Latest / Early Edition with Ryan Bridge / Matthew Hague: Lawyer on the Government's response to the Covid Inquiry
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: So the government's responded to the COVID inquiry, accepting all
- 0:02Speaker 1: sixty three recommendations in some forum or another, and it's
- 0:06Speaker 1: promising to release the advice behind any major decision affecting
- 0:09Speaker 1: Kiwi's rights, and they've promised to do that within five days.
- 0:14Speaker 1: It's also vowed to make emergency support faster, more targeted,
- 0:20Speaker 1: and also they want to make of course, they want
- 0:23Speaker 1: to rebuild the public trust. Here's some men.
- 0:25Speaker 2: The right response is to review existing laws and make
- 0:28Speaker 2: sure that for purpose whilst balancing our economic needs, our
- 0:31Speaker 2: health response and individual's rights and freedoms.
- 0:34Speaker 1: All right, so we're joined now by Matthew Haig, who
- 0:36Speaker 1: is a COVID lawyer. Good morning to you, Matthew, Good
- 0:39Speaker 1: morning at you. You're happy with this response? Is it's enough?
- 0:42Speaker 2: I'm happy with the words that they are using. And
- 0:44Speaker 2: I'm sorry this is going to sound cynical, but we
- 0:46Speaker 2: had a pandemic response when COVID hit. The problem is
- 0:50Speaker 2: the main problems with the previous government's response is they
- 0:52Speaker 2: deviated from it.
- 0:55Speaker 1: So what is the biggest lesson We've learned from that.
- 0:58Speaker 2: That governments will do what's politically expedient at the time
- 1:01Speaker 2: and Again, I don't want to be cynical. The seven
- 1:04Speaker 2: action points that the government is saying they will change.
- 1:07Speaker 2: This is positive stuff. Strengthening the rule of law, protecting
- 1:11Speaker 2: fundamental rights. These are good things.
- 1:14Speaker 1: Well, will it start future governments deviating from the course?
- 1:19Speaker 1: Is it strong enough to do that?
- 1:22Speaker 2: No, these are the words future governments. We live in
- 1:25Speaker 2: a system with political supremacy. They will do what they
- 1:28Speaker 2: want to do. The only thing I think that will
- 1:30Speaker 2: the biggest handbreak on future governments is the public backlash
- 1:35Speaker 2: when the previous government's resport went too far. I hope
- 1:39Speaker 2: that future governments will see that and realize that that
- 1:42Speaker 2: kind of thing comes at a political cost.
- 1:44Speaker 1: The other big thing is, of course, is the advice
- 1:46Speaker 1: within five days on stuff, particularly when you're in a
- 1:49Speaker 1: national emergency like a pandemic. Would that ease a lot
- 1:51Speaker 1: of concern for people?
- 1:53Speaker 2: I think again it's a positive step. Transparency is a
- 1:56Speaker 2: good thing. What I suspect we will see is if they,
- 2:00Speaker 2: as if advisers, know their advice we've made public very quickly,
- 2:03Speaker 2: it will quite quickly become quite land high level advice,
- 2:08Speaker 2: uncontroversial because they know it's going to be publicly released.
- 2:11Speaker 1: Yeah, Okay, Now, there's no doubt that some New Zealanders
- 2:15Speaker 1: suffered more heavily than other New Zealanders through the pandemic.
- 2:18Speaker 1: And when sim Peter says we need to have more
- 2:20Speaker 1: inquiries to review what happened to them, do you agree
- 2:22Speaker 1: with that?
- 2:24Speaker 2: I do. And what I'd really want to see is
- 2:26Speaker 2: an inquiry focused on the public health response, not just
- 2:29Speaker 2: a political response. We had part of that in the
- 2:32Speaker 2: World Commission. But I think a lot of people have
- 2:35Speaker 2: a sense of frustration and this COVID response. Talk about
- 2:39Speaker 2: rebuilding trust, that's a good thing. We need to rebuild trust,
- 2:42Speaker 2: or what about trust in the scientific community, because I
- 2:46Speaker 2: think that's really lacking at the moment.
- 2:48Speaker 1: And where did the scientific community lose public trust? How
- 2:51Speaker 1: did they do that?
- 2:53Speaker 2: I think that they took a purely scientific response. You know,
- 2:57Speaker 2: everyone should be vaccinated, vaccine mandates for everyone, without considering
- 3:01Speaker 2: all of the non health factors that go with it,
- 3:03Speaker 2: the impact of fundamental rights, people's ability to choose it
- 3:07Speaker 2: was the one source of truth. It was an inability
- 3:11Speaker 2: to recognize that there could be more than one scientific
- 3:14Speaker 2: viewpoint without being a conspiracy theorist or anything like that.
- 3:19Speaker 1: Well, exactly, and there was debate about the vaccines, and
- 3:22Speaker 1: I saw a lot of evidence about that. What I
- 3:24Speaker 1: never saw any evidence about was whether a mandate would
- 3:27Speaker 1: actually work.
- 3:28Speaker 2: Yes, and look, I think it did it. I think
- 3:30Speaker 2: we had an incredibly high vaccination rate. We were always
- 3:32Speaker 2: going to have it. The mandate might have increased that slightly.
- 3:35Speaker 2: But as we know very clearly now, and the evidence
- 3:38Speaker 2: at the time probably indicated this a there was risk
- 3:42Speaker 2: that we weren't being told about. And the vaccine wasn't
- 3:47Speaker 2: a perfect solution. It did have it short forced.
- 3:50Speaker 1: Yes, well, the search for a perfect solution. I spent
- 3:53Speaker 1: my whole life looking for a perfect solution. When I
- 3:54Speaker 1: understand that, Matthew. But the good thing about this thing
- 3:57Speaker 1: is that it's saying, well, we didn't get it right,
- 3:59Speaker 1: but let's try and get it do it better. It's
- 4:01Speaker 1: about learnings. It's about learnings people, because this will happen again.
- 4:05Speaker 1: Thank you for your time, Matthew.
- 4:07Speaker 2: For more from Early Edition with Ryan Bridge, listen live
- 4:10Speaker 2: to News Talk Set B from five am weekdays, or
- 4:13Speaker 2: follow the podcast on iHeartRadio.