Latest / Reformed Thinking / The Majestic Sufficiency of the Son: The Transfiguration (Matthew 17:1–8)

Transcript

The Majestic Sufficiency of the Son: The Transfiguration (Matthew 17:1–8) · Reformed Thinking

0:00
Welcome to Reformed thinking. We are thrilled you have chosen
0:03
to sit down with us today. Yes, we are very glad to have
0:05
you here in the room with us for this conversation.
0:07
We have a lot of ground to cover.
0:10
We really do. We are about to start a deep
0:11
dive into a text that, well, it forces all of us to reconcile a
0:16
stark, almost jarring contrast at the very center of the
0:19
Christian faith. On one hand, you have the
0:22
expectation of a conquering, glorious king, you know, Messiah
0:26
radiating majesty and absolute authority.
0:29
On the other hand, you have the shocking reality of a suffering,
0:31
beaten and crucified savior. So the question we want to lay
0:35
before you today is this. How can these two seemingly
0:38
opposite realities exist in one single person?
0:41
How does the crown of Heaven relate to the cross of Calvary?
0:44
That is the central tension we are going to unpack in this deep
0:47
dive. We are looking at Matthew
0:49
chapter 17 verses one through 8, which is the historical account
0:52
of the Transfiguration. We're taking our analysis from a
0:55
stack of classical and modern reformed theological
0:57
commentaries. The goal today is to demonstrate
1:00
how these sources interpret this event.
1:03
They argue that this mountain scene is not some arbitrary
1:06
spectacle or just a random display of light.
1:09
Rather, it is a public historical authentication of
1:11
Christ's unique authority and absolute deity.
1:14
But to grasp what happens on this mountain, we have to
1:16
understand the timeline. Matthew gives us a very strict
1:19
chronological marker, starting the passage with the phrase
1:22
after six days. Let us pause right there,
1:24
because that specific phrase is the hinge for the entire
1:27
narrative. What happens six days prior?
1:30
If we clip back a chapter to Matthew 16, we find Jesus and
1:33
his disciples at Caesarea Philippi.
1:36
Now, for those who might not know the geography, Caesarea
1:38
Philippi was located in the northern part of Angel,
1:40
Palestine, right at the base of Mount Hermon.
1:42
It was a region absolutely saturated in Pagan idol worship.
1:46
There was a massive rock face there with shrines dedicated to
1:49
the Greek God Pan. It was in front of this literal
1:51
wall of false gods that Jesus turned to his disciples and
1:54
asked, Who do you say that I am? Peter speaks up and makes his
1:57
great confession, declaring that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of
2:00
the living God. That is a massive high point for
2:02
the disciples. I mean, they are looking at the
2:03
man they believe is the promised Messiah.
2:07
The Jewish expectation at that time was heavily focused on
2:09
political and military liberation.
2:11
They wanted a descendant of King David who would March into
2:13
Jerusalem, kick out the Roman occupiers, and establish an
2:16
earthly Kingdom. So when Peter makes that
2:19
confession and Jesus affirms it, the disciples are likely
2:22
thinking that the revolution is about to start.
2:25
But almost immediately after Peter gets the answer right,
2:27
Jesus introduces a massive shock to their system.
2:30
He predicts his own death. He tells them he must go to
2:33
Jerusalem, suffer many things at the hands of the elders, be
2:36
killed, and on the third day be raised.
2:38
The psychological whiplash for the disciples must have been
2:40
severe. They expected a triumphal
2:43
Messiah who would hand out government positions in a new
2:45
empire. Instead, they hear about a
2:48
cross, which was the most humiliating, agonizing method of
2:51
execution the Romans had ever invented.
2:54
And Jesus does not stop there. He presses the issue even
2:57
further. He does not just predict his own
2:59
suffering. He calls his followers to take
3:01
up their own cross and deny themselves.
3:03
He tells them that whoever would save his life will lose it.
3:06
You can imagine the tension and the confusion they felt.
3:09
Human nature always desires victory without pain.
3:12
We want a Kingdom that requires zero loss.
3:15
But Christ commands a path of obedience through suffering.
3:18
So a heavy question hangs in the air for those 6 long days.
