Latest / UK Column Radio / UK Column News - 27th May 2024

Transcript

UK Column News - 27th May 2024 · UK Column Radio

0:08
Good afternoon. It's Monday, the twenty seventh May twenty twenty four, just
0:11
after one o'clock. Welcome to the UK Colin News. I'm your host,
0:13
Mike Robinson joining me today. We have Mark Anderson from the United States and
0:18
Anne rasmuson mccaddi and from Scotland and we will be talking well Marianna Spring a
0:25
little bit later. But first of all, we're going to get kicked off
0:28
because today is the first day of the World Health Assembly. We've been waiting
0:33
for this for quite a long time, and well Ted Ross decided that the
0:38
best thing that he could do to kick it off was to start patting himself
0:42
and some others on the back. Let's just have a quick look at this.
0:47
Professor Kathleen Carico and Professor Drew Wasteman for their groundbreaking scientific work that led
0:57
to the development of effective emmarne vaccine against COVID nineteen, research that led to
1:04
them being awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine last year. In twenty
1:12
twenty three, Professor Weissmann was not able to join us today, so Professor
1:19
Carrico will be accepting the awards on behalf of both of them. The vaccines
1:26
that Professor Weissmann and Professor Carrico developed have saved millions of lives and prevented millions
1:34
of caves of severe COVID nineteen. Their innovative joint work has played a critical
1:42
role in significantly reducing the burden of mortality and the burden of disease of COVID
1:49
nineteen. Their leadership in this field has the potential to play a critical role
1:57
in major health breakthroughs in the future. This achievement resultd from decades of hard
2:05
work, perseiverance and weathering, dedication and collaborative spread long before this work was
2:14
appreciated by the broad public and even the scientific community. So that's the tone
2:23
for the day, and no doubt for the entire event. But Mark,
2:27
I don't know what if you've got any thoughts on that little clip first,
2:30
but take us through your thoughts on the event. Well, yeah, that's
2:36
typically Tadrose to sound the trumpets and to talk as if vaccines cannot fail,
2:42
as if they are practically a perfect miracle instrument in fighting disease. And that's
2:47
always the underlying theme anyway, On the twenty fourth of May, as the
2:52
slide shows, the WHO Member States is, of course, is their own
2:55
website. They agree to share outcomes of the historic International Health REGs and the
3:02
Pandemic Agreement and as that processes the outcomes and processes to the World Health Assembly
3:09
that starts today. And that photo showed a couple members of the Bureau of
3:16
the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body, including Precious Metsoso, an African woman, and that
3:24
bureau sometimes calls it a treaty, but then now they've gotten away from calling
3:30
it a treaty, even though they were for a while, which is important
3:32
too. But anyway, this is a little bit from that May twenty four
3:36
press release. As this all heats up, WHO Member States have ended intensive
3:42
negotiations aimed at strengthening global capacities to respond to future pandemics and outbreaks in the
3:47
wake of the COVID nineteen pandemic, and agreed to submit outcomes of their work
3:52
for consideration by the upcoming Role of Health Assembly starting Monday, which is today.
3:57
Two parallel negotiation processes were undertaken to make a series of amendments to the
4:01
International Health REGs and to develop a first ever pandemic Agreement, convention or other
4:08
legal instrument. There they're kind of monkeying with the language again. It's a
4:12
treaty. Delegations to the seventy seventh WHA running today through June first, will
4:16
consider the outcomes of both processes, that's the regulation and the treaty and the
4:21
next steps, et cetera. So that lays the groundwork for exactly what they're
4:26
doing. Mike, here we have Tadros. These are some key quotes from
4:30
that press release. Over the past two years, WHO Member States have dedicated
4:35
enormous effort to rise to this challenge posed by COVID nineteen and responds to the
4:42
losses it caused, including at least seven million lives lost. No mention of
4:46
what the vaccines themselves might have done in injuries or deaths, and the other
4:50
parts of his quotes. COVID nineteen affected everybody, and that's why Member States
4:56
started a process to develop a Pandemic Agreement to make the world better for prepared
5:00
for the next pandemic. Right now, the main candidate is avian flu.
5:04
While great progress was made during these negotiations, ellipsis dots, there are challenges
5:11
still to overcome. We need to use the WHA to re energize us and
5:15
finish the job at hand to present the world with a generational pandemic agreement.
5:20
As Tadrose concluded, and this includes what I mentioned recently, Mike, the
5:26
great catchup to get a lot of kids, you know, millions of kids
5:30
they've been saying vaccinated that weren't vaccinated the first time during the initial pandemic.
5:35
So they want to perform the great catch up as well, and we'll move
5:40
on from there. I believe we have a video clip of Tadrose at a
5:44
subsequent press conference right after that press release. Next week, leaders from around
5:53
the world will participate in the World Held Assembly. This year could be one
5:58
of the most significantin teen our seventy six year history, as two years of
6:02
government and negotiations to strengthen the global pandemic and response apparatus are high on the
6:10
agenda and there is progress. Member states have in principle agreed to a package
6:17
of amendments to strengthen the international Health Regulations. These amendments set out to improve
6:26
how countries prepare, for, detect, and respond to public health emergencies of
6:30
international concern and will be part of a package put forward at the Assembly.
6:38
This process has been running in parallel to negotiations around a complementary International Agreement on
6:46
Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response. The international Health Regulations focus on raising countries
6:53
capacities to detect and respond to public health events that are an international risk.
