Latest / UK Column Radio / Dr Ferdinand Santos on the Artemis Hoax | Jerm Warfare

Transcript

Dr Ferdinand Santos on the Artemis Hoax | Jerm Warfare · UK Column Radio

0:30
Speaker 1: My name is Jim. This is Jim Warfare the Battle
0:33
Speaker 1: of Ideas.
0:34
Speaker 2: Doctor Ferdinand Santots, thank you for joining me in the Trangeres.
0:38
Speaker 3: Again, my pleasure, Jeram, thank you for thank you for
0:41
Speaker 3: having me. It's always fun.
0:43
Speaker 2: It is fun, just as much fun as watching Optemis.
0:51
Speaker 3: Oh yes, it's It's a bad film production, isn't it.
0:54
Speaker 3: I was expecting something more worthy of the sequel to
0:58
Speaker 3: the nineteen sixty nine had smash the Kniel of the
1:01
Speaker 3: strong Arms and his friend the drunk walls Alden walking
1:05
Speaker 3: around in the moon. I thought they might come up
1:07
Speaker 3: with something a little bit more interesting. What can you say,
1:10
Speaker 3: I guess the one point five trillion US dollars spent
1:13
Speaker 3: since the nineteen seventies has obviously not got into production
1:17
Speaker 3: grade AI and CGI software.
1:21
Speaker 2: It was such a liddown and it took months to
1:23
Speaker 2: get going. They started promising in January and then they
1:27
Speaker 2: kept having delays.
1:28
Speaker 1: What do you think was going on?
1:31
Speaker 3: Hard to say it's I think there's some complex in
1:34
Speaker 3: the calibration and coordination of what they're trying to convey.
1:38
Speaker 3: So as we discussed in terms of physics and technology,
1:42
Speaker 3: and we discussed the nineteen sixties before the Gagaron fraud
1:47
Speaker 3: and the Capricorn one flights of Shepherd and Gusper some
1:52
Speaker 3: rt Africa Garon, and then after the Shepherd flight in
1:56
Speaker 3: May nineteen sixty one is when Kennedy made his famous
1:58
Speaker 3: announcement that by the end of the decade, Americans be
2:00
Speaker 3: on the Moon. And a few years after that playing golf. So,
2:05
Speaker 3: you know, surpisingly enough, just before the end of the deadline,
2:07
Speaker 3: the Americans they made the landing. So but if you
2:12
Speaker 3: look at the physics and technology, and you look at
2:14
Speaker 3: any part of the program of Apollo or Artemis, it
2:18
Speaker 3: doesn't stand up to any scrutiny. So why the delay?
2:22
Speaker 3: I think there's some cosmic solar events that were happening.
2:25
Speaker 3: Certainly in January solar events and cosmic events were quite active,
2:30
Speaker 3: and probably there's some calibration and complexity in terms of
2:33
Speaker 3: coordinating what they're trying to present the people in terms
2:37
Speaker 3: of a flight, a journey, the communications, the imagery, and
2:42
Speaker 3: the all important return and splash down. So I don't
2:46
Speaker 3: it's not difficult because that's what Hollywood does for a living.
2:50
Speaker 3: They create artificial virtual realities, don't they. So and now,
2:54
Speaker 3: so I's been deeply vetted with with Hollywood since the
2:58
Speaker 3: time of both Disney the nineteen fifties, Disney was very
3:00
Speaker 3: active in NASA, and this is the point that the
3:03
Speaker 3: fanboys just prefer to ignore. So, starting with Disney, then
3:06
Speaker 3: with Kubrick and many other directors and Hollywood personalities, there's
3:10
Speaker 3: always been a relationship. There's almost like a symbiosis between
3:13
Speaker 3: Hollywood and NASA, and it's inexplicable really, So why are
3:18
Speaker 3: you engaging with Hollywood? Why is Kubrick and other people
3:22
Speaker 3: from Hollywood present at NASAU meetings? Why is Disney meeting
3:26
Speaker 3: almost every month for a period of time with NASAU executives?
3:30
Speaker 3: What are they doing? And I think because of people
3:33
Speaker 3: like you and me, Well, you understand the domain. I
3:35
Speaker 3: don't understand anything about making film or photos or anything
3:38
Speaker 3: like that, but I understand there's probably some complexity involved,
3:41
Speaker 3: and if you understand the craft and domain, you can
3:44
Speaker 3: create a stand in Kubrick too, those and one Space
3:46
Speaker 3: Odyssey where space looks quite real, isn't it? In that movie?
3:50
Speaker 3: And that came out just before the Apollo program launched
3:53
Speaker 3: in sixty nine. So Kubrick is kind of the baseline
3:56
Speaker 3: I think for the imagery, and if you look at
3:59
Speaker 3: what they're scenting through Poulla, through Artemis, I still see
4:03
Speaker 3: a lot of Kubrick in that. You see a lot
4:05
Speaker 3: of reuse of ideas. And with deep fake AI and
4:10
Speaker 3: software simulation and advanced CGI, it's quite difficult to know
4:15
Speaker 3: what we're looking at, you and I. When we see something,
4:17
Speaker 3: when we consume it, we don't really know if it's
4:20
Speaker 3: real or not. We can't tell. And that was true
4:22
Speaker 3: in nineteen sixty nine. Now, nineteen sixty nine of the
4:25
Speaker 3: Apollo program, as we discussed, was a fraud that landing
4:29
Speaker 3: in July sixty nine never happened, and there's a thousand
4:32
Speaker 3: one reasons why it never happened. And as a baseline,
4:36
Speaker 3: if you look at the problems that they had with
4:39
Speaker 3: the Apollo program, you you look at the size of
4:42
Speaker 3: the rocket, it was far too small on the launch pad.
4:44
Speaker 3: You look at fuel, You look at batteries or at communications.
4:48
Speaker 3: You look at the quite primitive ANALYOG technology running on
4:50
Speaker 3: vacuum to hardware. You look at aspects of even understanding space,
4:58
Speaker 3: the radiation and what I call the either or other
5:02
Speaker 3: as the Americans are sometimes English say other Americans as well,
5:06
Speaker 3: the other either is a planeum of space and it's
5:08
Speaker 3: an actual vibrant material medium and it's not empty. And
5:14
Speaker 3: they know this. It's in our cell's own calculations when
5:16
Speaker 3: they calculate fuel. So you look at space as a domain,
5:20
Speaker 3: you don't know anything about it. Nineteen Sixtein really in
5:22
Speaker 3: terms of humans traversing over a period of ten days
5:27
Speaker 3: around the moon and back. So if you add up
5:29
Speaker 3: all the probability theories, you probability analysis, basing analysis, and
5:34
Speaker 3: have all the components, and there's many ways of doing it,
5:38
Speaker 3: the chance of success is so small that you would
5:41
Speaker 3: not launch any production. So a normal company, before they
5:45
Speaker 3: can go live in production, you've done you've done testing,
5:49
Speaker 3: and you are ninety nine point six nine's sure of
5:53
Speaker 3: success and go into prod production and deploy and field
5:56
Speaker 3: is to be certain that it will succeed. That's what
6:00
Speaker 3: most companies do. If you do the same analysis. But
6:03
Speaker 3: now so it doesn't doesn't work out qu ahead Sorry.
6:06
Speaker 1: No, no.
6:07
Speaker 2: A lot of people to this day still don't know
6:11
Speaker 2: that the Apollo mission. Let's just for the sake of argument,
6:15
Speaker 2: say that it was real.
6:18
Speaker 3: OK.
6:18
Speaker 2: A lot of people don't know is that they actually
6:23
Speaker 2: filmed the entire thing in the event that the real
6:27
Speaker 2: thing wouldn't occur. And this is now even being acknowledged
6:31
Speaker 2: in Hollywood. So even absolutely so, even if you believe
6:36
Speaker 2: the Apollo missions were real, you wouldn't know because the
6:40
Speaker 2: astronauts themselves said, well, well, the engineers themselves said, you
6:44
Speaker 2: can't tell the difference between what they filmed and what
6:47
Speaker 2: was real.
6:49
Speaker 3: Correct it was filmed. So there's there's many simulations involved
6:53
Speaker 3: with the POLO program. This is what people don't know.
6:55
Speaker 3: They don't teach you this in education or on the
6:57
Speaker 3: fake news or anywhere. You have to go digging it yourself,
7:00
Speaker 3: and you'll find out that it's starting in nineteen sixty
7:03
Speaker 3: five NASA, which is a CIA company. It should be
7:08
Speaker 3: emphasized that NASA's part of the CIA Pentagon complex of
7:11
Speaker 3: the US, of the US Empire as I call it.
7:14
Speaker 3: And if you want to know about the deep State,
7:16
Speaker 3: then you're looking right at the CIA, the Pentagon, that's
7:18
Speaker 3: the deep States that runs the US and basically run
7:21
Speaker 3: to the so called New World Order that they keep
7:23
Speaker 3: talking about. And I'm not American, so I can I
7:26
Speaker 3: look at the American empire a little bit differently than
7:28
Speaker 3: an American wind. So NASA is a CIA company. It
7:32
Speaker 3: always has been. If you look at NASA's leadership, it's
7:35
Speaker 3: always come from the military, so it gets as directive
7:38
Speaker 3: as its leadership. In the nineteen sixties it's fighter pilots
7:41
Speaker 3: from the US military. And in nineteen sixty five, the
7:44
Speaker 3: CIA and NASA built an incredibly complicated engineering complex just
7:51
Speaker 3: down the road from Langley, Virginia, which happens to house
7:54
Speaker 3: the CIA headquarters, a place called hallm It's basically Langley's
8:00
Speaker 3: I still think it's the world's largest. I call it
8:01
Speaker 3: hardware simulator, but it's a hard physical set of simulators
8:06
Speaker 3: that would imitate and replicate the entire Moon landing. They
8:09
Speaker 3: had replicas of the Moon, they had replicas of the
8:11
Speaker 3: Moon's surface that they were hand painted. They had the
8:14
Speaker 3: ever present black curtains in the background, and they said
8:18
Speaker 3: it was a training and simulation center. And they have
8:20
Speaker 3: pictures and some grainy films of Armstrong and other people
8:24
Speaker 3: there doing some training. And on my substack I described
8:29
Speaker 3: the five main simulators and how is entirely possible and
8:34
Speaker 3: to end to simulate the entire Apollo eleven mission from
8:38
Speaker 3: Langley and then marry that too. Photoshoot or film film
8:42
Speaker 3: shoot at Cannon Air Force Base. So why an air
8:45
Speaker 3: force base in the desert? Many reasons for that. Secrecy
8:49
Speaker 3: is one, but the materials at hand, sand, desert sand.