3:22
Can the man who speaks of a cross truly be the glorious
3:25
King? Did Peter misunderstand the
3:26
confession he just made? God grants a preview of the
3:29
answer to that very question on the mountain.
3:31
That brings us to the first major section of our outline the
3:34
mountain and the eyewitnesses you pointed out the Matthew
3:37
starts with after six days. That phrasing is doing so much
3:41
more than just keeping a diary of Jesus's travel schedule.
3:44
When we read the Bible, we always have to look for the
3:46
echoes of the Old Testament. One of the commentaries we were
3:49
reviewing points us directly to Exodus chapter 24.
3:52
In that passage we see the glory of God.
3:54
Covering Mount Sinai. The text explicitly states that
3:57
after six days, God calls to Moses from the midst of the
3:59
cloud. Matthew is invoking theology
4:02
here, not just chronology. He is priming you, the reader,
4:06
to prepare. For a Sinai like revelation.
4:08
That is a brilliant connection made by our sources.
4:11
Scripture trains the people of God to associate mountains with
4:13
covenantal revelation, clouds with divine presence, and fear
4:17
with the holiness of God. The Transfiguration is a new
4:20
Sinai moment, but with a massive escalation.
4:23
At Sinai, Moses ascended to receive the Word of God for the
4:26
people on this mountain. Moses himself will appear as a
4:30
witness, and God the Father will speak directly to identify Jesus
4:32
as the beloved Son. The pattern of the Old Covenant
4:36
is recapitulated here so that it can be visibly surpassed.
4:39
God's revelatory presence remains consistent, yet His
4:42
climactic self disclosure is now entirely centered on the sun.
4:45
Jesus does not bring the entire crowd up this mountain.
4:49
He selects a very specific inner circle, Peter, James, and John.
4:54
Now sometimes people read this and think Jesus is just picking
4:57
his best friends for a special retreat.
4:58
But the theological commentaries argue that this misses the point
5:02
of how Israel's legal and covenantal life functioned.
5:06
In the Old Testament law, specifically Deuteronomy 19,
5:09
weighty matters had to be established by the testimony of
5:12
two or three credible witnesses. Jesus is establishing legal
5:16
witnesses for the new Covenant. Why is it significant that he
5:19
chose these three specific men? The glory of Christ is not some
5:23
inner feeling, a private imagination, or a subjective
5:26
emotional state. It is a public act of God seen
5:29
by appointed eyewitnesses. The selection of these three
5:31
specific men is highly intentional regarding their
5:34
preparation for future events. These are the same 3 disciples
5:37
who will later witness Christ's authority over death when He
5:39
raises Jairus, daughter from the dead.
5:42
They are also the exact same three who will witness his
5:44
agonizing sorrow in the Garden of Gethsemane right before his
5:47
arrest. So they're receiving a
5:48
theological education. They're being trained by God to
5:51
hold glory and suffering together in their minds.
5:54
They have to see the majesty on the mountain so they can endure
5:57
the horror of the garden in the cross without losing their
6:00
faith. It is about equipping them for
6:03
the brutal trial ahead. Let us talk about the stage for
6:06
this event. Matthew calls it a high
6:08
mountain. Our reformed sources indicate
6:11
this is highly likely Mount Hermon, which towers over
6:14
Caesarea Philippi. What stands out to you about how
6:17
the mountain functions as a theological stage?
6:20
In the modern religious landscape, people often use
6:22
climbing a mountain as a metaphor for human effort.
6:25
You hear people talk about climbing their personal mountain
6:28
to achieve enlightenment or working hard to reach the
6:30
divine, but the biblical picture is the exact opposite.
6:33
Revelation is received from God rather than achieved by human
6:37
climbing. The disciples do not climb Mount
6:39
Hermon to discover God through their own intellect or ascetic
6:42
practices. They were LED there by Christ to
6:44
behold what God sovereignly chooses to unveil.
6:47
That distinction is a hallmark of Reformed theology.
6:51
The ascent signals that revelation is a gift.
6:53
God's timing frames God's revelation.
