Latest / Chief in Tech Deep Dive Shortcast / Chief in Tech S1E61 - Özge Tekalp : Culture as Competitive Advantage – The Executive Leadership Model That Drives 5x Faster Revenue Growth

Transcript

Chief in Tech S1E61 - Özge Tekalp : Culture as Competitive Advantage – The Executive Leadership Model That Drives 5x Faster Revenue Growth · Chief in Tech Deep Dive Shortcast

• 0:00
  So if you bought a state of the art smart home
• 0:02
  system, but like 97 % of the time, it just completely
• 0:06
  malfunctioned and locked you out in the freezing
• 0:08
  cold. Oh, I'd be furious. I mean, you'd assume
• 0:11
  the tech was totally broken. Right. You would
• 0:13
  demand a refund immediately. Yet in the business
• 0:16
  world, companies are basically buying the equivalent
• 0:19
  of that broken system every single day. They
• 0:22
  really are. It's wild. Welcome to today's Deep
• 0:26
  Dive, where we're taking your notes and extracting
• 0:28
  the actual insights so you can cut through the
• 0:30
  noise. Our mission today is to figure out why
• 0:33
  these massive digital investments fail almost
• 0:36
  completely, and what the real secret weapon for
• 0:39
  a business actually is. Yeah, and we're looking
• 0:41
  at this fascinating summary of a keynote session
• 0:43
  today. It's titled, Culture as Competitive Advantage,
• 0:47
  the executive leadership model that drives five
• 0:49
  -backs faster revenue growth. And it's such a
• 0:52
  timely topic, right? Because we live in a world
• 0:54
  that is just obsessed with AI and digital tools.
• 0:57
  Totally. But the core argument here, it basically
• 0:59
  just upends all that conventional wisdom about
• 1:01
  where a company's true value actually comes from.
• 1:04
  OK, let's unpack this because... The numbers
• 1:07
  right at the top of these notes lay out a really
• 1:09
  jarring paradox. There's this huge disconnect.
• 1:12
  The data shows that 97 percent of digital transformations
• 1:16
  completely fail to achieve their objectives,
• 1:19
  which is just a staggering failure rate. It really
• 1:21
  is. But then on the flip side, some companies
• 1:24
  are somehow growing their revenues 5 .1 times
• 1:27
  faster than their competitors. So, I mean, if
• 1:30
  97 percent fail, why do we keep throwing millions
• 1:33
  at technology and market position? Well, what's
• 1:35
  fascinating here is that that 97 % figure, it
• 1:38
  reveals this fundamental blind spot. When a digital
• 1:41
  transformation fails, the failure usually isn't
• 1:44
  actually in the code itself. Really? So the tech
• 1:46
  isn't broken? No. I mean, a piece of enterprise
• 1:49
  software or some new AI tool, it generally works
• 1:52
  exactly the way it was programmed to. The failure
• 1:54
  happens in the environment where that code gets
• 1:56
  dropped. Oh, OK. So going back to that smart
• 1:58
  home analogy, if the system locks you out, the
• 2:00
  natural reflex is to just blame the hardware.
• 2:03
  Exactly. But. It's the allure of the quick fix,
• 2:08
  right? Technology is tangible. You can literally
• 2:10
  buy a software license, point to a new tech stack,
• 2:14
  and tell your board, look, we're innovating.
• 2:16
  Right, checking the box. But it's entirely superficial
• 2:19
  if the underlying ecosystem just rejects it.
• 2:23
  Think of culture as a company as operating system.
• 2:26
  Okay, I like that. If your company is running
• 2:27
  on an outdated, you know, low trust operating
• 2:30
  system, you can try to install the most expensive
• 2:32
  digital app in the world, but it just won't run.
• 2:35
  The operating system can't support it. The app
• 2:36
  will just crash. Exactly. So those 5 .1 times
• 2:39
  revenue multipliers we're seeing, those aren't
• 2:42
  things you can just buy off a shelf. They have
• 2:43
  to be cultivated through very intentional leadership.
• 2:46
  That makes perfect sense mechanically. If the
• 2:48
  baseline is toxic, no shiny new app is going
• 2:51
  to fix it. Which brings us to this concept that
• 2:55
  Kino calls the illusion of the tech mode. Yes,
• 2:57
  this is a big one. Because I think this will
• 2:59
  challenge a lot of assumptions for you listening,
• 3:02
  especially if you work in an engineering or tech
• 3:05
  -heavy space. The source material points out
• 3:08
  that technology can be copied within just 18
• 3:10
  months. And that 18 -month window is practically
• 3:14
  nothing. When you think about the lifespan of
• 3:16
  a business, we've all been conditioned to think
• 3:18
  of... intellectual property or proprietary software
• 3:23
  as this permanent moat, like around a medieval
• 3:26
  castle. Right, keeping the invaders out. Exactly.
