Latest / Honey Badger Radio / And they’re saying we’re radicalizing men | Maintaining Frame 161

Transcript

And they’re saying we’re radicalizing men | Maintaining Frame 161 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Hello everybody, and welcome to Honey Badger Radio. My name
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: is Brian. I'm here with Allison and this is maintaining
• 0:05
  Speaker 1: frame number one sixty one. And they're saying we're radicalizing men.
• 0:10
  Speaker 2: Where we're going to be looking at a cavalcade of
• 0:12
  Speaker 2: cringe from bedroom feminists who grew up supposedly at least
• 0:16
  Speaker 2: like technically in terms of Earth years, they are older
• 0:20
  Speaker 2: bedroom feminists, but they're still basically teenage girls.
• 0:24
  Speaker 3: So yep, been there now on probably the payroll of
• 0:28
  Speaker 3: the Department of Homeland Defense, so there, oh for sure. Yeah,
• 0:35
  Speaker 3: some some US alphabet agency is no doubt slipping them
• 0:39
  Speaker 3: for you.
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: And women you and women get you.
• 0:40
  Speaker 3: And women you and women in USA, YAH, Homeland Defense, CIA, FBI.
• 0:46
  Speaker 3: Now I guess there's no I thought they had a
• 0:49
  Speaker 3: different six, you know, getting the real, the real stuff
• 0:55
  Speaker 3: out there, making sure that men don't realize that, you know,
• 0:59
  Speaker 3: they deserve to, They deserve a society that actually cares
• 1:01
  Speaker 3: about their issues. God forbid, God forbid. All right, So
• 1:05
  Speaker 3: before we get into it, I guess I should do
• 1:07
  Speaker 3: Your voice is a little bit rough, so maybe I
• 1:09
  Speaker 3: should do more work.
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: I'll I'll heal. I'm not sick.
• 1:13
  Speaker 2: I just like damage my vocal cords yesterday from yelling.
• 1:18
  Speaker 2: I was frustrated.
• 1:19
  Speaker 3: So it happens to the best of us, certainly. I
• 1:22
  Speaker 3: don't know how I get so frustrated on this channel,
• 1:25
  Speaker 3: and usually my vocal cords are fine because I'm screaming
• 1:28
  Speaker 3: pretty hard at this nonsense. Okay, I'm not going to
• 1:32
  Speaker 3: squirrel out on you guys. I'm going to keep focused.
• 1:34
  Speaker 3: So if you want to send us a message, please
• 1:37
  Speaker 3: go to feed the Badger dot com slash just the
• 1:39
  Speaker 3: tip to do that. That's the very best way for
• 1:41
  Speaker 3: you to send us a message. You get a little
• 1:42
  Speaker 3: more space to elaborate, elaborate on your commentary, and that
• 1:46
  Speaker 3: commentary doesn't go through YouTube's comment enhancement system, and we
• 1:50
  Speaker 3: get the full benefit of whatever funds you send. So
• 1:52
  Speaker 3: feed the Badger dot com slash just the tips, send
• 1:54
  Speaker 3: those those comments and questions, criticisms, whatever you want. Charizo
• 2:01
  Speaker 3: wants to make some basic bitch feminist commentary, go ahead,
• 2:06
  Speaker 3: feed the Badger dot com slash just the tip. And
• 2:08
  Speaker 3: if you would like to support the show, I do
• 2:10
  Speaker 3: have the fundraiser open at feed the Badger dot com slash.
• 2:13
  Speaker 3: Support very important to get that done, so we can
• 2:15
  Speaker 3: continue to bring you this content, which I still think
• 2:18
  Speaker 3: is unique. I know that you were saying that Andrew
• 2:20
  Speaker 3: Wilson gets more attention, but I think that there's a
• 2:23
  Speaker 3: difference there is going at this from a conservative perspective
• 2:28
  Speaker 3: or promoting conservative ideas and then just promoting you know,
• 2:32
  Speaker 3: let's care about men. You know that that's it. That's
• 2:36
  Speaker 3: that's the only political position I have. We need to
• 2:39
  Speaker 3: care about men if we want to continue to have
• 2:41
  Speaker 3: a functioning society. That's it. But regardless, So if you
• 2:45
  Speaker 3: want to support that message, feed the Badger dot com
• 2:47
  Speaker 3: slash support, if you want to support the upcoming meetup,
• 2:52
  Speaker 3: feed the Badger dot com slash events to do that
• 2:56
  Speaker 3: very much appreciated there, and again, want to join our
• 2:59
  Speaker 3: community Badger done online. And I think that's pretty much
• 3:02
  Speaker 3: all the things. It's available in the low bar if
• 3:04
  Speaker 3: you're on the horizontal and wherever low bars are found
• 3:07
  Speaker 3: on the vertical and an ant dimension that can only
• 3:10
  Speaker 3: be accessed by arcane magic. So just get on the
• 3:15
  Speaker 3: horizontal and go on the little bar and you can
• 3:17
  Speaker 3: find all of that stuff and pick your poison and
• 3:20
  Speaker 3: do it. Because you know, trying to build a community
• 3:23
  Speaker 3: that believes that caring about men is not evil. All right,
• 3:28
  Speaker 3: speaking about a community caring about men not being evil.
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: Let's let's say, so here we go.
• 3:37
  Speaker 2: We got we got the Three Fates, I don't know
• 3:41
  Speaker 2: what you want to call them. Where the witches from
• 3:43
  Speaker 2: Greek myth Yeah, all shared an eye and they were like,
• 3:48
  Speaker 2: give me the eye. Remember that from Lots of the
• 3:51
  Speaker 2: Titans three?
• 3:53
  Speaker 3: Remember that? Yeah, that's that.
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: There was also the Norns in the Norns. Yeah, I
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: don't know.
• 3:59
  Speaker 3: I feel like those those characters, those those mythological women
• 4:02
  Speaker 3: are a little bit more respect respectable then.
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: Yeah. I was trying to find some evil women though,
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: that's why.
• 4:08
  Speaker 3: Yeah, maybe the Fury the Furies series.
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: Yeah, oh I'm sure relate.
• 4:13
  Speaker 2: To that, Okay, but anyway, yeah, uh so we have
• 4:17
  Speaker 2: three different tastes here. We can look at Brian and
• 4:20
  Speaker 2: Eclaire the basically like straightforward, like my little pony of
• 4:26
  Speaker 2: communist women. We have Drama Queen the Aids Goths girl
• 4:30
  Speaker 2: as I like to think of her. And then we
• 4:33
  Speaker 2: have Rainbow Shite a queer Kiwi queer Kiwi. Yeah, I
• 4:38
  Speaker 2: think all Australian chicks too. They're all from the upside down.
• 4:42
  Speaker 3: Good lord, I think so brightly covered frog, yeah, but
• 4:46
  Speaker 3: brightly colored frog not covered? I guess covered and colored?
• 4:50
  Speaker 1: Man, what do you want me to start with? Do
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: you have the preference anybody? I mean, we got to
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: do all of it.
• 4:56
  Speaker 2: Anyways, what I did was I tried to find a
• 4:58
  Speaker 2: three top time codes for each video, so we're not
• 5:03
  Speaker 2: like dragging this out.
• 5:06
  Speaker 3: So I don't know, yes, well, uh, you know what,
• 5:09
  Speaker 3: let's just go with byrony.
• 5:11
  Speaker 2: Okay, let's go the worst or I don't know, you
• 5:16
  Speaker 2: want to make like a tier list. I am working,
• 5:20
  Speaker 2: by the way, I am working on bringing back feminist
• 5:22
  Speaker 2: bingo in a way that's a little bit more interactive,
• 5:25
  Speaker 2: you know, follow back. We might have to like create
• 5:28
  Speaker 2: like a separate website to make it work, but there
• 5:31
  Speaker 2: is a way.
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: I'm looking into it right now.
• 5:33
  Speaker 2: So feminist bingo could be fun for these kinds of
• 5:35
  Speaker 2: response videos. Oh yeah, yeah, so let's uh so this
• 5:41
  Speaker 2: is very clear, yea.
• 5:43
  Speaker 3: Byrony clear? What would we rank feminists on rankness?
• 5:49
  Speaker 2: It's a tier list, so, but I don't know what
• 5:52
  Speaker 2: the top tier means is like the most you know,
• 5:55
  Speaker 2: feminist egregious, and then the most moderate.
• 6:00
  Speaker 3: Out intersectional the other.
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: Yeah, they're almost intersectional, the most progressive.
• 6:06
  Speaker 3: But there are white women, So there's I'm pretty sure
• 6:09
  Speaker 3: that Byrony is a lesbian, maybe a lesbian separatist that I.
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: Think they all claim to be queer or non binary
• 6:15
  Speaker 1: or something.
• 6:16
  Speaker 3: Oh yeah, that's right, queer Kiwi. Of course that would
• 6:18
  Speaker 3: be non binary. Yeah, it's it's politically send us a
• 6:24
  Speaker 3: send us a message how we should rank these people.
• 6:27
  Speaker 3: If you have any opinions on where they rank, I mean,
• 6:31
  Speaker 3: are they asked.
• 6:32
  Speaker 1: Here feminists at least the most insufferable at least, that's
• 6:36
  Speaker 1: a pretty good way to look.
• 6:37
  Speaker 3: At Yeah, that's pretty fine distinctions. It can be the
• 6:39
  Speaker 3: microscopic levels, like sub atomic levels of insufferable to find
• 6:44
  Speaker 3: the difference. All right, let's just start with Byrony.
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: All right, let's start with Briarny Claire. So her video.
• 6:51
  Speaker 3: Byrony Branny, Briaranny, Yeah, Bryroanny, Yeah, OK.
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: Be different?
• 6:56
  Speaker 2: Okay, so a I deep fakes? Oh wait, did I
• 7:00
  Speaker 2: super channel before we get started? We did get a
• 7:02
  Speaker 2: super chower. I should read it.
• 7:03
  Speaker 3: Oh cool?
• 7:03
  Speaker 2: Okay, So Pierri this was early this morning, like am
• 7:08
  Speaker 2: my time, gave us fifty dollars and said in your
• 7:12
  Speaker 2: stream Texas flood Diddy slips out of trouble HBr newsnumber
• 7:17
  Speaker 2: five to ten. You mentioned the White House's concern about men.
• 7:20
  Speaker 2: This from because we covered the White House statements of
• 7:23
  Speaker 2: men on yesterday's show as well. This reminded me about
• 7:27
  Speaker 2: a political speech that was recently made in Sweden.
• 7:30
  Speaker 1: The speech is too long.
• 7:31
  Speaker 2: To fit into this window, so I'll publish it in
• 7:34
  Speaker 2: English and as a comment on the mentioned stream above
• 7:37
  Speaker 2: so you can read it on a stream.
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: Maybe I'll read it next time or something.
• 7:41
  Speaker 3: Yeah, maybe next time.
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: It's a pretty long one. I look, yeah, did you
• 7:44
  Speaker 1: see it? Yes?
• 7:45
  Speaker 3: I did. It's basically, how how do we stop men
• 7:49
  Speaker 3: from checking out of society while continuing to tell men
• 7:52
  Speaker 3: that there are no specific work.
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: Real values. Its a real fat show of a British
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: guy doing that too. He's like lord.
• 8:00
  Speaker 2: Something he had like a like a name out of
• 8:02
  Speaker 2: like a roll doll book came. It was like huffle
• 8:06
  Speaker 2: Lord hufflepuff or something. He had a similar statement.
• 8:09
  Speaker 3: But yeah, boys are waste of space.
• 8:12
  Speaker 1: Yeah yeah, waste of space? Yeah, that was it.
• 8:15
  Speaker 3: How do we make them not waste of space? How
• 8:17
  Speaker 3: do we make them?
• 8:18
  Speaker 1: Women?
• 8:18
  Speaker 2: Just have to say they won't date them if they
• 8:20
  Speaker 2: continue to be waste of space.
• 8:22
  Speaker 3: It's like, dude, how do we beat men to death
• 8:26
  Speaker 3: men and boys to death emotionally while still having them
• 8:30
  Speaker 3: realize that we they deserve, we deserve their efforts in
• 8:34
  Speaker 3: order to maintain whatever. But right, yeah.
• 8:38
  Speaker 2: Okay, but to finish this guy's super child, he says,
• 8:41
  Speaker 2: my YouTube nickname is a pladdening. It seems like people
• 8:46
  Speaker 2: are starting to notice men's issues on at.
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: Least some scale.
• 8:50
  Speaker 2: Now, well, it's get to the point where they can't
• 8:52
  Speaker 2: ignore it like they used to ignore it, and now
• 8:54
  Speaker 2: they have to address it.
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: That's what That's what I'm saying.
• 8:57
  Speaker 2: That's why I'm I'm encouraged by that because it is
• 9:01
  Speaker 2: unavoidable and it's also very validating because you know, it's
• 9:04
  Speaker 2: got I mean, yeah, that means that the people who
• 9:07
  Speaker 2: are against this stuff are going to become louder and
• 9:10
  Speaker 2: more of an obstacle. But that's okay. You know you're
• 9:13
  Speaker 2: going in the right direction because you keep running into enemies.
• 9:16
  Speaker 2: It's like the law of video games.
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 9:18
  Speaker 2: So anyway, so this video by Bririty Claire is called
• 9:22
  Speaker 2: aid Fakes. The Dolls Guys don't need your permission anymore. Okay,
• 9:26
  Speaker 2: so let's play the beginning just so we get a
• 9:28
  Speaker 2: sense of what this is about.
• 9:30
  Speaker 4: AI is here to serve the male ego. We've already
• 9:33
  Speaker 4: had great video essays talk about how AI models tend
• 9:37
  Speaker 4: to be molded after women, young, beautiful, full up toous,
• 9:41
  Speaker 4: skinny women who are there to perfectly serve men. People
• 9:45
  Speaker 4: who spoke about the issues of companies naming their AI
• 9:48
  Speaker 4: and service robots after women who then also have women's
• 9:51
  Speaker 4: voices skeleton. Hansen has famously been someone who's not only
• 9:55
  Speaker 4: been targeted to link their personal images but also to
• 10:00
  Speaker 4: create deep fakes of them, but also her voice allegedly
• 10:03
  Speaker 4: being used to train open Aiy's voice for SKY. I
• 10:07
  Speaker 4: believe it was they approached her asking for permission to
• 10:10
  Speaker 4: use her voice, But in my opinion, in my little
• 10:13
  Speaker 4: conspiracy theory mind, is they'd already done all of the
• 10:16
  Speaker 4: training and then they asked her AFTWDS.
• 10:18
  Speaker 3: Okay, we're just pausing.
• 10:21
  Speaker 1: For banana, Yeah, just playing it safe.
• 10:23
  Speaker 3: But it's more desirable women, more socially desirable women, more
• 10:28
  Speaker 3: most affected.
• 10:30
  Speaker 1: Yeah, so she's setting the stage. Essentially, she is already telling.
• 10:34
  Speaker 2: Us that she has a bias because she's saying Scarlett
• 10:38
  Speaker 2: Johansson was approached to like be the model, but I
• 10:41
  Speaker 2: think they already did, Like they had no intention of
• 10:44
  Speaker 2: getting her permission because they already did it, which is stupid,
• 10:47
  Speaker 2: because they did get the permission and likely paid her
• 10:50
  Speaker 2: pretty well, and she likely went along with it because
• 10:53
  Speaker 2: she is paid to, you know, for her voice and
• 10:57
  Speaker 2: her acting ability. But of course, if a woman does
• 11:04
  Speaker 2: anything for a job that may please a man in
• 11:09
  Speaker 2: some way, then she obviously is not choosing that, and
• 11:13
  Speaker 2: that's just suppression. I mean, is it possible that Scarlet
• 11:16
  Speaker 2: Johansson was the model because she's popular and men like
• 11:20
  Speaker 2: her and we women probably like her too, you know.
• 11:23
  Speaker 3: Well, like I said, women socially desirable, women wanted for
• 11:28
  Speaker 3: a particular role. Women corporations want to pay women, women
• 11:31
  Speaker 3: most affected.
• 11:32
  Speaker 2: Okay, let's yeah, Okay, So I could play the rest
• 11:36
  Speaker 2: of this a little intro a bit, and then we'll
• 11:37
  Speaker 2: get into the other two.
• 11:38
  Speaker 4: So if it's far too well into the tech pro
• 11:41
  Speaker 4: space of move fast and break things, we're gonna be
• 11:43
  Speaker 4: talking about so much of farming, and there's video lots
• 11:46
  Speaker 4: of talk of corn and eggs. There's a whole bunch
• 11:49
  Speaker 4: of this video I will not be able to share
• 11:51
  Speaker 4: on YouTube because they love to demonetize people that talk
• 11:54
  Speaker 4: about the issues of stuff, as happens to me all
• 11:56
  Speaker 4: too often. There's an entire chapter of this video which.
• 11:59
  Speaker 2: I really well, one hundred and three thousand subscribers, Yes,
• 12:02
  Speaker 2: you've got it bad, Yeah, you certainly do.
• 12:04
  Speaker 1: You should basically be the new the next you know,
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: like Tom Brokaw.
• 12:11
  Speaker 3: Anyway, right, Okay, so what we have is this feminine
• 12:17
  Speaker 3: woman standing in judgment of masculinity basically, and what men
• 12:21
  Speaker 3: do tech bros are why you can sit your ass
• 12:26
  Speaker 3: there and we have a reasonable amount of prosperity. Now, honestly,
• 12:30
  Speaker 3: that's like you are sneering at the people who are
• 12:34
  Speaker 3: the men who are primarily responsible for our economic prosperity.
• 12:38
  Speaker 3: It's just we're living on the fumes, don't get me wrong,
• 12:41
  Speaker 3: because of women like this condemning and shaming and causing
• 12:46
  Speaker 3: men to turn away from society or just shut down.
• 12:49
  Speaker 3: We're living on the fumes of the innovation of a
• 12:53
  Speaker 3: tech bro, probably the ultimate boss tech bro, which was
• 12:59
  Speaker 3: Cloud Sham and nobody knows about him, and he was
• 13:02
  Speaker 3: the one who invented the foundation of binary communication like
• 13:08
  Speaker 3: binary signaling, and he invented the foundation of the prosperity
• 13:12
  Speaker 3: of the late nineties basically, and that we've been coasting
• 13:15
  Speaker 3: on that for twenty five years. And the reason why
• 13:19
  Speaker 3: you can sit in your comfortable environment talking on a
• 13:23
  Speaker 3: tech bro product is because tech bros existed.
• 13:27
  Speaker 1: Well.
• 13:28
  Speaker 3: When you read about Cloud Shannon, he reads like a
• 13:32
  Speaker 3: boy if he had been written if he had been
• 13:34
  Speaker 3: born not in the thirties, but are born in like
• 13:38
  Speaker 3: the twenties, I think, because you are twenty or tens.
• 13:41
  Speaker 3: If he had been born now or even in the eighties,
• 13:45
  Speaker 3: he'd been on ADHD drugs, which means instead of developing
• 13:51
  Speaker 3: his ability to move fast and break things leading to
• 13:54
  Speaker 3: our overall prosperity with his innovations, he would be drugged
• 13:59
  Speaker 3: into compliance and no doubt shamed into abandoning his approach
• 14:05
  Speaker 3: to the world and having any interest and curiosity about it.
• 14:10
  Speaker 3: This is why women like this shaming masculinity. So if
• 14:15
  Speaker 3: you want to know why we're going into a severe
• 14:18
  Speaker 3: economic down spiral, it's not to do with anything to
• 14:21
  Speaker 3: do with the government or either party. It's because we
• 14:25
  Speaker 3: have destroyed our disruptors, those men who would be creating
• 14:30
  Speaker 3: the new hotness that would be driving the economy, the
• 14:33
  Speaker 3: new products. Where are they? Well, they were drugged into oblivion,
• 14:38
  Speaker 3: they were shamed into oblivion. Thank you Byrony Claire. You
• 14:41
  Speaker 3: make the world worse by existing.
