:36
  Speaker 2: could have somebody who sincerely has a change of heart.
• 1:02:39
  Speaker 2: The politics change. Look, my politics changed, all right, but
• 1:02:44
  Speaker 2: you don't get it like this, like so quickly, and
• 1:02:47
  Speaker 2: also like timed, like perfect timing to maximally hurt Pierre Pouliev,
• 1:02:54
  Speaker 2: like right before the leadership convention for instance. Now the
• 1:02:58
  Speaker 2: whole thing is is gross, and in the past a
• 1:03:02
  Speaker 2: government wouldn't wouldn't have tried that because it would have
• 1:03:06
  Speaker 2: reflected so poorly on them. But now Carney's got that
• 1:03:09
  Speaker 2: media machine saying everything's great, It's awesome, awesome, this is
• 1:03:13
  Speaker 2: a great thing, this is this is how democracy works.
• 1:03:17
  Speaker 2: As he says, this is criminal, it's gone beyond dishonorable. Well,
• 1:03:20
  Speaker 2: what I want to know is hold on. So what
• 1:03:24
  Speaker 2: I want to know is liberal floor crosses. Let's go
• 1:03:26
  Speaker 2: down and see like this guy here, like this line
• 1:03:29
  Speaker 2: ball here, Chris Dontremont. What I want to know is
• 1:03:34
  Speaker 2: Mark Carney. You know, he bragged during the election about
• 1:03:37
  Speaker 2: all of his connections and all the companies connected to
• 1:03:39
  Speaker 2: at all his global connections. In twenty thirty, we're going
• 1:03:43
  Speaker 2: to find out that Chris Dontremont and Matt Genero and
• 1:03:48
  Speaker 2: and the rest of them, Michael Maud that they've got
• 1:03:51
  Speaker 2: cushy jobs at you know, some net zero company, some
• 1:03:56
  Speaker 2: nice six figure job or seven figure job at some
• 1:04:00
  Speaker 2: net zero company. Are we gonna find out because Mark
• 1:04:04
  Speaker 2: Kearney has a lot of influence. He has a lot
• 1:04:06
  Speaker 2: of people in the net zero business who have him
• 1:04:10
  Speaker 2: to think for a lot of subsidies and money and
• 1:04:13
  Speaker 2: a lot of wealth. Are we going to find out
• 1:04:16
  Speaker 2: these people all took nice cushy jobs that are you know,
• 1:04:19
  Speaker 2: that can be connected to Mark Kearney. There's gonna be
• 1:04:23
  Speaker 2: six degrees of Mark Kearney. We're gonna be playing. I
• 1:04:25
  Speaker 2: mean the mainstream media or most of them. Maybe somebody
• 1:04:28
  Speaker 2: from the National Post, you know, maybe you know, the
• 1:04:30
  Speaker 2: Toronto Sun might dig into it, but the rest of
• 1:04:35
  Speaker 2: the mainstream media is not gonna be interested. It'll have
• 1:04:37
  Speaker 2: to be an independent journalist that does it. That's the
• 1:04:41
  Speaker 2: state of journalism now in Canada. I mean, maybe it's
• 1:04:43
  Speaker 2: actually better this way, I don't know, but in any case, Yeah,
• 1:04:48
  Speaker 2: let's move on. What do we got now? So Holly
• 1:04:57
  Speaker 2: Doan from Blacklock's reporter here is talking about well worked here.
• 1:05:03
  Speaker 2: She's got an article about the National Observer, which is
• 1:05:07
  Speaker 2: funded by the government. Now, the Canadian government spends enormous
• 1:05:11
  Speaker 2: amounts of money funding media, and it's it's actually hard
• 1:05:15
  Speaker 2: to figure out how much because it's coming from so
• 1:05:17
  Speaker 2: many different places. But h Hold on a second, did
• 1:05:24
  Speaker 2: I have here we go so black Blocks Reporter eco
• 1:05:29
  Speaker 2: news site number one in grants, so a Vancouver climate
• 1:05:34
  Speaker 2: news site. The National Observer is the nation's heaviest user
• 1:05:38
  Speaker 2: of Department of Canadian Heritage grants newly disclosed newly disclosed
• 1:05:43
  Speaker 2: record show. So it's an ECO site. So that's right
• 1:05:47
  Speaker 2: up Mark Carne's alley, Right, Uh yeah. I really question
• 1:05:54
  Speaker 2: the value and the wisdom of giving the government so
• 1:05:58
  Speaker 2: much power over the media, like literally being their paymaster.
• 1:06:03
  Speaker 2: So the number one site in grants is an eco
• 1:06:09
  Speaker 2: is an eco site. The National Observer a climate news site.
• 1:06:13
  Speaker 2: Mark Karney right, net zero, King of the Planet. It
• 1:06:19
  Speaker 2: almost seems like there could be some corruption here, or
• 1:06:22
  Speaker 2: some conflict of interest or something. I don't know. The
• 1:06:27
  Speaker 2: independent news site really independent, received more than one point
• 1:06:31
  Speaker 2: three million in taxpayers eight. How can a how can
• 1:06:35
  Speaker 2: any new site be independent when they're getting one point
• 1:06:38
  Speaker 2: three million dollars from the government. I mean, these things
• 1:06:42
  Speaker 2: don't seem to work together, do they. Let's to cover
• 1:06:46
  Speaker 2: the equivalent of twenty three employee salaries while it's CEO
• 1:06:49
  Speaker 2: served on a volunteer board responsible for approving grants. Oh
• 1:06:55
  Speaker 2: Man one big happy family. The National Observer record speak
• 1:07:00
  Speaker 2: for itself regarding our independence for any government except for
• 1:07:03
  Speaker 2: the one point three million dollars in taxpayer aid. Aside
• 1:07:07
  Speaker 2: from that, should we take a look, all right, what
• 1:07:18
  Speaker 2: have we got National Observer? Let's see surprise win for
• 1:07:21
  Speaker 2: climate survival? Climate survival is that where we're calling it now?
• 1:07:27
  Speaker 2: Alberta falls far short of expectations on methane regulations. Oh dear,
• 1:07:33
  Speaker 2: if Alberta refuses to introduce a credible methane reduction plan
• 1:07:38
  Speaker 2: and then the federal regulation should stand. Well, there's a
• 1:07:40
  Speaker 2: bunch of Brookfield companies that can help with that, I
• 1:07:42
  Speaker 2: think right right, Let's see, real climate action requires immediate
• 1:07:48
  Speaker 2: mandates with teeth. Better put some more taxes on and
• 1:07:52
  Speaker 2: use some more and you know as subsidized some net
• 1:07:56
  Speaker 2: zero stuff. Vancouver sound artist turns me stories and science
• 1:08:01
  Speaker 2: and to blueprint for living with nature, and I mean
• 1:08:05
  Speaker 2: it looks pretty pretty calm there, So that's good. Good
• 1:08:09
  Speaker 2: for him. The government probably gave him one point three
• 1:08:12
  Speaker 2: million dollars to make that recording. I'm guessing gas tax
• 1:08:19
  Speaker 2: holiday gives drivers temporary relief, but an evey eliminates their
• 1:08:23
  Speaker 2: root problem. See just everything here is stuff that Mark
• 1:08:27
  Speaker 2: Carney would love. Let's see Avi Lewis, that's the leader
• 1:08:33
  Speaker 2: of the NDP, the even further left party in Canada
• 1:08:37
  Speaker 2: than the Liberals. Avvy Lewis is smart to shed light
• 1:08:40
  Speaker 2: on surveillance pricing. So any article, any headline that says
• 1:08:46
  Speaker 2: Avi Lewis is smart, that has the name Evy Lewis
• 1:08:49
  Speaker 2: and the words smart in it, unless there's a knot
• 1:08:52
  Speaker 2: in there as well, is just immediately discredits itself. So
• 1:08:56
  Speaker 2: let's move on from that big tent. Politics is back
• 1:09:03
  Speaker 2: in Canada, maybe better for it. So is this? Uh?
• 1:09:08
  Speaker 2: Is this about the floor crossers who were like super
• 1:09:12
  Speaker 2: fascist far right looties like the day before they decided
• 1:09:17
  Speaker 2: they wanted to be liberals? Is that is? That?
• 1:09:20
  Speaker 7: Is?
• 1:09:21
  Speaker 12: This?
• 1:09:21
  Speaker 2: Is it about that? I don't know, trying to smooth
• 1:09:24
  Speaker 2: that over for the liberals. Let's see Danielle Smith is
• 1:09:31
  Speaker 2: already turning out Berta into America's fifty first day. That's
• 1:09:34
  Speaker 2: just total nonsense, total nonsense. Let's say the twenty billion
• 1:09:40
  Speaker 2: a year that they give to Ottawa as it would say,
• 1:09:44
  Speaker 2: they're probably I mean, do you want to know the
• 1:09:47
  Speaker 2: real truth? You want to know the real truth? Canada
• 1:09:50
  Speaker 2: is America's fifty first state in terms of GDP per capita. Yeah.
• 1:10:02
  Speaker 2: By the way, the independence movement is not interested in
• 1:10:06
  Speaker 2: becoming the fifty first state. That's just the lie that's
• 1:10:08
  Speaker 2: being spread by I guess like Canada's National Observer here
• 1:10:13
  Speaker 2: right with their headline. That's just not true. They want
• 1:10:15
  Speaker 2: to be an independent country. That's what they want. Anything
• 1:10:19
  Speaker 2: else is a lie. Let's see giving rights to nature.
• 1:10:24
  Speaker 2: So this is all right up Mark Carti's alley, isn't it.
• 1:10:27
  Speaker 2: Let's see. Let's see all right, Eco News the site
• 1:10:37
  Speaker 2: eco neews site number one in grants. I wonder why.
• 1:10:41
  Speaker 2: I wonder why I thought I would just take a
• 1:10:43
  Speaker 2: look at some other grants. Now it's hard to find
• 1:10:45
  Speaker 2: them all because they're all scattered in different parts of
• 1:10:48
  Speaker 2: the government is funding. But I just typed in journalism.
• 1:10:54
  Speaker 2: This is the Government of Canada site grants and contributions.
• 1:10:59
  Speaker 2: And the first one that comes up. There's forty four
• 1:11:01
  Speaker 2: hundred and fifty two records. By the way, first thing
• 1:11:03
  Speaker 2: that comes up is Canadian News Media Association twelve point
• 1:11:08
  Speaker 2: five million dollars. More than twelve point five million dollars.
• 1:11:12
  Speaker 2: Local Journalism Initiative twenty twenty five to twenty twenty seven
• 1:11:16
  Speaker 2: twelve million dollars. Who are they? News Media Canada, But
• 1:11:24
  Speaker 2: that's who this is. News Media Canada is the voice
• 1:11:28
  Speaker 2: of the print and digital media industry in Canada, representing
• 1:11:31
  Speaker 2: hundreds of trusted titles in every province and territory. And
• 1:11:36
  Speaker 2: hold on a second though, yeah, never mind. News Media
• 1:11:41
  Speaker 2: Canada is an advocate. News Media Canada is an advocate
• 1:11:45
  Speaker 2: in public policy for daily and community media outlets and
• 1:11:49
  Speaker 2: contributes to the ongoing evolution of the news media industry
• 1:11:53
  Speaker 2: by raising awareness and promoting the benefits of news media
• 1:11:57
  Speaker 2: across all platforms. News Media Canada cts on behalf of
• 1:12:02
  Speaker 2: its members in a proactive manner for the benefits of
• 1:12:06
  Speaker 2: corporate news organizations as well as independently owned news outlets
• 1:12:10
  Speaker 2: like Member services include educational webinars, legal resources, auditing services,
• 1:12:15
  Speaker 2: regional seminars, newsletters, press release service and award programs. But
• 1:12:19
  Speaker 2: it sounds a lot like this is kind of a
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 2: lobbying organization lobbying the government right and is the voice
• 1:12:28
  Speaker 2: of the print and digital media industry in Canada, representing
• 1:12:31
  Speaker 2: hundreds of trusted titles in every province and territory. And
• 1:12:37
  Speaker 2: this is the Canadian News Media Association. So they're funded
• 1:12:44
  Speaker 2: by the government to represent all of this media, so
• 1:12:50
  Speaker 2: kind of a middleman in between, right, maybe like a
• 1:12:52
  Speaker 2: lobbying organization. And it feels like there's maybe a bit
• 1:12:57
  Speaker 2: of conflict of interest here, right, because they appear to
• 1:13:00
  Speaker 2: be funded. They're funded, you know, to the twoe of
• 1:13:06
  Speaker 2: twelve over twelve point five million dollars by the government.
• 1:13:11
  Speaker 2: It feels like there's kind of like a I don't know,
• 1:13:14
  Speaker 2: something kind of dirty happening here, right. It feels like
• 1:13:17
  Speaker 2: things are kind of rigged, doesn't it just a little bit?
• 1:13:23
  Speaker 2: All right, let's uh, let's see all right, so that's it,
• 1:13:34
  Speaker 2: let's move on. That says, let's go to the chat.
• 1:13:37
  Speaker 2: Back to the chat for a second. I need some
• 1:13:39
  Speaker 2: ranchers and get tired, all right, Brian Lynch says, I'm
• 1:13:53
  Speaker 2: an old boomer and can rarely stay up to listen
• 1:13:56
  Speaker 2: live great commentary and discourse. The level of absurdity of
• 1:14:00
  Speaker 2: absurdity nowadays is beyond my comprehension. Thank you, chie well,
• 1:14:04
  Speaker 2: thank you for coming in listening and being part of
• 1:14:06
  Speaker 2: the chat, because that's really the whole point of this show.
• 1:14:10
  Speaker 2: But if you're tired, we might have a little something
• 1:14:14
  Speaker 2: for you, give you that little boost you might need
• 1:14:17
  Speaker 2: into the next part of the show. I don't know, people,
• 1:14:19
  Speaker 2: what do you think? Has everybody tried having a couple
• 1:14:22
  Speaker 2: of coffees, a couple of double espressos, having a bit
• 1:14:26
  Speaker 2: of crack, some of that blue math from breaking bed,
• 1:14:29
  Speaker 2: chewing on I know ten eleven, twelve, thirteen, fourteen, fifteen,
• 1:14:34
  Speaker 2: polar Bear, adrenal glance. Everybody tried that I have, and
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 2: you know what, nothing I got nothing, nothing works, nothing works.
