Latest / Honey Badger Radio / What Can Sex Robots Teach Kids? | HBR News 561

Transcript

What Can Sex Robots Teach Kids? | HBR News 561 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: This is HBr News number five sixty one. What can
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: sex Robots Teach kids? Or we discussed the news of
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: the week and give it the Badger treatment. Hello everybody,
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: and welcome to Honey Badger Radio. I just realized that
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: I wrote can twice, so now it says what can
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: can sex robots teach it?
• 0:27
  Speaker 2: Well, I mean, I'm sorry, that was a. That was a.
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: That was bush League. That was bush League stuff. So
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna fix it real quick. But I hope you guys.
• 0:35
  Speaker 3: Are yes it is. Yes, it probably could to the
• 0:42
  Speaker 3: end of A. I believe it's a classic piece. But
• 0:45
  Speaker 3: in any case, the same tune was the tune I
• 0:48
  Speaker 3: used in one of my videos to give up a
• 0:51
  Speaker 3: list of different types of birth control for women.
• 0:54
  Speaker 2: Is the can can one of them?
• 0:57
  Speaker 3: No?
• 0:57
  Speaker 2: No, but you know.
• 1:01
  Speaker 3: Not let it not. Giving guys access to your can
• 1:03
  Speaker 3: is just one of them.
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: Well, this week, despite my inability to you know type,
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: we have a great show lined up, so please be
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: sure to continue the conversations both in the chat as
• 1:16
  Speaker 1: well as the comments section on this week's HBr News.
• 1:20
  Speaker 2: We're gonna be talking.
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: About the well now we have like what are we
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: on our seventh prime minister in the past ten years
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: over in the UK has just been you know, announced,
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: and that's I think that's worth talking about.
• 1:35
  Speaker 3: At what point do we stop calling them prime?
• 1:38
  Speaker 2: Yeah? Right? Are they even or odd? Yeah? I guess
• 1:42
  Speaker 2: they're odds. But yeah.
• 1:44
  Speaker 1: Also, we're gonna be talking a little bit about female
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: entitlement in a couple of different ways. Dua Lipa opens
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: a banned books library and more So stick around. It's
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: gonna be a good time and be sure to join
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: us afterwards for the Patron Only show. So I have
• 1:59
  Speaker 1: this medium blog that Alison and I almost covered yesterday
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: when we did that four hour stream. I thought I
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: would share with you guys in a Patron show. Alison,
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: I may go over this at some point in the future,
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: but I'm guessing that by that time rolls around, there'll
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: be some different kind of madness to look at.
• 2:16
  Speaker 2: So we're gonna look at this medium.
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: Blog by Fly with Me entitled men have started a
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: new drama to escape accountability and responsibilities. Did you guys
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: know that it's actually men that can never be accountable
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: for anything?
• 2:31
  Speaker 2: Do you guys know that I cannot know that I
• 2:33
  Speaker 2: have just learned this information? I am learning this. I'm
• 2:38
  Speaker 2: doing a Johnny Carson. Have you heard about this? It's wild,
• 2:40
  Speaker 2: it's really wild stuff.
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: I'm just now hearing about this. Men, as it turns out,
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: are not responsible at all. And everything that's running is
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: just happening because of vibes and wishes, not because of
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: men's hard work. No, that's not happening anyway. So we're
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: gonna read this bit of projection and find out what
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: is actually going on here. If you guys want to
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: join us for that, I'm sure it'll be very education educational.
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: Please go to feed the Bachelors dot Comfort least subscribe
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: to join our discord server. It's where Allison puts up
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: all of her let's say, deep dive ramblings on fassuppressing
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: and web signaling and you know, operative thinking and all
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: that other stuff. It's all there. So please if you
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: want to join, you know, you can just join for
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: the for the conversations with our our various UH community members.
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: It's a it's it's a good community. There's lots going
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: on all the time, and they're decent people. As matter
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: of fact, I think that a few people in the
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: discord server have like gotten together and gotten married and
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: or or at least started relationships. So it's it's a
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: it's kind of like an unintentional matchmaking spot two because
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: you all share that one thing in common, which is,
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: you know, uh men's let's say, masculinity is not evil,
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: and that's basically all it requires for you to join
• 4:15
  Speaker 1: and feel at home.
• 4:17
  Speaker 4: I'm I'm we're doing okay?
• 4:21
  Speaker 2: Yeah? Are we just saying oh yeah, you and Lauren
• 4:24
  Speaker 2: are doing great?
• 4:25
  Speaker 4: Yeah?
• 4:25
  Speaker 2: Yeah, you guys are doing okay.
• 4:27
  Speaker 4: Counts actual badges as well, Right.
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm I met Lindsay through doing this work and
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: we have been together for it's gonna be ten years
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: in December. Normally they say that if you get past
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: like the seven or eight year mark, that's like usually
• 4:42
  Speaker 1: when things you know, like if it's gonna work, it's
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: it's it's gonna it's gonna work after that, or if
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: it's gonna failable to be before that or right around there.
• 4:50
  Speaker 4: The three years of COVID or a bit of a
• 4:52
  Speaker 4: wild card, the.
• 4:53
  Speaker 2: Cove the COVID. The COVID thing brought us closer together
• 4:56
  Speaker 2: in a lot of ways.
• 4:57
  Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah, yeah, it.
• 5:00
  Speaker 3: Could do that, but it's a thing that's defining in
• 5:05
  Speaker 3: a relationship. What does adversity do to your your sense
• 5:10
  Speaker 3: of intimacy and you're relying on each other and your
• 5:12
  Speaker 3: ability to like trust each other and stuff.
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: And I got cancer like right after we got married,
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: right like, I got cancer right after that.
• 5:20
  Speaker 2: And you know, she could have just been like, well,
• 5:21
  Speaker 2: I'm out of here.
• 5:23
  Speaker 3: And a lot of women do that.
• 5:24
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 5:25
  Speaker 3: Although I will say with uh with regard to how
• 5:28
  Speaker 3: long marriages last, because there are women who will and
• 5:34
  Speaker 3: that this isn't like I'm not saying all women do this,
• 5:37
  Speaker 3: you know for the special chat, but because there are
• 5:40
  Speaker 3: women who will marry someone who makes a lot more
• 5:44
  Speaker 3: money than they do, especially if their income is say zero,
• 5:49
  Speaker 3: and stick with them until they are legally eligible for alimony,
• 5:55
  Speaker 3: and then divorce and and make all kinds of allegations
• 5:58
  Speaker 3: and bullshit. I say ten years. If it gets past
• 6:02
  Speaker 3: ten years, you have a lot lower chance of divorce.
• 6:07
  Speaker 3: Especially there are some states like ten years you don't
• 6:11
  Speaker 3: get you don't get alimony if you divorce before ten years,
• 6:15
  Speaker 3: but you do if you divorce after ten years. And
• 6:18
  Speaker 3: there's some states still I think that have you get
• 6:21
  Speaker 3: alimony if you're female, but not if you're male, which
• 6:23
  Speaker 3: is stupid because women have just as much learning capacity
• 6:26
  Speaker 3: as men now if not more so. Yeah, under the
• 6:31
  Speaker 3: DEI bullshit, women have an easier chance of getting jobs.
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: So yeah, well anyway, if anything, it again, we're just
• 6:42
  Speaker 1: like living proof that the community is good for that.
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: So if you guys, I mean, even if it's not
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: for that reason, you want to just see the additional
• 6:48
  Speaker 1: content you want to contribute in some way whatever, go
• 6:51
  Speaker 1: to feed the Badger dot com for slass, subscribe and
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: hopefully we'll see you guys in the Discord server. You
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: just want to like peek in there and see what
• 6:57
  Speaker 1: it's like. For free, you can just go to Badger
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: Nations on line and get access to let's say, some
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: of the Discord server, not every spot, but there's where
• 7:06
  Speaker 1: most of the people are at is in the free parts,
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: so there's still like, you know, good stuff going on there.
• 7:11
  Speaker 1: And if you don't want to wake up one morning
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: to find that we've been yeeded from the Internet, please
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: go to Badger feed dot com or Honeybadger Radio dot com.
• 7:18
  Speaker 1: That is where all of our content lives. Okay, with
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: that all out of the way, let us get into
• 7:23
  Speaker 1: today's stories. So first up, Kier Starmer. If you guys
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: don't know, the British Prime Minister has resigned as UK
• 7:33
  Speaker 1: Prime Minister, so he is no longer the UK Prime
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: Minister on or around July twentieth, after about two years
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: in office.
• 7:40
  Speaker 2: Following Labour's twenty twenty four landslide victory.
• 7:44
  Speaker 4: It's called a landslide. Sorry, carry on, that's okay.
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: Andy Burnham, the new Labor leader, succeeded him without a
• 7:50
  Speaker 1: general election through an internal party process and a by
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: election returned to Parliament. The transition was formalized at Buckingham
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: Palace with King Charles the Third. Andy Burnham born nineteen seventy,
• 8:04
  Speaker 1: often called the King of the North, is a veteran
• 8:07
  Speaker 1: Labor politician. He served as MP for lay or Lee
• 8:10
  Speaker 1: is it Lee or lay Lee, held cabinet roles under
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, including Health Secretary, and later
• 8:18
  Speaker 1: became Mayor of Greater Manchester, where he built a strong
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: reputation for devolution, investment in the North, buses, housing and
• 8:25
  Speaker 1: homeless homelessness initiatives. He returned to Parliament as MP for
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: Makerfield in a recent by election and won the Labor
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: leadership unopposed after Starmer's resignation. Burnham has positioned himself as
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: a fresh start, focused on ending political instability, tackling the
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: cost of living crisis, homelessness, and regional inequalities gosh with
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: a Manchesterist emphasis on devolution and reindustrialization. His early moves
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: include cabinet appointments, retaining or shifting figures like Yvette Cooper,
• 9:00
  Speaker 1: and policy shifts like dropping certain digital ID plans. Public
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: and political reactions are mixed. Some see hope for a
• 9:08
  Speaker 1: more left leaning economic focus within labor, while others question
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: funding and continuity. He is the UK's seventh Prime minister
• 9:17
  Speaker 1: in about a decade. They guys went through those like crazy.
• 9:21
  Speaker 1: It was also I guess I heard a lot of
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: people are getting fired that nobody likes.
• 9:26
  Speaker 4: So there is also that, But I don't know if
• 9:28
  Speaker 4: I'm replaced with more people that nobody likes.
• 9:31
  Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, that's probably it's been.
• 9:32
  Speaker 4: That's been the start. That's why there's been seven prime
• 9:34
  Speaker 4: ministers because everyone in the government is shit, and we
• 9:38
  Speaker 4: keep just revolving during all of these shit politicians in
• 9:43
  Speaker 4: and out of all these very important positions. And Andy
• 9:47
  Speaker 4: Burnham hasn't dropped the digital ID plans by the way,
• 9:51
  Speaker 4: he's only postponed them, and partially until it's politically convenient
• 9:59
  Speaker 4: for do it like after the next election, and partly
• 10:02
  Speaker 4: because they can't afford to implement those digital ID things
• 10:06
  Speaker 4: right now. But they're sure as hell can afford to
• 10:09
  Speaker 4: send an extra hundred billion to foreign aid Obviously so
• 10:15
  Speaker 4: mentioned one counts as foreign aid within Britain's shores, where
• 10:22
  Speaker 4: any fucking Foreign aids monkey can jump off a dinghy
• 10:26
  Speaker 4: and get treated like a fucking prince, a prince who
• 10:30
  Speaker 4: doesn't get publicly disgraced for his flagrant nansery. Funnily enough, Yeah, no,
• 10:38
  Speaker 4: all this shit is going to continue happening, and the
• 10:41
  Speaker 4: mainstream media will continue to cover it all up while
• 10:45
  Speaker 4: they summon a thousand puff pieces about the messianic figure
• 10:51
  Speaker 4: of Andy Burnham. Mark my words. The BBC is supposed
• 10:57
  Speaker 4: to be fair, unbiased and impartial. It is legally required
• 11:01
  Speaker 4: to be fair, unbiased and impossible. But everyone's gonna have
• 11:06
  Speaker 4: to sit there and watch them gargling Andy Burnham's balls
• 11:13
  Speaker 4: while they burn an effigy of Nigel Farage every hour
• 11:17
  Speaker 4: on the hour, and they're just gonna have to go Yeah,
• 11:21
  Speaker 4: this is this is totally unbiased and impassion and my
• 11:25
  Speaker 4: distant hope is that at some point the Normans will
• 11:28
  Speaker 4: start going, wait, this seems ever so slightly biased. What
• 11:34
  Speaker 4: is the BBC doing?
• 11:37
  Speaker 1: What?
• 11:37
  Speaker 3: What?
• 11:38
  Speaker 4: What is every channel doing? Regulated as they all are
• 11:42
  Speaker 4: by offcom. It seems like this is the kind of
• 11:45
  Speaker 4: partisan political badgering that Ofcom is supposed to prevent. Nope,
• 11:51
  Speaker 4: Offcom is here to ensure that all broadcast media is
• 11:55
  Speaker 4: skewed as far left as possible, and by far left
• 11:59
  Speaker 4: I mean as lycophobic as possible. It would be reductive
• 12:05
  Speaker 4: to call the UK a communist country, because communists is
• 12:09
  Speaker 4: just a euphemism. At the end of the day. What
• 12:12
  Speaker 4: it means is well, the UK is currently a beacon
• 12:19
  Speaker 4: of Robert Conquest's third law. The behavior of any bureaucratic
• 12:25
  Speaker 4: organization can best be understood by assuming that it is
• 12:28
  Speaker 4: controlled by a secret cabal of its enemies. Except it's
• 12:34
  Speaker 4: not secret. It's the EU, the UN, the WEF, Davos,
• 12:40
  Speaker 4: et cetera. None of this is secret. They're right out
• 12:45
  Speaker 4: in the open. They're practically t bagging us with their obviousness.
• 12:50
  Speaker 4: And yeah, they're globalists, and globalists are necessarily the enemy
• 12:55
  Speaker 4: of nations. Nations are what need to be destroyed if
• 12:58
  Speaker 4: one is to create a globe, one world government. So yes,
• 13:02
  Speaker 4: we are being controlled by a capal of our enemies,
• 13:05
  Speaker 4: but they're not even secretive about it anymore. They're like, yeah,
• 13:08
  Speaker 4: you will have no country, you will have no family,
• 13:11
  Speaker 4: you will own nothing, and you will be happy. And
• 13:15
  Speaker 4: for some reason, these flagrantly apocalyptic organizations who are saying
• 13:21
  Speaker 4: these things have still not been eradicated, and they won't
• 13:29
  Speaker 4: be as long as the likes of Andy Burnham are
• 13:32
  Speaker 4: in charge. To Andy Bumham, no Sternham Burnham, it's just
• 13:36
  Speaker 4: more globalist slop and more faffing about. And like I
• 13:43
  Speaker 4: said the other week, the Labor Party might just go
• 13:46
  Speaker 4: ahead and find a way to make it illegal to
• 13:50
  Speaker 4: talk publicly about how you're thinking of voting for reform
• 13:54
  Speaker 4: or restore, because that would constitute hate speech, constitute stirring
• 14:01
  Speaker 4: up hatred or whipping up division. You think they won't
• 14:05
  Speaker 4: do that, you still have, You still have a wisp
• 14:09
  Speaker 4: of trust that the government wouldn't do that. Well, shit,
• 14:15
  Speaker 4: your optimism is almost honorable, dear friend.
• 14:20
  Speaker 3: Almost okay, ye, So obviously, speaking as a foreigner to
• 14:34
  Speaker 3: to Brits and also as a female, which gives me
• 14:39
  Speaker 3: a lot less authority to speak on politics in my opinion.
• 14:43
  Speaker 3: But I will give you a couple of ideas here. Right,
• 14:47
  Speaker 3: Obviously a change has happened. Obviously it's not huge, and
• 14:53
  Speaker 3: obviously it's not necessarily good or bad per se for men.
• 15:03
  Speaker 3: And the reason is because pretty much everything Mike said
• 15:06
  Speaker 3: is true. All politicians are owned by the oligarchs that
• 15:10
  Speaker 3: run the world, and all they're ever going to do
• 15:14
  Speaker 3: is kiss the asses of the oligarchs that run the
• 15:16
  Speaker 3: world and let them loot you for as long as
• 15:21
  Speaker 3: you let them get away with it. And it's really
• 15:26
  Speaker 3: easy for a woman to sit around and call for
• 15:31
  Speaker 3: things like revolution, right because who has to pay the consequences.
