Latest / UK Column Radio / UK Column News Podcast 14th March 2025

Transcript

UK Column News Podcast 14th March 2025 · UK Column Radio

0:08
Speaker 1: Good afternoon. It's Friday, the fourteenth of March twenty twenty five,
0:11
Speaker 1: just after one o'clock and welcome to the UK called News.
0:13
Speaker 1: I'm your host Mike Robson. Joining me today in the
0:15
Speaker 1: studio is Patrick Henningson. Welcome to the program. Patrick, great
0:18
Speaker 1: to be with you, Mike, and by video link we
0:20
Speaker 1: have Mark Anderson my letter. In the program, we're going
0:22
Speaker 1: to be covering the NHS England closure, and James Rogowski
0:25
Speaker 1: will be joining us to discuss vaccines and so on.
0:28
Speaker 1: But we're going to begin with the response from Russia
0:32
Speaker 1: to the suggestion of a cease far. So yesterday Putin
0:38
Speaker 1: was meeting with President Alexander Lukashenko, who's of course the
0:43
Speaker 1: president of Belarus, and he was answered Putin rather was
0:47
Speaker 1: answering questions from the media about the seas far plan
0:50
Speaker 1: presented by the US and Ukraine, and he agreed in principle,
0:55
Speaker 1: but perhaps not in the specifics. So here's let's have
0:58
Speaker 1: a look at what he said. Here. We are also
1:00
Speaker 1: in favor of it, but there are nuances. The idea
1:04
Speaker 1: itself is right, so in other words, there should be peace. Well,
1:07
Speaker 1: we think everybody agrees on that. But he went on
1:10
Speaker 1: to say this, he said, I must sorry, I think
1:13
Speaker 1: we must talk them over with our American colleagues and partners,
1:16
Speaker 1: perhaps have a telephone conversation with President Trump and discuss
1:20
Speaker 1: them with him. These are the plans. We agree with
1:23
Speaker 1: the proposals to cease hostility. Hostilities proceed from the assumption
1:27
Speaker 1: that the cecision should lead to long term peace and
1:31
Speaker 1: eliminate the root causes of the crisis. We also want
1:34
Speaker 1: to guarantee that the thirty sorry that during the thirty
1:37
Speaker 1: days is far, Ukraine will not conduct mobilization and not
1:41
Speaker 1: trained soldiers, and will not receive weapons. And he pointed
1:44
Speaker 1: out that Russian troops are currently advancing along the entire
1:48
Speaker 1: two thousand kilometers front line of the war with Ukraine
1:51
Speaker 1: and halting military action would disrupt ongoing operations. And he
1:55
Speaker 1: said that Ukrainian forces could use a cease far period
1:59
Speaker 1: to group, receive more weapons, train fresh recruits, and so
2:03
Speaker 1: he said, so, how would these thirty days be used
2:06
Speaker 1: for forced mobilization to continue in your cred for more
2:09
Speaker 1: weapons to be supplied there, for retraining the mobilized units,
2:12
Speaker 1: or would none of this be done? And this is
2:15
Speaker 1: a good point, Patrick, The West has well, the West
2:18
Speaker 1: has form here because of the Mensk agreements, as you've
2:21
Speaker 1: talked about before, being a stolen tactic four war preparations,
2:26
Speaker 1: and of course we have Adessa on one hundred year.
2:28
Speaker 2: Packed well, quite right, Mike, And that's another sort of
2:32
Speaker 2: thing that people aren't paying attention to. Before Joe Biden
2:35
Speaker 2: left office, before Trump was sworn in, you had this
2:38
Speaker 2: one hundred year deal signed between Britain and Zelenski, and
2:42
Speaker 2: that was Biden and the globalists and NATO giving the
2:45
Speaker 2: nod basically to Starmer saying go ahead and put that
2:49
Speaker 2: one in there as a placeholder. So you have Special
2:53
Speaker 2: Boat Services SBS sending their teams in to occupy eight
2:59
Speaker 2: ports around Odessa. They're clearly digging in for some sort
3:03
Speaker 2: of you know, operation, or to defend that city. Because
3:07
Speaker 2: everybody knows, Mike, once Odessa falls, that's the end of
3:10
Speaker 2: NATO's southern flank. It's all over. You might as well
3:13
Speaker 2: close up the organization at that point, no matter what
3:16
Speaker 2: you put in Romania. We'll get onto Romania in a minute, Mike.
3:19
Speaker 2: But you know what's interesting about this is, and we'll
3:22
Speaker 2: see Kier Starmer's statement on this, this deal was designed
3:27
Speaker 2: to fail. This is like they took they asked the
3:30
Speaker 2: Israelis for advice on how to do negotiations, because this
3:34
Speaker 2: is a typical Israeli job, which is it's a perfectly
3:36
Speaker 2: good deal and we've the balls in your court. They've
3:39
Speaker 2: all tweeted out this slogan, Mike, if you noticed the
3:42
Speaker 2: balls in Russia's court, the balls Ursula, Vanderlind Starmer even
3:45
Speaker 2: released it Rubio. They all said the same thing, all
3:48
Speaker 2: the influencers on Twitter. So it is a total Israeli
3:51
Speaker 2: style negotiations. We've offered Russia a perfectly good deal, so
3:55
Speaker 2: they're treating Russia like Hamas. It's the same thing we've
3:58
Speaker 2: offered Hamas, so perfectly good deal, but they've rejected it.
4:01
Speaker 2: So what more can we do? And so what does
4:03
Speaker 2: this mean? Sanctioned stay in place, Aid to Ukraine stays
4:07
Speaker 2: in place, the money keeps flowing, the intelligence sharing continues. Basically,
4:13
Speaker 2: this is the same as Biden. There's no material change
4:16
Speaker 2: from Joe Biden in Ukraine to Trump in Ukraine. So
4:20
Speaker 2: we are back to default war of attrition status quo,
4:24
Speaker 2: keep the war going.
4:25
Speaker 1: So let's have a look at what Kirs Starmer had
4:28
Speaker 1: to say. Yesterday.
4:32
Speaker 3: And that's why everything that we're doing in relation to
4:36
Speaker 3: Ukraine is so important. And you've seen the developments in
4:40
Speaker 3: the recent weeks, developments this week, going on even today,
4:44
Speaker 3: because I profoundly believe that if we don't secure a
4:50
Speaker 3: just piece and a lasting piece, then that insecurity, which
4:55
Speaker 3: we've already felt, will continue. And that means here, higher prices,
5:01
Speaker 3: higher bills, the cost of living, crisis going on for
5:05
Speaker 3: even longer. If you're like a choke hold on our future,
5:09
Speaker 3: which will be much much harder for us to tackle.
5:13
Speaker 3: And look, we know some basics. Putin's appetite for conflict
5:17
Speaker 3: and for chaos is already there and it will only grow.
5:22
Speaker 3: And Russia is already menacing our skies, our waters, our streets,
5:27
Speaker 3: and our national security. And that's why I believe the
5:31
Speaker 3: fundamental task of politics right now is to take the
5:36
Speaker 3: tough decisions on security. And that's why we raised our
5:41
Speaker 3: defense spending, which we also need to use as an
5:44
Speaker 3: opportunity to renew our communities.
5:49
Speaker 1: So you noticed there and he said our skies, our waters,
5:53
Speaker 1: our street. Well, he's keeping banging on the Scribell drum there.
5:58
Speaker 1: You know, Russia carried out a chemical weapons attack on
6:01
Speaker 1: the streets of the UK. This is the narrative that
6:04
Speaker 1: keeps coming from the British government.
6:06
Speaker 2: When that was that it's a dubious event, to say
6:09
Speaker 2: the least, and we don't want to get into it,
6:10
Speaker 2: although you've published some great articles and reportage on this.
6:14
Speaker 2: But there's something else about that. Very quickly, Mike, there
6:17
Speaker 2: was a drone attack on Moscow just a couple of
6:19
Speaker 2: days ago, massive drone attack hitting civilians in Russia. Who's
6:24
Speaker 2: behind that drone attack? Was it just Zelenski or was
6:27
Speaker 2: it another NATO country that was involved in doing that
6:30
Speaker 2: to sabotage the negotiations. So menacing the streets of Russia,
6:35
Speaker 2: not military targets, civilian targets. What is Russia supposed to do?
6:39
Speaker 2: Oh and by the way, one of those attacks was
6:42
Speaker 2: on a pipeline monitoring station that monitors the pipeline flow
6:47
Speaker 2: into Hungary and Slovakia too. Dissenting European Union and NATO
6:52
Speaker 2: members coincidence is not interesting. I don't suppose any chickannery
6:57
Speaker 2: is going on behind the scenes. It's totally above board, right.
7:00
Speaker 1: And in the meantime, Maria Zakharova was tearing strips off
7:05
Speaker 1: the leaders of EU NATO countries in her press briefing
7:09
Speaker 1: for continuing demand the escalation and bloodshed in Ukraine, we
7:13
Speaker 1: regret to observe. She said that some political forces in
7:17
Speaker 1: Europe continue to hinder the emerging process that could lead
7:20
Speaker 1: to resolution in the future, and so she said the
7:24
Speaker 1: words peace and settlement might seem to upset them because
7:27
Speaker 1: their main goal is evidently to provoke escalation and violence.