8:53
Speaker 3: It looks like the lunar surface. So it's very easy
8:56
Speaker 3: to create a lunar surface in an air force hangar,
8:58
Speaker 3: secure it, lock it down for a period of one
9:00
Speaker 3: or two months, do the film shoot, wouldn't take that long,
9:04
Speaker 3: do the editing, and then marry that to the simulation.
9:07
Speaker 3: That's a far more credible explanation of what happened with
9:10
Speaker 3: the Paul eleven than their claim that using that technology,
9:14
Speaker 3: with the lack of fuel, with the lack of battery power,
9:16
Speaker 3: with the analog communications with navigation systems that I've never
9:20
Speaker 3: been tested in space through the radiation rich environment, through
9:24
Speaker 3: the Van Allen radation belts, which you completely ignored. This
9:27
Speaker 3: is the other thing with Apollo. So according to NASSA,
9:29
Speaker 3: after the Apollo up in flight some years later, they said,
9:32
Speaker 3: well we zip through the Van Allen radiation belts, which
9:35
Speaker 3: are anywhere from thirty five thousand and fifty thousand miles
9:39
Speaker 3: thick and deep. You can't avoid them. We did that
9:42
Speaker 3: in ten minutes. So this is a speed never before,
9:47
Speaker 3: never before understood in human history. So it's a remarkable speed.
9:51
Speaker 3: And so of course he didn't do it because he
9:52
Speaker 3: didn't have the fuel, didn't have the thrust. And then
9:55
Speaker 3: their story after that is, well, we slowed down, So
9:58
Speaker 3: why would you slow down? Why would you down? And
10:00
Speaker 3: radiation which you won't go as fast as possible and
10:02
Speaker 3: get there as quickly as possible and on your way
10:04
Speaker 3: back as fast as possible because of radiation. So this
10:08
Speaker 3: is not the way they think. So they took their
10:09
Speaker 3: time over ten days. They talk about breaking and deceleration,
10:12
Speaker 3: then reacceleration, they talk about doing the slingshot. All of
10:16
Speaker 3: this is nonsense to Paul eleven because the Paulo eleven
10:20
Speaker 3: craft could not have traversed the radiation belts in that
10:23
Speaker 3: period of time, simply impossible. And the Orion program Ryan two.
10:28
Speaker 3: The minivan as I call it, the ten ton minivan
10:30
Speaker 3: for him is two. Apparently for whatever reason, they have
10:34
Speaker 3: lots of reasons why they did. This was at forty
10:36
Speaker 3: six thousand miles altitude, right on the top of the
10:39
Speaker 3: Van Allen radiation belts in a plasma furnace, and he
10:41
Speaker 3: spent forty two hours there orbiting the Earth and doing
10:45
Speaker 3: the slingshot around the Earth to the Moon. So Paul
10:48
Speaker 3: is going through in ten minutes. Ryan two is taking
10:51
Speaker 3: forty two hours. The story doesn't make any sense.
10:53
Speaker 2: Well, you look at the let's be fair here. You
10:57
Speaker 2: know they they're using new technology.
11:02
Speaker 3: Well that's the thing I myself stack. I compared the technology.
11:05
Speaker 3: It's actually not that different. So back to the US
11:07
Speaker 3: one point five trillion spent since nineteen seventies, where's it
11:10
Speaker 3: going into. I compared the craft. I compare eying the
11:13
Speaker 3: rockets the craft, the fuel. The only think that's really
11:16
Speaker 3: different and the thickness of the hall. So the halls
11:19
Speaker 3: are the same thickness but one point five inches. It's
11:22
Speaker 3: the hull of a rimee. The mini van is a
11:25
Speaker 3: little bit different. There's some titanium alloys, but it's still
11:28
Speaker 3: too thin. You still need feet of lead or two
11:31
Speaker 3: or three to protect yourself from radiation. And they confirmed
11:35
Speaker 3: this with their supposed artemus one on man Journey in
11:39
Speaker 3: twenty twenty two where they were I was reading the documentation.
11:42
Speaker 3: They sounded shocked. Oh, there's protons and radiated particles can
11:48
Speaker 3: go through anything. There saying in the report they can
11:51
Speaker 3: go through metal, and can go through water and go
11:53
Speaker 3: through hydrogen. That's interesting. So it's a radiation filled environment
11:58
Speaker 3: and so the one point five inch doesn't really help you.
12:01
Speaker 3: And the app code coding that they put on, which
12:04
Speaker 3: is for re entry is a resin based material, which
12:06
Speaker 3: is another problem for them. It doesn't protect against radiation.
12:10
Speaker 3: It's just a it's a polymer, it's a resin and
12:13
Speaker 3: a silicon fiber mixture an epoxy, and so it's not
12:17
Speaker 3: going to help you the radiation. The particles are going
12:18
Speaker 3: to transfer themselves through that you might It's like having
12:21
Speaker 3: a screen door and expecting to keep out the mosquitoes
12:25
Speaker 3: or small insects. It's just not working. So NASA's own
12:28
Speaker 3: documentation they had review in twenty twenty four and early
12:31
Speaker 3: twenty five, and it gave a very high probability of
12:34
Speaker 3: failure for Artemis too. But of course it's one hundred
12:37
Speaker 3: percent successful, as we all knew it would be. And
12:40
Speaker 3: they talked about radiation, so they they gave some really
12:44
Speaker 3: top advice the actor nons. She said, hide behind the
12:47
Speaker 3: water and the food, stack them up in the in
12:49
Speaker 3: the minivan, and when you go through the van Allen
12:52
Speaker 3: radation belts hide behind there for a while, and that
12:54
Speaker 3: should that should do it because their their theory is
12:56
Speaker 3: that water will deflect a way particles, which is nonsense.
13:02
Speaker 3: But they have never solved from the time of Apollo
13:06
Speaker 3: the problem with radiation. They haven't solved it yet. And
13:10
Speaker 3: because there's trade offs and what they're trying to do.
13:13
Speaker 3: As we talked about before, there's always a trade off
13:16
Speaker 3: in physical science or an astrophysics with weight, with power,
13:21
Speaker 3: with fuel, with batteries, with absolute size, with communications, with
13:26
Speaker 3: radiation protection, with re entry protection. It's quite a balancing act,
13:30
Speaker 3: a lot of variables to consider. They're all interdependent, and
13:33
Speaker 3: so if you overcompensate, for example, on I'll have two
13:37
Speaker 3: feet of lead for radiation protection, Well you can't launch it.
13:40
Speaker 3: It's just too heavy. And this is one of the
13:42
Speaker 3: problems you have with the app code. There's epoxy blend.
13:45
Speaker 3: They put on a ton a ton and a half
13:49
Speaker 3: of epoxy resinume, mostly on the fat bottom let's call
13:54
Speaker 3: it the protected zone at the bottom and on the
13:57
Speaker 3: back of the hall. They have these little silicon tiles,
14:00
Speaker 3: silica tiles. That's not gonna protect you from anything. Why
14:04
Speaker 3: someone asked me, well, why didn't you just qut the
14:06
Speaker 3: whole thing five times? And this magic AV code Merlin approved,
14:09
Speaker 3: Wizard approved. Because of the way it's a ten ton minivan.
14:13
Speaker 3: If I start coding a NAV code, the ten tons
14:16
Speaker 3: go up to twelve thirteen. I can't even launch it.
14:19
Speaker 3: So again it's that balancing act. So they're really the
14:22
Speaker 3: constraints are quite serious. So if you go through any
14:25
Speaker 3: part of this of the Apollo program, and Paula had
14:28
Speaker 3: the same problem, by the way, with protection they had
14:30
Speaker 3: the one point five inch ilumna can they have all
14:32
Speaker 3: these fanboys on TV doing their debunking of the moon critics,
14:37
Speaker 3: and they have all sorts of nonsense to do on
14:39
Speaker 3: TV where they prove that the aluminum is good enough
14:41
Speaker 3: to protect. Again, it simply isn't. And NASA was admitted
14:44
Speaker 3: that because I was in twenty two twenty three when
14:46
Speaker 3: they're quite amazed at how easy the protons, which are
14:48
Speaker 3: celebrated to particles pass through anything. So that's just part
14:52
Speaker 3: of the problem that they have with the radiation. The
14:54
Speaker 3: other thing that's quite amazing as you as you might know,
14:57
Speaker 3: is that there's twenty twenty five thirty solar cosmic events
15:01
Speaker 3: almost every day except a NASA puts its minivanded operation
15:05
Speaker 3: for ten days and suddenly it's it's quiet. Everything's quiet.
15:08
Speaker 3: So this, this is impossible.
15:10
Speaker 1: There has to be over lays.
15:13
Speaker 3: All the delays. Yeah, and they launched in April fools,
15:16
Speaker 3: and they planned it perfectly. They've done the solar calendaring
15:19
Speaker 3: exactly right, and they know exactly when it's going to
15:21
Speaker 3: be quiet. But if you if you take that probability
15:24
Speaker 3: over the six poll emissions, it's seventy going to included
15:28
Speaker 3: Paul thirteen, which is also just a contrived stunt. I
15:33
Speaker 3: think we mentioned the Paul of thirteen, the supposed failure
15:35
Speaker 3: that they had. If there was a battery failure, you're
15:39
Speaker 3: dead and you're dead in minutes, because it was just
15:41
Speaker 3: frees of death. But the Russians a cour so it's
15:45
Speaker 3: more exactly found that the capsule floating off the Bay
15:47
Speaker 3: Biscay and gave it back to the Americans in the
15:50
Speaker 3: fall of nineteen seventy one. So it was it was
15:53
Speaker 3: a mislaunch, is what it was. And so but they
15:55
Speaker 3: had simulation. So, oh, I won't go back to the
15:57
Speaker 3: Langley thing just for just quickly. So Langley had in
16:00
Speaker 3: nineteen sixty five. It was built sixty five. All these
16:03
Speaker 3: simulators you can simulate everything, and one thing they could simulate.
