Latest / Reformed Thinking / Out of Egypt: Providence and the True Son (Matthew 2:13–15)

Transcript

Out of Egypt: Providence and the True Son (Matthew 2:13–15) · Reformed Thinking

0:00
Welcome to Reformed Thinking, the segment of the deep dive
0:02
where we really try to get into the text of Scripture.
0:04
We focus on how those big central doctrines of the church,
0:07
well, they aren't just abstract ideas, are they?
0:09
They're living realities right there in the narrative.
0:12
Today we're doing a deep dive into actually a very short, but
0:15
I think incredibly potent event in Matthew's Gospel.
0:18
It's the flight of the Holy Family to Egypt.
0:20
Matthew chapter 2, verses 13 through 15.
0:23
Now, this is way more than just, you know, a historical story
0:26
about escaping danger. The source material we're
0:29
looking at really frames this passage as a kind of theological
0:32
pressure cooker. You've got these massive
0:34
doctrines interlocking right there on the surface.
0:36
So our mission today isn't just reading it as biography.
0:39
We want to see it as a window, really, into how God perfectly
0:42
moves his redemptive promises forward, even through, well,
0:45
genuine danger and peril. We're going for a close reading,
0:48
focusing on divine Providence, God's meticulous control, then
0:51
Christological fulfillment, how Jesus is the true Son of Israel,
0:53
and finally faithful obedience, especially Joseph's practical
0:56
wisdom. Yeah, it's a striking little
0:58
sequence. Matthew designs it, I think, to
1:00
teach profound theological truth through sheer action.
1:05
The narrative is incredibly lean command, obedience, fulfillment
1:08
Bang Bang bang and as we look closely, we'll see that every
1:11
single detail Matthew includes the Greek verbs he picks the
1:14
time markers he uses. It's not just incidental
1:16
reporting. It's all doing theological work.
1:18
It's all part of executing God's plan of salvation.
1:21
So we start in Matthew 2.3 teen and the scene is 1 of immediate
1:25
prices. An Angel of the Lord appears to
1:28
Joseph in a dream. Kate and we'd probably note for
1:31
Matthew, dreams are pretty consistent way God reveals
1:33
things, especially around birth and preservation of the Messiah.
1:38
The warning itself is serious. Herod is he, and he's about to
1:41
seek the child, and the intent is crystal clear.
1:43
It's murderous to a Palessi to destroy him.
1:45
So the command isn't a suggestion, it's an urgent
1:48
order. Get up, take the child and his
1:50
mother and flee. Go to Egypt.
1:51
It feels incredibly tense just reading it.
1:54
The life of the mediator, the promised Messiah, is literally
1:57
hanging in the balance. You've got the most powerful guy
1:59
in the region trying to kill him.
2:01
That's right, and the threat isn't hypothetical.
2:03
I mean, the verses that follow confirm Herod's brutality with
2:07
the massacre of the Innocents. But notice Joseph's response in
2:10
verse 14. It's immediate.
2:11
It's quiet. He gets up, takes a child and
2:14
his mother, and withdraws nooks by night.
2:16
That's the obedience part. Then right after that action,
2:20
Matthew does something crucial in verse 15.
2:22
He pivots. He goes from just recording
2:25
history to interpreting it theologically.
2:27
He tells the reader, essentially, look, this whole
2:29
escape wasn't random. It happens so that Scripture
2:32
might be fulfilled and he links it back to the Exodus and the
2:35
prophet Hosea. It's an incredibly dense 3 verse
2:39
package containing a whole system of theology.
2:41
Yeah, the speed of it tells you Matthew thinks this is critical.
2:45
OK, let's start with that first big idea you mentioned, which is
2:48
right there in the text and speaks directly to all the
2:51
doctrine of Providence. You said the time they spent in
2:53
Egypt wasn't just Joseph guessing when it was safe.
2:56
God fixed the duration using 2 specific time markers.
3:00
Let's unpack that. Right.