7:31
Speaker 1: And I think Patrick, she's absolutely well, she is absolutely right.
7:33
Speaker 1: She finished by reiterating the Russian position on nedle bots
7:36
Speaker 1: in the ground, saying that for them, foreign troops, foreign
7:40
Speaker 1: bases or so called peacekeeping ambissions in Ukraine is unacceptable
7:44
Speaker 1: and that any such thing would end up with them
7:49
Speaker 1: leading a response. And you know, they're very clear about
7:52
Speaker 1: that that is a red line. But you know, we
7:54
Speaker 1: keep pushing up against their red lines constantly and then
7:57
Speaker 1: blaming them for it when we cross them.
8:00
Speaker 2: And there's no definitive statements there about NATO membership or
8:04
Speaker 2: the territory in the Dombas for instance. So it's a
8:07
Speaker 2: non starter from start to finish. The whole thing is
8:10
Speaker 2: a non starter.
8:12
Speaker 1: But you mentioned the ball is in their court thing,
8:16
Speaker 1: which of course is an example of rapid response mechanism
8:19
Speaker 1: in action. But what's been going on in Romania?
8:21
Speaker 2: I wish i'd shown those tweets on screen. Maybe we
8:23
Speaker 2: can do that next week. But the rapid response mechanism
8:27
Speaker 2: that's also familiar. I remember that we'll bring this up
8:30
Speaker 2: on screen right now. So Romania's online content removal policy
8:35
Speaker 2: empowering or overreaching? Obviously a generous rhetorical question. There, let's
8:40
Speaker 2: take a look at this. Romania's National Authority for Administration
8:44
Speaker 2: and Regulation in Communications has basically will bring this back,
8:50
Speaker 2: has basically put a new simulation exercise which is testing
8:54
Speaker 2: a rapid response system of information control aimed at swiftly
9:00
Speaker 2: identifying and removing illegal or quote inauthentic content from social media,
9:07
Speaker 2: particularly in light of the controversy surrounding Romania's recent presidential elections.
9:13
Speaker 2: They canceled the presidential election results and they've basically tried
9:17
Speaker 2: to ban the front running candidate calin Georgie. You here,
9:21
Speaker 2: and they go on, and this is where it gets
9:23
Speaker 2: interesting here. This initiative takes its root from the rapid
9:27
Speaker 2: response mechanism, which ironically was established during the G seven
9:32
Speaker 2: summit in June twenty eighteen. Meant to enhance cooperation among
9:37
Speaker 2: nations in addressing quote crisis moments and perceived threats to
9:43
Speaker 2: Western democracy. And how you brought it in That would
9:46
Speaker 2: have been Prime Minister Teresa May is correct who introduced this.
9:50
Speaker 2: So this is extremely worrying on so many different levels.
9:54
Speaker 2: And we did a bit more digging into this MIC
9:56
Speaker 2: and this here we go. This is the call for
9:58
Speaker 2: proposals from the U Commissioned dated October twenty fourth, twenty
10:03
Speaker 2: twenty four. This is an advance of the Romanian presidential
10:06
Speaker 2: elections here and so this is kind of like a
10:09
Speaker 2: tender for contracts. And we have identified the company who
10:12
Speaker 2: has the contract. We'll talk more about that next week.
10:15
Speaker 2: We'll have more information on this. And this goes incredibly deep.
10:18
Speaker 2: This is real time censorship of social media MIC. So
10:22
Speaker 2: in order to defend our democracy. This is being test
10:26
Speaker 2: run in Romania and this could go throughout the EU.
10:30
Speaker 2: And by the way, they did a beta test on
10:32
Speaker 2: this during the recent elections in Germany to test the concept.
10:38
Speaker 2: So was there real time censorship in the German elections
10:42
Speaker 2: just now? According to this?
10:43
Speaker 1: Yes, So how is that not election interference?
10:47
Speaker 2: Well, we're well, one thing is for sure, we're going
10:51
Speaker 2: to get out in front of the March twenty seventh
10:54
Speaker 2: rollout of this will be giving you plenty of information
10:57
Speaker 2: before they go live. We'll be going live with what
11:00
Speaker 2: it's all about, so that'll be interesting.
11:03
Speaker 1: Now. Of course, one way to deal with messages that
11:05
Speaker 1: you don't like is to censor and censor algorithmically. Another
11:10
Speaker 1: way might be just to kill the journalists. Now, of course,
11:14
Speaker 1: we don't know that what happened to Jimmy White in
11:17
Speaker 1: the United States was a censorship effort, but nonetheless he
11:22
Speaker 1: was a target.
11:24
Speaker 2: He was a target. We'll bring him up on screen.
11:28
Speaker 2: This is Jamie White. He's thirty six years old, a
11:31
Speaker 2: reporter for InfoWars dot com. He was murdered earlier this
11:36
Speaker 2: week and it's according to his family, this was a
11:40
Speaker 2: robbery or some sort in an apartment complex after he came
11:44
Speaker 2: home from work in a parking lot in Austin, Texas.
11:47
Speaker 2: I know the area very well myself, so I'm very
11:50
Speaker 2: familiar with this town and these types of settings is
11:55
Speaker 2: very disturbing. He was only thirty six years old or so,
11:58
Speaker 2: thirty six, thirty seven, very nice young men, very popular,
12:03
Speaker 2: you know, very hard working, so you know, one of
12:06
Speaker 2: US in terms of independent media journalists. So it's really disturbing.
12:12
Speaker 2: So we'll bring that back up on screen for a
12:15
Speaker 2: moment here and we'll go here. And so the coverage
12:18
Speaker 2: basically on this it has been pretty friendly, I would say,
12:23
Speaker 2: the coverage. But the thing is he also appeared on
12:26
Speaker 2: one of these Ukrainian hit lists. And there's a number
12:30
Speaker 2: of these Ukrainian hit lists which have been listing a
12:34
Speaker 2: journalist in America or anybody with a dissenting opinion on Ukraine.
12:38
Speaker 2: Basically there's the Moro Vettes, the Peacemakers, which a lot
12:42
Speaker 2: of people know about, but there's a few others. And
12:44
Speaker 2: it turns out the funding of these is quite interesting,
12:48
Speaker 2: being funded by the National Endowment for Democracy USAID.
12:52
Speaker 1: And so that would be the organization that just had
12:54
Speaker 1: its funding rastate.
12:56
Speaker 2: Yeah, that would be yes, indeed. So this is something
13:00
Speaker 2: Jamie had tweeted out over the summer. I'm on an
13:03
Speaker 2: Ukrainian enemies list due to my work at info Wars
13:07
Speaker 2: with Alex Jones on the Ukraine proxy war. I mean,
13:10
Speaker 2: just saying proxy war will get you on that list.
13:13
Speaker 2: And the group who compiled this list is tied to
13:16
Speaker 2: and funded by the US State Department, USCID, CIA and
13:19
Speaker 2: George Soros Open Society Foundation. So and again we checked
13:24
Speaker 2: the data on that and yes there's Jamie White, he
13:27
Speaker 2: is definitely on this list, but it's not more events.
13:30
Speaker 2: We did a little bit of digging and to my surprise,
13:33
Speaker 2: Mike I found out that this was another list which
13:37
Speaker 2: is called text y Okay, this is USAID funded Elon
13:41
Speaker 2: Musk As you can see jd Vance at the bottom there,
13:44
Speaker 2: he's also on this list. It's got three hundred and
13:46
Speaker 2: ninety one individuals and one hundred and something odd organizations,
13:51
Speaker 2: many of the media organizations, many names that are familiar
13:54
Speaker 2: to you and I. So we went did a little
13:57
Speaker 2: bit of a search on here. Just to Tulsi Gabbard,
14:00
Speaker 2: she's on this list as well. The current Director of
14:03
Speaker 2: National Intelligence texty dot org dot UA that's his funded.
14:07
Speaker 2: And you can see the heat maps like Kate Starbird.
14:11
Speaker 2: Do you remember this sort of stuff when it came
14:13
Speaker 2: out in twenty sixteen with a map individual journalists connect
14:17
Speaker 2: them to political parties. This is basically a very nefarious operation.
14:22
Speaker 2: This is the United States Deep State who are outsourcing
14:26
Speaker 2: this work to Ukraine using US tax funder money. Here
14:31
Speaker 2: and there it is far right website info Wars and
14:34
Speaker 2: its editor Alex Jones and many others. So it lists
14:37
Speaker 2: all of Alex's journalists on here, including Jamie White and others,
14:41
Speaker 2: and calls them enemies of Ukraine. Now they've had to
14:44
Speaker 2: backpedal on this, this organization because they've gotten so much pushback.