• 15:35
  Speaker 3: It's not women, it's men. And it's even easier when
• 15:39
  Speaker 3: we're saying, well, there has to be nonviolent revolution, because
• 15:44
  Speaker 3: how are you supposed to to accomplish that. One thing
• 15:48
  Speaker 3: I do know, just from my family's experience with politics,
• 15:53
  Speaker 3: is you can't do that without getting involved, and you
• 15:57
  Speaker 3: can't do it without getting involved locally. And what has worked,
• 16:03
  Speaker 3: what allowed us in the US to overturn the Biden
• 16:09
  Speaker 3: takeover was going through and reforming locally our election procedures. Yeah,
• 16:21
  Speaker 3: I'm not gonna say that Trump's the men's rights president
• 16:25
  Speaker 3: because he's not. Right. We don't have a politician on
• 16:30
  Speaker 3: earth outside of the ones who actually ran in the
• 16:34
  Speaker 3: men's rights party.
• 16:37
  Speaker 2: What about what about Philip Davies.
• 16:40
  Speaker 3: He was in the Men's I don't remember what the
• 16:41
  Speaker 3: party was called, but he was in the.
• 16:42
  Speaker 2: Men's Ministry for Equality.
• 16:47
  Speaker 3: No, no, no, the UK had Justice for Men and Boys.
• 16:50
  Speaker 3: Wasn't it a political party at one point?
• 16:53
  Speaker 2: I don't know. Was it a group?
• 16:55
  Speaker 4: It was Philip Davis was a conservative.
• 16:58
  Speaker 3: Was he okay?
• 16:58
  Speaker 2: Yeah?
• 16:59
  Speaker 3: So, but he's still part of the men's rights movement.
• 17:02
  Speaker 3: Outside of the men's rights movement, we do not have
• 17:04
  Speaker 3: a politician on earth, not one in any other country,
• 17:08
  Speaker 3: not one in you know, Canada, not the United States,
• 17:11
  Speaker 3: not even the easiest place on earth to get somebody
• 17:17
  Speaker 3: in office that is specifically pro male, because you have
• 17:21
  Speaker 3: supposedly the most free elections. Even we do not have
• 17:25
  Speaker 3: a specifically men's rights anything as far as you know,
• 17:31
  Speaker 3: no party, no president. There might be politicians that we
• 17:35
  Speaker 3: can look at now and say, hey, these guys are
• 17:37
  Speaker 3: going to do things for men's rights, and I kidd
• 17:41
  Speaker 3: he his name, My pillow guy is running. Yeah, Lindell,
• 17:46
  Speaker 3: he's paying attention to the use of the Duluth model
• 17:52
  Speaker 3: and the looting of American families as he has described it,
• 17:56
  Speaker 3: which is language taken directly from the men's rights movement. Yeah,
• 18:00
  Speaker 3: so there's a couple of guys at the lower end.
• 18:05
  Speaker 3: But the point is you can't achieve that without starting locally.
• 18:11
  Speaker 3: You can't achieve that without going you know, in the
• 18:14
  Speaker 3: United States, it's your state, it can be your your
• 18:17
  Speaker 3: county and your city politics. In the UK there have
• 18:23
  Speaker 3: to be similar equivalents obviously states, like we have states
• 18:27
  Speaker 3: that are twice the size of the entire UK and bigger.
• 18:32
  Speaker 3: But it's a similar principle, right, so you just have
• 18:39
  Speaker 3: to go that route and in your area create that reform. First,
• 18:46
  Speaker 3: you have to build a foundation before you can topple
• 18:53
  Speaker 3: you know, a skyscraper or pyramid scheme. You have to
• 18:58
  Speaker 3: build your own foundation, otherwise you go up against existing politics.
• 19:07
  Speaker 3: It's it's kind of like putting a professional runner in
• 19:11
  Speaker 3: a sumo wrestling ring and expecting that person to beat
• 19:15
  Speaker 3: a sumo wrestler at their own game. It's not gonna happen.
• 19:21
  Speaker 3: So I would tell people, don't be despondent and don't
• 19:24
  Speaker 3: think this solves anything. It's good to get the one
• 19:28
  Speaker 3: one asshole out, and it's it's fine to celebrate like
• 19:35
  Speaker 3: we've reached that marker. But but yeah, don't, don't sit
• 19:41
  Speaker 3: on your asses and celebrate. And like I said, this
• 19:45
  Speaker 3: is me from overseas as a female who has nothing
• 19:48
  Speaker 3: to do with it and much less stake in the
• 19:51
  Speaker 3: game making suggestions. So do it at what you will.
• 19:56
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, I mean, you know, things change more, things
• 20:02
  Speaker 1: change more, they stay the same, I guess, and I
• 20:04
  Speaker 1: guess we will see what this results in. I imagine
• 20:08
  Speaker 1: that it won't change things that much because as I mean,
• 20:13
  Speaker 1: as far as I can tell, this isn't like a
• 20:15
  Speaker 1: case of like individuals putting through specific policy.
• 20:19
  Speaker 2: This is more like, you know, like a.
• 20:22
  Speaker 1: Will, like an organized collective will, and the people that
• 20:26
  Speaker 1: are in power are just the method by which that
• 20:30
  Speaker 1: will is realized.
• 20:33
  Speaker 2: So but we'll see.
• 20:35
  Speaker 1: I've heard mixed things, and I hope like he he's
• 20:37
  Speaker 1: from Manchester. I wonder what do you remember, charming man.
• 20:42
  Speaker 1: I haven't talked to him in a while, but Mitch,
• 20:45
  Speaker 1: he was a Manchesterian, Manchester wright Manchester.
• 20:52
  Speaker 4: We had a Manchester meet up that one time.
• 20:54
  Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. It was fun. It
• 20:56
  Speaker 2: was him and a few other guys. I wonder what
• 20:59
  Speaker 2: he thinks about this. I haven't seen him around in
• 21:01
  Speaker 2: a while, but to be fair, I've been kicked off
• 21:04
  Speaker 2: of a lot of social media.
• 21:05
  Speaker 4: He's fully behind reform right now.
• 21:08
  Speaker 2: Reform or restore reform. Okay.
• 21:12
  Speaker 4: I still follow him on Twitter and he's he's right
• 21:14
  Speaker 4: behind reform. Okay, Well he's a Manchester lad, but yeah,
• 21:20
  Speaker 4: I'm sure he's looking at what's happened to Manchester recently
• 21:23
  Speaker 4: under and you'll have lots of Manchester. So there's a
• 21:28
  Speaker 4: Manchester in New Hampshire, and yeah, every time I'm told
• 21:31
  Speaker 4: about it, I'm like, that's exactly like Manchester. In England.
• 21:35
  Speaker 4: These rundown fucking cities, you'll have a lot of especially
• 21:41
  Speaker 4: Eastern that just have become post apocalypticas Yeah, that's that's
• 21:51
  Speaker 4: that's Manchester for you.
• 21:54
  Speaker 2: It's funny.
• 21:56
  Speaker 1: England is a really small place, but the areas are
• 21:58
  Speaker 1: so distinct. Okay, anyway, let us know what you guys
• 22:02
  Speaker 1: think about this. One of the comments we got to
• 22:03
  Speaker 1: move on and I got a couple of super comments
• 22:06
  Speaker 1: to read out super comments.
• 22:08
  Speaker 2: Uh.
• 22:08
  Speaker 1: The official reverse Traditionalism channel on YouTube gave us ten
• 22:12
  Speaker 1: dollars superchow and said, question for doc, do you think
• 22:16
  Speaker 1: we can solve the migrant crisis by convincing Muslim women
• 22:19
  Speaker 1: to choose stay at home dad relationships, because then they
• 22:22
  Speaker 1: wouldn't come to the West, They would stay in the
• 22:24
  Speaker 1: pre tender years doctrine Muslim countries where they don't have
• 22:28
  Speaker 1: to pay child support when men still get the children
• 22:31
  Speaker 1: in a divorce. There.
• 22:33
  Speaker 4: See that that's the actual forty chest there. Yeah, Like, like,
• 22:38
  Speaker 4: how do you intertwine the woke and the Islamic in
• 22:44
  Speaker 4: ways to get them to contradict each other? Like the
• 22:46
  Speaker 4: stick is saying Islam is right about women.
• 22:50
  Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, Islam is also the most feminist religion.
• 22:53
  Speaker 4: So I'm playing with that checkmate.
• 22:56
  Speaker 3: There is one problem with trying to do that though.
• 22:58
  Speaker 3: I mean, if you're talking about that the Muslim women
• 23:02
  Speaker 3: in in in their countries, in Islamic countries, they don't really,
• 23:10
  Speaker 3: they don't there. They their gig is not uh going
• 23:14
  Speaker 3: out and getting a job, and they're not going to
• 23:15
  Speaker 3: change what they're doing. But if you're talking about Muslim
• 23:19
  Speaker 3: women in Western countries, those are actually the most entitled,
• 23:24
  Speaker 3: entitled women in the world, and uh, they're not They're
• 23:28
  Speaker 3: not going to change their gig because they are the
• 23:31
  Speaker 3: ones that sit are sitting on the top of the
• 23:34
  Speaker 3: femininity hill, and they're they're gonna keep that. They're gonna
• 23:39
  Speaker 3: milk that for everything they can. So, yeah, you're not
• 23:46
  Speaker 3: gonna get anywhere by convincing women of anything.
• 23:49
  Speaker 2: No, you're not gonna be able to convince them. Why
• 23:51
  Speaker 2: why would you convince how would you convince.
• 23:53
  Speaker 1: Muslim women to uh work or like choosday stay up
• 24:00
  Speaker 1: home dad relationships when Muslim men are probably not allowed
• 24:03
  Speaker 1: to be stay at home dads. Like I don't know
• 24:06
  Speaker 1: what the environment is like, but I'm guessing that the
• 24:09
  Speaker 1: men are expected to carry the load of the labor
• 24:15
  Speaker 1: for the household, like basically like bring them bring home
• 24:18
  Speaker 1: the bacon, as it were.
• 24:19
  Speaker 4: And what if they want to wear the hit jab?
• 24:22
  Speaker 2: Yeah if the main exact reason they're.
• 24:24
  Speaker 4: Wearing it is because they want to because they think
• 24:27
  Speaker 4: the men are going to rape them.
• 24:30
  Speaker 2: Yeah, you're not liberating them from it.
• 24:32
  Speaker 4: Yeah, maybe those men are, or maybe they're just being
• 24:35
  Speaker 4: treated like rapists and so they become rapists. Maybe maybe
• 24:40
  Speaker 4: all the agency isn't like spewing from the the male waterfall.
• 24:45
  Speaker 4: Maybe there's some agency coming from the female waterfall. No, yeah, comment, All.
• 24:54
  Speaker 1: Right, thank you for the comment. And then Roboto gave
• 24:56
  Speaker 1: us a dollar and said, there is a word. There
• 25:00
  Speaker 1: is word attempting to put an AI prime minister in
• 25:03
  Speaker 1: power in a country. If it works, imagine all the
• 25:06
  Speaker 1: other AI prime ministers. That sounds somehow worse than what
• 25:12
  Speaker 1: we're getting now. You couldn't even get them to count
• 25:16
  Speaker 1: to one hundred though, you couldn't even get them to
• 25:18
  Speaker 1: count to one hundred.
• 25:20
  Speaker 3: All right, don't don't do don't go with AI. No,
• 25:23
  Speaker 3: please vote?
• 25:24
  Speaker 2: Yeah, a cat would be What about beIN face?
• 25:27
  Speaker 1: I hear Ben Face is running, isn't he's.
• 25:31
  Speaker 4: He's not neutral, he's invita for the BBC. I see
• 25:36
  Speaker 4: Kockwomble leftists.
• 25:37
  Speaker 2: We've been through this like like Vermin Supreme.
• 25:41
  Speaker 4: Yeah, that sort of thing. He used to be known
• 25:45
  Speaker 4: as some uh lord buckethead or something. But I couldn't
• 25:52
  Speaker 4: do that anymore because of a legal dispute. And I
• 25:54
  Speaker 4: have to wonder if if if it's because of the guitarist.
• 25:57
  Speaker 2: Yes, I was gonna say, I think it's the guitarist Buckethead.
• 26:00
  Speaker 4: A bucket on his yeah, yeah, guitar. I'm wondering if
• 26:06
  Speaker 4: if that's connected in some way, I would fucking vote
• 26:09
  Speaker 4: for Buckethead. Yeah, sure, fucking Wizardy yeah yeah.
• 26:16
  Speaker 1: Him and that one guy you know, you know who
• 26:18
  Speaker 1: that one guy is. He's like a guy that is
• 26:22
  Speaker 1: like a one man band. He has this crazy instrument
• 26:24
  Speaker 1: that he invented. And I saw a show I saw
• 26:28
  Speaker 1: a Buckethead live like years ago when I was in Chicago,
• 26:32
  Speaker 1: and that one guy, I think it's called that one
• 26:35
  Speaker 1: guy he opened for Buckethead and then they did like
• 26:37
  Speaker 1: a thing together.
• 26:39
  Speaker 2: It was awesome. It's awesome because that one guy is
• 26:42
  Speaker 2: his his instrument is like insane, like it's like it
• 26:46
  Speaker 2: does everything. But anyway, it looks like some Doctor Susan ship.
• 26:51
  Speaker 3: In uh the Mary Poppins movie that he was in
• 26:55
  Speaker 3: back in the day.
• 26:57
  Speaker 2: Who what is it?
• 26:58
  Speaker 3: Like the one that Dick randyke Oh.
• 27:01
  Speaker 1: Oh with the big with the big based drum and stuff. No, no, no,
• 27:05
  Speaker 1: it was like it looked like something out of a
• 27:07
  Speaker 1: Doctor Seuss book. Like I couldn't make out what it was,
• 27:09
  Speaker 1: but it had like pedals and levers and things that
• 27:13
  Speaker 1: you twist. I mean he made it as it was
• 27:16
  Speaker 1: basically like an art piece. That also was, you know,
• 27:20
  Speaker 1: a instrument. So but anyway that would watch even with
• 27:23
  Speaker 1: it it was you can look him up online, that
• 27:26
  Speaker 1: one guy, I think. I mean, I haven't seen his
• 27:28
  Speaker 1: stuff in a long time, but I remember when you
• 27:30
  Speaker 1: mentioned Buckethead. Immediately thought about that that time I saw
• 27:32
  Speaker 1: Buckethead live. So okay, anyway, I'm digressing a lot, So
• 27:37
  Speaker 1: let us know what you guys think about this. One
• 27:38
  Speaker 1: of the comments, thank you for the super chats and stuff.
• 27:41
  Speaker 1: We're gonna move on to the next story. Would you
• 27:43
  Speaker 1: also vote for Buckethead? Let us know in the comments. Okay,
• 27:47
  Speaker 1: So I saw these two Canadian stories about women, so
• 27:52
  Speaker 1: we're gonna go through each one of them.
• 27:53
  Speaker 2: They are wild. Okay. So a Canadian woman named Caitlin.
• 27:58
  Speaker 1: Tracy, thirty three, was arrested after allegedly slapping a teenage
• 28:03
  Speaker 1: girl on the boardwalk in Point Pleasant Beach, New Jersey,
• 28:07
  Speaker 1: on July third. According to police, Tracy confronted a group
• 28:11
  Speaker 1: of teens, yelled at them because they were wearing patriotic
• 28:15
  Speaker 1: colored sweatpants with Trump and Ice references, and struck the
• 28:19
  Speaker 1: girl across the face and body. She now faces charges
• 28:23
  Speaker 1: including simple assault, child endangerment, harassment, and obstruction. No serious
• 28:28
  Speaker 1: injuries were reported. Tracy, this is the ironic part entered
• 28:33
  Speaker 1: the US legally in April of twenty twenty four, but
• 28:36
  Speaker 1: overstayed her visa, which expired September of twenty twenty four.
• 28:40
  Speaker 1: So she's been here for what nearly two years and hasn't,
• 28:44
  Speaker 1: like you, updated her visa. She is now in ice
• 28:48
  Speaker 1: custody because she got arrested for assaulting a girl for
• 28:51
  Speaker 1: wearing like ice gear at Delaney Hall in Newark, pending
• 28:55
  Speaker 1: immigration proceedings and a court date so she might get deported.
• 29:00
  Speaker 1: Her American husband has downplayed the incident as a nothing burger,
• 29:03
  Speaker 1: claiming the teens provoked it and blaming online conservatives for.
• 29:07
  Speaker 2: Escalating the situation.
