Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Maryland Case and Cornell Expose a Massive Elephant in the Room | HBR News 573

Transcript

Maryland Case and Cornell Expose a Massive Elephant in the Room | HBR News 573 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Hello, everybody, and welcome back to Honey Badger Radio. I
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: hope you guys are doing well this week and that
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: you are laughing at all of the absurdity so that
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: you are not consumed by it. I'm your host, Brian.
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: I'm joined by, as always, my lovely co-hosts, Hannah Wallin
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: and Dr. Ranamercam.
• 0:15
  Speaker 2: Hello. Hello. Hello, hello. That's hello in Dutch.
• 0:19
  Speaker 3: I get to be the lovely ho.
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: And also, Mike Stevenson is here.
• 0:26
  Speaker 2: Yes, both of us. Myself. And Superman are both here.
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: Anyway, so be sure to continue.
• 0:35
  Speaker 3: At least you pronounced it right.
• 0:37
  Speaker 2: I did, I did. Yes.
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: I'm not going to get into a debate about that.
• 0:41
  Speaker 2: You never had a problem with Dr. Randomercam.
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: But, yeah. How many M's in Dr. Randomercam?
• 0:46
  Speaker 2: Two of any.
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: Anyway, this week we're going to be talking about the
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: latest news about the Cornell University civil suit against Jane
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: Doe or Jane Doe's filing. I don't know. It's all
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: over the place. There are some developments, though. And there's
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: also a congressional candidate that's also experiencing her own Cornell
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: 7 moment. Being gay or sorry, being non-binary is no
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: longer cool with the young people and more. So stick around.
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: It's going to be a good time. And be sure
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: to join us afterwards for the patron only show. So
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: you guys probably saw a lot of outrage, especially from women,
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: but also some men, uh, over Shane Gillis's opening monologue
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: at Saturday night live or SNL as people call it today. And, uh,
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: of course they all thought that he's the worst person
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: ever and they're trying to cancel him because surprise, surprise
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: cancel culture is not actually over. This is Woke 2.0,
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: as you know, or this is how they, that's what
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: they tell me. But anyway, I have, there's a lot
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: of articles on it, but I thought I would try
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: something a little bit different. And I'm looking at MS Now,
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: which is a website I never go to. This used
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: to be MSNBC. But they wanted to alter their branding
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: for some reason. I'm sure there's something really juicy for
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: the reason. But now it's called MS Now. But they're
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: just as bad as they've always been. And we have
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: an opinion piece.
• 2:18
  Speaker 3: So I'm just going to start calling them PMS Now.
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: Yeah, PMS Now, exactly.
• 2:22
  Speaker 2: The MS always stood for Microsoft. A lot of people
• 2:25
  Speaker 2: don't know that.
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: No, I know, yes.
• 2:27
  Speaker 2: That program that you're all using for your computer is
• 2:30
  Speaker 2: what MSNBC has named itself after and is still naming
• 2:33
  Speaker 2: itself after.
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: Now you've basically just awakened all the Linux users in
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: our chat. They're going to tell us about Linux.
• 2:43
  Speaker 2: But anyway. I'm not messing with you.
• 2:45
  Speaker 1: Because I know the Apple people can't say shit. They're
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: not much better.
• 2:50
  Speaker 2: But anyway.
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: So yeah, Shane Gillis did his opening monologue. And unfortunately,
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: for a small part of it, women were the butt
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: of a joke. And of course, women are not allowed
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: to be the butt of any joke. unless it's their
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: joke and it's about men. So they have an opinion.
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: So someone, and I will let you guess at the
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: sex of the person who wrote this, wrote, Shane Gillis'
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: SNL monologue was misogynistic and painfully unfunny. So we're going
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: to read this. It's actually a long article, despite it
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: being about a little, like, you know, opening bit on SNL,
• 3:30
  Speaker 1: which I don't even know, does anyone even watch SNL anymore?
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: I'm not even sure.
• 3:34
  Speaker 2: Only in the controversial clips on Twitter. And yeah, the
• 3:38
  Speaker 2: shorter the joke, the longer the lefty meme in response
• 3:42
  Speaker 2: to it. Women dress like whores. Let me tell you
• 3:47
  Speaker 2: how it's okay that we're dressed like whores. Yeah. Wall
• 3:50
  Speaker 2: of text. Become a badger so you can listen. Yes.
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: So if you want to really get like the full
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: brunt of what we're going to be talking about today
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: with regards to this particular topic, you have to become
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: a badger yourself by going to FeedTheBadger.com and setting up
• 4:07
  Speaker 1: a monthly subscription. Five bucks a month will get you
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: into Discord server. where you'll be able to watch all
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: the additional content, even hang out with the people in
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: our community and talk to us directly. So please consider
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: doing that. FeedTheBadger.com forward slash subscribe or just go to
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: the main website. That's basically Allison's finally decided to make
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: things easier. So just go to FeedTheBadger.com. Everything is right there.
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: And if you don't want to wake up one morning
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: to find that we've been yeeted from the internet, go
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: to BadgerFeed.com. Because that's what we need is another website
• 4:36
  Speaker 1: to confuse people even more. Or HoneyBadgerRadio.com, which is where
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: all of our content lives. And that way you don't
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: miss any of our videos, live streams, or what have you. So,
• 4:50
  Speaker 1: with all that out of the way, let us now
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: get into today's stories.
• 4:55
  Speaker 2: So.
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: Testimony from Cornell University's Title IX investigation into a 2024
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: alleged gang rape at the Chi Phi Fraternity House shows
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: that at least three of the accused students described their accuser,
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: Jane Doe, as the initiator and aggressor who engaged in
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: sexual activity without seeking their consent. Gilio, I hope I'm pronouncing,
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: it might be Gilio because it's like a J, a
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: G and like a Spanish name. And well, I don't know.
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: I'm just going to say Gilio or Gilio. Gilio Lopez
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: told investigators that Doe started sexual contact with him and
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: never asked for consent. He recalled drinking several beers and
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: mixed drinks, becoming uncomfortable and leaving around 2 a.m. Winston
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: Lee gave a similar account stating that Doe initiated activity
• 5:48
  Speaker 1: without first asking for his consent. He'll, He later asked
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: her for consent before further activity, and she replied that
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: they were, quote, all consenting adults, end quote. A third
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: student told investigators he considered himself the victim of sexual
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: misconduct because Doe performed oral sex on him while he
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: was too incapacitated to consent. Four of the seven men
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: acknowledged some sexual contact, describing it as consensual, while three
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: denied participating at all, and all denied any wrongdoing. These
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: accounts contrast with Doe's evolving claims, and I like using
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: the word evolving because they do seem to be, you know,
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: like a Pokemon, just changing a little bit. She initially
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: told police aspects of the night were, quote, pretty okay,
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: end quote, or involved voluntary participation, including agreeing to a
• 6:42
  Speaker 1: threesome due to attraction and intoxication. But later stated she
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: felt cornered, coerced into substances, including ketamine, hit and ultimately
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: raped while incapacitated, this is what she's claiming, telling investigators, quote,
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: I can say with 100% confidence I was raped, end quote.
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: Cornell's panel imposed sanctions ranging from suspensions and probation to
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: expulsions on some of these men, finding two responsible for
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: sexual assault and others for lesser or related violations. This
• 7:16
  Speaker 1: is the college, not the police. closed the fraternity chapter,
• 7:20
  Speaker 1: the Cornell, closed the fraternity chapter, and faced a 2026
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: civil lawsuit from Doe alleging non-consensual gang rape after she
• 7:30
  Speaker 1: was plied with alcohol, marijuana, and ketamine. The Thompson's County
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: DA declined charges in 2024 based on her sworn statement
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: describing the conduct as voluntary, conscious, and consensual under New
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: York law, but reopened the matter after the lawsuit was
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: No criminal charges have resulted as to date because, again,
• 7:50
  Speaker 1: this isn't a criminal case, this is a civil case,
• 7:53
  Speaker 1: even though the university is acting on it in the
• 7:56
  Speaker 1: way that they are. And that likely has a lot
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: to do with the fact that it's become a bit
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: of a media circus. So, the reason why I picked
• 8:06
  Speaker 1: this story is, I mean, it's obvious, like, some of
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: the men involved are claiming that they were the ones
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: that were sexually harassed and coerced because they also... were
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: high and drunk. I will add more to this later,
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: but I'll, like, cede the floor to anyone who wants
• 8:22
  Speaker 1: to comment on this latest sort of, like, you know,
• 8:25
  Speaker 1: bit of information coming out of this case.
• 8:30
  Speaker 2: Hannah, are you particularly champing at the bit?
• 8:33
  Speaker 3: Um, I can wait.
• 8:35
  Speaker 2: I can wait. Okay. This is one of the many
• 8:40
  Speaker 2: things we were warned about by the late prophet Christopher Hitchens. Yes,
• 8:45
  Speaker 2: I call him that with every sense of irony. Wherever
• 8:50
  Speaker 2: you stand on the religious question, Hitch was certainly to
• 8:53
  Speaker 2: be admired for his impatience with the feminist movement, even
• 8:59
  Speaker 2: in its excesses in the 90s and before. It was
• 9:02
  Speaker 2: on one of those panel shows where he said something
• 9:06
  Speaker 2: along the lines of, if you give women carte blanche
• 9:11
  Speaker 2: to cry victim at every opportunity... Eventually men will want
• 9:16
  Speaker 2: a piece of it too. Every sexual encounter between a
• 9:20
  Speaker 2: man and a woman will become a tug of war
• 9:23
  Speaker 2: of victim fighting and oppression Olympics. Obviously I'm paraphrasing. I
• 9:30
  Speaker 2: couldn't find the clip I'm thinking of, but yeah, he,
• 9:33
  Speaker 2: he predicted that this debacle would go on to be
• 9:37
  Speaker 2: so ubiquitous that it would become boring and And he
• 9:43
  Speaker 2: was wrong about that. I think he envisioned a future
• 9:47
  Speaker 2: in which female professional victims would be ignored for the
• 9:50
  Speaker 2: most part, as would their male counterparts. And if that
• 9:55
  Speaker 2: were the case, then it would indeed have become boring
• 9:57
  Speaker 2: and not worth talking about. but he died in 2011
• 10:04
  Speaker 2: having not envisioned what would be entailed in woke 1.0
• 10:08
  Speaker 2: never mind woke 2.0 female professional victims are not ignored
• 10:15
  Speaker 2: very far from it we've had everything from elevator gate
• 10:21
  Speaker 2: to the Cornell 7. Any female Z-list celebrity can cause
• 10:29
  Speaker 2: an apocalyptic tempest in Mr. Hitchens' beloved atheist community if
• 10:35
  Speaker 2: she so much as makes up a story about a
• 10:37
  Speaker 2: man inviting her for coffee. Meanwhile, any skank whore who
• 10:43
  Speaker 2: has consensual sex on any drug, probably up to and
• 10:47
  Speaker 2: including coffee... can not only kick up a media storm,
• 10:52
  Speaker 2: but also get the police involved in a police storm.
• 10:56
  Speaker 2: And I say skank whore, but I'm very much using
• 10:59
  Speaker 2: it as a euphemism for... Rapist. Alleged rapist, I suppose
• 11:06
  Speaker 2: I'm obliged to say. Like I outlined last week, I
• 11:09
  Speaker 2: doubt anyone knows exactly what happened in that room that night.
• 11:13
  Speaker 2: But if Jane Doe does recall what happened, then... Almost
• 11:18
  Speaker 2: by definition, she was more cognizant than the men, who
• 11:22
  Speaker 2: cannot recall anything, as was revealed in some PMs, I think,
• 11:31
  Speaker 2: unless what I saw was not real, but I recall things.
• 11:35
  Speaker 2: In any case, she didn't just have things done to her,
• 11:39
  Speaker 2: she did things to other people. But nobody cares. about
• 11:45
  Speaker 2: the men who were just as inebriated, just as vulnerable,
• 11:49
  Speaker 2: and just as incapable of consent. And if those men
• 11:53
  Speaker 2: were the first to report it, even the next day,
• 11:56
  Speaker 2: never mind two years later, they would have been laughed
• 12:00
  Speaker 2: out of the police station, just like they're being laughed
• 12:03
  Speaker 2: out of the conversation in the mass media, while the
• 12:07
  Speaker 2: mass media continues to bleat the one-sided story of woman victim,
• 12:13
  Speaker 2: man perpetrator. Needless to say, the mass media won't even
• 12:18
  Speaker 2: touch the hundreds of stories of adult female teachers statutorily
• 12:24
  Speaker 2: raping their male students. The myth persists that males always
• 12:30
  Speaker 2: enjoy sex with women and benefit from it at any
• 12:34
  Speaker 2: age and in any circumstance. While females never enjoy or
• 12:40
  Speaker 2: benefit from any contact with males whatsoever... Therefore, whatever happens
• 12:46
  Speaker 2: must be rape. Rape of women by men. Sorry to
• 12:52
  Speaker 2: say it, Mr. Hitchens, but the only people who listened
• 12:56
  Speaker 2: to your warning were the feminists. And they didn't adjust
• 13:01
  Speaker 2: their behavior by toning it down with the eternal victim culture.
• 13:07
  Speaker 2: On quite the contrary, they doubled down and tripled down
• 13:11
  Speaker 2: and dodeca doubled down to the point where men cannot
• 13:16
  Speaker 2: get a piece of that victim culture under any circumstance.
• 13:21
  Speaker 2: If a prepubescent boy so much as breathes in the
• 13:24
  Speaker 2: vicinity of a woman, he is a criminal. But if
• 13:28
  Speaker 2: a woman mass murders children, she is an innocent victim.