3:01
And this is where we Providence isn't just fatalism, you know,
3:05
random chance. Providence means God has decreed
3:09
the means, the ends, and the timing.
3:11
And the length of this exile in Egypt was totally under God's
3:15
sovereign schedule. Matthew makes this clear with
3:17
two specific temporal boundaries.
3:20
The first one is in the angel's command itself.
3:22
Joseph is told to stay in Egypt is Safi until God speaks again.
3:26
The Greek is ecsi, literally until I tell you.
3:30
That phrase puts Joseph's whole waiting period, all his anxiety,
3:33
his uncertainty about when to go back.
3:35
It puts it entirely under God's timing for the next command.
3:39
So Joseph didn't have a date on the calendar.
3:40
He was just waiting. Waiting for the next instruction
3:43
from God. Exactly.
3:44
His trust wasn't in, you know, figuring out the political
3:47
situation or reading the news about Herod.
3:49
His trust was in the promise that God would speak again.
3:52
Human calculations about when the danger might blow over?
3:55
Completely irrelevant. They move only when God gave the
3:58
green light. That dependence on God's
4:00
continuing word, that's the starting marker.
4:03
OK, that's the start. And then Matthew gives us the
4:05
end point in verse 15. And this is where for me, God's
4:09
Providence just seems shockingly specific.
4:12
The family was there until the death of Herod EMS to.
4:16
That little phrase feels incredibly loaded theologically.
4:19
Speaking. Oh, it absolutely is.
4:21
That endpoint reveals just how meticulous Providence is,
4:25
especially how it works even with the actions of, well,
4:28
wicked people. Let's really focus on that noun
4:30
Matthew uses, Taluti. It means end or death.
4:33
Matthew's choice of that word highlights a massive theological
4:36
point. Even a king dying isn't just a
4:38
random historical event. It's a scheduled boundary set
4:42
within God's Providence. Wow.
4:45
So, put differently, the most evil man in Judea, the guy whose
4:49
whole goal was to stop God's plan, was basically working on
4:53
God's clock. That's the doctrine right there
4:55
in practice. Herod's malice, his wicked plan
4:58
to murder the Christ child. It wasn't independent.
5:01
It wasn't ultimate. His lifespan, his very breath,
5:04
was like, well, like our source says, a dated leaf on God's
5:09
calendar. The exile ended precisely when
5:12
the danger Herod himself, was removed by God's scheduled
5:15
timing of his death. OK, I have to jump in there.
5:17
Because that level of control, it really challenges how we
5:20
often think about human freedom, doesn't it?
5:22
We tend to see a powerful evil figures as kind of running wild
5:25
unchecked unless humans stop them.
5:27
But Matthew's saying Herod's life itself was a boundary set
5:29
by God. How does this passage hold
5:31
together God's detailed control? The idea that Herod's death was
5:34
scheduled and necessary, with Herod's obvious guilt for the
5:37
horrible things he did, like killing those children.
5:39
Yeah, that's the crucial tension, isn't it?
5:41
And it's exactly what our theological sources, like the
5:44
Westminster Confession address when talking about secondary
5:46
causes. WCF chapter 5 says God's
5:49
Providence ordereth all things according to the infallible
5:52
foreknowledge and the free and immutable counsel of his own
5:55
will. This passage, which shows that
5:57
Herod's intent to murder was his own wicked choice.
6:00
He was fully responsible, fully culpable for seeking and
6:04
planning to destroy Tulsiya the child.
6:06
No question about that. And yet God's Providence
6:08
permitted that wicked intention only for a specific time and
6:12
directed it towards God's own righteous and preserving Christ
6:15
the Mediator. God uses the free, responsible
6:17
decisions of agents, Herod's evil, Joseph's obedience to
6:21
carry out his own predetermined plan.
6:23
So Herod's evil actions were real evil.
6:26
They weren't fake, yeah, but they were never truly
6:28
independent. They never operated outside the
6:30
boundaries of God's overarching plan.