• 29:09
  Speaker 1: Yes, yeah, the woman slapping the girl, the underage girl
• 29:13
  Speaker 1: in the face, that's the because of online conservatives, they
• 29:16
  Speaker 1: did that to her. Authorities emphasize that foreign nationals come
• 29:20
  Speaker 1: inting crimes in the US faced swift deportation.
• 29:24
  Speaker 4: So it still makes it still makes me laugh when
• 29:28
  Speaker 4: people talk about two tier policing when it comes to
• 29:33
  Speaker 4: racial and religious lines. M h I mean, right there,
• 29:37
  Speaker 4: you've already got another variable. It's two tiers racially, and
• 29:40
  Speaker 4: it's two tiers religiously, so that's at least four tiers.
• 29:43
  Speaker 4: But it's even more because there are multiple races and
• 29:47
  Speaker 4: multiple religions. The line is rapidly exponential, especially when you
• 29:52
  Speaker 4: notice the original two tier system, the one between men
• 29:57
  Speaker 4: and women, and then that of officially involves multiple genders
• 30:03
  Speaker 4: or whatever that even means. But yeah, sorry to break
• 30:07
  Speaker 4: out our biggest cliche, but if this Canadian woman was
• 30:11
  Speaker 4: instead a Canadian man, he would have been shuttled back
• 30:15
  Speaker 4: to Canada yesterday, two weeks ago, even especially if he
• 30:21
  Speaker 4: had assaulted teenage girls. Oh, if we are to do
• 30:26
  Speaker 4: the situational gender swap, it would be a man assaulting
• 30:30
  Speaker 4: some teenage boys. Then what it's It's equally difficult, isn't it.
• 30:36
  Speaker 4: We give a ship that a male was committing assault,
• 30:38
  Speaker 4: but we don't give a ship that males were assaulted.
• 30:43
  Speaker 4: When a woman assaults a man, no harm, no foul,
• 30:47
  Speaker 4: nothing happens ever, the same in Canada as it is
• 30:51
  Speaker 4: in the US, as it is all across the world. Honestly,
• 30:56
  Speaker 4: but when a man assaults a woman, he gets every
• 31:00
  Speaker 4: conceivable book thrown at him. But when woman assaults woman
• 31:07
  Speaker 4: or man assaults man, the legal system has to actually
• 31:11
  Speaker 4: think about it. I got a case by case basis,
• 31:15
  Speaker 4: the law has to actually like do its job. And
• 31:19
  Speaker 4: I'm just call me a dreamer, but I would appreciate
• 31:23
  Speaker 4: a legal system that also does its job when the
• 31:26
  Speaker 4: plaintiff and the defendant are different sexes. If you can
• 31:31
  Speaker 4: actually have a deep think about those cases too, rather
• 31:35
  Speaker 4: than just executing the man and feeding his fucking courts
• 31:39
  Speaker 4: to the woman every single time, Yeah, that'd be great
• 31:44
  Speaker 4: mm hm and yeahs. As concerned as I am about
• 31:48
  Speaker 4: the immigration situation, especially with regard to the two tier
• 31:51
  Speaker 4: policing that comes with it, I feel it's worth reminding
• 31:54
  Speaker 4: everyone of the original two tier policing. Not only do
• 31:58
  Speaker 4: men face harsh punishments than women for the same crimes
• 32:02
  Speaker 4: and so on, they even face punishments for the crimes
• 32:06
  Speaker 4: of women. Always have still due, So you shouldn't be
• 32:11
  Speaker 4: too surprised that when you put women in charge of
• 32:14
  Speaker 4: things you get similar schisms popping up. If it's okay
• 32:18
  Speaker 4: to make Native men second class citizens to Native women,
• 32:24
  Speaker 4: then it's also okay to make Native men second class
• 32:27
  Speaker 4: citizens to foreigners again, that's not second is fourth class citizens.
• 32:33
  Speaker 4: And we can also make heterosexual native men second class
• 32:37
  Speaker 4: citizens too. Homosexual again, that would be eighth class. And
• 32:43
  Speaker 4: while we're here, we can make native white men second
• 32:48
  Speaker 4: class citizens to the seventy two genders we've just invented.
• 32:54
  Speaker 2: And that's.
• 32:56
  Speaker 4: I mean, it's not worth doing the mathematics on seventy
• 32:59
  Speaker 4: two factorial. It's a big number. You get the point.
• 33:04
  Speaker 4: But yeah, this is why there's two tier policing when
• 33:07
  Speaker 4: it comes to these other factors, because it was already
• 33:10
  Speaker 4: normalized to have two tier policing. You know, the now
• 33:14
  Speaker 4: infamous footage of Henry Novak's left hand, ghostly white from
• 33:21
  Speaker 4: blood loss, handcuffed behind his back as he lay dying
• 33:25
  Speaker 4: on the ground. That's the picture of countless men, across
• 33:32
  Speaker 4: countless generations, across countless countries, who were punished for the
• 33:36
  Speaker 4: crimes of their wives. There was this punished for the
• 33:39
  Speaker 4: crimes of women thousands of years ago, hundreds of years ago,
• 33:44
  Speaker 4: and two day. And that was with men ostensibly in charge.
• 33:51
  Speaker 4: And then we put women ostensibly in charge, and they
• 33:53
  Speaker 4: quickly decided to crank up the sadism by creating this
• 33:58
  Speaker 4: thing called intersectionality, where you the native white men have
• 34:04
  Speaker 4: not just one reason to be treated as subhuman, but
• 34:07
  Speaker 4: two four eight sixteen, And now it's a number with
• 34:13
  Speaker 4: one hundred and four digits. I lied, I did do
• 34:17
  Speaker 4: the math, after all, regarding seventy two factorial, it's a
• 34:22
  Speaker 4: number with one hundred and four digits, and I wouldn't
• 34:24
  Speaker 4: recommend it. The world's worst black pills are to be
• 34:29
  Speaker 4: found in mathematics, ladies and gentlemen, because they're not just
• 34:33
  Speaker 4: black pills. They are black holes. All the more scow
• 34:38
  Speaker 4: when you realize it's what's happening in the real world
• 34:43
  Speaker 4: beyond the mathematics that theorizes. It about your eyes, gentlemen,
• 34:49
  Speaker 4: and God speed.
• 34:52
  Speaker 2: All right, hammy.
• 34:54
  Speaker 3: So in the world of criminal justice in the United States,
• 35:01
  Speaker 3: we have heard a lot of chastisement over the idea
• 35:06
  Speaker 3: that when somebody commits violence against a female victim, if
• 35:14
  Speaker 3: you suggest that what she was wearing provoked the attack
• 35:19
  Speaker 3: in any way, or even the actual argument that a
• 35:24
  Speaker 3: lot of people make, well, they'll target you if it
• 35:28
  Speaker 3: looks like people might not believe you didn't consent because
• 35:32
  Speaker 3: you were dressed like you planned to consent, Right, Yeah,
• 35:38
  Speaker 3: huge huge objections, huge tracts of objection. Women show up
• 35:45
  Speaker 3: from all corners of the earth to strip half naked
• 35:47
  Speaker 3: and walk down the street and yell about how they
• 35:50
  Speaker 3: get treated like pieces of meat and how dare you
• 35:52
  Speaker 3: treat them like pieces of meat? But they should be
• 35:54
  Speaker 3: allowed to treat themselves like pieces of meat, and you're
• 35:56
  Speaker 3: not allowed to look at them, and how dare you
• 36:00
  Speaker 3: not look at them? And God forbid you show up
• 36:03
  Speaker 3: in a sign that says I love sluts. But in
• 36:09
  Speaker 3: any case, that was what I gather from this new story.
• 36:14
  Speaker 3: That was the justification. Right, What were they wearing? Oh
• 36:17
  Speaker 3: my god, I was in the United States and these
• 36:20
  Speaker 3: Americans were wearing patriotic American colors? Yep, well fuck you.
• 36:31
  Speaker 2: Well you were here illegally.
• 36:32
  Speaker 3: Too, Yeah, I don't I don't care if she was
• 36:35
  Speaker 3: here legally. I don't care if she was born here, right,
• 36:40
  Speaker 3: I don't care if her grandparents were fucking born here.
• 36:44
  Speaker 3: If she walked up and hit people for wearing colors,
• 36:50
  Speaker 3: She's still better than a nineteen nineties gangbanger from California.
• 36:56
  Speaker 3: That's a dipshit move, right, It's it's not just a
• 37:01
  Speaker 3: dip shit move. It's been long known to be a
• 37:07
  Speaker 3: dip shit move men of our generation gen xers, new
• 37:15
  Speaker 3: people in the nineties who died for wearing blue or
• 37:20
  Speaker 3: red in the wrong neighborhood, Allowing violence because you're offended
• 37:28
  Speaker 3: at something somebody said, or something somebody wore, something somebody
• 37:33
  Speaker 3: might represent when they are engaging in peaceful activity in
• 37:38
  Speaker 3: your neighborhood. Men know that that's a stupid idea. Men
• 37:42
  Speaker 3: know that that leads to innocent deaths. It leads to
• 37:48
  Speaker 3: a constant state of war in a neighborhood that can
• 37:50
  Speaker 3: never be peaceful because there's really so many colors in
• 37:55
  Speaker 3: the spectrum of dyes that get used to make clothing.
• 38:00
  Speaker 3: And even if there wasn't any new thing that can
• 38:06
  Speaker 3: come along that can associate you with lives in this
• 38:09
  Speaker 3: neighborhood was born to this family, like the Hatfields and
• 38:13
  Speaker 3: the McCoys, likes this politician has these thoughts or ideas.
• 38:19
  Speaker 3: Peacefully can become a reason why you should get killed
• 38:23
  Speaker 3: or you should get smacked in the street. Only women
• 38:29
  Speaker 3: are stupid enough to think, gosh, if I just explain
• 38:36
  Speaker 3: they were wearing colors I didn't like because they represent
• 38:40
  Speaker 3: ideas that I disagree with. The cops won't arrest me.
• 38:44
  Speaker 3: I'm the victim of my assault on these other women,
• 38:49
  Speaker 3: or even if they were men. I'm the victim of
• 38:52
  Speaker 3: my assault on these innocent people who did nothing illegal
• 38:57
  Speaker 3: because I was angry, I had feelings. My feelings are
• 39:02
  Speaker 3: much more important. What the fuck? I really feel sorry
• 39:08
  Speaker 3: for this woman's husband. If that is her logic and
• 39:12
  Speaker 3: he has internalized and accepted that that guy's fucked like
• 39:19
  Speaker 3: he is fifty shades of fucked, he is never going
• 39:23
  Speaker 3: to have a happy life as long as that woman
• 39:25
  Speaker 3: is in his life. You cannot do that and live
• 39:32
  Speaker 3: a happy life and have the people around you get
• 39:34
  Speaker 3: to live happy lives. It will always eliminate the peace
• 39:42
  Speaker 3: around you. If you think that you can engage in
• 39:46
  Speaker 3: violence because of your feelings. Hey, men need to stop
• 39:51
  Speaker 3: tolerating that from women. And that I will say with authority,
• 39:56
  Speaker 3: because women. Women are cooked. They are not going to change.
• 40:02
  Speaker 3: They still to this day haven't learned after two hundred
• 40:08
  Speaker 3: and fifty years of witnessing how that attitude my feelings
• 40:14
  Speaker 3: are justification for violence creates death and destruction in their neighborhoods,
• 40:21
  Speaker 3: whether it's hanging and drowning people for being witches because
• 40:27
  Speaker 3: you had an argument about something and now you're mad,
• 40:31
  Speaker 3: or getting somebody shot because your boyfriend looked at his girlfriend,
• 40:40
  Speaker 3: or any other stupid reason to do with your feelings.
• 40:45
  Speaker 3: If two hundred and fifty years in this country is
• 40:49
  Speaker 3: not enough, you know, for women on the American continent,
• 40:54
  Speaker 3: the North American continent to realize that we have to
• 40:59
  Speaker 3: have as much much control over our reactions to our
• 41:02
  Speaker 3: emotions as men do when it comes to circumstances like conflict.
• 41:11
  Speaker 3: Then they're gonna have to be corralled by men like
• 41:15
  Speaker 3: cows to keep them from being dangerous. Nothing pisses me
• 41:21
  Speaker 3: off like this. This is so stupid, and I'm sorry
• 41:26
  Speaker 3: if I sound more outraged over a slap than over
• 41:31
  Speaker 3: the many murders that take place. But those slaps add up.
• 41:38
  Speaker 3: And women have never been more entitled than they are now.
• 41:44
  Speaker 3: Courtisans in Renaissance royal palaces were not as entitled as
• 41:52
  Speaker 3: your average middle class or lower income women in America
• 41:57
  Speaker 3: is now. It's got a change, and until women are
• 42:02
  Speaker 3: going to do it, men, you got to defend yourselves.
• 42:08
  Speaker 2: You just have to.
• 42:11
  Speaker 4: Agreed.
• 42:12
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, don't simp your woman made a mistake. Just
• 42:19
  Speaker 1: to own up to it all right, let me see
• 42:22
  Speaker 1: what you guys are saying. They're gonna move on to
• 42:24
  Speaker 1: the next one, which is sort of like a similar story.
• 42:26
  Speaker 2: It's related.
• 42:26
  Speaker 4: I guess.
• 42:28
  Speaker 2: It's just weird. It's also very Canadian.
• 42:31
  Speaker 1: Roboto gives another dollar and says, clearly she is a
• 42:34
  Speaker 1: victim of herself, which means women most affected. Someone call
• 42:38
  Speaker 1: a TV lawyer Tolichi and steal for her case. All right,
• 42:42
  Speaker 1: thank you for that, and now we will move on
• 42:45
  Speaker 1: to the next story. So this one's a little bit weird.
• 42:50
  Speaker 1: A same sex couple in Ontario, Canada, is suing their
• 42:53
  Speaker 1: surrogate mother for roughly six hundred thousand dollars Canadian as
• 42:59
  Speaker 1: after she refused their request to abort the pregnancy at
• 43:03
  Speaker 1: twenty two weeks in June of twenty twenty four. An
• 43:06
  Speaker 1: ultrasound had revealed that the baby that was like the
• 43:10
  Speaker 1: baby to be, had a cleft lip, possible cleft palate,
• 43:15
  Speaker 1: and a minor heart defect. The surrogate, a single mother,
• 43:18
  Speaker 1: insisted on further testing instead of proceeding with termination. Specialists
• 43:23
  Speaker 1: later determined the baby was otherwise healthy, with the cleft
• 43:25
  Speaker 1: lip being a relatively minor treatable condition. The couple ultimately
• 43:30
  Speaker 1: agreed to continue the pregnancy, and the child, a now
• 43:33
  Speaker 1: two year old boy, was born. The couple alleges in
• 43:37
  Speaker 1: Ontario Superior Court that the surrogate failed to keep them
• 43:40
  Speaker 1: properly informed about the baby's health, breach to confidentiality, caused
• 43:45
  Speaker 1: them emotional distress and put the child at risk. The
• 43:48
  Speaker 1: surrogate denies these claims, stating the relationship soured after she
• 43:52
  Speaker 1: refused the abortion and she feels used as the couple
• 43:55
  Speaker 1: allegedly wanted a perfect child. She has described the lawsuit
• 43:59
  Speaker 1: as distressing, noting it targets her assets as a single mom.
• 44:04
  Speaker 1: The case has sparked debate over surrogacy contracts, bodily autonomy,
• 44:07
  Speaker 1: and parental rights in Canada. Interesting. It's like an intersection
• 44:12
  Speaker 1: of two different I guess world views.
• 44:16
  Speaker 4: It's many.
• 44:18
  Speaker 2: Yeah, there's a lot of intersections going on.
• 44:20
  Speaker 4: Go ahead, we wanted a perfect child. I don't know
• 44:24
  Speaker 4: how abridged that quote is or how out of context
• 44:28
  Speaker 4: it is, but it seems like it's the you know,
• 44:32
  Speaker 4: the pitch, the premise, the moral of the story, and
• 44:37
  Speaker 4: it's I mean, it's the danger of human hubris distilled
• 44:41
  Speaker 4: all the way down into humanity itself. The idea of
• 44:46
  Speaker 4: a perfect baby. People fall a foul of hubris in
• 44:50
  Speaker 4: their attempts to build the biggest ship, the tallest tower,
• 44:54
  Speaker 4: the most impenetrable stronghold, and then they're treated to the
• 44:59
  Speaker 4: never sable, towering inferno should human hubris take over. But
• 45:06
  Speaker 4: at least that's aspiration within a man made context. Perfection
• 45:12
  Speaker 4: is something we can't achieve in the structures we build,
• 45:17
  Speaker 4: but we can nevertheless strive for it. And in that
• 45:20
  Speaker 4: striving we can build some pretty sturdy structures. You have
• 45:24
  Speaker 4: to do that when you're building something man made from scratch.