14:49
Speaker 2: Okay and Grayzone just did a story on this recently,
14:54
Speaker 2: but we actually had reported on this back in June, Mike,
14:58
Speaker 2: and we basically said they've put Daniel McAdams, Ron Paul
15:02
Speaker 2: and twenty first Century Wire on this same list. And
15:06
Speaker 2: so Daniel wrote a great piece for the Ron Paul
15:08
Speaker 2: Institute on this, which you can find up at twenty
15:11
Speaker 2: first centurywire dot com. And there they are Daniel McAdams,
15:15
Speaker 2: Ron Paul, and of course there's my website, twenty first
15:19
Speaker 2: century Wire. They're listed in there as well as myself,
15:23
Speaker 2: and by the way, in very good company with some
15:25
Speaker 2: very good pundits and journalists here. But look at that
15:28
Speaker 2: this is a doxing operation. And what's interesting about this, Mike,
15:32
Speaker 2: is that there's more than one of these. This one's
15:35
Speaker 2: funded by USAID, Okay, and the National Endowment for Democracy,
15:40
Speaker 2: but it's not the only one. There are more nefarious
15:42
Speaker 2: ones that are connected with this as well. So we'll
15:46
Speaker 2: go and maybe if we have more time. But this
15:49
Speaker 2: one is called Molfar. Okay, this is particularly nasty. This one.
15:54
Speaker 2: It docs as individuals post their personal details on the
15:57
Speaker 2: dark web. We're told I have not had access to
16:01
Speaker 2: the level of dosing on this, but this is one
16:03
Speaker 2: of those. Again you can see the Times, PBS, Reuters.
16:07
Speaker 2: They're affiliated with mainstream media organizations and we've done a
16:11
Speaker 2: little of research on this. Enemies of Ukraine, foreign propagandists
16:16
Speaker 2: aka journalists. This is an open source type thing here,
16:20
Speaker 2: So this is, you know, really kind of dangerous in
16:24
Speaker 2: a certain way, Mike, because of the fact is disclosing
16:30
Speaker 2: people's names, where they live, personal details, and it's funded
16:34
Speaker 2: by the US government, but it's outsourced to Ukraine. And
16:38
Speaker 2: our investigation this has found that these are a lot
16:41
Speaker 2: of these are functioning as money laundering outlets. These are
16:45
Speaker 2: money laundering outlets. They're using US and Western cash and
16:49
Speaker 2: then feeding this information to Western journalists in the mainstream
16:54
Speaker 2: media or activists who want to harass or target people
16:59
Speaker 2: who are on these blacklists. Let's say, so this is
17:02
Speaker 2: just one of those here. I'm on this one, as
17:04
Speaker 2: well as a number of other journalists and people as well.
17:07
Speaker 2: So the Grey Zone did a good expose on this recently,
17:10
Speaker 2: which was done I forgot which journalists did that. You
17:13
Speaker 2: can see usaid they're very proud of that affiliation. Even
17:17
Speaker 2: after the whole scandal, they still haven't removed that from
17:20
Speaker 2: their website. So it's just incredible. So you can just
17:23
Speaker 2: see the funding there. It's unbelievable, Mike. So this is
17:26
Speaker 2: basically where things are at on this. So you know
17:32
Speaker 2: there's too many of these going and they haven't been
17:34
Speaker 2: taken down And what kind of message does this send
17:38
Speaker 2: in terms of the West.
17:40
Speaker 1: Well, it's clearly intended to have a chilling effect on
17:44
Speaker 1: people that are speaking on for sure. But Moll far
17:47
Speaker 1: by the way, runs on as end training program which
17:52
Speaker 1: is available on some of the online platforms sort of
17:56
Speaker 1: training skills platforms. It's a ling but I have to say,
18:01
Speaker 1: but nonetheless, they clearly have people working for them that
18:04
Speaker 1: are able to troll this data and expose it.
18:10
Speaker 2: As you said, I think it reminds me of Belling Cat. Yes, well, yes,
18:14
Speaker 2: similar funding channels, similar kind of attitude, very belligerent and
18:20
Speaker 2: no respect for rights and norms and Western democracies so
18:26
Speaker 2: to speak.
18:26
Speaker 1: Yes, okay, well, look let's move on to health matters
18:30
Speaker 1: and welcome Mark to the program. Mark, let's talk Foxinges
18:35
Speaker 1: and discuss that with Jims Rugski.
18:41
Speaker 4: Thanks, gentlemen, Good day to you, Good day to the viewers. Yes,
18:45
Speaker 4: my guest today is James Ruguski. I'll sort of be
18:48
Speaker 4: the sub host right now. A little less than a
18:51
Speaker 4: year ago, James and I both gave some input to
18:55
Speaker 4: the Health and Human Services as they were gathering public
18:58
Speaker 4: comment out the International Health Regulations and related matters. That
19:02
Speaker 4: was a little less than a year ago. I've known
19:05
Speaker 4: Jim and about his very fine work for at least
19:08
Speaker 4: two years. But welcome Jim. I think you've been working
19:10
Speaker 4: at these matters, the REGs and the treaty for the
19:13
Speaker 4: better part of three years or even longer.
19:15
Speaker 5: Correct, correct, and thanks again for having me.
19:20
Speaker 4: Yeah, I've got the clicker by the way, just a
19:22
Speaker 4: quick comment, but I got four slides today and let's
19:26
Speaker 4: go through those, and this one here, this is just
19:33
Speaker 4: to start. You've got a letter to President Trump dated
19:36
Speaker 4: early March, and a letter to the new Secretary of
19:39
Speaker 4: Health and Human Services rfk JR. I'm just pointing out
19:43
Speaker 4: that through your substack website that people viewers can from
19:47
Speaker 4: any country, anywhere in the world, really can read your
19:50
Speaker 4: letters to them and use it as a model or
19:52
Speaker 4: a guidepost for writing their own correspondence. In a couple
19:56
Speaker 4: of minutes, will show how to contact President Trump on
19:58
Speaker 4: these matters. You can write to your members of Congress
20:01
Speaker 4: and anyone else, anyone else.
20:03
Speaker 1: That you see fit.
20:04
Speaker 4: But Jim, you can outline the website addresses on that.
20:09
Speaker 4: But go ahead and walk us through. I've got a
20:12
Speaker 4: couple of slides coming up. I'll show in just a
20:14
Speaker 4: minute of the actual physical effects of m r m
20:18
Speaker 4: RNA injections. One is a photo of a pfisor effect
20:21
Speaker 4: and the other is a Maderna outcome. Both pretty grizzly,
20:25
Speaker 4: that's for sure, and they weren't the worst ones. But
20:28
Speaker 4: go ahead and walk us through your latest posting and
20:32
Speaker 4: the activism that you're recommending and some of those m
20:35
Speaker 4: RNA you know, tragic physical outcomes that happened.
20:42
Speaker 5: Thank you well. The root of this, you know, all
20:44
Speaker 5: actually goes back well before Thanksgiving of last year, where
20:48
Speaker 5: I realized that when I was doing searches online and
20:52
Speaker 5: not just using Google, but you know alternative you know,
20:56
Speaker 5: search engines and such. It was becoming harder and harder
21:00
Speaker 5: to find the information that I knew existed out there,
21:04
Speaker 5: and so I went looking around to see if anybody
21:07
Speaker 5: had put together a compendium of, you know, all of
21:10
Speaker 5: the many things that I know and you folks have
21:12
Speaker 5: reported on, and you know, many others that these things
21:15
Speaker 5: were just gradually, maybe not disappearing from the Internet, but
21:19
Speaker 5: being pushed so far down on any kind of a
21:22
Speaker 5: search result that they were, for all intents, you know, invisible.
21:26
Speaker 5: And so I started asking people, you know, where do
21:29
Speaker 5: you go to get information about, quite frankly, the history
21:33
Speaker 5: of at this point, COVID, of the jabs and the harms,
21:36
Speaker 5: and you know, so many things had disappeared off the Internet.
21:39
Speaker 5: They've even disappeared off of archive dot org. So I
21:43
Speaker 5: put them all together on one, you know website where
21:47
Speaker 5: I ran a series of twenty seven articles and it's
21:50
Speaker 5: all available for everyone at not Safe and Not Effective
21:55
Speaker 5: dot com. I had just gotten tired. I'd heard one
21:58
Speaker 5: too many times, oh as are safe and effective?
22:01
Speaker 2: Safe and effective?
22:02
Speaker 1: No they're not.
22:03
Speaker 5: But if you bury the information and one of the
22:07
Speaker 5: key pieces of the information is that with the WHO,
22:11
Speaker 5: they have a coding system, you know, the ICD ten codes,
22:18
Speaker 5: where one of the codes that probably nobody on the
22:21
Speaker 5: planet is aware of is you twelve point nine, which
22:25
Speaker 5: is the code that doctors are supposed to use when
22:28
Speaker 5: someone shows up at their office with a vaccine injury
22:32
Speaker 5: or unfortunately, you know, if they're filling out a death certificate,
22:34
Speaker 5: you know, a death due to a vaccine. And so
22:38
Speaker 5: what I realized was with all of this information, when
22:42
Speaker 5: I dug into some of the gory and gruesome photos
22:46
Speaker 5: that are in the letter to Donald Trump, I realized that,
22:51
Speaker 5: you know, yes, I've seen these things, but these things
22:54
Speaker 5: don't make it to mainstream media. They don't make it
22:56
Speaker 5: to alternative media. They're gruesome and gory, and these images
23:01
Speaker 5: are not some TikTok video. They're not you know, somebody's claim.