• 3:29
  But in today's landscape, that moat dries up
• 3:31
  in a year and a half. Competitors will reverse
• 3:34
  engineer your software, or some startup is going
• 3:36
  to build a leaner, faster version. Wait, hang
• 3:38
  on. Let me just push back a bit on behalf of
• 3:40
  the skeptical listener here. If technology isn't
• 3:43
  a permanent moat, the immediate counterargument
• 3:45
  is talent. Okay, sure. But the notes explicitly
• 3:48
  say that top talent can be poached. I mean, isn't
• 3:51
  top talent the whole point of a strong culture?
• 3:53
  If your best engineers just get headhunted away
• 3:55
  for a huge pay bump, doesn't your competitive
• 3:57
  advantage just walk out the front door? Well,
• 4:00
  this raises an important question, and we really
• 4:02
  need to draw a sharp line here between individual
• 4:04
  talent and collective culture. Yes, you can absolutely
• 4:09
  poach a brilliant engineer, right? or a star
• 4:13
  executive. Yeah, happens all the time. But you
• 4:15
  cannot poach the ecosystem. You can't steal the
• 4:19
  institutional trust or the shared language of
• 4:21
  that team, or just the innate way the organization
• 4:23
  solves problems under pressure. Ah, I see. It's
• 4:27
  like you can hire away the star quarterback,
• 4:29
  but you definitely can't buy the team's entire
• 4:32
  playbook, their chemistry, and the coaching philosophy
• 4:34
  all with one check. Precisely. That's a great
• 4:37
  way to put it. The source material argues that
• 4:39
  while talent is transient, a strong culture creates
• 4:42
  a permanent moat that actually compounds over
• 4:45
  time. Compounding, right. Yeah. An 18 -month
• 4:47
  tech head start just depreciates. It starts losing
• 4:50
  value the literal second it launches. But culture
• 4:53
  works like compound interest in a bank. The longer
• 4:55
  it exists, the deeper the trust goes and the
• 4:58
  faster the teams can communicate. So what does
• 5:00
  this all mean in practice? Like if culture is
• 5:02
  the only true compounding moat? How does a company
• 5:05
  actually go about building it? Well, the keynote
• 5:07
  puts this responsibility squarely on executive
• 5:10
  leadership. Right. And it promises to map out
• 5:12
  these five specific leadership shifts that transition
• 5:16
  a culture from being a cost center to a growth
• 5:19
  engine. And I really want to dig into these,
• 5:22
  because calling culture a cost center is such
• 5:25
  a revealing phrase. It really exposes how a lot
• 5:28
  of leaders view it. Yeah. It implies executives
• 5:30
  usually treat culture like, you know, the mandatory
• 5:33
  office pizza party, like just an expense line
• 5:36
  item to keep people quiet rather than the actual
• 5:39
  engine driving the car. The office pizza party
• 5:42
  is literally the perfect example of a passive
• 5:45
  performative culture. It's basically an apology
• 5:48
  for a bad environment, not a real strategy. Right.
• 5:50
  So what are the shifts? So to move away from
• 5:52
  that mindset, the keynote outlines these five
• 5:54
  profound shifts. The first one is moving from
• 5:57
  siloed mandates to cross -functional ecosystems.
• 6:00
  OK, let's break that down. What does that actually
• 6:01
  look like, say, on a random Tuesday afternoon
• 6:04
  at the office? Well, in a traditional culture,
• 6:07
  the chief technology officer buys a new tool
• 6:09
  and just mandates that the sales team has to
• 6:12
  use it. And the sales team probably hates it,
• 6:14
  right? Because it doesn't fit their actual workflow.
• 6:16
  Exactly. So they just quietly ignore it. That
• 6:18
  is a classic siloed mandate. Got it. But the
• 6:21
  shift to a cross -functional ecosystem means
• 6:24
  the executives force those departments to co
• 6:27
  -design the solution from day one. You just don't
• 6:30
  buy the tech until the human workflow demands
• 6:32
  it. Oh, wow. OK, so the tech actually serves
• 6:36
  the culture rather than forcing the culture to
• 6:38
  warp itself around the tech. So what's the second
• 6:41
  shift? The second shift is moving from output
• 6:43
  management to behavioral architecture. Meaning
• 6:46
  what? Exactly. Most leaders only measure the
• 6:49
  final output, right? Like, did we hit our quarterly
• 6:52
  revenue target? But intentional leaders measure
• 6:55
  the behaviors that actually lead to that output.