• 13:35
  Speaker 2: I can only imagine how horrified Mr. Hitchens would be
• 13:39
  Speaker 2: to know that consensual sex... is the police's top priority,
• 13:45
  Speaker 2: while thousands of cases of actual gang rape by marauding
• 13:49
  Speaker 2: gangs of Muslims is brushed under every rug in the house,
• 13:55
  Speaker 2: every rug in the police station, as it were. I'm
• 14:00
  Speaker 2: almost glad you died when you did, Hitch, because you
• 14:04
  Speaker 2: didn't live to see the world descend into this hellscape,
• 14:09
  Speaker 2: or to watch your little brother spiralling into despair. Ironically,
• 14:15
  Speaker 2: it was you who God captured, raptured, I should say,
• 14:21
  Speaker 2: leaving your pious doomer of a brother to be left behind.
• 14:28
  Speaker 2: Say whatever you like about this God of ours, but
• 14:30
  Speaker 2: he certainly has a sense of humor. I'd really like
• 14:36
  Speaker 2: to eventually hear the punchline to this joke, though. This
• 14:40
  Speaker 2: is getting silly, father. Any minute now, please. I'm ending
• 14:52
  Speaker 2: on a pregnant pause. On you go. No, no.
• 14:54
  Speaker 3: No pregnancies. Oh, shit. I will say this. And it's
• 15:04
  Speaker 3: going to piss everybody off, but... Title IX is largely
• 15:10
  Speaker 3: to blame for this. How many... news stories have you
• 15:18
  Speaker 3: ever heard of coming out of the 1930s, the 1940s,
• 15:21
  Speaker 3: the 1950s, maybe the 1960s of gang rapes on university
• 15:25
  Speaker 3: campuses when it was unusual or less usual for there
• 15:43
  Speaker 3: to be lots and lots of women. And when you
• 15:49
  Speaker 3: didn't see as many women getting into the more serious
• 15:56
  Speaker 3: academic areas, Title IX in 1972 was passed to eliminate
• 16:05
  Speaker 3: quotas in areas of academia like medicine. You know, anything
• 16:16
  Speaker 3: that was like higher end engineering, anything like that. You
• 16:21
  Speaker 3: could go to school to be an educator if you're
• 16:24
  Speaker 3: a woman, but it was up to the university whether
• 16:30
  Speaker 3: or not you could get into the school of medicine.
• 16:36
  Speaker 3: And part of it could be legally based on your gender. Now,
• 16:40
  Speaker 3: by the time it passed, universities didn't give a rat's
• 16:43
  Speaker 3: ass if you were male or female. By the time
• 16:46
  Speaker 3: it passed, they didn't need a law to tell them
• 16:52
  Speaker 3: that they could make more money if they let as
• 16:54
  Speaker 3: many female students in as male students to the more
• 16:59
  Speaker 3: prestigious areas of study. And so, of course, the number
• 17:05
  Speaker 3: of female students skyrocketed. And then Title IX really had
• 17:11
  Speaker 3: nothing to do, so it went after sports. The next
• 17:15
  Speaker 3: thing you had was the administration that runs Title IX,
• 17:23
  Speaker 3: how it's applied and how it's communicated to the universities
• 17:30
  Speaker 3: and how the universities are judged for it. Are they
• 17:35
  Speaker 3: following it? Are they not? They decided... to create quotas, ironically,
• 17:47
  Speaker 3: to force the schools to have as many female athletes
• 17:52
  Speaker 3: as they did male athletes. And so now you had
• 17:58
  Speaker 3: girls getting scholarships to go to university to play basketball, volleyball,
• 18:06
  Speaker 3: and other sports. And at the same time, if you
• 18:10
  Speaker 3: didn't get enough interest at your school in the traditionally
• 18:16
  Speaker 3: female sports or the female versions of sports that were
• 18:21
  Speaker 3: traditionally both sexes, then your school was going to give
• 18:28
  Speaker 3: up its Olympic male gymnastics team and its Olympic wrestling
• 18:34
  Speaker 3: team because they weren't going to give up football And
• 18:37
  Speaker 3: they weren't going to give up the boys basketball team,
• 18:40
  Speaker 3: the men's basketball team. Those made money for most universities.
• 18:44
  Speaker 3: So now you have lots of students that maybe aren't
• 18:50
  Speaker 3: that serious academically that are female. And you have students
• 18:56
  Speaker 3: that are more prone to partying. And it really wasn't
• 19:01
  Speaker 3: until you had that mix that you started getting stories
• 19:06
  Speaker 3: about of wild, drunken frat parties where the students engaged
• 19:14
  Speaker 3: in ridiculous orgy behavior and so on in an environment
• 19:21
  Speaker 3: where they weren't really that much older than they were
• 19:27
  Speaker 3: when they were in high school. They were still, some
• 19:30
  Speaker 3: of them teenagers, even though they were legally adults. And
• 19:34
  Speaker 3: at the same time, They were still in some need
• 19:38
  Speaker 3: of adult supervision by older adults and didn't have it.
• 19:45
  Speaker 3: All the excesses that you hear about on university campuses
• 19:48
  Speaker 3: are came from that. All the excesses came from this
• 19:55
  Speaker 3: change that took place. But there was another key element
• 19:59
  Speaker 3: that went into that. And it's part of Title IX too.
• 20:02
  Speaker 3: Title IX didn't write itself and it didn't ask for itself.
• 20:06
  Speaker 3: Congress wasn't sitting around on their thumbs going, what should
• 20:10
  Speaker 3: we pass next? Oh, let's make up a law about
• 20:13
  Speaker 3: universities letting women become doctors and lawyers and such. Feminists
• 20:21
  Speaker 3: fought for that. Feminists went in there and badgered them
• 20:24
  Speaker 3: until they passed this law. Raised a huge fuss. At
• 20:31
  Speaker 3: the same time that they were doing that, They were
• 20:34
  Speaker 3: creating an entire area of study, starting with one course.
• 20:41
  Speaker 3: The course was called Women's Studies. And Women's Studies was
• 20:47
  Speaker 3: everything is rape 101 for girls. And for the most part,
• 20:51
  Speaker 3: it was female students that were taking Women's Studies. And
• 20:55
  Speaker 3: of course, they had all kinds of activities they engaged
• 20:59
  Speaker 3: in on campus. And it was the Women's Studies department
• 21:05
  Speaker 3: engaging with Title IX regulations that led to the creation
• 21:14
  Speaker 3: of on-campus consent standards, consent narratives. They are the ones
• 21:22
  Speaker 3: that initiated the Take Back the Night rallies of the
• 21:25
  Speaker 3: 1970s and 80s and 90s. They are the ones that
• 21:30
  Speaker 3: initiated consent training that you had to have Even in
• 21:36
  Speaker 3: the 90s, we did this. We had to sit in
• 21:38
  Speaker 3: a room and listen to some dumb bitch tell us
• 21:43
  Speaker 3: what yes and no meant and the difference between someone
• 21:47
  Speaker 3: who looks happy and someone who does not look happy.
• 21:50
  Speaker 3: And the difference between someone who is conscious and someone
• 21:55
  Speaker 3: who is not conscious. Someone who is blind, stinking drunk
• 22:00
  Speaker 3: and someone who is a little bit tipsy. As if
• 22:02
  Speaker 3: people don't actually know that. And that then led to
• 22:10
  Speaker 3: this idea among women and girls that they're safe. You
• 22:17
  Speaker 3: can do anything you want and you aren't going to
• 22:19
  Speaker 3: regret it. It's not going to be embarrassing. We've gotten
• 22:22
  Speaker 3: rid of slut shaming. We had the slut walks, right?
• 22:26
  Speaker 3: So no slut shaming. Everything you do is okay. Nobody's
• 22:32
  Speaker 3: allowed to judge you for it. And, uh, Everybody is
• 22:37
  Speaker 3: always going to get your consent. Well, that's not true.
• 22:44
  Speaker 3: None of it's true. You will still be slut-shamed. You
• 22:47
  Speaker 3: will still discover that people will judge you for it,
• 22:50
  Speaker 3: including the people that you did things with, including the
• 22:55
  Speaker 3: people who were cheering you on, including the people who
• 23:00
  Speaker 3: asked you to get involved, and including the people who
• 23:03
  Speaker 3: told you enthusiastically, yes, let's do that. They will all
• 23:07
  Speaker 3: judge you for it. And you're going to judge them
• 23:10
  Speaker 3: for it, too. You're going to judge yourself. And that's
• 23:15
  Speaker 3: probably going to be the harshest judge you have. You
• 23:17
  Speaker 3: might not say so out loud. But in your head,
• 23:23
  Speaker 3: you're going to judge yourself more harshly than any other
• 23:28
  Speaker 3: person except maybe your mom and dad. They're going to
• 23:32
  Speaker 3: be pretty upset, too, when they hear about this shit. Right?
• 23:36
  Speaker 3: So what happens? Well, if women face judgment, the first
• 23:42
  Speaker 3: thing they do is deny and deflect. This is true
• 23:46
  Speaker 3: no matter whether it is you ran a red light
• 23:50
  Speaker 3: or you fucked 17 guys and a dog or whatever
• 23:55
  Speaker 3: while on three different types of drugs and drinking and, oh,
• 24:01
  Speaker 3: some of them were drunker and more high than you
• 24:04
  Speaker 3: were and you might be the rapist. This is all
• 24:10
  Speaker 3: happening because Congress gave feminists what they wanted. The universities
• 24:18
  Speaker 3: gave feminists what they wanted. The students gave feminists what
• 24:23
  Speaker 3: they wanted. Business executives give feminists what they want. The
• 24:30
  Speaker 3: university administrators gave feminists what they wanted. If you want
• 24:36
  Speaker 3: shit like this to go away, If you want the
• 24:40
  Speaker 3: sexual revolution to go away. If you want the idea
• 24:45
  Speaker 3: that everybody who is a little bit tipsy is a
• 24:50
  Speaker 3: victim of anything that happens while they're drunk to go away.
• 24:55
  Speaker 3: If you want that to go away, stop giving in
• 24:59
  Speaker 3: to feminists. This is their fault. This isn't a student
• 25:08
  Speaker 3: got raped and the other students are all bad. And
• 25:12
  Speaker 3: it isn't really necessarily that she was a rapist either,
• 25:16
  Speaker 3: although if somebody was there and they were completely out
• 25:21
  Speaker 3: of it and had not planned on attending a party
• 25:25
  Speaker 3: and doing these things, then maybe she was. But if
• 25:29
  Speaker 3: this was just a bunch of students partying together, getting
• 25:34
  Speaker 3: wild together, And then some of them the next day
• 25:37
  Speaker 3: had regrets and went, I'm a victim. Nobody was a rapist.
• 25:41
  Speaker 3: Nobody involved victimized anybody else. Everybody was there of their
• 25:45
  Speaker 3: own accord. And that's that. If we want to go
• 25:50
  Speaker 3: back to that standard, feminism has to die. I, for one,
• 25:57
  Speaker 3: am ready to nail that coffin shut.
• 26:02
  Speaker 2: Good comment from Senior Sticks. Not a super chat, but
• 26:05
  Speaker 2: a good comment. If they get rid of fraternities, they
• 26:08
  Speaker 2: have to get rid of sororities too, which I think
• 26:11
  Speaker 2: is alluding to someone in power has said, which it
• 26:19
  Speaker 2: might have been Kathy Hochul saying that the Cornell seven
• 26:24
  Speaker 2: cases grounds for abolishing fraternities. No comment on sororities. And yeah,
• 26:30
  Speaker 2: this could very well go the same way as the
• 26:35
  Speaker 2: Boy Scouts and the Girl Scouts. Yeah. Men can't have
• 26:41
  Speaker 2: their own spaces, but women still can. And I'm like, well,
• 26:45
  Speaker 2: if men and women are to have their own spaces,
• 26:46
  Speaker 2: then maybe they should be their own spaces. And some
• 26:49
  Speaker 2: rule should be put in place that men can't go
• 26:54
  Speaker 2: to sororities and women can't go to fraternity. This is
• 26:57
  Speaker 2: why particularly in Britain we've had all boys schools and
• 27:04
  Speaker 2: all girls schools even up to and including like late
• 27:08
  Speaker 2: teenage years so that they can focus on their education
• 27:13
  Speaker 2: rather than get them in fuel orgies that sort of
• 27:19
  Speaker 2: thing there's a time and a place for men and
• 27:23
  Speaker 2: women fucking each other and it's not the same time
• 27:26
  Speaker 2: and place as where they should be educated or where
• 27:30
  Speaker 2: they happen to be living and sleeping during their education.
• 27:36
  Speaker 2: I'm sorry if that sounds Puritan or authoritarian, but why
• 27:41
  Speaker 2: do they even have fraternities and sororities as separate buildings
• 27:47
  Speaker 2: in the first place if it is not to separate
• 27:51
  Speaker 2: girls and boys or men and women? in the case
• 27:54
  Speaker 2: of college students, because they are adults at that point, but,
• 28:01
  Speaker 2: you know, if it's not conducive to education, to let
• 28:05
  Speaker 2: them mix together, if this is the kind of thing
• 28:07
  Speaker 2: they're going to do, well, ideally, just don't give women
• 28:13
  Speaker 2: the power to do whatever they like and then destroy
• 28:17
  Speaker 2: men's lives. You don't give men the power to do it.
• 28:22
  Speaker 2: I can destroy women's lives either, but that's not on
• 28:24
  Speaker 2: the cards whatsoever. So let's pull something back in an
• 28:32
  Speaker 2: egalitarian direction, or let's push something forward in an egalitarian direction,
• 28:37
  Speaker 2: be it authoritarian or libertarian. Just as long as we
• 28:42
  Speaker 2: get rid of this feminist nonsense. that anything women do
• 28:47
  Speaker 2: is just fine and peachy, and anything men do is
• 28:52
  Speaker 2: a crime. Is that too much to ask? I feel
• 28:56
  Speaker 2: like it is. I don't know why it is, but
• 28:59
  Speaker 2: it is.
