Latest / The Occult Rejects / Aleister Crowley's 777 Book Discussion- Introduction

Transcript

Aleister Crowley's 777 Book Discussion- Introduction · The Occult Rejects

0:02
Speaker 1: You see something's going to happen.
0:06
Speaker 2: What what's going to happen? I'll tak what help. Welcome
0:25
Speaker 2: to the Occult Rejects. In this episode, you got me
0:29
Speaker 2: and my boy Headless Giant, and uh as I, as
0:32
Speaker 2: far as I know now, woul assume it's just gonna
0:34
Speaker 2: be us two the whole time. But I mean, you
0:36
Speaker 2: never know. But hey, it's a first day of the
0:39
Speaker 2: new series. We're going to be trying. We're going to
0:43
Speaker 2: cover seven seven seven by Alista Crowley as best as
0:47
Speaker 2: we can. Uh you know, from our experiences of using
0:50
Speaker 2: it or there things that come up in there that
0:52
Speaker 2: we have experience with you will go on with it,
0:55
Speaker 2: and some stuff that we don't have experience, we'll obviously
0:57
Speaker 2: read over it, just so you get an idea of
0:58
Speaker 2: what's in there. I and Headless were even saying prior
1:02
Speaker 2: to the show, I do think a lot of people
1:05
Speaker 2: are actually misunderstood about what's actually inside this book. Not
1:09
Speaker 2: saying I'm promoting it and saying everybody go out and
1:11
Speaker 2: get it and start reading it like a Bible. But
1:14
Speaker 2: you know, I don't think this is probably as many
1:15
Speaker 2: dicks and demons in here as everybody thinks that.
1:18
Speaker 1: Right.
1:18
Speaker 2: Yeah, But before we go on, is there anything you
1:22
Speaker 2: want to say about this head list? I know, I
1:23
Speaker 2: know you're a big fan of this book as well,
1:25
Speaker 2: so well.
1:27
Speaker 1: This is Alistair Crowley's Kabbala. So if you're wondering about
1:31
Speaker 1: all of the associations and the worldview that Crowley had,
1:35
Speaker 1: don't go to the podcast. Go to seven seven seven,
1:38
Speaker 1: because this is going to give you sort of a
1:40
Speaker 1: view into his subconscious mind as well as his studies
1:43
Speaker 1: and all the rest of this stuff. That's that's why
1:45
Speaker 1: I think it's kind of important because it's shaping a
1:48
Speaker 1: whole generation of occultists, right. All the occultists of this
1:52
Speaker 1: generation had his book so that they could have those
1:54
Speaker 1: associations on hand. This is the ultimate reference guide for
1:59
Speaker 1: the Crowley and point of view. Yeah, so that's that's
2:02
Speaker 1: why we're covering it.
2:03
Speaker 2: And if there's any I guarantee you, if there's any
2:05
Speaker 2: witches in Chat or wickens in Chat that don't even
2:08
Speaker 2: like Crowley, some of you out there it might even
2:09
Speaker 2: be able to contest and say I still use that book.
2:12
Speaker 2: I have heard that so many times from people in
2:14
Speaker 2: the witchcraft and the cold community. I don't like Croley
2:17
Speaker 2: but I still use this seven seven seven. I've known
2:19
Speaker 2: wicks that have you know, witches that are into you know,
2:23
Speaker 2: typical ceremonial magic, still use that book. So obviously it's
2:28
Speaker 2: an impact regardless if you think it's real or not.
2:30
Speaker 2: You know what I'm saying, It is influenced. I have
2:34
Speaker 2: a huge chunk of ceremonial practices since I don't know,
2:38
Speaker 2: since this came.
2:38
Speaker 1: Out, you know, right right early nineteen hundred, so it's
2:44
Speaker 1: still having influence today. We're still reading it to you guys,
2:47
Speaker 1: so it's probably gonna shape some of those subconscious associations yourself.
2:51
Speaker 1: But one of the other things I wanted to cover
2:53
Speaker 1: is you can follow along too. I put the link
2:55
Speaker 1: in the chat, but if you can't find it there,
2:57
Speaker 1: you could also look on Internet archives seven to seven
3:00
Speaker 1: seven and you'll find it there as well. So it's
3:02
Speaker 1: it's free if you want to get your hands on it.
3:05
Speaker 2: Yes, And one thing I do want to mention that
3:07
Speaker 2: Young Stitch is eight over here said or eighty eight
3:09
Speaker 2: or eight Young Stitches eight. Uh, this is before Thalma,
3:12
Speaker 2: so it's pret aonic, So I mean it was before
3:14
Speaker 2: he became who he became, I guess, So all right,
3:19
Speaker 2: do you want me to start it off? Oh? Sure, sure,
3:23
Speaker 2: all right, yeah, we'll pull it up to uh, let
3:26
Speaker 2: you guys see it here. Let me maybe I can
3:28
Speaker 2: blow it up a little bit, make it look a
3:29
Speaker 2: little bit better for you guys. But I do highly
3:33
Speaker 2: suggest if you can to grab the grab the PDF
3:37
Speaker 2: for the book and read along with it. All right,
3:40
Speaker 2: here we go, take these glasses of us. This is
3:45
Speaker 2: a unique collection of Kabbalistic texts without parallel in the
3:49
Speaker 2: entire history of this vast mystical literature, all of them
3:55
Speaker 2: belonging to the very early professional career of Alista Crowley.
3:59
Speaker 2: That is a is they were written before he had
4:02
Speaker 2: reached the age of forty years, as every student of
4:06
Speaker 2: the Croley corpus of writing should know. However, they were
4:10
Speaker 2: used constantly and continuously by him throughout his lifetime. So
4:15
Speaker 2: I mean, I would hope if you put this out
4:17
Speaker 2: he adhered to his own work. But they're even saying
4:20
Speaker 2: he used it.
4:20
Speaker 1: Himself absolutely in the obscure footnotes to the Vision and
4:27
Speaker 1: the Voice Sangreal Foundation, Dallas, nineteen seventy two. That's an
4:32
Speaker 1: important place there. Yeah, elis in the nineteen sixties, interesting,
4:37
Speaker 1: which I recently edited. It soon became evident that a
4:40
Speaker 1: few of those explanatory notes of his would make a
4:46
Speaker 1: rhyme or reason to the average student unless he were
4:49
Speaker 1: exceedingly well grounded in the material and methods delineate delineated
4:55
Speaker 1: in those books. All three need to be studied a
4:59
Speaker 1: studious over a long period of time before those footnotes
5:03
Speaker 1: become intelligible to any degree, or until the intrinsic value
5:08
Speaker 1: of the text themselves is perceived as being of the
5:11
Speaker 1: purest goal little alchemy for you.
