Latest / The Bill Handel Show / Fireworks vs Drone Shows | Kidmaxxing

Transcript

Fireworks vs Drone Shows | Kidmaxxing · The Bill Handel Show

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: You're list Saints.
• 0:01
  Speaker 2: I am six forty the Bill Handles show on demand
• 0:05
  Speaker 2: on the iHeartRadio app I Am six forty Bill Handle
• 0:10
  Speaker 2: Here he is A Thursday morning, July two and coming
• 0:15
  Speaker 2: up behind Saturday, of course, the Fourth of July big doings.
• 0:18
  Speaker 2: This time around two hundred and fifty years the United
• 0:21
  Speaker 2: States has been around. Now, what does the Fourth of
• 0:24
  Speaker 2: July mean to a whole lot of people? Well, Burger's
• 0:27
  Speaker 2: hotdogs on the grill. Also, fireworks. Fireworks are a huge
• 0:32
  Speaker 2: part of July fourth, and there are some fireworks in
• 0:36
  Speaker 2: the fight now on July fourth fireworks. And it has
• 0:41
  Speaker 2: to do with these various companies, fireworks companies that are
• 0:45
  Speaker 2: now using drones. And if you've ever seen one of
• 0:50
  Speaker 2: those drone displays, one of those extravaganzas in the sky,
• 0:54
  Speaker 2: I mean they're brilliant. I mean it is extraordinarily you
• 0:58
  Speaker 2: can do with drones. Here's what's going on is that
• 1:02
  Speaker 2: when you talk about these fireworks or talk to these
• 1:04
  Speaker 2: fireworks companies, they're saying that is just additive. We can
• 1:08
  Speaker 2: do fireworks or drones or both. Well, there's a big
• 1:12
  Speaker 2: fight now about doing fireworks at all. And why Well,
• 1:17
  Speaker 2: Number one, environmentally people have a problem with him because
• 1:21
  Speaker 2: you've got that smell of cordite. I love the smell
• 1:25
  Speaker 2: of fireworks, and it can be dangerous in terms of
• 1:28
  Speaker 2: wildfires because embers or peak parts and pieces of fireworks
• 1:34
  Speaker 2: can come down and start fires. And of course the
• 1:37
  Speaker 2: danger of these fireworks. And I joke a lot about
• 1:42
  Speaker 2: kids blowing their hands off, but I refer to a
• 1:45
  Speaker 2: case that came down last year where some poor kid
• 1:49
  Speaker 2: did blow his hand off, which happens way too often,
• 1:53
  Speaker 2: and he sued the company that manufactured him and he one.
• 1:57
  Speaker 2: Of course, he won, and the court said even though
• 2:02
  Speaker 2: the kid was taking every precaution that he possibly could,
• 2:07
  Speaker 2: it didn't do enough because the fireworks were so defective.
• 2:11
  Speaker 2: And then it was argued that the court gave my
• 2:15
  Speaker 2: left handed compliment, and the court said, but he doesn't
• 2:17
  Speaker 2: have a left hand, so I really didn't do that.
• 2:19
  Speaker 2: In any case, they are dangerous as hell, those fireworks
• 2:25
  Speaker 2: that are safe and sane.
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: And here's also the problem.
• 2:28
  Speaker 2: It's jurisdictional in the sense that La County, for example,
• 2:32
  Speaker 2: does not sell fireworks safe in saying fireworks, I love that,
• 2:35
  Speaker 2: that's how they sell them. And you go across the
• 2:38
  Speaker 2: line of Ventura County, and literally it's across the street
• 2:41
  Speaker 2: where the county starts, and there are feet literally feet
• 2:46
  Speaker 2: that are on the other side of the county line.
