Latest / V / Biden's Cancer Cover-Up: How Long Did They Know? (Ep.206)

Transcript

Biden's Cancer Cover-Up: How Long Did They Know? (Ep.206) · V

0:00
Speaker 1: Good morning, happy Monday, and welcome to Bongina Report Early Edition.
0:04
Speaker 1: The Biden family announces that Joe has cancer, something that
0:09
Speaker 1: they've probably known for a while, potentially even years. The
0:13
Speaker 1: FBI moves to effectively shut down its D.C. headquarters. SCOTUS
0:18
Speaker 1: halts Trump's use of the Alien Enemies Act for deporting
0:21
Speaker 1: Venezuelan gang members. Hillary Clinton pushes for mass immigration over
0:26
Speaker 1: boosting birth rates of American citizens. The Telegram CEO reveals
0:30
Speaker 1: that France pressured him to censor Romanian conservatives. An anti-natalist
0:36
Speaker 1: terrorist bombs an IVF clinic in Florida. And the left
0:40
Speaker 1: insists a very much alive pregnant Georgia woman is actually dead.
0:44
Speaker 1: All this on Bongino Report, early edition.
0:58
Speaker 2: Office of former President Joe Biden issuing a statement just
1:01
Speaker 2: moments ago that the former president has been diagnosed on
1:05
Speaker 2: Friday with what they described as an aggressive form of
1:09
Speaker 2: prostate cancer that has spread to his bones. I want
1:11
Speaker 2: to read you this statement again from Biden's personal office.
1:15
Speaker 2: It says, last week, President Joe Biden was seen for
1:18
Speaker 2: a new finding of a prostate nodule after experiencing increasing
1:22
Speaker 2: urinary symptoms. On Friday, he was diagnosed with prostate cancer
1:25
Speaker 2: characterized by a Gleason score of nine with metastasis to
1:29
Speaker 2: the bone. While this represents a more aggressive form of
1:32
Speaker 2: the disease, the cancer appears to be hormone sensitive, which
1:35
Speaker 2: allows for effective management. The statement goes on to say
1:39
Speaker 2: that Biden and his family are reviewing treatment options with
1:42
Speaker 2: his physicians.
1:44
Speaker 1: President Joe Biden was under constant medical surveillance by a
1:48
Speaker 1: very sophisticated medical team while he was president. And after
1:53
Speaker 1: all of the lies we've been told about his health
1:56
Speaker 1: over the last four years, we're supposed to believe that
2:01
Speaker 1: nobody noticed that he had cancer that metastasized to the
2:07
Speaker 1: bone until now, apparently. And to that, I just say, really, guys?
2:13
Speaker 1: I looked up the timeline on prostate cancer. It's pretty
2:19
Speaker 1: clear cut. At the fastest, prostate cancer can metastasize to
2:23
Speaker 1: the bones within one to two years after initial diagnosis
2:26
Speaker 1: if it is highly aggressive and left untreated. I seriously
2:31
Speaker 1: doubt that they had no idea until last Friday that
2:36
Speaker 1: Joe Biden had prostate cancer to the point where it
2:40
Speaker 1: had metastasized to the bone. This is almost unbelievable considering
2:47
Speaker 1: the medical team that he has around him. The most
2:50
Speaker 1: usual timeframe for prostate cancer to metastasize to the bone,
2:54
Speaker 1: if it's going to happen, is typically around five to
2:58
Speaker 1: 10 years after the initial diagnosis. Now they're saying it's aggressive.
3:02
Speaker 1: And even if it is aggressive, again, we're still looking
3:04
Speaker 1: at one to two years, not last Friday. Here's a
3:08
Speaker 1: little flashback. July, 2022, when Joe Biden had a gaffe,
3:13
Speaker 1: where he said that he has cancer. Take a listen.
3:18
Speaker 3: And because it was a four-lane highway that was accessible,
3:22
Speaker 3: my mother drove us rather than us being able to walk.
3:26
Speaker 3: And guess what? The first frost, you knew what was happening.
3:31
Speaker 3: You had to put on your windshield wipers to get
3:34
Speaker 3: literally the oil slick off the window. That's why I
3:37
Speaker 3: and so damn many other people I grew up with
3:38
Speaker 3: have cancer and why I can't for the longest time.
3:42
Speaker 3: Delaware had the highest cancer rate in the nation.
3:45
Speaker 1: Seemed pretty smooth to me. Maybe it's a gaffe. Who knows?
3:47
Speaker 1: It could have been a gaffe. But given what we
3:51
Speaker 1: now know and given that the timeline makes no sense,
3:54
Speaker 1: it really makes you stop and think. Again, Joe Biden
3:57
Speaker 1: has been surrounded by a legion of top physicians. It's
4:01
Speaker 1: really hard to believe that just last week he discovered
4:04
Speaker 1: he has cancer. And they caught it so late that
4:08
Speaker 1: it's already colonized his bone marrow. Stephen Krakauer tweeted yesterday,
4:14
Speaker 1: Joe Biden just discovered he had cancer this week, like
4:17
Speaker 1: the corporate media and Dem establishment just discovered he had
4:20
Speaker 1: cognitive decline at the June debate. I mean, this is
4:24
Speaker 1: how believable it is. It's the same thing as Jake
4:26
Speaker 1: Tapper being like, I can't believe we had no idea
4:28
Speaker 1: that Joe Biden was in massive cognitive decline. Let me
4:32
Speaker 1: write a book and cash in on the cover up
4:34
Speaker 1: that I actively engaged in myself. It's just this is
4:38
Speaker 1: just as absurd. The real story here, guys, is that
4:44
Speaker 1: we were living under a shadow government for four years. Clearly,
4:48
Speaker 1: Joe Biden was never in charge. He couldn't have been.
4:53
Speaker 1: He most likely had cancer while he was in office.
4:57
Speaker 1: And he didn't tell the public, which, by the way,
4:59
Speaker 1: the American people had a right to know that. This
5:02
Speaker 1: is a massive, massive scandal. And the scandal is not
5:06
Speaker 1: just that, well, White House officials lied, as Jake Tapper
5:10
Speaker 1: wants it to be. No, no, no. First of all,
5:12
Speaker 1: there's a massive cover-up that included the media, which also
5:15
Speaker 1: included Jake Tapper, but that our government was not being
5:19
Speaker 1: run by the man that we allegedly elected to office,
5:23
Speaker 1: that his physician lied clearly about this, that his family lied,
5:28
Speaker 1: that people around him clearly lied. Here's urologist Dr. David
5:33
Speaker 1: Shusterman on NewsNation discussing this cancer diagnosis and just how
5:37
Speaker 1: unbelievable it is.