• 45:27
  Speaker 4: But life forms are not built from scratch. They are
• 45:33
  Speaker 4: built from four billion years off, you know. I'll just
• 45:41
  Speaker 4: you know. Random. Random is where God meets reality, you know,
• 45:48
  Speaker 4: because because nothing is truly random, not in a computer,
• 45:51
  Speaker 4: not in a human brain, not in the orbits of galaxies.
• 45:56
  Speaker 4: Nothing is truly random unless there is free will, unless
• 46:01
  Speaker 4: there is a play between God and his creation, unless
• 46:06
  Speaker 4: there is harmony between the finite and the infinite. This
• 46:10
  Speaker 4: is a subject close to my heart, folks. Random is
• 46:13
  Speaker 4: my middle name. After all, we can strive for perfection
• 46:18
  Speaker 4: in the realm of the man made, but striving for
• 46:20
  Speaker 4: perfection in nature. I'm pretty sure we have like a
• 46:25
  Speaker 4: million mythological warnings about how it is impossible to tame
• 46:31
  Speaker 4: nature in such a way, and that is it is
• 46:34
  Speaker 4: a fool's folly to even embark on such a mission.
• 46:40
  Speaker 4: I'm very tempted to mention the odyssey here, but I shan't.
• 46:46
  Speaker 4: We're going deeper than that. We're talking about the idea
• 46:49
  Speaker 4: of having perfect babies. You want your babies to be perfect,
• 46:55
  Speaker 4: do you, Not just from the moment they leave the womb,
• 46:58
  Speaker 4: but from the moment the egg meets the sperm in
• 47:02
  Speaker 4: whatever receptacle you have deemed suitable. So where does that end?
• 47:11
  Speaker 4: If you could create a baby that's at exactly nine
• 47:15
  Speaker 4: months just calmly exits the artificial womb and is immediately
• 47:20
  Speaker 4: able to do advanced calculus, and can change a flat tire,
• 47:24
  Speaker 4: and can bring about world peace, it seems like that
• 47:29
  Speaker 4: doesn't leave any room for what's it called parenting? I
• 47:34
  Speaker 4: think I think every parent to some degree wants a
• 47:40
  Speaker 4: perfect child kind of But the way they strive to
• 47:43
  Speaker 4: achieve the perfect child is by parenting them, teaching them
• 47:50
  Speaker 4: how to act morally, how to think for themselves, how
• 47:53
  Speaker 4: to master their emotions and so on. Nurture is not
• 47:59
  Speaker 4: set from nature, it is a part of it. It's
• 48:05
  Speaker 4: perfectly possible to teach all of this to a child
• 48:08
  Speaker 4: with a cleft palate. We're not We're not just We're
• 48:12
  Speaker 4: not talking about a child with fucking Harlequin type ichthiosis
• 48:17
  Speaker 4: who will invariably die in agony in a few days.
• 48:20
  Speaker 4: We're talking about a cleft fucking palate and a possible
• 48:23
  Speaker 4: heart disease. Well, join the fucking club. Like a billion
• 48:28
  Speaker 4: people have developed anomalous heart problems since twenty twenty one.
• 48:34
  Speaker 4: Maybe let's work on what might be causing that shit
• 48:36
  Speaker 4: and how to prevent it in the future. We tend
• 48:41
  Speaker 4: to think of the idea of designer babies as the
• 48:45
  Speaker 4: stuff of the future, of nightmarish futures where eugenics is normalized.
• 48:51
  Speaker 4: But yeah, no, it's already happening. All you need to
• 48:56
  Speaker 4: make eugenics happen is the opportunity to kill any who
• 49:02
  Speaker 4: just isn't up to snuff genetically or esthetically or whatever.
• 49:07
  Speaker 4: And that's already happening. It has been for many generations.
• 49:13
  Speaker 4: How is that not eugenics? Treating human beings as though
• 49:17
  Speaker 4: they're an RPG character. You're trying to create weapon skilled
• 49:23
  Speaker 4: fifteen dexterity twenty six. You haven't a laugh, No, of course,
• 49:28
  Speaker 4: I'm not going to keep this character. I wanted a
• 49:31
  Speaker 4: barbarian with a plus three attack strength, discard everything until
• 49:35
  Speaker 4: I find one. That's yeah, that's that's not how life works,
• 49:40
  Speaker 4: is it? Like in real life? Life is random. It's
• 49:45
  Speaker 4: supposed to be random. If you infect a randomized system
• 49:50
  Speaker 4: with a non randomized element, that's disaster. It's like unleashing
• 49:55
  Speaker 4: rabbits on Australia's like unleashing small parks on the Americas,
• 49:59
  Speaker 4: only much worse because rabbits and smallpox are also random
• 50:03
  Speaker 4: elements that can be offset by other random elements. A
• 50:07
  Speaker 4: truly non random, perfectly created life form will destroy everything
• 50:14
  Speaker 4: in its path, like a blob of strange quarks from
• 50:18
  Speaker 4: an exploded neutron star impacting a planet and instantaneously turning
• 50:24
  Speaker 4: the whole planet into a homogeneous mass of sub atomic strangelets.
• 50:29
  Speaker 4: That that might have been a metaphor too esoteric for
• 50:32
  Speaker 4: its context, but you know what I mean. This is
• 50:34
  Speaker 4: this is this is a potentially world destroying direction we
• 50:39
  Speaker 4: could be headed in. It probably won't destroy the Earth,
• 50:43
  Speaker 4: but it could destroy all life on earth. At the
• 50:47
  Speaker 4: very least, it could destroy human life. You know this,
• 50:51
  Speaker 4: this whole trying to make babies perfect. Organisms are not
• 50:57
  Speaker 4: supposed to be perfect. If they were, they were kill
• 51:00
  Speaker 4: every other organism or assimilate it, and resistance would be futile. Yeah.
• 51:08
  Speaker 4: I either we become the bog or we fail in
• 51:12
  Speaker 4: the project to become the borg and then everyone just
• 51:16
  Speaker 4: fucking dies. Either way, not good. Don't try to become
• 51:22
  Speaker 4: the borg. As a gentlemen, I am not a real doctor.
• 51:27
  Speaker 4: None of this is medical advice.
• 51:32
  Speaker 3: I'm not a real doctor either. But I have a
• 51:35
  Speaker 3: family member who was in her time, one of the
• 51:42
  Speaker 3: country's foremost experts in the field of children under the
• 51:49
  Speaker 3: age of six born with disabilities that were life changing,
• 51:56
  Speaker 3: and I was so glad that she didn't have to
• 52:02
  Speaker 3: see this happening. One of one of my favorite things
• 52:09
  Speaker 3: that she used to say was how precious life is,
• 52:14
  Speaker 3: and we can't just look at somebody who has it rough.
• 52:20
  Speaker 3: We can't just look at somebody who isn't perfect and
• 52:22
  Speaker 3: say this life isn't worth living, this life isn't worth saving.
• 52:27
  Speaker 3: She worked with children who never got to be three
• 52:32
  Speaker 3: years old. She worked with children who never got to
• 52:37
  Speaker 3: be three days old. She worked with children who had
• 52:45
  Speaker 3: to struggle to breathe, who had to struggle to move,
• 52:50
  Speaker 3: who couldn't see, couldn't hear, maybe only had three lobes
• 52:57
  Speaker 3: in their heart instead of four that can happen, And
• 53:03
  Speaker 3: the idea of a mere cleft palate being a reason
• 53:09
  Speaker 3: to kill someone a completely fixable birth defect. I can't
• 53:22
  Speaker 3: even tell you because I have to be careful what
• 53:27
  Speaker 3: I tell you about my work in order to protect
• 53:31
  Speaker 3: the privacy of people that I work with. But it
• 53:35
  Speaker 3: is ridiculous to suggest that somebody can't live a normal life,
• 53:44
  Speaker 3: can't become as able to do everything eating wise and
• 53:52
  Speaker 3: relationship wise, that anyone born with a perfect they formed palette.
• 54:02
  Speaker 3: Your palette is the you have. Your hard palette is
• 54:05
  Speaker 3: probably the part that's the cleft in this individual. It's
• 54:09
  Speaker 3: the roof of your mouth, right, anybody with a perfectly
• 54:13
  Speaker 3: formed roof of their mouth and anybody with a cleft palette,
• 54:15
  Speaker 3: they can they can have the same capabilities minor surgery
• 54:19
  Speaker 3: really compared.
• 54:20
  Speaker 4: To what.
• 54:23
  Speaker 3: Some people have to deal with in order to fix
• 54:26
  Speaker 3: problems that they were born with. And I don't remember
• 54:30
  Speaker 3: whether there's a seventies or the eighties, there was a
• 54:32
  Speaker 3: there was an infant that there was like a lawsuit
• 54:37
  Speaker 3: going on. The President got involved ahead to be the
• 54:40
  Speaker 3: eighties because it was Reagan called my grandmother for advice
• 54:44
  Speaker 3: on what to to do in regard to a law
• 54:50
  Speaker 3: that was being considered because of the controversy over this
• 54:55
  Speaker 3: one baby. And obviously I can't tell you a lot
• 55:04
  Speaker 3: about that case because I was a little kid, and
• 55:06
  Speaker 3: the only thing I remember was everybody marveling over the
• 55:10
  Speaker 3: fact that, you know, Grandma was completely unfazed by getting
• 55:14
  Speaker 3: a call from the President of the United States. What
• 55:17
  Speaker 3: should I do? What do you think I should do?
• 55:19
  Speaker 3: I want to take your your opinion into consideration, and
• 55:25
  Speaker 3: her answer was very simple. You do only what will
• 55:33
  Speaker 3: prolong the child's life with quality of life, and you
• 55:39
  Speaker 3: love the child. In the meantime, you do everything that
• 55:44
  Speaker 3: you do for a child that you love, and you
• 55:46
  Speaker 3: don't do anything unnecessary. Then in this instance, executing a
• 55:54
  Speaker 3: child essentially what this same sex couple in Ontario is doing,
• 56:00
  Speaker 3: executing a child for the crime of being maybe what
• 56:07
  Speaker 3: ugly to them, for for having a little bit of
• 56:11
  Speaker 3: a struggle in a child's life at the very beginning
• 56:17
  Speaker 3: doesn't seem like a very loving act. It doesn't seem
• 56:22
  Speaker 3: like something that people who want to be loving, caring
• 56:25
  Speaker 3: parents would do. When you raise a child, and your
• 56:32
  Speaker 3: child goes through toddlerhood, infancy first, then toddlerhood, then childhood,
• 56:38
  Speaker 3: early childhood, and then holy shit, adolescence, every step of
• 56:43
  Speaker 3: the way, your child is going to do things that,
• 56:48
  Speaker 3: in some way or another to you are profoundly ugly
• 56:53
  Speaker 3: behavior ugly attitudes. You hone your child's self creation. You
• 57:02
  Speaker 3: teach your child to mold him or herself into an
• 57:07
  Speaker 3: adult that is loving and caring and respectable and can
• 57:12
  Speaker 3: defend himself against people who aren't. You. Don't kill your
• 57:19
  Speaker 3: kid for ugliness. Kids will torture animals, Kids will pick
• 57:27
  Speaker 3: on each other. Kids will completely dirty their environment. Kids
• 57:34
  Speaker 3: will do things in public that hurt other people's feelings
• 57:38
  Speaker 3: that might actually get you into trouble until they learn better.
• 57:45
  Speaker 3: How are these people going to handle it if their
• 57:48
  Speaker 3: child has an attitude or a mental condition or a
• 57:56
  Speaker 3: behavioral problem that they think is is there six year
• 58:02
  Speaker 3: old gonna gonna end up in the newspaper as a
• 58:04
  Speaker 3: murder victim because you know he or she develops homophobia
• 58:13
  Speaker 3: and and at twenty two weeks, are you kidding me?
• 58:20
  Speaker 3: There's no argument for that. There's no valid argument for
• 58:23
  Speaker 3: that at that point, that is a pain capable child.
• 58:31
  Speaker 3: It just floors me that that people would behave like
• 58:37
  Speaker 3: this has to be. It makes me think it's lesbians.
• 58:39
  Speaker 3: But that's not necessarily Uh, it doesn't necessarily follow. Men
• 58:47
  Speaker 3: can Men can be capable of being horrible people too.
• 58:52
  Speaker 3: But to me, this is this is a nail in
• 58:57
  Speaker 3: the coffin for same sex couple parental rights. If you're
• 59:03
  Speaker 3: going to argue that people who are born with a
• 59:09
  Speaker 3: genetic deviance from the norm should be killed, when you
• 59:15
  Speaker 3: have a genetic deviance from the norm, you might want
• 59:21
  Speaker 3: to be very careful where you tread. Uh.
• 59:30
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it's.
• 59:34
  Speaker 1: It makes you call it calls in a question a
• 59:36
  Speaker 1: lot of things. That's why I thought this was a
• 59:37
  Speaker 1: really interesting story.
• 59:39
  Speaker 3: So I do kind of question the ethics of surrogacy.
• 59:43
  Speaker 1: I do too, I mean, yeah, like I get there
• 59:46
  Speaker 1: there are some couples that can't they have trouble with kids,
• 59:53
  Speaker 1: like maybe that Usually it's when the mom is barren
• 59:57
  Speaker 1: and they want a child, and so dad don't get some.
• 1:00:01
  Speaker 2: Sperm and you know to a surrogate.
• 1:00:04
  Speaker 1: Here's the thing though, But the thing is, that's like
• 1:00:06
  Speaker 1: people who really want kids here, they're not just looking
• 1:00:10
  Speaker 1: for a designer baby because they want a pretty baby.
• 1:00:13
  Speaker 3: Like these people don't understand what surrogacy in tintails, all right,
• 1:00:18
  Speaker 3: they don't. Just it's not always just artificial insemination, right,
• 1:00:22
  Speaker 3: The surrogate isn't always the biological mother of the child.
• 1:00:28
  Speaker 3: Often they're using frozen embryos. And the thing about frozen embryos,
• 1:00:36
  Speaker 3: and I'm gonna say this, I don't think they should
• 1:00:38
  Speaker 3: be killed because they're frozen, but at the same time,
• 1:00:41
  Speaker 3: I would argue that they shouldn't be getting created. They
• 1:00:46
  Speaker 3: are implanted. A percentage of them die. It is not
• 1:00:51
  Speaker 3: and it's much higher than the percentage of babies who
• 1:00:55
  Speaker 3: die in the womb after being conceived and implanting.
• 1:00:59
  Speaker 4: It is.
• 1:01:02
  Speaker 3: Creating a person who is in some ways destined to
• 1:01:09
  Speaker 3: die a dysfunctional early death. And it's it's hard for
• 1:01:15
  Speaker 3: me to not go off about this. I'm holding a
• 1:01:20
  Speaker 3: lot down right here. There are people who choose not
• 1:01:24
  Speaker 3: to reproduce because they have conditions, health conditions that are
• 1:01:28
  Speaker 3: painful or make their lives very difficult. And so they
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 3: get sterilized or they just are very careful not to conceive.
• 1:01:39
  Speaker 3: Some of them think abortion is a good way to
• 1:01:41
  Speaker 3: prevent it. It's not because you're killing someone for being different.
• 1:01:47
  Speaker 3: When you get into the question of serviency, you're getting
• 1:01:51
  Speaker 3: into the question of is it okay to put a
• 1:01:54
  Speaker 3: child at risk of death or a higher rate of
• 1:01:57
  Speaker 3: birth injuries to satisfy what somebody wants to do. And
• 1:02:03
  Speaker 3: it's bad enough when it's a couple who simply don't
• 1:02:09
  Speaker 3: conceive because the wife can't carry a baby, but when
• 1:02:13
  Speaker 3: it's people basically buying a baby. And essentially these guys
• 1:02:19
  Speaker 3: were having one made to order, right, because obviously they
• 1:02:23
  Speaker 3: had to have gotten sperm or an egg from somebody else.
• 1:02:26
  Speaker 3: They can't if they're same sex. They can only contribute
• 1:02:30
  Speaker 3: one sex of game meat to this. So they had
• 1:02:34
  Speaker 3: a baby manufactured. And the same people who are pro
• 1:02:41
  Speaker 3: abortion argue that children who are unplanned, right, pregnancies that
• 1:02:48
  Speaker 3: are unplanned should be aborted because not enough people want
• 1:02:50
  Speaker 3: to adopt. And yet here they are in that environment,
• 1:02:56
  Speaker 3: manufacturing a baby and then just iding to kill it
• 1:03:01
  Speaker 3: because they don't like a detail that isn't really that
• 1:03:06
  Speaker 3: big of a deal. I work with people who have
• 1:03:11
  Speaker 3: to struggle to just be able to eat or go places,
• 1:03:17
  Speaker 3: and they're happy to be alive. A cleft palate is
• 1:03:22
  Speaker 3: in comparison, it's nothing. It's like a speed bump in
• 1:03:30
  Speaker 3: comparison to trying to climb a mountain or down a cliff.
