Latest / Reformed Thinking / Reformation Theology

Transcript

Reformation Theology · Reformed Thinking

0:00
Imagine, for a second, living in a world where reading a book in
0:03
your own language could get you burned at the stake.
0:06
Yeah, that is a terrifying thought.
0:08
Right. I mean, think about a world
0:10
where your eternal destiny, your literal standing before the
0:14
creator of the universe, is dictated entirely by a man in a
0:18
distant city whom you have never met.
0:20
And you have zero way to verify what he's saying.
0:22
Precisely. You do not have a Bible on your
0:25
night stand. You do not have an app on your
0:27
phone. You have absolute terrifying
0:30
reliance on a massive institution to tell you what God
0:34
thinks of you. Which is so foreign to us today.
0:36
It really is. Well, welcome to a deep dive
0:39
into the source material on the podcast Reformed Thinking.
0:42
Today we are taking you into the 16th century.
0:45
We are drawing our entire conversation from excerpts of
0:47
Paul Enz's The Moody Handbook of Theology to examine the
0:51
historical and theological roots of the Reformation.
0:54
Because of that terrifying world you just described, that was the
0:58
reality for the common person for 1000 years.
1:01
A full Millennium. Yeah, 1000 years until a handful
1:04
of men opened the original text of scripture and realized that
1:08
almost everything they had been taught about their own souls was
1:11
just entirely wrong. Which is staggering, yeah.
1:14
But to truly grasp the sheer scale of the shift that
1:18
occurred, we have to look at the crushing weight of the system
1:22
that came before it. Oh, absolutely.
1:24
For an entire Millennium, the religious landscape of Europe
1:26
was this immovable monolith. The tradition of the Roman
1:30
Catholic Church, alongside the supreme authority of the papacy,
1:33
dictated every single aspect of belief.
1:36
Right. The individual person sitting in
1:38
the Pew had no direct access to the text.
1:40
None. The Church hierarchy acted as
1:43
the sole arbiter of truth. They instructed you on what to
1:46
believe, how to act, and precisely how to settle your
1:50
debts with God. It was a closed, airtight
1:52
system. It was, and for 1000 years it
1:55
went largely unchallenged by the common person.
1:57
Right. And then the dam breaks.
1:59
But you know, dams do not just break out of nowhere.
2:02
There is always pressure building up behind the concrete
2:04
before that very first crack appears.
2:06
Yeah, there's always a build up. Ends points out four distinct
2:10
catalysts that sparked this massive continent altering
2:13
shift, and the first one he identifies is political.
2:17
It centers around the year 14530.
2:19
Huge year. Yeah, in that year Islam
2:22
conquered Constantinople. That conquest caused the total
2:26
downfall of the Eastern Church. But I need to ask you to clarify
2:30
this for us, because it sounds a bit disconnected.
2:33
How does a military conquest in the East spark a Christian
2:37
reformation in Western Europe? That is a great question.
2:40
The link is incredibly practical actually.
2:43
When Constantinople fell to the Ottoman Empire, it sent shock
2:46
waves of panic through the Christian W, sure, but it also
2:49
sent a massive flood of refugees.
2:51
Oh, right, the scholars. Exactly.
2:53
Eastern scholars fled westward into Europe, and they brought
2:55
their ancient Greek manuscripts with them.
2:57
Just carrying them across the borders.
2:59
Yeah, and this influx of original literature helped fuel
3:02
the Renaissance, which we we'll discuss in a moment.
3:05
But on a purely political level, as the Islamic Empire moved
3:08
westward, it heavily distracted the Holy Roman Empire.
3:11
So the Pope's attention is divided.
3:13
Right. It threatened the papacy's
3:15
unquestioned dominance and at the exact same time you had a
3:19
rising tide of nationalism all across Europe.
3:21
Like individual countries wanting their own identity.
3:24
Yes, national States and free cities were forming the local
3:28
political leaders, you know, the Princess and magistrates, they
3:32
began to resent and challenge Rome's vast political grip over
3:36
their territories that. Makes a lot of sense.
3:38
That nationalistic spirit was crucial.
3:40
It created a practical, physical layer of protection.
3:44
When the reformers eventually spoke up, local Princess
3:47
protected them. I'm not always out of pure
3:49
theological conviction. Right.
3:50
Often just because it benefited their own national autonomy to
3:53
defy the Pope. That is fascinating.
3:56
So the political tension provided the shield,
3:58
essentially. But the second factor, the
4:00
educational catalyst that provided the weapon.
4:03
Oh, absolutely. The Renaissance.
4:04
Right, which translates to rebirth.
4:07
Essentially open men's minds to the rigorous study of classical
4:11
literature alongside the Bible. And Christian humanists were at
4:13
the absolute forefront of this movement.
4:16
Particularly a scholar named Erasmus.
4:19
He produced a Greek edition of the New Testament in 1516 and
4:23
ends points out that this was a seismic event.
4:26
It really was because it encouraged the study of the New
4:29
Testament in its original language.
4:30
Right. For centuries the Church had
4:32
relied on the Latin Vulgate, which was the official yet often
4:36
totally flawed translation. Very flawed.
4:39
Let me offer an analogy to explain what this educational
4:41
shift felt like for you. Listening.
4:44
It was like wiping centuries of accumulated mud off a stained
4:47
glass window. I like that.
4:48
Yeah, for generations, people only saw the dim, distorted
4:52
light that the church officials described to them.
4:54
But by returning to the original, Greek men like Erasmus
4:58
were cleaning the glass. They were stripping away all
5:00
those medieval translation errors.
5:02
And then you couple that clear glass.
5:05
With the advent of the printing press, suddenly the text could
5:08
be replicated and distributed on a scale never before seen.
5:11
The brilliant original colors of the text were visible to anyone
5:15
who could read. And those translation errors in
5:16
the Latin Vulgate you mentioned, they were not trivial.
5:19
Not at all. Give us an example.
5:21
Well, in some places the Vulgate translated the Greek word for
5:25
repent as due penance. Wow, that is a massive
5:30
difference. Right, that one translational
5:32
choice built an entire theological and economic system
5:36
of earning forgiveness. Which leads directly into the
5:38
third catalyst and highlights the social and economic factor.
5:43
Yeah, the end of the Middle Ages brought a surge of economic
5:46
development through city markets and colonies.