5:38
Speaker 4: It's very unlikely that someone could get annual checkups and
5:43
Speaker 4: not notice a PSA elevation over the past. This is
5:49
Speaker 4: what I typically would see in a VA hospital, where
5:52
Speaker 4: a patient hasn't had medical attention in 10 years, presents
5:57
Speaker 4: to an emergency room with bone pain, and then they
6:01
Speaker 4: find that it's metastatic prostate cancer. But in the modern
6:04
Speaker 4: age of medicine, especially the fact that he was a
6:08
Speaker 4: former president, he had intensive state-of-the-art care where we can
6:16
Speaker 4: see prostate cancer 10 years in the past. So this is,
6:20
Speaker 4: I mean, it's very unusual to hear that someone has
6:24
Speaker 4: prostate cancer where they're annually being followed up. And the
6:31
Speaker 4: fact that we just find it at a Gleason 9
6:34
Speaker 4: is just pretty much unheard of in this day and
6:37
Speaker 4: age of medicine.
6:39
Speaker 1: So obviously this didn't happen last Friday. I mean, this
6:42
Speaker 1: is like asking you to believe that my shirt is purple.
6:44
Speaker 1: If you're listening, it's blue. And I think some of
6:49
Speaker 1: you are bringing up the auto pen issue.
6:50
Speaker 5: Yeah.
6:51
Speaker 1: I mean, so to be fair with the auto pen,
6:53
Speaker 1: it's been used by previous presidents. It wasn't introduced by
6:56
Speaker 1: the Biden admin. At the same time, you have to think,
6:58
Speaker 1: He used it a lot. He used his auto pen
7:01
Speaker 1: a lot of times. And we also know that now
7:05
Speaker 1: he was likely seriously ill. He clearly was in massive
7:08
Speaker 1: cognitive decline. He was not in control of any of
7:11
Speaker 1: his mental or physical faculty. So you have to think, well,
7:15
Speaker 1: was he actually signing off on any of these bills
7:17
Speaker 1: or executive orders? I don't know. It's hard to tell.
7:20
Speaker 1: I mean, you have the auto pen plus this man
7:22
Speaker 1: who clearly was not in charge of the presidency, what
7:25
Speaker 1: are we supposed to believe here? I mean, it makes
7:28
Speaker 1: you feel like, is this whole system a facade? But
7:31
Speaker 1: this is why I talk about disclosure all the time,
7:33
Speaker 1: like the need for our government to be transparent with us,
7:37
Speaker 1: because we have no confidence. This is going to be
7:40
Speaker 1: so incredibly damaging to the faith that the American people
7:44
Speaker 1: have in our system. And I want to be real
7:47
Speaker 1: about something, because there's a lot of people online, even
7:49
Speaker 1: people on the political right, people that I like and
7:50
Speaker 1: respect who are saying Now is not the time to
7:53
Speaker 1: be mean. We have to be nice. We have to
7:55
Speaker 1: give Joe Biden space and offer up our prayers. And yes,
7:59
Speaker 1: you can pray for Joe Biden that he hopefully doesn't
8:03
Speaker 1: go to hell, pray for the repose of his soul
8:05
Speaker 1: if and when he dies. But I'll just say this,
8:08
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is a bad guy. Joe Biden is a
8:11
Speaker 1: very bad man. And I'm not going to just pretend
8:14
Speaker 1: like that's not true because he has a cancer diagnosis.
8:17
Speaker 1: David Axelrod said on CNN yesterday, that conversations about Biden's
8:21
Speaker 1: mental acuity, quote, should be more muted and set aside
8:25
Speaker 1: for now as he's struggling with this. And to that
8:28
Speaker 1: I say, no. Like, he sold this country out to
8:31
Speaker 1: America's foreign adversaries. Arguably, potentially lied about having cancer while
8:38
Speaker 1: God knows who ran the country. This is a massive
8:41
Speaker 1: public scandal. Like, huge. A betrayal at the highest levels.
8:47
Speaker 1: And we're supposed to just say, OK, well, now he
8:49
Speaker 1: has cancer, so we're just not going to talk about
8:50
Speaker 1: it anymore. And the timing here is extraordinary because right
8:56
Speaker 1: before this cancer announcement, another Biden story broke. The full
9:01
Speaker 1: Robert Herr, Joe Biden interview was released. If you'll all remember,
9:06
Speaker 1: in October 2023, then President Joe Biden was interviewed by
9:09
Speaker 1: special counsel Robert Herr regarding his handling of classified documents.
9:14
Speaker 1: These documents were from Biden's vice presidency, which means as
9:18
Speaker 1: vice president, he had no power to declassify these documents.
9:21
Speaker 1: And meanwhile, Biden's DOJ was pursuing criminal charges against Trump
9:25
Speaker 1: for holding classified documents that he did in fact have
9:30
Speaker 1: the power to declassify because he was the president. During
9:34
Speaker 1: Herr's interview with Biden, Herr concluded that while Biden had
9:38
Speaker 1: willfully retained and disclosed such materials, No criminal charges would
9:43
Speaker 1: be pursued because the conviction would be unlikely given that
9:46
Speaker 1: Biden is a was is an, quote, elderly man with
9:50
Speaker 1: a poor memory. So basically, he just said Joe Biden
9:53
Speaker 1: is not all there. So we can't prosecute him. The
9:57
Speaker 1: president of the United States is not mentally fit enough.
10:01
Speaker 1: He will never actually be convicted of anything, so we're
10:04
Speaker 1: not going to pursue any kind of charges. On May 17th,
10:07
Speaker 1: so like just a few days ago, Axios released the
10:11
Speaker 1: full unedited Robert Herr Biden interview. And it revealed something
10:15
Speaker 1: pretty interesting. Specifically, the audio revealed that Biden's lawyer stepped
10:18
Speaker 1: in multiple times and prevented Biden from implicating himself whenever necessary.
10:24
Speaker 1: So the tapes further suggest that special counsel Herr wanted
10:29
Speaker 1: to avoid charging Biden and used his cognitive decline as
10:33
Speaker 1: an excuse to avoid any kind of accountability for this president.
10:38
Speaker 1: As Mike Benz wrote yesterday, the DOJ used Biden's retarded
10:42
Speaker 1: mental state as a shield to not charge him for
10:45
Speaker 1: the exact felony crimes, possession of classified docs, they were
10:49
Speaker 1: actively charging Trump for. It's just a massive scandal. Biden
10:55
Speaker 1: and his family do not deserve sympathy from the American people.