7:00
A Pandemic Agreement focuses on strengthening coordination for an international response to pandemics with equitable
7:08
access to personal protective equipment, vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics at the core,
7:15
along with strength international health regulations. The Pandemic Agreement remains our best shot
7:23
and indeed our generational opportunity at making sure next time a virus hits, we
7:29
have a plan to get critical health tools to people quickly, effectively, and
7:34
fairly. That's more of the basic roundwork that Tait Rose is laying and we
7:43
might as well hit the next video mic because now he talks about some new
7:46
program. So they're always rolling out a follow up and then they've got something
7:51
new in store, which is pretty common these days, So let's listen to
7:54
the next one. Also at the Assembly, who be launched in a new
8:01
global health strategy developed in partnership with one hundred and ninety four member states and
8:07
partners, which sets a course for getting the world back on track to heat
8:13
the health related sustainable development goals. Crucial decisions are expected on a range of
8:20
health priorities such as climate and health, who's work in health emergencies, access
8:26
to transformative tools, communicabilities, non communicabile, diss mental health, women's health,
8:33
and the reform of WHO itself. On six May, WHO will be
8:39
launching our first Investment Round, a new mechanism for WHO which the Executive Board
8:46
approved in January. The Investment Round is designed to ensure that voluntary contributions,
8:54
which are currently the majority of our funding, will be more predicted, flexible
9:01
and sustainable. Our new investment case outlines why and how supporting w JOY is
9:07
essential for progress in global health and saving millions of lines. It will be
9:15
launched on twenty eight May during the Assembly. So you see there's a lot
9:22
in stor Mic and I think mainly what he is referring to there to target
9:26
the sustainable development goals of the UN twenty thirty is that great catchup to get
9:33
people, especially kids that weren't vaccinated sufficiently according to the who's criteria, to
9:39
get them vaccinated this time around. In case the feared H five N one
9:46
av and flu just as overwhelming the world. Maybe you have some comments,
9:50
Mike in the last couple of minutes of what we're doing here. Well,
9:52
I mean, my comment about that second video in particular is he's talking about
9:56
funding and investment runs. So suddenly the World Health Organization is turning into what
10:03
some kind of incubator for big business, you know, some kind of I
10:09
meant, obviously, we understand that the investment that the private investment that goes
10:16
into the w Health, the World Health Organization at the moment, is done
10:20
on a project by project business. So somebody like the Bill Milndigates Foundation will
10:24
come along and say, well, here's the tranche money for a particular project,
10:28
and that money can only be used for that project. And effectively it's
10:31
the private funders that are driving the wh SHOWS agenda. They seem to be
10:37
taking that to a new level as part of this World Health Assembly. I'm
10:43
staggered by how much they don't want to use the word treaty. But my
10:48
question, you Mark, is because obviously we are now in the process of
10:52
a general election, so our MPs won't be discussing any of this because they're
10:58
not in a job at the moment. Is there any engagement politically in the
11:03
United States on this issue or are you tube already too far into the election
11:09
cycle for November? The election cycle effects that somewhat. You're seeing most of
11:15
the discussion at the attorney general level. At the state rep level. A
11:20
few federal reps and senators like Ron Johnson and Wisconsin have discussed it off and
11:24
on over the months. Ron Johnson is supposed to have a bill S four
11:28
four four that would get the Senate really engaged in this, and the Killarney
11:33
declaration that we'll talk about a little later makes an oblique reference to that.
11:39
But on a report card, the US would be getting a C plus at
11:43
best. MIC In getting this discussed more broadly, there's rumbles here and there,
11:48
but nothing really loud and sustained and coherent, unfortunately that I'm aware of.
11:54
Hopefully that'll change real quick. Well, if you're getting a C plus
11:58
where you're doing better than the UK. But okay. In the meantime,
12:01
though, of course, the war agenda moves on, and well National Service
12:05
has raised its ugly head. Let's have a look at well the motivated,
12:13
energetic, exciting Richie Sinak launching this we have so much to be proud of
12:20
in Britain, but one of the problems in our society is that we have
12:22
generations of young people who don't have the opportunities they deserve. Britain today faces
12:28
a future that is more dangerous and more divided. There's no doubt how democratic
12:33
values are under threat. That is why we will introduce a bold new model
12:37
of national service for eighteen year olds to be spent either in a competitive full
12:43
time military commission over twelve months, or with one weekend per month volunteering in
12:48
roles within the community like delivering prescriptions, in food to infirm people or in
12:54
search and rescue. Young people will gain valuable skills, make our country more
12:58
secure and build a stronger national culture. This ambition benefits our country and our
13:05
young people alike. Just look at Sweden, where eighty percent of young people
13:09
completing national service say they'd recommend it to their friends. Uncertain times call for
13:15
a clear plan and bold action to chart a course to a secure future.
13:20
Our plan will ensure new generations and our country meet the challenges of the uncertain
13:24
world. Keirst, armor and labor don't have a clear plan and won't take
13:28
the bold action to navigate to a more secure future. You love the little
13:35
graphic at the end. There they've got a clear plan. Apparently it's so
13:39
clear, it's transparent. There's nothing in it. But anyway, that must
13:45
have inspired everybody. I realize it's lunchtime and you're all trying to eat,
13:48
so I do apologize for it. But let's bring up his tweets because he
13:52
also produced some tweets to tell us all about this. So he was introducing
13:56
National service and he was asking, are we wondering how it will improve ours
14:01
or our children's future? Not? Really, here are five things you need
14:05
to know, he says, So let's have a look. Every eighteen year
14:07
old will get the choice of how they do their National service, deciding to
14:11
either serve their country in the armed forces or serve their community by volunteering.
14:16
This bold new model will open up a world of opportunity, will make sure
14:20
young people in the UK get the same chance in life as their peers in
14:24
allies like Sweden. Let's just remember that Sweden is a country where young people
14:28
are already injecting themselves in microchips. So not sure that's the best model to
14:35
be using here. Sweden, Norway Denmark and France, he said. Tories
14:39
also mentioned Israel as a great example of national service as well. Some people
14:43
may have a view about that, but anyway, he said, which all
14:46
have recently introduced in the nice new forms of national service, everyone will get
14:52
the life changing chance to learn from the best of the best. For men
14:56
and women of our armed forces are inspirational NHS staff or the Fire Service,
15:01
gaining skills for life and everything from cyber to leadership. The COVID pandemic showed
15:05
the value of civic service to individuals and our country as a whole. By
15:09
building on this spirit of community, this bold action will enable young people to
15:13
give back to the communities and raise them. And he finished off by saying
15:16
this clear plan is costed in full through clamping down on tax avoidance and through
15:22
funding previously used for the Shared Prosperity Fund, meaning that we will deliver a
15:28
national service raising a single tax and on top of our commitment to spend two
15:31
point five percent of GDP on defense by twenty thirty. People that are in
15:37
RECEPD of money from the Department of Work and Pensions are already discovering how the
15:41
government is starting to crack down on what they considered to be wrongdoing and pulling
15:46
money back from people that are full time carers and so on. So this
15:50
seems to be the mechanism that they are wanting to use to fund this thing.
