Latest / Reformed Thinking / ἀδόκιμος (Adokimos): Rejected After Testing

Transcript

ἀδόκιμος (Adokimos): Rejected After Testing · Reformed Thinking

0:00
Welcome back to Reformed Thinking.
0:01
We are doing a deep dive today into a concept that really sets
0:06
at the center of Christian accountability and, well,
0:08
assurance too, the whole idea of a divine standard of approval.
0:13
We've gathered a lot of source material here, some very
0:16
detailed linguistic studies and theological work that all focus
0:18
on a specific family of Greek terms.
0:21
Our mission is to take those technical insights out of the
0:23
lexicon, you know, and turn them into a working understanding of
0:27
what it means to be considered acceptable or, on the other
0:29
hand, rejected in God's eyes. And this isn't just an academic
0:33
exercise. It's about getting a handle on
0:35
the seriousness and also the comfort that's found in God's
0:38
sovereignty over who gets validated.
0:40
It is, and that standard is really defined by three Greek
0:43
words that are all connected. You have doki mazo, which is the
0:46
active verb, the process of testing or examining something.
0:49
Then you have Doki MOS, which is the result, the state of being
0:52
approved, genuine, certified. And then it's opposite, a doki
0:55
MOS, which is, well, it's pretty stark.
0:58
It means rejected, failed, or just fundamentally disqualified.
1:01
And the weight of this word group comes from the fact that
1:04
it sets the terms for final acceptance or rejection, not
1:08
just in some abstract way, but across our conduct, our
1:11
spiritual health, and yes, the final judgment.
1:14
Right. And what's so interesting is
1:15
that the concept starts in very practical, almost mundane
1:19
settings. The historical background,
1:21
before it ever gets applied to the soul, is all about rigorous
1:24
technical insection. We're talking about the refiners
1:27
fire verifying if a substance or a person met an external
1:32
verifiable standard. OK, so let's start there in the
1:35
ancient world, in the marketplace.
1:36
If we trace this word group back, what's it all about before
1:40
we even get to the New Testament?
1:41
Well, the likely root is a word dokai, which means watching.
1:45
Watching, Yeah, and it suggests a very careful fixed gaze, not a
1:49
casual glance. It's the difference between,
1:51
say, scanning a page and doing a detailed audit.
1:54
So if something is called Doki Mos, it means it has survived
1:57
that level of scrutiny and been certified as the real.
2:00
Deal and the most vivid, the first application of that kind
2:03
of scrutiny is with things like metals and coins, right, quality
2:07
control. Absolutely.
2:08
Just think about the Roman economy.
2:10
A coin has the emperor's face on it, but that's only valuable if
2:14
the metal itself is what it claims to be.
2:17
Documos refers to an object that's been tested and found
2:21
genuine. The Septuagint, which is the
2:23
Greek Old Testament, uses it this way all time.
2:26
And this is where we get that powerful analogy that runs all
2:29
through scripture, the refining fire.
2:32
That's right. Fire is the test.
2:34
It's the means of verification. You take a lump of gold or
2:36
silver, you put it in the furnace, and you heat it up.
2:39
That heat forces a separation. The true metal separates from
2:43
the impurity that draws. The Hebrew word for that is sia.
2:47
So if the silver comes out pure, it's dokimos.
2:49
It's proving genuine, but if it has too many impurities, it's
2:52
either thrown out or it has to go through more refining, which
2:55
is, you know, a painful process. We see this in Genesis in First
2:58
Chronicles for instance. That image is so critical.
3:00
The test isn't optional, it's actually required for
3:03
verification. It's a standard that just strips
3:05
away all pretense. The fire doesn't care about what
3:08
an object claims to be. No, it only cares about its
3:10
actual composition. And that same practical,
3:13
verifiable test was then applied to people, especially people who
3:17
are being considered for public trust.
3:19
Yes, Dokamazo in the classical world meant to test or to
3:23
examine someone before approving them for an office.