5:49
A new middle class emerged. And they had money, but they
5:52
were tired of giving it away. Exactly.
5:54
This newly wealthy demographic fiercely resisted the constant
5:58
financial drain of their resources.
6:00
They were tired of their local economies being bled dry by
6:03
ecclesiastical taxes. Taxes that just flowed straight
6:05
over the Alps and into the treasury of Rome.
6:08
Just to build lavish cathedrals. Yeah.
6:09
So that financial frustration as the perfect bridge into the 4th
6:13
and easily the most volatile catalyst, the religious factor.
6:16
This is where it really explodes.
6:17
Right. With the printing press humming
6:19
and the New Testament available in its original language,
6:22
scholars began reading the text and looking around at the Church
6:25
of Rome. And what they saw was shocking.
6:28
Yeah, they discovered a glaring, undeniable discrepancy between
6:31
the humble, persecuted church described in the book of Acts
6:35
and the wealthy, ruthless church they saw in their own cities.
6:38
Corruption was rampant everywhere, from the local
6:40
priesthood all the way up to the papacy.
6:42
NS specifically mentions the sin of simony.
6:45
Yes, the buying and selling of church offices.
6:47
Right. A wealthy family could literally
6:50
purchase a position as a Bishop for their teenage son just to
6:54
secure political leverage. It was completely transactional.
6:56
But the practice that caused the most visceral outrage was the
7:00
sale of indulgences. This was the breaking point.
7:03
The Church taught that a person could pay for sins beforehand or
7:08
pay to release their deceased relatives from purgatory through
7:11
a financial transaction. A literal monetization of God's
7:15
grace. It was the idea that forgiveness
7:16
could be bought with a coin, and that specific practice enraged a
7:21
German monk named Martin Luther. It became the spark that ignited
7:25
his eventual break with the Roman church.
7:27
And that brings us directly to Section 1, the men behind the
7:31
movement. You know you cannot comprehend
7:34
this theological earthquake without looking closely at the
7:37
individuals who actually swung the hammers.
7:39
Let us start with Martin Luther. OK Luther lived from 1483 to
7:43
1546. He is widely considered the
7:46
primary catalyst of the Protestant Reformation.
7:48
But he did not come from nobility.
7:50
Right. No, not at all.
7:51
He came from peasant parentage in Saxony.
7:54
His father actually wanted him to be a lawyer.
7:56
So how did he end up a monk? Well, his trajectory changed
8:00
entirely during a violent thunderstorm in 15-O5A lightning
8:04
bolt struck near him, and terrified for his life, he strut
8:07
A bargain. He cried out to Saint Anne that
8:10
he would become a monk if he survived.
8:12
And he kept his word. He did.
8:13
He abandoned his legal studies and entered an Augustinian
8:16
monastery. But his time in the monastery
8:18
was characterized by crushing, overwhelming anxiety over his
8:22
own sinfulness. He was just tortured by his
8:24
conscience. Absolutely.
8:25
He would confess for hours, whip himself, starve himself, yet he
8:29
never felt that God was satisfied with him.
8:31
So what was the turning point for him?
8:33
It came in a few stages. The first was a trip to Rome in
8:36
1510. He went expecting to find a holy
8:39
city. But he found the opposite.
8:41
Yeah, he witnessed the sheer corruption, cynicism and
8:45
worldliness of the clergy first hand.
8:47
He saw priests just rushing through the Mass just to collect
8:51
their fees. That had to be devastating.
8:53
It was He returned to Wittenberg thoroughly disillusioned, earned
8:57
his doctorate in theology and began teaching the Bible.
9:00
I want to ask you to break down what happened next.
9:03
NS notes that it was while teaching through the Book of
9:05
Romans that Luther experienced his real breakthrough.
9:09
Yes. Can you explain the specific
9:11
doctrine Luther found in Romans 1.17 that completely shattered
9:15
his medieval mindset? In Romans 1.17, the apostle Paul
9:19
writes that in the gospel the righteousness of God is revealed
9:22
and that the righteous shall live by faith.
9:24
OK, for years Luther hated the phrase the righteousness of God
9:27
because he understood it as an active, punishing standard, like
9:31
a bar of perfection that a Sinner must achieve through
9:33
works or purchase through indulgences.
9:36
And he knew he could never reach that bar.
9:38
Exactly. But as he studied the Greek
9:40
text, the Holy Spirit illuminated his mind to
9:43
understand that the righteousness of God in this
9:45
verse is not a standard God demands from us, but a gift God
9:50
grants to us. Oh wow, that changes everything.
9:52
It does. He realized that justification
9:55
is by faith alone. God credits Christ's perfect
9:59
righteousness to the Sinner purely through faith, not
10:02
through any human merit. That doctrine formed the
10:05
absolute bedrock of his theology.
10:06
Yes, he realized that if salvation is a free gift
10:09
received by faith, than the entire Roman Catholic system of
10:13
penance, merits and indulgences was not just unnecessary.
10:17
He was a barrier to the true Gospel wait, and that conviction
10:20
could not stay contained in a classroom.
10:23
It culminated on October 31st, 1517, when Luther famously
10:26
nailed his 95 Theses to the door of the Castle Church at
10:30
Wittenberg. A legendary moment.
10:32
Yeah, these statements systematically outlined his
10:34
fierce disagreements with Catholic practices, specifically
10:37
targeting the sale of indulgences.
10:39
From that moment forward, Luther championed the concept of sola
10:42
scriptura. Meaning the scriptures alone
10:44
hold the final binding authority for the believer.
10:47
Not the church hierarchy, not papal decrees, not historic
10:52
councils, just the text of the Bible.
10:54
And the legacy Luther left is staggering.
10:57
By insisting on sola scriptura, he stripped away centuries of
11:01
accumulated tradition. He kept only two sacraments,
11:04
right? The baptism in the Lord's
11:05
Supper, because they were the only ones he found clearly
11:08
mandated in the New Testament text he wrote prolifically
11:12
establishing catechisms to instruct the common people who
11:15
had been kept in the dark for so long.
11:17
He also recognized the immense value of congregational singing.
11:20
Yes. Before this, choirs of priests
11:23
sang in the Latin while the congregation just listened
11:26
silently. Luther provided the church with
11:28
magnificent hymns in their own language.