• 6:57
  They measure things like psychological safety.
• 7:00
  Like whether a junior employee can speak up.
• 7:02
  Yeah, exactly. Can they point out a fatal flaw
• 7:04
  in a project without fearing for their job? If
• 7:07
  people are terrified to speak up, your digital
• 7:10
  transformation is going to fail because no one
• 7:12
  will tell you the software is broken until it's
• 7:14
  just way too late. I can easily see how that
• 7:16
  ties directly into that 97 % failure rate. If
• 7:20
  I'm scared of my boss, I'm just going to pretend
• 7:21
  the new software is great while secretly using
• 7:24
  my old spreadsheets on the side. Right, which
• 7:26
  is exactly the dynamic that completely kills
• 7:29
  innovation. Yeah. And that leads us to the third
• 7:32
  shift. moving from tech -led transformation to
• 7:36
  human -led transformation. That feels like a
• 7:38
  massive distinction. It is. It or is the realization
• 7:40
  that digital transformation is not an IT project.
• 7:44
  It's actually an organizational psychology project.
• 7:47
  Oh, wow. So you're shifting the burden of transformation
• 7:49
  completely away from just the IT department and
• 7:52
  placing it on the shoulders of every single manager.
• 7:55
  Yes. Every leader plays a part. And then the
• 7:57
  fourth shift involves the time frame. Moving
• 7:59
  from quarterly survival to compounding institutional
• 8:03
  memory. So stopping the endless reorganizations.
• 8:06
  Exactly. Executives have to stop resetting their
• 8:09
  culture every time there's a slightly bad quarter.
• 8:11
  When you constantly reorganize, you completely
• 8:14
  destroy institutional memory. Those 5 .1 times
• 8:18
  multipliers happen because teams stay together
• 8:20
  long enough to actually get incredibly fast at
• 8:22
  executing. So it's all about stability. And what's
• 8:25
  the fifth one? The fifth shift is transitioning
• 8:27
  from seeing culture as an HR initiative to treating
• 8:31
  it as a core business strategy. Right. It's not
• 8:33
  just background noise. Exactly. Culture isn't
• 8:36
  just something human resources handles. It's
• 8:38
  the primary lever the CEO uses to drive revenue.
• 8:42
  If your culture is dialed in, your customer experience
• 8:45
  naturally elevates, and that drives sales. Which
• 8:48
  bridges the gap perfectly to the next big promise
• 8:51
  of this keynote. The notes mention that these
• 8:54
  five shifts unlock six competitive factors. Basically,
• 8:58
  if you make these cultural changes, you gain
• 9:00
  six superpowers. What are they? Well, the first
• 9:03
  factor is agility and speed to market. Because
• 9:06
  you aren't fighting internal silos anymore, you
• 9:08
  can launch products in weeks instead of years.
• 9:10
  Makes sense. The second is operational resilience.
• 9:13
  When a market shock hits, high -trust teams adapt
• 9:16
  immediately. They don't have to wait for top
• 9:18
  -down orders. Oh, I imagine the third has to
• 9:20
  do with that talent poaching we talked about
• 9:21
  earlier. Spot on. The third factor is talent
• 9:24
  gravity. You aren't just retaining top talent,
• 9:27
  you track it effortlessly. The best engineers
• 9:31
  want to work where the operating system is healthy.
• 9:33
  Right, the culture is the magnet. Exactly. Then
• 9:36
  the fourth factor is customer -centric innovation.
• 9:39
  When your internal teams actually talk to each
• 9:42
  other, they understand the customer so much better,
• 9:45
  which leads to products people actually want.
• 9:47
  Which obviously leads into the financial factors.
• 9:51
  The fifth is maximized ROI on technology. You
• 9:54
  actually get value out of the software you bought
• 9:56
  because your people are actually using it. And
• 9:59
  finally, the sixth factor is sustainable revenue
• 10:02
  growth. The 5 .1 times multiplier. That's where
• 10:06
  it lives. Not just a one -time spike. It's a
• 10:08
  permanent upward trajectory. Okay, looking at
• 10:11
  these five shifts and six factors, I mean, these
• 10:13
  are profound structural changes. To really grasp
• 10:16
  the weight of these insights, I think we have
• 10:18
  to look at the architect behind them. Oh, absolutely.