6:56
Placed right after the harsh call to self denial, this
6:59
mountain scene becomes luminous confirmation that the road to
7:02
Jerusalem is the fulfilment of messianic hope, not the
7:05
abandonment of it. The disciples will soon walk
7:07
back down into a valley of misunderstanding, demonic
7:10
activity and intense opposition, but their minds are now fixed on
7:14
a confirmed reality. That leads us right into the
7:16
event itself described in verse 2, where the intrinsic glory of
7:20
the king is unveiled. The visual reality described by
7:22
Matthew is staggering. He writes that Jesus was
7:25
transfigured before them, that his face shone like the sun and
7:28
his clothes became white as light.
7:30
The Greek word used here for transfigured is metamorphi.
7:33
This is an exceedingly rare word in the New Testament appearing.
7:37
Let us unpack that word because it gives us the English word
7:40
metamorphosis. When we think about amorphosis,
7:43
we usually think of a Caterpillar turning into a
7:45
butterfly. It is an internal change that
7:48
alters the outward appearance according to the linguistic
7:52
analysis in our sources. How does the historical extra
7:55
biblical usage of metamorphosis apply to what happened to Jesus
7:59
on that mountain? In classical Greek usage,
8:01
metamor 50 denotes a core change of essential nature becoming
8:05
visible. It does not mean putting on a
8:07
superficial mask or a costume. It means that the true
8:11
underlying reality of a person is brought to the surface.
8:14
Jesus was not illuminated by a spotlight shining down from
8:17
heaven. The uncreated, intrinsic glory
8:19
of His divine nature burst through the veil of his human
8:22
flesh. What the disciples beheld was
8:24
not a new version of Jesus, but the true glory of the eternal
8:27
Son, which is ordinarily veiled during his earthly state of
8:30
humiliation. I love how one of the
8:32
commentaries contrasts Jesus with Moses to make this point
8:35
clear. In Exodus 34, when Moses came
8:38
down from Mount Sinai after speaking with God, his face
8:41
shone brightly. The Israelites were actually
8:43
afraid to look at him. But Moses's face shone because
8:46
he was reflecting the light of God, much like the moon reflects
8:49
the light of the sun. Moses had no light of his own,
8:52
and we know from the biblical text that Moses's radiant face
8:55
eventually faded away. But Christ's radiance is
8:58
entirely different. His light is his own intrinsic,
9:01
uncreated deity. It is not borrowed.
9:03
It is royal and eternal. This brings us to a cornerstone
9:07
of Orthodox Christology, specifically framed through
9:10
chapter 8 of the Westminster Confession of Faith, which
9:13
addresses the hypostatic union. For those who might not have a
9:16
seminary degree, the term hypostatic union can sound
9:18
intimidating, but it is simply the theological term for how
9:21
Jesus can be both God and man. The confession details how two
9:25
whole, perfect and distinct natures, the Godhead and the
9:28
manhood, are inseparably joined together in one person without
9:31
conversion, composition, or confusion.
9:33
Let us do and explain like I am 5 for that concept because it is
9:37
so vital. The early church councils spent
9:40
decades making sure we got this right.
9:42
Jesus is not 50% God and 50% man like some mythological demigod.
9:48
He is 100% fully God and 100% fully man.
9:51
The two natures do not mix together to create a third new
9:54
kind of nature who remain distinct yet entirely united.
9:57
In the one prison of Jesus Christ on the Mount of
10:00
Transfiguration, the active, essential deity of the sun is
10:03
made manifest through His human nature.
10:05
He is simultaneously the fully human man whose feet aches from
10:08
the climb, and the fully divine Creator who sustains the
10:10
universe. Our reformed sources state
10:13
firmly that this was a literal historical event.
10:16
They describe it as a pre millennial preview of the coming
10:19
Kingdom glory. What they mean by premillennial
10:22
preview is that the disciples were given a sneak peek of the
10:25
glorious resurrected state that Christ will possess when He
10:28
returns to consummate His Kingdom.
10:31
The commentaries spend a considerable amount of ink
10:33
pushing back against modern theological errors regarding
10:36
this passage. First, they absolutely reject
10:39
the liberal theological view of the Transfiguration.
10:42
Right. And we should clarify what the
10:43
sources mean when they critique liberal theology.
10:46
They're not talking about political liberalism.