15:56
But the question of what would happen if somebody decided not to bother that
16:00
they didn't really want to get involved in going to the military or any other
16:03
volunteering work. What would happen? Sky News asked, I'm Marie Trevellian this
16:08
morning if a young person, an eighteen year old, if this policy was
16:15
to come into force skip's National service, what recourse will they face? Are
16:19
they going to be arrested? Are they going to be in prison? Are
16:22
they going to be in fined? Are they going to have to do another
16:23
year's worth of service? What's going to happen to them? So, as
16:27
a barmister set out, there would be a Royal commission to work out the
16:32
details, but mandatory, and it's been clear that there wouldn't be a criminal
16:37
sanction. But much like the fact that it's a requirement to stay in their
16:44
educational training until you're eighteen, that is the normal way of things, and
16:48
this would therefore become in a similar way a mantra activity, so employers would
16:53
be clear that they would look to see what you had done. This would
16:57
be become part of the normal toolkit that young people would present as they moved
17:03
through their careers going forwards. And I think that so, in other words,
17:07
you're effectively being blackmailed into doing it. So there may not be any
17:11
criminal sanction, at least not on day one. The Row Commission will make
17:15
the decisions on how this happens, and then they're intending to have this rolling
17:18
out in a pilot scheme by the end of the year. So the question
17:23
is where's this all coming from. We've got to go back to January,
17:26
of course and bring Admiral to Tony Radigan on screen, and we remember that
17:33
he was talking about conscription, but not in any traditional sense of the term.
17:36
And indeed this is not in a traditional sense of the term conscription.
17:41
So this is clearly what they were talking about. And the key point here
17:44
is this who's driving this agenda. It's not the Tory Party. It's coming
17:49
from the defense community, the war community within the UK, and we shouldn't
17:56
forget that. Patrick Sanders also who's a Chief of the Defense Staff, also
18:00
talking about this government will need to mobilize the nation in the event with the
18:04
war with Russia. And now, of course they're already talking about openly in
18:08
the UK politicians and also NATO Jan Stotenberg talking openly about the need to start
18:15
attacking, taking the Ukraine war across the borders into Russia. This is getting
18:21
extremely dangerous and of course the main problem for the UK, as with many
18:26
in the West, is recruitment into the military. We've been talking about this
18:32
over the last couple of years here in the UK column News and this was
18:36
forces dot Net from March damning figures for UK military recruitment, with fifty four
18:41
percent giving up on the process. Last year, the UK handed the recruitment
18:48
i'd sourced that to Kapita, who also gathers money for the BBC, of
18:52
course, and they have failed miserably to recruit people into the military for a
18:57
number of reasons, one of them being the fact that they're pursuing a woke
19:02
agenda and attempting to bring diversity into the military. Another reason is, of
19:07
course, people are recognizing that the country is heading onto war footing and they
19:11
are not really wanting to go and fight for this bunch of buffoons that we
19:17
have running the country for the last lot of years, and nothing's going to
19:19
change, as we're going to see in a minute. But of course,
19:22
the other aspect of this was that if you don't want to join the milit
19:25
I should say, by the way, that although this is going to be
19:27
sort of a choice thing at the beginning, they're making it clear that there
19:30
will be legislation following which will make it mandatory. But the other aspect of
19:36
this was volunteering. And so I'll just make the point that one of the
19:40
topics that we've been covering on the UK column for many, many years now
19:42
is the issue of volunteering and how that is bringing young people into the third
19:49
sector, as Tony Blair called it. And so this article is from twenty
19:53
sixteen Volunteers Talent for the New Class. This is all about leadership training and
20:00
bringing people into civil society and into government and so on to pursue the types
20:06
of internationalist policies that Ted Ross represents. And well, let's just make the
20:11
point here that people are already criticizing this and saying, well, don't worry
20:15
because the Tories don't have a chance anyway. But this particular tweet saying Conservative
20:22
Central HQ sending out appalling media performers. That's not quite what it says,
20:27
but I'll just clean it up a little bit there, throwing everything at this
20:30
election except anything good. Well, of course that Tories don't have a chance
20:34
really, but the question is are they going to it's labor going to be
20:40
any better? Peter Hitchins doesn't think so. He's saying the best thing to
20:44
be doing at this point is voting against Starmer. I have no hopes for
20:48
the Tories, he says, whom I despise, but a new Liberal government
20:51
will be far, far worse and permanent. So of course Starmer was making
20:56
his law. His campaign launched this morning. As Debbie said on Friday,
21:02
the podium covered with the word change. But of course it's no change because
21:07
although it's going to be a change from Tory policy, this is effectively going
21:11
back to labor policy of the Tony Blair edge, and the voluntary aspect of
21:18
this is absolutely going to be part of this. There is no solution to
21:21
this problem within politics with any of these political parties, and so if we
21:26
just put that graphic back on screen again, I just want to remind everybody
21:30
again of the hashtag. Since it is the fourth of July that we're having
21:33
our general election on, let's start calling it Independence Day with a T and
21:38
encouraging people to vote independent outside of political parties. I think that is probably
21:44
the best option, at least as far as politics goes in this country.
21:48
Diane, let me welcome you to the program and we're going to be talking
21:53
Marianna Spring. Yes, Mike, thanks very much. For those of you
22:00
who hopefully saw UK Call News last Wednesday, you will have seen that Mike
22:04
launched for us UK see Verify. And the reason that we've done this is
22:08
because, for those of you who are not familiar with BBC Verify, BBC
22:12
has had a service that employs sixty journalists and has done for the last couple
22:18
of years now, which they claim they were working to fight misinformation. So
22:23
we know exactly what that means. Marianna Spring is at the head of BBC
22:30
Verify essentially, so we have to ask the question where did Marianna Spring from?
22:36
So if you look at her LinkedIn profile, we see some interesting things
22:41
she's done, some internships at The Guardian and so on. It is important
22:45
to note potentially that she worked at the Moscow Times from twenty fifteen to twenty
22:49
sixteen translating Russian articles into English, so that may be noteworthy. She studied
22:56
a variety of languages, including Russian, at Pembroke College at Oxford. Going
23:00
further back into her history, she was head girl in high school, so
23:06
Suffolk High School, and when she was fourteen she was the ballgirl at Wimbledon
23:11
and you can see there that she was handing flowers to the Queen as the
23:15
Queen arrived at Wimbledon that year, so that gives a little bit about where
23:18
she comes from. We have a short clip here I believe that shows her
23:23
talking about what she does now at the BBC, and it's a very long
23:29
title as well. It's Specialist Disinformation and Social Media Reporter and essentially what that
23:33
means is that I investigate usually the real world impact of online disinformation conspiracies.