23:06
Speaker 5: These are case studies that are published in well respected journals.
23:12
Speaker 5: They can all be found on pub med. It's part
23:16
Speaker 5: of the United States Database of Information, and nobody freaking
23:21
Speaker 5: seems to care. Now I'm not saying that people don't care,
23:24
Speaker 5: but because most people don't even know these things exist,
23:28
Speaker 5: so I figured that for President Trump, I put together
23:32
Speaker 5: some pictures I think he could understand forty photographs of
23:38
Speaker 5: the harm that has been caused by the result of
23:41
Speaker 5: Operation Warp Speed. This is due to his initial action
23:47
Speaker 5: with Operation Warp Speed to ram through essentially a biological
23:53
Speaker 5: weapon to be inflicted upon Americans. Now for the Kennedy letter,
23:57
Speaker 5: it's a bit longer, it's got a lot more detail,
24:00
Speaker 5: and it's all information that again is available from Pfizer,
24:06
Speaker 5: from Maderna, from the FDA, from the CDC, from you know,
24:10
Speaker 5: all of the various you know, national Institutes of Health
24:13
Speaker 5: and all of the databases that we have, the var's reports,
24:17
Speaker 5: and when you see that very specifically, what I put
24:21
Speaker 5: together for Kennedy was in relationship to children, because number one,
24:27
Speaker 5: they're never ever was a risk for children, you know,
24:34
Speaker 5: certainly under twelve or or any teenagers. The risk was inconsequential.
24:39
Speaker 5: So all of the risk benefit ratio from these injections
24:45
Speaker 5: is one hundred percent risk. Well, when you have thirty
24:48
Speaker 5: or forty reports of death of children where none of
24:53
Speaker 5: them were ever going to die from COVID, they are
24:56
Speaker 5: clearly been murdered by the jabs that were rammed through
25:01
Speaker 5: and here's the real kicker. Okay, the real kicker is
25:05
Speaker 5: these are not safe and effective. No one can say
25:09
Speaker 5: that these products are safe and effective because they are
25:12
Speaker 5: not FDA approved. They went through the PREP Act and
25:17
Speaker 5: the Emergency Use Authorization pathway. They're only legally allowed to
25:22
Speaker 5: say that they may be effective well. With the PREP
25:27
Speaker 5: Act and the way the governance structure is in the
25:30
Speaker 5: United States, it doesn't matter if people in the United
25:34
Speaker 5: States and around the world are wondering why everything occurred
25:40
Speaker 5: the way it did. It's because the PREP Act, by
25:43
Speaker 5: a declaration made by the Secretary of Health and Human Services,
25:48
Speaker 5: gives everyone immunity from prosecution. It doesn't matter if you
25:54
Speaker 5: accidentally injected the wrong person with the wrong job. It
25:58
Speaker 5: doesn't matter if you you know injected child even though
26:02
Speaker 5: they don't have their mother's or father's consent. It doesn't
26:06
Speaker 5: matter if you inject you know someone in arrest home
26:10
Speaker 5: who's unaware of their circumstances. It doesn't matter that all
26:14
Speaker 5: of these harmful you know, results occur. Everyone has immunity
26:20
Speaker 5: from prosecution. And that is the biological warfare under which
26:25
Speaker 5: we've been operating for the last five years.
26:29
Speaker 1: Thank you for that.
26:30
Speaker 4: James a very thorough explanation. And let's go on and
26:34
Speaker 4: show a couple of these results. And this is siriasis
26:40
Speaker 4: flare up associated with a second dose of pfizor biointech
26:44
Speaker 4: through popmad and nih is in that web address there,
26:49
Speaker 4: And of course these links will be posted in the
26:51
Speaker 4: show notes most likely. But go ahead and comment on
26:54
Speaker 4: that one very briefly, Jim, and I'll show another.
26:56
Speaker 2: One in just a moment.
26:59
Speaker 5: I believe I include forty images, and you know, some
27:02
Speaker 5: of them are unbelievably gruesome, but there are thousands more,
27:08
Speaker 5: and so I took a smattering of them. You know,
27:12
Speaker 5: essentially thousands upon thousands of people you know have suffered
27:17
Speaker 5: similar impact. But ask yourself, how often do you go
27:21
Speaker 5: to your doctor and your doctor says, oh my goodness,
27:25
Speaker 5: I'm going to write this up in a journal. You know,
27:27
Speaker 5: this is this is worthy of a case study. So
27:30
Speaker 5: obviously you know these are the worst of the worst.
27:33
Speaker 5: But you know they're right there in the letter to
27:38
Speaker 5: President Trump, because you know, pictures speak a thousand words.
27:43
Speaker 5: Whether you know it's all body inflammation. Many of the
27:47
Speaker 5: people ended up with necrotic tissue, dead, dying, you know, black,
27:51
Speaker 5: you know gangrenous tissue. You know, these are not for
27:55
Speaker 5: the squeamish, but it also is needed. You know, these
27:59
Speaker 5: are just swelling on a man's torso you know, these
28:03
Speaker 5: are not for the squeamish, but you also need to
28:06
Speaker 5: shock people into an awareness, because why in the world
28:10
Speaker 5: would anyone walking around town, you know, unaware, not reading
28:14
Speaker 5: medical journals, not digging, not searching for this stuff ever
28:18
Speaker 5: have any idea. People say, oh, it's safe and effective.
28:21
Speaker 5: It's safe and effective. The millions, if not billions of
28:25
Speaker 5: people around the world who have been harmed by not
28:29
Speaker 5: just Pfizer and Maderna, but astro Zenica and Jane Jay
28:32
Speaker 5: and all the other jabs and not to mention rendes
28:34
Speaker 5: severe and everything else, these people cannot be forgotten. You know, Yes,
28:40
Speaker 5: we're five years on, and we're four years on into
28:42
Speaker 5: the job, and you know, now they're talking about hundreds
28:46
Speaker 5: of other jobs, you know, for everything else under the sun,
28:50
Speaker 5: as if the you know, jobs for COVID were safe
28:53
Speaker 5: and effective, which they most certainly were not.
28:57
Speaker 2: And here's one other image.
28:59
Speaker 4: Let's get that other image up there, and this is
29:05
Speaker 4: a Bullus drug eruption. That one there from this one
29:10
Speaker 4: from Maderna. I picked out one Pfizer and one Baderna.
29:13
Speaker 4: That's the side of somebody's hip, just above the buttocks
29:17
Speaker 4: and the upper leg there and just to give one
29:21
Speaker 4: more example there quite shocking and as you say, these
29:24
Speaker 4: are not doctor these are official, no hanky panky with
29:29
Speaker 4: the photos, but you had to dig for them to
29:32
Speaker 4: show people the reality. And so it's obviously not just
29:35
Speaker 4: death from injection, as bad as that is, but also
29:39
Speaker 4: these tremendous side effects and outbreaks.
29:43
Speaker 1: But anyway, there's one other.
29:47
Speaker 4: Slide there with a contact info for Donald Trump, and
29:51
Speaker 4: this will also be available through the show notes. But
29:54
Speaker 4: there's truth social and other links to get a hold
29:58
Speaker 4: of Donald Trump.
29:59
Speaker 1: One more time.
30:00
Speaker 4: I'm James on that website, that one stop shop that
30:03
Speaker 4: people can go to to read more about this and
30:06
Speaker 4: get involved.
30:06
Speaker 5: What was that again, It's very simple, it's not safe
30:11
Speaker 5: and not effective dot com.
30:15
Speaker 4: Okay, thank you James for most enlightening and in depth
30:18
Speaker 4: explanation of what's going on.
30:21
Speaker 2: Thanks for having me.
30:27
Speaker 1: Sorry, Thank you, James, Thank you Mark. Okay, let's move
30:29
Speaker 1: on then to NHS England and well here he is
30:33
Speaker 1: Keir Starmer. He was giving this speech yesterday he's a
30:38
Speaker 1: nice d end of NHS England, So let's have a
30:41
Speaker 1: look at high end England fits into the NHS bureaucracy.