16:07
Speaker 3: They had what one thousand programs of simulation, including failures,
16:12
Speaker 3: so they could simulate a failure or a problem or
16:15
Speaker 3: something happening mid flight like with a Paul of thirteen,
16:17
Speaker 3: or something happening off the launch, and they could simulate
16:20
Speaker 3: that and record it. So every possibility could have been
16:25
Speaker 3: could have been simulated and married to married to the film.
16:28
Speaker 3: So if you look at a Ryan Artemis two, one
16:31
Speaker 3: thing that it's never made sense is the story that
16:34
Speaker 3: they're traveling at I would say re entry here. Just
16:38
Speaker 3: to start with that, they're traveling to reenter the year's
16:41
Speaker 3: atmosphere at Mack thirty two. So Mack thirty two is
16:44
Speaker 3: roughly twenty four thousand miles per hour, and if you're
16:49
Speaker 3: hitting the atmosphere at that speed, there's no chance you're
16:53
Speaker 3: going to survive as you go through the layers of
16:54
Speaker 3: the atmosphere. But what they do is they mass Us
16:58
Speaker 3: says in their own documentation that it takes twenty twenty
17:02
Speaker 3: five minutes to re enter. So what they're saying is
17:05
Speaker 3: that at twenty four thousand miles per hour is what
17:08
Speaker 3: forty two. They're basically starting that countdown from ten thousand
17:11
Speaker 3: miles in altitude, which is fine, and at that altitude
17:17
Speaker 3: the diffusion of molecules is quite is quite obvious if
17:22
Speaker 3: you look at the comparison to sea level here, so
17:25
Speaker 3: roughly in the Earth we have look at liquar compaction,
17:29
Speaker 3: we have about one point two kilograms per meter cube
17:32
Speaker 3: here a ten thousand miles or so in altitude, that
17:37
Speaker 3: drops to ten miles eighteen kilograms per meter cube, meaning
17:40
Speaker 3: that it's zero point seventeen zeros one kilogram per meter cube.
17:46
Speaker 3: I mean, that's quite diffuse, but that's not how physics works.
17:50
Speaker 3: And so as you go down through the layers and
17:52
Speaker 3: you hit seventy five miles, you're suddenly at ten to
17:55
Speaker 3: the minus seven. So it's ten thousand times denser in
18:00
Speaker 3: the layer just above, and so you're going down through
18:02
Speaker 3: density and so that the problem that they have is
18:06
Speaker 3: re entry. This is why I think all the nineteen
18:10
Speaker 3: sixties events or frauds for the simple fact you can't
18:12
Speaker 3: re enter at that speed with the technology we have
18:17
Speaker 3: thermo dynamics, kinetic energy, just basic physics won't allow it.
18:21
Speaker 3: And this is something that you can't simulate, however, and
18:24
Speaker 3: so I've shared with people simulators online. They can also
18:28
Speaker 3: buy some if you want to have a physical version,
18:31
Speaker 3: and you can put in these parameters and put in
18:33
Speaker 3: parameters of the mass or density. In this case, the
18:36
Speaker 3: Irin minivanoms ten tons. You can put in the atmosphere density.
18:39
Speaker 3: So you start at ten thousand miles acuard to NASA.
18:41
Speaker 3: It takes twenty five minutes from there, and it's ten
18:44
Speaker 3: to the minus eighteen kg permeter cube, et cetera, et cetera.
18:48
Speaker 3: Put in the parameters, you'll find out that at around
18:51
Speaker 3: seventy five miles in altitude, the structure's gone. It's a
18:55
Speaker 3: cintegrated because it's not just that it's the fuse. There's
18:58
Speaker 3: not that many molecules there. When you have a tent
19:00
Speaker 3: ton minivan moving in through the atmosphere, you're pushing. You're
19:04
Speaker 3: pushing on the molecules. It's hydrostatic pressure, it's called and
19:07
Speaker 3: it builds up and a static electricity builds up, and
19:10
Speaker 3: as you go further and further, the pressure keeps building up,
19:13
Speaker 3: and then by the time you hit mile seventy five
19:15
Speaker 3: in altitude, you're dealing with five thousand fahrenheit at least
19:18
Speaker 3: in temperatures, and there's what there's a thermal transfer, something
19:22
Speaker 3: called the heat soaking. So the app code's not going
19:25
Speaker 3: to help you. The AV coat is a resin based epoxy.
19:28
Speaker 3: So even if if the outside's five thousand, but my
19:31
Speaker 3: tin can melts at five hundred fahrenheit, which it does,
19:35
Speaker 3: the av coat is still because it's resin based, it's
19:37
Speaker 3: it carbonizes, it still transfers the heat and energy. And
19:40
Speaker 3: if any part of that vehicle, anything anywhere, starts to melt,
19:46
Speaker 3: or if one of the silica tiles on the back
19:48
Speaker 3: hole which is housing the transponder which is communications and
19:51
Speaker 3: the antennas, if that it just one falls off or
19:54
Speaker 3: it gets ripped off to the hydrostatic pressure, and through
19:58
Speaker 3: just the thermal pull and heat transfer, you're dead. You die.
20:03
Speaker 3: And so what's the probability of that happening. It's quite high. Actually,
20:07
Speaker 3: So if you take the seven flights that they said
20:09
Speaker 3: they had to pull six, okay, thirteen as well, let's
20:12
Speaker 3: say so say seven or eight flights, they've never had
20:15
Speaker 3: a problem with re entry. That is statistically impossible. We
20:19
Speaker 3: look at the thermo dynamics involved in the hydrostatic pressure,
20:23
Speaker 3: the sheer physics of trying to come back into our
20:26
Speaker 3: atmosphere at that speed. It's not that the molecules are
20:29
Speaker 3: ten tomize eighteen kg per meter cube. That's irrelevant. It's
20:34
Speaker 3: the velocity, it's the energy, it's the thermal transfer to heat.
20:39
Speaker 3: All these things come into play, and it envelops the minivan.
20:42
Speaker 3: What they're trying to sell us is that if you
20:45
Speaker 3: go in fat bottom first and you have a blade
20:48
Speaker 3: of shield that pushes it away, it's actually not true.
20:51
Speaker 3: It envelops the entire crowd. This is basic physics, and
20:54
Speaker 3: so it's going to shake the craft. The structure is
20:56
Speaker 3: going to be shaken. And hitting seventy five miles in
20:59
Speaker 3: alpha to at that speed is roughly the equivalent of
21:03
Speaker 3: you getting your car. There's sixty miles an hour driving
21:06
Speaker 3: sixty miles an hour smashing into wall and multi multiply
21:09
Speaker 3: that by one hundred and sixty thousand times, and if
21:13
Speaker 3: NASA is saying it takes twenty minutes to re enter,
21:15
Speaker 3: so it's not just you smashing into a wall at
21:17
Speaker 3: sixty mph and multiplying that by a factor is doing
21:22
Speaker 3: it for twenty minutes. So well comes back on you
21:25
Speaker 3: that the atmosphere comes back on you with hammers and
21:27
Speaker 3: starts hammering on your car with one thousand or a
21:30
Speaker 3: million hammers for twenty minutes. So what do you see
21:33
Speaker 3: on the on the splashdown, Jeremy, you see what a
21:37
Speaker 3: pristine white object that just went through a car wash
21:40
Speaker 3: being dropped in near San Diego.
21:42
Speaker 1: H it's ridiculous.
21:44
Speaker 2: In the.
21:46
Speaker 3: Oh, absolutely he saw this was Shephard. I know this
21:49
Speaker 3: was Shepherd's capsule that he had the intenta pointing around
21:52
Speaker 3: on the top the time you ripped right off. Because
21:54
Speaker 3: at seventy five miles, so Shepherd is sixty one s
21:56
Speaker 3: posing went up seventy five eighty miles, it came down.
21:58
Speaker 3: He actually exited that dividing line that they say separates
22:03
Speaker 3: let's say the heavier atmosphere and coming down towards a
22:06
Speaker 3: service from the lighter atmosphere, is call it, And he
22:09
Speaker 3: did that. There's no way that the antenna's gonna be
22:11
Speaker 3: ponging around on re entry at five thousand fair and
22:13
Speaker 3: heat with that type of impact from the speed. Now
22:16
Speaker 3: he's only traveling supposed at fifteen thousand miles an hour
22:19
Speaker 3: these guys are going at twenty four thousand miles an hour.
22:21
Speaker 3: So the basic laws of physics, and you look at
22:23
Speaker 3: material structures and the transfer that energy, it's actually just
22:27
Speaker 3: going to pop that minivan. It's going to pop it,
22:30
Speaker 3: and you're dead before you even get I think below
22:33
Speaker 3: much below seventy five miles in altitude, and then you
22:36
Speaker 3: keep going down. It's denser and denser and denser and denser.
22:40
Speaker 3: The para shoes, the parashoes come out about mile six
22:44
Speaker 3: from the surface, and before you get the mile six
22:48
Speaker 3: you're dead. So what happens kinetically is that and the
22:53
Speaker 3: other thing that people want talk about which really annoys me.
22:55
Speaker 3: And it's the same thing with Paul eleven. Paul Elevin
22:57
Speaker 3: never had enough battery power to go anywhere. They're using
23:00
Speaker 3: the zinc and silver batteries. They had a quarter of
23:03
Speaker 3: what they needed, and I talk about my sub stacked
23:05
Speaker 3: with all the numbers analysis just simply no way to
23:07
Speaker 3: argue against it. They had never had enough battery power
23:09
Speaker 3: for the command module or for that homeless shelter science
23:12
Speaker 3: fare project from Grade eight that they call the lunar module,
23:15
Speaker 3: which is an embarrassment. So no battery power. Artemis two
23:19
Speaker 3: has the same damn problem. They have a fourteen kilowatt
23:23
Speaker 3: h battery capacity, fourteen killo's per hour capacity. It's like
23:28
Speaker 3: running it's like running Jeremy A transport, eighteen wheeler transport
23:33
Speaker 3: on double A batteries. The guy at the Tesla, you know,
23:37
Speaker 3: these idiots on my street to have Tesla's, those things
23:40
Speaker 3: take up seventy five kill a watt hours okay, and
23:43
Speaker 3: energy that's that a capacity. These guys are running on fourteen.
