Latest / Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems / Prince Israel Zaar on: Be Led Not By Ignorance, Arrogance And Narcissim (IAN)
Transcript
- 0:04Speaker 1: Global economic catastrophe loaning. A global economic catastrophe is loaning
- 0:15Speaker 1: and is just hiding in the books, hiding in the
- 0:20Speaker 1: recordings and being spained by politicians, and but those projections
- 0:29Speaker 1: by experts and experience of seasoned analysts. It's clear that
- 0:42Speaker 1: the world is heading towards a global economic catastrophe based
- 0:48Speaker 1: on the war in Iran, and humanity should be conscious
- 0:54Speaker 1: of that, and the world should be doing every thing
- 1:00Speaker 1: to avoid that, and politicians to be sincere in their
- 1:06Speaker 1: politics and their promises, and they should make sure that
- 1:12Speaker 1: they don't jobadize the world economy for political gains or
- 1:18Speaker 1: for some machiavilion also for some some strategic reasons, that
- 1:27Speaker 1: all leaders should be mindful that a global economic catastrophe
- 1:34Speaker 1: in oil, petro chemicals and fatalizers and and gas prices,
- 1:41Speaker 1: rising affordability prices or difficulties in ensuring global shipping, and
- 1:52Speaker 1: the fear for the fluctuations and the stock exchange market
- 1:57Speaker 1: and financial markets, and the negative effects on commodities and
- 2:04Speaker 1: the necessity services that are connected to the state of
- 2:12Speaker 1: horme moves and the war in Iran, with effects in Israel,
- 2:18Speaker 1: the United States, and the Middle Eastern countries of the
- 2:21Speaker 1: Gulf States and Asia and particular, and the fear of
- 2:26Speaker 1: the global catastrophe. You think about South Korea and Japan,
- 2:35Speaker 1: they think about India and China. If India is heard,
- 2:43Speaker 1: China is heard, South Korea has heard, and Japan is heard.
- 2:51Speaker 1: Forget about Europe or Australia, or the Americas or Africa.
- 2:57Speaker 1: If these four nations are heard in the world, it's
- 3:02Speaker 1: moving towards a global economic catastrophe. Global economy is integrated, intertwined, interwoven, interconnected.
- 3:19Speaker 1: The supply chain is interconnected. The petrochemicals change are interconnected,
- 3:25Speaker 1: the financial change interconnected, the services change, the artificial intelligence
- 3:30Speaker 1: change change, or the science and technologies and research and
- 3:36Speaker 1: the patterns flow of patterns around the world is interconnected.
- 3:42Speaker 1: It's on politicians, the politicians. Countries who like to do business,
- 3:56Speaker 1: countries who like to conduct trade. Trees would like to
- 4:01Speaker 1: do exchanges. Vis are free for particular designated countries based
- 4:08Speaker 1: on give and tech. But politicians sometimes with their political promises,
- 4:19Speaker 1: the lobbying, the back deal, the back door deals, the compromise,
- 4:28Speaker 1: the black mail, and sometimes politicians are not are not
- 4:34Speaker 1: well educated on international affairs, on economic affairs, on military
- 4:39Speaker 1: affairs and scientific affairs on technologies are fair fairs and
- 4:45Speaker 1: try not sometimes icated on sociological, anthropological, culture, historical, religious, political, educational,
- 4:55Speaker 1: or culture or traditional affairs and countries. Some countries are
- 5:04Speaker 1: not cultural sensitive, They're not religion sensitive, they're not traditional sensitive.
- 5:11Speaker 1: Sometimes ignorance and or arrogance, you know, with narcissism become
- 5:17Speaker 1: so toxic. Arrogant, arrogance, ignorance, arrogance, narcissism becomes a very
- 5:23Speaker 1: toxic combination in in worl affairs. It will take people
- 5:28Speaker 1: to war, It will crush the world economy. It would
- 5:31Speaker 1: it would create cultural wars, on nationalistic wars, people will
- 5:35Speaker 1: fight and die for no good reasons, die for on
- 5:38Speaker 1: intelligent reasons, pseudosciencesm cultural warfare. The concept of dominance not
- 5:51Speaker 1: based on intelligence, not based on good, not based on productivity,
- 5:54Speaker 1: not based on positive causality, not based on positive contribution.
- 5:59Speaker 1: They can sep of dominance that may be by race,
- 6:02Speaker 1: by your eye type or your hair type or skin type.
