Latest / Daniel and Kelly’s Extraordinary Universe / How do particles carry forces?
Transcript
- 0:08Speaker 1: Hey, Jorge, I'm wondering how you feel about the Midi Chlorians,
- 0:12Speaker 1: those little critters that give Jedi the ability to interact
- 0:15Speaker 1: with the Force.
- 0:17Speaker 2: You mean in Star Wars. I mostly try to ignore them.
- 0:21Speaker 2: They're a bit of an awkward retroactive continuity or redcon
- 0:25Speaker 2: of the original series.
- 0:27Speaker 1: Mm so you prefer the original approach where it's like
- 0:29Speaker 1: more democratic. Anybody can learn the force like yoga.
- 0:33Speaker 2: You mean, like Yoda or yoga.
- 0:36Speaker 1: I mean like Yoda doing.
- 0:37Speaker 2: Yoga, and like downward facing Jedi.
- 0:40Speaker 1: That conjured of a pretty awkward mental image.
- 0:43Speaker 2: How flexible is Yoda? We may never know.
- 0:45Speaker 1: Well, I'm a fan of the Midichlorians. I feel like
- 0:47Speaker 1: they're more scientific.
- 0:48Speaker 2: Oh are you a fan of jar Jar Binks too?
- 0:50Speaker 2: Because I think most people who are in that camp
- 0:53Speaker 2: are also in the jar Jar Binks camp. But you're
- 0:55Speaker 2: not tall made up right? It's not real science.
- 0:57Speaker 1: I know it's not real science, but it's science. You know.
- 1:00Speaker 1: It's a better microscopic explanation than just like hand waving
- 1:04Speaker 1: yoga magic.
- 1:05Speaker 2: I think the magic in Star Wars is literally handwaving,
- 1:09Speaker 2: like waving your hands in front of your face, going,
- 1:11Speaker 2: does this not the signs you're looking for.
- 1:13Speaker 1: I need the old physics mind trick instead.
- 1:15Speaker 2: That's right, redcon our real universe, not my childhood fantasy.
- 1:18Speaker 1: That's my job.
- 1:35Speaker 2: Hi'm Jorhem, a cartoonist and the author of Oliver's Great
- 1:37Speaker 2: Big Universe.
- 1:38Speaker 3: Hi.
- 1:39Speaker 1: I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist, and that means my
- 1:41Speaker 1: job is to explain away all the apparent magic in
- 1:45Speaker 1: the universe.
- 1:46Speaker 2: You have to understand it first, though, don't you. Isn't
- 1:48Speaker 2: that step one? Or are you just making stuff up?
- 1:51Speaker 2: Are you? George Lucas seing it?
- 1:52Speaker 1: I think explaining it away is understanding it. Describing how
- 1:55Speaker 1: something works in terms of its like tiny little bits
- 1:57Speaker 1: and how they bump and dance together. That's basically explanation.
- 2:00Speaker 2: Or maybe I think you're maybe saying your job is
- 2:02Speaker 2: to look for explanations.
- 2:04Speaker 1: Yeah, and sometimes we actually find them.
- 2:06Speaker 2: Yeah, and then explain it to other pe books like
- 2:07Speaker 2: we do in this podcast. So welcome to Daniel and
- 2:10Speaker 2: Jorge Explain the Universe, a production of iHeartRadio.
- 2:13Speaker 1: In which we try to take everything in the universe
- 2:15Speaker 1: that seems unexplainable, that seems magical, and figure out how
- 2:19Speaker 1: it comes to be. Drill down into its tiny little
- 2:22Speaker 1: bits and particles and explain how they bump and dance
- 2:25Speaker 1: and push on each other to weave themselves together into
- 2:28Speaker 1: our reality, to explain why yoga feels so good or
- 2:31Speaker 1: so bad.
- 2:32Speaker 2: That's right, because it is a marvelous universe out there,
- 2:34Speaker 2: with giant gaxies moving across at cosmos and stars exploding
- 2:38Speaker 2: and black holes sucking stuff in, and we're interested in
- 2:40Speaker 2: knowing what are some of the forces that bind it
- 2:42Speaker 2: all together, that flow through us and make it all
- 2:45Speaker 2: make sense.
- 2:46Speaker 1: And is it even possible to explain all of that craziness,
- 2:49Speaker 1: all the amazing things we experience in the universe, from
- 2:52Speaker 1: leaves swirling in the fall to black holes collapsing in
- 2:55Speaker 1: terms of tiny particles. Is it really possible to break
- 2:58Speaker 1: it all down and say it's just a bunch of
- 3:00Speaker 1: electrons passing particles back and forth.
- 3:03Speaker 2: I feel like you're minimizing electrons. You said, only a
- 3:06Speaker 2: bunch of electrons. But electrons are pretty pretty special, aren't they.
- 3:09Speaker 2: Each one is a tiny snowflake in the universe.
- 3:12Speaker 1: They're all actually identical right in a way snowflakes aren't
- 3:15Speaker 1: even But I think the job of particle physics is
- 3:17Speaker 1: literally to minimize the universe, to say, everything that's big
- 3:21Speaker 1: can be explained in terms of everything that's small.
- 3:24Speaker 3: Yeah.
- 3:24Speaker 2: I guess that's a job of physics to break things down.
- 3:26Speaker 2: And I guess throughout the history of humans and signs,
- 3:30Speaker 2: that's what you have been doing, right, first breaking things
- 3:32Speaker 2: down into types of elements, and then atoms and then
- 3:35Speaker 2: atomic particles.
- 3:36Speaker 1: Yeah. We hope that breaking things down will give us explanations,
- 3:39Speaker 1: will reveal the true nature of the universe, and that
- 3:42Speaker 1: we could go the opposite direction also from the little
- 3:45Speaker 1: bits tooing and frowing, that we can weave those little
- 3:47Speaker 1: bits back together. All their tooing and frowing can be
- 3:50Speaker 1: sewn together to explain everything that happens, the way like
- 3:53Speaker 1: water droplets eventually could explain a hurricane, and the way
- 3:56Speaker 1: quantum particles somehow make up your classical body. We hope
- 4:00Speaker 1: that by drilling down we can expose the most fundamental
- 4:03Speaker 1: layer of the universe and then build back up to
- 4:05Speaker 1: explain everything.
- 4:06Speaker 2: Yeah, and so, little by little, scientists have come up
- 4:08Speaker 2: with a picture of the universe that can be broken
- 4:10Speaker 2: down into subatomic particles called electrons and quarks, and also
- 4:14Speaker 2: force particles. So the question is does it all make sense?
- 4:17Speaker 2: Does it all stick?
- 4:18Speaker 1: We have a mathematical description of how this all works,
- 4:21Speaker 1: which is incredibly precise. We can predict the outcomes of
- 4:24Speaker 1: experiments to ten or fifteen decimal places and mostly get
- 4:27Speaker 1: it right. But is it possible to get an intuitive
- 4:30Speaker 1: understanding to tell ourselves, like a little story about what's
- 4:33Speaker 1: happening down there in the quantum realm in a way
- 4:36Speaker 1: that gives us some insights, some understanding. Is it really
- 4:39Speaker 1: true that particles are zipping around tossing force particles back
- 4:42Speaker 1: and forth together or is something deeper happening?
- 4:45Speaker 2: Yeah, so we're here to force out the truth. So
- 4:47Speaker 2: today on the podcast, we'll be asking the question how
- 4:54Speaker 2: do particles carry force? This is generic force, not the force, right.
- 4:59Speaker 1: This is science force, not science fiction force or magical force.
- 5:03Speaker 2: Who Science Force? I want to be part of that team.
- 5:05Speaker 2: Do you wear uniforms? Do you have like a secret base?
- 5:08Speaker 1: Absolutely, they're snappier than the Space Force.
- 5:10Speaker 2: Also, yeah, well I'll join either one. To be honest,
- 5:13Speaker 2: anything that has a base and involves space or science
- 5:17Speaker 2: and laser guns.
- 5:18Speaker 1: I mean, I think we settle this already. The Science
- 5:20Speaker 1: Force is going to elect you to be part of
- 5:21Speaker 1: the space Force and send you up to meet the aliens?
- 5:24Speaker 4: Wait?
- 5:24Speaker 2: Wait, when do we settle this? I didn't sign any
- 5:26Speaker 2: agreements here.
- 5:27Speaker 1: Oh sorry, we had a meeting of the Science Force.
- 5:29Speaker 1: I guess you weren't there.
- 5:30Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, I guess it depends on how much you're
- 5:32Speaker 2: paying me. How much are you paying me to do this? Daniel?
- 5:35Speaker 2: And or am I surviving relatives?
- 5:37Speaker 1: Yeah? You get paid on your return? Is that all right?
- 5:39Speaker 2: What do you mean I pay or I get paid?
- 5:42Speaker 1: You get paid if you survive.
- 5:43Speaker 2: That sounds like a terrible deal. Do you get paid
- 5:46Speaker 2: only if you discover something in physics Daniel? Or do
- 5:49Speaker 2: you get paid either way?
- 5:50Speaker 1: I'm getting paid and I never discovered anything?
- 5:54Speaker 2: Then the answerds yes, so far, so far right. There's
- 5:58Speaker 2: always an optimism.
- 5:59Speaker 1: That's right and over yet.
- 6:00Speaker 2: That's right, your careering over yet? But maybe have a
- 6:04Speaker 2: podcast long enough and who knows what you'll say, day
- 6:07Speaker 2: tuned folks. But anyways, it's an interesting question because we
- 6:10Speaker 2: tend to think of matter and the things around us
- 6:13Speaker 2: is being made out of particles. That kind of makes sense.