3:26
So what did that look like? If you were a candidate for a
3:29
civic role, what was the test? Writers like Plato and Xenophon
3:33
give us a good idea. When they were testing
3:35
candidates for state office, the examination was really
3:38
comprehensive. They weren't just checking your
3:41
family connections or, you know, your education.
3:43
They were verifying your fitness for the role and maybe most of
3:47
all, your character. The person seeking office had to
3:50
prove their integrity, their capability for the job.
3:54
You're only accepted as a magistrate after you pass the
3:56
Dokamasu. So the key expectation was
3:58
reliability. It was if a public figure was
4:01
deemed docomos, it meant they had shown they were reliable
4:05
under scrutiny, they were worthy of public trust.
4:07
There's a really interesting example of this from Josephus
4:10
right with the Essenes. Yes, a fascinating 1.
4:12
The Essenes were this ascetic Jewish sect, and their whole
4:16
initiation process was built around this idea of attestation,
4:20
of proving yourself. I think he mentions A2 year
4:23
probation period, that's it. The character to Otos of a
4:26
novice who wanted to join the Essenes was tested.
4:30
It was Doki Mazatai for two full years before they were accepted
4:33
into the community. So they're just watching them.
4:35
They're watching everything. How the person acts under
4:38
stress, how they handle temptation, whether they're
4:41
outward behavior matches their inner character.
4:43
It was a long, very intense vetting process and you only got
4:47
in if you demonstrated a reliable character.
4:50
And it wasn't just for people. Xenophon uses the term for
4:52
objects too. Yes.
4:54
Anything that vital had to be verified.
4:56
You had to test the quality of horses for the military or the
4:59
fitness of your weapons before a battle.
5:01
All of this required dokimazo. The horse has to prove its
5:04
speed, its stamina, the sword has to prove it won't break.
5:07
Anything that required reliability had to be certified
5:10
as Dokimos. So all of this background really
5:13
sharpens the meaning of Dokimos for us.
5:16
It isn't just a simple declaration of acceptance, not
5:19
at all. It's a statement that this
5:21
person or this thing has successfully met a standard
5:25
after going through some kind of intense trial.
5:27
It's passed the test. Exactly.
5:30
And you even see Philo the Jewish philosopher, starting to
5:33
apply this to the spiritual life.
5:35
He uses documos for souls that are accepted into God's circle
5:39
of friends. So these are souls who were
5:42
proven faithful. Right.
5:43
And the concept carried this inherent weight.
5:46
You don't just passively become a friend of God, you become a
5:48
friend of God by passing the trials and showing that your
5:52
spiritual character is genuine. So OK, when the new testing
5:55
writers pick up this language, they are basically telling us
5:57
that the God we serve doesn't grant approval based on, say,
6:00
feelings or appearances. He grants it based on verifiable
6:05
demonstrated character that's been proved in the fire.
6:07
That's it. The place of scrutiny shifts.
6:09
It's no longer the City Council or the jeweler.
6:11
It's God himself. This is where the word group
6:13
gets its huge theological leverage.
6:16
The New Testament applies do kimazo to that tension at the
6:19
core of the Christian life. We've received salvation, but we
6:23
are also living with an impending judgment, so our whole
6:26
existence is under divine testing all the time.
6:29
And the Old Testament had already laid the groundwork for
6:32
God as the great scrutinizer. You have the psalmist praying.
6:35
Examine me, O Lord, and prove me.
6:37
Try my reigns and my heart. That's an invitation to a pretty
6:41
intense inspection. That awareness of God's constant
6:44
testing is everywhere. Paul even uses the active
6:47
participle to define God. In First Thessalonians 2.4 he
6:51
says God is Libuki Mazum Dascardia's home and he who
6:54
tests our hearts. Right.
6:56
And Paul is using this to defend his ministry, isn't he?
6:58
He is. He's saying that he and his
7:00
fellow workers weren't trying to please men.
7:02
They were approved by God and that's why they were entrusted
7:05
with the Gospel office. That's a huge statement against
7:07
the people who are questioning his authority based on things
7:10
like how well he could speak or how much money he had.