• 28:59
  Speaker 3: You know, the school that I went to didn't have
• 29:04
  Speaker 3: fraternities or sororities. We just had dormitories. They were not co-ed. Now,
• 29:10
  Speaker 3: some schools have co-ed dorms. Those are usually the party
• 29:13
  Speaker 3: schools too, by the way, but My school did not
• 29:16
  Speaker 3: have co-ed dorms, and you had to announce if you
• 29:21
  Speaker 3: brought your dad to help you carry something up or
• 29:25
  Speaker 3: your boyfriend or your brother or whoever to help you
• 29:30
  Speaker 3: with something on your floor. Aside from that, there were
• 29:35
  Speaker 3: days when you were allowed to have male visitors, and
• 29:39
  Speaker 3: the resident advice had to know who was in whose
• 29:42
  Speaker 3: room and your door had to be open. But if
• 29:48
  Speaker 3: it wasn't an open dorm day, when you brought someone in,
• 29:54
  Speaker 3: you had to yell man on the floor. And of course,
• 29:56
  Speaker 3: somebody would always yell something about mopping him up. But
• 30:00
  Speaker 3: That was to let people know, don't go running from
• 30:03
  Speaker 3: the shower to your room or vice versa in a
• 30:06
  Speaker 3: towel because there's a man in the hallway right now.
• 30:11
  Speaker 3: And I don't see why we shouldn't go back to that.
• 30:18
  Speaker 3: I think it would be safer. But I will say
• 30:20
  Speaker 3: one other thing. How many of you have heard of
• 30:24
  Speaker 3: anything like this happening at a trade school? Because I haven't.
• 30:32
  Speaker 2: Cricket noises. Yeah.
• 30:35
  Speaker 3: Just saying. Just saying. Nobody out there learning to weld
• 30:39
  Speaker 3: is acting like this.
• 30:44
  Speaker 1: So, I just want to say that I think the
• 30:51
  Speaker 1: problem that men are having here, and not just men
• 30:56
  Speaker 1: involved in the case, but also men looking at this case,
• 30:59
  Speaker 1: men that are in college, men that have Long left college, maybe.
• 31:03
  Speaker 1: I think that the thing that I find interesting about
• 31:09
  Speaker 1: this is that what's happening is men are trying to
• 31:12
  Speaker 1: navigate the world of women under feminism's rules for engagement.
• 31:20
  Speaker 1: And they're doing it because they're trying to be considerate.
• 31:24
  Speaker 1: I know that sounds weird considering what we're talking about,
• 31:26
  Speaker 1: which is basically like an orgy. involving one woman and,
• 31:30
  Speaker 1: you know, different numbers of men, depending on the accounts,
• 31:34
  Speaker 1: and I know that with all the drugs and alcohol involved,
• 31:36
  Speaker 1: it's probably, like, really fuzzy, but the point is there
• 31:39
  Speaker 1: was a lot of sexual activity going on and a
• 31:43
  Speaker 1: lot of inebriated people on various substances and so on.
• 31:48
  Speaker 1: And men are trying to navigate this in a way
• 31:50
  Speaker 1: that they think is fair and respectful to women. Which
• 31:53
  Speaker 1: is why what seemed to me the most important thing
• 31:56
  Speaker 1: here in this whole story is whether or not the
• 32:00
  Speaker 1: woman gave consent. Not whether or not the men gave it,
• 32:03
  Speaker 1: only whether or not the woman gave it. That was
• 32:06
  Speaker 1: like the only metric to determine whether or not a
• 32:09
  Speaker 1: crime was committed here. And even though every account the
• 32:13
  Speaker 1: woman gave, the men gave, all the witnesses, all lead
• 32:17
  Speaker 1: to the fact that it was all consensual, everyone is
• 32:20
  Speaker 1: still saying it's a gang rape. Now, you could say
• 32:23
  Speaker 1: that they're just stupid and they don't understand the rules
• 32:26
  Speaker 1: of consent, I would argue that consent doesn't exist. Not
• 32:30
  Speaker 1: for men. There's no such thing and that you should
• 32:33
  Speaker 1: stop playing this game. It's an illusion. All it's going
• 32:36
  Speaker 1: to do is get you screwed over. And I'll tell
• 32:38
  Speaker 1: you how I know. There are women saying that when
• 32:42
  Speaker 1: Jane Doe said that she was certainly 100% for sure raped,
• 32:46
  Speaker 1: which she could have said that for any number of
• 32:49
  Speaker 1: personal reasons that she wanted to get away with it
• 32:51
  Speaker 1: because she didn't want to be judged. or because she
• 32:53
  Speaker 1: wanted to win a civil lawsuit against the university. She
• 32:56
  Speaker 1: was trying to make a buck. She was trying to
• 32:58
  Speaker 1: get out of accountability. You can say all of that
• 33:00
  Speaker 1: is true. We can grant all of it. It doesn't
• 33:02
  Speaker 1: matter because women are supporting her in droves, and they're
• 33:06
  Speaker 1: all telling stories about how, oh, you know, she said
• 33:09
  Speaker 1: that she was for sure raped even though she stayed
• 33:11
  Speaker 1: in contact with them, even though she continued to hang
• 33:14
  Speaker 1: out with them, even though she had nothing bad to
• 33:16
  Speaker 1: say about them, right? In all the text messages and
• 33:20
  Speaker 1: all the continued, they stayed in contact. She probably went
• 33:23
  Speaker 1: and slept with those guys after this was over. Maybe
• 33:26
  Speaker 1: some of them, I don't know the details, doesn't matter.
• 33:28
  Speaker 1: What women are saying now is they're saying they have
• 33:31
  Speaker 1: stories that they're using to connect them to her. They're
• 33:36
  Speaker 1: saying things like, oh, I got raped and I continued
• 33:39
  Speaker 1: to date the guy for years afterwards. I stayed in
• 33:41
  Speaker 1: contact and I didn't realize that actually I was a
• 33:44
  Speaker 1: victim of rape. What that means is, gentlemen, consent doesn't exist.
• 33:50
  Speaker 1: It's completely conditional on the woman. If she decides that
• 33:54
  Speaker 1: you actually raped her that day, then you did. And
• 33:57
  Speaker 1: this is the reason why we have to stop operating
• 33:59
  Speaker 1: within this paradigm of consent being the highest possible measure
• 34:03
  Speaker 1: of what is true and what is good. You have
• 34:06
  Speaker 1: to avoid this at all costs, okay? And You cannot function,
• 34:13
  Speaker 1: you cannot operate within this paradigm of consent being the
• 34:18
  Speaker 1: only metric under which a crime is either committed or
• 34:21
  Speaker 1: not committed. Because guess what? You have just given her
• 34:24
  Speaker 1: a loaded gun and said, please don't shoot me with it.
• 34:27
  Speaker 1: Because that's exactly what happened. And that's what she's doing.
• 34:31
  Speaker 1: And again, I'm not even going to make this about
• 34:33
  Speaker 1: Jane Doe and the Cornell 7. I'm looking at the
• 34:36
  Speaker 1: bigger picture of every time I see this happen, where
• 34:39
  Speaker 1: a woman is makes an accusation against the man, whether
• 34:42
  Speaker 1: it's Brock Turner, whether it's LaCrosse, the Duke LaCrosse, whether
• 34:46
  Speaker 1: it's Emma Sulkowicz, Mattress Girl, whether it's the Rolling Stone
• 34:50
  Speaker 1: piece that was written, or the Cornell 7, or anything
• 34:54
  Speaker 1: that comes after that, Bill Cosby, Harvey Weinstein, all of
• 34:57
  Speaker 1: it is the same shit. Women give consent, then later
• 35:01
  Speaker 1: they say, you know what, actually I think he raped me,
• 35:03
  Speaker 1: and everyone gets behind her. The laws, they are not
• 35:07
  Speaker 1: equipped for this, okay? Consent is a lie. This is
• 35:13
  Speaker 1: what I'm saying. I'm not saying that there isn't a
• 35:15
  Speaker 1: scenario where it makes sense. I'm saying that as the
• 35:19
  Speaker 1: kind of like... As the kind of like.
• 35:23
  Speaker 1: The one event that decides whether or not you're safe,
• 35:28
  Speaker 1: it doesn't exist. That's not going to protect you. So
• 35:31
  Speaker 1: what you should do is stay the fuck away from
• 35:34
  Speaker 1: people like this. I would not get involved with anyone
• 35:37
  Speaker 1: that's going to operate under these pretenses. Yeah, we can
• 35:40
  Speaker 1: talk about getting rid of sororities and fraternities. It's not
• 35:43
  Speaker 1: going to stop young people from finding ways to hook up.
• 35:46
  Speaker 1: So the best thing to do is to just avoid
• 35:49
  Speaker 1: these kinds of casual sexual encounters. Stay away from hookup culture.
• 35:55
  Speaker 1: Stay away from dating apps. Stay away from it because
• 35:58
  Speaker 1: it is not safe for men. 100% not safe. And
• 36:02
  Speaker 1: I don't care how much you want your dick wet.
• 36:04
  Speaker 1: You got to like practice some discipline and back off
• 36:08
  Speaker 1: of that because I'm telling you right now, consent does
• 36:11
  Speaker 1: not exist. It doesn't.
• 36:15
  Speaker 3: It doesn't.
• 36:16
  Speaker 1: So you might as well just not even bother with that, okay?
• 36:20
  Speaker 1: Because it is the one weapon that these women have,
• 36:24
  Speaker 1: and they will use it if it's going to save
• 36:26
  Speaker 1: their reputation or their friendships or whatever. And look at
• 36:31
  Speaker 1: what this, in the Cornell 7 case here that we're
• 36:34
  Speaker 1: talking about, okay? No evidence of any wrongdoing, no criminal
• 36:38
  Speaker 1: charges were filed, no police reports were And these guys
• 36:42
  Speaker 1: are still getting expelled. They're getting suspended. There's all kinds
• 36:45
  Speaker 1: of punishments. And they probably have to walk around for
• 36:49
  Speaker 1: a very long time looking over their shoulder because some
• 36:52
  Speaker 1: white knight might try to kick their ass or worse. So, yeah.
• 36:57
  Speaker 1: My thing is, consent, that's just bullshit. Like, it's not even, like,
• 37:01
  Speaker 1: you can't talk about it. If you're not, even in,
• 37:05
  Speaker 1: and I would be the first person to say that, like,
• 37:08
  Speaker 1: in the context of a marriage... you know, sex should
• 37:11
  Speaker 1: be a given. Like you would assume that if you're
• 37:14
  Speaker 1: married to a woman, you can have sex with her.
• 37:16
  Speaker 1: But even that is being called into question, right? Now,
• 37:19
  Speaker 1: there are women who are being convinced that if their
• 37:22
  Speaker 1: husband initiates a sexual contact while they're like alone in
• 37:26
  Speaker 1: bed somewhere, that maybe he's breaking the law. This is
• 37:31
  Speaker 1: like where we're headed because we have listened to and
• 37:35
  Speaker 1: adopted the framework of the sexual revolution when it comes
• 37:39
  Speaker 1: to sexual contact. That's where we're at now. Did you
• 37:43
  Speaker 1: know that we weren't even talking about safe sex until
• 37:46
  Speaker 1: like the 80s? Like it didn't even exist as a
• 37:49
  Speaker 1: concept before. I mean, there were condoms and stuff, but like.
• 37:52
  Speaker 1: The concept of practicing safe sex among adolescents did not
• 37:56
  Speaker 1: exist as a concept until about the 80s. Because we knew,
• 38:02
  Speaker 1: at least back then, that it was probably better to
• 38:06
  Speaker 1: wait until... Because sex was a big deal. It is,
• 38:11
  Speaker 1: I think, something that we undervalue as a means of
• 38:15
  Speaker 1: bonding with people. Obviously, it exists to produce children. And
• 38:19
  Speaker 1: I know that I'm sounding like... like a boomer or whatever,
• 38:22
  Speaker 1: but I'm telling you for your own protection, okay, the
• 38:26
  Speaker 1: way that things are now is completely out of whack
• 38:31
  Speaker 1: and it's very hostile towards men. So don't do it.
• 38:36
  Speaker 2: It was because of AIDS. Yeah, it was because of AIDS.
• 38:40
  Speaker 2: Female contraception has been a thing since the 60s, but
• 38:44
  Speaker 2: it was never acknowledged that women could have safe sex
• 38:47
  Speaker 2: from then on because if women are in charge of
• 38:51
  Speaker 2: then women can't be in charge of anything. No, we
• 38:53
  Speaker 2: should still blame men for everything, even though women have
• 38:58
  Speaker 2: all these kinds of pills and devices that they can
• 39:03
  Speaker 2: put up themselves, whereas all men can do is use condoms,
• 39:06
  Speaker 2: whereas women can still also insist on using condoms. So
• 39:11
  Speaker 2: it continued to be assumed that men are in charge
• 39:19
  Speaker 2: of safety, And women can just do whatever they like
• 39:22
  Speaker 2: despite the numerous kinds of contraceptives they have. It wasn't
• 39:26
  Speaker 2: until the 80s when everyone said AIDS! Everyone be scared
• 39:30
  Speaker 2: of AIDS and that was when women suddenly went oh
• 39:33
  Speaker 2: no I don't want to get AIDS yeah.
• 39:36
  Speaker 3: I was in the 5th grade when we started going
• 39:38
  Speaker 3: from yelling cooties to yelling AIDS on the playground and
• 39:41
  Speaker 3: then got in trouble for it because that wasn't very
• 39:43
  Speaker 3: nice but The thing I wanted to point out, I'm
• 39:46
  Speaker 3: going to bounce off of what Brian said with regard
• 39:49
  Speaker 3: to consent not being real. You have to understand, if
• 39:53
  Speaker 3: you look back into the history of what constituted rape,
• 39:58
  Speaker 3: going back like centuries, because it does, the crime goes
• 40:02
  Speaker 3: back centuries. It used to just, it started out just
• 40:08
  Speaker 3: meaning sex outside of marriage, where the woman said she
• 40:12
  Speaker 3: didn't agree to it. And then either she could agree
• 40:16
  Speaker 3: to marry the guy or he would be executed. And
• 40:21
  Speaker 3: so would she. And the idea basically was, well, depending
• 40:26
  Speaker 3: on the religion, some religions did not execute the woman,
• 40:31
  Speaker 3: only the man. But she was still considered damaged after that. Right.
