Latest / Honey Badger Radio / The Religion of "Women's Ways of Knowing" With TL;DR | Rantzerker 176

Transcript

The Religion of "Women's Ways of Knowing" With TL;DR | Rantzerker 176 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Hello everybody, and welcome to Honey Badger Radio. My name is Brian.
• 0:03
  I'm here with Allison and our special guest friend of the channel, Teal Deer,
• 0:08
  and we're gonna be looking at well, we're gonna get into it in
• 0:11
  a moment. Tilder has a project he's working on that I think it's going
• 0:13
  to be very interesting, and we're I guess we're kind of getting like a
• 0:18
  little bit of a glimpse into it. It's it's a lot of taste a
• 0:23
  tape. Yeah, like a like a sample, like a demo that you
• 0:26
  don't have to pay for, Like a Deer is bringing up the finest access
• 0:31
  type of the finest cringe from his bolts. Get this a little taste and
• 0:36
  uh yeah, So you know, stick around and hang out with us.
• 0:39
  I think it should be very interesting. And before we do a couple of
• 0:43
  things. So I've been meaning to do this for a while, let me
• 0:45
  show what I got to you guys in the chat here on my obs.
• 0:51
  So years ago when I was still in Chicago, it was around Christmas time
• 0:56
  and we were I was just sort of like there was like this area downtown
• 1:00
  in the Loop where you can walk underground you go from one train station to
• 1:03
  another, but you pass through a kind of mall and I was passing through
• 1:07
  the mall and I was kind of drunk and I went into this one place
• 1:10
  and it was around Christmas time, and there was this reindeer. It's teal
• 1:15
  colored, and I bought it because I thought of teal deer. So on
• 1:19
  the screen there you'll see because JoJo's not here because he's with Lindsay, but
• 1:23
  there is a teal deer in my room on camera. You guys, get
• 1:27
  you guys see it. I see it. It is a deer and it
• 1:30
  is teal. It is I did not create this. I found this in
• 1:34
  a store at random and bought it immediately. So I just thought I would
• 1:38
  share secret Teal dear merchandise. Yes, I have a lot of secrets around
• 1:47
  Christmas time, because I also have two small plastic teal colored literally deal,
• 1:53
  you just find them randomly. Yes, I'm just like, well that's brand
• 1:57
  appropriate, so's I'll pick that up. And yeah, we'll wonder why I
• 2:02
  have these things on my desk and at some point I'll have to explain it
• 2:06
  to someone and that will be a weird conversation. Yeah. So anyway,
• 2:12
  I don't know why such a thing exists, but I'm glad it does.
• 2:14
  So that was why that particular color. I noticed that a teal is a
• 2:21
  popular color for deers. But it seems counterintuitive, is it, I don't.
• 2:25
  I mean, apparently it is more than it should be. You would
• 2:29
  think that they would just be brown or white or that's it really. I
• 2:34
  mean, we have deer around here and they're all brown. So but this
• 2:38
  is some kind of secret shout out. Maybe maybe there is a fan that
• 2:43
  works in a Chinese factory somewhere. Well, this one's covered in like a
• 2:49
  glitter it's it's actually like glittery, so it's supposed to sparkle, but it's
• 2:53
  sparkles teal. But anyway, so we're a fan who is creating all of
• 2:58
  this unlicensed much and dice of me. I would like to point out my
• 3:01
  lack of cap. You could get into contact with me about that, and
• 3:07
  I won't have the lawyer off. So if you get back to me about
• 3:10
  this, I will be able to afford a lawyer too. It would be
• 3:14
  nice. Oh it's a it's a selfa Okay, so I should do the
• 3:19
  things right. Yes, I'm going to hand it to Alison, so you
• 3:22
  can set the show up and then we're gonna go to the deer himself.
• 3:24
  Go ahead, out, yes, all right. So the topic is going
• 3:30
  to be cringe from the feminist past, ghost the feminist past, to prove
• 3:34
  that it was always it was always rotten at the very core. But I
• 3:40
  do want to remind everyone that I am doing. I'm restarting the fundraiser to
• 3:46
  support my editing of my novel The Captive. I I recently finished a survey
• 3:53
  of the top fifty science fiction and fantasy books as given or created by good
• 3:59
  Reads. I never intended to create this story to actually be pro male.
• 4:03
  In fact, I thought it was pretty neutral overall, but now that I've
• 4:08
  seen the average offering in the publishing industry, now it's terrifying, like it's
• 4:15
  It's the reason why I was pretty like copacetic about watching the Barbie Movie and
• 4:20
  I didn't get quite as I rate as Brian is because I've been reading modern
• 4:25
  fantasy and science fiction, and the Barbie movie is actually much more good natured
• 4:33
  than anything you can find in that field. I would honestly say that if
• 4:36
  you are the mother or son or guardian of a young man, or well,
• 4:42
  you know, like a teenage boy. Do not let them randomly pick
• 4:46
  out a book. Of course they probably will anyway, but that the sheer
• 4:50
  amount of anti male sentiment in literature today is shocking and horror fighting. And
• 5:00
  if you would like to push back on that a little, you can help
• 5:02
  me publish my project and get it properly edited at feed the Badger dot com
• 5:08
  slash. I that's e y e yeah, please please help me fight against
• 5:14
  that tide of miss injury. It's just really seethingly awful. And once again,
• 5:21
  if you would like to send us a message at any point during this
• 5:25
  show, if you'd like to comment on what we're saying, just say you
• 5:28
  enjoy the content, say hi to our guest, or whatever you would like.
• 5:32
  Go to feed the Badger dot com slash just the tip. That helps
• 5:36
  us get the full benefit of whatever you send in terms of funds, and
• 5:40
  you get the benefit of a longer canvas to baffle us with, as well
• 5:46
  as avoiding YouTube's see see seethe of censorship. So once again, that's feed
• 5:53
  the Badger dot com slash just the tip. You can also send them if
• 5:56
  you are listening after the show at any time and we will endeavor to read
• 6:00
  them out on the next show, the next relevant show. All right,
• 6:04
  I think I've done the thing, So are we just yeah, I guess
• 6:10
  we can jump right in. So I got this til Deer was kind of
• 6:14
  up to email me about this topic. I guess, tell us what it
• 6:17
  is that you're you're working on and why? I mean, what is we're
• 6:21
  going to do? I guess, Okay, what we're going to do for
• 6:26
  the next while is you're going to sit comfortably where you are and watch a
• 6:31
  sleep deprived madman pull out several court boards and reels of right string and go
• 6:36
  to town. I have no other way of explaining. Okay, So the
• 6:44
  tide of miscendry that we're experiencing now is about one hundred and fifty years,
• 6:48
  if not more, in the making, and I'm working on a project.
• 6:54
  So this all started when all the critical x's critical theories critical and now sees
• 7:00
  critical blah blah blah, critical race theories, etc. Started hitting their high
• 7:04
  point a few years ago. All of that stuff has a religious and spiritual
• 7:11
  underpinning, and I wanted to point that out because I consider that to be
• 7:15
  very interesting because some of the religious underpinning of that comes from a pre existing
• 7:21
  enjoyment of mine, which is like European folk law and pre Christian religions and
• 7:27
  religions which are other than Christianity, and some of the more esoteric parts of
• 7:31
  Christianity which evolved out of that, and these topics that the Critical X theories
• 7:38
  have an origin. In fact, however, feminism also has an origin in
• 7:45
  that, and going through the critical theory side of it and the feminist side
• 7:50
  of it, I basically just came to a point where I was like,
• 7:55
  I need to break this up, so it's just cooped down. So I've
• 8:01
  decided to break the project down into two parts, one of which is going
• 8:05
  to go through the critical X theories studies religious underpinnings, and the other side,
• 8:11
  which is going to go through the women's rights, feminism, and intersectionality,
• 8:16
  religious and spiritual under the pot. And I've before I sort of get
• 8:24
  into the books that I'm going to go through on this and the one in
• 8:28
  particular that I want to folks on day, I've had somewhat a I don't
• 8:35
  want to call it like a revelation because I don't think it's that profound,
• 8:39
  but an idea in my mind about why we're seeing such a rip between the
• 8:48
  second and third or ways. And I think that that actually has to comes
• 8:54
  from this religious underpin too, because I think what you're seeing in this,
• 9:03
  and this may bear some explain is I think what you're seeing is the the
• 9:09
  Gailian second wave, the spiritual, the Gaelian second wave smacking into the Marxist
• 9:16
  materialist food because when it comes to the second and third wave cancer argument that
• 9:22
  they're having, you're hitting the second wave there is some immaterial, wibbly,
• 9:30
  wobbly, undefinable woman nous that makes women women, whereas the third waves you
• 9:35
  have no everything is materialist. It's all social constructs. You can pick.
• 9:39
  It is just something you are as signed and we can control reality and go
• 9:45
  from them. And so I think that that might be part of this struggle
• 9:50
  that's breaking out between these two. Can I just add or ask? It
• 9:56
  sounds like those two things should be contradictory. I don't think they are.
• 10:01
  I think that one leads into the other. It does. The Marxist side
• 10:09
  grew out of the Hegelian side, because the Marxist view of it is still
• 10:13
  spiritual, but he just defined it in materialistic tone. Can I just get
• 10:20
  in here for a secaus I'm gonna play the what the hell are you talking
• 10:24
  about? Card? Okay, so, yeah, the Hegelian second wave versus
• 10:30
  the Marxist materialist third wave? It what's the first wave? Was it platonic
• 10:35
  solids? The first wave is the it's still kind of Hegelian in the well,
• 10:43
  it's more accurately a gnostic spiritualist. I want to get into narcissism a
• 10:52
  bit here, but like because I think it's a very important point. But
• 10:56
  Telia, can you turn your microphone up a little bit? I don't know
• 10:58
  if that's something you can do when you're in I have I have you basically
• 11:01
  cranked up on my land here. I can try you gotta you gotta compete
• 11:05
  with us loud North Americans. Yeah, don't worry, guys, and I
• 11:09
  don't plan on yellington. I can reduce my voice. Yeah that's good.
• 11:15
  Yeah, Okay, Now, please please some definitions because okay, yeah,
• 11:20
  sorry, have my audio software on the desktop because I have three separate write
• 11:26
  ups up and I need to see all of them, so I can't keep
• 11:28
  an eye on any of the technical stuff. Okay, So in order to
• 11:33
  understand some of this stuff. There's a few books which I'm going to reference
• 11:39
  and I want to go through. I think we need to go through the
• 11:41
  Hegelian write up first because that might explain something. So Hegel was a philosopher
• 11:50
  and a lot of his theories are based on a Gnostic tradition and fundament a
• 11:56
  Gnostic tradition is that the world is a castle role construct created by a fallen
• 12:03
  angel, which if you follow things like I think it's in Cabala, or
• 12:07
  it's the Demiurge which basically created this the material world and everything in it as
• 12:13
  a castle form of keeping the human spirit locked up and isolated away from God.
• 12:20
  And your way of escaping this casserole hell hole that we all apparently live
• 12:26
  in is to achieve nosis, it is to achieve the knowledge, and it
• 12:30
  is to free your spirit from the material work. And you see that tradition
• 12:35
  stem up through quite a few different traditions. You do see it in Cabala,
• 12:39
  you see it in the Gnostic Christian traditions. You even see it in
• 12:45
  Eastern philosophies, things like Buddhism and escaping into nirvana and you get out of
• 12:50
  that cycle of reincarnation, you leave the material. Yeah, it's also in
• 12:54
  our culture, like The Matrix is literally a nastic story where Neil has to
• 12:58
  find out about the real world and only Morpheus can show him the way,
• 13:03
  or Star Wars is the Gnostic story and that Luke, you know, has
• 13:07
  to learn about the Force, and it's like this this this fit knowledge that
• 13:11
  you are trying to gain access to. It's the only way to sort of
• 13:15
  achieve a higher level of understanding and gnostissism. A lot of people practice it
• 13:20
  in their everyday life. It's it's very normal, at least at this stage.
• 13:24
  So it's just taking that beyond that. Okay, well, I'm sorry,
• 13:28
  go ahead till yours. That's fine. Although I might suggest that if
• 13:35
  you look at stories like Star Wars, I don't think you might necessarily be
• 13:37
  looking at a gnostic tradition with that, with the finding of information and doing
• 13:41
  that, because that's not about leaving the world. That I think would be
• 13:43
  more based on things like the Olympian cycle from the Liberborian tradition, which entails
• 13:50
  basically solo traditions and solo stories where your main character is the Sun and then
• 13:54
  their journey throughout the story tracks the path of the Sun. Through the darkness,
• 14:00
  which is the night, going through all the chaos, and that's where
• 14:03
  you get the typical dragon and serpent immogay and then coming to the west and
• 14:07
  then and then coming out back, returning to returning to the east and going
• 14:13
  tracking through the sky, and that that's a whole other thing which I don't
• 14:18
  really want to get into back for some like mythology analysis, because I just
• 14:24
  got a dump of a whole bunch of chrome like positive male mythology stories in
• 14:31
  my DMS. But just to bring it back on topic, how does how
• 14:37
  do what does this look like? The second wave, the feminist second wave?
• 14:41
  Is Hegelian? What does that look like? What does that mean?
• 14:45
  Like I said, it's just an idea which I've sort of vaguely had in
• 14:48
  my head. I don't have a lot of absolute But what I am going
• 14:52
  to do is go through the Hegel right up here, and then I might
• 14:56
  be able to tie it together. I honestly I didn't actually and that bit.
• 15:00
  It's just it's something that's just somewhere in my brain and I wanted to
• 15:05
  get it out because why not so deep lur so the major part of Hegel
• 15:11
  and his way of working about things is you have an interplay between being,
• 15:16
  which is a thesis, nothing which is antithesis, and this goes through a
• 15:20
  diet what he calls a dialectic process, which is synthesis. So this is
• 15:22
  where you take two things which are the opposites of each other, you whack
• 15:26
  them together and then you basically get the result out of it. And the
• 15:31
  result finding that result is something which is a very specific term which you find
• 15:37
  in a lot of these feminist and intersectional writings. It is the process of
• 15:41
  becoming and you will see that word becoming quite a lot. It's even in
• 15:46
  a lot of these books that I'm going to go through. And the process
• 15:50
  of this dialectical prop of this dialectic is called subplation. So the Hegelian view
• 15:56
  works on what he calls a philosophy of history, and the philosophy of history
• 16:02
  is imminentist in nature, and immanentism is something which you find in gnosticism,
• 16:07
  and it basically means that there is an imminent end point to history, so
• 16:12
  that everything about the world is moving in one distinct direction. And you'll probably
• 16:17
  recognize that from Marxist theology as well. It's very uptical theology because it is
• 16:25
  in that they believe that you go through all of these revolutionary stages and eventually
• 16:30
  you'll end up in this end of history, because they believe that the entirety
• 16:33
  of history is a one way political slide going forever left. And that's quite
• 16:40
  important. And Hegel was one of the people who sort of formalized this isn't
• 16:45
  here. So he believes that all things that exist except for his one theory,
• 16:51
  which is his theory of alphaban, which we'll talk about a little bit
• 16:53
  later. He thinks that everything everywhere is subject to this philosophy of history eman
• 17:00
  and its endpoint that we will reach eventually. And so Hegel's argument is that
• 17:06
  history is a constant process of dialectic clash, with each thesis encountering an opposite
• 17:12
  idea or its event antithesis, and the clash of both of these things super
• 17:18
  eight, which is the term for going through that synthesis, and it forms
• 17:22
  a conjunction that conserves the contradictions between the two things, the thesis and the
• 17:26
  antithesis, while then sublimating it into its into its final synthesized port. And
• 17:33
  this is a contradiction of terms, and this is somewhat deliberate because his term
• 17:37
  alphaban, which covers all of this, is a contradictory term. It means
• 17:42
  simultaneously to lift something up but also to abolish it, to preserve something,
• 17:48
  but also to transcend something. And transcendence is a theme that comes up.
• 17:52
  It literally comes up in this book which we're going to talk about later,
• 17:56
  this Women's Reality, but they literally talk about transcendence and how men and women
• 18:02
  use things to transcend the differently. So this religious theme is very pervasive throughout.
• 18:10
  So the imminentist view of history results in a belief in an end of
• 18:15
  history where all contradictions have been worked out, and this is the acquisition of
• 18:19
  knowledge through becoming, which is not as it is the acquisition of knowledge that
• 18:25
  will allow you to become. So in the Hegelian world view which inspired Marks
• 18:30
  very heavily, anything that accelerates contradictions, and thus the destruction of the current
• 18:37
  system is a good thing because it will bring humans to the end of history
• 18:41
  at a faster rate, and that is the point where we need to get
• 18:45
  and for that you'll want to read more on Marks and his specific view of
• 18:49
  sublation, which he thinks of as a material concept. Whereas Hagel thinks of
• 18:56
  it as a spiritual concept, and that, I think is where we on
• 19:00
  into the difference between the second and third wave of feminism. Like I said,
• 19:03
  that's a weirdly experimental point that was just in my mind reading through this,
• 19:08
  and I thought, oh, this might actually explain some of the social
• 19:12
  construction aside versus the indefinable, wibbly wobbly womanness, that women are definitely women
• 19:18
  no matter what side. When you argue in spiritual versus material terms, that
• 19:25
  conflict seems to make some degree of sense. And I want to cammer that
• 19:30
  out more in my own time. I don't particularly want to touch on it
• 19:34
  too much to say, because I don't have much of the details finalized.
• 19:40
  So Hegel used all of this in a spiritual man and for Hegel, sublation
• 19:45
  reflects the agency of geist, which is spirit. Hence it's a spiritual tradition,
• 19:52
  and geist can manifest itself in numerous ways. Throughout Hegel's writing, you
• 19:56
  get things like Veltgeist, which is old spirit, Volksgeist national spirit, and
• 20:03
  Zeitgeist spirit of the age. This concept of geist is why Marxists are so
• 20:07
  fixated on capitalized identities. Is capital b Black and use of the term folk
• 20:15
  to refer to groups black folk. For instance, capital B black folks when
• 20:19
  they say it capitalty trans folks is an example of a Hegelian term, and
• 20:26
  it is specifically referring to the black spirit or the trans spirit and necessarily refers
• 20:30
  to some element of this Hegelian dielectric dialectic contradiction. And the interesting thing about
• 20:38
  this is if you follow things like the Volksgeist from hegel you actually then end
• 20:45
  up in the far right politics of things like the nineteen thirties Germans, which
• 20:53
  is very interesting that feminism and that thing share a common origin point. It's
• 21:00
  it's a very far removed origin point that that it's it's not like I'm going
• 21:03
  to sit and say, ah, yes feminists and Nazis because of this connection.
• 21:07
  They're not. But it's kind of interesting where it's like, oh,
• 21:11
  this is like your fourth cousin a few times removed. Do you really think
• 21:18
  you have a right to be calling other people Nazis considering that it is part
• 21:22
  of your your spiritual canon. I'd be careful with that. So this whole
• 21:29
  thing about Nazissism, I wonder if there's an analysism aside and I apologize.
• 21:33
  I don't want to interrupt, but I you know, I you see a
• 21:37
  lot of of let's say, expertise, and I put that in quotes coming
• 21:44
  from the left in the media and all that, and they say, well,
• 21:48
  you know, for example, I saw an argument between Christopher Ruffo and
• 21:52
  a host on MS and PC about critical race theory and yes, msn PC,
• 22:03
  Yes, And she was basically trying to discredit Rufo by saying that,
• 22:08
  you know, he is not a critical race theorist. He doesn't understand the
• 22:15
  the any of the content. He doesn't have the knowledge right. And then
• 22:19
  when Rufo would cite people, he would say, well, here's you know,
• 22:25
  Ebramex Kendy's work, or or the other woman, Robin DeAngelo's work.
• 22:30
  And then she would just counter and say they're not critical, they're not critical
• 22:33
  race theorist. There. They're a different kind of critical theorist right there.
• 22:37
  They're different things. And and he would even say I think he even said,
• 22:41
  uh not hegel Paulo Fieri, who's you know, like what was like,
• 22:47
  I guess where they were pulling from? Uh? And she would say,
• 22:49
  well he was, he wasn't that he was a critical something else?
• 22:52
  Right, So there's this, there's this, It's like you have to have
• 22:56
  this secret knowledge to be able to have the discussion. And on top of
• 23:00
  that, there are people who are sort of, you know, guarding access
• 23:04
  so that no one else can speak on these things. Do you think that's
• 23:10
  there's a relationship there. That's just gaslighting And I don't even know if it's
• 23:15
  intentional gas lighting. So, for instance, when you bring up critical race
• 23:18
  theory and you talk about like, well, here is literally a paper written
• 23:22
  by Kendy, here is a paper written by Crenshaw, or who are the
• 23:26
  other ones? Let me just actually grab the Critical Race Theory textbook which I
• 23:32
  have here, because of course I do. So. Yeah, things like
• 23:33
  you bring up like Krenshaw, Gatan, d Appella, Thomas, you can't
• 23:37
  even throw people like Brown, Kendy and whatnot in there as well. Yeah,
• 23:41
  you can literally cite these people to them and they will say, that's
• 23:44
  not real critical race theory, that's not what it is. You don't understand
• 23:48
  it. The problem is you do understand it, they don't. Now.