23:47
Speaker 3: So the comparison is that Teesla's is roughly two tons.
23:51
Speaker 3: They ran minivans ten five times a size. They're running
23:54
Speaker 3: on five times a battery capacity. It's just insane. So
23:58
Speaker 3: you're dark within a couple of days on any journey
24:01
Speaker 3: to the moon. But coming back into the re entry
24:04
Speaker 3: this is really interesting. So they get rid of and
24:08
Speaker 3: it's another problem for them. But they had the solar panels.
24:10
Speaker 3: You may they've been amazed by the solar panels, which
24:12
Speaker 3: is feeding the double A battery and so and substack.
24:19
Speaker 3: I give some examples of doing experiments at home where
24:21
Speaker 3: you can see if the double A battery would actually
24:23
Speaker 3: run anything for more than a few minutes. So the
24:25
Speaker 3: double A battery being charged by the sixty three foot
24:29
Speaker 3: solar panels which are folded up and they launch over
24:32
Speaker 3: the E s M. The E SMS to fuel modules.
24:34
Speaker 3: See it's a generator fuel capacity, and the SMS essential
24:39
Speaker 3: for the entire program. Without the SM they can't go anywhere.
24:42
Speaker 3: That's where the fuel is. So the solar wings are
24:46
Speaker 3: folded over, they go up and they unfold magically went
24:50
Speaker 3: to get past a certain point and that's how they
24:52
Speaker 3: feed the battery. Now when they go back and re entry,
24:56
Speaker 3: those panels are gone three forty thousand dollars or so
25:00
Speaker 3: E s M, which is your fuel, and the angel
25:04
Speaker 3: the wings of the angels are gone and you're running
25:08
Speaker 3: on you're running on the double A battery. The double
25:12
Speaker 3: A battery powers everything. It powers a life support, it
25:15
Speaker 3: powers navigation, that powers a computer systems. You need it
25:19
Speaker 3: to re enter, so they don't have enough battery power
25:22
Speaker 3: to re enter. And in terms of physics, if you
25:26
Speaker 3: as you go through this process of heading down towards
25:28
Speaker 3: the seventy five mile belly flop zone, whereas like belly
25:32
Speaker 3: flopping into a pool and you get involved with the
25:37
Speaker 3: hydrostatic pressure and structural dynamics. The battery is long dead
25:42
Speaker 3: by that, it's dyed. It would not withstand the g
25:48
Speaker 3: force or the speed or all this connect transfer of energy.
25:51
Speaker 3: It just wouldn't survive it. So you're basically taking the
25:55
Speaker 3: risk as an if you're a real actronaut or astronaut,
25:58
Speaker 3: you're betting your life on the battery being in business
26:02
Speaker 3: below fifty miles in altitude. There's absolutely no guarantee of that.
26:06
Speaker 3: In fact, i'd say the probability is almost zero based
26:08
Speaker 3: on just physics. The structure itself is going to be
26:12
Speaker 3: It could be subject to shearing and pulling and tearing
26:16
Speaker 3: and heat transfers. If he transfers enough, it just it
26:20
Speaker 3: fries the electronics. It will destroy the battery. The battery
26:23
Speaker 3: itself a leak. So that's a talk listener documents, you
26:27
Speaker 3: talk about battery leakage, go ahead, and you want to say.
26:30
Speaker 1: Something what Yes, So.
26:33
Speaker 2: All right, so the Optimus mission was staged, but something
26:38
Speaker 2: happened on the day, right, there was a rocket that
26:41
Speaker 2: lifted off.
26:42
Speaker 1: What happened?
26:43
Speaker 3: Well, yeah, oh, I don't really know it was in there. Actually,
26:47
Speaker 3: I don't watch the launch because I just okay, so
26:52
Speaker 3: I've seen I've seen I've seen videos of the launch
26:55
Speaker 3: where there's two emergency cable cars coming down beside the
27:00
Speaker 3: beside the rockets as it's just about to take off,
27:04
Speaker 3: and so it goes back to Capricorn one. So worthy
27:09
Speaker 3: were these actronauts in the cable cars Because there's supposed
27:11
Speaker 3: to emergency cable cars. Something goes wrong at the last minute,
27:14
Speaker 3: you can put them in the cars and get them down.
27:16
Speaker 2: I guess from a module, I did I missiear you?
27:19
Speaker 2: Did you say astronauts or actonauts?
27:23
Speaker 3: Actronauts pretending to be astronauts their actronauts.
27:28
Speaker 1: Well they're unknown as well, all right, sorry to carry on.
27:35
Speaker 3: Well that's that's one of one of the issues for
27:37
Speaker 3: an assel. So these people are unknown, right. So in
27:39
Speaker 3: nineteen sixty spent a lot of time telling the American
27:42
Speaker 3: especially American public, how great I'm sure they were great guys.
27:45
Speaker 3: I'm sure they're all smart and and physically mentally capable,
27:48
Speaker 3: no doubt in my mind about that. They're all young men.
27:51
Speaker 3: Armstrong or Shepherd or Grisome and the other jet fighter pilots.
27:56
Speaker 3: You're actually je fire policy had five thousand or more
27:58
Speaker 3: hours of experience a flight time with complex equipment at
28:05
Speaker 3: high speeds at high G force. Uh. These people for
28:08
Speaker 3: the Ryan two minivan, uh almost to Ryan minivan. I
28:11
Speaker 3: have no idea who they are. No one knows, no
28:13
Speaker 3: one knows who they are. They do they do appear
28:15
Speaker 3: to be actors or mildly trained astronauts, but they're nowhere
28:21
Speaker 3: close to the quality that But they're nowhere close to
28:26
Speaker 3: what you know, whatever you think of it. So our
28:29
Speaker 3: arms song is a fraud in a criminal for what
28:30
Speaker 3: he did, but has a fighter pilot. These men were
28:34
Speaker 3: real and they were well trained their top guns. So
28:36
Speaker 3: I don't know who these people are. And they've done
28:38
Speaker 3: this before with the Polaris SpaceX mission where they had
28:41
Speaker 3: amateurs apparently going up to eight hundred miles in altitude
28:45
Speaker 3: and doing all sorts of stuff coming back. I don't
28:48
Speaker 3: if you saw the return of the Polaris mission, they're
28:51
Speaker 3: doing this, punching their arms out and waving and pointing
28:54
Speaker 3: at the camera. You just went through a near death experience.
28:57
Speaker 3: You're in a radiant environment, you haven't slept in a
28:59
Speaker 3: long time time. You're probably staggering out of there, if
29:03
Speaker 3: at all, are you being pulled out of there? And
29:05
Speaker 3: you're not doing the arm pumps. You're asking for a
29:07
Speaker 3: hospital bed. So and they did this with your blue
29:11
Speaker 3: Origin fraud from from Beso's company where the Starlets went
29:15
Speaker 3: up and imitated the Shepherd flight almost the exact same
29:19
Speaker 3: altitude but without any no helmets, needed, no training. I
29:22
Speaker 3: think they trained for like two or three weeks or
29:24
Speaker 3: something in a few hours here and there, and those
29:26
Speaker 3: pilot but course by Beslos's wife. So this is where
29:31
Speaker 3: we're at. It's it's all theater. It's not even it's
29:33
Speaker 3: not even something you can take seriously. And this kind
29:36
Speaker 3: of is in the same vein. We don't know who
29:38
Speaker 3: these people are, we don't know what it's supposedly well trained,
29:41
Speaker 3: et cetera. But there's no proof of this and they'll disappear.
29:43
Speaker 3: You'll ever see these people again, whoever they are. So yeah,
29:46
Speaker 3: I think actronauts is a good way.
29:48
Speaker 2: Do we have any detailed analyses by expert astronauts like
29:55
Speaker 2: Katie Perry.
29:59
Speaker 3: Well, she had mentioned the mannequan arm and the window
30:02
Speaker 3: and landing was really her touch. You thought that was
30:05
Speaker 3: a very clever thing to add. And the inward opening door.
30:08
Speaker 3: So it's a space regulation that all doors have to
30:12
Speaker 3: open hatch doors have to open out. This comes from
30:15
Speaker 3: the Gus Grissom murder of nineteen sixty seven January. We're
30:18
Speaker 3: Grisom a few weeks before hung a lemon on the
30:21
Speaker 3: Apollo one. Instead, We're not going anywhere. This program is
30:24
Speaker 3: a joke. He was very vocal about it. He went
30:26
Speaker 3: to the media. He was putting together a manuscript and
30:29
Speaker 3: all the defects and why the Apollo missians are going
30:32
Speaker 3: to fail. So the murder, so NASA says it was,
30:37
Speaker 3: of course a wiring issue, was just a mistake. But
30:41
Speaker 3: the interior of that of the apollow one of the
30:43
Speaker 3: capsule was covered with flammable material and the door opened inwards.
30:50
Speaker 3: So the NASA story is that they couldn't open the
30:54
Speaker 3: hatch and pushed their way in because of the way
30:56
Speaker 3: the door was constructed. So they mandated after that has
30:59
Speaker 3: to swing out. They can, you know, for emergency whatever.
31:02
Speaker 3: So the fact that Besos Space Origin door opens inward
31:06
Speaker 3: is it violates regulations. It would never pass a safety
31:11
Speaker 3: audit or regulation. It couldnt be launched in other words,
31:13
Speaker 3: so you just know it's a film for ten thousand
31:16
Speaker 3: other reasons as well. But yeah, these acts Katie Perry
31:20
Speaker 3: and other people supposedly trained in just a few hours,
31:22
Speaker 3: is what they're trying to tell us. So trying to
31:24
Speaker 3: tell us that everyone and anyone can go to the
31:27
Speaker 3: Moon or to Mars, or to anywhere, and it's going
31:29
Speaker 3: to be very easy. And the reality is that you're
31:31
Speaker 3: going to die if you try that. You're just simply
31:34
Speaker 3: going to die. This is why they spent so much
31:36
Speaker 3: time advertising eighteen sixties of training for these astronauts, how
31:40
Speaker 3: difficult it was and how serious a business it was.
31:43
Speaker 3: Now we've gone into almost a parody, haven't we. It's
31:46
Speaker 3: just it's just a movie business.