• 2:48
  Speaker 2: You see all of these kiosks, all of these little stands,
• 2:52
  Speaker 2: these pop up plywood, cheap o creepo stands that sell
• 2:58
  Speaker 2: these packages of fireworks. And the other thing I noticed
• 3:01
  Speaker 2: is that it used to be home homemade fireworks or
• 3:06
  Speaker 2: home grown fireworks that you could buy at these kiosks,
• 3:09
  Speaker 2: at these little stands, or bottle rockets, and they were,
• 3:14
  Speaker 2: you know, the sparklers, which are very dangerous by the
• 3:18
  Speaker 2: way those things burn at three thousand degrees. It's kind
• 3:21
  Speaker 2: of crazy. Now it's almost professional fire fireworks. I don't
• 3:26
  Speaker 2: know if you've noticed that. We live on top of
• 3:29
  Speaker 2: this little hill and we overlook this little valley, and
• 3:34
  Speaker 2: so we see the tops of houses, and on July fourth,
• 3:38
  Speaker 2: we see the people who have fire works. I don't
• 3:42
  Speaker 2: even know if they're legal in the county that I
• 3:44
  Speaker 2: live in, in Orange County. They may or may not
• 3:46
  Speaker 2: be legal. I have no idea. But as I look
• 3:49
  Speaker 2: down and I see the fireworks, which we do, we
• 3:52
  Speaker 2: look down and man, these are professional, great fireworks. I mean,
• 3:58
  Speaker 2: how they held, you get them? Where do they sell?
• 4:01
  Speaker 2: So the danger part I understand the pollution part. I
• 4:07
  Speaker 2: also understand the danger in terms of physical danger. Yeah,
• 4:10
  Speaker 2: the pollution part I don't care about because you know
• 4:12
  Speaker 2: how much pollution can it possibly cause. The possibility of
• 4:18
  Speaker 2: fire is a big one, both wildfires and home fires.
• 4:22
  Speaker 2: But how do you beat fireworks? I mean, I mean
• 4:27
  Speaker 2: fireworks are fireworks. You know, the exploding shells, the colors,
• 4:33
  Speaker 2: although you can beat those colors with a drone display,
• 4:36
  Speaker 2: and just you know the smoke that comes out in
• 4:39
  Speaker 2: that wonderful smell that happens, I don't think you can
• 4:42
  Speaker 2: beat that. And at the same time, the drone stuff
• 4:44
  Speaker 2: is terrific. I'm in favor of both. But now, of
• 4:48
  Speaker 2: course there is a fight, and you've got the environmentalists,
• 4:52
  Speaker 2: which you're fighting like crazy, saying we shouldn't do this,
• 4:55
  Speaker 2: and then you have jurisdictions that are saying nope.
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: Absolutely.
• 5:01
  Speaker 2: You go to the show at the Rose Bowl, which
• 5:03
  Speaker 2: used to be a tremendous fireworks show, it's drones now
• 5:07
  Speaker 2: Grand Park its shrones now, Hanson Hanson Dam in the
• 5:11
  Speaker 2: San Gabriel Valley drones more Obey Lake Cunningham up North
• 5:16
  Speaker 2: have all gone to drones. Now if you put the
• 5:20
  Speaker 2: two together, both thrones and fireworks. As I said, man,
• 5:24
  Speaker 2: is that a show? And the fireworks debate, of course,
• 5:29
  Speaker 2: has entered some very serious political culture wars, as it
• 5:32
  Speaker 2: always does, but more so than ever. Right wing influencers
• 5:36
  Speaker 2: are slamming the anti fireworks crowd, targeting the Coastal Commission
• 5:41
  Speaker 2: because the Coastal Commission is in there and is denying
• 5:44
  Speaker 2: permits because at certain areas along the coast you have
• 5:48
  Speaker 2: to have the Coastal Commission say okay to it too. Well,
• 5:52
  Speaker 2: no no, so we may see the end of real fireworks.