• 23:52
  The reason that they tell you that you don't understand it is because they need
• 23:56
  to delegitimize your position. Is actually a term for this night. I cannot
• 24:00
  remember what it is because I'm slept enough to remember is it? Is it?
• 24:04
  Because there was another thing I've been looking into. Mao Zedong. He
• 24:11
  created as part of the Cultural Revolution, a series of groups that were placed
• 24:15
  into what was translated as black categories. And so like, if someone was
• 24:22
  a member of a black category, then you're supposed to already have a bunch
• 24:26
  of notions about that person. It's like, you know, thought terminating cliche,
• 24:32
  you could say, right, So, for example, here in America
• 24:37
  and in the West in general, if there are parents who are concerned about
• 24:41
  what their children are learning in schools, the women are the ones that go.
• 24:45
  So when people say, oh, look at all the mama bears at
• 24:48
  the at the PTA meeting or whatever. One of the reasons for that,
• 24:51
  and one of the reasons why they get listened to, is because men as
• 24:53
  a group have been put into a black category along with Christians and conservatives and
• 25:00
  like whatever the group needs to be right that, And on the flip side
• 25:04
  of that, you have like the name. This is why everybody gets called
• 25:07
  a fascist or a Nazi because it's a purpose. The purpose of it is
• 25:11
  to drop people into a category, a black category. So I wonder if
• 25:17
  that's also not another part of it that I've been seeing, because that was
• 25:22
  what MAO did during the Culture Revolution. Yeah, it's basically just any way
• 25:26
  of discrediting what it is that you've got to say. Now. The reason
• 25:30
  that they do this, and this is why I want to say, like
• 25:33
  it is gas lighting, but it also isn't. It's because when we go
• 25:37
  through all of this stuff and we uncover the religious origin of this stuff,
• 25:42
  these people who you argue with about this, they are neophytes. They don't
• 25:47
  actually understand it. They are the equivalent of the Sunday Christians who have never
• 25:52
  actually read the Bible. They just get told by the priest what is in
• 25:55
  the book and they just go up there, you go, that's what it
• 25:56
  is. And that's what these people are. They go to their university lectures,
• 26:00
  they get told what is in these books, and that's it good enough
• 26:04
  for them. They don't actually read any of these books. They haven't They
• 26:07
  certainly haven't read any of these older manuscripts, and they're not going to because
• 26:11
  they're not actually interested in properly understanding. They just want to believe that they
• 26:15
  have the full knowledge of this topic, and they're just going to use that
• 26:18
  to shut you down because they they they just basically want to be right about
• 26:23
  everything, and they want you to be wrong about everything, and that's just
• 26:27
  where it ends, unfortunately. So okay, let's go through some of the
• 26:36
  books which I'm going through on this project because this might explain some of it
• 26:41
  perhaps. So the book which we're going to be talking about in detail today
• 26:48
  is this book, which is and Wilson's Shafe Women's Reality and Emerging Female System
• 26:52
  in a White male Society. We'll talk about that one in some death today.
• 26:57
  That's the most recent one Chiming going through. This is published in nineteen
• 27:02
  eighty one, and it does actually expressly talk about how women's ways of knowing
• 27:07
  and female understanding and the female system as she terms it, is a theological
• 27:12
  concept. She literally talks about things like paradoxes and dualism and actually even says
• 27:19
  the actually the last chapter of the book which talks about the female system,
• 27:23
  which is the system that must emerge to destroy the male system. This is
• 27:27
  why we talked about the acceleration of history earlier. And the final chapter of
• 27:33
  her books literally call an introduction to female system theology. I have a question.
• 27:38
  Yes, okay, so this is basically a woman taking hegel and painting
• 27:42
  at pink kind of. There's a few that there's there are quite a few
• 27:49
  post it notes on this where I have just written literally Hegel, because yeah,
• 27:56
  there are. There's quite a few references to think like Hagel. I'm
• 28:00
  just I'm just spargling mention him by name. She like mentions the concept,
• 28:06
  spargling that this female system as joint from a man to a certain degree.
• 28:11
  He said, you have the post it's that say this is literally Hegel,
• 28:15
  and then she just sort of slaps a you know, put slaps it in
• 28:19
  blue velvet and says, no, this is the female system literally that she
• 28:23
  goes through is a Gaelian. There's a bunch of stuff in the female system.
• 28:30
  We will talk about this. This is the main reason why I am
• 28:33
  here to talk about this book specifically. The female process is actually basically a
• 28:40
  wibbly, wobbly, undefinable woman. This thing like it literally can be everything
• 28:45
  and nothing. And I will explain that as we as we get feel like
• 28:48
  I have encountered this, you probably have because this one is heavily influenced by
• 28:55
  the New Age movement and also heavily influenced the New Age movement. And it
• 28:59
  was quite a popular of the book it had at the time that this version
• 29:03
  was printed. This is the second edition version, which was printed in nineteen
• 29:07
  ninety two. I think it was at that point in time it had over
• 29:10
  three hundred thousand copies sold. That was what forty years ago, so it's
• 29:15
  sold a lot more by now, so that this was quite an influential one.
• 29:18
  It's another good reason to cite these books as well, is like the
• 29:22
  defense And this goes back to what Brian said when they say, you don't
• 29:25
  understand this, you don't know this, that's not real, that's not my
• 29:27
  okay, which ones are the real ones? Then? How many of these
• 29:30
  books do I have to read? How many of these writers do I have
• 29:33
  to cite? How many of their ideas do I have to present? From
• 29:36
  all of these texts? Agree like this one and Wilson Shafe the women Study
• 29:40
  Women's Reality. This one literally on the back page says Women's studies like this
• 29:45
  is a women's studies book. If you go to any library, any university
• 29:52
  department, any women's studies fom it will be there And it will be in
• 29:55
  the women's studies depart So again another reason, and to cite these sort of
• 30:00
  things, okay, well which ones are the real ones then? But then
• 30:06
  that just reveals more that they don't actually know any of this stuff. Nope,
• 30:11
  and they just result back to the thought terminating cliche you don't know what
• 30:14
  it is. I know what it is because I am the enlightened person who
• 30:18
  my brain is so big and so ascendant, and you are just you know,
• 30:23
  you're you're you're just the filthy materialist. You might not even be a
• 30:27
  psychic. But no, I am the true I am the true healing in
• 30:30
  this I know everything. I have the spirit and the geist and blah blah
• 30:33
  blah. But they don't know the terms, so they wouldn't won't say anything
• 30:37
  like that. No, they just calling you a misogynist. Yes, So
• 30:42
  that's the one we're going to go through today. Other books which I'm going
• 30:45
  through on this topic American Feminism and the Birth of New Age Spirituality Searching for
• 30:52
  the Higher Self eighteen seventy five to nineteen fifteen. That one's by Katherine Tomba,
• 30:57
  and throughout this book she demonstrates quite convincingly how American feminism caused the birth
• 31:04
  of the New Age spiritual movement, and how they are very heavily connected together,
• 31:10
  and goes through that in some quite some detail. Other books I've actually
• 31:15
  spoken I think about this one before and Honey Badger Radio Radical spirit This is
• 31:18
  a spiritualism and women's rights in nineteenth century America. This is by Anne Broud.
• 31:25
  I remember that. Yes, this one goes through again just confirming and
• 31:30
  demonstrating the connection between those two things. In fact, actually there's a there's
• 31:34
  an excellent part that she wrote in the introduction about this. Let's see if
• 31:38
  I can find it where she actually explicitly says, yeah, no, this
• 31:41
  stuff is religious and you can't deny it. Why do you keep denying?
• 31:48
  Here we go, all right, so actually this is this is not the
• 31:51
  book that we're talking about, but I am just going to read a paragraph
• 31:53
  from it because it highlights how obviously true this is, and yet all of
• 31:57
  the modern adherents to this religion don't know. So this is from the introduction
• 32:02
  or Radical Spirits by Anne Browd. Taking spiritualism seriously as a religion means that
• 32:09
  a carder of female mediums who spread the movement should be seen as religious figures
• 32:15
  rather than as impressionable Jews. When I embarked on the research that eventually became
• 32:20
  radical spirits, more than one person asked whether I really wanted to tar women's
• 32:24
  rights with the taint of spiritualism. Wouldn't that be bad for the movement?
• 32:30
  At the time, I viewed these questions as curiously inconsistent with the goals of
• 32:34
  women's history and religious study. All historians, I believe, were committed to
• 32:38
  the quest for truth, whether or not they liked where it led. Historians
• 32:43
  of women in particular, needed to restore what had been excluded from the historical
• 32:47
  record, not to impose new sets of blinders. Students of religion aspired not
• 32:52
  to judge specific faiths, but rather to understand than interpret. So that that's
• 33:00
  a feminist author here writing in a book like this stuff is being intentionally hidden?
• 33:07
  Why stop doing it? Be honest about it, be honest about the
• 33:10
  spiritualistic tradition that you're drawing from. Yeah, I wonder what, So why
• 33:15
  do you think it was hidden? That's why I'm going through all these books?
• 33:21
  Yeah, I would very I would very much like to know. I
• 33:23
  think it's because they started embracing heavy materialism, and they just wanted to get
• 33:29
  away from religion, possibly because religion has hierarchical implications that they don't like.
• 33:36
  I think development, Yeah, I think things are pretty heavily materialists now.
• 33:43
  And the women the Women's Reality book does sort of go into the the theological
• 33:50
  side a little bit, and like I said, we will get into that
• 33:52
  one which will explain some of that perhaps maybe, but yeah, so that
• 33:58
  that is a book, the Radical Spirit one which is just basically saying,
• 34:00
  you know, this stuff is true, like just please stop denying it like
• 34:05
  you're supposed to not be denying it. Just accept that this is the origin
• 34:08
  point of your religion. Other books which are useful for this divine feminine theosophy
• 34:15
  and feminism in England. This book by Joy Dixon, which actually goes through
• 34:22
  and demonstrates the theosophical underpinning of the women's rights movement, obviously from England as
• 34:30
  the title implies. And that's very important because that brings in the woman who
• 34:36
  founded the Theosophical Society, which is Helena Blavatsk, and she was a very
• 34:44
  influential medium and psychic. Oh look, we're covering all of these same terms
• 34:50
  again, but she basically spent her entire life traveling around Europe and traveling around
• 34:55
  Asia, and she specifically wanted to fuse together Eastern Western mysticisms and occultisms.
• 35:01
  We'll talk a little bit about that going into some of the writeups. Yes,
• 35:07
  this this writer up which I want to go through shortly because hopefully that
• 35:10
  will explain it. But Bates suffice to say she borrowed a lot of stuff
• 35:15
  from narcissism, from Christian cults, kabbala from Judaism cults, and some of
• 35:20
  the stuff from Buddhist cults as well, and that basically just mashed it all
• 35:25
  together into this female led, matriarchal religion. Which is why all of the
• 35:31
  early women's rights organizations or the early feminists and pretty much every suffragist basically or
• 35:37
  not every suffragists, every suffragett pretty much all of them were Theosophists because they
• 35:45
  viewed it as art. This is a female led religion. It is a
• 35:47
  female organized thing where women hold the power. It is not a patriarchal religion
• 35:52
  of men telling you things coming down from a patriarchal male dot. It is
• 35:59
  a female religion coming from women, being generated within from women. And that
• 36:05
  was quite an important part of their spirituality, which is another part of why
• 36:08
  when you get into the New Age stuff, you just sort of have these
• 36:12
  unspoken rules that women are like more spiritual than men and more spiritually achieved than
• 36:17
  men, and men are like these just spiritually defunct things. And even if
• 36:22
  you go into one of the other offshoots of New Ages and things like Wicker,
• 36:27
  it's basically just all women led. Because it's Ask Hannah about that,
• 36:31
  she'll explain, and I can't be bothered too frankly, but I know that
• 36:37
  she was into some of that and hasn't mentioned it before. So if they're
• 36:40
  pulling from established religions, not necessarily all Abrahamic religions, Christianity, Judaism,
• 36:49
  and even Buddhism, and who knows what else, maybe Paganism or something to
• 36:52
  some degree, but they're in it sounds like they're inverting what they think those
• 37:00
  those religions represent. Like they view, say, Christianity as a patriarchal religion,
• 37:06
  so in order to create their own religion, as it were, they
• 37:10
  have to take the existing patriarchal religion as they see it and then reverse everything
• 37:16
  and put women at the top. Because they believe that that that the opposite
• 37:22
  is the case. Is that what can I just make make some yeah,
• 37:25
  before you get before you answer that teal, there can I just make an
• 37:29
  observation about Christianity as a patriarchal religion. I don't know how many people who've
• 37:34
  ever actually gone to Rome and wandered around the hell a gaunted Europe, but
• 37:42
  Rome in particular, I noticed this. Every single intersection had one specific image.
• 37:49
  You want to guess what that image was, the vagina statue. Well,
• 37:52
  sorry, virgin Mary, but vaginative as representative of female gender failure if
• 37:59
  you look at the US. But yes, yes, not the Virgin Mary
• 38:04
  with the with the baby Jesus. Yes, every single street corner. And
• 38:09
  if you go to any other place in Europe, they may not have an
• 38:13
  image of the Virgin Mary and the baby Jesus at every single street corner,
• 38:17
  but they have the Virgin Mary without the baby Jesus at the foundation of every
• 38:23
  cathedral, the foundation stone of every cathedral. Don't give me this ship that
• 38:29
  Christianity already doesn't integrate the feminine, if not Malta Maria. Of course,
• 38:37
  of course it's not. It's not patriarchal and just saying this is like what
• 38:40
  they're what I think this is an attack on roping. I just wanted to
• 38:45
  point that out because it's it's the allegation. It's not just an inversion.
• 38:51
  It's a removal of the masculine. They don't just want equality, Like look
• 38:55
  at the Barbie movie. They didn't just want the handmaidens that were assisting the
• 39:00
  patriarchal Barbies. They didn't just want to get the Kens and the Barbies to
• 39:06
  vote. They just wanted to get the Kens completely removed for having any influence
• 39:10
  whatsoever. Like that's it, like it isn't It isn't an inversion. It's
• 39:15
  a complete removal of the masculine from from Christianity under the under the apparent assumption
• 39:22
  that if there is any place for men, that means by definition, there
• 39:27
  is no place for women, or there is a place that they and the
• 39:31
  women's reality book that we're going to do so we're going to look through expressly
• 39:37
  story for story for hijacking your questions. It's okay, what was your question,
• 39:43
  Brian or the inversion? Yea, Whether it seems like a lot of
• 39:47
  the stuff that goes on in our culture now is about taking what is perceived
• 39:52
  as an oppressive system where there is a group that has all of the social,
• 39:57
  cultural or material puttal and inverting that so that the you know, it's
• 40:02
  the they're just all they can do is reverse things. Basically, it's just
• 40:06
  reversing everything. Some of it does. If we go through actually the Women's
• 40:10
  Reality books, she actually expressly in the theology section rights that our culture is
• 40:15
  set up according to this basic hierarchical structure God, men, women, children,
• 40:19
  animals, and certain parts of the New Age movement do just straight up
• 40:23
  in for that because mother guy a most important thing. They're animals, and
• 40:29
  then we must do things for like well, they don't actually reverse the children
• 40:32
  and women. Women still come first, but it goes in there one it
• 40:36
  goes earth, animals, women, children, Men like to make a comment
• 40:39
  on them, the mother Guia thing. You know, there's this classic statement
• 40:44
  in I Think Islam that every man is a woman to God. Okay,
• 40:49
  ladies, every woman is a man to Gaya get your manud around that one.
• 40:57
  I just throwing that up because I'm being a troll. But anyway,
• 41:00
  continue ignore me. The other book, and I kind of wish I've read
• 41:05
  this one first because it explains pair amount of thissm. This one is actually
• 41:10
  Science Politics and Gnosticism by Eric Vogelin, and it's a redox of pretty much
• 41:19
  everything that he's ever written, where he just goes through and explains how prevalent
• 41:23
  gnosticism is throughout pretty much everything in society. So he goes through and even
• 41:34
  he references Hegel, he references Marks, he references Heidegger as well. Heidegger
• 41:39
  was an interesting one because he was actually very Hegalian in his thinking, and
• 41:45
  if memory serves, he actually was literally a card carrying Nazi, I think,
• 41:51
  which was quite interesting given everything that we've spoken about. So that's a
• 41:57
  very interesting one, but it veers a little bit away from the specific sort
• 42:04
  of feminist and intersectional approach of it. But this one I would recommend to
• 42:07
  anyone Science Politics and Gnosticism by Eric Vogel. Buy it, Read it.
• 42:13
  It will explain quite a lot to you just how prevalent it is and how
• 42:19
  this system of thinking got through everything. I do have some very slight disagreements
• 42:24
  with Vogelin in some areas in that he talks about how he thinks that Christianity
• 42:32
  is going to be a way out of gnosticism in some ways of looking at
• 42:37
  it, which I would contest in some capacities because gnosticism is an offshoot of
• 42:44
  Christian cults. It grew out of it, and so I don't know how
• 42:46
  effective you could be at using Christianity as a means of getting away from it.
• 42:52
  But I want to read more of his stuff on it because it's quite
• 42:58
  It's just an interesting way of looking at it, I suppose. And other
• 43:04
  backups to reading this if you're really interested in the much more esoteric side of
• 43:09
  it. This book Key to Theosophy by Helena Blavatsky, which is basically a
• 43:15
  question and answer style manual of how the hell you explain theosophy to people who
• 43:19
  don't know what the hell it is? And the other book would be this
• 43:23
  one, Yeah, which is again Blebotsky The Secret Doctrine. This is literally
• 43:30
  explaining theosophy and how theosophical views is that the synthesis of like she actually literally
• 43:37
  called it, the synthesis of science, religion, and philosophy. It's just
• 43:39
  marrying all of this stuff together and basically saying that, hey, science and
• 43:43
  religion, sure they can be the same thing. Why the hell not?
• 43:46
  So those are all the books which I'm going through to achieve this project.
• 43:52
  Let's get all of these off my desk to a different part of my desk,
• 43:58
  and we will finally now talk about Women's Reality, the book that we're
• 44:02
  actually here to discuss, because that's what we're here. So we've gone against
• 44:10
  a book. Okay, yeah, yep, so yeah, No. I
• 44:13
  just think that this was necessary groundwork so that we can understand the deep lore
• 44:16
  of what what we're about to and bark into. Yeah, this stuff is,
• 44:22
  like I said, it's at least one hundred and fifty years old minimum.
• 44:27
  You could probably trace it back further than that if you wanted to.
• 44:30
  But this is already enough books for me to go through. I'm not going
• 44:35
  to be finishing this project this year, like no way in hell, mostly
• 44:37
  because it takes quite a while to read through these things and I don't have
• 44:42
  as much spare time as I would like to do. So. Also,
• 44:45
  this book that we are discussing today, Women's Reality, it's only one hundred
• 44:49
  and seventy pages long. It took me about two or three weeks to get
• 44:52
  through it because of just how frustrating it is to read. There is if
• 45:00
  I flick it around next to the microphone. Every single page has at least
• 45:05
  one post it note on it, so that's just post it notes sticking out
• 45:13
  of it. Every single page has at least one post It note, and
• 45:16
  that's just part of why it took so damn long to get through it,
• 45:20
  because I was just like, literally, what are you talking about? I
• 45:22
  mean, I just actually have some post it notes on this that just say
• 45:28
  loll one is an exclamation mark and a question mark are the ones which are
• 45:31
  just opposite of reality. And a few of them regarding some of her anecdotes,
• 45:39
  are just post it notes that say this didn't happen because they very obviously
• 45:45
  didn't happen. Some of the anecdotes in this are literally everyone stood up and
• 45:50
  clapped tier stuff. It just it's very clearly the author's fan fiction about what
• 45:57
  she wishes her life was seventy age leftist meme. Yeah, yeah, it
• 46:05
  really is so right. I'm going to finish the untitled right up so I
• 46:08
  can close that. Okay, So we've listed the books Vogelin explained narcissism.
• 46:13
  We've done that feminism is the spiritual movement. It is spiritualist in nature.
• 46:17
  We've covered that bit reading the very short part from radical spirits. So feminism
• 46:23
  aims to change society. The personal is political, as they like to say.