7:13
He's basically saying our call is genuine because God approved
7:16
us for it. Exactly.
7:18
Their apostleship wasn't about a popularity contest or visible
7:21
success. It was based on the secret
7:24
sifting counsel of God. God tested their inner motives,
7:27
their consciences, and He found them fit for the job.
7:30
That is the only validation that counts.
7:32
The prophet Jeremiah takes this imagery even further.
7:35
He connects God's testing of an individual's heart to these
7:38
large scale historical judgments against the entire nation.
7:41
Yes, Jeremiah 11.20 says that God is the Lord who tries the
7:45
reigns in the heart, the reigns there.
7:47
That's the innermost being, the seat of your motivations and
7:49
will. So God's testing isn't random.
7:52
It's a process that's woven into history itself.
7:55
And in Jeremiah 6, the image just becomes brutally visceral.
7:58
God appoints Jeremiah to sift the people.
8:01
He uses that image of the purifier of metals.
8:03
God says I have made you a tester of metals among my people
8:06
that you may know and test their ways.
8:08
So God is telling Jeremiah, you're my assay officer.
8:11
Your job, your whole ministry, is to expose the dross.
8:14
And what's the result of that test on the people of Judah?
8:18
God says they are all grievous revolters, they are bronze and
8:22
iron. They are all corrupters.
8:24
The bellows are burned, the refiner refines in vain, for the
8:28
wicked are not plucked away. It's a painful conclusion.
8:32
God's testing fire didn't remove the wickedness because the
8:35
people were just so fundamentally debased.
8:38
The whole process ends not with purification, but with God's
8:41
final rejection up at Okimahz's of a whole generation that
8:45
failed the test of covenant faithfulness.
8:48
And this leads us straight to the Last Judgment, which the New
8:50
Testament presents as the final moment of this ongoing divine
8:54
scrutiny. The Last Judgment is the
8:56
definitive moment. It's when all human life and all
8:59
our achievements are put to the test.
9:00
The classic text here is First Corinthians 3.13, where Paul
9:03
talks about the building work of Christian ministers.
9:06
Right. He talks about some building
9:07
with gold, silver and precious stones, while others are using
9:09
wood, hay and straw. And the fire is coming to test
9:11
the whole thing. The fire will prove the value,
9:14
the quality, the inherent worth of each person's work.
9:18
The Greek is to Pyr Doki Masai. The fire will test it.
9:21
Now this is a key point for you listing.
9:23
Paul makes a distinction between the work and the worker.
9:26
The worthless materials, the wood, hay, straw, they get
9:29
burned up by the fire, but the worker is saved.
9:32
Yet, as he says, as through fire.
9:35
That distinction is so comforting, but it's also deeply
9:38
sobering. It tells us that our salvation
9:41
is all about Christ, but the effectiveness and the
9:43
genuineness of our Christian labor are put to the same
9:46
rigorous test as a piece of metal.
9:48
That's it. The fire of judgement validates
9:50
the genuine product, the gold and silver, and it destroys the
9:54
fake or temporary editions, the hay and straw.
9:57
So the test isn't about salvation, it's about spiritual
9:59
quality and motive. The person who has proven
10:01
himself in life and whose work passes that fire test of
10:04
judgement, that's the one who is Dokimos.
10:06
And the reward for being proven genuine is spelled out by James.
10:10
James 1.12 gives us the direct connection.
10:13
Dokimos, Genominos, Lopsetaitone, Stefanontos use
10:17
haven't become proved. He will receive the Crown of
10:19
Life. So the crown isn't just given
10:21
out automatically. No, it's the promised reward for
10:24
those who endure the trial and are found to have a true,
10:27
verifiable character. This whole framework of divine
10:30
testing gets back to that tension Paul had with the
10:32
Corinthians. They were looking for validation
10:35
based on human categories. They were.
10:38
The Corinthians were obsessed with outward signs of spiritual
10:40
authority, impressive speeches, flashy displays of charisma, and
10:45
they judged Paul and his friends harshly because they didn't have
10:49
that worldly Polish. Paul just confronts this vanity
10:52
directly in 2nd Corinthians 10 Point old team.