23:44
So she's written a book that has been published earlier this year called Among Patrols,
23:49
My Journey through a Conspiracy Land, and it's interesting to see the endorsement
23:53
on the front cover when Ian Hisslat said that it is full of unbelievable nonsense.
24:00
I would like to remind the viewers that the definition of nonsense, according
24:03
to the Merriam Webster Dictionary, is words or language having no meaning or conveying
24:08
no intelligible ideas, and that is what this book is comprised of. I
24:12
read it twice the past few days so that the UK column viewers and presenters
24:17
didn't have to. It is mostly anecdotes about people she met online, through
24:22
telegram, through various lockdown protests that she went to in the last few years.
24:30
So over the weekend, Debbie and I were quite busy on Twitter while
24:34
the rest of our team was away at the Damn the Light Festival. So
24:37
we kind of started a bit of a Twitter storm, and Debbie had a
24:41
pull asking if anyone would like to hear me. A professor of informatics and
24:47
a qualified librarian and a researcher interviewed Maryanna Spring for some open, evidence based
24:52
debate and it looks like almost everyone said no, said yes. One person
24:57
said no. That was probably Marianna her I tweeted out little bits of information
25:03
from her book and so on throughout the weekend, including her saying I realized
25:07
how low conspiracy theorist and trolls had sunk, not just in the UK but
25:10
all over the world. And just as a reminder, Justin Trudeau, for
25:12
example, said those who don't get jabbed our misogynist and racist, which I
25:18
believe is really sinking to the bottom. So it's unfortunately we reached out to
25:23
Marianna, she didn't respond. We really hope she would. I was really
25:26
surprised that she hasn't blocked us just yet. But because she didn't accept my
25:32
invitation to come today on the UK column News for this evident space debate,
25:37
we have a fake Marianna spring with us today instead to be interviewed. I
25:41
guess maybe the real Marianna she's too shy, maybe she just doesn't want to
25:45
talk to us, maybe we have too much facts on our show. I'm
25:48
not sure. But instead we have fake Marianna here. Sorry, I just
25:55
want to make it absolutely clear to everyone that the words that the fake that
26:00
are going to be speaking are Marianna's words from her book. That's right,
26:04
that's right. But we have the real Marianna fake words from her book.
26:08
We have the fake Marianna today standing in her place. And the fake Marianna
26:12
is our best voiceover actress. Some of our regular viewers might recognize her voice,
26:19
but welcome to the show, Fake Marianna, how are you? Oh?
26:23
Hold on, let me just check my twenty four fake social media profiles
26:27
for notifications before we start. Okay, I hope you're done with that.
26:36
You have made up the name conspiracy Land. Could you please tell our viewers
26:40
what that means. You can build a whole world where objective truth is irrelevant.
26:48
That's how conspiracy Land works. Okay, what did you think you were
26:56
going to do when you started to write this book? Well, I'm going
27:00
to track the lives of various online lies deployed by different activists and governments,
27:08
Marianna. In twenty twenty, our Prime minister told us we must stay at
27:14
home whilst he had parties at Number ten Downing Street. That's what your BBC
27:19
employer said, right? Do you trust what they have covered when we were
27:22
told to stay at home while bors was out having parties. I have a
27:27
friend whose health was constantly flooded with sewage water, including dirty used masks.
27:33
Was it safe for her to stay at home? Huh? Jason in top
27:38
Ness had conspiracy theory videos including job Justice, Stop the Job and Climate Fear
27:45
and saying no to the digital identification slavery. They tended to be underpinned by
27:52
the idea though. We're being constantly tracked and trapped in order to control us,
28:03
Marianna, We are being constantly tracked and trapped in order to control us.
28:07
Do you remember the NHS test and tracea? Did you know that Australia
28:11
has just passed the digital idea built twenty twenty four. This has all happened,
28:15
and it's all fat ah. The problem with truth though, is that
28:22
it's cold and categorical. To me, it seems very sinister when a young
28:27
female investigative reporter working in a democracy is specifically targeted with hate and abuse at
28:37
her place of work. Oh you know what, we actually found something that
28:44
we agree on. To me, it has felt very sinister indeed, when
28:48
I, a middle aged female professor working in a democracy, have been specifically
28:52
targeted with hate and abuse at my place of work as well. Well.
28:57
Anyway, thanks for your time, pick Mary and maybe the real one.
29:00
We'll join us next time. And thank you you trolling, hateful conspiracy theorist.
29:14
Wow, Mike, what do you think of that? Well, I'm
29:18
glad you read the book so that I didn't have to, and I'm glad
29:22
you read the book, so none of our viewers had to. I would
29:25
absolutely discourage anyone for buying the book. Maybe you could get it from a
29:29
library if you're really particularly interested. But of course, the idea of any
29:34
critical comment equaling hit is designed to stop critical comments absolutely. So with our
29:45
new service U case you Verify, we are offering a real fact checking service.
29:51
Let us know what you need fact checked. Anything from mainstream media we
29:55
can fact check, We will do our best and we will make sure that
29:57
it is factual. So please pass on any questions that you have. Yes,
30:02
with the cavet, of course, we don't have how many journalists did
30:06
you say are in BBC Verify at this point? They have sixty. Yeah,
30:10
so we will not have the same quite the same resource, so we
30:14
will have to choose our fact checking. But we will be doing this on
30:18
a much more regular basinis because it's time to hold mainstream media to account.
30:22
So anyway, let's move on. Thank you Dan for that, and thank
30:26
you to fake Marianna as well. I think everybody knows who that was.
30:30
If you like what the UK column does, you'd like to support us,
30:33
Support dot UK column dot org is the place to go. A membership is
30:37
five pounds a month. We do need your support. It's only you guys
30:41
that keep us going. We want to say a massive thank you to everyone
30:45
who has joined and it continues to support us in this way. It is
30:48
amazing. If you could share our material as far and wide as you possibly
30:53
can, that would be great, especially from UK column dot org and UK
30:57
column Extracts so cool at UK and for anybody wondering why we're not on Facebook
31:03
is because we're locked out at the moment and that seems to be a permanent
31:07
thing. UK Column Extracts hasn't had much love over the weekend because Kenny has
31:11
been up at the Standing of the Light Festival along with Brian and Claire and
31:18
so on, so that's why he will be back on it tomorrow. Of
31:22
course, if you'd like to pick something up at the UK column Shop,
31:26
please do plenty for you to get hold of there a quick reminder of the
31:30
event on Sunday in the second of June twenty twenty four in Jamaica Street in
31:34
Glasgow. That's tickets available at Tickets to Scotland. This is for the VAX
31:41
Scottish Vaccine Injury Group. Do get along to that if you possibly can.