• 5:58
  Speaker 2: Matter of fact, fireworks are so important. At my wedding,
• 6:02
  Speaker 2: we made sure there were fireworks, really good fireworks. There's
• 6:08
  Speaker 2: a video of my wedding, isn't there ann that's available
• 6:11
  Speaker 2: where it shows the fireworks display? And where do you
• 6:14
  Speaker 2: see that? Where do we have that? What platform do
• 6:18
  Speaker 2: we have that? On Instagram? On inst that bill handle
• 6:24
  Speaker 2: show Okay, and there's my wedding and right behind me
• 6:28
  Speaker 2: I had the fireworks display go off, and it wouldn't
• 6:32
  Speaker 2: have been the same. Big fan of fireworks and very entertaining.
• 6:37
  Speaker 2: His kids get seriously hurt. No, not so good. So
• 6:41
  Speaker 2: if you have a kids, don't do it at home.
• 6:44
  Speaker 2: Just don't do it because it really is kind of
• 6:46
  Speaker 2: dangerous saying kind of stupid. Okay, administration, certainly not when
• 6:51
  Speaker 2: it comes to Trump, his kids, his family, his business
• 6:54
  Speaker 2: is no chance. And this is another episode and how
• 6:59
  Speaker 2: we have a brand new kind of presidency that.
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: Will probably never have again.
• 7:04
  Speaker 2: Any case, There's a story I want to share with
• 7:08
  Speaker 2: you in New York Times and this has to do
• 7:10
  Speaker 2: with conflicts of interest, and of course it has to
• 7:13
  Speaker 2: do with our president and conflicts of interests. So let's
• 7:17
  Speaker 2: start with the fact that Donald Trump is by far
• 7:20
  Speaker 2: the wealthiest president we have ever had. We haven't had
• 7:24
  Speaker 2: too many billionaire presidents. And the story is, this story
• 7:30
  Speaker 2: became big because it just was released that the president
• 7:36
  Speaker 2: made two point two billion dollars. Made two point two
• 7:39
  Speaker 2: billion dollars, not is worth two point two billion dollars,
• 7:43
  Speaker 2: but total revenue of the companies that he is involved
• 7:47
  Speaker 2: with that he previously owned. Does he own them now? Well,
• 7:50
  Speaker 2: he says no, because he transferred all ownership interest over
• 7:55
  Speaker 2: to his two sons who now run the companies. So
• 7:59
  Speaker 2: what normally happens well, virtually every senior member of the
• 8:03
  Speaker 2: administration and every president modern day president thinks starting maybe
• 8:08
  Speaker 2: Eisenhower or Truman, or Truman didn't have any money to
• 8:11
  Speaker 2: deal with anyway, what they did, these presidents and senior
• 8:15
  Speaker 2: members of the administration is put their assets into a
• 8:19
  Speaker 2: blind trust, meaning that they truly had no idea of
• 8:26
  Speaker 2: where the investments are, where those assets are being held
• 8:30
  Speaker 2: at bank, at brokerage company. There was a firewall that
• 8:34
  Speaker 2: was thirty feet high. Well, but that's not the law,
• 8:40
  Speaker 2: that's simply policy. That's simply what the presidents did.
• 8:46
  Speaker 1: Legally. Can they do what Trump does? Yeah? And what
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: does Trump do? Well?
• 8:51
  Speaker 2: How about selling his name all over the place making
• 8:54
  Speaker 2: the kind of money that he has made. He has
• 8:57
  Speaker 2: argued when questioned about all this money made, I don't
• 9:01
  Speaker 2: talk to the people that handle my money.
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: I never talked to my kids about it.
• 9:04
  Speaker 2: I never talked to anybody about the money that I'm
• 9:08
  Speaker 2: making or not making. Now, he came out against crypto
• 9:12
  Speaker 2: really hard, and then all of a sudden changed his
• 9:16
  Speaker 2: tune and is now in favor of crypto and has
• 9:19
  Speaker 2: in fact pardoned a couple of crypto gangsters who have
• 9:23
  Speaker 2: made hundreds of millions of dollars, been convicted of ripping
• 9:27
  Speaker 2: people off. He has pardoned them, and his company that
• 9:31
  Speaker 2: he and his family have been engaged in made a
• 9:35
  Speaker 2: billion dollars a billion dollars just out of crypto.