• 14:46
  Speaker 1: I'm playing more YEP definitely.
• 14:49
  Speaker 4: And cleared on hand. So that's exclusively available on Patreon.
• 14:52
  Speaker 4: And if you ever do want my ad free uncensored,
• 14:54
  Speaker 4: directest cut versions of these videos, how about I have
• 14:57
  Speaker 4: it to Patreon. The link is down below. And when
• 14:59
  Speaker 4: it comes to how AI presented on screen, it's not
• 15:02
  Speaker 4: always done in the best way. I would really recommend
• 15:05
  Speaker 4: it going and watching this video from Final Girl Digital, Like,
• 15:09
  Speaker 4: we've got such an issue, especially when it comes to
• 15:11
  Speaker 4: women of enjoying or capitalizing off our own sexuality, you know,
• 15:16
  Speaker 4: of their own autonomy and volition. People hate the boy
• 15:19
  Speaker 4: fans work.
• 15:19
  Speaker 3: Is who the thing is that what you talk about
• 15:23
  Speaker 3: people hating women's autonomy. Meanwhile, you're shaming men pursuing sexuality
• 15:30
  Speaker 3: that has nothing to do with you, Like this has
• 15:32
  Speaker 3: nothing to do with you. If men create a sexpot,
• 15:36
  Speaker 3: men create an AI and then pursue that there has
• 15:39
  Speaker 3: nothing to do with you. Ladies. Nothing, There's no relevance
• 15:44
  Speaker 3: to your life, except men apparently have gained sexual autonomy.
• 15:49
  Speaker 3: Would you say men have a problem with when it
• 15:51
  Speaker 3: comes to women, But this OnlyFans is not sexual autonomy.
• 15:55
  Speaker 3: You still need men to give you money, right, you
• 16:00
  Speaker 3: want to cheat, you still need a man to cheat with.
• 16:02
  Speaker 3: This is not sexual autonomy. It's just sexual bad behavior.
• 16:06
  Speaker 3: What you mean is making sexual choices that harm others
• 16:10
  Speaker 3: that you don't want to take responsibility for. Now OnlyFans,
• 16:14
  Speaker 3: I don't know.
• 16:15
  Speaker 2: I think she's trying to have her cake and eat
• 16:17
  Speaker 2: it to what a shocker. So it's basically like when
• 16:21
  Speaker 2: women sexualize themselves for money. It's good because women are
• 16:25
  Speaker 2: doing it, but those bad, bad men judge them for it,
• 16:31
  Speaker 2: which is again bullshit because some people women included, do
• 16:37
  Speaker 2: judge or criticize women for being sex workers or doing
• 16:41
  Speaker 2: OnlyFans or whatever, and a lot of people also don't
• 16:45
  Speaker 2: care or they support it.
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: So it's not black and white.
• 16:50
  Speaker 2: But she makes it black and white because she has
• 16:52
  Speaker 2: to somehow make the argument against AI as a substitute
• 16:57
  Speaker 2: for women by like problematime is it while not essentially
• 17:02
  Speaker 2: like alienating her pro sex work audience, like the part
• 17:06
  Speaker 2: of her audience that is that. It's like, that's what
• 17:08
  Speaker 2: I'm saying. She's trying to walk this type rope. How
• 17:10
  Speaker 2: do I How do I criticize this thing that's sex
• 17:13
  Speaker 2: work without criticizing sex work or the sex worker pro
• 17:17
  Speaker 2: sex work people. I know, But that's it doesn't matter.
• 17:20
  Speaker 2: That's how she frames it. That's her framing. We're talking
• 17:22
  Speaker 2: about her framing.
• 17:23
  Speaker 3: Arlot Johansson being the model for AI isn't sex work?
• 17:29
  Speaker 1: No, I know.
• 17:29
  Speaker 3: But and then she hasn't because but not a problem
• 17:33
  Speaker 3: with OnlyFans, Yeah, because she can't.
• 17:35
  Speaker 2: She's not allowed to have a problem with OnlyFans because
• 17:38
  Speaker 2: she has an audience of women who have different opinions
• 17:41
  Speaker 2: on like you know, what is acceptable and what is not,
• 17:45
  Speaker 2: and so she has to somehow make have an opinion
• 17:49
  Speaker 2: and not upset anyone.
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: So this is how she's doing well.
• 17:53
  Speaker 3: Well, of course, upsetting men is free.
• 17:55
  Speaker 2: No I'm upset, not without upsetting her audience, which is women. Yeah,
• 17:58
  Speaker 2: without upsetting women. Basically, even if men were not upset
• 18:02
  Speaker 2: by it, she wouldn't care. So you know, there are
• 18:05
  Speaker 2: probably men who are in her comments that are like
• 18:09
  Speaker 2: male feminist types and they're just like, oh, you go
• 18:12
  Speaker 2: girl and other women saying shut up, man, you know
• 18:14
  Speaker 2: we don't care what you think. Okay, so we can
• 18:20
  Speaker 2: jump to the next time, cod because well I'll listen
• 18:23
  Speaker 2: to the rest of.
• 18:23
  Speaker 4: Her point here, paid for something which should be able
• 18:27
  Speaker 4: to be god of for free. Well, they're working, so
• 18:29
  Speaker 4: they should be paid for their work, just like you
• 18:31
  Speaker 4: should be paid for your work.
• 18:32
  Speaker 3: Right.
• 18:33
  Speaker 5: But this is just your.
• 18:33
  Speaker 4: Entitlement and societal shaming talking which has created this whole disgusting,
• 18:37
  Speaker 4: misogynistic mess. And yes, eggs wick is a whole other
• 18:40
  Speaker 4: topic hunt of itself. I mould even recommend you go
• 18:42
  Speaker 4: and watch this video from very old video from Philosophy too.
• 18:46
  Speaker 4: It was made like six plus years ago. At this point,
• 18:48
  Speaker 4: Sidney Sweeney, someone who men absolutely adore and have claimed
• 18:52
  Speaker 4: that finally women are women again.
• 18:55
  Speaker 1: She's oh, I have no idea. Why what is it
• 18:57
  Speaker 1: about Sydney? What is it about Sidney Sweeney that men
• 19:00
  Speaker 1: find years ago?
• 19:01
  Speaker 5: At this point, Sydney Sweeney someone.
• 19:03
  Speaker 1: I could not, for the life of me put my
• 19:05
  Speaker 1: finger out.
• 19:06
  Speaker 3: It's pretty mysterious even if I wanted to, which I do.
• 19:11
  Speaker 1: But anyway, yeah, I go, let's keep going.
• 19:12
  Speaker 4: And men absolutely adore and have claimed that.
• 19:15
  Speaker 5: Finally women are women.
• 19:17
  Speaker 4: Again, she's still soap containing her bathwater, and people say
• 19:20
  Speaker 4: that this cheapens her. But these are the exact same
• 19:23
  Speaker 4: people who had quite happily watched deep fakes of her right.
• 19:26
  Speaker 1: Or would be interested and you're doing that's a big assumption.
• 19:31
  Speaker 3: Also, that's a biohazard.
• 19:34
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean we don't know. True.
• 19:36
  Speaker 3: Allowed, you're not allowed to actually send stuff like that
• 19:39
  Speaker 3: through the mill. But regardless, I so there, you don't
• 19:43
  Speaker 3: know if those two groups of people are the same.
• 19:48
  Speaker 3: And also why is there like this constant war against
• 19:50
  Speaker 3: any criticism against a woman And oh but wait if
• 19:54
  Speaker 3: it's a woman like me or if you're at fair game.
• 19:56
  Speaker 3: Funny how that works. Okay, let's go to the next time.
• 20:00
  Speaker 1: This sounds like she's yeah, yeah, she's just saying, oh
• 20:04
  Speaker 1: my god, double standards. It's so bad. Oh okay, so before,
• 20:08
  Speaker 1: But it's.
• 20:08
  Speaker 3: Not double standards because they're just opinions men have on women.
• 20:12
  Speaker 3: They might not be the same. Win.
• 20:14
  Speaker 1: Why isn't everyone the same?
• 20:17
  Speaker 3: Because convenient like that.
• 20:19
  Speaker 1: Also, I like that she says philosophy. This philosophy two
• 20:21
  Speaker 1: video is.
• 20:22
  Speaker 2: Very old because since that video Philosophy two, I believe transitioned.
• 20:27
  Speaker 2: So how do you address that without saying you have
• 20:30
  Speaker 2: to basically be like, look, guys, I know you're about
• 20:32
  Speaker 2: to see a man in this video, but I promise
• 20:35
  Speaker 2: you this is an old video and I'm not doing
• 20:37
  Speaker 2: this to bring up to dig up anything.
• 20:39
  Speaker 1: You know. It's like me going like I want to
• 20:41
  Speaker 1: watch X Men three again even though I really don't,
• 20:44
  Speaker 1: but it's got you know, what's her name in it?
• 20:46
  Speaker 1: Ellen Page? His name, Ellie Elliott Page. Yeah, but Ellen Page,
• 20:50
  Speaker 1: Like back then, you know if I play?
• 20:52
  Speaker 3: Yeah?
• 20:52
  Speaker 6: Yeah?
• 20:54
  Speaker 1: Like what am I? I mean? Can I play that game?
• 20:55
  Speaker 1: I don't know? But anyway, So next time, Code is
• 21:00
  Speaker 1: talking about the environmental and ethical impacts of generative AI.
• 21:06
  Speaker 4: Between Japan and Russia, and most countries aren't like us
• 21:09
  Speaker 4: here in Altah, where a majority of electricity is from
• 21:12
  Speaker 4: renewable resources between eighty to eighty five percent. So the
• 21:16
  Speaker 4: world to survive, we need to have a massive decreases
• 21:19
  Speaker 4: in energy consumption, particularly fossil fuels if people ever got
• 21:23
  Speaker 4: to be able to survive planet's dying, and generative AI
• 21:25
  Speaker 4: has its foot to the.
• 21:30
  Speaker 3: All right, Fossil fuels is like, like Karen puts it
• 21:32
  Speaker 3: out as plant food, So we don't care about any
• 21:36
  Speaker 3: other forms of environmental degradation, including the real big one
• 21:40
  Speaker 3: that no one talks about, which is nuclear war. Consumption,
• 21:43
  Speaker 3: women's consumption but also nuclear war. Of course we don't
• 21:46
  Speaker 3: talk about women's consumption. But what about nuclear war that
• 21:50
  Speaker 3: that is the end of the period. Well, I guess
• 21:52
  Speaker 3: maybe it'll recover in like a million years, But I mean,
• 21:55
  Speaker 3: why don't we talk about that? And that's war usually
• 21:58
  Speaker 3: happens when economies go south, when people start competing over resources.
• 22:04
  Speaker 3: That's not an issue. It's got to be the plant food,
• 22:08
  Speaker 3: not the toxins that we put into the environment, getting
• 22:12
  Speaker 3: the electric vehicle batteries or the toxins the additional toxins
• 22:17
  Speaker 3: that coal fired plants that are used to actually run
• 22:20
  Speaker 3: those evs create. No, it's just plant food, plant food. Yeah,
• 22:25
  Speaker 3: maybe the waters rise, maybe we all drown, but the
• 22:29
  Speaker 3: plants will be happy and then the earth will recover
• 22:32
  Speaker 3: very quickly. But if we have a situation where our
• 22:36
  Speaker 3: infrastructure melts down or we end up into a nuclear
• 22:39
  Speaker 3: war as a result of economic complete collapse, that's going
• 22:44
  Speaker 3: to end the earth. So it's like proportionality. Yeah, I
• 22:48
  Speaker 3: guess we could be slightly concerned about the plant foods.
• 22:50
  Speaker 3: Who knows, maybe the plants will get so much carbon
• 22:53
  Speaker 3: dioxide they'll turn satient, and then they will want a
• 22:57
  Speaker 3: nuclear arsenal because they'll want to be considered their own
• 23:01
  Speaker 3: independent nation and be respected or something. But until then,
• 23:07
  Speaker 3: we're worried about plant food and we ignore all of
• 23:10
  Speaker 3: the other potential hazards that are much more likely to
• 23:14
  Speaker 3: destroy the earth. But anyway, I just find it interesting
• 23:17
  Speaker 3: how people sort what they care about.
• 23:21
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it's almost like they really actually don't care about it,
• 23:24
  Speaker 2: and this is actually about control. Like she's making she
• 23:27
  Speaker 2: I'll keep playing the clip, but she's essentially just using
• 23:30
  Speaker 2: the environmental argument to essentially say, and so this is
• 23:34
  Speaker 2: why men can have ai girlfriend.
• 23:36
  Speaker 1: But that's kind of like that's where this whole thing goes. Okay, men,
• 23:40
  Speaker 1: men shouldn't want women because that's sexist.
• 23:44
  Speaker 2: Men shouldn't want to be alone or away from women
• 23:47
  Speaker 2: like Miktau does. That's also sexist. Men shouldn't like necessarily
• 23:52
  Speaker 2: commit to one woman, so he's not a problem for
• 23:55
  Speaker 2: every other woman, but only like you know, in a
• 23:58
  Speaker 2: relationship with one woman, because that oppresses that one woman.
• 24:01
  Speaker 2: And men also should not be consuming pornography or having
• 24:06
  Speaker 2: an AI girlfriend because it's going to destroy the planet.
• 24:09
  Speaker 2: Notice how all roads lead to men can't have it.
• 24:12
  Speaker 2: That's that's kind.
• 24:13
  Speaker 1: So it's almost like if you sat them down and said,
• 24:16
  Speaker 1: here's why your argument against the environment is wrong.
• 24:20
  Speaker 2: They don't care. They don't care, or they just want
• 24:23
  Speaker 2: to control men.
• 24:25
  Speaker 1: That's it. That's all this is. Everything is just a
• 24:28
  Speaker 1: pretense to get there. Do what I say? Why because
• 24:30
  Speaker 1: you're going to destroy the planet, So we'll ultimately it's
• 24:33
  Speaker 1: just do what I say, you know, and of course
• 24:36
  Speaker 1: hopefully men are not doing that. But anyway, let's listen
• 24:39
  Speaker 1: to more of the.
• 24:40
  Speaker 4: Clip, utualizing it and using the objectification of women and
• 24:44
  Speaker 4: this sense of entitlement to further. There are again creating
• 24:47
  Speaker 4: bots which you are better than real women because they
• 24:50
  Speaker 4: can't say no. In nineteen seventy four, Maria Abramovich created
• 24:54
  Speaker 4: Rhythm Zero, an art piece Wisch. She was the subject
• 24:57
  Speaker 4: and people could choose from a table of things of
• 24:59
  Speaker 4: what they wanted to quote do to her. They could
• 25:00
  Speaker 4: give her a flywelt.
• 25:01
  Speaker 2: I don't see any sandwich ingredients. That's not a real
• 25:04
  Speaker 2: art project. Where's the bread, ham, cheese? All of mayonnaise.
• 25:10
  Speaker 3: This is not fucking art.
• 25:12
  Speaker 2: Yes it is, they said, So it's an insulation. She's
• 25:17
  Speaker 2: an object, Allison. Don't you see how deep it is.
• 25:20
  Speaker 2: Don't you see how deep this is.
• 25:22
  Speaker 4: She's just my fact created Go ahead, this is I.
• 25:25
  Speaker 3: Just don't understand this mentality. It's one of the things
• 25:28
  Speaker 3: that make me think that maybe I'm not a woman.
• 25:31
  Speaker 3: You just push yourself out there to be like, I'm
• 25:34
  Speaker 3: making a statement, I'm being a victim because I'm a woman,
• 25:37
  Speaker 3: and right, right at the basis the very foundation of
• 25:41
  Speaker 3: that entire concept is your association with your sex and victimhood.
• 25:48
  Speaker 3: Would you never challenge anyway?
• 25:51
  Speaker 1: All right?
• 25:53
  Speaker 4: Them surrounded the table at this exhibition. There were photographs
• 25:56
  Speaker 4: of what happened at the exhibit. They show predominantly men
• 25:58
  Speaker 4: playing with the objects, touching Anthromovic's body, oggling and laughing
• 26:02
  Speaker 4: at her with her friends as she stands there alone,
• 26:05
  Speaker 4: tears filling her eyes.
• 26:07
  Speaker 3: Well, what were the photos that I saw? Okay, who's
• 26:12
  Speaker 3: the name of this woman? Yes, artistic men apparently are
• 26:16
  Speaker 3: very violent kind of man.
• 26:20
  Speaker 1: Is this attracting this exhibit?
• 26:22
  Speaker 3: Yeah? What what what does doing this do? And the
• 26:26
  Speaker 3: other thing is that those pictures didn't indicate anything. She's
• 26:30
  Speaker 3: and she's been very careful with her language. You see women,
• 26:32
  Speaker 3: men fondling the objects, and this dude is just looking
• 26:36
  Speaker 3: at them with extremely tight pants.
• 26:39
  Speaker 2: Marina Abramovic Rhythm zero or Rhythm oh shows why we
• 26:46
  Speaker 2: still cannot trust people. And this is a Guardian article.
• 26:49
  Speaker 2: I guarantee it. I can tell by the way it's
• 26:52
  Speaker 2: written it's a Guardian article. But I guess you're looking
• 26:57
  Speaker 2: it up. I'm gonna play the.
• 26:58
  Speaker 4: Yeah life between in her legs and attached a piece
• 27:01
  Speaker 4: of paper to her body that read vile. Surrounded the
• 27:03
  Speaker 4: table at this exhibition. There were photographs of what happened
• 27:06
  Speaker 4: at the exhibit the.
• 27:08
  Speaker 3: Heart, and she called it vile, like, did you actually
• 27:12
  Speaker 3: become injured from this?
• 27:14
  Speaker 1: No, they put us.
• 27:15
  Speaker 2: They put a paper on her that read vial Allison.
• 27:18
  Speaker 2: That's basically getting stabbed in the chest.
• 27:21
  Speaker 4: Same thing with the objects touching Ampomovic's body, oggling and
• 27:25
  Speaker 4: laughing at her with her friends as she stands there alone.
• 27:28
  Speaker 2: I mean, isn't the point of observing art to look
• 27:31
  Speaker 2: at it? What's the difference between looking at something and
• 27:35
  Speaker 2: ogling at it?
• 27:37
  Speaker 3: What are these these dudes doing that's so horrible. I
• 27:40
  Speaker 3: think one is like maybe cleaning a wound, and the.
• 27:44
  Speaker 2: Other is, you know, there's like dudes that like wear
• 27:47
  Speaker 2: like gold pain all over their body and they like
• 27:50
  Speaker 2: pre tend to be statues in public and they do it,
• 27:53
  Speaker 2: I think for money basically, But like is that also,
• 27:56
  Speaker 2: like are they like what's the difference, except that those
• 28:00
  Speaker 2: guys are not getting paid. Probably she got like millions
• 28:04
  Speaker 2: of dollars for this insulation, insulation or performance piece by
• 28:09
  Speaker 2: some like you know, rich curator that had some money
• 28:12
  Speaker 2: he needed to launder. And those guys are just on
• 28:14
  Speaker 2: the street like wearing like gold or silver paint.
• 28:17
  Speaker 3: But anyway, yeah, the other thing is money. We know
• 28:21
  Speaker 3: that she didn't attract a bunch of like saddests. I mean,
• 28:26
  Speaker 3: she's basically giving pre consent to this activity.
• 28:29
  Speaker 2: So we know that she isn't herself a masochist, and yeah,
• 28:33
  Speaker 2: what if she's getting something out of this?
• 28:36
  Speaker 1: It was the seventies, but anyway, okay, a little bit
• 28:38
  Speaker 1: more and then we'll move on to the third time
• 28:40
  Speaker 1: code she asked for it, right.
• 28:41
  Speaker 4: The rhythms explore the tightening of rules in an authoritarian society,
• 28:45
  Speaker 4: but also what it's like to be a woman in
• 28:47
  Speaker 4: a deeply misogynistic culture. But I mean, if the opportunity
• 28:50
  Speaker 4: is there, you can't expect people to not go and
• 28:52
  Speaker 4: do in the world.