• 1:03:38
  Speaker 3: I can't tell you, guys how mad I am about this.
• 1:03:40
  Speaker 3: And the surrogacy question comes in because it creates excuses
• 1:03:47
  Speaker 3: for this shit. Sorry to interrupt, but that that does
• 1:03:53
  Speaker 3: kind of set me off.
• 1:03:54
  Speaker 2: No, it's fine.
• 1:03:55
  Speaker 1: I Like what I was gonna say is that, like,
• 1:03:57
  Speaker 1: you know, we we seem well, some of us seem
• 1:04:01
  Speaker 1: to have gotten away from what it means to start
• 1:04:07
  Speaker 1: a family, like like what what that means? And it's
• 1:04:11
  Speaker 1: just sort of like an esthetic. Now it's like, Oh,
• 1:04:13
  Speaker 1: we're gonna we're gonna have like a baby's gonna be
• 1:04:16
  Speaker 1: really beautiful. I'm just okay, I don't know. They don't
• 1:04:19
  Speaker 1: really get into the details of who the couple are,
• 1:04:24
  Speaker 1: which I find kind of tough to work out. But
• 1:04:31
  Speaker 1: maybe it doesn't matter. But what I have noticed, I'll
• 1:04:33
  Speaker 1: just say this. What I've noticed is there are a
• 1:04:35
  Speaker 1: lot of male gay couples that basically get have children
• 1:04:42
  Speaker 1: through surrogates, and I think that they tend to, at
• 1:04:47
  Speaker 1: least some of the ones that are using social media
• 1:04:50
  Speaker 1: to like you know, work up this whole presence online,
• 1:04:55
  Speaker 1: they use the child as part of it. Like I
• 1:04:57
  Speaker 1: don't know if you guys have probably seen clips of
• 1:05:01
  Speaker 1: male gay couples that like have surrogates, and they're always boys.
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 1: I don't know what that means, but that's what they want.
• 1:05:06
  Speaker 1: They want boys, and they want them to be attractive,
• 1:05:10
  Speaker 1: and I wonder what that's about. But then on the
• 1:05:11
  Speaker 1: other hand of that, on the other side of that,
• 1:05:13
  Speaker 1: you have like the surrogate who probably believes in my body,
• 1:05:17
  Speaker 1: my choice, and she's putting she's being put in a
• 1:05:20
  Speaker 1: position now where she is being like essentially commanded to
• 1:05:25
  Speaker 1: get an abortion, and she didn't end up it didn't
• 1:05:28
  Speaker 1: end up happening, so, like like I said, this was
• 1:05:31
  Speaker 1: eventually she did just have the kid. Anyways, I don't
• 1:05:36
  Speaker 1: know if they're raising the kid or if they've just
• 1:05:38
  Speaker 1: like rejected it. If she's stuck with the child now,
• 1:05:41
  Speaker 1: I don't know what that is.
• 1:05:43
  Speaker 3: But well, just remember women are never stuck with a child, because.
• 1:05:47
  Speaker 1: I wouldn't say stuck but you know what I mean,
• 1:05:49
  Speaker 1: like where they basically said we're not gonna we're not
• 1:05:51
  Speaker 1: gonna keep the kid, or if she's gonna make them
• 1:05:53
  Speaker 1: pay child support, I don't know. And so now it's
• 1:05:56
  Speaker 1: a whole thing. But I'm just saying, if we'd have
• 1:05:58
  Speaker 1: done this the old fashioned way, this wouldn't be an issue.
• 1:06:01
  Speaker 1: The other thing is too with regards to like aborting
• 1:06:04
  Speaker 1: babies because they might have like some kind of like
• 1:06:07
  Speaker 1: you know, medical condition which is happens, you know, it
• 1:06:10
  Speaker 1: is what it is. I've noticed that in where I
• 1:06:14
  Speaker 1: live moved to. When I moved here to Roanoke, Okay,
• 1:06:18
  Speaker 1: I noticed a lot of children and adults that I
• 1:06:23
  Speaker 1: have Down syndrome, that have autism, that have various like complications,
• 1:06:29
  Speaker 1: that have cleft palettes as well, that probably would have
• 1:06:33
  Speaker 1: been aborted in Chicago. And we're not aborted here because
• 1:06:37
  Speaker 1: the people who have kids here at least a lot
• 1:06:39
  Speaker 1: of the time, I wouldn't say all the time, I
• 1:06:40
  Speaker 1: don't really know, but a lot of the time that
• 1:06:44
  Speaker 1: doesn't deter them. They just say, well, this is the
• 1:06:46
  Speaker 1: the you know, this is the hand I was given.
• 1:06:49
  Speaker 1: I'm going to love this child anyway. I'm going to
• 1:06:52
  Speaker 1: raise it. You know, it's not that abortion it's band here,
• 1:06:55
  Speaker 1: it's not. But most of the time, from what I've seen,
• 1:06:58
  Speaker 1: people do not abort babies because they learned that their
• 1:07:01
  Speaker 1: baby is gonna have problems. They just say, Okay, well,
• 1:07:04
  Speaker 1: I'm just gonna do what I do the best I
• 1:07:06
  Speaker 1: can with what I have. And I don't even think
• 1:07:08
  Speaker 1: that that's unique to Virginia. I think that's like people
• 1:07:11
  Speaker 1: who generally, like live in Flyover Country. They don't see
• 1:07:18
  Speaker 1: children as things that you know, have to be measured
• 1:07:21
  Speaker 1: against personal convenience or inconvenience. So they just like say, okay,
• 1:07:26
  Speaker 1: well my kid has this now, right, and I'm just
• 1:07:28
  Speaker 1: gonna work with that. And the truth is is that
• 1:07:31
  Speaker 1: those people, whether they have Down syndrome or autism or whatever,
• 1:07:35
  Speaker 1: they seem to be very they're they're fine, they're likable people. Hell,
• 1:07:39
  Speaker 1: the kids with Down syndrome, they're like living their best
• 1:07:43
  Speaker 1: life most of the time, you know, and they don't
• 1:07:47
  Speaker 1: have any problems really, I mean outside of whatever comes
• 1:07:49
  Speaker 1: with that, you know. And I just think that we're
• 1:07:52
  Speaker 1: we some people have moved to this, to this stage
• 1:07:55
  Speaker 1: of eugenics. I don't know what else to call it.
• 1:07:58
  Speaker 1: Where they're just like, yeah, the baby doesn't it's not perfect,
• 1:08:01
  Speaker 1: so we're gonna abort it. And I think that that
• 1:08:03
  Speaker 1: was normalized by feminism and its treatment of abortion as healthcare.
• 1:08:09
  Speaker 1: So like they have like changed the language around abortion
• 1:08:12
  Speaker 1: itself to where it used to be. What was it,
• 1:08:16
  Speaker 1: you know, rare and like basically something that you only
• 1:08:21
  Speaker 1: do in certain circumstances, or at least that's how it
• 1:08:24
  Speaker 1: was sold. I don't think that was ever the case,
• 1:08:26
  Speaker 1: and now it's just like no, no, I just want
• 1:08:28
  Speaker 1: to do it. And you know, you can just look
• 1:08:30
  Speaker 1: at the data. Obviously the over eighty percent of abortions
• 1:08:34
  Speaker 1: were done because the woman was just like, yeah, this
• 1:08:37
  Speaker 1: is what I want to do. Like it was nothing
• 1:08:39
  Speaker 1: to do with the health risks for herself or the baby,
• 1:08:43
  Speaker 1: has nothing to do with any of these other It
• 1:08:46
  Speaker 1: wasn't a product of rape or incests, It wasn't any
• 1:08:48
  Speaker 1: of those things. It was just I didn't really feel
• 1:08:50
  Speaker 1: like being pregnant, I'm gonna kill the baby. That's like
• 1:08:53
  Speaker 1: the overwhelming majority of reasons for abortions. So and I
• 1:08:58
  Speaker 1: think that when you get to that point, you start
• 1:09:00
  Speaker 1: treating human life itself as like this, it's like another commodity,
• 1:09:05
  Speaker 1: Like do I want that?
• 1:09:06
  Speaker 2: Do I not want that? I don't know.
• 1:09:07
  Speaker 1: You know, the baby's got some problems. I think we're
• 1:09:10
  Speaker 1: just gonna kill it and start over. And it also like,
• 1:09:13
  Speaker 1: you know, because there is such a disdain this for
• 1:09:16
  Speaker 1: human life. I've also got this theory and I think
• 1:09:20
  Speaker 1: that there's don't I can't prove anything, but I just
• 1:09:22
  Speaker 1: think it makes sense that something like this could happen,
• 1:09:25
  Speaker 1: that there are places in the world where people are
• 1:09:27
  Speaker 1: having babies just for the purposes of using the fetus
• 1:09:31
  Speaker 1: for something else, whether that is to raise those kids
• 1:09:35
  Speaker 1: to be terrorists, which we did a story on. There
• 1:09:39
  Speaker 1: was like a terrorist cell in America of like a
• 1:09:43
  Speaker 1: couple of women who were making babies and a couple
• 1:09:45
  Speaker 1: of men giving them babies, and they were just they
• 1:09:48
  Speaker 1: were training them to be soldiers. They were just training
• 1:09:50
  Speaker 1: children that they were just having women have and they
• 1:09:53
  Speaker 1: so they weren't their kids. It wasn't like I mean,
• 1:09:55
  Speaker 1: they were biologically their kids, but they weren't raising them
• 1:09:58
  Speaker 1: as children. They saw them as assets. They were turning
• 1:10:01
  Speaker 1: them into soldiers. And the boys were being trained as
• 1:10:04
  Speaker 1: soldiers and the girls were being trained to if they
• 1:10:08
  Speaker 1: even kept them. They were being trained to, you know,
• 1:10:10
  Speaker 1: sort of like be in supporting roles. But it was
• 1:10:13
  Speaker 1: basically they were building a military terrorist cell like from
• 1:10:18
  Speaker 1: the ground up literally. And I also think that there
• 1:10:22
  Speaker 1: are places where, like in China, for example, there are
• 1:10:26
  Speaker 1: stories of Chinese dignitaries or Chinese citizens trying to have
• 1:10:33
  Speaker 1: children who are American born by coming over here making
• 1:10:37
  Speaker 1: babies with American women, either by paying them to have
• 1:10:41
  Speaker 1: their kids or whatever, and then they leave and then
• 1:10:43
  Speaker 1: those women stay here they have Chinese kids, and then
• 1:10:46
  Speaker 1: those those kids are Chinese nationals, but they have American
• 1:10:51
  Speaker 1: you know immigration there. They're basically American citizens because they
• 1:10:53
  Speaker 1: were born in this country and they're being used like that.
• 1:10:56
  Speaker 1: So where this is this is so I know, oh,
• 1:11:00
  Speaker 1: it's like really dark stuff, but this stuff happens. I
• 1:11:03
  Speaker 1: think that babies are being born so that their organs
• 1:11:06
  Speaker 1: could be harvested, so that their foreskin could be used
• 1:11:09
  Speaker 1: to make creams.
• 1:11:10
  Speaker 2: Or whatever, stem cells, whatever it is.
• 1:11:14
  Speaker 1: And I think it comes that that stuff happens when
• 1:11:17
  Speaker 1: you start seeing human life as less and less valuable
• 1:11:21
  Speaker 1: over time, it just becomes another resource, like oh, it's
• 1:11:24
  Speaker 1: another it's like you know, another kind of energy you're
• 1:11:27
  Speaker 1: just getting. And I think that happens. Like I mean
• 1:11:30
  Speaker 1: with the baby, the organ harvesting, I think that happens.
• 1:11:33
  Speaker 2: I can't prove it. The stuff with the Chinese nationals
• 1:11:36
  Speaker 2: is definitely happening. We have data on that.
• 1:11:38
  Speaker 1: There's like stories on that and the other stuff I
• 1:11:42
  Speaker 1: mentioned before with the terror cells and stuff. That stuff happened,
• 1:11:47
  Speaker 1: that was real, And like I said, it just comes
• 1:11:50
  Speaker 1: from like people not valuating the life of children. I mean,
• 1:11:54
  Speaker 1: and I think it's downstream from feminism because feminism was
• 1:11:58
  Speaker 1: started the whole conversation where it essentially treated the child
• 1:12:02
  Speaker 1: like our columbus cells, which is what they always called it,
• 1:12:05
  Speaker 1: and that abortion was only a women's issue. I had
• 1:12:07
  Speaker 1: nothing to do with the father of the child or
• 1:12:09
  Speaker 1: the child, the unborn child itself. So when you start
• 1:12:13
  Speaker 1: changing the way you view an unborn child, it's a
• 1:12:18
  Speaker 1: really short trip to just using them as you know,
• 1:12:22
  Speaker 1: for whatever purposes, like whatever the convenience demands, whether that's
• 1:12:25
  Speaker 1: killing them off, turning them into you know, child soldiers
• 1:12:29
  Speaker 1: or or whatever it is. So yeah, not surprised by that.
• 1:12:32
  Speaker 1: It's pretty dark stuff, but it is.
• 1:12:34
  Speaker 2: What it is, all right.
• 1:12:35
  Speaker 3: I just want to remind anybody before we switch out
• 1:12:37
  Speaker 3: of this this topic that sense abortion became legal in
• 1:12:44
  Speaker 3: the US, and USAIDS and other infectious initiatives began promoting
• 1:12:53
  Speaker 3: it overseas, funded by your tax dollars. Women worldwide have
• 1:13:00
  Speaker 3: made being aborted the leading cause of human death. It
• 1:13:05
  Speaker 3: outpaces war, poverty, famine, every type of in a health
• 1:13:14
  Speaker 3: condition that causes death, accidents, homicide, everything. It is like
• 1:13:20
  Speaker 3: half again as much, almost as as as prominent, as
• 1:13:25
  Speaker 3: prevalent as the top listed cause of death. And the
• 1:13:31
  Speaker 3: only reason it's not phrased that way by organizations like
• 1:13:34
  Speaker 3: the WHO is because they don't treat living human organisms
• 1:13:40
  Speaker 3: as living human organisms until after they go through the
• 1:13:44
  Speaker 3: magic vagina.
• 1:13:47
  Speaker 4: Yep.
• 1:13:48
  Speaker 1: So yeah, anyway, let me know what you guys think
• 1:13:50
  Speaker 1: about this one in the comments. Go ahead, Mike, I'm sorry,
• 1:13:54
  Speaker 1: go ahead.
• 1:13:55
  Speaker 4: To sign off. Eugenics is like slavery. The proverbial left
• 1:14:00
  Speaker 4: does it as deep and as hard as they can
• 1:14:04
  Speaker 4: do it until they can't get away with doing it anymore,
• 1:14:07
  Speaker 4: and then they claim they never did it and it
• 1:14:09
  Speaker 4: was just the right all along. Who did it? You
• 1:14:13
  Speaker 4: are here when it comes to slavery, The Democrats who
• 1:14:17
  Speaker 4: fought and died to keep their slaves are now blaming
• 1:14:22
  Speaker 4: their opponents for the history of slavery. Mark my words.
• 1:14:26
  Speaker 4: The Democrats, who are presently presently fighting and dying for
• 1:14:31
  Speaker 4: their right to abortion will eventually pretend their opponents were
• 1:14:36
  Speaker 4: the ones who did that. Yeah, even after the next
• 1:14:40
  Speaker 4: civil war is fought. I'll leave you with that. Yeah.
• 1:14:46
  Speaker 1: Well, in the words of Tim Poole, I don't know, man, Okay,
• 1:14:53
  Speaker 1: I gotta move on. Let me know what you guys
• 1:14:55
  Speaker 1: think about this one of the comments, and do you
• 1:14:56
  Speaker 1: have some super chows to read out? I got three
• 1:14:58
  Speaker 1: of them, so I want to read them all out
• 1:15:01
  Speaker 1: and they'll move on to the next one. So Meredith
• 1:15:03
  Speaker 1: g gives us five dollars and says HBr News five
• 1:15:06
  Speaker 1: to six to one. Just about every foreigner who came
• 1:15:09
  Speaker 1: to the US for the World Cup figured out that
• 1:15:11
  Speaker 1: to Americans, the flag represents we the people, not the
• 1:15:15
  Speaker 1: man who sits in the White House or the politicians
• 1:15:17
  Speaker 1: who occupy our office. Finding out the origins of the
• 1:15:21
  Speaker 1: star spangled banner was an educational experience for them. But
• 1:15:24
  Speaker 1: a Canadian who has been around Americans a lot can't
• 1:15:27
  Speaker 1: figure that out. Yeah, you know, that's the thing about Canadians.