• 46:29
  And this coincides with the late eighteen hundreds and early nineteen hundreds rise of
• 46:32
  spiritualist mediums and theosophists, which we've covered. There is a reason why there
• 46:37
  is that popular image, you know, of the female psychic that you go
• 46:40
  to see, you know, with her her head scarf on on in the
• 46:44
  darkened room, with the table and the taro and the crystal. That's why
• 46:47
  we have that stereotype. It was the theosophists. It was the female psychics,
• 46:51
  the female mystics who were all part of this Theosophist movement. That is
• 46:55
  where that stereotype comes from. That is why we have so theosophy was founded
• 47:00
  by Helena Blavatsky. It was a combination of Eastern and Western mysticism. She
• 47:05
  traveled the world and borrowed heavily from Eastern mysticism and Western occultic traditions, Kabbala
• 47:09
  from Judaism, Gnosissism, from Christianity. One of her students who followed her
• 47:15
  around the world even wrote a book about esoteric Buddhism. So that clearly got
• 47:21
  in there as well. All of these things state, as we covered earlier,
• 47:24
  that the world is carcele meaning as in incarceration, as in it is
• 47:30
  a prison. Your means of escaping from this prison is nosis or nirvana or
• 47:36
  however the hell do you want the phrase it spirit? Escape from your body
• 47:38
  and go back to the SCE, go back to being one with whatever the
• 47:42
  source is. Whether you want to call it God or something else, doesn't
• 47:45
  really matter. That is the entire person New Ages, which is what all
• 47:49
  of this stuff grew out of. They think that all humans are just these
• 47:52
  vibrational beings and that if we all just vibrate at the right frequency, then
• 47:58
  we will transcend into non physical form where we all join together into this weird
• 48:05
  divine slurry, because that is apparently the end purpose of these things, and
• 48:12
  Women's Reality actually expressly points this out throughout chapter six and seven, which are
• 48:17
  the final two chapters, which means I can close that right up and go
• 48:23
  to the very end of this one. So chapter six, which is paradox
• 48:29
  dualism, Levels of Truth, and that title is actually very important because it's
• 48:35
  capital T truth and when you see words with capital letters, as we discussed
• 48:39
  earlier things like capital be black. It's because they have a very distinct esoteric
• 48:45
  reference to them. So capital T truth is not just normal truth as an
• 48:49
  objective truth because throughout this book she actually states that she believes objective truth doesn't
• 48:53
  exist, or more correctly, the female system believes that objective truth doesn't exist,
• 48:59
  because that's just a white male const Okay, ye can can I just
• 49:04
  I'm sorry, I'm like, I just need to I need to beak off
• 49:07
  periodically, just no offense. But I know this object to go through,
• 49:15
  no objective truth. Okay, So there's no time either if somebody, if
• 49:21
  two people disagrees, so the person with the biggest rock wins in this particular
• 49:27
  formula. Oh yeah, it goes because we're all peaceful beings and we delight
• 49:31
  in pacts. Yeah. Specifically, she even says that when people disagree,
• 49:35
  this creates paradox, and women delight in paradox apparently, Okay, just love
• 49:38
  it, whereas men don't. Men men just like things to be rigid and
• 49:44
  structured, and women women love when things make no sense. That's that's why
• 49:47
  female groups have such deep philosophical divides that they're constantly jarring. Are jousting over
• 49:54
  and male groups are all about oh you go, boy, you, oh
• 49:58
  you did, Oh that amazing. Let's all congratulate each other and pat each
• 50:01
  other on the back and kiss each other's asses, and oh we don't have
• 50:05
  any any disagreements, and we all agree on the same things that men suck.
• 50:09
  I just want to point out that what she sounds like is again that
• 50:15
  there should be only one position, you know, like I said that Christianity
• 50:19
  is no good because it even allows men to be there. So the inversion
• 50:24
  is not allowing men at all. I mean, it sounds like this is
• 50:28
  a way of saying that men's point of view is wrong. Well, actually,
• 50:31
  what am I saying? It sounds like it is like if you can't
• 50:36
  like literally she's saying, well, men, when women's ideas are so inclusive,
• 50:39
  that's why we should completely reject men's men's being as a way, that
• 50:45
  you know, way of thinking as absolutely wrong because women are so inclusive,
• 50:50
  that's why we need to reject people. It's like, what, Okay,
• 50:53
  wait the fuck? This is why the New Age position and all this stuff
• 50:59
  is that again this book we we will get to it is if you reject
• 51:02
  the white male system and you embrace the female system. Everyone then basically just
• 51:07
  begins. Isn't transcend because we start liking everything, which literally just means that
• 51:13
  basically you transcend. Haven't you just created a hierarchy, Like you're just saying,
• 51:17
  well, we reject the hierarchy, so therefore you know women's opinions are
• 51:21
  better, Well, you just created one. Congratulations. Yeah. Did I
• 51:25
  mention that I think that this author is insane and I found her book really
• 51:30
  frustrating to read. I'm yeah, lots and lots of post it notes.
• 51:38
  I'm not surprised. I'm finding it. Like I said, periodically, I
• 51:42
  got a beak off because I'm finding what you're telling me just like how all
• 51:46
  right, I've becoming newered to the fact that feminism is almost a continuous contradiction
• 51:52
  of itself. But this is that's because female system delights in power. Doose
• 52:00
  okay? Yes? Or is just a funch of bullshit that you can't run
• 52:02
  a society on okay. That's not going to keep the trains running on time
• 52:06
  or at least running okay. But here's the thing. Because the female system
• 52:10
  doesn't believe in time, so the female system is inclusive. That's why it
• 52:15
  rejects male thought. The female system is not hierarchical. That's why it's better
• 52:20
  than male thought. The female system is more equality equalitarian. That's why there
• 52:29
  are no mental allowed in it. Like all right, no, okay,
• 52:32
  I'm done. I'm just pointing it out. That's it. Yeah, that's
• 52:37
  fight. So so the chapter six, which is the paradox dualism, Levels
• 52:40
  of truth, the book asserts that the process of the female system cannot truly
• 52:45
  be measured in numbers or by instruments. In order to understand the female system,
• 52:50
  you must relinquish both intellectual and physical control. That's quote. The paradox
• 52:57
  she speaks of is right brain thinking. She is white, white male system
• 53:01
  is left brain thinking, and so cannot understand paradox. Quote. Women delight
• 53:07
  in paradox and find it stimulating and enhancing. When we experience paradox, we
• 53:12
  don't care who is in control. We realize that there is no one truth,
• 53:16
  and that all truth is what white man. The white male system forces
• 53:24
  people to think dualistically. Either or the author of their rights. Okay,
• 53:30
  I got a beak again, the white male system either or I'm just going
• 53:37
  to go back to the whole The whole Christianity things. You know, I
• 53:39
  just had a thought. I just want to mention real quick about the Smithsonian.
• 53:45
  They had that report or some kind of thing about all of the various
• 53:52
  like examples or evidence of living under a white supremacist society, and one of
• 53:58
  them was being punctual. So like da boom, this is about the time
• 54:01
  thing like that time should not exist. So it's male supremacy, yeah,
• 54:07
  white, Well yeah in this case. But I mean, like Alison,
• 54:10
  you're acting like there's some kind of logical framework to any of this to begin
• 54:15
  with. It's all about how do we use I think that these conclusions that
• 54:19
  Tilde are telling us about these women purposed in other ways. So this is
• 54:23
  why they are saying things like, well, you know, having schedules and
• 54:25
  showing up on time, you know, those are white supremacies things, or
• 54:30
  those are male things, whatever the whatever the enemy is come down people in
• 54:38
  two time. Yeah, of course, actually just says it. I'm surprised
• 54:43
  that I'm surprised that that that white male that or that that that white supremacy
• 54:47
  list didn't include having a penis being white. I was I was late today,
• 54:52
  so you know, forgive me white people yeah, that' I'm female,
• 55:02
  so I get I get a pass. I just wanted to point out that
• 55:06
  the the the female thought form is not exclusion or is not either or that's
• 55:12
  why it can be there cannot be meant. That's why that that option has
• 55:15
  to be completely removed like it is one. Do you know what this all
• 55:21
  sounds like? They just don't like the fact that there exists another point of
• 55:27
  view in the world, another kind of psychology, another being that is legitimate
• 55:31
  in and of itself, and they just want to remove it. And I
• 55:34
  swear to God, you see this in the American Psychology Association's gradual stigmatization and
• 55:44
  like dismissal of masculinity as valid and perframing it as a mental illness rather than
• 55:52
  its own thing. You see what I'm saying. It's like this, this,
• 55:54
  this is just staturated and this idea that the only right way of being
• 56:00
  is female. Yes, okay, I'm not insane. The also this,
• 56:06
  this could be titled the only right way is being being is female because the
• 56:10
  female way of being is non hierarchical. That's why it's better. It's inclusive,
• 56:15
  the only one it should exists. It's yeah, it's inclusive. That's
• 56:20
  why it's the only one it exists, and it's more equal. That's why
• 56:22
  men should disappear entirely. All right, Okay, fuck, don't don't don't
• 56:28
  worry it. This book expressly talks about how a hierarchical thinking is white male
• 56:32
  system, but then the female system also creates hierarchies in the form of levels
• 56:37
  of understanding. But again, just don't try and understand it. It doesn't
• 56:42
  make sense. Well, no, it's just woman, good man, bad
• 56:45
  man shouldn't exist like it's it's just this this childish insecurity about the existence of
• 56:51
  someone, excuse me, a way of thinking like an other people that it's
• 56:55
  it's xenophobia. Really, it's female xenophobia. It's like, oh my god,
• 57:00
  those people over on the hills with the penises, they're just evil and
• 57:05
  they don't have their rituals are wrong and the way that they talk is wrong,
• 57:08
  and the way that they think is wrong, and like, y'all you
• 57:12
  are as a bunch of goddamn this is this is like xenophobia the book.
• 57:17
  I can explain more about the xenophobia or in the book, sure, or
• 57:22
  I'm sorry, sorry for speaking out there, continues Fine, it's somewhat cathartic
• 57:28
  because I'm seeing in you the frustrations that I had while reading it, and
• 57:31
  there's there's some level of enjoyment to that, and also confirmation that I'm not
• 57:36
  as mad as I think I am going through. So when when the author
• 57:40
  talks about this a dualistic thing, she gives us an anecdote that didn't happen
• 57:46
  because none of her anecdotes happened. When she was talking to a male student
• 57:51
  and she said that the white male system creates either or thinking, and there
• 57:54
  are other ways of doing things like the female system, you know, like
• 57:59
  you can have continue and stuff. Apparently a male student stood up and shouted,
• 58:02
  we have to think dualistically. There is no other way to understand the
• 58:07
  world around us. Besides, if what you are saying is true, then
• 58:10
  everything I'm learning is wrong. My posted note just said this anecdote didn't happen,
• 58:16
  because obviously didn't. This just does not sound like something a human would
• 58:21
  say if they're a student in a lecture. Nope, yeah, you're right.
• 58:24
  Also, she's engaging in dualistic thinking like this is. The funny thing
• 58:31
  is that when you create a mono pole, like when you cut off one
• 58:36
  of the polls, you are not creating diversity, You're removing it. You
• 58:42
  know, you are actually engaging in either or thinking. It's just saying that
• 58:45
  one or is absolutely one hundred percent wrong and you can't engage in it at
• 58:49
  all. That's the funny thing. It's like this feminism, what are you
• 58:53
  fucking talking about a gender spectrum? You only want one pole. You don't
• 59:00
  want the mail poll at all. You want to get rid of it,
• 59:04
  remove it entirely from existence. There's no spectrum without at least two poles.
• 59:10
  Ah, that's another thing that really I hope that my beaking is indeed helping,
• 59:15
  but I'm just funny. It's like somebody comes up to her and says,
• 59:21
  you are engaging in either or sit this thinking when you reject mail is
• 59:24
  wrong, and she's like our dirt. But dirp, woman, good dirp.
• 59:30
  Maybe the polls are between women, like the spiritual side and the materialist
• 59:36
  side, and men are not at all a part of it. I mean,
• 59:40
  I don't know. So I got, I got, I got a
• 59:45
  couple of super childs. I should read them really quick. Sorry, I
• 59:47
  won't. I won't play the rumble chant or the badger changing giggles, but
• 59:52
  I'll put her on the screen. So I got one from anonymous for five
• 59:58
  bucks. And they say, in my experience, there has always been two
• 1:00:01
  distinct currents to the women's rights movement, like a river split in half.
• 1:00:06
  On one hand, you have the materialists who wrote write the papers that you're
• 1:00:08
  looking at. They're bathed in the anti spiritual materialism of Marxism and his ilk.
• 1:00:15
  The other current is the Goddess of the Water's culture, which rejects the
• 1:00:17
  materialism. I think the hippies and the crystal type. I think the reason
• 1:00:22
  that the goddess part was hidden by the materialist was because of the deep hatred
• 1:00:27
  of all things religious and spiritual inherent in Marxist like philosophies. The goddess culture
• 1:00:32
  is the part of the family, I guess, part of the family they
• 1:00:37
  don't like to talk about. Strangely enough, or maybe not so much.
• 1:00:42
  It is the male feminist slash Marxists, in my experience, who still honor
• 1:00:45
  the goddess culture. Do you n want to say anything to that? All
• 1:00:52
  right, well, thank you for that, very insightful appreciate I did,
• 1:00:54
  I did, Okay, Well you should say something all right, go.
• 1:00:58
  I know I was, I was struggling with the mute button because I got
• 1:01:00
  like two computers and then I was like, why is this not on muting.
• 1:01:04
  I'm like, oh wait, I'm on the wrong computer. But I
• 1:01:07
  just wanted to say, in relation to this, you know that the the
• 1:01:13
  hippie crystal women are now Nazis or you if you're referring to the reaction to
• 1:01:19
  COVID. Sure, but I mean yeah, yeah, no, no,
• 1:01:22
  I mean they're sure they're they're Nazis according to the pro science folks. Yeah,
• 1:01:28
  the the but this is this is something like they're the women who are
• 1:01:34
  now into herbalism and uh, you know, natural healing and all of that
• 1:01:39
  kind of stuff. They are now considered to be Nazis or at least Nazi
• 1:01:45
  adjacent by sure. The anarchists that seemed to take all of their positions from
• 1:01:52
  a corporate pr hand out, it's the commies. Yeah, yeah there,
• 1:02:00
  but let's be honest, let's be honest to happen, do any of their
• 1:02:05
  positions Do any of their positions differ from basically corporate uh uh dove speak anarchists
• 1:02:14
  because they can't. Those are those are those are not compatible but I'm just
• 1:02:21
  saying that if you're advocating for pharma, big pharma, media, big media,
• 1:02:25
  and all of this other shit like huge huge, you're basically protecting the
• 1:02:31
  farma getting huge huge what is it like profits? And I have told them,
• 1:02:40
  I said, well, if you're gonna give this kind of immunity to
• 1:02:43
  pharma, maybe you should not allow them to profit off of it, because
• 1:02:46
  that's a that's a huge moral hazard, And these so called commies are like,
• 1:02:51
  no, they should be able to profit, like really anyway, anyway,
• 1:02:54
  that's that's irrelevant. But ultimately, the women that that this individual is
• 1:02:58
  talking about are now consider not see adjacent, and I find that fascinating.
• 1:03:02
  And I also find it fascinating whenever I go into like to get my magnesium
• 1:03:07
  and other supplements, they're the only place that still shows white couples with children
• 1:03:15
  in their advertising. So I'm maybe there's something to that. Okay, all
• 1:03:20
  right, sorry, real quick, now the other super chow and then I'll
• 1:03:23
  give it to Tildeer again. So well he's he's gonna be going, oh
• 1:03:29
  yeah, till did you want to add anything to that other super chow that
• 1:03:31
  I just read? I am enjoying resting my voice for a few Yeah,
• 1:03:36
  that's probably that's what We've got a while more to go. Yeah, yeah,
• 1:03:38
  yeah. So Anonymous gives us five bucks and says, if you want
• 1:03:43
  one perspective on the tendency of the materialist left slash feminist slash Marxist tendency to
• 1:03:47
  ignore religion and religious aspects of their theories by C. S. Lewis's Meditations
• 1:03:52
  in a tool Shed short to the point, and he witnessed the shift happened
• 1:03:57
  firsthand. And then there includes a link to C. S. Lewis essay,
• 1:04:00
  Meditation in a tool Shed. I like watching C. S. Lewis's
• 1:04:06
  essay. You can watch a bunch of them on YouTube. They are pretty
• 1:04:10
  insightful. All I will say is that I think there have been people in
• 1:04:15
  the Christian world that had been talking about this stuff for a very long time.
• 1:04:20
  I will make a recommendation, look up father Sarah fim Rose. Everything
• 1:04:27
  that James Lindsay is doing videos on, Sarah fim Rose was doing it first,
• 1:04:31
  and he did it like in the I don't know, like he's working
• 1:04:34
  on it like in the seventies. So I know that, like some people
• 1:04:39
  might be turned off by the fact that I've even suggested a priest. But
• 1:04:43
  maybe you should ask yourself why you're questioning that to begin with, because I
• 1:04:47
  think that Christians were among the first people to be thrown into a black category
• 1:04:53
  where you're not supposed to want to hear from them. And there's probably a
• 1:04:56
  good reason, because Sarah from Rose was talking about this long for James Lindsay
• 1:05:00
  even started on this journey. So anyway, thank you for that, and
• 1:05:04
  I'm going to give the floor back to Tilder so great. I'm going to
• 1:05:10
  go back, I think, to the start of the right up, because
• 1:05:14
  that's actually I think going to explain the white male system and the female systems
• 1:05:18
  rather than just sort of picking at these odd bits at the end. I
• 1:05:21
  really just sort of wanted to go there because the two end chapters are talking
• 1:05:26
  about dualism and levels of truth and female system of theology. If that doesn't
• 1:05:30
  tell you that this is a religion, I don't know what else will.
• 1:05:33
  Like it's literally there, black and white. We're using the term theology to
• 1:05:38
  describe this. We're literally talking about white male system of theology and female system
• 1:05:43
  of theology. You don't really get much more on the nose than that.
• 1:05:46
  So we're going to go back to the beginning of the Women's Reality right up,
• 1:05:49
  and then we'll go through And this might explain some of this, some
• 1:05:54
  of it. I might repeat myself a little bit regarding the first bits of
• 1:05:58
  what I've said. But again this is because these are all separate writeups written
• 1:06:01
  for different reasons. So Schafe, which is the author of this book,
• 1:06:06
  wrote a follow up book in twenty sixteen. There will be a thousand Years
• 1:06:11
  apiece and Prosperity, and they will be ushered in by the women. Version
• 1:06:15
  one and version two The Essential Role of Women in finding personal and planetary solutions.
• 1:06:23
  This book is written in two halves, both telling the same narrative.
• 1:06:27
  The first time it is written in the style of an Irish Cherokee woman and
• 1:06:30
  uses poetry, song and stories to relate information. Second time she writes the
• 1:06:34
  book, it's written as a normal book. This would seem to be informed
• 1:06:39
  by her musings on white male system thinking and female system thinking. Schafe talks
• 1:06:45
  about how as women get clear within themselves and speak out to their truth,
• 1:06:49
  anyone and everyone and everything on this planet moves into a life giving moves into
• 1:06:57
  more life giving options than what we are currently experiencing. And the reason that
• 1:07:02
  I've put that in is because that from a book written in twenty sixteen very
• 1:07:06
  heavily mirrors what was written in this book. This book at the end when
• 1:07:11
  it talks about the white male system theology versus the female system theology, she
• 1:07:18
  actually basically explicitly says that the white male system she actually refers to it as
• 1:07:23
  pollution in this book anyway, and how it is leading to exploitation and destruction
• 1:07:30
  of the planet, and how the female system will avert that crisis so literally,
• 1:07:34
  and she's bringing the climate religion in then yes, yeah, yes,
• 1:07:41
  yeah, yeah, well all of that stuff again because while it grew out
• 1:07:44
  the hippie stop in the sixties, so of course, and you see,
• 1:07:46
  okay, guys, I just want to point out that this isn't just academia.
• 1:07:50
  You see the threads of this moving into the health industry in terms of
• 1:07:55
  the American Psychological Association, the condemnation, the criminalization, the stigmatization, and
• 1:08:02
  the othering of masculinity as wrong. You see that being reflected in how people
• 1:08:11
  practice this supposedly mental health. And this is like, this is this is
• 1:08:16
  just xenophobia. This is women saying, well, there's something outside of us
• 1:08:21
  that must be wrong. It's xenophobes, and these xenophobes are informing how men
• 1:08:27
  are treated in the most intimate manner. It's disgusting and it's very critical to
• 1:08:32
  see that there is a direct line from this to actual harm to men,
• 1:08:38
  actual policies towards men, and you know, actual things that are said about
• 1:08:43
  men in the media in academia. This is rot and it's taking lives.
• 1:08:49
  And the other thing is that if you think about us in terms of our
• 1:08:54
  evolution, let's imagine that you know, Gaya, Mother Earth in creating men
• 1:09:01
  didn't make a gigantic mistake. And actually the reason why men have persisted as
• 1:09:08
  half the human race is because there's they exist and are of benefit to the
• 1:09:13
  human race. Then condemning men is destruction. Is ultimately a society at war
• 1:09:21
  with reality and its own future, right, because you can't like the men
• 1:09:28
  would never have evolved if they weren't of benefit to human community, to women,
• 1:09:33
  to children, right, they wouldn't. They would have just been because
• 1:09:38
  they are They're a net limitter on reproduction. We'd all just be female asexuals
• 1:09:44
  butting off like offspring. But males persist because there's a reason for them.
• 1:09:53
  They benefit though the process of reproduction, the health of their their species,
• 1:09:59
  and human males are no difference. So this entire toxic narrative about men being
• 1:10:03
  wrong is anti everything. It's even anti Mother Nature because you're basically saying,
• 1:10:14
  oh, yeah, mother Nature, you made a huge damn mistake. Well
• 1:10:17
  no, she didn't. Even if you believe she exists, You're you're being
• 1:10:24
  apostates, You're thrumbing your nose at Mother Nature. Okay, I just wanted
• 1:10:30
  to point that out. And I'm not necessarily saying that everybody has to worship
• 1:10:33
  Mother Nature. I'm just saying that even in that context, what these women
• 1:10:38
  are doing and saying is I mean, if you if you think about guy
• 1:10:43
  as being some sort of penultimate good, then you have to think that what
• 1:10:47
  has happened on this earth is what she if you want to go that right
• 1:10:51
  designed, Therefore they are once again defying God or Goddess. You see what
• 1:10:59
  I'm saying. That would be true if this author didn't define the female process
• 1:11:04
  as being God in the end part of the book. Okay, so we'll
• 1:11:09
  get there eventually. So there's nothing greater than a human woman, not even
• 1:11:12
  gaya. That's what I'm saying, like this is this is absolute hubris and
• 1:11:18
  xenophobia. And the fact is that we indulge women so much in their bullshit
• 1:11:25
  that we don't call this out. This should have died in the crib.