11:30
Like Mighty Fortress. Right, so the people could sing
11:33
their theology. He also established an
11:35
educational system so that common people could actually
11:37
read the German Bible he had translated for them while in
11:40
hiding. He firmly believed the text
11:42
belonged to the people, not just the professionals.
11:45
But Luther was not the only mind shaping this era.
11:48
While Luther was the hammer, we also have to look at John
11:51
Kelvin, who provided this systematic architecture of the
11:54
Reformation. Calvin is a fascinating figure.
11:57
He lived from 15 O 9 to 1564. And his background was entirely
12:01
different from Luther's. Completely different.
12:03
Calvin was not an agonizing monk.
12:05
He was a brilliant French humanist and a law student.
12:08
So how did he get involved in all this?
12:10
Well, in 1534, or after experiencing what he called a
12:13
sudden conversion, he openly identified with Protestantism.
12:17
But because the French monarchy was fiercely Catholic, things
12:21
became incredibly dangerous. He was forced to flee France.
12:24
Yes, due to intense persecution against Protestants, Calvin
12:28
possessed an incredibly systematic, rigorously logical,
12:32
legal mind. After fleeing, he eventually
12:34
settled in Basel, Switzerland. And that is where he wrote his
12:37
masterpiece, right? At the astonishingly young age
12:40
of 26, he completed the 1st edition of the Institutes of the
12:43
Christian Religion. What is so fascinating to me is
12:46
the original intent of this work.
12:49
Ends notes that it began as an apologetic defense of
12:51
Protestantism addressed directly to the King of France.
12:55
He was trying to explain that the Protestants being persecuted
12:58
in France were not dangerous political insurrectionists, but
13:01
faithful Orthodox Christians adhering to the Bible.
13:05
And it grew significantly over time.
13:07
Oh yes, over his lifetime, Calvin continually revised and
13:11
expanded it. It grew from a small pocket
13:14
sized book into a massive 80 chapter works spanning 4
13:18
volumes. It remains one of the most
13:20
significant, comprehensive works of systematic theology ever
13:23
produced. And Calvin did not stay in
13:25
Basel. He eventually settled in Geneva,
13:27
Switzerland, where he spent the vast majority of the rest of his
13:30
life pastoring. His work ethic was astonishing.
13:33
He preached and lectured almost daily, and he wrote rigorous,
13:36
highly detailed commentaries on nearly the entire Bible.
13:40
But, you know, as we look at Calvin objectively from our
13:43
shared Reform perspective, we have to address the most
13:45
controversial aspect of his time in Geneva.
13:48
The surveydis incident. Yes, which ends rightfully
13:52
includes in the source material. Michael Cervatus was executed in
13:56
Geneva for anti trinitarian heresy.
13:58
If you were listening to this today, it is incredibly jarring
14:01
to hear that a hero of the Reformation was involved in
14:04
executing someone over theology it completely.
14:06
Violates our modern understanding of religious
14:08
liberty. Right.
14:10
I want to ask you to provide the objective historical context
14:12
from the source material. How did the 16th century mind
14:17
view this event? It is so essential to look at
14:20
this through the lens of that era, rather than strictly
14:23
through our modern sensibilities.
14:25
Today we view heresy as a private matter of conscience,
14:28
but in the 16th century the legal and religious framework
14:31
was entirely different. How so?
14:33
Well, denying the Trinity was viewed across Europe by both
14:36
Roman Catholics and Protestants as a crime worse than physical
14:40
murder. Worse than murder?
14:41
Yes, their logic was that a murderer only killed the
14:44
temporary physical body, but a heretic spread a spiritual
14:47
contagion that destroyed eternal souls.
14:50
Heresy of that magnitude incurred capital punishment
14:52
universally under the ancient Justinian Code, which was the
14:55
basis of European law. OK, so that was the legal
14:57
atmosphere. Right.
14:58
And when Cervinus arrived in Geneva, he was actually already
15:02
condemned to burn by the Catholic Inquisition in France.
15:05
So he was a wanted man? Did Calvin just hand them over?
15:09
No, Calvin actually tried to intervene in various ways.
15:12
He visited Cervedus in prison to try and persuade him to recant
15:15
his views so his life could be spared.
15:17
And when that failed? When that failed, Calvin argued
15:20
for a more humane method of execution, specifically
15:24
beheading rather than burning at the stake.
15:27
But the City Council of Geneva rejected Calvin's plea and
15:30
surveyed. US was burned.
15:32
But Calvin concurred with the judgement.
15:33
He did because he shared the era's conviction that the civil
15:36
magistrate had a duty to protect the Church from fatal heresy.
15:40
It is a sobering historical reality of how tightly
15:43
intertwined the civil and religious realms were at that
15:46
time. It really is.
15:47
Now, theologically, Calvin's primary focus was the absolute
15:51
sovereignty of God. He built his entire theological
15:54
system on the premise that God is actively ruling and reigning
15:58
over every single detail of the universe, including human
16:01
salvation. That high view of sovereignty
16:03
directed the Reformed churches throughout Europe and eventually
16:07
Scotland. Furthermore, Ends notes that
16:09
Calvin is often called the first scientific interpreter of the
16:12
Bible. Because of his rigorous,
16:14
methodical and objective approach to analyzing the text.
16:18
But while Calvin was structuring the theology of the French
16:21
speaking Swiss, another man, Ulrich Zwingli, was ministering
16:25
to the German speaking Swiss. Born in 1484, Zwingli was
16:29
originally a Roman Catholic priest.
16:31
His conversion to Reformation views did not happen through a
16:34
dramatic crisis like Luther's thunderstorm, did it?
16:37
No, it happened very quietly. While he was rigorously studying
16:41
Erasmus's Greek New Testament, Zwingli became a pastor in
16:44
Zurich in 1519. And he was known for a
16:47
revolutionary approach to preaching expository sermons.
16:51
Yes, instead of following the prescribed church calendar and
16:53
preaching topically, he opened the Gospel of Matthew at chapter
16:56
1 and simply preached straight through the text, verse by
16:59
verse. Just letting the text dictate
17:01
the message. Exactly.
17:03
And as he preached through the New Testament, he fiercely
17:06
denounced Roman Catholic practices that he could not find
17:08
in the Bible. Following a public debate before
17:11
the Zurich City Council, where he argued from the scriptures,
17:14
his views were officially adopted by the city.
17:17
Which led to massive practical shifts in daily life.