• 1:14:41
  Speaker 2: I mean, what could we possibly get after all of that?
• 1:14:44
  Speaker 2: Where could we find the kind of energy that we
• 1:14:47
  Speaker 2: need to continue with this show? I have no idea.
• 1:14:51
  Speaker 2: I mean, I can't imagine where we went energy and
• 1:15:02
  Speaker 2: teapot Woo. I'm jack now, I'm jack down that day
• 1:15:09
  Speaker 2: them energy people woo. Yeah. I still don't think they're
• 1:15:13
  Speaker 2: saying that their best representativeself. I think they could sell
• 1:15:16
  Speaker 2: it better. Quite frankly, powerful stuff though, powerful stuff and confusing, bewildering,
• 1:15:22
  Speaker 2: actually powerfully confusing. Uh A lot of says stink and
• 1:15:28
  Speaker 2: filthy gunnies, as he says, tired on a Tuesday. I
• 1:15:36
  Speaker 2: think we have something for that, and we did is
• 1:15:44
  Speaker 2: he says Blue myth sounds fun. Don't do the blue math.
• 1:15:49
  Speaker 2: Don't even watch Breaking Bad, is he? Okay, just stay
• 1:15:52
  Speaker 2: away from that shit. You don't want that shit. Let's see,
• 1:15:56
  Speaker 2: Rosie says, muting. Let's say we did the chocolate last night. Rosie,
• 1:16:01
  Speaker 2: we did the chocolate last night. Should be coming after
• 1:16:04
  Speaker 2: me for chocolate? We did it last night? Oh maybe
• 1:16:06
  Speaker 2: later on. I don't know now, feel bad now, feel mean?
• 1:16:09
  Speaker 2: Maybe we'll do some later on. Okay. Uh, she still
• 1:16:15
  Speaker 2: looks like a mini van, Nevada said, But u a
• 1:16:18
  Speaker 2: they van? Are them Van? Sorry, don't be a big
• 1:16:22
  Speaker 2: at Nevada them van.
• 1:16:27
  Speaker 3: Uh?
• 1:16:28
  Speaker 2: As, he says, Yet your rewarn does the media and
• 1:16:30
  Speaker 2: schools were taking decades ago. Uh? Yeah, it's a generational
• 1:16:35
  Speaker 2: problem now unfortunately, like the teaching colleges have been just
• 1:16:41
  Speaker 2: turning out like like Red Guard. Okay, it's it's actually
• 1:16:48
  Speaker 2: scary what's been happening. Nevada says. We have the same
• 1:16:53
  Speaker 2: problem here with the media. Well I cover that as well,
• 1:16:57
  Speaker 2: And yes, it's the same everywhere. I think you could
• 1:16:59
  Speaker 2: there all just interchangeable, Like you could take Jake Tapper
• 1:17:04
  Speaker 2: and just put him on the CBC. Nobody would know
• 1:17:06
  Speaker 2: any difference. You could take Rosie Rosemary Barton down, put
• 1:17:10
  Speaker 2: her on MSNBC or MS now they call it now,
• 1:17:14
  Speaker 2: and maybe she'd you know, I have a little bit
• 1:17:15
  Speaker 2: more freedom to be uh, to be wrong about everything.
• 1:17:19
  Speaker 2: But she'd fit in just fine, say it. With the BBC.
• 1:17:22
  Speaker 2: They're just all interchangeable. They're all the exact same thing,
• 1:17:25
  Speaker 2: with the same job, and it ain't informing you and
• 1:17:28
  Speaker 2: being objective. That ain't their job anymore. Let's see, all right,
• 1:17:40
  Speaker 2: let's get to the next thing. What are we talking
• 1:17:42
  Speaker 2: about now? Uh? All right, So hold on a second,
• 1:17:48
  Speaker 2: I got a coffee, Get all right? Where do I
• 1:17:57
  Speaker 2: want to start this? Where do I want to start this?
• 1:18:00
  Speaker 2: Hold on a second, Where do I want to start this?
• 1:18:08
  Speaker 2: Where do we want to start? Let's see, let's start
• 1:18:15
  Speaker 2: with the food Professor. PM Carti announced this morning the
• 1:18:19
  Speaker 2: creation of Canada's first sovereign wealth fund, echoing models already
• 1:18:24
  Speaker 2: in place at the provincial level. Reporters asked sharp, substant
• 1:18:28
  Speaker 2: substantive questions. Easily one of the best press conferences I've
• 1:18:32
  Speaker 2: seen in years. Well, the thing is he's got his
• 1:18:34
  Speaker 2: majority now, so it doesn't matter. So now they can
• 1:18:36
  Speaker 2: pretend to be journalists again, when pressed on why Canadians
• 1:18:40
  Speaker 2: should care, especially as many struggle to pay for groceries,
• 1:18:44
  Speaker 2: the Prime Minister suggested he doesn't expect everyone to understand
• 1:18:48
  Speaker 2: or be concerned. He did call himself an elitist, a
• 1:18:56
  Speaker 2: globalist elitist, so you know you have to remember that
• 1:19:00
  Speaker 2: at let's see hold out a second, where so here's
• 1:19:07
  Speaker 2: he's gonna here, He's gonna tell us about is Canada
• 1:19:10
  Speaker 2: strong fund And of course this is all at the
• 1:19:14
  Speaker 2: very least very misleading, but uh, Marty up North posted this.
• 1:19:20
  Speaker 2: He says that, uh, while Mark Carney's Canada Strong fund
• 1:19:23
  Speaker 2: ed is peak Davos meets Late Night Info Marshall, All right,
• 1:19:29
  Speaker 2: let's take a look.
• 1:19:31
  Speaker 1: This is our country, it's your future, and we're building
• 1:19:35
  Speaker 1: it together. We're catalyzing a series of nation building projects
• 1:19:40
  Speaker 1: in energy and trade, critical minerals, transport, data and beyond.
• 1:19:46
  Speaker 1: These projects will make Canada stronger, more resilient, and more independent.
• 1:19:51
  Speaker 2: Or they're all just going to be taxpayer funded boondoggles.
• 1:19:54
  Speaker 2: And it sure looks like it's gonna be that.
• 1:19:57
  Speaker 1: They'll create good jobs and grow our economy, providing the
• 1:20:00
  Speaker 1: resources that we need to take care of ourselves and
• 1:20:04
  Speaker 1: take care of each other.
• 1:20:05
  Speaker 2: Well, you know, we do have that gravel lot with
• 1:20:08
  Speaker 2: an rvpad on it. Sorry, I mean the spaceport, the
• 1:20:12
  Speaker 2: two hundred million dollars spaceport.
• 1:20:14
  Speaker 1: So anyway, and to make sure that all Canadians can
• 1:20:19
  Speaker 1: share in these benefits, we're creating the Canada Strong Fund,
• 1:20:24
  Speaker 1: Canada's first sovereign wealth fund to Canada.
• 1:20:27
  Speaker 2: Now it's not well, it's not what you're thinking when
• 1:20:30
  Speaker 2: you hear sovereign wealth fund. But we'll get to.
• 1:20:32
  Speaker 1: That Strong Fund. We'll invest alongside the private sector in
• 1:20:36
  Speaker 1: nation building projects to create wealth for Canadians today and
• 1:20:40
  Speaker 1: our kids tomorrow. And if you have a bit of
• 1:20:43
  Speaker 1: extra money, we'll make it easy for you to invest
• 1:20:46
  Speaker 1: in the fund to help build Canada Strong.
• 1:20:50
  Speaker 2: So there you go, Canada. If you've still got any
• 1:20:52
  Speaker 2: extra money left, you might as well just give it
• 1:20:55
  Speaker 2: to Mark Cardi. Now for the future.
• 1:20:58
  Speaker 1: For all Indians are choosing to buy Canadian, to explore
• 1:21:03
  Speaker 1: Canadian and build Canadian.
• 1:21:05
  Speaker 2: Well except for you, because you still got what ninety
• 1:21:08
  Speaker 2: percent of your investments in the States. Family lives in
• 1:21:11
  Speaker 2: the States, kids all go to school in the States,
• 1:21:13
  Speaker 2: so you're not really doing that so much. It's just yeah,
• 1:21:16
  Speaker 2: you want Canadians to But all right, let's continue.
• 1:21:19
  Speaker 1: Because it's our country and we're building our future together.
• 1:21:25
  Speaker 2: Are we. I'm surprised they didn't have Michael Moore. I'm
• 1:21:30
  Speaker 2: surprised they didn't have Mike Myers fly up to do
• 1:21:32
  Speaker 2: an elbows up thing with him. You know, I've got
• 1:21:36
  Speaker 2: a feeling, I've got a feeling that those elbows are
• 1:21:40
  Speaker 2: going to start coming down. Over the next year or so,
• 1:21:43
  Speaker 2: things continue to get worse in Canada. You know, he
• 1:21:46
  Speaker 2: had Mike Myers come down and build himself, putting his
• 1:21:49
  Speaker 2: elbows up, and then you know, immediately went to the
• 1:21:51
  Speaker 2: airport and he had his elbows up again because you know,
• 1:21:53
  Speaker 2: when he's getting scanned to get onto the first class
• 1:21:57
  Speaker 2: ticket on the plane back to la where he lived,
• 1:22:00
  Speaker 2: where he loves. Right, And you know Joni Mitchell again,
• 1:22:04
  Speaker 2: she's she's she thinks the world of Mark Carney, Right,
• 1:22:08
  Speaker 2: Mike Myers thinks the world of Mark Carney. Not enough
• 1:22:11
  Speaker 2: to move back to Canada. They sure hate Trump too,
• 1:22:15
  Speaker 2: Not enough to move back to Canada. I mean, nothing's
• 1:22:18
  Speaker 2: worth that, right, nothing's worth that. You can't like Mark
• 1:22:22
  Speaker 2: Carty enough to move back to Canada. Uh yeah, all right,
• 1:22:29
  Speaker 2: in any case, where is this coming from? So people
• 1:22:32
  Speaker 2: think about When people hear sovereign wealth wealth fund, they
• 1:22:36
  Speaker 2: think about Norway's Sovereign Wealth Fund, officially the Government Pension
• 1:22:41
  Speaker 2: Fund Global, or simply the Oil Fund, is the world's largest,
• 1:22:46
  Speaker 2: managing over two trillion in assets as of late twenty
• 1:22:49
  Speaker 2: twenty five. Established in nineteen ninety to manage surplus oil
• 1:22:54
  Speaker 2: and gas revenues, which, yeah, surplus oil and gas revenues,
• 1:23:02
  Speaker 2: it acts as a long term financial reserve for future generations.
• 1:23:07
  Speaker 2: The fund is managed by norsees Bank Investment Management and
• 1:23:11
  Speaker 2: invests solely outside of Norway to avoid overheating the domestic economy.
• 1:23:19
  Speaker 2: So Canada's sovereign wealth fund is not going to be
• 1:23:23
  Speaker 2: based on surpluses. So that's normally what happens the country
• 1:23:27
  Speaker 2: Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Norway. They have surpluses because their country
• 1:23:31
  Speaker 2: is ablely managed fiscally right, unlike Canada. So but if
• 1:23:37
  Speaker 2: a country is does has has if a country does
• 1:23:41
  Speaker 2: have responsible leadership and responsible fiscal policy, they can take
• 1:23:45
  Speaker 2: the surplus money from things like oil and gas revenue
• 1:23:49
  Speaker 2: and create a sovereign wealth fund. So they've got all
• 1:23:52
  Speaker 2: this extra money sitting around. They think, well, we should
• 1:23:54
  Speaker 2: invest it and grow it. That's what they do. What
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 2: Canada has is a what we're going to have is
• 1:24:01
  Speaker 2: a sovereign debt fund, because the taxpayers are going to
• 1:24:05
  Speaker 2: have to put up the twenty five billion in seed
• 1:24:07
  Speaker 2: money so and then and also pay the interest on
• 1:24:12
  Speaker 2: that because it's obviously going to have to be borrowed,
• 1:24:15
  Speaker 2: so already not looking great. And it's also supposed to
• 1:24:18
  Speaker 2: be invested in Canada, which is a really bad idea. Right,
• 1:24:23
  Speaker 2: let's say invest solely outside of Norway to avoid overheating
• 1:24:27
  Speaker 2: the domestic economy. You go through recession all of a sudden,
• 1:24:31
  Speaker 2: that's obviously going to affect your It's uh, they're doing
• 1:24:35
  Speaker 2: it all wrong, is what I'm saying. But I've got
• 1:24:39
  Speaker 2: a feeling that Mark Currenty's got some really great ideas
• 1:24:42
  Speaker 2: on where you know, on a bunch of net zero
• 1:24:44
  Speaker 2: projects that this sovereign wealth fund, your your twenty five
• 1:24:48
  Speaker 2: billion dollars can go to. But you know, don't worry
• 1:24:51
  Speaker 2: about that because it's going to be independent, right, totally independent.
• 1:24:54
  Speaker 2: For sure. He wouldn't lie to you, he wouldn't mislead you.
• 1:25:01
  Speaker 2: Here's Franco Rizano Carni did not create a severin well,
• 1:25:06
  Speaker 2: so Carnie did not create a sovereign wealth fund, he says.
• 1:25:09
  Speaker 2: Let's take a look.
• 1:25:12
  Speaker 15: Carne wants you to think he just created a sovereign
• 1:25:15
  Speaker 15: wealth fund. Carne did not. Okay, Carney just created a
• 1:25:19
  Speaker 15: debt fueled corporate slush fund.
• 1:25:22
  Speaker 2: Okay. So here's what's going on.
• 1:25:23
  Speaker 15: Carne just made an announcemente Canada's first ever sovereign wealth fund. No, no, no, no,
• 1:25:28
  Speaker 15: here's what's going on. The government is already more than
• 1:25:30
  Speaker 15: a trillion dollars in debt, and Carne just announced he's
• 1:25:33
  Speaker 15: gonna borrow another twenty five billion dollars to dump into
• 1:25:37
  Speaker 15: this new fund. And then the fund is going to
• 1:25:40
  Speaker 15: subsidize Canadian companies. That is not a sovereign wealth fund.