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: We're talking his first year.
• 9:40
  Speaker 2: In office, the kind of money that he has made.
• 9:43
  Speaker 2: And the argument is this a conflict, Well, of course
• 9:48
  Speaker 2: it's a conflict, but not legally a conflict. So as
• 9:53
  Speaker 2: these interviews are going on, because this is kind of
• 9:56
  Speaker 2: a big story and Republicans hard knows for Republicans that
• 10:01
  Speaker 2: have been asked this question, members of Congress, for example, saying,
• 10:04
  Speaker 2: don't you find it at least unsettling that the president
• 10:08
  Speaker 2: is making this much money? And by the way, on
• 10:11
  Speaker 2: his name, let's not kid ourselves. Do you think the
• 10:15
  Speaker 2: deals that are being cut in Katar and the Emirates
• 10:18
  Speaker 2: with his two sons, Trump facilities, Trump golf golf courses,
• 10:25
  Speaker 2: Trump office towers. Oh, they would have happened even if
• 10:28
  Speaker 2: he wasn't the president. Okay, you believe that. So what
• 10:32
  Speaker 2: are these Republicans say when asked? Isn't there an issue here?
• 10:37
  Speaker 2: Is this kind of unsettling for you? What he's doing
• 10:40
  Speaker 2: is within the law. He is within the law. That's
• 10:45
  Speaker 2: the position. But okay, do you have a problem with
• 10:49
  Speaker 2: at all, even the perception, even the fact that this
• 10:53
  Speaker 2: is happening. It's within the law. There is no question.
• 10:56
  Speaker 2: This is all legal. And here's the scary part is
• 11:00
  Speaker 2: that during the first term Trump was actually concerned about
• 11:04
  Speaker 2: the potential lease the appearance of conflict. His second term
• 11:09
  Speaker 2: didn't even pretend. And he says something very interesting about
• 11:15
  Speaker 2: these potential conflicts which are not conflicts within the law.
• 11:19
  Speaker 2: He said, you know what, I don't care. I just
• 11:24
  Speaker 2: don't care. And more telling, and he's absolutely right about this.
• 11:30
  Speaker 2: His supporters don't care. It doesn't matter. Now, this is
• 11:36
  Speaker 2: a populist president who is there for the little man.
• 11:41
  Speaker 2: He is there to cut taxes for middle class lower
• 11:45
  Speaker 2: class or middle class and lower class economic strata. And
• 11:51
  Speaker 2: he well, it's the big corporations, it's the billionaires, it's
• 11:56
  Speaker 2: the multi millionaires that have gotten all the breaks or
• 11:58
  Speaker 2: the majority of the breaks. But doesn't matter, it doesn't matter.
• 12:03
  Speaker 2: It's I don't get any of this, I really don't.
• 12:07
  Speaker 2: And then this issue with the airplane, why aren't people offended.
• 12:11
  Speaker 2: It's granted it was a gift four hundred million dollars
• 12:14
  Speaker 2: from the government of Katar. Great, we'll accept it, and
• 12:16
  Speaker 2: Trump said, will take it? And I was there a
• 12:18
  Speaker 2: conflict there. I don't buy that. I think it's a
• 12:21
  Speaker 2: country that's just sucking up to the president, which is fine,
• 12:24
  Speaker 2: but they just the government has just spent four hundred
• 12:28
  Speaker 2: million dollars. That's the price of the airplane. We don't
• 12:30
  Speaker 2: even know what is going to cost or did cost
• 12:33
  Speaker 2: to U to redo the airplane for security purposes, put
• 12:38
  Speaker 2: in communications, harden the wiring case of there's a nuclear attack,
• 12:43
  Speaker 2: and in planes anywhere near their anti radiation a lot
• 12:47
  Speaker 2: of security that costs. I had heard over a billion dollars.