10:58
Speaker 1: We deserve an apology, frankly, especially when you consider that
11:03
Speaker 1: this family cashed in on Biden's name for years, selling
11:08
Speaker 1: out this country to our foreign adversaries. That was Hunter
11:11
Speaker 1: Biden's whole job. The Hunter Biden laptop, which revealed the
11:15
Speaker 1: whole thing, confirmed it all. The laptop was confirmed by
11:19
Speaker 1: the FBI a full year prior to the New York
11:23
Speaker 1: Post story. And instead of investigating and prosecuting, the permanent
11:27
Speaker 1: state actively covered up the story by inhibiting well-meaning IRS
11:32
Speaker 1: investigators and suggesting to the media and big tech companies
11:36
Speaker 1: that the laptop was somehow fake foreign disinformation. It's a fully,
11:41
Speaker 1: fully corrupted story. permanent state. And this is why, frankly,
11:45
Speaker 1: at the FBI, the firings are so good. This is
11:48
Speaker 1: exactly what we need. Dan and Cash have been getting
11:52
Speaker 1: rid of anyone who touched the Trump-Mar-a-Lago raid and who
11:56
Speaker 1: touched any J6 cases. Clearly, they don't deserve to have
12:00
Speaker 1: the jobs that they have right now. So they're getting
12:02
Speaker 1: rid of them. And yesterday, we had learned some more
12:05
Speaker 1: positive news on the FBI front. Dan and Cash, this
12:08
Speaker 1: is actually very critical, they're shutting down The D.C. FBI headquarters.
12:14
Speaker 1: Take a listen.
12:15
Speaker 6: Look, the FBI is 38,000 when we're fully manned, which
12:18
Speaker 6: we're not. In the national capital region, in the 50
12:20
Speaker 6: mile radius around Washington, D.C., there were 11,000 FBI employees.
12:24
Speaker 6: That's like a third of the workforce. A third of
12:26
Speaker 6: the crime doesn't happen here. So we're taking 1,500 of
12:28
Speaker 6: those folks and moving them out. Every state's getting a
12:30
Speaker 6: plus up. And I think when we do things like that,
12:33
Speaker 6: we inspire folks in America to become intel analysts and
12:36
Speaker 6: agents and say, we want to go work at the
12:37
Speaker 6: FBI because we want to go fight violent crime and
12:39
Speaker 6: we want to get sent out into the country to
12:41
Speaker 6: do it. And that's what we're doing in the next three, six,
12:43
Speaker 6: nine months. We're going to do that hard. And, you know,
12:46
Speaker 6: I didn't know that I was going to do this,
12:48
Speaker 6: but I'm going to announce it on your show anyway.
12:50
Speaker 6: This FBI is leaving the Hoover Building because this building
12:53
Speaker 6: is unsafe for our workforce. And we want the workforce.
12:55
Speaker 6: You just gave up a big nugget there. But we
12:57
Speaker 6: want the American men and women to know if you're
13:00
Speaker 6: going to come work at the premier law enforcement agency
13:02
Speaker 6: in the world, we're going to give you a building
13:04
Speaker 6: that's commensurate with that. And that's not this place.
13:08
Speaker 1: So what this does is it decentralizes power and it
13:11
Speaker 1: reduces political influences. concentrated in our nation's capital at the FBI.
13:18
Speaker 1: The centralization of operations in Washington, D.C. makes the FBI
13:23
Speaker 1: more susceptible to political pressure, lobbying, insider manipulation, and it's
13:29
Speaker 1: clearly skewed the mission away from impartial law enforcement. So
13:33
Speaker 1: by reducing its operations to regional offices, I'm sorry, redistributing
13:38
Speaker 1: it and reducing its influence in D.C., The FBI is
13:42
Speaker 1: refocusing on fieldwork, community-based investigations, rather than these political entanglements
13:47
Speaker 1: that have really defined the entire Biden admin. So this
13:51
Speaker 1: is a huge deal. And there was talk, actually, I
13:54
Speaker 1: was pretty angry about this at the time. There was
13:55
Speaker 1: talk from President Trump that the Trump admin was going
13:59
Speaker 1: to expand the FBI's DC branch by opening up a
14:02
Speaker 1: new office closer to the Capitol building. First of all,
14:05
Speaker 1: if that new building is still in the works, it's
14:07
Speaker 1: going to take a very long time. It's not going
14:09
Speaker 1: to open anytime soon. And it may not even matter
14:11
Speaker 1: because what Cash and Dan are doing right now is
14:13
Speaker 1: moving everyone out. So that is huge, amazing news. All right,
14:17
Speaker 1: we're going to discuss some not-so-great news when we come back,
14:21
Speaker 1: and really some problems when it comes to Trump's ability
14:25
Speaker 1: to deport illegal criminals out of this country. This is
14:28
Speaker 1: a huge deal, and it really makes my blood boil.
14:31
Speaker 1: But first, we have to get to our wonderful sponsors.
14:35
Speaker 1: All right, some not-so-great news. The U.S. Supreme Court voted
14:39
Speaker 1: 7-2 on Friday to block the Trump administration from using
14:45
Speaker 1: the Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelan illegal alien gang
14:49
Speaker 1: members being held in Texas. The two dissenters were, of course,
14:53
Speaker 1: Justice Alito and Justice Thomas. The unsigned decision clarified that
14:59
Speaker 1: the court was only ruling on the notice requirement and
15:02
Speaker 1: not whether the Trump admin can use the Alien Enemies
15:05
Speaker 1: Act itself. That's important to note. Now, of course, for
15:08
Speaker 1: some context, guys, Alien Enemies Act was enacted in 1798.
15:12
Speaker 1: It allows the president to apprehend and deport citizens of
15:15
Speaker 1: a hostile nation during wartime or invasion. Administration officials argue
15:20
Speaker 1: that Venezuela's government has used Tren de Aragua as a
15:24
Speaker 1: proxy force, effectively weaponizing the gang to destabilize the United
15:28
Speaker 1: States through criminal activity and drug trafficking. Marco Rubio actually
15:31
Speaker 1: just over the weekend confirmed this on Face the Nation.
15:36
Speaker 1: Alito very aptly wrote in his dissent that there are
15:39
Speaker 1: no grounds for the court to intervene at, quote, such
15:43
Speaker 1: an early stage of the litigation. And he added that
15:47
Speaker 1: not deferring to the executive branch on immigration issues is
15:50
Speaker 1: frankly unprecedented for SCOTUS. And it makes no sense because
15:53
Speaker 1: the court is, and this is a quote from the dissent,
15:56
Speaker 1: far removed from the circumstances on the ground, not the
15:59
Speaker 1: right people to be making decisions on deportation matters, which
16:02
Speaker 1: is true. So the case has now been sent back
16:05
Speaker 1: to the appeals court to establish appropriate due process procedures
16:09
Speaker 1: for the detainees in yet another legal impediment to Trump's
16:13
Speaker 1: immigration agenda, to his deportation mandate. And frankly, I don't
16:19
Speaker 1: even know why this is an issue, because illegals aren't
16:23
Speaker 1: owed any kind of process other than capturing them, verifying
16:28
Speaker 1: they are here legally, and then deporting them. That's the process.