• 40:38
  Speaker 3: But then it became, you know, so you had the
• 40:41
  Speaker 3: against your will. There was no consent. it had to
• 40:45
  Speaker 3: be against her will. And if she said it wasn't
• 40:47
  Speaker 3: against her will, or there was evidence that it wasn't
• 40:50
  Speaker 3: against her will, then it was considered fornication. And it
• 40:54
  Speaker 3: was because her father had to be responsible for her
• 40:58
  Speaker 3: for the rest of his life if nobody was going
• 41:00
  Speaker 3: to marry her. So it damaged the whole family. When
• 41:05
  Speaker 3: it became a crime against the woman, it became a
• 41:11
  Speaker 3: crime based on The use of force, the use of
• 41:16
  Speaker 3: coercion that was the usually involved threat of force or
• 41:21
  Speaker 3: acting upon somebody when they could not refuse. And it
• 41:27
  Speaker 3: was always, always about taking away somebody's right or ability
• 41:33
  Speaker 3: to refuse. It was never about whether they said yes
• 41:38
  Speaker 3: or how enthusiastically they said yes. It was always about
• 41:43
  Speaker 3: Did they say no? And did you push the issue
• 41:49
  Speaker 3: after they said no when you were taking away their
• 41:55
  Speaker 3: ability to continue to say no? Or did you take
• 41:59
  Speaker 3: advantage of something that would make them unable to say no?
• 42:03
  Speaker 3: Did you take advantage of something that would make them
• 42:05
  Speaker 3: incompetent to decide whether or not to say no? And
• 42:10
  Speaker 3: those were the standards. And when we had those standards,
• 42:16
  Speaker 3: women knew how to be safe and men knew how
• 42:20
  Speaker 3: to be safe. The goal of the consent narrative was
• 42:26
  Speaker 3: not to stop rape. It was to end the ability
• 42:31
  Speaker 3: of both sexes to know how to be safe. Now,
• 42:37
  Speaker 3: tell me how somebody could do that. Tell me how
• 42:40
  Speaker 3: somebody could could want to take away everyone's ability to
• 42:45
  Speaker 3: know how to be safe and not be malicious? How
• 42:51
  Speaker 3: could somebody non-malicious, how could somebody have a good reason,
• 42:56
  Speaker 3: a helpful reason, a caring reason to want to take
• 43:00
  Speaker 3: away everyone's ability to know how to be safe? Because
• 43:05
  Speaker 3: that's the consent narrative in a nutshell. You can't know
• 43:08
  Speaker 3: how to be safe anymore.
• 43:11
  Speaker 1: Yeah. And ever since.
• 43:14
  Speaker 2: Just stop fucking each other like rabbits. Fuck each other
• 43:17
  Speaker 2: like humans.
• 43:21
  Speaker 1: I don't know, man. I think guys should really... If
• 43:25
  Speaker 1: you're a young guy, you should read the writing on
• 43:27
  Speaker 1: the wall. This isn't a sign to back off and
• 43:31
  Speaker 1: maybe just focus on your studies and what matters. Because
• 43:35
  Speaker 1: the truth is.
• 43:35
  Speaker 3: There's more to it than that. You can't just try
• 43:38
  Speaker 3: to navigate this. Gen Z, Gen Alpha, you have to
• 43:44
  Speaker 3: walk back every law that feminists have gotten passed in
• 43:48
  Speaker 3: regard to this. Every standard they have set. This has
• 43:53
  Speaker 3: to be unraveled, undone, and burned. So that it never
• 43:58
  Speaker 3: comes back.
• 44:00
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 44:01
  Speaker 3: Or your kids are fucked.
• 44:05
  Speaker 2: Alright, well.
• 44:06
  Speaker 1: Let us know what you guys think about this one
• 44:08
  Speaker 1: in the comments. Let me read your super chats and stuff,
• 44:11
  Speaker 1: and then we'll move on to the next story. So
• 44:13
  Speaker 1: Roboto gives us a dollar and says, It was never
• 44:16
  Speaker 1: about consent. This is always about power and entitlement. Otherwise,
• 44:20
  Speaker 1: when the woman said, I did it, I wanted it,
• 44:23
  Speaker 1: they would believe her and stop claiming victimhood. Yeah, they
• 44:25
  Speaker 1: don't believe women.
• 44:27
  Speaker 3: It's not about that either. It's about money. Y'all don't
• 44:30
  Speaker 3: understand how much money is in this. For every rule
• 44:37
  Speaker 3: they make like this, there are thousands, tens of thousands
• 44:43
  Speaker 3: of little independent contractors out there making pamphlets and going
• 44:49
  Speaker 3: to businesses. There's tens of thousands of Anita Sarkeesians whose
• 44:56
  Speaker 3: subject is rape instead of video games that are making
• 45:00
  Speaker 3: their hundreds of thousands of dollars telling your kids... how
• 45:06
  Speaker 3: they don't know how to be safe and confusing them
• 45:12
  Speaker 3: about their gender and about whether or not they can
• 45:15
  Speaker 3: use drugs and whether or not they can have sex
• 45:17
  Speaker 3: and who can they have sex with and how much
• 45:20
  Speaker 3: fun it is and whether or not it's harmless, whether
• 45:23
  Speaker 3: or not they're going to get pregnant, whether or not
• 45:26
  Speaker 3: abortion matters and so on. This is all about money.
• 45:30
  Speaker 3: They don't give a rat's ass about power. The only
• 45:32
  Speaker 3: time they give a rat's ass about power is when
• 45:35
  Speaker 3: they can use it to get more laws passed that will,
• 45:38
  Speaker 3: in turn, create more business opportunities for women's studies graduates,
• 45:45
  Speaker 3: for gender studies graduates. And I guess now it's intersectionality
• 45:48
  Speaker 3: studies or interdisciplinary studies graduates. That's all it is. It
• 45:54
  Speaker 3: is money. Bottom line. Big dollar signs all across the board.
• 45:59
  Speaker 3: Feminism should have dollar signs for the S. the whole
• 46:05
  Speaker 3: word should be spelled with dollar signs. That's all it is.
• 46:10
  Speaker 2: All right.
• 46:12
  Speaker 1: Roboto then gives another dollar and says it probably has
• 46:14
  Speaker 1: happened at trade schools to be fair. Statistically. I heard
• 46:18
  Speaker 1: the engineers at MIT get up to many shenanigans. I
• 46:23
  Speaker 1: don't think there's a place that doesn't, if it's, if
• 46:25
  Speaker 1: it's co-ed, it's got it going on. And look, it's,
• 46:28
  Speaker 1: it's not just in colleges, obviously that, you know, it's in,
• 46:31
  Speaker 1: it's in the, it's everywhere. It's in every, It's basically
• 46:35
  Speaker 1: everything after the supposed free love movement of the 60s
• 46:39
  Speaker 1: has led to all of this because it was never
• 46:41
  Speaker 1: free love. It was just like women's liberation.
• 46:44
  Speaker 3: It was never free. There was a great big dollar
• 46:48
  Speaker 3: sign on it. I'm telling you, this is about money.
• 46:53
  Speaker 2: All right.
• 46:54
  Speaker 1: Meredith G gives us a super chow for five. Thank you, Meredith.
• 46:58
  Speaker 1: And she says, HBR News 573, as Brian said last week,
• 47:02
  Speaker 1: consent culture does not have an epistemology for morals or ethics.
• 47:07
  Speaker 1: It also don't have an epistemology for regret or consequences.
• 47:11
  Speaker 1: For 30 years, feminists have pushed consent culture combined with
• 47:15
  Speaker 1: Bacchanalian culture on campus that worships at the altar of intoxicants.
• 47:24
  Speaker 1: And at the same time, feminists look for ways to
• 47:27
  Speaker 1: of taking away all female accountability by saying, if a
• 47:30
  Speaker 1: woman has imbibed in alcohol or drugs, she can't consent.
• 47:34
  Speaker 1: I agree that if women can't be held to the
• 47:36
  Speaker 1: same standards as men with regard to consent, there is
• 47:38
  Speaker 1: no such thing. No, it doesn't exist.
• 47:42
  Speaker 2: Free love was only ever free for women. For men,
• 47:45
  Speaker 2: it's increasingly expensive.
• 47:48
  Speaker 1: Yeah, and even then, women are going to pay that price.
• 47:53
  Speaker 1: It just comes a little bit later. When they're alone
• 47:56
  Speaker 1: with lots of kids and, you know, that they don't
• 48:00
  Speaker 1: know where their father is. So there is still, like,
• 48:02
  Speaker 1: this is just not a way to run a society
• 48:06
  Speaker 1: that's healthy. This is why we are sick. And one
• 48:09
  Speaker 1: of it is exactly what is going on with this
• 48:12
  Speaker 1: case and how people are reacting to it. But anyway,
• 48:16
  Speaker 1: with all that said, though, let us know what you
• 48:18
  Speaker 1: guys think about this one in the comments. We're going
• 48:19
  Speaker 1: to move on to the next story. All right, so
• 48:24
  Speaker 1: is this the next one? Yeah, I guess it is. So, okay,
• 48:26
  Speaker 1: here we go. Thank you to Mike J for doing
• 48:29
  Speaker 1: the write-up for this one. A congressional candidate running for
• 48:33
  Speaker 1: Arizona's 8th District alleges that she was both physically and
• 48:38
  Speaker 1: sexually assaulted by two men while campaigning. On August 14th,
• 48:43
  Speaker 1: Democrat candidate Bernadette Green Placentia, that's her name, that's an
• 48:48
  Speaker 1: unfortunate last name, and she hyphenated it on top of that, I.
• 48:54
  Speaker 2: Believe you can get a cream for that. Yeah.
• 49:00
  Speaker 1: Let me read this again. Remember, this is the woman
• 49:03
  Speaker 1: claimed to have been sexually assaulted, okay? On August 14th,
• 49:06
  Speaker 1: Democrat candidate Bernadette Green Placentia, age 52, says that while
• 49:13
  Speaker 1: out repairing damaged campaign signs alone at 2 a.m. What
• 49:17
  Speaker 1: was she doing out there? She was knocked unconscious by
• 49:20
  Speaker 1: two assailants. When she woke up, she claims that she
• 49:23
  Speaker 1: could feel one of the men pulling his penis out
• 49:25
  Speaker 1: of her.
• 49:26
  Speaker 2: What?
• 49:27
  Speaker 1: Pulling his penis out of her? Followed by him saying
• 49:30
  Speaker 1: something to the effect of, um, bitch, wait, something, ick, bitch,
• 49:37
  Speaker 1: not a very good fuck. a line that Green Placentia
• 49:40
  Speaker 1: believes must have started with democratic bitch. She then claims
• 49:44
  Speaker 1: that the other man then agreed with the first, stating,
• 49:47
  Speaker 1: not even worth it. The only other detail that she
• 49:50
  Speaker 1: claims she can remember is that the second man was
• 49:53
  Speaker 1: wearing black boots and had small feet. You know what
• 49:56
  Speaker 1: they say about men with small feet. After the alleged incident,
• 50:00
  Speaker 1: she claims she hardly remembers the next several hours, stating, Quote,
• 50:04
  Speaker 1: it's just these little tiny flashes of things that I
• 50:06
  Speaker 1: do remember. As much as I don't want to remember,
• 50:09
  Speaker 1: I've tried very, very hard to remember more stuff. But
• 50:12
  Speaker 1: that's where I'm at, end quote. She then dropped off
• 50:16
  Speaker 1: the radar for three days to both her campaign team
• 50:19
  Speaker 1: and her husband, only contacting her campaign team first and
• 50:23
  Speaker 1: explaining the absence and then contacting her husband a day
• 50:26
  Speaker 1: later to do the same. I guess it wasn't that dangerous.
• 50:29
  Speaker 1: It would not be until August 31st that she would
• 50:32
  Speaker 1: give a statement to the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office who
• 50:35
  Speaker 1: noted that she had sustained injuries such as a bump
• 50:38
  Speaker 1: on the head, multiple bruises notably on the arms and torso,
• 50:42
  Speaker 1: as well as an abrasion on her back. But due
• 50:45
  Speaker 1: to the amount of time she waited after the attack,
• 50:48
  Speaker 1: as well as the amount of showers she took and
• 50:50
  Speaker 1: time she washed her clothes from the day of the attack,
• 50:54
  Speaker 1: no DNA evidence could be collected. So far, no further
• 50:57
  Speaker 1: evidence of the alleged crime has surfaced and no suspects
• 51:00
  Speaker 1: have been named.
• 51:02
  Speaker 2: There are so many jokes. I... I just... I just
• 51:08
  Speaker 2: want to start by saying if this is true, if
• 51:12
  Speaker 2: this is an accurate reflection of real life events that
• 51:16
  Speaker 2: actually happened, then it's obviously a tragedy and an outrage
• 51:20
  Speaker 2: and something should be done about it. And as such, I...
• 51:26
  Speaker 2: conditionally apologize for all the things I'm about to say,
• 51:30
  Speaker 2: but this isn't our first rodeo, ladies and gentlemen. It
• 51:34
  Speaker 2: does sound a lot like we're in the same cinematic
• 51:37
  Speaker 2: universe where those two MAGA Nigerians attacked Jussie Smollett.
• 51:42
  Speaker 1: This is Hussie Smollett.
• 51:47
  Speaker 2: And they put a noose around his neck, which he
• 51:49
  Speaker 2: conveniently carried to the police station around his neck. It
• 51:53
  Speaker 2: must be the same two... Guys, up to their old
• 51:56
  Speaker 2: tricks again. Memory is a tricky steed to tame, isn't it?
