Latest / Sleepy Facts About History / Who Were the Young Conspirators Behind the Sarajevo Plot? - The Sarajevo Plot and the Decisions of July 1914 | Sleepy Facts About History

Transcript

Who Were the Young Conspirators Behind the Sarajevo Plot? - The Sarajevo Plot and the Decisions of July 1914 | Sleepy Facts About History · Sleepy Facts About History

0:00
Welcome to Sleepy Facts About History. On the
0:12
morning of June 28, 1914, a sequence of errors,
0:17
coincidences, and small failures brought an Archduke's
0:22
car to a stop directly in front of a 19 -year
0:26
-old with a pistol. The assassination of Archduke
0:29
Franz Ferdinand and his wife Sophie in Sarajevo
0:33
is often remembered as a single inevitable moment
0:37
that triggered the First World War. The actual
0:40
history is far more uncertain. The plot was an
0:43
amateurish near -disaster carried out by young
0:47
radicals, and its success depended entirely on
0:50
a wrong turn, a stalled engine, and a shouted
0:54
command. This episode examines the specific circumstances
0:58
of that morning. including the motivations of
1:02
the young Bosnia conspirators, the failure of
1:05
the first bomb attack, and the persistent myth
1:08
that Gavrilo Princip was eating a sandwich when
1:11
history found him. It also explores the distinction
1:14
between the assassination and the war that followed.
1:18
The conflict did not flow automatically from
1:21
two bullets in Sarajevo, but emerged from the
1:24
deliberate choices made in European capitals
1:27
in the weeks afterward. I kept returning to one
1:31
question while working on this episode. How do
1:34
we understand an event that feels inevitable
1:36
in hindsight, yet depended entirely on contingency?
1:41
Exploring the gap between the conspirators' intentions
1:44
and the catastrophic consequences that followed
1:46
offers a way to look at July 1914 not as a mechanical
1:51
unfolding of destiny, but as a branching path
1:54
where different choices were still possible.
1:59
On the morning of June 28, 1914, seven young
2:04
conspirators armed with bombs and pistols lined
2:07
a Sarajevo street to kill an archduke. By evening,
2:12
two bullets had found their mark, not because
2:15
of design, but because a wrong turn, a stalled
2:19
engine, and a shouted command brought the target
2:22
to a stop directly in front of a 19 -year -old
2:25
who had already given up hope. On the morning
2:29
of June 28, 1914, Sarajevo was a small provincial
2:34
capital in a mountain valley. It was a city of
2:38
roughly 50 ,000 people where the Miljaka River
2:42
ran slow between stone embankments and the main
2:46
road, the Apple Key, followed the water's curve.
2:50
Above the rooftops, the minarets of the Ghazi
2:54
Husrev Beg Mosque, and the spires of Orthodox
2:57
and Catholic churches rose within sight of each
3:00
other. This was because Bosnia -Herzegovina was
3:04
a place where Ottoman and Habsburg layers sat
3:06
close together. Along the quay, the imperial
3:11
administration had built in the Habsburg style.
3:14
The governor's residence, the military barracks,
3:18
the post office with its clock tower. Behind
3:21
the city, the mountains rose steeply, pine covered.
3:25
trapping the summer heat. That morning, the Appelke
3:30
was decorated with flags and bunting for a state
3:32
visit. The heir to the Habsburg throne, Archduke
3:37
Franz Ferdinand, had arrived with his wife, Sophie.
3:41
A marriage to him had been controversial at the
3:44
Habsburg court. They were scheduled to drive
3:47
along the river to the city hall. The date was
3:51
provocative. June 28 was St. Vitus Day for Dofton.
3:57
the anniversary of the 1389 Battle of Kosovo,
4:00
when Ottoman forces had defeated a Serbian -led
4:03
coalition. In Serbian national memory, this was
4:08
a day of martyrdom and sacred loss. It was a
4:12
date that resonated through centuries of poetry,
4:15
religious observance, and political aspiration.