31:45
And the interview that was done with Ruth Rafferty is on the UK Column website.
31:51
Ruth Rafferty from the Scottish Vaccine Injury Group is on the UK Column website.
31:56
If you haven't seen that and you haven't shared it yet, please do
32:00
one pm tomorrow for the interview with Dinny van Kleef from the Control Group.
32:07
This is all about parallel societies and so on. Of course, under the
32:10
government's definition of extremism, creating parallel parallel institutions is considered an act of extremism,
32:20
so please join us one pm tomorrow to hear about this particular act of
32:24
extremism. And we also want to mention Hands Off RAFA event emergency rally taking
32:31
place opposite Dining Street tomorrow six p Yes, tomorrow, six pm. If
32:37
you can possibly get along to that, please do, And let's just very
32:42
briefly mention RAFA And of course what's been happening overnight is absolutely atrocious, not
32:47
that anybody should be surprised, bearing in mind what's been happening for the last
32:51
six months, but it's really air strikes on Rafa, killing at least thirty
32:55
five people, possibly as many as fifty. This of course was a strike
33:01
on what was effectively a refugee camp at the time. This was an area
33:07
that the IDEF had said was effectively not at least it was specifically designated as
33:14
a humanitarian area, and they certainly had not told anyone to evacuate. So
33:20
most of these people that were killed and injured by this were civilians, including
33:25
one particularly harrowing image or video clip of a baby missing its head. It
33:31
was I'm sorry to have to tell you that, but it was absolutely horrendous
33:37
the scenes from this and well, this is what Gilad Atsman was putting out
33:43
this morning on Twitter. I'll be happy to learn from Apak, Israel and
33:47
the IDF what is the exact international law that makes the burning of dozens of
33:52
displaced refugees in their tents into a legal act. Mark. I don't know
33:58
if you've got any thoughts on this, but the situation continues to get worse.
34:02
So it was probably inevitable that once the ICC sorry the ICJ, demanded
34:10
that Israel stop their attack on Rafa, that in fact it was going to
34:14
ramp up. But you know this continuous attack on civilians under the guise of
34:22
dealing with hamas can't continue. Oh. Absolutely. The one thing about Israel
34:29
is we're told that nationalism, particularly hypernationalism, is bad, but when it
34:35
comes to the Israeli state, the cruelest forms of nationalism are allowed to blossom.
34:40
Other than that, we're told we have to be internationalists and we all
34:44
have to get along, and isn't it wonderful on a global scale? And
34:47
so Israel feels in boldened, especially through USAID, to do whatever they want
34:52
to do whenever they want to do it, and to hell with anybody that
34:55
would tell them different, especially the International Court of Justice. And so the
35:00
huge irony here, the thing that we really got to contemplate, is any
35:05
other time in history, the Israeli state would have been seen as a pariah
35:08
and the world would have been galvanized to go stop the Israeli state from doing
35:13
this. But now they're doing it with impunity, and it's even celebrated in
35:16
some circles. It's a huge irony and black eye on humanity's notion of morality
35:23
and fair play. Well, it's a huge black eye on the notion of
35:28
the so called international rules based order, or at least it's a demonstration of
35:31
what that term means is that we make up the rules and the rules can
35:36
change on a daily business. There's no actual order in it. It's disorder
35:39
and it's quite incredible. I mean, I've only touched the surface of this
35:44
story and Vanessa undoubted lee we'll cover it much more detail on Wednesday, but
35:47
it did feel that we couldn't do the news today without mentioning it. But
35:52
now let's come back onto international events and so on, in the sense of
35:57
international policy at least, what is the Kilarney Declaration? Mark Well, in
36:06
Killarney, Ireland, this activist named Eddie Hobbs, and thanks to Alex Thompson
36:10
for tipping me off on this, Eddie Hobbs brought out a declaration. Along
36:17
declaration that's what it is a long statement of observing what's going on with the
36:25
World Pandemic Treaty and Ireland's involvement in that and other internationalist schemes. The declaration
36:32
is calling out against those schemes. It's calling on the Government of Ireland,
36:37
including the ancient peoples of Ireland that predate the state itself, is calling on
36:43
you might say, the soul of Ireland to really protest these things, and
36:47
there was a big Global Economic Summit. We can see that in the next
36:51
slide, happening in Killarney right at the same time, and by all indications,
36:55
Mike Eddie Hobbs read this declaration at or near the site of the Global
37:00
Economic Summit. We can talk a little bit about that just for context.
37:06
Global cooperation, as says, has never been more important about the Global Economic
37:10
Summit in connecting progress with purpose. Globalization, international conflict, the dawn of
37:16
artificial intelligence, and the climate emergency are just some of the issues that will
37:22
dominate policy making and global boardroom conversations for years to come. This Global Economic
37:27
Summit, which we're told as a relatively new event, is a not for
37:30
profit thing which we'll see international leaders and decision makers convene in the West of
37:36
Ireland to develop fresh solutions to these global challenges, fresh solutions really transforming words
37:42
into meaningful impact. It took place at the europe Hotel in County Kerry and
37:49
I won't read all of this next slide except to say the middle part of
37:53
it this is really interesting. Keeping in mind the context where Eddie Hobbs read
37:58
this Declaration. The Globeble Economic Summit is established as an independent company limited by
38:04
guarantees CLG and proudly functions as the philanthropic foundation for the Business Post Group.
38:12
So they're hiding behind charity again. Originating from a collaborative effort among journalists,
38:16
business leaders and political figures, the foundation emerged in response to evolving journalism models,
38:23
evolving journalism models and the need for impartial analysis that guides fact based,
38:29
objective decision making. Fusing the dynamism and rigor of a newsroom with Ireland's extraordinary
38:36
convening power the Global Economic somemit is uniquely positioned to unite global leaders in impactful
38:42
dialogue. So journalism Mike is just embedding itself in the governmental process. It's
38:46
not reporting on it apart from it. Rather it's a part of it.