• 28:52
  Speaker 3: Wait wait, wait, wait wait wait. Faced with her abdugation
• 28:55
  Speaker 3: with will it's with its implied collapse of human psychology,
• 28:58
  Speaker 3: a protective group began to find itself in the audience.
• 29:01
  Speaker 3: When a loaded gun was thrust in Marina's head and
• 29:04
  Speaker 3: her own finger was being worked around the trigger, a
• 29:06
  Speaker 3: fight broke out between the audience factions.
• 29:08
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I have I have serious doubts about that. Somebody
• 29:12
  Speaker 2: walked into an art museum with a fucking gun with
• 29:16
  Speaker 2: the intention of getting hurt it unless it was a
• 29:19
  Speaker 2: toy gun or something maybe, or prop one of the
• 29:23
  Speaker 2: props that was on.
• 29:24
  Speaker 3: The table in this retelling. It's just it's you. It's
• 29:29
  Speaker 3: playing the pronoun game, visitors, audience, one person. Where does
• 29:34
  Speaker 3: it say that men did this? And those photos don't
• 29:37
  Speaker 3: indicate that men were part of this. Okay, all right,
• 29:40
  Speaker 3: let's keep going.
• 29:41
  Speaker 1: Well, I'm gonna go to the third that's the end
• 29:43
  Speaker 1: of that section. So ninth. Okay.
• 29:45
  Speaker 3: The audience members were aware that there would be no
• 29:48
  Speaker 3: consequences for their actions. Then they're flipping idiots. Any person
• 29:52
  Speaker 3: who walks into this this installation thinking oh, I can
• 29:56
  Speaker 3: do whatever they want. No law still exists. She's not
• 29:59
  Speaker 3: able to subtend that.
• 30:02
  Speaker 4: Okay, all right, interesting, nervous, you're not supposed to talk.
• 30:06
  Speaker 3: I've had guys say that the reason why they want
• 30:09
  Speaker 3: to get like these dolls is because they don't want
• 30:13
  Speaker 3: to have to be have aggressive sex like they find
• 30:17
  Speaker 3: when they're going out and they're dating women. Women want
• 30:21
  Speaker 3: them to be more violent and aggressive than they are
• 30:23
  Speaker 3: really comfortable with. But if they want to have any
• 30:26
  Speaker 3: kind of affection or sex life, they have to abide
• 30:29
  Speaker 3: by women's expectations in the bedroom. And they're not They're
• 30:32
  Speaker 3: guys who are not even necessarily going to get a
• 30:34
  Speaker 3: sex doll, but they're like, yeah, this this would be
• 30:36
  Speaker 3: a feature, which is that no hair pulling, no choking,
• 30:41
  Speaker 3: no aggressive physical altercations, you know, just something gentle and
• 30:46
  Speaker 3: loving that would be that be an appreciation. I think
• 30:49
  Speaker 3: that people would be startled what actually happens with these
• 30:52
  Speaker 3: sex bots and men. I think they would be surprised.
• 30:56
  Speaker 3: They would be surprised that what men actually want is
• 31:00
  Speaker 3: somebody to talk to them and listen to them and
• 31:04
  Speaker 3: have a loving intimate, relate like comforting situation with rather
• 31:10
  Speaker 3: than this hysteria, which incidentally, she's painting this about all men. Right,
• 31:16
  Speaker 3: She's not just saying there's a subset of sadists who
• 31:20
  Speaker 3: are a subset, but they're a subset. There's also a
• 31:23
  Speaker 3: subset of female statists. She's saying this about all men,
• 31:27
  Speaker 3: and this is how men will use sex dolls. Well,
• 31:30
  Speaker 3: maybe they won't use them in this way. Maybe the
• 31:32
  Speaker 3: average man won't use them in this way because the
• 31:34
  Speaker 3: average man isn't a saddest Have you considered that? And
• 31:39
  Speaker 3: then she uses something from a feminist rights a man,
• 31:43
  Speaker 3: and then she uses that fiction to prove how men are.
• 31:48
  Speaker 3: It's so fricking infuriating. What Look, Okay, let's go to
• 31:53
  Speaker 3: the biggest Let's find the most the biggest misogynist on
• 31:56
  Speaker 3: the planet who writes a woman, and then we'll film
• 32:00
  Speaker 3: that woman doing things, and then we'll make a make
• 32:04
  Speaker 3: a video about how that woman represents all women. Right,
• 32:09
  Speaker 3: not even going to the whatever podcast and listening to
• 32:12
  Speaker 3: actual women talking about their preferences, talking about their ideas,
• 32:16
  Speaker 3: talking about their life. Let's not, you know, let's not
• 32:19
  Speaker 3: actually listen to actual women, which we're not. Also we're
• 32:21
  Speaker 3: also supposed to do when we criticize women. No, let's
• 32:25
  Speaker 3: go imagine something and then criticize that.
• 32:29
  Speaker 1: What the.
• 32:31
  Speaker 3: This is offensive? And the fact is I don't know
• 32:35
  Speaker 3: what to say. Women like this gets so much attention
• 32:38
  Speaker 3: from other women. I make sure as hell represent women's
• 32:41
  Speaker 3: voices more than I do. So what do I say
• 32:44
  Speaker 3: to men? This is more likely to be the average woman,
• 32:47
  Speaker 3: someone who will take something written by a feminist and
• 32:50
  Speaker 3: say this is men like feminists don't write men. Feminists
• 32:55
  Speaker 3: writes stereotypes, really nasty, bigoted stayes. And then this woman
• 33:02
  Speaker 3: looks at those nasty, bigoted stereotypes and says, yep, this
• 33:06
  Speaker 3: is proof that men are like that. No, it's proof
• 33:08
  Speaker 3: that you're a bunch of bigots.
• 33:10
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 33:10
  Speaker 2: I mean, the point of all of this media, and
• 33:16
  Speaker 2: I'm starting to think most media in general that makes
• 33:19
  Speaker 2: it into the mainstream is to paint a picture of
• 33:23
  Speaker 2: a twisted version of reality, so that academic types and
• 33:27
  Speaker 2: activists can point to that twisted vision and say that's
• 33:30
  Speaker 2: reality because I see it around me. This is why Briernclair,
• 33:34
  Speaker 2: for example, and a lot of other feminists do this
• 33:37
  Speaker 2: online they always reference work that essentially backs their bias,
• 33:42
  Speaker 2: but it's always like fictional work like mad Men. So
• 33:46
  Speaker 2: and yeah, I know we can get into like what
• 33:48
  Speaker 2: is really about, but that's not.
• 33:50
  Speaker 1: What people take away from it.
• 33:52
  Speaker 2: It's only these little sound bites and snapshots that go
• 33:56
  Speaker 2: out into you know, like these like pieces and essays.
• 34:02
  Speaker 2: And even if you get that enough, even if you
• 34:04
  Speaker 2: sat down and watched it, you would it wouldn't even
• 34:07
  Speaker 2: penetrate if you weren't like really thinking critically. But anyway,
• 34:11
  Speaker 2: so we're getting into a section where well, basically this
• 34:13
  Speaker 2: quote summarize it. AI gives people the tools to create
• 34:17
  Speaker 2: that personality. But in a number of cases, male users
• 34:20
  Speaker 2: who have been interviewed by various media outlets have said
• 34:24
  Speaker 2: they prefer their robots to not speak at all.
• 34:27
  Speaker 3: Well, do you want your dildos to speak? But really,
• 34:30
  Speaker 3: maybe they just don't want to be distracted from the experience,
• 34:32
  Speaker 3: or maybe they don't want it to resemble actual human interaction.
• 34:36
  Speaker 1: Or too expensive.
• 34:39
  Speaker 3: Oh yeah, maybe robots that talk are too expensive. What
• 34:42
  Speaker 3: are you trying to say about that? Until you guys
• 34:44
  Speaker 3: like ladies are okay with dildos who express men's issues.
• 34:48
  Speaker 3: I think that's what we should do, Brian. That's it.
• 34:52
  Speaker 1: We can make you know who makes madam savvy.
• 34:56
  Speaker 2: We can put little chips and little speakers in the
• 35:00
  Speaker 2: and maybe, like you know, program it with an AI
• 35:03
  Speaker 2: that basically gives male men's issues talking points.
• 35:06
  Speaker 3: While you use yes exactly, there are disrespecting men. They
• 35:12
  Speaker 3: are using dildos, and those dildos aren't interacting with those
• 35:16
  Speaker 3: women and expressing male viewpoints so that they can learn
• 35:20
  Speaker 3: to be sympathetic to men. That's what we need to do.
• 35:23
  Speaker 3: We need to start a petition to make sure that
• 35:26
  Speaker 3: all female dildos come pre recorded with a bunch of
• 35:31
  Speaker 3: men's issues, perhaps testimony from men who have been sexually
• 35:34
  Speaker 3: assaulted by women. That's what they should be hearing when
• 35:38
  Speaker 3: they're using them, because they need to have consciousness raising,
• 35:42
  Speaker 3: they need to become good people. So we should bring
• 35:46
  Speaker 3: that into their sexual experience to make sure that every
• 35:51
  Speaker 3: time they use these dildos shamed and realizing that they're
• 35:55
  Speaker 3: subhuman for breaking men down into parts and not recognizing
• 35:59
  Speaker 3: the whole humanity. And also, come to think of it,
• 36:03
  Speaker 3: what do dildos teach women? They teach women not just
• 36:06
  Speaker 3: to break men down into parts, but that male sexuality
• 36:09
  Speaker 3: should always be available to them, which is obviously a
• 36:12
  Speaker 3: part of rape culture. So in order to fight rape culture,
• 36:15
  Speaker 3: we need to put those dildos. We need to install
• 36:18
  Speaker 3: voice synthesizers in those dildos. In we need to make
• 36:21
  Speaker 3: sure that every time a woman's going to town, she
• 36:24
  Speaker 3: gets an air full of some men suffering for women's
• 36:29
  Speaker 3: behavior sexual aggression towards men. Like nobody talks about that
• 36:33
  Speaker 3: shit like I'm doing that satirically, you know, I don't
• 36:37
  Speaker 3: think that's necessary. I don't think it's necessary for people
• 36:41
  Speaker 3: to be informed of sexual issue like sexual assault with
• 36:46
  Speaker 3: their sex toys, or to look at their sex toys
• 36:49
  Speaker 3: in terms of teaching them to appreciate the whole human
• 36:54
  Speaker 3: of the opposite sex. But if we're gonna go there,
• 36:57
  Speaker 3: let's go all the way. Let's do it to women too.
• 37:00
  Speaker 3: Good grief, all right, talking dildos.
• 37:04
  Speaker 4: I'd rather not personality. But in a number of cases,
• 37:08
  Speaker 4: male users who have been interviewed by various media outlets
• 37:12
  Speaker 4: have said that they prefer their robots not to speak
• 37:14
  Speaker 4: at all. When one company added a new AI feature
• 37:17
  Speaker 4: to their robots to enable them to make more realistic conversation,
• 37:20
  Speaker 4: some owners chose to switch it off because it made
• 37:22
  Speaker 4: their dolls seem different from what they imagined. In other words,
• 37:25
  Speaker 4: the more that companies made dolls that seem to have
• 37:27
  Speaker 4: minds at their own, the less that male users seem.
• 37:30
  Speaker 1: To like them.
• 37:30
  Speaker 4: Of course, some male users would argue that turning off
• 37:33
  Speaker 4: imperfectly rendered voice technology enables them to maintain that what.
• 37:39
  Speaker 3: It's a fantasy. We're going to insist that women have
• 37:46
  Speaker 3: dial those with realistic male personalities so that they learn
• 37:50
  Speaker 3: to respect men or men's independence from their sexual needs.
• 37:55
  Speaker 3: Like this is absurd, it's a freaking it's a sex toy.
• 37:59
  Speaker 2: Yeah, okay, well that was the last time code on this.
• 38:03
  Speaker 1: Remember we have two more videos to get through, so yes, I.
• 38:05
  Speaker 3: Don't need to see any more of this.
• 38:07
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I think we get it right.
• 38:09
  Speaker 2: She goes into deep faces and how essentially deep fakes are,
• 38:13
  Speaker 2: like I don't know, assaulting women somehow, Like if you say, oh,
• 38:16
  Speaker 2: I want to put you know, I don't know name,
• 38:18
  Speaker 2: like a hot celebrity, I want to put her face
• 38:20
  Speaker 2: on this, like AI girl or this like simulation and
• 38:26
  Speaker 2: uh yeah, I mean even if they're fictional, like you
• 38:28
  Speaker 2: can put lower Croft or Tifa on somebody you want
• 38:31
  Speaker 2: to bang, she, of course thinks, because the thing is
• 38:34
  Speaker 2: is that she doesn't want women to lose any of
• 38:37
  Speaker 2: their their sexual leverage over men. And so like all
• 38:41
  Speaker 2: of these things that get introduced, I think they lower
• 38:45
  Speaker 2: the leverage, and that's what she wants to hold on to,
• 38:47
  Speaker 2: and that's what women are worried about.
• 38:50
  Speaker 1: I mean, that's what I think anyway.
• 38:53
  Speaker 3: Yeah, all right, should.
• 38:55
  Speaker 1: To AIDS gothchick.
• 38:58
  Speaker 3: Yeah, aids goth check. Let's do it, all right?
• 39:00
  Speaker 1: So here we go. This is drama Queen and she.
• 39:03
  Speaker 3: Has actually, wait, there's one thing I should say before
• 39:06
  Speaker 3: we go on fan artists. Female fan artists have done
• 39:10
  Speaker 3: all kinds of things to male actors, and now you
• 39:14
  Speaker 3: have a problem with these deep fakes, like with their art.
• 39:18
  Speaker 3: What's the difference. It's just an artistic expression, okay, using
• 39:23
  Speaker 3: the likeness of somebody that you are interested in sexually.
• 39:28
  Speaker 3: And believe me, women have done a lot of that.
• 39:31
  Speaker 3: Are we supposed to start condemning that too? Okay?
• 39:36
  Speaker 2: All right, So this is Drama Queen and she has
• 39:38
  Speaker 2: a video called no your husband Doesn't Own your Body?
• 39:43
  Speaker 1: Oh I can't wait.
• 39:45
  Speaker 2: Okay, So we'll just start with the opening just like
• 39:49
  Speaker 2: the other one.
• 39:51
  Speaker 7: I don't give a damn what beliefs you subscribe to
• 39:54
  Speaker 7: you in your private time, you will not force dangerous
• 39:59
  Speaker 7: belief and agendas upon the younger generation of girls people
• 40:05
  Speaker 7: in general.
• 40:06
  Speaker 3: Who currently boys ladies stop raping men and boys full stop.
• 40:13
  Speaker 3: Just do it like This is what's infuriating. They all
• 40:17
  Speaker 3: come from a flawed premise that women do not have
• 40:20
  Speaker 3: to take their share of responsibility for sexual assault. That's
• 40:25
  Speaker 3: where it comes from. And this is this is why
• 40:27
  Speaker 3: I always go back to this right, This is the
• 40:30
  Speaker 3: fulcrum on which all of this rests, the idea that
• 40:34
  Speaker 3: women and girls do not have to take as much
• 40:37
  Speaker 3: responsibility for sexual assault as men and boys. There is
• 40:42
  Speaker 3: very little solid evidence that this is the case, and
• 40:46
  Speaker 3: there is getting to be more and more evidence that
• 40:48
  Speaker 3: the prevalence of sexual violence towards men and boys is high,
• 40:52
  Speaker 3: and a lot of it is being done by women
• 40:54
  Speaker 3: and girls. And then there's also evidence that the abuse
• 40:58
  Speaker 3: of boys by women is the primary causal factor for
• 41:02
  Speaker 3: those boys, and a minority of those boys at that
• 41:04
  Speaker 3: to go on to abuse others. So there the fact
• 41:07
  Speaker 3: is that they start from a false premise and everything
• 41:12
  Speaker 3: that flows after it is bullshit. It's controlling abuse. This
• 41:17
  Speaker 3: woman has absolutely no basis to say something like don't
• 41:22
  Speaker 3: teach the younger generations of girls. Yeah, you know what,
• 41:27
  Speaker 3: you're already teaching girls a falsehood, and that is they
• 41:31
  Speaker 3: don't have to take responsibility for their sexual aggression and
• 41:35
  Speaker 3: that they are uniquely victims of sexual assault. Both are
• 41:39
  Speaker 3: not true. You're already starting off from lies, so you
• 41:45
  Speaker 3: have no basis to lecture anybody else, but no doubt
• 41:49
  Speaker 3: she will.
• 41:49
  Speaker 2: So yeah, all right, let's listen to the rest of this.
• 41:54
  Speaker 2: We're still getting the established. So her stick is that
• 41:58
  Speaker 2: she's really like Ranti and Yelly So and women like that.
• 42:01
  Speaker 2: It's like, that's why she looks like something out of
• 42:04
  Speaker 2: a you know, if you order like Rocky horror Picture
• 42:07
  Speaker 2: show on wish.
• 42:09
  Speaker 7: That much of a direction in life just yet. Getting
• 42:13
  Speaker 7: married doesn't suddenly mean you surrender your autonomy to the
• 42:18
  Speaker 7: person you said I do too.
• 42:20
  Speaker 3: It's a marriage.
• 42:22
  Speaker 7: You're not going to cash convergence and buying a PSP
• 42:26
  Speaker 7: and sign.
• 42:27
  Speaker 3: Well, I think it's I think she's complaining about the
• 42:30
  Speaker 3: trad wives who say that their bodies belong to their husbands. Well,
• 42:33
  Speaker 3: that's their choice. Lady.
• 42:35
  Speaker 2: I mean, I don't know if they even say that,
• 42:36
  Speaker 2: but she probably would assume that they do.
• 42:39
  Speaker 1: Yeah, but they're also the it's a surrender or like
• 42:41
  Speaker 1: a submission maybe, but their.
• 42:43
  Speaker 3: Husband's bodies belong to them, apparently, like they're supposed to
• 42:47
  Speaker 3: become one flesh in God, so that that's their thing,
• 42:52
  Speaker 3: if if that is is what she.
• 42:54
  Speaker 1: Is talking about.
• 42:55
  Speaker 3: Yeah, And the funny thing is that I don't know
• 42:58
  Speaker 3: if the Australia actually recognizes women raping men is a
• 43:03
  Speaker 3: problem in law or probably not. Probably not. And this
• 43:06
  Speaker 3: is this is what's freaking hilarious. People like this will
• 43:09
  Speaker 3: assert that we know that men have to take more
• 43:13
  Speaker 3: responsibility for sexual aggression, and yet as civilization, we are
• 43:19
  Speaker 3: in the first baby steps of recognizing women engaging in
• 43:24
  Speaker 3: sexual aggression against men. You know, we're just starting to
• 43:30
  Speaker 3: recognize this is a problem, and we've already pre decided
• 43:34
  Speaker 3: that it's less of a problem than something we've recognized
• 43:37
  Speaker 3: as a problem since millennia. Right, No, we don't know.
• 43:42
  Speaker 3: And it's looking like women and girls do a significant
• 43:47
  Speaker 3: amount of the rape, and that's what it's looking like.
• 43:50
  Speaker 3: The numbers are coming in. You know, we started to
• 43:52
  Speaker 3: look numbers are coming in and I'm sure kiwi. Well,
• 43:56
  Speaker 3: I can't say I'm sure a kiwi, but I would
• 43:58
  Speaker 3: I would not be surprised that there if there's a
• 44:01
  Speaker 3: reason why she's assuming or forcing the world to only
• 44:05
  Speaker 3: recognize or mostly recognize that rape is something that men do.
• 44:09
  Speaker 3: It's a perfect cover, perfect camouflage, shall we say, for
• 44:13
  Speaker 3: a certain type of woman.
• 44:15
  Speaker 7: All right, let's all right, let's keep going leaning it
• 44:17
  Speaker 7: over and being like, okay, yep, that that's mine. It's
• 44:21
  Speaker 7: not a dad signing his daughter over as if she's property.