5:13
Speaker 2: Yeah, one thing I do want to mention that it's
5:16
Speaker 2: interesting they said the Vision in the Voice, Dallas, nineteen
5:19
Speaker 2: seventy two. As far as I know, if this is
5:21
Speaker 2: talking about what they're talking about. The Vision in the
5:24
Speaker 2: Voice is now located in Austin, Texas in a different library,
5:27
Speaker 2: But you can go there and see his handwritten notes.
5:31
Speaker 2: Do you have a fuck ton of pictures in video
5:33
Speaker 2: of it? And I am thinking about possibly showing it.
5:35
Speaker 2: But if you have the chance to go down there
5:37
Speaker 2: and look at that, you will see him literally doing
5:40
Speaker 2: drumatria fitting words in. He's using that word rose and
5:45
Speaker 2: he's doing the mads for it. He's not talking about
5:48
Speaker 2: his girl all the time he is doing something else
5:51
Speaker 2: when he says their names. Sometimes you can see that.
5:54
Speaker 2: I will even say, for the Sjw's out there who
5:58
Speaker 2: coucked for Crowley. This some stuff you might see him
6:01
Speaker 2: writ in there that might offend you some you know,
6:03
Speaker 2: offensive names for certain types of people. He may not
6:06
Speaker 2: be the you know, the great man you thought he was.
6:08
Speaker 2: He was just like everybody else, you know, all right, yeah, yeah.
6:16
Speaker 2: The first of these three texts is actually one of
6:19
Speaker 2: the installments from the Equinox, the fifth containing a biographical
6:26
Speaker 2: sal sorry containing a biographical serial entitled The Temple of
6:31
Speaker 2: King Solomon. The serial strove to present a more or
6:36
Speaker 2: less dynamic picture of the personality of Alista Crowley or
6:40
Speaker 2: Frader pert Rabo, which is something you called himself, per Rabbo.
6:43
Speaker 2: He's called himself the Beast and a few other names.
6:45
Speaker 2: I think to use his order name in the course
6:49
Speaker 2: of his progress along the mystical and magical path. The
6:53
Speaker 2: first few installments were written by one of his major
6:55
Speaker 2: disciples of the first decade of this century, Captain uh
7:00
Speaker 2: later General J. F. C. Fuller. After a while, these
7:05
Speaker 2: two men separated as separated as narrated in the Confessions
7:10
Speaker 2: of Alista Crowley. The result was that Crowley, being left
7:14
Speaker 2: in the in the lurch as it were, wrote the
7:17
Speaker 2: fifth installment as a kind of filler, enabling him to
7:20
Speaker 2: find time to resume the narrative of his attainment, interrupted
7:23
Speaker 2: by Fuller's departure. That's fine. That reminds me of It's like,
7:28
Speaker 2: sometimes it sounds shitty. Sometimes I'll do like filler shows
7:30
Speaker 2: why I'm in between, like trying to do more in depth.
7:32
Speaker 2: Once it's like, yeah, I kind of get what you
7:34
Speaker 2: get in at dude. Oh sorry, great.
7:37
Speaker 1: Also, we left out the part that this is a
7:41
Speaker 1: ford written by Israel Regardos. Oh yeah, Alchemist Handbook also
7:46
Speaker 1: has a ford written by Israel Regarded So he's getting
7:49
Speaker 1: all over back then he's got his hand in everything.
7:52
Speaker 2: So he might have had his hand in Alista Crowley at.
7:56
Speaker 1: One at some point might have The filler has nothing
8:01
Speaker 1: to do in reality with the biographical narrative. It consisted
8:05
Speaker 1: of a set of cobbalistic and pragmatic notes on number
8:09
Speaker 1: that Crowley had accumulated over the years, which he now
8:13
Speaker 1: tied together for his purposes. It consisted of a study
8:17
Speaker 1: of one phase of the Kabbalistic process, which is held
8:20
Speaker 1: in rather poor esteem today, mostly so, I believe, because
8:24
Speaker 1: the majority of the modern writers have not been able
8:27
Speaker 1: to penetrate its mystery, they cannot cope with it in
8:31
Speaker 1: any way. They regard it unfortunately on par with common
8:36
Speaker 1: practice of numerology and fortune telling, thus missing the boat entirely.
8:43
Speaker 2: Jumatria, as this process is named, is pronounced as je
8:48
Speaker 2: whatever a mutt rhea. As a method, it reminds me
8:52
Speaker 2: somewhat of the mystery surrounding the usage of the coan
8:56
Speaker 2: koa n in the Rinzi sect of Zen r I
9:01
Speaker 2: n z Ai z Ai sect of Zen. It seems
9:06
Speaker 2: at first sight first site nothing but perfect nonsense, this
9:11
Speaker 2: taking liberties with names and letters and numbers. But in
9:15
Speaker 2: point of fact, just as the coan is a meaningful
9:19
Speaker 2: but not necessary rational statement made from a mystical level
9:22
Speaker 2: of consciousness, so also it may be used to induce
9:27
Speaker 2: a similar type of illumination in the determined student who
9:31
Speaker 2: uses it. Depending on the spiritual state of the reader,
9:35
Speaker 2: Jamatria will be perceived either as nonsense of the most
9:38
Speaker 2: grotesque description, or it will awaken some smoke riom similacrum
9:46
Speaker 2: of the mystical state originally experienced by its writer. That's interesting.
9:54
Speaker 1: So he's having these illumination experiences and saying that understanding
10:02
Speaker 1: the Gematria in a certain frame of mind can induce
10:06
Speaker 1: the same similar state of consciousness. Very interesting. Let me
10:12
Speaker 1: see if he studies crowley exposition of the number four
10:15
Speaker 1: eighteen in this book Jamatria, for example, something of this
10:19
Speaker 1: high point of view may be perceived. It was not arbitrary,
10:24
Speaker 1: arbitrarily chosen as an important or significant number for him,
10:28
Speaker 1: or for that matter, anyone else, And so with many
10:31
Speaker 1: other numbers. This method does have definite sphere of usefulness
10:36
Speaker 1: and a vital place in cabalistic exogetical process, but it
10:43
Speaker 1: does require to be understood.
10:47
Speaker 2: Yeah, I don't like that word either. Whatever, never for
10:52
Speaker 2: one moment suspect Crowley of gullibility, ornate, or being naive.
11:00
Speaker 2: They seem at first sight as if he were. But
11:02
Speaker 2: read the first few pages of the essay on Jamatria,
11:05
Speaker 2: where you will notice his satire, his ridicule, his ridicule,
11:09
Speaker 2: and his humor. This should never be ignored or minimized.
11:12
Speaker 2: He never had difficulty pulking fun at himself or the
11:15
Speaker 2: methods he used for different purposes. It saved him from
11:18
Speaker 2: being gullible in crudelity, the curse of the average occult student.