- 6:06Speaker 1: That that ignorant perspective, the ignorant perspective or the junk
- 6:14Speaker 1: school perspective where people assume to myth and superstition and
- 6:21Speaker 1: superiority complex, not govern or proven by anything, but because
- 6:30Speaker 1: with power and wealth and influence and the law on
- 6:36Speaker 1: their side, they think they can do whatever they like
- 6:40Speaker 1: with the universe. They can reshape the universe. They can
- 6:43Speaker 1: reconnalize countries. They can redefine how human conduct business. They
- 6:50Speaker 1: can redefine they can redesign the human struggles and take
- 6:53Speaker 1: humanity back. They can eradicate diversity. The question becomes what's
- 7:03Speaker 1: wrong with diversity? Because the humanity service a diversified being.
- 7:09Speaker 1: Divergent intelligences makes the human being. The selves are different,
- 7:14Speaker 1: the selves of the eyes, or the brain, or the mind,
- 7:17Speaker 1: or the hands or the nerves, all this are interconnected.
- 7:20Speaker 1: The human beings service a connected being. Connectivity cannot work
- 7:25Speaker 1: with a diversity. Connectivity cannot work with a diversity. Humanity
- 7:32Speaker 1: cannot work with a diversity. The word humanity means diversity.
- 7:36Speaker 1: The word civilization means diversity. It means it's a way
- 7:41Speaker 1: of a particular group of people from different places that
- 7:45Speaker 1: have come to have one common purpose, to believe in
- 7:48Speaker 1: something bigger than themselves, to believe in good, to be
- 7:51Speaker 1: that counter on the here, to be that humanity, positive hope,
- 7:58Speaker 1: a positive new deal, the source becomes a thing that
- 8:05Speaker 1: the world is on the taking time bomb scale or
- 8:09Speaker 1: on the taking time bomb mushroom cloud scale, not because
- 8:14Speaker 1: of anything that measure, not because of any necessity, not
- 8:21Speaker 1: because of anybody is threatening to attack anybody, just because
- 8:25Speaker 1: some group of people through mythology and some grand scheme
- 8:33Speaker 1: of thing thinking, some grandeousness, some superiority complex, and they
- 8:41Speaker 1: sit and think that the world is so weak, that
- 8:46Speaker 1: the world is so intelligent, so unintelligent, that the world
- 8:50Speaker 1: is so primitive, that the world is so severe, so vulnerable,
- 9:03Speaker 1: and all is full of cowards, and yes men's and
- 9:07Speaker 1: yes women, that for some reasons they can least subjugate
- 9:12Speaker 1: the world, re enslaved the world, recolonize the world, reimparorize
- 9:18Speaker 1: the world, for some reason, for some fantasis of insecurity, inadequacy,
- 9:25Speaker 1: and empty futility, that some human beings sits somewhere, either
- 9:30Speaker 1: by some imaginative illucination or utopia or distopianism, or mean
- 9:37Speaker 1: by some influence of something, some substance and some idiocrasy,
- 9:44Speaker 1: as some ignorance, that they do think that this world
- 9:53Speaker 1: today doing artificial intelligence, that this world is as most
- 9:57Speaker 1: as intelligent as it has ever being this world that
- 10:02Speaker 1: is more versed, more traversed, more intelligenalized, more diverse, more
- 10:11Speaker 1: open minded, open hearted, and open handed. These people think
- 10:16Speaker 1: they can reorient the will, They can tend the will,
- 10:21Speaker 1: that the progress of humanity can be rolled back to
- 10:26Speaker 1: an inferior state, to a primitive state, to a subjugative state,
- 10:31Speaker 1: to a slave state, the compromise state, the confined state
- 10:40Speaker 1: to instead of prejudice, stigmatization, categorization, stratification, where the human
- 10:47Speaker 1: being is not the mind, not the intellect, not the good,
- 10:50Speaker 1: not the contribution, not it's intrinsic individuality, not it's intrinsic
- 11:00Speaker 1: creativity or intensity, or intrinsic imagination, or its intrinsic ingenuity
- 11:06Speaker 1: or talent or invention or innovation or contribution, or humanity
- 11:18Speaker 1: or good will or good conscience or good intention or
- 11:23Speaker 1: civility or dignity or distancing or recive proxity or understanding
- 11:33Speaker 1: or wisdom or intelligence or enlightenment or positive elevation, that
- 11:44Speaker 1: they can re engineer humanity and divide. The great philosopher
- 11:50Speaker 1: divideohn Locke, divine nature, Divide socrtastes, diffie platos, divide, don't
- 11:59Speaker 1: tell defied soccer tastes, defy Montesquieu, Jean Jacques Rousseau or
- 12:07Speaker 1: Voter or their car or Hume, or the founding fathers,
- 12:18Speaker 1: John Adam's, Jefferson, Franklin, Washington, Hamilton, all those great thinkers,
- 12:31Speaker 1: those makers and doers and movers and shakers, those great scientists,
- 12:36Speaker 1: those great innovators, those inventors, those great politicians, those great builders,
- 12:44Speaker 1: those contributors, those great wow that was discovered and given
- 12:53Speaker 1: to us for some reason, these people said, either by
- 12:59Speaker 1: some either by some illucinative or illucinatory drugs or influence,
- 13:05Speaker 1: under the conditions of something, they come to this realization
- 13:15Speaker 1: of this two pianism, that they can take the take
- 13:21Speaker 1: the world back to one particular race, one particular skin on,
- 13:26Speaker 1: one particular eye type or hair type, or one particular religion.