30:46
Speaker 1: So basically what we have is the Department of Health
30:49
Speaker 1: and Social Care at the top funneling money into NHS England,
30:54
Speaker 1: who funnels money into local Integrated Health Boards and then
30:57
Speaker 1: into the various service providers. But basically those service providers
31:02
Speaker 1: might be dentists, GPS and pharmacies, hospitals, district nurses and
31:07
Speaker 1: district nurses and so on. On the other side of
31:10
Speaker 1: the coin, money flows from DHSC into local authorities and
31:14
Speaker 1: then also into slightly different service providers in this case
31:17
Speaker 1: you know social care as well as healthy lifestyle programs
31:21
Speaker 1: and so on. Now, NHS England is a quango, a
31:26
Speaker 1: quango for those who don't know, as a quizi autonomous
31:28
Speaker 1: non governmental agency. There are more than three hundred of
31:32
Speaker 1: these across the United Kingdom, and anyway we'll come on
31:37
Speaker 1: to why that's significant. And second, but west streeting then
31:40
Speaker 1: yesterday in the House of Commons said this we inherited
31:45
Speaker 1: and NHS going through the worst crisis in history, so
31:49
Speaker 1: there's no time to waste. We inherited public finances with
31:53
Speaker 1: a twenty two billion pound black hole, so there's no
31:55
Speaker 1: money to waste. Well maybe if they stop wasting it
31:57
Speaker 1: on Ukraine, that wouldn't be such a problem anyway. He
32:00
Speaker 1: went on to say, today the NHS delivers worse care
32:03
Speaker 1: for patients, but more expensive than ever before. The budget
32:07
Speaker 1: for NHS England staff and addmin alone has sorted two
32:09
Speaker 1: billion pounds. Taxpayers are paying more but getting less work.
32:14
Speaker 1: Has already begun to strip out the duplication between the
32:17
Speaker 1: two organizations and bring many of NHS England's functions into
32:21
Speaker 1: the department as a Department of Health.
32:23
Speaker 2: No.
32:25
Speaker 1: In the meantime, that was in the morning, then Kirs
32:27
Speaker 1: Starmer was on his travels. We've seen a little bit
32:29
Speaker 1: of what he had to say already, but let's see
32:31
Speaker 1: what he said on this particular topic.
32:36
Speaker 3: Politicians almost not trusting themselves, outsourcing everything to different bodies
32:40
Speaker 3: because things have happened along the way to a point
32:44
Speaker 3: where you can't get things done. And I accept that
32:47
Speaker 3: all parties have done a bit of this, including the
32:50
Speaker 3: Labor Party, and therefore today has got to be a
32:53
Speaker 3: line in the sand for all of us. But I
32:57
Speaker 3: also think that in government there was a clear moment
33:01
Speaker 3: when the Tories crossed the rubicon. It was early, and
33:05
Speaker 3: it was decisive, and it sent a signal across Whitehall
33:10
Speaker 3: that was never undone. So today I'm going to reverse
33:15
Speaker 3: it because I don't see why decisions about two hundred
33:21
Speaker 3: billion pounds of taxpayer money on something as fundamental to
33:26
Speaker 3: our security as the NHS should be taken by an
33:32
Speaker 3: arm's length body NHS England. And I can't, in all
33:37
Speaker 3: honesty explain to the British people why they should spend
33:41
Speaker 3: their money on two layers of bureaucracy. That money could
33:46
Speaker 3: and should be spent on nurses, doctors, operations, GP appointments.
33:52
Speaker 3: So today I can announce We're going to cut bureaucracy
33:55
Speaker 3: across the state, focus government on the priorities of working people,
34:00
Speaker 3: shift money to the front line. So I'm bringing management
34:04
Speaker 3: of the NHS back into democratic control by abolishing the
34:10
Speaker 3: arm's length body NHS England. That will put the NHS
34:15
Speaker 3: back at the heart of government where it belongs, freeing
34:19
Speaker 3: it to focus on patients, less bureaucracy, with more money
34:24
Speaker 3: for nurses, NHS refocused on cutting waiting times at your hospital.
34:32
Speaker 1: So if you're listening carefully to that you'll understand what
34:36
Speaker 1: the point of about to make. But so you know,
34:38
Speaker 1: because the question is what is this all about. Is
34:40
Speaker 1: it about the eighth thousand unfilled doctors posts and twenty
34:43
Speaker 1: seven thousand nursing vacancies or is it about NHS waiting
34:47
Speaker 1: less or any wedding less or ambulance response times. Probably not,
34:52
Speaker 1: because he says he's got to talk. He's got to
34:54
Speaker 1: cut bureaucracy right across the state. Those were his words.
34:57
Speaker 1: And I'm going to cut bureaucracy right across the state
35:00
Speaker 1: where we heard this before. It's fascinating to watch as
35:05
Speaker 1: some kinds of policies are ruled out on both sides
35:07
Speaker 1: of the Atlantic at exactly the same time. First Starmer
35:10
Speaker 1: announces the building of data centers to run massive AI
35:13
Speaker 1: systems and why in order he said, to provide personalized
35:17
Speaker 1: cancer care. And then a week later, Larry Ellison announces
35:20
Speaker 1: that new TRUP regime will launch operations stargeted to build
35:24
Speaker 1: data centers to run massive AI systems in order to
35:27
Speaker 1: provide personalized cancer care. And then here we have and
35:30
Speaker 1: then we have Elon Musk in the United States running
35:33
Speaker 1: is DOGE operation to cut bureaucracy right across the federal government,
35:37
Speaker 1: and just a few weeks later, Starmer's announcing exactly the
35:40
Speaker 1: same policy with NHS England as the first to fall.
35:43
Speaker 1: And I've got to ask, is this a coincidence, you know,
35:47
Speaker 1: if it could it be that Starmer has looked at
35:51
Speaker 1: Doge and said, well, that looks popular, let's do that,
35:54
Speaker 1: or is it that actually there's something else going on,
35:57
Speaker 1: something else which is happening at a war, at a
36:00
Speaker 1: deeper level of the state, which is deciding that certain
36:03
Speaker 1: policies need to be implemented on both sides of the altic.
36:06
Speaker 1: And my main question is is this actually about reorienting
36:10
Speaker 1: things more onto a war footing.
36:12
Speaker 2: I think he wants to give the look of Doge, Mike,
36:14
Speaker 2: he wants to give the Doge vibe, but no real
36:17
Speaker 2: doging going on. What I think you've nailed at, Mike.
36:20
Speaker 2: This is also about creating that militarization of healthcare or
36:25
Speaker 2: vaccine rollouts mRNA, you know, boutique customized vaccines like they
36:30
Speaker 2: did with Operation and warpsbeat in here in England and
36:33
Speaker 2: Europe as well. That was a military operation during that period.
36:37
Speaker 2: So that's that looks like what it is and behind
36:40
Speaker 2: that big corporations. So what softening up the public for
36:44
Speaker 2: the next part of the conversation later, which is, well,
36:46
Speaker 2: we think that privatization might be more efficient in some
36:50
Speaker 2: of these areas. So this is a constant bait and
36:52
Speaker 2: switch exercise with the NHS. Let's face it, this is
36:56
Speaker 2: the most emotional central issue in the country for every
37:00
Speaker 2: because everybody is involved or dependent on it or connected
37:04
Speaker 2: with it in some way shape perform. So it becomes
37:06
Speaker 2: a political tool in a way, in a political football
37:10
Speaker 2: from administration or government to government. But the long range
37:14
Speaker 2: my trend is privatization. That's what we've seen over the years.
37:19
Speaker 2: So is that reversing has cure. Starr made a pledge
37:23
Speaker 2: that the NHS will not be or never be privatized.
37:28
Speaker 2: I'm not hearing that part of the conversation.
37:30
Speaker 1: If you're intending to privatize something, the first thing you
37:32
Speaker 1: do is to strip out all the fat because that
37:34
Speaker 1: makes it more attractive. But anyway, we'll keep you posted
37:38
Speaker 1: on this. If you like what the UK Column does,
37:40
Speaker 1: you'd like to support us. Support dot UK column dot
37:43
Speaker 1: org as the place to go. There are various options.
37:46
Speaker 1: You can make a donation, join as a member of
37:49
Speaker 1: the community, and that of course gives you access to
37:51
Speaker 1: UK column News extra that will follow this program. Other
37:55
Speaker 1: ways to support us would be pick something up at
37:57
Speaker 1: the UK column Shelp or from clivetcar dot com. But
38:01
Speaker 1: if you can't do any of that, then please share
38:03
Speaker 1: the material that you find on the various platforms, but
38:06
Speaker 1: particularly from UK column dot org. There's lots of content
38:10
Speaker 1: going up on that website on a regular business. Share
38:12
Speaker 1: links are in the content. Now, of course we have
38:16
Speaker 1: an event coming up. Let's watch a quick advertisement for.
38:20
Speaker 6: That Dictator UK column. This is an advert morals are
38:26
Speaker 6: the Vegans, I'm a steak man. Okay doomas newsplash On
38:31
Speaker 6: fifth of April, UK column that debauched spand Reprobates hosting
38:34
Speaker 6: a conference for fellow truthers and shakers in Cheltenham called
38:37
Speaker 6: on Location. Speakers will be a rogues gallery of experts
38:40
Speaker 6: that the government still hasn't killed yet on topics ranging
38:43
Speaker 6: from the wf ate my homework to How's Loser Guy
38:46
Speaker 6: in ten Stages of Paranoia. There will also be an
38:49
Speaker 6: exclusive evening event where pleeps can't come in, where you
38:52
Speaker 6: can hobnob eating a column a cop gobbing off and
38:54
Speaker 6: how to hobble the un using a doorknob shaped keyfob
38:57
Speaker 6: to break into the Secondary General's office to drop the
38:59
Speaker 6: COVID files, dub them all in, leaving them sobbing and mopped.