• 10:21
  Context is everything here. Right, because it's
• 10:22
  one thing to read these theories in a textbook,
• 10:24
  but it's totally different to actually deploy
• 10:26
  them in the real world. For sure. The speaker
• 10:30
  behind this keynote is Esgri Tecalp. And her
• 10:33
  background really gives these insights incredible
• 10:36
  gravity. She is not some academic theorist. No,
• 10:38
  she has over 30 years of global experience driving
• 10:41
  transformation across the USA and the EMEA regions,
• 10:45
  which, if you're unfamiliar, stands for Europe,
• 10:48
  the Middle East, and Africa. Right, three decades
• 10:50
  across multiple continents. And it owes the specific
• 10:53
  types of organizations she's been turning around
• 10:55
  that really jump out to me. The notes list these
• 10:58
  massive complex corporate roles. We're talking
• 11:02
  traditional global banks like East Bank, BNP
• 11:05
  Paribas, Q &B Finance Bank, Bank Defar, Veripark,
• 11:09
  as well as legacy giants like Kodak. I mean,
• 11:12
  if we connect this to the bigger picture, just
• 11:14
  consider the sheer inertia of those organizations.
• 11:16
  Yeah. A traditional global bank or, you know,
• 11:18
  a century old photography pioneer. These are
• 11:21
  not nimble 10 person Silicon Valley startups.
• 11:23
  Right. The CEO can't just pivot the whole culture
• 11:25
  over a weekend retreat. Not at all. You are fighting
• 11:28
  against decades of behavioral muscle memory.
• 11:30
  heavy bureaucracy, ancient legacy computer systems,
• 11:33
  traditional ways of doing things. You definitely
• 11:35
  can't just walk into a global bank, install a
• 11:38
  new app, and expect everything to change overnight.
• 11:41
  Exactly. So her assertion that 97 % of digital
• 11:44
  transformations fail, that isn't just a statistic
• 11:47
  she read in some article. It's a reality she
• 11:49
  had to navigate in the absolute trenches of these
• 11:52
  massive legacy institutions. She knows firsthand
• 11:55
  the incredible friction of trying to force new
• 11:58
  tech onto a rigid culture. But she clearly figured
• 12:02
  out how to overcome it and become the architect
• 12:04
  of that 5 .1 times multiplier. Yeah, she mastered
• 12:07
  the art of delivering exceptional results in
• 12:10
  literally the most rigid environments imaginable.
• 12:13
  Which brings us to her current work, right? Since
• 12:15
  founding her consultancy in 2019, she has specialized
• 12:18
  in everything from sales strategy to customer
• 12:21
  experience. And she currently serves as a fractional
• 12:23
  chief customer and project officer at an organization
• 12:25
  called LST. And that concept of fractional leadership
• 12:29
  is really worth noting for you listening. A fractional
• 12:32
  executive basically parachutes into an organization
• 12:34
  as a part time, highly specialized leader. Oh,
• 12:37
  like bringing a veteran harbor pilot aboard a
• 12:40
  ship just to navigate a really tough channel.
• 12:42
  Exactly that. She guides these organizations
• 12:45
  through complex transformations without needing
• 12:48
  to be there full time because her whole methodology
• 12:50
  is about building a culture that sustains itself.
• 12:53
  after she leaves. Here is where I think this
• 12:56
  entire deep dive gets so incredibly fascinating.
• 12:59
  When you actually look at her education and her
• 13:01
  credentials, you uncover this brilliant, almost
• 13:05
  poetic paradox. You're looking at her digital
• 13:08
  credentials. Yes. Listen to this educational
• 13:10
  background. So she holds an MBA from the University
• 13:12
  of Rochester, which establishes a very strong
• 13:15
  traditional business foundation. But then she
• 13:18
  completed the chief digital officer program from
• 13:20
  Kellogg Business School at Northwestern. Which
• 13:22
  is huge. And on top of that, she holds a postgraduate
• 13:25
  degree in digital business from MIT and Columbia
• 13:28
  Business School. I mean, in the corporate world,
• 13:30
  those are arguably the most elite. technological
• 13:35
  and digital credentials you could possibly acquire.
• 13:38
  She is a certified world -class digital master.
• 13:41
  She has literally held titles as Chief Digital
• 13:44
  Officer. And yet, with all of this elite, cutting
• 13:48
  -edge technical education from MIT and Columbia,
• 13:52
  she is the one standing on a keynote stage telling
• 13:54
  executives, hey, Technology is not your secret
• 13:57
  weapon. It sounds totally contradictory at first
• 13:59
  glance, but it actually synthesizes her entire
• 14:02
  philosophy perfectly. Her deep, intricate knowledge
• 14:06
  of digital architecture is precisely what qualifies
• 14:08
  her to confidently say that tech isn't the ultimate
• 14:11
  answer. Right, because she intimately knows exactly
• 14:14
  what a line of code can do so she is painfully
• 14:16
  aware of what it cannot do. That's the absolute
• 14:19
  core of the issue. A leader who doesn't truly
• 14:21
  understand digital transformation, they might
• 14:23
  just panic and blame the software when a rollout
• 14:25
  fails. And just buy a different software package.