• 1:25:44
  Speaker 3: Okay.
• 1:25:45
  Speaker 15: That is a debt fueld corporate slush fund that gambles
• 1:25:50
  Speaker 15: taxpayers money, your money on corporate welfare. Okay. The whole
• 1:25:54
  Speaker 15: point of a gold standard sovereign wealth fund like Norway's
• 1:25:59
  Speaker 15: is to save money, right. Norway saves its oil revenue
• 1:26:04
  Speaker 15: into its sovereign wealth fund, and then it invests the
• 1:26:08
  Speaker 15: interests and only invests that interest in projects abroad, right
• 1:26:13
  Speaker 15: to help with diversification, to guard against politicians dumping wasting
• 1:26:18
  Speaker 15: money on corporate welfare or their own pet projects. In
• 1:26:22
  Speaker 15: start contrasts, Okay, Carney's corporate slush fund is built on
• 1:26:27
  Speaker 15: borrowed money, twenty five billion dollars of borrowed money, and
• 1:26:31
  Speaker 15: then it's going to subsidize Canadian companies, picking winners and
• 1:26:34
  Speaker 15: losers in the Canadian marketplace. Again, this is not a
• 1:26:39
  Speaker 15: sovereign wealth fund, right the whole point.
• 1:26:42
  Speaker 2: Did somebody mention something about Carne's conflicts of interest? Anybody
• 1:26:45
  Speaker 2: mentioned something about that? Anybody? Let's see, maybe I'm just
• 1:26:48
  Speaker 2: hearing it in my head all the time. Let's see,
• 1:26:50
  Speaker 2: So this is a Franco Terrazanto Canadian Taxpayers Federation. Let's
• 1:26:58
  Speaker 2: see what's going on here, cbcwatcher. So this made it
• 1:27:02
  Speaker 2: out too well, this is at CTV. So this made
• 1:27:05
  Speaker 2: it out to CTV. Is let's take a look.
• 1:27:10
  Speaker 16: All right, let's get back to our top story. Prime
• 1:27:12
  Speaker 16: Minister Markcarti announcing his government is going to create what
• 1:27:14
  Speaker 16: he's calling the Accountabi's Strong Fund. This is a sovereign
• 1:27:17
  Speaker 16: wealth fund, basically a state owned investment fund investing in
• 1:27:20
  Speaker 16: things like real estate, oil and gas stocks, you name it.
• 1:27:23
  Speaker 16: Let's bring in political analyst Lydia Miljad, who's been standing
• 1:27:26
  Speaker 16: by the way in on this. The takeaways what it means, Lydia,
• 1:27:29
  Speaker 16: good to see you.
• 1:27:30
  Speaker 2: What do you make of it?
• 1:27:31
  Speaker 10: I see you, Todd.
• 1:27:33
  Speaker 17: I mean, in theory, it's a great idea to you know,
• 1:27:36
  Speaker 17: if you look at Norway's Sovereign Fund, it's an amazing vehicle.
• 1:27:39
  Speaker 17: What they did in Norway was invest the surplus revenue
• 1:27:42
  Speaker 17: from their oil and gas industry, and they had really
• 1:27:46
  Speaker 17: strict controls about how much they could pull out. I
• 1:27:48
  Speaker 17: think it was like three percent a year, and so
• 1:27:50
  Speaker 17: they've been able to essentially fund a lot of their
• 1:27:52
  Speaker 17: social services from that that fund because they were really
• 1:27:56
  Speaker 17: robust in how much they could draw away from it
• 1:27:59
  Speaker 17: and how much they were hard to put in.
• 1:28:01
  Speaker 10: Canadian examples aren't so good.
• 1:28:03
  Speaker 17: I mean, the closest one I can think of off
• 1:28:06
  Speaker 17: the top of my head is the Alberta Heritage Fund.
• 1:28:09
  Speaker 17: It's been criticized for being mismanaged, for the government not
• 1:28:12
  Speaker 17: reinvesting enough in it, not growing it enough, and sort
• 1:28:15
  Speaker 17: of pulling out the fund when they wanted to balance
• 1:28:19
  Speaker 17: their books. And so really the real crux of this
• 1:28:22
  Speaker 17: is going to be in the details. How are they
• 1:28:24
  Speaker 17: going to manage the fund? How are they going to
• 1:28:27
  Speaker 17: invest surplus? I think that you know right now they
• 1:28:30
  Speaker 17: actually do have some surplus from just the tax revenue.
• 1:28:33
  Speaker 10: Alone because of the price of gas. So is that
• 1:28:36
  Speaker 10: what they're planning to do, We don't know.
• 1:28:38
  Speaker 17: They also had this sort of mushy answer about how
• 1:28:41
  Speaker 17: there was going to be you and I, for example,
• 1:28:44
  Speaker 17: could decide that we would want to invest in it
• 1:28:46
  Speaker 17: as well.
• 1:28:47
  Speaker 10: Interesting.
• 1:28:48
  Speaker 17: Interesting, So it sounds like they just want to have
• 1:28:50
  Speaker 17: an equity fund essentially.
• 1:28:52
  Speaker 16: Yeah, basically an initial investment of about twenty five billion,
• 1:28:55
  Speaker 16: as you know, and this idea the Prime Minister mentioned this.
• 1:28:58
  Speaker 16: Liddy just referenced it that Canadians could contribute and benefit
• 1:29:02
  Speaker 16: from the fund alongside even international partners, the private sector,
• 1:29:06
  Speaker 16: you name it.
• 1:29:06
  Speaker 10: Just a big pool pot of money. Yeah, and we've
• 1:29:10
  Speaker 10: seen those before.
• 1:29:11
  Speaker 17: I mean, in theory, CPP is a big pool of
• 1:29:13
  Speaker 17: money for our pensions. Again, I haven't been especially impressed
• 1:29:17
  Speaker 17: with my return on investment from my Canada pension plan
• 1:29:20
  Speaker 17: as opposed to a private pension plans that I hold.
• 1:29:23
  Speaker 17: So the real issue is how are they going to
• 1:29:26
  Speaker 17: manifest this. Now, there is a transitional agency that's going
• 1:29:30
  Speaker 17: to create this. They say it's going to be arm's length.
• 1:29:32
  Speaker 17: They're going to have a CEO and an independent board
• 1:29:34
  Speaker 17: of directors, and so we'll have to see how they
• 1:29:37
  Speaker 17: do it.
• 1:29:37
  Speaker 2: Now, my guess is that currently is going to that
• 1:29:41
  Speaker 2: the fund is going to My guess is that the
• 1:29:44
  Speaker 2: fund is going to blow a bunch of money subsidizing
• 1:29:47
  Speaker 2: a bunch of net zero stuff and Canadians will be
• 1:29:50
  Speaker 2: left with nothing other than the debt of the twenty
• 1:29:53
  Speaker 2: five billion and all the interest on it. That's that's
• 1:29:56
  Speaker 2: my guess.
• 1:29:57
  Speaker 10: The other thing to.
• 1:29:58
  Speaker 17: Note is that that twenty five billion dollars is over
• 1:30:01
  Speaker 17: three years, so we don't know how much they're going
• 1:30:03
  Speaker 17: to at least today, we don't know how much they're
• 1:30:05
  Speaker 17: going to invest this year, but over the next three years,
• 1:30:07
  Speaker 17: that's what they plan on investing.
• 1:30:09
  Speaker 16: You mentioned Norway, the Saudist, China and other countries that
• 1:30:12
  Speaker 16: do have these sorts of sovereign wealth funds. I mean,
• 1:30:15
  Speaker 16: in some cases they are worth a ton of money,
• 1:30:18
  Speaker 16: and it also gives those countries a lot of economic
• 1:30:21
  Speaker 16: clout and muscle on the world stage.
• 1:30:24
  Speaker 15: Yeah.
• 1:30:24
  Speaker 17: Absolutely, and again there's nothing wrong in theory about reinvesting
• 1:30:28
  Speaker 17: your surpluses. And I think the question that was put
• 1:30:31
  Speaker 17: to the Prime Minister today is an important one.
• 1:30:33
  Speaker 10: Where's the money? Where you finding the money for this?
• 1:30:35
  Speaker 17: We still have deficits, And even though they're saying the
• 1:30:38
  Speaker 17: deficits is it going to be as high as we
• 1:30:40
  Speaker 17: initially projected, the fact remains we have deficits, not surpluses.
• 1:30:44
  Speaker 17: So the equivalence would be we're going to be boring
• 1:30:46
  Speaker 17: off the credit cards again to put money in an
• 1:30:49
  Speaker 17: investment vehicle that we really don't know how it's going
• 1:30:51
  Speaker 17: to be managed. What is the investment criteria going to be?
• 1:30:54
  Speaker 17: So there's a lot of unknowns about this. So there
• 1:30:56
  Speaker 17: is still aric risk involved. And we have all sorts
• 1:31:00
  Speaker 17: of other agencies in this country that are presumably there
• 1:31:03
  Speaker 17: to fund major projects. And that's the other thing that
• 1:31:06
  Speaker 17: Carney said is that this fund is now going to
• 1:31:08
  Speaker 17: be used not just as an investment vehicle, but as
• 1:31:11
  Speaker 17: a funding mechanism for these big projects.
• 1:31:14
  Speaker 10: So I'm not sure how the moth works for mister Carney.
• 1:31:17
  Speaker 17: Maybe you need a PhD in economics to understand this one.
• 1:31:22
  Speaker 2: Maybe you need a PhD in economics to understand this one.
• 1:31:25
  Speaker 2: She says, but Carney Carney Oxford Oxford Carney, Yeah, credentials,
• 1:31:31
  Speaker 2: but credentials. Yeah. I've been predicting since uh, Mark Cardi
• 1:31:37
  Speaker 2: became Prime Minister in effactancy, since the Liberal leadership Rice
• 1:31:41
  Speaker 2: that he was going to max out the national credit card.
• 1:31:44
  Speaker 2: It looks like I was right. Uh. Michelle Remple Garner says,
• 1:31:49
  Speaker 2: to be fair, this headline is wrong. It says here
• 1:31:52
  Speaker 2: Carney to announce sovereign wealth fund, it would be a
• 1:31:56
  Speaker 2: debt fund, not a wealth fund. Huh. True sovereign wealth
• 1:32:00
  Speaker 2: funds at true, Sovereign wealth funds like Norway's are built
• 1:32:02
  Speaker 2: from surpluses. Canada is running massive deficits. This is akin
• 1:32:07
  Speaker 2: to a man who's in debt borrowing hundreds of thousands
• 1:32:09
  Speaker 2: to buy stocks. Yeah. Yeah, but Oxford though, Oxford, but credentials.
• 1:32:19
  Speaker 2: Let's see what's what's going on here. Jason Kenny, former
• 1:32:24
  Speaker 2: Premier of Alberta, says, what is he talking about? Well,
• 1:32:27
  Speaker 2: let's see what is he saying here. Mark Kearney on you.
• 1:32:31
  Speaker 18: Said the goal of it is to grow wealth, and
• 1:32:34
  Speaker 18: so I'm wondering to what extent though that you have
• 1:32:36
  Speaker 18: already coordinated or consulted with the provinces that really have
• 1:32:40
  Speaker 18: control over There is a lot of the oil and gas,
• 1:32:42
  Speaker 18: for example, generating sectors at Alberta's Scatchman in Newfoundland. Why
• 1:32:48
  Speaker 18: how can you persuade them it's not ultimately a resource
• 1:32:52
  Speaker 18: wealth grab.
• 1:32:53
  Speaker 1: Well, it's not the there's a series. Sometimes if I
• 1:33:01
  Speaker 1: made the discussion of how we're building the country, how
• 1:33:05
  Speaker 1: Canadians are building the country gets reduced to one sector
• 1:33:09
  Speaker 1: or one type of infrastructure in one sector. There is
• 1:33:13
  Speaker 1: a very broad range of things that we're Canadians are
• 1:33:16
  Speaker 1: doing to grow Canada strong. That involves entirely new ports
• 1:33:21
  Speaker 1: in the Arctic. It involves a host of critical minerals.
• 1:33:26
  Speaker 1: It involves data infrastructure and other infrastructure that will be necessary.
• 1:33:31
  Speaker 1: Involves a series of a series of investments above and
• 1:33:35
  Speaker 1: beyond the TG the high speed rail and others. Where
• 1:33:40
  Speaker 1: there is at the heart of all of these projects,
• 1:33:43
  Speaker 1: including in resources provincial jurisdiction, including resources where the federal
• 1:33:51
  Speaker 1: government is catalyzing helping to make the project happen through
• 1:33:56
  Speaker 1: tracks you.
• 1:33:57
  Speaker 2: Said, catalyze everybody take a shot.
• 1:33:59
  Speaker 1: Incentive through some other support, regulatory or other support. And
• 1:34:05
  Speaker 1: at the core there is a commercial business a commercial
• 1:34:09
  Speaker 1: project that is making a profit. It is fair, right,
• 1:34:13
  Speaker 1: just smart for Canadians to have a share directly of
• 1:34:18
  Speaker 1: those profits. And that's what the fund is going to
• 1:34:21
  Speaker 1: make possible. And this is a great thing for Canadians
• 1:34:24
  Speaker 1: today and very much tomorrow because.
• 1:34:27
  Speaker 2: Geez, I wonder if this is going to help with
• 1:34:28
  Speaker 2: that whole losing a trillion dollars worth of investment over
• 1:34:32
  Speaker 2: the last ten years. So that's the Liberals to go
• 1:34:34
  Speaker 2: over I wonder eleven years. Sorry, what that's going to help?
• 1:34:38
  Speaker 2: Jason Kennedy says, what is he talking about? Resource companies
• 1:34:41
  Speaker 2: pay tens of billions in taxes, including federal corporate taxes.
• 1:34:45
  Speaker 2: Those revenues are redistributed to Canadians. Canadians who want to
• 1:34:50
  Speaker 2: profit more directly from resource companies can buy shares in
• 1:34:53
  Speaker 2: them and take and take on both the risk and reward.