11:24
Speaker 2: Some of his conclusions on his numerical manipulations, therefore, are
11:28
Speaker 2: entitled at the very least to some scrutiny and examination,
11:32
Speaker 2: and this in turn may lead to respect. For example,
11:36
Speaker 2: I have always been profoundly impressed by his handling of
11:39
Speaker 2: the number nine, one three, equinox one, number five, page
11:44
Speaker 2: one oh seven. It is the jamatria of God, this
11:48
Speaker 2: name barasheth barashith, a Hebrew word meaning the beginning, the
11:53
Speaker 2: first word of the Book of Genesis. He starts with
11:56
Speaker 2: a discussion of the number nine and reduces it by
11:59
Speaker 2: several brilliant permutations and attributions to one, stating that the
12:05
Speaker 2: many being the many being but veils of the one,
12:09
Speaker 2: and the course of argument leads one to knowledge and
12:12
Speaker 2: worship of each number. In turn, in concluding the lengthy analysis,
12:18
Speaker 2: he does state explicitly that nine is not equal to
12:22
Speaker 2: one for the neophyte. These equivalences are dogmatic and only
12:27
Speaker 2: true by favor of Him in whom all is truth.
12:33
Speaker 1: Any man who can write thus of a subject which
12:36
Speaker 1: is taboo because capable of infinite abuse, and which has
12:40
Speaker 1: earned the contempt of several reasonable students of the mysteries,
12:45
Speaker 1: is worthy of respect and consideration. Right to the end
12:49
Speaker 1: of his days, Crowley felt that this Jematria was a
12:52
Speaker 1: most useful tool, and tested many of his theoretical and
12:55
Speaker 1: intuitive feelings relative to the Book of Law against the
12:59
Speaker 1: manipulation and inspiration of Jamatria. I must say that I
13:04
Speaker 1: am in complete accord with him in this respect, as
13:08
Speaker 1: testified by my earliest piece of writing, A Garden of Pomegranates,
13:13
Speaker 1: in which there is a chapter on Jamatria.
13:17
Speaker 2: Nice. The second of these liber seven seven seven has
13:23
Speaker 2: been reprinted several times in recent years. All of the
13:26
Speaker 2: new editions improved on the first one, which is rare
13:29
Speaker 2: nowadays and most expensive, by the inclusion of many short
13:32
Speaker 2: essays and commentaries written at various times of Crowley, and
13:36
Speaker 2: added skillfully by the editor after Croley's demise in nineteen
13:39
Speaker 2: forty seven. I'll read the next one too. The book
13:42
Speaker 2: was first started in nineteen oh seven, shortly after his
13:45
Speaker 2: return from the China expedition. It is humorously referred to
13:49
Speaker 2: in the second essay and Knox on Pox, where there
13:52
Speaker 2: are references to the table of correspondences in preparation. In
13:58
Speaker 2: point of fact, these tables of Correspondences, which comprise Libra
14:02
Speaker 2: seven to seven in which were not published until nineteen
14:04
Speaker 2: oh nine, consists of basic information provided originally piecemeal and
14:10
Speaker 2: the knowledge lectures of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dome.
14:14
Speaker 2: Predicated on his own further studies and experiences. They were
14:18
Speaker 2: enormously expanded by Kroley, so that at first sight they
14:21
Speaker 2: bear little resemblance to the fragmented tables in the Golden Dome.
14:27
Speaker 1: There is a wealth of valuable material here just waiting
14:31
Speaker 1: to be used. Many writers have done so without due acknowledgement.
14:35
Speaker 1: This book provides a basic system or method of filling
14:39
Speaker 1: new information on any topic and subject. The filing system
14:44
Speaker 1: is predicated on a mere thirty two categories, the ten
14:48
Speaker 1: sever off of the Tree of Life and the twenty
14:51
Speaker 1: two letters of the Hebrew alphabet. Once this schema is understood,
14:56
Speaker 1: any new set of data of any kind can be
14:59
Speaker 1: referenced to it, thus undergoing immense, immediate and spontaneous organization
15:07
Speaker 1: and synthesis within the psyche. True most of the material
15:11
Speaker 1: relates to comparative religion and mythology, including precious stones, herbs, plants,
15:18
Speaker 1: and a multitude of other matters. Because these compromise the
15:22
Speaker 1: basic notions currently employed, one should not feel limited only
15:27
Speaker 1: to these topics. At one time I experimented allocating the
15:30
Speaker 1: elements on the atomic scale to this tree, with some
15:34
Speaker 1: modicum of success somewhere along the lines. It's so funny
15:38
Speaker 1: because the entire periodic table is set up with numbers
15:43
Speaker 1: and weights based off of the entire compilatory, and they're
15:47
Speaker 1: all named after Greek gods too. Go figure and guess what.
15:50
Speaker 1: The number of those Greek gods also corresponds with those elements.
15:54
Speaker 1: So he's being either modest or lying his butt off
15:59
Speaker 1: any culture right.
16:01
Speaker 2: One thing I would like to add I have come across,
16:03
Speaker 2: but it was a long time ago. If there's any listeners,
16:06
Speaker 2: or if you're yourself, or you know what the shows,
16:09
Speaker 2: if you know anybody who's really good with the element
16:11
Speaker 2: table with tying it to ocult stuff, please let us know.
16:14
Speaker 2: I'd love to get somebody on like that. I've seen
16:17
Speaker 2: it done, but it was so long ago. I can't
16:19
Speaker 2: remember the channel that I saw that was doing it.
16:22
Speaker 1: The occult elements that would be fantastic. Yeah, it showed
16:25
Speaker 1: me a good one.
16:26
Speaker 2: And another thing I just want to mention, like you
16:28
Speaker 2: just said right here, as he's tying it to the
16:29
Speaker 2: you know, the elements like yo, like this, These people
16:34
Speaker 2: over and over again do reference to science, and people
16:36
Speaker 2: just ignore it. These guys are into occult science, you know,
16:42
Speaker 2: say the toll you right here?
16:43
Speaker 1: Absolutely. Let me see somewhere along the line in the
16:48
Speaker 1: course of my mini travels, this set of attributions has
16:51
Speaker 1: got lost and I never made another attempt to duplicate it.
16:55
Speaker 1: It is mentioned here though, in the hope that this
16:58
Speaker 1: enterprising student will realize as the enormous potentialities which lay
17:02
Speaker 1: ahead when using the Tree of Life in this way.
