Latest / Bloomberg Intelligence / Farr on Impact of FOMC Decision (Audio)

Transcript

Farr on Impact of FOMC Decision (Audio) · Bloomberg Intelligence

• 0:01
  Speaker 1: You're listening to Taking Stock with Kathleen Hay and Pox
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: on Bluebird Radio. The Federal Reserve said yesterday that it's
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: keeping its benchmark interest rate unchanged, also modestly upgrading the
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: central banks longer term economic outlook. That's the conclusion of
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: the two day meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: of the announced federal funds rate will remain at a
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: quarter of a percent to a half a percent. That's
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: what the banks charge each other for overnight loans. Here
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: to tell us more about the Federal Reserve and your
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: investments is Michael Farr. He is the chief executive and
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: the founder of far Miller and Washington. He's based in Washington,
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: d C. He can be followed on Twitter at Michael Underscore,
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: k Underscore, far f A double R and of course Washington,
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: d C home to Bloomberg one FM and one oh
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: five point seven FM h D two. Michael Farb tell
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: us what your reaction is to the fed A Reserving?
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: Will they raise interest rates in December by points? Jim,
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: thanks for having me very much. It's always great to
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: be with you and Kathleen. Um. I don't I can't
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: believe the market's reaction today. I mean, I can't, for
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: the life of me understand how everyone didn't see this
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: non event, no move, nothing done, as we say in
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: the business, kind of a move out of the FED coming.
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: And yet the market reaction today looks like I guess
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: they really weren't expecting it. Stocks are higher, the dollar
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: is lower, and bonds are rallying. I mean that that
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: really looks like there was something of a surprise in
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: this data anyway, or somehow we've inspired the most all
• 1:44
  Speaker 1: of the bulls and perhaps the dollar bears to come
• 1:47
  Speaker 1: in and make some changes. They threatened, of course, more
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: action that they're actually going to go ahead and get
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: closer to tightening in December. I don't believe them. I
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: wish they would. I'd like to see him moved the sidelines.
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: I don't believe them. I think if they're going to
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: remain data dependent, they are very worried. I think they're
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: chickens at the FED, and I think they're going to
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: stay at very least on the sidelines for the foreseeable future.
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: And of course now we've got hawks do doves and chickens.
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: I like that, But you know, I think that, But
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: you know, Michael seems that a couple of things. Number One, Um,
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: it wasn't just whether or not the Fed raised the
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: rate in yesterday and whether or not to reason December,
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: is the fact that they consensus view. Now the dots
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: are all over the map, but the dots are clustered
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: for around two interest rate increases, only two, not three
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: as they had before. Okay, And that seems to be
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: underscoring this view that was described very well in a
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: trific story on the Bloomberg today that instead of diverging,
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: traders are saying, oh, they're still in convergence mode. The
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: Fed's not going to make a move, and if they do,
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: it's not going to be very much. And the European
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: Central Bank and gosh, the Bank in Japan and the
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: Bank of England, they're all really easy. So it seems
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: that's one of the reasons why you see this this
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: move down on the dollar again. Kathleen, I think that
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: you're you're right, though I suppose on some level I'm
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: pretty disappointed. Markets have been moving for seven or eight
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: years now on every utterance out of the Federal Reserve.
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: The Fed is going to tighten and markets go down,
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: and the Feed's gonna ease and markets go up, and
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: the FED is going to maintain low rates for longer
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: and markets go up. You know, I'm kind of one
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: of these old fundamental investors who likes to look at
• 3:30
  Speaker 1: balance sheets and income statements and understand businesses and barriers
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: to entry and what really creates value. And a lot
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: of that hasn't mattered the last few years. Most of
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: market gains have been driven by pe multiple expansion, a
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: little bit in terms of earnings increases, and a lot
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: of terms of really the easy money effect um optimism on,
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: you know, free money forever out of investors. I think
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: it's created moral hazard. I think it's creating bubbles in
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: certain places. But I think the message that wall streets
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: getting is They're not going to change anything soon. So
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: I'm going to stay in and swim, and the punch
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: bowl stays full and so party on. Guys. Well, Michael,
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: you know, you sound so last century with this idea
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: of you know, actually looking at a balance sheet or
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: you know, some kind of defensible business model or even
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: some kind of innovation. You know, I feel for you there,
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: you know, but you've got to get with the modern worlds. Here,
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: let me appreciate it. Martaine said that I do. I
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: was God rest his soul was said, I was kind
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: of stupid for thinking that moral hazard still existed sooner
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: or later. And you know, it's been a lot later
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: than I and a lot of others thought. Others thought, um,
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: sooner or later. Fundamental valuations matter and balance sheets matter. Again,
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: there is a disruptor in our future, and you better