4:19
For a Habsburg archduke to visit Sarajevo on
4:23
Vidovdan was, to Serbian nationalists, Either
4:27
obliviousness or deliberate provocation, the
4:31
governor of Bosnia -Herzegovina, Oskar Potiorek,
4:34
had arranged the visit and the security. He had
4:38
not arranged it well. What happened that morning
4:42
is often remembered as a single gunman and a
4:45
single moment that started the First World War.
4:49
That memory is wrong in almost every particular.
4:52
The assassination was not a well -executed plan.
4:58
It was a plot that nearly failed. It succeeded
5:02
only through a sequence of errors, coincidences
5:05
and small failures that brought the Archduke's
5:08
car to a stop directly in front of one of the
5:10
conspirators. And the war that followed did not
5:14
flow automatically from two bullets in Sarajevo.
5:18
It came from decisions made in Vienna, Berlin,
5:22
St. Petersburg and other capitals in the weeks
5:24
after. Those decisions could have been made differently.
5:30
To understand what actually happened, we need
5:33
to look at who the conspirators were, how they
5:36
obtained their weapons, how they positioned themselves
5:38
along the motorcade route, and how the morning
5:41
unfolded from the first failed attack to the
5:44
final fatal shots. The conspirators were young.
5:50
Gavrilo Princip was 19. Most of the others were
5:55
teenagers or in their early 20s. They were 17,
5:59
18, 19. Nadejko Obrinovi and Mohamed Mehmedboshi
6:06
were older at 27. Danilo Ilic was 24. They were
6:13
mostly Bosnian Serbs. The Mehmedboshi was a Bosniak.
6:19
The network they belonged to, Young Bosnia or
6:22
Mladá Bosna, included Croats as well. They were
6:27
students, workers and intellectuals who had absorbed
6:30
a mixture of revolutionary, anarchist and nationalist
6:33
ideas. They opposed Habsburg rule not because
6:37
of ancient ethnic hatred, but because they lived
6:40
under an imperial administration that limited
6:42
political representation, favoured certain groups
6:45
over others, and had annexed their province without
6:48
consultation. They wanted South Slav unification.
6:53
They saw the Kingdom of Serbia as a potential
6:57
center for that unification. Young Bosnia was
7:00
not a tightly organized conspiracy. It was a
7:04
loose network of like -minded young people who
7:07
read forbidden literature, discussed revolutionary
7:09
ideas, and occasionally took action. The Sarajevo
7:14
plot was more concrete than most of their activities,
7:17
but it was still amateurish in its planning and
7:20
dependent on outside help for weapons. That help
7:25
came through clandestine channels linked to the
7:27
Black Hand. The Black Hand, formerly Ujedinjen
7:31
Ilis Mert, Union or Death, was a secret society
7:36
founded in 1911 by Serbian military officers.
7:40
The most prominent of these officers was Colonel
7:44
Dragutin Dimitriević, known as Apis. Its goal
7:49
was Serbian national expansion through covert
7:52
action, including propaganda, sabotage and assassination.
7:57
It operated outside and often against the civilian
8:01
government of Serbia. This distinction matters.
8:05
The Serbian government under Prime Minister Nikola
8:09
Bashi was a constitutional monarchy with its
8:12
own internal conflicts. Auschwitz civilian administration
8:16
was frequently at odds with the military intelligence
8:19
circles of the Black Hand. There is evidence
8:23
that Pesic had some awareness of weapons smuggling
8:26
toward Bosnia and may have attempted to warn
8:29
Vienna. The warning was vague and not acted upon.