31:51
Speaker 2: Going back to the rocket launch though, I mean, assuming
31:53
Speaker 2: the rocket did launch, where did it go?
31:57
Speaker 3: Well, that's the thing I said, I don't really know.
31:59
Speaker 3: The directory is kind of so NASA has a very
32:01
Speaker 3: low trajectory. It's not like you or ID just using
32:04
Speaker 3: because there's normal people to say, well, probably if the
32:07
Speaker 3: moon is that way, then I want to launch straight
32:09
Speaker 3: up and probably go straight up, and but no, they
32:12
Speaker 3: go straight up and then they flatten out the angle
32:16
Speaker 3: of exit. And they have some reasons for this, and
32:18
Speaker 3: a lot of reasons have to do with using the
32:20
Speaker 3: Earth as a slingshot, so you exit and then you
32:23
Speaker 3: slink shot around the Earth and go to the moon.
32:27
Speaker 3: But critics have pointed out that could probably just take
32:30
Speaker 3: the same trajectory and fly the rocket into an ocean
32:34
Speaker 3: somewhere and the bury it's and then you know, the
32:37
Speaker 3: actor nauts came down in the emergency cable cars and
32:40
Speaker 3: did the Capricorn one ended up with Langley or Nordan
32:43
Speaker 3: Air Force Base and did the coms from there, which
32:45
Speaker 3: is what they did during the Pollo eleven program. Of course,
32:48
Speaker 3: those guys are terrestrial. They were not talking from space.
32:51
Speaker 3: The comms would the analog comms at that time would
32:53
Speaker 3: not allow it. So what do you think, what do
32:55
Speaker 3: you think happened to the rocket? What's your opinion?
32:58
Speaker 2: I've got no idea. Perhaps into orbit and coming I
33:02
Speaker 2: don't know who knows. But did you see the video
33:05
Speaker 2: of that of that woman which she forgot her lines?
33:09
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, yeah, that's kind of funny. So she didn't
33:11
Speaker 3: know what to say, uh, you know, was talking and
33:14
Speaker 3: then stopped in this sentence.
33:19
Speaker 1: Piece.
33:20
Speaker 3: She had an air piece and she's going like that.
33:22
Speaker 3: She's looking down and muttering to herself and it's just embarrassing. Really.
33:27
Speaker 3: The whole thing is Stage is scripted exactly the same,
33:30
Speaker 3: was Polaris exactly the same, it was Blue Origin, So
33:34
Speaker 3: they turned into theater. They've taken a Walt Disney as
33:36
Speaker 3: word and just made theater out of it. Unfortunately.
33:40
Speaker 2: Another another thing that you that you noted on your
33:44
Speaker 2: substeck is that the crew, the guys, they were clean
33:48
Speaker 2: shaven after after they crashed.
33:52
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, so can you imagine being ten days? So
33:54
Speaker 3: the ten days always needs explanations, so the ten days
33:57
Speaker 3: makes no sense an actual fact. I think the ten
34:00
Speaker 3: days is to coordinate the simulation, the simulations they've done CGIAI,
34:07
Speaker 3: but also maybe some hardware simulations with the imagery and
34:10
Speaker 3: the story and everything else. I think that's why they
34:12
Speaker 3: take ten days. There's no mechanism, there's no fuel. So
34:15
Speaker 3: the one thing to talk about is there's just no
34:16
Speaker 3: fuel to do what they're saying that they're going to do.
34:19
Speaker 3: So they have to two thousand most gallons of hypergolic
34:21
Speaker 3: fuel for the Orion Midivan. It's probably one third of
34:26
Speaker 3: what is really needed. And they say that when they
34:28
Speaker 3: return and hit their's atmosphere, there's almost nothing left. Well
34:32
Speaker 3: that you die then, because according to their own documentation.
34:37
Speaker 3: You need to have fuel for the re entry, and
34:39
Speaker 3: they had apparently had none or very little, So the
34:42
Speaker 3: fuel doesn't add up either. So if you look at
34:44
Speaker 3: the ten days, it's hard to understand what they're saying
34:47
Speaker 3: with the ten days. Why would it take ten days?
34:49
Speaker 3: How would you slow down with the retro rockets fire
34:52
Speaker 3: which takes fuel and they talk with things like you know,
34:54
Speaker 3: magic words, gravity, et cetera.
34:57
Speaker 2: Yeah, but the point that you're making is just something
34:59
Speaker 2: as all says, growing a beard in ten days, you're
35:03
Speaker 2: going to grow quite a lot of stubble, if not
35:05
Speaker 2: a beard. And they're certainly not shaving up there, No, no.
35:10
Speaker 3: Ten days very long time, and you're not sleeping while
35:14
Speaker 3: you're eating you know what they're eating. They're apparently taking
35:17
Speaker 3: selfies with the iPhones and using.
35:20
Speaker 1: Out I mean, how do they go to the toilet?
35:24
Speaker 3: Well, they have a toilet there apparently has some problems
35:26
Speaker 3: with it. But yeah, you have to get the d
35:27
Speaker 3: of the waste out through the craft into space somehow.
35:31
Speaker 3: But yeah, it did be very unhygienic, unfriendly environments. They've
35:36
Speaker 3: never been there before, these people, so you'd be terrified,
35:38
Speaker 3: be terrified. It'd be very cold. It's minus two hundred
35:40
Speaker 3: and fifty fahrenheit roughly. And again you're relying on this
35:45
Speaker 3: a battery for heat, systems, for navigation, for it, for everything.
35:50
Speaker 3: So you're you're completely reliant on this. Never before tried
35:54
Speaker 3: in a manned flight anyways, solar energy from wings to
35:59
Speaker 3: very small battery to run everything in the capsule, and
36:04
Speaker 3: people never talking about this, but that that's that's the obvious,
36:07
Speaker 3: obvious issue. If you're an actor astronaut, you're real astronaut,
36:11
Speaker 3: you wouldn't go in it because there's absolutely no backup
36:14
Speaker 3: if something happens to the solar wings, and it would
36:18
Speaker 3: in a radiation rich environment, and space is not a vacuum.
36:21
Speaker 3: It's it's a planum, it's it's full of energy and
36:23
Speaker 3: material natrinos, plankts, gamma, rays, photons, plasma. It is a
36:28
Speaker 3: it is a rich environment, it's not not a vacuum.
36:31
Speaker 3: So something would go wrong with the solar panels. The
36:34
Speaker 3: chance that happening is pretty high. You see with the
36:36
Speaker 3: ISS ISS you see them on their supposed spacewalks. What
36:40
Speaker 3: are they doing. They're fixing the solar panels, that's what
36:43
Speaker 3: they're doing because because they have to replaced them. So
36:46
Speaker 3: over ten days, you're don't have a problem with the
36:48
Speaker 3: solar panels. You're going on the dark side of the moon.
36:51
Speaker 3: Supposedly there's no there's no apparently no solar radiation photonic
36:55
Speaker 3: energy there, so you're dark. So how does the how
36:58
Speaker 3: is the how's a little battery work then? So you're
37:01
Speaker 3: hoping that it's stored, the energy is stored there and
37:03
Speaker 3: you have enough to get around the dark side of
37:05
Speaker 3: the moon and come back to the lighter side and
37:08
Speaker 3: receive the energy again. There's so many things that can
37:10
Speaker 3: go wrong in this process, and the first time it's tried,
37:14
Speaker 3: as always it works perfectly. This is not real life.
37:17
Speaker 3: It doesn't happen in production like that. So the only
37:20
Speaker 3: thing they can say is while we did it with
37:22
Speaker 3: Artemist one, which is unmanned and seemed to work okay.
37:25
Speaker 3: But there's lots of problems with the artemist one story
37:27
Speaker 3: as well. So they were caught photoshopping artists won photos.
37:31
Speaker 3: And in twenty twenty three they had the science A
37:34
Speaker 3: team of the scientists had a little chin wag and
37:37
Speaker 3: they on YouTube you can see it. They're talking about
37:39
Speaker 3: why they must absolutely must photoshop and edit those photos,
37:45
Speaker 3: so it leaves a timestamp, so there's metadata left and
37:49
Speaker 3: as an imprint in every artifact. If it's a photo,
37:53
Speaker 3: you can timestamp it.
37:55
Speaker 2: But also a barndly they took on phoons right now,
38:00
Speaker 2: I took iPhone to Yeah, okay, so this would be
38:03
Speaker 2: a big deal for Apple. They would they would be
38:06
Speaker 2: putting out announcements and videos and things about how their
38:11
Speaker 2: phone was taken to space that I don't think they've
38:15
Speaker 2: done anything like that.
38:17
Speaker 3: No, they don't. It's a fraud, that's why. So the
38:21
Speaker 3: basic thing they work in it or technology and this
38:23
Speaker 3: is something annoys me, but it t people engineers. So
38:26
Speaker 3: if you're in it, you should have half a brain
38:29
Speaker 3: to know that it's a fraud, just based on the technology.
38:31
Speaker 3: So iPhone, so again you're dealing with a double a battery.
38:35
Speaker 3: Now as a comparison running a truck. You're not going
38:38
Speaker 3: to waste your energy and draw down for your iPhone charge?
38:42
Speaker 3: Are you?
38:43
Speaker 1: You're not going to resk the iPhone banks? What about
38:46
Speaker 1: pop banks?
38:48
Speaker 3: They'll say if they're still joining the same power source.
38:50
Speaker 3: So an iPhone said, they said they used outlook, so
38:54
Speaker 3: that would look at TCP I p connection. That protocol
38:57
Speaker 3: does not allow latency, so you have to be connected.
39:00
Speaker 3: So they have what's called a deep space, a deep
39:05
Speaker 3: network layer that they've added, but still you don't have
39:09
Speaker 3: the real time networking there from tw hundred thousand miles
39:11
Speaker 3: away to take the selfie and have a transfer. You
39:14
Speaker 3: also don't have the transmission power, so they have to
39:16
Speaker 3: transmit it somehow. They have a transmitter, it's about maybe
39:20
Speaker 3: ten percent of the size you'd actually need to transmit
39:22
Speaker 3: rich data through a planteum like space in which you're
39:26
Speaker 3: going to have what's called bitflips, you're going to have
39:28
Speaker 3: radiate radiation interference, you're going to have scintillation, you know, drops,
39:32
Speaker 3: you're going to have problems. So they have nothing and
39:35
Speaker 3: these these photos, these supposed itself. These a lot of
39:38
Speaker 3: them are fraudulent. They've been analyzed. Some people maintain a
39:42
Speaker 3: few of them are AI generated, so they ran through
39:45
Speaker 3: AI filters. But I think probably more likely because they
39:49
Speaker 3: now so would understand that people who use AI filters
39:51
Speaker 3: to look at the pixelation, they're probably very manually they're
39:54
Speaker 3: probably manually done and very cleverly done. They're still composites
39:58
Speaker 3: and you can see that it's on the photos by
40:00
Speaker 3: myself stack. I have a photo of a selfie of
40:02
Speaker 3: the woman looking at the porthole of the braided hair.