17:05
Speaker 1: So what they're talking about is a memory palace, the
17:07
Speaker 1: same sort of thing that Nick is covering in his
17:10
Speaker 1: series on Oh guy was burnt at the Stag Georda Bruno. Yeah,
17:16
Speaker 1: so Geordana Bruno used the same sort of method to
17:20
Speaker 1: create a memory palace in which people would accuse him
17:23
Speaker 1: of being a witch because his memory was so damn
17:25
Speaker 1: good and he had photographic comprehension and uh recall of
17:29
Speaker 1: everything he ever saw using this methodology.
17:32
Speaker 2: Yeah, he impressed uh, I forgot to King Henry. One
17:34
Speaker 2: of them was somebody. He impressed somebody and they gave
17:37
Speaker 2: him money. They said, like he was almost like encyclopedia,
17:40
Speaker 2: like fucking kid like memories, crazy shit like that. And
17:44
Speaker 2: he swore it was from literally from staring at certain
17:48
Speaker 2: sigils and certain uh, certain Hebrew letters and like just
17:51
Speaker 2: going around in a fucking wheel. After six months, he
17:54
Speaker 2: says it should work. Imagine that shit works and people
17:58
Speaker 2: out there actually know it right, right, people who still
18:03
Speaker 2: have his original shiit have it.
18:05
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's right, And that was one of the things
18:09
Speaker 1: that was hard to find, Like they had to reconstruct
18:11
Speaker 1: it because they didn't get a hold of it right.
18:15
Speaker 1: Libra seven seven seven created a new type of literature
18:18
Speaker 1: when it first appeared. It was the first of its kind,
18:20
Speaker 1: and Crowley deserves credit for that, even if some of
18:24
Speaker 1: the material itself is not original. A lot of it
18:27
Speaker 1: is not original.
18:28
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, that's true. The lb r P and the hextagram,
18:32
Speaker 2: it's not his. A lot of people again, people by
18:36
Speaker 2: like how you covering Crowley and you constantly shit on them.
18:38
Speaker 2: It's just the fact that like too many people give
18:40
Speaker 2: this guy too much credit. Unfortunately, in different ways. Put
18:43
Speaker 2: it that way. You know, when they want to ship
18:45
Speaker 2: on him, they blame him for every fucking sick, every
18:47
Speaker 2: fucking specific origual out there, every ritual out there. Crawley
18:51
Speaker 2: did it, Curly did it, Curly did No, we didn't
18:53
Speaker 2: get over you, so right right, so alcoholic. Yeah, you
19:00
Speaker 2: end up writing the next one in order to get
19:02
Speaker 2: some theoretical idea of the Kabbala as a philosophical schema.
19:06
Speaker 2: There are some modern books outside the Croley Corpus which
19:08
Speaker 2: could be consulted to considerable advantage. Of course, they're going
19:12
Speaker 2: to talk about the Unfortune. First of all, there is
19:15
Speaker 2: the Unfortune's masterpiece, the Mystical Kabbala, which I will suggest
19:18
Speaker 2: is a good book, which is similarly based on the
19:21
Speaker 2: Golden Door material. Its value lies in the manner in
19:24
Speaker 2: which she has considered each item in each detail, with
19:27
Speaker 2: an exposition which ties them all together intelligibly. I'll do
19:32
Speaker 2: the next one just parallel this to William Garry's Ladder
19:36
Speaker 2: of Lights, which is another elucidation of the tree from
19:39
Speaker 2: a different viewpoint, but equally illuminating. Both of these books aurelimited, however,
19:43
Speaker 2: merely to a study of the ten Sepharoath the main
19:46
Speaker 2: categories of the tree. Supplementing these this is another amazing book.
19:52
Speaker 2: So I'm actually wondering if this is how I came
19:55
Speaker 2: across the guy's book Supplementing these is Gareth Knight's practical
19:59
Speaker 2: course and Babbelistic symbolism. Honestly, when anybody ever does ask
20:03
Speaker 2: me for books on the Cabala, that's the one I
20:05
Speaker 2: send them as a PDF. So if people are interested
20:08
Speaker 2: in it, I highly suggest that because it touches on
20:10
Speaker 2: the paths besides the spheres huge, I think, which extends
20:15
Speaker 2: the scope.
20:15
Speaker 1: I still got them all highlighted, which.
20:18
Speaker 2: Extends the scope of the previous two books. By studying
20:21
Speaker 2: these three books, good background materials should be provided from
20:24
Speaker 2: which to learn to appreciate the enormously valuable task performed
20:28
Speaker 2: by Crole and Libra seven seven several decades ago. The student.
20:33
Speaker 2: What's funny that they're even suggesting that book. That guy
20:36
Speaker 2: does shit on Crowley a few times, and they're saying
20:37
Speaker 2: he's wrong, he doesn't agree with his the way he
20:39
Speaker 2: looks at it, So that's impressive that they're even suggesting
20:41
Speaker 2: someone like that. The student can accept as much or
20:45
Speaker 2: as little of the philosophy described in the above name
20:48
Speaker 2: books as he wishes. It does not matter, so long
20:51
Speaker 2: as the basic schema is understood and applied to Libra
20:54
Speaker 2: seven seven. I foresee but little difficulty in this task.
21:02
Speaker 1: The third volume included here is cepher sephar Oath, which
21:06
Speaker 1: means simply the Book of Numbers. It is extrapolated from
21:10
Speaker 1: Equinox one number eight. Originally, the book was started by
21:14
Speaker 1: Alan Bennett, one of the Golden Dawn adapts, who took
21:18
Speaker 1: Crowley under his wing, grounded him in the fundamental process
21:21
Speaker 1: of magic, kabbala and meditation. He must have been the
21:24
Speaker 1: most exemplar extraordinary man, for his mark on Crowley proved
21:29
Speaker 1: to be indelible. And there are a few whom this
21:34
Speaker 1: may be said. Because he was such a narcissist. Alan
21:39
Speaker 1: left one or two other pieces of writing which Crowley
21:42
Speaker 1: reproduced in one or another or several volumes in the Equinoxes.
21:46
Speaker 1: They are worthy of being referred to as they're referred to.
21:51
Speaker 1: A Note on Genesis is a brilliant piece of exposition
21:54
Speaker 1: of Kabbalistic principles, demonstrating the whole gamut of Golden Dawn teachings.
22:00
Speaker 1: Some of the Kabbalistic methods described here. For this reason
22:03
Speaker 1: alone it should be studied. The other was written after
22:07
Speaker 1: he had abandoned the order to become a Buddhist monk,
22:11
Speaker 1: with the sacramental name of b Q b h Ananda Metia.
22:18
Speaker 1: It is entitled The Training of the Mind, a Study
22:22
Speaker 1: of the Buddhist Way of Life. Both essays show a
22:25
Speaker 1: fine caliber of his mind, demonstrating why Crowley was so
22:29
Speaker 1: profoundly impressed by him. Anyway, this book is due in
22:33
Speaker 1: large measure to the efforts which Crowley continued.