• 1:15:30
  Speaker 1: And I'm not saying this about like Canadians. I'm friends
• 1:15:33
  Speaker 1: with Alison and Karen. I love them and of course
• 1:15:36
  Speaker 1: my wife. But Canada has been conditioned to hate the
• 1:15:41
  Speaker 1: United States and their identity as Canadians is we are
• 1:15:47
  Speaker 1: not the US. That's their identity. And I'm sorry, but
• 1:15:51
  Speaker 1: it's true. I'm not saying that. I'm sure there are
• 1:15:53
  Speaker 1: Canadians that watch US that would say that's not me,
• 1:15:56
  Speaker 1: but I think that it can be. It has been
• 1:15:58
  Speaker 1: admitted that this is like the general sentiment. I think
• 1:16:01
  Speaker 1: Genice Fiamengo, who's from Ottawa, has said it herself. She
• 1:16:05
  Speaker 1: has said that the Canadian identity is being anti American
• 1:16:09
  Speaker 1: or not American, more more specifically not American.
• 1:16:12
  Speaker 2: It's like how they differentiate. It's their whole culture. We
• 1:16:15
  Speaker 2: are not you.
• 1:16:16
  Speaker 1: So when America does something, it doesn't matter what Canada
• 1:16:21
  Speaker 1: is like, well, we can't be like America, so we're
• 1:16:23
  Speaker 1: not gonna do that, or we're gonna do the opposite
• 1:16:25
  Speaker 1: of that or something. So yeah, they're they they have.
• 1:16:30
  Speaker 1: Unfortunately it's a cultural problem. It's a Canadian problem. But uh,
• 1:16:34
  Speaker 1: we're not gonna invade though, so it's.
• 1:16:36
  Speaker 4: Over the same with the rest of the of the anglosphere.
• 1:16:39
  Speaker 2: Yeah, like.
• 1:16:43
  Speaker 4: None of it's natural. We have we've developed this archophobic
• 1:16:47
  Speaker 4: idea that if if Europeans or any descendants of Europeans
• 1:16:51
  Speaker 4: are doing well, well, for heaven saying this, you were
• 1:16:54
  Speaker 4: not allowed to do this well. And this includes Americans,
• 1:16:57
  Speaker 4: and Americans are doing really well. They've been come the
• 1:17:01
  Speaker 4: world's superpower and the euchophobes amongst us. So like heavens,
• 1:17:06
  Speaker 4: don't do that. No, no, no, we must lie back
• 1:17:10
  Speaker 4: and allow the fifty archy shadow beasts to smother us.
• 1:17:17
  Speaker 4: It's a long story anyway.
• 1:17:19
  Speaker 3: Not well, there's there's a reason for it all right.
• 1:17:22
  Speaker 2: Throughout the rest of this is going to be a
• 1:17:24
  Speaker 2: really long show.
• 1:17:25
  Speaker 3: This is gonna be this is gonna be a brief statement.
• 1:17:27
  Speaker 3: But you have this idea throughout the rest of the anglosphere,
• 1:17:31
  Speaker 3: going back to monarchy, that there are some people who
• 1:17:35
  Speaker 3: are just born better than other people and therefore are
• 1:17:39
  Speaker 3: justified and titled or otherwise right to take away other
• 1:17:44
  Speaker 3: people's autonomy, and the other people should just go along
• 1:17:49
  Speaker 3: with it. And the reason that everybody hates America in
• 1:17:55
  Speaker 3: the anglosphere isn't things that we have done to them,
• 1:18:01
  Speaker 3: it's things that we've done in spite of their belief
• 1:18:06
  Speaker 3: that that is the superior way to live, when we
• 1:18:09
  Speaker 3: have abandoned it. We abandoned the historical case system, We
• 1:18:16
  Speaker 3: abandoned the historical notion that you have to be born
• 1:18:21
  Speaker 3: into ruling authority, and for that they hate us, all right.
• 1:18:30
  Speaker 1: Next super Chow Dark Kigy Mora goes off topic again
• 1:18:35
  Speaker 1: for five dollars and says off topic, But I heard
• 1:18:39
  Speaker 1: Doc saying or Doc mentioned seventy two factoral factorial, and
• 1:18:44
  Speaker 1: my ears perked up because I know seventy factoral factorial
• 1:18:47
  Speaker 1: is already larger than the number of atoms in the universe.
• 1:18:50
  Speaker 1: So I always thought it would be cool if modern
• 1:18:52
  Speaker 1: video games had seventy factors that would be randomly set
• 1:18:55
  Speaker 1: every time you played, and they could put a seventy
• 1:18:58
  Speaker 1: factorial logo on the box because you'll never play the
• 1:19:00
  Speaker 1: game the same way twice. My idea would go back
• 1:19:03
  Speaker 1: to this crazy guy called random Terrain, who argues that
• 1:19:07
  Speaker 1: e T for the Atari actually is a good game
• 1:19:10
  Speaker 1: compared to any s Mario and Zelda because it has
• 1:19:12
  Speaker 1: controlled randomness.
• 1:19:15
  Speaker 2: All right, thank you.
• 1:19:16
  Speaker 4: Controlled randomness can make for infinite gameplay. This was first
• 1:19:20
  Speaker 4: discovered in Zelda A Link to the Past. For this Nintendo,
• 1:19:27
  Speaker 4: if you randomize all the item locations every time you
• 1:19:31
  Speaker 4: play it, then it becomes a different game. This has
• 1:19:36
  Speaker 4: since been implemented in all manner of old sixteen bit
• 1:19:40
  Speaker 4: and even sixty four bit games from the nineties. Well,
• 1:19:43
  Speaker 4: you could just swap all the items around, and then
• 1:19:46
  Speaker 4: you can play the game like it's a completely different game,
• 1:19:48
  Speaker 4: and it's brilliant, and it's all thanks to randomizing. I'm
• 1:19:53
  Speaker 4: telling you, random is the way and the light. I
• 1:19:57
  Speaker 4: know I would say that because my name is doctor Random,
• 1:20:00
  Speaker 4: but it's true. Random is is what brings us closer
• 1:20:04
  Speaker 4: to God.
• 1:20:06
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 1:20:08
  Speaker 1: Robato one two three sixty seven gives us two dollars
• 1:20:11
  Speaker 1: on Rumble and says it is obvious that in the USA,
• 1:20:13
  Speaker 1: surrogacy has gone too far and needs to be dialed back.
• 1:20:17
  Speaker 1: Like so many things, it needs to be regulated and taxed,
• 1:20:20
  Speaker 1: otherwise surrogacy will become the new abortion widget issue. Uh
• 1:20:26
  Speaker 1: I don't know, I don't I'd look generally when it
• 1:20:29
  Speaker 1: comes to the state getting involved, I'm not I'm not
• 1:20:32
  Speaker 1: for it. I think we can find other ways. But
• 1:20:35
  Speaker 1: uh yeah, but I appreciate the comment. Nonetheless, Richard Bierre
• 1:20:40
  Speaker 1: gives us five dollars super chow and says, getting a
• 1:20:44
  Speaker 1: flashback to the story of baby Alfie, who had a
• 1:20:47
  Speaker 1: condition that the NHS deemed to be no longer treatable
• 1:20:51
  Speaker 1: and he exhausted the lifetime amount of care. The hospital
• 1:20:55
  Speaker 1: didn't allow him to leave the hospital when the parents
• 1:20:58
  Speaker 1: found an experimental treat that was available outside of the country.
• 1:21:02
  Speaker 1: The Pipe even granted him Vatican citizenship and with even
• 1:21:06
  Speaker 1: the Pope, so that he could have been brought to
• 1:21:09
  Speaker 1: where the treatment was available. The NHS still kept him
• 1:21:12
  Speaker 1: in hospital until he died. Imagine if the Pope was
• 1:21:15
  Speaker 1: actually called the Pipe. That's not like a name for
• 1:21:19
  Speaker 1: the Pope.
• 1:21:24
  Speaker 3: I remember that I had a big argument with an
• 1:21:31
  Speaker 3: actual doctor on Twitter about that, and the doctor was
• 1:21:36
  Speaker 3: saying that it was abuse to try to save the
• 1:21:40
  Speaker 3: child's life, and of course, you know I had I
• 1:21:44
  Speaker 3: had to go back to that instance with with my
• 1:21:48
  Speaker 3: grandmother and the President in her her litmus test basically
• 1:21:55
  Speaker 3: was will will the child have quality of life? And
• 1:22:00
  Speaker 3: does the child have a good chance of survival with
• 1:22:03
  Speaker 3: that quality of life? That good quality of life? And
• 1:22:06
  Speaker 3: in this instance, the answer was yes, and yes, it's
• 1:22:11
  Speaker 3: just that the the British medical system couldn't provide it
• 1:22:15
  Speaker 3: and so they decided that the child should not have it.
• 1:22:21
  Speaker 3: But apparently it's abuse to give someone a longer, good
• 1:22:25
  Speaker 3: quality life if they can't get it at home.
• 1:22:34
  Speaker 2: Yeah, all right, let us know what you got. People
• 1:22:38
  Speaker 2: are laughing about the pipe.
• 1:22:41
  Speaker 1: Let us know what you guys think about this one
• 1:22:43
  Speaker 1: in the comments, I did get another super Chow super chat. Rather,
• 1:22:47
  Speaker 1: I will get to it right now, But then the
• 1:22:50
  Speaker 1: next story is related to this, so uh dialon one
• 1:22:54
  Speaker 1: O two double O one gives us five dollars and says,
• 1:22:57
  Speaker 1: came late to the discussion what do you all think
• 1:23:00
  Speaker 1: sex bots and sex dolls? While we're about to find out?
• 1:23:03
  Speaker 1: So let's get into the next story. This one comes
• 1:23:06
  Speaker 1: from Kotaku, but I thought it was interesting anyway. The
• 1:23:09
  Speaker 1: AI company real Botics, whose parent company real Doll assigns
• 1:23:14
  Speaker 1: AI powered humanoid robots built for meaningful human written interaction,
• 1:23:19
  Speaker 1: would like to start placing their products into schools to
• 1:23:22
  Speaker 1: teach STEM subjects using AI. The pitch from real Botrix
• 1:23:28
  Speaker 1: or real Botics rather, is that their AI powered M
• 1:23:32
  Speaker 1: series humanoid robot teacher's assistant uses natural conversation, facial expressions,
• 1:23:37
  Speaker 1: and real time interaction to create engaging.
• 1:23:40
  Speaker 2: Hands on learning experiences.
• 1:23:42
  Speaker 1: The initial test run will be in the small town
• 1:23:45
  Speaker 1: of Salamanca, New York, which has a population of just
• 1:23:49
  Speaker 1: under six thousand people. The first of these robots that
• 1:23:52
  Speaker 1: will be put to use is Sally, a brown haired,
• 1:23:55
  Speaker 1: female appearing teaching robot. The company claims that Sally will
• 1:23:59
  Speaker 1: be able to remember conversations with students and be able
• 1:24:02
  Speaker 1: to pick up where they left off for days. Children
• 1:24:04
  Speaker 1: will also be able to download a portable version of
• 1:24:07
  Speaker 1: Sally to take home with them to aid in homework.
• 1:24:10
  Speaker 1: I got nothing got jokes, I'm not gonna tell them.
• 1:24:12
  Speaker 1: Real Robotics for the Record stated that this series of
• 1:24:16
  Speaker 1: robots are not linked to their parent company, Real doll
• 1:24:18
  Speaker 1: in any way, including designs, blueprints, or technology. These robots
• 1:24:23
  Speaker 1: are not anatomically correct and have never been designed, marketed,
• 1:24:26
  Speaker 1: or sold as adult products.
• 1:24:31
  Speaker 4: It's much like the Internet right in its infancy, it
• 1:24:34
  Speaker 4: was used for pornography, must like the printing press before it.
• 1:24:38
  Speaker 4: No doubt, we've got this revolutionary new way of efficiently
• 1:24:43
  Speaker 4: processing information and solving tasks, and it's mostly used for pornography.
• 1:24:51
  Speaker 4: Don't worry about it. This is just what happens in
• 1:24:54
  Speaker 4: emergent technologies. You can't swing a cat without hitting a
• 1:24:58
  Speaker 4: conglomerate of polynograp exploitation. Look, women don't seem to get
• 1:25:05
  Speaker 4: along with men anymore ever since the advent of romantic chivalry.
• 1:25:09
  Speaker 4: Women seem to kind of hate men actually, And so
• 1:25:13
  Speaker 4: men are walking away and filling every available technological niche
• 1:25:19
  Speaker 4: with their seminole contribution if you catch from a drift.
• 1:25:23
  Speaker 4: So yeah, if you want a robot to do the
• 1:25:26
  Speaker 4: laundry for you, you might have to buy that robot
• 1:25:29
  Speaker 4: from a company that mostly trades in sex robots, because
• 1:25:34
  Speaker 4: at least ninety percent of all robots will be sex robots.
• 1:25:39
  Speaker 4: Because again, modern women seem to have been indoctrinated into
• 1:25:44
  Speaker 4: an infinite hatred of all men, especially all normal men.
• 1:25:49
  Speaker 4: So in any given market, the biggest void to be
• 1:25:53
  Speaker 4: filled is the desire that men have for something that
• 1:25:58
  Speaker 4: is vaguely woman shaped and does not hate men. There
• 1:26:03
  Speaker 4: there is a possible future ahead of us, folks, the
• 1:26:07
  Speaker 4: future in which human beings on average are having sex
• 1:26:12
  Speaker 4: with machines more than they are having sex with other humans.
• 1:26:19
  Speaker 4: I mean, if dildos count as we do that, then
• 1:26:22
  Speaker 4: then then we might already be there. But this is
• 1:26:26
  Speaker 4: not inevitable, Folks. By circumstance, the rise of the technological
• 1:26:32
  Speaker 4: age has coincided with the rise of what is euphimistically
• 1:26:37
  Speaker 4: called communism. Is that the revolution of the useless against
• 1:26:42
  Speaker 4: the useful. Be it along the lines of class, or
• 1:26:45
  Speaker 4: sex or race, And yes, it did happen in that order,
• 1:26:50
  Speaker 4: but it all comes down to whosoever excels must be
• 1:26:55
  Speaker 4: forbidden from excelling. We are in a society that has
• 1:27:01
  Speaker 4: been falling into this absurd fallacy for generations. Well, the
• 1:27:07
  Speaker 4: technology around us advances at the speed of Moore's law,
• 1:27:13
  Speaker 4: and so the technology fills the most urgent niche. And
• 1:27:20
  Speaker 4: that's what the world's most urgent niche is, sex, not
• 1:27:23
  Speaker 4: climate change. If the world really was too hot, right,
• 1:27:28
  Speaker 4: if it was becoming inhospitably hot for whatever reason, most
• 1:27:32
  Speaker 4: of the robots in the world would be put to
• 1:27:35
  Speaker 4: the task of making it colder. They could be robots
• 1:27:41
  Speaker 4: that act as fucking air conditioners.
• 1:27:44
  Speaker 2: Maybe.
• 1:27:47
  Speaker 4: And if you wanted your robot to teach you how
• 1:27:49
  Speaker 4: to do calculus, you'd have to buy it from a
• 1:27:52
  Speaker 4: company that mostly produces air conditioning robots, because the most
• 1:27:57
  Speaker 4: urgent problem would be the heat up. Evidently, the most
• 1:28:03
  Speaker 4: urgent problem is women hate men, so men have no
• 1:28:08
  Speaker 4: choice but to fuck robots. That seems to be what
• 1:28:12
  Speaker 4: the market is telling us. For all this brew haha,
• 1:28:16
  Speaker 4: we hear about climate change, it looks like the most
• 1:28:19
  Speaker 4: urgent problem is well, not only building data centers, let's
• 1:28:22
  Speaker 4: not talk about that, but it's how much women hate men.
• 1:28:27
  Speaker 4: And maybe we should look into how we could perhaps
• 1:28:31
  Speaker 4: not teach women to hate men, and then men and
• 1:28:35
  Speaker 4: women could be happy together, happy, and we can put
• 1:28:42
  Speaker 4: most of our robots to the most pertinent and important tasks,
• 1:28:48
  Speaker 4: like you know, crushing your enemies and seeing them driven
• 1:28:51
  Speaker 4: before you and hearing the lamentations of their women. Is
• 1:28:57
  Speaker 4: that not too much to ask?