- 13:31Speaker 1: They can they can take the world into a monolithic,
- 13:35Speaker 1: inferial state that just one mind can do. What what
- 13:43Speaker 1: can one human do to this war? What can one person,
- 13:50Speaker 1: one phenotype, one culture, one religion, one tradition. What world
- 13:58Speaker 1: are you in to think that this world is not
- 14:01Speaker 1: made by everybody? Take every single civilization. It became a
- 14:07Speaker 1: civilization because of a collection of people, the collection of ideas,
- 14:11Speaker 1: a collection of philosophies and ideals and values. It's a
- 14:15Speaker 1: collective of people that make a civilization. Not the head type,
- 14:19Speaker 1: nor their skin type, or the accent or the eye,
- 14:27Speaker 1: but the particular religion. In the particularly of religion, it's
- 14:33Speaker 1: started from the ancient world. You cannot talk about religion today.
- 14:37Speaker 1: We're are talking about Africa, We're are talking about Egypt.
- 14:42Speaker 1: You can't talk about the modern world without talking about Egypt,
- 14:46Speaker 1: or Persia, or ancient China, or the Mesopotamia, or the Harmorabics,
- 14:57Speaker 1: or the Aztecs, or the Greek or the Romans, or
- 15:07Speaker 1: the Mungos, or the Mania, or the Russian, even the
- 15:15Speaker 1: Cambodia civilization, the Indian civilization, then the Police civilization. Humanity
- 15:23Speaker 1: is because of great civilization to the Americas, the Aztecs,
- 15:32Speaker 1: and the Anchors. If my pronunciations are right, those are
- 15:36Speaker 1: great civilizations. You cannot talk about the world as if
- 15:43Speaker 1: you invented the world. You're not the genesis being. You're
- 15:46Speaker 1: not the founder's mine. Another ip mind, you're not the
- 15:54Speaker 1: beginner's mine. It's just a human being that is a
- 16:00Speaker 1: beneficiary of everything else. You didn't invent the car. You
- 16:04Speaker 1: didn't invent the pants you wear. You didn't invent the
- 16:07Speaker 1: time you were. You didn't invent anything. He just went
- 16:11Speaker 1: to school and organized school. And you were giving some privileges,
- 16:15Speaker 1: not by merit, by corruption and nepotism and federritism, corruption, nepotism, federritism, discrimination.
- 16:26Speaker 1: That's where you find yourself. Where you find yourself not
- 16:29Speaker 1: by merit. You are not there because of some quantum intelligence,
- 16:35Speaker 1: because of some nerd some nerdity, or some superior genotype
- 16:43Speaker 1: or intelligence type. You are there because of nepotism, federritism, cronism,
- 16:50Speaker 1: and corruption, and racism and sexism and bigotry. You're not
- 16:56Speaker 1: on top of the world because of merit. Those who
- 17:01Speaker 1: lead the world and not the smartest an the most intelligent,
- 17:06Speaker 1: that they're because of influence of pedaling, of lobbying, of gamesmanship,
- 17:18Speaker 1: of court and sets and organizations. So the world is
- 17:27Speaker 1: not given by intelligence. Intelligence want the intelligent ones in
- 17:31Speaker 1: the world and even none by the world. Asked a
- 17:37Speaker 1: question the young kids in school the name the Nobel laureates.