39:02
Speaker 6: Amusingly enough, given the theme is deep state from Bosis.
39:05
Speaker 6: The conference will take place next to GCHQ and we're
39:08
Speaker 6: in the midst of a battle of counter surveillance in
39:09
Speaker 6: escalating measures. Of course, there is a gulf in budget
39:12
Speaker 6: between us and them, so the methods have varied. They
39:14
Speaker 6: sent an agent provocateur in ourjeent provocateur to seduce our
39:18
Speaker 6: top guy get the deepest, darkest secrets of the biz,
39:20
Speaker 6: whilst we send someone in a pantomime coalcostion right into
39:23
Speaker 6: the lobby to see how far they could get. They
39:25
Speaker 6: bugged our entire venue with the most cutting edge equipment
39:27
Speaker 6: and have all the details down to the width of
39:29
Speaker 6: the seat screws, whilst we send one elderly pigeon flying
39:32
Speaker 6: over their ruth and managed to find out the gym
39:34
Speaker 6: the security guard likes tea. That was a coupe, so
39:38
Speaker 6: in the end we thought to help with it. Let
39:40
Speaker 6: them know, Let them know, and we're going ahead with it,
39:43
Speaker 6: and we'd like you to join us.
39:45
Speaker 2: Be there or be scared.
39:47
Speaker 6: I'm dictator and you're all idiots.
39:51
Speaker 1: Thank you, Dick, Thank you very much for that. Everybody
39:54
Speaker 1: needs to be there. Patrick will be speaking of course,
39:56
Speaker 1: Catherine gunn Rajamir and Alex Thompson, Brian Gerret speaking. We
40:01
Speaker 1: will all be there to have offline discussions as well,
40:06
Speaker 1: So please get there if you possibly can. Now I
40:08
Speaker 1: quickly mentioned of the interview that went out yesterday Unmasking
40:12
Speaker 1: Autism with shaneier Murphy is on the website at the moment.
40:15
Speaker 1: If you didn't see it yesterday, please have a look
40:17
Speaker 1: at it. And a reminder that Sunday, March the sixteenth,
40:24
Speaker 1: we have supporting Farmers for Food Security symposium in Cheltenham
40:29
Speaker 1: and Charles Mallett Sandy Adams will be taking part in that.
40:33
Speaker 1: So if you can get along to that one, please do. Okay,
40:37
Speaker 1: let's move on then, and where do we go now,
40:40
Speaker 1: Trump and Rutter, because Mark Ruder, the Secret General of NATO,
40:44
Speaker 1: was visiting Washington.
40:46
Speaker 2: Yeah, he is. This is the successor of the heir
40:49
Speaker 2: apparent to John Stoltenberg here and so the question is, Mike,
40:54
Speaker 2: of course, what is this is this anything but NATO appeasement.
40:58
Speaker 2: They like to use that word meant a lot these
41:01
Speaker 2: days about Putin's aggression taking territory in Europe and the
41:05
Speaker 2: sovereign or rulespace international order. And so here's router with
41:10
Speaker 2: Trump and no protesting against anything that Trump is saying,
41:16
Speaker 2: which is absolutely umbastic. Watch this discussion. So when it
41:24
Speaker 2: comes to Greenland or not joining the US, I believe
41:26
Speaker 2: that's outside for me this discussion because I don't bump
41:30
Speaker 2: to Drake nature in that box.
41:31
Speaker 7: We're going to have to make a deal on that,
41:33
Speaker 7: and Denmark is not able to do that. You know,
41:36
Speaker 7: Denmark's very far away and really has nothing to do
41:40
Speaker 7: what happens a boat landed there two hundred years ago
41:43
Speaker 7: or something and they say they have rights to it.
41:45
Speaker 7: I don't know if that's true. I don't think it
41:47
Speaker 7: is actually. You know, we have a couple of bases
41:50
Speaker 7: on Greenland already, and we have quite a few soldiers,
41:53
Speaker 7: and maybe you'll see more and more soldiers go there.
41:57
Speaker 7: I don't know what do you think about that beat,
41:59
Speaker 7: So don't answer.
42:00
Speaker 2: To that piece.
42:02
Speaker 1: Don't answer that.
42:04
Speaker 7: But we have bases that we have quite a few
42:06
Speaker 7: soldiers in Greenland as a state, it would be one
42:10
Speaker 7: of the great states. Anyway, This would be the most
42:13
Speaker 7: incredible country visually. If you look at a map, they
42:16
Speaker 7: drew an artificial line right through it between Canada and
42:20
Speaker 7: the US, just a straight artificial line. Somebody did it
42:23
Speaker 7: a long time ago, many many decades ago, and makes
42:29
Speaker 7: no sense. It's so perfect as a great and cherished state.
42:36
Speaker 7: Keeping Oh Canada the national anthem.
42:39
Speaker 2: I love it.
42:39
Speaker 7: I think it's great. Keep it. But it'll be for
42:42
Speaker 7: the state, one of our greatest states, maybe our greatest state.
42:46
Speaker 7: But there'll be a little disruption, but it won't be
42:49
Speaker 7: very long. But they need us, we really don't need them,
42:54
Speaker 7: and we have to do this. I'm sorry, we have
42:55
Speaker 7: to do this.
42:56
Speaker 2: Yes, he says, we don't need Canada, they need us.
43:01
Speaker 2: Then why are you annexing it if you don't need it? So,
43:05
Speaker 2: I mean, it's just totally insane, like and Mark Rute
43:09
Speaker 2: just stood there in his suit and just basically said nothing, nothing, nothing,
43:14
Speaker 2: really substantial. So I mean, it's just kind of ridiculous.
43:18
Speaker 1: Is that because it was basically impossible to respond to.
43:22
Speaker 2: You can't, Yeah, obviously you can't. You can't object to
43:25
Speaker 2: the King while you're sitting in his court, right. I
43:27
Speaker 2: think King Abdullah from Jordan learned that lesson the hard
43:30
Speaker 2: way Zelenski tried. He tried. So it really makes a
43:36
Speaker 2: mockery of NATO. It makes a mockery of international law,
43:41
Speaker 2: Canadian sovereignty. Canada is a NATO member and so is Denmark.
43:46
Speaker 2: So nothing to say from the NATO Secretary General. So
43:50
Speaker 2: he's doing his job.
43:51
Speaker 1: Okay, Well we're going to have a NATO related aspect
43:55
Speaker 1: to the next item, which is all about Builderberg. Mark
43:58
Speaker 1: bring us up to date.
44:02
Speaker 2: Well, good day, gentlemen.
44:03
Speaker 4: Once again, thanks again to James Muguski. Basically moving along here,
44:10
Speaker 4: I'm doing some clicking on my end. I wrote a
44:13
Speaker 4: news brief and the main part is in yellow. The
44:16
Speaker 4: chief negotiator for Sweden's a session to NATO Oscar Strenstrom,
44:20
Speaker 4: who officially took part in the twenty twenty three Builderberg
44:23
Speaker 4: conference in Lisbon and at last year's conference in Madrid,
44:26
Speaker 4: reportedly is helping to organize the twenty twenty five summit
44:30
Speaker 4: in Stockholm on behalf of billionaire Marcus Wallenberg. Wallenberg, of
44:33
Speaker 4: course owns the Majestic Grand Hotel in Stockholm, where the meeting,
44:38
Speaker 4: by all indications, will be held. It's not ultra official,
44:42
Speaker 4: of course, until the obscure Builderberg Meetings media department announces it,
44:46
Speaker 4: but that's very late in the game. The Guardian did
44:49
Speaker 4: run an article on Christmas Day just this past December,
44:53
Speaker 4: which probably didn't get much play, all but confirming that
44:57
Speaker 4: it'll take place in Stockholm. So that's the going knowledge
45:00
Speaker 4: right now. We'll move forward from there, and we're going
45:03
Speaker 4: to cover a little more than just a meeting. The
45:05
Speaker 4: meeting will come, of course soon enough. And moving on here.