• 12:51
  Speaker 2: It may even be more than that, which is okay.
• 12:54
  Speaker 2: And what is happening with that plane is the taxpayer
• 12:59
  Speaker 2: is paying for all the security upgrades. The president is
• 13:02
  Speaker 2: going to use it for two years and then the
• 13:05
  Speaker 2: deal it's going to be donated to the Presidential Library.
• 13:09
  Speaker 2: It won't even be Air Force one. It'll be on
• 13:13
  Speaker 2: the library at the library. Whether it flies or doesn't fly.
• 13:16
  Speaker 2: I have absolutely no idea. But does anybody upset about that?
• 13:19
  Speaker 1: No, not at all. Well, how crazy is it? Okay?
• 13:23
  Speaker 2: Now it's July fourth, could be a lot of parties
• 13:26
  Speaker 2: that are going to occur, and there will be people
• 13:30
  Speaker 2: and historically have been people that rent Airbnb short term
• 13:36
  Speaker 2: rentals houses for blowout parties, and a.
• 13:41
  Speaker 1: Lot of people don't like them.
• 13:42
  Speaker 2: First of all, the home owners don't like them because
• 13:45
  Speaker 2: of the damage, noise, complaints from major from neighbors, injury risks,
• 13:50
  Speaker 2: all of it. And so about five years ago Airbnb
• 13:54
  Speaker 2: began using technology because this was really bad in terms
• 13:59
  Speaker 2: of people rent these homes just for the parties. And
• 14:04
  Speaker 2: so what they started using was machine learning technology basically AI,
• 14:08
  Speaker 2: the precursor of AI, to weed out these quote higher
• 14:12
  Speaker 2: risk bookings. And you can bet that technology is certainly
• 14:16
  Speaker 2: going to be working now and it does. And what
• 14:19
  Speaker 2: the company says, the technology uses quote hundreds of signals
• 14:23
  Speaker 2: like is the user making the reservation locally?
• 14:26
  Speaker 1: Is it a local person making.
• 14:28
  Speaker 2: The reservation or for a one or two day stint,
• 14:31
  Speaker 2: And that flags whether this booking is characteristic of the
• 14:36
  Speaker 2: kind of reservations that would turn a house into a
• 14:40
  Speaker 2: party house. Also, another thing, it's a big one that
• 14:44
  Speaker 2: prevents these crazy parties, is that guests can't book an
• 14:49
  Speaker 2: entire home. We'll rent you a room we're still going
• 14:56
  Speaker 2: to be around. And that's how Airbnb actually started. If
• 14:58
  Speaker 2: you remember, it was people that owned homes and they
• 15:01
  Speaker 2: had an extra room and they would rent it for
• 15:05
  Speaker 2: people coming into town.
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: It was a direct.
• 15:09
  Speaker 2: Attack on hotels, if you want to call it an
• 15:11
  Speaker 2: attack or alternative to hotels.
• 15:15
  Speaker 1: So nope, only rooms, and if they are.
• 15:22
  Speaker 2: If the potential guests do make it into this quote
• 15:27
  Speaker 2: list of undesirables, they're redirected to book private room listings,
• 15:32
  Speaker 2: individual rooms, even hotels because Airbnb, strangely enough has hotels now,
• 15:38
  Speaker 2: even though it was built to as built to be
• 15:42
  Speaker 2: an alternate to hotels. To conflict and so, according to Airbnb,
• 15:47
  Speaker 2: last fourth of July, the system deterred more than twenty
• 15:50
  Speaker 2: thousand people in the US from booking an entire home.