• 1:11:33
  There is one, one, one good thing out of this though, because
• 1:11:36
  I do think this is a good road to go down. Is that if
• 1:11:40
  you can demonstrate that this is in fact a religion, then and and it
• 1:11:45
  looks like it has all of the you know, let's say it has all
• 1:11:50
  of the characteristics of one, then you can remove it from like government policy,
• 1:12:00
  because then otherwise we're I mean, we're basically living in a theocracy in
• 1:12:03
  the way that everything is, how everything is informed by this stuff. So
• 1:12:08
  yes, that would have to go. Good luck, right, that's all
• 1:12:14
  I'm going to say, good luck, because that won't happen because people like
• 1:12:17
  women too much, except for when they hate them and oppress them and create
• 1:12:20
  a society for the benefit of men at the expensive women. It's ascounting that
• 1:12:25
  the society that this society for the benefit of men at the expensive women has
• 1:12:30
  allowed women to this women's xenophobia and belief that men don't have legitimacy to their
• 1:12:39
  existence to infect so many of its parts, to become such an overwhelming narrative
• 1:12:47
  that's influencing psychology or even making demands of psychology that are being met. This
• 1:12:56
  is as a note there, I would like to remind people hear that this
• 1:13:00
  Anne Willison shaf woman that we're reading this book. A lot of her anecdotes
• 1:13:04
  throughout this book take place in therapy sessions or in group that either individually or
• 1:13:09
  in groups, So she's actually talking to people in a therapeutic context about this
• 1:13:15
  crap uh huh, and telling people that this stuff is the truth and how
• 1:13:20
  it works. Forty years ago, I thought there wasn't really any surprise that
• 1:13:24
  the APA turned out how it did. Now, no, we at the
• 1:13:28
  end of history? Did we get there is the dialectic over they're gonna try.
• 1:13:34
  Yeah, there are people who are There are men who have died because
• 1:13:38
  of this crap. I mean, the main problem is that people are still
• 1:13:42
  alive. At the end of history, we won't be alive because we'll all
• 1:13:45
  be vibrating spirits, which means we all have to die to reach the end
• 1:13:48
  of history. I'm so feminism is not only just a religion or a cult.
• 1:13:54
  It is actively a death cult because this is the underlying truth to it,
• 1:13:58
  that you have to be free from your mortal coil so that you can
• 1:14:00
  escape from the demiurge. At fundament they don't know that that's the underlying part
• 1:14:05
  of their religion. But yes, feminism is actually at its core deeficult.
• 1:14:11
  Yeah, I was wondering why, like why this constant drumbeat of wanting to
• 1:14:16
  destroy itself, like I have on a previous video that we did on one
• 1:14:21
  of shoes videos, like there's this woman in the comments, who's who's talking
• 1:14:26
  about how well women shouldn't have to find men the average man attractive. They
• 1:14:30
  just want to mate with the top men. I'm like, yes, but
• 1:14:33
  the top men don't want you, Like, let's be honest, they'll screw
• 1:14:38
  you, but they don't want a long term relationship with you. And the
• 1:14:42
  way that you're structuring society, there's no future to it because you've got at
• 1:14:45
  some point you can no longer borrow on the money that your great grandchildren are
• 1:14:49
  not making because they're not gonna be born right. At some point, all
• 1:14:54
  of it collapses. This pons on the topic of children. If I were
• 1:14:57
  to tell you that this author says the women hate the children, would that
• 1:15:00
  surprise anyone? We'll get there eventually. But yeah, well, you know,
• 1:15:08
  like as much as I would like it acknowledged that women aren't this amorphous
• 1:15:13
  goodness like and perfect mothers, I think that's going a little freaking far.
• 1:15:18
  Oh No, No, women hate their children because their children oppressed them by
• 1:15:24
  giving them purpose. Because by giving them purpose, they're tying them to the
• 1:15:29
  material world, not allowing them to become these vibrational spirit I'm sorry, I'm
• 1:15:32
  getting off. I'm getting into the side of stuff for all of them getting
• 1:15:36
  through this. God damn, that makes so much sense. This is why
• 1:15:40
  abortion is a sacrament, Yes, because having children gives women a material purpose,
• 1:15:47
  and a material purpose is being colonized by the masculine or you know,
• 1:15:55
  and and then you have to take care of them and ship and that's horrible.
• 1:15:59
  Oh, this is crawlingly awful. Ye Shall I continue? Ah?
• 1:16:06
  Okay, yes, I guess. Okay. So the author's note from the
• 1:16:11
  nineteen ninety two edition, which is this one that I'm reading, the author
• 1:16:15
  has changed her view regarding the white male system and female system. She states
• 1:16:19
  she was in her fairness phase when she wrote this book and now believes that
• 1:16:24
  both the white male system and the female system are both collaborative sides of the
• 1:16:28
  addictive system. The addictive system does not support life or living. The female
• 1:16:32
  system has since become known to her as the living process system, which is
• 1:16:38
  life supporting and life sustaining. Ten years on, and the author basically declares
• 1:16:43
  that the white male system, which is Gramsky's hedemon, is a system of
• 1:16:46
  death for humanity and the planet, and we all need to move to the
• 1:16:49
  female system so that we and the planet will not die. This is heavily
• 1:16:55
  influenced by a New Age thinking via the school of gnostic immanentism as described by
• 1:17:00
  Vogelin, but this combines with the borderline new Age female divine view of humanity
• 1:17:04
  as can be seen throughout the book and how the author describes the female system,
• 1:17:09
  female thinking and women's ways of knowing and becoming. Becoming is a Hegelian
• 1:17:15
  and later Marxist term for the dialectic process the thesis, antithesis synthesis. The
• 1:17:20
  synthesis is the end in the end of the process is the becoming. For
• 1:17:26
  more information on this, read about hegel and the concept of alpha, which
• 1:17:30
  recovered earlier. So throughout this book, system theory is used because she's talking
• 1:17:35
  about systems, male system and female system. A system theory can be the
• 1:17:41
  observation of things interacting. That's what it can be. It can also be
• 1:17:45
  an imminentist view, as described by Vogelin. The imminentist view can be found
• 1:17:49
  in the philosophies of Hegel and his dialectic method, the idea that all thoughts
• 1:17:55
  have an opposite that results in two conflicting ideas, usually irreconciling conf which is
• 1:18:00
  a Marxist term that you'll find them using quite a lot. By the way,
• 1:18:04
  these these ideas, the thesis and its opposing antithesis, must be melded
• 1:18:10
  together in synthesis, the combination of both together, thus working out the conflict.
• 1:18:15
  The reason this results in imminent is thinking is that the end result of
• 1:18:17
  Hegel's thought process is that eventually all contradictions will be synthesized. This will result
• 1:18:24
  in the end of history, humans reaching a not properly defined utopia free of
• 1:18:29
  contradiction and conflict. This is within the framework of the Death of God,
• 1:18:34
  where humans become divine because they know all the things. Even Marxist dialectic materialism
• 1:18:41
  uses this framework. They just use different words and obscure the theological underpinnion.
• 1:18:47
  Page two of this book literally says that the understanding and defining of female theory
• 1:18:54
  female system theory comes from synthesis, not analysis. Analysis is male system thinking.
• 1:19:00
  The author mentions how having objective and defined roots to get there is restricting
• 1:19:05
  and limiting because it is white male system thinking. Female system thinking is based
• 1:19:12
  on process not results. I'm sure you're seeing how this is very much the
• 1:19:16
  dialectic doesn't actually care about the result. It just cares about the process of
• 1:19:19
  working out the condiction. Female system focuses on the process of vaguely defined understanding
• 1:19:27
  and growth throughout the book, i e. The synthesis of becoming. The
• 1:19:31
  author states on page four this book is not the answer and may cause conflict
• 1:19:36
  and facilitate growth aka the dialectic process. Page five, the author states,
• 1:19:43
  if men don't understand the mystical woo they are reading, discuss this book with
• 1:19:47
  five women, three of whom are feminists, also known as submit to the
• 1:19:53
  struggle session. Would anyone like to chime in? I go into what is
• 1:20:00
  the white male system? I would like to know, but I will say
• 1:20:04
  that struggle sessions are a form of psychological torture. Yes, okay, let's
• 1:20:11
  move on. Okay, what is the white male system, as this book
• 1:20:15
  de fights, the white male system is where the power and influence lies with
• 1:20:19
  white males. It didn't happen overnight. It's a long process of evolution upheld
• 1:20:26
  by everyone. You're probably getting whips of Dramsky in that idea. It is
• 1:20:30
  just a system and does not reflect reality. Even when the white male system
• 1:20:35
  attempts to measure reality and be objective, it is just asserting its dominance and
• 1:20:41
  maintaining itself without the actors within the systems knowing or understanding how or why.
• 1:20:46
  See the concept of the panopticon. Does everyone know what the panopticon is?
• 1:20:51
  In this maybe we should explain it. Okay, So the pop sicon is
• 1:21:01
  God, I haven't had enough sleep to remember the name of the guy who
• 1:21:03
  came up with it. But the concept of the panopticon is that basically,
• 1:21:06
  if you've got a bunch of people in a prison and you have a central
• 1:21:10
  tower and there are it is basically unknown whether or not there are guards in
• 1:21:15
  that tower or not, because the tower can see all the prisoners, but
• 1:21:18
  the prisoner can't see the guards, then the prisoners always behave as if they're
• 1:21:23
  being monitored when they're not. And so having people basically being unknowing it being
• 1:21:30
  unknown whether or not they are being watched or being forced into a pattern of
• 1:21:32
  action, they will just uphold the states quote because they don't actually know if
• 1:21:36
  they have to maintain it or not. That's that's a fundament the concept of
• 1:21:45
  that's good enough. Yeah, that seems good enough. Yeah, okay,
• 1:21:47
  yeah, because I don't know if ah, sorry, three hours of sleep.
• 1:21:53
  Okay, let's keep going. Okay. It decides what the go came
• 1:21:57
  up with? Is Jeremy Bentham in the late eighteenth century, right social theorist
• 1:22:01
  Jeremy Bentham ben Tham Bentham, Sorry, maybe it's I. I'm terrible with
• 1:22:09
  names at the best of times, and this is not the best of times.
• 1:22:13
  So the white male system, it decides what is knowledge and how it
• 1:22:16
  is taught. The white male system envelopes all other systems, including black,
• 1:22:20
  Native American, Asian, and female. Everything is racist, everything is sexist,
• 1:22:27
  everything is homophobic. You need people who understand the other systems to point
• 1:22:31
  it all out. Because the white male system can't or won't understand any system
• 1:22:38
  other than the white male system. There is a word for that. Essentially,
• 1:22:46
  Yeah, this is essentially the lived experience thing. Then is that is
• 1:22:49
  that an example of that, you know, like when left to say my
• 1:22:55
  lived experience and that that somehow makes is like additional knowledge that the same origin.
• 1:23:03
  Ye, But there was a there was one author and I can't remember
• 1:23:11
  their name at all who it was, but this was the you know,
• 1:23:15
  white people can understand white people thing, but black people can understand black people
• 1:23:18
  stuff and white people stuff. And it was one of the main critical race
• 1:23:23
  theorists. And I cannot remember which one it was. It doesn't really matter
• 1:23:28
  because I've said that, and if people really want to find out who it
• 1:23:30
  is, they will, But that it's the exact same logic being used here.
• 1:23:35
  So the author states here she had to learn with the help of two
• 1:23:40
  black people, not if she was racist, but how she was racist.
• 1:23:45
  But the white male system is analogous to pollution. It's everywhere, and you're
• 1:23:50
  so used to it that you can't see it. Native Americans saw it first,
• 1:23:56
  then blacks who went their own way to make their own system. This
• 1:24:00
  is a basic loose defense for ghettos and gang culture forty years on, but
• 1:24:03
  it isn't addressed. I also have a sneaking suspicion that the author likes to
• 1:24:09
  paint the Native Americans in a good light here because she's one of the one
• 1:24:13
  drop folk Hunter's kind of people, maybe like the noble savage. Yeah,
• 1:24:19
  but I think she's also one of them by like a single drop of blood.
• 1:24:24
  Yeah yeah, sure, right, yeah, so she likes to paint
• 1:24:28
  them in a somewhat positive light in some cases. So, because blacks don't
• 1:24:34
  accept the white male system, they have increased rates of strokes and heart attacks,
• 1:24:40
  high blood pressure, and ulcers. This is because the white male system
• 1:24:44
  says white men are superior. Women also accept the white women who accept the
• 1:24:50
  white male system also suffer the same. The white male system kills everyone who
• 1:24:56
  isn't a white male because they learn to accept their inferi priority and die for
• 1:25:00
  the stress. This is okay, So, but why do white women like
• 1:25:05
  why are they longest living women except for like Asian women who will probably lives
• 1:25:12
  the paradox, Alison, they are in it. Perhaps they are long living
• 1:25:15
  but long suffering, Alison. You know what's really funny is this really isn't
• 1:25:20
  a paradox because I see that her conclusions are always the same. What's paradoxical
• 1:25:26
  is that she comes to the same conclusions from exactly opposing evidence, Like evidence
• 1:25:32
  of X is evidence of why, and evidence of why is also evidence of
• 1:25:35
  why. That probably is not a really good analogy. Everything is evidence of
• 1:25:42
  her conclusion, even if it's stuff that's directly contradicting the other stuff, because
• 1:25:49
  she's brainwashed by a white male the system thinking, and so are you.
• 1:25:53
  And that's why. See, part of the reason that you're trying to understand
• 1:25:56
  it is because you're a white male system. Yes, I am not white
• 1:26:00
  mail system. I am Allison's system. Sorry, no, I reject your
• 1:26:08
  fucking I will never submit to this crap reality. There is a reality,
• 1:26:18
  and we acquire better understanding by listening to other people's point of views, arguing
• 1:26:28
  based on a logic and reason and evidence, and uh, it's it's we
• 1:26:34
  we can. You know that's really ironic, is because when you look at
• 1:26:39
  the so called Maile view of consensus, like it's about logic and reason and
• 1:26:45
  evidence, and anybody can contribute logic and reason and evidence and their point of
• 1:26:49
  view and whatever else. And then we are all just sort of coming together
• 1:26:53
  and working on what's real. And then this woman comes and says, no,
• 1:26:56
  that's wrong. What you need is a commune system, which basically means
• 1:27:00
  I'm always right. Shut up. Yeah, well, the author does actually
• 1:27:05
  basically say that in this book. We'll get there. So, you know,
• 1:27:10
  because I've said this before, the system of logic and reason and evidence
• 1:27:16
  is ultimately an egalitarian system. It is everybody can contribute. Everybody can have
• 1:27:24
  an opinion. It will be vetted for how well it adheres to the evidence
• 1:27:29
  and the logic, but everybody can have one basically, And basically, evidence
• 1:27:33
  and logic is just a merit meritocracy about what you're trying to assert. And
• 1:27:41
  she's replacing that diversity with yeah, this is the conclusion that you're allowed.
• 1:27:47
  Why are you allowed it because I got the boobs? Shut up? Why
• 1:27:53
  is this the conclusion because I got the boobs? Shut up? That's it?
• 1:28:00
  Oh well, but what happens with trans women? Are they allowed to
• 1:28:01
  have access to this kind of gnosis, this kind of absolute truth? I
• 1:28:06
  guess that's the that that is the that is the religious that is the you
• 1:28:10
  know how you know, early Christianity they kept branching off into heresies. You
• 1:28:15
  know that that's what we're seeing right now. We're seeing the religion of woman
• 1:28:19
  branching into a heresy can men become women? And uh, and then then
• 1:28:25
  I'll then have access to the female nosis and uncertainty or or are they permanently
• 1:28:32
  scarred by the original sin of penis? Okay, I don't know if I'm
• 1:28:38
  adding to the conversation anymore. It's an interesting that that's actually a very interesting
• 1:28:43
  way of looking at it, Like, yeah, that would actually fit because
• 1:28:46
  this book very much is wibbly, wobbly, undefinable womanness that definitely makes you
• 1:28:50
  a woman, And so what is a woman? Everything and nothing? Woman
• 1:28:59
  is a process. Yeah, but I'm pretty sure that the adherents of this
• 1:29:01
  womanism would probably say that men couldn't, like, if you're born biologically male,
• 1:29:08
  you are permanently cast down as one of the fallen eight fault well not
• 1:29:12
  even angels, the demons, the demon people probably, But because of the
• 1:29:16
  time this book was written, the trans thing doesn't really come up. Yeah,
• 1:29:20
  they hadn't. They hadn't had to contend with the would become so toxic
• 1:29:28
  for men that they decided fuck it under woman now because it's you know,
• 1:29:32
  honestly good for them. I think that's the real problem that the Turfs have
• 1:29:40
  with I mean, like, the Conservatives are basically just the Turf's fucking simps
• 1:29:44
  at this point. But I think the real problem that the Turfs have with
• 1:29:46
  trans women is that they are what they think are men with moral authority over
• 1:29:51
  women, and that just pisses them. It has nothing to do with bathrooms
• 1:29:57
  or being afraid of female prisoners. I don't know why the hell you would
• 1:30:00
  think that the the demonic entities known as the women and female prisons or someone
• 1:30:08
  you should care, like worry about, Like, I don't know, maybe
• 1:30:12
  they'll choke on a trans woman's bones after they eat, but who knows.
• 1:30:15
  But whatever, that's not their real concern. The real concern is there might
• 1:30:21
  be biological males what they consider biological males who have moral authority over women.
• 1:30:28
  That terrifies them. Okay, now maybe I have gone too far. No,
• 1:30:36
  I'm just passing that that it policies a smell test. It does make
• 1:30:43
  sense, and they're just using the the bathrooms and the female prisons as ways
• 1:30:48
  of sucking. Conservatives in to the argument that men should never have any kind
• 1:30:54
  of moral authority over women, And of course conservatives are lapping it up because
• 1:30:58
  you know, that can't that's not gonna, that's not gonna splash back on
• 1:31:02
  any kind of conservative thought. This idea that men might have some moral authority
• 1:31:09
  over that's not gonna. That's not gonna be a problem or contradictory with anything
• 1:31:13
  that conservatives might espouse. They always slit their own throats. It's just okay,
• 1:31:19
  all right, anyway, let's get back to back to the white male
• 1:31:24
  system. So the white male system has four myths upholding it. One,
• 1:31:30
  it is the only system, and that system is reality. Anyone denying this
• 1:31:34
  is labeled crazy, especially women. This leads to the need for white male
• 1:31:40
  system validation see myth three. The second myth, the white male system is
• 1:31:45
  innately superior to other systems, interesting since it's the only one in its world
• 1:31:51
  view, but we'll gloss over that because what's another contradiction Myth three. The
• 1:31:57
  white male system knows everything and understands all. This is why women need validation
• 1:32:02
  from men, for it is possible to be objective, logical, and rational.
• 1:32:09
  The fourth myth leads to denying intuition subjectivity and feelings, which is female
• 1:32:15
  system thinking. The white male system thinking leads men to believe they are innately
• 1:32:19
  superior. Page eighteen, the author says an anecdote that didn't happen to prove
• 1:32:25
  her point. In a session she told people these myths. One man became
• 1:32:30
  angry and said, if what you're saying is true, I'm nothing but a
• 1:32:32
  piece of shit. If I'm not innately superior and I don't know or understand
• 1:32:38
  everything, then I'm nothing but a piece of shit, just like the rest
• 1:32:42
  of you. Is this is And then everyone stood up and clapped tea fan
• 1:32:47
  fiction. Yeah, this is bullshit. I'm pretty sure that also. I
• 1:32:55
  can just imagine her walking in the world that male thought made, you know,
• 1:33:00
  plumbing, electricity, gigantic skyscrapers, all of the benefits that she enjoys,
• 1:33:09
  and just being like a male thought is worthless. Really until she complains
• 1:33:15
  about climate control. Climate control, Wait until she complains about it. She
• 1:33:21
  does in a very very funny way. How how maybe we need to make
• 1:33:27
  split this into two because I don't know how much more I can take in
• 1:33:30
  one day. Sorry too, No, it's okay, I mean, if
• 1:33:34
  you're okay with it. Till dar I'm okay with it. I am okay,
• 1:33:39
  I honestly I want this over with. I understand, okay, mostly
• 1:33:45
  because I've got all these all the damn books that I need to get through
• 1:33:47
  to actually complete this project at some point in the future. How much more
• 1:33:54
  content do we have to go through to get to the end of this?
• 1:34:00
  Maybe the same amount twice over of what we've done of this, right,
• 1:34:04
  so two thirds more roughly, okay, because this is going to be like
• 1:34:11
  a six hour podcast, it shouldn't be. I might be able to get
• 1:34:15
  through some of it. There there are optional bits which I could cut out.