17:20
Priests were allowed to marry, images and statues were banned
17:24
and removed from the churches. The traditional Catholic Mass
17:27
was entirely abolished. Church property was even
17:30
confiscated by the city and repurposed for educational and
17:33
social use. Sadly, Zwingli's life ended
17:36
violently. He was killed in 1531 while
17:39
serving as an armed chaplain in a battle against a neighboring
17:42
Roman Catholic province. To truly comprehend these men,
17:46
Luther, Calvin, and Zwingli, you have to understand how they view
17:50
their primary tool. They did not accomplish this
17:52
massive shift with an army. They did it with a book.
17:55
Exactly. We freeze this to Section 2.
17:58
Reformation. Bibliology For Martin Luther,
18:01
the Bible was the single infallible authority regarding
18:04
faith and salvation. He outright rejected the
18:06
authority of the Pope, the decrees of Church councils and
18:10
human traditions if they contradicted the written text.
18:13
Luther famously declared that the word of God shall establish
18:17
articles of faith and no one else, not even an Angel.
18:21
He believed the Scriptures held this supreme authority because
18:24
they were the direct witness of the Holy Spirit.
18:27
Luther's approach to reading the Bible was highly specific.
18:30
You mentioned earlier the analogy of panning for gold.
18:33
Yeah, let's talk about that. When a miner pans for gold, he
18:36
washes away all the dirt, gravel and silt, looking strictly for
18:40
the heavy, shining flakes of precious metal.
18:42
For Luther, the gold was Christ. He read the entire Canon through
18:47
that specific Christological lens.
18:49
He evaluated every single book of the Bible based on how
18:52
clearly it pointed to Jesus and the gospel of justification by
18:55
faith. And that's Pacific Lens led to
18:58
some well known quirks in his theology, didn't it?
19:00
It really did. Because he was panning strictly
19:02
for the Gospel of Grace, he became frustrated with books
19:05
that focused heavily on human behavior.
19:08
Anne's notes that Luther called the Book of James a straw
19:11
epistle. He felt James lacked pure gospel
19:14
instruction about Christ and focused too heavily on works
19:18
seemingly contradicting Paul's letters.
19:20
He also seriously questioned the authorship of Ecclesiastes, and
19:24
he even argued that the book of Esther should be removed from
19:26
the Old Testament entirely because it never explicitly
19:29
mentions the name of God. He was fiercely protective of
19:32
the doctrine of grace, sometimes to the point of judging the
19:35
Canon itself. Despite those highly subjective
19:38
evaluations of certain books, Luther laid down incredibly
19:42
stringent rules for interpreting the text.
19:45
Right. He insisted that the
19:46
illumination of the Holy Spirit was essential.
19:48
You could not just read the words mechanically.
19:50
You needed the spirit to open your eyes.
19:52
He stressed that understanding the historical circumstances of
19:55
the text was vital. He drew a sharp defining
19:59
distinction between the Old Testament as law, which condemns
20:02
us, and the New Testament as gospel, which saves us.
20:06
Above all, he insisted on a literal interpretation of the
20:09
text. He fiercely rejected the
20:11
allegorical method that have been wildly popular in the
20:13
Middle Ages. For centuries, monks had
20:16
spiritualized the text, claiming every verse had a hidden
20:19
mystical meaning. The source material quotes
20:22
Luther dismissing allegorical interpretation as mere monkey
20:26
tricks. He wanted the plain grammatical
20:29
historical meaning of the text. Zwingli also had a very
20:31
distinct, robust approach to the Bible.
20:34
He acknowledged its complete infallibility, calling it the
20:37
certainty of its force. By that he meant he had total,
20:41
unshakable confidence that the Word of God would accomplish
20:43
precisely what it claimed it would do.
20:46
Zwingli also championed the clarity of the Word.
20:49
He taught that the Bible is perfect in itself and revealed
20:52
specifically for the welfare of humanity.
20:54
This is a massive shift. It meant the common person, the
20:57
Baker, Oregon, the blacksmith, could open the text and
21:00
understand his core message without needing an
21:02
ecclesiastical middleman. No Pope, no priest, no counsel
21:06
required. That concept of clarity is
21:07
crucial, but Zwingli added a necessary caveat.
21:10
What was that? Well, he knew that human reason
21:12
is corrupted by sin. Therefore, the ability of the
21:16
common person to understand the text was not based on raw human
21:20
intellect alone. It required the active ministry
21:23
of the Holy Spirit. Swingley taught that the
21:26
Scriptures yield their true meaning only when approached
21:29
with humility, fervent prayer, and a deliberate absence of
21:32
prejudice. Under those specific conditions,
21:35
the Holy Spirit provides the necessary enlightenment for the
21:38
reader. John Calvin shared this high
21:40
view of scripture affirming the Bible, not the church, as the
21:44
final binding authority on all people at all times.
21:47
Calvin is often described as the king of commentators and the
21:51
creator of genuine exegesis. He wrote sound, rigorous
21:54
commentaries on nearly every book of the Bible.
21:56
His primary rule for interpretation was a phrase that
21:59
is still central to reformed theology today.
22:01
Scripture interprets Scripture. A phenomenal rule.
22:03
Let us unpack what that actually meant for Calvin in practice.
22:06
How did a layperson apply that rule?
22:08
It meant a strict adherence to literal interpretation.
22:12
It meant listening to the original author and letting the
22:15
text speak for itself without forcing an outside philosophical
22:19
agenda onto it. It required a strenuous study of
22:21
grammar. You did look at the historical
22:23
meaning of the words. Examine the surrounding
22:25
paragraph or context. And most importantly, compare
22:28
difficult, obscure passages with clearer passages on the exact
22:32
same subject. Calvin was so resolute on this
22:35
method that he explicitly labeled allegorical
22:38
interpretation as satanic. Strong word.
22:41
Very strong. He argued that by spiritualizing
22:45
the text, allegorical teachers intentionally LED people away
22:48
from the objective, grounded truth of God's Word.