16:31
Speaker 1: That's it. That's all that they're entitled to. They're not U.S. citizens.
16:34
Speaker 1: They don't have the rights of citizens. And the second
16:38
Speaker 1: thing I want to say is I think that Trump
16:39
Speaker 1: should just ignore this. And I know that that sounds
16:42
Speaker 1: pretty crazy, but what we have right now is essentially
16:46
Speaker 1: seven judges stepping in and preventing the executive branch from
16:50
Speaker 1: deporting illegal terrorists. Seven people who are completely removed from
16:55
Speaker 1: the situation, right? They're not in charge of the executive
16:58
Speaker 1: branch of deporting criminals, of keeping this country safe. of
17:01
Speaker 1: protecting sovereignty, some people are just saying, all right, you guys,
17:05
Speaker 1: you American people, kiss your sovereignty goodbye. You're done. We
17:08
Speaker 1: don't care. SCOTUS's ruling is just a blatant example of
17:13
Speaker 1: judicial overreach that tramples on executive authority and national security.
17:18
Speaker 1: And the founders, and this is what's key here, I'm
17:19
Speaker 1: not saying, like, you should just throw out the Constitution
17:22
Speaker 1: right now, because the founders never intended for unelected.
17:28
Speaker 1: Unelected executive branch officials, meaning judges, to micromanage immigration policy
17:36
Speaker 1: or tie the hands of a president acting under a
17:39
Speaker 1: centuries-old law designed to protect the nation. And by demanding
17:45
Speaker 1: more due process for foreign criminals weaponized by a hostile regime,
17:50
Speaker 1: the court not only undermines the president's constitutional right to
17:52
Speaker 1: secure American borders, but it also sets a really dangerous
17:55
Speaker 1: precedent where national security decisions are second guessed by judges,
18:01
Speaker 1: far removed from real world threats. This is exactly what
18:04
Speaker 1: Alito and Thomas were saying in the dissent. The court
18:07
Speaker 1: is literally stripping just power away from the executive branch
18:11
Speaker 1: and handing it to themselves and weakening America's ability to
18:16
Speaker 1: defend itself. I mean, this is a serious, serious situation
18:19
Speaker 1: that we're finding ourselves in, a complete subversion of the
18:23
Speaker 1: intention of our founding fathers. It is a total disregard
18:27
Speaker 1: for for the intent of the founders, for what the
18:32
Speaker 1: right area is for the judicial and for the executive.
18:36
Speaker 1: It's all being turned on its head right now. And
18:39
Speaker 1: America is indeed facing an identity crisis. I think this
18:43
Speaker 1: is key because for some reason, the vast majority of
18:46
Speaker 1: our ruling class wants to quite literally replace us. The
18:51
Speaker 1: war on Trump's deportation agenda seems absurd unless you consider
18:56
Speaker 1: more sinister motives. Here's Hillary Clinton slamming Trump for encouraging
19:02
Speaker 1: American families to have more children in favor of importing
19:06
Speaker 1: people from abroad. She would rather we bring in immigrants
19:10
Speaker 1: than to promote childbirth and birth rates among American citizens.
19:16
Speaker 1: This is truly incredible. Take a listen.
19:18
Speaker 7: But if you had read the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025,
19:23
Speaker 7: despite Trump saying he knew nothing about it, if you
19:25
Speaker 7: had read it, it's all in there. It's all in there.
19:28
Speaker 7: Return to the family, the nuclear family. Return to being
19:33
Speaker 7: a Christian nation. Return to producing a lot of children,
19:40
Speaker 7: which is sort of odd because the people who produce
19:43
Speaker 7: the most children in our country are immigrants and they
19:45
Speaker 7: want to deport them. So none of this adds up.
19:48
Speaker 7: But one of the reasons why our economy did so
19:51
Speaker 7: much better than comparable advanced economies across the world is
19:55
Speaker 7: because we actually had a replenishment because we had a
19:58
Speaker 7: lot of immigrants, legally and undocumented, who had a larger
20:04
Speaker 7: than normal by American standards, families.
20:09
Speaker 1: Okay, so encouraging mass immigration as a solution to declining
20:14
Speaker 1: population rates is not just demographic engineering, it is cultural erasure.
20:23
Speaker 1: When millions of people pour into a country with entirely
20:27
Speaker 1: different customs, languages, worldviews, the distinct identity that once defined
20:32
Speaker 1: that society is diluted and replaced. But notice how she's
20:37
Speaker 1: really disgusted by this idea of the nuclear family or
20:41
Speaker 1: America being a Christian nation. That's why she wants mass immigration, legal, illegal,
20:48
Speaker 1: doesn't matter to her. People like Hillary Clinton despise Western
20:53
Speaker 1: Civ and its values. They loathe the idea that America
20:57
Speaker 1: was founded as a Christian nation. by Christian Europeans with
21:02
Speaker 1: Christian ideals, and they see mass immigration as a tool
21:06
Speaker 1: to dismantle that legacy by flooding the country with populations
21:11
Speaker 1: disconnected from its founding ideals. They hope to uproot the
21:15
Speaker 1: traditions and values that have made America unique, replacing them
21:19
Speaker 1: with a fractured, divided society, more easily controlled and less
21:24
Speaker 1: tied to the nation's original spirit. It's a quiet revolution.
21:29
Speaker 1: executed not with guns, but with policies that strip a
21:32
Speaker 1: people of their heritage one wave at a time. So again,
21:36
Speaker 1: this is why I say, ignore it. We have to
21:38
Speaker 1: take our country back. This is a really sinister agenda
21:42
Speaker 1: playing here. And to me, I kind of take a
21:46
Speaker 1: step back and I wonder if this ever would have
21:48
Speaker 1: been said and perceived as normal by the American people,
21:53
Speaker 1: even a few decades ago. But we have an intelligentsia class,
21:58
Speaker 1: a ruling class that actively despises the heritage of this country,
22:03
Speaker 1: actively hates the people, the founding, everything that, I mean,
22:08
Speaker 1: who we are really. And they're actively discouraging birth rates
22:14
Speaker 1: in this country and promoting mass illegal and legal immigration,
22:19
Speaker 1: not because they care about the birth rates or the popularity,
22:21
Speaker 1: the well-being of our country, but because they actually hate it.
22:25
Speaker 1: and they want to replace us. It's not a conspiracy theory.
22:29
Speaker 1: It's not racist to say this is open. This is true.
22:32
Speaker 1: This is exactly what the agenda is all about. All right,
22:36
Speaker 1: I have some pretty disturbing news from Pavel Durov, the
22:39
Speaker 1: founder and CEO of the encrypted messaging app Telegram. If
22:43
Speaker 1: you don't use Telegram, it is just basically a messaging app,
22:47
Speaker 1: but is allegedly a lot more secure than, say, Messenger
22:51
Speaker 1: with Facebook or your iMessaging app if you have an iPhone.