- 6:15Speaker 2: But the idea that maybe the forces between those particles
- 6:18Speaker 2: the things that make you stand here on Earth or
- 6:20Speaker 2: that makes all your atoms stick together, or your hair
- 6:23Speaker 2: stent when they're theirs static electricity, those things could be
- 6:27Speaker 2: due to particles also is kind of confusing, right.
- 6:30Speaker 1: It is confusing, and yet it's something you hear a
- 6:33Speaker 1: lot in popular science without a sort of deeper explanation
- 6:36Speaker 1: for what the limits are of that description. You know,
- 6:38Speaker 1: everything in the end is an analogy, and those analogies
- 6:41Speaker 1: always break down at some point. So which parts of
- 6:43Speaker 1: that story are true and which parts of that story
- 6:45Speaker 1: are just a cartoon?
- 6:46Speaker 2: That's right. You don't want to force a force analogy
- 6:49Speaker 2: that's too deep, all right? Well, as usual, we were
- 6:51Speaker 2: wondering how many people out there I thought about the
- 6:53Speaker 2: idea of particles caring force and how they might do that.
- 6:57Speaker 1: So thanks to everybody who volunteers for this audience participation
- 7:00Speaker 1: segment of the podcast. We'd love if you participated. Since
- 7:04Speaker 1: you are part of the audience. Don't be shy write
- 7:06Speaker 1: to me two questions at Daniel and Jorge dot com
- 7:09Speaker 1: and in the future you'll hear your voice on the podcast.
- 7:11Speaker 2: So think about it for a second. How do you
- 7:13Speaker 2: think particles carry forth? Here's what I be glad to say.
- 7:17Speaker 4: I think technically, they carry force by exchanging particles. I know,
- 7:20Speaker 4: all the matter particles are called fermions, and they exchange
- 7:24Speaker 4: force by passing around their boson counterparts. For example, the
- 7:28Speaker 4: strong force I think passes around gluons, and so the
- 7:31Speaker 4: mental model that I have is fermians passing their bosons around,
- 7:35Speaker 4: sort of like playing catch. But I'm sure that's not
- 7:37Speaker 4: even close to an accurate representation, but it's kind of
- 7:40Speaker 4: what I've.
- 7:40Speaker 2: Thought of boson's carry force, because there's a way paint
- 7:43Speaker 2: qui fermions, just in the way light light steams up.
- 7:50Speaker 5: I think particles carry forces by interacting with fields, or
- 7:56Speaker 5: they might also carry a force by being like a
- 7:59Speaker 5: part of them, like shaking in that dimension. Sort of.
- 8:03Speaker 6: Particles carry force in their pockets, and when they want
- 8:06Speaker 6: to transmit a force, they reach into their pocket and
- 8:08Speaker 6: they pull out a boson and they lob it at
- 8:11Speaker 6: another particle to push it out of the way.
- 8:13Speaker 7: I assume particles carry force through velocity, mass, and spin,
- 8:18Speaker 7: and they transfer force as they translate one of those
- 8:22Speaker 7: upon interaction with something else.
- 8:25Speaker 6: I thought that the forces were transmitted when the force
- 8:28Speaker 6: particles were transferred from one particle to another, but Having
- 8:31Speaker 6: just listened to your podcast on energy, I imagine the
- 8:35Speaker 6: answer is probably just momentum.
- 8:37Speaker 2: All right, a lot of pretty science the answers. Are
- 8:40Speaker 2: you also recruiting them for the science force? Is there
- 8:42Speaker 2: a pledge to be in the science force?
- 8:44Speaker 1: Did you like the answer where the're pulling bosons out
- 8:46Speaker 1: of their pockets?
- 8:47Speaker 7: Yeah?
- 8:48Speaker 2: What's it required? What kind of gadgets do you get?
- 8:50Speaker 1: You get a pocket full of bosons and you set free,
- 8:53Speaker 1: go go forth in science.
- 8:55Speaker 2: Nice. Nice, that sounds like a ninety song pocket full
- 8:58Speaker 2: of bosons. But anyways, interesting answers from our listeners here.
- 9:01Speaker 2: None of them mentioned Yoda doing yoga or Medei Chlorians disappointed. Yeah,
- 9:07Speaker 2: step it up, listeners. We have some interesting answers having
- 9:10Speaker 2: to do with velocity and mass and colored matter and
- 9:14Speaker 2: maybe extra dimensions. So I'll have to explore here. So
- 9:16Speaker 2: let's break it down, Daniel, what is the technical definition
- 9:19Speaker 2: of a force? Let's start with that.
- 9:21Speaker 1: So all of these explanations in the end are trying
- 9:23Speaker 1: to describe things we have experience with. That's what physics does, right,
- 9:27Speaker 1: give labels to things and then try to explain them.
- 9:29Speaker 1: And so a force is something we're familiar with. Right,
- 9:32Speaker 1: somebody pushes you, or you press down the accelerator in
- 9:35Speaker 1: your car. These are things that involve forces. Mathematically and
- 9:38Speaker 1: in physics, we think about a force as anything that
- 9:41Speaker 1: changes the momentum of an object. So a ball flying
- 9:44Speaker 1: through space at the same velocity, there's no force on
- 9:46Speaker 1: it. It just continues. If you want to change its velocity,
- 9:49Speaker 1: its direction, or its overall momentum in any way, you
- 9:52Speaker 1: have to apply a force.
- 9:54Speaker 2: Right. It also goes back to basically f equals ma
- 9:56Speaker 2: a right, like, if you have a mass, something with
- 9:59Speaker 2: mass and it's change it's velocity, then there must be
- 10:02Speaker 2: a force involved. And that's kind of maybe what you're
- 10:04Speaker 2: saying is the definition of it.
- 10:05Speaker 1: Yeah, you can actually even rewrite eth eqals ma as
- 10:08Speaker 1: the change in momentum, and that really helps you understand
- 10:11Speaker 1: the connection between forces and momentum because remember that in
- 10:14Speaker 1: our universe, momentum is conserved, So if something has a
- 10:17Speaker 1: certain momentum, it's just going to keep that momentum unless
- 10:20Speaker 1: you add in momentum from somewhere else. That's what a
- 10:22Speaker 1: force is. You have a particle flying through space, you
- 10:25Speaker 1: want to change its direction, change its momentum, you have
- 10:28Speaker 1: to bring in some external momentum, you have to have
- 10:30Speaker 1: another particle come by and give it a push or pull.
- 10:32Speaker 1: That's what the force is. It's the change of momentum
- 10:35Speaker 1: of an object.
- 10:36Speaker 2: But the objects ever really change mass, And if they
- 10:40Speaker 2: never do, then what's the point of saying momentum? Why
- 10:42Speaker 2: did you say ethicals?
- 10:43Speaker 1: When things are moving slowly, you can think of momentum
- 10:46Speaker 1: as just mass times velocity. But as things approach the
- 10:49Speaker 1: speed of light, when they get relativistic, there's another term
- 10:51Speaker 1: that creeps in there that changes the relationship between momentum
- 10:55Speaker 1: and velocity. They're no longer just linear. We whole episode
- 10:58Speaker 1: on the concept of like relativistic mass and whether that
- 11:01Speaker 1: makes any sense, and you remember, we decided that the
- 11:03Speaker 1: real concept is relativistic momentum. That momentum has a simple
- 11:07Speaker 1: relationship with velocity when you're moving slowly, but when you
- 11:10Speaker 1: move fast, it's much more complicated, And it's momentum that's
- 11:13Speaker 1: really the more fundamental concept. That's the thing that the
- 11:15Speaker 1: universe cares about, that's the thing the universe conserves. So
- 11:19Speaker 1: it's really sort of the more pure idea is momentum.
- 11:22Speaker 2: So when you say force is a change in momentum.
- 11:25Speaker 2: Are you also talking about its relativistic momentum?
- 11:28Speaker 7: Yeah?
- 11:29Speaker 1: Absolutely. Relativistic momentum is the more general concept. You only
- 11:32Speaker 1: really need it near the speed of light. Mostly you
- 11:34Speaker 1: can use the old classical momentum, which is just mass
- 11:36Speaker 1: times velocity, and it gets things mostly right. But it
- 11:39Speaker 1: is the relativistic momentum that the universe conserves. And that's
- 11:43Speaker 1: one way we know that relativity is right is that
- 11:45Speaker 1: it's this relativistic momentum that the universe keeps track of.
- 11:49Speaker 2: I see all right, So then to change your momentum,
- 11:51Speaker 2: you can increase it or decrease it. So forces can
- 11:53Speaker 2: push and pull.
- 11:54Speaker 1: Right, yeah, exactly. The intuitive description of a force is
- 11:57Speaker 1: a push or a pull. And what happens there is
- 11:59Speaker 1: you're changing your momentum. When you hit the brakes on
- 12:01Speaker 1: your car, you're changing your velocity. When you hit the accelerator,
- 12:04Speaker 1: you're changing your velocity. A change in your velocity is
- 12:07Speaker 1: an acceleration. It's a change in momentum, and there's always
- 12:10Speaker 1: a force involved there. Like the fastest way to slow
- 12:12Speaker 1: down is like hit a brick wall. There the wall
- 12:14Speaker 1: is applying a force on you and your car changing
- 12:17Speaker 1: your momentum.
- 12:18Speaker 2: And it's kind of a weird feature of the universe
- 12:21Speaker 2: that it has this conservation of momentum, right, or that
- 12:23Speaker 2: you need a force to change momentum. It could have
- 12:25Speaker 2: been that the universe was different, right. It could have
- 12:27Speaker 2: been that the universe maybe preferred mass time's acceleration to
- 12:30Speaker 2: be conserved.
- 12:32Speaker 7: Right.
