Latest / DEEP INSIGHT / Michigan secretary of state Our job is guarding citizens against election overreach
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: And as primary season kicks off, state election officials around
- 0:03Speaker 1: the country are navigating an unusual political landscape ahead of
- 0:06Speaker 1: November's mid terms, with a chance that an election bill
- 0:09Speaker 1: making its way through Congress could overhaul the country's voting laws,
- 0:13Speaker 1: and a president who's calling for more federal control over
- 0:16Speaker 1: voting and continues to make false claims about the election
- 0:20Speaker 1: he lost in twenty twenty. Joining me now is Michigan
- 0:24Speaker 1: Secretary of State Joscelyn Benson. She is also a Democratic
- 0:27Speaker 1: candidate for governor. Secretary Benson, I do want to start
- 0:30Speaker 1: with the overall landscape heading into the midterm elections. How's
- 0:33Speaker 1: Michigan preparing for the primaries in August and the general
- 0:36Speaker 1: election in November.
- 0:40Speaker 2: Well, this is We've been through this rodeo before in
- 0:42Speaker 2: twenty twenty, twenty two, twenty four, So we've got a
- 0:45Speaker 2: well oiled machine here in Michigan. Our elections are safe
- 0:48Speaker 2: and secure. We've had back to back to back the
- 0:50Speaker 2: highest turnout elections in our state's history over the last
- 0:54Speaker 2: several cycles. We have fifteen hundred local clerks who show
- 0:57Speaker 2: up to work every day. They are professional, they are bipartisan,
- 1:01Speaker 2: and they are ready to ensure our elections are smooth,
- 1:04Speaker 2: and that's why it's so important that elections are run
- 1:08Speaker 2: by the states and at the local level, because we
- 1:10Speaker 2: know best what our voters need to ensure their voices
- 1:12Speaker 2: are heard, no matter who they may vote for. And
- 1:14Speaker 2: I'm really proud in Michigan we've got a record of
- 1:18Speaker 2: high turnout, secure elections with the results are an accurate
- 1:21Speaker 2: reflection of the will of the people.
- 1:23Speaker 1: Well, NBC has reported that the FBI has actually invited
- 1:26Speaker 1: state election officials to discuss those preparations ahead of the midterms.
- 1:31Speaker 1: Sources called the invitation a bit unusual and unexpected. So
- 1:35Speaker 1: have you received that invitation or have other officials in
- 1:37Speaker 1: the state, and if so, what can you tell us
- 1:39Speaker 1: about it and whether you will take them up on it.
- 1:43Speaker 2: We have, I mean, to a certain extent. Working with
- 1:45Speaker 2: federal enforcement officials is somewhat routine when ensuring our elections
- 1:51Speaker 2: are secure, making sure we have support from federal officials
- 1:55Speaker 2: if we need additional monitoring, cybersecurity protections and the like.
- 2:00Speaker 2: That's all been routine and really helpful for the last
- 2:04Speaker 2: several cycles. What feels different about this invitation is that
- 2:08Speaker 2: it feels more like we're being investigated, or that there's
- 2:11Speaker 2: this presumption of impropriety that isn't based on any facts.
- 2:15Speaker 2: It's just based on sort of falsehoods and suspicions. And
- 2:18Speaker 2: so I think why people are a little bit on
- 2:21Speaker 2: edge and suspicious of this invitation is that it's not
- 2:23Speaker 2: been extended as a helping hand, but more as a
- 2:28Speaker 2: sort of almost investigatory approach. Of course, what happened in
- 2:31Speaker 2: Fulton County, Georgia recently just underscores that sentiment. So for us,
- 2:37Speaker 2: we welcome support from the federal government, but we also
- 2:39Speaker 2: know how to do our jobs, and we expect respect
- 2:42Speaker 2: and to a certain extent difference so that the professionals
- 2:47Speaker 2: at the local level are able to do the jobs
- 2:48Speaker 2: they signed up to do well.
- 2:50Speaker 1: You've said that state election officials are really the only
- 2:52Speaker 1: guardrails left when it comes to election security. So tell
- 2:56Speaker 1: me more about that and how you think about this
- 2:58Speaker 1: idea of putting election guardrails around someone and an administration
- 3:03Speaker 1: to those really demonstrated a willingness to test them.