• 15:54
  Speaker 2: Twenty five hundred people in California were redirected. In LA,
• 15:59
  Speaker 2: two hundred people were deterred. It doesn't seem like a
• 16:03
  Speaker 2: huge number of people as far as I'm concerned, But
• 16:07
  Speaker 2: I'm willing to bet that the company had no idea
• 16:10
  Speaker 2: this was going to happen, although in retrospect you can
• 16:12
  Speaker 2: know what's going to happen. Now Here is a stat
• 16:15
  Speaker 2: Airbnb in twenty twenty five, fewer than point zero six
• 16:21
  Speaker 2: percent of stays resulted in a report of a party,
• 16:26
  Speaker 2: and Airbnb recorded five hundred and thirty three million nights
• 16:33
  Speaker 2: in twenty twenty five that they were able to sell. Okay,
• 16:37
  Speaker 2: by the way, this machine learning tool uses vast amounts
• 16:40
  Speaker 2: of consumer data to make decisions, and there are detractors say, oh,
• 16:44
  Speaker 2: there's blind spots, there are false positives, and people who
• 16:48
  Speaker 2: are trying to rent legitimately are being nailed for it. Great, okay,
• 16:53
  Speaker 2: And so here's the argument. If something wrong happens and
• 16:56
  Speaker 2: we have to kill all of it. For example, if
• 16:59
  Speaker 2: a plane crash happens, we're done with airplanes because they're
• 17:02
  Speaker 2: too risky. Because people die in car crashes, no, we
• 17:06
  Speaker 2: can't have cars anymore. And certainly medical malpractice, which does happen,
• 17:11
  Speaker 2: It happens occasionally, which means that there should be no
• 17:14
  Speaker 2: surgeries anymore. I mean, it's always the argument, well, there
• 17:19
  Speaker 2: may be false positives. Welcome to life, give me a break, okay, Okay.
• 17:26
  Speaker 2: A story about something called kid maxing. Now what is
• 17:30
  Speaker 2: kid maxing? Well, kid maxing is about having kids. And okay,
• 17:36
  Speaker 2: so we've done the story of people having kids. Now,
• 17:39
  Speaker 2: keep in mind that we've done story after story of
• 17:41
  Speaker 2: people not having kids. It's just way too expensive. In
• 17:45
  Speaker 2: many cases, you don't want to put kids into the world.
• 17:48
  Speaker 2: The way it's going, it's a lot easier to be single.
• 17:51
  Speaker 2: There's a bunch of reasons. So it's more and more
• 17:54
  Speaker 2: difficult for people to have kids for a variety of reasons,
• 17:57
  Speaker 2: except for billionaires.
• 17:59
  Speaker 1: Who want kids.
• 18:01
  Speaker 2: And I'm talking about young billionaires either, I'm talking about
• 18:05
  Speaker 2: old billionaires.
• 18:07
  Speaker 1: There is just this.
• 18:08
  Speaker 2: Thing going on and a personal story, you bet, because
• 18:11
  Speaker 2: I've done this for three different older billionaires in their
• 18:15
  Speaker 2: sixties and seventies with wives that are a lot younger.
• 18:19
  Speaker 1: Well, what a shocker. And it turns out that.
• 18:23
  Speaker 2: The sub cases these men never had children. In some
• 18:28
  Speaker 2: cases they wanted to start a family with their new
• 18:31
  Speaker 2: wife or the wife wanted kids. And it's an issue
• 18:35
  Speaker 2: that the argument is a gee, can they afford it? Yeah,
• 18:39
  Speaker 2: they can, as a matter of fact. But it's more
• 18:41
  Speaker 2: than that. It is a trend that is happening. First
• 18:44
  Speaker 2: of all, there are a lot more billionaires out there,
• 18:46
  Speaker 2: and second of all, amongst these they want to have kids.