- 12:32Speaker 1: Maybe yes, and no, it's not true that we have
- 12:35Speaker 1: no idea why the universe conserves momentum. It comes from
- 12:38Speaker 1: a deeper symmetry. We know because of Nuther's law, which
- 12:41Speaker 1: tells us that every time the universe can serves something,
- 12:44Speaker 1: it's because of a symmetry of the universe. In this case,
- 12:47Speaker 1: the symmetry of the universe is a symmetry of space itself.
- 12:50Speaker 1: The laws of physics are the same at every point
- 12:52Speaker 1: in space, the momentum is conserved. That step there seems
- 12:56Speaker 1: like a big leap, but that's exactly the leap from
- 12:57Speaker 1: Nuther's law. I mean Nuther, this mathematics from about one
- 13:00Speaker 1: hundred years ago made this deep realization that there's a
- 13:03Speaker 1: connection between symmetry and conservation laws. So this law conservation
- 13:07Speaker 1: momentum comes from the fact that space is the same everywhere,
- 13:10Speaker 1: and so you're right, it doesn't have to be true
- 13:12Speaker 1: that space is the same everywhere in our universe. It
- 13:14Speaker 1: seems to be, and that's why we have conservation and momentum.
- 13:17Speaker 1: But there could be other universes where the laws of
- 13:20Speaker 1: physics change as you move through space and their momentum
- 13:23Speaker 1: would not be conserved.
- 13:24Speaker 2: I feel like you. You spend a minute agreeing with me.
- 13:26Speaker 1: Awesome, can we agree?
- 13:30Speaker 2: Well, this is the universe we live in, and it
- 13:31Speaker 2: seems to conserve momentum. And there's several ways that you
- 13:35Speaker 2: can do that, right, Several forces that will allow you
- 13:38Speaker 2: to change particle's momentum, maybe depending on what kind of
- 13:41Speaker 2: particle it is and what its properties are.
- 13:43Speaker 1: Yeah, and so we can take the same concept of
- 13:45Speaker 1: a force that applies to your car and applied also
- 13:48Speaker 1: to particles. Particles have momentum, and if you want to
- 13:51Speaker 1: change your momentum, you have to apply a force. And
- 13:53Speaker 1: you're right, there's several ways to do that. We've observed
- 13:55Speaker 1: several ways, and again this is just descriptive. We've noticed
- 13:58Speaker 1: several things happened to particles, and we've categorized them as
- 14:01Speaker 1: much as we can. We've tried to like weave them
- 14:03Speaker 1: together into one concept, but haven't totally succeeded. We call
- 14:06Speaker 1: these things the fundamental forces. So there's like electricity and magnetism.
- 14:10Speaker 1: Charged particles will push or pull on each other. That's
- 14:13Speaker 1: definitely a force. Electrons will change each other's momentum. They'll
- 14:17Speaker 1: change their direction entirely, right, that's a change in momentum.
- 14:20Speaker 1: Even if your velocity is the same but your direction
- 14:23Speaker 1: is different, it's still a change in momentum.
- 14:25Speaker 2: M So that's maybe the most familiar force to people,
- 14:28Speaker 2: like your magnetism. That's basically what keeps our atoms together, right,
- 14:32Speaker 2: and our molecules stuck together with the different atoms in it. Right.
- 14:36Speaker 2: Without the electromagnetic force, it would be a big deal.
- 14:38Speaker 2: We would all fall apart, exactly. We all need electromagnetism.
- 14:41Speaker 2: So you truly acknowledge the electromagnetic force in like every
- 14:44Speaker 2: book or paper you write, because you totally rely on it.
- 14:46Speaker 2: That's right, every acceptance speech you give, every thank you
- 14:50Speaker 2: card you write.
- 14:51Speaker 1: There you go, yeah, you sent a holiday card to
- 14:53Speaker 1: the electromagnetic force this year.
- 14:55Speaker 2: Have put it on the holidays, and thanks again to
- 14:58Speaker 2: the electromagnetic force.
- 14:59Speaker 1: Thanks for all the photons but it's not the only
- 15:01Speaker 1: force that's out there. There's another force called the weak force,
- 15:05Speaker 1: which US physicists actually have managed to stitch together into
- 15:08Speaker 1: one force we call the electro week. But traditionally people
- 15:11Speaker 1: talk about the weak force as responsible for like radioactive
- 15:14Speaker 1: decay and interactions of neutrinos and stuff like that. So
- 15:18Speaker 1: it's sort of a shyer force.
- 15:20Speaker 2: What does it mean that it's related to radioactive decay?
- 15:22Speaker 2: Like when something decays radioactively, the weak force is there
- 15:26Speaker 2: to split things apart or to hold things together. What
- 15:28Speaker 2: is it doing there?
- 15:29Speaker 1: Lots of radioactive decay can be explained by one kind
- 15:32Speaker 1: of quark changing into another kind of quark, and it
- 15:35Speaker 1: does so using the weak force. So the weak force
- 15:37Speaker 1: can change, for example, like an upcork into a down
- 15:39Speaker 1: cork if you emit a w boson, and the w
- 15:42Speaker 1: boson is intimately connected to the weak force, as we'll
- 15:44Speaker 1: talk about more later. Without the weak force, that can't happen.
- 15:47Speaker 1: And so that's what we mean when we say the
- 15:49Speaker 1: weak force is responsible for radioactive decay. It like opens
- 15:52Speaker 1: up a channel for this to happen.
- 15:54Speaker 2: But is it pushing or pulling on anything?
- 15:55Speaker 1: That's a tricky question the weak force can push and
- 15:58Speaker 1: it can pull. The whole podcast episode inspired by a
- 16:01Speaker 1: question from an organic chemistry professor, but whether the weak
- 16:04Speaker 1: force can push and can pull? The answer is that
- 16:06Speaker 1: it can do both, but it's more complicated than the
- 16:09Speaker 1: electromagnetic force.
- 16:10Speaker 2: Well or right, what are some of the other forces
- 16:12Speaker 2: in nature?
- 16:13Speaker 1: So the last thing that's really a force is the
- 16:15Speaker 1: strong force. This is the thing that quarks feel, but
- 16:17Speaker 1: like electrons don't. Two electrons can pass near each other
- 16:20Speaker 1: and not push or pull on each other with the
- 16:22Speaker 1: strong force. But quarks or gluons, these things do feel
- 16:25Speaker 1: the strong force. They have another kind of charge, the
- 16:28Speaker 1: way an electron has an electric charge, which allows it
- 16:31Speaker 1: to feel electric fields and electromagnetic force, but neutrinos don't.
- 16:35Speaker 1: Quarks and gluons have a color charge, a strong force
- 16:39Speaker 1: charge lets them interact using the strong force in a
- 16:41Speaker 1: way that electrons just don't. And so that's the last force.
- 16:45Speaker 1: And this is the one that holds quarks together into
- 16:47Speaker 1: protons and neutrons, and the residual little forces bind those
- 16:50Speaker 1: protons and neutrons together into nuclei. So we also rely
- 16:53Speaker 1: on the strong force to build our world.
- 16:57Speaker 2: So they're all pretty necessary.
- 16:58Speaker 1: It seems they all have role to play exactly the
- 17:01Speaker 1: top billing to the extras in the back.
- 17:03Speaker 2: What about gravity? Is in gravity also a force.
- 17:05Speaker 1: So we sometimes think of gravity as a force, and
- 17:07Speaker 1: we talk about the force of gravity, and Newton describes
- 17:10Speaker 1: his force law or gravity. But now we know that
- 17:13Speaker 1: gravity isn't actually a force. Things move in a way
- 17:15Speaker 1: that makes it look like there's a force there, but
- 17:17Speaker 1: that's actually just because they are free falling in curved space.
- 17:21Speaker 1: There's no actual change in momentum there. And you can
- 17:24Speaker 1: tell the difference between gravity and these other forces because
- 17:27Speaker 1: gravity doesn't cause a change in momentum. You can't measure
- 17:30Speaker 1: acceleration due to gravity.
- 17:32Speaker 2: Wait, what do you mean If I hold a bowling
- 17:34Speaker 2: ball above you and I let it go, isn't it
- 17:36Speaker 2: going to gain some dangerous momentum for you there?
- 17:38Speaker 1: So if you're falling with the bowling ball and you
- 17:41Speaker 1: have like an accelerometer, you're not going to measure any
- 17:43Speaker 1: acceleration there. The bowling ball is in freefall, there are
- 17:46Speaker 1: no forces on it.
- 17:47Speaker 2: Right, But here it is going to measure a pretty
- 17:50Speaker 2: big acceleration, isn't it.
- 17:51Speaker 1: Yeah, Because in that scenario I'm actually doing the accelerating.
- 17:54Speaker 1: I'm accelerating towards the bowling ball. The bowling ball is
- 17:57Speaker 1: in freefall. The surface of the Earth or my chair
- 17:59Speaker 1: or whatever is accelerating me against the natural curvature of
- 18:03Speaker 1: space time towards the bowling ball. So that's actually my
- 18:06Speaker 1: acceleration due to the structure of the Earth or my
- 18:09Speaker 1: rocket ship or whatever that I'm measuring. There's no acceleration
- 18:12Speaker 1: there due to gravity.
- 18:13Speaker 2: Wait, so if I drop a bowling ball on you,
- 18:15Speaker 2: it's not my fault, it's you're saying it's your fault.
- 18:18Speaker 1: Yeah, I basically rear ended you.
- 18:20Speaker 2: Yeah, basically would that work in a court of law? Daniel,
- 18:24Speaker 2: can I bring you in as an expert physicist?
- 18:26Speaker 1: I definitely recommend you hire a particle physicist instead of
- 18:29Speaker 1: a lawyer next time you're in court. See how that
- 18:31Speaker 1: works out, well, your honor, I want to upend thousands
- 18:35Speaker 1: of years of legal tradition.