• 44:26
  Speaker 7: It's not even a man taking control of his newfound property.
• 44:31
  Speaker 7: It is agreeing to come together formal souls as a union.
• 44:37
  Speaker 1: You know what, you know?
• 44:38
  Speaker 2: Okay, So, like the father giving away his daughter at
• 44:42
  Speaker 2: a wedding, like giving the bride away, that never implied
• 44:45
  Speaker 2: that he was the property or she was his property.
• 44:47
  Speaker 2: He was responsible for her, and he has authority over
• 44:50
  Speaker 2: her because he is her father.
• 44:52
  Speaker 3: Yes, And so what.
• 44:53
  Speaker 2: He's doing is he's basically saying, okay, now you're taking
• 44:57
  Speaker 2: the responsibility.
• 44:59
  Speaker 1: It's not just own her, you know so.
• 45:03
  Speaker 2: But okay, yeah, like this is a again, like I
• 45:06
  Speaker 2: said for the first video, guy wants to you know,
• 45:09
  Speaker 2: date women and maybe like sleep around with lots of women.
• 45:13
  Speaker 1: Hates women. Guy wants to avoid women. Hates women. Guy
• 45:15
  Speaker 1: wants to have an ai girlfriend. Hates women. Guy wants
• 45:19
  Speaker 1: to marry a woman and just like.
• 45:22
  Speaker 2: Be in a monogamous relationship with one and start a
• 45:24
  Speaker 2: family with one. Guess what, hates women, wants to own her.
• 45:28
  Speaker 2: There's no there's no getting out of it, because the.
• 45:30
  Speaker 1: Purpose of it is to complain until society is completely unraveled.
• 45:35
  Speaker 2: That's the purpose. That's the dialectic, that's what we're in.
• 45:38
  Speaker 2: There's no logic to it. It's just about unraveling our
• 45:43
  Speaker 2: civilization by bitching. So it's it, Yeah, more like she's
• 45:47
  Speaker 2: your problem now, Yeah, basically, I mean that's another way
• 45:51
  Speaker 2: to look at all.
• 45:51
  Speaker 1: Right, So let's let's keep going and.
• 45:54
  Speaker 7: The rest of your lives together, respectively. If that is
• 45:58
  Speaker 7: so what you two want? Who do it has nothing
• 46:02
  Speaker 7: to do with one handing their body over to somebody else.
• 46:07
  Speaker 3: Does Why are you inserting yourself and making it about
• 46:10
  Speaker 3: that he.
• 46:11
  Speaker 1: Thinks everyone else thinks that?
• 46:13
  Speaker 3: Or men think that, Yeah, this is this is the
• 46:15
  Speaker 3: funny thing. They are screaming at projections in their own head.
• 46:19
  Speaker 3: I have stereotyped this activity in this manner, and now
• 46:23
  Speaker 3: I shall scream, and how horrible my stereotype of this
• 46:27
  Speaker 3: activity is God?
• 46:29
  Speaker 2: Ye, all right, next time code, So let's let's uh
• 46:35
  Speaker 2: yeah this. Apparently she's gonna say that there's a dismissal
• 46:39
  Speaker 2: of consent in marriages, not like catch me.
• 46:42
  Speaker 7: Never getting married if that is the case, and furthermore,
• 46:47
  Speaker 7: encouraging this mindset towards the younger generation of girls and women.
• 46:52
  Speaker 8: Is so not allowed to refuse to get physical with
• 46:56
  Speaker 8: your spouse and I and look, I do not have
• 46:59
  Speaker 8: to get my wife's or missaying to get physical work.
• 47:01
  Speaker 7: Because you have cretinous men hiding in the comments.
• 47:04
  Speaker 3: But they also say the same thing about women. That's
• 47:09
  Speaker 3: what he said. You do not have to get your
• 47:11
  Speaker 3: spouse's permission. Bitch. That means women too. Okay, it is
• 47:16
  Speaker 3: equal now, screw off. There is equality to be found here.
• 47:21
  Speaker 2: You can take an issue with that statement that guy made,
• 47:24
  Speaker 2: but you can't gender it.
• 47:26
  Speaker 3: No, you can't gender it. You are gendering it because
• 47:29
  Speaker 3: you are obsessed with female victimhood, which is his own
• 47:33
  Speaker 3: toxic mentality.
• 47:36
  Speaker 1: All right, yeah, okay, look at her. Jesus God, okay.
• 47:42
  Speaker 7: Talks comparing a grown woman to a child, a child that,
• 47:47
  Speaker 7: by the way, has pretty much no authority over themselves
• 47:52
  Speaker 7: because they are a kid and they need to be
• 47:55
  Speaker 7: kept safe. Just like your parents own the response ability
• 48:00
  Speaker 7: of you.
• 48:01
  Speaker 3: As a child unto you became an adult.
• 48:04
  Speaker 1: Being an adult.
• 48:05
  Speaker 3: Me saying, what is the statement.
• 48:08
  Speaker 1: On that, just like your parents owned the responsibility of
• 48:13
  Speaker 1: you as a child until you became an adult. And
• 48:16
  Speaker 1: it says, my future husband owns mean and my body.
• 48:21
  Speaker 1: So okay, So this is your.
• 48:22
  Speaker 3: Husband consent to having you say this and then throw
• 48:25
  Speaker 3: this ship into the public sphere. No idea like honestly,
• 48:31
  Speaker 3: if this is just wait a second. This woman is
• 48:34
  Speaker 3: making a part of her life with her husband public
• 48:38
  Speaker 3: and he she is opening him up for condemnation and
• 48:43
  Speaker 3: potential censure and whatever else comes of it. For what
• 48:48
  Speaker 3: TikTok clout You know, I see a problem here. It
• 48:54
  Speaker 3: is her. Why is she throwing this into the public
• 48:57
  Speaker 3: life if they have decided this, why is you painting
• 49:01
  Speaker 3: a bull's eye on her husband in order to throw
• 49:04
  Speaker 3: her weight around on TikTok. I'm just That's all I
• 49:07
  Speaker 3: wanted to say.
• 49:08
  Speaker 2: Go ahead, Brian, I was just gonna say, I think
• 49:11
  Speaker 2: this is just more intersexual competition.
• 49:13
  Speaker 1: I think this.
• 49:14
  Speaker 2: Woman is essentially like bragging about how she is so
• 49:20
  Speaker 2: I mean assuming that she's not like does she believes
• 49:23
  Speaker 2: what she says about being the property of her husband.
• 49:26
  Speaker 1: She's so comfortable with.
• 49:29
  Speaker 2: That, like does she doesn't have anything to worry about,
• 49:31
  Speaker 2: that he will take care of her and protect her
• 49:33
  Speaker 2: and provide and all that that she can like post
• 49:35
  Speaker 2: it online and other women are getting angry at her
• 49:39
  Speaker 2: for that, and they're they're trying to problematize this.
• 49:44
  Speaker 1: So this isn't This really doesn't have anything to do
• 49:46
  Speaker 1: with the men. This is women fighting with other women
• 49:50
  Speaker 1: and their men are the ball. Yes it yeah, And.
• 49:56
  Speaker 3: The fact is that nobody did the Did the husband
• 49:59
  Speaker 3: say yeah, you can throw me out here like this,
• 50:02
  Speaker 3: you can.
• 50:02
  Speaker 1: Say she probably didn't ask.
• 50:06
  Speaker 3: Think to ask him. Incidentally, if you really are a
• 50:10
  Speaker 3: surrendered wife like this, what are you doing on TikTok
• 50:14
  Speaker 3: put a painting bull's eyes on your husband's back for clout?
• 50:18
  Speaker 3: What are you doing? Like, get rid of this idea?
• 50:24
  Speaker 3: I think he's she's turning this, like you said, she's
• 50:27
  Speaker 3: turning this surrender into intersectional sexual intersectional competition between women,
• 50:34
  Speaker 3: like instead of it being about her relationship with her husband,
• 50:36
  Speaker 3: it's about her relationship or her one upping other women
• 50:41
  Speaker 3: while sacrificing her husband's privacy and well being. If anybody
• 50:47
  Speaker 3: decides that he's he's like a rapist, a rapist, or
• 50:51
  Speaker 3: a sexual assaulter, what do you think that's that's gonna
• 50:53
  Speaker 3: blowback on him?
• 50:54
  Speaker 1: Did she?
• 50:55
  Speaker 3: Did she even think about that? Apparently not? Apparently not.
• 50:58
  Speaker 3: This is why surrendered wife language. You know, I understand
• 51:03
  Speaker 3: Christians use it. Respecting your husband's vulnerabilities, I think is
• 51:09
  Speaker 3: a much stronger statement and a much more constrained expectation
• 51:15
  Speaker 3: to place on men. Before you throw your personal life
• 51:19
  Speaker 3: out on the internet. Maybe run it by your husband,
• 51:22
  Speaker 3: because he's part of it and he might be hurt
• 51:25
  Speaker 3: by it. Recognize how he can be hurt. She's not
• 51:28
  Speaker 3: just a dispensary of dominance and authority, he's a person.
• 51:33
  Speaker 1: Anyway, Yeah, I would, I would.
• 51:36
  Speaker 2: I push back a little bit on this being a
• 51:38
  Speaker 2: Christian thing because it's vainglorious.
• 51:40
  Speaker 1: Yeah no, yeah, you're right, make these claims.
• 51:42
  Speaker 2: You're boasting and that's not Yeah, that's that's a that's
• 51:46
  Speaker 2: ving glory. But anyway, So we'll just do a little
• 51:49
  Speaker 2: bit more of this.
• 51:50
  Speaker 1: I think adult.
• 51:53
  Speaker 7: Being an adult means that absolutely nobody has authority over
• 51:58
  Speaker 7: your body. It doesn't matter how many times you want
• 52:01
  Speaker 7: to die your head.
• 52:05
  Speaker 3: You're wrong. The state of every state on the planet
• 52:09
  Speaker 3: has authority over men's bodies. I mean, we could talk about, oh,
• 52:13
  Speaker 3: there hasn't been there hasn't been a draft. There will
• 52:17
  Speaker 3: be one if it's necessary, as we see in the Ukraine,
• 52:22
  Speaker 3: there will be a draft if the state sees that
• 52:24
  Speaker 3: it's necessary. This it's always on the table. They never
• 52:27
  Speaker 3: take it off, right, So you are one hundred wrong, lady.
• 52:31
  Speaker 3: If you're a man, the state has authority over your body. Right.
• 52:36
  Speaker 3: And also the state has authority over men's bodies, and
• 52:40
  Speaker 3: for no reason, like not as a result of anything
• 52:42
  Speaker 3: that they've done, because the state also has authority over
• 52:45
  Speaker 3: your body if you start using your body to hurt
• 52:48
  Speaker 3: other bodies. Right, So the state gains authority over you
• 52:51
  Speaker 3: if you engage in criminal acts. But men don't have
• 52:53
  Speaker 3: to engage in criminal acts to have the state dictate
• 52:57
  Speaker 3: to them. You know they're there their immediate future for whatever,
• 53:01
  Speaker 3: and and and throw them into a situation that could
• 53:03
  Speaker 3: get them killed or seriously harmed. Right, And this is
• 53:06
  Speaker 3: something that has never really been legally challenged. We'd have
• 53:11
  Speaker 3: to write it in the constitution to pretend it probably,
• 53:15
  Speaker 3: and nobody does because they always want to have states,
• 53:18
  Speaker 3: always want to have that option to go sacrifice a
• 53:20
  Speaker 3: bunch of men to solve political disputes. And this is
• 53:23
  Speaker 3: what's so infuriate women like this lecture, the one group
• 53:27
  Speaker 3: of people that has effectively no bodily autonomy about bodily
• 53:32
  Speaker 3: autonomy and how they're taking it away. Shut up, shut up, women.
• 53:38
  Speaker 7: Okay, yes, Or if you want to guard the opposite
• 53:41
  Speaker 7: route and you want to wear some slacks and a polo.
• 53:44
  Speaker 5: Up to you, that's your body, that's your choice.
• 53:46
  Speaker 1: You're allowed to.
• 53:47
  Speaker 7: Say no, whatever you don't want inside yours.
• 53:53
  Speaker 3: There are another time code, because I don't yeah, the next.
• 53:56
  Speaker 1: The last one. I got the last one, So I
• 53:58
  Speaker 1: want to give her a chance to say this is noise. Yeah,
• 54:02
  Speaker 1: it's like all three of these are noise. All right.
• 54:05
  Speaker 1: Here we go.
• 54:06
  Speaker 7: Viewing that as quite literal gospel, because it just it isn't.
• 54:11
  Speaker 7: I'm sorry, but I feel as though too many times
• 54:14
  Speaker 7: I see people making this kind of argument because the
• 54:19
  Speaker 7: book said, So I don't care what the book says
• 54:22
  Speaker 7: because I don't follow that way of life, and you.
• 54:26
  Speaker 3: Don't follow that way of life, I'll stop shaming it. Goodbye. Like,
• 54:30
  Speaker 3: why does she have two sets of eyebrows?
• 54:33
  Speaker 1: I think those are supposed to be like eyelids. I
• 54:37
  Speaker 1: don't know.
• 54:38
  Speaker 3: I don't know, man, it's odd, Like I mean she
• 54:41
  Speaker 3: trying to no.
• 54:43
  Speaker 2: I mean she's supposed to be spooky and like apparently
• 54:46
  Speaker 2: it is in the animal prints and I don't know, man,
• 54:49
  Speaker 2: I don't know.
• 54:50
  Speaker 1: I don't know when this was cool, but it was,
• 54:51
  Speaker 1: it's not now.
• 54:53
  Speaker 5: Now.
• 54:54
  Speaker 7: Does this mean that you should aim to be in
• 54:56
  Speaker 7: a senseless marriage? Absolutely not, because cold hard truth, a
• 55:01
  Speaker 7: lot of times it's not gonna work out that way.
• 55:04
  Speaker 7: But if women were made to feel a lot more
• 55:07
  Speaker 7: comfortable saying no at times, to be quite honest, I
• 55:10
  Speaker 7: think that there would be more sex in marriages. And
• 55:13
  Speaker 7: I say that because everybody has a right to deny
• 55:18
  Speaker 7: what they don't want to do in that moment.
• 55:20
  Speaker 1: It is all right, that's kind of like her, Okay, sure,
• 55:24
  Speaker 1: I mean funny do men can men say no if
• 55:27
  Speaker 1: they don't want no? Isn't it assumed that if you
• 55:30
  Speaker 1: marry someone, you want to be intimate with that person.
• 55:35
  Speaker 2: I mean, I'm not again, you know, she cherry picks
• 55:38
  Speaker 2: a clip. I don't know what the context is uses
• 55:41
  Speaker 2: that to go on our whole tirade. I can't speak
• 55:44
  Speaker 2: to that because I don't know what the whole context is.
• 55:46
  Speaker 2: But I can tell you that in most marriages that
• 55:49
  Speaker 2: are happy, like, people are fine being intimate with each
• 55:54
  Speaker 2: other in whatever terms they feel like.
• 55:57
  Speaker 1: So, okay, do you have anything to say about that?
• 56:03
  Speaker 1: This was the last time code for this one.
• 56:05
  Speaker 3: I'm just somebody who's yeah, I'm fighting with a vertical chat.
• 56:09
  Speaker 3: There's an individual named Mini Moon who is I think communists.
• 56:14
  Speaker 3: She's read Poverty by America by Matthew Desmond. Well, here's
• 56:17
  Speaker 3: the problem, all right, how do you incentivize productivity? Money
• 56:23
  Speaker 3: doesn't make you rich. It's the productivity of your neighbors
• 56:26
  Speaker 3: that make you rich, or at least give you access
• 56:29
  Speaker 3: to things worth buying. Right, So if you stop incentivizing productivity,
• 56:35
  Speaker 3: nobody's productive, nobody has anything worth buying, and we all
• 56:39
  Speaker 3: descend into poverty, which is pretty much what's happening now.
• 56:43
  Speaker 3: So you solve that conundrum, communists, and then you might
• 56:48
  Speaker 3: have something. All right, let's uh, is this the end
• 56:52
  Speaker 3: of this because she hasn't really made a point except
• 56:56
  Speaker 3: you know, bodily autonomy except for men.
• 56:59
  Speaker 1: Yeah, that's the whole video. That's basically it.
• 57:03
  Speaker 2: All right, let's go on to rainbow shite then, yes,
• 57:06
  Speaker 2: all right, so again we'll play the intro.
• 57:09
  Speaker 5: Let's see here greasings guys, galson on binary pals, and
• 57:14
  Speaker 5: welcome back to another video. And today I am joined
• 57:21
  Speaker 5: by someone whom we.
• 57:23
  Speaker 1: Have the view. I just want to say really quick.
• 57:28
  Speaker 2: Channel has five hundred almost five hundred thousand subscribers. I
• 57:32
  Speaker 2: think Briarty Claire should have more because I think she
• 57:36
  Speaker 2: does more work.
• 57:38
  Speaker 1: I will say that.
• 57:39
  Speaker 2: I mean, if we're gonna rank them, this content is
• 57:43
  Speaker 2: the the The TMU goth chick is probably like the
• 57:47
  Speaker 2: worst in terms of like the substance. It's just like
• 57:51
  Speaker 2: I'm mad, I put on makeup, I yell at the
• 57:53
  Speaker 2: camera about women and men, and then I'm done.
• 57:56
  Speaker 1: This chick just like.
• 57:58
  Speaker 2: Kind of just well you'll see, it's just really I
• 58:01
  Speaker 2: don't know, it's it's like it's waffle.
• 58:04
  Speaker 1: It's just waffles, you know. Oh, it's like completely undeserved.
• 58:11
  Speaker 3: Yeah, well I guess that she is the CEA tier,
• 58:16
  Speaker 3: Byrony is the s tier because of effort she both she.
• 58:21
  Speaker 1: Puts sources in all of her stuff.
• 58:24
  Speaker 3: But yeah, they're not.
• 58:25
  Speaker 2: I mean, they're all communists of different stripes, don't get
• 58:29
  Speaker 2: me wrong. But but like, Yesny would be like if
• 58:34
  Speaker 2: you lived in a world where you did get paid
• 58:36
  Speaker 2: for your work, she would do some work.
• 58:38
  Speaker 3: So yeah, okay, all right, So I just want to
• 58:42
  Speaker 3: do a shout out. Feed the Badger dot com slash
• 58:46
  Speaker 3: just the tip if you want to send us a message,
• 58:48
  Speaker 3: and we will get right on that, like white on rice.
• 58:50
  Speaker 3: So feed the Badger dot com splash just the tip.
• 58:54
  Speaker 3: Get those comments in, Guys, don't just hang around the
• 58:57
  Speaker 3: special chat poking the bear or their barina as it were.
• 59:03
  Speaker 5: Okay, let's keep going clad for a really long time,
• 59:07
  Speaker 5: and we have finally made it happen. And that is
• 59:10
  Speaker 5: of course one.
• 59:12
  Speaker 9: Topic literally calling me out. I get it, Okay, I
• 59:15
  Speaker 9: didn't respond all your messages.
• 59:16
  Speaker 1: I'm sorry.
• 59:17
  Speaker 9: I tried. We've been trying to organize this.
• 59:19
  Speaker 1: For oh my god, it's I don't know who this is,
• 59:22
  Speaker 1: but it's giving fhosh.
• 59:26
  Speaker 2: And that's a bit worse. Are those fucking stuffed dolls
• 59:33
  Speaker 2: in the background.
• 59:34
  Speaker 1: Is that merch?
• 59:35
  Speaker 2: Yes, that's march of him quite the capitalist communist.
• 59:39
  Speaker 3: Good lord. Also, this is a red flag, ladies, if
• 59:45
  Speaker 3: you're wondering actually, but yeah, if you have purple flag. Okay,
• 59:49
  Speaker 3: I mean he's probably just a narcissist, not a sociopath.