- 3:08Speaker 2: Yeah, it's very clear, and it has been really since
- 3:10Speaker 2: we endured and prevailed in the twenty twenty elections in
- 3:13Speaker 2: ensuring our democracy held that this administration is willing to
- 3:17Speaker 2: use every tool at their disposal to try to create
- 3:20Speaker 2: chaos and confusion about the sanctity and the security of
- 3:23Speaker 2: the elections process. But just as this president doesn't get
- 3:27Speaker 2: to decide who wins elections, he also doesn't get to
- 3:29Speaker 2: decide who runs them. The law dictates that, and the
- 3:32Speaker 2: law has in a very effective way enabled us to
- 3:36Speaker 2: protect the sanctity of our elections at the local level
- 3:39Speaker 2: when it's enforced. And so that's why those state officials
- 3:42Speaker 2: are so critical, because we follow the law, we follow
- 3:44Speaker 2: the Constitution, we follow the rules, and we make sure
- 3:47Speaker 2: that no matter who someone votes for, they can cast
- 3:50Speaker 2: their ballot freely and fairly and have confidence that the
- 3:52Speaker 2: results are an accurate reflection of their will. That's our duty,
- 3:56Speaker 2: that's our oath of office that we take, and our job,
- 3:59Speaker 2: unfortunately in this moment, often means guarding that reality that
- 4:03Speaker 2: those protections, guarding our citizens and the safety of our
- 4:06Speaker 2: elections against a real overreach and even abusive authority at
- 4:10Speaker 2: times at the federal government.
- 4:12Speaker 1: Well, I want to ask you more about that. How
- 4:14Speaker 1: seriously do you take those recent comments from the President
- 4:16Speaker 1: about nationalizing voting or having more federal control over elections.
- 4:23Speaker 2: We take them as seriously as we've taken every other
- 4:26Speaker 2: seed that he has planted. To suggest any element, falsely
- 4:31Speaker 2: of improprietary or problems with our elections. We know in Michigan,
- 4:35Speaker 2: as in other states, our elections are secure. We have
- 4:38Speaker 2: post election audits that reaffirm their accuracy. We have, as
- 4:41Speaker 2: I said, a well oiled machine. And for the President
- 4:44Speaker 2: to joke about the nationalization of elections what it does,
- 4:50Speaker 2: even though he has no authority to cancel elections to
- 4:53Speaker 2: change who runs them, it does create a sense of
- 4:56Speaker 2: fear and uncertainty among citizens at a time when we
- 5:00Speaker 2: at the state level are working to give them the
- 5:02Speaker 2: confidence and clarity they need that our elections will be held.
- 5:05Speaker 3: And that they can hold there are leaders accountable, which
- 5:09Speaker 3: is also what this is all about, trying to at
- 5:11Speaker 3: a time when at least in Michigan, opinion polls show
- 5:14Speaker 3: the president is not very popular, trying to create confusion
- 5:18Speaker 3: about our ability of citizens to hold him accountable with
- 5:20Speaker 3: the ballot box.
- 5:21Speaker 2: This fall is of course on America, and it is undemocratic,
- 5:25Speaker 2: but it is not going to change our focus on
- 5:28Speaker 2: making sure our elections are held safely, securely freely this fall,
- 5:32Speaker 2: so that citizens can to their leaders and hold those
- 5:35Speaker 2: that they oppose accountable.
- 5:38Speaker 1: And logistically, when we're talking about the Save America Act,
- 5:41Speaker 1: what do you mean if it passed before November? Would
- 5:44Speaker 1: you even have time and the resources to implement those
- 5:47Speaker 1: provisions around voter registration and photo ID requirements without potentially
- 5:51Speaker 1: disenfranchising eligible voters. Would that be feasible?
- 5:56Speaker 3: No, it would not be feasible.
- 5:58Speaker 2: And unless the federal government wants to, as we've asked for,
- 6:00Speaker 2: give us a significant amount of money to help us
- 6:03Speaker 2: continue to administer our elections securely and safely, it is
- 6:07Speaker 2: untenable to add these additional mandates and requirements that no
- 6:10Speaker 2: one is asking for that are unnecessary for securing our elections,
- 6:14Speaker 2: but that would create a lot of challenges in making
- 6:17Speaker 2: sure our elections go smoothly. So we are prepared and
- 6:20Speaker 2: the secretaries of state around the nation are talking about
- 6:23Speaker 2: how to handle the potential for this legislation to pass.
- 6:26Speaker 2: But it is simply untenable and unworkable to expect any
- 6:29Speaker 2: state to be able to administer these additional changes to
- 6:33Speaker 2: the law in time for the midterm elections. And so
- 6:36Speaker 2: what we should likely see is simply a lot of
- 6:38Speaker 2: states not being able to feasibly comply elections going smoothly
- 6:43Speaker 2: and as planned, and likely there will be some legal
- 6:47Speaker 2: action if this were to pass, to at least prevent
- 6:51Speaker 2: it from being in effect this fall, so that we
- 6:54Speaker 2: have the protection of the courts and our ability to
- 6:58Speaker 2: ensure our elections go smoothly.
- 7:00Speaker 1: A lot to watch for their Michigan Secretary of State
- 7:02Speaker 1: Jocelyn Benson, thanks for your time
- 7:06Speaker 2: Thank you, thanks for having me well, thank you for watching,
- 7:09Speaker 2: and remember stay updated on breaking news and top stories
- 7:12Speaker 2: on the NBC News app or watch live on our
- 7:14Speaker 2: YouTube channel.