• 18:49
  Speaker 2: A lot of it is for I want airs I
• 18:52
  Speaker 2: want my first male child with Chinese billionaires for example. Now,
• 18:58
  Speaker 2: I have done this, as I said, through so because
• 19:00
  Speaker 2: it's usually done through IVF, it's done through egg donation,
• 19:04
  Speaker 2: certainly done through surrogate parenting, because if a man is
• 19:06
  Speaker 2: married to a woman in her late forties, fifties, or
• 19:10
  Speaker 2: she's not going to be pregnant. And so I have
• 19:13
  Speaker 2: I helped many many couples. I've had twenty five hundred
• 19:15
  Speaker 2: kids through my surrogacy program. By the way, if I
• 19:17
  Speaker 2: have mentioned it before, and one of my early cases,
• 19:21
  Speaker 2: i'd never been I've never met a billionaire in my life.
• 19:25
  Speaker 1: I had never met a billionaire.
• 19:28
  Speaker 2: So when this gentleman will call him Richie Rich, Okay,
• 19:32
  Speaker 2: when mister Richie Rich came into my office to talk
• 19:36
  Speaker 2: about surrogacy, and he excused himself to go to the.
• 19:40
  Speaker 1: Restroom, I followed him. I followed him in.
• 19:44
  Speaker 2: And there he goes up to the urinal and I'm
• 19:47
  Speaker 2: right behind him. He said, Bill, what are you doing?
• 19:50
  Speaker 2: And I said, I've never seen a billionaire pee before.
• 19:54
  Speaker 2: I just wanted to see how that worked. And you
• 19:58
  Speaker 2: know what, it's exactly the same. It was kind of
• 20:02
  Speaker 2: interesting that there is no difference between u Peeing and
• 20:05
  Speaker 2: a billionaire peing.
• 20:06
  Speaker 1: Unless you're a man versus a woman. He didn't have
• 20:08
  Speaker 1: like a like a Wiener staff or something that came in.
• 20:13
  Speaker 1: He did not. No, he did not.
• 20:15
  Speaker 2: And even with and he was Chinese actually, and I
• 20:19
  Speaker 2: would think that, well, you know, it's God has not
• 20:23
  Speaker 2: been particularly good to you. But I didn't say that
• 20:27
  Speaker 2: because he's a billionaire. Stop shaking your finger there, Cono.
• 20:30
  Speaker 2: I'm going to stop right there. Okay, I am not
• 20:32
  Speaker 2: going to talk about Chinese and length of penises. I
• 20:36
  Speaker 2: will not be doing that. There'll be no reference to that.
• 20:40
  Speaker 2: But the point is, in his case, he wanted He'd
• 20:43
  Speaker 2: never had biological children, and he wanted kids, and that
• 20:46
  Speaker 2: was his reason for doing it. And so it's just, well,
• 20:50
  Speaker 2: this is turning out to be the ultimate status symbol
• 20:54
  Speaker 2: for ultimate wealth.
• 20:55
  Speaker 1: Here.
• 20:56
  Speaker 2: I am a man in my sixties seventies, and I
• 20:58
  Speaker 2: can still produce kids variety of reasons, and sometimes it's
• 21:02
  Speaker 2: just ego.
• 21:04
  Speaker 1: Now is there a downside?
• 21:06
  Speaker 2: You know, I'd love to see studies of what happens
• 21:08
  Speaker 2: to these kids, because my guess is, when a kid
• 21:13
  Speaker 2: is growing up with unbridled, unbelievable wealth, it's just not
• 21:18
  Speaker 2: the same as the billionaire who are all self made.
• 21:22
  Speaker 2: It's just not the same influence. Okay, we're done with that.
• 21:27
  Speaker 2: Coming up, and Neil, this is a story that you
• 21:30
  Speaker 2: can jump into, and that's the story of M and
• 21:32
  Speaker 2: MS and trying to find that blue color, the elusive blue.
• 21:39
  Speaker 2: We'll deal with that coming up. Kf I am six forty.
• 21:43
  Speaker 2: You've been listening to the Bill Handle Show. Catch my
• 21:45
  Speaker 2: Show Monday through Friday, six am to nine am, and
• 21:49
  Speaker 2: anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app.