10:54
What's his main response there? He.
10:56
Just draws a line in the sand. He says.
10:58
It is not the one who commends himself who is approved, but the
11:01
one whom the Lord commends. He just pulls the rug out from
11:04
under their entire system of evaluation.
11:06
He does human categories, fame, reputation, appearance.
11:10
They are totally irrelevant to the standard of divine
11:13
attestation. God and God alone issues the
11:16
final verdict on who is dokomos. So if the ultimate validator is
11:20
God who looks at the heart, then our effort should be focused
11:23
entirely on aligning our character with it His searching
11:28
eye. Whether the world or even the
11:29
church happens to notice or not. This reality of constant testing
11:34
is really what defines the believers experience.
11:36
Yes, and that's why the early church, which lived under this
11:40
constant external pressure, persecution, oppression, social
11:43
alienation, saw that situation of affliction or ellipsis as the
11:48
very Crucible for proving one's faith.
11:50
The. Situation for the community of
11:52
Christ was never abstract. It was often painful.
11:54
Phillipsis that word for pressure.
11:56
It was the default setting. But Paul takes this negative
11:59
reality and turns it into a positive mechanism for creating
12:02
spiritual stability and strength.
12:03
This is that famous chain of spiritual virtues in Romans 5.
12:06
It's worth breaking down how document fix into that
12:09
progression. So Romans 5 verses 3 and 4.
12:11
It shows a logical step by step process.
12:13
It does. Affliction works.
12:15
Patience or hypo money? Patience works.
12:17
Document and document works. Hope and document is not the
12:21
process of testing, but the quality that results from it.
12:24
Proven character or verifiable proof?
12:26
So it's the spiritual metal that's been put to the fire and
12:29
come out whole. Yes, the basis of your
12:32
attestation is the patient faithfulness that continues
12:35
despite the crushing weight of negative circumstances.
12:39
In that sense, Dokie May is the concrete evidence that your
12:42
faith is real. It's the thing that assures you
12:44
that the hope you have isn't just wishful thinking, but it's
12:47
grounded in a tested reality. And this ability to face
12:50
suffering with spiritual stability is why both James and
12:53
Peter tell believers to find joy in these moments of trial.
12:56
Which seems completely backward to our modern way of thinking
12:59
where we try to avoid all discomfort.
13:01
It does, but James 1.2 says to count it all joy when you fall
13:06
into various temptations. But as well.
13:08
Poka Y and Peter echoes this. He says the being grieved by
13:12
various trials is necessary so that the testing of your faith
13:15
can achieve his purpose. The thought underneath it all is
13:18
that affliction and trial are reasons for joy.
13:20
Because they perform this necessary testing function, they
13:23
reveal the genuine article inside you.
13:26
A believer should welcome the testing because it reveals what
13:28
is true. OK, let's focus on the term for
13:30
that resulting proven worth to Dokumian.
13:33
It's related to Dokumi, but maybe it points more to the
13:36
tangible result. Dokumian is the neuter form of
13:39
the adjective that means tested or genuine.
13:41
It's often translated as proof or proven character.
13:44
So James 1.3 explains that the testing of your faith to
13:48
Dokumian Humantus pistets produces endurance.
13:53
There's a slight debate here, isn't there?
13:54
Does Doquemian mean the means of testing the trial itself or the
13:58
genuine character that the test revealed?
14:00
There is, but while some argue for the means, the context,
14:04
especially when you look at First Peter, strongly suggests
14:06
it's the resulting quality. Peter connects the two ideas so
14:09
clearly. In First Peter 1.7.
14:11
He says the genuineness of faith proved in suffering is much more
14:14
precious than perishable gold which is tried by fire.
14:17
That is a shocking comparison. Why is proven faith more
14:20
precious than refined gold? Because gold perishes, but
14:24
faith, when it's been proved by God, does not.