• 1:29:00
  Speaker 3: Yuh So, I'm gonna have a completely different take on
• 1:29:05
  Speaker 3: this from what people might expect, and and it's it's
• 1:29:10
  Speaker 3: it's because I'm not going to to really talk about
• 1:29:14
  Speaker 3: it as a gender issue per se. You know, before
• 1:29:19
  Speaker 3: the Internet was for porn, the Internet is for porn.
• 1:29:23
  Speaker 3: Before the Internet it was for porn, It was tactical,
• 1:29:27
  Speaker 3: it was it was a government thing. Before uh, computers
• 1:29:35
  Speaker 3: were prevalently used by the public. Right they were tactical
• 1:29:45
  Speaker 3: for business and government, and before robots were starting to
• 1:29:50
  Speaker 3: become you know, at least androids and little vacuum cleaners
• 1:29:55
  Speaker 3: that sort of autonomously bump into things and change direction
• 1:30:00
  Speaker 3: in your home were used by the public. They were
• 1:30:05
  Speaker 3: they were for business and government, and when the public
• 1:30:11
  Speaker 3: started using these things, their purpose changed and it wasn't
• 1:30:15
  Speaker 3: just for porn. Similarly, before key cards were commonly used
• 1:30:25
  Speaker 3: by the public for access to things, they were used
• 1:30:30
  Speaker 3: by government and big corporations. Now we use them in
• 1:30:35
  Speaker 3: grocery stores to get fifty percent off of an item
• 1:30:38
  Speaker 3: one week that goes back up to regular price the next.
• 1:30:42
  Speaker 3: And the price for using them is that the store,
• 1:30:47
  Speaker 3: the chain, the corporation knows everything you buy and it
• 1:30:52
  Speaker 3: gives them information that helps them find things to sell you.
• 1:30:57
  Speaker 3: Our androids crack every thing we do.
• 1:31:00
  Speaker 2: If you.
• 1:31:03
  Speaker 3: Buy something on Amazon, you get ads for that kind
• 1:31:06
  Speaker 3: of thing for the next month.
• 1:31:07
  Speaker 2: If you.
• 1:31:10
  Speaker 3: Buy you know or talk. I actually created a just
• 1:31:15
  Speaker 3: just for the fun of it, and a I saw
• 1:31:17
  Speaker 3: him stop selling me dog food because of this. Like
• 1:31:20
  Speaker 3: I had a conversation with my daughter about her dog
• 1:31:24
  Speaker 3: one day and for like the next six months, every
• 1:31:30
  Speaker 3: time a Google ad came up on my phone, it
• 1:31:33
  Speaker 3: was you know, I had dog food in the ad.
• 1:31:36
  Speaker 3: It was either in the ad or the ad was
• 1:31:38
  Speaker 3: for dog food, Like, I don't have a dog, Why
• 1:31:43
  Speaker 3: are you selling me dog food? Because I mentioned it,
• 1:31:46
  Speaker 3: I'll probably get a bunch of ads now for it.
• 1:31:52
  Speaker 3: It's not about the sex aspect. It's about the trojan aspect.
• 1:32:02
  Speaker 3: Every electronic device that is put in the vicinity of
• 1:32:07
  Speaker 3: your child by someone else is a trojan device used
• 1:32:14
  Speaker 3: to sneak in data collection on your child and influence
• 1:32:21
  Speaker 3: on your child. You give your kid a phone, you
• 1:32:26
  Speaker 3: have just given other people influence over your child. You
• 1:32:29
  Speaker 3: have given other people information personal information about your child.
• 1:32:35
  Speaker 3: You give your kid a computer. Same thing. When Google
• 1:32:39
  Speaker 3: started donating chromebooks to schools across the country, this was
• 1:32:44
  Speaker 3: brought up in parents groups. Are these things going to
• 1:32:47
  Speaker 3: be tracking kids? Oh no, no, definitely not going to
• 1:32:50
  Speaker 3: do it. We're going to totally respect their privacy. Five
• 1:32:53
  Speaker 3: years later there was a lawsuit because they didn't. And
• 1:33:00
  Speaker 3: one of the things that I noticed, because my kid
• 1:33:04
  Speaker 3: went to one of those schools that had chromebooks donated,
• 1:33:09
  Speaker 3: was that if he looked up information to do a
• 1:33:11
  Speaker 3: report on something, it was very limited when he looked
• 1:33:15
  Speaker 3: it up at school. If he wanted to get the
• 1:33:18
  Speaker 3: full spectrum of available information and do a well informed,
• 1:33:24
  Speaker 3: well rounded report on a subject, he had to do
• 1:33:28
  Speaker 3: his research at home. So what do you think is
• 1:33:33
  Speaker 3: going to happen. I'm not really worried that sex dolls
• 1:33:38
  Speaker 3: are going to influence children's sexual habits in the classroom.
• 1:33:44
  Speaker 3: I'm going to tell you right now, I'm worried that
• 1:33:47
  Speaker 3: biological women teaching in schools are already doing that. There
• 1:33:54
  Speaker 3: is an epidemic. And when I say epidemic, I don't
• 1:33:59
  Speaker 3: mean like nine some of the teachers are doing it.
• 1:34:01
  Speaker 3: I mean far too many are doing it, and it's
• 1:34:04
  Speaker 3: not being taken seriously of young like millennial and zoomer
• 1:34:11
  Speaker 3: age teachers molesting their students. And so I'm not gonna
• 1:34:21
  Speaker 3: turn around and say replacing them with robots puts the
• 1:34:26
  Speaker 3: kids in danger, because clearly not replacing them puts the
• 1:34:31
  Speaker 3: kids in danger. But a robot is programmed and it's
• 1:34:37
  Speaker 3: influenced by someone with an agenda. If you're going to
• 1:34:45
  Speaker 3: replace women in the classroom, replace them with male educators.
• 1:34:50
  Speaker 3: Vetted women should be vetted. They're not, but men get
• 1:34:55
  Speaker 3: vetted better than women do, but definitely male. And instead
• 1:35:01
  Speaker 3: of getting answers on things like this is in an
• 1:35:04
  Speaker 3: appropriate discussion, you shouldn't be asking those questions. You'll get
• 1:35:09
  Speaker 3: teachers that will ask their kids to focus on ethics,
• 1:35:17
  Speaker 3: and if the kid asks a challenging ethical question, they
• 1:35:21
  Speaker 3: might actually take that kid through the mental process to
• 1:35:27
  Speaker 3: figure out what the most ethical path is instead. Because
• 1:35:33
  Speaker 3: they aren't going to put robots loaded with rock software
• 1:35:38
  Speaker 3: into your kid's classroom, they are going to put PC
• 1:35:43
  Speaker 3: police into your kids classroom. They're going to put detectors
• 1:35:48
  Speaker 3: for insurgency meaning you voted for the wrong candidate in
• 1:35:55
  Speaker 3: your kids classroom. They're going to put influencers in the
• 1:35:59
  Speaker 3: kids classroom that are going to teach your child not
• 1:36:03
  Speaker 3: to think now, I don't think too hard, right, because
• 1:36:07
  Speaker 3: that's that's thought crime. And God forbid you know that
• 1:36:12
  Speaker 3: you come to a different conclusion than the powers in charge.
• 1:36:18
  Speaker 3: And while we're at it, you know, give me all
• 1:36:21
  Speaker 3: your data so I can find out what's going on
• 1:36:24
  Speaker 3: in your in your household, what are your parents doing,
• 1:36:27
  Speaker 3: what do they think, who are they voting for, what
• 1:36:30
  Speaker 3: kind of political conversations are they having teachers Female teachers
• 1:36:37
  Speaker 3: are already conning kids into developing a mental health condition
• 1:36:44
  Speaker 3: and uh, trying to fix it with surgery that doesn't
• 1:36:47
  Speaker 3: change their mental health. It's going to happen when you
• 1:36:53
  Speaker 3: can't go in there and have a conversation with a
• 1:36:56
  Speaker 3: teacher and say hands off my kid. So I don't
• 1:37:01
  Speaker 3: like this idea, but it has nothing to do with
• 1:37:05
  Speaker 3: the origin as a sexual robot company. That's completely a
• 1:37:09
  Speaker 3: red herring. And what they're gonna do here is they're
• 1:37:12
  Speaker 3: gonna get people all up in arms. Well, these are
• 1:37:14
  Speaker 3: gonna be sexy robots. These are gonna be sexual robots,
• 1:37:17
  Speaker 3: and they'll quote unquote solve the problem by making them unattractive,
• 1:37:21
  Speaker 3: middle age, you know, looking fat, you know, man faced,
• 1:37:28
  Speaker 3: female robots. And they'll still mine your kids data, influence
• 1:37:35
  Speaker 3: them against you, use them to use your children to
• 1:37:39
  Speaker 3: spy on you, and use them to dumb them down.
• 1:37:46
  Speaker 3: This is a really good time to start homeschool in
• 1:37:49
  Speaker 3: your kids if you're not already doing it. Don't let
• 1:37:52
  Speaker 3: them get into contact with this. Don't let another electronic
• 1:37:57
  Speaker 3: trojan horse get access to your children.
• 1:38:05
  Speaker 1: All right, Uh yeah, point well made. I just think
• 1:38:09
  Speaker 1: it's funny that this is another another case of AI
• 1:38:13
  Speaker 1: taking women's jobs. So yeah, well, I don't think it's
• 1:38:19
  Speaker 1: gonna be good for them. I don't think this test
• 1:38:21
  Speaker 1: is gonna work out very well. But uh, it's it
• 1:38:24
  Speaker 1: is a funny thing. And also, you know, Mike said android.
• 1:38:28
  Speaker 1: But if they're like made too, like when when we
• 1:38:30
  Speaker 1: call them guiden droids, like, wouldn't we call them gunddroids
• 1:38:35
  Speaker 1: instead of androids?
• 1:38:36
  Speaker 4: I think would be there.
• 1:38:37
  Speaker 3: I don't know.
• 1:38:39
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I don't know either. I'm just saying if they're because.
• 1:38:42
  Speaker 4: What do you do if they don't identify as androids?
• 1:38:46
  Speaker 2: Yeah?
• 1:38:46
  Speaker 3: Right, Well, I know one thing. If female teachers are
• 1:38:53
  Speaker 3: concerned about losing their jobs to these things, maybe they
• 1:38:56
  Speaker 3: should stop raping the children.
• 1:38:58
  Speaker 2: Yeah, maybe they should prove that they're better for the
• 1:39:02
  Speaker 2: children than.
• 1:39:03
  Speaker 1: The than the robots and the robots, or we can
• 1:39:07
  Speaker 1: just go back to calling them foids if they're if
• 1:39:09
  Speaker 1: they're female androids, there you go, all right, anyway, let
• 1:39:12
  Speaker 1: us know what we you guys think about this one
• 1:39:13
  Speaker 1: of the comments, and we're gonna move on to the
• 1:39:15
  Speaker 1: final story. This has been a slightly longer than average sausage,
• 1:39:18
  Speaker 1: but that's Okay, I kind of knew it.
• 1:39:20
  Speaker 2: Dua Lipa. If you guys don't know, she is a
• 1:39:23
  Speaker 2: pop star, yeah, I know, I don't. I don't know.
• 1:39:26
  Speaker 2: I know of this person, but I don't know their music.
• 1:39:28
  Speaker 4: It sounds like a disease, bad.
• 1:39:32
  Speaker 2: Case of Dua Lipa.
• 1:39:35
  Speaker 1: So anyway, pop star Dua Lipa opened the Manifesto Library,
• 1:39:39
  Speaker 1: which is a permanent collection of one hundred band and
• 1:39:43
  Speaker 1: censored books inside the historic.
• 1:39:47
  Speaker 2: Yeah they're not banded or sensor.
• 1:39:49
  Speaker 1: The Historic Live Live aria Leo in Porto, Portugal, one
• 1:39:55
  Speaker 1: of the world's most beautiful bookstores and it's also a
• 1:39:58
  Speaker 1: tourist locate. The library and extension of her service ninety
• 1:40:03
  Speaker 1: five books. The book club is housed in a new
• 1:40:06
  Speaker 1: cultural auditorium designed by Pritzker Pritzker Prize winning architect Alvaro Siza.
• 1:40:14
  Speaker 2: Interesting.
• 1:40:14
  Speaker 1: The Pritzker family, the guys that created the prize. They
• 1:40:19
  Speaker 1: run lots of territory in the United States.
• 1:40:22
  Speaker 2: In fact, JP J. D. Printzker is the governor of Illinois,
• 1:40:26
  Speaker 2: which is where I'm from. But anyway.
• 1:40:29
  Speaker 1: It organizes titles around themes of power, control, voice, and memory,
• 1:40:33
  Speaker 1: featuring works by authors like Margaret Atwood, which is basically
• 1:40:38
  Speaker 1: The Handmaid's Tale, Solomon Rushdie, George Orwell, and others. Lipa
• 1:40:43
  Speaker 1: described it as a shrine to books that have disappeared
• 1:40:46
  Speaker 1: and a space for reading, debate, and reflection on censorship.
• 1:40:52
  Speaker 2: Literally not being censored but okay.
• 1:40:54
  Speaker 1: Many of the books highlighted have face challenges or removals
• 1:40:57
  Speaker 1: from US school curricula and library because they have themes
• 1:41:01
  Speaker 1: involving race, sexuality, or LGBTQ plus content. So they're basically
• 1:41:05
  Speaker 1: like critical theory books and queer theory books, but they
• 1:41:09
  Speaker 1: are not banned in the broader sense. They remain widely
• 1:41:13
  Speaker 1: available for purchase and reading by adults. You can get
• 1:41:15
  Speaker 1: them on Amazon, you can go to Walden Books, and
• 1:41:17
  Speaker 1: go to Barnes and Noble. They're all there in their
• 1:41:19
  Speaker 1: own banned book sections. By the way, critics have noted
• 1:41:25
  Speaker 1: that the banned books framing often refers to age appropriate
• 1:41:28
  Speaker 1: restrictions in educational settings rather than outright prohibitions on public access.
• 1:41:34
  Speaker 1: The initiative has drawn praise promoting literacy and free expression,
• 1:41:38
  Speaker 1: while sparking debate about the rhetoric around book challenges.
• 1:41:43
  Speaker 4: So so they're not it doesn't include the kids, and
• 1:41:47
  Speaker 4: book it doesn't tell you how to make bombs.
• 1:41:50
  Speaker 2: You can probably I don't know, I have to look
• 1:41:54
  Speaker 2: tell you that you.
• 1:41:55
  Speaker 4: Should make bombs so as to kill all those strutted
• 1:42:01
  Speaker 4: something like that.
• 1:42:02
  Speaker 3: I'm not going to say that I have a copy
• 1:42:09
  Speaker 3: of it, but I have seen the inside of the
• 1:42:12
  Speaker 3: Anarchist Cookbook, and it does actually disclose how to make
• 1:42:17
  Speaker 3: different types of weapons, some some different types of weapons
• 1:42:21
  Speaker 3: and other mayhem devices. But a lot of this stuff
• 1:42:25
  Speaker 3: that's in it, if you don't know what you're doing,
• 1:42:28
  Speaker 3: you're more likely to blow your own hands off or
• 1:42:30
  Speaker 3: poison yourself than you are to damage anyone else.
• 1:42:36
  Speaker 2: Uh.
• 1:42:36
  Speaker 3: And also, like I said, I'm not saying I have
• 1:42:41
  Speaker 3: a copy or anything like that. It is actually, if
• 1:42:43
  Speaker 3: I understand correctly, not legal, and that is an actual
• 1:42:47
  Speaker 3: banned book. You can get in trouble for that, which
• 1:42:52
  Speaker 3: but the Anarchist Cookbook believe that's the Oh yeah, and
• 1:42:55
  Speaker 3: you can get.
• 1:42:56
  Speaker 2: Those in Chicago. They're in all the bookstores there.
• 1:42:58
  Speaker 3: No, they're not. There is a real version, and there
• 1:43:04
  Speaker 3: is a fake fake version is widely available. Don't try
• 1:43:09
  Speaker 3: any of the things that you find in it, because
• 1:43:12
  Speaker 3: that that will actually do uh some damage to you.