6:32
Correct. Think of it maybe like like a
6:34
grand building project. The master architect has the
6:37
blueprints, nose in the materials, sets the timeline.
6:40
Now imagine a worker on the site deliberately tries to sabotage
6:43
something, maybe weaken a support beam out of spite.
6:46
That's his wicked, culpable act. But the architect in his wisdom
6:50
has already accounted for potential problems like that.
6:53
The overall design, the subsequent steps are already
6:55
planned to ensure that the building gets finished correctly
6:57
despite the sabotage. Herod's malice was the secondary
7:01
'cause that made the flight necessary.
7:03
But it was God's decree that provided the means, the Angel,
7:06
the safe place, Egypt and the endpoint Herod's death.
7:09
So this scene really shows Providence executing God's
7:12
decree with absolute precision. It uses ordinary things like the
7:15
geography, Egypt being outside Herod's reach, and ordinary
7:18
actions like traveling at night. And it uses extraordinary means,
7:22
the angelic warning. But the central point, the non
7:24
negotiable, is that the preservation of Christ the
7:26
Mediator was guaranteed. Herod simply could not win.
7:29
The guarantee, then, is that Herod died exactly when needed
7:33
to keep the Messiah safe, ensuring Jesus could continue on
7:36
the path toward the cross and resurrection.
7:38
History, viewed this way, certainly isn't just a tangle of
7:41
accidents. It's a highly coordinated,
7:43
purposeful drama. Exactly.
7:45
And that coordination doesn't stop with Herod's death.
7:47
Remember the family stayed in Egypt until Herod died and then
7:51
importantly they get the next divine command in verses 19 to
7:54
20 telling them to return. It shows God controls both the
7:58
exit and the re entry, the means of preservation and the timing
8:01
of getting back into Israel. That really makes those time
8:04
markers. Until I tell you, and until the
8:06
death of Herod, the low bearing walls for the doctrine of
8:09
Providence. In this story, a King's life and
8:11
death, even a wicked king, were just dates on God's calendar,
8:14
used strategically to protect the infant Messiah.
8:17
Amazing. OK, so we've looked at God's
8:20
detailed control. Now let's shift focus to
8:22
Joseph's response. His obedience is just, well,
8:24
it's prompt, it's quiet, it's faithful, and it gives us this
8:27
incredible picture of sanctified prudence.
8:30
It's not just that he obeyed, but how he did it.
8:32
Yeah, Matthew really paints Joseph as the model of
8:35
practical, immediate submission. When the Angel gives those
8:39
urgent commands, rise, take, flee, Joseph doesn't hesitate.
8:43
He doesn't argue. He doesn't ask questions about,
8:46
you know, the logistics of going to Egypt.
8:47
He acts right away. Immediate compliance rising and
8:51
leaving Nukus by night and that detail by night.
8:55
It's actually really significant.
8:56
It ramps up the sense of urgency, but also the prudence
8:59
of his response. He didn't wait for morning,
9:02
didn't wait for the perceived safety of daylight.
9:04
He acted when visibility was low.
9:06
When God's Word is clear, obedience needs to be immediate.
9:09
What's the theological take away from that night travel beyond
9:12
just the time of day? Why does Matthew even include
9:15
Nukus? I think it speaks to how faith
9:17
often operates when things are uncertain or dangerous.
9:20
Leaving at night shows that obedience frequently means
9:23
moving forward under the cover of darkness, trusting God's care
9:26
even when you can't see the path clearly ahead.
9:29
Safety for the believer isn't ultimately found in human
9:32
visibility or feeling secure or political stability.
9:36
It's found in submitting to the Father's word and His timing.
9:39
Jesus action is pomped practice if the word is clear, whether
9:43
it's about fleeing a specific danger or maybe fleeing A
9:46
temptation or taking on a task, the call is to get up and move
9:49
immediately, trusting that even the darkness is held within the
9:53
light of God's Providence. And you mentioned Matthew
9:55
emphasizes the exactness of Joseph's obedience.