38:52
And this is a common builderberg thing. The media is just completely dropping its
38:55
function as a watchdog of the state and has said it's collaborating with the state
39:00
anyway. We have some of what Eddie Habs read from the Clarney declaration and
39:06
he kind of captures the essence of it here at the beginning of it.
39:08
So we'll go with this video. The ancient Irish people, who predate this
39:16
state by centuries and who have long asserted our rights to freedom from tyranny,
39:22
do so again. We declare the right of the Irish people to the unfettered
39:29
control of Irish destinies, to be sovereign and indefeasible. The Irish people demand
39:37
our legal endowment from the nineteen eighty seven Supreme Court Crosti ruling to a national
39:43
referendum on the continuing membership of the World Health Organization. We do so because
39:52
the WHO intends to force a Trojan Heart treaty upon us, disguised as a
39:58
new agreement and a complete overhaul of all regulations. We demand, in the
40:07
first instance that the Irish government rejects these maneuvers as a breach of WHO membership
40:13
rules and which require a four month window before any changes are adapted. But
40:20
we see through and beyond the agency of the WHO to a multi front agenda
40:28
determined to create a borough digital technocracy which threatens to subvert all liberal democracies.
40:37
And so we reach out from here at home and abroad to all those now
40:42
awakening to the real and present danger from it. Whispered through the sound of
40:49
silence during the lockdowns is a stark warning about the banality of evil from Hannah
40:54
Arrent, who studied the Eichmann trial in Jerusalem in the early nineteen sixties and
41:01
who predicted that twenty first century totalitarianism would be led not by the monsters of
41:09
the last one, but by the banal bureaucrats of the next. So we
41:15
recognize and applaud the intervention of all US Republican senators to demand Senate vote on
41:22
the WHO plans to subvert US democracy, the rejection of it by large numbers
41:29
of attorney state attorney generals, and the determination of state legislatures led by Louisiana
41:36
to reject the WHO, the UN, and the World Economic Forum. We
41:42
recognize the intentions of the UK, Netherland and the Slovak Republic governments to reject
41:47
the WHO. And we note that these events occur as a first major vaccine
41:53
is pulled from human health due to the clatting of our human blood that gives
42:02
the thrust of it. There are a couple more slides where I could read
42:06
a little more of it. Mike, I don't know if you have any
42:07
comments, but he is clearly laying the groundwork for this, and showing that
42:14
he believes there's something in the the inside of the Irish people, something in
42:21
their history, in their traditions, that can rise up and fight against this,
42:24
and calling attention to this. One of those banell bureaucres, by the
42:29
way, is Tadros, the Director General of the WHO, who in fact
42:34
did attend this global Economic summit, the outside of which Eddie Hobbs read the
42:38
entire declaration, which is actually quite long. I might add, Mike,
42:43
I don't know if you have any other comments. I can share a couple
42:45
other choice comments from that declaration, but either way you want to go,
42:51
yeah, go ahead, Mark, Yeah, anyway, Just to sort of
42:54
put a capstone on what he was saying, it also says we see you
43:00
the bureaucrats in the Irish government's continued participation in a globalist enterprise for which it
43:06
has no mandate from the Irish people, a people who fought long and hard
43:09
to repel the grip of empire, to which we have no intention of capitulating,
43:15
no matter how it disguises itself. The WHO Pandemic Agreement Agenda twenty thirty,
43:20
with its so called sustainable development goals and the EU Migration Pact. We
43:25
see you the banell bureaucrats in the moves to bring representative representative democracy, bring
43:31
it to an end by replacing it with stakeholder capitalism. That's so true.
43:37
This is a model of centralized, anti democratic global governance advanced by the unelected
43:43
World Economic Forum, which craves fusing state power, NGOs and corporate power together.
43:47
Very accurate there to the growing global power of unaccountable and unelected super national
43:53
institutions like the WHO and the UN. And we can move on from CyArk.
43:59
Just before you do move on, I'll just I'll just say in that
44:01
in that one, that second paragraph there talking about stakeholder capitalism, talking about
44:07
the fusing of of par these are terms that we are seeing in the UK
44:15
government. With the UK government even has a doctrine which it calls the Fusion
44:19
Doctrine, which is all about creating these public private partnerships, but also extending
44:27
that to partnerships with nngus and other so called third sector organizations. So he's
44:34
absolutely hit the nail on the head with this. This is exactly the type
44:37
of thing that Mariana Spring would be calling conspiracy theory. But he has he's
44:42
absolutely accurate with it, and you're accurate, Mike, and showing that the
44:46
government with this fusion doctrine is actually doing these things. The Marianna Springs of
44:52
the world, they just call people wrong without looking as as to whether the
44:55
statements are actually accurate or not. We'll just look at this last because it's
45:00
the most important of the remaining ones. And this is the actual website where
45:05
the Clarinity declaration. When you go to it, there's a icon that's floating
45:09
in the text field and you click on that and this is what comes up.
45:13
Signed the declaration digitally, and I believe you don't have to be irish
45:17
to do it. It looks like it's worldwide, So check it out if
45:21
you want to get involved and sign it, and you can read more about
45:23
it at that website as well. Thank you, Mark, Thank you very
45:27
much, Diane. Then back to you, and we're beginning with Debbie's blog.
45:32
Yes, thanks Mike. So, when Debbie was discussing her blog with
45:38
me a few days ago and we realized that we had some convergence and things
45:44
that I've done in the past and what she was looking into, specifically around
45:47
my predos research and health information and providing health information to people in ways that
45:53
are the most effective. And so this particular section, if you go bacimate
45:59
her blog, you can link to the research that we've mentioned, both mine
46:04
as well as the other one that I'm going to talk about today. So
46:07
I'm not sure if anyone has ever heard of the company called wood Newton.
46:13
I had not heard of wood Newton until last week when we were having this
46:16
discussion. But what happened was Wood Newton got funding through Nice and the MHRA
46:24
of some of our best friends to do this research around digital mental health tools.
46:30
So the money was from the Welcome Trust that was the funder, and
46:36
they gave money to Nice and MHRA and then the majority of the money went
46:40
on to wood Newton, the company to do the actual research and do most
46:46
of the reporting. So I had to look into who is wood Newton.
46:50
So it turns out that wood Newton, working together with the MHRA with Nice
46:54
with Welcome Trust funding, is another one of these public privates, and we'll
47:00
call this one a philanthropic partnership. So what does wood Newton do Well,
47:04
they have a CREEPI first of all, on top of what they do,
47:07
and they basically give some very vague language in my opinion, about the type
47:12
of research that they do, engaging people that work with different things in terms
47:17
of finding innovative and cost effective solutions. We have to be innovative these days.