10:48
They were talking about a theological movement that gained
10:50
traction in the 19th and 20th centuries.
10:53
Theologians in that camp often denied the supernatural elements
10:56
of the Bible. They argue that the
10:58
Transfiguration was just a misplaced resurrection myth or a
11:01
piece of pious fiction invented by the early church to make
11:04
Jesus look more divine. Spot on.
11:07
Our sources argue that treating the text as a fable destroys the
11:10
basis of the Christian faith. If the event did not happen in
11:13
space and time, then the eyewitness testimony of the
11:16
apostles is a lie. The commentaries also aim their
11:19
critique at the other end of the spectrum, the prosperity gospel.
11:23
This is the teaching that believers should expect constant
11:26
earthly triumph, physical health and financial wealth in this
11:29
life. The Prosperity View looks at the
11:31
glory on the mountain and tries to claim a crown without a
11:34
cross. Both of those errors distort the
11:36
text in different ways. The liberal theology movement
11:40
denies the supernatural reality of the King, while the
11:42
prosperity movement denies the suffering mandate of the King.
11:46
The Reformed view, as presented in our sources, corrects both by
11:49
showing us a literal, historical king who possesses ultimate
11:52
authority, yet whose glory is inextricably linked to his
11:55
mission as the suffering mediator.
11:58
The same Christ who shone like the sun is the one who willingly
12:01
walked into the darkness of Calvary to accomplish redemption
12:04
for sinners. But Jesus is not alone up there
12:06
on the mountain. Verse 3 introduces the
12:09
subordination of the Old Covenant.
12:11
Matthew writes. And behold, there appeared to
12:14
them Moses and Elijah talking with him.
12:18
Let us identify what these two monumental figures represent.
12:22
Moses is the physical representation of the law, the
12:24
Lex. He is the one who received the
12:27
commandments at Sinai. Elijah is the great
12:29
representative of the prophets, the prophet I.
12:32
He is the one who called down fire from heaven on Mount
12:35
Carmel. Together, they encompass the
12:37
entire Old Testament witness. Their appearance is a brilliant
12:40
demonstration of the unbroken continuity of God's redemptive
12:43
plan. The commentaries link this
12:46
directly to the final words of the Old Testament in Malachi
12:48
chapter 4, verses four and five. In those verses, God commands
12:51
Israel to remember the Law of Moses and promises to send
12:54
Elijah the prophet before the great and awesome day of the
12:56
Lord. Their physical presence on the
12:58
mountain signals to the disciples that the Promised Day
13:00
has broken into history. But we must be very careful to
13:03
observe the dynamic here. How does Chapter 7 of the
13:05
Westminster Confession help us understand the relationship
13:07
between Moses, Elijah and Jesus? Chapter 7 of the Confession
13:11
outlines how the Old Covenant functioned as a schoolmaster or
13:15
a tutor. A tutor is meant to guide a
13:17
child until the child reaches maturity, at which point the
13:20
tutor's job is done. Moses and Elijah are not showing
13:24
up as peers or equals to Jesus. They are not forming a committee
13:28
of three Co equal religious leaders to discuss strategy.
13:32
They are subordinates. They are handing over their
13:34
mandate to the true King. Everything Moses wrote in the
13:37
law and everything Elijah proclaimed in the prophets was
13:40
pointing directly to the one standing between them.
13:43
They are bearing witness that their preparatory work has
13:46
reached its intended climax. To add even more detail to this
13:49
scene, we can bring in Luke's parallel account of the
13:51
Transfiguration. The Gospel of Luke reveals the
13:53
specific topic of their conversation.
13:56
Luke tells us that Moses and Elijah were talking with Jesus
13:58
about his exodus, which he was about to accomplish at
14:00
Jerusalem. That Greek word exodus literally
14:04
means a departure. It is a specific reference to
14:06
his impending death. The use of the word exodus is
14:09
heavily loaded with meaning. For a Jewish reader, the exodus
14:13
was the defining event of their history.