• 59:52
  Speaker 3: But yeah, that's a bit of a red flag right there. Okay,
• 59:56
  Speaker 3: let's keep Do we have to listen to more of him?
• 59:59
  Speaker 1: Well?
• 1:00:00
  Speaker 2: Can I just take an executive vision setting the topic, Allison?
• 1:00:03
  Speaker 1: We need to know what the topic is, which the
• 1:00:05
  Speaker 1: videos called are the straits? Okay, with one topic at
• 1:00:09
  Speaker 1: a time? Is he a straight great value bass? Yes,
• 1:00:13
  Speaker 1: great value destiny? What was that, Allison?
• 1:00:17
  Speaker 3: What?
• 1:00:18
  Speaker 6: Oh?
• 1:00:19
  Speaker 1: I thought you froze?
• 1:00:20
  Speaker 3: No, No, I didn't phrase. I just was contemplating the
• 1:00:24
  Speaker 3: special chat. All right, let's go. Let's let you do it.
• 1:00:27
  Speaker 9: For bachically three years now and if as a scroll
• 1:00:31
  Speaker 9: up oars for DMS you're like, Hi, I'm ready at
• 1:00:34
  Speaker 9: twenty twenty four, I am ready. I hope you're doing
• 1:00:37
  Speaker 9: well the end of twenty twenty four.
• 1:00:39
  Speaker 5: Like, hey, do you want to do this?
• 1:00:40
  Speaker 1: Yes?
• 1:00:41
  Speaker 5: When's good? Nothing for like eight months and then oh
• 1:00:44
  Speaker 5: you're wait, we were.
• 1:00:45
  Speaker 9: Talking do we want to last season?
• 1:00:48
  Speaker 5: But we finally made it happen.
• 1:00:51
  Speaker 9: I'm here, I'm excited. Give me a cheek a little
• 1:00:54
  Speaker 9: preview of what we might be doing today, and I'm excited.
• 1:00:57
  Speaker 5: Oh, we are looking at some things from of course
• 1:01:02
  Speaker 5: oslash all the straight's okay, which is always really fun.
• 1:01:06
  Speaker 5: I think everyone in there is really normal, and just like, really, what.
• 1:01:09
  Speaker 1: Are the straits? Okay? Is okay? I'm gonna take as
• 1:01:13
  Speaker 1: writ what she says.
• 1:01:14
  Speaker 2: I haven't seen this, but I'm gonna take it as
• 1:01:17
  Speaker 2: writ She said everyone in there in this reddit is
• 1:01:21
  Speaker 2: really normal. So like, first of all, Reddit and normal,
• 1:01:24
  Speaker 2: I don't know that those have a lot in common.
• 1:01:27
  Speaker 1: Sorry, but this particular reddit are the straits? Okay?
• 1:01:31
  Speaker 2: Let's find out what her definition of normal is because
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 2: I'm I'm a bit concerned.
• 1:01:37
  Speaker 5: It really okay.
• 1:01:38
  Speaker 9: Based opinions to be honest, Yeah, what is.
• 1:01:41
  Speaker 5: Like really fitting for.
• 1:01:42
  Speaker 1: The word based has lost all meaning our time?
• 1:01:45
  Speaker 5: Is this person who posted if straight men were smart,
• 1:01:49
  Speaker 5: they would come to Pride to meet women, and I
• 1:01:52
  Speaker 5: just don't think that is quite right.
• 1:01:55
  Speaker 9: For half a second I was like, well there are
• 1:01:57
  Speaker 9: women there, and then the other half a second but
• 1:02:00
  Speaker 9: well a lot of them are gay. Yeah, I don't
• 1:02:04
  Speaker 9: know if the ratio is going to be that. I
• 1:02:05
  Speaker 9: don't know if it's gonna work out.
• 1:02:07
  Speaker 1: They might mean it, actually, I well, first of all, no,
• 1:02:11
  Speaker 1: even if they're straight, you don't want to be friends
• 1:02:13
  Speaker 1: with them. But a lot of straight women go to
• 1:02:17
  Speaker 1: Pride parades though, I mean, I think anyway, Elsie, you're
• 1:02:22
  Speaker 1: still fighting with these people.
• 1:02:24
  Speaker 3: Yeah, I am.
• 1:02:25
  Speaker 2: Okay, Well what's going on? What are we talking about
• 1:02:28
  Speaker 2: the special chat now? Or are we doing this video?
• 1:02:30
  Speaker 3: Yes, yes, there's a no. No, okay, you're right, I'll
• 1:02:34
  Speaker 3: focus get down to business the business.
• 1:02:38
  Speaker 2: Yeah, let's get down the business of defeating the Han
• 1:02:45
  Speaker 2: or thirty five. Isn't that how it goes? I actually
• 1:02:47
  Speaker 2: never saw Milan.
• 1:02:50
  Speaker 3: Yeah, that's but I think it just get down.
• 1:02:55
  Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, to defeat the Hahn bisexual lighting.
• 1:03:00
  Speaker 2: Okay, so now we are going into okay, yeah, let's
• 1:03:04
  Speaker 2: let's play from here.
• 1:03:04
  Speaker 5: You're the worse like Okay, I just just pointed out
• 1:03:08
  Speaker 5: to you.
• 1:03:10
  Speaker 3: No, I'm just mocking her, laugh the laugh.
• 1:03:14
  Speaker 2: Yeah, a lot of straight women go to Pride to
• 1:03:17
  Speaker 2: prey on men, yes, gay men, because because straight women
• 1:03:22
  Speaker 2: or just women in general, because I mean lesbians. I've
• 1:03:25
  Speaker 2: had lesbians like be very forceful with me when they're drunk.
• 1:03:29
  Speaker 2: They suddenly become straight, is what I'm saying. So I've
• 1:03:32
  Speaker 2: had that happen because I used to live there was
• 1:03:35
  Speaker 2: a part of Chicago close to the lake, and people
• 1:03:38
  Speaker 2: called it Boys Town. It was originally a gay community,
• 1:03:42
  Speaker 2: a gay neighborhood, but then because it was mostly just
• 1:03:45
  Speaker 2: gay men that you know, because gay men, they they're
• 1:03:48
  Speaker 2: pretty good with money, and they tend to like make
• 1:03:50
  Speaker 2: good money, and because they're with other men who also
• 1:03:53
  Speaker 2: make money, they just combine their money and they're just
• 1:03:56
  Speaker 2: doing really well.
• 1:03:57
  Speaker 1: So it was a pretty affluent area. I lived a
• 1:03:59
  Speaker 1: few blocks away from there because I worked at this
• 1:04:01
  Speaker 1: paint paint shop that was on one of the streets there,
• 1:04:05
  Speaker 1: and I lived in a little studio apartment in the area.
• 1:04:08
  Speaker 1: And so because of that, a lot of the people
• 1:04:10
  Speaker 1: who were my neighbors were gays and lesbians.
• 1:04:14
  Speaker 2: And lesbians moved into the to the gy area because
• 1:04:17
  Speaker 2: they just were like, well we will all hear too,
• 1:04:19
  Speaker 2: and a lot of them didn't make as much money,
• 1:04:21
  Speaker 2: so they lived in like the little apartments. Anyway, when
• 1:04:24
  Speaker 2: I had some lesbian friends and the lesbian and I
• 1:04:28
  Speaker 2: had gay friends too because they I lived around them.
• 1:04:30
  Speaker 2: But the lesbian friends, when they got drunk, they got
• 1:04:32
  Speaker 2: really handsy and they got really aggressive. I remember one Halloween,
• 1:04:36
  Speaker 2: I dressed up as Dracula and just Dracula. It was
• 1:04:39
  Speaker 2: just generic, like you know, suit, nothing fancy, and we
• 1:04:43
  Speaker 2: were in a cab getting driven around to various bars
• 1:04:46
  Speaker 2: and they were getting really forceful. So what I'm saying
• 1:04:49
  Speaker 2: is is that at gay areas and a gay pride,
• 1:04:53
  Speaker 2: women are lesbians and straight women can get pretty aggressive
• 1:04:58
  Speaker 2: towards men, and I think the that's worth pointing out.
• 1:05:01
  Speaker 1: So maybe not.
• 1:05:02
  Speaker 2: What the claim is like, Hey, if you're you can
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 2: find girls, I don't think I don't think that's good.
• 1:05:07
  Speaker 2: But if you're a gay man and you're at a
• 1:05:09
  Speaker 2: gay event, you should probably also avoid the women there.
• 1:05:13
  Speaker 3: Yeah Therezo says, oh no grabby women. Yes, well there
• 1:05:17
  Speaker 3: are some men in our audience. You don't appreciate random
• 1:05:20
  Speaker 3: sexual assault from women as you might, but you know,
• 1:05:24
  Speaker 3: other men prefer boundaries.
• 1:05:27
  Speaker 2: I like how you assume that they're if they're that
• 1:05:29
  Speaker 2: we're not supposed to be a problem with it because they're
• 1:05:31
  Speaker 2: women and.
• 1:05:31
  Speaker 1: We should feel lucky.
• 1:05:34
  Speaker 3: Is that biooll is a biotruth? There, it smells like
• 1:05:37
  Speaker 3: a biotruth.
• 1:05:40
  Speaker 2: Yeah, did you the white face Tracula? Yeah, I had
• 1:05:43
  Speaker 2: like the pale. I was going full Bella Lagosi is
• 1:05:47
  Speaker 2: what I was going for, because a lot of people
• 1:05:49
  Speaker 2: they do vampires and they're trying to like, you know,
• 1:05:52
  Speaker 2: do it like the new kind of and Rice, you know, bullshit,
• 1:05:56
  Speaker 2: you know, And I was like, yeah, but Belle Lugosi
• 1:05:58
  Speaker 2: was creepy or what's his name from the Hammer films,
• 1:06:02
  Speaker 2: like those Draculas were scary. I like that more, you know,
• 1:06:06
  Speaker 2: like Christopher Lee when he played Dracula. So anyway, are
• 1:06:10
  Speaker 2: the straits?
• 1:06:11
  Speaker 9: Okay?
• 1:06:11
  Speaker 1: We were talking about this.
• 1:06:13
  Speaker 5: You are the one who asked the question maybe simple solution.
• 1:06:16
  Speaker 9: On one, two, three four fun. They're scratching a line
• 1:06:20
  Speaker 9: in the cake with their thumb, I assumed in in hands.
• 1:06:23
  Speaker 9: Look at that. Look at the cake topper where his
• 1:06:25
  Speaker 9: hand is grabbing the cake that you've ever seen that before?
• 1:06:28
  Speaker 9: Only ever seen someone their fingernails in not also their thumb.
• 1:06:31
  Speaker 5: That's wild. Yeah, digging that thumbino is really fantistic choice.
• 1:06:35
  Speaker 5: It does make it look like those too many fingers
• 1:06:38
  Speaker 5: what is this.
• 1:06:39
  Speaker 3: Okay, Theresa said Bela Lopez. That's that's actually clever. You're
• 1:06:43
  Speaker 3: going for all.
• 1:06:45
  Speaker 1: I get it.
• 1:06:47
  Speaker 3: Maybe not as clever as I thought. It was just
• 1:06:49
  Speaker 3: fine whatever, it's it's b TI your cleverness, wittiness, maybe
• 1:06:53
  Speaker 3: c plus.
• 1:06:53
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 1:06:55
  Speaker 3: I didn't even get a chie.
• 1:06:56
  Speaker 2: I didn't I shaved and stuff. It was years ago.
• 1:06:59
  Speaker 2: It was I was like twenty six. Ah, you know,
• 1:07:03
  Speaker 2: so it was a long time.
• 1:07:03
  Speaker 3: Ago, extremely good looking.
• 1:07:08
  Speaker 2: It was literally like the year nine to eleven happened.
• 1:07:11
  Speaker 2: That's that's when it was.
• 1:07:13
  Speaker 3: Yeah, you were twenty six then I was.
• 1:07:16
  Speaker 2: I was twenty six in the year two thousand and
• 1:07:20
  Speaker 2: most of two thousand.
• 1:07:22
  Speaker 3: I learned. I learned a couple of days ago that
• 1:07:24
  Speaker 3: there's actually a generation starting at nineteen seventy seven to
• 1:07:28
  Speaker 3: about like nineteen eighty three called the Sillennials.
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 1: No excell Yeah, okay.
• 1:07:37
  Speaker 3: Yeah, that apparently I'm azillennial, not a not a gen Zer,
• 1:07:42
  Speaker 3: which go figure.
• 1:07:45
  Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, okay, I just.
• 1:07:48
  Speaker 3: Okay, you're not really saying anything like so far, I
• 1:07:51
  Speaker 3: have not heard a single point.
• 1:07:53
  Speaker 1: We're being reacting to memes, you know, I don't know we're.
• 1:07:56
  Speaker 3: Being ambassed on the special chat for not addressing the
• 1:08:03
  Speaker 3: substantive meat of the three Witches argument arguments.
• 1:08:08
  Speaker 2: That's, uh, someone help us summarize it. Apparently we don't
• 1:08:11
  Speaker 2: have good.
• 1:08:12
  Speaker 1: Media literally, what is what is the substance of these videos? Yeah, okay, that's.
• 1:08:21
  Speaker 3: Why I'm focusing on the special. This person is throwing
• 1:08:24
  Speaker 3: around the term media literacy, and I know what they
• 1:08:27
  Speaker 3: mean is you're not saying something that I'm comfortable with.
• 1:08:32
  Speaker 3: You haven't come to the conclusions that I expect, et cetera. Okay,
• 1:08:38
  Speaker 3: do they get to a point.
• 1:08:41
  Speaker 2: It's it's them reacting to memes. I don't know that
• 1:08:43
  Speaker 2: there's a point. That is why I'm saying like this.
• 1:08:46
  Speaker 2: The Queer Kiwi's content is probably like the lowest tier.
• 1:08:52
  Speaker 2: It's like the I don't know, like it's it's like
• 1:08:55
  Speaker 2: the skibbity toilet brain rot of feminist content. It's the
• 1:09:00
  Speaker 2: brain rot. Yeah, it's just, Oh, we're gonna look at
• 1:09:02
  Speaker 2: memes and I got five hundred thousand subscribers, Like that's
• 1:09:06
  Speaker 2: that's five times, isn't it? Manifestell at like two hundred thousand,
• 1:09:10
  Speaker 2: so she's like more than double the same amount.
• 1:09:15
  Speaker 3: Yeah, Well, it's because it's it's it's shallow and a
• 1:09:18
  Speaker 3: lot of times like shallow.
• 1:09:20
  Speaker 1: But yeah, you know it's deep.
• 1:09:22
  Speaker 3: But this is even more shallow than Brony. It's shallow content.
• 1:09:25
  Speaker 3: It's intending to be funny, but it's awkward and and
• 1:09:32
  Speaker 3: you know, it's I don't want to say, Andrew Wilson
• 1:09:34
  Speaker 3: does the same kind of stuff, but it's personal conflict, right,
• 1:09:38
  Speaker 3: people like that they don't like abstractions. I'm probably the
• 1:09:41
  Speaker 3: one that's really dragging down the channel because I'm like, okay,
• 1:09:45
  Speaker 3: let's let's enter Alison World today, which is we're just
• 1:09:48
  Speaker 3: going to dive into into an entire universe of abstractions.
• 1:09:52
  Speaker 3: And and then everybody's because.
• 1:09:54
  Speaker 1: The worst thing about Honey Badger Radio.
• 1:09:56
  Speaker 3: Yeah, I am the worst thing. And it's because I
• 1:09:58
  Speaker 3: think in huge abstractions and it's hard for me to
• 1:10:03
  Speaker 3: articulate them.
• 1:10:04
  Speaker 2: Like it's like you're like the prog rock of this channel,
• 1:10:07
  Speaker 2: like you're the You're like yes, or like you know,
• 1:10:12
  Speaker 2: King Crimson or something like they're just too we're in
• 1:10:16
  Speaker 2: a floid hole.
• 1:10:17
  Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, all right, let's just really think about it. Okay,
• 1:10:21
  Speaker 1: but anyway, let's keep going.
• 1:10:22
  Speaker 2: And and by the way, I was gonna get some
• 1:10:24
  Speaker 2: aviators because I think they would work.
• 1:10:27
  Speaker 1: Well with the mustache.
• 1:10:28
  Speaker 2: I don't know what you guys think, but this guy
• 1:10:30
  Speaker 2: is killing it for me.
• 1:10:32
  Speaker 5: Food is awful and eating sucks. I eat the BAM
• 1:10:34
  Speaker 5: minimum and as fast as possible. I hate eating. I
• 1:10:37
  Speaker 5: hate feeling full. Men who think cooking makes them manly
• 1:10:41
  Speaker 5: are cook's afraid of the cage, desperately validate and non
• 1:10:44
  Speaker 5: existent masculinity. Imagine how stupid you have to be to
• 1:10:47
  Speaker 5: find food entertaining literally embarrassing fellas.
• 1:10:51
  Speaker 9: Is it gay to eat food?
• 1:10:53
  Speaker 1: No? And I cook? Does that make me gay?
• 1:10:56
  Speaker 3: I think this might be slightly wry.
• 1:10:58
  Speaker 1: Men make the best shifts.
• 1:10:59
  Speaker 3: Yeah, well, I mean I can't think he's got a
• 1:11:01
  Speaker 3: point like food shouldn't be necessarily I mean, food is entertaining,
• 1:11:06
  Speaker 3: but that shouldn't be the reason why you do it.
• 1:11:09
  Speaker 3: You eat right. I don't think he's saying. Honestly, this
• 1:11:13
  Speaker 3: guy might be a gay nationalist, so I would not
• 1:11:18
  Speaker 3: assume that. Yeah, well hoo, homo nationalist. It's sort of
• 1:11:26
  Speaker 3: like white nationalists, except homosexual.
• 1:11:30
  Speaker 1: A country of only homosexuals.
• 1:11:32
  Speaker 3: I don't know.
• 1:11:33
  Speaker 2: I mean, you can have it, you can have it,
• 1:11:36
  Speaker 2: but it's not gonna last.
• 1:11:38
  Speaker 3: Well, they'll have sex with women purely to produce suns.
• 1:11:42
  Speaker 3: Will then be inculcated into the homo nationalist contempt for
• 1:11:46
  Speaker 3: all things weak and feminine and indulgent and everything will
• 1:11:51
  Speaker 3: just murder and murder and murderer, murder and militarism. So
• 1:11:58
  Speaker 3: that's the homo nationalist.
• 1:12:00
  Speaker 2: They can have California, they already have it.
• 1:12:03
  Speaker 3: Well, they certainly would change. It would be uh, it
• 1:12:08
  Speaker 3: would be different. It wouldn't be faggy. Am I allowed
• 1:12:11
  Speaker 3: to say that? Probably not? Okay, I did, all right,
• 1:12:16
  Speaker 3: I made the mistake.
• 1:12:17
  Speaker 2: So yeah, I mean this is one of those things
• 1:12:19
  Speaker 2: maybe where they're basically gonna try to make every It's
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 2: funny for people who claim that, like you know, things
• 1:12:28
  Speaker 2: like sex and gender cannot be defined. They sure are
• 1:12:32
  Speaker 2: good at putting people in boxes based on those presuppositions, like, oh,
• 1:12:36
  Speaker 2: you're a man that likes to cook, you might.
• 1:12:38
  Speaker 5: Be gay, literally embarrassing fellas.
• 1:12:41
  Speaker 9: Isn't gay to eat food? I mean if it's phallic shaped.
• 1:12:44
  Speaker 9: I think that's the thing that they always say, like oh,
• 1:12:46
  Speaker 9: do you eat bananas gig or you eat a popsicle
• 1:12:49
  Speaker 9: without a knife?
• 1:12:50
  Speaker 1: Who eats a popsicle with a knife. I guess that's
• 1:12:54
  Speaker 1: supposed to be a joke.
• 1:12:55
  Speaker 5: But I guess so.
• 1:12:58
  Speaker 3: Okay, but you got so did he say that you
• 1:13:02
  Speaker 3: don't eat a popsicle with a knife?