• 1:34:57
  Speaker 2: And I'm guessing they would be much wh there to
• 1:35:00
  Speaker 2: just do that. Then giving your money to Mark Carney
• 1:35:04
  Speaker 2: and every Canadian who is eligible for the CPP and
• 1:35:07
  Speaker 2: most other public sector pension schemes already own shares and
• 1:35:11
  Speaker 2: resource companies through pension funds. Mark Carney is going to
• 1:35:17
  Speaker 2: max out the National Credit Card to fulfill his own goals,
• 1:35:22
  Speaker 2: not those of Canadians his. That's what this is about.
• 1:35:29
  Speaker 2: And what do we have here at Demetrius Sudas. Prime
• 1:35:33
  Speaker 2: Minister Mark Carnie announced today that Canada will get its
• 1:35:36
  Speaker 2: first ever sovereign wealth fund. But here's the question everyone
• 1:35:40
  Speaker 2: should be asking, where does the money come from? Well,
• 1:35:44
  Speaker 2: let's take a look.
• 1:35:49
  Speaker 13: So let me take you behind the curtain and give
• 1:35:52
  Speaker 13: you a sense of what's going to happen.
• 1:35:53
  Speaker 2: Tomorrow.
• 1:35:55
  Speaker 13: The government's fiscal update will show that the forecast and deafest,
• 1:36:00
  Speaker 13: which was about seventy eight billion, will be lower than
• 1:36:03
  Speaker 13: what they forecasted in a budget that was tabled in November.
• 1:36:06
  Speaker 2: Remember they flipped the cycles between budgets and fiscal updates. Yeah,
• 1:36:10
  Speaker 2: that's because oil prices are high right now. But also
• 1:36:14
  Speaker 2: don't believe the numbers. By the way, I think we've
• 1:36:16
  Speaker 2: learned that from the Liberal government since twenty fifteen, haven't we?
• 1:36:21
  Speaker 2: But I guess.
• 1:36:23
  Speaker 19: Economists and folks like me who have helped write a
• 1:36:27
  Speaker 19: budget will look at the following things to see if
• 1:36:30
  Speaker 19: his lower than projected deficit is real or.
• 1:36:33
  Speaker 11: It was just a horseshoe of somebody behind. And here's
• 1:36:36
  Speaker 11: the issue.
• 1:36:37
  Speaker 13: Here, if the forecasted lower deficit doesn't come from the
• 1:36:41
  Speaker 13: government actually showing that they were able to slow and
• 1:36:45
  Speaker 13: eliminate some expenses. And if this forecasted lower deficit comes
• 1:36:48
  Speaker 13: from three points ie an adjustment number two higher than
• 1:36:53
  Speaker 13: anticipated revenues which the government had no direct impact on,
• 1:36:56
  Speaker 13: for example oil prices, and number three because the government
• 1:37:00
  Speaker 13: didn't spend all the money that it said it was going.
• 1:37:03
  Speaker 19: To spend, but is planning on spending it anyway, then sorry,
• 1:37:07
  Speaker 19: I will not.
• 1:37:08
  Speaker 1: Be fooled by that.
• 1:37:09
  Speaker 2: Yeah, that's enough of that. It's basically the same thing.
• 1:37:12
  Speaker 2: Hold on, let's uh, let's hear Pierre pauliev and see
• 1:37:17
  Speaker 2: what he thinks. I'm gonna I'm gonna go out to
• 1:37:19
  Speaker 2: live here and say he thinks this is a boondoggle.
• 1:37:22
  Speaker 2: Let's take a look. This was posted by Ryan garrettson
• 1:37:25
  Speaker 2: this clip.
• 1:37:29
  Speaker 11: Some of the countries around the world you will note
• 1:37:32
  Speaker 11: have sovereign wealth funds. You need to have wealth for
• 1:37:36
  Speaker 11: those funds. Norway, Singapore, and Saudi Arabia run big budget
• 1:37:43
  Speaker 11: surpluses which they accumulate and then put in to their
• 1:37:48
  Speaker 11: sovereign wealth funds. Carney has no surplus and therefore no
• 1:37:53
  Speaker 11: wealth to put in such a fund. He's talking about
• 1:37:57
  Speaker 11: a sovereign debt fund. Wants to put another twenty five
• 1:38:01
  Speaker 11: billion dollars on the national credit card to gamble on,
• 1:38:04
  Speaker 11: a liberal slush fund that will inlet enrich liberal insiders
• 1:38:08
  Speaker 11: at the expense of hardworking Canadians. How many corporate welfare
• 1:38:12
  Speaker 11: agencies do the Trudeau Carny liberals need to create before
• 1:38:15
  Speaker 11: they learn that it doesn't work. They have the Canada
• 1:38:18
  Speaker 11: Infrastructure Fund, Remember the Infrastructure Bank? Remember that was going
• 1:38:22
  Speaker 11: to invest in all these projects.
• 1:38:24
  Speaker 2: What happened with that?
• 1:38:25
  Speaker 11: There's a new Defense Industry Bank. There's the Canada Growth Fund,
• 1:38:29
  Speaker 11: and countless of our departmental agencies that liberals have created
• 1:38:32
  Speaker 11: and grown over the last decade to give us the
• 1:38:34
  Speaker 11: worst investment and growth in the G seven. And here
• 1:38:38
  Speaker 11: we are. It's deja vu all over again. Borrowing yet
• 1:38:43
  Speaker 11: another twenty five billion dollars out of the economy to
• 1:38:47
  Speaker 11: subsidize projects that the government still cannot figure out how
• 1:38:50
  Speaker 11: to approve will only cost hardworking Canadians. Multinational corporations get
• 1:38:56
  Speaker 11: the profit, taxpayers will get the loss. Let's ask some
• 1:38:59
  Speaker 11: basic questions. Who will get the money? Small and medium
• 1:39:03
  Speaker 11: sized businesses, of course not. It will be the billionaires
• 1:39:06
  Speaker 11: and bankers that will go to Mark Carney's Elite summit
• 1:39:09
  Speaker 11: coming up in September. They will again get rich, making
• 1:39:12
  Speaker 11: everyone else poor. That guarantee small businesses and entrepreneurs get
• 1:39:17
  Speaker 11: shut out and politically powerful corporations get carve outs, handouts
• 1:39:22
  Speaker 11: and bailouts. And here's another question. If a project has
• 1:39:26
  Speaker 11: a business case, why would the government need to fund it.
• 1:39:30
  Speaker 11: If it doesn't have a business case, why would the
• 1:39:32
  Speaker 11: government want to fund it? And why can't projects get
• 1:39:36
  Speaker 11: funding now? Is it because investment doesn't exist?
• 1:39:39
  Speaker 2: Of course not.
• 1:39:40
  Speaker 11: There's a trillion dollars of investment from Canada now invested
• 1:39:46
  Speaker 11: outside of Canada, according to Royal Bank. In Fact, Statistics
• 1:39:51
  Speaker 11: Canada reported in Q three of last year that trusteed
• 1:39:55
  Speaker 11: Canadian pension funds held one point three to three trillion
• 1:39:58
  Speaker 11: dollars in foreign assets. That is, a majority of Canadian
• 1:40:02
  Speaker 11: pension funds are now invested outside of Canada. There are
• 1:40:07
  Speaker 11: more Canadians opening businesses out of Canada than in Canada.
• 1:40:11
  Speaker 11: The investment exists, it comes from our country. It just
• 1:40:15
  Speaker 11: can't get a return in our country. Putting another twenty
• 1:40:18
  Speaker 11: five billion dollars on the national credit card to pad
• 1:40:22
  Speaker 11: a liberal slush fund will not change that. What we
• 1:40:25
  Speaker 11: need is for the liberal government to get out of
• 1:40:28
  Speaker 11: the way. Get out of the way and repeal the
• 1:40:30
  Speaker 11: anti resource lass C sixty nine. Get it of the
• 1:40:33
  Speaker 11: way and repeal the ban on shipping oil off the
• 1:40:36
  Speaker 11: BC coast. Get it of the way and scrap the
• 1:40:39
  Speaker 11: industrial liberal carbon tax. Get it of the way, and
• 1:40:42
  Speaker 11: I prove a pipeline of the Pacific by this summer.
• 1:40:44
  Speaker 11: Get out of the way and unlock and unblock our economy.
• 1:40:48
  Speaker 11: That is how we will make Canada the richest, most
• 1:40:51
  Speaker 11: affordable country anywhere on Earth. That is how we will
• 1:40:54
  Speaker 11: make Canada affordable at home, safe at home, and strong
• 1:40:57
  Speaker 11: at home.
• 1:40:58
  Speaker 2: Thank you. Yeah, that's the main question. Why don't they
• 1:41:02
  Speaker 2: just get out of the way, remove the roadblocks? Like
• 1:41:05
  Speaker 2: oil companies want to make money. Energy companies want to
• 1:41:08
  Speaker 2: make money, right, Why aren't they racing in to make money? Right? Well,
• 1:41:12
  Speaker 2: it's all the roadblocks. It's all of the liberal legislation, right,
• 1:41:18
  Speaker 2: all the regulation. That's why. Get rid of that. If
• 1:41:20
  Speaker 2: you want investment, get rid of that stuff. We have
• 1:41:22
  Speaker 2: stuff that people want to invest in, right, We're very
• 1:41:25
  Speaker 2: natural resource rich in Canada. It shouldn't be a problem.
• 1:41:30
  Speaker 2: It's insane that it is. But why not just do that? Well,
• 1:41:37
  Speaker 2: problem is, if you do that, then CARRENTI can't funnel
• 1:41:41
  Speaker 2: a bunch of taxpayer subsidies into a bunch of net
• 1:41:44
  Speaker 2: zero companies, you know which is I mean, look Brookfield,
• 1:41:51
  Speaker 2: he had the ESG fund, right, he had the net
• 1:41:55
  Speaker 2: zero fund at Brookfield. I mean, how can anybody not
• 1:41:58
  Speaker 2: see what's going on here? I have no idea. I mean,
• 1:42:02
  Speaker 2: this guy was the UN, the UN Global Climate Finance Envoy.
• 1:42:09
  Speaker 2: How can anybody not see what's going on here? Let's
• 1:42:14
  Speaker 2: see some m all right, what else we got? Let's see?
• 1:42:31
  Speaker 2: Oh yeah, Mark McQuay. Nine years ago, Justin Trudeau launched
• 1:42:34
  Speaker 2: the Canadian Infrastructure Bank. It was tasked with financially supporting
• 1:42:38
  Speaker 2: revenue generating infrastructure projects that are in the public interest
• 1:42:43
  Speaker 2: by catalyzing, catalyzing private investment, catalyzing private investment. So even
• 1:42:51
  Speaker 2: back then they were using catalyzing. I mean, how do
• 1:42:54
  Speaker 2: you know that Mark Carty was actually giving Justin Trudeau
• 1:42:59
  Speaker 2: all of his ideas all along. There's a clue right there, catalyzing.
• 1:43:06
  Speaker 2: Do we have something on that? Let's see hold on
• 1:43:12
  Speaker 2: Canada Infrastructure Bank has faced intense criticism and accusations of
• 1:43:17
  Speaker 2: failure due to slow project completion, low private sector investment,
• 1:43:21
  Speaker 2: and high administrative costs since its twenty seventeen inception. This
• 1:43:26
  Speaker 2: is just another one of these, right, This sovereign wealth
• 1:43:29
  Speaker 2: fund is just another one of these boondoggles and high
• 1:43:32
  Speaker 2: administrative costs, of course, because liberal cronies need to make
• 1:43:36
  Speaker 2: a lot of money and high administrative costs. Since it's
• 1:43:40
  Speaker 2: twenty seventeen inception, critic site stalled projects such as the
• 1:43:44
  Speaker 2: Lake Erie Connector project has evidenced that the thirty five
• 1:43:48
  Speaker 2: billion bank has failed to meet its goal of bridging
• 1:43:52
  Speaker 2: public private investment. Yeah, go ahead, give your money to
• 1:43:57
  Speaker 2: Mark Carny's suffering wealth fund DARIA. Low project completion within
• 1:44:03
  Speaker 2: its first five six years, the CIB has struggle to
• 1:44:06
  Speaker 2: move projects from commitment to construction, with critics highlighting a
• 1:44:10
  Speaker 2: lack of completed projects and substantial delay in projects failed
• 1:44:14
  Speaker 2: investment ratios. The bank originally aimed to attract up to
• 1:44:18
  Speaker 2: five dollars of private private investment for every one dollar
• 1:44:22
  Speaker 2: of public money, but reports indiclate. But reports indicate it
• 1:44:26
  Speaker 2: has attracted less than one dollar of private investment for
• 1:44:30
  Speaker 2: each public dollar, high costs, low paces, political interference. That's interesting.
• 1:44:38
  Speaker 2: I wonder if there'll be any of that from the
• 1:44:41
  Speaker 2: Liberal Party. Concerns have been raised by some that the
• 1:44:44
  Speaker 2: Bank's investment choices are influenced by political rather than financial
• 1:44:50
  Speaker 2: or technical criteria. Huh, I wonder if they'll be investing
• 1:44:55
  Speaker 2: in that high speed rail from Toronto to Quebec City
• 1:44:59
  Speaker 2: goes through all the those uh liberal writings. I wonder,
• 1:45:05
  Speaker 2: Let's see what have we got here, Jackmans and not
• 1:45:08
  Speaker 2: another Liberal slush fund from the Financial Post rather than
• 1:45:15
  Speaker 2: pay down the federal governments that Prime Minister Carney has
• 1:45:17
  Speaker 2: announced a twenty five billion sovereign wealth fund. Let's make
• 1:45:21
  Speaker 2: this a little bigger hold on the Canada Strong Fund,
• 1:45:30
  Speaker 2: which will join with private interests to invest in nation
• 1:45:33
  Speaker 2: building projects. It could grow even larger by selling a
• 1:45:37
  Speaker 2: retail investment product to any Canadian who for some reason
• 1:45:41
  Speaker 2: want to hold shares, and it's politically directed projects like
• 1:45:45
  Speaker 2: high speed rail, fighting critical minerals and expanding the port
• 1:45:49
  Speaker 2: of Churchill. Governments and private investors usually make strange bedfellows.