22:40
Speaker 2: Consists of hundreds of Hebrew words selected from several sources
22:44
Speaker 2: that are listed in the front of the text. Most
22:47
Speaker 2: of the words are from the Old Testament in a
22:48
Speaker 2: couple of non Zoric texts translated by McGregor Mathers under
22:54
Speaker 2: the title of the Kabbala Unveiled. It's a good one too,
22:59
Speaker 2: from the latinition of Nora von Rosenroth. These words are
23:03
Speaker 2: arranged according to their numerical value by Bennett. The process
23:07
Speaker 2: and additional words were continued by Crowley after he had
23:10
Speaker 2: inherited the book from his mentor. There are some strange
23:14
Speaker 2: dematriary combinations to be found there, but it is traditionally
23:17
Speaker 2: assumed that if two words have the same number of value,
23:20
Speaker 2: a connection of some kind may be said to exist
23:23
Speaker 2: between them. At first sight. In some instances, no such
23:28
Speaker 2: relationship may be perceived, But if the student persists in
23:31
Speaker 2: his study and meditation, he may come to realize something
23:35
Speaker 2: of the profoundities of these subtle connections and associations that
23:39
Speaker 2: are not immediately perceived. I have taken the liberty of
23:46
Speaker 2: deleting a table of factor, which is which in reality
23:50
Speaker 2: has nothing whatsoever to do with in my opinion, is
23:55
Speaker 2: one of the occasional examples of Crowley's in exhibition them.
24:00
Speaker 2: Sometimes he just had to demonstrate his erudition much much much.
24:07
Speaker 2: The same is true of many numbers in the last
24:09
Speaker 2: few pages of the text, save for a few with
24:13
Speaker 2: their corresponding Hebrew words that could be condensed and work
24:16
Speaker 2: closer together, these pages are omitted because there are no
24:19
Speaker 2: corresponding Hebrew word. There was no There are no corresponding
24:23
Speaker 2: Hebrew words listed for the time being. They are just
24:26
Speaker 2: a waste of space in paper.
24:32
Speaker 1: That the serious student, what's that?
24:34
Speaker 2: I said? They should have They still should have left
24:37
Speaker 2: it in there. I would have let you know, it's
24:39
Speaker 2: probably actually like him figuring it out like I was
24:41
Speaker 2: saying about the vision and the voice, you know what
24:42
Speaker 2: I'm saying. Or it's like.
24:47
Speaker 1: I got a put note on mine that says this
24:49
Speaker 1: table is included in the by the publisher in the
24:52
Speaker 1: third edition in nineteen seventy five. So they actually did
24:55
Speaker 1: leave it out.
24:55
Speaker 2: Okay, nice, Sorry, let me see.
25:00
Speaker 1: While it is true that the serious student might study
25:03
Speaker 1: other cabalistic texts and in the future discover new Hebrew
25:06
Speaker 1: words having a numero numerical value that corresponds to those
25:11
Speaker 1: that I have now just I have just now deleted, nevertheless,
25:16
Speaker 1: he should make his own additions to suffer Sepharoth in
25:19
Speaker 1: certain new strings of numbers, to make a place for
25:22
Speaker 1: his newly found words. And that is it should be,
25:27
Speaker 1: and that is as it should be. There should be
25:30
Speaker 1: nothing fixed or rigid about any of these three books.
25:33
Speaker 1: They could be supplemented and expanded by the explorations of
25:36
Speaker 1: each student, depending on his own judgment and ingenuity. But
25:41
Speaker 1: he must not fall into the pitfall of some modern writers, who,
25:45
Speaker 1: having no sympathy or understanding of the process, decry it
25:50
Speaker 1: and declare it of little value. In the cabalistic scheme,
25:53
Speaker 1: of things. I'm also I am also omitting Crowley's preface
25:58
Speaker 1: to the book. It is an that's the malicious piece
26:01
Speaker 1: of writing, and it does not do justice to the
26:04
Speaker 1: system with which he is dealing. Every so often Crowley
26:08
Speaker 1: falls from one of the heights which he has seen
26:11
Speaker 1: and swallows someone else's folly, someone whom he had the
26:15
Speaker 1: occasion to admire. In this case, Sir Richard Burton not
26:18
Speaker 1: always a wholly reliable authority outside the Arabian nights.
26:24
Speaker 2: The essay on Jamatria and Cephas Sepharoth should be studied together.
26:29
Speaker 2: Some of the profundities of this first of the first
26:32
Speaker 2: will never be perceived until one has meditated long and
26:36
Speaker 2: often on some of the words analyzed in that essay.
26:39
Speaker 2: I must confess that every now and again, during the
26:42
Speaker 2: course of my life, I have experienced a thorough going
26:46
Speaker 2: revulsion to Crowley as a person, resulting in the total
26:50
Speaker 2: rejection and neglect of what he has written. Days, weeks,
26:53
Speaker 2: once or years may elapse. Then accidentally I stumble across
26:57
Speaker 2: something he wrote, such as Jamatria, becomes so engrossed in
27:01
Speaker 2: a navid of his ingenuity and inspiration that my revulsion
27:06
Speaker 2: becomes almost immediately transcended. This is probably more true of
27:11
Speaker 2: Jamachia than either of the two. Here included. The student
27:17
Speaker 2: who has missed the excitement and inner elevation experience by Jamatia,
27:21
Speaker 2: whether of his own making or merely reading Crowley, has
27:24
Speaker 2: missed a very great deal. Do you want me to
27:29
Speaker 2: keep going?
27:29
Speaker 1: One scholar recently, oh, I can hit it. One scholar
27:33
Speaker 1: recently suggested to me that a letter that Crowley's knowledge
27:37
Speaker 1: of Hebrew was most limited. He made a very impressive
27:41
Speaker 1: showing only in some ways I'm inclined to agree. But
27:45
Speaker 1: on the other hand, what little he did know he
27:48
Speaker 1: has used extremely effectively and creatively. Anyways, he was not
27:53
Speaker 1: a dull bluffer like Arthur Edward Waite, who pretended all
27:58
Speaker 1: to all sorts of linguistic and scholastic skills he in
28:03
Speaker 1: fact never had, take for example his sorry about that.
28:11
Speaker 1: Take for example his book The Secret Doctrine in Israel,
28:15
Speaker 1: which is a lengthy analysis of the Zohar. That book
28:19
Speaker 1: was not written until after a French translation of the
28:22
Speaker 1: Zohar had been made, and of course long been before
28:26
Speaker 1: the English one had appeared. The footnotes bear ample testimony
28:30
Speaker 1: to this conclusion. Yet he pretended years prior to that
28:34
Speaker 1: book that his Latin and Hebrew were more than adequate
28:38
Speaker 1: to the task, although they were not. Even His Latin
28:41
Speaker 1: translations of many alchemical texts were merely good editing jobs,
28:46
Speaker 1: the translators having been, amongst others, some elderly Anglican priests
28:53
Speaker 1: preferring to remain, if not in anonymous, then in obscurity,
28:58
Speaker 1: who had got mixed up in the Golden Dawn and
29:01
Speaker 1: the occult art in general. They did the donkey work
29:05
Speaker 1: of translating donkey, remember the donkey.