14:28
Gold is tested by fire to verify its purity, but faith, the faith
14:33
that has survived the trial, is the result that lasts forever.
14:37
Dokemian signifies that proven, genuine character of faith that
14:40
has come out of the furnace, authenticated and ready to be
14:43
presented to Christ when he is revealed.
14:46
And this idea of attestation isn't just about internal
14:49
patients. It has to show up in active,
14:51
verifiable conduct and ministry. Oh absolutely.
14:54
Faithfulness in ministry is a central way this is shown.
14:57
Paul praises Timothy to the Philippians and he points to his
15:01
document, his proven character, which was demonstrated by the
15:04
fact that he served faithfully with Paul for the gospel as a
15:07
son with a father. So Timothy's track record, his
15:10
actual verifiable actions, that's what constituted his
15:12
approval. That's it.
15:14
And the Corinthians, who are so quick to judge Paul, they were
15:16
themselves challenged to provide document to provide proof of
15:19
their own spiritual health through their material
15:21
generosity. Right.
15:22
Paul uses the collection for the poor Saints in Jerusalem as a
15:26
kind of test case. He does.
15:28
He tells the Corinthians he wants them to give proof,
15:30
document of their genuine love and obedience through this
15:33
collection. So obedient sacrificial conduct,
15:36
in this case being generous to people they had never even met,
15:39
that serves as the objective verification of their subjective
15:42
claim to spiritual health and love for Christ.
15:45
What's really surprising, though, is Paul's view on
15:47
internal division on heresy within the Church.
15:51
He seems to suggest that even these painful negative things
15:55
have a divine purpose in this whole testing process.
15:57
He does in First Corinthians 11.1 teen he makes this very
16:00
severe claim. He says divisions Harris must
16:04
necessarily arise so the document, those who pass the
16:07
test may become manifest among you.
16:09
So heresy is a test of discernment and allegiance.
16:12
It is. It forces you to make a choice.
16:15
The documentary are the ones who stand fast and sound doctrine,
16:18
who cling to Christ and who refused to break the body into
16:20
pieces over worldly or fault intellectual ideas.
16:23
It's like a spiritual filtration system.
16:25
It uses internal stress to separate the genuine from the
16:28
counterfeit, to expose who has true character and who is just
16:31
following a trend. And the final conclusion here is
16:33
that the main demand on every Christian is to present oneself
16:36
as dokimos to God. Paul tells Timothy to strive to
16:40
present himself to God as an approved worker.
16:43
Spouteson, Sauron. Dokimon, Paris de aasi Tutesh.
16:47
And that approval is based on excellent achievements in gospel
16:50
ministry, on discipline service, and on behavior that other
16:54
people recognize as the mark of a valuable disciple of Christ.
16:57
It really moves the Christian life away from being just a
17:00
passive receiving of grace to an active discipline striving
17:04
toward a verifiable God approved character.
17:07
The seriousness of this standard becomes crystal clear when we
17:10
look at its opposite, a dokomos. If dokomos carries all the
17:14
weight of divine acceptance, then a dokomos means, well,
17:17
complete theological devastation.
17:19
It is a complete reversal. It means rejected, failed,
17:21
spurious, worthless base. It means you have failed to meet
17:24
the necessary divinely mandated standard.
17:27
If dokimos is the purified gold, a dokimos is the counterfeit
17:30
coin or the metal that failed the quality check.
17:32
It was just thrown on the scrap heap.
17:34
And historically, the Old Testament used the same
17:36
metallurgical image for moral failure.
17:38
Yes, in Proverbs 25.4 it's used for the dross that's purged from
17:42
silver. Isaiah 1.22 uses a Hebrew term
17:46
that the Greek later translates as worthless silver.
17:49
The metal just has no inherent purity or value, so it's
17:52
rejected. Philo also used this idea for
17:55
worthless words, desires and deeds that are typical of a
17:59
foolish person. One of the most stark examples
18:02
of this idea of worthlessness applied to creation is in the
18:04
book of Hebrews, where it connects the failure to produce
18:07
fruit with a judgement of rejection.