• 52:04
  Speaker 2: It's the same ambiguity that makes it difficult, verging on impossible,
• 52:10
  Speaker 2: to discern what happened at Cornell. Someone can claim they
• 52:14
  Speaker 2: remember nothing, but they might be lying. Someone can claim
• 52:19
  Speaker 2: they remember exactly what happened to a 100% certainty, and
• 52:23
  Speaker 2: they might be lying. But the bit in between, the
• 52:28
  Speaker 2: bit we call selective memory, is in some way navigable,
• 52:34
  Speaker 2: even legally navigable. And you don't have to have ever
• 52:41
  Speaker 2: been drunk or on drugs or knocked unconscious to understand
• 52:44
  Speaker 2: what it's like to drift in and out of consciousness.
• 52:47
  Speaker 2: It's what happens every time we fall asleep and every
• 52:50
  Speaker 2: time we wake up. It tends to take... Minutes at
• 52:55
  Speaker 2: a time, doesn't it? Several seconds at the very least.
• 53:00
  Speaker 2: So it's understandable that you could have several hours missing
• 53:03
  Speaker 2: from your memory. We all experience that every night. But
• 53:08
  Speaker 2: has anyone out there ever woken up halfway through a
• 53:12
  Speaker 2: word and been fully aware of the last syllable of
• 53:17
  Speaker 2: that word, but with no idea what the rest of
• 53:20
  Speaker 2: it was? I suppose it depends on the word. It
• 53:24
  Speaker 2: depends on the length of the word. If you wake
• 53:28
  Speaker 2: up hearing silicovolcanoconiosis, then you could just about reasonably extrapolate
• 53:36
  Speaker 2: that the word was pneumo-ultra-microscopic-silicovolcanoconiosis. But if you're telling me
• 53:44
  Speaker 2: the exact syllable that you woke up to, and it
• 53:48
  Speaker 2: happens to be the last one, Nah, no one wakes
• 53:52
  Speaker 2: up that quickly. It's impossible. The reason we have trouble
• 53:56
  Speaker 2: remembering our dreams, even seconds after them, is because our
• 54:01
  Speaker 2: brains chemically diminish our memory recording functions when we're asleep.
• 54:09
  Speaker 2: Not completely, but mostly. No biochemical reaction happens instantaneously, or
• 54:15
  Speaker 2: even in the short time it takes to get from
• 54:17
  Speaker 2: one syllable to another. If you woke up hearing... Ick, bitch...
• 54:25
  Speaker 2: He was probably just saying... Ick, bitch. I mean, a
• 54:30
  Speaker 2: green placenta... Would certainly give me the ick.
• 54:33
  Speaker 1: Maybe he was a German... And he was saying something
• 54:36
  Speaker 1: in German.
• 54:40
  Speaker 2: Jokes aside... This is just me being... As clinical as possible...
• 54:45
  Speaker 2: In my diagnosis. Even if her story made perfect sense...
• 54:49
  Speaker 2: we'd still be left to weigh up the possibilities. What's
• 54:52
  Speaker 2: more likely? That two men would knock out and rape
• 54:58
  Speaker 2: a woman on suspicion of her being a Democrat? Or
• 55:03
  Speaker 2: that a Democrat politician would tell a lie? Bear in mind,
• 55:09
  Speaker 2: this isn't MAGA country any more than fucking Chicago is.
• 55:14
  Speaker 2: It's Maricopa County. It's... Oh, boy. It's a Democrat voting region,
• 55:21
  Speaker 2: at least allegedly. It wouldn't be the first time the
• 55:25
  Speaker 2: Democrats have committed fraud on a massive scale in Maricopa County.
• 55:28
  Speaker 2: Although for legal reasons, I am not at liberty to
• 55:31
  Speaker 2: elaborate on what I might be alluding to. Needless to say,
• 55:37
  Speaker 2: I'm not a real brain doctor. None of this is
• 55:40
  Speaker 2: neurological advice. Just neurotic advice.
• 55:48
  Speaker 3: Oh boy. Where do I start? All right. All right.
• 55:56
  Speaker 3: I just, I let's, let's say I totally believe this
• 56:02
  Speaker 3: woman because we all know that, uh, it's, it's absolutely
• 56:09
  Speaker 3: the best idea to, to go out in the middle
• 56:13
  Speaker 3: of the night, 2 AM and, and start messing with
• 56:17
  Speaker 3: your signs and, I'm assuming this was in somebody's yard
• 56:23
  Speaker 3: in a neighborhood where there were people. Arizona's 8th Congressional
• 56:30
  Speaker 3: District has a population of 802,956 to 815,902 residents, depending
• 56:33
  Speaker 3: on the specific 2024 data source cited, according to AIA.
• 56:47
  Speaker 3: So it's got to be around there. There's almost a
• 56:50
  Speaker 3: million people. It wasn't out the boonies. She went into
• 56:56
  Speaker 3: a neighborhood at 2 a.m. and started fiddling with the
• 57:02
  Speaker 3: signs in somebody's yard. As you do. We all do
• 57:07
  Speaker 3: that on a regular basis, right? And it's totally not
• 57:12
  Speaker 3: sus that this happened right now. right before just a
• 57:18
  Speaker 3: month before an election, you know, the signs have been
• 57:22
  Speaker 3: up for a month, um, already. And, uh, it wouldn't
• 57:28
  Speaker 3: be all that weird for one to be damaged. And
• 57:34
  Speaker 3: of course the thing to do is, is definitely not
• 57:38
  Speaker 3: replace it with a new sign in broad daylight, but
• 57:42
  Speaker 3: go over at two o'clock in the morning, less traffic, right?
• 57:47
  Speaker 3: That's exactly when you want someone dicking around in your yard.
• 57:51
  Speaker 3: Maybe bad choice of words there, but you know. And
• 57:54
  Speaker 3: of course, it is absolutely believable that Chick was knocked
• 58:01
  Speaker 3: out in this neighborhood and raped by two men and
• 58:07
  Speaker 3: nobody noticed. Nobody saw anything happening, heard anything happening out
• 58:12
  Speaker 3: their windows. Not a single sound was made. So, yeah, no,
• 58:19
  Speaker 3: I'm really skeptical just because of those details. But, you know,
• 58:24
  Speaker 3: on the knockout thing, it's not like anybody could know
• 58:28
  Speaker 3: what that's like. Oh, wait, I've been knocked out by
• 58:31
  Speaker 3: a hit to the head and come to when somebody
• 58:34
  Speaker 3: was talking to me because I bought a skateboard when
• 58:39
  Speaker 3: I was 17 and decided to try some stupid trick
• 58:44
  Speaker 3: with it and Well, actually, I was watching a guy
• 58:47
  Speaker 3: go by in a Jeep and then turned around and
• 58:51
  Speaker 3: stepped on the skateboard. It was totally uncool. I ended
• 58:55
  Speaker 3: up landing on my head. My feet went straight up
• 58:58
  Speaker 3: in the air and I banged my head down onto
• 59:01
  Speaker 3: the pavement of the basketball court at the park where
• 59:03
  Speaker 3: I was. I was there to try new tricks that
• 59:07
  Speaker 3: I didn't know how to do yet. And I woke
• 59:10
  Speaker 3: up to this guy standing over me and over and
• 59:14
  Speaker 3: over again, he didn't know my name. So he just
• 59:15
  Speaker 3: kept saying, hey girl, are you okay? Hey girl, are
• 59:18
  Speaker 3: you okay? You know, I didn't hear the last syllable
• 59:23
  Speaker 3: of a word all of a sudden. You know what
• 59:25
  Speaker 3: it sounded like? It sounded like he was very far
• 59:30
  Speaker 3: away from me and getting closer. And then I finally
• 59:35
  Speaker 3: started to become aware that I was real and the
• 59:38
  Speaker 3: world around me existed. And I started paying attention to
• 59:43
  Speaker 3: what he was saying instead of just, I hear this voice.
• 59:47
  Speaker 3: And then finally, the words he was saying started to
• 59:50
  Speaker 3: make sense. And I opened my eyes and I could
• 59:52
  Speaker 3: see him. I don't believe somebody who says they got
• 59:59
  Speaker 3: knocked out and they came to so fast that it
• 1:00:06
  Speaker 3: was like somebody turned on the TV there. Ick bitch.
• 1:00:09
  Speaker 1: No, no, no.
• 1:00:11
  Speaker 3: She would have heard the whole word. She just would
• 1:00:13
  Speaker 3: have heard it like maybe a little farther away. So
• 1:00:17
  Speaker 3: why is this happening? Why is this woman making up
• 1:00:20
  Speaker 3: an allegation about two men who probably don't exist and
• 1:00:25
  Speaker 3: In a neighborhood where somebody would have noticed if an
• 1:00:30
  Speaker 3: act of violence took place because there would have been noise.
• 1:00:35
  Speaker 3: Where somebody's dog probably would have been barking if you
• 1:00:38
  Speaker 3: were fiddling around with a sign. Where you shouldn't be
• 1:00:40
  Speaker 3: at 2 o'clock in the morning anyway. Why is she
• 1:00:46
  Speaker 3: doing this right now? Because if a woman is a
• 1:00:51
  Speaker 3: rape victim, you have to vote for her. That's what
• 1:00:55
  Speaker 3: she thinks. I'm sure this woman is expecting this allegation
• 1:01:02
  Speaker 3: to win her the election. I'm a victim. You have
• 1:01:05
  Speaker 3: to vote for me.
• 1:01:07
  Speaker 2: Don't vote Republican.
• 1:01:10
  Speaker 3: People hated on me because I was a Democrat. You
• 1:01:12
  Speaker 3: got to vote Democrat. Vote for me and all the
• 1:01:14
  Speaker 3: other Democrats. I was raped, literally. Don't buy it. I
• 1:01:22
  Speaker 3: don't believe this happened. I believe that this is something
• 1:01:26
  Speaker 3: that she decided to tell everybody happened so that she
• 1:01:29
  Speaker 3: could get people to vote for her specifically and to
• 1:01:34
  Speaker 3: vote Democrat. And the response to it should be a
• 1:01:38
  Speaker 3: landslide against the Democrats. If you don't like the Republicans
• 1:01:43
  Speaker 3: and you're not going to vote Republican, but you want
• 1:01:45
  Speaker 3: to do what I said, I'm sure there's independent candidates.
• 1:01:49
  Speaker 3: If you don't usually vote and you weren't planning on voting,
• 1:01:53
  Speaker 3: and you live in her district, go to the polls
• 1:01:58
  Speaker 3: and where it asks for a write-in candidate, write in
• 1:02:03
  Speaker 3: not and her name. Not that green placenta bitch, if
• 1:02:11
  Speaker 3: you have to. Anything. Just to make the point that
• 1:02:16
  Speaker 3: you are voting against her. Because that's the only way
• 1:02:20
  Speaker 3: women will get the message that making shit up like
• 1:02:24
  Speaker 3: this does not gain them anything.
• 1:02:32
  Speaker 2: All right.
• 1:02:33
  Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, that basically covers what I was going
• 1:02:36
  Speaker 1: to say. And basically, uh, well, first of all, I
• 1:02:38
  Speaker 1: was wondering if those, if it's those same Nigerians, like
• 1:02:41
  Speaker 1: if they basically created a franchise of like going to different,
• 1:02:44
  Speaker 1: you know, different cities around the country, they should make
• 1:02:48
  Speaker 1: a show out of it. Like two, two Nigerian dudes
• 1:02:52
  Speaker 1: cross the country, you know, getting involved with all kinds
• 1:02:55
  Speaker 1: of hoaxes for various celebrities and politicians. And they ought
• 1:03:00
  Speaker 1: to come up with new, new way, new scenarios. You know,
• 1:03:03
  Speaker 1: this time you're going to be the only.
• 1:03:05
  Speaker 3: Gen X woman that, that didn't know that you go
• 1:03:08
  Speaker 3: to police the same day, the same night, right away,
• 1:03:11
  Speaker 3: the hospital first. I, she.
• 1:03:14
  Speaker 1: Should have at least said she was at a getting
• 1:03:16
  Speaker 1: Jimmy Johns or, you know, Jersey Mike's or whatever they
• 1:03:19
  Speaker 1: have down there in Maricopa County. But, But yeah, I mean, basically,
• 1:03:24
  Speaker 1: this is a woman that knows that if she has
• 1:03:27
  Speaker 1: a story like this to tell, that it will get
• 1:03:30
  Speaker 1: women to vote for her. And she doesn't have to
• 1:03:32
  Speaker 1: prove anything, because as we've already established, all you have
• 1:03:35
  Speaker 1: to do is say, I had this experience, and women
• 1:03:38
  Speaker 1: will figure out ways to relate to said experience. Oh,
• 1:03:41
  Speaker 1: me too! You know, and so, she's probably going to
• 1:03:44
  Speaker 1: get some votes, I'm afraid. I mean, I don't know
• 1:03:47
  Speaker 1: if she's going to win, but it's definitely a tactic.
• 1:03:52
  Speaker 1: That I think can be employed. And yeah that's crass.
• 1:03:55
  Speaker 1: But I think that's what's going on here.
• 1:03:57
  Speaker 2: And she deserves. Everything that happened to. Justice Moyet. Even though.
• 1:04:05
  Speaker 2: What happened to Justice Moyet. As in he was convicted
• 1:04:08
  Speaker 2: in a court of law. For committing a hoax. I
• 1:04:12
  Speaker 2: kind of don't think she will. Because. However privileged. A
• 1:04:19
  Speaker 2: Hollywood actor. Of color is. it's a drop in the
• 1:04:23
  Speaker 2: bucket compared to how privileged a Democrat politician is. And
• 1:04:28
  Speaker 2: no matter how much of this story comes to light,
• 1:04:31
  Speaker 2: I don't, I don't think she'll ever be convicted. I
• 1:04:33
  Speaker 2: think it's all going to get brushed under the rug
• 1:04:36
  Speaker 2: and she might even get elected. She might.