8:33
The extent and timing of his knowledge remain
8:36
debated among historians. What is clear is that
8:41
the Serbian government did not direct the assassination
8:43
plot. Elements connected to the Black Hand facilitated
8:48
the weapons. The young Bosnia conspirators conceived
8:52
and carried out the attack. The weapons arrived
8:56
through intermediaries, Major Vojislav Tenkosikic
9:00
and Milan Sikanovic. They passed four Browning
9:04
pistols and six bombs from Serbian military stocks
9:07
to the conspirators in Sarajevo. The bombs were
9:12
crewed based on a design from the Balkan Wars
9:15
of 1912 -1913. The pistols were standard military
9:20
-issue Brownings. The conspirators had some training
9:24
in their use, but not much. They were not professional
9:28
killers. On the evening of June 27, the seven
9:33
conspirators positioned themselves along the
9:36
announced motorcade route. They were spaced at
9:39
intervals along the Apple Quay, each armed with
9:43
a bomb and a pistol. The plan was simple in conception
9:46
and fragile in execution. As the Archduke's car
9:51
passed, They would throw their bombs. If the
9:55
bombs failed, they would use their pistols. If
10:00
the pistols failed, they would swallow cyanide
10:02
capsules and try to drown themselves in the Miljaka.
10:07
The cyanide, as it turned out, was old or weak.
10:11
This would matter. The morning of June 28 was
10:16
warm. Crowds gathered along the Apulki. Some
10:22
were curious, some hostile. most simply present
10:25
for a state occasion. The motorcade consisted
10:29
of six cars. Franz Ferdinand and Sophie rode
10:33
in the third, an open -top Graf Stift Double
10:36
Phaeton with a folded convertible roof. The governor,
10:40
Potiorek, sat with them. The driver was Leopold
10:45
Locher, a professional chauffeur who did not
10:48
know Sarajevo well. This too would matter. The
10:54
first part of the drive proceeded without incident.
10:57
The motorcade passed the first conspirators,
11:00
who lost their nerve or judged the moment wrong.
11:04
Then, as the cars approached the A. Umurhi Bridge
11:08
near the central market, Nedeljko A. Abranovic
11:12
stepped forward, pulled the pin on his bomb and
11:15
threw it at the Archduke's car. The bomb arced
11:19
through the air. Whether it struck the folded
11:23
convertible roof or glanced off Franz Ferdinand's
11:26
arm is unclear from the accounts. What is certain
11:30
is that it did not enter the car. It fell behind
11:34
the Archduke's vehicle and exploded under the
11:37
following car with a sound that scattered the
11:40
crowd. Several occupants were wounded, including
11:44
Lieutenant Colonel Franz von Hara. A number of
11:48
bystanders were hit by shrapnel or thrown to
11:51
the ground. The explosion caused chaos. Ubrinovic
11:57
swallowed his cyanide capsule and jumped into
12:00
the Miljaka River. The cyanide only made him
12:04
vomit. The river, in late June, was only 10 to
12:09
15 centimeters deep in that stretch. He landed
12:13
in shallow water and was immediately seized by
12:16
police and bystanders, who beat him before authorities
12:19
intervened. The motorcade continued to the city
12:24
hall. Franz Ferdinand was angry, shaken, and
12:29
determined to proceed with the official program.
12:31
He gave his scheduled address, with blood from
12:35
a minor cut on his cheek visible to those nearby.
12:39
Then he insisted on visiting the wounded from
12:41
the bombing at the hospital. This decision, to
12:45
continue the visit rather than leave Sarajevo
12:48
immediately, was one of several moments that
12:51
morning when different choices might have produced
12:53
different outcomes. The route to the hospital
12:56
was supposed to differ from the original route.
13:00
The drivers were supposed to proceed along the
13:02
Apple Quay and then turn onto a different street,
13:06
avoiding the area where the first attack had
13:08
occurred. But the change was not communicated
13:11
clearly to all the drivers. When the motorcade
13:15
reached the junction of Apple Quay and Franz
13:17
Josef Street, The first car turned onto Franz
13:20
Josef Street as originally planned. Leopold Lacher,
13:25
driving the Archduke's car, followed. Governor
13:29
Potiorek, realizing the error, shouted at Lochte
13:33
to stop and reverse. Lochte stopped the car,
13:37
put it in reverse, and either stalled or simply
13:40
stopped directly in front of a shop called Schiller's
13:43
Delicatessen. Obrillo Prinz was standing there.
13:49
He had been positioned along the original route.
13:52
He had seen the motorcade pass after the bombing.
13:56
He had assumed the plot had failed. He had wandered
14:01
toward this spot. He was not eating a sandwich.