18:10
Hebrews 6.8 uses adokamos for barren soil.
18:14
The soil had received the rain. It was meant for cultivation,
18:17
but instead all it produced was thorns and thistles.
18:20
It is a dokomos and near a curse because it has failed its whole
18:23
intended purpose. It's judged by its lack of
18:25
expected works or fruit. It's deemed unusable, unfit for
18:28
what the master needs. That is a terrifying parallel
18:31
for the spiritual life, that usefulness is the measure of
18:33
approval. And Paul makes the threat of
18:35
being a dokomos intensely personal, especially for anyone
18:38
in ministry. He uses the dramatic analogy of
18:40
the ancient games like the Olympics and Corinth.
18:43
That's First Corinthians 9, 1.27 where he talks about rigorously
18:46
training and disciplining his. Body.
18:48
Yes, Paul says. He trains his body like a slave.
18:51
Mopus, Alice, Crexes, Altos, Adochemos, Chinumi.
18:55
For fear lest after preaching to others, I myself should be
18:58
disqualified. The term adakamos here doesn't
19:02
refer to losing the final race. It refers to the judge
19:05
eliminating A contestant who failed the mandatory preliminary
19:08
examination. So the fear isn't just about
19:10
missing the prize, it's about being declared unfit to even get
19:13
on the track in the first place. Precisely.
19:15
The athlete had to pass a very stringent physical and moral
19:18
test before the Games even started.
19:21
Being a docchios means being deemed unqualified.
19:24
It means having preached the authentic truth, but failing to
19:26
embody the self-discipline and authentic character that's
19:29
required for the crown. The fear of disqualification, of
19:32
being exposed as a fraud, was a powerful driver for Paul's own
19:35
rigorous self-control. And this word gets its most
19:38
severe usage when it's not just applied to works or discipline,
19:41
but to the mind itself. That's in Romans 1.28,
19:44
describing the judgement on godless humanity.
19:47
Oh, this passage uses the word group with just astonishing
19:49
force. It's a devastating linguistic
19:51
link. Paul says that because they did
19:53
not approve the verb is to have God in their knowledge, they
19:59
failed to deem him worthy of recognition.
20:01
So God in turn gave them over to an adoki Mon noun.
20:05
So they refused to pass a judgement in God's favor.
20:07
So God hands them over to a mind that is itself rejected, an
20:10
unapproved, debased, corrupted mind.
20:13
It's a judicial action, a divine abandonment.
20:16
The mind is made incapable of sound spiritual or moral
20:19
judgment. It's unfit to properly discern
20:21
truth and virtue. And that leads them to do things
20:24
they should not do. Tom MO Cathiconta this condition
20:27
having a docomo noun, it signifies a complete
20:30
determinative outlook that has just utterly failed the standard
20:33
of attestation before God. Which suggests a kind of
20:35
spiritual incompetence so deep that they are incapable of any
20:38
genuine good. That's borne out when Paul
20:40
describes those who oppose the gospel.
20:42
Like the heretics in Titus 1.16. He defines them as corrupted in
20:46
their intelligence and radically A Dokamoy, unqualified, useless
20:51
or incapable for any good work. Their distorted minds make their
20:55
actions worthless in God's sight.
20:57
The state of Adakamos is one of total rejection, and it results
21:01
from a life that refused the standard of God's scrutiny.
21:04
So, given the gravity of that divine standard and the
21:07
terrifying possibility of being found adakamos, the Christian
21:11
life must include a constant, serious ethical duty.
21:14
We have to check our own spiritual accreditation.
21:17
We do. If God is the ultimate tester,
21:20
why is self examination needed? It's because we live by faith
21:23
and we are so prone to self deception.
21:26
Self testing is the believers necessary act of lining up our
21:29
internal assurance with the objective divine standard.
21:32
We're called to test our own spiritual proof.
21:34
Yutis doki mazeda. Examine yourselves as Paul
21:37
challenges the Corinthians in 2nd Corinthians 13.5.