- 17:43Speaker 1: I always go and talk about the Nobel lawrates. You
- 17:49Speaker 1: take away the number lawrates, society falls apart. They take
- 17:55Speaker 1: away the philosophers, society for apart. You take away the
- 18:02Speaker 1: inventors and the innovators and the creators, society falls apart.
- 18:09Speaker 1: You take away the influences and those that inspire motivate humanity,
- 18:16Speaker 1: society falls apart. They take away the workers, the contributors,
- 18:22Speaker 1: society falls apart. Politicians are the beneficiary of a society
- 18:30Speaker 1: that's already made, and most of the time they're coming
- 18:34Speaker 1: and destroy it. They take humanity to war. They destroy humans.
- 18:39Speaker 1: They make humans dumber, less intelligent, less cohesive, less harmonious.
- 18:48Speaker 1: The divide rule. Politicians pray on ignorance and cowardice, and
- 18:55Speaker 1: fear and intimidation, on divisions, on conspiracies, on misinformation, on disinformation,
- 19:08Speaker 1: on propaganda. That's what they do. That's what they do.
- 19:20Speaker 1: That's what they do. They don't bring humanity together. Politicians
- 19:28Speaker 1: are scared of the good ones. That's scared of the
- 19:32Speaker 1: peaceful one, Scared of peacemakers, Scared of the voice of unity,
- 19:41Speaker 1: Scared of equality. Politicians are scared of equity. That's scared
- 19:51Speaker 1: of fairness and justice, that's heed of love and kindness.
- 20:00Speaker 1: Humans working together, because if humans do, they will not
- 20:05Speaker 1: need politicians Partianers come to push the things they cannot give,
- 20:13Speaker 1: but to promise the things they take away. Partitioners come
- 20:18Speaker 1: and tell you that they're gonna bring people together. They're
- 20:22Speaker 1: gonna bring fairness and justice and quality. They talk about
- 20:27Speaker 1: those things because they don't. They do not want those things.
- 20:32Speaker 1: They want the world to be divided. They want the war.
- 20:35Speaker 1: They want the world to be at war with itself.
- 20:40Speaker 1: They get the war. They destroy humans, The forced people
- 20:45Speaker 1: to the table, and they take the greatest as pacemaker.
- 20:50Speaker 1: You burn the bridge, and you build the bridge, and
- 20:57Speaker 1: they expect to be awarded for building the bridge that
- 20:59Speaker 1: you it destroyed. What became the world, what became of
- 21:06Speaker 1: the world, is not let by intellect. It's not let
- 21:10Speaker 1: by humanity. It's not let by legality. It's not let
- 21:16Speaker 1: by morality. It's not let by descency. It's not let
- 21:21Speaker 1: by common sense. It's not let by compassion or sympathy
- 21:28Speaker 1: or apathy. It's not let by peaceful coexistence. Why must
- 21:37Speaker 1: the world be divided into blocks, into sections? Why most
- 21:41Speaker 1: countries go to war? Why most countries with this nat
- 21:46Speaker 1: as enemies? Why most humans be a perpetual war in itself?
- 21:57Speaker 1: Why must there be confrontation. Why can humans just coexist
- 22:05Speaker 1: and trade? I love one another? Based on capital, based
- 22:10Speaker 1: on capital, based on intelligence, based on contribution, based on humanity,
- 22:17Speaker 1: based on freedom and equity and fairness and resid proxity
- 22:24Speaker 1: of mutuality or multilateralism. What must humans be compressed? Be depressed?
- 22:34Speaker 1: We are pressed, be subjucated, be dominated and control by
- 22:45Speaker 1: a few group of the un smart or intelligence or
- 22:50Speaker 1: kind ones? What is it to be a leader with
- 22:54Speaker 1: that humility? What is it to be a leader with
- 22:57Speaker 1: our compassion? What is it to be lead out of
- 23:01Speaker 1: the intellect of understanding? What is to be lead out
- 23:05Speaker 1: as logic and common science and reason and rationality? The
- 23:16Speaker 1: montiverse are perspective of measurement, proportionality and balance or projection,
- 23:26Speaker 1: perception and perspective and mind that thinks now and ask questions.
- 23:33Speaker 1: Politicians are heard in the world. It's then for humans
- 23:40Speaker 1: to elect the intelligent ones, the humane ones, the positively
- 23:45Speaker 1: intelligent ones to be that correct, positively intelligent ones that
- 23:51Speaker 1: use measurement, proportionality and balance in their thinking, that they
- 23:55Speaker 1: can think down and ask questions are allowed to answer
- 23:58Speaker 1: a question or ask questions? How every human being can
- 24:03Speaker 1: contribute in that part most polticians don't take power by merit.