22:55
Speaker 1: So last summer, Durov was arrested in France and detained
22:59
Speaker 1: over alleged criminal activities facilitated through the Telegram platform. They
23:04
Speaker 1: basically said that, Durov, you are responsible for illegal activity
23:09
Speaker 1: that has taken place on your platform. And this is
23:13
Speaker 1: pretty unprecedented because if you can imagine, what if Mark
23:15
Speaker 1: Zuckerberg was responsible for for any and all crimes that
23:19
Speaker 1: took place on Facebook. Mark Zuckerberg would be behind bars.
23:22
Speaker 1: Mark Zuckerberg would have the death penalty. You can't have
23:26
Speaker 1: a founder of a platform be responsible for everything that
23:29
Speaker 1: takes place on said platform. But that's exactly what France
23:32
Speaker 1: was saying about Pavel Durov. It's a standard that has
23:35
Speaker 1: not been subject to any other tech CEO or tech founder,
23:40
Speaker 1: but it has been used against Pavel Durov. And so
23:45
Speaker 1: Dourav was placed under judicial supervision, required to post a
23:49
Speaker 1: $ 5 million euro bail, prohibited from leaving France, and mandated
23:58
Speaker 1: to report to a police station twice weekly. And in
24:02
Speaker 1: March 2025, a judge granted Dourav permission to temporarily leave
24:07
Speaker 1: France for a few weeks. Yesterday, we had an update
24:11
Speaker 1: on what he's been experiencing, Dourav revealed on X that
24:16
Speaker 1: Nicolas Lerner, the head of French intelligence, asked him to
24:21
Speaker 1: ban conservative voices in Romania ahead of elections. And Dourav
24:26
Speaker 1: said that he refused. But what's interesting about this is
24:30
Speaker 1: Mike Pence literally predicted this when Pavel Dourav was arrested,
24:35
Speaker 1: that the French government would use Dourav's incarceration as a
24:39
Speaker 1: means to pressure him into censoring opposition voices on Telegram
24:44
Speaker 1: that challenged the interests of narratives promoted by the French
24:49
Speaker 1: Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the U.S. State Department in
24:52
Speaker 1: Eastern Europe. There is an understanding, and I would love
24:55
Speaker 1: the Trump admin to release information on this, that the U.S.
24:57
Speaker 1: State Department played a role in this arrest. And this
25:03
Speaker 1: is part of a broader movement, right? Conservative populist movements
25:06
Speaker 1: have been deemed anti-democracy and and anti-Western by the U.S.
25:12
Speaker 1: and our allies' state departments. It is a total inversion
25:18
Speaker 1: of what democracy actually means, but it is in line
25:22
Speaker 1: with what has been waged against populist movements abroad for
25:26
Speaker 1: a very long time now, and it has probably just
25:29
Speaker 1: recently begun to cease under this new Trump admin. So,
25:33
Speaker 1: Durov wrote yesterday, you can't defend democracy by destroying democracy.
25:38
Speaker 1: You can't fight election interference by interfering with elections. You
25:42
Speaker 1: either have freedom of speech and fair elections or you don't.
25:45
Speaker 1: And the Romanian people deserve both. Here was Mike Benz
25:50
Speaker 1: last summer predicting exactly what Pavel Durov has just confirmed.
25:54
Speaker 8: And in terms of the U.S. role in this, the
25:58
Speaker 8: point that I really want to drive home is This
26:01
Speaker 8: has been a strategic imperative of the Pentagon, the CIA,
26:04
Speaker 8: the State Department, and thousands of U.S. government-funded soft power
26:09
Speaker 8: projects to bring Telegram under control, into its possession. Not
26:15
Speaker 8: to kill Telegram. Telegram is a critical— asset for U.S. intelligence.
26:20
Speaker 8: Telegram was the primary method for mobilizing street protests and
26:24
Speaker 8: the attempted color revolution of Belarus in the summer of 2020.
26:26
Speaker 8: It is a vital asset for U.S. intelligence within Russia itself.
26:31
Speaker 8: I don't know if your audience knows this, but you
26:34
Speaker 8: can look this up. Several years ago, in 2018, 26 U.S. NGOs,
26:40
Speaker 8: the lion's share of them, U.S. government funded, U.S. State
26:43
Speaker 8: Department funded, condemned Russia and threatened Russia for attempting to block,
26:48
Speaker 8: for considering blocking Telegram in Russia. Why did U.S. NGOs
26:54
Speaker 8: call it a human rights violation for Russia to go
26:57
Speaker 8: after Telegram? Well, it's because these NGOs are fomenting the
27:01
Speaker 8: political resistance movements within Russia using the fact that Telegram
27:06
Speaker 8: is an open playing field for all intelligence agencies everywhere.
27:10
Speaker 8: So they want to rig that playing field by taking
27:12
Speaker 8: control of the back end in terms of spying and surveillance,
27:16
Speaker 8: and by taking control of content moderation in order to
27:18
Speaker 8: kill perceived Russian propaganda channels, because much of the Russian
27:22
Speaker 8: military and much of the Russian civilian class, most of it,
27:26
Speaker 8: most of them use Telegram. This is why everyone celebrating
27:30
Speaker 8: what just happened on social media today is going to
27:32
Speaker 8: have a Ukraine checkmark, you know, emoji icon in their name.
27:36
Speaker 8: And by the way, I'm not even weighing in on
27:38
Speaker 8: the foreign policy of this. The fact is, is free
27:40
Speaker 8: speech is a casualty of a proxy war by the U.S.
27:44
Speaker 4: Blob.
27:44
Speaker 1: So that was Mike Benz and the Charlie Kirk show,
27:46
Speaker 1: but he actually has an interview with Tucker Carlson after
27:49
Speaker 1: the Pavel Durov arrest that is excellent. And I would
27:52
Speaker 1: highly suggest you listen to that. Also, Pavel Durov's interview
27:55
Speaker 1: on Tucker Carlson was also very, very good. What I'll
27:59
Speaker 1: say is, so he's laying out that Intelligence in the U.S.
28:06
Speaker 1: and also in places like France and abroad are allies.