9:58
He didn't just generally do what he was told, he mirrored the
10:01
command precisely. Yes, exactly.
10:03
When the Angel says rise, the text immediately shows Joseph's
10:07
action. Then he having risen.
10:09
Matthew uses the same Greek participle form.
10:12
OK, for listeners maybe not familiar with Greek tenses, what
10:15
does using the ARS tense there signify?
10:18
Why is that mirroring important for understanding Joseph?
10:21
Well, the ARS tense often describes a simple completed
10:24
action. Think of it as something done
10:26
swiftly, decisively, as a single event.
10:30
By mirroring the ARS imperative in the command with the ARS
10:33
participle describing Joseph's action, Matthew highlights this
10:36
exact obedience. It wasn't a long, drawn out
10:39
process of thinking it over, it was quiet decisiveness.
10:42
It points to a faith that doesn't need tons of human
10:45
calculation because the divine command itself is sufficient.
10:48
It's just simple immediate action based on a clear word
10:51
from God. That distinction, the
10:53
simplicity, the immediacy is really striking.
10:55
Now let's dig into the specific verb Matthew uses for the act of
10:59
leading and assure. Matthew says just Venus resume.
11:02
He withdrew. Our sources really emphasized
11:05
that this was a careful word choice carrying strategic
11:07
weight. Oh, absolutely.
11:08
This choice of verb is definitely strategic, not
11:11
random, And asuruo means to withdraw or to retire, often
11:16
specifically to a safer position.
11:19
In the Greek of the time, and even before, this word
11:22
frequently had military or strategic connotations.
11:26
It's the kind of language you'd use for a tactical retreat, a
11:29
measured pullback in the face of superior force.
11:32
Matthew uses this word, I believe, to frame the family's
11:35
movement as ordered obedience under divine direction.
11:39
It makes it clear this wasn't just Joseph panicking and
11:41
running for his life. He was executing a divine
11:44
strategy. So if this were a military
11:46
report, it wouldn't be called a route or fleeing in terror, but
11:49
a strategic withdrawal. Precisely.
11:52
Matthew could have used a different verb, maybe something
11:54
more panicked like a podiso, which means to run away or
11:57
escape in a kind of frantic sense.
11:59
But by choosing Ashiro, he elevates the action.
12:01
It's not just a personal survival instinct, it's the
12:04
divinely sanctioned tactical withdrawal for the sake of the
12:07
mission preserving the Messiah. So Joseph wasn't running from
12:11
fear necessarily. He was strategically withdrawing
12:13
in obedience. That totally changes the feel of
12:16
the scene, doesn't it? Becomes an act of, well,
12:18
courage, guided by wisdom, not cowardice.
12:21
That's the crucial distinction, especially for us as pilgrims
12:23
living out our faith. And what's more, Matthew seems
12:26
to be setting up a pattern here. He uses ina sharu again and
12:30
again in his Gospel, not just here.
12:32
He uses it in 2.22 when the family withdraws to Galilee
12:36
after returning from Egypt. He uses it in 4.12 when Jesus
12:39
withdraws after John the Baptist is arrested, and again in 12.15
12:43
when Jesus withdraws from the Pharisees who were plotting
12:46
against him. Matthew consistently uses the
12:48
specific verb to mark these protected withdrawals at key
12:51
moments. It establishes this recurring
12:54
theme, this motif of the Messiah's strategic movement.
12:57
Jesus himself models for us, for the church, that sometimes
13:00
faithfulness means standing your ground, but other times it means
13:03
withdrawing to preserve the mission.
13:04
And both responses have to be governed by obedience to God's
13:07
specific timing and word, not just human feelings or bravado.
13:10
So this withdrawal becomes a model for what Reformed theology
13:14
might call sanctified prudence under persecution.
13:18
Fleeing danger in this specific context is actually affirmed as
13:22
an act of obedience, not a lack of faith.