14:15
It was the moment God rescued them from slavery in Egypt
14:18
through the blood of the Passover lamb and the parting of
14:20
the Red Sea. By calling Jesus's death an
14:23
exodus, the text is telling us that his death on the cross will
14:26
be the ultimate rescue mission, freeing his people from the
14:29
slavery of sin and death. The irony and the beauty of this
14:33
detail are staggering. Right in the middle of blinding,
14:36
uncreated heavenly glory, the focal point of their
14:38
conversation is the substitutionary atonement.
14:41
The cross is not an interruption of Christ's glory.
14:44
It is the ordained path through which his glory saves sinners.
14:48
This highlights the dynamic between the law and the gospel.
14:50
So clearly, the law represented by Moses demands perfect
14:55
obedience. Because we can't achieve perfect
14:58
obedience, the Law condemns us. The prophets, represented by
15:01
Elijah, foretell the coming of the gospel and warn of judgement
15:04
for those who break the law. Yet neither the law nor the
15:07
prophets could actually save a single human soul.
15:10
They could point to the disease and they could promise a cure,
15:13
but only the mediator standing between them provides the actual
15:16
remedy for sin. The law points us to our
15:18
desperate need for a Savior, and the prophets assure us that God
15:21
will provide one. Now, in the presence of the
15:24
transfigured Lord, the old covenant bows out.
15:26
The shadow gives way to the substance.
15:28
Our sources note that this guards US against any
15:31
inclination to read the Old Testament as a collection of
15:33
disconnected moral fables. The stories of David and Goliath
15:36
or Daniel on the lion's den are not just inspiring tales of
15:39
human courage. The entire Old Testament is a
15:42
unified God breathed witness that moves inexorably toward the
15:45
sun and his redemptive work. But of course, human beings
15:48
always find a way to misunderstand divine moments.
15:52
That brings us to verse 4, which exposes the folly of human
15:55
pragmatism. Peter wakes up, sees this
15:58
incredible glory, and reacts with misguided zeal.
16:01
He says, Lord, it is good that we are here.
16:03
If you wish, I will make 3 tents here, one for you and one for
16:06
Moses and 1:00 for Elijah. It's a highly relatable, almost
16:10
comical human moment. Peter is terrified.
16:13
He does not know what to say, so he blurts out a construction
16:15
project proposal. What is the background here?
16:18
Why sensor? The commentary suggests Peter
16:21
likely has the Feast of Tabernacles in mind.
16:24
The Feast of Tabernacles, or Sukkot, was an annual Jewish
16:27
festival where the people built temporary shelters or booths out
16:30
of branches. It commemorated God's provision
16:33
during their wilderness wanderings, but it also had an
16:35
eschatological focus. It looked forward to the day
16:38
when God would definitively dwell with His people in the
16:40
Messianic Kingdom. Peter sees the glory, sees Moses
16:44
and Elijah, and assumes the final Kingdom has arrived.
16:47
He wants to inaugurate it right then and there on his own
16:49
schedule. Peter's reaction is a perfect
16:52
study of human instinct crashing into divine revelation.
16:55
Notice the theological error embedded in his proposal.
16:59
By suggesting 3 identical tents, Peter unconsciously exercises a
17:03
leveling instinct. He is placing Jesus, Moses, and
17:07
Elijah on the exact same tier. He assumes Jesus is simply the
17:11
greatest among the great. Failing entirely to grasp
17:15
Christ's absolute supremacy as the unique Son of God, He
17:18
attempts to manage the glory He is witnessing.
17:20
The Reformed sources apply this directly to contemporary church
17:23
culture. They argue that Peter's instinct
17:25
is alive and well today, specifically pointing to modern
17:28
pragmatism and what is often called the seeker sensitive
17:31
movement. For our listeners who might be
17:33
unfamiliar with that term, the Seeker Sensitive Movement is a
17:35
church growth philosophy that became highly popular in the
17:38
late 20th century. It operates on the idea that
17:40
church services should be designed to be as appealing,
17:43
comfortable and accessible to unchurched people as possible,
17:46
often downplaying difficult doctrines like sin, wrath or
17:49
suffering. The critique from the
17:51
commentaries is that modern believers often act just like
17:53
Peter. We encounter the majesty of God
17:56
and our immediate reaction is to try and do something, to build a
17:59
program, to launch a marketing campaign, to organize and manage
18:03
God's glory. Instead of simply resting in
18:05
Christ's absolute sufficiency, we want to construct a religious
18:08
experience that we can control. We want to institutionalized the
18:12
glory. Peter's desire to build tents
18:14
and stay on the mountain reflects the flesh's desire for
18:17
a theology of glory while actively avoiding a theology of
18:19
the cross. A tent is a structure of
18:22
permanence. Peter wants to freeze the
18:24
narrative at the moment of triumph so they do not have to
18:26
descend into the valley of suffering.