• 1:45:56
  Speaker 2: Governments pursue political objectives that compromise the profitability investors want
• 1:46:02
  Speaker 2: to assuage investor concerns. Subsidies boost the return to nation
• 1:46:08
  Speaker 2: building of the sort promised in last falls budget. Big
• 1:46:11
  Speaker 2: losers are taxpayers. This is all just a giant boondoggle,
• 1:46:15
  Speaker 2: a ginormous ote of everything. What do we have here?
• 1:46:20
  Speaker 2: Mark Carney suggested the plan draws inspiration from Norway's fund,
• 1:46:24
  Speaker 2: which at one point seven trillion in assets, is the
• 1:46:27
  Speaker 2: largest in the world and focuses on international investments, and
• 1:46:30
  Speaker 2: this is nothing like that. In fact, it seems like
• 1:46:33
  Speaker 2: it's kind of guaranteed to fail. The Canadian fund is
• 1:46:37
  Speaker 2: linked to what the government describes as nation building efforts,
• 1:46:40
  Speaker 2: including ports and natural resources projects. Mister Carney said it
• 1:46:45
  Speaker 2: is aimed at domestic investments, but he pointed out that
• 1:46:48
  Speaker 2: other countries with similar funds also began with domestic focus
• 1:46:52
  Speaker 2: and then broadened their scope. But I don't know, there's
• 1:46:54
  Speaker 2: not going to be any money left to do that.
• 1:46:56
  Speaker 2: That's the problem, let's say. Lucy Hargreaves, CEO of Build Canada,
• 1:47:04
  Speaker 2: says the Canada Strong Fund is a sovereign, well funded name.
• 1:47:08
  Speaker 2: Only what was announced today is closer to a war bond,
• 1:47:13
  Speaker 2: with Canadians buying equity in projects the government is already
• 1:47:17
  Speaker 2: trying to get off the ground. Yeah, so it's another boondoggle,
• 1:47:23
  Speaker 2: another liberal boondoggle. So all I can say is do
• 1:47:28
  Speaker 2: All I can say is do not give your money.
• 1:47:32
  Speaker 2: All I can say is do not give your money
• 1:47:35
  Speaker 2: to Mark Cardy. Whatever you do, all right, invest in
• 1:47:41
  Speaker 2: like magic beans or something instead. All right, let's go
• 1:47:45
  Speaker 2: back to the chat. That was a long bit there.
• 1:47:47
  Speaker 2: That took a while, but you know it had two
• 1:47:51
  Speaker 2: Let's see, all right, what are you guys saying. Let's
• 1:47:57
  Speaker 2: see us says, leering centers, We have spaceports. Let's see.
• 1:48:03
  Speaker 2: There's not even a sign like a spaceport sign at
• 1:48:07
  Speaker 2: it at the gravel lot, which is our spaceport. Let's see,
• 1:48:12
  Speaker 2: as he says, extra money, what's that? Yeah, exactly.
• 1:48:18
  Speaker 1: No.
• 1:48:19
  Speaker 2: Mota says someone should make recordings of him speaking and
• 1:48:22
  Speaker 2: sell them as sleep aids sleep aids. But if you
• 1:48:26
  Speaker 2: listen to him while you fall asleep, you might get
• 1:48:29
  Speaker 2: sleep aids. Though, that's the problem. Uh yeah, let's see,
• 1:48:41
  Speaker 2: Trudeo server says. In August twenty twenty five, Cartie announced
• 1:48:44
  Speaker 2: the Major Project's Office to exponite nation building projects of
• 1:48:47
  Speaker 2: Strategic importance. Apparently that wasn't enough. Carnie also needs a
• 1:48:51
  Speaker 2: crony slush wealth fund. Yeah, you'd have to be crazy
• 1:48:56
  Speaker 2: to give your money to that. Let's see, as he says,
• 1:49:00
  Speaker 2: don't forget the suckers that invest alongside will lose everything.
• 1:49:04
  Speaker 2: I wonder if that'll bring their elbows up. Let's see,
• 1:49:12
  Speaker 2: as he says, just a wait for Cardi to steal
• 1:49:14
  Speaker 2: more money. I think you're right. Let's see. All right,
• 1:49:19
  Speaker 2: I'm gonna skip down here a little bit. Let's see,
• 1:49:33
  Speaker 2: it says boondoggle sounds like a graft. Well, you know
• 1:49:35
  Speaker 2: either either way, Canadians will lose. All right, what do
• 1:49:41
  Speaker 2: we got next? Where are we at? What's this one?
• 1:49:46
  Speaker 2: All right? I want to show you this. This is fun.
• 1:49:49
  Speaker 2: And then I think we're done with the Canadian news
• 1:49:51
  Speaker 2: and get to the last stab of the evening. This
• 1:49:53
  Speaker 2: was posted by Canada Proud and this was April twenty seventh,
• 1:49:58
  Speaker 2: twenty twenty six. And here is Pierre pauliff. So, I
• 1:50:01
  Speaker 2: guess the Liberals think they are going to really burn
• 1:50:05
  Speaker 2: Pierre Paul if here, I guess. I guess the Liberals
• 1:50:08
  Speaker 2: so here in Parliament, I guess the Liberals I think
• 1:50:10
  Speaker 2: they're going to really really get Pierre Pauli. If here
• 1:50:13
  Speaker 2: they're really going to burn them. This is sick burn.
• 1:50:16
  Speaker 2: Let's see how it turns out.
• 1:50:19
  Speaker 11: Finnus were trying to answer questions in the House of
• 1:50:20
  Speaker 11: Commons because he's been wrong on every single major economic
• 1:50:23
  Speaker 11: issue of our time and the results of what Canadians
• 1:50:26
  Speaker 11: are paying for now more costs, more debt, more taxes,
• 1:50:31
  Speaker 11: more of the same. In fact, this Prime minister has
• 1:50:34
  Speaker 11: given Canada the worst food inflation in the G seven,
• 1:50:37
  Speaker 11: the worst household debt in the G seven, the worst
• 1:50:39
  Speaker 11: housing costs in the G seven, the second highest unemployment
• 1:50:42
  Speaker 11: in the G seven, and tomorrow he intends to put
• 1:50:44
  Speaker 11: it all on the national credit card. Trudeau had a
• 1:50:47
  Speaker 11: thirty one billion dollar deaths that left over for this year.
• 1:50:50
  Speaker 11: Will you break through that limit and put that on
• 1:50:52
  Speaker 11: the national credit card as well?
• 1:50:55
  Speaker 10: The only the government healthy years.
• 1:50:57
  Speaker 11: Well, this speaker, inflation has been in the Bank of
• 1:51:00
  Speaker 11: Canada's target zone and has.
• 1:51:02
  Speaker 2: Been for some time.
• 1:51:03
  Speaker 4: But we are continuously intrigued by this notion about inflationary spending.
• 1:51:08
  Speaker 2: So we just want to ask and have him answer
• 1:51:11
  Speaker 2: with absolute clarity. The leader of the opposition, is.
• 1:51:14
  Speaker 6: It the Canada Child Benefit that is inflationary?
• 1:51:17
  Speaker 2: Is it the Canada Disability Benefit? Is it? The Canadian
• 1:51:21
  Speaker 2: Dental Care Plan?
• 1:51:22
  Speaker 7: Is it?
• 1:51:22
  Speaker 2: The grocery is an essential benefit? Is it Old age security? Exactly?
• 1:51:27
  Speaker 2: What is inflationary spending? Well, it's the front thing like
• 1:51:32
  Speaker 2: talks about, like the checks they're sending out because groceries
• 1:51:35
  Speaker 2: are so unaffordable or so unaffordable because of because the
• 1:51:39
  Speaker 2: Liberals have been in power since twenty fifty. Yeah, what
• 1:51:42
  Speaker 2: do you have to borrow money to pay for stuff
• 1:51:44
  Speaker 2: that is inflationary? Right, it's part of the death spiral
• 1:51:47
  Speaker 2: that we're in. But anyway, let's see what Pierre has
• 1:51:49
  Speaker 2: to say about it, right in the eyes of the
• 1:51:52
  Speaker 2: leader of the opposition.
• 1:51:54
  Speaker 7: The hoable leader of the opposition.
• 1:51:56
  Speaker 11: Well, I'm glad, he asked, because I got some direct answers.
• 1:52:00
  Speaker 2: You answer it qual.
• 1:52:01
  Speaker 11: What is inflationary spending? Ninety billion dollars for the wasteful
• 1:52:05
  Speaker 11: alto project, a billion dollars for a gun grab that
• 1:52:09
  Speaker 11: the Public Safety Minister admits will not stop crying. Twenty
• 1:52:13
  Speaker 11: billion dollars, that's double four consultants, seven percent increase in
• 1:52:18
  Speaker 11: the spending on the national bureaucracy, over a billion dollars
• 1:52:22
  Speaker 11: in handouts to fake and phony refugees, a one hundred
• 1:52:26
  Speaker 11: percent increase in spending on corporate welfare. It's all inflationary spending.
• 1:52:32
  Speaker 11: Will they stop putting it on the national credit card
• 1:52:34
  Speaker 11: and get.
• 1:52:34
  Speaker 20: Rid of it instead?
• 1:52:37
  Speaker 2: Spoiler alert, No they won't. No, they won't. But you
• 1:52:41
  Speaker 2: know what, we better check, I mean, we better check.
• 1:52:44
  Speaker 2: We better do a quick fact We better do a
• 1:52:46
  Speaker 2: quick fact check here. So what did we have? First?
• 1:52:58
  Speaker 2: Let's see ninety billion in also rail. Yeah, high speed
• 1:53:03
  Speaker 2: rail between let's see Toronto and Quebec City, and just
• 1:53:07
  Speaker 2: just full of liberal votes all along the way. Yeah,
• 1:53:11
  Speaker 2: so that one checks out, by the way, no, like
• 1:53:18
  Speaker 2: what percent? Ninety ninety eight percent of Canadians will never
• 1:53:22
  Speaker 2: use this, by the way, and probably ninety eight percent
• 1:53:24
  Speaker 2: of Canadians right now couldn't afford to use it anyway.
• 1:53:27
  Speaker 2: And if it ever actually gets built, right, well, let's continue.
• 1:53:34
  Speaker 2: Let's see, Ottawa's gun buyback program will cost billions and
• 1:53:38
  Speaker 2: for no good reason. That's from December second, twenty twenty five.
• 1:53:41
  Speaker 2: Hasn't gotten any better. There are provinces that have just
• 1:53:44
  Speaker 2: completely opted out. There's lots of police departments that say
• 1:53:47
  Speaker 2: they won't enforce it. So yeah, checks out too. Let's
• 1:53:51
  Speaker 2: see what's the next one. Let's see record outsourcing spending.
• 1:53:59
  Speaker 2: So we mentioned something about twenty billion dollars on consultants.
• 1:54:03
  Speaker 2: The federal government spent over nineteen billion. I guess we'll
• 1:54:06
  Speaker 2: round it up to twenty on external professional and special
• 1:54:10
  Speaker 2: services in the twenty four twenty five fiscal year, which
• 1:54:13
  Speaker 2: includes consultants, contractors, and other services. I'm sure it's going
• 1:54:16
  Speaker 2: to be higher this year. Where was it? What was
• 1:54:20
  Speaker 2: he saying? Next? Let's see, so, actually the cost of
• 1:54:25
  Speaker 2: the federal bureaucracy, it's actually a lot worse than seven percent.
• 1:54:29
  Speaker 2: If you go back ten years, it's actually up eighty percent.
• 1:54:34
  Speaker 2: So I guess, you know, seven percent since Carney got in,
• 1:54:37
  Speaker 2: but eighty percent in ten years. Yeah, that's uh, that's
• 1:54:43
  Speaker 2: a Liberal party for you. The PBO the Parliamentary Budget
• 1:54:47
  Speaker 2: Officer who Carni fired, by the way, unsurprisingly, Let's see,
• 1:54:54
  Speaker 2: the PBO released its personnel. The PBO released its personnel
• 1:54:59
  Speaker 2: expenditure and aalysis today. The federal bureaucracy cost taxpayer seventy
• 1:55:03
  Speaker 2: four point one billion in twenty four to twenty five.
• 1:55:06
  Speaker 2: According to the PBO, the bureaucracy costs taxpayers thirty nine
• 1:55:11
  Speaker 2: point six billion in twenty fifteen twenty sixteen. That means
• 1:55:16
  Speaker 2: the cost of the federal bureaucracy increased eighty percent in
• 1:55:21
  Speaker 2: ten years eighty percent. So it's even worse than Pierre
• 1:55:24
  Speaker 2: said there. So what do we have next here? Let's see.
• 1:55:29
  Speaker 2: Oh yeah, Canadians now spending one billion per year to
• 1:55:32
  Speaker 2: cover health care costs of refugee claimants. He was right
• 1:55:36
  Speaker 2: about that too. Wow, a billion a year to cover
• 1:55:40
  Speaker 2: the costs of refugee claimants. So people who are not
• 1:55:44
  Speaker 2: real refugees. So instead of sending them back, the Curry
• 1:55:48
  Speaker 2: government keeps them here and then gives them actual medical
• 1:55:52
  Speaker 2: benefits that normal just Canadian citizens don't get for free.
• 1:55:57
  Speaker 2: So yeah, so everything that he said is correct. You
• 1:56:02
  Speaker 2: know you're not gonna hear that on the CBC. That's
• 1:56:04
  Speaker 2: definitely not coming up on the screen of Rosemary Barton's
• 1:56:07
  Speaker 2: teleprompter or any of the teleprompters on CBC or Global
• 1:56:11
  Speaker 2: or CTV. But all true, all checks out, And I
• 1:56:16
  Speaker 2: just think this guy could have been our prime minister
• 1:56:19
  Speaker 2: instead of Canadian Montgomery Burns from The Simpsons. Sorry, I
• 1:56:24
  Speaker 2: forgot the George Clooney of Finance they actually say that.