22:51
Now, from their view of the Bible, the deep dive moves
22:53
logically into Section 3, the nature of Christ in the human
22:56
condition. Right, because once you decide
22:58
the Bible is your final authority, you have to look at
23:00
what it actually says about the Savior and the sinners He came
23:03
to rescue. Let us look at Reformation
23:05
Christology first. Calvin and Zwingli maintains the
23:08
strictly orthodox historical view of Christ established at
23:11
the ancient councils. They taught that Christ is one
23:14
person possessing 2 distinct natures, a human nature and a
23:18
divine nature. With absolutely no intermingling
23:21
of those two natures, His humanity remains fully, truly
23:24
human, subject to space and time, and His deity remains
23:29
fully divine, infinite and eternal.
23:32
Luther, however, departed from this strict separation of
23:35
natures, and the reason he did so is fascinating.
23:38
I need to pause you right there, because this is where theology
23:40
gets intensely practical. It really does.
23:42
Luther adjusted his Christology specifically to support his view
23:46
of the Lord's Supper. Luther read the words of Jesus,
23:49
This is my body. And he felt completely trapped
23:52
by the literal text. He wanted to maintain that
23:55
Christ's physical body was truly bodily present in the bread and
23:58
the wine on the altar. But logically, how can a
24:01
physical human body be present in thousands of different
24:04
churches simultaneously across the globe?
24:06
Right, it doesn't make natural sense.
24:08
To solve this, Luther taught that Christ's human nature
24:11
actually takes on certain attributes of his divine nature,
24:14
specifically omnipresence, omniscience, and omnipotence.
24:17
That is the core of the issue. The theological flaw in Luther's
24:21
view, as Ends points out, is that it fails to maintain the
24:25
proper distinction between the two natures.
24:27
This is where we have to look at the philosophical mechanism.
24:30
Yeah. If a human body becomes
24:32
omnipresent, if it can be everywhere at once, it ceases to
24:36
be a true human body. It breaks the definition of what
24:39
humanity is. It becomes something else
24:40
entirely. Calvin and Zwingli recognize
24:43
this logical and theological contradiction.
24:46
They rejected Luther's view, insisting that Christ's human
24:50
body is currently located in heaven, sitting at the right
24:53
hand of the Father, and therefore cannot be physically
24:55
enclosed and earthly bred on an altar.
24:58
This difference in Christology seems incredibly nuanced, almost
25:01
like academic hair splitting. But it had massive, disastrous
25:04
practical implications for their fellowship.
25:06
Which we will see when we discuss the ordinances later.
25:09
Let us pivot from how they viewed the perfect Christ to how
25:13
they viewed broken humanity. This is Reformation
25:15
anthropology. Among the core reformers,
25:18
Luther, Calvin and Zwingli, there was absolute lockstep
25:22
consensus on the Doctor of Total Depravity.
25:25
They taught that humanity has an utter inability to affect its
25:28
own salvation. Human beings are entirely
25:32
reliant on the sovereign grace of God to be redeemed.
25:35
Theodore Beza, who was a brilliant theologian and
25:38
Calvin's successor in Geneva, formalized this concept through
25:42
the doctrine of Adam as the federal head of humanity.
25:45
Explain that concept of federal headship for US.
25:48
Federal headship means that Adam acted as the representative for
25:51
the entire human race in the Garden of Eden.
25:53
When he sinned, the entire race fell with him.
25:56
We were in him, legally speaking.
25:58
Yes, his sin polluted the entire stream of humanity.
26:02
Therefore, every single child born into the world inherits a
26:05
totally deproved condition. Because of this total depravity,
26:09
Calvin completely disavowed the idea of a free will in the
26:12
unregenerate person. He taught that the will was
26:15
forfeited through the fall and is now bound.
26:17
It is chained, unable to move in any direction except toward
26:20
evil. However, and this is a critical
26:22
distinction that often confuses people, Calvin maintained that
26:25
man is still fully responsible for his sin.
26:28
Yes, that is a common question. How can a person be held
26:31
responsible if their will is bound?
26:33
Because, as Calvin explained, the Sinner sins willingly.
26:37
They act out of their own corrupted desires and not by any
26:40
outward compulsion from God. God does not force anyone to
26:43
sin. Even though human reason is
26:45
terribly impaired, people still possess the capacity to discern
26:49
between good and evil, and they consistently, voluntarily, and
26:52
eagerly choose the bad. They are bound by their own
26:55
nature. This dark view of humanity was
26:58
not universally accepted, and the source material introduces
27:01
several dissenting historical views that provide helpful
27:05
contrast to the Reformed position. 1st is the Socinian
27:08
view, named after Faustus Socenus.
27:11
This view was deeply rooted in ancient Pelagianism.
27:14
So Sinus completely denied human depravity.
27:16
He argued that man was not created in a state of moral
27:19
perfection to begin with, but only with the capacity for
27:22
dominion over the Earth. According to So Sinus Adam, sin
27:25
was entirely his own private failure and did not adversely
27:29
affect his descendants in any legal or moral way.
27:32
He taught that human nature is transmitted intact, clean,
27:35
without any inherited corruption.
27:37
In this view, people sin today simply because they look around
27:40
and all of bad examples, not because they possess an
27:44
indwelling hereditary sin nature.
27:46
He actually believed people possess the innate ability to
27:49
avoid sinning entirely if they try hard enough.
27:52
Which is a massive departure from the Reformers.
27:54
The other major pushback came from the Armenian view, named
27:58
after Jacobus Arminius. The history here is fascinating.
28:02
Arminius actually started as a strict Calvinist.
28:04
He even studied under Theodore Biza in Geneva.
28:07
So what changed his mind? Well, during a theological
28:10
debate where he was supposed to defend the reformed view, he
28:13
felt his opponent had the stronger arguments and he
28:16
completely altered his position. Arminius advocated for universal
28:20
grace and the freedom of the human will.
28:22
His position is categorized as Semi Pelagian.
28:25
He denied the strict doctrine of original sin, specifically
28:29
disputing the idea that the guilt of Adam's sin was imputed
28:32
or legally credited to his descendants.
28:35
Armini has suggested that only the pollution of Adam's sin was
28:38
passed down. He categorized this pollution
28:40
merely as a weakness, not a condition that brings a person
28:43
under the sentence of legal condemnation.
28:45
That distinction between inheriting guilt versus
28:49
inheriting a weakness is crucial to the entire Armenian system.
28:53
Arminius taught that this inherited weakness renders a
28:56
person incapable of attaining eternal life by their own
29:00
unaided effort. But he argued the fall did not
29:04
render humanity completely incapable of making an initial
29:08
positive move toward God. But wait, let me push back on
29:11
this logic. If humanity is weakened by the
29:13
fall, how do they have the strength to make that first
29:16
move? Arminius argue that God
29:18
dispenses what is called prevenient grace to all people
29:21
everywhere. Prevenient meaning coming
29:23
before. Exactly.