• 1:34:23
  I'll just power through. I guess. I think I think it's I
• 1:34:27
  know that Telia wants to get through it, but I think that the this
• 1:34:30
  is important and I can see that this is very important stuff. It kind
• 1:34:34
  of like is in line with the work that jansp A Mango has been doing,
• 1:34:38
  although her work is more historical about but it's sort of making the same
• 1:34:43
  case, right, But I think it's important stuff. So I mean,
• 1:34:47
  I'm okay with like doing maybe two three at the most on it, and
• 1:34:55
  then let tield your work on the project. And this will give people a
• 1:34:59
  sample of what he has planned, and I think it's I personally think it's
• 1:35:01
  worth doing and worth going into. It's a it's an important Essentially, what
• 1:35:06
  I was asking was, Tilder, do you want to adjourn like and then
• 1:35:12
  do a get another show and or power through. I'm happy to keep going.
• 1:35:17
  My lack of sleep as apparently abated. Okay. I think it's because
• 1:35:23
  I'm actually just getting into it. So okay, all right, well so
• 1:35:28
  just one show before you do. I did get another rumble rant, and
• 1:35:31
  I thought I would read it because maybe Tilda can respond to this before he
• 1:35:34
  continues. So Noba Fan twenty one gives his one dollar and says, can
• 1:35:39
  you help me understand what the author means by it's a process. Yes,
• 1:35:45
  we'll do that later because that's the female system that will be explained when we
• 1:35:50
  do that. Okay, Sorry, another session, another angry white man said,
• 1:35:56
  if you get power, you'll do the same thing to us that we've
• 1:35:59
  done to you. Another anecdote that didn't happen regarding oppressing women and non white
• 1:36:04
  since forever. The funny thing is forty years on and he was right.
• 1:36:09
  See the expansive definitions of racism in CRT and the past discrimination requires present discrimination
• 1:36:15
  rhetoric. There is a part about the author's race consciousness raising we can skip
• 1:36:21
  that because it doesn't really matter. It's not relevant to the feminism bit.
• 1:36:27
  So the author asserts the white male system desire to be God manifests in the
• 1:36:32
  form of air conditioning and artificial lights. The white male system has quote embraced
• 1:36:39
  the scientific method and distorted it so as to achieve godhood end quote. Later
• 1:36:44
  in the book, the author will assert that women are just more accepting of
• 1:36:46
  the natural environment as is, and thus would not seek to make climate controlled
• 1:36:53
  places. This is the opposite of reality. Women frequently working climate controlled environs
• 1:36:59
  by a choice, and will often only enter a field of work once the
• 1:37:02
  environment is suitably controlled, safe, and in a state of homeostasis. The
• 1:37:11
  author asserts that in its original form, science was about being open minded and
• 1:37:15
  learning. Women and non whites distrust science for good reason, because it doesn't
• 1:37:20
  make sense. We can be quote we can be convinced that numbers are real,
• 1:37:26
  though we forget they are only symbols that represent other realities. Numbers are
• 1:37:30
  just words in a foreign language. We can learn to speak French, and
• 1:37:34
  we can learn to speak numbers as well. But this does not mean that
• 1:37:39
  numbers have special powers. Oh, the French ain't real, yo, I
• 1:37:44
  missed, I do it. France isn't real. It's just an illusion that
• 1:37:50
  the Europeans created. French don't real, numbers don't real. It's it's just
• 1:37:56
  it's all just ideas. Guys. We can change our back to this thing
• 1:38:00
  with France. Why isn't the real enemy? I think we should be asking
• 1:38:04
  the French question, are you guys real? I mean, Jesus, bighets
• 1:38:12
  only air? Yeah. Also, bighets are basically ways to cut your gums
• 1:38:19
  up there, I said it. They're just mouth torture baked goods. All
• 1:38:30
  right, No, this is what the okay? What? Yeah, this
• 1:38:38
  is just the author relying on a fallacy of social constructions. Just we have
• 1:38:43
  abstract ways of representing our ideas, of representing things that are objectively true.
• 1:38:47
  But she's making the card no mistake that all of these leftists to do,
• 1:38:50
  which is not really a mistake. It's by intent where they basically just say
• 1:38:55
  that, well, because we have a socially constructed system for understanding something objective,
• 1:38:59
  that means the objective thing donal, which is wrong, But it's just
• 1:39:03
  the fallacy that if the objective objectivity is subjective, it's a mutual subjectivity.
• 1:39:11
  In other words, people come with a reason, they come with a logical
• 1:39:15
  argument, they come with evidence, and they say this is probably approximating reality,
• 1:39:19
  and other people are like, yep, let's let's put this to the
• 1:39:23
  test. Oh, yeah, it does seem to approximate reality. So basically
• 1:39:26
  what they're against is this kind of communal creation of reality, Like we are
• 1:39:31
  not creation but trying to describe reality in a communal sense through through a conceptive
• 1:39:39
  measurement. They meritocratic kind of communal activity where we come together to try to
• 1:39:45
  describe reality. Right. They oppose that because boobs real, yes, boob's
• 1:39:54
  equal real. Yes. Whatever comes out of a mouth with boobs equal real
• 1:39:59
  yes, Hence it will go on say maths doesn't represent anything. It's just
• 1:40:04
  a means of white male system to control things. Math Or asserts this is
• 1:40:09
  neither good nor bad, and both the white male system and female system have
• 1:40:13
  good and bad points. See the nineteen ninety two introduction for the dissonance.
• 1:40:19
  Because she changed her mind on that, at the time, she was still
• 1:40:25
  in her equality and fairness phase when she wrote this, remember so and because
• 1:40:30
  introd I'm sorry, but because of what men did between the seventies and whenever
• 1:40:35
  she rewrote this, she became less less enamored of men, Like because what
• 1:40:43
  men were doing, you know, giving women everything that they damn well asked
• 1:40:45
  for. She became more angry at men. Yes, you know, honestly,
• 1:40:51
  I think the POA is like the really dark ones might have a point
• 1:40:55
  shit test, uh, you know that they should be responded to with the
• 1:40:59
  back and in mancraft. Like. What she really needed was to be put
• 1:41:04
  in her place and some men to go to her and say, no,
• 1:41:08
  you're getting your funding yanked. Go get a real job, become a barista
• 1:41:12
  at Starbucks, do something of benefit to the world, because this isn't.
• 1:41:15
  But instead she was indulged. So she got even angrier because she got every
• 1:41:21
  scene she wanted. Therefore, the logical result of that is to get even
• 1:41:26
  angrier. Or I guess she didn't get what she wanted because the female system
• 1:41:33
  didn't. Like, here's the thing, all right, the female let me
• 1:41:38
  let me this is This is my observation of what I've heard of this woman
• 1:41:41
  so far. The female system is simply a way of saying that women be
• 1:41:46
  centered. Okay, and that their their beliefs should be centered. But here's
• 1:41:53
  the thing who's going to center them without the male system, Well, the
• 1:41:58
  female system and the men living under the female system. Yeah, but the
• 1:42:01
  men living under the female system are not going to Their only use will be
• 1:42:05
  the male system that they create to center the female system. Oh, let's
• 1:42:13
  talk. You are okay? All right, let's continuing on. Okay.
• 1:42:17
  Every time the author says the white male system is not bad, this is
• 1:42:21
  now known to be either a lie or incorrect. Thus, Lee, we
• 1:42:25
  could now, with hindsight include the author believes maths and numbers must be destroyed
• 1:42:29
  for the betterment of humanity, will cover white That is late on page forty.
• 1:42:33
  Men's authority and power is inherited, not earned. According to this author,
• 1:42:38
  men assume birthright, power, influence, statues, etc. This is
• 1:42:43
  the opposite of reality. Men work their entire lives to succeed and to provide
• 1:42:46
  worth to women. Finally, we get into what is the female system.
• 1:42:53
  The female system is philosophical, sociological, psychological, political, and theological.
• 1:43:00
  According to this author. Just for the sake of being confusing, there are
• 1:43:03
  technically two female systems. One is the reactive female system, which is how
• 1:43:08
  women survive in the white male system. The second is the true female system,
• 1:43:13
  which is variable and changing. It is open ended. The system will
• 1:43:17
  change and dichotomies between the female system and white male system will be worked out
• 1:43:21
  aka the dialectic. The second system is where women feel safest and can truly
• 1:43:27
  be themselves because it has no constraints such as hierarchy, objectivity, and time,
• 1:43:32
  which is addressed later in the book Chapter two, Yes, Chapter two,
• 1:43:41
  The Original Sin of being female. The author asserts women only attack each
• 1:43:46
  other because the white male system has made that they're acceptable and preferred tart.
• 1:43:53
  This is to stifle the growth of the female system. Note of dissonance.
• 1:43:57
  White male system suppressed female syste and while not understanding it or even knowing that
• 1:44:01
  it existed. As she said earlier, But when women say I don't like
• 1:44:06
  other women a quote, they're not really They're really saying I don't like myself.
• 1:44:12
  This can be expanded to say I don't like femaleness. The author asserts
• 1:44:17
  this means women hold the position that being female is innately wrong. Women attempt
• 1:44:24
  attempt to be things they are not like tough and hard working so as to
• 1:44:30
  appease the white male system to relieve themselves of feeling of guilt from the taint
• 1:44:34
  of being born female. The author relates several anecdotes of women wanting to do
• 1:44:41
  better, getting straight a's in school, working on a PhD thesis, and
• 1:44:45
  yet still having received job offers despite having not completed it, yet fearing failure
• 1:44:51
  and not being accepted because of the failure. That basically, women are human
• 1:44:56
  and have doubts about themselves sometimes, and they desire to achieve things. The
• 1:45:00
  author asserts that this is because the white male system has made women feel as
• 1:45:02
  though they are born inferior. The author states male therapists do not understand this
• 1:45:10
  innate feeling of inferiority that women have because of the white male system. Men
• 1:45:15
  only struggle with feelings of inferiority because the white male system tells them they must
• 1:45:19
  be superior at all times. Quota Okay, They cannot understand how deeply the
• 1:45:25
  feelings of innate inferiority penetrate our being and however present they are. Yeah,
• 1:45:30
  but yes, because all right, I'm gonna, I'm gonna, I'm gonna
• 1:45:34
  connect some dots here Prior to the Industrial Revolution, women were a lot more
• 1:45:41
  important to the actual survival of humanity. After the Industrial Revolution, progressively their
• 1:45:47
  work disappeared. I mean they had they had their own sort of like you
• 1:45:53
  know, their own. The home was a unit of production, was really
• 1:45:57
  critical to the survival. So the security doesn't come from men, It doesn't
• 1:46:01
  come from the male system. Well maybe it does, because wow, the
• 1:46:04
  Industrial Revolution was basically a result of a bunch of male innovations, and boy
• 1:46:12
  howdy did it really improve everything. Like when women were in charge of all
• 1:46:15
  the water and heating and all of that, we just were plotting along.
• 1:46:20
  But then when men were like, hey we can, then suddenly bam,
• 1:46:24
  we're we're of space faring species. We're no longer to a large part the
• 1:46:30
  home economy, effectively, large parts of it became automated because women didn't want
• 1:46:34
  because men didn't want their women to have to work. Yes, but they'd
• 1:46:39
  turn around and that insecurity of not being necessary or not feeling necessary for human
• 1:46:46
  survival. I mean, this is this is the psychosis that's come out of
• 1:46:50
  that. So, yeah, it's great that men got rid of all of
• 1:46:56
  women's labor, but then we have this this Betty Free Dance Problem with No
• 1:47:01
  Name, which is this on we and this insecurity, that they're useless,
• 1:47:08
  and they insist that somehow men are responsible for these feelings of insecurity and uselessness.
• 1:47:14
  Like this woman is like, oh, the male system is making me
• 1:47:16
  insecure. No, yeah, your obsolescence is making you feel insecure. But
• 1:47:21
  instead of digging deep and I don't know, making a renaissance of fiction or
• 1:47:29
  doing something of benefit to the world, you constructed this gigantic narrative of how
• 1:47:33
  the very people who are supporting you are evil for doing so. It's like,
• 1:47:42
  this is psychotic. Just sit with yourself and say, Okay, I
• 1:47:45
  am a woman. What is it that I can give to the world now
• 1:47:51
  that I'm no longer as instrumental to the survival of humanity? They don't do
• 1:47:58
  that, Like, maybe I can. I can learn to understand something other
• 1:48:02
  than myself and use that as a means to become a more individuated person,
• 1:48:11
  you know what I mean, like have some kind of external standard to live
• 1:48:15
  up to, or even just make a damn sandwich. Now, she kind
• 1:48:18
  of addresses this a little bit regarding how women learn to cope with the white
• 1:48:23
  male system. Yeah, this is. I can tell you her thoughts on
• 1:48:27
  it that would help, but literally, well, I suspect that her thoughts
• 1:48:32
  aren't. Oh wow, it was really cool of men to actually remove all
• 1:48:35
  of our labor. Yep, that was not a bad thing that we now
• 1:48:41
  need. We now have a leisure to pursue. I mean, apparently pursued
• 1:48:45
  developing some incredibly resentful, whining philosophy about how men removing our labor as oppression.
• 1:48:53
  Like I mean, I see so many women I mean talking to one
• 1:48:56
  now in the comments of the video that I just did, who think that
• 1:49:00
  the minuscule amount of labor that people do now in the home is oppression?
• 1:49:06
  Like what, It's not like you're you're beating laundry against rocks anymore, or
• 1:49:15
  are making or I don't know, rendering fat to make candles or any of
• 1:49:20
  the other ship that women had to do. It's basically most a part time
• 1:49:27
  job now, and you still consider it slavery. Like It's like the jobs
• 1:49:33
  in the home become less and less onerous, less and less time consuming,
• 1:49:39
  less and less damaging and dangerous, and women complain more and more about them.
• 1:49:45
  It's insane. Is that really what you guys are complaining about or is
• 1:49:50
  it because you're now no longer On some level, you all subconsciously realize you're
• 1:49:58
  now no longer as instrumentals the arrival of humanity, and it's making you feel
• 1:50:01
  insecure. The uselessness is making you feel insecure, and then you hide beyond.
• 1:50:09
  Also, you know, being in a relationship with a man having children
• 1:50:14
  requires courage, and you don't have that. So you're a bunch of corporate
• 1:50:16
  drones who are complete cowards at this point. Okay, like that that seems
• 1:50:23
  to be more accurate. Or alternatively, men really did construct this entire system
• 1:50:28
  to oppress you, to make you feel bad. Okay, yeah, you
• 1:50:36
  know right, Well go ahead, Tillier, I'm sorry, go ahead.
• 1:50:40
  I was just gonna go with how women cope with the white male system,
• 1:50:43
  because it's just funny. Effectively, women trying to refined their purpose here.
• 1:50:50
  So the author says that women learn event details to cope with the white male
• 1:50:56
  system, remembering dates, talks, phrases, and even specific words used.
• 1:51:00
  They only do this so they can prove they are right at all times,
• 1:51:04
  so as to counter or the white male system telling them that they are wrong
• 1:51:09
  because they are born female. I just find that hilarious. So the topic
• 1:51:15
  of divorce comes up here. The author asserts that the white male system tricks
• 1:51:20
  women into thinking it is fair. Women find out that white male system is
• 1:51:25
  not fair when they get divorced, and women suffer emotionally and financially as they
• 1:51:30
  are stripped of the last sense of ultimate fairness. The author states she has
• 1:51:35
  a female judge friend who said they want to be fair but can't because the
• 1:51:40
  law isn't fair. The hypothesis, this female judge wants to exercise in group
• 1:51:45
  preference as hard as possible, but the law says you can't do that.
• 1:51:50
  For the record, this author seems to think that divorce is unfair on women
• 1:51:56
  and that men basically get away with everything, and that they usually get away
• 1:52:00
  with more stuff and more money than the woman does. And I've just got
• 1:52:02
  notes on that, like this is the opposite of reality, Like we really
• 1:52:05
  don't need to cover that. I think I write it somewhere else in the
• 1:52:10
  following sentences, but it's just absolute la la land. So there's a story.
• 1:52:15
  On page thirty six, the author states a woman was pulled over by
• 1:52:19
  a police officer for no reason. She had a bumper sticker that virtue signaled
• 1:52:24
  a political orientation different from the state majority. I she was a Democrat in
• 1:52:29
  a red state. A scuffle broke out when she was asked for her license
• 1:52:32
  and registration. She got arrested, and when in the holding cell, began
• 1:52:36
  smacking the bars with her shoes and screaming obscenities. Oh oh, we got
• 1:52:41
  to stop this for a second. Jojo is booping teal deer. He did,
• 1:52:46
  but I think he's done. He was just like, what is that
• 1:52:49
  thing doing by my bed? I don't think he's going to stick around,
• 1:52:53
  though, Oh can them? Yeah, he's this. This may be some
• 1:53:00
  form of doggie approval. I'm just saying, I'm I'm I'm at least enjoying
• 1:53:04
  the dago significantly more than sorry. He's the dribble of female system. Yeah,
• 1:53:15
  okay, continue, It doesn't it doesn't. It doesn't go on for
• 1:53:17
  much longer, the female system. Then we get into the woo slide a
• 1:53:20
  bit. So someone told her she wasn't acting like a lady, and she
• 1:53:24
  replied, yes, I am. White women are angry too. My note
• 1:53:28
  here is And then everyone stood up and clapped. No, they would white
• 1:53:32
  feminism, they would conde. Well, this but this was written in the
• 1:53:36
  nineties, though white feminism I don't think was a thing yet, right,
• 1:53:41
  No, So her ideals state she should get a feminist lawyer, but she
• 1:53:45
  picked a man with a track record of winning. The author states the guy
• 1:53:49
  bullshits his way through proceedings by using a giant suitcase stuff with random papers as
• 1:53:55
  a psychological weapon. He did win the case. She didn't go to jail
• 1:53:59
  and had to pay fines. The author asserts that the male lawyer only one
• 1:54:03
  because of bullshit and not competence, and this shows the white male system is
• 1:54:08
  on there somehow. I also have notes about how this story obviously leaves a
• 1:54:14
  lot of stuff out, because it's like, oh, this woman only got
• 1:54:17
  pulled over an aspenbal license of registration because of a bumper sticker and a scuffle
• 1:54:21
  just broke out. Okay, so this woman just like randomly started going at
• 1:54:26
  a police officer for there's a lot of stuff you're not telling us in this
• 1:54:29
  story, but I'm not exactly surprised. So a women develop understanding so they
• 1:54:35
  can survive the white mail system. They gather information on everyone and everything and
• 1:54:41
  remember everything about relationships, so quote we can understand why this or that happened,
• 1:54:45
  and we forgive end quote. Apparently women apparently only remember things in relationships
• 1:54:53
  to prove they are right and forgive people. They never bring things up from
• 1:54:58
  months or years ago that everyone else forgot about it in order to point score
• 1:55:00
  and be county. It's all just them surviving in the white male system and
• 1:55:05
  looking to have their sin of being born female forgiven. Do you have a
• 1:55:11
  few notes throughout this book that I don't think this author has ever met a
• 1:55:14
  woman, but yeah, well she she's only met her stereotype of men and
• 1:55:19
  women. Yep, she has like this, she's got a very sisterhood method
• 1:55:26
  of looking at women how women relate to each other. And I do actually
• 1:55:30
  have a posted note in the front of this book which is just a Williams
• 1:55:32
  twenty twenty three. There is no sisterhood and the Williams twenty twenty three is
• 1:55:38
  actually a PhD thesis that looks at women's intrasectual competition and how women basically take
• 1:55:44
  each other down pegs all the goddamn time by backstabbing each other in conversation and
• 1:55:48
  even doing things like physically messing with each other, like when women go and
• 1:55:55
  get haircuts. The stylists will actually recommend ill fitting haircuts and actually intentionally take
• 1:56:00
  more off than the woman said if they think they can get away with it
• 1:56:04
  so as to lower her value. So it's like, I'm sorry, we
• 1:56:08
  just have so much psychological evidence that is no sisterhood between women, but authors
• 1:56:12
  like this that women just never our catty or have no form of intra sectual
• 1:56:18
  competition, which they is just objectively wrong. What is the book that you're
• 1:56:23
  talking about. I'd like to take a look at that. I'm going to
• 1:56:25
  write that. It's not a book. It's a PhD thesis by Williams.
• 1:56:29
  It was published in twenty twenty three. There's actually an overview of it on
• 1:56:34
  the internet if you go to a Star Dusks channel the YouTube of the Midtail
• 1:56:39
  YouTube. But he actually just did a video is about a month ago or
• 1:56:41
  something like that. Actually the yeah, the video was just called there is
• 1:56:45
  no sisterhood. That's the video that he did on that study. Okay,
• 1:56:48
  so maybe there's a there's a link to us so you can go and find
• 1:56:53
  that. Otherwise, Do I have the link immediately available? I? Oh
• 1:57:02
  yes I do. There we go, Okay, M Williams research thesis female
• 1:57:09
  intrasectual competition. I will put that in the live show, Chaps. I
• 1:57:15
  just I prefer to read stuff and watch videos, So I know that sounds
• 1:57:17
  really hypocritical, really all right, so thank you, and I will take
• 1:57:24
  a look at that. I wanted to point out that, yes, there
• 1:57:27
  is no real female solidarity to your sisterhood. It's just women come together against
• 1:57:31
  men. And I think that's one of the reasons why women seem to be
• 1:57:38
  so repulsed by me, because I'm like, no, why don't we just
• 1:57:42
  why don't we actually judge ourselves by how we treat men? And they're like,
• 1:57:45
  what you know, and how we treat other women? Because I think
• 1:57:48
  that for the most part, like feminists want to justify their horrific treatment of
• 1:57:54
  other women and their use of other women as resources. Like I've seen that,
• 1:57:58
  and when I look at the female DV like financials, these women are
• 1:58:02
  basically just doing nothing and using the strife, the supposed strife of women in
• 1:58:08
  domestic violence situations to make lots and lots and lots of money, and that's
• 1:58:14
  it. Not doing anything for them, They're just skimming off the top.