29:07
Speaker 2: Yeah you're just talking about that.
29:10
Speaker 1: Yeah, Uh, translating difficult material. But wait, got all the
29:15
Speaker 1: glory and the swollen head. Whatever maybe said of Alistair
29:19
Speaker 1: Crowley's inflated ego, and I have often said perhaps too
29:24
Speaker 1: much about this, he never stooped quite that low. Very interesting,
29:29
Speaker 1: Yeah right, agent gossip.
29:32
Speaker 2: He's even saying your Croles fucked up and this motherfucker
29:34
Speaker 2: was worse. All of this makes the book that Kabbala
29:39
Speaker 2: have asked the Croley a greater interest to the average
29:41
Speaker 2: good student, whose Hebrew may be no better or no
29:44
Speaker 2: worse than that of Croley. Uh it may be given,
29:49
Speaker 2: uh it maybe it may give him heart to pursue
29:52
Speaker 2: his own personal adenda to those books and become as
29:55
Speaker 2: good a cobbolist as was Croley. Finally, let me add
30:00
Speaker 2: that the students should own a good Hebrew English lexicon.
30:03
Speaker 2: Perhaps one of the best ways of using this is
30:05
Speaker 2: to browse through it at random, casually as it were,
30:09
Speaker 2: and then, as his interest and excitement mount, look for
30:12
Speaker 2: certain words deliberately and methodically. For example, for example, open
30:18
Speaker 2: the lexicon at random and on that particular page, point
30:21
Speaker 2: carelessly to the first word noticed. Transfer the word and
30:25
Speaker 2: its translation to a sheet of paper, and then work
30:28
Speaker 2: out its jamatia. Then turn to sepher sepharoth to see
30:32
Speaker 2: if that number and word are represented. If not, add
30:36
Speaker 2: them using page inserts if necessary. Make special entries of
30:41
Speaker 2: such words as time proceeds. Certain other words. Certain other
30:45
Speaker 2: words will evoke special interest and should be treated in
30:48
Speaker 2: the same manner. Try to follow Crowley's analysis of what
30:53
Speaker 2: was that name? Bearshith again bearschith you said in the
30:57
Speaker 2: essay jamachia as a model for the management of these words,
31:00
Speaker 2: and as the basis for meditation to lead to the
31:03
Speaker 2: highest That's interesting that he you are muted the headless.
31:09
Speaker 2: It's interesting that he is a he's mentioning that I,
31:13
Speaker 2: for all I know, I either don't remember. But the
31:16
Speaker 2: way they're explaining I was, like, you said, what I
31:18
Speaker 2: was trying to do with my jomatry, you know how
31:19
Speaker 2: I have that like jamatia thing up on the site
31:21
Speaker 2: and I didn't want to put it into a book.
31:22
Speaker 2: It was actually kind of like you're being able to
31:25
Speaker 2: take the numerical value and run it to that book
31:27
Speaker 2: to see what it matches. That was kind of the
31:29
Speaker 2: way I had it. So it's interesting to know. I
31:31
Speaker 2: guess you could do that with one of.
31:32
Speaker 1: His right, But they're they're going for a type of
31:36
Speaker 1: libromancy here. So you're just opening the lexicon at random
31:39
Speaker 1: and then working through it like it's an exercise. But
31:42
Speaker 1: in the process you're going to get a lot of
31:44
Speaker 1: meaning that you can see through. But also we've got
31:47
Speaker 1: the Jamatria calculator now, which is like ten times easier
31:50
Speaker 1: than what they're suggesting in this book.
31:52
Speaker 2: Yeah, you imagine that back in the day you had
31:54
Speaker 2: to write everything down and figure it out.
31:58
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Here are a couple of examples. I opened
32:02
Speaker 1: the lexicon at random too, and selected two words a
32:05
Speaker 1: variety of cabalistic methods may be used to elaborate on them.
32:10
Speaker 1: Practice will produce the skill and insight. The first word
32:13
Speaker 1: selected and was one meaning empty. In Hebrew it is
32:18
Speaker 1: spelled and you and non iron valv rash. This thus,
32:24
Speaker 1: it's chamatria is fifty, seventy six and two hundred, totaling
32:30
Speaker 1: three hundred and twenty six. This is a number that
32:33
Speaker 1: is listed in the Sepher Sephar, and surprisingly is that
32:37
Speaker 1: of Yeheshua Yeshua Redeemer. The word for vision also comes
32:45
Speaker 1: within the purview of this number. Our lexicon word empty
32:50
Speaker 1: may seem a far cry from any of those other
32:53
Speaker 1: words just mentioned, but see what little meditation can do.
32:59
Speaker 1: Having followed the similar procedure used by alis Chacrole relative
33:05
Speaker 1: to Burasha. Yes, a lot of Gnostic Christians believe Christ
33:10
Speaker 1: is emptiness because of that word. Another word selected at
33:14
Speaker 1: random defit de fact or what In Hebrew, this is
33:21
Speaker 1: spelled Czech semach resh vav final nun It's chamatria comes two,
33:28
Speaker 1: three twenty four, counting the nun as fifty. This too
33:32
Speaker 1: is another number already in Cephra Sephar Oath, but it
33:35
Speaker 1: is worth comparing with the words already given there redness, darkness, roaring,
33:41
Speaker 1: et cetera. All three of these Kabbalistic texts must be
33:46
Speaker 1: consulted to make sense of these apparently unrelated words and numbers.
33:50
Speaker 1: The process thus becomes a test for one's cabalistic knowledge
33:54
Speaker 1: and skill. But more importantly, the process becomes a stimulus
33:59
Speaker 1: for the surrender of the mind to the mystical experience
34:03
Speaker 1: which the one is seen to be all and vice versa.
34:07
Speaker 1: Back to the experiencing this altered frame of consciousness.
34:12
Speaker 2: I'll just I just want to have the pleasure to
34:15
Speaker 2: just finish it off.
34:17
Speaker 1: All right. There are simply no limits to be set
34:20
Speaker 1: to the applications of these numerical processes. It will take
34:24
Speaker 1: only a little patience and experience for the sincere and
34:28
Speaker 1: ingenious student to be to become aware of the possibilities
34:32
Speaker 1: inherent in the Jamatria, and he will conclude by developing
34:36
Speaker 1: a fine appreciation for the value, individually and collectively of
34:41
Speaker 1: these three books assembled for the first time as the
34:45
Speaker 1: Kabbala of Alistair Crawley that is written by Israel Regardi.