- 18:37Speaker 2: That's right. Let me bring out some charts here.
- 18:40Speaker 1: And the truth is that Einstein did say something really
- 18:42Speaker 1: interesting about this. The equivalence principle that a lot of
- 18:44Speaker 1: people have heard about says that any experiment you do
- 18:46Speaker 1: is the same whether or not. You're in curved space
- 18:49Speaker 1: that you basically can't ever measure locally the curvature of space.
- 18:54Speaker 2: Wait, so I feel like I'm a little bit confused, Beau.
- 18:56Speaker 2: If I drop a bowling ball on you, and you're
- 18:59Speaker 2: saying the only bob doesn't accelerate to the gravity, You're
- 19:02Speaker 2: saying you're accelerating. Your head is accelerating due to the
- 19:06Speaker 2: you know, the forces that the ground is pushing up
- 19:08Speaker 2: on you with exactly.
- 19:09Speaker 1: So it looks to me like the bowling ball is
- 19:11Speaker 1: accelerating towards me, but I'm actually accelerating towards it.
- 19:14Speaker 2: I see.
- 19:14Speaker 1: An acceleration is not just relative, right, unlike velocity, and
- 19:17Speaker 1: velocity is equivalent to say, I'm moving in this speed
- 19:20Speaker 1: relative to you, and you're moving in this speed relative
- 19:22Speaker 1: to me, But acceleration is not relative. We can both
- 19:24Speaker 1: hold accelerometers and we can tell who's being accelerated.
- 19:28Speaker 2: Right. Does that mean that if I'm just sitting here
- 19:30Speaker 2: doing nothing, my momentum is changing.
- 19:32Speaker 7: Yeah?
- 19:33Speaker 1: Absolutely, Right now you are being accelerated.
- 19:35Speaker 2: So you're saying my momentum is changing, Yeah, absolutely, even
- 19:37Speaker 2: though I'm just sitting here.
- 19:38Speaker 1: Momentum is defined relative to your axis. So you can
- 19:41Speaker 1: always define an access in which you're at rest and
- 19:43Speaker 1: that doesn't change, and so your momentum is not changing,
- 19:45Speaker 1: but that frame of reference is accelerating. So from an
- 19:48Speaker 1: inertial reference frame, you are definitely accelerating, but you are
- 19:51Speaker 1: not in an inertial reference frame. You're an accelerating reference
- 19:55Speaker 1: frame on the surface of the Earth.
- 19:56Speaker 2: So my reference frame is like off into space or what.
- 20:00Speaker 1: If you define your reference frame to be you, then
- 20:02Speaker 1: you have no momentum and you never will right by definition, hmm.
- 20:06Speaker 1: If you pick some reference frame of a distant observer
- 20:08Speaker 1: looking at the Earth, then yes, you are definitely accelerating.
- 20:11Speaker 1: You're accelerating against the curvature of space time from the Earth,
- 20:14Speaker 1: and you're accelerating against the curvature of space time from
- 20:17Speaker 1: the Sun.
- 20:18Speaker 2: I see this requires us to kind of think in
- 20:20Speaker 2: space time, not just space.
- 20:22Speaker 1: I don't know that you need space time, but you
- 20:23Speaker 1: do have to think about inertial reference frames, ones that
- 20:26Speaker 1: are not accelerating and accelerating reference frames.
- 20:29Speaker 2: So then how do you explain the fact that I
- 20:30Speaker 2: don't feel like I'm moving?
- 20:32Speaker 1: Why don't you feel like you're moving? If you stand
- 20:33Speaker 1: on a scale, you measure something that tells you that
- 20:36Speaker 1: there's a force being applied. You're just used to it.
- 20:38Speaker 2: I don't feel like I'm moving.
- 20:39Speaker 1: Motion is relative, right, You can just define a reference
- 20:42Speaker 1: frame at yourself and then you're not moving, But acceleration
- 20:44Speaker 1: is not, and that's why you can measure it.
- 20:46Speaker 2: M I think maybe what you say is you said
- 20:49Speaker 2: relativity is complex, and if you sort of think about
- 20:52Speaker 2: the curvature space or of space time, then technically even
- 20:56Speaker 2: if you're just sitting there, you're changing momentum.
- 20:58Speaker 1: If you want to dig deep into these questions relativity,
- 21:00Speaker 1: we had an episode recently about inertial versus gravitational mass
- 21:03Speaker 1: that laid it all out in detail. I think the
- 21:05Speaker 1: big picture here is that gravity is not a force.
- 21:08Speaker 1: It doesn't apply in acceleration the way the other fundamental
- 21:11Speaker 1: forces do, at least not in our current understanding of gravity, right.
- 21:15Speaker 2: Right, Because some people think maybe gravity is a force, right,
- 21:18Speaker 2: and there might be gravit cons perhaps.
- 21:20Speaker 1: There might be in future theories of quantum gravity might
- 21:23Speaker 1: change our entire picture of how gravity works.
- 21:26Speaker 2: All right, Well, let's dig into the larger question we're
- 21:28Speaker 2: trying to answer here, which is how particles can carry
- 21:31Speaker 2: forces for the things that we do call forces for now,
- 21:35Speaker 2: I guess, And so let's dig into that. How to
- 21:37Speaker 2: force particles work? And is that really the picture of
- 21:40Speaker 2: how the universe actually is? So let's dig into that.
- 21:43Speaker 2: But first let's take a quick break. All right, we're
- 21:53Speaker 2: talking about Yoda doing yoga. Now do you think Yoda
- 21:56Speaker 2: does hot yoga or some other kind of yoga?
- 22:00Speaker 1: I think Yoda's pretty hot already. I don't think he
- 22:02Speaker 1: has to do any yoga.
- 22:03Speaker 2: Oh yeah, yeah, you're into the ears and the wrinkles.
- 22:06Speaker 1: Well, you know, there's also baby Yoda, right for those
- 22:08Speaker 1: of you who are interested in the smoother skin.
- 22:10Speaker 2: Oh yeah, yeah, he does like cute yoga, adorable adorbs yoga. Well,
- 22:15Speaker 2: it's hard to keep track of yoga and yoga at
- 22:18Speaker 2: the same time. Now, can Yoda drink yogurt doing yoga?
- 22:21Speaker 1: You got me?
- 22:22Speaker 2: Yeah, yo got me? All right, Well, we're talking about
- 22:26Speaker 2: how particles can carry force? Do they carry force? What
- 22:28Speaker 2: does it mean for a particle to carry force? Because
- 22:31Speaker 2: I feel like we're used to forces being just some
- 22:33Speaker 2: sort of invisible thing in the universe. It makes us
- 22:35Speaker 2: want to go towards something, we're away from something, But
- 22:37Speaker 2: I feel like you're saying. Physicists have this view where
- 22:40Speaker 2: a force, when something's pulling or pushing you, it's actually
- 22:43Speaker 2: some sort of exchange of particles.
- 22:45Speaker 1: Yeah, this microscopic picture is compelling because it helps connect
- 22:48Speaker 1: with our macroscopic understanding, our like intuitive experience of what
- 22:52Speaker 1: a force is, and that's basically touching. You know, when
- 22:55Speaker 1: the brick wall slows your car down, it does so
- 22:57Speaker 1: because you hit the brick wall. Or when you lap
- 23:00Speaker 1: that baseball into a home run, you do so because
- 23:02Speaker 1: the baseball hit the bat. Right, And we have this
- 23:04Speaker 1: sense that in order to change something's momentum, you got
- 23:07Speaker 1: to touch it, that it comes from contact, from like
- 23:10Speaker 1: literally pushing on something or pulling on something to apply
- 23:13Speaker 1: that force.
- 23:13Speaker 2: Well, not necessarily like a magnet, Like I think people
- 23:16Speaker 2: are familiar with a magnet kind of pushing pulling things
- 23:19Speaker 2: without actually touching it.
- 23:20Speaker 1: Yeah, that's a great example. I think that's probably why
- 23:22Speaker 1: magnets feel so spooky and weird to a lot of people,
- 23:25Speaker 1: because it is action at a distance. Right, it's things
- 23:28Speaker 1: pushing and pulling out each other without touching.
- 23:31Speaker 2: Or Oh well, I don't want to get into this again,
- 23:34Speaker 2: but you know, reused to gravity making things move towards
- 23:37Speaker 2: each other without any kind of contact.
- 23:39Speaker 1: Also, yeah, there, what's happening is you're interacting with curved.
- 23:42Speaker 2: Space, all right, So then what do you mean by
- 23:44Speaker 2: this macroscopic view?
- 23:46Speaker 1: Just basically that things feel like they're local. You know,
- 23:48Speaker 1: if you want to push on something, you got to
- 23:50Speaker 1: touch it. And often when we're telling stories about what's
- 23:53Speaker 1: happening on the microscopic scale, when we're trying to tell
- 23:56Speaker 1: ourselves a story about the particles, we rely on our
- 23:58Speaker 1: intuition from the macroscop it from like the big scale stuff.
- 24:01Speaker 1: So then the question is, when particles are pushing on
- 24:04Speaker 1: each other, are they coming into contact in some way?
- 24:07Speaker 1: Is this interaction like a local thing? And that's where
- 24:09Speaker 1: the story of two particles exchanging some particle helps us
- 24:13Speaker 1: sort of fill in that gap. It tells us a
- 24:15Speaker 1: local story. Now, like one particle is flying along and
- 24:18Speaker 1: it throws a particle, pulling it out of its boson pocket.
- 24:21Speaker 1: Add another particle which catches it. In that story, everything
- 24:24Speaker 1: is always local.