29:25
This universal grace acts like a spiritual adrenaline shot.
29:28
It offsets the effects of the inherited depravity, effectively
29:31
leveling the playing field. It makes every single person
29:34
capable of cooperating with God in their own salvation by
29:37
choosing to believe. If you understand how a
29:39
theologian views the human condition, you can almost always
29:42
predict how they will view salvation.
29:44
Oh, totally. If man is basically good, he
29:46
just needs a teacher. If man is weakened, he needs
29:49
medicine. But if man is totally dead in
29:51
sin, he needs a resurrection. Which leads us seamlessly into
29:54
Section 4, rescued by grace, Eteriology and the Atonement.
29:59
Since Luther, Calvin, and Zwingli believe that humanity
30:02
was totally depraved and completely unable to make a
30:04
positive move toward God, they logically concluded that
30:07
salvation must be initiated, secured, and applied entirely by
30:11
God. This is the doctrine of
30:12
predestination. Calvin taught that salvation is
30:16
rooted firmly in the eternal decree of God.
30:19
Because God is completely sovereign, all events have been
30:22
ordained by Him before His time began.
30:24
This LED Calvin to teach the doctrine of double
30:26
predestination. Double predestination is an
30:29
incredibly heavy concept. I need to ask you to clarify
30:32
this because it often sounds to modern years like God is a
30:35
cosmic tyrant. It can sound that way, yes.
30:38
Ends quotes Calvin, defining it as the eternal decree of God by
30:42
which he determines the destiny of every individual God for
30:45
ordained, some to eternal life, which is election and
30:48
forwardings, others to eternal damnation, which is reprobation.
30:52
How does Calvin possibly defend that without making God the
30:55
author of evil? Calvin stressed that while
30:58
election to salvation is an act of pure, unmerited grace, you
31:02
know God rescuing those who deserve wrath, reprobation is an
31:06
act of pure, unadulterated justice.
31:08
So God is simply leaving the reprobate to the consequences of
31:11
their own actual sin and guilt. Right.
31:14
He's not forcing them to sin, He is passing over them and
31:17
administering perfect justice. Luther also firmly taught the
31:21
absolute necessity of predestination, but he primarily
31:25
based his argument on man's total inability to choose God.
31:29
If man cannot choose God, God must choose man.
31:32
Zwingli, approaching it from a slightly different philosophical
31:35
angle, base his belief in predestination heavily on the
31:38
overarching Providence of God over all creation.
31:41
God is sovereign, therefore God must decide.
31:44
The mechanism of that salvation, the actual way God saves the
31:47
elect, relies entirely on the cross.
31:49
We need to examine the various theories of the atonement
31:52
presented in the text. Before the Reformation, the
31:54
Roman Catholic Church generally followed the teaching of Thomas
31:56
Aquinas, while the Reformers modified the view held by
31:59
Anselm. Anselm, centuries earlier, had
32:02
taught that God was robbed of his honor by human sin, and
32:05
Christ died to satisfy that offended honor.
32:08
It was a view rooted in medieval feudalism.
32:11
The reformers sharpened this significantly.
32:14
They moved it from a feudal system to a legal courtroom.
32:16
They taught that Christ died to satisfy the strict legal justice
32:20
of God, not simply his honor. Christ acted as a true literal
32:25
substitute. He bore the actual specific
32:28
punishment due for sin, absorbing the wrath of God and
32:32
thereby satisfying God's legal justice.
32:34
By faith, the believer is united to Christ, and Christ's perfect
32:38
righteousness is legally imputed or credited to the believer's
32:42
account. Following his high view of God's
32:44
sovereignty, Calvin taught that this was a particular atonement,
32:47
meaning Christ died intentionally and specifically
32:49
to secure the salvation of the elect, rather than just making
32:52
salvation a theoretical possibility for everyone.
32:55
Just as we saw pushback on the nature of humanity, we see
32:58
massive pushback on the nature of the Atonement.
33:01
It can be overwhelming to track all these views, so let's walk
33:03
through them carefully. 1st The Sicinian view completely
33:06
repudiated the idea that God's justice required a blood
33:10
sacrifice. Remember, Sicinus didn't believe
33:12
in total depravity. Right.
33:14
So he taught that God could simply pardon sinners at will,
33:17
based entirely on his mercy, without any need for Christ's
33:21
death to pay a debt. If a human judge can just let a
33:24
criminal go out of kindness, why can't God?
33:27
In the Sicinian view, God only requires repentance and a desire
33:30
to obey the law. Therefore, Christ's death was
33:33
nothing more than a supreme example of human obedience
33:36
designed to inspire us to be better people.
33:39
Then you have the Groschen view developed by Hugo Groschius,
33:42
which is known as the governmental theory.
33:44
Groschius argued that God did not need to demand full, exact
33:48
payment for the violation of sin.
33:50
Instead of viewing God as a strict judge in a courtroom, he
33:53
viewed God as a moral governor ruling a universe.
33:56
In this theory, Christ's death was a token payment.
33:59
By accepting this token payment, God essentially set aside the
34:02
strict requirements of His own law.
34:05
He punished Crass just enough to show the universe his extreme
34:08
displeasure with sin, maintaining moral order while
34:10
still pardoning the Sinner. However, Ends points out the
34:13
massive biblical flaw here. The New Testament explicitly
34:17
teaches that Christ's death did in fact, completely satisfy the
34:21
requirements of the law. Christ redeemed us from the
34:24
curse of the law by becoming a curse for us.
34:27
Grossius theory fails to uphold the strict legal satisfaction
34:30
demanded by biblical justice. It implies God just bent his own
34:35
rules. That brings us to the Armenian
34:37
view of the atonement formulated by men like Curse, Elias, and
34:40
Limborg. They viewed Christ's death as
34:43
analogous to Old Testament animal sacrifices.
34:46
Their argument hinges on the idea that an animal's death is
34:49
not a strict equivalent payment for human sin.
34:52
The value of a sheep does not equal the value of a human.
34:55
Therefore, they argued that Christ did not endure the exact
34:58
equivalent punishment due to sinners.