• 1:13:04
  Speaker 1: Didn't eat a popsicle without a knife?
• 1:13:08
  Speaker 9: Here, listen, without a knife?
• 1:13:10
  Speaker 5: Okay, you got to break it in your hands, I
• 1:13:14
  Speaker 5: think into like little tiny pieces. That's the only way
• 1:13:16
  Speaker 5: to eat a popsicle in a manly way.
• 1:13:19
  Speaker 3: No offense, But is there any At any point, do
• 1:13:22
  Speaker 3: these two actually make any kind of substantive argument or observation.
• 1:13:28
  Speaker 2: No, it's a reaction of memes.
• 1:13:31
  Speaker 3: Okay, So do we have another a person who.
• 1:13:33
  Speaker 1: I do have?
• 1:13:34
  Speaker 2: Another time? I have the last time code? Did the
• 1:13:36
  Speaker 2: person who sent you this video tell you what to
• 1:13:40
  Speaker 2: expect in the video?
• 1:13:42
  Speaker 3: No?
• 1:13:42
  Speaker 1: That okay, so they're just sent it. So this is
• 1:13:46
  Speaker 1: the this is what we get. This is it? This
• 1:13:49
  Speaker 1: is the payload of the video? Well, you know, it's okay,
• 1:13:52
  Speaker 1: let's look at some memes.
• 1:13:55
  Speaker 3: Honestly, it's not bad.
• 1:13:58
  Speaker 9: Like.
• 1:13:58
  Speaker 3: The thing is that when they do make substantive points,
• 1:14:02
  Speaker 3: it makes my anger gland go into overdrive. So maybe
• 1:14:06
  Speaker 3: it's okay to just have them bullshit for a bit,
• 1:14:10
  Speaker 3: but not too much.
• 1:14:12
  Speaker 1: It's the whole thing. They look at memes. Do you
• 1:14:15
  Speaker 1: want to just look at the memes?
• 1:14:17
  Speaker 3: Yeah, sure's look at the memes.
• 1:14:18
  Speaker 1: Okay, so I just cut We'll just cut right here.
• 1:14:22
  Speaker 3: Fun.
• 1:14:24
  Speaker 1: Oh wait, what did he say? Capitalism? Consumerism?
• 1:14:27
  Speaker 5: What?
• 1:14:27
  Speaker 1: Fun? Okay?
• 1:14:28
  Speaker 5: Fun? Is it?
• 1:14:30
  Speaker 1: Fun? Is a feminine concept, if I'll just let her
• 1:14:33
  Speaker 1: read it.
• 1:14:34
  Speaker 5: Feminine concept. If it interests you, you likely have the
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 5: low testosterone feminine hormones, whereas high testosterone masculine hormones make
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 5: you derive fulfillment and positive emotion from progressing in the
• 1:14:46
  Speaker 5: social hierarchy.
• 1:14:47
  Speaker 3: You know, I think men do have I do have
• 1:14:51
  Speaker 3: a sense of fun. I'm not so sure. You want
• 1:14:53
  Speaker 3: to give fun to the women? I sort of God,
• 1:14:55
  Speaker 3: this is homonationalism.
• 1:14:57
  Speaker 1: I would, I would homo supremacy.
• 1:15:00
  Speaker 3: Yeah, homo supremacy, homo nationalism, some some.
• 1:15:03
  Speaker 1: Kind of she's he is the magneto of gay people. Yes, manka,
• 1:15:10
  Speaker 1: let's see.
• 1:15:11
  Speaker 9: Amusing though, Does he think that Einstein was feminine?
• 1:15:17
  Speaker 5: Apparently he thinks that everybody's climbing that grease ladder of
• 1:15:22
  Speaker 5: physic physic physics.
• 1:15:24
  Speaker 3: You know, he was climbing the cigarette, the physics, uh
• 1:15:30
  Speaker 3: physics cigarette like, you know, how how can you say
• 1:15:33
  Speaker 3: that he wasn't trying or I don't think he necessarily
• 1:15:36
  Speaker 3: was trying. But that's the thing, you know, it's truly
• 1:15:39
  Speaker 3: masculine to climb the social hierarchy while not appearing to
• 1:15:42
  Speaker 3: do so. Yeah, and why is it that we're only
• 1:15:45
  Speaker 3: talking about men? Do they ever talk about women in
• 1:15:47
  Speaker 3: the strange crap they get up to? I said, why
• 1:15:50
  Speaker 3: aren't we he's talking about straits? Are you now getting
• 1:15:54
  Speaker 3: sucked into the the readers?
• 1:15:56
  Speaker 2: Well, I have to look at the chat to see
• 1:15:58
  Speaker 2: if any like super chats go through whatever.
• 1:16:00
  Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, none half guys sending those super chats and
• 1:16:03
  Speaker 3: super chows. I think we do have one coming through.
• 1:16:06
  Speaker 1: It might be saying didn't get a superchow. I just
• 1:16:08
  Speaker 1: put her.
• 1:16:08
  Speaker 3: Yeah, Well, what I was saying is that they're talking
• 1:16:11
  Speaker 3: about men to bring up women at any point? Or
• 1:16:14
  Speaker 3: are the only straits men?
• 1:16:16
  Speaker 1: I think it's the straits are just men?
• 1:16:17
  Speaker 2: Okay, great indoors and gives us five dollars superchow, thank you,
• 1:16:21
  Speaker 2: and says, if you're going to rank online feminists on
• 1:16:23
  Speaker 2: a scale of blood boiling, I'd suggest you start with
• 1:16:26
  Speaker 2: the Guardian. Bot Arwa Madowie. She's my favorite or if
• 1:16:30
  Speaker 2: you want, ooh Wu Madowie or Mommy Madowie for she,
• 1:16:34
  Speaker 2: despite all of her efforts, never seems to ruffle any
• 1:16:37
  Speaker 2: feathers with anyone at HBr. She just seems to generate
• 1:16:40
  Speaker 2: a whole bag of lulls and kecks. She has a
• 1:16:43
  Speaker 2: lull printer. She's funny because her job is to find
• 1:16:52
  Speaker 2: ways to She basically her job is to find the
• 1:16:55
  Speaker 2: patriarchy in anything.
• 1:16:57
  Speaker 1: She literally has. Her column is called The Weekend Patriarchy
• 1:17:00
  Speaker 1: Arwa Madali, and she basically go She's English, so it's
• 1:17:03
  Speaker 1: really easy.
• 1:17:04
  Speaker 2: She goes in to whatever's going on. She writes an
• 1:17:07
  Speaker 2: opinion piece, runs it through chat, GPT or something probably,
• 1:17:11
  Speaker 2: and then spits out an article. And she gets to
• 1:17:13
  Speaker 2: do it every week. I don't know if she makes
• 1:17:16
  Speaker 2: any money, but it's hilarious because it's like watching them
• 1:17:20
  Speaker 2: reach you know, so.
• 1:17:22
  Speaker 3: Yeah, and they're all like somebody said in the chat,
• 1:17:25
  Speaker 3: you can't criticize the straight women because it'll be misogyny.
• 1:17:28
  Speaker 1: Yep.
• 1:17:28
  Speaker 3: They always go for the straight for the scapegoat. For
• 1:17:31
  Speaker 3: some reason, the one person, the one group of people
• 1:17:34
  Speaker 3: that everybody can shit on is the one group of
• 1:17:38
  Speaker 3: people in power. Supposedly, you think that if you were
• 1:17:42
  Speaker 3: in power, the first thing you do would be to
• 1:17:45
  Speaker 3: be like, yeah, people in power have done throughout history,
• 1:17:50
  Speaker 3: which is to stop people from shitting on them. You know,
• 1:17:53
  Speaker 3: you go to like some tinpot dictatorship in Eastern Asia,
• 1:17:58
  Speaker 3: and what's the one thing you can't you know, anything
• 1:18:02
  Speaker 3: against the man or the woman in power or the
• 1:18:05
  Speaker 3: women in power. You can't. You go back in time,
• 1:18:09
  Speaker 3: communistic to what you can't say anything because against the
• 1:18:13
  Speaker 3: person in power. You know, you go dictatorship in South America, Nope,
• 1:18:18
  Speaker 3: You're not allowed to say anything against the people in power,
• 1:18:22
  Speaker 3: against against the party, nope. And in the history aristocracy,
• 1:18:26
  Speaker 3: did you were you allowed to slander the king or
• 1:18:28
  Speaker 3: the queen or the aristract? No, you were not. Probably
• 1:18:31
  Speaker 3: a capital offense, consider treason. But we are in the
• 1:18:35
  Speaker 3: most remarkable error era of human history in which the
• 1:18:39
  Speaker 3: group of people in power, according to the feminists, is
• 1:18:43
  Speaker 3: the one group that you can say whatever you want,
• 1:18:47
  Speaker 3: kicking the phase, kicking the balls, kicking the knees, do
• 1:18:51
  Speaker 3: whatever you want to them, right, say whatever you want,
• 1:18:55
  Speaker 3: smear them in any way, accuse them of anything, and
• 1:18:59
  Speaker 3: it's just free game. Isn't that astounding? It's quite a
• 1:19:04
  Speaker 3: world we live in today, don't we Because it's like
• 1:19:07
  Speaker 3: it's like human nature just stopped and in the sixties.
• 1:19:11
  Speaker 3: Because usually, again, the first thing that people in power
• 1:19:15
  Speaker 3: do unless they maybe they have principles and integrity, but
• 1:19:19
  Speaker 3: if they don't, which is feminists, feminists say men don't
• 1:19:22
  Speaker 3: have principles or integrity, the first thing they do when
• 1:19:25
  Speaker 3: they're in power is they prevent anybody from talking shit
• 1:19:28
  Speaker 3: about them. Men didn't do that. I wonder why. I
• 1:19:31
  Speaker 3: wonder what's not fitting in that?
• 1:19:34
  Speaker 5: Okay, all right, So this is a comic of two people.
• 1:19:40
  Speaker 5: This woman who is very angry and says I must
• 1:19:44
  Speaker 5: have been blind and deaf to marry you. And this
• 1:19:47
  Speaker 5: guy is ruffling up her hair and says, see what
• 1:19:49
  Speaker 5: gruesome diseases I've saved you from.
• 1:19:51
  Speaker 9: It's not ruffling her hair. He's putting a sock on
• 1:19:53
  Speaker 9: her heads.
• 1:19:54
  Speaker 5: He's putting a sack on her head.
• 1:19:56
  Speaker 9: I couldn't even tell I need socks are everywhere. There's
• 1:19:58
  Speaker 9: socks on the cat, there as everywhere.
• 1:20:01
  Speaker 1: Yeah, So, okay, should we get their opinion on this
• 1:20:05
  Speaker 1: meme or I think that's a joke, Like, yeah, it
• 1:20:09
  Speaker 1: is obviously a joke, but it's.
• 1:20:10
  Speaker 3: Like, this is Howard. No, Howard, you is the guy,
• 1:20:13
  Speaker 3: the millionaire who was crazy. Yeah, this must be a I.
• 1:20:19
  Speaker 1: I don't know. I mean it looks a little No,
• 1:20:23
  Speaker 1: I don't think it is. It looks it looks a
• 1:20:25
  Speaker 1: little too human, flawed to the AI. I mean, it's possible,
• 1:20:29
  Speaker 1: but I don't. I don't, I don't know.
• 1:20:31
  Speaker 3: I don't think so people, where's the joke? I mean, really,
• 1:20:34
  Speaker 3: the problem with this memes?
• 1:20:35
  Speaker 1: Well, these are these are all feminist memes now, so
• 1:20:38
  Speaker 1: they're not funny. That's why. That's why there have been
• 1:20:41
  Speaker 1: no laughs, because they're feminist memes.
• 1:20:43
  Speaker 3: So they're making memes about how awful men are, and
• 1:20:46
  Speaker 3: then they're turning around and saying, oh, look at how
• 1:20:48
  Speaker 3: bad men are, based on again a fictionalized portrayal of men.
• 1:20:52
  Speaker 3: Oh good grief.
• 1:20:53
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, this is not good. It's just not even.
• 1:20:57
  Speaker 2: This segment is really short. It's like they couldn't even
• 1:20:59
  Speaker 2: go anywhere. Okay, let's jump ahead to the next one.
• 1:21:02
  Speaker 5: She says, it's all like one long day, nothing new happens,
• 1:21:05
  Speaker 5: and he said, well, you could sleep on the couch
• 1:21:08
  Speaker 5: to night for a change.
• 1:21:09
  Speaker 2: Really really, she says, I mean, okay, like these are
• 1:21:14
  Speaker 2: almost like is this loss?
• 1:21:16
  Speaker 1: These are completely like no context.
• 1:21:20
  Speaker 3: So Mini Moon is responding, this platform has limited characters
• 1:21:23
  Speaker 3: to type with, Like I said, it's kind of impossible
• 1:21:25
  Speaker 3: to have a substantial discussion. And every little thing you
• 1:21:28
  Speaker 3: all are talking about being a woman make you per man. Okay,
• 1:21:34
  Speaker 3: So she essentially said, we have lack media literacy. We're
• 1:21:38
  Speaker 3: not responding to these people correctly. I don't know what
• 1:21:41
  Speaker 3: the hell she wants us to respond to here with
• 1:21:43
  Speaker 3: this one. And she won't substantiate it, like she can't
• 1:21:47
  Speaker 3: even give us a sentence of what we're not responding
• 1:21:50
  Speaker 3: to one summed up sentence. No, but she insists she
• 1:21:55
  Speaker 3: has greater media literacy than all of us. And as
• 1:21:58
  Speaker 3: we all know, in storytelling, it's telling your audience. That's
• 1:22:03
  Speaker 3: the real powerful way of convincing them of something, not showing.
• 1:22:08
  Speaker 3: Oh man, And then she accuses, you know what, I
• 1:22:10
  Speaker 3: am anti woman. I'll come out there right now. Whatever
• 1:22:16
  Speaker 3: our society has defined women as being, it sucks. Women
• 1:22:21
  Speaker 3: are basically you don't even need the word women. We
• 1:22:25
  Speaker 3: don't we can get rid of the word woman. We
• 1:22:28
  Speaker 3: don't need it. We don't need it in our society.
• 1:22:31
  Speaker 3: Just replace it with the word victim. It's more accurate victim.
• 1:22:35
  Speaker 3: You say, I am anti woman. What you mean is
• 1:22:37
  Speaker 3: I am anti victim. I'm actually what you mean is
• 1:22:39
  Speaker 3: I'm anti associating women with victimhood. You're damn right. I
• 1:22:43
  Speaker 3: don't like that. All right, let's say I'm.
• 1:22:46
  Speaker 1: Done with.
• 1:22:50
  Speaker 5: One long day, nothing new happens. And he said, well,
• 1:22:54
  Speaker 5: you could sleep on the couch night for a change.
• 1:23:00
  Speaker 9: First, and the gender rules. Get it because normally it's
• 1:23:02
  Speaker 9: the fella that sleeps on the couch. Am I right?
• 1:23:04
  Speaker 5: Gang, This is a great vessel gender roles. We're fighting
• 1:23:08
  Speaker 5: gender course.
• 1:23:10
  Speaker 3: Of control here. Usually it's a man being abused. God,
• 1:23:14
  Speaker 3: these are progressives, gigantic blind spots.
• 1:23:19
  Speaker 1: This is not funny. I have nothing to add.
• 1:23:22
  Speaker 5: Nod saying gave it talk at Oxford excited.
• 1:23:24
  Speaker 1: It's like it tastes like baking soda. That's what it
• 1:23:27
  Speaker 1: tastes like. Not that I know what that tastes like, but.
• 1:23:30
  Speaker 5: It's saying, gave a talk at Oxford exciting and met
• 1:23:32
  Speaker 5: some emotional support. Olpack is more exciting and she's just
• 1:23:36
  Speaker 5: standing there with her OL packet is cut?
• 1:23:38
  Speaker 1: Is that a meme?
• 1:23:40
  Speaker 3: Yeah, no, probably some guy responded to this with annoyance.
• 1:23:46
  Speaker 1: I have a feeling this isn't gonna go anywhere, but okay,
• 1:23:49
  Speaker 1: yeah maybe.
• 1:23:49
  Speaker 3: I mean the al packas are cute. They're very lovely
• 1:23:52
  Speaker 3: looking creatures. Cats love eating them. My cats in particularly
• 1:23:55
  Speaker 3: love al pack of meat.
• 1:23:57
  Speaker 5: It little brace you, and she looks real cute. And
• 1:24:00
  Speaker 5: then this guy quotrated her and said, the male urge
• 1:24:04
  Speaker 5: to marry a woman like this and stop her from
• 1:24:06
  Speaker 5: wearing men's clothing permanently.
• 1:24:07
  Speaker 2: Okay, that was good, but that was because it was
• 1:24:11
  Speaker 2: a dude saying something funny, the male urge to marry
• 1:24:14
  Speaker 2: a woman like this and stop her from wearing men's
• 1:24:16
  Speaker 2: clothing permanently.
• 1:24:18
  Speaker 3: Get her, get her in a sundress.
• 1:24:21
  Speaker 1: That's that is. She probably looked really good in a sundress.
• 1:24:24
  Speaker 1: That got me. I didn't expect it. I didn't expect it.
• 1:24:27
  Speaker 1: Thank you, ambassador, Thank you sir. That was good.
• 1:24:31
  Speaker 2: I know these people are going to get triggered by that,
• 1:24:33
  Speaker 2: but I just wanted to get the laugh.
• 1:24:35
  Speaker 3: Oh MANI Moon says, it's not about responding, it's about understanding.
• 1:24:39
  Speaker 3: I don't think you understand what the word understand means.
• 1:24:42
  Speaker 3: It doesn't mean agree. So I mean if you understand that,
• 1:24:45
  Speaker 3: can you Mini Moon give a criticism of the concepts
• 1:24:51
  Speaker 3: that these lovely ladies have elaborated to a substantive degree,
• 1:24:58
  Speaker 3: like these the concepts that they presented, their feasts, their
• 1:25:01
  Speaker 3: their hypotheses. Can you give me a constructive criticism of
• 1:25:06
  Speaker 3: anything that these ladies have offered. That would mean that
• 1:25:10
  Speaker 3: you understand what they're saying without agreeing with it. I
• 1:25:15
  Speaker 3: wonder if you can do that. I doubt it. Okay,
• 1:25:21
  Speaker 3: let's see. Let's look.
• 1:25:24
  Speaker 1: That is a male urge.
• 1:25:25
  Speaker 2: I will say that I got Lindsay wearing dresses now,
• 1:25:28
  Speaker 2: but she loves it.
• 1:25:29
  Speaker 1: She loves it. Okay, so let's keep going.
• 1:25:32
  Speaker 9: That's this question of violent statement.
• 1:25:34
  Speaker 1: That's a violent statement. Oh my god, let's wait.
• 1:25:38
  Speaker 2: Wait no, he did not just say that that is
• 1:25:41
  Speaker 2: a violent statement.
• 1:25:42
  Speaker 1: Wow, this is amazing.
• 1:25:45
  Speaker 5: And then this guy quotraated her and said the male
• 1:25:48
  Speaker 5: urge to marry a woman like this and stop her
• 1:25:50
  Speaker 5: from wearing men's clothing permanently.
• 1:25:52
  Speaker 9: This question violent statement?
• 1:25:54
  Speaker 3: Insane?
• 1:25:55
  Speaker 9: Is what that is men's clothing?
• 1:25:58
  Speaker 5: Like? She's wearing a suit.
• 1:26:00
  Speaker 9: She's wearing a suit that is buttoned differently than a
• 1:26:03
  Speaker 9: man's suit. Yeah, it's have you never seen The Office
• 1:26:07
  Speaker 9: when Michael Scott grabs a suit out of a bin
• 1:26:10
  Speaker 9: and thinks he's getting a big sale and then he
• 1:26:11
  Speaker 9: wears it, and.
• 1:26:12
  Speaker 2: Really, oh my god, shut up with your I watch
• 1:26:14
  Speaker 2: TV a lot. Okay, let's listen to the rest.