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: have a seat when the music stops. Okay, So, having
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: said that, would you be willing to take let's say,
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: three percent dividend from a bank like JP Morgan or
• 5:01
  Speaker 1: another financial institution in order to just kind of wait
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: and maybe see when that moment comes. Yes, absolutely I would.
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: I think it makes a great deal of sense. If
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: you look at the banks that are trading at book
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: value and some of them write at tangible book value.
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: With the two and a half to three percent dividend,
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: I think that those banks at some one they're cheap,
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: but uh, they will benefit as interest rates go up.
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: It's a hard environment from to make money. It's a
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: new world for banks post dot frank, but at a
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: certain valuation they I think they're very compelling. A three
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: percent dividend makes sense, and the time to buy stuff
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: is when everybody else hates it. I don't know anybody
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: who's out there jumping into banks. I like them. Okay,
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: so what what and who are you avoiding and why? Well,
• 5:48
  Speaker 1: I think you have to avoid the stuff that has
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: run the most and the most recently. So if you
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: take a look at a lot of the yield stocks,
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: a lot of the utilities, certainly the pipeline LPs and
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: energy LPs, a lot of them already rolled over and
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: it's way late in that trade. Uh, utilities and some
• 6:04
  Speaker 1: of the reach they were great trades for the first
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: six months of the year. I think you're going to
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: see a return, and you've already started to see people
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: voting and moving with their wallets to the more fundamentally
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: sound balance sheets that have real growth, that are not
• 6:19
  Speaker 1: over levered, and that do have some dividends. So I
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: think valuations are beginning to matter again. If the FED
• 6:25
  Speaker 1: actually says that they're going to stay away for longer
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: and people begin to believe it, then I think the
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: risk trade comes back in and watch out for the
• 6:33
  Speaker 1: fang stocks again. But but for now, we seem to
• 6:36
  Speaker 1: be enamored of fundamentals. I've always been enamored of fundamentals
• 6:41
  Speaker 1: as some days it works, some days it doesn't. But
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: I sleep very well at night, all right, So in
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: the context of sleeping well at night, I'm just going
• 6:48
  Speaker 1: to offer up your list the B B and T
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: bank as well. They pay more than three percent JP
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: more than two point eight percent. You also a side
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: P n C and Goldman Sacks. Maybe just talk about
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: in the context of what you describe as this rotation
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: out of those high yielders. Maybe at one point Utilities
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: Telecommon reads right, Well, I would own those companies, and
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: I'm still probably below a market weight, meaning that my
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: allocation to those banking stocks will be below as you
• 7:16
  Speaker 1: look at a financial allocation within the S and P
• 7:19
  Speaker 1: five hundred. But I think that they fit a nice
• 7:22
  Speaker 1: place within a portfolio that has probably some consumer staples,
• 7:26
  Speaker 1: some healthcare, and some technology, but the technology again with
• 7:30
  Speaker 1: some stolid balance sheets. So these are these are on
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: the banking side um names that have basically gotten beaten
• 7:38
  Speaker 1: up as a group as there's a they really haven't
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: with these low rates been able to make much money
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: and earn much on deposits at all. Uh, Just any
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: incremental rate increase helps these guys a lot. I might
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: be early, but I get paid to wait. And you know,
• 7:53
  Speaker 1: as you said, Tim, as a stogy guy, UH like me,
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: that's not a bad idea to let somebody pay me
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: three percent when the ten year treasury is paying what
• 8:02
  Speaker 1: one point six? So, Michael, how are you factoring into
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: the the election into the Market's Hillary Clinton leading pretty
• 8:10
  Speaker 1: handily in some of the latest polls out today, Presidential
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: debates coming, but Donald Trump is giving it all he's got.
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: There's still time left. How how is this outcome of
• 8:22
  Speaker 1: the election going to effect or not affect the stock market?
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: You know, it's such a thorny question, Kathleen, whenever you
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: talk politics, and in Washington we talk politics, uh much
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: more easily than other places around the country. But um,
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: this is not a political comment. Markets have been pricing
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: in a Clinton victory. That's where the numbers have shown,
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: and markets have gone ahead and said we're going to
• 8:45
  Speaker 1: place our investments basically in line with a uh Secretary
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: Clinton outcome as victor. When she stumbled and became ill
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: uh week and a half ago or so, markets really
• 8:59
  Speaker 1: fell to that. It's not so much an anti Mr
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: Trump sort of a comment. In my opinion. It's much
• 9:05
  Speaker 1: more of a oh my, we haven't considered what we're
• 9:08
  Speaker 1: We're going to have to put our money for a
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: Trump victory. So I think that you will certainly, uh
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: see a fair amount of frenzy and fraud in the
• 9:17
  Speaker 1: markets coming into the election. But Wall Street wants to
• 9:21
  Speaker 1: know how to price what it can expect um and
• 9:25
  Speaker 1: right now they continue to price a Secretary Clinton victory.
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: Will see if that if that pans out, But a
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: little volatility is expected. And by the way, markets are high,
• 9:35
  Speaker 1: markets are, you know, still at a near all time high.
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: Markets will come down at some point. That's not a
• 9:41
  Speaker 1: reason for panic. It will be an opportunity to do
• 9:44
  Speaker 1: some buying. But don't start worrying. I'm talking to so
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: many clients who think, where should we get out of this? Now?
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: You don't, all right, Michael Farr, thank you so very
• 9:54
  Speaker 1: much for joining us from far Miller Washington in Washington,
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: d C. Market closed with a stock switor Dave Wilson
• 10:01
  Speaker 1: coming up on Kathleen Hayes along with pim Fox. This
• 10:04
  Speaker 1: is Bloomberg. Yeah,