• 1:43:18
  Speaker 3: And then the real version like there, there are some
• 1:43:22
  Speaker 3: very dangerous recipes in there as well. If you, like
• 1:43:25
  Speaker 3: I said, if you don't know what you're doing, If
• 1:43:27
  Speaker 3: you don't understand what you're doing, and people make stupid
• 1:43:32
  Speaker 3: mistakes with chemistry and their own homes all the time,
• 1:43:34
  Speaker 3: trying to improve upon existing over the counter available cleaning stuff.
• 1:43:42
  Speaker 3: Don't mix ship if you don't understand how it works.
• 1:43:46
  Speaker 3: I will just say that, and uh, but yeah, there,
• 1:43:50
  Speaker 3: if you have easy access to it, it's it's fake.
• 1:43:55
  Speaker 3: It's not the real one. And if you if you
• 1:43:59
  Speaker 3: really have to work for it, if you're ever suspected
• 1:44:03
  Speaker 3: of doing something that you should not have done, involving
• 1:44:06
  Speaker 3: any kind of mayhem causing it will be used against you.
• 1:44:11
  Speaker 3: If there's evidence that you have possessed and owned a copy,
• 1:44:16
  Speaker 3: which I've never owned a copy, well, well we'll go
• 1:44:20
  Speaker 3: that far. And it's it's it's really dumb. That's that's
• 1:44:28
  Speaker 3: actually the closest you've ever seen to a band book.
• 1:44:32
  Speaker 4: I have to wonder if the if the Bible can
• 1:44:36
  Speaker 4: be found among the shelves of this bookstore, because there
• 1:44:39
  Speaker 4: are many countries in which the Bible is banned. Did
• 1:44:44
  Speaker 4: you know that there's like fifty odd countries.
• 1:44:48
  Speaker 2: Well, I'm looking at the list and.
• 1:44:52
  Speaker 4: Islamic countries. Yeah, the Bible is completely banned. There are
• 1:44:56
  Speaker 4: very few countries in which the Koran is banned. And yeah,
• 1:45:01
  Speaker 4: cookbook is banned. And to be honest, the Quran is sense,
• 1:45:07
  Speaker 4: it's sense, it's censored. I didn't say anything. I don't
• 1:45:11
  Speaker 4: know what you're talking about. I'm not saying that the
• 1:45:14
  Speaker 4: Quran is some kind of instruction manual for terrible. I
• 1:45:20
  Speaker 4: didn't say anything. I didn't say anything. I don't know
• 1:45:24
  Speaker 4: what we're talking about.
• 1:45:26
  Speaker 3: Well, here's here's the thing about band books, right, there's
• 1:45:30
  Speaker 3: two narratives about band books. There are books that actually
• 1:45:32
  Speaker 3: were burned and confiscated from people's homes. It wasn't in
• 1:45:37
  Speaker 3: the United States for the most part. I think Germany
• 1:45:40
  Speaker 3: is famous for that. I also think some some conservative
• 1:45:47
  Speaker 3: theocracies have been famous for that.
• 1:45:49
  Speaker 4: Right.
• 1:45:53
  Speaker 3: One of the most deadly books in human history was
• 1:45:55
  Speaker 3: the Malleus Maleficarum. That wasn't banned. It was actually quite
• 1:46:01
  Speaker 3: widely used in its time. But a lot of people
• 1:46:08
  Speaker 3: have made claims throughout public education history in the United
• 1:46:12
  Speaker 3: States about banned books. And the skinny is this there
• 1:46:16
  Speaker 3: have been groups of people throughout the history of public
• 1:46:20
  Speaker 3: education in the United States who have attempted to prevent
• 1:46:25
  Speaker 3: schools from using certain books in the education system or
• 1:46:29
  Speaker 3: allowing students to use certain books in the education system
• 1:46:34
  Speaker 3: for part of their education. And historically it was stuff
• 1:46:40
  Speaker 3: like huck Finn. And the reason they were upset at
• 1:46:45
  Speaker 3: huck Finn was because it provided evidence that not everybody
• 1:46:51
  Speaker 3: was on board with racism back in the day when
• 1:46:56
  Speaker 3: you know, we're supposed to believe that every buddy that
• 1:47:00
  Speaker 3: wasn't black was racist, and it was pretty obvious through
• 1:47:06
  Speaker 3: the eyes of the child character that Mark Twain created,
• 1:47:12
  Speaker 3: that Mark Twain thought racism was pretty stupid and disgusting,
• 1:47:18
  Speaker 3: and that totally destroyed the narrative that there should always
• 1:47:23
  Speaker 3: be a divide between the races. They attacked nineteen eighty
• 1:47:28
  Speaker 3: four because nineteen eighty four showed how dangerous communism is.
• 1:47:36
  Speaker 3: That's the pattern that used to exist. And so kids
• 1:47:40
  Speaker 3: who were old enough to comprehend, debate, and draw conclusions
• 1:47:47
  Speaker 3: from the material, they didn't want them seeing those books,
• 1:47:53
  Speaker 3: and they worked really hard to get them out. And
• 1:47:56
  Speaker 3: then there were parents that wanted anything to do with
• 1:48:00
  Speaker 3: you know, sex education, birth control and stuff like that eliminated,
• 1:48:04
  Speaker 3: and they were the bad guys. So now the people
• 1:48:10
  Speaker 3: who want to molest your children to impose a mental
• 1:48:17
  Speaker 3: health condition on them, artificially increase their likelihood of suicide,
• 1:48:24
  Speaker 3: cause them to think that they have to have life
• 1:48:26
  Speaker 3: changing surgery that won't cure it, and then abandon them
• 1:48:31
  Speaker 3: if they figure out that they've been exploited. They want
• 1:48:36
  Speaker 3: to use that same complaint against people keeping kids from
• 1:48:41
  Speaker 3: being able to think and learn. They want to use
• 1:48:47
  Speaker 3: the complaint that you're stopping us by banning books, when
• 1:48:52
  Speaker 3: what is being discussed here is books being kept out
• 1:48:57
  Speaker 3: of elementary school that have subject matters that a kid
• 1:49:02
  Speaker 3: really shouldn't see at that age, or books being kept
• 1:49:06
  Speaker 3: out of the school system when their only purpose is
• 1:49:11
  Speaker 3: pornography and other forms of erotica rather than educational. That's
• 1:49:20
  Speaker 3: a completely different situation, and it is perfectly fair for
• 1:49:25
  Speaker 3: the school system for school libraries and classrooms to reserve
• 1:49:30
  Speaker 3: their book space entirely from books that can be used
• 1:49:34
  Speaker 3: for educational purposes. When you looked at it from the
• 1:49:40
  Speaker 3: perspective of attempting to educate a child in not just reading, writing,
• 1:49:46
  Speaker 3: and arithmetic, but how to identify and parse ethical issues.
• 1:49:54
  Speaker 3: It pretty much draws a line what should not be
• 1:49:58
  Speaker 3: in schools in what should be. But it really doesn't
• 1:50:05
  Speaker 3: matter because you should be homeschooling your children anyway. And
• 1:50:11
  Speaker 3: if you're homeschooling your children, it doesn't matter what the
• 1:50:14
  Speaker 3: fuck they want to put in the school buildings. They
• 1:50:16
  Speaker 3: can put you know, mud in place of all the
• 1:50:20
  Speaker 3: books for all of that. It matters homeschool your kids.
• 1:50:24
  Speaker 3: Don't give these dipshits access to it, and don't listen
• 1:50:27
  Speaker 3: to the whining.
• 1:50:32
  Speaker 2: All right, So yeah, I brought up a list of
• 1:50:35
  Speaker 2: the books, and.
• 1:50:37
  Speaker 1: There is there is no Doctor Seuss, there's no Mark Twain,
• 1:50:43
  Speaker 1: there's no George orwell Tolki roll Doll thirty years ago.
• 1:50:49
  Speaker 1: It's all stuff that. It's all stuff that is basically like,
• 1:50:53
  Speaker 1: it's all wolf shit. Well there's there's clockwork orange, but
• 1:50:57
  Speaker 1: I don't know, I don't know that.
• 1:50:58
  Speaker 2: Kids should be reading that book. So again, they're not banned,
• 1:51:02
  Speaker 2: you know, these are.
• 1:51:02
  Speaker 3: Which is a discussion that we had at my house
• 1:51:04
  Speaker 3: because I started reading nineteen eighty four in like the
• 1:51:06
  Speaker 3: fourth grade and my mom was like, no, that's too violent.
• 1:51:08
  Speaker 3: Here's the animal Farm. Yeah, age appropriateness matters of course.
• 1:51:13
  Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, for sure.
• 1:51:16
  Speaker 1: So yeah, so I'm looking at the list, and none
• 1:51:20
  Speaker 1: of these books are actually banned. These are all just
• 1:51:23
  Speaker 1: books that are oh well, yeah, moos Men who Hate
• 1:51:29
  Speaker 1: Women by Laura Bates is on there. Nobody banned that book.
• 1:51:34
  Speaker 1: It's a terrible book probably, but you know, like I
• 1:51:38
  Speaker 1: mentioned nineteen.
• 1:51:38
  Speaker 3: Eighty four, it doesn't sound very educational. I can say that.
• 1:51:43
  Speaker 1: Oh no, so yeah, Fahrenheit for fifty one. Again, I
• 1:51:51
  Speaker 1: think that if anything, most of these are this is
• 1:51:54
  Speaker 1: just like another signal. They're just signaling. To Kill a
• 1:51:57
  Speaker 1: Mockingbird is on here.
• 1:51:59
  Speaker 3: Oh well, those are books that have that we were
• 1:52:01
  Speaker 3: attacked in the eighties and the nineties. Here's the thing.
• 1:52:05
  Speaker 3: Right to Kill a Mockingbird is a story that demonstrates
• 1:52:11
  Speaker 3: why the believe all Women narrative is bullshit, so they
• 1:52:16
  Speaker 3: want to ban it. That's that's that's the whole reason
• 1:52:19
  Speaker 3: why that book is in any way, shape or form
• 1:52:23
  Speaker 3: considered inappropriate. And Fahrenheit four fifty one is about the
• 1:52:33
  Speaker 3: importance of being able to think for yourself. The thing
• 1:52:38
  Speaker 3: that is banned in the world of Fahrenheit four fifty
• 1:52:42
  Speaker 3: one is independent thought, intelligence, accountability, and in order to
• 1:52:50
  Speaker 3: facilitate that. Books that facilitate that are banned. In fact,
• 1:52:56
  Speaker 3: books are banned. Uh so, so they don't like that
• 1:53:01
  Speaker 3: book because they don't want people thinking for themselves. They
• 1:53:04
  Speaker 3: want compliance.
• 1:53:06
  Speaker 1: Yeah yeah, so yeah that basically this is just a
• 1:53:13
  Speaker 1: big old virtue signal, that's all it is.
• 1:53:16
  Speaker 2: And then, of course do Alipa knows what she's doing.
• 1:53:19
  Speaker 1: She's acting like there's a problem where there is not,
• 1:53:22
  Speaker 1: and she's acting like people are making an argument when
• 1:53:25
  Speaker 1: they are not. But it doesn't matter because she is
• 1:53:27
  Speaker 1: going to get this whole project. It's gonna get a
• 1:53:30
  Speaker 1: lot of press, and it's gonna be celebrated, and tourists
• 1:53:33
  Speaker 1: are gonna like go down there to Portugal just to
• 1:53:36
  Speaker 1: visit the library and say I was there and I
• 1:53:38
  Speaker 1: fought back against tyranny or something by buying this, buying
• 1:53:43
  Speaker 1: The Handmaid's Tale. So yeah, I guess good for you guys,
• 1:53:48
  Speaker 1: if you're that kind of that's the kind of thing
• 1:53:50
  Speaker 1: you're into.
• 1:53:51
  Speaker 2: All right, let me make sure that I.
• 1:53:52
  Speaker 4: Still do not know who do Alipa is. She never
• 1:53:55
  Speaker 4: discovered this.
• 1:53:58
  Speaker 2: Yeah, she's a singer.
• 1:54:00
  Speaker 4: Series of syllables will never take pride of place in
• 1:54:04
  Speaker 4: my brain.
• 1:54:05
  Speaker 2: No, it's it doesn't.
• 1:54:06
  Speaker 4: It's just a series of syllables. It's duwa leaper. It's
• 1:54:10
  Speaker 4: like some kind of magic spell that someone tried to
• 1:54:12
  Speaker 4: cost on me. Yeah, and I was like, no, I
• 1:54:15
  Speaker 4: do not accept this jewel leap a spell of yours.
• 1:54:18
  Speaker 3: She's the international symbol for homeschool your children.
• 1:54:24
  Speaker 2: The mascot of home schooling your children.
• 1:54:27
  Speaker 4: Yeah, juwe leapa. Yes, I know what you mean. Let
• 1:54:30
  Speaker 4: us home school our children.
• 1:54:34
  Speaker 2: Yes, yes, of course.
• 1:54:35
  Speaker 1: All right, So I got some super things and then
• 1:54:41
  Speaker 1: we'll go into the patron show. So Dylon Dylan is Dylan.
• 1:54:45
  Speaker 1: Dylan gives us five dollars and says it's pronounced Dylan
• 1:54:48
  Speaker 1: like Bob Dylan. The Band Books Library will house every
• 1:54:51
  Speaker 1: band book except Expedient Homemade Firearms by Philip A Lootie. Yeah,
• 1:54:57
  Speaker 1: I look that one's not on the list.
• 1:54:58
  Speaker 2: So you are right, but of course you are. We
• 1:55:01
  Speaker 2: knew that. Thank you, Dylan. I like saying dialon though.
• 1:55:05
  Speaker 1: Roboto gives us a dollar and says, does an anarchy
• 1:55:08
  Speaker 1: for dummies exist?
• 1:55:09
  Speaker 2: Already?
• 1:55:09
  Speaker 3: Probably the anarchy for dummies does? It's called the Democrat Party,
• 1:55:17
  Speaker 3: all right, And I.
• 1:55:18
  Speaker 2: Think there was a super chow. I mean double check.
• 1:55:21
  Speaker 1: Yeah, the one good man earlier gave us five dollars
• 1:55:24
  Speaker 1: and said, these stories remind me of what happened in
• 1:55:27
  Speaker 1: World War eleven.
• 1:55:28
  Speaker 2: I was there for that. No, I wasn't there for that.
• 1:55:30
  Speaker 2: I don't know what when did that happen? All right?
• 1:55:33
  Speaker 1: Anyway, So now we're going to go into the Patron
• 1:55:37
  Speaker 1: Show and we're going to look at this medium article
• 1:55:41
  Speaker 1: or blog. It's blog technically that entitled men have started
• 1:55:45
  Speaker 1: a new drama to escape accountability and responsibilities. We're gonna
• 1:55:50
  Speaker 1: find out how exactly are men doing this? How are
• 1:55:53
  Speaker 1: they escaping accountability and responsibility?
• 1:55:58
  Speaker 2: I didn't know that was a man thing. I guess
• 1:56:00
  Speaker 2: I was. I guess I have a lot to learn
• 1:56:02
  Speaker 2: about this stuff. So if you guys want to, I'm sorry,
• 1:56:05
  Speaker 2: we're gonna say anybody.
• 1:56:08
  Speaker 4: Well, I said, ugh, yeah, I leaned in as I
• 1:56:13
  Speaker 4: said it.
• 1:56:16
  Speaker 1: All right, So anyway, if you guys want to join
• 1:56:18
  Speaker 1: us for that, become a Badger by going to feed
• 1:56:20
  Speaker 1: the Badchel dot com forward slast subscribe so you can
• 1:56:23
  Speaker 1: join us for the Patron Show and all the additional
• 1:56:24
  Speaker 1: content and yeah, hopefully we'll see you guys in the
• 1:56:29
  Speaker 1: Patron Show at that time.
• 1:56:31
  Speaker 2: But in the meantime we have to go.
• 1:56:34
  Speaker 1: So thank you to Mike Jay for helping with the
• 1:56:37
  Speaker 1: write ups, thank you to Mike and Hannah for joining
• 1:56:39
  Speaker 1: me on the show, and thank you guys most of
• 1:56:41
  Speaker 1: all for watching and participating in the conversations around today's
• 1:56:46
  Speaker 1: news topic. So, if you guys liked this video, please
• 1:56:48
  Speaker 1: hit like, subscribe if you're not already subscribed, hit the
• 1:56:51
  Speaker 1: BELF notifications, leave us a comment, let us know what
• 1:56:53
  Speaker 1: you guys think about what we talked about on the
• 1:56:54
  Speaker 1: show today, and share the video because sharing is caring.
• 1:56:57
  Speaker 1: Thank you guys so much for coming on this episode
• 1:56:58
  Speaker 1: of HPR News and we will see you next Tuesday.
• 1:57:01
  Speaker 4: Machines