• 1:56:32
  Speaker 2: Let's see, Yeah, if George Clooney was like a mummified monkey. Sure,
• 1:56:40
  Speaker 2: all right, so that's it. Let's see, let's go back
• 1:56:49
  Speaker 2: to the chat for a minute, and then we will
• 1:56:54
  Speaker 2: go to the last tab of the evening. We're two
• 1:56:55
  Speaker 2: hours in already. I thought it was gonna be a
• 1:56:57
  Speaker 2: short one. Let's let's see. JJ says, soccer is gay.
• 1:57:17
  Speaker 2: He says, wish I was an illegal immigrant. Well, you'd
• 1:57:20
  Speaker 2: probably be wealthier quite frankly, with better healthcare. You definitely
• 1:57:23
  Speaker 2: would have better healthcare. And Nevana says, Underbiden, illegals were
• 1:57:27
  Speaker 2: getting way more help than Americans. Well, it is amazing,
• 1:57:31
  Speaker 2: isn't it. Like so many things you could just they're
• 1:57:35
  Speaker 2: just right across the Western world and it doesn't seem
• 1:57:38
  Speaker 2: like it, like it can't be a coincidence, right, it
• 1:57:42
  Speaker 2: cannot be. Look at the UK, it's the same thing. Sure,
• 1:57:44
  Speaker 2: it's the same in Australia. Like, it's not a coincidence.
• 1:57:47
  Speaker 2: The exact same things are happening in all of these
• 1:57:50
  Speaker 2: Western countries, I mean immigration. It may happen in different forms.
• 1:57:54
  Speaker 2: It may be you know, illegal immigration primarily in the
• 1:57:58
  Speaker 2: state in the United States, although the United States still
• 1:58:01
  Speaker 2: has very high. It's a million legal immigrants a year
• 1:58:04
  Speaker 2: or more. In Canada, it's legal immigration, right and even
• 1:58:09
  Speaker 2: when we find out that they lied to us and
• 1:58:10
  Speaker 2: they're not real refugees, or they lied in their in
• 1:58:13
  Speaker 2: their documents or whatever, they just get to stay. Anyway.
• 1:58:16
  Speaker 2: It's the same right across the Western world, all through
• 1:58:18
  Speaker 2: Europe as well. All on a second, we've got a
• 1:58:21
  Speaker 2: uh a link here. Hold on, I'm gonna check it out.
• 1:58:26
  Speaker 2: Hold on, I am just going to screen it first.
• 1:58:30
  Speaker 2: Hold on, but let's do a link monkey thing. So
• 1:58:32
  Speaker 2: we got a link in there. Let's take a look.
• 1:58:38
  Speaker 2: All right, let's see. Let's see what we've got. Uh
• 1:58:47
  Speaker 2: what is this? All right? Hold on? What the heck
• 1:58:52
  Speaker 2: is that? I don't think that's uh no, that's not
• 1:58:57
  Speaker 2: what it's supposed to be. All right, So now, uh
• 1:59:03
  Speaker 2: there was something else. I don't know what the heck
• 1:59:04
  Speaker 2: that was, and maybe the wrong link. Let's see, all right,
• 1:59:10
  Speaker 2: let's get to the last tab of the evening, shall we. Uhuh, so,
• 1:59:17
  Speaker 2: what the hell's going on here? Doctor Jebra Fauchet. First
• 1:59:21
  Speaker 2: Angelina Jolie showed up looking like the ghost of her
• 1:59:24
  Speaker 2: former self, and now Olivia Wilde looks like she has
• 1:59:27
  Speaker 2: been overdoing the golp ones? Is that the oz empic?
• 1:59:30
  Speaker 2: I think it is? What is happening to these actresses?
• 1:59:33
  Speaker 2: So first I thought that.
• 1:59:36
  Speaker 17: When I read this grip it was already set in
• 1:59:38
  Speaker 17: Syrancisco and Rachida Johnson Will McCormick has leo, said Johnson Wilma.
• 1:59:43
  Speaker 2: At first, I thought, man, Keith Richards looks bad. But
• 1:59:47
  Speaker 2: apparently this is Olivia Wilde the actress, and uh, yikes,
• 1:59:52
  Speaker 2: what is going on there? Let's go and take a
• 1:59:54
  Speaker 2: look at what she looks like, well, what she used
• 1:59:57
  Speaker 2: to look like, Olivia wild here, So this is what
• 2:00:10
  Speaker 2: she's you know, always looked like, you know, which is
• 2:00:14
  Speaker 2: fairly normal. She's forty two, so I wonder if she's,
• 2:00:18
  Speaker 2: you know, having a midlife crisis, worried about her looks
• 2:00:21
  Speaker 2: and she thinks that looks better. I don't know. Something's
• 2:00:24
  Speaker 2: going on though with us, Like a lot of actresses
• 2:00:27
  Speaker 2: are like looking really weird. Is that really Angelina Jolie?
• 2:00:32
  Speaker 2: Yikes again, it looked like like mammified Michael Jackson when
• 2:00:36
  Speaker 2: I first saw it. I mean, you can see the
• 2:00:39
  Speaker 2: nose there and everything. I mean, the skin, her skin
• 2:00:42
  Speaker 2: just looks like plastic. It's weird. We got to check
• 2:00:45
  Speaker 2: that out as well. Hold on, let's see in hold
• 2:00:55
  Speaker 2: on Angel Lena Jolee. Let's take a look. Okay, so
• 2:01:05
  Speaker 2: that's what she's kind of supposed to look like. Here,
• 2:01:07
  Speaker 2: that's what she's supposed to look like, what she used
• 2:01:09
  Speaker 2: to look like?
• 2:01:11
  Speaker 17: Uh?
• 2:01:12
  Speaker 2: Is there anything down here about her looking really weird?
• 2:01:17
  Speaker 6: So?
• 2:01:17
  Speaker 2: I don't know, is that a real picture of her?
• 2:01:22
  Speaker 12: Uh?
• 2:01:24
  Speaker 2: I don't know, there's nothing really. You'd think it would
• 2:01:27
  Speaker 2: trend pretty high if that was like how she looks
• 2:01:30
  Speaker 2: all the time. Old don let's say, uh, plastic surgery,
• 2:01:36
  Speaker 2: plastic surgery. Take a look. Uh, I don't know. I
• 2:01:47
  Speaker 2: mean she looks pretty health Oh wait a second, what
• 2:01:49
  Speaker 2: the heck is that? No, that's not her, that's somebody else,
• 2:01:53
  Speaker 2: but ken there's a resemblance. Uh, I don't know. I
• 2:01:59
  Speaker 2: feel like it's kind of like a doctorate image or something.
• 2:02:02
  Speaker 2: All right, hmm, maybe not though I don't know. Is
• 2:02:08
  Speaker 2: that even her?
• 2:02:08
  Speaker 15: Though?
• 2:02:09
  Speaker 2: I don't know. I don't think that's correct. Anybody's saying
• 2:02:14
  Speaker 2: anything underneath? Uh, someone destroyed the portraits in their hecks
• 2:02:19
  Speaker 2: a little Dorian. Great joke there. Let's see don Dan
• 2:02:25
  Speaker 2: Bongino tells Sean Hannity he will never be the same
• 2:02:28
  Speaker 2: again after serving as FBI Deputy director. This was This
• 2:02:33
  Speaker 2: clip was posted by Overton here. So talking with Sean Hannity,
• 2:02:38
  Speaker 2: and I can believe it. I mean what I mean,
• 2:02:44
  Speaker 2: he could just be talking about just national security threats
• 2:02:47
  Speaker 2: that are unbelievable, the horrifying. Uh, with this kind of
• 2:02:54
  Speaker 2: technology explosion that we have now, Uh, you know what
• 2:02:59
  Speaker 2: kind of of horrors are people kicking up in their basements?
• 2:03:03
  Speaker 2: Who knows, Let's take a look. But listen, I will.
• 2:03:07
  Speaker 20: Never be the same. And I'm being as serious as
• 2:03:09
  Speaker 20: a stroke right now. I'm really I'm scared, man, Like,
• 2:03:13
  Speaker 20: I know what I did, and I'm proud of my work,
• 2:03:17
  Speaker 20: and I'm proud of what me and Cash accomplished in
• 2:03:19
  Speaker 20: the past year. Beyond proud. I know what we did,
• 2:03:23
  Speaker 20: I know what's coming, I know what I started at.
• 2:03:26
  Speaker 20: Some of it's I know what I laid out, and
• 2:03:29
  Speaker 20: I know it's all. You saw a lot of these
• 2:03:31
  Speaker 20: cases coming out over the past few days, even But
• 2:03:35
  Speaker 20: don't think for a second that I don't think every day.
• 2:03:40
  Speaker 20: And this is what's really sad, and this is why
• 2:03:41
  Speaker 20: I know, and I never thought this after reading that
• 2:03:44
  Speaker 20: enough Friday night, that they're going to come for me.
• 2:03:47
  Speaker 20: And listen, man, I'm that's not a sob story. I
• 2:03:50
  Speaker 20: knew what I was getting into. But it happened to
• 2:03:52
  Speaker 20: the president, and he went through just the worst, just
• 2:03:58
  Speaker 20: destruction of his similarities, some of the liberties I've ever seen.
• 2:04:02
  Speaker 20: But I say to my wife all the time, I know, Sean,
• 2:04:06
  Speaker 20: I can look you in the face as a friend,
• 2:04:08
  Speaker 20: tell you and your millions of viewers and listeners.
• 2:04:12
  Speaker 2: I promise you.
• 2:04:12
  Speaker 20: Everything I did I did with a dotted I and
• 2:04:14
  Speaker 20: a cross tea. I brought in my own attorney from
• 2:04:16
  Speaker 20: the outside person I trusted, a wonderful, wonderful person. I said, no,
• 2:04:21
  Speaker 20: everything is going to be by the book. Everything I'm
• 2:04:25
  Speaker 20: confident in that. You know what, it don't matter. They'll
• 2:04:28
  Speaker 20: rewrite the book, just like they did it for President Trump.
• 2:04:31
  Speaker 20: And I said to my wife, I said, you know,
• 2:04:33
  Speaker 20: I got a fourteen year old. The presidency could change.
• 2:04:36
  Speaker 20: I hope it doesn't in a little over two years.
• 2:04:39
  Speaker 20: You don't think on election night if we lose. It's
• 2:04:41
  Speaker 20: not going through my head like they're going to send
• 2:04:44
  Speaker 20: some thugs to my house. I was never the same
• 2:04:48
  Speaker 20: after that because after reading what I read about how
• 2:04:51
  Speaker 20: many people did this to President Trump, this Russia hoax, collusion, crossfire,
• 2:04:58
  Speaker 20: hurricane bullshit, and not as single person stop them. I'm
• 2:05:03
  Speaker 20: terrified that they're just not going to do the right
• 2:05:07
  Speaker 20: thing when they're in charge.
• 2:05:10
  Speaker 2: So it sounds like, for one, the deep state is
• 2:05:13
  Speaker 2: alive and well and angry, and uh, the you know
• 2:05:18
  Speaker 2: Democrat Party is even more corrupt than he thought when
• 2:05:21
  Speaker 2: he went in. And yeah, there's a lot of speculation
• 2:05:25
  Speaker 2: about you know, if the Democrats get back in, they're
• 2:05:28
  Speaker 2: going to seal it up permanently, right like, they're going
• 2:05:32
  Speaker 2: to go hard. They're going to do all the things
• 2:05:34
  Speaker 2: that the Republicans are too afraid to do. And that'll
• 2:05:37
  Speaker 2: just be it. You know, just let in another twenty
• 2:05:41
  Speaker 2: million people, naturalize them all, naturalize everybody in the country
• 2:05:46
  Speaker 2: that's that's not that's not a citizen, and get them voting.
• 2:05:50
  Speaker 2: Just turn it into a one party state, you know,
• 2:05:53
  Speaker 2: rig everything, just make you know, the elections mail in ballots,
• 2:05:58
  Speaker 2: I mean, not even being facetious. So he's afraid, he's
• 2:06:03
  Speaker 2: afraid of what them coming after him, and he says
• 2:06:07
  Speaker 2: he brought in his own lawyer. It doesn't even matter.
• 2:06:10
  Speaker 2: You know, he did it by the book. They'll rewrite
• 2:06:11
  Speaker 2: the book, or throw the book away or burn the book.
• 2:06:14
  Speaker 2: So it's pretty scary, isn't it. It's pretty scary. But
• 2:06:20
  Speaker 2: it seems like, I mean Biden was so bad. I
• 2:06:23
  Speaker 2: mean because they had they had you know, they turned
• 2:06:26
  Speaker 2: the FBI. Uh, they had the FBI monitoring parent teacher
• 2:06:31
  Speaker 2: meetings in case teachers said that they you know, they
• 2:06:35
  Speaker 2: weren't comfortable with all of the gender stuff. I mean,
• 2:06:40
  Speaker 2: aside from you know, like just hunting down like grannies,
• 2:06:44
  Speaker 2: you know, who had a picture of themselves taken with
• 2:06:46
  Speaker 2: a little American flag on January sixth. You know, the
• 2:06:53
  Speaker 2: I get going after Trump to all the ridiculous lawsuits
• 2:06:57
  Speaker 2: against Trump. They're insane lawsuits again, Trump and pretty much
• 2:07:01
  Speaker 2: everybody you'd ever known. I mean, this lawyer's everybody. Everybody
• 2:07:05
  Speaker 2: who ever shook hands with Trump they went after. So yeah,
• 2:07:07
  Speaker 2: I think he's gotta I think he's right to be afraid.
• 2:07:09
  Speaker 2: I think people are right to fear that. Yeah. When
• 2:07:13
  Speaker 2: when the Democrats get back in, uh, they're not gonna
• 2:07:15
  Speaker 2: play nice. Let's see, They're gonna want to lock it down.
• 2:07:23
  Speaker 2: Uh declaration of memes. Women have no idea about some
• 2:07:27
  Speaker 2: of the struggles dudes, base, Well, let's take a look.
• 2:07:34
  Speaker 21: Let's see how good your etiquette is. This one's a
• 2:07:37
  Speaker 21: no brainer. I'd definitely go all the way to the right.
• 2:07:39
  Speaker 21: You want to space yourself as much as you can.