28:08
Speaker 1: They don't hate Telegram. They've actually used Telegram for forward
28:12
Speaker 1: influence meddling, for regime change operations. But they don't have
28:17
Speaker 1: control of Telegram in the same way that they would
28:19
Speaker 1: an app like Facebook or Twitter pre-Elon. Because Pavel Durov
28:25
Speaker 1: is a true believer. He is really somebody that doesn't
28:29
Speaker 1: doesn't bend the knee to any foreign government he believes
28:32
Speaker 1: in his app and it being a real space for privacy,
28:36
Speaker 1: for a platform for conversations and just communication. And he
28:41
Speaker 1: doesn't want it to be used as any kind of
28:43
Speaker 1: form of statecraft. So this is, of course, a big
28:46
Speaker 1: problem for countries like the United States, for countries like France,
28:49
Speaker 1: who want to control the flow of information abroad. And
28:53
Speaker 1: you can expand that out. to the West attempting to
28:57
Speaker 1: influence Eastern European countries like Romania. Now, Romania specifically. Right-wing
29:03
Speaker 1: nationalist populist candidate Colleen Georgescu literally won the presidential election
29:09
Speaker 1: in Romania last year. And we talked about this on
29:11
Speaker 1: the show. And his victory was incredibly annulled by Romania's
29:16
Speaker 1: constitutional court last December because of so-called Russian interference. And
29:21
Speaker 1: the Trump admin has actually spoken out about this. It's
29:23
Speaker 1: completely absurd. And it sparked massive protests in Romania. The
29:27
Speaker 1: people demanded that George's skews be reinstated. But he was
29:30
Speaker 1: barred from running in the rescheduled election. In his place,
29:34
Speaker 1: George Simeon emerged as the right-wing nationalist candidate. And after
29:38
Speaker 1: winning the first round election, 41% to 21% against the
29:42
Speaker 1: NATO-EU blob-controlled candidate two weeks ago, however, Simeon somehow lost
29:50
Speaker 1: the runoff. And I'm sorry, so he, sorry, two weeks ago,
29:53
Speaker 1: he had the first round of the election, and then yesterday,
29:56
Speaker 1: he somehow lost the runoff. So this is actually the
29:58
Speaker 1: context of which And Pavel Durov is explaining what happened
30:03
Speaker 1: and saying that he was actually pressured to censor conservatives
30:05
Speaker 1: by the French because we just had this news that
30:08
Speaker 1: after being ahead and seeming to have the election in
30:11
Speaker 1: the bag, this right-wing nationalist candidate suddenly lost the runoff yesterday.
30:17
Speaker 1: And it's just really disturbing news and a reminder that
30:21
Speaker 1: the West is weaponizing itself against populist right-wingers everywhere. This
30:26
Speaker 1: has happened in the United States, but it's happening all
30:28
Speaker 1: across the West. And they'll apparently even arrest tech CEOs
30:33
Speaker 1: to try and control information online and actually subvert democracy
30:37
Speaker 1: in the name of saving it. And don't think Romania
30:41
Speaker 1: is the only victim. The entrenched state has it in
30:45
Speaker 1: for this admin as well. And subversion from within is
30:49
Speaker 1: something that we should come to expect. Trump is inheriting
30:53
Speaker 1: a hostile state. He is inheriting the leader of all
30:57
Speaker 1: of these intelligence apparatuses that are attempting to control and
31:02
Speaker 1: destroy authentic democracy abroad. So something to keep in mind
31:06
Speaker 1: and truly a disturbing reminder of what we're up against.
31:10
Speaker 1: All right, I want to get to this terror attack
31:12
Speaker 1: on the IVF clinic Saturday. A 23-year-old guy named Guy
31:17
Speaker 1: Edward Bartkis detonated a car bomb outside the American Reproductive
31:22
Speaker 1: Centers in Palm Springs, an IVF clinic. Bartkis killed himself
31:27
Speaker 1: and injured four others. But he was not a Christian
31:30
Speaker 1: conservative as some assumed he would be because many conservatives
31:34
Speaker 1: do not believe in using IVF. Marcus actually identified as
31:38
Speaker 1: a pro-mortalist and reportedly held radical beliefs that bringing new
31:42
Speaker 1: life into the world without consent only led to unnecessary suffering.
31:47
Speaker 1: So an extreme nihilistic worldview, a hatred of life itself,
31:51
Speaker 1: a really disturbing story. But frankly, an ideology that many
31:55
Speaker 1: don't know is pushed by the modern left. This is
31:59
Speaker 1: not something that is just found in extreme fringe groups.
32:03
Speaker 1: This is mainstream left-wing ideology, if you really think about it.
32:08
Speaker 1: Harry and Meghan Markle were applauded when they announced their
32:11
Speaker 1: decision to have only two children as part of their
32:14
Speaker 1: commitment to reducing their carbon footprint. Per the climate cult,
32:18
Speaker 1: human reproduction is a burden on the planet. Procreation is vilified.
32:23
Speaker 1: childlessness is a moral imperative. And this is actually a
32:28
Speaker 1: very old movement, a very old tradition among the political left.
32:32
Speaker 1: It didn't just spring up in the last decade. The
32:35
Speaker 1: roots of modern antinatalism and population control trace back over
32:40
Speaker 1: a century with the first World Population Conference held in
32:44
Speaker 1: Geneva in 1927, which actually laid the groundwork for global
32:48
Speaker 1: discussions on managing human reproduction and a precursor to today's
32:53
Speaker 1: World Economic Forum, which we hear about all the time.
32:55
Speaker 1: So key figures at this event included Planned Parenthood founder
32:59
Speaker 1: Margaret Sanger. And she was actually instrumental in pushing birth
33:02
Speaker 1: control as a means of population control, often under the
33:07
Speaker 1: guise of solving poverty and resource scarcity. Here is Margaret
33:12
Speaker 1: Sanger back in the day.
33:14
Speaker 6: Do you believe in sin?
33:16
Speaker 8: When I say believe, I don't mean believe in committing sin.
33:18
Speaker 9: Do you believe there is such a thing as sin?
33:21
Speaker 5: Well, I think the greatest sin in the world is
33:23
Speaker 5: bringing children into the world that have disease from their parents,
33:28
Speaker 5: that have no chance in the world to be a
33:30
Speaker 5: human being, practically. Delinquents, prisoners, all sorts of things just
33:34
Speaker 5: mark when they're born. That, to me, is the greatest
33:37
Speaker 5: sin that people can commit.
33:39
Speaker 1: So Margaret Sanger was obviously a eugenicist. Many of the
33:42
Speaker 1: people that participated in the World Population Conference were also eugenicists.
33:46
Speaker 1: But those... those strains have not really left the modern
33:52
Speaker 1: progressive movement. The progressive movement throughout the 20th century pushed
33:57
Speaker 1: for limits on family size, arguing that large families strained
34:01
Speaker 1: global food supplies, exacerbated poverty, harmed the environment, and this
34:05
Speaker 1: ideology continually resurfaces under new banners like climate change, sustainability,
34:12
Speaker 1: global equity, and yet they consistently echo the belief that
34:16
Speaker 1: human reproduction must be controlled, for the greater good. So
34:20
Speaker 1: hating kids is actually a left-wing tradition, if you didn't know.
34:24
Speaker 1: Speaking of, I want to cover what is happening in Georgia.