18:28
He wants the crown without the crucifixion.
18:31
But true discipleship requires walking down the mountain,
18:34
facing opposition and bearing the cross.
18:37
The mountaintop is granted to strengthen faith for the valley,
18:40
not to provide an escape from it.
18:42
The surrounding culture constantly tells us if it feels
18:45
good, it must be right. Capture the moment, stay where
18:47
the emotional high is. But God's design is entirely
18:50
different. God refuses to let Peter manage
18:53
this moment. And we see that divine refusal
18:55
in verse 5, which introduces the final authority of the Father's
18:58
voice. While Peter is still babbling
19:00
about building tents, a bright cloud overshadows them.
19:03
This is not a regular weather phenomenon.
19:05
This is the Shekinah Cloud. Let us explain what the Shekinah
19:09
is. The Shekinah is the localized,
19:12
visible manifestation of the presence of God.
19:15
It is the same pillar of cloud that led the Israelites out of
19:18
Egypt. It is the same cloud that filled
19:19
the Tabernacle in the wilderness and later filled Solomon's
19:22
temple with such intense glory that the priest could not stand
19:26
to minister. The sudden arrival of this
19:28
bright cloud on Mount Hermon is a moment of massive theological
19:31
clarity. It also gives us a clear
19:33
Trinitarian manifestation. You have a Father's voice
19:37
speaking from heaven, the sun's physical presence radiating
19:40
glory on the mountain, and the Holy Spirit's manifestation in
19:43
the overshadowing cloud. The Father does not wait for
19:46
Peter to finish his pragmatic speech about building shelters.
19:49
Heaven interrupts earth to correct human folly.
19:53
The Father's endorsement of the Son is the interpretive key for
19:56
the entire event. Let us analyze exactly what the
19:58
Father says from the cloud. He declares, This is my beloved
20:02
son, with whom I am well pleased.
20:03
Listen to him. These words are a brilliant
20:06
combination of Old Testament fulfillment.
20:08
This is my beloved son, echoes Psalm 2.7, which is a royal
20:12
Psalm identifying the conquering Messianic king who will rule the
20:15
nations with a rod of iron, with whom I am well pleased.
20:18
Echoes Isaiah 42.1, which identifies the suffering Servant
20:22
who will quietly bear the. The Father is mashing up two
20:25
distinct Old Testament expectations into one person.
20:29
He is publicly declaring that he takes supreme pleasure in the
20:32
Son's obedience, specifically his obedience to go to the
20:35
cross. He is validating the very
20:37
mission that Peter had rebuked Jesus for six days earlier at
20:40
Caesarea Philippi. The Father takes pleasure in the
20:43
cross because it is the instrument of redemption.
20:46
But the climax of the Father's speech is the command at the
20:48
end. Listen to Him.
20:50
In the original Greek, listen to him is a present act of
20:53
imperative akowit O2 It demands continuous, exclusive obedience.
20:58
This command establishes the Son as the final supreme authority
21:01
over all other voices. Moses is there representing the
21:04
Law. Elijah is there representing the
21:06
prophets. But the Father does not say
21:08
listen to them. He directs their full attention
21:11
and submission exclusively to the Son.
21:13
Our Reformed sources draw a very firm line from this command to
21:17
how we view authority today. Relying on Chapter one of the
21:20
Westminster Confession, the commentaries use this event to
21:24
argue for concepts known as a closed Canon and cessationism.
21:27
Let us break those terms down so everyone can follow the
21:30
argument. What are those terms actually
21:32
mean in this context? Closed Canon refers to the
21:35
belief that the Bible is complete.