34:49
Speaker 1: You know, we should combine this with some of the
34:53
Speaker 1: great Jamatria people that we've had on the show throughout
34:55
Speaker 1: the years. I think they would love this.
34:57
Speaker 2: Yeah, and you know, and you know what, unfortunately is
35:03
Speaker 2: because of the fear of the man, they would never
35:05
Speaker 2: actually probably read any of his ship. No, you know
35:08
Speaker 2: what I'm saying, like, well, I'm gonna keep it real.
35:11
Speaker 2: There's some people that we have, that we've had on
35:12
Speaker 2: the show that do Jamatia, that used fucking Aliston Crowley
35:14
Speaker 2: every other week as a fucking bad guy and someone
35:16
Speaker 2: to point at and always his fucking ritual and his
35:19
Speaker 2: fucking Jamatria. They would never look at his ship. Too
35:22
Speaker 2: busy shitting on him. Yeah, keep it real. I mean,
35:26
Speaker 2: just keep it real.
35:28
Speaker 1: As they're using yet it interesting.
35:35
Speaker 2: That is funny, right, Arthur.
35:38
Speaker 1: Edward Waite, Arthur Edward Wait, just like what Israel just
35:43
Speaker 1: said about Arthur Edward Waite.
35:44
Speaker 2: Do you uh do you want to wait till next
35:46
Speaker 2: week to actually start to Jamatria and just stop here?
35:48
Speaker 2: It's up to you. I don't know if you want
35:49
Speaker 2: to continue or just Yeah.
35:51
Speaker 1: I think this is a pretty good introduction. I think
35:54
Speaker 1: a lot more people are are interested in this. So
35:56
Speaker 1: let's leave him once and more. We'll come back next
35:58
Speaker 1: week and I'm sure to get into it a lot more,
36:02
Speaker 1: but I think this is a good length.
36:03
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, and I do think again like
36:08
Speaker 2: a reason, Like I even said to Headless, we're both
36:11
Speaker 2: you know, we both agreed that doing the introduction and
36:15
Speaker 2: obviously the Jamachi I mean, it's the book, but it's
36:17
Speaker 2: uh again, you know a lot of people not Jamachia.
36:21
Speaker 2: I mean, maybe it's just because I'm a fan of it,
36:23
Speaker 2: but I actually do think there is something into it.
36:26
Speaker 2: I mean, I'll even put it this way. If you
36:28
Speaker 2: don't want to believe it doesn't really mean anything, I
36:30
Speaker 2: guarantee you that the people who do believe it means
36:32
Speaker 2: something do cipher their shit at times. So regardless if
36:36
Speaker 2: it means anything magical, you're not gonna understand their stuff
36:38
Speaker 2: because you're not deciphering it. Yeah I ain't either because
36:41
Speaker 2: I ain't figuring out to cipher either, But there's stuff
36:44
Speaker 2: where I guarantee you it's ciphered. Sow knowing jomatry would
36:48
Speaker 2: help with that.
36:49
Speaker 1: And a lot of people like we're just starting to
36:52
Speaker 1: get into the the not socratic, but the neoplatinist view
36:57
Speaker 1: of these chains, right, the neo plating, this view of
37:00
Speaker 1: these chains that are all connected to the one, coming
37:04
Speaker 1: down to the many through all these associations and stuff.
37:07
Speaker 1: That's where Kamala gets its power. It's like unseen chains
37:10
Speaker 1: linking these ideas and these thoughts together through altered states
37:14
Speaker 1: of consciousness. So what a lot of people are getting
37:17
Speaker 1: out of this is going to be personal to them, right,
37:20
Speaker 1: But it is an interesting painting that they're using numbers
37:25
Speaker 1: and words, right, So it is an individual expression. But
37:29
Speaker 1: at the same time, there's a deeper meaning and a
37:32
Speaker 1: deeper connectedness you can get.
37:33
Speaker 2: Out of it.
37:34
Speaker 1: If you think about it more like an art than
37:36
Speaker 1: a science. You can kind of see what I'm thinking.
37:38
Speaker 2: Yes, And I've even mentioned on the show before. If
37:41
Speaker 2: you go back to I think we did a three
37:42
Speaker 2: parts Marchie series guys almost two years ago, there was
37:47
Speaker 2: a point where I was reading and it was stuff
37:48
Speaker 2: that you know, I got online. It wasn't making it up.
37:51
Speaker 2: It's been known that in the past to translate some
37:57
Speaker 2: different different languages from one to the other. I don't
38:00
Speaker 2: how it was done. They used jamatru. I mean they
38:03
Speaker 2: said that. I mean, fuck, I don't know how the
38:04
Speaker 2: fuck to do that either, but obviously they were and
38:07
Speaker 2: I think honestly if I remember correctly, that's even how
38:11
Speaker 2: they started even getting some of the Islamic shit figured out,
38:16
Speaker 2: because that shit was on im popping for alchemy and
38:18
Speaker 2: they were trying to figure out what the fuck they
38:19
Speaker 2: were saying in their text.
38:22
Speaker 1: Every alphabet has the same numerical cipher, so you've got
38:28
Speaker 1: the AB's and c's all front loaded, and all these
38:30
Speaker 1: different alphabets Latin, Greek, Hebrew, freaking you know, all of
38:36
Speaker 1: these alphabets have the same starting points, and those same
38:40
Speaker 1: starting points have the same numbers. For instance, of Greek.
38:44
Speaker 1: Greek didn't have separate symbols for numbers. Their numbers were
38:47
Speaker 1: their letters with an extra symbol on top. So that's
38:51
Speaker 1: that's what you're seeing when it comes to the number
38:54
Speaker 1: and letter combination. That was called isopsophy before they were
38:58
Speaker 1: doing it all. And here the problem with isoprophy is
39:02
Speaker 1: that people don't want to go through the work of
39:05
Speaker 1: learning Greek because there's a lot to it. There's a
39:09
Speaker 1: fuck ton to it, actually, and then you got the
39:11
Speaker 1: different dialects, so it makes more sense to have it
39:14
Speaker 1: in Hebrew. I just like the Greek better, you know,
39:18
Speaker 1: I can pronounce it better. I've looked into it more,
39:20
Speaker 1: but you know it's a preference.
39:23
Speaker 2: Yes. One thing I do want to mention, I don't
39:26
Speaker 2: know if it would be an issue. I've had the
39:29
Speaker 2: issue before. It was a little bit differently. I was
39:31
Speaker 2: reading the Sacred Secret Rituals of the Oto. I could
39:33
Speaker 2: understand getting slapped with a copyright infringement on that. Believe
39:38
Speaker 2: it or not, the OTO actually did hit me with
39:39
Speaker 2: the DMCA.