40:04
Speaker 3: It's obviously a fake. But the real time distribution over
40:09
Speaker 3: a network wouldn't exist in space back to Earth, and
40:11
Speaker 3: they're almost immediately put onto a portal somewhere or social media,
40:16
Speaker 3: which is impossible. So the entire rich data transport architecture
40:21
Speaker 3: doesn't make any sense, and you would not be taking
40:24
Speaker 3: selfies there. The radiation the protons would go through the
40:30
Speaker 3: very thin hull, and it does must affect hardware, including iPhones,
40:34
Speaker 3: So it's similar to the jeeps and the golf clubs
40:40
Speaker 3: from the Apollo missions. It's a prop. It's a kind
40:42
Speaker 3: of a distracting prop. So you look at that and
40:45
Speaker 3: say and focus on that, and so looking at issues
40:49
Speaker 3: with battery or fuel or radiation protection, you get distracted
40:53
Speaker 3: by the iPhone and so it's obviously a fraud. The
40:57
Speaker 3: protocols don't even allow that from where they were, but
41:00
Speaker 3: the IT engineers mostly quiet and they must know damn
41:04
Speaker 3: well it's impossible, but very few say anything.
41:09
Speaker 1: Sadly, what would be the point of staging the whole thing?
41:16
Speaker 3: Oh? I think, well, it's as you know, it's the
41:21
Speaker 3: American Empire. So at the core of the heart of
41:23
Speaker 3: the American Empire two things, war and money. So the
41:28
Speaker 3: Apollo eleven has to be followed up. And the critics
41:31
Speaker 3: are getting noisier and noisier and noisier and louder and
41:34
Speaker 3: more of them. So outside the excited states, where everyone
41:40
Speaker 3: in the America, in America watches TV and believes what's
41:42
Speaker 3: on the TV. Outside in the real world people aside
41:47
Speaker 3: the excited States, what half the population does not believe
41:50
Speaker 3: that the Americans landed on the Moon and sixty nine
41:52
Speaker 3: roughly half depends on the country, of course, but put half,
41:56
Speaker 3: it's at least a third. Anyways, in America there's maybe
41:59
Speaker 3: ten percent of the pop relation might have some days
42:01
Speaker 3: about Apollo eleven. For example, Now after Paul eleven landed,
42:05
Speaker 3: supposed he landed, it was obviously a film a fig
42:08
Speaker 3: that numbers did at what one third. So in America
42:12
Speaker 3: you have from nineteen sixty nine to now a reduction
42:15
Speaker 3: from a third being skeptics down about ten percent. The
42:18
Speaker 3: rest of the world it's gone the other way. It's
42:20
Speaker 3: gone from twenty twenty five percent quite skeptical to the
42:23
Speaker 3: thirty thirty five, maybe fifty percent in some countries. So
42:27
Speaker 3: the critics are getting noisy, and they have to keep
42:29
Speaker 3: the money flowing, so you have to do something. They're
42:32
Speaker 3: forced into doing something to keep the money. NASA choose
42:35
Speaker 3: through minimum twenty five billion US dollars a year. If
42:39
Speaker 3: you add in all the other agencies around the world
42:41
Speaker 3: that NASA sees funds and guides, probably doubling that number,
42:45
Speaker 3: and it was riding billiings to that number. So per
42:48
Speaker 3: annum it's roughly a forty or fifty billion dollar industry.
42:54
Speaker 3: It's a massive industry, space huge. You have all the
42:57
Speaker 3: contractors and companies, enterprises that are connected with it, as
43:01
Speaker 3: well as all the people bought off. All the politicians,
43:05
Speaker 3: the senators and media, the journals, the science rags, the university,
43:09
Speaker 3: all all these research laboratories are all tied in. Got
43:12
Speaker 3: to keep the money flowing. So they have to do something,
43:15
Speaker 3: and for a long time they did very little. They
43:17
Speaker 3: had the ISS which a couple of tubes up two
43:20
Speaker 3: hundred and fifty miles from the surface. Perhaps that that's
43:23
Speaker 3: their claim. All sorts of fraudulent videos and imagery and
43:27
Speaker 3: all sorts of other problems with that claim being the
43:30
Speaker 3: construction itself is problematic. That's it. That happened in nineteen
43:34
Speaker 3: ninety eight, so that's been demised being replaced by another project.
43:39
Speaker 3: So they've been promising a moon bus since the nineteen
43:42
Speaker 3: eighty so promising moon holidays since the nineteen nineties. Musk
43:45
Speaker 3: in twenty seventeen said he'd have a moon bus for
43:48
Speaker 3: tourism ready by twenty eighteen. I looked at my calendar
43:52
Speaker 3: this morning, I said, twenty twenty six. Are still waiting
43:54
Speaker 3: on that. Musk has said many times the past five
43:57
Speaker 3: years that by twenty fifty Mars we colonized the entire
44:01
Speaker 3: system of Mars, its biosphere would be changed to make
44:04
Speaker 3: a human habitable. He plans and starting sending people there.
44:07
Speaker 3: He said to twenty thirty in a starship. The starship
44:10
Speaker 3: has never got off the ground. There's been nothing but
44:12
Speaker 3: problems with that. He went to send a thousand people
44:15
Speaker 3: per starship or something tomorrows start colonizing it. So that
44:18
Speaker 3: these are the fantasies that they're promoting. So they have
44:21
Speaker 3: to do something. It's a big industry. It's tied to
44:23
Speaker 3: the US military, but they're really after is what Eisenhower's
44:26
Speaker 3: administration said back in nineteen fifties. They would like to
44:29
Speaker 3: nuclearize the Moon. They would like to do something on
44:33
Speaker 3: the Moon, create a US military base there, or do
44:35
Speaker 3: something the upper atmosphere anyways, to control what goes on
44:38
Speaker 3: in this planet. I think that's the real But they're
44:40
Speaker 3: really after so they have to keep the money flowing
44:43
Speaker 3: for these projects. And then NASA gets involved with nonsense
44:47
Speaker 3: like climate Bologne and global only warming and all that
44:50
Speaker 3: stuff which is connected to managing the weather. So the
44:55
Speaker 3: government's now happily admit that. The geo engineer. So you know,
44:59
Speaker 3: another conspiracy theory has always been the m trails. So
45:02
Speaker 3: only an idiot like me would look up the sky
45:03
Speaker 3: and see nucleated material and say, well, it's a chemtrail
45:06
Speaker 3: full of probably substances that could be declared nuclear in
45:12
Speaker 3: some ways, or the chemicals that are unhealthy include strong
45:15
Speaker 3: team of varying other chemicals. But they admit it now,
45:19
Speaker 3: and they've been doing this in the nineteen fifties. They're
45:21
Speaker 3: trying to control the weather. The Iranians just recently said
45:23
Speaker 3: that when the shut down the US basis in the Gulf,
45:28
Speaker 3: they suddenly rain returned, so they maintained that the Americans
45:31
Speaker 3: were changing weather patterns over I Ran, making you ran dryer,
45:35
Speaker 3: getting rid of of vaturally forming rain clouds. That's entirely possible.
45:40
Speaker 3: In the UK, in the nineteen fifties they had a
45:42
Speaker 3: flash flood in Devon, which is an account in the West.
45:45
Speaker 3: They killed about thirty five people. The UK government admitted
45:48
Speaker 3: later that they they had geoengineered the weather to cause
45:52
Speaker 3: that flood. They've been doing it since the nineteen fifties.
45:54
Speaker 3: So this is all part of the same game. That's why.
45:56
Speaker 3: Now that's part of the CIA Pentagon complex. So why
46:00
Speaker 3: why do it keep that money flowing? And the sheep
46:03
Speaker 3: will love it and everyone if you're if you're a
46:06
Speaker 3: really clever sheeople, you swear your bottom few days to
46:10
Speaker 3: to Star Trek and Star Wars, and you watch all
46:12
Speaker 3: the sci fi and you read all the sci fi,
46:15
Speaker 3: and you're really clever because you say magic words like
46:18
Speaker 3: teleporting space, time and other magic words. So you're really
46:22
Speaker 3: clever guy, and you follow the science. So of course
46:24
Speaker 3: you can do it. Because Captain Jerk mister Kirk was
46:27
Speaker 3: he and Spock and the boys of flying around all
46:30
Speaker 3: over the place, teleporting and doing this and doing that.
46:33
Speaker 3: Eventually it's going to be a reality, and you just
46:35
Speaker 3: have to be smart and clever and be're part of
46:37
Speaker 3: that NASA cult. So it's a cult following, is what
46:40
Speaker 3: it is. But not sadly most people don't have the
46:43
Speaker 3: critical thinking skills. You just take a part of the program.
46:46
Speaker 3: Just take part of what you saw. You mentioned the launch.
46:48
Speaker 3: You can serve the launch, serve the fuel. Did they
46:51
Speaker 3: have enough fuel to launch this a ten ton minivan
46:54
Speaker 3: out of the atmosphere? How much fuel would you need? So,
46:57
Speaker 3: Paul eleven von Braun, the Nazi said they need a
47:00
Speaker 3: rocket the size the Empire State Building. Well, the Saturn
47:03
Speaker 3: five rocket was nowhere near that. It was about three
47:06
Speaker 3: percent of that volume. You're missing quite a bit of
47:09
Speaker 3: volume there. If you get out of the atmosphere, Musks
47:12
Speaker 3: go ahead.
47:13
Speaker 1: And Alice, I've got this wrong.
47:14
Speaker 2: NASA have now said that Artemus three is no longer
47:17
Speaker 2: going to send anybody to the moon.