21:40
And Paul throws this challenge out at the height of his dispute
21:42
with the Corinthians, when they were questioning his authority.
21:45
He just flips the script on them.
21:47
He does. He asks them to test themselves
21:49
for one simple reason. Unless you should be void.
21:53
The Greek is a medi, A Dukamoy estate.
21:55
Unless you yourselves are fundamentally unapproved or
21:58
disqualified. He hopes that in their own self
22:00
scrutiny they will confirm that they are Dukamoy, and by doing
22:04
that they'll have to confirm that the apostles they were
22:06
criticizing are also UK esman A Dukhamoy, not unapproved.
22:10
The challenge is severe. Look at your own life before you
22:13
presume to judge those whom God has attested.
22:16
And this required self scrutiny becomes especially urgent in the
22:19
context of our corporate life, particularly when observing the
22:22
Lord's Supper. Yes, First Corinthians 11.28 is
22:25
a direct command. It comes right after Paul
22:27
describes the chaotic and undisciplined way the
22:29
Corinthians were celebrating the Lord's Supper with his blatant
22:32
disregard for one another. They are challenged, document
22:35
secuded. The Ancupos Hyocontin let a
22:38
person test himself before participating.
22:40
What specifically were they failing to test in themselves?
22:43
They were failing to test their attitude toward the body of
22:45
Christ, and that means both the physical body of the Lord
22:49
represented by the elements and the body of believers
22:51
represented by the community. They were approaching Christ's
22:54
presence carelessly, without reverence or love for their
22:57
neighbors. Self scrutiny requires checking
22:59
our immediate motive, our current moral standing, and our
23:02
relationship with the community before we come to Christ's
23:05
table. To fail this test is to eat and
23:08
drink judgement on yourself. This duty of testing goes beyond
23:11
just personal accreditation. It extends to testing and
23:15
proving what God desires of us. How does the renewal of the mind
23:18
connect to this? Romans 12.2 explains that
23:21
spiritual transformation, metamorphosis, and we're being
23:24
continually transformed is achieved through the renewal of
23:27
the mind is to document him as the to the lama, to Theo so that
23:31
you may verify what the will of God is.
23:34
The renewed mind gains the ability to critically evaluate
23:37
and approve God's will. It's not passive acceptance.
23:41
It's an act of spiritual and moral discernment that proves to
23:44
experience that God's will is good, acceptable, and perfect.
23:47
So we're constantly putting God's principles to the test in
23:50
real life and verifying that they're true.
23:52
And this duty then has some specific areas of ethical
23:55
discernment. It does first, we're told to
23:57
discern what is fitting in a given situation.
24:00
Philippians 1.10 tells us to test Ted Diferanta what things
24:05
differ or are morally fitting so that we may be sincere and
24:08
without offense until the day of Christ.
24:11
This requires constant calibration.
24:13
Second, the basic rule of life is testing what is pleasing to
24:16
the Lord. Documente este este guare estos
24:19
tu quiche which we see in Ephesians.
24:21
Our actions should never be governed by, you know, whim or
24:24
selfish desires, but by the seriousness of determining what
24:26
delights the Lord. And we also have a clear
24:28
instruction about religious phenomena and doctrine.
24:30
We can't just accept everything that claims to be spiritual.
24:33
Absolutely not. The general rule is simple, but
24:36
it covers everything. Padte de doki mazete tequilan
24:39
cadete test all things hold fast.
24:41
What is good. That's First Thessalonians 5.21,
24:44
and John commands us to test the spirits.
24:47
The church has an obligation to verify the authenticity of every
24:50
spiritual manifestation, every claimed prophecy, every
24:53
doctrine. We have to reject what is
24:55
suspect and hold only to what has been certified as true and
24:59
good by the divine standard. And finally, we see Jesus
25:02
criticizing his own contemporaries for failing this
25:05
very act of discernment. He connects spiritual testing to
25:08
history itself. Luke 12.56 is just a biting
25:12
reproach. Jesus sees their skill at
25:14
predicting the weather. He says, you know how to
25:17
evaluate the appearance of the earth and of the sky.