• 1:58:17
  They're using women as an other women as a resource. And then you see
• 1:58:20
  how much feminists bully women who don't agree with them, or even women who
• 1:58:27
  slightly disagree with them, and it's like, this is all like we maybe
• 1:58:32
  we can set aside this automatic contemptible behavior towards men, because this is the
• 1:58:39
  other thing. When women don't judge themselves by their behavior towards men, what
• 1:58:44
  happens is that it seems like men become a scapegoat for their behavior towards each
• 1:58:48
  other. And I'm like, no, let's not do that. Let's not
• 1:58:53
  use men as a scapegoat for our behavior towards other women, and let's actually
• 1:58:57
  look at how we treat men as a valid moral thing, like that we
• 1:59:03
  shouldn't treat men badly, and we shouldn't excuse our bad treatment of other women
• 1:59:08
  on men. Now, let's be better. And that's something a woman living
• 1:59:13
  in the male system would say. That's right, that's right. And I
• 1:59:17
  don't have this like rose colored view of women giving women a gigantic excuse like,
• 1:59:25
  oh, it's the male system that's making me beat you in the head,
• 1:59:29
  Like is just going to empower female abusers of both men and women.
• 1:59:33
  Okay, you're right, I'm just I'm just a free in the free Kingdom.
• 1:59:42
  Okay, just continue? Yes, shall we go? Okay, so
• 1:59:46
  we have actually not a huge amount left to go. But I guess it
• 1:59:53
  depends how quickly I read through it and how much you want to shout at
• 1:59:57
  me for reading. I'm not shouting it, you tell, dear, I'm
• 2:00:00
  just shouting the person talking about and yeah in her head. Yep. So
• 2:00:11
  the next interesting part here, this is where you start getting to the New
• 2:00:15
  Age. Wou of this the solar plexus hole in need of evening? So
• 2:00:20
  page fourteen forty one, what the solar plexus hole in need of stealing is
• 2:00:27
  at the bonus hole? Fred would say yes, but this author says no.
• 2:00:33
  Okay, Like I said, we're getting into some of the New Age.
• 2:00:36
  So you have a hole that needs filling, lady, Yes, yes
• 2:00:41
  you yes, so page forty to forty one. A. Freed and Ericson
• 2:00:45
  assert women haven't in a hole of being that needs filling. Fred and Ericson
• 2:00:50
  suggests penis and baby not because having a family is fulfilling for many women.
• 2:00:56
  Married women, I might not here married women consistently poll greater levels of happiness.
• 2:01:01
  No, it's because they are men. And they see things as penis
• 2:01:08
  in women because men. Okay, can I just point something out In my
• 2:01:12
  experience, a lot of men also engage in intra sexual competition by tearing the
• 2:01:16
  fuck out of other men and saying, nah, sister, you don't need
• 2:01:18
  a man. I've seen this with feminist men quite a bit. Maybe not
• 2:01:25
  so much with non feminist men, but holy shit, feminist men are really
• 2:01:28
  toxically competent, have toxic levels of competition with other men. They are always
• 2:01:32
  the best men in every room that they're in, there are they're the best
• 2:01:35
  men, and they are the one good man ever, the one man who
• 2:01:40
  figured out that that women should be provided for and protected all of them.
• 2:01:45
  Actually addresses guys like that in this really Yeah, it's quite funny. She
• 2:01:49
  refers to them and how they use it to manipulate women. It's it's actually
• 2:01:54
  quite interesting. You might actually enjoy that. Pop Well, I mean,
• 2:01:57
  it's probably accurate, but it's coming from a very very negative place, Like
• 2:02:00
  I'm sure she doesn't condemn the fact that they tear the crap out of other
• 2:02:03
  men. No, but no, if we've got to try and take the
• 2:02:08
  positives where there are positives, we can have guess yes, for sanity,
• 2:02:16
  we shall take the positives where we can find them. Yes, so,
• 2:02:19
  the author asserts, So this is going to shape now. The author asserts,
• 2:02:24
  women experience the inner hole, a void in the solar plexus. This
• 2:02:29
  is a hole where they maintain their original sin of being born female. They
• 2:02:33
  often adopt physical postures where they fold their arms over their solar plexus and hunch
• 2:02:39
  in on themselves to protect this vulnerability. The author notes, also, we
• 2:02:43
  often cover it with fat, which I think is just kind of the proto
• 2:02:48
  health at every size message sneaking in there. But again, books forty years
• 2:02:54
  old. So yes, the patriarchy slash white male system is making women fat
• 2:02:58
  because they feel vulnble, because they have a whole because they were born wrong
• 2:03:02
  at The author states directly, women have eating and drinking problems so they can
• 2:03:06
  shrink and fill this void of female sin, which I just think is I
• 2:03:14
  think that's just a fantastic phrase. That is that is like that is like
• 2:03:17
  a metal album song titled the Void is pretty good. Yeah, that sounds
• 2:03:25
  like that sounds pretty good brutal. You know what's you know what's really funny
• 2:03:29
  is I don't feel that like I don't feel a void of female sin,
• 2:03:35
  Like I don't feel like being a woman. I think that being a freaking
• 2:03:42
  artist is really what really got me throughout my life, but I don't feel
• 2:03:45
  like it was being a woman. In fact, I think being a woman
• 2:03:48
  allowed me to be less condemned for being an artist in some way. So
• 2:03:55
  I'm just I don't understand that the void of female sin really well, it's
• 2:03:59
  it's just it's just the original sin of being born female at this author do
• 2:04:03
  but what like is it? Is? It? Is it? Because because
• 2:04:06
  like you know, I was thinking the saying idle hands are the devil's playground,
• 2:04:14
  And I feel like as as convenient as we made the lives of women
• 2:04:18
  by like making all these inventions and all these like advancements and technology, and
• 2:04:23
  he's going to make women's lives easier. The more spare time they have,
• 2:04:27
  and the more spare time they have, the more resentful of their own existence
• 2:04:30
  they become. Yeah, and I wonder if that's not what this is,
• 2:04:35
  you know, kind of like I'm kind of talking to Lindsay a little bit
• 2:04:41
  like while you're you're reading stuff, and uh, she was saying that because
• 2:04:49
  we were talking about women's paranoia, like a female paranoia of of being.
• 2:04:58
  They're a paranoid about the like in life because there's so much uncertainty, because
• 2:05:02
  the world is uncertain a right, and so women are more risk averse,
• 2:05:09
  and so they're more likely to be paranoid. It's like, you know,
• 2:05:12
  today, I was running some errands and my car is old from two thousand
• 2:05:19
  and eight. It has over two hundred thousand miles on it, and so
• 2:05:21
  when I'm driving it around, I don't really think about it too much,
• 2:05:24
  but Lindsay always hears things like did you hear that that's the car? Like
• 2:05:28
  something's wrong. I can't tell. I went to the mechanic and I told
• 2:05:30
  them about it, and the woman that works at the mechanic shop, she
• 2:05:35
  said, she basically like you know, reassured me that the issue is is
• 2:05:42
  a non issue because she knows what she knows what it is because I've taken
• 2:05:45
  the car in before. And I was like, all right, as long
• 2:05:47
  as I know that the car is not going to fall apart one day,
• 2:05:49
  right, And she was like, no, you know, And I said,
• 2:05:53
  well, my wife says she hears thing and I don't hear things.
• 2:05:56
  And she said it's probably best like some times, just not to tell them.
• 2:06:00
  And she and then she said, because I'm a woman, I know,
• 2:06:03
  and you know, so I don't know. I just that's that that
• 2:06:09
  void that you're talking about. It sounds like the crisis. It's the crisis
• 2:06:14
  of being and women are experiencing it in that way. Yeah. And the
• 2:06:19
  fact that they have so much Yeah, because they have all this spare time
• 2:06:23
  to be in their own heads and they don't like it in there that there
• 2:06:27
  is something to be said for that regarding effectively utopianism and how it can't exist
• 2:06:32
  naturally. If you I'm going to reference the book again, the Science Politics
• 2:06:36
  Gnosticism by Vogelin, first book. He does actually in this book talk about
• 2:06:44
  utopia and how utopia can't exist because effectively utopian thinking effectively has to remove sin
• 2:06:53
  from humans and you can't actually do that, and effectively that is why you
• 2:06:59
  will never be able to have a utopian way of thinking, because humans will
• 2:07:01
  always find some way of screwing it up. And so this is I think
• 2:07:05
  partially a reflection of this attitude that you've got with you. Women like this,
• 2:07:10
  their waves get easier and easier and easier, but they can't remove this
• 2:07:16
  slight paranoia from themselves, and also just their desire to complain about things and
• 2:07:23
  have men do things for them. Like it's it just seems to me that
• 2:07:27
  no matter how perfect a world you live in, humans will always find something
• 2:07:30
  to wind you about. Yeah, and I think it's been particularly bad for
• 2:07:39
  women because and you know, it's not unsympathetic. It's a cool role throwing
• 2:07:44
  a video about this called the Cycle of Oppression Inflation fucking years ago. Yeah,
• 2:07:48
  but it's I mean, to be honest, it's not completely unsympathetic that
• 2:07:53
  you lose your job basically and you're like, what the fuck am I now?
• 2:07:58
  And then you create feminem to fill the whole, because that's basically what
• 2:08:01
  it is. Yeah, ween entering the workforce, it was effectively at the
• 2:08:07
  substitute for the lack of the home economy. Yeah, it real revolution destroyed
• 2:08:11
  and that women are now miserable. Yes. And the funny thing is that
• 2:08:16
  when feminists look back in history, they completely erase the importance of the home
• 2:08:20
  economy and they completely minimize the kind of the power that it was wielded and
• 2:08:28
  the important like the importance the power and the amount of self I think that
• 2:08:35
  women got from it even in the nineteen I think sixties, and rand I
• 2:08:39
  think it was the nineteen sixteen, the nineteen fifties. He she went on
• 2:08:41
  a I don't know, like one of those talk shows, the original podcast,
• 2:08:48
  and she was talking about how women just have their own thing, and
• 2:08:52
  so they're not interested in the feminist message because they got their own thing.
• 2:08:56
  And at that point in time, women still sort of had their own thing.
• 2:09:00
  There still was like I guess, more rural, more homesteading, less
• 2:09:05
  of this kind of hot box flower housewife idea that's very new, very Hollywood.
• 2:09:15
  And and and she was right, like women in the past, if
• 2:09:20
  you ask them, they would say, no, we don't need feminism because
• 2:09:24
  we have the power of necessity. We're essential to the running of the human
• 2:09:30
  race. And once that was taken away, the more that was taken away,
• 2:09:33
  the more they got involved in feminism. And that is the whole that
• 2:09:37
  this woman is talking about. The whole. The thing is which is funny,
• 2:09:41
  is that it was partially taken away by their own demands. Yes,
• 2:09:46
  but people are are famously self destructive and lacking in any insight, Like if
• 2:09:54
  you are in a situation where you so called loss the necessity, and that's
• 2:09:58
  what I think that women are seeking in these jobs. It's like some kind
• 2:10:03
  of sense of purpose. But they're never going to find it because it isn't
• 2:10:05
  connected to their femininity. It's connected to how well they actually integrate into the
• 2:10:11
  male world, I suppose. So they're never going to be content with it,
• 2:10:16
  is what I'm getting at. It's never going to be a source of
• 2:10:20
  contentment, which is probably why they're miserable. And they're becoming more and more
• 2:10:22
  and more miserable. And nobody wants to solve this problem because nobody wants to
• 2:10:26
  look at it. They all just want to blame men for it. I
• 2:10:28
  might suggest that actually, part of a reason why a lot of some sections
• 2:10:33
  of industry are failing is because they're trying to fix it for them and you
• 2:10:37
  can't. But they're adapting their industries to a way that those industries don't function
• 2:10:43
  because yes, new method of functioning would satisfy women. Those industries fail.
• 2:10:50
  Well, if the goal stops becoming the goal of the industry and starts becoming
• 2:10:56
  making women feel good about themselves, I guess that's the rise of all the
• 2:11:00
  bizarre like adult daycare, jobs where that you get a prestigious title and all
• 2:11:05
  you do is eat snacks and take naps all day and then you know,
• 2:11:11
  play in the playroom. It's like this, this is this is a job.
• 2:11:16
  This isn't a job, this isn't an industry. It's basically just something
• 2:11:22
  that is constructed to provide succor to a woman. And that's it. Nothing
• 2:11:28
  is being done except a woman is being treated like a child, and that's
• 2:11:37
  making her feel good. She's got a little she got a little title means
• 2:11:41
  nothing, it has not no responsibilities, But she got a little title.
• 2:11:46
  It sounds prestigious. And she's got her blankie, and she's got her place
• 2:11:50
  where she takes her naps, and she's got her snacks and she's and she's
• 2:11:54
  got she's got time where she goes with the other women and they chat about
• 2:11:58
  nothing and do nothing. And then that's that is that's that is the world
• 2:12:03
  that we want to construct, and we're constructing it out of the bones of
• 2:12:09
  the system that keeps everybody alive. Good god, well I'm hearing is this
• 2:12:16
  is just a bunch of white male system methods of forcing into women's void of
• 2:12:20
  female sits like a lot of women have been forcing snacks into their void,
• 2:12:26
  that's for sure. I'd like to think that I'm capable of making my own
• 2:12:31
  original thoughts. Like, I don't think this woman has original thoughts. She
• 2:12:35
  basically has he Hagel plus wo Hagel plus boobs equal right. Yep, And
• 2:12:43
  that's that's like the Okay, am I wrong? Hegel plus boobs equals right
• 2:12:48
  is her entire thesis? Pretty much? Okay, that's not an original thought,
• 2:12:52
  that's not an original insight. I think the connecting the rise of the
• 2:12:58
  industry with the destruction of women's role in human survival, with the rise of
• 2:13:05
  feminism and their anger towards men is more of an insight than any of this
• 2:13:11
  ship. And I like to think that I'm capable of making these kinds of
• 2:13:15
  insights without them actually being the male patriarchy coming through me and controlling my lips
• 2:13:20
  and gums. Okay, I think I've got a means of phrasing this very
• 2:13:26
  original thought. The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for humanity.
• 2:13:35
  Well, it may end up being a disaster or original thought. I
• 2:13:43
  would like to say that it might be that we can overcome this because I
• 2:13:52
  think I think I ultimately know what the underlying pressures of all of this is,
• 2:13:56
  and if we can actually address them, then what can happen is sort
• 2:14:01
  of what happened when Constantine moved the capital of Rome to Constantinople and and you
• 2:14:09
  know, gave clemency to the Christians, which ended up used to be yeah
• 2:14:13
  no, no that now it's now, but it was Constantinople. Yeah yeah,
• 2:14:18
  you got a little reed anyway. So but that reinvigorated the empire,
• 2:14:24
  like the very thing that the empire persecuted end up ended up reinvigorating it for
• 2:14:28
  another thousand years. So we could go we could go that route. We
• 2:14:33
  don't have to completely die, which can just change, which is like the
• 2:14:37
  most frightening thing for human beings. Often they prefer death to change. Look
• 2:14:43
  at like the look at the couple, like the six hundred, eight hundred
• 2:14:46
  people and the South tower when the when the plane struck the North tower,
• 2:14:50
  and we're like, yeah, maybe we should just stay. Of course,
• 2:14:54
  it didn't help that the port authority was telling them to stay, but you
• 2:14:58
  know, they didn't want to let go, so they stayed, all right,
• 2:15:03
  I wanted to. So we've been going for almost two and a half
• 2:15:09
  hours. I don't know how much longer we should go, and I know
• 2:15:13
  there's a lot more and I'm actually really interested in doing Wait, I'm just
• 2:15:18
  I want to let you know what I did. So I did a poll
• 2:15:24
  about a half an hour ago, and I said, what do you think
• 2:15:26
  about like, you only get so many characters, so pardon the framing of
• 2:15:31
  my question, but what do you think of the breaking this up into episodes?
• 2:15:33
  And forty one percent voted break it up, thirty percent said get or
• 2:15:37
  done, and thirty percent doesn't care. So it's like indifference there. So
• 2:15:43
  I'm just letting you know what the audience said. This is a democratic chat
• 2:15:50
  and that's what they voted for. But we could keep going if you guys
• 2:15:54
  really want to. And then the other thing is I got a super chow
• 2:15:56
  and I wanted to read it before you know, we continue from Great Indoors
• 2:16:01
  because it's ten bucks and says, when are we getting to the midsummer part
• 2:16:07
  where they are going to start burning people alive to please their inner demons?
• 2:16:09
  Because that's the trend I'm seeing there are here. Sorry anyway, So that's
• 2:16:15
  it. I just want to say that, Well, I can finish the
• 2:16:20
  bit about women's void of female sin, and we can reassess definitely want to
• 2:16:24
  hear about that. That's sinful. Okay, so that's the sinful female system
• 2:16:31
  would help to heal and shrink this hole, but it is way too easy
• 2:16:37
  to rip open again, such as losing a primary relationship. This is because
• 2:16:41
  women are using male validation to fill They are making this way too easy,
• 2:16:52
  begging for it. Yeah, it is true that women do take some value
• 2:16:56
  from men, and men do take some value from women. I actually have
• 2:17:01
  no problem with that, But it's just everything else at that message, which
• 2:17:05
  is nonsense. God forbid men. Women have a relationship with a man,
• 2:17:09
  takes some value from it and he dies or something, and then they are
• 2:17:11
  like, oh my god, I'm in pain, Like what kind of unhumanly
• 2:17:18
  hilary, what kind of awful anti human connection is this crap? I know
• 2:17:28
  that my my, my wording is not great, but yes, connecting with
• 2:17:33
  another human has Yeah, this is what it is. This is just cowardice,
• 2:17:39
  Like she's just incur encouraging more female cowardice. Oh, don't don't have
• 2:17:43
  a relationship with a man. You're opening yourself up to being wounded yes,
• 2:17:46
  everybody does when they have a relationship. In fact, it's inevitable that a
• 2:17:50
  relationship will hurt you. Either it will end because of some incompatibility or will
• 2:17:58
  end because someone died. But that's not why we're on this earth, is
• 2:18:05
  to just be afraid of opening ourselves up to vulnerability. And I don't even
• 2:18:09
  know how this became the male system's problem. Let's just human, like,
• 2:18:13
  no matter what happens throughout human history, you opened yourself up to loving something
• 2:18:20
  a cat, a dog, a purse, a man, a child that
• 2:18:24
  could be taken away from you. So she's basically turning into some kind of
• 2:18:28
  self righteousness, a fear of loss. It's, you know what, a
• 2:18:35
  lot of feminism seems to be justifying female cowardice. I'm just saying that turning
• 2:18:41
  female cowardice into self righteousness, a crisis of being, paranoia about being and
• 2:18:46
  like not knowing how to handle it, and maybe like women should be,
• 2:18:52
  you know, we are always like feminists are always trying to take the I
• 2:18:56
  think one of the consequences of this toxic masculinity argument is that men should be
• 2:19:01
  more like women, but also in the ways that men should not have to
• 2:19:05
  live or seek a purpose because women don't seem to feel as though they have
• 2:19:11
  one, so they don't think men should either, and so men are driven
• 2:19:15
  by purpose. So's something that we've been talking about with this loneliness thing that
• 2:19:18
  people are picking up on and noticing. Now. I think it's because men
• 2:19:22
  lack purpose because they've been told they shouldn't have one. But maybe the reverse
• 2:19:26
  is true. Maybe women should also have it. You know, like lindsay
• 2:19:31
  what has been doing a lot of digging into her like her family history,
• 2:19:37
  no, her family history, and like like learning about what her great great
• 2:19:43
  ancestors did, and like you know, we're talking about people who were working
• 2:19:48
  three jobs when they were twelve years old, like like you know how and
• 2:19:52
  they were grateful, like you know, there was a lot of grace around
• 2:19:56
  how hard life was because that was what you new. And now you know,
• 2:20:01
  somebody could just have a part time job and complain. So and it's
• 2:20:05
  not just because of industrialization or whatever, but because a lot of these people
• 2:20:11
  that were going through this it was like in the nineteen hundreds maybe like you
• 2:20:13
  know, earlier in the century. So but it's about purpose. So I
• 2:20:18
  think that it's it's one thing to say you know, oh, we were
• 2:20:22
  so advanced technology wise, as people have a lot more free time. Sure,
• 2:20:26
  I mean there that's true, Like it doesn't take all day to clean
• 2:20:30
  your house anymore and do the laundry and whatnot, but like you should be
• 2:20:33
  filling your time with other important things. This is supposed to give you more
• 2:20:37
  time, not feel like your time is worth less. Right. So I
• 2:20:41
  think that the thing is is that men in general, and that's being for
• 2:20:46
  all men, they are seeking purpose. They want to be like doing something
• 2:20:52
  good. They want to make the world better. They want to build out
• 2:20:54
  the garden, right like as it was said, and the garden of Eden,
• 2:20:58
  like they want to build Adams to build out the garden in the world.