21:37
The 66 books of the Old and New Testaments contain everything
21:40
God intended to reveal for our salvation and rule of life, and
21:44
no new books will ever be added. Cessationism is the theological
21:48
position that the miraculous sign gifts like speaking in
21:51
tongues or receiving direct new prophetic revelations from God
21:54
ceased after the era of the original apostles ended.
21:58
The apostles were given those gifts to lay the groundwork for
22:00
the early church, and once the written word was complete, those
22:03
specific revelatory gifts faded away.
22:06
The commentaries we are reading argue heavily against ongoing
22:09
modern revelation, what they sometimes refer to as
22:12
charismatic chaos. Their argument is built directly
22:14
on the Father's command. If the Father has spoken finely
22:18
and supremely in his Son and commanded us to listen to Him as
22:21
the climax of redemptive history, then we do not need to
22:24
look for new visions or voices. The pursuit of ongoing
22:28
revelation actually undermines the sufficiency of Christ.
22:32
According to the Westminster Confession, the Holy Spirit
22:34
speaking in the Scripture is the supreme judge of all theological
22:38
controversies. God has spoken His final word in
22:41
the person of Jesus Christ. Therefore, the Reformed argument
22:44
is that our faith must be governed entirely by the written
22:46
word, not driven by fleeting internal impressions, emotional
22:50
experiences, or individuals claiming to have a new word from
22:52
God. To seek a word outside of
22:55
Scripture is to imply to the Father that His revelation on
22:58
the mountain and subsequently in the closed Canon of Scripture,
23:00
was somehow insufficient for our lives.
23:02
That is a staggering reality to confront.
23:05
It requires us to place our full trust in the objective truth of
23:09
Scripture rather than our subjective feelings.
23:12
And that leads us to the physical reaction of the
23:13
disciples in verses 6 through 8, which reveals the Mediator's
23:17
grace and the reality of Jesus. Only when the disciples hear the
23:21
voice of the Father speaking from the cloud, they do not
23:24
stand around taking notes, Matthew tells us.
23:26
They fall face down and are terrified.
23:28
This is not dramatic exaggeration on their part.
23:30
This is holy terror. Throughout the Bible, whenever
23:33
sinful humans encounter the unfiltered holiness of God, the
23:36
reaction is always absolute tread.
23:39
Think of the prophet Isaiah in chapter 6 crying out, Woe is me
23:42
for I am lost when he sees the Lord sitting upon a throne.
23:45
Or the Apostle John in the Book of Revelation falling down as
23:48
though dead. It is the correct, inevitable
23:50
reaction of sinful flesh encountering absolute,
23:53
unmediated holiness. It is the fear of creatures
23:56
before their Creator, the dread of sinners exposed before the
23:59
Holy One. The sources note that this
24:01
moment vigorously confronts the casual, flippant approaches to
24:04
worship that are so common today.
24:06
We often see approaches that lack any genuine reverence for
24:09
God's majesty, Treating God like a cosmic buddy, you cannot stand
24:14
casually in the presence of unshielded divine glory.
24:17
The disciples posture of falling face down is a silent confession
24:21
that they're entirely unsafe in their own righteousness.
24:24
They have nothing to offer to protect themselves from the
24:26
consuming fire of God's perfection.
24:29
But then comes the turning point of the entire narrative, and it
24:31
is incredibly beautiful, Matthew writes.
24:34
Jesus came and touched them. Think about the pastoral grace
24:37
of the incarnation right there. Jesus does not shout
24:40
instructions from a distance. The one whose face outshines the
24:43
sun, the Lord of glory dries near.
24:45
He uses his physical human hands to provide comfort to terrified
24:49
sinners. He acts as the ultimate bridge,
24:51
the perfect mediator between a holy, consuming God and sinful,
24:55
frail humanity. This demonstrates that the
24:57
holiness of God does not diminish in the New Covenant,
25:00
but access is granted through the appointed mediator.
25:04
Christ commands them rise and have No Fear.
25:08
That is such a fascinating command.
25:10
How can they possibly have No Fear when they were enveloped in
25:13
a cloud of divine glory? Christ can displace the terror
25:16
of judgement because He knows He will soon absorb the Father's
25:19
full wrath on the cross. He's effectively saying you do
25:22
not need to fear the consuming fire of God's holiness because
25:25
I'm standing between you and the fire.