- 24:25Speaker 2: M Yeah, I'm all about eating local and theorizing locally.
- 24:31Speaker 2: But maybe let's paint a picture, more concrete picture for
- 24:33Speaker 2: folks Let's say you have two electrons a meter part
- 24:36Speaker 2: and according to what we know, they feel that electromagnetic
- 24:39Speaker 2: force and they have the same charge. So they're repelling
- 24:42Speaker 2: each other, meaning if you just leave it for a while,
- 24:44Speaker 2: they're going to move away from each other. Yep, okay,
- 24:46Speaker 2: So then how is that force being transmitted if they're
- 24:49Speaker 2: not touching each other.
- 24:50Speaker 1: Yeah, So there's a lot of different ways to think
- 24:51Speaker 1: about it. One story, which I'm not a big fan of,
- 24:54Speaker 1: but is a sort of common story you hear, is
- 24:56Speaker 1: that they do it by exchanging a particle. That one
- 24:59Speaker 1: electron transmits momentum to the other electron basically by shooting
- 25:04Speaker 1: a photon at it. Because electrons can emit photons and
- 25:07Speaker 1: they can also absorb photons, it's like an interaction that's
- 25:11Speaker 1: allowed in the universe. So the story is like, electron
- 25:14Speaker 1: one shoots off a photon and in doing so, it
- 25:16Speaker 1: recoils against that photon. Right, maybe it was going straight,
- 25:19Speaker 1: now it's going left, shoots that photon off to the right.
- 25:22Speaker 1: The other electron, which was going straight, absorbs that photon
- 25:25Speaker 1: which was going right, and now it's going right. And
- 25:28Speaker 1: so it's sort of like two cars driving in parallel,
- 25:30Speaker 1: and one of them throws a ball at the other one,
- 25:32Speaker 1: and some momentum gets carried along with that ball.
- 25:36Speaker 2: Or like if I toss a bowling ball at you,
- 25:38Speaker 2: you know, when I toss it at you, I'm going
- 25:39Speaker 2: to move back a little bit because it takes some
- 25:41Speaker 2: effort to toss it your way, and then when you
- 25:43Speaker 2: catch it, you're going to recoil back also a little bit,
- 25:46Speaker 2: because the ball had some sort of momentum to it
- 25:48Speaker 2: and it pushes you back.
- 25:50Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly the same way you feel a literal recoil
- 25:52Speaker 1: when you shoot a gun, and then the target also
- 25:55Speaker 1: feels that momentum transfer.
- 25:56Speaker 2: Absolutely, I feel like this view is something that you
- 25:59Speaker 2: would get it if you were already a little bit
- 26:01Speaker 2: familiar with science, right, like if you're take in a
- 26:03Speaker 2: maybe a college little physics course. I don't know, maybe
- 26:06Speaker 2: they teach it also in high school. But maybe for
- 26:08Speaker 2: the everyday person, this might be a new story that
- 26:10Speaker 2: they had never heard before, right, Like, maybe to then
- 26:12Speaker 2: average person, they're just thinking, well, those two electrons, one
- 26:15Speaker 2: of them is exerting a force on the others through
- 26:18Speaker 2: the magic of magnetism.
- 26:19Speaker 1: Yeah, and then the question is, how do you actually
- 26:21Speaker 1: explain that. How do you come up with like a
- 26:22Speaker 1: coherent theory that says what's really happening? And one way
- 26:25Speaker 1: to do that is to say, oh, these forces are
- 26:27Speaker 1: actually being carried by particles, right, because particles are things
- 26:31Speaker 1: we know in the universe can carry momentum, and so
- 26:33Speaker 1: if you want to push on something or pull on something,
- 26:35Speaker 1: you've got to use particles to carry that momentum. So
- 26:38Speaker 1: this is just like a way to try to explain
- 26:41Speaker 1: these forces that we see. Maybe what's happening microscopically is
- 26:45Speaker 1: that particles are being exchanged the same way you might
- 26:47Speaker 1: wonder like, well, what's everything made out of around me?
- 26:50Speaker 1: And you drill in on the tiny details and you discover, oh,
- 26:52Speaker 1: the surface of my table is not smooth. It's actually
- 26:54Speaker 1: a bunch of particles. I just don't see them because
- 26:57Speaker 1: they're so tiny. So maybe the forces between two and
- 27:00Speaker 1: the forces between two electrically charged objects are actually particles
- 27:03Speaker 1: being transmitted between them. That's sort of how the story goes.
- 27:07Speaker 2: Right, Like if people see me and you moving away
- 27:09Speaker 2: from each other, they might think, oh, there's some sort
- 27:11Speaker 2: of invisible magical force, but no, really, actually it's because
- 27:14Speaker 2: Orhea tossed a bowling ball to Daniel.
- 27:16Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly, do you have invisible bowling balls? By the way,
- 27:18Speaker 1: that sounds pretty cool.
- 27:19Speaker 2: Well, no, it doesn't have to be invisible. It could
- 27:21Speaker 2: just be a black bowlling ball at night. But I
- 27:25Speaker 2: think what you're trying to get at is like, this
- 27:27Speaker 2: is a view that's maybe popular out there if you
- 27:30Speaker 2: consume a lot of science and physics, but maybe this
- 27:32Speaker 2: view doesn't quite work. So does it work or not?
- 27:34Speaker 1: It definitely doesn't work for me, and I get the
- 27:36Speaker 1: sense that it doesn't work for a lot of people
- 27:38Speaker 1: out there because they get a lot of questions about it.
- 27:40Speaker 1: People absorb this idea and then they do what we're
- 27:43Speaker 1: always telling them to do on this podcast, which is well,
- 27:45Speaker 1: think about whether that makes sense. Does it explain other
- 27:48Speaker 1: things you see? Can you understand it in other circumstances,
- 27:50Speaker 1: does it click together with the other parts of your understanding.
- 27:53Speaker 1: And there's a bunch of pretty typical questions that this
- 27:55Speaker 1: picture raises and can't really answer. For example, For example,
- 27:59Speaker 1: we can tell a nice story about electrons repelling each
- 28:02Speaker 1: other by tossing photons back and forth, but how do
- 28:04Speaker 1: things attract each other if an electron and a positron.
- 28:08Speaker 1: Electromagnetism says they should be pulled together. How does an
- 28:11Speaker 1: electron or a positron throw a ball at the other
- 28:14Speaker 1: one and pull it towards itself. It have to be
- 28:16Speaker 1: like a ball with negative momentum somehow.
- 28:19Speaker 2: Yeah, I was about to say that.
- 28:21Speaker 1: Why not, because if it's negative momentum, it's going the
- 28:24Speaker 1: other direction, right?
- 28:26Speaker 2: Is that a requirement? Can I just come up with
- 28:27Speaker 2: a magical bowling ball it has negative momentum.
- 28:30Speaker 1: Having negative momentum really makes no sense. It's sort of
- 28:32Speaker 1: like having a negative mass or negative length, right. It
- 28:35Speaker 1: really just means momentum in the other direction. So if
- 28:38Speaker 1: you're going to throw a ball to the right with
- 28:40Speaker 1: negative momentum, you're really throwing a ball to the.
- 28:42Speaker 2: Left right, which would push me towards the you right,
- 28:45Speaker 2: And so it would make sense.
- 28:47Speaker 1: But that's not an exchange of particles. Right. Maybe the
- 28:49Speaker 1: electron throws off a ball in one direction, the positron
- 28:52Speaker 1: throws off the ball in the other direction. They move
- 28:54Speaker 1: towards each other. But now you also have these photons, right,
- 28:56Speaker 1: and we don't see those photons when electrons and positrons
- 28:59Speaker 1: are try and then there's no exchange there, the electron
- 29:02Speaker 1: and positron not actually exchanging particles there.
- 29:05Speaker 2: Well, I feel like you know, I'm new to this,
- 29:08Speaker 2: so to me, it could all be magical. Daniel, lets
- 29:11Speaker 2: you make stuff up. I'm relying on YouTube. Tell me, like, no,
- 29:13Speaker 2: that's a fundamental law of the universe that you're breaking.
- 29:15Speaker 2: So like, let's you have a magical bowling ball with
- 29:17Speaker 2: native momentum and you're you're standing in front of me,
- 29:19Speaker 2: so to toss it to you, I actually have to
- 29:21Speaker 2: push it back behind me, and then the ball would
- 29:24Speaker 2: go towards you, and then when you catch it, it has
- 29:26Speaker 2: negative momentum, which would actually pull you towards me. When
- 29:29Speaker 2: am I breaking there?
- 29:29Speaker 1: Okay, well then I'll just tell you that that's not allowed.
- 29:32Speaker 1: You can't have particles with negative momentum. It just doesn't
- 29:35Speaker 1: make any sense.
- 29:36Speaker 2: Hmmm, it says to you. But let's move on.
- 29:40Speaker 1: You just have to me to tell you when you're
- 29:41Speaker 1: breaking the rules, you breaking the rules. But there's also
- 29:44Speaker 1: other parts of the story that don't really make sense,
- 29:46Speaker 1: like how does the electron know the positron is there?
- 29:48Speaker 1: Has it no to admit a photon in one direction
- 29:51Speaker 1: to attract the positron.
- 29:53Speaker 2: M Yeah, That's one thing I've always wondered about this
- 29:55Speaker 2: picture is like, does that mean that electrons are just
- 29:58Speaker 2: throwing a photons in all their all the time, and
- 30:00Speaker 2: then it just happens to interact with another elect what
- 30:02Speaker 2: happens to catch it? Then they're going to repel each other?
- 30:05Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly is that what you mean?
- 30:06Speaker 2: Like that doesn't make sense.