39:43
Speaker 1: This.
39:43
Speaker 2: I don't know if if it happens with this and
39:45
Speaker 2: it gets taken down on YouTube, I will continue to
39:47
Speaker 2: do it or at least on rumble bit, shoot and audio.
39:51
Speaker 2: I won't let that stop me. So you know, I'm
39:54
Speaker 2: just saying if it happens to be a problem, because
39:56
Speaker 2: I don't know what happened when my Facebook came down already,
39:58
Speaker 2: I doubt it's due to copyright and fringement, but you
40:00
Speaker 2: know who knows. Yeah, I'm just letting people know. If
40:04
Speaker 2: it's an issue, I'm going to keep going with it,
40:06
Speaker 2: just not on YouTube.
40:08
Speaker 1: Right well, it is on Internet archives, so I think
40:11
Speaker 1: see the trademark or copyright has expired.
40:14
Speaker 2: So well, yeah, one would think, but no, no, no,
40:17
Speaker 2: I have to have to worry about can Kitty hit
40:19
Speaker 2: me with another DMC. It was crazy is I personally
40:24
Speaker 2: knew the fucking person who did that to me, So
40:27
Speaker 2: it was the girl was in my lodge. She was
40:28
Speaker 2: a lawyer. She was a lawyer for the OTO. I
40:30
Speaker 2: know exactly who slapped me with that DMCA. So I
40:36
Speaker 2: tried contacting them so I can go over the vision
40:38
Speaker 2: of the voice. I didn't get a fucking answer. I
40:40
Speaker 2: was like, I didn't think so, because I know if
40:42
Speaker 2: I do, if I cover that vision in the voice,
40:44
Speaker 2: they could hit me with the copyright. Then they told
40:48
Speaker 2: the person who went and filmed it was already told
40:50
Speaker 2: you can't show that online unless you ask for permission.
40:52
Speaker 2: And when she asked for the information to ask for permission,
40:55
Speaker 2: it was the same fucking lady that hit me with
40:57
Speaker 2: the DMCA copyright. I was like, Fuck, this ain't gonna
41:01
Speaker 2: work all right, but uh yeah, I'm good to be interesting.
41:08
Speaker 2: Yeah yeah, yeah, I'm just letting people know. If it
41:10
Speaker 2: becomes an issue with that stuff, I will try to
41:12
Speaker 2: keep it going as long as I can. And you know, honestly,
41:16
Speaker 2: for real, for real people that are really into this stuff,
41:18
Speaker 2: share it, Please share it out. If you're in any
41:20
Speaker 2: occult discords, share it because I will be I'll be
41:23
Speaker 2: totally honest with you. I've lost some mods and I
41:25
Speaker 2: have lost some listeners from starting to cover more of
41:27
Speaker 2: the occults. So uh maybe it would help if I
41:29
Speaker 2: actually got some more of a cultist to listen to
41:31
Speaker 2: my show instead of scared conspiracy theorists. So uh yeah,
41:34
Speaker 2: hook a brother up and send some links out there
41:36
Speaker 2: if you can.
41:39
Speaker 1: Absolutely, if you're in any groups on Facebook that have
41:42
Speaker 1: lots and lots of people, there are a bunch of
41:43
Speaker 1: occult groups on Facebook, share it in those groups. That's
41:46
Speaker 1: what I've been doing so exactly. Look at those Reddit
41:50
Speaker 1: as well. We're not on Reddit and we're mostly not
41:53
Speaker 1: on Facebook, but redd it's a great place to share it.
41:55
Speaker 2: No, we there's somebody did make a credit for us,
41:58
Speaker 2: actually really believe it or not, or if you search
42:02
Speaker 2: for us, our name does pop on there a few times,
42:04
Speaker 2: even even the whole uh whatever that the problem I
42:07
Speaker 2: had with you know, Tinfoil had that even comes up
42:10
Speaker 2: on Ready to Check. Yeah yeah, so uh yeah, if
42:15
Speaker 2: there's a readdit out there and somebody happens to see it,
42:17
Speaker 2: I'll throw us at comments or add something or whatever.
42:19
Speaker 2: But I don't keep an eye on it. A fan
42:21
Speaker 2: made it for us. I can't even get into it,
42:24
Speaker 2: but yeah, share this out and uh yeah, help us
42:28
Speaker 2: a hook a brother up with some new listeners and ship.
42:31
Speaker 2: So all right, you're good Headless.
42:35
Speaker 1: I'm good. This has been a great episode. Guys. You
42:37
Speaker 1: can catch me on Thursday where me and nick A
42:40
Speaker 1: coming back. Send me your emails at Headless Giant Podcast
42:43
Speaker 1: at gmail dot com with all of your occult, strange,
42:46
Speaker 1: esoteric stories.
42:48
Speaker 2: You know you want to.
42:50
Speaker 1: Everybody says they want to do it, but you want
42:51
Speaker 1: to do it because you want to get some stickers.
42:54
Speaker 1: I know you do.
42:55
Speaker 2: Yes, I got a cult stickers. Yeah, I gotta eat
42:59
Speaker 2: stickers that I'll send out to you. Gotta keep it
43:00
Speaker 2: magical with the Magician the Infinity side number eight and
43:03
Speaker 2: it is an artistic depiction of the inside of your
43:06
Speaker 2: arrival and it has a QR code on it too
43:08
Speaker 2: for people to scan if you happen to slap them
43:10
Speaker 2: around and tag with it. So uh, definitely definitely check
43:15
Speaker 2: out Hellis's show on Thursday and check out his Alchemy
43:19
Speaker 2: Mondays with euros up as well. At some point you
43:22
Speaker 2: might be able to catch one of them blowing themselves
43:23
Speaker 2: up it might be worth it. So and you know it,
43:28
Speaker 2: Headless will still come back the next week trying to
43:30
Speaker 2: do it again. He'll still come back the next week
43:32
Speaker 2: trying to do it again.
43:34
Speaker 1: It's all part of it is.
43:36
Speaker 2: I got to push those buttons. See what happens to yeah.
43:39
Speaker 1: All of them by pushing the whole button elevator.
43:44
Speaker 2: Yeah, I thought that was great. Guys, that was great
43:46
Speaker 2: when you said that. But yeah, that's the end of
43:49
Speaker 2: another Recult Rejects and again every Tuesday, hopefully around this time.
43:52
Speaker 2: If anything maybe changes with his job, et cetera, we
43:54
Speaker 2: might move around the time. But I think we're shooting
43:56
Speaker 2: for this every week and uh yeah, check it out
43:58
Speaker 2: and until the next one, everybody be well later
44:04
Speaker 1: Mhm.