• 1:26:18
  Speaker 9: It's shapely, quite a bit on the booty, has no pockets,
• 1:26:21
  Speaker 9: and it's also for women. Yeah, women's clothing.
• 1:26:24
  Speaker 5: But you know apparently she's wearing men's clothing and it's
• 1:26:27
  Speaker 5: the masculine.
• 1:26:28
  Speaker 2: Well wait a minute, Okay, So if there is suits
• 1:26:31
  Speaker 2: for women and they they make your butt shapely if
• 1:26:34
  Speaker 2: you're a woman, then is that not sexist because it's
• 1:26:38
  Speaker 2: still gender clothing. Shouldn't we eliminate all barriers? Should we
• 1:26:43
  Speaker 2: break all.
• 1:26:43
  Speaker 1: Of it down? We still have so much more liberating
• 1:26:46
  Speaker 1: to do.
• 1:26:48
  Speaker 3: It was going to be something nasty like.
• 1:26:50
  Speaker 1: No, but it was funny.
• 1:26:51
  Speaker 2: I thought it was funny. I think they think it's
• 1:26:55
  Speaker 2: violent sous.
• 1:26:57
  Speaker 3: From a woman or sorry from a man. They reduce
• 1:27:00
  Speaker 3: women down to victims and men down a villain, so
• 1:27:02
  Speaker 3: everything men do is violent in some capacity.
• 1:27:06
  Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, okay, the.
• 1:27:11
  Speaker 9: Male to marry her immediately, so that way she becomes
• 1:27:14
  Speaker 9: his property and then that.
• 1:27:17
  Speaker 5: Since it's a maleer, I know.
• 1:27:20
  Speaker 1: No, that's what he means. Remember, these people are against
• 1:27:24
  Speaker 1: property and they think that's violence.
• 1:27:26
  Speaker 5: Is that Is that something that you're feeling when you
• 1:27:29
  Speaker 5: are looking at a woman in a suit, you're like, damn,
• 1:27:31
  Speaker 5: my man brain says, I must marry her immediately to
• 1:27:34
  Speaker 5: change No, No, you.
• 1:27:35
  Speaker 3: Need to actually provide him with the challenge. He needs
• 1:27:38
  Speaker 3: to look at a woman that does not comply with
• 1:27:42
  Speaker 3: being cast as a victim, and then let's see what
• 1:27:45
  Speaker 3: he does. That's a real challenge. I've seen what some
• 1:27:48
  Speaker 3: male feminists do to women who decide not to play
• 1:27:51
  Speaker 3: the role that they assign them. It's not necessarily a
• 1:27:54
  Speaker 3: pretty thing.
• 1:27:56
  Speaker 2: Well, first of all, he's describing it as an urge,
• 1:27:58
  Speaker 2: which is which means he's not playing acting on it,
• 1:28:00
  Speaker 2: but he's acknowledging.
• 1:28:01
  Speaker 1: That it's there.
• 1:28:03
  Speaker 2: The other thing is is that I think that what
• 1:28:05
  Speaker 2: if you really want to like get technical, there are
• 1:28:08
  Speaker 2: women who would probably look really attractive in women's clothing.
• 1:28:15
  Speaker 1: And that's what he's saying.
• 1:28:16
  Speaker 2: She's a good looking woman, but she'd be so much
• 1:28:18
  Speaker 2: hotter if she was wearing women's clothing. Now, of course,
• 1:28:21
  Speaker 2: themnist will say, well, you have no right to I
• 1:28:24
  Speaker 2: don't know have that expectation. Yes he does, you don't
• 1:28:26
  Speaker 2: know what a right is. He can have that expectation.
• 1:28:29
  Speaker 2: Doesn't mean that he's entitled to anything. But he's not
• 1:28:32
  Speaker 2: saying that he's entitled to anything. He's just saying this.
• 1:28:36
  Speaker 2: It's basically like a little bit of a you know, snappy, clever,
• 1:28:40
  Speaker 2: witty statement about a photograph of a woman wearing a
• 1:28:44
  Speaker 2: pants suit. Essentially, so anyway, til deer says the straw
• 1:28:49
  Speaker 2: man's cousin, not a lie, but quote, I'm going to
• 1:28:51
  Speaker 2: say something dumb about your position. Look, look everyone, how
• 1:28:55
  Speaker 2: dumb I think he is by implying he might believe
• 1:28:57
  Speaker 2: this thing. End quote. Yes, he's joking, and I thought
• 1:29:01
  Speaker 2: it was effective. It got a chuckle out of me.
• 1:29:03
  Speaker 2: So he wins.
• 1:29:04
  Speaker 1: You lose.
• 1:29:05
  Speaker 2: You're not funny and you're humorless. And you can see it, like,
• 1:29:08
  Speaker 2: look at that's a that's a face of pain on
• 1:29:10
  Speaker 2: the inside.
• 1:29:11
  Speaker 1: She's dying on the inside.
• 1:29:13
  Speaker 3: Well, she thinks, well, she like, we need new pronouns
• 1:29:16
  Speaker 3: because the victims don't deserve she or her vic the victim.
• 1:29:23
  Speaker 3: Of course, she's dying on or VIC is dying on
• 1:29:25
  Speaker 3: the inside. VIC does not know Vic's self outside of
• 1:29:31
  Speaker 3: how VIC is acted upon by others who exist. VIC
• 1:29:35
  Speaker 3: does not I know, I just made that totally competing. Yeah,
• 1:29:39
  Speaker 3: just roll with it. Let's keep going.
• 1:29:40
  Speaker 1: All right, Well, let's see if she says anything else about.
• 1:29:43
  Speaker 5: This, because I don't. I don't think it is for
• 1:29:46
  Speaker 5: you or most men, I would argue, Well, another.
• 1:29:51
  Speaker 9: Bio reading this, well, I was excited for her video
• 1:29:56
  Speaker 9: and I read this now I'm.
• 1:29:57
  Speaker 5: Said, that's fair son.
• 1:30:00
  Speaker 1: Oh god, Okay, here's another meme.
• 1:30:04
  Speaker 3: So basically, this is shipped on men our not.
• 1:30:06
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it's not. It's not about the straits. It's about
• 1:30:10
  Speaker 2: straight men. Yeah, we're just men, but straight men particularly.
• 1:30:15
  Speaker 3: Well gay men or the gay men or the white
• 1:30:19
  Speaker 3: men of gay people. Yes, gay, gay men straight.
• 1:30:24
  Speaker 9: When I read this, no, I'm said, a son's first hero, dad,
• 1:30:31
  Speaker 9: a daughter's first No, no.
• 1:30:33
  Speaker 3: No, what because you'll never be a.
• 1:30:38
  Speaker 2: Father, A son's first hero, a daughter's first love is
• 1:30:42
  Speaker 2: what it says on the.
• 1:30:44
  Speaker 3: I hate that so much. Okay. Do you know that
• 1:30:46
  Speaker 3: parents love their children and their children children generally love
• 1:30:49
  Speaker 3: their parents.
• 1:30:50
  Speaker 1: What is the problem with daddy issues?
• 1:30:53
  Speaker 2: Daddy alert? Daddy issues alert. That's why I hate my dad.
• 1:30:57
  Speaker 2: I wonder if he's gonna say.
• 1:30:58
  Speaker 1: It, I hate my dad. If you're watching it, you
• 1:31:03
  Speaker 1: my life.
• 1:31:03
  Speaker 2: But I'm actually really happy in this new identity that
• 1:31:06
  Speaker 2: I've selected for myself.
• 1:31:07
  Speaker 1: But you ruin my life. But I'm happy because I
• 1:31:09
  Speaker 1: selected this. I did this. I am the I am
• 1:31:12
  Speaker 1: the god of my own life, and I've done this
• 1:31:13
  Speaker 1: to myself.
• 1:31:14
  Speaker 9: But I hate you for it so much.
• 1:31:18
  Speaker 5: Yeah, I just made a video about this specific topic,
• 1:31:20
  Speaker 5: so it's pretty own brand on topic for the moment,
• 1:31:23
  Speaker 5: because I need these people to stop doing this different thing.
• 1:31:28
  Speaker 5: If you're treating your child differently in like the way
• 1:31:31
  Speaker 5: you love them, because if they agenda, you're giving me
• 1:31:33
  Speaker 5: a real weird, creepy vibes, and I'm going to need
• 1:31:36
  Speaker 5: you to like stop it.
• 1:31:37
  Speaker 3: You most definitely treat children differently like you you advocate. Yeah, yeah,
• 1:31:42
  Speaker 3: we can't. This is the great irony of all this.
• 1:31:46
  Speaker 3: We have this cute little poster dad is the son's
• 1:31:49
  Speaker 3: first hero and the daughter's first love. And she's like, oh,
• 1:31:52
  Speaker 3: you can't treat children differently because of the gender, But
• 1:31:55
  Speaker 3: you can't take boys aside and tell them they have
• 1:31:58
  Speaker 3: nothing of worth. That they're actly flawed girls, that patriarchy
• 1:32:01
  Speaker 3: forces them to suppress their femininity, and they need to
• 1:32:05
  Speaker 3: take all responsibility for sexual violence and domestic assault against
• 1:32:08
  Speaker 3: adult women. You can do that. You can take a
• 1:32:12
  Speaker 3: boy aside and distrush his sense of self and self worth,
• 1:32:18
  Speaker 3: and you can also constantly empower women based on a
• 1:32:23
  Speaker 3: conjecture about reality that has never been proven. So we
• 1:32:26
  Speaker 3: can constantly empower girls you want. So you can treat
• 1:32:29
  Speaker 3: boys differently, You make boys take responsibility, and you try
• 1:32:34
  Speaker 3: you constantly say that girls need to be empowered. You
• 1:32:37
  Speaker 3: are treating the sexes differently. But it's terrible to do
• 1:32:43
  Speaker 3: it in a positive way if your dad. It's totally
• 1:32:46
  Speaker 3: justified to do it in a destructive way if you're
• 1:32:50
  Speaker 3: a gender ideologue. Okay, hypocrisy.
• 1:32:54
  Speaker 2: Yeah, so she doesn't understand what love is. I mean,
• 1:33:00
  Speaker 2: that's all I was gonna say about that, because if
• 1:33:03
  Speaker 2: you if you read the word love and you think
• 1:33:05
  Speaker 2: it's sexual, something's wrong with you.
• 1:33:08
  Speaker 1: That's that's all I'll say.
• 1:33:09
  Speaker 2: Because that's what she's trying to suggest, is that, like,
• 1:33:12
  Speaker 2: you know, the daddy's girl thing, you know about his daughter,
• 1:33:18
  Speaker 2: she's probably she's got to make that something weird. She's
• 1:33:21
  Speaker 2: making it weird by claiming it's weird. But that's what
• 1:33:24
  Speaker 2: you're trying to do. You're trying to pathologize fathers and
• 1:33:28
  Speaker 2: make them seem dangerous to their children. And that's because
• 1:33:32
  Speaker 2: you don't know what love is. You don't understand it.
• 1:33:35
  Speaker 2: You probably don't know your dad either.
• 1:33:37
  Speaker 1: I hate to tell you your.
• 1:33:38
  Speaker 2: Mom probably fucked a loser or kept you away from him,
• 1:33:42
  Speaker 2: and he wanted to be in your life.
• 1:33:44
  Speaker 1: So I know that that probably burns. But that's what
• 1:33:48
  Speaker 1: I think.
• 1:33:50
  Speaker 6: There is.
• 1:33:51
  Speaker 3: This is I don't even know if they're at war
• 1:33:53
  Speaker 3: with heterosexuality. There is a difference. Girls and boys relate
• 1:33:56
  Speaker 3: to their fathers and their mothers differently. They're not every
• 1:34:00
  Speaker 3: people are not a neutral parental unit. Neither are children
• 1:34:05
  Speaker 3: gender neutral units. Much as you are trying to force it.
• 1:34:10
  Speaker 3: And you know what's funny is that they aren't trying
• 1:34:12
  Speaker 3: to force it. What they're trying to force is their
• 1:34:15
  Speaker 3: vision of sex differences. Yes, their vision, because they sure
• 1:34:21
  Speaker 3: as hell don't ever question what generation of young men
• 1:34:25
  Speaker 3: are boys? Do we stop saying that they're responsible for
• 1:34:29
  Speaker 3: everything everything bad in the world, all the violence? And
• 1:34:35
  Speaker 3: what generation do we stop does the patriarchal original sin.
• 1:34:40
  Speaker 3: Stop being taught to boys. You, guys, are not enlightened.
• 1:34:45
  Speaker 3: You're not hovering above the rest of us. You just
• 1:34:47
  Speaker 3: want to teach your version of strict gender roles. Well,
• 1:34:53
  Speaker 3: you've gotten able to for several generations. Now, how is
• 1:34:57
  Speaker 3: society looking? You've done it. You have claimed the center
• 1:35:01
  Speaker 3: of the chess board when it comes to how people
• 1:35:03
  Speaker 3: view the relationship between men and women. How's society looking,
• 1:35:08
  Speaker 3: how's the relationship looking? How's the birth rate looking, how's
• 1:35:13
  Speaker 3: the marriage rate looking? How's our economic future looking? Yeah,
• 1:35:17
  Speaker 3: you've done a great job. And you don't give me
• 1:35:20
  Speaker 3: this shit about oh, we're gonna get rid of gender,
• 1:35:23
  Speaker 3: We're gonna get rid of the binary bullshit. It's still
• 1:35:28
  Speaker 3: the people who are expected to take responsibility, men and boys,
• 1:35:32
  Speaker 3: to be blamed, to be scapegoaded, to be seen as
• 1:35:35
  Speaker 3: more violent, and everybody else. You still have a gender binary. Okay, yep, okay.
• 1:35:43
  Speaker 6: This is I don't even know what this is a
• 1:35:45
  Speaker 6: vehicle of some description. And it's got acoustics for husband
• 1:35:49
  Speaker 6: and wife. Husband stands for hanson useful, smart but at
• 1:35:55
  Speaker 6: night dangerous, and wife stands for without information, fight every time?
• 1:36:01
  Speaker 5: And I have some.
• 1:36:02
  Speaker 1: Concent what without information fight every time?
• 1:36:08
  Speaker 3: This looks like it's from India.
• 1:36:09
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I was gonna say, is this India or Asia somewhere?
• 1:36:13
  Speaker 1: So gonna does she.
• 1:36:14
  Speaker 3: Have a problem with Does she even bring up any
• 1:36:18
  Speaker 3: memes that target men? No, because she only sees women
• 1:36:22
  Speaker 3: as victims. And then she has the audacity to say
• 1:36:25
  Speaker 3: everybody else is applying a strict general.
• 1:36:29
  Speaker 1: Are these memes?
• 1:36:30
  Speaker 3: I don't know. They're really freaking lame, very.
• 1:36:34
  Speaker 2: Funny, but at night dangerous? Okay, so let's see she's
• 1:36:39
  Speaker 2: gonna like, now they're getting really.
• 1:36:41
  Speaker 5: Dark, senseful without information fight every time? And I have
• 1:36:46
  Speaker 5: some concerns, largely about why is a husband dangerous at night?
• 1:36:51
  Speaker 5: What's going on then.
• 1:36:53
  Speaker 3: Expected of her and protect her?
• 1:36:57
  Speaker 1: Yeah, it's probably because if there's like a noise downstairs,
• 1:37:01
  Speaker 1: guess who's got to go down there and be dangerous?
• 1:37:03
  Speaker 2: Not the woman, not the wife. Is literally talking about
• 1:37:08
  Speaker 2: a husband and wife dynamic.
• 1:37:11
  Speaker 3: I'm guessing that this is going to be interpreted in
• 1:37:13
  Speaker 3: the worst way possible because women have to be victor.
• 1:37:15
  Speaker 3: Let me, let me. I'm just gonna make a prediction.
• 1:37:18
  Speaker 3: She's going to reinterpret this in a way that makes
• 1:37:22
  Speaker 3: women victims.
• 1:37:23
  Speaker 1: Yep, Wow, that's a stretch, Alison. I don't know. I
• 1:37:26
  Speaker 1: don't know that. It seems like a bold strategy.
• 1:37:28
  Speaker 3: Let's find out. I'm calling it.
• 1:37:31
  Speaker 5: All husband's are Batman in the day, they're useful and
• 1:37:35
  Speaker 5: small and at night it.
• 1:37:37
  Speaker 2: Swear reminds me whatever happened to parking lot Batman. We
• 1:37:40
  Speaker 2: need to think put out the parking lot Batman signal,
• 1:37:43
  Speaker 2: because you know, we need to find more videos of
• 1:37:47
  Speaker 2: white nighting men. But they don't really seem to be
• 1:37:49
  Speaker 2: as common because that was what parking lot Batman was
• 1:37:52
  Speaker 2: when we did that way back.
• 1:37:53
  Speaker 1: In the day.
• 1:37:54
  Speaker 2: Because men are not doing that anymore, so that's kind
• 1:37:57
  Speaker 2: of interesting. Parking lot Batman is no longer with us.
• 1:38:02
  Speaker 1: Okay anyway, not.
• 1:38:03
  Speaker 5: Useful or smart, but they are or handsome. They're not
• 1:38:06
  Speaker 5: hand some usual smart at night time, just dangerous?
• 1:38:09
  Speaker 9: Better wife though, wife could never be Batman. Why isn't
• 1:38:13
  Speaker 9: the beat in husband Batman Batman at night dangerous? That
• 1:38:17
  Speaker 9: would have been so much better.
• 1:38:18
  Speaker 5: It would have been.
• 1:38:19
  Speaker 3: Fun They're not wrong here, it comes here, it comes
• 1:38:22
  Speaker 3: slightly concerning.
• 1:38:24
  Speaker 1: Yep, it would have.
• 1:38:25
  Speaker 5: Been funny instead of just slightly concerning. Why, I mean, wife,
• 1:38:31
  Speaker 5: why yeah, it could just sitting there.
• 1:38:38
  Speaker 2: It was just sitting there. It was just there spread eagle.
• 1:38:44
  Speaker 2: I couldn't help myself. That's why I had them anywhere.
• 1:38:47
  Speaker 9: Why wonder Woman is for everyone?
• 1:38:51
  Speaker 5: There we go, there, we go perfect. That's so much better.
• 1:38:54
  Speaker 5: I think that is what life stands for.
• 1:38:55
  Speaker 9: Actually, we can fix some quier key we one me
• 1:38:58
  Speaker 9: minute time, we will do this.
• 1:38:59
  Speaker 1: God so cringe. Yeah, I'm dying inside.
• 1:39:04
  Speaker 3: Okay, concerning because I can imagine that a woman is
• 1:39:10
  Speaker 3: a victim of this retarded the silly thing that was
• 1:39:13
  Speaker 3: put on somebody's You know, he probably has to pedal
• 1:39:18
  Speaker 3: people around for a living. You imagine that it's like
• 1:39:24
  Speaker 3: a rickshaw in order to feed his wife. You know,
• 1:39:27
  Speaker 3: I think he gets one sexistrits no, no, no demerits.
• 1:39:31
  Speaker 3: I think I think he gets I think he gets
• 1:39:33
  Speaker 3: to have one sexist meme on his rickshaw. Yeah, and
• 1:39:38
  Speaker 3: that's the real critical thing, not that this man probably
• 1:39:41
  Speaker 3: makes money off of pedaling people around.
• 1:39:43
  Speaker 1: I think it's sexist.
• 1:39:44
  Speaker 3: I mean that's a little really because all of these
• 1:39:48
  Speaker 3: people are communists, right, and yet they don't notice how
• 1:39:52
  Speaker 3: all class stuff has been subsumed into gender.
• 1:39:58
  Speaker 1: Yeah, what it always does yeah, it.
• 1:40:00
  Speaker 3: Just gets subsumed like it's all consumed by gender and intersectionality.
• 1:40:06
  Speaker 3: All of the class analysis is subsumed into that. It's
• 1:40:09
  Speaker 3: it's turned into a fart.