34:27
Speaker 1: A woman, Adriana Smith, she's a 30-year-old Georgia nurse, was
34:31
Speaker 1: nine weeks pregnant in February when she started getting terrible headaches.
34:36
Speaker 1: She went to the hospital where, according to her family,
34:39
Speaker 1: she was not given any tests or scans, but was
34:42
Speaker 1: simply treated with medications. And unfortunately, Smith worsened, and the
34:47
Speaker 1: next morning her boyfriend awoke to her gasping for breath,
34:51
Speaker 1: and he promptly called 911. According to a local news station,
34:56
Speaker 1: Smith was taken to Emory University Hospital in Atlanta, where
35:00
Speaker 1: she worked as a nurse. There, a CT scan revealed
35:03
Speaker 1: multiple blood clots in her brain. Initially, doctors recommended aggressive treatment,
35:09
Speaker 1: and later they told the family that there was nothing
35:11
Speaker 1: they could do and that Smith was, quote, brain-dead. because
35:16
Speaker 1: Smith is so-called brain dead, Smith's family is demanding to
35:20
Speaker 1: decide whether she and her baby live. They want a
35:24
Speaker 1: choice to remove life support. It's unclear why she would
35:28
Speaker 1: have to be killed if she's already dead, and that's
35:31
Speaker 1: because she's not dead. The term brain dead is an oxymoron,
35:35
Speaker 1: fake term. We're going to get into that in a second,
35:37
Speaker 1: but first I want to play for you a video
35:39
Speaker 1: of the current narrative that the left is attempting to
35:42
Speaker 1: twist this entire story into. Take a listen.
35:46
Speaker 9: So they're keeping a pregnant woman alive in Georgia who's
35:48
Speaker 9: brain dead because she's 20 weeks pregnant. And they said
35:52
Speaker 9: that they can't take her off life support because that
35:55
Speaker 9: would be an abortion. And it would be one thing
35:57
Speaker 9: if that's what she said her wish was or her
35:59
Speaker 9: family's wish even. But it's against her family's wishes. Let
36:03
Speaker 9: me say that again. They are keeping a pregnant woman
36:05
Speaker 9: who was dead alive for her fetus. So she's literally
36:11
Speaker 9: just an incubator now while her older son watches her
36:15
Speaker 9: and thinks that she's just sleeping. And if that doesn't
36:17
Speaker 9: make you throw up, then you, my friend, are the
36:20
Speaker 9: one who is dead inside.
36:21
Speaker 1: Okay, one, you can't keep a pregnant woman who is
36:25
Speaker 1: dead alive. It just doesn't make any sense. It's not
36:28
Speaker 1: a real thing. The concept of brain death was established
36:33
Speaker 1: by a small group at Harvard in 1968 as a
36:38
Speaker 1: legal construct, not a medical fact. People declared brain dead
36:42
Speaker 1: are neurologically disabled, not dead, but they are certainly, certainly
36:48
Speaker 1: treated like they are dead, expendable. Their lives have no
36:54
Speaker 1: value whatsoever because countless families have pleaded for continued care
36:58
Speaker 1: for their loved ones only to be denied under a
37:01
Speaker 1: diagnosis that has never been scientifically proven to signify true death.
37:07
Speaker 1: The 2023 American Academy of Neurology guidelines even admit that
37:11
Speaker 1: brain death criteria were determined through anonymous voting rather than
37:16
Speaker 1: solid medical evidence, allowing people with brain waves and functioning
37:20
Speaker 1: hypothalamuses to be labeled dead, when they're clearly not. In reality,
37:25
Speaker 1: these individuals maintain biological processes, heartbeats, metabolism, digestion, even childbirth,
37:32
Speaker 1: demonstrating that they are very much alive. The only benefit
37:36
Speaker 1: to the fake term is organ procurement, which is a
37:39
Speaker 1: little bit creepy, and hospital convenience. Adriana Smith is clearly
37:45
Speaker 1: not dead. She's in a sleep-like coma. Corpses can't deliver babies.
37:51
Speaker 1: Here's the other thing. Apparently this is all about consent, right?
37:55
Speaker 1: Like we care about the right to choose. Did Adriana
37:59
Speaker 1: consent to her family deciding to kill her and her baby?
38:04
Speaker 1: Why should it be her mother's decision? Here's her mother.
38:08
Speaker 10: It should have been left up to the family because
38:10
Speaker 10: I'm in my 50s. Her dad is in his fifties.
38:15
Speaker 10: So we're going to have the responsibility with her partner
38:18
Speaker 10: to raise her sons, you know? And I'm not saying
38:22
Speaker 10: that we would have chose to terminate her pregnancy. What
38:25
Speaker 10: I'm saying is we should have had a choice. We
38:29
Speaker 10: should have had a choice.
38:30
Speaker 1: Okay. Just because you're in your fifties and would have
38:34
Speaker 1: to co-parent with this woman's boyfriend doesn't mean that you
38:37
Speaker 1: can kill your grandkid. But think about what she's demanding.
38:41
Speaker 1: She says, I want the choice to take my daughter
38:43
Speaker 1: and my grandchild off life support because it would be
38:46
Speaker 1: inconvenient for me if my grandson lives. That's what she's saying.
38:52
Speaker 1: And the mother doesn't even get a say in this scenario.
38:55
Speaker 1: And let me just add this. People wake up from
38:58
Speaker 1: comas all the time. People make dramatic recoveries from neurological
39:03
Speaker 1: injuries all the time where they couldn't do anything. Like
39:07
Speaker 1: you can't eat, can't laugh. And suddenly they can walk
39:10
Speaker 1: and they can eat and they can laugh and they
39:12
Speaker 1: can have a very reasonable life after these injuries. And
39:18
Speaker 1: often when people awake from comas, they reveal astonishing accounts
39:22
Speaker 1: of awareness during their unconscious state. So while they appear unresponsive,
39:27
Speaker 1: a lot of people report being able to hear conversations.
39:30
Speaker 1: to sense the presence of loved ones, to feel emotions
39:34
Speaker 1: while trapped inside their immobile bodies. This happens all the time.
39:38
Speaker 1: And patients later recall specific details about their surroundings or
39:42
Speaker 1: discussions that took place while they were considered unconscious, considered brain-dead,
39:48
Speaker 1: The term brain dead should not be a term. It
39:51
Speaker 1: should be a dead term. Objectively, you are not dead,
39:55
Speaker 1: nor is your brain specifically dead. And speaking of this woman,
40:01
Speaker 1: you know, I just, I think it's incredible that we're
40:03
Speaker 1: constantly talking about consent and the right to choose and
40:07
Speaker 1: the right of the mother. And in this situation, it's
40:10
Speaker 1: not even the woman deciding whether she and her baby live.