25:27
I will take the heat so you can rise.
25:29
Rise and have No Fear. Those words create the reality
25:33
they command. And then comes the climax of the
25:36
passage. The disciples look up and they
25:38
see no one but Jesus. Moses has vanished.
25:40
Elijah has vanished. The bright cloud is gone.
25:43
The shadows have yielded to the substance, Jesus.
25:45
Only our classical reform sources point out that this
25:49
phrase is the entire theology of the passage contained in 2
25:51
words. The witnesses have completed
25:53
their testimony and now only the King remains.
25:55
The Apostle Peter never forgot that sight.
25:57
It bunned into his memory Years later when he is an old man
26:01
facing imminent execution by the Roman Empire, he writes his
26:04
second epistle in chapter 1, verses 16 through 18.
26:08
Peter uses this exact event to validate his Apostolic ministry
26:12
to a persecuted church. He writes that they did not
26:14
follow cleverly devised myths, but were eyewitnesses of His
26:18
Majesty. He says they actually heard the
26:20
voice born from heaven when they were with him on the majestic
26:23
mountain. The Christian faith is not built
26:25
on creative fables, it is built on the historical eyewitness
26:28
validation of the King's glory. Peter leans on the
26:31
Transfiguration to prove to the Church that the suffering
26:33
Messiah will indeed return an absolute triumph.
26:37
He is telling his readers that they can face persecution and
26:39
death because he saw with his own two eyes that Jesus is the
26:42
true sovereign of the universe. Our sources also bring this
26:44
right down to how we worship today, specifically connecting
26:47
it to Chapter 21 to the Westminster Confession, which
26:50
deals with religious worship and the Sabbath day, but more
26:53
broadly applies to the sacraments.
26:55
The physical body that radiated uncreated light on that mountain
26:59
is the exact same body that was broken for our justification.
27:03
The commentaries use this to discuss the Lord's Supper.
27:07
They advocate for a real spiritual feeding upon Christ by
27:10
faith. Let us do a quick comparison of
27:13
views on the Lord's Supper to understand the Reformed position
27:16
our sources are advocating. The commentaries reject the
27:19
Roman Catholic view known as transubstantiation or the Roman
27:22
Mass, which argues that the bread and wine literally change
27:25
into the physical body and blood of Christ.
27:27
They also reject the opposite end of the spectrum known as
27:30
memorialism, which is the idea that the bread and wine are just
27:33
symbols and communion is just an act of remembering with no
27:36
spiritual reality attached to it.
27:38
The Reformed view, following theologians like John Calvin, is
27:41
that while the bread and wine remain physical bread and wine,
27:44
Christ is genuinely spiritually present in the sacrament.
27:48
When believers take communion by faith, they are spiritually
27:51
nourished by the glorious King who once shone on Mount Hermon
27:55
and later bled on Mount Calvary. We feed by faith on the
27:59
sufficient Savior. The transfiguration proves that
28:02
the suffering Messiah is the undisputed Lord of glory.
28:05
The Law and the prophets willingly yield to Him.
28:07
The Father openly authenticates Him, and the believer's sole
28:10
comprehensive duty is to hear Him.
28:13
The believer does not need a constant stream of miraculous
28:16
spectacles to persevere in the faith.
28:18
When the cloud lifted, the ordinary path of discipleship
28:21
resumed. They still had to walk down the
28:22
mountain, they still had to face unbelief, and they still had to
28:24
go to Jerusalem. But they resumed that path with
28:27
the unshakable certainty that Jesus is sufficient.
28:29
We want to leave. You with a challenging thought
28:31
to consider as. You go about your week when the
28:33
cloud. Lifted on Mount Hermon and the
28:35
disciples were left with Jesus. Only Look at your own life and
28:38
your own spiritual habits. What modern tense are you trying
28:41
to build? What secondary authorities,
28:43
comfortable spiritual routines, or pragmatic programs do you
28:46
need to let vanish from your life so that you are left
28:49
relying on Jesus alone? Thank you so much for joining us
28:53
for this deep dive into Matthew 17.
28:55
Keep your eyes fixed firmly on the sun.
28:57
Listen to His Word and rest in His sufficient grace.