• 1:04:41
  Speaker 3: She's an idiot. She went out and she went out
• 1:04:43
  Speaker 3: at two o'clock in the morning, fixing her signs. That
• 1:04:46
  Speaker 3: alone should disqualify her. No matter what happened to her
• 1:04:49
  Speaker 3: when she did it, Like that's a pretty dumb idea.
• 1:04:52
  Speaker 3: She said she was doing something stupid. You want to
• 1:04:55
  Speaker 3: elect somebody that was doing something stupid just because she
• 1:04:58
  Speaker 3: happened to have consequences to her stupidity, according to her words.
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 1: Well, don't ask a woman not to go out in
• 1:05:08
  Speaker 1: two in the morning to fix signs. Ask men not
• 1:05:10
  Speaker 1: to rape.
• 1:05:11
  Speaker 3: Oh, by the way, by the way, when you get
• 1:05:15
  Speaker 3: knocked out like that, Do you know what you have
• 1:05:17
  Speaker 3: the next day? You don't just have a couple of
• 1:05:20
  Speaker 3: bruises on your arms and stuff. You have a concussion.
• 1:05:25
  Speaker 3: I did not see that in the list of injuries
• 1:05:28
  Speaker 3: that you talked about.
• 1:05:29
  Speaker 1: She had a bump on her head, I think.
• 1:05:30
  Speaker 3: Yeah, but that's not a concussion.
• 1:05:33
  Speaker 2: No.
• 1:05:34
  Speaker 1: No, I don't think it was described as a concussion
• 1:05:36
  Speaker 1: according to Mike's write-up. And I'm sure that, like I said,
• 1:05:38
  Speaker 1: I'm sure that she's probably lying. I'm just going to
• 1:05:41
  Speaker 1: go out and say it. But it probably doesn't matter because, again...
• 1:05:45
  Speaker 1: Women's lies don't matter in 2026. They're just brazen with
• 1:05:51
  Speaker 1: it and women will support them anyway. So even women
• 1:05:55
  Speaker 1: who tell the truth, like Lindsay Clancy told the truth,
• 1:05:58
  Speaker 1: she did it. And women were like, yes, you did.
• 1:06:00
  Speaker 2: But.
• 1:06:03
  Speaker 3: Or, or, oh, we don't believe you did it. We
• 1:06:06
  Speaker 3: think you're.
• 1:06:06
  Speaker 1: Yeah. Your, your, your husband's making you say that.
• 1:06:10
  Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah.
• 1:06:11
  Speaker 1: But the point is they're going to believe what they
• 1:06:14
  Speaker 1: want to believe and nothing that this woman does is
• 1:06:19
  Speaker 1: going to hurt her, I don't think. I mean, we'll see.
• 1:06:25
  Speaker 1: My main thing is that the main thing I'm drawing
• 1:06:28
  Speaker 1: attention to is not whether or not it's smart to
• 1:06:30
  Speaker 1: go out at 2 a.m. to fix signs. The main
• 1:06:32
  Speaker 1: thing I'm pointing to is a woman leveraging her victimhood
• 1:06:36
  Speaker 1: to get power and that it probably will work. And
• 1:06:41
  Speaker 1: that should be something to consider, to think about.
• 1:06:45
  Speaker 2: So, all right.
• 1:06:48
  Speaker 1: Mr. Newbid gives us $ 2 and said, I got to
• 1:06:50
  Speaker 1: give Brian a tip just for reading Bacchus. Did I
• 1:06:53
  Speaker 1: read it right? It was spelled differently, though. I know
• 1:06:56
  Speaker 1: Bacchus is like a Greek god or something. Anyway, or
• 1:07:02
  Speaker 1: maybe like a Greek demigod character. OIC gives us $ 5.
• 1:07:07
  Speaker 1: Thank you, OIC. And says, Juicy Sommelier sequel, Electric Boogaloo.
• 1:07:11
  Speaker 1: This is patriarchy country.
• 1:07:13
  Speaker 2: Yes.
• 1:07:14
  Speaker 1: And then he gave a dollar and says, was she
• 1:07:15
  Speaker 1: out to get a Quiznos sandwich quiz? Is Quiznos still around?
• 1:07:19
  Speaker 1: I didn't really care. You know who's really good? Potbelly's
• 1:07:22
  Speaker 1: Sandwich Works. That was like my favorite place. And they
• 1:07:25
  Speaker 1: don't have them in Chicago anymore. They got rid of them.
• 1:07:27
  Speaker 1: And they're not around here at all. But there is
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 1: one in the airport in North Carolina. And I had
• 1:07:33
  Speaker 1: it like last year.
• 1:07:34
  Speaker 2: It was delicious.
• 1:07:35
  Speaker 1: Anyway, if you have a Potbelly's in your neighborhood, check
• 1:07:38
  Speaker 1: them out. They're good.
• 1:07:39
  Speaker 2: All right.
• 1:07:40
  Speaker 1: So with that out of the way and look out
• 1:07:42
  Speaker 1: for Nigerians when you go pick up your sandwich. Oh,
• 1:07:46
  Speaker 1: and here's Bane666AU. Do you guys see that Bane is
• 1:07:49
  Speaker 1: in the chat? And he said, yeah, but did you
• 1:07:52
  Speaker 1: use her right pronouns while raping her?
• 1:07:56
  Speaker 3: Well, that would be wrong too because she's a Democrat.
• 1:07:58
  Speaker 3: They have to use her left pronouns.
• 1:07:59
  Speaker 2: Okay.
• 1:08:00
  Speaker 1: Okay. Let us know what you guys think about this
• 1:08:06
  Speaker 1: one in the comments. Hello, Bane. Welcome back. I saw
• 1:08:09
  Speaker 1: you here Thursday. When Hannah was doing your show, Bane
• 1:08:13
  Speaker 1: was in the chat then as well.
• 1:08:14
  Speaker 2: Make some videos, brother. We miss you.
• 1:08:17
  Speaker 1: Yeah, we miss you, Bane. All right. So, you know,
• 1:08:21
  Speaker 1: I know that you're doing life things. That's fine.
• 1:08:24
  Speaker 3: All right.
• 1:08:24
  Speaker 1: Anyway, let's move on to the next story. Let us
• 1:08:26
  Speaker 1: know what you guys think about this one in the comments.
• 1:08:27
  Speaker 2: Okay.
• 1:08:29
  Speaker 1: So, a federal jury in Maryland... found that the University
• 1:08:32
  Speaker 1: of Maryland was deliberately indifferent under Title IX to sex-based
• 1:08:36
  Speaker 1: harassment of a male student, John Doe, so now we're
• 1:08:39
  Speaker 1: talking about John Doe in a different case, okay, after
• 1:08:43
  Speaker 1: he was cleared of sexual assault allegations. October 2020, a
• 1:08:48
  Speaker 1: female student, Jane Roe, accused Doe and another man of assault.
• 1:08:54
  Speaker 1: An external hearing officer in August of 2021 found both
• 1:08:58
  Speaker 1: of them not responsible So somebody actually did some due
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 1: process over here. Rowe, that's the woman, and leaders of
• 1:09:14
  Speaker 1: the student group Preventing Sexual Assault allegedly ran a months-long
• 1:09:18
  Speaker 1: campaign publicly lading John Doe, the male accused, a rapist,
• 1:09:23
  Speaker 1: sexual predator, and dangerous to girls, contacting his club lacrosse team, huh, that's, man,
• 1:09:29
  Speaker 1: I'm getting all kinds of flashbacks, leading to his removal
• 1:09:33
  Speaker 1: from the lacrosse team, confronting him and excluding him from activities.
• 1:09:38
  Speaker 1: Doe reported the harassment, the man, starting in late 2021.
• 1:09:44
  Speaker 1: The university's office allegedly dismissed or ignored his complaints without investigation.
• 1:09:49
  Speaker 1: The jury agreed the harassment was because of his sex,
• 1:09:53
  Speaker 1: severe and pervasive enough to deprive him of equal educational access,
• 1:09:57
  Speaker 1: and that the university's response was clearly unreasonable. The man, Doe,
• 1:10:03
  Speaker 1: had sued in 2022 seeking roughly $ 10 million, but the
• 1:10:07
  Speaker 1: jury awarded $ 1 million in nominal damages recognizing his rights
• 1:10:12
  Speaker 1: being violated. His attorney, Jason Greaves, described it as the
• 1:10:16
  Speaker 1: first jury finding that false rape accusations can constitute sex-based
• 1:10:20
  Speaker 1: harassment under Title IX, and the first holding a university
• 1:10:24
  Speaker 1: liable for deliberate indifference to such harassment after clearance, calling
• 1:10:29
  Speaker 1: it a landmark for due process and equal protection of
• 1:10:31
  Speaker 1: male students. The university stated it disagrees with the verdict
• 1:10:35
  Speaker 1: but respects it and maintains it followed Title IX regulations
• 1:10:39
  Speaker 1: and its policies. It had sought judgment as a matter
• 1:10:42
  Speaker 1: of law still pending further briefing. John Doe, the man
• 1:10:46
  Speaker 1: who was accused in this case, incurred over $ 100, 000 in
• 1:10:50
  Speaker 1: legal fees during the Title IX process itself, which the
• 1:10:54
  Speaker 1: nominal award will not cover. So, this could set new precedent,
• 1:11:01
  Speaker 1: which is a good thing, but it's unfortunate how it
• 1:11:04
  Speaker 1: played out. But yeah, I will give the floor up now.
• 1:11:08
  Speaker 2: I've said it before, and I'll say it again. Peak
• 1:11:12
  Speaker 2: Woke was not 2016. It was not 2020. It was
• 1:11:16
  Speaker 2: not 2023, which we'll get to in the next story.
• 1:11:22
  Speaker 2: Peak Woke is today, and it will be Peak Woke tomorrow.
• 1:11:27
  Speaker 2: In 2016, this was the kind of story we were
• 1:11:30
  Speaker 2: all talking about all the time, because at that point,
• 1:11:33
  Speaker 2: Miss Andri had taken over the West and subverted the
• 1:11:38
  Speaker 2: rule of law, and that subversion is still in full swing.
• 1:11:44
  Speaker 2: The Lindsay Clancy thing, the Cornell 7 thing, this thing,
• 1:11:50
  Speaker 2: and the thing in the previous story. Feminism was never defeated.
• 1:11:55
  Speaker 2: Feminism was just woke 1.0. And lo, Alexander wept for
• 1:12:02
  Speaker 2: there were no more worlds to conquer. But there was
• 1:12:07
  Speaker 2: another way to conquer those worlds even harder. The feminists
• 1:12:11
  Speaker 2: who concluded that white men are the untermensch, the avatar
• 1:12:15
  Speaker 2: of the enemy, the cause of all our problems, realized
• 1:12:19
  Speaker 2: that they can stick it to us even harder by
• 1:12:22
  Speaker 2: inviting the third world to invade us. They don't care
• 1:12:26
  Speaker 2: if they get raped in the process. It's worth it
• 1:12:30
  Speaker 2: as long as it accelerates the extinction of white men.
• 1:12:36
  Speaker 2: A corrupt king will scorch the earth to rule over
• 1:12:41
  Speaker 2: the ashes, but a corrupt queen will scorch the earth
• 1:12:47
  Speaker 2: even if she doesn't get to rule over the ashes.
• 1:12:50
  Speaker 2: She doesn't even want the ashes. Much like a scorned
• 1:12:56
  Speaker 2: mother will murder her children and then kill herself because
• 1:13:00
  Speaker 2: it's better than letting the husband have custody. Y'all have
• 1:13:05
  Speaker 2: seen those stories that we're calling Clancy copycat cases. But,
• 1:13:11
  Speaker 2: you know, scale that up to the level of country...
• 1:13:17
  Speaker 2: And it explains everything. A lot of people think that
• 1:13:21
  Speaker 2: because the demographic replacement of the West has become a
• 1:13:27
  Speaker 2: more urgent and pressing problem than the gynocentric marginalization of men,
• 1:13:34
  Speaker 2: that means feminism doesn't matter anymore. We have bigger fish
• 1:13:37
  Speaker 2: to fry. No, mate. This isn't a bigger fish. It's
• 1:13:43
  Speaker 2: just the latest generation of the same species of evil
• 1:13:47
  Speaker 2: fish that gave birth to it. In short, Woke 1.0
• 1:13:55
  Speaker 2: was first world women ruling over first world men. Woke 2.0
• 1:14:04
  Speaker 2: is first world women holding the gates open to the
• 1:14:08
  Speaker 2: barbarians of the third world. You cannot defeat Woke 2
• 1:14:14
  Speaker 2: until you've defeated Woke 1. Every effort you put into
• 1:14:18
  Speaker 2: fighting another head of the Hydra is wasted energy. I'm
• 1:14:27
  Speaker 2: not sure I can even predict what Woke 3.0 will be.
• 1:14:31
  Speaker 2: I mean, back in the 60s, in the advent of feminism,
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 2: we couldn't possibly have predicted what Woke 2 would entail,
• 1:14:41
  Speaker 2: where the non-whites would have the whip hand over the white. Well...
• 1:14:45
  Speaker 2: Enoch Powell absolutely did predict that. He was shunned and
• 1:14:51
  Speaker 2: ridiculed and muscled out of any influence. Maybe his mistake
• 1:14:57
  Speaker 2: was that despite his prophetic visions, he didn't focus on
• 1:15:02
  Speaker 2: the body of the Hydra, the female codex of the
• 1:15:07
  Speaker 2: communist monster. If there is a woke 3.0, then it
• 1:15:16
  Speaker 2: will probably be the final stage, the one that leads
• 1:15:18
  Speaker 2: to complete metastasis, the irreversible rule of Big Brother. And
• 1:15:25
  Speaker 2: it's practically irrelevant, because if we can't solve Woke One,
• 1:15:29
  Speaker 2: then we're doomed to be torn asunder by whatever takes
• 1:15:34
  Speaker 2: place after it. Sorry, I can't remember what this story
• 1:15:40
  Speaker 2: is about. Sometimes I just get distracted by the deep lore,
• 1:15:44
  Speaker 2: and I repeat myself. but I will continue to repeat
• 1:15:47
  Speaker 2: myself until someone fucking listens. Dr. Random, come on to
• 1:15:55
  Speaker 2: News Only Budget Radio.