35:00
Instead, God agreed to accept Christ's death as a substitute
35:03
for a penalty. Let me see if I am grasping this
35:06
distinction. They're saying God essentially
35:08
waived the strict claims of justice and accepted something
35:11
of inferior worth to satisfy the requirement, much like a bank
35:14
accepting A lesser settlement on a massive debt.
35:16
As Ends notes, this view has striking similarities to gross
35:20
use as governmental theory because both deny that Christ
35:23
made a full exact payment for this specific debt of sin.
35:26
This theological sequence, moving from human depravity to
35:30
predestination to the nature of the atonement, it all culminates
35:33
in how the individual actually receives the salvation.
35:36
This is the great debate over faith and works.
35:39
Luther's defining conviction, drawn from his agonizing study
35:42
of Romans 1.1 SIA, is justification by faith alone
35:46
solified. He completely rejected the Roman
35:49
Catholic synergistic view. The Catholic view combined God's
35:52
grace with human merit, demanding penance and the
35:55
purchase of indulgences. Luther taught that God's grace
35:58
alone forgive sin and imputes Christ's righteousness.
36:02
Human works have absolutely no part in securing or maintaining
36:05
salvation. He drew a sharp, immovable line
36:07
between the works of the law, which an unbeliever attempts in
36:10
a fetal effort to earn salvation, and the works of
36:12
faith, which naturally flow from a person who is already
36:15
justified. For Luther, genuinely good works
36:18
aligned with the 10 commandments and act as the fruit, never the
36:20
root of salvation. Calvin agreed entirely with
36:23
Luther on justification by faith.
36:26
He also viewed it as a forensic legal act where God, acting as
36:31
judge, declares the believing Sinner righteous.
36:35
However, Calvin rooted this justification firmly in
36:38
unconditional election. He argued that if election
36:41
depended on God looking down the corridors of time and for seeing
36:44
a person's faith or good works, grace would cease to be grace.
36:49
It would be a reward for human intelligence or morality.
36:52
Calvin also provided a brilliant nuance to reconcile Paul's
36:56
writings with the Book of James, which had so frustrated Luther.
36:59
Oh, the double justification concept.
37:01
Yes. Calvin taught a concept of
37:03
double justification. The primary justification is
37:06
acceptance before God in the courtroom of heaven through the
37:09
imputation of Christ's righteousness by faith alone.
37:11
And the secondary justification. The secondary justification is
37:14
the manifestation of that righteousness before other
37:17
people in the community through our daily actions.
37:19
James is talking about the second.
37:21
Paul is talking about the first. That brilliant synthesis leads
37:25
to one of Calvin's most significant contributions to
37:27
theology, explicitly tying justification to sanctification.
37:31
While maintaining fiercely that they are distinct acts,
37:35
justification is an instantaneous legal declaration,
37:38
while sanctification is a lifelong process of becoming
37:41
holy, he insisted. They are utterly inseparable.
37:44
Christ never justifies someone without also beginning the work
37:49
of sanctifying them. The free gift of justification
37:52
becomes the supreme joyful motivation for the believers.
37:56
Progressive sanctification out of deep gratitude.
37:59
In stark contrast, the Armenian view teaches conditional
38:02
election. They believe God elects those
38:04
whom He foresees will choose to believe.
38:06
Because they believe God provides universal prevenient
38:09
grace, the human will remains entirely free to accept or
38:13
reject the gospel. Consequently, an Armenian
38:15
believes a person can actively resist the Holy Spirit, fall
38:18
back into the world, and completely lose their salvation.
38:21
In the Armenian system, personal perseverance and ongoing
38:24
obedience are absolutely essential to maintain eternal
38:27
life. All of this intense theological
38:29
recovery, changing how we read the Bible, how we view the human
38:32
condition and how we are saved, It inevitably spills out into
38:35
the streets. It changes how believers gather.
38:38
This brings us to Section 5, Ecclesiology and the Ordinances.
38:43
When you change the foundation of salvation, you have to
38:46
completely change the structure of the Church.
38:49
Luther rejected the infallibility of the Roman
38:51
Church and the concept of a unique mediating priesthood.
38:56
He championed the priesthood of all believers, meaning every
38:59
Christian has direct access to God.
39:01
He defined the true Church as the assemblage of all Christian
39:04
believers on earth, united to Christ by faith.
39:07
He distinguished between the visible Church, which we can
39:11
observe through the preaching of the Word and the administration
39:13
sacraments in a physical building, and the invisible
39:15
Church, which consists of the mystical fellowship of all true
39:19
believers known only to God. The Reformed tradition shared
39:22
this massive departure from Rome, but they applied a much
39:25
stricter rule regarding what practices to keep in their
39:28
worship services. Right.
39:30
Lutheranism generally adopted a normative principle.
39:33
They retained any tradition from the Catholic Church that was not
39:35
expressly forbidden by Scripture.
39:37
If the Bible didn't condemn it, they felt free to keep it.
39:40
The Reformed Churches, however, adopted what we call the
39:43
regulative principle. They retained only what they
39:45
believed had explicit positive warrant in the Scriptures.
39:49
If the Bible didn't command it, they threw it out.
39:51
Furthermore, while Luther emphasized strongly that
39:54
salvation occurs within the context of the visible church
39:56
and its ordinances, Reformed theology taught that God's
40:00
sovereign spirit is not bound by the physical walls of the
40:03
visible church. Salvation is entirely possible
40:06
outside its formal bounds. The Reformed view also stressed
40:10
that the invisible universal church remains incomplete until
40:14
the final return of Christ. Then you have the Anabaptist
40:17
movement, which took ecclesiology in a radically
40:20
different direction. Their view of the Church clashed
40:23
sharply with both Rome and the other reformers.
40:25
They insisted that the visible church must be a pure church
40:29
composed solely of born again baptized believers.
40:32
Because infants cannot exercise conscious faith, they argued,
40:35
infants are absolutely not part of the Church.
40:38
They enforced A rigid separation of church and state, completely
40:41
withdrawing from civic entanglement.
40:43
This LED directly to their doctrine of pacifism or non
40:46
resistance. They refused to bear arms in
40:49
war, and many refused to serve in police forces or hold
40:52
judicial offices because those roles required the use of force.
40:55
They live simple lives, focused intensely on obeying the Sermon
40:59
on the Mount, and practice strict church discipline.