14:06
There is no contemporary evidence for the sandwich
14:09
story. It appears to be a later myth, possibly
14:13
originating in a misremembered detail or a fictionalized
14:17
account. It has no basis in the trial records.
14:21
the investigation files or any witness statement
14:24
from 1914. Princip was standing outside Schiller's
14:29
because he had been walking along the route,
14:32
because the shop happened to be there and because
14:35
the car had stopped directly in front of him.
14:38
He stepped forward, drew his pistol and fired
14:41
two shots at close range. The first hit Franz
14:45
Ferdinand in the jugular vein. The second hit
14:49
Sophie in the abdomen. Both were fatal. Sophie
14:55
died first, before the cart could reach the governor's
14:58
residence. Franz Ferdinand died shortly after.
15:02
He reportedly spoke words to her that have been
15:05
variously recorded. One version is, Sophie, Sophie,
15:11
don't die, stay alive for our children. But the
15:15
exact wording is uncertain, and should be treated
15:17
with caution. Princip attempted to swallow his
15:21
cyanide, and then to shoot himself. But the cyanide
15:25
was weak. and the pistol was wrestled from him
15:27
by bystanders and police. He was arrested alive.
15:32
The entire sequence from the car stopping to
15:35
the shot being fired took seconds. The contingency
15:39
is almost impossible to overstate. If the route
15:43
change had been communicated clearly, if Logica
15:47
had not followed the first car, if Potiorek had
15:50
not shouted to stop, if the car had not stalled
15:54
at that exact spot. If Princip had been five
15:57
minutes earlier or later, any of these differences
16:01
and the assassination fails. The plot was not
16:05
a well -oiled machine. It was a near disaster
16:09
that became successful through confusion. Princip
16:13
was held in custody. In the days that followed,
16:16
the other conspirators were identified through
16:19
interrogation and arrested. The physical evidence
16:22
was collected. The pistols, the bombs, the cyanide
16:26
capsules, the clothes the young men had worn.
16:29
The investigation, led by Austro -Hungarian authorities,
16:33
established the basic facts of the plot, the
16:36
weapons supply, and the connections to Serbian
16:39
military circles. What the investigation found
16:43
mattered less than what Vienna chose to do with
16:46
it. The investigation also served political purposes.
16:51
Vienna wanted to use the assassination to confront
16:54
Serbia, to settle accounts that had been building
16:57
since the annexation crisis of 1908 and the Balkan
17:01
Wars. The assassination became a pretext, a casus
17:05
belli, not a cause in any simple sense. On July
17:10
23, Austria -Hungary issued an ultimatum to Serbia
17:15
with demands so severe that full acceptance was
17:18
virtually impossible. Serbia accepted most but
17:23
not all terms. Austria -Hungary declared war
17:27
on July 28. Russia mobilized in support of Serbia.
17:33
Germany, which had given Austria -Hungary a blank
17:36
check of support, declared war on Russia on August
17:40
1, and on France, Russia's ally, on August 3.
17:44
Britain entered the war after Germany invaded
17:47
Belgium. The alliance system activated. The machinery
17:53
of European war. Built over decades of military
17:56
planning, diplomatic rivalry and imperial competition
18:00
engaged. None of this was inevitable. The assassination
18:06
did not make war unavoidable. At multiple points
18:11
in July 1914, different decisions were possible.
18:15
The German government could have restrained Austria
18:18
-Hungary. The Austro -Hungarian government could
18:22
have accepted Serbia's partial compliance. The
18:25
Russian government could have delayed mobilization.
18:28
The Serbian government could have accepted the
18:31
ultimatum in full. None of these choices were
18:35
taken. The reasons they were not taken involved
18:39
the specific calculations of specific men in
18:42
specific circumstances, not the mechanical unfolding
18:45
of historical necessity. The conspirators themselves
18:49
did not expect or intend a world war. They were
18:54
focused on Bosnia, on South Slav unification.
18:57
on the local struggle against Habsburg rule.