45:10
Speaker 4: The parton red is another little news brief that I
45:13
Speaker 4: wrote here. The Trump administration has previously claimed it wants
45:16
Speaker 4: to reduce America's military presence on the European continent, and
45:20
Speaker 4: exercises in Sweden are also reportedly expected to be affected
45:24
Speaker 4: by the decision. This matter is all but certain to
45:28
Speaker 4: be a hot official or unofficial Builderberg topic this year
45:31
Speaker 4: in Stockholm, although NATO is always a general topic and
45:35
Speaker 4: has been for a long time. Simply NATO just that
45:38
Speaker 4: one word on the official Builderberg topics list, and from
45:43
Speaker 4: there we've got we're branching out a little bit. This
45:50
Speaker 4: is a picture of Oscar Strensom for the Stenstrom Excuse me,
45:54
Speaker 4: Oscar Stenstrom, get that right. This is a picture of
45:57
Speaker 4: him with Magdalena Anderson, the of Sweden at the time
46:01
Speaker 4: in Lisbon in twenty twenty three. This Swedish NATO negotiator
46:05
Speaker 4: is left off the Buildeberg list, but he gets in
46:08
Speaker 4: any the way. He's a non official person who's been
46:10
Speaker 4: there the last two years. That's fairly commonly known now
46:14
Speaker 4: that the Builderberg attendees list is by no means complete,
46:17
Speaker 4: something always to keep in mind. And now again we'll
46:20
Speaker 4: branch out some more. And this is the Nordic Times,
46:25
Speaker 4: which is doing some pretty good work lately. Concerns over
46:28
Speaker 4: Bilderberg executive's influence on Trump, and that's of course Peter
46:32
Speaker 4: Teal and the Trump administration has quite a few Teal
46:36
Speaker 4: associates people that have been involved in Palenteer and other companies.
46:40
Speaker 4: Of course, Teal helped found Palenteer, and Palenteer is run
46:44
Speaker 4: by Alex Karp, who is a Builderberg regular now a
46:48
Speaker 4: perennial there and he's on the steering committee. And moving
46:52
Speaker 4: on from there, I noted here that tech mogul and
46:56
Speaker 4: multi billionaire Peter Teowheel's significant influence over present and a
47:00
Speaker 4: Trump's administration, and.
47:01
Speaker 2: Bloomberg brought out a brand new review.
47:04
Speaker 4: On this, saying that at least fifteen I counted sixteen
47:08
Speaker 4: representatives in the new US administration have clear ties to
47:11
Speaker 4: the Palnteer founder mister Teal, who, unlike Elon Musk, prefers
47:16
Speaker 4: to keep below profile.
47:18
Speaker 1: So going on from.
47:19
Speaker 4: There, we have the picture of the cover page of
47:25
Speaker 4: the Bloomberg investigation. Now I inserted the lettering in yellow
47:29
Speaker 4: and green up at the top from the Bilderberg Steering
47:34
Speaker 4: Committee currently not former, but currently Peter Teel is still
47:38
Speaker 4: on the steering committee, so is Marcus Wallenberg who's kind
47:42
Speaker 4: of overseeing this year's conference. And Alex Karp, very involved
47:47
Speaker 4: in Ukraine logistics and things like that, high technology in Ukraine,
47:51
Speaker 4: of course leading Palenteer that Teo co founded. Now, of
47:55
Speaker 4: these sixteen people closely associated with tel the Trump administration,
48:01
Speaker 4: I listed what I felt were the eight top ones,
48:04
Speaker 4: and let's just go through those real quick. I'm calling
48:07
Speaker 4: it the TL sixteen.
48:08
Speaker 1: That's my own name.
48:10
Speaker 4: A Clark Minor, former Palenteer software engineer, now the chief
48:15
Speaker 4: information officer at the Department of Health and Human Services,
48:18
Speaker 4: so he's a couple notches below Kennedy Colin Carroll formerly
48:23
Speaker 4: of Anderro, which is another non traditional defense contractor kind
48:27
Speaker 4: of like Palenteer doing deals with the Pentagon. He's now
48:31
Speaker 4: Chief of Staff to the Deputy Secretary of Defense excuse
48:35
Speaker 4: me again, a pretty high position. Chief of staff to
48:38
Speaker 4: the Deputy Defense Secretary, and a Gregory Barbacia or Barbarcia
48:44
Speaker 4: formerly with Palenteer and Elements Elements as a reference to
48:49
Speaker 4: U Palenteer itself, as I understand it. He's now Chief
48:53
Speaker 4: Information Officer at the Office of Management and Budget. Again
48:57
Speaker 4: a rather high office for these privateers. And we'll move
49:01
Speaker 4: on from there. Jacob Hellberg. He's now Under Secretary of
49:05
Speaker 4: State for Trump for Economic Growth, Energy in the environment.
49:09
Speaker 4: He's married to A Keith Reboi, an early PayPal executive
49:13
Speaker 4: and former general partner at the Teal initiated Former's Fund,
49:17
Speaker 4: Founder's fund, excuse me. He was senior advisor to Pallunteer
49:21
Speaker 4: CEO Alex Karp on national security and a fellow at
49:25
Speaker 4: the Palenteer Foundation. Of course, JD. Advance himself vice president
49:29
Speaker 4: of the US He saw Teal speak at Yale Law
49:32
Speaker 4: school back in law school back in twenty eleven, and
49:35
Speaker 4: later joined Teal's Mithrill Capital. Teal became a mentor and
49:41
Speaker 4: bankroll Advance's Ohio Senate run with a record fifteen million dollars,
49:46
Speaker 4: and in twenty twenty one, as word has it, Teal
49:49
Speaker 4: brought Dvance to Maro Largo to patch up his relationship
49:52
Speaker 4: with Trump. And I've got just a couple more or
49:55
Speaker 4: three more. In fact, Barbacia ended up in there twice.
49:59
Speaker 4: Excuse me on that. Let me go down to Jim O'Neil.
50:03
Speaker 4: He's now the Deputy Secretary of Department and Health and
50:06
Speaker 4: Human Services. He served in roles at Education and the
50:10
Speaker 4: Health and Human Services departments. He's been in government before.
50:14
Speaker 4: He joined Teal's Clarion Capital in two thousand and eight,
50:18
Speaker 4: and in twenty ten he co founded the Til Fellowship.
50:21
Speaker 4: And last but not least, a Michael Obadal nominated in
50:26
Speaker 4: March to be the Army's number two civilian official at Anderil,
50:30
Speaker 4: the Defense contractor. He worked on next generation command and
50:34
Speaker 4: control projects with the Army and he's a twenty seven
50:37
Speaker 4: year Army officer. So these are the well connected, that is,
50:42
Speaker 4: well teal connected people in the current Trump government. You
50:46
Speaker 4: guys are talking about the privatization of government services on
50:49
Speaker 4: both sides of the pond, and this seems to fit
50:52
Speaker 4: that pattern. And I've got a couple of things that
50:55
Speaker 4: are sort of a charry on top. It turns out
50:58
Speaker 4: that Jen Stoltenberg has stepped down from the co chair
51:02
Speaker 4: of the Builderberg Steering Committee, and the Builderberg Group announced
51:07
Speaker 4: that I didn't happen to get that same email. Usually
51:10
Speaker 4: I get a number of their emails that when I
51:12
Speaker 4: did not get people can check out the source s
51:15
Speaker 4: ide list of there and the show notes that they
51:17
Speaker 4: want to.
51:17
Speaker 1: Know more about it.
51:19
Speaker 4: And the last item is almost comical, comic relief, and
51:27
Speaker 4: we have we're talking about Canada. Well Trump is actually
51:32
Speaker 4: sounding serious that he wants.
51:33
Speaker 2: To absorb Canada.
51:35
Speaker 4: Well, Canada has got what amounts to a new Builderberg
51:38
Speaker 4: government as we know. The Canadian Prime Minister Mark is
51:42
Speaker 4: now Mark Coarney, a longtime banker, formerly on the Bilderberg
51:46
Speaker 4: Steering Committee. He attended Bilderberg in twenty eighteen as the
51:50
Speaker 4: Governor of the Bank of England and in twenty twenty two,
51:53
Speaker 4: twenty twenty three and twenty twenty four under Brookfield Asset
51:56
Speaker 4: Management under that banner, and Christia Freeland, so called opponent
52:01
Speaker 4: to b PM, attended Builderberg the last two years as
52:06
Speaker 4: Canada's Deputy Prime Minister, and it's supposed that she still
52:10
Speaker 4: holds alongside Carney. So basically the Prime Minister and the
52:14
Speaker 4: Deputy Prime Minister of Canada are both in essence builderbergers.
52:19
Speaker 4: So that's an interesting optic, you might say, for Trump
52:26
Speaker 4: wanting to absorb Canada. Now Canada's becoming more under open
52:30
Speaker 4: Builderberg control, although their Builderberg affiliations, of course, are not
52:35
Speaker 4: the whole story. But it's a curious alignment of the stars,
52:38
Speaker 4: that's for sure. But anyway, that's the latest on Builderberg.
52:41
Speaker 4: I've got a couple of Bilderberg articles posted on the
52:44
Speaker 4: uk UKC website that explained a lot more of their
52:48
Speaker 4: meddlings and connections in AI and in big media.
52:51
Speaker 1: So back to you guys, Thanks Mark, And we should
52:54
Speaker 1: not forget that if we want to add another name
52:56
Speaker 1: to Peter Thiel network list, that would be nice.
53:01
Speaker 2: Oh really, are they?
53:02
Speaker 1: Absolutely? They are best buddis? Yes, apparently, so there we go. No,
53:08
Speaker 1: let's move on then, and what's Tulsi up to?
53:11
Speaker 2: Well? Not so much, but this is an incredible story.