• 2:21:01
  And that is basically saying to make the world better. And men want
• 2:21:05
  to do that, but we haven't done that with women. We've told them
• 2:21:09
  they can just like live and the thing is just exist, right, And
• 2:21:13
  that's why they become so materialist and like they're just they're like the biggest consumers.
• 2:21:20
  We're always talking about men as consumers, but it's it's really women right
• 2:21:22
  and there, and they get all that stuff and they're not really satisfied.
• 2:21:28
  And and of course That's why I think this woo thing is coming out where
• 2:21:33
  you know, uh, this this woman is trying to like fill that hole
• 2:21:39
  with and she doesn't like the materialist approach that the Marxists have, but it
• 2:21:43
  her approach doesn't really any better anyways, because it's it's the wrong. Yeah,
• 2:21:48
  because it's anti mail. It doesn't include the male perspective. It it
• 2:21:52
  blames men for women's lack of purpose. And this the truth is that women
• 2:21:58
  should be seeking purpose, and for many of them, for many of them,
• 2:22:03
  it's probably something that they have ignored, like you know, something like
• 2:22:07
  family or caring for their community or being involved you know in that way,
• 2:22:11
  or growing something for Christ's sake, right, So I don't know I purpose
• 2:22:18
  comes from Yeah, purpose comes from recognition that there's something greater than yourself,
• 2:22:24
  or something outside yourself at the very least. And if women are going to
• 2:22:28
  find purpose, they're going to find it in men, in men, not
• 2:22:33
  in spite of men or to spite men. Yeah, Like it's it's simple
• 2:22:39
  as that, and so ultimately talking about but no, you are making sense.
• 2:22:45
  It is a situation. And the thing is that when I hear,
• 2:22:48
  for example, we got a comment of one of the previous videos that that
• 2:22:52
  women's hero's journey is their first period. No, women's hero's journey is their
• 2:22:58
  last period, Like that's the moment where they cease to Like the whole red
• 2:23:05
  Riding Hood myth is about how you need to integrate the masculine, You need
• 2:23:11
  to integrate the external into your psychology in order to deal with the process of
• 2:23:18
  becoming of no longer being able to have children and no longer being defined entirely
• 2:23:24
  about being female, because that, you know, when your post mental puzzle
• 2:23:28
  that's all gone, it's done, what are you going to have left in
• 2:23:31
  your life? And the idea that women are fine enough they are and they're
• 2:23:37
  not like, look around you, guys, look at the women today.
• 2:23:41
  Look at the ship that they put out on TikTok. This is the result
• 2:23:46
  of saying, yeah, women, you're all fine as you are. You're
• 2:23:50
  not, or that that women have no hero's journey, it's just having a
• 2:23:52
  period is all they need. Yeah, well this is this is the result
• 2:23:56
  of that of having no external standards for women. This is the women that
• 2:24:01
  result. So no, obviously there's something missing, and not just that,
• 2:24:05
  I mean like literally feminism is that that that scream of a purposeless individual.
• 2:24:13
  The the hole in the solar plexus, which is purposelessness. And the irony
• 2:24:18
  is that she is continued to perpetuate that hole by denying the importance of an
• 2:24:24
  external standard by saying that, you know, uh, boobs equal me,
• 2:24:28
  right, So no external standard at all. It's still well, you're going
• 2:24:33
  to continue to have that hole in your solar plexus because what's supposed to be
• 2:24:37
  in there is something that you strive for, something that you become better for,
• 2:24:41
  something external to you. And yeah, if if it's gonna be if
• 2:24:46
  there's going to be anything external to women, it's got to be men,
• 2:24:50
  because men are by definition external to women. And I'm not sure why all
• 2:24:54
  of these women are so terrified of that thought that you just have to accept
• 2:25:01
  that maybe caring about men it's sort of part of your purpose in life,
• 2:25:07
  you know. And without that, you're just gonna constantly be complaining about this
• 2:25:11
  whole in your solar plexus. You're constantly going to be feeling like your life
• 2:25:16
  is worthless because it is because you're not doing anything for anybody else but yourself,
• 2:25:22
  and you know, and also kids can be involved in that in community,
• 2:25:24
  but it seems like men is the first step, you know, and
• 2:25:30
  I think that's reflected more in the hero's journey for women getting married, you
• 2:25:35
  know, extending yourself to understand another human being who is different from the primal
• 2:25:41
  feminine? Shall we say? And uh, yeah, that's what I have
• 2:25:43
  to say on that. Is there anything more on this particular topic, the
• 2:25:46
  whole in the solar plexus? Yes, okay, let's let's finish it.
• 2:25:52
  I have some I have some crazy craziness that might ground a lot of this
• 2:25:56
  stuff if we want to. The author state, the whole contains the essence
• 2:26:01
  of being female in the white male system. Women fear being alone because they
• 2:26:05
  need male validation and good ease to absolve them of their sin of being female.
• 2:26:11
  Women only seek marriage to acquire validation to fill their whole by finding a
• 2:26:16
  man who will absolve them of their sin. This is no bullshit. Yes,
• 2:26:22
  shall I just get through this? Yes? Sure? Because yes,
• 2:26:26
  we will be here awhile other way. So note, I actually agree people
• 2:26:28
  should not externalize their sense of validation or loaks of control and responsibility. This
• 2:26:35
  must be cultivated from within. However, this is not unique to women.
• 2:26:39
  Men also yearn for things outside themselves an external validation from others, usually women,
• 2:26:45
  since women provide men their sense of value, lest they undertake long,
• 2:26:48
  hard reflection and self growth so as not to require this external validation women require.
• 2:26:54
  We're just the need point of clarification. So it's men who need to
• 2:26:58
  do this growth to require this validation from women. Oh no, this is
• 2:27:03
  me say this, this is my note. Tare Okay, the men yearned
• 2:27:07
  the things outside themselves, but you can undertake long reflection and self growth so
• 2:27:11
  as to not require it. But it's just a thing that you can do.
• 2:27:16
  I'm making no commentary on whether or not. Yeah, but do men
• 2:27:18
  ever really do that, or they just simply find something else like physics or
• 2:27:24
  religion than they do. Yeah, but do migtoo really find something external like
• 2:27:30
  another like another four form of meritocracy or endeavor like hobbies or or it's just
• 2:27:39
  not external validation from women. But it's still yeah, yeah, so validation
• 2:27:43
  from other things, but other things. And it's honestly, I think that
• 2:27:46
  that's also an expression of human courtship behaviors, like our approaches to understanding the
• 2:27:54
  mysteries, penetrating the mysteries of nature and stuff like that. Okay, can
• 2:27:58
  we continue? Yeah. The author of this book literally does not understand men
• 2:28:03
  at all. She assumes all the work men do to cultivate themselves to grow
• 2:28:07
  and get better and gain competence is just a birthright handed to them. Because
• 2:28:11
  penis, she is incapable of seeing the male struggle and drove page forty six.
• 2:28:16
  The author states she is not obnoxious, she is only told she is
• 2:28:20
  obnoxious because she is female in a white male system. She filters her failures
• 2:28:26
  in life and finds that ninety percent of it is not because she is wrong.
• 2:28:31
  It's society that is wrong. Do they know something we don't feel?
• 2:28:35
  Live by a woman? What does a woman know? Asserts that women are
• 2:28:43
  always told they cannot be the in group because of their sin. Women learn
• 2:28:48
  to lie to themselves and others about what they need and want. But once
• 2:28:52
  they open up to other women and they all learn they actually are an in
• 2:28:56
  group, they begin to heal and their holes. Phil My note here this
• 2:29:01
  is weird. Women have a strange dualism. They have automatic in group preference
• 2:29:07
  and the halo effect. However, as Williams twenty twenty three noted, there
• 2:29:13
  is no sisterhood and women constantly take each other down pegs in social standing so
• 2:29:16
  as to elevate themselves. Other studies other studies regarding outcomes with women that indicate
• 2:29:24
  women will reject a one hundred dollars payout if someone else receives two hundred dollars
• 2:29:30
  in favor of themselves receiving fifty and the other person receiving zero. Other studies
• 2:29:35
  have revealed women are more likely to renege on previously struck deals so as to
• 2:29:39
  please another person in the moment, as opposed to men who prefer sticking to
• 2:29:43
  bargain's mate. Women receive a societal boon for being female. Their bad behavior
• 2:29:48
  is excused and they are perceived as being better than Simultaneously, women also see
• 2:29:54
  themselves as being amazing, yet they are also duplicitous and backstabbing when compared to
• 2:30:00
  men. This book contains much new Age wu about this sisterhood aspect of women
• 2:30:05
  coming together and asserts women are only catty count to each other because the white
• 2:30:11
  male system makes it so. Also of note, the author implies if women
• 2:30:16
  had more sense of self from working, they would be happier. Women's levels
• 2:30:22
  of unhappiness are consistently rising the more they attempt to fulfill the male rock.
• 2:30:26
  Page forty eight apparently states that society seems to lament. Why can't women be
• 2:30:31
  more like men again with the whole This is the last paragraph about the void
• 2:30:41
  of female sin that page forty nine. Women are angry and should be angry.
• 2:30:46
  Anger runs their lives. They express their anger in many ways, making
• 2:30:52
  other people work hard, seducing men and leaving them hanging, being a good
• 2:30:56
  housewife, and making men depend on her so they function without her the good
• 2:31:01
  Christian woman. The author calls this the worst of them all, interesting because
• 2:31:07
  socialism is the religion that must replace Christianity. She goes without dessert to make
• 2:31:11
  other people feel guilty. All of this is because women are just angry because
• 2:31:16
  white male system. This is why we must destroy the white male system and
• 2:31:20
  institute the female system. Destroy the white male system. Huh okay, And
• 2:31:28
  I would argue that this is all just an expression of women who are served
• 2:31:35
  by men, honestly, like, this is just this is the psychological knots
• 2:31:41
  that she puts herself in to avoid just being grateful. You know, and
• 2:31:48
  you know you don't have to like not deny the fact that losing your purpose
• 2:31:52
  might have had a severely negative effect psychologically. I think that we can say
• 2:31:56
  that at this point in time that maybe one of the worst effects of the
• 2:32:01
  Industrial Revolution was to take away women's jobs, take away the home economy,
• 2:32:05
  because it really fucked women over mentally, and in all of the rise of
• 2:32:11
  this bullshit about how ah, women are just fine and none of themselves like
• 2:32:13
  ah bred aren't. Well yeah, okay, well this is what results.
• 2:32:18
  These are the women that result, and they are not cases. Okay.
• 2:32:22
  So, yes, women need their own hero's journey. Women need something external
• 2:32:26
  to themselves. They need to be told that they need to get out the
• 2:32:28
  fuck out of their heads and think about something other than themselves or they go
• 2:32:33
  bonkers. Okay. And this woman is insisting that the problem isn't that women
• 2:32:39
  are in their heads. The problem is that patriarchy is. It's like,
• 2:32:45
  it's like this. She only understands one way of dealing with the world,
• 2:32:50
  which is to continuallessly cast men as the ones responsible for things. You notice
• 2:32:56
  that like men that when she talks about men and then need to be God,
• 2:33:03
  which is coming up next, Oh God. Okay. She talks about
• 2:33:07
  the male ego a lot, which is quite interesting. Never mentioned the female
• 2:33:11
  ego, but male ego. Okay, But that ultimately this seems to come
• 2:33:15
  down to I can't take responsibility. I have to shuff it onto men.
• 2:33:20
  Why is it that nothing is nothing is improving. Well, it's because you
• 2:33:26
  have been trained. And I would honestly say that this is and I'm not
• 2:33:31
  saying that men have deliberately done this or society. I think it just sort
• 2:33:33
  of fell in that way. This woman has been trained to constantly frame things
• 2:33:39
  in terms of male guilt. And because she's been trained to constantly frame things
• 2:33:45
  in terms of male guilt, she can never take the responsibility to fill the
• 2:33:50
  whole in her solar plexus. And that whole in her solar plexus is the
• 2:33:54
  sense of herself having efficacy in the greater world and having an effect on somebody
• 2:34:01
  else besides herself and other women, which would be men, and that whole.
• 2:34:03
  How do you fill that hole? You fill it with men's issues and
• 2:34:07
  recognition of them. There you go. That's how women fill the whole by
• 2:34:11
  recognizing men's vulnerabilities. Because when they see men's vulnerabilities, they see their affect
• 2:34:16
  in the greater world, and suddenly they see themselves for the first time ever
• 2:34:22
  as individuals, does that is that too woo? Nope, I think that
• 2:34:31
  we purplish levels of woo never thought possible just by going through this book.
• 2:34:37
  Yeah, it gets us. This is nothing so far. Yeah, but
• 2:34:43
  you have to understand that this is a constrained animal. Like literally, she's
• 2:34:48
  a milking cow whose entire world is creating the milk of male guilt. And
• 2:34:54
  she does not understand the world outside of being that thing that produces guilt for
• 2:34:58
  men. And she just basically her brain is institutionalized. And I can explain
• 2:35:07
  that more because I know that's really confusing, and I will eventually, but
• 2:35:09
  not in this context because live streams are not really good for my kind of
• 2:35:18
  shit that I talk about. I guess that's the That's not a really good
• 2:35:22
  way of putting it. Like I feel like when I when I talk about
• 2:35:26
  the esoteric stuff that I talk about that it doesn't really work on a live
• 2:35:31
  stream. People get confused. So I'm going to make some videos on this.
• 2:35:37
  I think they may be some of the most important videos I make.
• 2:35:39
  It just did basically explaining what the role, the psychological role that feminism provides
• 2:35:46
  in perpetuating our society because there is actually if it has a function, and
• 2:35:54
  I've realized what that function is, and I've realized why women like this are
• 2:36:00
  incapable of seeing themselves outside of that function. But anyway, that's that's neither
• 2:36:05
  here nor there. We're talking about the hole in the solar plexus. Men
• 2:36:09
  as God eating to be God. Okay, but honestly, I can't do
• 2:36:16
  more than three hours. Oh okay, okay, So it's we got,
• 2:36:22
  we got sort of we're at the point where I think we need to maybe
• 2:36:26
  do some super chows. I also wanted to maybe operationalize all of this wu
• 2:36:33
  In an exchange that I had as a result of a very short video,
• 2:36:39
  I did, what do you think, Brian, can we do that?
• 2:36:41
  As in the last like seven Well, yeah, so like I'm okay with
• 2:36:46
  whatever. Tilder, do you feel like this is a good place to pause
• 2:36:52
  it or do you want to like get to another little like milestone and then
• 2:36:56
  you feel like it's good because there's a lot of content, but it's totally
• 2:37:01
  worth it. So yeah, we've got men as goden needing to be God.
• 2:37:07
  That we've got how the white male system oppresses women. The white male
• 2:37:13
  system relationships, children and the relationship to rage. The chapter five the white
• 2:37:18
  male system as pollution, the definition and defining of relationships, sexuality, friendship,
• 2:37:26
  and then we get into the dualistic of the theology section at the end
• 2:37:30
  of Yeah, there is a fair amount. Yeah, we have to go
• 2:37:35
  over. Okay, then maybe we should like let all of this marinate.
• 2:37:41
  I mean, this is it. What go ahead? I'm just saying,
• 2:37:43
  tild this is a lot for people to digest. Yeah, I think I
• 2:37:48
  think that. I mean, it was a lot for him because he's the
• 2:37:50
  one who put all this together, and I yeah, I'm sorry that you
• 2:37:54
  made such a sacrifice. This is just the beginning. Yeah, good to
• 2:38:00
  get Oh, I know, I know, it's it's not even a rabbit
• 2:38:03
  hole. It's like those worms from Dune. But okay, so I do.
• 2:38:09
  So what we'll do is we'll stop it here and we'll plan another day
• 2:38:16
  to do another part of this, maybe soon. I have a super I
• 2:38:20
  have a firestight chat with Paul Elam on Monday. And how about Wednesday?
• 2:38:26
  We could try Wednesday. Yeah, we could try Wednesday of next week if
• 2:38:28
  Tildier is okay with it. I mean, again, how you're going to
• 2:38:33
  feel. I guess around that, I think I think the next show will
• 2:38:37
  be a lot will be shorter because we won't have as much content to deal
• 2:38:39
  with, right Tillier will be because there's this It's basically the last half of
• 2:38:46
  this right up. And when you consider the we've done the first half of
• 2:38:50
  this and the other two smaller write ups as well going into it, you
• 2:38:54
  know it won't be it nearly as long, maybe about half this amount of
• 2:38:58
  time. Well, I guess it depends how triggering it is. Yeah,
• 2:39:03
  I'm excited to get through the rest of it. So then what we'll do
• 2:39:07
  is I'll read out Richard Bierre's super Chow and then Alison can give her closing
• 2:39:11
  thoughts and then we'll oh, well, no, I I actually I want
• 2:39:15
  to show you guys something. This is a video that I've been working on.
• 2:39:18
  I put out it's the I just sent it to you. Brian,
• 2:39:20
  Well, you can do the super Chow, but I want to. But
• 2:39:22
  I thought it's the is it the mia Khalifa thing? Yes, it is
• 2:39:26
  the Mia Khalifa thing, but I have edited it. And also I wanted
• 2:39:31
  as an example of the whole in the female solar plexus, like I think
• 2:39:35
  it's a perfect example of it. Let me see if I can download it.
• 2:39:39
  I'd have to like set up mind, I can read. I can
• 2:39:43
  read Richard's statements while you're doing that. Go ahead, okay, all right,
• 2:39:50
  he's John Cena. Richard Bierre writes, Oh yeah, hold on,
• 2:39:54
  I think I got something for that, because whenever he puts it in,
• 2:39:58
  I think he wants me to play the sound. So John six, Okay,
• 2:40:03
  there you go. Are you satisfied? Richard? He sends us five
• 2:40:11
  bucks, and he says when farm tractors were first developed, they didn't have
• 2:40:15
  headlights on them because it was thought that all the field work would be completed
• 2:40:18
  before sunset. There's a notion that if a technology will make tasks like take
• 2:40:22
  less time to complete, more tasks need to be added to a work day
• 2:40:24
  to maximize productivity. These adult daycare jobs are most prevalent in locations we're Having
• 2:40:30
  either an office or headquarters in a particular city adds to the prestige of a
• 2:40:33
  company as to how serious or legitimate the particular company is. Very good point.
• 2:40:39
  There are entire office buildings that exist solely to add legitimacy to their company
• 2:40:46
  and have absolutely no productivity. What's so fucking ever involved? And that's that
• 2:40:52
  might because my my aspect ratios like top, like portrait. It might look
• 2:40:58
  a little weird. But let's let's do it anyway. Let's do this live,
• 2:41:03
  do what live, Whatever it is you're doing. I'm trying to do
• 2:41:07
  it. Yeah, I'm trying to open it. But like, hmmm,
• 2:41:11
  Discord doesn't like the video. It's not showing me anything. So I gotta
• 2:41:18
  try and do this a different way. I'm sorry. Maybe I can drus
• 2:41:20
  file into up round. There was a previous super chat that okay, yeah,
• 2:41:26
  this was also from rich Career. This is the this is the deep
• 2:41:30
  lore of Richard's conversation. This is a okay, as far as AI replacing
• 2:41:37
  office jobs, go. I remember a news magazine show segment during the Internet
• 2:41:41
  gold rush days where some firms which were providing services with a very small staff
• 2:41:46
  would hire job title fake workers so that clients would see a very fully staffed
• 2:41:50
  office to cater to the needs of the customers. Tim Pool mentioned a company
• 2:41:54
  and NYC that had a twelve story office building full of people who didn't know
• 2:42:00
  what their individual contributions did for the final product. A different version of the
• 2:42:05
  TikTok girls bragging about their do nothing adult daycare jobs at social media companies.
• 2:42:09
  Yeah, that's sort of the situation, you know, the whatever these industries
• 2:42:16
  are doing, all their main goal now is to is to try to make
• 2:42:20
  women feel better about themselves. So you got a prestigious a silly little prestigious
• 2:42:26
  title, and then you got snacks and a nappy blanket and all this other
• 2:42:28
  shit that these children need because they're fucking cowards. All right, all right,
• 2:42:33
  so here I got let me share the screen with you guys. So
• 2:42:37
  I got to stop sharing my obs really quick, and I will instead share
• 2:42:43
  this mia Khalifa video. Oh no, it's my edit well of the Miya
• 2:42:50
  Khalifa video. But okay, let's let's listen to it. Married at eighteen,
• 2:42:56
  divorced at twenty one. Second marriage, married at twenty five, divorce
• 2:43:00
  at twenty eight. I've been going to this high school for seven and a
• 2:43:03
  half years. I know, dummy. Marriage is not a sanctimonious thing.
• 2:43:11
  I know, dumbs. It's a commitment you make to someone. It is.
• 2:43:16
  It is paperwork. I kept the ring. She's no dummy. I
• 2:43:20
  know it's difficult to fill out paperwork. Specifically the paperwork in an office.