• 1:40:11
  Speaker 2: Well because there's new no Because to them, they would
• 1:40:14
  Speaker 2: say that all of the ways that communism has been
• 1:40:18
  Speaker 2: sort of repurpose or reorganized is to take the concept
• 1:40:22
  Speaker 2: of capital and reframe it. So being straight is a
• 1:40:27
  Speaker 2: form of capital. Being male or masculinity itself is like
• 1:40:32
  Speaker 2: an ultimate form of capital.
• 1:40:34
  Speaker 1: Exactly that mutualizing has to be flattened. So this is like,
• 1:40:39
  Speaker 1: that's what they do.
• 1:40:40
  Speaker 2: They engage in the dialectic to remove, unravel everything, remove
• 1:40:46
  Speaker 2: all meaning, and call everything they don't like capital without
• 1:40:51
  Speaker 2: saying it explicitly.
• 1:40:52
  Speaker 1: But that's the framing they operate under.
• 1:40:54
  Speaker 3: But isn't it interesting that they just that the full
• 1:40:58
  Speaker 3: focus gets orientated towards men as opposed to presumably a
• 1:41:05
  Speaker 3: system in which that isn't enabling upward mobility so that
• 1:41:09
  Speaker 3: people can attain some kind of quality of life. And
• 1:41:12
  Speaker 3: I agree, like our system it's fucked. It's fucked in
• 1:41:18
  Speaker 3: many cases because of out of control government's bending and
• 1:41:22
  Speaker 3: the government picking winners and losers among corporations and government
• 1:41:27
  Speaker 3: intervention into the economy. Yeah, there's no longer a meritocracy.
• 1:41:31
  Speaker 3: It's now nepotism. It's who you know, and that's not fair.
• 1:41:36
  Speaker 3: But that's not the critique that they're interested in. It's
• 1:41:39
  Speaker 3: just like, let's go shit on men some more, because
• 1:41:43
  Speaker 3: you know, we live in a shit We live in
• 1:41:45
  Speaker 3: a society with no longer no upward mobility anymore. But
• 1:41:50
  Speaker 3: at least we can shit on men, right, at least
• 1:41:54
  Speaker 3: we can just keep freaking shaming and feeling superior to men.
• 1:42:00
  Speaker 3: That makes it all worthwhile, doesn't it. God damn. As
• 1:42:05
  Speaker 3: long as the society has escapegoat, it can do whatever
• 1:42:07
  Speaker 3: it wants.
• 1:42:08
  Speaker 1: All right, Let's get to the next the last time.
• 1:42:11
  Speaker 9: Come, Oh no, oh, no, he's a spreadsheet guy.
• 1:42:18
  Speaker 5: This is when I saw on Twitter today.
• 1:42:20
  Speaker 9: Years of data to twenty seventeen. Oh they divorced, for sure,
• 1:42:24
  Speaker 9: divorced or he died.
• 1:42:30
  Speaker 1: Oh so this guy sent.
• 1:42:32
  Speaker 5: On Twitter today?
• 1:42:34
  Speaker 2: No, he's a Okay, Manson's wife a spreadsheet of all
• 1:42:38
  Speaker 2: the times she denied him sex, and it starts in
• 1:42:41
  Speaker 2: twenty fourteen, and there's like.
• 1:42:44
  Speaker 3: Not denied, she refused.
• 1:42:48
  Speaker 1: She denied him sex. Yeah, but it's being reframed.
• 1:42:51
  Speaker 3: Yeah, and I defy that framing. She refused to have
• 1:42:55
  Speaker 3: sex with him, so she rejected him. Man Send's wife
• 1:42:58
  Speaker 3: a spreadsheet of all the times she rejected him. Was
• 1:43:03
  Speaker 3: not get denied because there was no She's not like
• 1:43:06
  Speaker 3: a deposit like a bank account that he can comes back. Yeah,
• 1:43:13
  Speaker 3: that's that's not the way this is being framed. I
• 1:43:17
  Speaker 3: remember this, remember this, Yeah, this was I remember it
• 1:43:22
  Speaker 3: because he was trying to make the argument like she
• 1:43:26
  Speaker 3: was saying, oh, I have sex every time you ask,
• 1:43:29
  Speaker 3: and he's like, no, you don't, you know, and being
• 1:43:33
  Speaker 3: rejected like this can be very exhausting and disheartening and
• 1:43:38
  Speaker 3: harmful to you know, feeling good about yourself. That that
• 1:43:42
  Speaker 3: was what this was about. But of course these two
• 1:43:44
  Speaker 3: vultures find an opportunity to shit on men again by
• 1:43:49
  Speaker 3: reframing this. Who the hell leaked this to the public,
• 1:43:52
  Speaker 3: by the way, like if it.
• 1:43:54
  Speaker 2: Was the wife surprised? So yeah, so that's the one
• 1:44:00
  Speaker 2: and as well, let's just keep.
• 1:44:01
  Speaker 9: Going spreadsheet guy.
• 1:44:04
  Speaker 5: This is what I saw on Twitter today.
• 1:44:06
  Speaker 9: This is years of data to twenty Are they divorced
• 1:44:09
  Speaker 9: for sure? Divorced?
• 1:44:10
  Speaker 5: Or I opened Twitter today to this this is the
• 1:44:14
  Speaker 5: first thing I saw.
• 1:44:15
  Speaker 2: You basically said, he hopes the guy died because he
• 1:44:17
  Speaker 2: made a list of times his wife like and this is.
• 1:44:21
  Speaker 3: The other thing like that we were talking about that.
• 1:44:24
  Speaker 1: That's almost like and they'll kill you.
• 1:44:27
  Speaker 3: That trad woman who published this thing about you know
• 1:44:30
  Speaker 3: her her husband owns her body without considering any kind
• 1:44:34
  Speaker 3: of blowback to her husband. Wife may but you have
• 1:44:37
  Speaker 3: published this Excel document without considering that now her husband
• 1:44:41
  Speaker 3: gets to be sexually humiliated by two colorful vultures on YouTube. Okay,
• 1:44:48
  Speaker 3: let's go ahead. Let's listen to these people enjoy this
• 1:44:52
  Speaker 3: man's sexual humiliation.
• 1:44:54
  Speaker 5: Haven't this morning? That's fun?
• 1:44:56
  Speaker 1: Loved that.
• 1:44:56
  Speaker 5: It was a great stop to my day. Perfect stops
• 1:44:58
  Speaker 5: my morning?
• 1:45:00
  Speaker 3: What are the victim of it?
• 1:45:00
  Speaker 1: But are you?
• 1:45:01
  Speaker 5: I don't want to will. I used Twitter. I'm not
• 1:45:04
  Speaker 5: usually on my actual main account. I used Twitter for
• 1:45:07
  Speaker 5: fandom stuff.
• 1:45:08
  Speaker 9: Okay, that's kind of I like that.
• 1:45:10
  Speaker 5: I use it for my like favorite books and like
• 1:45:13
  Speaker 5: my K pop stuff. I don't touch anything else away
• 1:45:17
  Speaker 5: from me, but sometimes it's like this does make it
• 1:45:18
  Speaker 5: onto my timeline.
• 1:45:19
  Speaker 9: I can't hate on that. But yeah, ever, Muski gay.
• 1:45:24
  Speaker 3: This was based to Post eleven years ago on Reddit,
• 1:45:27
  Speaker 3: and of course the feminists are still talking about it
• 1:45:30
  Speaker 3: to this day.
• 1:45:31
  Speaker 2: Yep, all right, yep, that post is what over ten
• 1:45:35
  Speaker 2: years old, came on twenty fourteen, or at least the
• 1:45:38
  Speaker 2: earliest date on there is twenty fourteen, so that's eleven
• 1:45:42
  Speaker 2: years old and they just found it.
• 1:45:45
  Speaker 1: All right, let's keep going.
• 1:45:47
  Speaker 9: It's not amazinging we just promoted up the timeline is
• 1:45:49
  Speaker 9: like his tweets. And then also Crypto Bros. And anybody
• 1:45:52
  Speaker 9: that pays ten bucks a month for a badge lame.
• 1:45:55
  Speaker 9: And also every single reply to every mem ever is
• 1:45:58
  Speaker 9: just another meme instead of people talking about it. Remember
• 1:46:00
  Speaker 9: when up voting like liking something pushed you up the
• 1:46:02
  Speaker 9: reply list, so that way the thing under the thing
• 1:46:04
  Speaker 9: was also very funny. Now it's not. And also here's
• 1:46:10
  Speaker 9: an AI video of Joe Biden selling you Crypto and
• 1:46:12
  Speaker 9: he says it's great.
• 1:46:14
  Speaker 5: It's horrible.
• 1:46:17
  Speaker 3: You just don't like it because you guys don't have
• 1:46:19
  Speaker 3: complete rain like you more. You don't control it.
• 1:46:23
  Speaker 2: You don't have fresh override network to kick everybody off
• 1:46:26
  Speaker 2: that doesn't agree with you. Yeah, say what you want
• 1:46:30
  Speaker 2: about X, but I think it's better than it was.
• 1:46:33
  Speaker 2: I think it, you know, could be even better. It's
• 1:46:36
  Speaker 2: definitely better than it was when Jack Dorsey was running it,
• 1:46:39
  Speaker 2: So I guess you just like I said, well, you
• 1:46:41
  Speaker 2: know Blue Sky. Funny thing about Blue Sky, which is
• 1:46:45
  Speaker 2: where these people may be on. I don't know if
• 1:46:47
  Speaker 2: they're going to say it, but Blue Sky has become
• 1:46:49
  Speaker 2: the alternative right, and it appears that Blue Sky is
• 1:46:53
  Speaker 2: exactly the thing that I have been saying about leftists forever,
• 1:46:58
  Speaker 2: which is essentially a constant shrinking drain of people excluding
• 1:47:04
  Speaker 2: other people because they're.
• 1:47:05
  Speaker 1: Not pure enough.
• 1:47:07
  Speaker 2: So Blue Skuy has been bleeding people because they they
• 1:47:11
  Speaker 2: fall into a spiral of hatred and they start pushing
• 1:47:15
  Speaker 2: people out. And I think it was like Mark Cuban,
• 1:47:18
  Speaker 2: who's like just some you know, I don't know, like
• 1:47:21
  Speaker 2: some political commentator or a politician or something.
• 1:47:23
  Speaker 1: I don't give a shit, but I know who he is.
• 1:47:24
  Speaker 1: He looks like Rosie.
• 1:47:25
  Speaker 2: O'Donnell now, but he was on Blue Sky and he
• 1:47:30
  Speaker 2: was like, you know, he's just like this normal like
• 1:47:32
  Speaker 2: politician guy that happens to be like a Democrat or whatever.
• 1:47:35
  Speaker 2: But his views were just like completely wrong, like the
• 1:47:39
  Speaker 2: people in Blue Sky aree. It's like a self radicalization whole.
• 1:47:44
  Speaker 2: And it's funny because they all hate Twitter, but they
• 1:47:48
  Speaker 2: they have created like the new reddit in blue Sky,
• 1:47:52
  Speaker 2: so it's just funny.
• 1:47:53
  Speaker 3: Well yeah, all right, so that's the last one.
• 1:47:58
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, let's se want to see the rest
• 1:48:00
  Speaker 1: of that. But that's basically not one. Yeah, that's basically
• 1:48:04
  Speaker 1: the last one. Yet.
• 1:48:05
  Speaker 3: So basically they what they mean by are the straights? Okay,
• 1:48:09
  Speaker 3: is our straight men, Let's insult straight man, let's shop
• 1:48:13
  Speaker 3: on straight up.
• 1:48:13
  Speaker 1: It's okay, it's just yeah, it's.
• 1:48:16
  Speaker 3: Just just like, oh, men have a weakness. It's time
• 1:48:19
  Speaker 3: to get the knikes out. Let's start sharpening the knives
• 1:48:23
  Speaker 3: because we're so compassionate. And like I said to uh
• 1:48:27
  Speaker 3: a communist on Twitter, the big, the big impediment to
• 1:48:32
  Speaker 3: implementing communism is that nobody wants to give men free stuff.
• 1:48:37
  Speaker 3: So it's never gonna happen because no one wants to
• 1:48:40
  Speaker 3: give men free stuff.
• 1:48:41
  Speaker 1: Also probably also there's no such thing as free stuff.
• 1:48:44
  Speaker 3: Yeah, there is no such thing as free stuff.
• 1:48:46
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 1:48:46
  Speaker 3: Basically, what you'd be doing is taking it away from
• 1:48:48
  Speaker 3: the men to give it back to them.
• 1:48:51
  Speaker 1: Yeah, but you'd rather just give it to the women,
• 1:48:53
  Speaker 1: which was what we already do. Yeah, just take that,
• 1:48:56
  Speaker 1: and we already.
• 1:48:57
  Speaker 3: Have as much communism as as will ever be. Let's
• 1:49:03
  Speaker 3: be honest, and let's let's also be honest. The people
• 1:49:06
  Speaker 3: who espouse it in the government, they do it because
• 1:49:11
  Speaker 3: they want to make lots of money as directors of
• 1:49:14
  Speaker 3: all the distribution programs. So now all of you, all
• 1:49:20
  Speaker 3: of you are motivated by money, right, Even the communists
• 1:49:23
  Speaker 3: are motivated by money. And that's it. Everybody's a capitalist,
• 1:49:28
  Speaker 3: even the communists. All right, let's uh, I know, that's
• 1:49:31
  Speaker 3: a really strange thing to say. So maybe I mean
• 1:49:35
  Speaker 3: all they all like money. That's why they get into
• 1:49:38
  Speaker 3: the government. It's the easiest way to make money. They
• 1:49:41
  Speaker 3: get into the government and they say, give me money
• 1:49:44
  Speaker 3: to advocate for. I don't know, like the left brain hemisphere,
• 1:49:51
  Speaker 3: like the left brain hemisphere of this disadvantaged little person
• 1:49:55
  Speaker 3: who's a trans toyota like the minute, the smallest unit
• 1:50:02
  Speaker 3: that they have to advocate for, which means they have
• 1:50:04
  Speaker 3: the least amount of oversight over their advocacy. They have
• 1:50:08
  Speaker 3: the like the So that's the ideal, Right, you find
• 1:50:11
  Speaker 3: the smallest group of people to advocate for. That means
• 1:50:16
  Speaker 3: you have the least oversight over your advocacy the least feedback, right,
• 1:50:23
  Speaker 3: you know, if you could, if you could find deaf
• 1:50:26
  Speaker 3: mutes with no with no brains trans deaf mutes, you
• 1:50:29
  Speaker 3: have no brain function. That's what you do. You advocate
• 1:50:31
  Speaker 3: for them. Never they'll never disagree with you, they'll never
• 1:50:36
  Speaker 3: give you an even negative feedback, and nobody can argue
• 1:50:39
  Speaker 3: with it, because if you do, you just hate those people. Right,
• 1:50:44
  Speaker 3: So you're that's it, your set for life. Oh, good grief.
• 1:50:48
  Speaker 3: All right, that's the problem with communism. People are too greedy,
• 1:50:51
  Speaker 3: even the communists, especially the communists. All right, so I guess, uh,
• 1:50:59
  Speaker 3: do you have anything further to say, disagree with my
• 1:51:01
  Speaker 3: analysis of communism?
• 1:51:03
  Speaker 1: No, these these people are cringe.
• 1:51:06
  Speaker 3: Yeah, this is sort of cringe.
• 1:51:08
  Speaker 1: Thanks, Richard, I hate it.
• 1:51:11
  Speaker 3: Yeah right, yeah it was Richard. It was a while back.
• 1:51:14
  Speaker 3: So he's got a whole bunch of stuff.
• 1:51:17
  Speaker 1: I've got stuff too.
• 1:51:19
  Speaker 3: Yeah, we can do other stuff, you know, we don't
• 1:51:21
  Speaker 3: always have the cringe. I mean, the last bit was
• 1:51:24
  Speaker 3: not that bad. It wasn't making me chew nails. It
• 1:51:28
  Speaker 3: was just dumb, you know, mm hmm. Okay, so this
• 1:51:34
  Speaker 3: sort of ended with a queaf rather than an explosion
• 1:51:38
  Speaker 3: of myssry.
• 1:51:39
  Speaker 1: Well yeah, I mean it's just you know, kind of
• 1:51:42
  Speaker 1: I don't know, old old. Yeah.
• 1:51:45
  Speaker 3: Okay, So if you want to send us message, feed
• 1:51:48
  Speaker 3: the Badger dot com slash just the tip, support the show,
• 1:51:50
  Speaker 3: Feed the Badger dot com slash support, continue, consider coming
• 1:51:54
  Speaker 3: out for the event in Calgary September thirteenth, and if
• 1:51:58
  Speaker 3: you want more details, Feed the Badger dot com slash events.
• 1:52:01
  Speaker 3: It's uh, you know, it's if you feel like isolated
• 1:52:05
  Speaker 3: in this stuff, I often do. It does really help
• 1:52:09
  Speaker 3: to get out and meet people who want to live
• 1:52:12
  Speaker 3: in a world where we don't believe the fundamental currency
• 1:52:17
  Speaker 3: between men and women is oppression. Believe me, it's it's
• 1:52:21
  Speaker 3: a real weight off your mind to meet other people
• 1:52:24
  Speaker 3: who realize that that's extremism. And maybe before we started
• 1:52:28
  Speaker 3: deserting it throughout all of our institutions, we might have
• 1:52:31
  Speaker 3: spent a moment proving whether or not it's true or false,
• 1:52:34
  Speaker 3: because that hasn't even happened. So it's good to meet
• 1:52:37
  Speaker 3: people who agree with that you feel like you're saying.
• 1:52:40
  Speaker 3: If you want to, if you want to experience that,
• 1:52:43
  Speaker 3: go to Feed the Badgery dot com slash events. Either
• 1:52:46
  Speaker 3: put a few shekels in the hat. I'll be trying
• 1:52:48
  Speaker 3: to set up something virtual for anybody who supports, so
• 1:52:51
  Speaker 3: that's what that's there for. Or come and join us,
• 1:52:55
  Speaker 3: cause it's uh. I'm still a little bit like running
• 1:52:59
  Speaker 3: off of last year and just being able to talk
• 1:53:01
  Speaker 3: to people without in person, without that feeling if you
• 1:53:08
  Speaker 3: have a fundamental disagreement of how reality is that you
• 1:53:12
  Speaker 3: get with a lot of people. I don't know if
• 1:53:13
  Speaker 3: other people have experienced that, I certainly do. So anyway,
• 1:53:16
  Speaker 3: feed the Badger dot com slash event to find out
• 1:53:18
  Speaker 3: more about that events. All right, Brian, you want to
• 1:53:22
  Speaker 3: take it away, nothing further to say.
• 1:53:24
  Speaker 1: Nope, no, I'm good.
• 1:53:26
  Speaker 2: I mean yeah, I mean like, I think I said
• 1:53:29
  Speaker 2: everything I wanted to say. So all right, Well, if
• 1:53:32
  Speaker 2: you guys like this video, please hit like, subscribe if
• 1:53:34
  Speaker 2: you can not already subscribe to the BELF notifications, leave us
• 1:53:37
  Speaker 2: a comment, let us know you guys think about what
• 1:53:39
  Speaker 2: we talked about on the show today, and please please
• 1:53:41
  Speaker 2: please share this video because sharing is caring. Thank you
• 1:53:44
  Speaker 2: guys so much for coming on today's episode of Maintaining Frame,
• 1:53:47
  Speaker 2: and we'll talk to you guys in the next one.
• 1:53:49
  Speaker 8: Men's right activists are machines, dude. Okay, they are literal machines.
• 1:53:55
  Speaker 8: They are talking point machines. They are impossible to fucking
• 1:53:58
  Speaker 8: deal with, especially if you have, like, especially if you
• 1:54:00
  Speaker 8: have like a couple of dudes who have good memory.
• 1:54:03
  Speaker 8: On top of that, too, holy shit, you're fucked