53:14
Speaker 2: Bring this up on screen. So Tulcy Gabbart had already
53:18
Speaker 2: selected a deputy for the Director of National Intelligence DNI,
53:24
Speaker 2: and his name is Daniel Davis. A lot of people
53:27
Speaker 2: might know him as Colonel Daniel Davis. He has a
53:29
Speaker 2: very successful podcast which is on YouTube. He's also a
53:34
Speaker 2: senior fellow at Defense Priorities. This is a think tank
53:37
Speaker 2: in Washington, generally known in that kind of Douglas McGregor,
53:41
Speaker 2: vain of a pretty good, straight talking, common sense guy,
53:45
Speaker 2: a decorated combat veteran, which is Raron Washington to find
53:49
Speaker 2: such people in politics, very experienced and it's kind of
53:53
Speaker 2: been on the right side of most issues over the years.
53:57
Speaker 2: And something happened Mike. He was basically appointed and all
54:01
Speaker 2: of a sudden, the appointment was scuttled a couple of
54:04
Speaker 2: days later, and it turns out it was because he
54:07
Speaker 2: wasn't hawkish enough. We're told on the issue of guess
54:12
Speaker 2: what Israel, Yes, Israel, He's not supportive of Israel, not
54:16
Speaker 2: hawkish enough against Iran. So this is what we've understood,
54:20
Speaker 2: and there was a campaign run. We'll bring this up
54:22
Speaker 2: on screen. Ear the ADL was involved in basically smearing
54:27
Speaker 2: Daniel Davis. So the Anti Defamation League involved in defamation. Interesting,
54:33
Speaker 2: isn't it. And then you had top Fox hosts like
54:36
Speaker 2: Mark Levin. Here he's up on stage basically doing victory
54:40
Speaker 2: laps afterwards after lobbying. So all these influencers like Laura
54:44
Speaker 2: Lumer and all these like Maga, Zionist pro Israeli influencers
54:50
Speaker 2: all piled in and went after Daniel Davis and what
54:53
Speaker 2: was clearly a coordinated attack. So this is incredible. So
54:57
Speaker 2: they've managed to basically veto a top pick for intelligence,
55:02
Speaker 2: the Israeli lobby and all these influencers and they put
55:05
Speaker 2: pressure on Trump and the White House and work through
55:08
Speaker 2: social media. Unbelievable. So this is incredible. So that's not
55:12
Speaker 2: foreign interference, that's not foreign meddling in the US government.
55:16
Speaker 2: Of course that's what Russia does, right, we're told. So anyway,
55:21
Speaker 2: I think it's important that people will bring his show
55:23
Speaker 2: up on screen. Here. The best thing we can do
55:26
Speaker 2: at this point is to support Daniel Davis and go
55:30
Speaker 2: visit his YouTube channel, Daniel Davis Deep Dive. It is
55:33
Speaker 2: absolutely one of the best shows online. Like Judge Napolitano,
55:38
Speaker 2: I think even better than some of these other programs,
55:41
Speaker 2: quite frankly, but it's incredible that he nearly got the job,
55:44
Speaker 2: and that would have been such a great thing. But
55:47
Speaker 2: what does it show you, Mike? Why would Israel want
55:49
Speaker 2: to keep someone like this out of a job where
55:52
Speaker 2: they're curating intelligence. And we talked about this on this
55:56
Speaker 2: program in previous weeks, and that's because there is an
55:59
Speaker 2: agenda to wage war and to do a preemptive strike
56:03
Speaker 2: on Iran. And where's the intelligence coming from for that?
56:06
Speaker 1: Israel?
56:07
Speaker 2: It's coming from Israel. So will will Tulsi Gabbor be
56:10
Speaker 2: compelled to act on what quote credible threat intelligence about
56:15
Speaker 2: something Iran is supposed to do? And if not, who
56:19
Speaker 2: would be there to check that? Would some could be
56:22
Speaker 2: someone like colonel Colonel Daniel Davis to offer a second
56:25
Speaker 2: opinion on that. That's basically what Tulsi probably selected him
56:29
Speaker 2: to do. And sure enough, the Israeli lobby got winned
56:33
Speaker 2: and scoppered the whole thing. So it's it's unbelievable and
56:37
Speaker 2: it makes me worry that something is coming down the pipeline.
56:40
Speaker 2: There's an agenda to confront Iran militarily in Washington and
56:45
Speaker 2: in Tel Aviv, and this is this is a big
56:48
Speaker 2: red flag.
56:48
Speaker 1: Mic So two questions, any suggestion about who might be
56:53
Speaker 1: put in place as an alternative? And the other is
56:56
Speaker 1: does this say anything about Tulsi's chances for staying in
57:00
Speaker 1: the role?
57:01
Speaker 2: Good? Two good questions, Mike, and I will say that
57:03
Speaker 2: Eldridge Colby, who is another person who is up for
57:07
Speaker 2: a high national security post to be the president's advisor,
57:12
Speaker 2: that's been stalled, and the rumor is because he is
57:15
Speaker 2: not pro Israel enough. Okay, that's one of them. And
57:19
Speaker 2: then the hostage envoy, Trump's hostage on But who's talking
57:23
Speaker 2: to Hamas? I think he's been sacked and he's Jewish
57:27
Speaker 2: by the way, so he wasn't because he was being
57:30
Speaker 2: too friendly to Hamas and not giving enough deference to
57:34
Speaker 2: net Yahoo apparently, so he's been kicked out. So who's
57:38
Speaker 2: running US foreign policy?
57:40
Speaker 1: That's pretty clear.
57:41
Speaker 2: Is it Trump or is it somebody else? Is it
57:43
Speaker 2: Mariam Addelson? Is it the Israeli lobby? Is it Benjamin Netanyahu?
57:48
Speaker 2: So if Benjamin net Yahoo is having the final veto
57:51
Speaker 2: on US foreign policy and military affairs, then who's the
57:55
Speaker 2: president of the United States? Really a very.
57:58
Speaker 1: Good question, I suspect it's eat all Musk.
58:02
Speaker 2: Well, let's bring this up on screen here, Mike, and
58:06
Speaker 2: there's this thing called the conflict of interest. So Musk
58:10
Speaker 2: just pledges to dump one hundred million dollars into a
58:14
Speaker 2: Maga super pac. Trump's not even running.
58:16
Speaker 1: For the British audience. You better just mention quickly what
58:19
Speaker 1: a pack in a super pack is.
58:21
Speaker 2: Well, super pac is because of legislation. Superpack is where
58:24
Speaker 2: people can put an unlimited amount in a super pac
58:26
Speaker 2: and the super pac and donate that to a candidate.
58:29
Speaker 2: Individuals couldn't do that, but if you go through this
58:32
Speaker 2: thing called a super pac, it makes it all legal basically.
58:35
Speaker 2: So this is basically buying democracy. Corporations and oligarchs can
58:39
Speaker 2: buy candidates through super PACs. It's all legal right in
58:42
Speaker 2: our democracy. Right, So what does Trump do? He's promoting
58:46
Speaker 2: Tesla here in this video you can see Elon's got
58:49
Speaker 2: his child there as the human shield against any media criticism.
58:53
Speaker 2: He's such a good family man. He's got lots of wives,
58:57
Speaker 2: mothers and children, so he's a big family guy. But
59:00
Speaker 2: Trump's promoting Tesla here after while getting a bun of
59:04
Speaker 2: one hundred million dollars. I mean, does this not look good?
59:08
Speaker 2: Imagine if this was George Soros doing this with Biden. Yeah,
59:14
Speaker 2: Alex Soros's company is getting plugged by Biden and then
59:17
Speaker 2: Alex Soros drops one hundred million into a Biden super pack.
59:21
Speaker 2: What would the right be doing? They'd be screaming bloody
59:23
Speaker 2: murder on Fox News. But for some reason, for a
59:27
Speaker 2: lot of people, this is okay. I can't afford to
59:33
Speaker 2: drop one hundred mills, so I guess I don't have access.
59:36
Speaker 2: Do you have one hundred mill We know none of
59:38
Speaker 2: us do, so we can't. We don't have access to
59:41
Speaker 2: democracy in the same way that some people do. Is
59:45
Speaker 2: that fair? Is that a meritocracy? What is this exactly?
59:48
Speaker 2: Or is it a plutocracy? This is the question.
59:52
Speaker 1: Very good questions. We'll talk much more about this and
59:54
Speaker 1: the other things we'd be talking about on the news
59:56
Speaker 1: today and extra in a few minutes. If you're a
59:58
Speaker 1: UK Call members, stick around on live stream and you
1:00:00
Speaker 1: can watch. If you're not a UK Call member, maybe
1:00:03
Speaker 1: you'd like to join. Do pick up tickets for the
1:00:06
Speaker 1: April event if you can, but we're going to leave
1:00:10
Speaker 1: it there for today. I would say thank you very
1:00:11
Speaker 1: much to Mark and to Patrick and James Rogowski for
1:00:14
Speaker 1: joining us today. Have a great weekend and we will
1:00:16
Speaker 1: see you on Monday as usual.
1:00:18
Speaker 2: Bye bye