- 30:07Speaker 1: That doesn't make sense. And then you would see those photons, right,
- 30:10Speaker 1: And if you stick your head between two particles that
- 30:12Speaker 1: are supposedly exchanging photons, why can't you see them? When
- 30:15Speaker 1: magnets are floating above each other? Why can't you see
- 30:17Speaker 1: flashes of light there? So there's all sorts of questions
- 30:20Speaker 1: that are raised by this particle exchange model that don't
- 30:22Speaker 1: really have good answers.
- 30:24Speaker 2: Okay, so this view doesn't seem to make sense. Where
- 30:27Speaker 2: did it come from? Who came up with this? And
- 30:28Speaker 2: then didn't they think of these things when they came
- 30:30Speaker 2: up with it.
- 30:31Speaker 1: They didn't have a cartoonist keeping them in check. That's
- 30:33Speaker 1: really the problem.
- 30:33Speaker 2: Yeah, that's really the problem. They're missing their cartoonists in
- 30:37Speaker 2: their science force.
- 30:38Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly. Every physicists should have adult supervision in the
- 30:41Speaker 1: form of a cartoonist. That's what we're learning today.
- 30:44Speaker 2: But then who supervises the cartoonist and we're off the rails?
- 30:49Speaker 1: Yoda, I think, yoda. But yeah, where does this come from?
- 30:52Speaker 1: It comes from You won't be surprised to learn the
- 30:55Speaker 1: unfortunate naming of another idea. So what's really happening here
- 30:59Speaker 1: is not the There are literal photons being exchanged between
- 31:02Speaker 1: electrons or electrons and positrons. But there's something else happening.
- 31:06Speaker 1: There's an interaction that we describe using the phrase virtual
- 31:09Speaker 1: particles and virtual particles because it has the word particle
- 31:13Speaker 1: in it sounds like maybe it's a kind of particle,
- 31:15Speaker 1: but really they're not particles at all.
- 31:18Speaker 2: Which you're saying, like the first person who came up
- 31:20Speaker 2: with this idea really meant virtual particles. But then at
- 31:23Speaker 2: some point people stop using the word virtual.
- 31:26Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly when it transitions over into popular science, people
- 31:28Speaker 1: are like, you know, it's kind of like they're throwing
- 31:30Speaker 1: photons back and forth. They're virtual particles, but you can
- 31:33Speaker 1: think of them as particles, And that's exactly where it
- 31:35Speaker 1: breaks down. If you think of them as particles, they're
- 31:37Speaker 1: not really because they don't do all these other things
- 31:39Speaker 1: you would expect particles to do.
- 31:41Speaker 2: All right, well, let's dig into what is actually going
- 31:44Speaker 2: on virtually and for reals in this universe and see
- 31:47Speaker 2: if we can make sense of this picture of what
- 31:50Speaker 2: a force is. So tostig into that. But first let's
- 31:52Speaker 2: take another quick break. All right, we're asking the question
- 32:06Speaker 2: how do particles carry force? And there's a view that
- 32:09Speaker 2: maybe they exchange force particles. But Daniel, you're saying that
- 32:12Speaker 2: actually they're not really exchanging particles. They're exchanging virtual particles,
- 32:16Speaker 2: which is kind of like bitcoin.
- 32:19Speaker 1: It's nothing. Well, I mean if you say bitcoin is
- 32:23Speaker 1: nothing like money, then yes, virtual particles are like bitcoin.
- 32:27Speaker 2: Yeah, there you go. They're not real. They're just like
- 32:29Speaker 2: a concept.
- 32:30Speaker 1: I mean, you're going to bring all the crypto bros
- 32:32Speaker 1: down on us, dude.
- 32:33Speaker 2: Bring it on. Yeah, maybe they like to fund us
- 32:36Speaker 2: in bitcoin or dorsche coin.
- 32:37Speaker 1: Well, we can only pay virtual bills with virtual dollars,
- 32:40Speaker 1: so I'm not sure how helpful that is.
- 32:42Speaker 2: I feel like I have a virtual job anyways. But anyway,
- 32:46Speaker 2: so explain it to us. What's the difference between a
- 32:47Speaker 2: particle and a virtual particle, and how to virtual particles
- 32:50Speaker 2: create forces.
- 32:51Speaker 1: So what is a particle anyway? A particle is actually
- 32:54Speaker 1: a ripple in a field, like what is a real photon.
- 32:57Speaker 1: A photon is a ripple in the electronnetic field. The
- 33:00Speaker 1: whole field fills the universe, and a photon is a
- 33:03Speaker 1: very regular disturbance in that field. It's a very particular,
- 33:07Speaker 1: very special kind of disturbance that's sort of self sustaining.
- 33:10Speaker 1: Like you point your flashlight up at Alpha Centauri. Those
- 33:13Speaker 1: photons can go across light years and make it to
- 33:17Speaker 1: Alpha Centauri. They don't get tired, they don't run out
- 33:19Speaker 1: of steam. All that energy is compact in this perfect way.
- 33:22Speaker 1: It's slashing through the electromagnetic fields in this very special
- 33:25Speaker 1: particular way that lets it propagate through the universe. That's
- 33:28Speaker 1: what a particle is, So like a very special kind
- 33:31Speaker 1: of disturbance in the field that satisfies a bunch of
- 33:34Speaker 1: equations for how those field works.
- 33:36Speaker 2: Okay, it's a particle, not like a real object. It's
- 33:38Speaker 2: a little ripple, special ripple in the giant cosmic universe
- 33:42Speaker 2: spanding field.
- 33:44Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly. Now, a virtual particle is also a disturbance
- 33:49Speaker 1: in that field, but doesn't have any of those same properties.
- 33:51Speaker 1: Virtual particles are like basically everything else that field can do.
- 33:55Speaker 1: If that field is disturbed by the presence of some
- 33:58Speaker 1: other particle, then the field will slasher and oscillate a
- 34:00Speaker 1: little bit, and then that'll die out, and that we
- 34:03Speaker 1: can describe as virtual particles if you like, or you
- 34:06Speaker 1: can just think about it as oscillations in the field.
- 34:09Speaker 1: But virtual particles are basically a way of thinking about
- 34:11Speaker 1: what else fields can do other than having particles in them.
- 34:15Speaker 2: Now is the difference that that one is sustainable or
- 34:18Speaker 2: sustained and the other one kind of fades away like
- 34:21Speaker 2: an electron. It's special in the electron field because it's
- 34:24Speaker 2: there and it doesn't go away.
- 34:26Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly. All these fields have equations to describe how
- 34:29Speaker 1: they wiggle. The fields are always wiggling. They have kinetic energy,
- 34:32Speaker 1: which means they're moving. They have potential energy, which means
- 34:34Speaker 1: they have energy of their configuration. It's sort of like
- 34:37Speaker 1: a kid on a swing. Right, they're swinging back and forth.
- 34:40Speaker 1: And for a kid on a swing, you give them
- 34:42Speaker 1: just the right push, they can swing really nicely. Right,
- 34:44Speaker 1: if you push them at the right frequency, they can
- 34:46Speaker 1: swing in a really nice regular way. But there's also
- 34:48Speaker 1: other crazy things that that swing can do that aren't
- 34:51Speaker 1: so nice and self sustaining. Like you give that kid
- 34:54Speaker 1: random pushes at random times, it's going to get a
- 34:56Speaker 1: very chaotic sort of oscillation. So if you wiggle a
- 34:59Speaker 1: field in just the the right way, you can set
- 35:01Speaker 1: up these self sustaining perturbations that will move through space.
- 35:04Speaker 1: If you don't do it in just the right way,
- 35:06Speaker 1: then they sort of peeter out and the energy dissipates
- 35:09Speaker 1: instead of like moving in a little compact blob.
- 35:11Speaker 2: And so virtual particle is any wiggle of the field
- 35:15Speaker 2: that is not self sustaining, which is not special like
- 35:18Speaker 2: the wiggle that is an electron exactly.
- 35:20Speaker 1: So an electron is a special wiggle, and you can
- 35:22Speaker 1: see it, you can interact with it, same with a photon.
- 35:25Speaker 1: A virtual particle is any other sort of disturbance in
- 35:27Speaker 1: the field that fades away really quickly. And there's sort
- 35:29Speaker 1: of an argument in particle physics about what's the best
- 35:32Speaker 1: way to describe them. Some people think, look, let's just
- 35:34Speaker 1: talk about the fields. Everything is a field. Particles are
- 35:37Speaker 1: actually wiggles in fields when they interact with each other.
- 35:39Speaker 1: That's just fields interacting other people like this virtual particle story.
- 35:43Speaker 1: They say, no, particles are the basic thing, and let's
- 35:45Speaker 1: talk about how they interact in terms of virtual particles.
- 35:48Speaker 1: So in some sense, virtual particles are just the story
- 35:51Speaker 1: we tell ourselves to describe some things that fields can do.
- 35:54Speaker 1: But fields are really the more fundamental element of the universe,
- 35:57Speaker 1: according to lots of physicists.
- 36:00Speaker 2: Okay, so then it has to if it feels. But
- 36:01Speaker 2: then I guess what do you call these particles virtual?
- 36:04Speaker 2: They seem as real as the other kinds of particles,
- 36:06Speaker 2: like the electron.
- 36:07Speaker 1: We call them virtual for a few reasons. Number one
- 36:09Speaker 1: is they don't obey the rules that particles obey. These
- 36:11Speaker 1: real particles. They have like the same mass, right, so
- 36:14Speaker 1: a real electron always has the same mass, and real
- 36:17Speaker 1: photons always have zero mass. These other wiggles in the field,
- 36:20Speaker 1: you can try to describe them in terms of a
- 36:22Speaker 1: particle like story, but it breaks down because they don't
- 36:24Speaker 1: follow the same rules. And so like, what is the
- 36:27Speaker 1: mass of this virtual photon? Well, if you try to
- 36:29Speaker 1: calculate a mass, you end up with weird numbers. Sometimes
- 36:31Speaker 1: they have really huge mass, sometimes it's even negative. It's
- 36:34Speaker 1: because it doesn't really apply. You're trying to describe a
- 36:36Speaker 1: bowling ball as a car, and you're asking, like, you know,
- 36:38Speaker 1: what's it like to drive? Well, it's not really anything
- 36:40Speaker 1: like to drive a bowling ball.