• 2:07:42
  Speaker 2: Here.
• 2:07:42
  Speaker 21: I'd probably go to the same thing because anything else
• 2:07:44
  Speaker 21: and you're kind of too close to people. You definitely
• 2:07:46
  Speaker 21: don't want those two in the middle because then you're
• 2:07:47
  Speaker 21: like stacked between people.
• 2:07:49
  Speaker 2: Is this a thing?
• 2:07:50
  Speaker 21: This one's a no brainer. You want to go directly
• 2:07:52
  Speaker 21: in the middle. Otherwise your shoulder to shoulder with somebody,
• 2:07:54
  Speaker 21: which is super weird. This is a lose lose honestly
• 2:07:58
  Speaker 21: all around. But I think you just have to take
• 2:07:59
  Speaker 21: one one of the edges. I don't think it matters
• 2:08:01
  Speaker 21: too much.
• 2:08:02
  Speaker 2: Yeah, either edge on either side is the no brainer. Well,
• 2:08:06
  Speaker 2: this one what I think.
• 2:08:08
  Speaker 21: You go middle here because if you go to the left,
• 2:08:11
  Speaker 21: you're going to be next to two people on your left,
• 2:08:13
  Speaker 21: whereas if you're on the middle one you only have
• 2:08:15
  Speaker 21: one person directly to your right. I don't know, do
• 2:08:17
  Speaker 21: you guys agree?
• 2:08:18
  Speaker 2: These are things you guys have to think about when
• 2:08:21
  Speaker 2: you go to the year. No, this is a dilemma.
• 2:08:25
  Speaker 10: This is a daily dilemma for you guys.
• 2:08:28
  Speaker 2: Yeah, yes it is, Yes it is. Let's see what's
• 2:08:33
  Speaker 2: going on here. I don't know if I want to
• 2:08:37
  Speaker 2: do that one tonight. Let's see, how about this edu
• 2:08:41
  Speaker 2: the curious case of Ellis Pinsky stole twenty four million
• 2:08:46
  Speaker 2: in crypto by doing a simswap. He was only fifteen
• 2:08:49
  Speaker 2: years old, spent the money on watches, clubs, and prostitutes,
• 2:08:54
  Speaker 2: used his real name to withdraw the funds on coinbase.
• 2:08:57
  Speaker 2: FBI tracks account shows up right, it is door. They
• 2:09:00
  Speaker 2: discover he's a minor. They can't press criminal charges against him.
• 2:09:04
  Speaker 2: He gets away without going to prison. Today he's studying
• 2:09:08
  Speaker 2: philosophy at New York University. There's a lesson in there.
• 2:09:14
  Speaker 2: I guess it has to be b Ellis Pinsky. I
• 2:09:19
  Speaker 2: guess what else? What else could the lesson be? Right,
• 2:09:24
  Speaker 2: there's definitely incentives there. I hope he had fun. I'm
• 2:09:29
  Speaker 2: I'm sure he had a lot of fun. Let's see.
• 2:09:34
  Speaker 2: Maybe we'll save that one for let's see. Wall Street
• 2:09:39
  Speaker 2: Ape says Americans believe technology like this is why they
• 2:09:43
  Speaker 2: really got rid of lead paint in our homes. So
• 2:09:45
  Speaker 2: I think it was that. You know, the baby is
• 2:09:47
  Speaker 2: the kids eating the lead paint thing that's with the
• 2:09:50
  Speaker 2: brain and everything, the brain problems. The p X one
• 2:09:53
  Speaker 2: from Vittera Technologies is a portable backscatter X ray imager.
• 2:09:58
  Speaker 2: You can see items be behind a wall very clearly,
• 2:10:01
  Speaker 2: and I'll probably give everybody behind the wall cancer. I'm
• 2:10:05
  Speaker 2: guessing too. Let's take a look. I mean, it is
• 2:10:08
  Speaker 2: cool technology. Look at that. I mean, unless it's uh,
• 2:10:38
  Speaker 2: you know, like I don't know, they just rigged it
• 2:10:41
  Speaker 2: so they could play a video on there, and that
• 2:10:43
  Speaker 2: they filmed earlier. I don't know. I believe it. Sure,
• 2:10:45
  Speaker 2: why not? It's cool. It's definitely cool. Look at this
• 2:10:50
  Speaker 2: when your grandma loves to crochet. But it's also cool.
• 2:10:54
  Speaker 2: Look at that alien. I get that adorable little alien there.
• 2:10:59
  Speaker 2: That is awesome. I like it. I approve approved authorized.
• 2:11:05
  Speaker 2: Let's see. Okay, that's the cutest little thing I've seen
• 2:11:07
  Speaker 2: all year. A baby armadillo chasing an apple. Well, good lord,
• 2:11:14
  Speaker 2: this is what we call a palette cleanser. That's pretty uh,
• 2:11:31
  Speaker 2: that's pretty darling. As they say, I'm not even gonna
• 2:11:33
  Speaker 2: check if it's a I I just believe it's real.
• 2:11:37
  Speaker 2: All right, we already covered that. Uh this one. Uh
• 2:11:43
  Speaker 2: you know what, I forgot to turn off the YouTube
• 2:11:44
  Speaker 2: part of the stream that's gonna get copyrighted for sure.
• 2:11:48
  Speaker 2: Eh what happened here? Do you know? Just for this
• 2:11:51
  Speaker 2: last little bit, I do want to show it, but
• 2:11:54
  Speaker 2: I can't show it on the YouTube part. In fact,
• 2:11:56
  Speaker 2: I already got I probably already get like two copyright
• 2:11:58
  Speaker 2: strikes already. So we'll watch this last bit, which is
• 2:12:02
  Speaker 2: only gonna be like the last I know, fifteen minutes
• 2:12:04
  Speaker 2: or something over on Rumble. But we're gonna shut off
• 2:12:07
  Speaker 2: the YouTube portion of the stream right now and we'll
• 2:12:10
  Speaker 2: be back though on YouTube on Friday, seven thirty Pacific time,
• 2:12:13
  Speaker 2: ten thirty Eastern time. So anybody who's over on YouTube
• 2:12:17
  Speaker 2: right now, if you want to catch the end of
• 2:12:18
  Speaker 2: the show, join us over on Rumbo. Otherwise I'll see
• 2:12:21
  Speaker 2: you on Friday night. Good night you guys. Thanks for
• 2:12:23
  Speaker 2: showing up. There we go. Now we can just play things,
• 2:12:34
  Speaker 2: play videos freely and look at videos. Let's see what
• 2:12:39
  Speaker 2: about here, So Monty Python, Greg Lukennioff. Before Monty Python's
• 2:12:44
  Speaker 2: Life of Brian became a classic, John Clee told me
• 2:12:47
  Speaker 2: it was radioactive. No studio wanted to touch it. So
• 2:12:50
  Speaker 2: let's take a look. That is a really funny movie.
• 2:12:55
  Speaker 2: And it is not making fun of Jesus. By the way,
• 2:12:57
  Speaker 2: it's not mocking Jesus. Ryan is not Jesus in it.
• 2:13:01
  Speaker 2: It's more just mocking like organized religion. Uh, and the
• 2:13:07
  Speaker 2: way that you know, uh, you know, some people can
• 2:13:10
  Speaker 2: use it to manipulate.
• 2:13:12
  Speaker 15: And so as a buss fever, you are to be
• 2:13:17
  Speaker 15: stoned to death.
• 2:13:19
  Speaker 3: When we wrote Life of Brian, we could not find
• 2:13:24
  Speaker 3: a studio in England or America that would give us
• 2:13:27
  Speaker 3: three million dollars two million pounds, not a lot of money.
• 2:13:31
  Speaker 2: We could not find a single studio that we're touching.
• 2:13:35
  Speaker 3: And so the wonderful George Harrison got a script from
• 2:13:39
  Speaker 3: Eric Idler with a friend read it. He rang Eric
• 2:13:43
  Speaker 3: the next day said he'd laughed so much he'd fallen
• 2:13:45
  Speaker 3: out of bed and he said, Eric, what.
• 2:13:54
  Speaker 2: The mortgage house?
• 2:13:56
  Speaker 3: And Eric, this is wondering why George said all to
• 2:14:02
  Speaker 3: see the movie. It's absolutely true.
• 2:14:08
  Speaker 2: So that was, you know, back when it was controversial
• 2:14:11
  Speaker 2: to make a movie like Life of Brian. I'm dealing
• 2:14:14
  Speaker 2: with Christianity, and you know, it was supposed to be conservatives.
• 2:14:19
  Speaker 2: Were these super sensors. But you know, the movie got
• 2:14:21
  Speaker 2: made and it came out, and there's a lot of
• 2:14:25
  Speaker 2: movies you could There are movies about religions you could make, well,
• 2:14:28
  Speaker 2: that you certainly could make. Now you can do anything
• 2:14:31
  Speaker 2: about Christianity. Now you can be as disgusting as you want,
• 2:14:34
  Speaker 2: as blasphemous as you as you want, and no problem.
• 2:14:37
  Speaker 2: I mean, you have to be celebrated for it. But
• 2:14:39
  Speaker 2: there's other religions you're definitely there's definitely one you definitely
• 2:14:44
  Speaker 2: cannot make a movie like Life of Brian about right
• 2:14:50
  Speaker 2: that changed the name Brian for another name, And uh yeah,
• 2:14:55
  Speaker 2: you definitely can't do that, right, and not only because
• 2:15:00
  Speaker 2: you know you risk your life doing it, but the
• 2:15:02
  Speaker 2: left would freak out. They would absolutely try and censor you.
• 2:15:07
  Speaker 2: So how times have changed. That turns out these those
• 2:15:10
  Speaker 2: censorious conservatives weren't really all that censorious after all, were they.
• 2:15:16
  Speaker 2: Let's see what's this from Declaration of Memes. Let's take
• 2:15:20
  Speaker 2: a look.
• 2:15:22
  Speaker 1: Yes, I'm trans transporting this liquor into my stomach.
• 2:15:28
  Speaker 2: Yes, Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear. Let's see. Yeah,
• 2:15:36
  Speaker 2: he says I'd be one for Islam. No, now that's
• 2:15:39
  Speaker 2: you can't. And the left would freak out if you did.
• 2:15:42
  Speaker 2: Freak out right sat white supremacist, destroy everybody involved with
• 2:15:48
  Speaker 2: the project. Uh, what do we have here? Charlie's Voice
• 2:15:52
  Speaker 2: Rising posted this clip, and let's hear Trump talking of
• 2:16:00
  Speaker 2: the world and that the world is a well, it's
• 2:16:03
  Speaker 2: a dangerous place. Let's take a look.
• 2:16:06
  Speaker 3: I think I said it this morning.
• 2:16:08
  Speaker 8: I think it's a very small price to pay, and frankly,
• 2:16:13
  Speaker 8: I thought it was going to.
• 2:16:14
  Speaker 22: Go down much more.
• 2:16:15
  Speaker 8: If you want another I assume that it was going
• 2:16:17
  Speaker 8: to go down much more, only because people don't understand
• 2:16:20
  Speaker 8: to a large it's a great It's a big chess
• 2:16:22
  Speaker 8: game at a very high level. It's a very high
• 2:16:25
  Speaker 8: level chess, the highest, and I'm dealing with very smart players.
• 2:16:28
  Speaker 8: These are smart people.
• 2:16:29
  Speaker 3: They don't get there.
• 2:16:30
  Speaker 2: You know, when you deal with some of these people, you're.
• 2:16:33
  Speaker 8: Dealing with high level intellect, high very high IQ people.
• 2:16:41
  Speaker 8: These are not Jasmine Crockett and Enter group. These are
• 2:16:44
  Speaker 8: smart people. These are really smart people, and violent people
• 2:16:47
  Speaker 8: am vicious people and some very nice people and some
• 2:16:50
  Speaker 8: are very nice but violent they turn violent. But you
• 2:16:54
  Speaker 8: know what if I didn't do if I didn't do
• 2:16:57
  Speaker 8: what I did, we would have been hit number one
• 2:17:01
  Speaker 8: very important, which the termination of Obama's horrible deal. And
• 2:17:06
  Speaker 8: number two this beautiful plane hitting them eight months ago
• 2:17:10
  Speaker 8: whatever it was and taking out their nuclear company that
• 2:17:14
  Speaker 8: totally threw them for a look. If they had that
• 2:17:19
  Speaker 8: bomb at either time five years ago or seven months ago,
• 2:17:25
  Speaker 8: if they had that bomb, that bomb would have been
• 2:17:28
  Speaker 8: used almost immediately.
• 2:17:30
  Speaker 2: So this would have been before, like after the original
• 2:17:35
  Speaker 2: Iran action, but before this latest one that's shut down
• 2:17:38
  Speaker 2: the street or hormones and everything. And I guess you
• 2:17:41
  Speaker 2: know what happens is you become president and then you know,
• 2:17:45
  Speaker 2: they sit you down and they explain what your adversaries
• 2:17:47
  Speaker 2: are doing and that they're not constrained by ethics or
• 2:17:52
  Speaker 2: you know, your concerns for human rights or anything like that.
• 2:17:57
  Speaker 2: Like they are just they are playing, they're they're out,
• 2:18:02
  Speaker 2: they're at the chessboard, right, and they're looking for hedgemoney.
• 2:18:06
  Speaker 2: I mean, China states openly they want to be the
• 2:18:08
  Speaker 2: global legemon, and everybody should fear that enormously, enormously, And
• 2:18:15
  Speaker 2: so I guess there's stuff that you have to confront
• 2:18:19
  Speaker 2: that a regular person doesn't have to confront in their
• 2:18:23
  Speaker 2: daily lives, and that like journalists don't have to confront.
• 2:18:27
  Speaker 2: I'm not saying that that gives a free pass to
• 2:18:30
  Speaker 2: any president to do just whatever the hell they want,
• 2:18:33
  Speaker 2: but I just, I guess, just to give it some context,
• 2:18:37
  Speaker 2: I guess is all all right? Was there anything? Oh?