13:25
Yes. It affirms that God has given us
13:26
ordinary means, reason, geography, understanding
13:30
jurisdictions like Egypt, being outside Herod's control and
13:33
using those means wisely to preserve life.
13:36
And God's mission is actually virtuous.
13:39
Joseph's faithfulness put him under the shelter of God's
13:41
ordinary means. He used prudence as a tool
13:44
directed by faith. That's a helpful corrective.
13:46
I think sometimes we might mistakenly equate faith with a
13:49
kind of recklessness, thinking we shouldn't take any practical
13:51
steps for safety. But Joseph shows that a measured
13:54
strategic withdrawal can be the very expression of faith when
13:57
God directs it. He trusted God, and God's
14:00
direction involves specific action and movement.
14:03
Exactly. Trusting God means trusting the
14:05
means he provides or commands, and this demonstrates clearly
14:08
that human responsibility, Joseph's decision, his action by
14:11
night, works perfectly alongside divine decree to ensure the
14:14
Messiah's life is preserved. Joseph's obedience wasn't
14:17
optional. It was a necessary part of God's
14:20
providential plan unfolding. OK, so we've seen God's perfect
14:23
timing. We've seen Joseph's obedient
14:25
response. But Matthew then insists this
14:27
whole episode wasn't just about safe travel, it was actually a
14:30
scriptural necessity. How does Matthew pivot us so
14:33
quickly from history and prudence to, well, deep
14:36
Christology in the unity of Scripture in just a few words?
14:39
That pivot happens right in the second-half of Matthew 2.62.
14:44
The text shifts gear from describing the historical action
14:47
being in Egypt to explaining the divine reason behind it.
14:51
Matthew essentially says the sojourn happens so that
14:53
scripture might be fulfilled. This is where Matthew really
14:56
puts on his theological interpreter hat for us, the
14:59
readers. He uses that fulfillment formula
15:01
at the Greek phrase in a clear off so that it might be
15:04
fulfilled. This phrase is like a recurring
15:08
signpost throughout Matthews Gospel and it always signals
15:10
divine purpose, what theologians call paleology.
15:14
It means the event, the flight to Egypt staying.
15:16
There wasn't some random occurrence that Matthew later
15:18
cleverly matched up with an Old Testament verse.
15:20
No, it was governed by God from the start, specifically to bring
15:23
His previously spoken word to its intended fullness in Christ.
15:27
That distinction, God governing the event towards the
15:30
fulfillment rather than just finding a verse later, seems
15:32
really important for understanding Matthew's view of
15:35
scriptures authority. It is crucial, the formula Ena
15:38
Priyatha asserts, that the event unfolded precisely in order that
15:43
the word God had already spoken through the prophet would reach
15:46
its appointed climax, its goal in Jesus.
15:49
And the formula also underlines the idea of double agency in
15:53
Scripture. Matthew says it was spoken
15:55
ugurito prophet by the Lord through the prophet.
15:58
God is the ultimate author. The prophet is the instrument he
16:01
uses. So the full authority of
16:03
Scripture is upheld. OK, let's talk about the verb
16:06
Matthew uses for fulfill. Clue, or our source material
16:09
suggests this word means more than just predicting something
16:12
that came true. It talks about completion,
16:14
right? Absolutely plears fulfill in
16:16
Matthew often carries the weight of typological completion.
16:20
It's not just about predicting a future event.
16:22
In a one to one way typology means God shaped earlier events,
16:26
people, or institutions in the Old Testament, like the history
16:29
of Israel itself, as patterns or types that were intentionally
16:32
incomplete. They're pointing forward.
16:34
These types find their talos, their ultimate goal, their
16:37
intended meaning their consummation, only in Jesus
16:40
Christ. So the flight to Egypt isn't
16:42
just an event that happens to look like the Exodus story.
16:45
It means God is deliberately replaying or echoing that
16:48
earlier act of preservation to show that the Messiah, Jesus is
16:52
completing the very pattern that Israel's history established.