41:03
But we have to address the tragedy here it.
41:05
Is very dark. Because their views on church
41:07
and state threaten the social and political order of the 16th
41:10
century, Catholics, Lutherans, and Calvinists all heavily
41:15
persecuted the Anabaptists. They were drowned, burned and
41:18
executed. It is a sobering reminder that
41:21
the Reformers, while recovering glorious biblical truths, were
41:24
still flawed men operating within a brutal historical
41:27
context. The friction over who belongs in
41:30
the church naturally centers on the ordinance of baptism.
41:34
Luther's view of baptism remained remarkably close to the
41:36
Roman Catholic view. He retained much of the
41:39
traditional ceremony and taught that baptism actually produces
41:42
regeneration. He viewed the water as a
41:44
necessary vehicle that communicates God's grace,
41:47
operating on God's objective promise rather than the subject
41:50
of faith of the recipient. This is precisely why Luther
41:53
vehemently defended infant baptism.
41:56
He believed God, through prevalent grace, actively works
42:00
faith within the unconscious infant during the physical act
42:03
of the sacrament. The Reformed view adjusted this
42:06
significantly. They taught that the sacraments
42:08
act as signs and seals of the Covenant of Grace.
42:11
For an adult convert, baptism is administered as a visible sign
42:15
of their conscious faith. However, they continued the
42:18
practice of infant baptism, but they did not do it because they
42:21
believe the water regenerates the child.
42:24
Instead, they viewed it as a covenantal sign.
42:27
It functions much like circumcision did in the Old
42:29
Testament. Right.
42:30
It indicates the child's inclusion in the visible
42:32
covenant community, and it acts as a symbol of assurance to the
42:36
parents that God's promises extend to their household.
42:39
The Anabaptists, true to their name, which literally means to
42:42
baptize again, rejected infant baptism entirely.
42:45
They demanded that anyone who had been baptized as an infant
42:48
in the Catholic or Reformed Church must be re baptized upon
42:52
making a credible adult profession of faith.
42:54
The mode of baptism, whether by immersion or pouring, was
42:58
actually less of an issue for them than the absolute
43:01
prerequisite of conscious saving faith.
43:04
Finally, we must examine the Lord's Supper, which became the
43:06
most fractured, heartbreaking theological issue among the
43:09
reformers. Luther fiercely rejected the
43:12
Roman Catholic doctrine of transubstantiation, which claims
43:15
the bread and wine literally magically change into the
43:19
physical body and blood of Christ.
43:21
However, Luther's still insisted on the real physical presence of
43:26
Christ. His view, known as
43:27
consubstantiation, argued that while the elements themselves do
43:31
not change their substance, Christ's physical body is
43:34
miraculously present in, with, and under the bread and wine.
43:38
Because the grace is attached directly to the physical
43:40
elements themselves, Luther taught that even an unbeliever
43:44
who partakes receives the physical body of Christ.
43:46
Though they receive it to their own judgement.
43:49
Calvin found a middle ground that rejected both Rome and
43:52
Luther. He denied any literal physical
43:54
presence of Christ in the elements, keeping Christ's human
43:57
body in heaven. However, he also rejected the
43:59
idea that the supper is a bare, empty symbol.
44:03
Calvin taught a real spiritual presence.
44:05
Christ is spiritually present at the table, actively mediating
44:09
grace to the participant, but that grace is received strictly
44:12
through the avenue of faith, not through the physical digestion
44:16
of bread. Therefore, an unbeliever
44:18
partaking of the elements receives absolutely nothing but
44:20
common bread and wine because they lack the spiritual faith
44:24
required to feed on Christ. Swingley and subsequently the
44:27
Anabaptists adopted the memorial view.
44:29
Zwingli argued that when Christ said this is my body, he was
44:33
using clear symbolic language, just as when he said I am the
44:36
door or I am the vine. The bread and the cup simply
44:39
memorialize and symbolize Christ's physical death on the
44:42
cross. No unique mystical grace is
44:45
mediated through the elements. For the Anabaptist, the Lord's
44:48
Supper was highly valued, but primarily for its horizontal
44:51
function. It confirmed their inner unity,
44:54
strengthened their brotherly fellowship, and provided
44:57
tangible assurance that they belong to the true gathered body
45:00
of persecuted believers. This specific disagreement over
45:03
the physical presence in the Supper famously caused a
45:06
permanent rupture in fellowship between Luther and Zwingli at
45:09
the Marburg Colloquy. Preventing A unified Protestant
45:13
political front against the Catholic armies.
45:15
It was a massive lost opportunity.
45:17
That covers an immense amount of historical and theological
45:20
ground. To summarize the massive shifts
45:23
achieved by the reformers. They successfully move the locus
45:26
of ultimate authority away from a centralized, unquestionable
45:30
human institution and placed it directly onto the text of
45:33
Scripture. By recovering the original Greek
45:36
and Hebrew languages and insisting on the clarity of the
45:39
word, they fundamentally altered how Europe defined human sin.
45:43
How they understood the legal transaction of salvation and how
45:46
they structured the gathered church.
45:48
It was a recovery of biblical truth that cost many of them
45:51
their livelihoods, their reputations, and in many cases,
45:55
their lives. As we conclude, I want to leave
45:57
you with a concept to chew on that builds directly on what we
46:00
have discussed today. The reformers fought, bled and
46:03
died for the principle of the clarity of the word.
46:06
They sacrificed everything for the idea that the common person
46:09
could open a Bible and with the help of the Holy Spirit,
46:12
understand it without a professional priest interpreting
46:15
it for them. Today we sit in a reality where
46:18
we have more access to original language, tools, commentaries,
46:21
and theological texts than Calvin or Luther could have ever
46:24
dreamed of having on their desks.
46:26
Yet we increasingly outsource our theological thinking.
46:29
We rely entirely on digital content, video essays, or
46:32
popular authors to tell us what the biblical text means.
46:36
The provocative question we must ask ourselves is this Are we
46:39
inadvertently building a new digital priesthood and
46:44
abandoning the very intellectual and spiritual responsibility
46:47
that the Reformers handed to us? Thank you for joining us for
46:50
this deep dive into the source material.
46:52
We hope this rigorous examination of our theological
46:55
heritage challenges you to open the text for yourself and test
46:58
everything you hear against the scriptures.
47:00
This concludes reformed thinking.