47:22
That's another buzzword our clients is you can see here some wonderful organizations,
47:28
including the NHS, including the Ministry of Defense, including you know, other
47:32
third sector charity government organizations. So we can see here that they have incredible
47:38
links with corporations as well as government as well as what we would call third
47:44
sector or charities. And we know a little bit about those. So what
47:49
did they do with this? So they did this research and there's a larger
47:54
report, it's about a sixty page PDIF report. We can provide a link
47:58
to that and the show notes. But I'm going to take about this part
48:00
of it because dead Be pointed out in particular that if we put together this
48:07
agenda of wellness as we would call it, and what does wellness mean?
48:10
Wellness to me, it seems like after being directly involved in wellness related research,
48:17
I used to be in a research group called the Digital Health and Wellness
48:21
Group, so I have first hand experience of how this all works. They
48:23
get large amounts of Moody to do things that they could find out or much
48:28
cheaper, and we're talking about millions of pounds for these projects such as this
48:32
one that wood Newton has through the MHIR and nice. So when we look
48:37
in particular at young people and what they said about digital health mental health technologies
48:42
and what this means is things like apps or in the past it would have
48:45
been websites, but now it's apps. So the idea is that anybody can
48:51
go online and download an app, right there might be some therapeutic benefit,
48:55
there might be some sort of game element to it, there might be quizzes,
49:00
there might be figuring out are they depressed? How do they feel?
49:05
So they were just sort of asking young people what they thought about these different
49:09
types of technologies, and they felt like, well, it's easy to use,
49:14
it's safe, it's familiar. Because we know young people spend a lot
49:17
of time generally speaking on their phones. They don't have to talk to anyone,
49:22
they don't have to disclose anything to anyone that they're not comfortable with.
49:25
They can talk to maybe somebody they don't know if there is in some cases
49:30
somebodies have chat features if they want to talk to someone who may or may
49:35
not be qualified on the other end. Honestly, it might not solve anything.
49:40
And also we can't really diagnose things, but that doesn't seem to be
49:45
the point with a lot of these apps. It's not meant to be a
49:46
diagnosis. But at the same time, there are a few concerns about things
49:53
that people might disclose that are dangerous. For example, they might give away
49:57
too much personal information, they might share things where they're really in this into
50:02
a serious situation with one to take their own life. And are these apps
50:07
really going to do anything where they really need an actual intervention from a real
50:12
qualified person to help them. So, just to go back to some of
50:16
my research, I have lots of research in this area. I've been doing
50:20
this work since was you. I think my first published paper in this area
50:23
was two thousand and nine, I believe. So these are just abstracts from
50:28
two of the papers. And if you want to read the abstracts, I
50:30
would read this all out to you because I could get a bit boring,
50:32
a bit academic. But just to say that I found a lot of the
50:37
same things that I found that would be found and I never had one point
50:42
eight million pounds to do it. We had a very low budget. Maybe
50:45
we'd give away a few you know, incentives, a few vectors to spend
50:49
a little bit of money or something, maybe travel costs, but mostly we
50:53
did these online over telephone calls and so on. And so we realized that
51:00
generally speaking, they like them, but they also have limitations. They don't
51:05
necessarily know that they're available, they don't necessarily know what to do with them,
51:07
how to use them appropriately. And also particular just to me, was
51:13
that they don't use the same terms that clinicians use, so that somebody might
51:16
type into Google if they don't have a diagnosis, I hate my life.
51:21
I've seen that happen, I hate my life. That's not going to lead
51:23
them to things that are clinical, assuming that any of these apps are clinical,
51:28
because a lot of them are not designed with clinicians together. They're just
51:31
people who thought they should make an app, you know, app designers,
51:36
developers who say, oh, let's do something for depression and we'll throw it
51:37
together and we'll put it out on Google Play and see what happens. So
51:40
they are a bit dangerous. I would say those well that one of another
51:45
one of my papers around the issue of authority goes back to what I was
51:49
talking about with Marianna Spring and you know, the idea of what is authoritata
51:53
piece of information. It might be more authoritative to talk to someone who feels
51:58
the same layer, has the same condition or health problem, compared to an
52:01
NHS doctor who you don't want to talk to at all. This was a
52:05
keynote speech that I gave in twenty eighteen to people in NHS Scotland around policy
52:10
practice and research in mental health. So this summarizes not only my own or
52:15
last ten years of research going in and out of this topic, as well
52:21
as what other people were finding at the time. So I really I find
52:25
it very very discouraging that this much money has been spent on something that we
52:31
already knew, and that if they had just given me a phone call they
52:35
could have found this out for free and not have to spend that much of
52:37
the taxpayer's money. Yeah. So I do wonder, Diane, why they
52:42
felt the need to relaunch a new investigation instead of looking at what's already in
52:47
the scientific literature. Yeah. I mean, the other possibility is that they
52:52
found my papers. They're all freely available that maybe they found it, and
52:54
then who knows what they actually did with the one point eight million pounds.
52:58
But from what I saw the reading the report, the field work, which
53:02
was the interviews in the focus groups they said they did took place over three
53:06
months. So I don't know how you spend one point eight million pounds in
53:10
three months. I really don't know how you do that on actual research costs.
53:15
So I would like to know where that really meant. Okay, well,
53:19
thank you for that, Mark. Let's come back to the United States
53:22
and what's this tenth Circuit Court been up to. Well, this is actually
53:30
good news, Mike. The tenth and eighth Circuit courts in the US are
53:36
hitting back against vaccine mandates and related matters. How timely right with the who
53:42
starting their WHA today. And another thing I'll preface with here, Mike,
53:47
is that these are the kinds of actions where courts and state legislatures, even
53:53
county governments, et cetera, make independent decisions medically in terms of informed consent,
54:00
and they don't force people to take a vaccine, they don't force people
54:05
to take a PCR test. Things like that. These are the kinds of
54:07
actions that many people fear the Pandemic Treaty aka Agreement will mitigate against and put
54:15
everything in a straight jacket and make local and judicial independent actions far more difficult.