16:55
Got it. OK, now let's look very closely.
16:57
The Old Testament verse Matthew actually quotes was the 11.1 out
17:01
of Egypt I called my son. We really need to grasp the
17:03
original context of Hosea to see just how radical Matthew's claim
17:07
about Jesus is here. Yes, understanding the original
17:10
Hosea context is key. In Hosea 11.1, the prophet is
17:13
looking back. He's recalling the historical
17:15
Exodus when God brought the nation of Israel out of slavery
17:18
in Egypt and God calls Israel his son there, which echoes
17:22
Exodus 4.22 where God says Israel's my first born son.
17:26
So Hosea is reminding Israel of God's past grace and rescuing
17:30
them. But the immediate context in
17:32
Hosea 11 shifts very quickly from remembering God's grace to
17:35
lamenting Israel's disobedience. The corporate son, the nation
17:38
Israel proved faithless. Hosea says.
17:40
Things like the more I called them, the more they went away
17:42
from me. The nation failed miserably in
17:45
its calling to be God's faithful son.
17:47
So the historical pattern set up in the Exodus, God calling his
17:51
son out of Egypt, was fundamentally broken because
17:53
Israel itself failed to live up to that calling.
17:56
And Matthew is now claiming that Jesus, through this relatively
17:59
brief time in Egypt, actually repairs that broken pattern.
18:02
Precisely. That's exactly the claim, and
18:04
Matthew uses Hosea 11.1 with deliberate pinpoint
18:07
Christological precision to make it.
18:10
Notice the exact wording he quotes out of Egypt.
18:12
I called my son singular to the sumo.
18:16
Now this is interesting because Matthew's quotation here aligns
18:18
with the Hebrew Masoretic Text, the standard Hebrew Bible, which
18:21
reads my son singular. The Septuagint, the Greek
18:24
translation often used at the time, actually renders it in the
18:27
plural in some manuscripts. His children.
18:30
Matthew's choice to stick with the singular son isn't
18:33
accidental. It's the theological hinge of
18:35
his entire argument here. It focuses all the attention
18:38
specifically on Jesus as the individual, the representative
18:41
son who perfectly embodies and fulfills Israel's vocation
18:44
precisely where the nation, the corporate son, had failed.
18:47
OK, this takes us right into the core of the doctrine of federal
18:51
headship, doesn't it? Matthew seems to be using this
18:54
Christological typology, Jesus, as the fulfillment of the sun
18:57
pattern to demonstrate that Jesus stands as the
18:59
representative covenant keeper in Israel's place.
19:02
Can you flesh that out a bit more?
19:04
How does quoting the singular sun really prove this federal
19:07
headship idea right? The concept of federal headship,
19:10
which is articulated so clearly in the Westminster Confession,
19:13
particularly chapter 8 about Christ the Mediator, means that
19:16
Jesus acts not merely as an individual, but as the covenant
19:19
head, the representative of God's true people.
19:22
Think about Israel's story called Sun, brought out of
19:26
Egypt, passed through the waters the Red Sea, entered the
19:29
wilderness for testing, and then failed through complaining,
19:31
idolatry, breaking the covenant. Matthew is showing us that Jesus
19:36
is the true Israel, the one who successfully completes that
19:39
entire pattern. By going into Egypt and then
19:42
being called out, Jesus recapitulates or relives the
19:45
Exodus pattern. Then consistently, he passes
19:48
through the waters. At his baptism, he enters the
19:50
wilderness for testing Matthew 4.
19:53
And where the corporate sun failed over 40 years, the
19:55
singular sun overcomes temptation in 40 days.
19:58
He fulfills the law and the mission perfectly without
20:01
failure. Wow.
20:02
So the flight to Egypt wasn't just about escaping Herod, it
20:05
was actually a necessary part of validating Jesus's identity.
20:09
He had to go through the foundational pattern of Israel's
20:11
own story to establish himself as the perfect, obedient,
20:14
representative son. Absolutely.