- 36:42Speaker 2: Oh, how do you know. I'm just trying to ask
- 36:45Speaker 2: the tough questions here today, Daniel.
- 36:46Speaker 1: No, these are great questions. I love that you can't
- 36:48Speaker 1: be flat footed with questions like what is it really
- 36:51Speaker 1: like to drive a bowling ball?
- 36:53Speaker 2: I mean, for making blanket statements here about the nature
- 36:56Speaker 2: of bowling balls, we need to back it up with
- 36:58Speaker 2: real science.
- 37:00Speaker 1: The point is that we have these weird disturbances in
- 37:02Speaker 1: the field that we can describe mathematically, but they don't
- 37:05Speaker 1: have the same behavior as normal particles, and so we
- 37:07Speaker 1: can't interpret them in the same way.
- 37:10Speaker 2: Okay, so they're weird wiggles in the field. They're not
- 37:13Speaker 2: as as special as the particles. You call them virtual particles. Now,
- 37:16Speaker 2: how do they actually the transmit a force?
- 37:19Speaker 1: All these fields contain energy, right, An electron is a
- 37:22Speaker 1: little pulse in the field, still vibration of the fields.
- 37:24Speaker 1: It's an excited state of the field. It has energy.
- 37:27Speaker 1: So in this field picture, how do two electrons push
- 37:30Speaker 1: on each other? They do so through the electromagnetic field.
- 37:33Speaker 2: So we're talking about multiple fields now, right. So there's
- 37:36Speaker 2: an electron field and then there's a photon field, which
- 37:39Speaker 2: is the electromagnetic force field. Yes, and you're saying, like,
- 37:42Speaker 2: the two electrons are in the same field, the electron field.
- 37:45Speaker 2: They're sharing the same field, but to talk to each
- 37:47Speaker 2: other they have to go through another field.
- 37:49Speaker 1: Yeah, that's exactly right. The field doesn't interact with itself. Right.
- 37:53Speaker 1: You have these two fields that feel space, the electromagnetic
- 37:56Speaker 1: field and the electron field. These are two separate fields, right.
- 38:00Speaker 1: For one of them, the excited state of that field
- 38:02Speaker 1: is an electron. For the other one, for the electromagnetic field,
- 38:05Speaker 1: the excited state of it is a photon.
- 38:07Speaker 2: Right now, why can't they interact within the same field,
- 38:10Speaker 2: Like if I have the ocean like a way will
- 38:12Speaker 2: interact with another wave.
- 38:13Speaker 1: Some fields will do that, like the strong force. Gluons
- 38:16Speaker 1: can interact directly with themselves, but photons can't interact with photons,
- 38:20Speaker 1: and electrons can't interact with other electrons.
- 38:22Speaker 2: It's just a weird happenstance of the universe that the
- 38:25Speaker 2: electron field can't do that.
- 38:26Speaker 1: That's right. Some fields are allowed to interact directly with themselves.
- 38:29Speaker 1: But the electron field doesn't do that, and you might
- 38:31Speaker 1: ask why, and it's just description, this is what we
- 38:33Speaker 1: see in the field.
- 38:34Speaker 2: Do Okay, So they talked through the photon field, and
- 38:38Speaker 2: so what's going on. Where are the virtual particles in
- 38:40Speaker 2: the photon field or the electron field.
- 38:42Speaker 1: They're in the photon field, So these are virtual photons,
- 38:45Speaker 1: and again they're not real particles. They're like weird disturbances
- 38:48Speaker 1: in the field. So electron number one causes a disturbance
- 38:51Speaker 1: in the photon field, and it does that all the time,
- 38:53Speaker 1: like electron can't exist without disturbing the photon field. It's
- 38:56Speaker 1: doing it all the time. It's constantly interacting with the
- 38:59Speaker 1: photon field, and the photon field is constantly interacting with
- 39:02Speaker 1: electron fields, like a photon flying through space is constantly
- 39:05Speaker 1: interacting with the electron field. It's not like it just
- 39:08Speaker 1: sometimes does. And so the electron is causing these disturbances
- 39:11Speaker 1: in the photon field. And if those disturbances interact with
- 39:14Speaker 1: another electron, then that's effectively momentum transfer from one electron
- 39:18Speaker 1: to another through the photon field, which you could also
- 39:21Speaker 1: say is the exchange of a virtual photon, but it's
- 39:24Speaker 1: not really a particle. It's not a particle you could
- 39:26Speaker 1: like see with your eyes or if you put a
- 39:28Speaker 1: detector in there, because it's not a real photon. It's
- 39:31Speaker 1: just a ripple in the photon field that we call
- 39:33Speaker 1: a virtual particle to connect with this story about electrons
- 39:36Speaker 1: passing particles back and forth.
- 39:38Speaker 2: But I feel like this all sounds great, but I
- 39:40Speaker 2: feel like you're just going to run into the same
- 39:42Speaker 2: question as you did with the real particles picture right,
- 39:45Speaker 2: because you might say this is not a bowling balls,
- 39:46Speaker 2: there's a virtual bowling ball, or it's a tennis ball,
- 39:49Speaker 2: but you're still you're still run into the same questions
- 39:51Speaker 2: like if I toss a virtual a tennis ball to you,
- 39:54Speaker 2: how did I know where you were? And how did
- 39:55Speaker 2: you know to catch it? And why am I not
- 39:57Speaker 2: shooting tennis balls in all directions? And what if you're
- 40:00Speaker 2: and I'm an electron, how do we repel each other?
- 40:02Speaker 2: How do we throw a negatively momentum a tennis ball?
- 40:05Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, great questions, and we can actually answer all
- 40:08Speaker 1: of them now, right, So an electron is constantly creating
- 40:11Speaker 1: these ripples in the field. It doesn't have to know
- 40:13Speaker 1: that the positron or the other electron is there. It's
- 40:16Speaker 1: constantly creating these ripples in the electromagnetic field. That's just
- 40:19Speaker 1: what it does. The two fields are constantly interacting, so
- 40:21Speaker 1: you don't have to know the other particle is there.
- 40:24Speaker 2: So it's constantly in all directions shooting virtual photons. Yes,
- 40:27Speaker 2: but where does this energy come from? And wouldn't you
- 40:29Speaker 2: be able to see them? It's the same question you
- 40:31Speaker 2: have with the photons, right, mm hmm.
- 40:32Speaker 1: The energy dissipates, right, So virtual photons are not like
- 40:35Speaker 1: real particles that you could interact with. It's not like
- 40:37Speaker 1: it's shooting a light bulb at Alpha centauri and eventually
- 40:40Speaker 1: it will be seen. These fade away really quickly, and
- 40:42Speaker 1: if you try to think about them in terms of
- 40:43Speaker 1: a particle, it's really just part of the story. There's
- 40:46Speaker 1: lots of complicated ripples going on. You can describe them
- 40:48Speaker 1: in terms of one virtual photon or two virtual photons
- 40:51Speaker 1: or seventeen virtual photons. That's really just an attempt to
- 40:54Speaker 1: describe what's happening to the field. But to get back
- 40:56Speaker 1: to the question, basically, the two fields are constantly interacting,
- 41:00Speaker 1: So if a positron comes by then the fact that
- 41:02Speaker 1: there's an electron there. The electron is affecting the electromagnetic
- 41:05Speaker 1: field that the positron is also constantly interacting with. So yeah,
- 41:08Speaker 1: basically you're constantly shooting these virtual particles. Answered the other
- 41:12Speaker 1: question of like, well, then how do you attract virtual particles?
- 41:14Speaker 1: Don't have to obey that law I told you about
- 41:16Speaker 1: earlier about what because they're not really particles. There you go, yes, exactly.
- 41:22Speaker 3: He's told me that it was not possible, Daniel, for particles,
- 41:27Speaker 3: or for bowling balls, or for tennis balls. Particles have
- 41:30Speaker 3: to obey that law. Virtual particles are not particles. It
- 41:33Speaker 3: feels like a cop out because we're saying, oh, you
- 41:35Speaker 3: put virtual on it. You don't have to obey the rules.
- 41:37Speaker 3: Like if I'm driving my virtual car, can I ignore
- 41:39Speaker 3: the speed limits. It's not really a particle. It's just
- 41:42Speaker 3: a ripple in the field. And these fields can have
- 41:44Speaker 3: all sorts of weird.
- 41:45Speaker 1: Ripples in them that don't obey the rules of normal particles,
- 41:49Speaker 1: like negative mass or crazy high mass photons. That feels
- 41:52Speaker 1: like a contradiction.
- 41:53Speaker 2: So it is like I'm shooting a negative momentum tennis
- 41:56Speaker 2: ball at you, right, that's what you're saying.
- 41:58Speaker 1: Sort of, except that these are not particles, right, They're ripples.
- 42:02Speaker 1: They're ripples exactly.
- 42:03Speaker 2: Just like a particle is.
- 42:05Speaker 1: A particle is a special kind of ripple that like
- 42:07Speaker 1: satisfies the wave equation of the field. Virtual particles do
- 42:11Speaker 1: not satisfy that, and so you can't even ask the
- 42:13Speaker 1: question like, what is the mass of this thing? There
- 42:15Speaker 1: are energy and they are flowing through the field, but
- 42:17Speaker 1: they're not particles.