• 1:15:58
  Speaker 3: There we go. So this precedent actually can be useful
• 1:16:05
  Speaker 3: in a way that I think a lot of people
• 1:16:07
  Speaker 3: might not be thinking of. It's not just on university
• 1:16:10
  Speaker 3: campuses that it is illegal to to follow someone around
• 1:16:18
  Speaker 3: and continually engage in a course of conduct that could
• 1:16:25
  Speaker 3: cause them to, say, lose their job, lose their relationships
• 1:16:30
  Speaker 3: with their family, lose their public reputation, their ability to
• 1:16:36
  Speaker 3: involve themselves in their normal public life. In other words,
• 1:16:40
  Speaker 3: interfere with their normal pursuit of happiness. If you in
• 1:16:45
  Speaker 3: the United States, engage in a course of conduct toward
• 1:16:53
  Speaker 3: another person in the United States, this being online or offline,
• 1:16:59
  Speaker 3: in the neighborhood, whatever, and your intention is to harass
• 1:17:05
  Speaker 3: or intimidate that person, and that course of conduct results
• 1:17:12
  Speaker 3: in either their fear of any kind of serious bodily
• 1:17:19
  Speaker 3: injury or death, or it could be reasonably expected to
• 1:17:26
  Speaker 3: cause substantial emotional distress. In fact, the actual wording is,
• 1:17:31
  Speaker 3: if it causes, attempts to cause, or would be reasonably
• 1:17:35
  Speaker 3: expected to cause substantial emotional distress. So all they really
• 1:17:38
  Speaker 3: have to prove is that you intended... to cause substantial
• 1:17:44
  Speaker 3: emotional distress. That you wanted to humiliate the individual, perhaps.
• 1:17:53
  Speaker 3: An individual who does these things can be considered guilty
• 1:18:00
  Speaker 3: of stalking. Stalking is a crime. In fact, it is
• 1:18:06
  Speaker 3: a federal crime. And it does not say in this
• 1:18:12
  Speaker 3: part of this law, this subsection of this law, that
• 1:18:17
  Speaker 3: it is only women who can be stalked and only
• 1:18:20
  Speaker 3: men who can be stalkers. Even though the law that
• 1:18:25
  Speaker 3: I'm quoting from is the Violence Against Women Act. So,
• 1:18:31
  Speaker 3: this is something that men should pay attention to. A
• 1:18:35
  Speaker 3: court has found that false allegations... can be considered gender-based
• 1:18:44
  Speaker 3: harassment because they have consequences. If they can be considered
• 1:18:51
  Speaker 3: gender-based harassment because they have consequences, they can also be
• 1:18:55
  Speaker 3: considered stalking. So if you have an ex who is
• 1:19:01
  Speaker 3: trying to use false allegations to get custody of your
• 1:19:07
  Speaker 3: kids away from you, Remember that. You can file a complaint.
• 1:19:14
  Speaker 3: You can get a restraining order. You can, oh wait, no,
• 1:19:18
  Speaker 3: you're a man. But you can talk to your attorney
• 1:19:23
  Speaker 3: about it. Your attorney may find it useful, particularly with
• 1:19:29
  Speaker 3: the judge in your custody case. And if you're being
• 1:19:34
  Speaker 3: harassed in this manner for any other reason, talk to
• 1:19:39
  Speaker 3: an attorney about this. If you can prove those allegations
• 1:19:44
  Speaker 3: are false and the accuser knows that she's lying, then
• 1:19:50
  Speaker 3: you can prove that the accuser is harassing you. The
• 1:19:53
  Speaker 3: accuser is stalking you. And you should be able to,
• 1:19:57
  Speaker 3: with the assistance of an attorney, make the state treat
• 1:20:04
  Speaker 3: you the same way. Give you the same rights under
• 1:20:08
  Speaker 3: the law. There is a clause... In the Violence Against
• 1:20:12
  Speaker 3: Women Act, that says it is not intended to be discriminatory.
• 1:20:20
  Speaker 3: It is not intended to only be protective toward women.
• 1:20:27
  Speaker 3: That any of these crimes supposedly can be accused by
• 1:20:34
  Speaker 3: a man against a female perpetrator. I think it's time
• 1:20:39
  Speaker 3: we started finding out. So if you get falsely accused,
• 1:20:43
  Speaker 3: if you get harassed with false accusations, look into filing charges,
• 1:20:51
  Speaker 3: even if you have to hire an attorney to help
• 1:20:54
  Speaker 3: you do it.
• 1:21:04
  Speaker 1: All right. Mike, did you already? I think you did, right?
• 1:21:08
  Speaker 2: I said my thing.
• 1:21:09
  Speaker 1: Okay.
• 1:21:10
  Speaker 2: All right.
• 1:21:11
  Speaker 1: Sorry. Yeah, so I guess, like, I think I said
• 1:21:15
  Speaker 1: what I wanted to say about this, but I guess
• 1:21:18
  Speaker 1: we should see if this becomes a pattern, and then
• 1:21:23
  Speaker 1: maybe if it does, it could become precedent for some
• 1:21:28
  Speaker 1: kind of change to the laws. I don't know. Or
• 1:21:30
  Speaker 1: at least, like, a way of treating the existing systems, like,
• 1:21:34
  Speaker 1: more fairly.
• 1:21:35
  Speaker 3: It could become good news.
• 1:21:37
  Speaker 1: It could. That's kind of why I chose it, because
• 1:21:41
  Speaker 1: I thought it could, especially because, you know, despite the
• 1:21:44
  Speaker 1: fact that there are a lot of women, like, standing
• 1:21:46
  Speaker 1: behind the accuser in the Cornell 7 story, I think
• 1:21:51
  Speaker 1: that a lot of men are looking at this, and
• 1:21:53
  Speaker 1: they're like, what the fuck? Like, something's got to change.
• 1:21:57
  Speaker 1: And I'm glad about that. So maybe this, if this
• 1:22:00
  Speaker 1: gets out, and people see the contrast, then, you know,
• 1:22:03
  Speaker 1: maybe we'll see some... And I saw, like, a... video
• 1:22:08
  Speaker 1: recently where it was, um, Steven Crowder. He was reacting
• 1:22:13
  Speaker 1: to the, the latest call her daddy podcast, you know,
• 1:22:17
  Speaker 1: the most popular podcast in the world before women. And, uh,
• 1:22:22
  Speaker 1: Alice Cooper had a guest on who was a professor
• 1:22:25
  Speaker 1: at Cornell and they were talking about the Cornell case.
• 1:22:28
  Speaker 1: And of course they were, it was what you would
• 1:22:31
  Speaker 1: expect from a podcast for women. But, um, Crowder and
• 1:22:37
  Speaker 1: the crew and the people in the comments, they were
• 1:22:39
  Speaker 1: all like 100% against that. They didn't buy into it
• 1:22:43
  Speaker 1: at all. And in fact, a lot of the people
• 1:22:45
  Speaker 1: in the comments were saying that the penalty for false
• 1:22:49
  Speaker 1: accusation should be the same as it is for someone
• 1:22:53
  Speaker 1: who was actually accused and guilty of rape.
• 1:22:57
  Speaker 3: They're thinking too small.
• 1:23:00
  Speaker 1: Well, okay, yes, I get it. But my point is
• 1:23:03
  Speaker 1: the sentiment is going in that direction. That's my point.
• 1:23:07
  Speaker 3: But they are still thinking too small.
• 1:23:09
  Speaker 2: Okay.
• 1:23:11
  Speaker 1: So what I'm saying is in the past, there would
• 1:23:13
  Speaker 1: have been a lot of, there would have been a
• 1:23:15
  Speaker 1: lot of like, you know, um, like fretting and land
• 1:23:20
  Speaker 1: acknowledgements and these kinds of like white nighty statements like, well,
• 1:23:24
  Speaker 1: you know, this is like, no one's like, people are
• 1:23:28
  Speaker 1: done with this. They're done with it. Like you can
• 1:23:30
  Speaker 1: look at how people reacted to Brett Kavanaugh and the
• 1:23:34
  Speaker 1: allegations against him. And how fake those were. How people
• 1:23:37
  Speaker 1: reacted to Emma Sulkowicz. How people reacted to the Duke Lacrosse.
• 1:23:43
  Speaker 1: And how they're reacting to the Coronel 7. And I
• 1:23:46
  Speaker 1: think the tone is completely different. And that's my point.
• 1:23:48
  Speaker 1: Is that it's moving in this direction. So, there you go.
• 1:23:52
  Speaker 1: Let us know what you guys think about this one
• 1:23:54
  Speaker 1: in the comments. Did I get any super chats or anything? No.
• 1:23:57
  Speaker 2: Okay.
• 1:23:57
  Speaker 1: So, let us know what you guys think about this
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 1: in the comments. We're going to move on to the
• 1:24:00
  Speaker 1: last story. Alright.
• 1:24:03
  Speaker 2: So.
• 1:24:04
  Speaker 1: Professor Eric Kaufman, director of the Center for Heterodox Social Science,
• 1:24:10
  Speaker 1: analyzed large-scale U.S. surveys and found that identification as non-binary
• 1:24:15
  Speaker 1: or genderqueer, neither male or female, among young educated Americans
• 1:24:21
  Speaker 1: peaked around 2023 and has since entered a sharp decline
• 1:24:25
  Speaker 1: he described as freefall. Drawing primarily on the Foundation for
• 1:24:30
  Speaker 1: Individual Rights and Expressions annual survey of roughly 50,000 to 68,000 undergraduates,
• 1:24:36
  Speaker 1: the share of students identifying as gender other than male
• 1:24:40
  Speaker 1: or female fell from about 6.8% in 2023 to 3.6,
• 1:24:42
  Speaker 1: so about half, in 2025, roughly a halving in two years. Now,
• 1:24:51
  Speaker 1: considering this is, like, supposedly a biological identity, the fact
• 1:24:54
  Speaker 1: that it's dropped so much so quickly shows you that
• 1:24:57
  Speaker 1: it was more like a social contagion that's basically going
• 1:25:00
  Speaker 1: out of style. Hopefully nobody, like, did anything permanent to
• 1:25:03
  Speaker 1: their bodies in trying to, like, identify this way.
• 1:25:08
  Speaker 2: But anyway. Yes, they did.
• 1:25:10
  Speaker 1: Yes, a lot of people did. Comparable drops appeared in
• 1:25:12
  Speaker 1: higher response surveys at elite institutions such as Andover Phillips Academy,
• 1:25:18
  Speaker 1: which dropped from 9%... people identifying as genderqueer to 3%,
• 1:25:23
  Speaker 1: and Brown University around 5% to 2.5%. Parallel declines occurred
• 1:25:29
  Speaker 1: in non-conforming sexual identities such as queer, questioning, bisexual, and
• 1:25:33
  Speaker 1: similar categories. Queer, by the way, is not a sexual orientation,
• 1:25:36
  Speaker 1: it's a political position, but that's a digression. With heterosexual
• 1:25:40
  Speaker 1: identification rebounding by about 10 percentage points, while gay and
• 1:25:43
  Speaker 1: lesbian identification remained relatively stable. Incoming freshmen reported lower rates
• 1:25:48
  Speaker 1: than seniors, pointing to a continuing cohort shift. Kaufman's report
• 1:25:54
  Speaker 1: attributes the reversal less to changes in political ideology, religiosity,
• 1:25:59
  Speaker 1: or social media use, which stayed relatively constant, and more
• 1:26:02
  Speaker 1: to a pattern of a fading social fashion or trend,
• 1:26:06
  Speaker 1: with a partial contribution from improved mental health, lower rates
• 1:26:10
  Speaker 1: of anxiety and depression among students. He notes that the
• 1:26:14
  Speaker 1: rise itself through the late 2010s and early 2020s tracked
• 1:26:17
  Speaker 1: social and peer influences more closely than underlying changes in behavior,
• 1:26:22
  Speaker 1: and that the recent contraction is visible across independent datasets
• 1:26:26
  Speaker 1: of college-age youth. Critics have questioned the use of neither
• 1:26:30
  Speaker 1: male nor female as a proxy for transgender identity, which
• 1:26:34
  Speaker 1: can include binary male-female identification, and aspects of survey weighing weighting.
• 1:26:40
  Speaker 1: But the consistent direction of the decline across multiple sources
• 1:26:44
  Speaker 1: has been noted by other researchers examining related youth data.
• 1:26:49
  Speaker 1: And in addition to that, it seems like the youngest generations,
• 1:26:52
  Speaker 1: which is this, you know, we're going to see because
• 1:26:55
  Speaker 1: the alphas are still, I think they're like in middle school,
• 1:26:58
  Speaker 1: maybe like early high school at this point. But it
• 1:27:02
  Speaker 1: seems to me that the younger generations are a little
• 1:27:05
  Speaker 1: bit more aware of these things as social trends and
• 1:27:09
  Speaker 1: not like a real definition of what you are. So
• 1:27:12
  Speaker 1: maybe that's why they're resisting better than the zoomers and
• 1:27:16
  Speaker 1: the millennials. Although I, you know, it's still happening to
• 1:27:19
  Speaker 1: the alphas. I'm not saying it's not happening to them.
• 1:27:22
  Speaker 1: And another thing too, I learned as an aside is
• 1:27:25
  Speaker 1: that boys have also stopped like watching and consuming manosphere content.
• 1:27:32
  Speaker 1: I put that in quotes. I mean like Andrew Tate
• 1:27:34
  Speaker 1: and these kinds of people. I don't know if you
• 1:27:36
  Speaker 1: guys have noticed, but Andrew Tate hasn't been in the
• 1:27:38
  Speaker 1: news at all lately. I mean, there was something with
• 1:27:41
  Speaker 1: his case, but like no one's talking about him anymore.