• 14:27
  Exactly. But T -Calp understands the digital
• 14:30
  landscape so thoroughly that she sees right past
• 14:33
  the code. She knows about that 18 -month copying
• 14:36
  window because she has lived it. She has built
• 14:38
  digital motes and watched them evaporate. She
• 14:41
  perfectly embodies that bridge between hard technology
• 14:44
  and the human experience. And that bridge is
• 14:47
  really evident in her job titles, too. The fact
• 14:50
  that she served as both Chief Digital Officer,
• 14:52
  which is completely focused on systems and data,
• 14:55
  and Chief Customer Officer, which is entirely
• 14:57
  focused on human emotion and outcomes, shows
• 15:00
  that she has always operated right at the intersection
• 15:03
  of machines and people. And that dual perspective
• 15:05
  is just incredibly rare. It really explains why
• 15:08
  she has accumulated such significant global recognition,
• 15:12
  too. The nose highlight that she was featured
• 15:14
  in Ink Magazine in 2024. Oh, wow. Yeah. And she's
• 15:18
  recognized as one of the 50 most influential
• 15:20
  business women for 2025, and one of the top 100
• 15:23
  women leaders in the Middle East for 2025. Plus,
• 15:27
  she was named one of the top 10 dynamic chief
• 15:29
  customer officers, and she has over 30 prestigious
• 15:33
  industry awards, including gold medal Stevie
• 15:35
  Awards. I mean, you do not rack up that kind
• 15:37
  of hardware just by telling a board of directors
• 15:39
  to buy more expensive software. Definitely not.
• 15:41
  You earn those accolades by fundamentally re
• 15:44
  -architecting how a business operates on a human
• 15:46
  level. And her methodology really inspires organizations
• 15:49
  towards sustainable growth. And sustainable is
• 15:53
  the operative word there. I mean, anybody can
• 15:55
  create a quick spike in revenue by slashing costs
• 15:58
  or, you know, launching a gimmicky app. For short
• 16:01
  term gains. But compounding permanent growth,
• 16:04
  the kind that survives economic downturns and
• 16:06
  tech disruptions that is driven by those five
• 16:10
  executive leadership shifts she champions. So
• 16:13
  as we wrap up today's deep dive, I really want
• 16:15
  you to take a moment and look at the landscape
• 16:17
  of your own workplace or examine the strategic
• 16:20
  direction of the companies you might invest in.
• 16:23
  Where are they actually focusing their energy,
• 16:25
  their budgets, and their daily stress? Yeah,
• 16:28
  are they pouring all their resources into acquiring
• 16:30
  technology that is pretty much guaranteed to
• 16:33
  be copied and obsolete in 18 months? Or are they
• 16:36
  actively, intentionally doing the really hard
• 16:38
  human work of building a permanent cultural moat?
• 16:41
  It is the difference between pouring a really
• 16:43
  deep concrete foundation and just, you know,
• 16:46
  slapping a fresh coat of paint on a crumbling
• 16:47
  wall. And I think it leaves us with a final thought
• 16:50
  to really mull over. OK, let's hear it. We've
• 16:52
  established that Culture compounds over time,
• 16:56
  growing stronger and deeper, like interest in
• 16:59
  a bank, while technology consistently depreciates
• 17:03
  and expires every 18 months. Right. Given that
• 17:06
  reality, is every single dollar a company spends
• 17:09
  on digital transformation without first building
• 17:12
  a strong cultural foundation, essentially just
• 17:15
  a short term rental? Oh, a short term rental.
• 17:17
  I love that. You spend millions of dollars and
• 17:19
  at the end of the lease, you don't even own the
• 17:21
  outcome. It brings us right back to that freezing
• 17:23
  smart home we talked about at the very beginning.
• 17:26
  You can go out and buy the most expensive digital
• 17:28
  locks, the most advanced automated thermostats,
• 17:30
  and the most intricate lighting systems on the
• 17:33
  market. But if the underlying system fails and
• 17:35
  locks you out 97 % of the time, you are just
• 17:38
  left standing in the dark. Because at the end
• 17:40
  of the day, all the cutting edge technology in
• 17:43
  the world just cannot artificially generate the
• 17:46
  actual warmth of a home. That warmth, that resilience,
• 17:49
  and that power that has to come from the people
• 17:51
  inside it.