19:01
At his trial, Princip described himself as a
19:05
Yugoslav nationalist who believed in the unification
19:08
of South Slavs. He expressed satisfaction at
19:12
the assassination, but showed no awareness that
19:15
his act would produce continental catastrophe.
19:18
The gap between his intentions and the consequences
19:21
illustrates something important about political
19:24
violence. Its effects are not controlled by its
19:27
authors. The trial of the conspirators began
19:31
in Sarajevo in October 1914. Princip, Abrinovic
19:37
and Grebeth were too young for execution under
19:41
Habsburg law. They received 20 -year prison sentences
19:45
and died in custody during the war. Princip died
19:50
of tuberculosis in April 1918. Others received
19:55
various sentences. The trial records remain a
19:59
primary source for understanding the conspirators'
20:02
motivations. They must be read with awareness
20:05
that judicial interrogation shapes testimony
20:08
in particular ways. Post -war memoirs by surviving
20:12
conspirators, including Vaso Akubralovic and
20:17
C .V. Jetko Popovic, add detail but must be treated
20:21
with caution. Memory changes over time, especially
20:25
after transformative events. like war and revolution.
20:30
These accounts are valuable but not transparent
20:33
windows onto 1914. For decades, the assassination
20:37
was described as the spark that ignited a powder
20:41
keg. That image makes the war seem inevitable,
20:45
as if Europe was waiting to explode. But the
20:49
powder keg was not a natural phenomenon. It was
20:53
built by human decisions, and different decisions
20:56
could have diffused it. More recent scholarship
21:00
has emphasized the specific failures of the morning
21:03
in Sarajevo and the distinct choices made in
21:06
July 1914. The traffic accident analogy for the
21:11
assassination's contingency risks understating
21:14
the deliberate intent of the conspirators. They
21:17
chose to place themselves along the route. They
21:21
chose to throw bombs and fire pistols. The assassination
21:26
was not an accident. but its success was not
21:30
assured. It was contingent on multiple failures
21:34
that no one had planned. The sandwich story persists
21:38
in popular memory because it offers a neat narrative
21:40
irony. The assassin was eating lunch when history
21:44
found him, but there is no evidence for it. Princip
21:49
was standing outside a delicatessen, not eating
21:52
at a café. The myth may have originated in a
21:56
confusion between Schiller's delicatessen. and
21:59
a nearby establishment or in a later fictionalization
22:03
that gained credence through repetition its persistence
22:07
illustrates how historical events are simplified
22:10
and dramatized in popular retelling losing the
22:14
texture of contingency and confusion that the
22:16
actual morning contain what remains uncertain
22:20
in the historical record the exact wording of
22:24
franz ferdinand's last words to sophie The precise
22:28
degree of black -hand control over the plot,
22:31
whether Apis and his associates directed the
22:34
operation or merely facilitated it, the full
22:38
extent of Serbian government knowledge and the
22:40
nature of any warning to Vienna, the exact sequence
22:44
of decisions in the car after the bombing, particularly
22:47
how the route change was or was not communicated
22:50
to the drivers. These gaps do not prevent a clear
22:55
understanding of the basic events. But they remind
22:58
us that historical reconstruction is always partial,
23:02
always dependent on surviving evidence that was
23:05
created for particular purposes and that preserves
23:09
some things while obscuring others. The conspirators
23:13
themselves resist simple categorization as heroes
23:16
or villains. They were young men who believed,
23:20
with the certainty of youth and the intensity
23:22
of political commitment, that violence against
23:25
an imperial representative would advance the
23:28
cause of national liberation. They were willing
23:31
to kill and to die for this belief. They were
23:35
also, in their methods and their associations,
23:39
connected to a secret military society that operated
23:42
outside democratic accountability. Their act
23:46
produced not liberation, but catastrophe. It
23:50
produced not -South Slav unification under favorable
23:54
conditions, But war, empires collapse, and a
23:58
troubled interwar kingdom that would itself dissolve
24:00
in further conflict. They could not have foreseen
24:04
this, but their actions contributed to it. Franz
24:09
Ferdinand and Sophie were not simply symbols
24:12
of imperial oppression. They were a married couple
24:15
with three children, traveling together on a
24:18
day that combined official duty with personal
24:21
companionship. In Sarajevo, she sat beside him
24:26
in the open car, and she died beside him. The
24:30
human scale of the event, two people killed at
24:33
close range on a city street, should not be lost
24:37
in the abstraction of historical significance.