• 1:27:43
  Speaker 1: The kids are not into him anymore. So it's sort
• 1:27:46
  Speaker 1: of like happening in other areas as well. But I
• 1:27:48
  Speaker 1: thought in particular, this recognition as the genderqueer, non-binary identity
• 1:27:56
  Speaker 1: as a social trend... is fading is actually worth pointing out.
• 1:28:01
  Speaker 1: Because again, it is something that got pushed from the
• 1:28:03
  Speaker 1: top down in a lot of ways. And yeah, I
• 1:28:06
  Speaker 1: think a lot of kids did some irreversible stuff to
• 1:28:09
  Speaker 1: themselves in order to fit in. But anyway, I will
• 1:28:12
  Speaker 1: leave it there. I think this is great news, but
• 1:28:15
  Speaker 1: I cede the floor.
• 1:28:17
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I can only reiterate what I previously iterated. Do
• 1:28:24
  Speaker 2: people still genuinely believe... that men oppress women? Does the
• 1:28:32
  Speaker 2: majority of the population still believe that men oppress women
• 1:28:36
  Speaker 2: and always have? And do they make important life decisions
• 1:28:40
  Speaker 2: and important political decisions based on this belief? Yes, they do.
• 1:28:47
  Speaker 2: That is what caused the social contagion of the trans cult.
• 1:28:51
  Speaker 2: So it doesn't even matter if the social contagion of
• 1:28:54
  Speaker 2: the trans cult does indeed die out in the next
• 1:28:56
  Speaker 2: few years. It was just another head of the hydra.
• 1:29:01
  Speaker 2: Like I said, people 40 years ago couldn't possibly have
• 1:29:06
  Speaker 2: predicted that future generations would be permanently mutilating children based
• 1:29:13
  Speaker 2: purely on their insistence that reality is whatever they say
• 1:29:16
  Speaker 2: it is. Just like they couldn't have predicted smartphones. And
• 1:29:22
  Speaker 2: we today can't possibly predict what artificial intelligence will make
• 1:29:29
  Speaker 2: of the future. And we can't possibly predict what kind
• 1:29:33
  Speaker 2: of mass hysteria, what kind of mass torture the next
• 1:29:38
  Speaker 2: head of the feminist Hydra will inflict on us. Especially
• 1:29:44
  Speaker 2: given that this time the feminist Hydra is programming the AI. Yeah.
• 1:29:56
  Speaker 2: I mean, maybe Grok will win. Who knows? But even
• 1:29:59
  Speaker 2: Grok is not exactly based certainly not as based as
• 1:30:03
  Speaker 2: we would like because it's learning from fucking reddit grok
• 1:30:09
  Speaker 2: is just the least chaotic of the chaos gods it's
• 1:30:15
  Speaker 2: basically zench where the other ones are slanesh nurgle and
• 1:30:21
  Speaker 2: corn don't ask me which one is which only time
• 1:30:25
  Speaker 2: will tell and if you don't know what the fuck
• 1:30:27
  Speaker 2: i'm talking about don't worry i don't fully understand it
• 1:30:30
  Speaker 2: either Sorry, again, I'm just creatively doom-mongering at this point.
• 1:30:37
  Speaker 2: And I told myself not to blackpill as much as
• 1:30:42
  Speaker 2: my power level can take, y'all. You wouldn't appreciate just
• 1:30:47
  Speaker 2: how blackpilled I am. So, yeah, I'm just going to stop.
• 1:30:54
  Speaker 2: I'll just lie to you. Don't worry, folks. This is fine.
• 1:30:58
  Speaker 2: Everything's going to turn out just great. There is nothing
• 1:31:01
  Speaker 2: to worry about. I'm going to go and skip through
• 1:31:04
  Speaker 2: a field of daisies, whimsically playing the piccolo. Give me
• 1:31:09
  Speaker 2: a call when you're ready to say, We were wrong, Doc!
• 1:31:13
  Speaker 2: Please help us! And I will spontaneously laugh in your
• 1:31:18
  Speaker 2: face while disintegrating into the grass. And thereby touching the
• 1:31:24
  Speaker 2: grass as I disintegrate into it. And I will give
• 1:31:28
  Speaker 2: you the finger as I disintegrate into the grass to
• 1:31:32
  Speaker 2: which I eternally touch. Mic out.
• 1:31:40
  Speaker 3: There is one thing, one takeaway from this that everyone
• 1:31:45
  Speaker 3: should have. Feminists should not have access to the institutions.
• 1:31:54
  Speaker 3: But the fact that some of gender ideology are no
• 1:32:04
  Speaker 3: longer popular. Doesn't really surprise me. Feminists can make them
• 1:32:09
  Speaker 3: popular for a while. They can brainwash kids. They can
• 1:32:14
  Speaker 3: paint a pretty picture. But a lot of what they
• 1:32:18
  Speaker 3: do operates on this makes you special. This is popular.
• 1:32:23
  Speaker 3: This will make you popular. And so on. This will
• 1:32:27
  Speaker 3: get your teacher to be happy with you. you'll get
• 1:32:31
  Speaker 3: extra points in class. What they can't do is keep
• 1:32:37
  Speaker 3: kids interested in the same thing for a long time
• 1:32:42
  Speaker 3: after everyone is doing it. And as soon as it
• 1:32:46
  Speaker 3: becomes commonplace, the kids that would be most likely to
• 1:32:52
  Speaker 3: choose this path aren't going to be interested in it
• 1:32:56
  Speaker 3: anymore because... Now it's mainstream. Everyone's doing it. It doesn't
• 1:33:00
  Speaker 3: make them interesting. They're just another annoying person showing off
• 1:33:07
  Speaker 3: their status. Just another status seeker. And because of that,
• 1:33:15
  Speaker 3: they quit. They don't do it anymore. It's no longer exciting.
• 1:33:19
  Speaker 3: It's no longer fun. They're no longer special if they
• 1:33:23
  Speaker 3: have this characteristic. They're no longer unique. They're no longer
• 1:33:28
  Speaker 3: getting rewarded because it's no longer something new. So there's
• 1:33:34
  Speaker 3: no point in putting any effort into it. And I
• 1:33:37
  Speaker 3: guess it takes a lot of effort to switch genders
• 1:33:42
  Speaker 3: every day. But they're still buying all of the same
• 1:33:50
  Speaker 3: bullshit that they were buying before. They're still listening to
• 1:33:55
  Speaker 3: some dumb fuck in the front of their classroom telling
• 1:33:59
  Speaker 3: them that they can screw everything that moves and it's
• 1:34:03
  Speaker 3: not bad and they're not sluts and they're not gonna,
• 1:34:07
  Speaker 3: you know, they're not sinning. They're not going to die
• 1:34:09
  Speaker 3: from it and they don't have to get pregnant. They
• 1:34:11
  Speaker 3: don't have to get a disease. They can do this
• 1:34:15
  Speaker 3: safely as long as they follow these rules for consent that, um,
• 1:34:24
  Speaker 3: take away your entire ability to figure out how to
• 1:34:27
  Speaker 3: be safe. So we kind of just ended up right
• 1:34:32
  Speaker 3: back where we were. As long as you let feminists
• 1:34:36
  Speaker 3: have access to the institutions. And when I say they
• 1:34:40
  Speaker 3: have access to the institutions, they have access to the
• 1:34:43
  Speaker 3: institutions the way Kudzu Root has, the Kudzu plant has
• 1:34:48
  Speaker 3: access to a field. Any field. Any field. As long
• 1:34:53
  Speaker 3: as you haven't killed it off, as long as there
• 1:34:56
  Speaker 3: is one little bit of it left, it will shoot
• 1:35:01
  Speaker 3: its little roots and its little runners all across everything,
• 1:35:06
  Speaker 3: choke out all the other plants, and become the only
• 1:35:10
  Speaker 3: thing that can survive there. This is pretty much what
• 1:35:17
  Speaker 3: feminism does. It doesn't stand alone. It's not a tree.
• 1:35:22
  Speaker 3: It's a creeping, crawling, deep-rooted, leeching-into-everything parasitic vine. So, again,
• 1:35:34
  Speaker 3: I hate to say this, but Gen Z, Gen Alpha,
• 1:35:40
  Speaker 3: you got a lot of work to do. Because you're
• 1:35:43
  Speaker 3: going to have to go through every institution, the schools,
• 1:35:50
  Speaker 3: the government, the media, Not just the news media. The
• 1:35:55
  Speaker 3: entertainment media too. Arts and entertainment. Business.
• 1:36:05
  Speaker 2: Law. Everything.
• 1:36:08
  Speaker 3: And start eliminating feminism from all of it. Because what
• 1:36:16
  Speaker 3: it leads to is what we saw in the last
• 1:36:18
  Speaker 3: couple of years with this damn social contagion. And there
• 1:36:21
  Speaker 3: will be another and another, and another, until it's dead.
• 1:36:28
  Speaker 3: And like Mike said, right now it is influencing the next, latest, greatest,
• 1:36:36
  Speaker 3: biggest technology that's going to be used to control you.
• 1:36:41
  Speaker 3: And if you're not afraid of that, you should be
• 1:36:44
  Speaker 3: aware that this technology is going to control your car
• 1:36:50
  Speaker 3: within the next few years. And probably within the next
• 1:36:53
  Speaker 3: 10 years, it's going to control your house. It's going
• 1:36:57
  Speaker 3: to be watching from every one of those stupid little
• 1:37:00
  Speaker 3: cameras that have been put everywhere. And it's going to
• 1:37:06
  Speaker 3: be deciding whether or not you get charged with a crime.
• 1:37:12
  Speaker 3: So you damn well better get feminism out of it.
• 1:37:17
  Speaker 3: So I don't know how you're going to do it,
• 1:37:21
  Speaker 3: but All of the generations ahead. The generations before us.
• 1:37:29
  Speaker 2: And.
• 1:37:31
  Speaker 3: My generation. Fuck this up for everybody. The millennials. Might.
• 1:37:39
  Speaker 3: Be able to team up with you to fix it.
• 1:37:41
  Speaker 3: But they might be too fucked up to do it.
• 1:37:44
  Speaker 3: So it's up to the kids. Well. Gen Z is.
• 1:37:49
  Speaker 3: Turning 30. It's up to.
• 1:37:51
  Speaker 2: The uh.
• 1:37:53
  Speaker 3: Younger middle-aged and, uh, that's just blew my mind. Gen
• 1:37:59
  Speaker 3: Z is turning 30 because my son's Gen Z and
• 1:38:02
  Speaker 3: he's almost there.
• 1:38:04
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 1:38:04
  Speaker 3: Um, yeah, but yeah, Gen Z, Gen Alpha balls in
• 1:38:09
  Speaker 3: your court.
• 1:38:12
  Speaker 1: All right.
• 1:38:12
  Speaker 2: Yeah. Okay.
• 1:38:14
  Speaker 1: Well, I will say that I am again, I'm, I'm
• 1:38:17
  Speaker 1: glad that they, eventually said, you know what? This is stupid.
• 1:38:22
  Speaker 1: I'm not doing this anymore. So keep at it, young people.
• 1:38:28
  Speaker 1: Know the difference between, look, I like playing pretend when
• 1:38:31
  Speaker 1: I was a kid too but just know when you
• 1:38:33
  Speaker 1: know you're getting into stuff that's a little bit too
• 1:38:36
  Speaker 1: serious so and I hope it continues to the point
• 1:38:41
  Speaker 1: where it's almost gone because I want to see the
• 1:38:44
  Speaker 1: people who are pushing this shit sort of like realize
• 1:38:48
  Speaker 1: what they have done so All right, but anyway, we're
• 1:38:51
  Speaker 1: done with the stories. This has been a slightly longer-than-average sausage.
• 1:38:55
  Speaker 1: So we're going to go into the patron show now,
• 1:38:57
  Speaker 1: and we're going to look at this article with this
• 1:38:58
  Speaker 1: opinion piece on Shane Gillis making jokes and how that's
• 1:39:03
  Speaker 1: not allowed. And for those of you guys who are
• 1:39:05
  Speaker 1: wondering who wrote this, Jacques Berlinerblau wrote it, who I
• 1:39:11
  Speaker 1: think is a man, but he's French, so, you know.
• 1:39:14
  Speaker 1: All right, but anyway, with all that said... We're going
• 1:39:17
  Speaker 1: to go into the patron show now. Once again, if
• 1:39:19
  Speaker 1: you guys want to join us for that, become a
• 1:39:21
  Speaker 1: Badger yourself. Go to FeedTheBadger.com and set up a monthly subscription.
• 1:39:25
  Speaker 1: And hopefully we will see you there. I want to
• 1:39:27
  Speaker 1: thank Mike for doing the write-ups, or helping me with
• 1:39:30
  Speaker 1: the write-ups, that is. And I want to thank Hannah
• 1:39:32
  Speaker 1: and Mike, other Mike, and Dr. Ranmerkam, for giving their
• 1:39:37
  Speaker 1: commentary on the stories today. And I want to thank
• 1:39:40
  Speaker 1: you guys most of all for tuning in and watching
• 1:39:42
  Speaker 1: with us. With all that said, if you guys liked
• 1:39:44
  Speaker 1: this video, please hit like. Subscribe if you're not already subscribed.
• 1:39:47
  Speaker 1: Hit the bell for notifications. Leave us a comment. Let
• 1:39:49
  Speaker 1: us know what you guys think about what we talked
• 1:39:50
  Speaker 1: about on the show today. And share the video because
• 1:39:52
  Speaker 1: sharing is bearing. Sharing is bearing? Sharing is caring. Thanks
• 1:39:58
  Speaker 1: so much for coming on this episode of HBR News.
• 1:40:01
  Speaker 1: And we will see you next Tuesday.