20:16
Matthew is arguing that the original historical act of God,
20:19
the Exodus was a spirit intended pattern, sonship, exodus testing
20:23
mission that is now re enacted perfectly without failure in
20:27
Jesus. He is the one who lives the life
20:30
of obedience required of Israel, and because he's the true Son,
20:34
because he fulfills that pattern, he can then fulfill the
20:37
law perfectly and purchase reconciliation for his people,
20:40
for those the Father gave him. Matthew uses typology here as
20:44
the concrete expression of that federal relationship.
20:47
What Israel failed to be a faithful, obedient son, the
20:49
singular son Jesus is and does for his people.
20:53
This established identity as the true Son becomes the very
20:56
foundation for everything Jesus does next.
20:59
It validates his authority, his teaching and ultimately his
21:02
atoning death. The preservation in Egypt is
21:04
therefore a necessary step towards the cross and
21:06
resurrection because it guarantees the perfection of the
21:09
mediators life lived before his substitutionary death.
21:12
It really sounds like Matthew isn't just saying, hey, Jesus is
21:14
kind of like Israel. He's saying Jesus is the reality
21:17
that Israel was always meant to be.
21:18
That's the critical point. The old story wasn't just a
21:22
similar story that happened to rhyme.
21:23
It was, in a sense, an unfinished script waiting for
21:26
the perfect actor to step in and fulfill it.
21:29
God writes history with these echoes, bringing the Exodus
21:32
pattern to its ultimate fulfillment in Christ.
21:35
And that tells us so much about the unity and the divine
21:37
authority of all of Scripture, doesn't it?
21:40
Every part of the Old Testament is pointing forward, finding its
21:43
meaning in this one singular Messiah.
21:46
OK, we've established at the time in Egypt was essential for
21:49
safeguarding the mediators life and mission, ensuring he could
21:52
live that perfect life needed for atonement.
21:54
But there's a practical question here.
21:56
Joseph needed to dream, right? Specific special revelation to
22:00
know when to go and when to come back.
22:03
How does this passage affirm that believers today should rely
22:05
solely on the written word? Our sources, like the
22:08
confession, are clear that the special revelation of the New
22:11
Testament era, like dreams and visions for guidance, is closed.
22:14
How does this story support that?
22:15
That's a really important question for how we live now.
22:18
Yes, Joseph needed that immediate, extraordinary
22:21
revelation in the angelic dream because the story was still
22:24
unfolding, the Canon of Scripture wasn't complete yet,
22:27
and the physical life of the Mediator himself had to be
22:29
protected by specific, ongoing divine instructions.
22:33
The plan was actively being revealed, step by step.
22:37
Today, though, we stand on the other side.
22:38
We look back on the finished revelation, the completed path
22:41
of the Messiah. The Westminster Confession
22:44
affirms the sufficiency of Scripture, that the Bible
22:46
contains all we need for faith and life.
22:49
This passage actually reinforces that sufficiency.
22:51
How? Because it shows that all the
22:53
special revelation Joseph needed was given.
22:56
It was used for its specific purpose, and crucially, it was
22:58
recorded for us in the finished Word, the Bible.
23:01
We rely on the completed record of how the mediator was
23:04
preserved, not on seeking new personal, immediate instructions
23:07
through dreams or visions to guide our steps.