- 42:19Speaker 2: Hmmm. I feel like you're trying to get me on
- 42:21Speaker 2: a technicality here.
- 42:22Speaker 1: Physics is technicalities, man.
- 42:25Speaker 2: But I guess the main question is, so you're saying
- 42:27Speaker 2: that if we've put the word virtual in front of it,
- 42:31Speaker 2: then this whole picture of exchanging particles work. You just
- 42:33Speaker 2: have to call them virtual so that they can break
- 42:36Speaker 2: the rules of regular particles.
- 42:37Speaker 1: Yeah, but they're not even really particles, right. I feel
- 42:40Speaker 1: like it's really misleading to just say, oh, it's a
- 42:42Speaker 1: kind of particle. It's not a kind of particle. It's
- 42:44Speaker 1: a totally different thing. Virtual particles are kinds of particles
- 42:47Speaker 1: the way bowling balls are types of cars.
- 42:49Speaker 2: Well, I see, Really the name should be a non
- 42:51Speaker 2: particle ripple.
- 42:52Speaker 1: Yes, exactly, come up with a better name than virtual
- 42:55Speaker 1: particle because that has misled millions of people.
- 42:57Speaker 2: Now, is that the best name for it, non particle ripple.
- 43:02Speaker 1: I feel like that's confusing because you're still using the
- 43:04Speaker 1: word particle.
- 43:05Speaker 2: No, but it's a non particle ripple. It's a ripple
- 43:08Speaker 2: that doesn't mean all the requirements of a particle.
- 43:10Speaker 1: Should I describe my bowling ball as a non car
- 43:12Speaker 1: bowling ball.
- 43:13Speaker 2: It causes confusion. Yeah, for sure.
- 43:16Speaker 1: It has nothing to do with cars. I should also
- 43:17Speaker 1: describe it as a non banana ball and a non
- 43:20Speaker 1: chocolate ball.
- 43:21Speaker 2: Well, no, I mean the difference is that of this
- 43:23Speaker 2: virtual particle in this particle have something common, which is
- 43:26Speaker 2: that they're both ripples in the field.
- 43:28Speaker 1: Yeah, that's true. Bowling balls and cars both can roll
- 43:30Speaker 1: down the road, right, very different things. I feel like
- 43:33Speaker 1: you're trying to get me in a technicality here.
- 43:36Speaker 2: No, just trying to understand you're confusing nomenclature here. But
- 43:39Speaker 2: I mean, just so we can reach an understanding maybe
- 43:42Speaker 2: with our listeners, would you say that a better way
- 43:45Speaker 2: to call these things is as non particle ripples in
- 43:48Speaker 2: the field, because I feel like that's what you just
- 43:50Speaker 2: explained it as.
- 43:51Speaker 1: Yeah, that's definitely better than virtual particles because they're not particles.
- 43:54Speaker 1: And there are ripples in the field, yes, there you go.
- 43:57Speaker 2: But some ripples are particles, but those are special m
- 44:00Speaker 2: and so these are not those kinds exactly.
- 44:02Speaker 1: And we often describe these in terms of virtual particles
- 44:05Speaker 1: because we like to think about particles particles are the
- 44:07Speaker 1: things we observe. We never see the field directly, right,
- 44:10Speaker 1: You never observe a field. You only see the effect
- 44:12Speaker 1: of the field on a particle. So a lot of
- 44:14Speaker 1: people like to think of the particles as the sort
- 44:17Speaker 1: of basic stuff that we're using to describe the universe,
- 44:20Speaker 1: and in order to describe how they interactly, think about
- 44:22Speaker 1: that in terms of particles. And we draw these cute
- 44:24Speaker 1: little finement diagrams that include like little wiggles in the
- 44:27Speaker 1: paper that we say are virtual particles. So it's a
- 44:29Speaker 1: compelling story, but we should always remember these are not
- 44:31Speaker 1: really particles. They're really just different kinds of ripples in
- 44:34Speaker 1: a field.
- 44:35Speaker 2: Well, and I mean to be a pain, but it's
- 44:38Speaker 2: a little bit like says you kind of right, like
- 44:40Speaker 2: you're saying that the boundary of the definition of a
- 44:43Speaker 2: particle is that it meets all these rules. Now, is
- 44:46Speaker 2: that something that's totally accepted by every physicist or would
- 44:49Speaker 2: some physicists say, well, I would say any ripple is
- 44:51Speaker 2: a particle.
- 44:52Speaker 1: No, I think that's totally acceptable. And also, you can
- 44:55Speaker 1: see real particles. You can't ever see virtual particles. They're
- 44:58Speaker 1: just a part of the description. This feels very complicated ripples,
- 45:01Speaker 1: and you can describe part of it using a virtual particle,
- 45:04Speaker 1: but to describe it fully you need like an infinite
- 45:06Speaker 1: number of virtual particles. So the virtual particles are just
- 45:09Speaker 1: like a component of the story. They're not a real
- 45:11Speaker 1: thing in any sense. You can't see or interact with
- 45:14Speaker 1: a virtual particle.
- 45:15Speaker 2: Would you sort of see them? When two electrons repel
- 45:17Speaker 2: each other, aren't you sort of seeing them?
- 45:19Speaker 1: Not directly? I mean, if you had like a photon counter,
- 45:22Speaker 1: you wouldn't register any photons there. You're right, you can
- 45:24Speaker 1: see the effect on two electrons. Absolutely well.
- 45:27Speaker 2: You can't see in the photon either without interacting with it.
- 45:30Speaker 1: Right, Yeah, but here you're one more step removed. Right here,
- 45:32Speaker 1: you're seeing its effect on the electron. You're not even
- 45:35Speaker 1: interacting with a photon because you can't because it's not
- 45:37Speaker 1: a real photon a virtual photon.
- 45:39Speaker 2: Now, okay, so then you're saying that forces happen in
- 45:43Speaker 2: the universe between two particles with a capital P because
- 45:46Speaker 2: they interchange virtual particles or non particle ripples in the
- 45:51Speaker 2: quantum field. Yes, does that mean that everything's explained now?
- 45:54Speaker 2: That works?
- 45:55Speaker 1: That works. That is a very effective description of how
- 45:58Speaker 1: particles interact and allows us to ditt what particles will
- 46:01Speaker 1: do with extraordinary accuracy, which makes us feel like maybe
- 46:04Speaker 1: we got it right.
- 46:05Speaker 2: And in this picture, like an electron is just sitting
- 46:07Speaker 2: there in space and it's shooting an infinite number of
- 46:10Speaker 2: ripples in all directions all the time.
- 46:12Speaker 1: Well, the two fields are interacting with each other. The
- 46:15Speaker 1: electromagnetic field and the electron field are interacting with each other.
- 46:18Speaker 1: The energy is kind of going back and forth, right,
- 46:20Speaker 1: it's a constant interaction. You can describe that as like
- 46:23Speaker 1: the electron creeds virtual photons which it then absorbs, or
- 46:26Speaker 1: maybe those virtual photons interact with a passing positron or electron,
- 46:30Speaker 1: or you can just think about it as fields sort
- 46:32Speaker 1: of pulsing back and forth together.
- 46:33Speaker 2: Oh, I see, there's no like energy being generated. It's
- 46:37Speaker 2: like the electron puts some energy into the photon field,
- 46:40Speaker 2: and maybe that energy doesn't like dissipate, it goes back
- 46:42Speaker 2: to the electron. But unless maybe there's another electron nearby,
- 46:45Speaker 2: or a positron, in which case some of that energy
- 46:47Speaker 2: goes to the other particles exactly. All right, that was
- 46:51Speaker 2: not a forced conversation at all. You got very real,
- 46:54Speaker 2: not virtual.
- 46:56Speaker 1: And somewhere out there in some universe, Yoda is driving
- 46:59Speaker 1: his bowling all down the road and this all makes
- 47:01Speaker 1: sense to him. That's right on his way to his
- 47:03Speaker 1: yoga class.
- 47:04Speaker 2: Hot yoga class. Yes, Now, do you think both Jedis
- 47:08Speaker 2: and Sith practice yoga or is this something only the
- 47:12Speaker 2: Jedi would do?
- 47:14Speaker 1: I wonder if there's dark yoga there you.
- 47:16Speaker 2: Go, Yeah, evil yoga. All yoga is evil. Maybe what's
- 47:20Speaker 2: the other one? Pilates? Maybe pilates is what the Sith practice.
- 47:24Speaker 1: Yeah, forever he will dominate their strenchiness.
- 47:26Speaker 2: That's right? All right? Well, I think this has been
- 47:29Speaker 2: an interesting exploration of how physicists view the universe and
- 47:32Speaker 2: how particles interact. But again, this is just kind of
- 47:35Speaker 2: your view of it, right, who knows what's really happening underneath?
- 47:38Speaker 1: Yeah, philosophically, this is just a story we tell that
- 47:41Speaker 1: explains experiments. Is any of it true? Do the elements
- 47:44Speaker 1: of our ideas actually correspond to real physical things happening
- 47:47Speaker 1: out there in the universe. That's for philosophers to decide.
- 47:50Speaker 2: All right, well, we hope you enjoyed that. Thanks for
- 47:52Speaker 2: joining us. See you next time.
- 47:57Speaker 1: For more science and curiosity, come fine us on social
- 48:00Speaker 1: media where we answer questions and post videos. We're on Twitter, Discord, Insta,
- 48:05Speaker 1: and now TikTok. Thanks for listening, and remember that Daniel
- 48:09Speaker 1: and Jorge Explain the Universe is a production of iHeartRadio.
- 48:13Speaker 1: For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,
- 48:18Speaker 1: or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.