• 2:18:43
  Speaker 2: I think Rosie said something about Okay, hold on, all right,
• 2:18:50
  Speaker 2: Rosie had a link there. Let's take a look copy
• 2:18:54
  Speaker 2: link address. All right, let's do the link monkey. What
• 2:19:04
  Speaker 2: do we got?
• 2:19:08
  Speaker 9: So?
• 2:19:08
  Speaker 19: What is this?
• 2:19:09
  Speaker 2: I want to congratulate Charles on having made a fantastic
• 2:19:11
  Speaker 2: speech today at Congress. He got the Democrats to stand.
• 2:19:14
  Speaker 2: I've never been able to do that. I couldn't believe it.
• 2:19:19
  Speaker 2: Rapid response forty seven. So yeah, this is from the
• 2:19:22
  Speaker 2: White House. All right, let's take a look.
• 2:19:25
  Speaker 22: This is a great honor, and we welcome Their Majesty's
• 2:19:30
  Speaker 22: King Charles the Third and Queen Camilla of the United
• 2:19:35
  Speaker 22: Kingdom to the White House. Very special place, very very special.
• 2:19:40
  Speaker 22: And I also want to before we really begin, I
• 2:19:43
  Speaker 22: want to congratulate Charles on having made a fantastic speech
• 2:19:49
  Speaker 22: today at Congress.
• 2:19:51
  Speaker 2: He got the Democrats to stand.
• 2:19:52
  Speaker 3: I've never been able to do that.
• 2:19:55
  Speaker 2: I couldn't believe it.
• 2:19:58
  Speaker 3: I couldn't believe it.
• 2:20:01
  Speaker 8: They liked him more than they've ever liked any Republican
• 2:20:04
  Speaker 8: or Democrat.
• 2:20:04
  Speaker 2: Actually, this is well. I mean, there's some irony in it,
• 2:20:09
  Speaker 2: isn't there. Like they'll stand for the King of England,
• 2:20:12
  Speaker 2: they won't stand for the President of the United States.
• 2:20:15
  Speaker 2: And it feels like there's something ironic happening there, doesn't it. Yikes?
• 2:20:22
  Speaker 2: But yeah, could it be any other way? Uh? What
• 2:20:26
  Speaker 2: the heck is that? Oh? Here's what's this? Some chatter
• 2:20:30
  Speaker 2: about Angelina Jolie not looking like herself at a recent event.
• 2:20:34
  Speaker 2: Someone asked if she might have had a stroke. You
• 2:20:36
  Speaker 2: be the judge. That's something changed, Like you were looking
• 2:20:38
  Speaker 2: at this earlier. So it looks like she has facial
• 2:20:52
  Speaker 2: paralysis from an enormous amount of plastic surgery that's been
• 2:20:58
  Speaker 2: done on her face. She looks like a different person.
• 2:21:01
  Speaker 2: And yeah, she looks like she can no longer you know,
• 2:21:04
  Speaker 2: express anything with her face. It's just over. Is that
• 2:21:09
  Speaker 2: really her? Wow? All right? Crazy? Something truly wonderful has
• 2:21:20
  Speaker 2: happened in the chat and well. Rosie has gifted a
• 2:21:27
  Speaker 2: subscription to Radio Boloni here on Rumble and as everybody knows.
• 2:21:31
  Speaker 2: This is probably the most generous thing any person has
• 2:21:34
  Speaker 2: ever done. And when you do that, you earn the title,
• 2:21:38
  Speaker 2: I think, very rightfully, as the best person ever.
• 2:21:49
  Speaker 4: You know.
• 2:21:50
  Speaker 2: You see all these documentaries with all these great figures
• 2:21:53
  Speaker 2: from history and stuff, and it's like, oh, yeah, they're great. Yeah.
• 2:21:57
  Speaker 2: I mean it's not like they're not good. Okay, important people,
• 2:21:59
  Speaker 2: you know, important people whatever. All I'm saying is is
• 2:22:04
  Speaker 2: that compared to Rosie, they're all human garbage. That's all
• 2:22:09
  Speaker 2: that I'm saying. Rosie clearly best person ever, you know, donating,
• 2:22:15
  Speaker 2: you know, gifting a subscription to Radio boloney. I mean,
• 2:22:18
  Speaker 2: Winston Churchill never did that, right, right, Rosie, best person ever?
• 2:22:22
  Speaker 2: Thank you. Mother's a race. I never did that. Let's say,
• 2:22:35
  Speaker 2: uh seriously, no, it's the best thing anybody can do
• 2:22:37
  Speaker 2: for my channel, Thank you very much. Maybe before we go,
• 2:22:39
  Speaker 2: I'll just see if I want to do a quick
• 2:22:42
  Speaker 2: and see if there's something that is worth it for me.
• 2:22:46
  Speaker 2: Not really, not really, Uh maybe one. Let's see if
• 2:22:51
  Speaker 2: we can do one. If it works, I'll do it,
• 2:22:57
  Speaker 2: all right, folks. They can steal your accounts, freeze your cards,
• 2:23:01
  Speaker 2: decide what you're allowed to buy say or support. Are
• 2:23:05
  Speaker 2: we talking about communists here? Big banks and financial institutions
• 2:23:09
  Speaker 2: have total control and they use it. That's why financial
• 2:23:13
  Speaker 2: independence matters more now than ever. Introducing a Rumble wallet,
• 2:23:20
  Speaker 2: a wallet built for real freedom. With Rumble Wallet, you
• 2:23:24
  Speaker 2: control your money, not a bank, not communists, not a government,
• 2:23:28
  Speaker 2: not a tech company, not Zoran Mom Donnie by. Digital
• 2:23:34
  Speaker 2: assets like Tether Tether gold had bitcoin in one secure place. Hey,
• 2:23:39
  Speaker 2: no permission, no middlemen, no cancel button. And when you
• 2:23:43
  Speaker 2: want to support the creators you actually believe in, you
• 2:23:46
  Speaker 2: can use the Rumble wallet app to directly tip content creators, securely,
• 2:23:51
  Speaker 2: instantly and without interference. This isn't a credit line they
• 2:23:55
  Speaker 2: can shut off. It's your wallet, permanently yours, to protect
• 2:24:00
  Speaker 2: your future, yours, to protect your family from communists when
• 2:24:03
  Speaker 2: the system fails, when institutions turn on their own people.
• 2:24:07
  Speaker 2: Financial sovereignty is the difference between security and vulnerability, and
• 2:24:13
  Speaker 2: we don't like vulnerability. Rumble Wallet isn't about politics, folks,
• 2:24:17
  Speaker 2: It's about freedom, ownership and protecting what's yours from communists.
• 2:24:24
  Speaker 2: So take control today. Download Rumbo Wallet now and step
• 2:24:28
  Speaker 2: away from the big banks for good. That's going to
• 2:24:31
  Speaker 2: feel good. That's going to feel great. True ownership, true protection,
• 2:24:35
  Speaker 2: true financial freedom. Oh yeah, that was a new one.
• 2:24:44
  Speaker 2: I haven't read that one before. That was a really
• 2:24:46
  Speaker 2: good one. Really enjoyed that. It's like poetry. I think
• 2:24:49
  Speaker 2: I did a bang up job on it. By the way,
• 2:24:52
  Speaker 2: bang up job, Dame, Pam. How you doing all right?
• 2:24:58
  Speaker 2: Amazing faces? How you do it? Sorry to tell you, guys,
• 2:25:02
  Speaker 2: but we are we're signing out. We're done. Let's see.
• 2:25:09
  Speaker 2: Rosie says, so strange gifted at the beginning, delayed post. Well,
• 2:25:12
  Speaker 2: that's weird. It was gifted right at the beginning. Strange,
• 2:25:15
  Speaker 2: that's weird. I don't know. I'm just glad it came through.
• 2:25:19
  Speaker 2: Rosie says, you could do a quick chocolate Oh god,
• 2:25:22
  Speaker 2: all right, you know what. I'm happy to actually with
• 2:25:24
  Speaker 2: his whole best person everthing. I think you've earned it.
• 2:25:27
  Speaker 2: Let's do let's do a chocolate chuckle lot. Let's see
• 2:25:34
  Speaker 2: shuck uh chuckle a lot chuckle lot uh chocolate what
• 2:25:42
  Speaker 2: chocole lot? Brownie? Ooh that sounds nice. What's oh good, Lord,
• 2:25:52
  Speaker 2: let's check it out. Look at that, folks, that's a
• 2:25:56
  Speaker 2: lot of chocolate in there, a lot of chocolate. That's delicious.
• 2:25:59
  Speaker 2: Oh yeah, I wish I had that. I'd eat that
• 2:26:01
  Speaker 2: whole thing right after this dream if I had it,
• 2:26:04
  Speaker 2: which I don't in Canada, that would cost I'm going
• 2:26:09
  Speaker 2: to guess seven hundred and eighty dollars right now at
• 2:26:12
  Speaker 2: the safe way. All right, some beautiful chocolate right there.
• 2:26:20
  Speaker 2: Let's see, jud doo Uh Dame Pamp, says Angelina. Julie
• 2:26:28
  Speaker 2: looks like she has one robotic it's larger than the
• 2:26:33
  Speaker 2: other one.
• 2:26:35
  Speaker 12: Uh.
• 2:26:35
  Speaker 2: Probably I wouldn't get I wouldn't. I wouldn't doubt it.
• 2:26:39
  Speaker 2: Let's see is he says Commie Banks. I knew it.
• 2:26:43
  Speaker 2: I need to get myself one of those rumble while
• 2:26:45
  Speaker 2: it's rumbo wallet's let's see, Rosie says, good video? Did
• 2:26:52
  Speaker 2: we watch that?
• 2:26:53
  Speaker 12: Er?
• 2:26:54
  Speaker 2: Okay, did we do this one already? Hold on, puppy
• 2:26:56
  Speaker 2: Lincoln dress? Is this one we just watched? Hold on?
• 2:27:10
  Speaker 11: My wife stopped trusting me because I never do the
• 2:27:12
  Speaker 11: things I say i'll do.
• 2:27:13
  Speaker 2: She just does everything herself. Now I finally found out why.
• 2:27:19
  Speaker 2: I thought that was kind of depressing, so it was
• 2:27:22
  Speaker 2: just an ad though. Oh, for fuck's sake, this guy again, Jesus,
• 2:27:38
  Speaker 2: how long is this five minutes? We're not watching the
• 2:27:40
  Speaker 2: whole thing. God damn it, Rosie. All right, but you
• 2:27:44
  Speaker 2: did do the whole best person ever think, So okay,
• 2:27:46
  Speaker 2: I'll calm down. I'm very grateful for that, by the way,
• 2:27:49
  Speaker 2: and you're the best person ever. It's just again again.
• 2:27:55
  Speaker 2: All right, let's do it. Let's go a little further ahead.
• 2:27:58
  Speaker 2: It's five minutes. So what's he building this? I'm like
• 2:28:06
  Speaker 2: a goat cart out of chocolate? All right? Wow, it
• 2:28:53
  Speaker 2: is very impressive, made all out of chocolate. I mean
• 2:28:56
  Speaker 2: it's great. I mean it is very impressive. I think
• 2:28:58
  Speaker 2: he used to make these for Saddam Hussein's grandchildren. I think.
• 2:29:02
  Speaker 2: I'm not sure billion dollars each it is. It is
• 2:29:08
  Speaker 2: impressive chocolate, you know, art or workmanship or something. I
• 2:29:14
  Speaker 2: don't know, but yeah, that's not how I eat my
• 2:29:18
  Speaker 2: chocolate though. I eat it in just old fashioned bar form.
• 2:29:23
  Speaker 2: Let's say. Namada says, damn, these Hollywood types are so
• 2:29:28
  Speaker 2: plastic they look freakish. Indeed, Rosie says, excellent, ad rate
• 2:29:33
  Speaker 2: needs more commy hate nine point eight out of ten.
• 2:29:36
  Speaker 2: I do believe that's the most you can get out
• 2:29:38
  Speaker 2: of ten. So it's pretty good. I thought there was
• 2:29:40
  Speaker 2: quite a lot of commy hate in there. Rosie says,
• 2:29:43
  Speaker 2: chocolate nine point nine out of ten, it's a party.
• 2:29:48
  Speaker 2: Let's see. Namana says, that looks awesome. Chocolate cake ten
• 2:29:52
  Speaker 2: out of ten. I'd eat that is, he says. Let's
• 2:29:55
  Speaker 2: see amazingly creative as he says, yep. Has he ever
• 2:30:07
  Speaker 2: just made like a bookshelf out of chocolate? Just put
• 2:30:10
  Speaker 2: books on it? I wonder, I don't know. Let's see.
• 2:30:16
  Speaker 2: Has he ever made like a rake out of chocolate?
• 2:30:19
  Speaker 2: Has he ever made like an air fryer out of chocolate?
• 2:30:24
  Speaker 2: Be interested in that? Or like a refrigerator. Let's see,
• 2:30:28
  Speaker 2: like a shoe rack out of chocolate. Let's see. All right,
• 2:30:37
  Speaker 2: I guess that's pretty much it. I guess it's two
• 2:30:41
  Speaker 2: hours and thirty minutes on a Tuesday night. I mean,
• 2:30:43
  Speaker 2: that's pretty darn good. I think it's awful good. Actually,
• 2:30:46
  Speaker 2: all right, all right, everybody, I would like to thank
• 2:30:50
  Speaker 2: you for showing up tonight and being fun in the chat,
• 2:30:53
  Speaker 2: because if you weren't it, it'd be depressing, it'd be sad.
• 2:30:57
  Speaker 2: I would go into a deep spiral of press and anxiety,
• 2:31:01
  Speaker 2: and it would be awful, awful, and really, it would
• 2:31:03
  Speaker 2: affect the quality of the streams as well. So thank
• 2:31:07
  Speaker 2: you for not allowing me to go in a downward spiral,
• 2:31:10
  Speaker 2: a spiral, a downward emotional and psychological spiral. I really
• 2:31:15
  Speaker 2: appreciate that. And if you guys keep showing up, I
• 2:31:18
  Speaker 2: will keep showing up. So I hope to see everybody
• 2:31:21
  Speaker 2: on Friday at seven thirty Pacific time, ten third Eastern.
• 2:31:25
  Speaker 2: See you guys later.