25:19
How is it that you do not evaluate this present time,
25:22
Ellen? Karen Tutten.
25:23
They were experts at reading the clouds for rain.
25:25
But they completely failed to discern the crucial
25:28
eschatological time, the arrival of the Messiah, when a decision
25:32
should have been made about Him. Their failure to verify the
25:34
spiritual meaning of historical events LED directly to their
25:37
refusal to approve Christ. They were dokimos at being
25:40
weather watchers, but a dokimos at being spiritually discerning
25:43
citizens of the Kingdom. And this brings us to the final
25:46
ultimate act of rejection in the New Testament, which is
25:49
expressed by this intensified verb apodokimazu.
25:52
This means to throw out in the test, or to find utterly
25:56
unworthy and discard. And what gives this concept its
25:59
greatest theological irony is that the figure this ultimate
26:03
rejection is applied to is Christ himself.
26:05
This is the deep paradox that sits under the entire Christian
26:08
concept of approval. Jesus quotes Psalm 117 to the
26:12
chief priests and elders after the parable of the wicked
26:14
husbandmen, he says live on Han Apodokimazan Hoy Okodomandez.
26:19
The stone which the builders rejected, found unworthy in the
26:21
test, has become the head of the corner.
26:23
The builders there, they represented the established
26:25
religious authority, human wisdom, human insight.
26:29
They scrutinized Christ. They subjected him to their
26:31
tests of acceptability, power, conformity to tradition,
26:34
political usefulness, and they declared him Apodokimazu.
26:38
They judged him by their human faulty categories and found him
26:41
lacking. And that rejection is the
26:44
ultimate verification of the futility of human judgement.
26:47
The most genuine, perfectly tested and fully approved
26:50
individual. Whoever lived was found unworthy
26:53
by the highest human authorities.
26:56
Peter picks up this theme, stating that Christ is the stone
26:59
which was rejected by you builders, but which has become
27:02
the head of the corner. So our foundation as Christians
27:04
is literally the rejected article.
27:07
This fact completely validates Paul's argument to the
27:09
Corinthians. Divine attestation stands
27:12
completely outside of all human systems of judgment and
27:14
criteria. It forces us to redefine what
27:17
documents truly means in the spiritual sense.
27:20
If the world rejects you because you don't conform to its
27:22
standards of charisma or success, that rejection might
27:25
actually confirm your genuine character, as long as you're
27:28
standing firm and sound doctrine and discipline.
27:30
So the ultimate measure of worth is not found in avoiding the
27:33
furnace of testing, whether that testing comes from internal
27:36
doubt, external persecution, or corporate division.
27:40
True worth being documos, is shown by the patient
27:43
perseverance of faith in the middle of that affliction.
27:46
The fire cannot consume those who are genuinely united to
27:49
Christ. They emerge like refined gold,
27:52
attested by God alone. This deep dive has covered a lot
27:55
the historical roots, the theological weight, and the
27:58
severe counterpoint of this language of testing documazo
28:01
documos and a documos. This word group demands a
28:04
constant rigorous self scrutiny in light of a divine standard
28:08
that looks past all outward appearances.
28:10
We. Have to get that acceptance is
28:11
not automatic, it is the result of verification.
28:13
Documos signifies the divinely improved, tested, and genuine
28:17
life, while a documos signifies the rejected worthless dross
28:21
disqualified because it failed to meet the verifiable standard
28:23
of faith and obedience. So as we all go back to our
28:26
regular duties, knowing that the standard for accreditation is
28:29
focused on the unseen purity of the heart, how honest has your
28:33
own self testing been this past week?
28:35
Where might you have avoided submitting a particular action
28:38
or a thought or an attitude to that critical Christ centered
28:42
examination as I showed it done through post Hirocum?
28:45
And if you ran your life through the refiners fire, what
28:47
unnecessary and worthless materials would be consumed?
28:49
That's something worth watching carefully.
28:52
Until next time, keep thinking.