• 2:43:28
  Okay, so that was my ridiculous Yeah, there you go, not bad.
• 2:43:33
  Yeah that was my edit. But I don't know why anyone would want
• 2:43:37
  to take advice from mea Khalifa about like long term relationships and marriage. Apparently,
• 2:43:45
  apparently there's some women in my comments who do like by Ray. By
• 2:43:50
  Ray says, I love how you edited it. I think that's sarcasm.
• 2:43:54
  That's a bit of backstabbing. That's the sisterhood. What she was saying in
• 2:43:58
  the actual video. Just because you were married does not mean you need to
• 2:44:00
  stay in that relationship no matter what. There are so many marriages which continue
• 2:44:03
  for the kids. But if the parents get divorced, blah blah blah.
• 2:44:07
  If you cannot make the marriage work, you are an abusive marriage. It
• 2:44:09
  just get out. And then I said, but make sure to keep the
• 2:44:13
  ring. Also, the way that she phrased it, marriage is just paperwork
• 2:44:16
  is bullshit. She shows that she values what she values at Ending a relationship
• 2:44:22
  isn't about losing hopes and dreams and a companion but inconvenience. Looking like a
• 2:44:26
  smug bully didn't help her case here either, because the original she looked really,
• 2:44:31
  she looked like she was enjoying the idea of harming another person. Oh
• 2:44:33
  yeah, yeah, finally, leave if you're abused is basic bitch advice.
• 2:44:39
  It doesn't need to be said, and that wasn't what was said. What
• 2:44:41
  was said is if you're not getting what you want out of the relationship,
• 2:44:43
  leave What is that thing you want out of the relationship? Companionship? People
• 2:44:48
  who want companionship from the relationships don't create these kind of TikTok disasters or keep
• 2:44:52
  the ring and by Ray responds with, yes, it is just paperwork.
• 2:44:58
  Was a bad take on her part. But the rest of the take is
• 2:45:01
  its commitment. Blah blah blah. This is solid advice, and the majority
• 2:45:05
  of the takes against her as low what okay, but that was not my
• 2:45:07
  take. Lowell whatever sex worker. I didn't mention the fact she was a
• 2:45:11
  sex worker, except to say that what she did seems like prostitution with extra
• 2:45:15
  steps because she got married, got divorced, she went through a whole bunch
• 2:45:20
  of paperwork, and she apparently kept some of the shit that her partners gave
• 2:45:24
  her. Sounds like prostitution with extra steps. What do you want out a
• 2:45:28
  relationship depends on you. If I marry a man who's nice to me before
• 2:45:31
  marriage but ditched all the housework, et cetera on me, I'm going to
• 2:45:35
  put an effort to communicate with him and fix that. If it doesn't change,
• 2:45:37
  though, I'm out. I'm not going to waste my ears being a
• 2:45:39
  mother to a guy who was supposed to be my partner in life. I
• 2:45:43
  can't, And I said, look at the expression of triumphalism on her face
• 2:45:46
  when she describes leaving moving. That actually makes her less like an abusive asshole,
• 2:45:50
  leaving only a bunch of memorable silliness. I could have made her look
• 2:45:54
  like a demon. Instead, I made her look funny. As for being
• 2:45:56
  someone's mother, you can always do what I did. You know Mary stays
• 2:46:00
  at home. Of course, you have to learn to deal with the anxiety
• 2:46:01
  of being the one who makes sure all the bills are paid. Sound good,
• 2:46:05
  And she says, the stress of making sure the bills are paid.
• 2:46:09
  I'm an engineer. I already pay my bills. Thanks nice. Try trying
• 2:46:13
  to put me down like this, though I'm not exactly sure how I'm putting
• 2:46:16
  her down, But whatever. Men and women both work in households for many
• 2:46:20
  years now. Men still have the nerve to leave the househork to women after
• 2:46:22
  they both come home from work. Though. This is why divorce rates increased.
• 2:46:28
  Women are no longer stuck in a bad relationships because we have economic freedom.
• 2:46:31
  Rest just sounds like you're projecting to be honest. Okay, so when
• 2:46:35
  women didn't when women commonly stayed at home and then did the housework, was
• 2:46:41
  that just a fair exchange? You know what I mean? Like she's complaining
• 2:46:46
  that when men and women come home and then the man doesn't do the housework,
• 2:46:52
  well, you could have solved that by just staying home and doing the
• 2:46:56
  housework, but that seemed to not work. And then I replied, but
• 2:47:00
  you don't pay for the bills of another human being. You don't understand the
• 2:47:03
  stress of making sure someone else has their health costs through cost shelter costs paid
• 2:47:07
  for. Also, if you're an engineer, paid for someone to clean a
• 2:47:11
  problem solved and quoting her. Men still have the nerve to leave the housework
• 2:47:16
  to women after they both come home from work, though, and I said,
• 2:47:20
  done, don't do it? Problem solved? Like this is what is
• 2:47:22
  if you're both coming home and he's not doing the housework, then you don't
• 2:47:26
  do the housework, or you go have as he's on paying someone else to
• 2:47:31
  do it. What's the problem here, and take responsibility for your choices.
• 2:47:37
  Also, you don't have a relationship with men. You have a relationship with
• 2:47:41
  a man like this is. This is the frustrating thing about these women.
• 2:47:46
  They don't see relationships in terms of having a relationship with another individual. They
• 2:47:52
  seem to see relationships in terms of having a relationship with a stereotype about men,
• 2:47:56
  and usually a very negative one, just like we were taught talking about.
• 2:48:00
  In this entire segue, this is she says, this is why divorce
• 2:48:07
  and creates increased. Women are no longer stuck in bad relationships because we have
• 2:48:09
  economic freedom. So women, this is me responding, So women were only
• 2:48:13
  in relationships for a paycheck, because that's the other thing. Now that women
• 2:48:18
  have their own jobs and we have no divorce, like we have almost no
• 2:48:24
  marriages. What did that say about what women were in marriage for in the
• 2:48:28
  first place, Like, they were in it too improve themselves materially. They
• 2:48:35
  weren't in it for a companion. They just wanted to improve themselves materially.
• 2:48:39
  Yeah, like, well, that's a problem. Now that you have all
• 2:48:45
  of these jobs, you have to ask yourself and apparently this is destroying people's
• 2:48:52
  family formation in the West, which will then destroy the entire Western system which
• 2:48:58
  is giving you your job. Like you have to ask you, well,
• 2:49:03
  what were what were women really about? Then they're about money? And I
• 2:49:09
  said, honestly, I'm not tried to convince you to be in a relationship
• 2:49:13
  with a man. Judging from your unpleasant stereotypes about men, you should probably
• 2:49:16
  avoid them and find yourself another flavor in the gender spectrum. And here's square.
• 2:49:20
  I'm curious, and I really needs your guys' input because I have no
• 2:49:24
  idea what happened next. This is where I'm I'm like scratching my head.
• 2:49:30
  This is her response. You're just mindlessly dribbling at this point. Who said
• 2:49:35
  I'm stuck? My whole point was I'm getting out, I'm single and happy.
• 2:49:39
  You sound like you love making shit up and arguing about that or you're
• 2:49:43
  just drunk high. Either way, not going to waste my time here any
• 2:49:46
  longer. So I'm like looking at this and I'm scratching my head. Where
• 2:49:50
  did I say that she was stuck? And how is she getting out if
• 2:49:56
  she's not stuck? What is she stuck in? Like, can you guys
• 2:50:01
  give me any insight do you? Since you've you've you've learned about the female
• 2:50:05
  system. Learning about the female system has just made me say, you know
• 2:50:13
  what, I'm not anymore, You're not doing this anymore. No, it's
• 2:50:22
  just no, No, it doesn't give you any insight into what the hell
• 2:50:26
  this woman means when she says that I accused her of being stuck, but
• 2:50:30
  also that she's not stuck, but she's getting out of the thing that she's
• 2:50:33
  not stuck in, but she is stuck. She just wants to blame you
• 2:50:37
  for it. She still isn't taking responsibility. Yeah she's no God, yeah,
• 2:50:43
  it's any situation that she's in. But it seems like she's arguing with
• 2:50:48
  someone Like all I'm saying is you know, if you don't like men,
• 2:50:52
  don't get in a relationship with n And then she's like, I'm not stuck,
• 2:50:54
  Like, well I didn't, All right, I was just hoping that
• 2:50:58
  understand the female system might actually help you understand women, but apparently I No,
• 2:51:05
  No, it's just made it far more enigmatic and not worth understanding.
• 2:51:13
  Good lord. Okay, well yes, no, Now we're just basically putting
• 2:51:18
  gigantic roadblocks in the way of people actually forming relationships, because that's going to
• 2:51:22
  work out because going through so much of this, even this book, when
• 2:51:26
  it says, you know that the female system is not actually a thing that
• 2:51:30
  can be measured, it is just the process, and like she literally towards
• 2:51:35
  the end of this says that the process is God. So the female system
• 2:51:37
  is God, and this is why we need to use it so that we
• 2:51:41
  can transcend. And yeah, at that point in time, it's just like,
• 2:51:45
  okay, so a female method of doing things is ever shifting, ever
• 2:51:50
  changing. It has no actual measurable, tangible, understandable qualities. And that
• 2:51:56
  is except they're always right. Yeah, except for the system is always right.
• 2:52:01
  I mean she even says, like other points in this book that women
• 2:52:05
  can use white male system thinking and white male system means of giving things as
• 2:52:09
  part of the female system, like if it benefits that woman at that moment
• 2:52:13
  in time, and that's fine. And so at that point it's just like
• 2:52:18
  you, it doesn't matter what you're saying because basically all you're saying it's the
• 2:52:24
  same thing. When she said, like, oh, I went through everything
• 2:52:26
  in my life when people were calling me obnoxious. No, ninety percent.
• 2:52:28
  At the time, it was just that everyone else was wrong. Yeah,
• 2:52:33
  it's it's just woo. It's just so I'm always right no matter what.
• 2:52:35
  Everyone else is always wrong. No, man, there's no external standard to
• 2:52:39
  hold me too. Yeah. Yeah. And you know what's really funny about
• 2:52:41
  this exchange is what I'm getting a sense of, And it was we watched
• 2:52:46
  we watched a video a while back. It was Tom Woods, the libertarian
• 2:52:52
  You remember that Brian and he had a guest. He had a guest on
• 2:52:56
  who said that the reason why women don't want to get in relationship with men
• 2:53:00
  and have children is because it's safer to have a paycheck. So it's a
• 2:53:05
  cowardly position. And I'm thinking that the reason why this woman insists on seeing
• 2:53:11
  the most negative stereotype about men is because she's a coward and does not want
• 2:53:16
  to take the risk of actually understanding men. And I think that's also why
• 2:53:20
  this porn star kept leaving as because probably what really happened is you get to
• 2:53:28
  a point in a relationship where you have to be vulnerable or you have to
• 2:53:31
  recognize someone else's vulnerable abilities or the external like there's something beyond you the relationship,
• 2:53:39
  and she just was like, yeah, I'm bailing, and she pretended
• 2:53:45
  she pretended to think that, oh, it was his problem. Yeah.
• 2:53:48
  I think women really have a commitment issue, and it's because they're cowards.
• 2:53:52
  They face the world with cowardice, and they hide their cowardice behind this kind
• 2:53:58
  of idea of female systems being superior, that there's nothing really out there that
• 2:54:03
  they need to care about that's greater than them, and uh, and that
• 2:54:07
  men aren't worth it. Men don't automatically if you're in a relationship with the
• 2:54:13
  man, he's going to foist the housework off on you for some reason.
• 2:54:16
  So why even bother like just just be happy with having a paycheck because it's
• 2:54:22
  reliable and safe and it's it's sort of sad, actually, anyway, it's
• 2:54:31
  quite sad. Okay, this was a little bit more off topic, but
• 2:54:35
  I just wanted to go over that because I think it does relate to this
• 2:54:37
  idea of the female system, because it relates to this idea like there's nothing,
• 2:54:43
  there's no value in a relationship with a man, and that's basically what
• 2:54:48
  she's arguing is there's no value in men. All right, Okay, so
• 2:54:56
  I guess we'll wrap it up here at least for now. Put a put
• 2:55:00
  a put a three hours is pretty good. I think that's the Yep,
• 2:55:05
  that's a lot. So we'll pause here, you know, put a bookmark
• 2:55:13
  or whatever, and tend to come back to it next Wednesday if we can.
• 2:55:18
  So, I don't think I can fit any more post it notes in
• 2:55:22
  this book, I'm sorry. And that's just one book. Yeah, this
• 2:55:26
  is one out of the stack of lot six. Yeah, oh my god.
• 2:55:31
  So you are are you making like this project? Is this like a
• 2:55:35
  series of videos or I'm hoping that I might be able to content sit down
• 2:55:39
  to one Well, well, I don't know. I just still see how
• 2:55:43
  it goes. Okay. I'm currently basically at the point of just writing,
• 2:55:48
  rewriting every single one of these books in shorter bullet point sort of form.
• 2:55:54
  Is kind of like I'm going through for this stream and I'm hoping to base
• 2:56:00
  they get a version of that for each one of these books, pull out
• 2:56:01
  sort of all the core points of them and draw a timeline of events and
• 2:56:05
  just say like, hey, look, this is the objective, spiritual underpinnings
• 2:56:11
  of the feminist movement, like you can't get away from this, and anyone
• 2:56:16
  who tries the that's not real, that's not my okay, neophyte, you've
• 2:56:22
  never read your you've never read your holy texts. Read them. Come back
• 2:56:28
  when you actually understand your religion, the sacred texts. How could you ignore
• 2:56:33
  me? Yeah? Yeah, all the underpinning for why they were not Yeah,
• 2:56:41
  the underpinning for why having a relationship with a man is a net a
• 2:56:46
  net negative like this is this is this is where this comes from. Guys,
• 2:56:50
  Like we're talking about how men are completely they have to they have to
• 2:56:54
  push against a head wind of this constant drum that they're that a relationship with
• 2:57:01
  the man is a burden and worthless, despite the fact that married women are
• 2:57:05
  them are significantly happier than single women. You know, being in a relationship
• 2:57:11
  with a man is a total burden. You don't want it. Well,
• 2:57:13
  this is this is like ground zero for where a lot of this stuff came
• 2:57:16
  from rolling downhill, just like it was rolling downhill to the American Psychological Association.
• 2:57:22
  So you have to look at this and see how this is the purpose
• 2:57:26
  of it. It is just the history of it, because people do just
• 2:57:31
  seem to I also think that it's I suppose maybe a side tangent, which
• 2:57:37
  I don't want to go on too too much, is that you've noticed,
• 2:57:41
  I'm sure this sort of new wave of pseudo red pill content creators who just
• 2:57:45
  seemed to come out of nowhere and yet have these weirdly large audiences for no
• 2:57:50
  discernible reason, like these freshiem. Yeah, that those sorts of people,
• 2:57:56
  and I just I look at the things that they're saying, and I'm just
• 2:58:00
  like, you're not saying anything new, and frankly, you people are the
• 2:58:05
  worst straw men of the rocal community from like ten years ago. Like you're
• 2:58:11
  not you're not actually helping it. You're making everything worse. And part of
• 2:58:15
  the reason that you're making everything worse, first of all, you're making shit
• 2:58:18
  arguments, frankly, and as I said, you literally have become the worst
• 2:58:22
  straw men of this movement from like ten years ago. But also they don't
• 2:58:28
  know any of this stuff, so they're not they're not going to point out
• 2:58:31
  why any of this stuff has happened. They have no understanding of it at
• 2:58:35
  all. Frankly, a lot of them just seemed to be coming in and
• 2:58:37
  trying to turn it into some sort of grift, right, and yeah,
• 2:58:43
  catapulted to the stratosphere right, So yeah, I'm with it. I think
• 2:58:48
  the phrase is controlled opposition. Yet to prove that conclusively, Yeah, I
• 2:58:54
  have a feeling about that. But okay, so welcome back to this next
• 2:59:03
  week. I think we'll wrap it up here. Alison, do you have
• 2:59:07
  any thing else? Okay? Sure, yeah, okay, So I'm still
• 2:59:11
  again canvassing for the editing of the captive I Game of Thrones meets Alice in
• 2:59:18
  Wonderland. You can go to feed the Badger dot com slash I e ye
• 2:59:22
  to help out with that, and also if you have any messages after the
• 2:59:26
  show that you want to send us, you want to give us a tip
• 2:59:28
  because you really like this content, you find it areadite. That's how you
• 2:59:33
  pronounce that you can go to feed the Badger dot com slash just the tip.
• 2:59:37
  Really appreciated that we aren't like just screaming into the abyss always makes us
• 2:59:41
  feel like we're doing something that matters, you know, is important to someone.
• 2:59:46
  So feed the Badger dot com slash just the tip if you send us
• 2:59:48
  a message after this show is over, we again will endeavor to read it
• 2:59:52
  at the next relevant show. In this case, we'll read it at the
• 2:59:56
  next show on this topic. I'm yes, well, yeah, yeah,
• 3:00:01
  that's fine. And also I wanted to ask Tildier, you're not on YouTube
• 3:00:09
  anymore? I don't think, because I mean I was subscribed to you and
• 3:00:11
  you've been gone there from there for a while. Are you still on like
• 3:00:15
  any places like bit shoot or I'm a Boo, I'm on Bitch Shoot,
• 3:00:20
  I'm on Rumble, I'm on Minds. I was on Odyssey until that channel
• 3:00:24
  killed itself. I have to remove the videos over to the channel there,
• 3:00:28
  which I will do it. Yeah. The reason my Odyssey account doesn't exist
• 3:00:33
  anymore is a weird situation. They had an option where it was disconnect your
• 3:00:39
  YouTube channel from the Odyssey channel. Yeah, and I said, yes,
• 3:00:43
  remove the YouTube account from the Odyssey channel. And apparently, even though that
• 3:00:46
  was a sub option under the connect YouTube channel to Odyssey account, apparently that
• 3:00:52
  was the remove your Odyssey account, which left me really confused. It was
• 3:00:56
  like, okay, so so your option tree is connect YouTube account to your
• 3:01:01
  Odyssey account sub menu remove account. Weird, right, But that button,
• 3:01:07
  that button terminates the Odyssey account. Okay, sure, your your UI is
• 3:01:11
  badly designed, but it's It's okay though, because all the videos are still
• 3:01:16
  on the site, I still have access to them. I basically just have
• 3:01:20
  to do a bunch of checkboxes to move them over to the new channel,
• 3:01:22
  which I'm going to do once I've finished uploading the backlog of stuff the Rumble,
• 3:01:26
  which I am doing. Yeah, I'm just gonna say, people just
• 3:01:31
  don't use YouTube. YouTube as a terrible, terrible platform. Everything here is
• 3:01:35
  controlled. People are just shadow band into oblivion if they have anything worth saying.
• 3:01:43
  Anything that gets popular gets popular for a reason, and it's because YouTube
• 3:01:46
  wants you to see it, which is possibly why the worst examples of red
• 3:01:50
  bill philosophy is the stuff that's rising. Now be aware of that. Go
• 3:01:54
  to altech and actually go to alt tech and look for people. I just
• 3:02:01
  followed Till Dear on Rumble. So go to Rumble. Just search tl Semi
• 3:02:05
  Cole and d R and give him a follow there and check out the videos.
• 3:02:11
  So while I agree with that philosophy, I've We're still on YouTube because
• 3:02:16
  at the very least someone you know, there has to be some other thing
• 3:02:20
  out there. We're also on Rumble too, so and on Twitter, which
• 3:02:26
  is of looking like it could be a good place to upload content. And
• 3:02:31
  we're on Facebook because some old people watch us there so as well, and
• 3:02:39
  also honestly too, I'm pretty sure we're also. Yeah, I think we've
• 3:02:43
  reached the limit of the number of places we can stream too, but because
• 3:02:46
  I guess like there's cozy and there's some of a d live so yeah yeah.
• 3:02:54
  And also for some reason, YouTube delivers up my shorts content tent on
• 3:03:00
  the main channel to a lot of women for some reason. So I'm enjoying
• 3:03:05
  like trolling the fuck out of the basic bitch normy women with my heart takes.
• 3:03:13
  So there you go. There's some joy to be had left on YouTube,
• 3:03:16
  and I'm having it, agreed. Okay. Oh, speaking of joy
• 3:03:20
  on YouTube, I do run the icons even news channel where I relentlessly mocked
• 3:03:24
  the news. Oh yeah, okay. It's basically just the most far left
• 3:03:28
  propaganda you can imagine, and YouTube doesn't seem to notice what I'm doing,
• 3:03:33
  which I find funny. Okay, So what's the channel? I can't even
• 3:03:39
  news. I can't even news, Okay, so guys go there too,
• 3:03:43
  All right, back to you, Brian because I'm done, all right,
• 3:03:45
  So if you guys like this video, please smash like, subscribe if you're
• 3:03:48
  not already subscribe, hit the belt notifications, leave us a comment. This
• 3:03:54
  is actually a really worthwhile conversation I have, so please please leave us a
• 3:03:58
  comment, and please please please share this video because sharing is caring. I'll
• 3:04:03
  be sure to follow us on all of all all tech sites. Thank you
• 3:04:07
  guys so much for coming on today's episode of The Rand Cercer, and we
• 3:04:09
  will talk to you all in the next video.