- 24:11Speaker 1: They take power by promising to take away from artists
- 24:15Speaker 1: and to give to artists, by promising to divide arthers.
- 24:21Speaker 1: They can call a right wing, left wing, middle wing,
- 24:24Speaker 1: or whatever that is. It's right left omitror based on
- 24:29Speaker 1: that dividing lines. But why should they be divided lines?
- 24:35Speaker 1: Why should they be right left omitror? One can one?
- 24:39Speaker 1: Why can't they just be humanity, humanity, morality, civility, legality,
- 24:50Speaker 1: That the law should mean something, that the moral cult
- 24:53Speaker 1: sure mean something, that the civil culture mean something at
- 24:57Speaker 1: the distance, he coult shure, means something. If you do
- 25:02Speaker 1: talk about the scripture, the scripture, that you mean something.
- 25:06Speaker 1: Politicians come and assume that their god incarnect and I
- 25:11Speaker 1: do everything on godly. They assume that they represent a
- 25:14Speaker 1: particular religion, but they do not know the scripts of
- 25:17Speaker 1: that religion, and they do not care about it. They
- 25:21Speaker 1: assume that they're from the greatest country in the war,
- 25:24Speaker 1: but they want to divide their greatest country in the war.
- 25:27Speaker 1: They believe that they are from the dominant race, but
- 25:31Speaker 1: do not know what race means. It's a race of
- 25:34Speaker 1: what what are you raising to raising to your skin
- 25:38Speaker 1: color rais into the eye type or your hair type.
- 25:44Speaker 1: How can you raise with naturalities? How can you compete
- 25:49Speaker 1: with naturalities? You compete with artificialities. You cannot create a
- 25:58Speaker 1: naturally You cannot confuse and naturality for an artificiality and
- 26:04Speaker 1: make an artificiality to become a naturality. That's the concept
- 26:08Speaker 1: of racism and sexism. You come from the womb. That's naturality. Artificiality.
- 26:15Speaker 1: The woman doesn't matter sexism. The human beings natural itself.
- 26:23Speaker 1: That's naturality artificiality. The human being is a color, and
- 26:29Speaker 1: therefore naturality doesn't matter. Artificiality matter, but that the artificiality
- 26:34Speaker 1: is not rooted in science, it's not roted in facts.
- 26:43Speaker 1: Humanity lay itself to be governed by ignorance, arrogance, and narcticism.
- 26:49Speaker 1: That's the question to ask, and that's for you to fix.
- 26:56Speaker 1: We can be better. Humanity expects better. If you call
- 27:02Speaker 1: upon to lead, try not to display ignorance, arrogance, and narcissism.
- 27:07Speaker 1: It takes away or it means to be a leader.
- 27:11Speaker 1: Every human being is a leader in their own way.
- 27:14Speaker 1: And whatever thing you're doing, no matter that's small. If
- 27:17Speaker 1: you are led by ignorance, arrogance, and narcisism. You disqualify
- 27:21Speaker 1: yourself from being a leader. Three types of people. Those
- 27:26Speaker 1: who create problems they cannot solve out of arrogance, ignorance,
- 27:32Speaker 1: and narcissism. Those who solve the problems they create out
- 27:38Speaker 1: of measurement, proportionality, and balance. And those who solve problems
- 27:43Speaker 1: they didn't create. The happy minds, the genesis minds, the
- 27:49Speaker 1: beginner's mind, the positive causality mine, the positive contributors mind,
- 27:56Speaker 1: that builder, that founder, that maker, the creator of good.
- 28:03Speaker 1: That's who you are, all of us, all of us
- 28:09Speaker 1: have that good in us. If given the opportunity, every
- 28:14Speaker 1: human being everywhere, come be that good, Come be that better.
- 28:20Speaker 1: Come be that humane and positive and constructive and productive.
- 28:24Speaker 1: If given the chance, don't be led by ignorance, arrogance,
- 28:31Speaker 1: and narcissism. Philosopher Prince are, Intelligence is. Philosopher Prince is
- 28:36Speaker 1: resolved From the Great City of Las Vegas. April seventeen,
- 28:40Speaker 1: twenty twenty six. Thank you, don't be led by ignorance, rogans,
- 28:46Speaker 1: and narcicism.