47:21
Speaker 3: Well, yeah, that's the thing too. So that's set so
47:24
Speaker 3: that Paul eleven, so Artemis the minivan for Ryan is
47:28
Speaker 3: ten tons. So I compare my substack. It's not that
47:32
Speaker 3: dissimilar to what the Paul eleven had as a command module.
47:35
Speaker 3: Then you add in the Space Space Project, the Great
47:38
Speaker 3: eight Science for a project, which I called the Lunar module,
47:41
Speaker 3: that was more weights fifteen tons. So now I've multiplied
47:45
Speaker 3: my problems by two. This is what von Braun was saying.
47:49
Speaker 3: You can't You can't launch twenty five tons. This is
47:51
Speaker 3: simply not. This is why the app code doesn't work
47:54
Speaker 3: as a magic re entry a blatant material because you
47:57
Speaker 3: can't put enough of it on.
47:59
Speaker 1: Because it's a.
48:00
Speaker 3: Ton, literally a ton, you still can't cover the craft.
48:03
Speaker 3: So the wait is an issue. If they try to
48:06
Speaker 3: put a lander with the Ryan Minivan, you've doubled your problems.
48:10
Speaker 3: You got double the power. You gotta double the field,
48:13
Speaker 3: you gotta double the battery. The double a battery is
48:15
Speaker 3: not gonna work anymore. But back to where you were
48:18
Speaker 3: with a Paul eleven. Paul eleven in the batteries are
48:20
Speaker 3: a significant issue. The fanboys cannot answer any of the
48:23
Speaker 3: criticisms on the battery. And if the battery dies, you're
48:26
Speaker 3: dark and you're dead. You're finished. You're finished in hours.
48:31
Speaker 3: Not a paula thirteen nonsense, where you're floating around, you're
48:33
Speaker 3: doing the Tom Hanks dramatics. That is a BS. You
48:36
Speaker 3: are dead in no time. You have no heat, there's
48:40
Speaker 3: no air circulation. How can you breathe out air circulation?
48:45
Speaker 3: And how can you survive without heat? Now you have
48:48
Speaker 3: to heat the landing module as well. So if they
48:50
Speaker 3: put the landing module for Ryan Artemis III in the dark,
48:54
Speaker 3: it freezes. You can't use it when you get there.
48:56
Speaker 3: It's a dead rock. You have to heat it. Now
48:58
Speaker 3: what I have to do heat builds up. I need
49:00
Speaker 3: to get the heat out of there. I have to
49:01
Speaker 3: transfer the heat. So now I have another problem. How
49:04
Speaker 3: do I do that? I need a battery. So you're
49:07
Speaker 3: back to all these issues. You're they're all connected. It
49:10
Speaker 3: it's not simple. They make it appear to be simple.
49:12
Speaker 3: It is so complicated when you look at things like
49:15
Speaker 3: managing heat and air and even water fuel. This is
49:19
Speaker 3: why they cannot land in the moon. You don't have
49:21
Speaker 3: the they don't have the fuel or the battery. They
49:24
Speaker 3: haven't figured to do how to do it. And the
49:28
Speaker 3: Orion Mini van slingshot at around the moon, so that's
49:35
Speaker 3: also a problem which to talk about. But without getting
49:37
Speaker 3: into a teat so it's impossible to what they said
49:39
Speaker 3: they did. They didn't have enough fuel or speed, and
49:43
Speaker 3: they're too close to the surface. There only four thousand
49:45
Speaker 3: miles above the surface based on their own calculations. But
49:49
Speaker 3: Apall eleven was supposed to the camand modules supposedly thirty
49:52
Speaker 3: miles above the surface of the Moon doing the orbit. Well,
49:56
Speaker 3: the actornauts are down supposing the lunar surface with their
49:59
Speaker 3: sign for a project. Well, then did do the sling
50:02
Speaker 3: shot back? Didn't have enough fuel, didn't have enough rocket thrust,
50:06
Speaker 3: It couldn't do the sling shot back. So you know
50:08
Speaker 3: it's a fraud just from that, and it can go
50:10
Speaker 3: on and on and on. Every single step of the way.
50:13
Speaker 3: There are problems and issues. And if you start looking
50:15
Speaker 3: at probability theory, started looking at the phases, every single phase,
50:21
Speaker 3: asked me ninety nine point seven, eight, nine, ten nines
50:25
Speaker 3: perfect that even then you still only get eighty percent
50:30
Speaker 3: chance of success. Now, if you look at the components,
50:34
Speaker 3: everything has to work beautifully in synchronicity for those ten days.
50:38
Speaker 3: What's the chance of that happening? Again? You do probability
50:41
Speaker 3: here that you find out I did a probability theory.
50:45
Speaker 3: I think I came up to three percent three percent
50:47
Speaker 3: chance that Artemis to the minivan Ryan would be able
50:51
Speaker 3: to do this, and that was optimistic because it's obviously
50:54
Speaker 3: a fraud and didn't do anything but NASA's own documentation.
50:58
Speaker 3: They did a study in twenty four to twenty five
51:00
Speaker 3: looking at things like the av code, this magic Wizard
51:03
Speaker 3: approved coding, and look at other factors and they said
51:06
Speaker 3: the risk of death is quite high. In NASAU talk.
51:09
Speaker 3: They either are putting it a ten percent or more. Okay,
51:12
Speaker 3: that's using simulation. They're simulating that, so you can change
51:16
Speaker 3: the parameters and get whatever number you want, but they're
51:18
Speaker 3: admitting that there's a high degree. You never go into
51:20
Speaker 3: prod if there's a ten percent chance of death. I'm
51:23
Speaker 3: not getting into capsule. I'm not getting in my car
51:25
Speaker 3: in the morning. If there's a ten percent chance of death,
51:27
Speaker 3: I'll take my bike or I'll walk. So that's what
51:30
Speaker 3: a normal person does. So even admit it that they
51:33
Speaker 3: can't do it and the probability is quite low. So
51:37
Speaker 3: this is what people have to analyze. You don't have
51:39
Speaker 3: to have a degree or be anologist or anything. Just
51:41
Speaker 3: take something that you're interested in. Take batteries. If you
51:44
Speaker 3: understand energy, electricity, and batteries. Just take that and start
51:46
Speaker 3: analyzing and say, what's the probability of all that working
51:49
Speaker 3: over ten days and surviving a re entry Mack thirty two,
51:53
Speaker 3: five thousand fair night heat, hydrostatic pressure pushing in and
51:57
Speaker 3: around the minivan. It would crush it. The batteries would
52:00
Speaker 3: die anyways. But you can do any analysis like that.
52:03
Speaker 3: You never hear any of it, Germ. Never hear in
52:05
Speaker 3: the fake news, the fake science journals, nothing from it. Guys.
52:09
Speaker 3: I think guys with PC's in fact to hear nothing.
52:11
Speaker 3: They're so disappointing. They just buy the narrative or the
52:14
Speaker 3: support for whatever reason, because it's part of their cultimates
52:17
Speaker 3: for their religious doctors that they believe in. But there's
52:20
Speaker 3: no analysis of reality. And you just use basic math
52:23
Speaker 3: theory that we all learned in back in grade nine,
52:26
Speaker 3: probability theory, and start doing some calculations. And that's all
52:29
Speaker 3: I'm asking people to do. And once you start doing
52:32
Speaker 3: it yourself, you find out there's just no chance whatever
52:35
Speaker 3: there's they're showing us cannot happen in real life. It
52:38
Speaker 3: doesn't happen physically.
52:40
Speaker 1: Why do people believe it?
52:43
Speaker 3: I think it's part of the culture, the zeit guys.
52:45
Speaker 3: I think it's the cultural milieu where people believe that
52:48
Speaker 3: comes of the sixties, where we had the suppose the
52:51
Speaker 3: Cold War and had this space race where both sides
52:55
Speaker 3: are saying that we had to win. We had to
52:56
Speaker 3: win this space race to control space or the other side,
52:59
Speaker 3: if they control space, would control the world. And so
53:03
Speaker 3: whatever systems, whatever system was best, would win. That's how
53:07
Speaker 3: I was portrayed. So the Western system, state capitalism, I
53:12
Speaker 3: guess you could call it, won that particular encounter with
53:15
Speaker 3: the Soviets, a totalitarian state based, communist based system, and
53:21
Speaker 3: proved that it had more value, could produce technology, had
53:26
Speaker 3: more scientific advancements, et cetera, et cetera. So it became
53:28
Speaker 3: part of the system, became part of the education system.
53:31
Speaker 3: You're taught this starting a kindergarten that because of a
53:34
Speaker 3: great system and a great technology, we were able to
53:37
Speaker 3: defeat the Soviets, and so it becomes part of you.
53:40
Speaker 3: And this is the problem. So people outside of America
53:43
Speaker 3: don't have the same emotional attachment. They could care less.
53:46
Speaker 3: People like me don't care about it. I could care
53:47
Speaker 3: less to go to the moon. I think it's a
53:48
Speaker 3: complete waste of time and money. There's nothing there except
53:51
Speaker 3: I honestly want to die. But for the Americans, because
53:55
Speaker 3: they control the media and the publications, and they're the
53:57
Speaker 3: gatekeepers of almost everything. The seven eight around space, the
54:02
Speaker 3: America is very emotional for them. It's part of how
54:05
Speaker 3: they won the Cold War, and so they propagate that
54:07
Speaker 3: through through films and through books, through and through universities,
54:12
Speaker 3: and it's very difficult to ignore because it's so prevalent.
54:17
Speaker 3: So I think it's just an emotional attachment without any
54:20
Speaker 3: real critical thinking, your logic. And the other thing is
54:22
Speaker 3: that people always say is that the moon landings or
54:27
Speaker 3: Artemis two must be true because X number of people
54:31
Speaker 3: worked in the programs, whatever the numbers are. Well, that's
54:34
Speaker 3: just ridiculous, isn't it. I mean, this is a fiction.
54:36
Speaker 3: So you could actually you could actually simulate Apaul eleven
54:40
Speaker 3: with fewer than fifty people actually knowing what's going on.
54:43
Speaker 3: You could have someone, you could have someone building in Huntsville, Alabama,
54:46
Speaker 3: a strut, a lunium strut for the whatever the capsule,
54:49
Speaker 3: another guy making a seat belt, another guy making the glass.