23:09
The pattern of Jesus's life and the way God protected him is now
23:12
fixed and revealed. Our grace comes through faith in
23:15
that written record of his finished work, not by trying to
23:18
get new dreams to tell us where to move or what timing to
23:21
follow. Joseph's necessary dependence on
23:24
ongoing revelation at that specific historical moment gives
23:28
way to our joyful dependence on the completed sufficient
23:30
Scripture, which authoritatively interprets the very history
23:33
we've just been discussing. So this really tight narrative
23:36
in Matthew 2.1315, just three verses, has shown us this
23:40
amazing interlocking system. God's decree sets the plan, His
23:43
Providence executes it perfectly, Scripture interprets
23:46
the meaning through typology, and Christ's mediator
23:48
accomplishes the goal. When you see it like that, this
23:50
scene offers real theological comfort, doesn't it quiets our
23:53
tendency towards frenzy, because we know even the wicked are
23:56
constrained by God's plan. And it also quiets fatalism
24:00
because we see that our obedient action, like Joseph's, genuinely
24:03
matter within that plan. Absolutely, and the application
24:06
for us, for the listener, flows right out of that clarity about
24:09
God's action in our response. We can kind of structure our
24:12
final thoughts around how this knowledge impacts our head, our
24:14
heart, and our hands. So head belief, first and
24:18
foremost, we really need to grasp and believe that God
24:21
actively orders the means, even the terrible actions of kings,
24:24
even the geography of nations, so that His prior word, His
24:28
promises in the Scripture, reach their intended fullness.
24:31
And because that word is now complete, we rely on the
24:33
sufficient Scripture as our ultimate guide.
24:36
We believe history isn't just chaos.
24:38
Providence governs all things making sense, even of what seems
24:41
senseless. And then heart, love, and trust.
24:43
This scene really invites us to love and trust the Father who
24:46
specializes in divine reversals, doesn't he?
24:48
Think about it. Egypt, historically the place of
24:51
Israel's slavery, becomes the very place where Israel's true
24:54
king is sheltered and preserved. God often works like that,
24:58
turning places of past oppression or present struggle
25:00
into stages for his work of preservation and preparation.
25:03
Yeah, and that reality should ground our security entirely in
25:06
Christ's preservation, not in our own cleverness or strength.
25:10
If the Father so meticulously guarded the infant mediator,
25:13
ensuring he completed his path to the cross, then we can
25:16
absolutely trust Him to guard those of us who are in Christ by
25:19
faith. Our confidence isn't in our
25:22
ability to dodge every danger, but in the Son's perfect
25:24
faithfulness and his completed preserved mission.
25:28
OK, and finally, hands, action and prudence.
25:31
How does this translate into what we do?
25:34
Joseph gives us the model, prompt obedience and practical
25:37
wisdom. We need to practice that
25:38
immediate action, like rising and leaving by night when the
25:41
Word speaks clearly to us, dangers to our holiness or
25:44
spiritual laziness setting in, or threats to our mission.
25:47
The call is often for quiet, immediate withdrawal or action,
25:50
not just stalling and hoping things feel more comfortable
25:52
later. And we need to practice.
25:54
That sanctified prudence. Joseph's strategic withdrawal in
25:58
Austro teaches us that sometimes fleeing danger or removing
26:02
ourselves from specific, overwhelming temptation is a
26:05
measured act of faith, not cowardice or a lack of trust.
26:09
Real Christian courage isn't about never retreating.
26:11
It's about unwavering fidelity to the mission and timing of
26:14
Christ, whatever that requires. Sometimes that means standing
26:17
firm. Other times it means a wise
26:19
tactical withdrawal, always under the shelter of God's
26:21
ordinary means, exercised in prompt obedience.
26:24
We started this deep dive by. Highlighting that stunning idea
26:26
from our sources, Herod's life being like a dated leaf on God's
26:30
calendar, a scheduled boundary within God's redemptive plan,
26:33
that level of sovereign control even over the wicked is just
26:37
well to resting. So here's the final thought for
26:40
you, the listener, to Mull over. How does knowing that the lives
26:43
and deaths of even most powerful and wicked rulers, maybe those
26:46
in authority today, those causing suffering or oppression,
26:49
are ultimately scheduled boundaries within God's
26:52
unstoppable redemptive Providence?
26:54
How does that knowledge change the way you pray about current
26:57
events? How does it change how you view
27:00
governing authorities? That's a question this passage
27:02
leaves us with. God used the death of Judea's
27:05
king to bring the true king of Israel home.
27:07
Something to think about.