40:14
Speaker 1: We're not even talking about that. This is the woman's
40:17
Speaker 1: mother demanding that she have the right to make that
40:20
Speaker 1: decision about her daughter and the baby. It's kind of absurd.
40:24
Speaker 1: And her reasoning is, well, me and my husband are older,
40:28
Speaker 1: and we don't want to deal with it. It's really
40:31
Speaker 1: kind of disgusting. And there's this whole narrative out there, right,
40:37
Speaker 1: that women are oppressed and that we love abortion. This
40:42
Speaker 1: is what Kamala Harris ran on, right? This was the
40:43
Speaker 1: year of the woman, and women were going to fall
40:46
Speaker 1: in line and vote for her in droves because we just,
40:50
Speaker 1: we love killing babies. That was the big pitch from
40:53
Speaker 1: the Kamala campaign. And when women didn't fall in line entirely,
40:57
Speaker 1: especially white women refused to fall in line, there was
41:01
Speaker 1: a growing resentment, and it's been growing on the left,
41:05
Speaker 1: of women who dare to not be left-wing. Here is
41:09
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton calling Republican women handmaidens of the patriarchy. Take
41:15
Speaker 1: a listen.
41:16
Speaker 9: What advice do you have for the first female president
41:19
Speaker 9: of the United States?
41:22
Speaker 7: Well, first of all, don't be a handmaiden to the patriarchy,
41:34
Speaker 7: which kind of eliminates every woman on the other side
41:38
Speaker 7: of the aisle, except for very few. Lisa Murkowski.
41:42
Speaker 4: Lisa Murkowski.
41:44
Speaker 10: Liz Cheney.
41:45
Speaker 1: Yeah, there's a few.
41:48
Speaker 7: Look, first we have to get there and it is,
41:51
Speaker 7: you know, obviously so much harder than it should be. So,
41:57
Speaker 7: you know, if a woman runs who I think would
42:00
Speaker 7: be a good president, as I thought Kamala Harris would
42:03
Speaker 7: be and as I knew I would be, I will
42:05
Speaker 7: support that woman.
42:06
Speaker 1: Okay, she's just very cringe. So you just tell, like
42:11
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton is She's the greatest loser in this country
42:14
Speaker 1: and she's still so full of herself. I'm sorry. If
42:18
Speaker 1: I were Hillary Clinton, if I ran for office and
42:22
Speaker 1: lost as miserably as I did to President Trump and
42:25
Speaker 1: then tried to destroy him with the Russia collusion hoax
42:28
Speaker 1: after and then that failed too, and then I endorsed
42:30
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris and then she loses as well, I would
42:33
Speaker 1: just crawl into a hole and die. I would be
42:36
Speaker 1: too humiliated to show my face in public. And yet
42:38
Speaker 1: we keep seeing her face. And a lot of you
42:40
Speaker 1: are commenting, stop playing Hillary Clinton. We hate her. It's like, yeah,
42:44
Speaker 1: I get it. I get it. But sometimes it's just,
42:46
Speaker 1: she's so bad. We have to talk about it. Like it's,
42:48
Speaker 1: it's so bad. It's good. So I want to talk
42:51
Speaker 1: about this a little bit because again, the left champions
42:54
Speaker 1: women's and they also champion minority, minority minorities, right? Like
42:58
Speaker 1: they say, we are on your side, solidarity. We're here
43:01
Speaker 1: for you. Unless that woman or that minority happens to
43:06
Speaker 1: be a conservative. If you dare to step out of
43:10
Speaker 1: of ideological line, then you are dismissed, you are ridiculed,
43:15
Speaker 1: you are labeled a betrayer of your own gender or race.
43:20
Speaker 1: The support is always conditional. It's almost like the left
43:25
Speaker 1: thinks they own these groups as if their value is
43:30
Speaker 1: tied to political loyalty rather than individual autonomy. And isn't
43:35
Speaker 1: that it? Political allegiance. is the price for their so-called solidarity,
43:41
Speaker 1: which means there is no solidarity. The whole thing is fake.
43:45
Speaker 1: They're fake. I even look at this Adriana Smith story,
43:50
Speaker 1: been entirely manipulated to fit a political script. Humanity is
43:54
Speaker 1: secondary to the talking points that can be extracted from
43:58
Speaker 1: our situation. This is an ideology that uses people, exploits
44:04
Speaker 1: them really for politics, and pretends to be on their
44:07
Speaker 1: side all the time. And I don't know, as a woman,
44:11
Speaker 1: I just say, I am required to vote for Democrats,
44:16
Speaker 1: to vote for Hillary Clinton because I'm a woman. And
44:18
Speaker 1: if I don't, you're going to call me a handmaiden
44:20
Speaker 1: of the patriarchy. That doesn't make me want to vote Democrat.
44:24
Speaker 1: That doesn't make me think you have my best interests
44:28
Speaker 1: in mind. I don't know what the strategy is here,
44:31
Speaker 1: but certainly it is revealing of who they truly are.
44:34
Speaker 1: And it reveals again, that if you're not useful to them,
44:38
Speaker 1: you are discarded. So this entire solidarity idea is fake
44:44
Speaker 1: because they are. All right, that is all I have
44:47
Speaker 1: for you guys today. Thank you so much for tuning
44:49
Speaker 1: into the show. As always, if you want to listen
44:51
Speaker 1: on Apple or Spotify, you can go there or the
44:54
Speaker 1: video version of the show. We're live 9 a.m. Eastern time,
44:58
Speaker 1: five days a week. If you want to follow me
44:59
Speaker 1: on X or Instagram, my user is avitadeffy underscore one.
45:02
Speaker 1: Shout out to Michael for putting the show together, for
45:04
Speaker 1: being up early in the morning. being in the chat,
45:06
Speaker 1: talking to you all when I sometimes miss what's happening
45:09
Speaker 1: in the chat. So shout out to Michael, give him
45:11
Speaker 1: some love in the comments and I will see you
45:12
Speaker 1: all tomorrow.
45:14
Speaker 7: The U.S.
45:14
Speaker 1: Soccer Podcast.
45:16
Speaker 2: I'm your host, Megan Klingenberg, and I am super stoked
45:19
Speaker 2: to be joined by Daryl Dike.
45:21
Speaker 1: Arguably, your most impressive quality.
45:23
Speaker 2: Cannot be measured.
45:24
Speaker 1: You're a guy who is the definition of grit.
45:27
Speaker 9: Injuries have ended plenty of careers, but instead you decided
45:30
Speaker 9: yours would only be a chapter instead of the ending.
45:32
Speaker 7: Welcome to the show, Daryl.
45:33
Speaker 10: Thank you so much. That's a good intro right there.
45:36
Speaker 4: That's good.
45:36
Speaker 1: The U.S. Soccer Podcast.
45:38
Speaker 7: Follow and listen on your favorite platforms.