54:53
Speaker 3: They don't have a clue what's going on. Okay, But
54:55
Speaker 3: the fifty people who understand the architecture and to end
54:57
Speaker 3: who responsible for nasalls own communit cass at work. NASA
55:01
Speaker 3: has its own communications now we's called NASCM and they
55:04
Speaker 3: built this during the Apollo eleven program. They have their
55:07
Speaker 3: own orbiting satellites. They have four thousand of them. It's
55:09
Speaker 3: called the it's called a mesh sellite mesh, and they
55:12
Speaker 3: control the transponder signals going back to the Earth receivers.
55:17
Speaker 3: So in Apollo eleven they had one it's called the
55:19
Speaker 3: TetR Now they have four thousand. That's what people they
55:24
Speaker 3: pick up a signal and you're saying, well, that's from
55:26
Speaker 3: Artemis two two hundred thousand miles, Well, you know it's
55:28
Speaker 3: from a low Earth orbit satellite, one of four thousand,
55:32
Speaker 3: four thousand. It's a mesh because of a high availability,
55:35
Speaker 3: and it covers the entire planet. So a Paul eleven
55:39
Speaker 3: was a little different. It was centralized. It was just
55:41
Speaker 3: a single large satellite, so they decentralized that that architecture,
55:45
Speaker 3: but they control the signal. So if someone says that, well,
55:49
Speaker 3: you know, the Soviets picked up the Apoll eleven signal
55:51
Speaker 3: in sixty nine, it's simply false. The Soviets picked up
55:54
Speaker 3: it was a low Earth orbit satellite setting a test
55:57
Speaker 3: band transponder signal to a receiver on the Earth. Earth.
56:00
Speaker 3: Doesn't mean it came from outer space, doesn't mean it
56:02
Speaker 3: came from anywhere, because it came from another Trusler location
56:06
Speaker 3: up to the lower and back down. That's that's that's
56:08
Speaker 3: the networking architecture that they have the same thing with
56:11
Speaker 3: Artemis two. It's not difficult to do. And they're they're
56:14
Speaker 3: they're testing this in nineteen sixty eight, the te t
56:18
Speaker 3: R and they rolled it out in sixty nine. So
56:21
Speaker 3: nobody knows this. No one even talks about it. Why
56:23
Speaker 3: are you rolling out an S band transponder low Earth
56:25
Speaker 3: orbit satellite if it's really coming from the Moon, why
56:29
Speaker 3: do you need it? You don't need it. The fact
56:32
Speaker 3: is that the homeless shelter, the lunar module transferring rich
56:36
Speaker 3: data from the lunar surface is a joke. They had
56:39
Speaker 3: a little satellite slapped on the back of it, hardwired
56:43
Speaker 3: to a transponder sitting in the hall, an S band
56:46
Speaker 3: transponder for Paul Levin ran on the equivalent of a
56:49
Speaker 3: refrigerator light bulb. It's it's that EHF headsets they have
56:55
Speaker 3: they're talking, has that to transmit over that frequency VH
57:00
Speaker 3: to the transponder through the hall, which then takes it.
57:04
Speaker 3: Is it to the satellite. The satellite has to be
57:05
Speaker 3: locked into a receiver station on Earth and send the signal.
57:10
Speaker 3: Now there is not enough power the source and the
57:14
Speaker 3: planetum of space, the radiated planet of space, would would
57:18
Speaker 3: take that signal and turn into noise. You need to
57:21
Speaker 3: be able to be nothing but the town hit the planet.
57:24
Speaker 3: So you know that's a fraud. So they the communications
57:28
Speaker 3: are all terrestrial, all the comms, Nixon's green phone, the
57:34
Speaker 3: astronauts supposedly talking. You know it's all terrestrial because there's
57:37
Speaker 3: no drops, there's no flips, there's no what's called scintillation,
57:40
Speaker 3: there's no loss. And the communications network even today is
57:44
Speaker 3: not strong enough to send signals like that in real
57:47
Speaker 3: time where the round trip is taking less than three seconds,
57:51
Speaker 3: simply impossible. They're talking and sometimes even below real time
57:54
Speaker 3: it's like that, sometimes it's immediate. It's simply impossible. That
57:59
Speaker 3: technology possible today. So you know that's a fraud. But
58:02
Speaker 3: there's so many other issues with the architecture networking. And again,
58:08
Speaker 3: if you're in, trusted in it, or you're interested in
58:11
Speaker 3: software comms, that's what you should look at, study it,
58:14
Speaker 3: analyze it, convince yourself as possible. There's absolutely no testing
58:20
Speaker 3: proof of what they showed during a Paul eleven. No,
58:23
Speaker 3: there's no testing of that anywhere like that. And there's
58:26
Speaker 3: no testing proof of what they showed with artist Tune orient.
58:29
Speaker 3: They cannot show you any real, any reality based production
58:33
Speaker 3: testing of that. So the comms are an easy area
58:37
Speaker 3: to look at and reveal the fraud.
58:38
Speaker 2: People are interested, Okay, so how can I follow all
58:44
Speaker 2: your substact work.
58:46
Speaker 3: So I have a substack called unstabinated U N S
58:50
Speaker 3: T A B B I n A t ed unstabinated,
58:54
Speaker 3: so that means I wasn't stabbed during their own a pandemic.
58:57
Speaker 1: And it's talked toled scientism than new religion.
59:00
Speaker 3: Yes, that's exactly right.
59:01
Speaker 1: Time.
59:01
Speaker 3: I'm more interested. So the space stop is kind of
59:04
Speaker 3: sideline and more interested in physical sciences. So I talk
59:07
Speaker 3: about a lot of the laws, so called laws, the
59:09
Speaker 3: laws in physics and reality. So my background is physics
59:11
Speaker 3: and it I talk about a lot a lot of
59:15
Speaker 3: the theories that were told are true or not true.
59:18
Speaker 3: Einstein is thoroughly destroyed Newton for the most part as well.
59:22
Speaker 3: And it gets to the heart of our philosophy. So
59:25
Speaker 3: if these theories like relativity in the Big Bang, hellocentricity
59:29
Speaker 3: or doubt or wrong, changes everything. If the speed of
59:32
Speaker 3: light is wrong, which it is, it changes everything. So
59:35
Speaker 3: if space is a planet, it's an eitheric sponge like
59:39
Speaker 3: fungible material, it changes everything. And it is. So we're
59:44
Speaker 3: living in a bit of a dream world neo. So
59:47
Speaker 3: this is the substack is just trying to get people
59:49
Speaker 3: to think out of the box. And if you don't
59:50
Speaker 3: understand some of the stuff I talk about, I put
59:52
Speaker 3: some simple experiments on there say okay, there's an either.
59:56
Speaker 3: You can do it at home. Here's how you can
59:57
Speaker 3: prove there's an either. I got a post coming up
59:59
Speaker 3: on benjam Franklin. People don't even know anything. But even
1:00:02
Speaker 3: Americans know nothing but Benjamin Franklin. Benjamin Franklin is a
1:00:06
Speaker 3: precursor to Tesla. Tesla harness the either. He harness the
1:00:11
Speaker 3: energy from the either through what's called longitudinal waves. The
1:00:14
Speaker 3: science has gotten rid of longitudin waves. It don't exist.
1:00:17
Speaker 3: Franklin was doing this one hundred and fifty years before Tesla.
1:00:21
Speaker 3: People don't even know that. They teach us nothing about
1:00:25
Speaker 3: what goes on in real life, and it would change
1:00:27
Speaker 3: everything if Franklin and Tesla are right and you can
1:00:31
Speaker 3: harness free energy from the either What the hell are
1:00:33
Speaker 3: we doing? Why we give that up to the US
1:00:37
Speaker 3: military to make DO weapons direct energy weapons. People don't
1:00:42
Speaker 3: know that. Tesla demonstrated nineteen thirty three in New York City.
1:00:45
Speaker 3: He demolished a building using sound waves, which is a
1:00:50
Speaker 3: do It's a direct energy weapon using sound waves and frequency.
1:00:54
Speaker 3: And he said all he did was harness the frequency
1:00:57
Speaker 3: of the sound waves at the right level, and he
1:01:00
Speaker 3: destroyed that. It destroyed the structural integrity. That's what he
1:01:03
Speaker 3: was doing. So that's what the US military has. US
1:01:06
Speaker 3: military has that capability. So we've given over to the military. Now,
1:01:11
Speaker 3: imagine if we had that for civilian use and we
1:01:14
Speaker 3: could use what Tesla and Franklin are doing. Just amazing
1:01:18
Speaker 3: what could be done. Sure, So that's what the substacts about.
1:01:21
Speaker 3: It is what challenging the narrative quaccines as well on
1:01:24
Speaker 3: that other nonsense and that people talk about evolutions. On
1:01:26
Speaker 3: the one I can't stand because if the bacteria became
1:01:29
Speaker 3: you so these are things that may not agree with it,
1:01:32
Speaker 3: but at least it we'll get people thinking and challenge
1:01:35
Speaker 3: the dogma.
1:01:36
Speaker 1: Well, that's precisely why I have you on my should.
1:01:40
Speaker 3: Thank you, jir. Yeah, we have to challenge the dogma
1:01:42
Speaker 3: because so much of it is wrong. Not everything is wrong,
1:01:46
Speaker 3: but a lot of it's wrong, and it's it's used
1:01:48
Speaker 3: for malicious purposes. That's the thing that there's evil in
1:01:52
Speaker 3: the world, and you can taste it and bite it
1:01:53
Speaker 3: and feel it. And it was quite apparent in the
1:01:56
Speaker 3: ponent the roan of pandemics uh, the bat to paygol
1:02:02
Speaker 3: and virus story that they had. It's quite quite apparent
1:02:04
Speaker 3: that you will existed during that period of time. So
1:02:08
Speaker 3: I think a lot of people woke up. I think
1:02:09
Speaker 3: about maybe a third of the population finally go out
1:02:11
Speaker 3: of their slumber and said something's not right here. They're
1:02:14
Speaker 3: still two thirds ago, so we have some working to
1:02:18
Speaker 3: all right.
1:02:18
Speaker 2: Doctor Ferdinand Santos, thank you for joining me in the Strangers.
1:02:22
Speaker 3: Thanks. That's fun.