54:22
But anyway, the Tenth Circuit in this matter weighed whether the University of
54:28
Colorado Medical School's vaccine mandate burden the exercise of religion. It's the case Doe
54:34
versus Board of Regions at that university, dated May seventh, and so on
54:39
and so forth. People can read more on the slides about that. We'll
54:43
move on from there. This is also from the publication Colorado Politics that we
54:49
started out with for this segment. In a fiery opinion, the Federal Appeals
54:53
Court based in Denver tore into a pair of COVID nineteen vaccination policy that the
55:00
University of Colorado imposed on its own medical staff in latter twenty twenty one,
55:06
and the court concluded they discriminated against certain religions and affected plaintiffs were consequently entitled
55:12
to exemptions. In the two to one vote in the Tenth Circuit, the
55:16
all Republican panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit directly direct
55:22
excuse me, directed unusually sharp barbs at each other and at the trial judge
55:27
who initially declined to block the university's mandates. Judge Allison id or ied Eid,
55:34
writing for the majority in the two to one decision, believed the policies
55:37
governing religious exemptions at Colorado University Colorado University Medical Campus were permeated with animus.
55:46
In other words, there was, you know, a parent animus or things
55:52
like that. In this next slide, Colorado University quote has not even attempted
55:58
to explain why it's interest is served by granting exemptions to practitioners of some religions
56:04
but not others. This is a dissenting opinion. No one contends that Christian
56:07
scientists are any less likely to contract or spread COVID nineteen than Buddhists, Roman
56:13
Catholics, or Orthodox Christians, wrote Judge Eyed, an appointee of Donald Trump.
56:19
But because plaintiffs were the wrong religions, their exemptions were denied. Actually,
56:25
that was the main opinion against what the university did. It's a little
56:31
hard to sort out here that the next paragraph Senior Judge David Ebel, a
56:37
Reagan appointee, not a Trump appointee. Like the first one, he agreed
56:40
that the Anshutz Campus of University Colorado Medical School. The initial policy requiring employees
56:49
seeking religious exemptions to show their faith opposed all immunizations. He agreed they were
56:54
likely unconstitutional, but he disagreed that the revised policy was problematic, and he
57:00
criticized the majority for accusing the university of discriminatory intent, so he didn't see
57:07
it as discrimination, whereas the majority did. We're still unpacking this a little
57:12
bit. Here's what Judge Ebel warned, disagreeing with the majority. I believe
57:17
it is imprudent and beyond the current record for our court to make emphatic and
57:21
unsupported findings of animus when it is quite possible that the university was just trying
57:27
to draft a narrow policy addressing a very specific risk in order to keep his
57:30
patients and staffs free from a preventable COVID risk at a time of great urgency
57:36
and uncertainty when COVID was killing so many people receiving medical care. And we'll
57:42
move on from there as we unpact this and wrap it up, Mike.
57:45
Another twist in this is the eighth circuit to the east of that it took
57:52
into account the Mayo clinic, which is in Rochester, Minnesota. It's main
57:55
clinic anyway, and the Eighth Circuit ruled that the Mayo Clinic must face religious
58:01
bias claims over COVID nineteen back vaccine policy. The court ruled, and I
58:07
think we have a little bit more about that. I certainly won't get into
58:12
this whole thing. I'll just hit the main part of it. A US
58:15
appeals court on Friday received a lawsuit accusing the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota of illegally
58:22
firing five employees who refused on religious grounds to receive the COVID vaccine or to
58:28
be regularly tested for the virus. In this case a unanimous three judge panel,
58:32
the other one was two to one of the Saint Louis based Eighth Circuit.
58:37
A Court of Appeals said the judge who tossed out the consolidated lawsuits last
58:40
year wrongly ruled that the workers had not connected their objections to Mayo's COVID nineteen
58:46
policies with their sincere Christian religious beliefs. Basically, what it boils down to
58:52
is, in both cases it came up that the people seeking religious exemptions had
58:59
to actually point out specific passages in their religions where vaccines could be specifically said
59:06
to be a bad idea, and this turned out to be an unnecessary burden
59:09
that didn't have to be met. And so it's good news that rejecting the
59:15
jab MIC on religious grounds was supported and ruled to be a favorable thing by
59:22
both circuits. And it's a good trend to see. Just as the WHA
59:28
is being started there in Geneva, Switzerland. We can only hope that if
59:31
they consummate a treaty, it will not mitigate against this kind of local,
59:37
localized decision making at the national and subnational level that would uphold medical choice and
59:44
informed consent. Yeah, okay, thank you, Mark. We're just going
59:47
to finish with a couple of very brief items here. First of all,
59:51
the Daily Base was pushing the side. Twelve people were injured after turbulence struck
59:55
a Qatar Airways flight from Doahad. The Dublin and Sunday officials confirmed. This
1:00:00
is all over the mainstream press and again they're taking something which is totally normal
1:00:07
and making it appear to be abnormal. Just remind everybody what we showed them
1:00:09
last Wednesday's program. This is from the NTSP, the National Transportation Safety Board.
1:00:15
It's a paper called Preventing Turbulence Related Injuries in their Carrier Operations conducted under
1:00:21
Title fourteen, Code of Federal Regulations, Part one twenty one, and they
1:00:24
absolutely demonstrate that if you look at the dark blue line there there is zero
1:00:30
trend from between nineteen eighty nine and twenty eighteen in the number of turbulence related
1:00:36
injuries. So any suggestion by the mainstream press this is somehow related to climate,
1:00:42
that there are more it's more common for me to be injured is simply
1:00:45
false. So let's call that a ukc Verify reminder. And we'll just end
1:00:52
with this because this went out on Twitter today from doctor Simon Goodek. The
1:00:59
mame saying, virus didn't cancel your medical treatment, destroy your business and raise
1:01:04
your civil liberties. The government did. And again we put hashtag Independence Day
1:01:08
on this because it wasn't just the government. It was because the government of
1:01:14
the day was absolutely supported by the opposition and by well all the opposition parties
1:01:20
in fact, so there was no opposition within politics to the lockdowns and so
1:01:28
on. So if we're thinking that there are any solutions in the mainstream parties.
1:01:31
I think we would be thinking incorrectly. Just keep that in mind and
1:01:36
do push that hashtag. Let's get some momentum behind it. We'll leave it
1:01:40
there for today. We'll be back in a few minutes if you're a uk
1:01:44
CALUN member for some extra Otherwise, don't forget the interview tomorrow, and we'll
1:01:50
be back for the news on Wednesday at one pm as usual. We'll see
1:01:53
then, bye bye and set him ra