24:41
Sarajevo, on June 28, 1914, was a specific place
24:46
at a specific moment, not a stage for inevitable
24:49
tragedy. The city was small enough that the conspirators
24:54
could walk its main thoroughfare in half an hour.
24:57
The river was shallow enough to wade across.
25:01
A driver's wrong turn could bring an archduke's
25:04
car to a stop in front of a 19 -year -old with
25:07
a pistol. The imperial administration was present
25:11
but thin. The security arrangements were inadequate.
25:16
The political tensions were real but not deterministic.
25:21
The assassination emerged from this particular
25:23
conjunction. Young radicals with weapons supplied
25:26
by secret military channels, a provincial capital
25:30
on a symbolic date, a motorcade route that was
25:33
public knowledge, a security apparatus that failed
25:37
to protect its principle, and a series of small
25:40
errors that combined to produce a fatal outcome.
25:43
The war that followed was not contained in those
25:46
two shots. It was constructed in the Chancellories
25:50
of Europe in the weeks after, by men who chose
25:54
to interpret the assassination as an opportunity
25:56
or a necessity. They chose escalation over restraint.
26:02
They chose to honour alliance commitments that
26:05
might have been renegotiated. They chose to mobilise
26:09
rather than to wait. The assassination was the
26:13
occasion for these choices, not their cause.
26:17
Without it, some other occasion might have served
26:20
or might not the point is not that the war would
26:24
have happened anyway the point is that it happened
26:27
because of specific decisions made after sarajevo
26:31
decisions that were not mechanically determined
26:34
by the event itself to understand this is to
26:37
recover a sense of historical contingency that
26:40
is often lost in retrospective narration from
26:44
the vantage point of 1918 or 1945 or 2024 The
26:50
path from Sarajevo to the Somme, from Princip's
26:53
Pistol to the collapse of empires, can look like
26:56
a straight line. It was not. It was a branching
27:01
path with multiple points where different choices
27:04
were possible. The men who made the choices did
27:08
not know what would follow. The outcome was not
27:11
visible to those who had not yet lived through
27:14
it. The task of historical understanding. is
27:18
not to smooth this contingency into destiny,
27:21
but to preserve it. It is to show how the actual
27:24
emerged from the possible. It is to resist the
27:28
temptation to treat what happened as what had
27:30
to happen. Sarajevo remains a place where this
27:34
contingency can be felt. The Latin bridge still
27:39
crosses the Meljaka, near the site of the assassination.
27:43
Schiller's delicatessen is long gone, but the
27:46
corner where the car stopped is marred. It is
27:50
visited by tourists who come with varying degrees
27:53
of knowledge about what actually occurred. The
27:57
city has changed regimes multiple times since
28:00
1914, but the corner where the car stopped is
28:03
still marked. What the listener should carry
28:06
away is this. The assassination of Franz Ferdinand
28:10
and Sophie was a contingent act of political
28:13
violence, carried out by young conspirators in
28:17
a particular Bosnian and South Slav context.
28:20
with weapons supplied through clandestine networks
28:23
linked to elements of the Serbian military, but
28:26
not to the Serbian civilian government. It nearly
28:30
failed. It succeeded because of route confusion,
28:34
driver error, and the chance positioning of Princip
28:37
at the exact spot where the car stopped. It did
28:42
not cause the First World War. The war came from
28:46
the decisions of governments in July 1914. decisions
28:50
that could have been different. The sandwich
28:54
story is a myth with no contemporary evidence.
28:57
The conspirators were neither simple heroes nor
29:01
simple villains. The past is not a lesson, but
29:05
a field of human action, constrained by circumstances,
29:09
shaped by choices, and never fully determined
29:13
until it has already happened.